The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-03-13; City Council; ; Adopt a Resolution approving update to the San Diego County MultiJurisdiction Hazard Mitigation PlanThe top five hazards identified for the region are: • Structural fire/Wildfire • Flood • Earthquake • Hazardous materials releases • Other man-made disasters (including terrorism) Climate scientists who advised on the plan explain that climate change will result in: • Increased average temperatures • Increased number of heat waves (raising the risk of wildfires) • Changes in our rainfall pattern (fewer rainy days, but greater rainfall amounts when it does rain, increasing the risk of urban an flash flooding) In a separate action, to account for these and other changes, Carlsbad's Emergency Preparedness Division has updated Carlsbad's Emergency Operations Plan, which will be forwarded for Council review and approval in coming weeks. Fiscal Analysis There is no fiscal impact associated with this request. Next Steps Staff will inform San Diego County Office of Emergency Services once resolution to approve the updates has been signed. Environmental Evaluation (CEQA) The recommended action is not a project pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5). This section exempts from CEQA government organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Public Notification This item was noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public viewing and review at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting date. In addition, during the update process, in order to ensure that the public had the opportunity to comment on the draft plan, all participating jurisdictions posted a public survey on websites requesting input. Exhibits 1. Resolution approving update to the San Diego County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 2. Table of Contents of San Diego County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 2 of 21 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-036 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN UPDATE TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY MULTI- JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has determined that it is desirable and in the public interest to qualify for hazard mitigation program grants and post-disaster mitigation funds; and WHEREAS, having a Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) allows San Diego County and participating cities to qualify for hazard mitigation program grants and post-disaster federal mitigation funds pursuant to the federal Disaster Mitigation Act (Public Law 106-390); and WHEREAS, under 44 CFR §201.6 local governments must have a FEMA approved Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to apply for and receive assistance under the following grant programs: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP); Pre-disaster Mitigation (PDM); Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA); and Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL); and WHEREAS, these provisions are a condition of pre-and post-disaster assistance; and WHEREAS, the County of San Diego, the 18 incorporated cities located within the County, combined efforts to develop a unified Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan that encompasses the region; and WHEREAS, FEMA has reviewed the plan and found it meets all requirements, and WHEREAS, the adoption of the plan is the last step required for the plan to receive formal approval by FEMA, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the City Council approves the Carlsbad-specific section of updated Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (Attachment A). March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 3 of 21 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 13th day of March, 2018, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: M. Hall, K. Blackburn, M. Schumacher, C. Schumacher, M. Packard. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. (SEAL) March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 4 of 21 Attachment A SECTIONFIVE Goals, Objectives and Actions 5.3 City of Carlsbad The City of Carlsbad (Carlsbad) reviewed a set of jurisdictiona1'-1{?yel hazard maps including detailed critical facility information and localized potential hazard exposure/loss estimates to help identify the top hazards threatening their jurisdiction. In addition, LPGs were supplied with exposure/loss estimates for Carlsbad summarized in Table 5 .3-1.. See Section 4.0 for additional details. Table5.3-1 Summary of PC>tential Hazard:..Related Exposure/Loss in Carlsbad Residential Commercial Critical Facilities Potential -. Potential Exposure/Loss Potential Exposure/Loss for Exposure Number of for R.EJsidentia.l Number of Commercial Number of for Critical Exposed Residential Buildings Commercial Buildings Critical Facilities Hazard Type Population Buildings {X$1,000) Buildings (x$1,000) Facilities (x$1,000) Coastal Storm I Erosion 25 0 0 0 0 1 964 Sea Level Rise 876 66 18,579 47 16,588 32 32,889 r Dam Failure 4531 1,95.1 549,207 49 219,603 12 1,775 Earthquake (Annualized -., Loss -Includes shaking, · liquefaction and landslide r components) 10,495t 4,456* 1,254,364* 5,344* 1,870,237* 41* 61,257* Flood (Loss) fOOYear 2,346 650 182;975 101 35,416 43 33,960 500Year 2407 650 182,975 101 35.416 44 36,311 Rain-Induced ' Landslide. High Risk 464 24 6;756 4 1,231 0 0 Moderate Risk 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 Tsunami 520 106 29,839 10 3,584 29 26,531 Wildfire I Structure Fire . \ Fire Regime II & - IV 99,892 43,157 12,148,696 29,541 10,339,342 525 1,889,061 · * Represents.500-year earthquake value under three earthquake scenarios (shake only, shake and liquefaction, and shake and landslide). 5-5 March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 5 of 21 SECTIONFIVE GoalsJ Objectives and Actions After revfowing the localized hazard maps and exposure/loss table above, the following hazards were identified by the Carlsbad LPG as their top five. A brief rational for including each of these is included. • Structural Fire/Wildfire: The potential of damage and losses to existing assets, includm:g people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities can be sigrtlficant. The crmtinuing drought and likely implications of climate change exacerbate the fire threat. • Earth~uake: The potential for loss of life, injuries~ and damage to ptoperty, as well as disruption of services, is significant. • Hazardous Materials: One major freeway and one major railway pass through the community. The community also hosts an airport. and several fixed facilities that utilize hazardous materials. • Flooding: There are several areas of the community, which are near natural creek crossings and channels, coastal areas as well as lagoons. • Severe Weather: Heavy rains can cause erosion and trigger slope instability in habitat areas of Carlsbad. damaged during the May 2014 .Poinsettia wildfire. Erosion and slope instability can cause dl:lllage to infrastructure, systems and facilities. High· winds can also cause damage to infrastructure, systems and facilities. 5 •. 3.1 Capabilities A~sessment The City of Carlsbad local planning gJ."oup (LPG) for emergency planning is the Carlsbad Emergency Management Administrative Team (CEMAT). The LPG identified· cunent capabilities availaJ:,le for implementing hazard mitigation activities. The Capability , Assessment (Assessment) portion of the jurisdictional mitigation plan identifies administrative, technical, legal and fiscal capabilities. This includes a summary of d~partments_ and their responsibilities associated to hazffi:d mitigation planning as well as codes, ordinances, and plans already inplace associated to hazard mitigation planning. The second part of the Asses.sment provides Carlsbad's fiscal capabilities that may be applicable to providing :financial resources to implement identified. mitigation action items. 5.3.2 Exi,ting Institutions, Plans, .Policies and Ord_inances \ - The following isa s1lllll1lary of existing cl.epartments in Carlsbad and their responsibilities related to hazard mitigation planning and impleD1entation, as well as existing planning documents and regulations related to mitigation efforts with.in the co:mniunity. The administrative and'tecln;rical capabiµties of Carlsbad, as shown in Table 53-2, provides an identification ofthe staff. personnel~ and department resources available to :in:tplemeint the actions identified in the mitigation section of the Plan. Specific resoutces reviewed include those involving technical petso:nn.el such as plannets/engpieers with knowledge of land developm(:}nt and land manage1nent )}tactices, engirieers trained in construction practices related to building and infrastructure, planners and engineers with an understanding of natural or manmade hazards, fl.ood_plain managers, surveyors, personnel with GIS sldlls and scientists familiar with hazards in the community. 5-6 March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 6 of 21 SECTIONFIVE Goals, Objectives and Actions Table5.3-2 City of Carlsbad: Administrative and Technical Capacity Sfaff/Personner Resources . YIN Department!Agency and Position A. Planner(s) or engfneer(s) wrth knowledge of rand Community· and Economic Development, Public y Works, Housing and Neighborhood Peve[opment, development and land management practices Parks and Recreation Department B. Engineer(s) or professlonaf(s) trained in construction y Public Works and Community and Economic practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Development C. PlannElrs or Engineer(s) with an understanding of natural Community and Economic Development, Public and/or manmade hazards. y Works, Fire Prevention, Property and Environmental Management D. Floodplain manager y PiJblic Works, Community and Economic Development E. Surveyors y Community and Economic Development CEMAT, Fire Prevention, Community and F. Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's y Economic Development, · Property and vulnerabil1ty to hazards Environmental Management, Parks and Recreation Department G. Personnel skilled in GIS and/or HAZUS y GIS Staff in IT H .. · Scientists familfar with the hazards of the community N I. Emergency manager y City Manager, Public Safety Chiefs, Emergency Preparedness Manager J. Grant writers y Various Departments throughout City of Carlsbad The legal and regulatory capabilities of Carlsbad are shown in Table 5 .3-3,. which presents the existing ordinances and codes that affect the physical or built environment of Carlsbad. Examples of legal and/ or regulatory capabilities can include: the City's building codes, zoning ordinances, subdivision ordnances, special purpose ordinances, growth D?-anagement ordinances,_ site plan reyiew, general plans, capital impr9vement plans, economic development plans, emergency response plan~, and real estate disclosure plans. ' March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 7 of 21 SECTIONFIVE Goals, ObiectiVes and Actions TableS.3-3 City of Carlsbad: Legal and Regulatory Capability . Local Does State Regulatory Tools (ordinances, codes, plans) Authority Prohibit? (YIN) (YIN) A. Building code y N B. Zoning ordinance y N C. Subdivision ordinance or regulations y N D. Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside y N or steep slope ordinances, wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) E. Growth management ordinances (also called "smart growth" or anti-sprawl programs) y N F. Site plan review requirements y N G. General or comprehensive plan y, ' N H. Acapital improvements plan y N I. An economic development plan y J. An emergency respons~ plan y N K. A post-disaster recovery plan y N L. A post-disaster r~cov~ry ordinance N M. Real estate disclosurerequirements y N N. Habitat Management Pian y N 0. Master Drainage, Sewer; Water, & Reclaimed Water y N P. Redevelopment fV!aster Plan y N 5.3.3 Fiscal Resources Table 5.3-4 shows specific financial and budgetary tools 11vailable to Carlsbad such as community development block grants; capital improvements project :funding; authority to levy taxes for specific purposes; fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services; impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new development; ability to incur debt through general obligations bonds; and withholding spencling in hazard- prone areas. . Table 5.3-4 City of Carlsbad: Fiscal Capability Financial Resources Accessible or Eligible to Use Yes/No A. Community Development Brock Grants (CDBG) Yes 8. Capital im...provements project funding· Yes C. Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Limited (Voter Approval) D. Fees for water; sewer, gas, or electric service Yes ~. E. Impact fees for homeb1:1yers or developers for new developments/homes Yes F. Incur debt through general obligation bonds Limited (Voter Approval) G. Incur debt through special tax and revenue bonds Limited (Voter Approval) 5,8 ,. March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 8 of 21 SECTIONFIVE Goals, Objectives anil Actions H. Incur debt through private activity bonds Yes I. Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Yes 5.3.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions Listed below are Carlsbad's specific hazard mitigation goals, objectives and refateq. potential actions. For each goal, one or more objectives have been identified that provide strategies to attain the goal. Where appropriate, the City has identified a range of specific actions to achieve the objective mid goal. The goals and objectives were developed by considering the'risk assessment :eyndirtgs, lo.calized hazard identification and loss/exposure estimates, and an analysis of the jurisdiction's current capabilities assessment. These preliminary goals, objectives and actions were developed to represent a vision of long- te1.1n hazard reduction or enhancement of capabilities. To help in further development of these goals and oQj,ectives, the LPG compiled and reviewed cum~nt jurisdictional sources including the City's plarm.mg documents, codes, and ordinances. In addition, City representatives met with consultant staff and/or OES to specifically discuss these hazard-related goB:ls, objectives and actions as they related to the overall Plan, Represent~tives of numerous City departments involved in hazard mitigation planning, including Fire, Police, and Public Works provided input to the Carlsbad LPG. The original Carlsbad LPG members were Carlsbad Emergency Management Administrative Team(CEMAT) members: Mike Davis, David Harrison, Neil Gallucci, Marc Reno, Joan Mabrouk, Maria Callander, Don Wasko, Joe Garuba, Val Brown,·Lori Swenck, CJ-lynn Birdwell, Michele Masterson and Kurt Musser. Once developed, City staff presented them to the· City of Carlsbad City Coqncil for their approval. Public input was soUcited thmugh Cadsbad's Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), National University Emergency Management and Homeland Security students at the Carlsbad campus, and through the City of Carlsbad's web page. ·. ·, The following sections present the hazard-related goals, objectives and actions as prepared by Carlsbad's LPG in conj!Jllcfiorrwith the :ijazard Mitigation Working Group, locally elected officials, and local citizens. ) 5.3.4.1 Goals The City of Catlsbad has developed the following 8 Goals forthe:itHazardMitigation Plan (See Attachment A for Goal 8). Goal 1. Increase public understanding and support for effective hazard mitigation. Goal 2. Build and mainta.in Ideal capacity and commitment to hazard mitigation goals. Goal3. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses tQ existing assets, _irtcluding people, facilities and in:fi:i:istructure due to floocling/damfailtu·e. - Goal 4. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to· existing assets, irtcludirtg people, critical facilities/in;frastructin:e, and public facilities due to earthquakes. Goal 5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, critical facilities/infrastructute, and public facilities due to structural :fite/wildfire. Goal 6. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existirtg assets, including people, facilities and infrastructm;e due to hazardous materials~related hazards March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 9 of 21 \. SECTIONFIVE Goals, Objectives and Actions Goal 7. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, inclu~ing people, facilities and infrastructure due to severe weather and/ot climate change where appropriate. I Goal 8. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including people, facilities and infrastructure due to manmade hazards where appropriate. . . . 5.3.4.2 Objectives and Actions / The City of Carlsbad developed the following broad list of objectives and actions to assist in the implementation of ea:ch of their eight identified.goals. The City of Carlsbad developed objectives to ·assist in achieving their hazard mitigation goals. For each of these objectives, specific actions were developed thatwouldassist in their implementation. A discussion of the prioritization and implementation of the action items is provided in Section 5 .3 .5 · Goal 1: Increase public nnde!standing and support for effective hazard New mitigation. Existing or Both Objective I.A: Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions. Action l.A.1 Carlsbad.Emergency Management Admmistrative Team (CEMAT) develop hazard mitigation public awareness strategies. Action 1.A.2 Publicize and encourage the adoption of appropriate hazard mitigation actions. Both Objective JB: Promote partnerships between the state, counties, and local jurisdictions and agencies to identify, prioritize, and implement mitigation actions. Action l.B.1 Continue to participate in regional hazard mitigation activities as a member of the Both San Diego County Unified Disaster Council (UDC). Action l.B.2 Support public sector symposiums and pp.blic education oppo~ties. Objective JC: Work with Chamber of Commerce, businesses and other local agencies to promote hazard mitigation in the local community. Action 1.C.l Increase awareness and knowledge of hazard mitigation principles and practices. Both Action 1.C2 Encourage businesses to develop and implement hazard mitigation actions. Action l.C.3 Support p1ivate sector symposiums and public education opportunities. Goal 2: Build and maintain local capacity and commitment to hazard New mitigation goals. Existing or :Both Objective 2.A: Increase awareness and hiowledge of hazard mitigation principles and practice among local officials. J Action 2.A.1 I CEMAT liaison with city departments to increase awareness and Both lmowledge of hazard mitigation plan, principles and goals. 5-10 March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 10 of 21 SECTIONFIVE . Goals, Objectives and Actions Goal 2: Build and maintain local capacity and commitment to hazard New mitigation goals. . Existing or:Both Objective 2.B: Implement actions associated with hazard mitigation plan. - Action 2.B. l CEMAT coorclinate and monitor action plan milestones. Both CEMAT seek training opportunities, through Regional Training Manager, Action 2.B.2 https://sduasi.org,. and other resources, to expand staff emergency. management Both training Action2.B.3 CEMAT review an<l'update EOC position staffingrosters and oversee · staff member Both cross-tramiri.g for multipie BOC pos1tion:s. Objective 2.C: Continue·GIS mapping of potential hazard areas. ·' Action.2.C.l Update GIS mapping as appropriate. Both . . . Goal 3: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, includ~g New people, facilities and infrastructure due to flooding/dam failure. E:xisting or Both Objective 3:A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibiUty of damage and losses due to flooding/dam failure. Action 3 .A.l Update inµndationmaps every 10 years. Action 3 .A.2 Review· and compare e:ristmg flood ·control standards, zo:rring and building Both requirements; Action 3.A.3 Review and update policies that discourage growth in flood-prone areas. Action 3.A.4 Review and update city-wide Evacuation Plan. . . Action3.A.5 Periodically exercise flooding/dam failure response actions, Objective 3.B: Protect existing assets with the high_est relative vulnerabiltty to the effects of a flooding (100 year floodplain)ldam failure. Action 3 .B.1 Identify hazard-prone structures and areas. Both Action 3.B.2 Maintain Storm V{ ater System. Action 3.B.3 · Maintain materials for buHdmg water barriers. Objective 3. C: Coordinate with and support existing efforts to mitigate dani failure (e.g.,, US Army Corps of Engineers, US Bureau of Reclamation and California Department of Water Resources). Action~,C.1 Incorporate and maintain valuable wetl.ands in ope:u space preservation programs. Both Objective 3.D: Protect floodplains from inappropriate development. Action 3.D;l Plan and zone for open space, recreationat agricliltaral, or other low-int~nsity uses Both withm floodway fringes. March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 11 of 21 SECTIONFIVE Goals, Objectives and Actions Goal 4: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including New people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to Existing earthquakes. or Both Objective 4.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of daniage and losses due to earthquakes. · Action4A.1 Update e~hquake response actions in Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). Both Action 4.A.2 Continue periodic updates oflocal building codes, public works construction codes, zoning and grading ordinances to reflect legislative changes. Action.4,A.3 Review and update city-wiµe Evacuation Plan. Action 4.A.4 Periodically exercise earthquake response actions. Objective 4.B: Protect existing assets with the highest relativ.e vulnerability to the·effects of earthquake.i Action 4.B.l CEMAT review local vulnerability to ground motion, landslides and liquefacti!-m Both impacts on facilities and infrastructure. Objective 4.C: Coordinate with and support existing efforts to mitigate earthquake hazard Action 4.C. l Identify projects for pre-disaster mitigation funding. Both Objective 4.D: Community Outreach Action 4.D. l Encourage participation in state-wide earthquake preparedness exercises. Both Goal 5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including New; people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public facilities due to structural Existing fire/wildfire. or Both Objective5.A: Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to structural fire/wikffire. Action 5.A.l Update structural fire/wildfire response actions in Emergency Operations Plan Both (EOP) and/or Wtldland fire plans. Action 5 .A.2 Review and update city-wide Evacuation Plan. ·' ' Action 5.A.3 Periodically exercise strnctural fire/wildfire response actions. . ' Action 5.A.4 Participate in amendments to F:iry Protection programs, policies, .and requirements; ref. Section IV.F. City Landscape Manual. Action 5.A.5 Continue with Hosp Grove trimming and replanting efforts. Action 5.A.6 Continue to provide for annual vegetationmanagemenl!maintenance, as necessmy, · I :in.Hosp Grove defensible space. Objective5.B: Coordinate with and supportexisting efforts to mitigate structuralfire/wildfire. Action 5.B.1 Continue to maintain the City's w,eed abatement ordinance to facilitate the removal of annual weeds/vegetation or habitat. Both Action 5.B.2 Provid.e increased vegetation management oversight to developments or HOA's Both borc:lering on open space or in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. 5-12 March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 12 of 21 SECTIONFIVE Goals, Objectives and Actions Goal 5: Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including New, people, critical facilities/infrastructure, and public faciijties due to structural Existing fire/wildfire. or Both Objecttve5.C: Maintain GIS mapping to best reflect potential vulnerqbility of assets from structural fire/wikffire. Action 5.C.I GIS maintain mapped fire risk area&-Both Objective5.D: Maintain adequate emergency response capabiHty. Continue to evaluate service level impacts and needs as part of City Council goals, Action 5.D.l Standards of Cover reviews, and Annual Operating Budget and Capital Both Improvement.Pi'ogram. Goal 6. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including New, people, facilities and infrastructure due to hazardous materials-related Existing hazards or Both Objective 6.A.I Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to hazardous materials-related hazards \ -, Action 6.A.I GIS develop and maintain mapped hazardous materials _fac;ilities and ris:ks for the Both City of Carlsbad. l Action 6.A.2 Fire Prevention maintain library of hazardous materials plans for Carlsbad ·, hazardous materials facilities. Action 6.A.3 Fire Prevention coordinate with GIS the development of mob:Ue data computer based hazardous materials preplans associated with mapped facilities. Objective 6.B.Tlncrease awareness and krzowledge of hazardous materials niitigation principles and practice amon .,. zocal officials. Action 6.B.I Periodically exercise coordinated.hazatdotis materials response actions. Both Action 6.B.2 Support private sector symposiums and public education opportunities. Goal 7. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existfugassets, including New, people, facilities-and infrastructure due. to severe weather and/or climate Existing change where appropriate. or Both Objectfv.e 7.A.1 Develop a contprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to severe weather an.d/or climate change. Update and adopt Local Coastal Program (LCP) to incluqe assessment of impacts Action 7.A.I and vulnerabilities associated with sea level rise, such as inundation, flooding; Both wave impacts, erosion; and saltwatet :intrusion. LCP will identify strategies and adaptation mea,sures to minj1nize risks. Objective 7.B.1 Increase awareness and knowledge of severe weather and/or climate change among senior ci'ty leadership and/or local officials. Adopt a Climate Actii:m PlfUJ, which contains information about the impacts of Action 7 .B.l climate change and a comprehensive strategy to reduce the community's Both greenhouse gas. emissions that are contributing to climate change. Objective 7.C.I Increase public awareness and krzowledge of damages and losses due to severe weather and/or climate change through comm,unity awareness Action 7. C. l In.crease publicawarenes.s and lmowledge ofdamages and losses due to severe· weather an.d/or climate change through . public outreach and education, Both including social media. March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 13 of 21 SECTIONFIVE . Goals, Obieclives and Actions Go~I 8. Reduce the possibility of damage and losses to existing assets, including New, services, funds, facilities, infrasb."Ucture and · possibly people due to Existing :information technoloQV-related vulnerabilities and cvber insecurities. or Both Objective 8.A Develop a comprehensive approach to reducing the possibility of damage and losses due to s~vere weather and/or climate change. Action 8.A.l Coordinate city information technology and cyber securi,ty planning with County Both · Cyber Security PXmnring Group. -- Action 8.A.2 . Attend regional cybersecurity planning meetings. Objective 8.B Increase awareness andknowledge of information technology-related vulnerabilities and1 cyber insecurities among city staff, 'including senior city leadership and/or local officials. Action 8.B.1 Participate in regional cyber security training and exercises. Both Objective 8,C Prepare cyber security plans and policy Action 8.C.l Conduct security audit. Action 8.C.2 Using San Diego County Office of Emergency Services cyber secmity plan as a Both reference, develop Carlsbad cybersecurity plan. 5.3~5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items Once the comprehensive list of jurisdictional goals, objectives, and action items-listed above was developed, the proposed mitigation actions were prioritized. This step resulted in a list of acceptable and realistic actions that address the hazards identified in each jurisdiction. This prioritized •list of action items was formed by the LPG weighing STAPLEE criteria -. The Disaster Mitigation Action of 2000 (at 44 CFR Parts 201 and 206) requires the development of an action plan that not only includes prioritized actions but one that includes information on how the prioritized actions will be implemented. Implementation consists of identifying who is responsible .for which action, what kind of funding mechanisms and other resources are available or will be pursued, and when the action will be completed. The prioritized actions below reflect progress in local mitigation efforts as well as changes in development. The top IO prioritized mitigation actions as well as an implementation s1:rategy for each are: · Action Item #1: Car~sbad Emergency Management Administrative Team (CEMAT) develop hazard mitigation public awarenc:ss strategies. Coordinating IndividuaJ/Organization: CEMAT Potential F-qnding Source: General Fund Implementation Timeline: On-going Action Item #2: Continue with Hosp Grove trimming and replanting effmis. Coordinating IndividuaJ/Organization: Parks and Recreation Planning Potential Funding Source: Grant Funding and General Fund Implementation Tim.eline: On~going Action Item #3: Continue to maintain the City's weed abat~ment ordinance.to facilitate the removal of annual weeds/vegetation or habitat. / 5-14 March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 14 of 21 \ SEOTIONFIVE Goals, ObJectives and Actions Coordinating Individual/Organization: Fire Prevention Potential Funding Source: General Fund Implementation Timeline: Gu-going Action Item #4: Investigate feasibility of maintaining hazardous materials business plans in Mobile · Data Computer. Coordinating Individual/Organization: Fire Department Potential )funding Source: General Fund Implementation Timeline: FY 2015-2020 Action Item #5: Continue periodic updates of local building codes, public works construction codes, zoning and grading ordinances to reflect legislative changes. . Coordinating Individual/Organization: Fire Department Community and Economic Development Potential Funding Source: General Fund Implementation Timeline: FY 2015-2020 Action Item #6: Update hazardous material business plan library. Coordinating Individual/Organization: Fire Prevention Potential Funding Source: General Fund Implementation Timeline: FY 2015-2020 Action Item #7: Provide information to the public on the City website and through public education opportunities. Coordinating Individual/Organization: CEMAT Potential Funding Source: General Fund Implementation Timeline: FY 2015-2020 Action Item #8: Update and adopt Local Coastal Program (LCP) to include assessme?-t of impacts and. vulnerabilities associated with sea-level rise, such as inundation, flooding, wave impacts and erosion. LCP will identify strategies and adaptation measures to minimize risks. Coordinating Individual/Organization: Community and Economic Development Depmtment Potential Funding Source: General Fund, state grants Implementation Timeline: 2017 Action #9: Adopt Climate Action Plan, which contains infonnation about the impacts of climate change and a comprehensive str~tegy to reduce the community's greenhouse gas emissions that are contributing to climate change. / · · · Coordinating Individual/Qrganization: Co:mmunity and Economic Devefopment, Public Works Potential Funding Source:' General Fund, federal, state grants, private sources Implementation Timeline: 2015 Action Item #10: Coordinate city information technology and cybersecurityplanningwith County Cyber Security Planning Group. Coordinating Individual/Organization: Informatibn Technology Department Potential Funding Source: General Fund March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 15 of 21 SECTIONFIVE . Goals, Objectives and Actions . · Implementation Timeline: 2015 · \ I . 5-I6 ;\ .~ .... March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 16 of 21 Exhibit 2 Section 1 Contents Section 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Plan Description/Purpose of Plflll ................................................................. l 1.2 Plan Purpose. and Authority ..................................................................... , .... 2 1.3 Community Descdption ............................................................... ; ...... , ......... 3 1.3.1 The County of San Diego ............................................................ : .... 3 1.3 .2 . · Local Jurisdictions ............................... , ........................................... 6 Section 2 MultbJurisdictional Participation lnformation ................................... 2-1 2.1 List of Participating and Non-Paiticipating Jurisdictions ........................ 2-1 2.2 Description ofEa:ch Jurisdictioi1's Participation in the Planning Process 2;.1 Section 3 Planning Process Doc.umentation ............ , .....•..... ,. ........................... 3-1 3.1 Description of Planning Committee Formation ....................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Invitation to Participate ......... , ............... , ...................................... 3-1 3.2 Nanie of Planning Committee and its. Members ............... , ...................... 3-1 3.3 Hazard Mitigation Working Group Meetings ...................................•...... 3-3 3.4 PlanningProcessMilestones ............................................................... , •.•. 3-3 3.5 Public Inyolvement ..................................................................... , ............... 3-4 3.6 Existing Plans or Studies Reviewed .............................. '. .......................... 3-5 Section 4 Risk Assessment ................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Qvervkw of the Risk Assessment Process .............................................. 4-1 4.L1 Risk Assessment ........................ , ...... :· ..................... , ..................... ,. 4-1 4.1.2 Profiling (Describing) Hazai·ds .................................................... 4-2 4.1.3 Identifying Assets· ......................................................................... 4-2 4.1..4 Analyze Risk ........... , ................................................................... 4-2 . 4.1.5 Repetitive Loss ................................... , .................. · ..................... ,.~···· 4-3 4.1.6 Exposure Analysis .........•.........•.... ,0 ............................. 1 ................ 4-3 4.2 Hazard Identification and Screening ... , .................................................... 4-3 4.2.l ' List of Hazards Prevalentih the Jurisdictionr. ............................. 4-3 4._2.2 Hazard Identification Process, ..................................................... 4-4 4.2.3 Hazard Identification Sources ......................................................... 4~1 4.2.4 Non-Profiled Hazards .................. · ........•. · ........•.••.•.•.•..•.•.•....•.•...•........ 4-7 4.3 Hazard Profiles .......... , .............................................................. _. ............... , .. 4-8 4.3.1 Emerging Risk-Climate Change ................................................. 4-8 4.3 .2 Sea Level Rise, Coastal Stoims;faosfon and Tsunan1i... .... , .• , .. 4-11 4.3.3 Dam Failure .......................................... , .... \ ................................... 4-20 4.3.4 Eaitbquake ......... , .......... : ....... _., ... _ ... ,., . ., ................... , ... ,.: ................... 4-25 4.3.5 Flood .... · ...................................... , .................................... , .............. 4-31 4.3 .6 Rain-faduced Landslide ............................................................. 4-37 4.3.7 Liquefaction ..... '. ...... _ .. , .... ,., .... ,., .. , ... , .. a.;., •• , ••• , •• , .............. , ... , ........ 4-41 4.3.8 Structure/Wildfire Fire ........ , ................... , .. , .............................. 4~44 4.3 .9 Extreme l:I€;lat ............... -.........•............ , ............................................. 4-48 4.3.10 Drought/Water Supply ................. , .................. , ................... ,,., ... 4-51 March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 17 of 21 4.3.11 Manmade Hazards ...................................................................... 4-51 4.4 Vulnerability Assessment .............. ; ...................... , ......... , ........................ 4-57 4.4.1 Asset Inventory ...... , ................................................................. , .... 4-57 4.4.2 Estimating Potential Exposure and Losses, and Future Development Trends .............................................. , ..........•................................ 4-57 4.5 Multi-Jurisdictional Assessment .............................. , .. , ............................ 101 4;5.1 Analysis of Land Use ................................................................... 101 4.5.2 Analysis of Development Trends ...... ; ......................................... 101 Section 5 Goals, Objectives and·Actions ................. , ......................................... 5-1 5.1 Overview ................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Develop Mitigation Goals and Objectives ................................... 5-1 5 .1.2 Identify and Prioritize Mitigation Actions ................................... 5-1 5 .2 Regional Considerations· ............................................................................ 5-3 5.3 City of Carlsbad ............................... ; ....................................................... 5-5 5.3.1 Capabilities Assessment ............................................................ ,. 5-6 5 .3 .2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .................. 5-6 5,3.3 Fiscal Resources .......................................................................... 5-8 5.3.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions ..................................................... 5-9 5 .3 .5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items .... , .............. 5-14 5.4 City of Chula Vista .................................................................................. 5-17 5.4.1 Capabilities Assessment ............... ; .............................. , ............. 5-19 5.4.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances ................ 5-19 5.4.3 Fiscal Resources ........................................................................... 5-24 5.4A Goals, Objectives and Actions .......... , ........................................ 5-25 5.4.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ................... 5-35 5.5 City of Coronado ................................. , .......................... : ........................ 5-37 5.5.l Capabilities Assessment .......... : ....................... , ..........•............. , 5-38 5.5.2 Existinginstitutions,Plans, Policies and Ordinances ........... , .... 5-38 5 .5 .3 Fiscal Resources ...................................................... _ ................... 5-40 5 .5 .4 Goals, Objectives and Actions ................................................... 5-41 5.5.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ................... 5-46 5.6 City of Del Mar .................................................................................... , ... 5-49 5.6.1 Capabilities Assessment .............. , ............................................. 5-50 5.6.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances ................ 5-50 5.63 Fiscal Resources .................................... '.-; ..................................... 5-52 5.6.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions ................................................... 5-54 5.6,5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Ite:tns ............. -....... 5-60 5.7 City ofEl Cajon ..................... _ .............•........ , .... _.-........... , ............ , ............. 5-63 5.7.1 Capabilities Assessment ................................ , ........................... 5-64 5.7.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances ................ 5-64 5.7.3 Fiscal Resources ............................................................. , .......... 5-66 5.7.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions .............................. ;. ................... 5-67 5.7.5 Prioritization and Implementation cif Action Items,., .... , ............ 5-74 5.8 City of Encinitas ..................................................................................... 5-77 5.8.l Capabilities Assessment ...........•........... , ............. , ...................... 5-79 5.8.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies arid Oidinances ...... , ......... 5-79 5.8.3 Fiscal Resources, ........................................................................ -5-81 5.8.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions ................................................... 5-82 5.8.5 Prioritization and Iniplerilentation of Action Items ................... 5-97 ii March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 18 of 21 5.9 City of Escondido .. , .............................................................................. 5-101 5.9 .1 CapabHity Assessment ............................................................. 5-102 5.9 .2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-102 5.9.3 Fiscal Resources ................ , ....................................................... 5-105 5.9.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions, ................................................ 5-106 5 .9.5 Prioritization lill.d Implementation of Action Items ................. 5-114 5 .10 City of Imperial Beach ......................................................................... 5-116 5.10.1 Capabilities Assessment ................................ , ......................... 5-117 5.10.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-117 5.10.3 Fiscal Resources ....•...... , ............ , ............ , ................................ 5-120 5.10.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions, . ., .............................. , .............. 5-121 5 .10.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ................. 5-129 5.11 City of La Mesa ....... , ........... , ...... , ....................... , ................................... 5-131 5.11.1 Capabilities Assessment ............. : ............................................ 5-132 5.11.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-132 5.l 1.3 Fiscal Resources·:·············································· ........................ 5-134 5.11.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions ......................... , ....................... 5-135 5 .11.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ................. 5-142 5.12 City of Lemon Grove ......................................... , ... , ................................ 5-145 5.12.1 Capabilities Assessment .......................................................... 5-146 5.12.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-146 5.12.3 Fiscal Resources .................. , .................................................... 5-149 5.12.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions ....•.................. , ..................•...... 5-150 5 .12.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ................. 5-157 5.13 City of National City .. , ............ ,.: ............................................... , .......... 5-159 5.13.1 Capabilities Assessment .............•.. ; ......................................... 5-160 5.13.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-160 5.13.3 Fiscal Resources, ............................................ · ............ , ............. 5-162 5 .B .4 Goals, Objectives :and Actions ................................................. 5-163 5 .13 .5 Prioritization atid Implementation of Action Items ................. 5-170 5.14 City of Oceanside ........................... , .• ; ....... , .....................•....... , .................. 5-173 5.14.1 Capabilities Ass.essment.. ........................................................ , 5-174 5.14.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-174 5.14.3 Fiscal Resoutces.,:., ...... ,., .•...........•..•...........•................................. 5-177 5.14.4 Goals; Objectives lilld Actions ................................................. 5-178 5 .14.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ... · .............. 5-184 5.15 City of Poway .• , ....• , ................................................................................. 5-187 5;15.1 Capabilities Assessment ... , ...... ,.., ............................................ 5-188 5 .15 .2 Existing Institutions, Plans, .Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-18 8 5.15.3 Fis cal Resources .......... , ............................................................. 5-191 5.15.4 Goal~, Objectives ::ind Actions ................ , ................................. 5-191 5.15.5 Prioritization andlmplementation of Action Items ................. 5-195 5.16 City of San Diego ................................................................................. 5-197 5.16,1 Capabilities Assessment .•... ,., .... , .•.... , ..... ,,., .............................. 5-198 5 .16.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances ...... , ....... 5-19 8 5.16.3 Fiscal Resources .. , .......................... , .... , ....... ,., ................................. 5-:206 5.16.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions ......... , ..... , ................................. 5-207 5.16,5 Prioriti:tation and Implementation of Action Items ................. 5-211 5.17 City of San Marcos ........ , ........................ , ................ , .. , ..... : ... ,., ....................... 5-217 5.17.1 Capabilities Assessment .......................................................... 5-218 5.17.2 Existing Institutions, Plans; Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-218 iii March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 19 of 21 5.17.3 Fiscal.Reso.urces ...................................................................... 5-222 5.17.4 Goals, ObjectivesandActions ................................................. 5-223 5 .17.5 Prioritizatio11 and Impleml:liitation of Action Items ................. 5-23 2 5.18 CityofSantee ............................ · ........ .-................... · ................................... 235 5.18.1 Capabilities Assessment .............................................................. 236 5.18.2 Existingfustitutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .................. 236 5.18 . .3 Fiscal Resources .... -................... , .......................................... , ......... 239 5.18.4 Goals, Objectives and Acnons ... ., ......................................... , ...... 240 5.18.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ..................... 250 5-.19· City of Solana.Beach.-................. , ... _ .............................................................. 255 5.19.1 Capabilities Assessment ................................................ , .............. 256 5.19.2 Existinginstitutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances ....... , .......... 256 5.19.3 Fiscl!l Resources ., ..................... .-................................... , ............... 258 5 .19.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions ..................................................... 259 5 .19 .5 Prioritization and Implemerttatio11 of Action Items .. , .................. 265 5.20 City of Vista .. , ......................................... -.............................................. 5-,269 5 ,20 .1 Capabilities Assessment ..... , ..................................................... 5-2 70 5.20.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances, ............. 5-270 5.20.3 Fiscal Resources ......... "'··"·"······ ........................ _ ........... : ........... 5-273 5.20.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions ................................................. 5-274 5.20.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ................. 5-280 - 5.21 County of San Diego ...... -................. .-..................................................... 5-:283 5.21.1 Capabilities Assessment .................................... , ..................... 5-285 5.21.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-285 5.21.3 Fiscal Resources ......... .-.............................................................. 5-290 5.21.4 Goals, Objectives andActions; ................................................ 5-291 5.21.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ................. 5-302 5.22 Alpine Fire Protection District ............... , ................................................. 306 5 .22.1 Capabilities Assessment ............................................................. .3 07 5.22.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .................. 307 5 .22.3 Fiscal Resources ........................................................................... 312 5.22.4 Goals, Objectives and Actions .......................... : .......................... 313 5.22.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items .......... '. ......... 315 5 .23 Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District ............................................. 5"-317 5.23.1 Capabilities Assessment ........ , ...................... , .......................... 5-319 5.23.2 Existing Institutions~ Plans, Policies and Ordinances ....... · ....... 5-319 5.23.3 Fiscal Resources , ..................................................... : ....... ,.1 ..... 5-324 5.23.4 Go.als, Objectives and Actions ........... , ... , .................... .-............ 5-325 5.23.5 Prioritization ~ndimplementation of Action Items .............. , .. 5-331 5.24 Padre Dam Municipal Water District ...... , ............................................ 5--317 5.24.1 Capabilities Assessment ...................................................... ,.,. 5-336 5.24.2 Existing Institutions, Plans, Policies and Ordinances .............. 5-336 5.243 Fiscal Resources ..... ; .............. ; .................................................... 5-339 5.24.4 Goals, Obj~ctives and Actions ... , ............................................. 5-340 5.24.5 Prioritization and Implementation of Action Items ....... , ......... 5-345 Section 6 Plan Maintenance ...................................................................... _. ......... 7;.1 6.1 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan ........................................ 7-1 6.1.1 Plan Monitoring ....... -, ................ .-..... -. .-............................................. 7-1 6.1.2 Plan Evaluation .. ,, .. -...... .-., .... .-., ..................... , ................................. 7-1 iv March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 20 of 21 6.1.3 Plan Updates .................................................................................. 7-1 6.L4 Implementation ThroughExistingPrograms ............... , .............. 7-2 6.L5 Continued Public Involvement.. .................. , ...................... , ........ 7-2 Section 7 References ................................................................... .' ........................ 8-5 V March 13, 2018 Item #5 Page 21 of 21