HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-03-10; City Council; 21889; Conditional Use Permit Palomar Transfer Station 5960 El Camino RealCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA BILL 14
AB# 21,889 ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE
HOURS OF PUBUC ACCESS TO THE PALOMAR
TRANSFER STATION (PTS) FROM 9:00 A.M. TO 4:00
P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY TO 7:00 A.M. TO
4:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5960 EL CAMINO REAL
DEPT. DIRECTOR 6§^^.
MTG. 3/10/15
ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE
HOURS OF PUBUC ACCESS TO THE PALOMAR
TRANSFER STATION (PTS) FROM 9:00 A.M. TO 4:00
P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY TO 7:00 A.M. TO
4:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5960 EL CAMINO REAL
CITY ATTORNEY J/^
DEPT. CED
ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE
HOURS OF PUBUC ACCESS TO THE PALOMAR
TRANSFER STATION (PTS) FROM 9:00 A.M. TO 4:00
P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY TO 7:00 A.M. TO
4:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5960 EL CAMINO REAL
CITY MANAGER [UfS
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. 2015-063 approving a Conditional Use Permit Amendment CUP 260(E) to increase the
hours of public access to the Palomar Transfer Station (PTS) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday
to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday on property located at 5960 El Camino Real.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
This project involves a request to increase the hours of public access to the PTS from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Public access hours on Saturdays and
Sundays are from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and would not change.
The proposed changes in public access hours require approval of a CUP Amendment. The Planning Commission
would be the final decision maker on typical CUP amendments; however, this project is located within the
industrial zone (M) which requires City Council approval for this type of use.
Project Planning Commission City Council
CUP 260(E) RA X
RA = Recommended approval
X - Final city decision-making authority
On January 21, 2015 the Planning Commission voted 5-1-1 (Commissioner Anderson voted no; Commissioner
Segall absent) to recommend approval of the project. The Planning Commission minutes are also attached as
Exhibit 5.
The applicant would like to increase the hours for public access as currently approximately 40 to 50 vehicles,
primarily construction workers and landscapers, arrive at the PTS between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.
The applicant stated that they allow the vehicles to use the facility starting at 7:00 a.m. instead of turning them
away and requiring them to come back later. The Solid Waste Facility Permit issued by the County of San Diego
for the PTS states the facility's hours of operation for public access are from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The applicant
would like the hours of operation for their CUP to be the same hours as their Solid Waste Facility Permit. The
Level of Service (LOS) for the nearby intersections is B. LOS determinations are standardized criteria to determine
levels of operational efficiency and can range from A (free flowing traffic) to F (gridlocked traffic). The City of
Carlsbad has established the threshold for acceptable LOS at city intersections and along roadway segments as
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Pam Drew 760-602-4644 pam.drewOcarlsbadca.gov
FOR CITY CLERKS USE ONLY.
COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED CONTINUED TO DATE SPECIFIC •
DENIED • CONTINUED TO DATE UNKNOWN •
CONTINUED • RETURN ED TO STAFF •
WITHDRAWN • OTHER-SEE MINUTES •
AMENDED •
Palomar Transfer Station
Feb. 24, 2015
Page 2 of 2
LOS D or better (80 to 90% capacity). Furthermore, the City of Cartsbad Transportation Department reviewed the
proposed increase in public access hours and determined that no significant impact would occur.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are no fiscal impacts associated with the proposed Conditional Use Permit Amendment.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAa:
The project was previously evaluated in the FEIR (04-03), dated September 2004, and adopted by the City Council
at its February 1, 2005 meeting. The FEIR evaluated the potential environmental effects, including the proposed
traffic and circulation impacts on the surrounding circulation system, to allow public access to the PTS Monday
through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. The proposed project
is within the scope of the prior environmental document and no further environmental documentation is
required per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline Section 15162.
PUBUC NOTIFICATION:
Information regarding public notifications of this item such as mailings, public hearing notices posted in the
newspaper and on the City website are available in the Office ofthe City Clerk.
EXHIBITS:
1. Citv Council Resolution No. 2015-063
2. Location Map
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7080, dated January 21, 2015
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 21, 2015
5. Excerpts of the Draft Planning Commission Minutes, January 21, 2015
EXHIBIT 1
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-063
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
3 CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT
TO INCREASE THE HOURS OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE PALOMAR
4 TRANSFER STATION (PTS) FROM 9:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. MONDAY
THROUGH FRIDAY TO 7:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH
5 FRIDAY ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5960 EL CAMINO REAL.
CASE NAME: PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION
6 CASE NO.: CUP 260(E)
7 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission
^ did, on January 21, 2015, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider Conditional
9
26
27
28
Use Permit Amendment (CUP 260(E)) and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 7080,
recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit Amendment (CUP 260(E)); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 10th day of
^^'^^^ , 2015, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider adoption of a Conditional
Use Permit Amendment (CUP 260(E)); and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors relating to
the adoption of a Conditional Use Permit Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of a
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 Conditional Use Permit Amendment (CUP 260(E)) is approved and adopted, and that the findings and
23 conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 7080 on file
24 with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City
25 Council.
///
///
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting ofthe City Council ofthe City
of Carlsbad on the day of 2015, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
Council Members Hall, Blackburn, Schumacher, Wood, Packard.
None.
ABSENT: None.
'J2.
MATT HALL Mayor
ATTEST:
SHELLEY COLLINSXCMC, Assistant City Clerk
(SEALU^^*'''';"/,,
EXHIBIT 2
N
NOT TO SCALE
SITEMAP
Palomar Transfer Station
CUP 260(E)
5
EXHIBIT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7080
1
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
3 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE HOURS OF PUBLIC ACCESS
4 TO THE PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION (PTS) FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M.
MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ON A SITE LOCATED AT 5960 EL CAMINO REAL
BETWEEN FARADAYAVENUE AND EL CAMINO REAL AND WITHIN IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5.
CASE NAME: PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION
CASE NO.: CUP 260(E)
g WHEREAS, Palomar Transfer Station, Inc., "Developer," has filed a verified application
g with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by the County of San Diego, Department of Public
IQ Works - Airport Division, "Owner," described as
11 A portion of lots A and B of Rancho Agua Hedionda according to Map
No. 823 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County
12 on November 16,1986
13 ("the Property"); and
1'* WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Conditional Use Permit
Amendment on file in the Planning Division PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION - CUP 260(E), per Conditional
Use Regulations Chapter 21.42 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on January 21, 2015, hold a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by taw to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to
the CUP amendment; and
WHEREAS, on January 21,2015, the Planning Commission recommends approval of CUP
260(E), as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 7080.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad as follows:
1 „
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
2 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CUP 260(E) - PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION, based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
3 "
4
7
8
26
27
Findings:
1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, and is in
5 harmony with the various elements and objectives ofthe general plan, including, if applicable, the
certified local coastal program, specific plan or master plan, in that the proposed amendment is
^ to increase hours of operation for public access. No structures are proposed.
That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the
zone in which the proposed use is to be located, in that the project site is surrounded by areas
zoned for open space or industrial uses. Much of the surrounding area is undeveloped. The
g developed sites contain industrial type uses (e.g., the CMWD office and equipment storage
yard, Safety Center, etc.). Therefore, the expanded hours of operation for public access is not
2Q detrimental to any existing uses or permitted uses in the area.
11 3. That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other
12 development features prescribed in this code and required by the City Planner, planning
commission or city council, in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood, in
13 that the proposed amendment is to increase hours of operation for public access. No structures
are proposed.
14
4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic
generated by the proposed use, in that the LOS for the street system surrounding the PTS was
determined to be a B which is considered to be acceptable. The additional vehicles are not
anticipated to change the LOS at the intersections of El Camino Real at Palomar Airport Road
^.^ and El Camino Real at Faraday Avenue; therefore, the street system serving the facility is
adequate to properly handle all existing and proposed traffic.
18
That the project is consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
29 (ALUCP) as amended March 4, 2010 in that the adopted project findings for CUP 260(D), which
are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6907, still apply to this project (CUP
20 260(E)). Furthermore, the proposed amendment is to increase hours of operation for public
access. No structures are proposed.
21
That the proposed land use is compatible with the airport (General Plan Land Use Element -
22 Special Planning Considerations - Airport) in that the proposed amendment is to increase hours
of operation for public access. No structures or land uses changes are proposed.
23
24
Conditions:
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented
and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained
according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein
granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further
condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted;
record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their
2g compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained
PC RESO NO. 7080 -2-
1
by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Conditional Use Permit
2 Amendment.
3 2. The adopted project conditions for CUP 260(D), which are contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 6907, still apply to this project (CUP 260(E)) with the exception of Condition No.
4 3, 6 and 7, which have been completed. Condition No. 8 has been extended retroactively for
24 months from November 6, 2014, the date of the City Council's approval of CUP 260(D) as
5 stated in City Council Resolution 2012-243.
^ Engineering:
^ 3. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall
implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are
not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff
g during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational
practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or
10 reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance
system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and
11 tenants of the above requirements.
8
12 NOTICE
13
14
15
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. Ifyou protest
them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the
protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent
17 legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
18 You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT
APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other
19 similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute
20 of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RESO NO. 7080 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting ofthe Planning Commission of
the City of Carlsbad, California, held on January 21, 2015 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Scully, Commissioners Black, L'Heureux, Montgomery and
Siekmann
NOES: Commissioner Anderson
ABSENT: Commissioner Segall
y\(^lQm SCULLY, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
\T7^ST: Jl
1^ DON NEU
City Planner
PC RESO NO. 7080 -4-
EXHIBIT 4
The City of Carlsbad Planning Division
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: January 21, 2015
Application complete date: November 25, 2014
Project Planner: Pam Drew
Project Engineer: David Rick
SUBJECT: CUP 260(E) - PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION - Request for a recommendation of
approval of a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to increase the hours of public access
to the Palomar Transfer Station (PTS) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday
to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday on a site located at 5960 El Camino Real
between Faraday Avenue and El Camino Real and within in Local Facilities Management
Zone 5.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 7080 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of an amendment to CUP 260, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
This project involves a request to increase the hours of public access to the PTS to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday. Currently the public access hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday. Public access hours on Saturdays and Sundays are from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and would
not change.
The proposed changes in public access hours require approval of a CUP Amendment. The Planning
Commission would be the final decision maker on typical CUP amendments; however, this project is
located within the industrial zone (M) which requires City Council approval for this type of use.
The PTS was originally permitted on this site in 1977 (CUP 140), and there have been various extensions
and amendments (including a new permit number (CUP 260)) granted for the faciiity since that time. In
1977 the hours of operation for public access were 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. seven days a week. CUP 260(B)
allowed for public access from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday only. CUP 260(C) requested
to increase public access to include 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
The Planning Commission, at its December 1, 2004 meeting, recommended approval of the applicants
request to expand the PTS and to increase the hours for public access to Monday through Friday from
7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday (CUP 260(C)).
The City Council, at its February 1, 2005 meeting, received a memo from the City Attorney suggesting
additional conditions to the CUP amendment as a result of Mayor Lewis' concerns about traffic impacts
from outside of the city, which clarified the tonnage limit the days/hours of operation and truck route
control. The City Council incorporated the City Attorney's additional conditions in Resolution No. 2005-
029. The public access hours were reduced to Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Saturday and Sunday remained the same from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
,0
CUP 260(E) - PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION
January 21, 2015
Page 2
However, per the City of Carlsbad's Traffic Monitoring Program, dated October 28, 2004, the morning
peak hours were from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. at the intersections of El Camino Real at Palomar Airport
Road (2,218 total vehicles) and El Camino Real at Faraday Avenue (2,781 total vehicles). The reduced
hours for public access may have been related to the a.m. peak hour. However, the Level of Service (LOS)
for the morning peak hour at the intersections was B. LOS determinations are standardized criteria to
determine levels of operational efficiency and can range from A (free flowing traffic) to F (gridlocked
traffic). The City of Carlsbad has established the threshold for acceptable LOS at city intersections and
along roadway segments as LOS D or better (80 to 90% capacity) during peak hours and LOS C during off-
peak hours.
Furthermore, the City Attorney's memo stated that the applicant may request an amendment to expand
the hours of operation up to the limits specified in the Project's Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR
04-03) for the CUP amendment (CUP 260(C)), adopted by the City Council on February 1, 2005. The FEIR
included analysis for public access seven days a week from 7:00 a.m, to 4:00 p.m.
Additionally, the Project's FEIR (04-03) states in Section 2.14.4.2 - Trip Distribution and Assignment the
greatest traffic volumes for the PTS for any one-hour time period for the a.m. peak hour volume is from
6:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. and the p.m. peak hour volume is between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. According to
the application, the Waste Management collection trucks start departing the PTS at 5:30 a.m. and the last
truck leaves by 6:30 a.m. Given that all waste collection trucks leave the facility by 6:30 a.m., there is no
potential for conflicts with incoming public customers beginning at 7:00 a.m.
The FEIR analyzed the potential impacts of the project on the surrounding circulation system and
determined that the proposed project would have an adverse cumulative impact on the existing roadway
system in the vicinity of the project site. While the impacts were considered less than significant the
project was required to contribute traffic impact fees to fund a fair share of the planned roadway
improvements for cumulative projects and related traffic growth in the City of Carlsbad. No additional
project specific mitigation measures were required.
The City of Cartsbad's Traffic Monitoring Program, dated November 18, 2014, states that the morning
peak hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. at the intersections of El Camino Real at Paiomar Airport Road
(2,357 total vehicles) and El Camino Real at Faraday Avenue (3,400 total vehicles). The applicant stated
that approximately 40 to 50 vehicles arrive at the PTS between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. The
applicant stated that they allow the vehicles to use the facility starting at 7:30 a.m. instead of turning
them away and requiring them to come back later. The Solid Waste Facility Permit issued by the County
of San Diego for the PTS states the facility's hours of operation for public access are from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. The applicant would like the hours of operation for their CUP to be the same hours as their Solid
Waste Facility Permit. The LOS for these intersections is B. The City of Carlsbad Transportation
Department reviewed the proposed increase in public access hours and determined that no significant
impact would occur.
III. ANALYSIS
The existing transfer station continues to be consistent with all applicable plans, policies and regulations
described below:
A. City of Carlsbad General Plan Planned Industrial (PI) designation;
B. Industrial (M) Zone regulations (Chapter 21.32 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code);
C. Conditional Use Regulations (Chapter 21.42 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code);
D. McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan; and
E. Growth Management Regulations (Chapter 21.90 of the Cartsbad Municipal Code).
CUP 260(E) - PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION
January 21, 2015
Page 3
The recommendation for approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency
with the applicable city regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above
regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below.
A. General Plan
Staff has analyzed the proposed project for consistency with the city's General Plan. Staff has concluded
that the project is consistent with the PI General Plan designation as discussed in Table 1, below.
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL,
OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM
PROPOSED USES 8i
IMPROVEMENTS
COMPLIANCE
Land Use,
Industrial,
Objective B.l
"To provide industrial lands
which can accommodate a wide
range of industrial uses,
including those of relatively high
intensity, white minimizing
negative impacts to surrounding
land uses."
The proposed project would
increase the hours of pubiic
access to the transfer station from
Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m. to Monday through
Friday 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and
continued operation of the
existing trash transfer facility,
which is an allowed use under the
PI designation as implemented by
M zoning.
Yes
B. Industrial (M) Zoning
The existing PTS is permitted in the M (Industrial) zone subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
The amendment would only increase the hours of operation; therefore, setback and height requirements
are not applicable. The PTS, as modified by this amendment would remain in compliance with all
applicable requirements ofthe M zone as demonstrated in Table 2, below.
TABLE 2 - INDUSTRIAL ZONE CONFORMANCE
M ZONE STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED
Permitted Use Transfer facilities are a conditionally allowed use. Transfer station
C. Conditional Uses
Conditional uses such as the existing PTF possess unique and special characteristics which make it
impractical to include them as permitted uses "by right" in the various zoning districts. Staff has reviewed
the proposed CUP Amendment and has concluded that the necessary findings can be made as discussed
in detail in Table 3, below.
n
CUP 260(E) - PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION
January 21, 2015
Page 4
TABLE 3 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
FINDING PROJECT CONSISTENCY
That the requested use is necessary or desirable for
the development ofthe community, is essentially in
harmony with the various elements and objectives
of the General Plan, including, if applicable, the
certified Local Coastal Program, specific plan or
master plan.
The proposed amendment is to increase hours of
operation for public access. No structures are
proposed.
That the requested use is not detrimental to
existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the
zone in which the proposed use is to be located.
The project site is surrounded by areas zoned for
open space or industrial uses. Much of the
surrounding area is undeveloped. The developed
sites contain industrial type uses (e.g., the CMWD
office and equipment storage yard. Safety Center,
etc.). Therefore, the expanded hours of operation
for public access is not detrimental to any existing
uses or permitted uses in the area.
That the site for the proposed conditional use is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading
facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other
development features prescribed in this code and
required by the City Planner, planning commission
or city council, in order to integrate the use with
other uses in the neighborhood.
The proposed amendment is to increase hours of
operation for public access. No structures are
proposed.
That the street system serving the proposed use is
adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by
the proposed use.
The LOS for the street system surrounding the PTS
is B which is considered to be acceptable. The
additionat vehicles are not anticipated to change
the LOS at the intersections; therefore, the street
system serving the facility is adequate to properly
handle all existing and proposed traffic.
McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
The proposed project site is within a Vz mile of the McClellan-Palomar Airport and is located within the
existing Airport Influence Area and the Airport Flight Activity Zone and as such is regulated by the
amended McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), dated March 4, 2010. The
project site is located outside the 60 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) contour and is
compatible with the Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix. The finding required by the ALUCP can be
supported, as demonstrated in Tabte 4 betow.
CUP 260(E) - PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION
January 21, 2015
Page 5
TABLE 4 - MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY PLAN - FINDINGS
FINDING RESPONSE
That the project is consistent with the McClellan-
Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
(ALUCP) as amended March 4, 2010.
The adopted project findings for CUP 260(D), which are
contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6907,
still apply to this project (CUP 260(E)). Furthermore, the
proposed amendment is to increase hours of operation for
public access. No structures are proposed.
That the proposed land use is compatible with the
airport (General Plan Land Use Element - Special
Planning Considerations - Airport).
The proposed amendment is to increase hours of
operation for public access. No structures or land use
changes are proposed.
E. Growth Management Regulations
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 5 in the southeast quadrant of
the city and wilt have no impacts on public facilities. The LOS for the morning peak hour at the adjacent
intersections identify which ones were determined to be B. The project's incremental contribution to
morning peak hour trips does not impair the ability to maintain acceptable level of service at these
intersections. Based on the city's growth management policies, a LOS of B is considered acceptable.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project was previously evaluated in the FEIR (04-03), dated September 2004, and adopted by the City
Council at its February 1, 2005 meeting. The FEIR evaluated the potential environmental effects, including
the proposed traffic and circulation impacts on the surrounding circulation system, to allow public access
to the PTS Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturday and
Sunday. The proposed project is within the scope of the prior environmental document and no further
environmental documentation is required per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline
Section 15162.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7080
2. Location Map
3. Disclosure Form
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6907 (CUP 260(D))
N
NOT TO SCALE
SITE MAP
Palomar Transfer Station
CUP 260(E)
\6
DISCLOSURE Develoament Seruic..
STATEMENT planning Division
^ CMY Of P. 1/A\ 1635 Faraday Avenue
CARLSBAD * '
www.can5oadca.gov
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will
require discretbnary action on ttie part ofthe City Council or any appointed Board, Commission
or Committee.
The following infomnation MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project
cannot be reviewed until this information Is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, finn, co-partnersh'p, joint venture, association, social club, firatemal
organization, corporatk>n, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in Hiis and any ottier county, dty and county,
city municipality, distnct or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit*
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of ttie appBcant and pn^erty owner
must be provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicants agent)
Prowde the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a
financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a conooration or partnership,
include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE
INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a Publiclv-owned
corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A
separate piage may be attached if necessary.)
Person Palomar Transfer Station Corp/Part
Title , Title
Address 5960 El Camino Real Address ;
Carlsbad, CA 92008
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any
ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provkle the nature of the legal
ownership (i.e., partnersNp, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the
ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of
all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE
THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE
SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corooration. include the names, titles, and
addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Countv of San Dieeo Corp/Part__
Title O iKe^£. fh^^fttcH Title
Address 1960 joe Crosson Drive Address_
El Cajon, CA 92020
P-1 (A) Page 1 of 2 Revised 07/10
11^
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust,
list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non^
profit organization or as tmstee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Taist Non Profit/Tojst
Title ^ Title.
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City
staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12)
months?
I—I I—I
I I Yes [XJ No If yes, piease indicate person(s):_
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
certi%Kthat att-th^bov^ informatiorikis true and correct to the best of ray-knowledgej!>fe*vt #2 /v^.^^
signature of cH{jher/date Signature of ar^fHeent/dat^^
Pnnt or type nameof owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
p-1 (A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6907
5
8
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
3 APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT AND A RETROACTIVE TEN YEAR
4 EXTENSION TO ALLOW THE: 1) EXPANSION OF THE
EXISTING TRANSFER STATION TIPPING BAY STRUCTURE;
2) COLLECTION OF UNIVERSAL WASTE; AND 3)
6 COLLECTION OF HOME-GENERATED SHARPS NEEDLES
ON A SITE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ORION
7 STREET BETWEEN FARADAY AVENUE AND EL CAMINO
REAL AND WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 5.
9 CASE NAME: PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION
CASE NO.: CUP260rD^
10 ••
11
j2 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by the County of San Diego,
13 Department of Public Works - Airport Division, "Owner," described as
A portion of lots A and B of Rancho Agua Hedionda according
j5 to Map No. 823 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County on November 16,1986
16 "
17
18
WHEREAS, Palomar Transfer Station, Inc., "Developer," has filed a verified
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Conditional Use
19 Permit Amendment and extension as shown on Exhibits "A" - "G" dated October 3, 2012, on
20 file in the Planning Division PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION - CUP 260(D), as provided
21 by the conditions of approval of CUP 260(C) and Chapter 21.42 and/or 21.50 ofthe Carlsbad
22
Municipal Code; and
23
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on October 3, 2012, hold a duly
24
2^ noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
26 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
27 and arguments, if any, ofall persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the CUP amendment; and
WHEREAS, on October 3, 2012, the Planning Commission recommends
2
approval of CUP 260(D), as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No.
3
6907.
4
5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
6 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
7 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct,
g
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
9 RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION -
CUP 260(D) Amendment and extension, effective retroactively from March 4,
0 2012 through March 4, 2022, based on the following findings and subject to the
J ^ following conditions:
j2 Findings:
13 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community,
and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, including,
1^ ifapplicable, the certified local coastal program, specific plan or master plan, in that the
I ^ requested uses are necessary and desirable for the community, in that segregating
household waste and sharps needles from the main stream of waste is a benefit for
16 the health and safety of the community and environment.
17 2. That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted
in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located, in that the project site is
surrounded by areas zoned for open space or industrial uses. Much of the
surrounding area is undeveloped. The developed sites contain industrial type uses
(e.g., the CMWD office and equipment storage yard. Safety Center, etc.). Therefore,
20 the facility is not detrimental to any existing uses or permitted uses in the area.
18
19
22
21 3. That the site for the proposed condifional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas,
landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the
23 City Planner, planning commission or city council, in order to integrate the use with other
uses in the neighborhood, in that all proposed structures and uses can be
24 accommodated within the existing site boundaries.
26
25 4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic
generated by the proposed use, in that no additional traffic will be generated with the
proposed project. The street system serving the facility is adequate to properly
2y handle all existing traffic.
28 5. That the project is consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use
Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) as amended March 4, 2010 in that the adopted project
PC RESO NO. 6907 -2-
findings for CUP 260(C), which are contained in Planning Commission Resolution
2 No. 5800, still apply to this project (CUP 260(D)) including an update to Finding No.
7 to state the project is consistent with the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use
3 Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) as amended March 4, 2010.
4 6. That the proposed land use is compatible with the airport (General Plan Land Use
^ Element - Special Planning Considerations - Airport) in that the project is also
consistent with the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77 Guidelines, which
5 determines if structures located within the Airport Influence Area will affect
navigable airspace. A Part 77 form was completed for the project. The FAA made a
7 Determination of "No Hazard to Air Navigation" (Aeronautical Study No. 2012-
^ AWP-2456-OE dated 6/6/12).
9
12
15
Conditions;
10 Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all condifions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a
building or grading permit whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
13 implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condifion issuance of all
14 future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the
property fitle; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
g conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Conditional Use Permit
17 Amendment.
8 2. The adopted project conditions for CUP 260(C), which are contained in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 5800, still apply to this project (CUP 260(D)) with the
exception of Condition No. 14, which is not applicable, Condition No. 18, which is
20 replaced by Condition No. 4 of this Resolution, Condition No. 25, which is replaced
by Condition No. 3, of this Resolution, Condition No. 27, which is no longer
21 applicable given the requirements of the current ALUCP, is replaced with
Condition No. 5 of this Resolution, and Condition Nos. 38, 40, 42, 46, 49 and 53,
which are no longer applicable as they have been satisfied.
23
3. Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction executed by the owner ofthe
24 real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County
Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all interested parties
2^ and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Conditional Use Permit
25 Amendment by Resolution No. 6907 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall
note the property descripfion, locafion of the file containing complete project details and
27 all conditions of approval as well as any condifions or restrictions specified for inclusion
in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an
28 amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of
good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
PC RESO NO. 6907 -3-
4
7
4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of ten (10) years retroactively from
2 March 4, 2012 through March 4, 2022. This permit may be revoked at any time after a
public hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental, effect on
3 surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed
herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time
not to exceed ten (10) years upon written application of the permittee made no less than
2 90 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission may not grant such
extension, unless it finds that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land
6 uses or. the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negafive effect on surrounding
land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be denied or
granted with conditions which will eliminate or substantially reduce such effects. There
g is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant.
9 5. The project shall comply with the provisions in the ALUCP as amended March 4,
2010.
10
Developer shall submit and obtain City Planner approval of a Final Landscape and
Irrigation Plan showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and
12 the City's Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping and
irrigation as shown on the approved Final Plans. All landscaping shall be maintained in a
13 healthy and thriving condifion, free from weeds, trash, and debris. All irrigation systems
shall be maintained to provide the optimum amount of water to the landscape for plant
1"^ growth without causing soil erosion and runoff
" The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be pursuant to the
16 landscape plancheck process on file in the Planning Division and accompanied by the
project's building, improvement, and grading plans.
17
18
19
20 „
9. The developer shall design the relocation of the existing private fire hydrant, located in
21 front ofthe building expansion, subject to the approval of the Fire Code Official. 22
23
24
25
8. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this
project within 24 months from the date of project approval.
Fire:
Engineering;
General
10. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer
25 for the proposed haul route.
27 11. This project is approved upon the express condifion that building permits will not be
issued for the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has
2^ determined that adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of pennit
issuance and will continue to be available until time of occupancy.
PC RESO NO. 6907 -4-
12. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections and driveways in
2 accordance with City Engineering Standards. The property owner shall maintain this
condifion.
3 "
4
11
25
Fees/Agreements
2 13. Developer shall cause property owner or developer to execute and submit to the city
engineer for recordation, the city's standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless
6 Agreement.
7 14. Developer shall cause property owner or developer to execute and submit to the city
g engineer for recordation the city's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement.
9 Grading
0 15. Based upon a review ofthe proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the site
plan, a minor grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall process grading
plans via the building permit process. Technical studies/reports may be required subject
j2 to the city engineer's review. Developer shall pay all applicable grading plan check and
permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule.
13
16. Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall
1"^ implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include
but are not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt
runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollufion prevention and
16 educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or
devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or
17 stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify
^ ^ prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements.
JP 17. Developer shall complete and submit to the city engineer a Project Threat Assessment
Form (PTAF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF,
20 developer shall also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form and
appropriate Tier level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by
21 the completed PTAF all to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Developer shall pay all
22 applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule.
23 18. Developer shall incorporate measures with this project to comply with Standard
Stormwater Requirements per the city's Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan
24 (SUSMP). These measures include, but are not limited to: I) reducing the use of new
impervious surfaces (e.g.: paving), 2) designing drainage from impervious surfaces to
discharge over pervious areas (e.g.: turf, landscape areas), 3) and designing trash
26 enclosures to avoid contact with storm runoff, all to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
27
28
PC RESO NO. 6907 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Govemment Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing m accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Cahfomia, held on October 3,2012 by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Chairperson Schumacher, Commissioners Arnold, L'Heureux,
Nygaard, Scully and Siekmann
Commissioner Black
MICHAEL SCHUMACRER, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
DON NEU
City Planner
PC RESO NO. 6907
EXHIBIT 5
Planning Commission Minutes January 21,2015 Page 2
1. CDP 14-13 - HIRSCHKOFF RESIDENCE - Request for the adoption of a l\/litigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Addendum,
and approval of a Coastal Development Permit to allow for the construction of a 3,015
square foot single family residence within the Mello II Segment ofthe City's Coastal Zone
generally located on the west side of Jefferson Street, adjacent to the Interstate Five
freeway and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project site is within the
appealable area of the California Coastal Commission.
Mr. Neu stated Agenda Item 1 would normally be heard in a public hearing context; however, the project
appears to be minor and routine in nature with no outstanding issues and Staff recommends approval. He
recommended that the public hearing be opened and closed, and that the Commission proceed with a vote
as a consent item. Staff would be available to respond to questions if the Commission or someone from
the public wished to comment on Agenda Item 1.
Chairperson Scully asked if any member of the audience wished to address Agenda ttem 1. Seeing none,
she opened and closed public testimony.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Anderson and duly seconded by Commissioner L'Heureux
that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7081
adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program and Addendum, and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7082
approving Coastal Development Permit CDP 14-13 based upon the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein including the errata sheet.
VOTE: 6-0
AYES: Chairperson Scully, Commissioner Anderson, Commissioner Black, Commissioner
L'Heureux, Commissioner Montgomery, and Commissioner Siekmann
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Segall
ABSTAIN: None
Chairperson Scully closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 1, asked Mr. Neu to introduce the next item,
and opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 2.
2. CUP 260(E) - PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION - Request for a recommendation of
approval of a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to increase the hours of public access
to the Palomar Transfer Station (PTS) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday
to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday on a site located at 5960 El Camino Real
between Faraday Avenue and El Camino Real and within in Local Facilities Management
Zone 5.
Mr. Neu introduced Agenda Item 2 and stated Associate Planner Pam Drew would make the staff
presentation.
Ms. Drew gave a brief presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions.
Chairperson Sully asked if there were any questions of staff.
Commissioner Anderson asked about the road construction near the project site and the estimated
completion date. Ms. Drew stated that she did not know the exact timing on the completion of the
construction. Mr. Neu commented that he too was not aware of the completion date.
Chairperson Scully asked if there were any further questions of staff. Seeing none, she asked if the
applicant wished to make a presentation.
Neil Moore, representative for the Palomar Transfer Station, stated he was available to answer questions.
71 i
Planning Commission Minutes January 21,2015 Page 3
Chairperson Scully asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Seeing none she asked if there
were any members of the audience who wished to speak on Agenda Item 2. Seeing none. Chairperson
Scully opened and closed public testimony on Agenda Item 2.
Chairperson Scully asked if there were any further questions of staff.
DISCUSSION
Commissioner Montgomery stated he can approve the project.
Commissioner Black stated he can support the project.
Commissioner Siekmann stated her concurrence.
Commissioner L'Heureux stated he can support the project.
Commissioner Anderson commented that she has concerns regarding the traffic and feels the increase in
the hours will contribute to the traffic issues around the project site. She feels the hours should be non-
peak hours and suggested the approval be postponed until the construction on Faraday Avenue is
complete.
Commissioner Siekmann commented that the ADT are already included in the traffic counts because the
site has been accepting customers during these proposed hours. She stated that approving the project
would not make the situation worse since the hours have already been adjusted to help serve the public.
Commissioner Anderson feels that the increased hours will create more activity and traffic at the center.
Commissioner Montgomery stated he understands Commissioner Anderson's concerns; however he feels
the traffic will not impacted.
Commissioner Anderson commented that she feels customers will come from neighboring cities from all
directions and there are already enough cars on the road at rush hour.
Chairperson Scully stated she can support the project.
MOTION
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner L'Heureux and duly seconded by Commissioner Siekmann
that the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7080
recommending approval of an amendment to CUP 260, based upon the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
VOTE: 5-1
AYES: Chairperson Scully, Commissioner Black, Commissioner L'Heureux, Commissioner
Montgomery, and Commissioner Siekmann
NOES: Commissioner Anderson
ABSENT: Commissioner Segall
ABSTAIN: None
Chairperson Scully closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 2 and thanked staff for their presentations.
COMMISSION COMMENTS
None.
CITY PLANNER COMMENTS
None.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident
of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of
eighteen years and not a party to or interested In
the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk
of the printer of
UT - North County
Formerly known as the North County Times and
which newspaper has been adjudicated as a
newspaper of general circulation by the Superior
Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of
Escondido, Court Decree numbers 171349 &
172171, for the County of San Diego, that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set
in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been
published In each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not In any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
February 28*^ 2015
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Proof of Publication of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
iNOTlCE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your in-Iterest may be affected, that the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Coun-
cil Chamber, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 10, 2015, to consider approval of a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to increase the hours of public access to the Palomar Transfer Station
(PTS) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday on property gen-
erally located at 5960 El Camino Real between Faraday Avenue and El Camino Real and within in Local Facilities Management
Zone 5. and more particularly described as:
A portion of lots A and B of Rancho Agua Hedionda according to Map No. 823 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San
Diego County on November 16,1986
Whereas, on January 21, 2015 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 5-1-1 (Commissioner Anderson voted no;
Commissioner Segall absent) to recommend approval of a Con-ditional Use Permit Amendment to increase the hours of public
access to the Palomar Transfer Station (PTS) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Mon-
day through Friday on a site located at 5960 El Camino Real be-tween Faraday Avenue and El Camino Real and within in Local
Faci I ities Management Zone 5.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially in-vited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the agenda bill will
be available on and after March 6, 2015. If you have any ques-tions, please contact Pam Drew in the Planning Division at
(760) 602-4644 or pam.drew@carlsbadca.90v .
If you challenge the Conditional Use Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this no-tice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CUP 260(E) CASE NAME: PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION CITYOF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL pub: 2/28/15
Dated at Oceanside, California
On This 02"^ davMarch, 2015
Jane Allshouse
UT NORTH COUNTY
Legal Advertising
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO: CITY CLERK
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 3/lo/cS
SUBJECT: Pc^o^vKjOLr 7?^.<s/c»^ ^3hiM^&r^
LOCATION: f^Oo ^IWfefe:^ {/dl/ZjC^ I>r.^ (lA^bcLcL
DATE NOTICES MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS: ^/^SpS
NUMBER MAILED:
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am
employed by the City of Carlsbad and the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
^ (Date) (Signature) f (Dafe)
SENT TO FOR PUBLIdAtlON VIA E-MAIL TO: d^funion Tribune
I I Coast News
PUBLICATION DATE: Union
Coast News
Tribune 7
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am
employed by the City of Carlsbad in the City Clerk's Office and the foregoing is true and
correct.
Date: A//'=f/(S.
(Signature)
Attachments: 1) Mailing Labels
2) Notice w/ attachments
Easy Peel® Labels
Use Avery® Template 5160®
CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
6225 EL CAMINO REAL
CARLSBAD CA 92011
SAN DIEGUITO SCHOOL DISTRICT
710 ENCINITAS BLVD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
I
i
r
CITYOF ENCINITAS
505 S VULCAN AV
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF VISTA
200 CIVIC CENTER DR
VISTA CA 92084
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
3883 RUFFIN RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
SAN DIEGO LAFCO
STE 200
9335 HAZARD WAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
U.S. FISH & WILDUFE
STE 250
2177 SALK AV
CARLSBAD CA 92011
CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
5934 PRIESTLEY DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
itiquettes faciles a peler
I itii;
Bend along line to expose Pop^up Edge'^"
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT
STE 250
255 PICO AV
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
LEUCADIA WASTE WATER DISTRICT
TIM JOCHEN
1960 LA COSTA AV
CARLSBAD CA 92009
CITY OF SAN MARCOS
1 CIVIC CENTER DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92069-2949
VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT
201 VALLECITOS DE ORO
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
REGIONAL WATER QUAUTY CONTROL BOARD
STE 100
2375 NORTHSIDE DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-2700
AVERY® 5160®
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
10124 OLD GROVE RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92131
CA COASTAL COMMISSION
ATTN KANANI BROWN
STE 103
7575 METROPOLITAN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-4402
MICHAEL MCSWEENEY - BIA SD
STE 110
9201 SPECTRUM CENTER BLVD
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1407
Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de
ENCINITAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
101 RANCHO SANTA FE RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT
1966 OLIVENHAIN RD
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CITY OF OCEANSIDE
300 NORTH COAST HWY
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
I.P.U.A.
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMIN AND URBAN
STUDIES
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN DIEGO CA 92182-4505
SD COUNTY PLANNING
STE 110
5510 OVERLAND AV
SAN DIEGO CA 92123-1239
SANDAG
STE 800
401 B ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO CO. AIRPORT AUTHORITY
PO BOX 82776
SAN DIEGO CA 92138-2776
vwvw.avery.com
if
Easy Peel® Labeb
Use Avery® Template 5111^/8160™
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
R I F lll-IMPALA LLC
11601 WILSHIRE BLVD #650
LOS ANGELES CA 90025
BECKMAN COULTER INC
2200 PENNSYLVANIA NW
#800W
WASHINGTON DC 20037
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
1635 FARADAY AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LUANNE L LEONARD
36 SAQUAROCT
RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270
GATEWAY COLORADO
PROPERTIES INC
POBOX 4900
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261
FRANZ-ATRIUM MLP
2710 LOKER AVE W #100
CARLSBAD CA 92010
PROMONTORY BUSINESS PARK
OWNERS ASSN
POBOX 4029
TUSTIN CA 92781
JAABALLC
2780 LOKER AVE W
CARLSBADCA 92010
PETERABASILE
1620 GLORIETTA BLVD
CORONADO CA 92118
AtNt:yiim^llKet&> i;
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA
1111 FRANKLIN ST#12TH FLR
OAKLAND CA 94607
JAMES & DENISE BALDWIN
6351 ALLSTONST
CARLSBAD CA 92009
J B B PROPERTIES LLC
2470 IMPALA DR
CARLSBADCA 92010
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MANDANA CAL CO
POBOX 18197
IRVINE CA 92623
FENTON H G COMPANY
7577 MISSION VALLEY RD #200
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
E C P MIDWEST LLC
10451 MILL RUN CIR #1000
OWINGS MILLS MD 21117
GUNTHER LLC
2717 LOKER AVE W
CARLSBADCA 92010
NODAL VENTURES LLC
2719 LOKER AVE W #B
CARLSBADCA 92010
TPS HOLDINGS LLC
2713 LOKER AVE W
CARLSBADCA 92010
R I F lll-IMPALA LLC
11620 WILSHIRE BLVD #300
LOS ANGELES CA 90025
MISSETT FAMILY TRUST 07-06-
90
2460 IMPALA DR
CARLSBADCA 92010
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE
OF SAN DIEGO
349 CEDAR ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
FENTON CARLSBAD LLC
7577 MISSION VALLEY RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
CARLSBAD OAKS LTD L P
1000 PIONEER WAY
EL CAJON CA 92020
FENTON H G COMPANY
7577 MISSION VALLEY RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
RAM BUILDING OWNERS LLC
55 INDEPENDENCE CIR #201
CHICO CA 95973
THOMAS & KATHLEEN
RHATIGAN
1074 BEACON BAY RD
CARLSBADCA 92011
CJ3 LLC
15843 PAUMA VALLEY DR
PAUMA VALLEY CA 92061
LOKER REALTY LLC
4 ALDGATE DR W
MANHASSET NY 11030
Sensde RBplitediaUaiidduB^efifiHlde {
• —I inni innii
EisvPeel®li^™'°°^"^
Ute Avery® Template 5160®/8160™
SFT CARLSBAD LLC
6519 E BAR ZLN
PARADISE VALLEY AZ 85253
CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH
PARTNERS LIP
P O BOX 80036
SAN DIEGO CA 92138
CAMPUS CARLSBAD LLC
1525 FARADAY AVE #100
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSBAD SELF STORAGE
INVESTORS LLC
POBOX 1368
CARLSBADCA 92018
SLATER PLACE L P
1800 THIBODO RD #320
VISTA CA 92081
Fled Paper
loaaiai jaj^A^j luauiaBjeqD i
^~l|?zaBd«tf along ,
expose Pop-up EdgF" J
SOLANA CARLSBAD OAKS LLC
401 BST #1700
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH
VENTURES L P
3575 KENYONST
SAN DIEGO CA 92110
TIM CAULDER
GILLESPIE FIELD TERMINAL
1960 JOE CROSSON DRIVE
EL CAJON CA 92020
CORSAIR MANAGEMENT
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
5410 ELA PALMA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 92807
SIR CAMPBELL PLACE INC
255 WASHINGTON ST #300
NEWTON MA 2458
i
CENTER FOR NATURAL LANDS
MGMT
27258 VIA INDUSTRIA #B
TEMECULA CA 92590
BOI CARLSBAD LLC
555 E LANCASTER AVE #100
RADNOR PA 19087
PIVOTAL 650 CALIFORNIA ST L L
C
1702 E HIGHLAND AVE #310
PHOENIX AZ 85016
LOT 23 BRESSI RANCH LLC
221 15THST
DEL MAR CA 92014
ALPS INNOVATION LLC
621 S HIGHWAY 101
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
to
Its
s
5
/
s
L
s
3
>La6p3 dn-dod asodxa
^(naufiBuoirawmz^l: jaded paaj
afln^B I
®09l.fi WBiduiai @AjaAV asn
Ufui/uir awBnaamn .laaj taott
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chamber, 1200 Carlsbad Village
Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 10, 2015, to consider approval of a
Conditional Use Permit Amendment to increase the hours of public access to the Palomar
Transfer Station (PTS) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. Monday through Friday on property generally located at 5960 El Camino Real between
Faraday Avenue and El Camino Real and within in Local Facilities Management Zone 5. and
more particularly described as:
A portion of lots A and B of Rancho Agua Hedionda according to Map No.
823 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on
November 16, 1986
Whereas, on January 21, 2015 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 5-1-1
(Commissioner Anderson voted no; Commissioner Segall absent) to recommend approval of a
Conditional Use Permit Amendment to increase the hours of public access to the Palomar
Transfer Station (PTS) from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday to 7:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. Monday through Friday on a site located at 5960 El Camino Real between Faraday Avenue
and El Camino Real and within in Local Facilities Management Zone 5.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing.
Copies of the agenda bill will be available on and after March 6, 2015. If you have any questions,
please contact Pam Drew in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4644 or
pam.drew@carisbadca.gov.
If you challenge the Conditional Use Permit Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carisbad, Attn: City Cleri<'s Office, 1200 Carisbad
Village Drive, Carisbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: CUP 260(E)
CASE NAME: PALOMAR TRANSFER STATION
PUBLISH: February 28, 2015.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
wor TO SCALE
SITEMAP
Palomar Transfer Station
CUP 260(E)
Palomar Transfer Station
Pam Drew, Associate Planner
March 10, 2015
2
FARADAY AV
E
L
C
A
M
I
NO
R
E
A
L OR
I
O
N
S
T
ORION WYPALMER WY0 400 800200
Feet
ICUP 260(E)
Palomar
Transfer Station
Project Description
•Increase public access hours to 7:00 a.m. –
4:00 p.m. Monday –Friday
40 –50 vehicles between 7:00 am –9:00 am
Level of Service at nearby intersections is B
No significant impact would occur
3
4
Recommendation
•City Council adopt Resolution No. 2015-063
approving CUP 260(E) as recommended by
the Planning Commission, based on the
findings contained therein.