HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-01-08; City Council; ; Consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a Minor Review Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow 2,323 square feet of new additions to anCA Review ~
~ CITY COUNCIL
~ Staff Report
Meeting Date:
To:
From:
Staff Contact:
Subject:
Project Name:
Project No.:
January 8, 2019
Mayor and City Council
Scott Chadwick, City Manager
Paul Dan, Associate Planner
paul.dan@carlsbadca.gov or 760-602-4614
Consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a
Minor Review Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow 2,323
square feet of new additions to an existing 573-square-foot commercial
building, and allow the operation of a hot glass blowing use located at
3060 Roosevelt Street.
Barrio Glassworks
RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 {DEV2018-0023)
Recommended Action
That the City Council hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution denying the appeal and
upholding the Planning Commission's decision to approve RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014.
Executive Summary
On September 5, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding a Minor
Review Permit and Coastal Development Permit for applicant Barrio Glassworks. The permits
would allow the construction of 2,323 square feet of new additions to an existing 573-square-
foot building, demolition of a kiosk less than 100 square feet, and operation of a hot glass
blowing use within District 1 of the Village Master Plan and Design Manual. The Planning
Commission voted to approve the project 5-0-1 (Chairman Montgomery Absent). An appeal of
the Planning Comm ission's decision was submitted on September 14, 2018, by Cameron
Wetzler.
Discussion
Project Background and Description
Located at 3060 Roosevelt Street, this 0.56-acre site is currently developed with two detached
structures: a 573-square-foot commercial building, and a kiosk that is less than 100 square feet.
The northern half of the lot is located with the Village Segment of the Local Coastal Program,
thus requiring a Coastal Development Permit. Consequently, the project is reviewed in
accordance with the Village Master Plan and Design Manual, not the Village & Barrio Master
Plan since it is still under review by the California Coastal Commission.
The commercial uses that were in operation at 3060 Roosevelt Street at the time of the
Planning Commission hearing were a vape shop (e.g. electronic cigarettes) in the 573-square-
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 1 of 44
foot building, and a skate shop within the smaller kiosk. Presently, neither use is operating
onsite and the buildings are vacant.
The proposed project is to allow the construction of 2,323 square feet of new additions to the
573-square-foot building, demolition of the kiosk, and the operation of a hot glass blowing use.
The intended business operations of the hot glass blowing shop, or Barrio Glassworks, is to
create and sell ornate glass pieces within the community and occasionally teach courses to
patrons. The size of the shop and on site equipment will not pose a significant impact on the
community when operating.
Planning Commission Hearing
The Planning Commission considered the Barrio Glassworks project on September 5, 2018.
After staff's presentation but prior to public comment, the Commission asked the Assistant City
Attorney Ron Kemp a clarifying question as to the Commission's standard of review for
evaluating the project. Mr. Kemp responded that the Commission can only base the decision on
whether the proposed project meets the standards of the Village Master Plan and Design
Manual and that the Commission does not have the purview to make a decision based on civil
issues between the property owner and the tenants. Of the 33 speakers during public
comment, three people spoke in support, and 29 spoke in opposition to the project. The issues
raised by the speakers in opposition to the project were overwhelmingly based on preserving
the kiosk and allowing the skate shop to remain in operation. Again, approval of the project
would demo the kiosk and ultimately remove the vape and skate shop from the site. Concerns
were also raised regarding the emissions a glass blowing operation would produce. Staff
addressed these concerns by stating this type of use is exempt per San Diego's Air Pollution
Control District (APCD) Rules & Regulations 11 subsection (d) which lists equipment, operations,
or processes not requiring a permit to operate.
Ultimately, the Planning Commission voted to approve the project 5-0-1 with Vice Chairperson
Anderson, and Commissioners Geidner, Luna, Meenes, and Segal voting yes, and Chairperson
Montgomery absent. An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision was submitted on
September 14, 2018, by Cameron Wetzler.
Standard of Review for Appeals
Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) Section 21.54.150 outlines procedures for appeals of Planning
Commission decisions, and states
Grounds for appeal shall be limited to the following: that there was an error or abuse of
discretion on the part of the planning commission in that the decision was not supported
by the facts presented to the planning commission prior to the decision being appealed;
or that there was not a fair and impartial hearing.
Section 21.54.150 goes on to state that the City Council's consideration is "de novo" (or "like
new") but limits the consideration to "only the evidence presented to the Planning Commission
for consideration in the determination or decision being appealed." Thus, no new information
may be considered by the City Council that was not presented to the Planning Commission. The
City Council may uphold, modify or overturn the Planning Commission's decision.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 2 of 44
Project Appeal and Response
The appellant is basing their appeal on two reasons. The first reason states "public safety was
overlooked and not properly investigated" at the time of approval because "there is no
mention of an exhaust or the many harmful chemicals that will be release into the air & water
of our direct community, short term/long term effects." The project was reviewed by Building
and Safety and Fire Prevention and complies with the applicable codes and regulations. The
applicant proposes to use an electric kiln that will not have an exhaust. In addition, as disclosed
to the Planning Commission, such an operation is exempt per San Diego APCD Rules and
Regulations. The project brought before the Commission is the proposed development and
operation within the Village and whether it meets the standards of the Village Master Plan and
Design Manual. The specifics of the chemicals used when in operation will be reexamined by
Building and Safety and Fire Prevention when construction permits are submitted -if the
appeal is denied. The Building and Safety and Fire Prevention Divisions regulate and mandate
best practices of certain uses that exceed their code's thresholds of hazardous material and/or
waste.
The second reason for the appeal is that the project would not be "enhancing the vitality of the
Village, but taking it away with the demolition of Elm Street Boardshop, its uplifting art and
community involvement." The project will enhance the vitality of the Village by updating an
older commercial building with a modern yet eclectic design that would be unique to the area,
as well as improving the site's hardscape and landscape. The investment in the property
aesthetically enhances the lot, and also provides a unique service to local residents that will
draw customers from throughout the city.
Staff recommended approval of the project and concurs with Planning Commission's decision
on September 5, 2018 to approve the required permits. The project, Barrio Glassworks, meets
the development standards of the Village Master Plan and Design Manual and will not produce
any significant impacts to the public's health, safety and/or welfare. Therefore, staff
recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision and deny the
appeal.
Fiscal Analysis
If approved, all required improvements to serve this project will be funded and/or constructed
by the developer.
Next Steps
City Council's action on this item is final.
Environmental Evaluation (CEQA)
The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction of Small
Structures) of the State CEQA Guidelines Class 3 Categorical Exemption. The 2,323-square-foot
addition to the exiting 573-square-foot building is below the screening threshold of 900
MTCO2e, and is therefore not subject to the Climate Action Plan.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 3 of 44
Public Notification
Information regarding public notification of this item such as mailings, public hearing notices
posted in the newspaper and on the city website are available in the Office of the City Clerk.
Exh ibits
1. City Council Resolution
2. Location Map
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7309
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 5, 2018
5. Planning Commission minutes dated September 5, 2018
6. Appeal Letter dated September 14, 2018
7. Letters from project applicant
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 4 of 44
RESOLUTION NO. 2019-002
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A MINOR REVIEW PERMIT AND
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW 2,323 SQUARE FEET OF NEW
ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING 573-SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING,
AND ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A HOT GLASS BLOWING USE LOCATED AT
3060 ROOSEVELT STREET IN LAND USE DISTRICT 1 OF THE VILLAGE MASTER
PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL, THE VILLAGE SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL
COASTAL PROGRAM, AND WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
1.
CASE NAME: BARRIO GLASSWORKS
CASE NO.: RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 (DEV 2018-0023)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has determined that pursuant to
the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on September 5, 2018, hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider Minor Review Permit RP 2018-0004 and Coastal
Development Permit CDP 2018-0014, as referenced in Planning Commission Resolution No. 7309
approving the project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 5-0-1 (Anderson, Geidner, Luna, Meenes, and Segal
voting yes, and Montgomery absent); and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2018, the appellant Cameron Wetzler timely filed an appeal with
the city as provided pursuant to Chapter 21.54 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad held a duly noticed public hearing to consider
the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve said Minor Review Permit and Coastal
Development Permit; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if
any, of the persons desiring to be heard, said City Council considered all factors relating to the appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision is denied, that all matters not
specified in the appeal have been supported by substantial evidence with findings and
approved by the Planning Commission, and that the findings and conditions contained
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 5 of 44
in Planning Commission Resolution No. 7309 on file in the City Clerk's office and
incorporated herein by reference are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
3. That this action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The
provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial
Review" shall apply:
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by
Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by
Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the
appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes
final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record is filed with
a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time
within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following
the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of
record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be
filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA, 92008.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 8th day of January, 2019, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
K. Blackburn, P. Bhat-Patel, C. Schumacher, B. Hamilton
None.
M. Hall.
Cb~mar!~
~RBARA ENGLESON, City Clerk
{SEAL) ,,,,'~SBAd'',,, ,, ,..~ ........ C ,, ~c,iif~ ilJ.../ . _\_',-~ =O: . • ~-;:: =>-: . ' -:~= ;\;;:\ , /~~ -:.,v ··•... . .. /.$;-~ ,., ······· ...... .,,, ' * , ,, ... l,,,: ! l ! : t t '· ... '·
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 6 of 44
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7309
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR REVIEW PERMIT AND
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW 2,323 SQUARE FEET OF
NEW ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING 573-SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL
BUILDING. THE EXISTING USE WOULD BE CONVERTED TO A HOT GLASS
BLOWING OPERATION LOCATED AT 3060 ROOSEVELT STREET IN LAND
USE DISTRICT 1 OF THE VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL,
THE VILLAGE SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COSTAL PROGRAM, AND WITHIN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: BARRIO GLASSWORKS
CASE NO: RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 (DEV2018-0023l
Exhibit 3
WHEREAS, Mary Devlin, "Applicant," has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad
regarding property owned by Marguerite Montabano, "Owner," described as
Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 2420, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State
of California, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, March
8, 1974 as file no. 74-058989 of official records.
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal Development Permit as
shown on Exhibit(s) "A" -"D" dated September 5, 2018, attached hereto and on file in the Carlsbad
Planning Division, RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 -BARRIO GLASSWORKS, as provided in Chapter
21.201.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on September 5, 2018, hold a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if
any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Coastal
Development Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad,
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES
of RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014-BARRIO GLASSWORKS, based on the following findings and subject to
the following conditions:
Findings:
Minor Review Permit, RP 2018-0004
1. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with
the Elements of the city's General Plan, and the development standards of the Village Review
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 8 of 44
RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 (DEV2018-0023) -BARRIO GLASSWORKS
September 5, 2018
Pa e 2
Ill. ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following ordinances, standards, and policies:
A. Village (V) General Plan Land Use Designation;
B. Village Review (VR) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35), Land Use District 1, Carlsbad Village Center (Village
Master Plan and Design Manual);
C. Coastal Development Regulations for the Village Segment of the Local Coastal Program (CMC
Chapter 21.81 and Village Master Plan and Design Manual);
D. Growth Management Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.90), Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1.
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency
with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations
and policies is discussed in the sections below.
A. Village (V) General Plan Land Use Designation
The General Plan Land Use designation for the property is Village (V). The following Table 2 identifies
General Plan goals and policies relevant to the proposed project and describes how the project is in
compliance with those goals and policies.
TABLE 2 -GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
Element Goal/Policy Compliance with Goal/Policy
Land Use Goal 2-G.29:
Maintain the Village as a center for residents The proposal to construct 2,323 square
and visitors with commercial, residential, feet of additions to an existing 573
dining, civic, cultural, and entertainment square foot existing commercial building
activities. will enhance the vitality of the Village by
providing a unique service to local
Goal 2-G.30: residents and draw customers from
Develop a distinct identity for the Village by throughout the city, generating revenue
encouraging a variety of uses and activities, and jobs, and an entertainment use that
such as a mix of residential, commercial is characteristic to the downtown core
office, restaurants and specialty retail shops, area. The project will complement the
which traditionally locate in a pedestrian-existing uses within the Village by
oriented downtown area and attract visitors providing an additional commercial use
and residents from across the community by that is distinct from surrounding uses.
creating a lively, interesting social This project also reinforces the
environment. pedestrian orientation desired for the
downtown area by providing a use that is
Policy 2-P.70: within close proximity to residences and
Seek an increased presence of both mixed uses. The project's proximity to
residents and activity in the Village with new existing bus routes and mass transit will
development, particularly residential, help to further the goal of providing new
including residential as part of a mixed-use economic development near
development, as well as commercial, transportation corridors.
entertainment and cultural uses that serve
both residents and visitors. Overall, the commercial project will
contribute to the revitalization of the
Village area.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 16 of 44
RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 (DEV2018-0023) -BARRIO GLASSWORKS
September 5, 2018
Pa e 3
Mobility Goal 3-G.2:
Improve connectivity for residents, visitors The proposed project has been designed
and businesses. to meet all of the circulation
requirements, which includes vehicular
access off Roosevelt Street.
The proposed project is located
approximately a quarter of a mile from
the train/coaster station which provides
service throughout the day.
Furthermore, the project supports
walkability and mobility by locating the
project near existing goods and services
within the Village.
In addition, the project site provides
adequate pedestrian connectivity by an
existing sidewalk along Roosevelt Street.
Public Policy 6-P.6
Safety Enforce the requirements of Titles 18, 20, The proposed building is designed to be
and 21 pertaining to drainage and flood in conformance with drainage, flood
control when reviewing applications for control and seismic design standards. In
building permits and subdivisions. addition, adequate fire access is provided
at all points around the building.
Policy 6-P.34
Enforce the Uniform Building and Fire codes, To help promote public safety, specific
adopted by the city, to provide fire building elements will be added to the
protection standards for all existing and structure including lighting, transparent
proposed structures. entry doors, addressing, and security-
locked entry/exit doors.
Policy 6-P.30
Encourage physical planning and community
design practices that deter crime and
promote safety.
B. Village Review (VR) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35), Land Use District 1, Carlsbad Village Center (Village
Master Plan and Design Manual)
The subject property is located within Land Use District 1, Carlsbad Village Center, of the Village Master
Plan. Hot glass operations are a provisional use permitted in Land Use District 1. The specific development
standards for new development within Land Use District 1 and the project's compliance with these
standards is shown in Table 3 below. No variances or standards modifications are requested for the
project. Therefore, the project complies with the guidelines specific to District 1 and the Coastal Zone.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 17 of 44
RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 (DEV2018-0023) -BARRIO GLASSWORKS
September 5, 2018
Pa e4
TABLE 3 -COMPLIANCE WITH VILLAGE MASTER PLAN, LAND USE DISTRICT 1
STANDARD REQUIRED/ ALLOWED PROPOSED
Front Yard For non-residential projects, there 9 feet 6 inches
Setback shall be no minimum or maximum
setback for the first at grade floor.
Side Yard No minimum or maximum 40 feet
Setback requirement
Rear Yard No minimum or maximum 25 feet
Setback requirement
Building 45 feet 16 feet 2 inches
Height
Building 100% 12%
Coverage
Roof Pitch 50% of the total roof structure must At least 50% of the roof structure has a
have a 5:12 roof pitch 5:12 roof pitch
Open Space 20% (4,878 sq. ft.) 20%of
landscape planters and outdoor seating
Total-4,878 sq. ft.*
Parking One space per 300 square feet of net 14 parking spaces are provided onsite.
floor space (2,896/300 = 10 spaces)
COMPLY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
*Project is conditioned to meet the 20% open space requirement prior to approval of building permit.
C. Coastal Development Regulations for the Village Segment of the Local Coastal Program (CMC
Chapter 21.81 and Village Master Plan and Design Manual)
The site for the proposed project is located within the Village Segment of the Coastal Zone. Consistency
with the Local Coastal Program is required for this project. The Village Master Plan and Design Manual
functions as the Local Coastal Program for the Village area. Therefore, as long as the project is consistent
with the Village Master Plan and Design Manual, the project is consistent with the Local Coastal Program.
Staff finds the proposed project, as discussed in the prior section, to be consistent with the Village Master
Plan and Design Manual and, therefore, the Local Coastal Program.
D. Growth Management Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.90), Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the Northwest Quadrant of
the city. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted
performance standards, are summarized in Table 4 below.
TABLE 4-GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE
City Administration N/A Yes
Library N/A Yes
Waste Water Treatment 0.7 EDUs Yes
Parks N/A Yes
Drainage Basin A Yes
Circulation S0ADT Yes
Fire Station 1 Yes
Open Space N/A N/A
Schools N/A Yes
Sewer Collection System 120 GPD Yes
Water 290 GPD Yes
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 18 of 44
RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 {DEV2018-0023) -BARRIO GLASSWORKS
September 5, 2018
Pa e 5
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 {New Construction of Small Structures of the
State CEQA Guidelines Class 3 Categorical Exemption. The project is consistent with the Village Master
Plan as well as the General Plan, the project site is within the city limits, and is surrounded by urban uses;
there is no evidence that the site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species;
approval of the project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water
quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project is
exempt from further environmental documentation pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA
Guidelines. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the City Planner upon final project approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7309
2. Location Map
3. Disclosure Statement
4. Reduced Exhibits
5. Full Size Exhibits "A" -"D" dated September 5, 2018
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 19 of 44
Planning Commission Minutes -Amended September 5, 2018 Page2
Structures of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on
the environment.
City Planner Neu introduced Agenda Item 1 and stated Associate Planner Dan would make the
staff presentation.
Associate Planner Dan made the presentation and stated he would be available to answer any
questions.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if any members of the Commission have any ex pa rte communications
to disclose for this item.
DISCLOSURES:
Commissioner Segall disclosed that he drove by the site.
Commissioner Meenes disclosed that he drove by the site.
Commissioner Luna disclosed that she drove by and walked around the site.
Commissioner Geidner disclosed that she drove and walked around the site.
Commissioner Anderson disclosed that she drove by the site.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if there were additional questions of staff. Seeing none, she asked if
the applicant would like to make a presentation.
Mary Devlin, the applicant, made the presentation and stated she would be available to answer
questions.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if there were questions for the applicant.
Commissioner Geidner asked the applicant several clarifying questions. Will the roof structure
and the solar panels be at the same angle so the panels are mounted parallel to the roof? She
also asked if there will be exhaust or fumes?
Ms. Devlin stated the solar panels will be parallel to the roof. She addressed the question on
fumes. She stated that they are not manufacturing. They do have a furnace that is electric. The
manufacturer of the equipment has assured her there is no exhaust or combustion. There are
safety features included with shut off values if there are temperature variations.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if there were additional questions for the applicant. Seeing none, she
asked if there were any members of the public who wished to speak on the project and opened
public testimony.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 27 of 44
Planning Commission Minutes -Amended September 5, 2018 Page3
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Elizabeth Birnbaum, a Leucadia resident, stated that she is in support of the project and staff's
recommendation to approve the project. She thinks this project will complement and enhance
the City of Carlsbad.
Sean Dominquez, a resident, stated he is opposed to the project. He stated he helped set up the
skateboard shop. He asked Commission to consider if this business is viable and is concerned
about the exhaust impacts. He would like to see the small skateboard shop remain at this
location.
Cameron Wetzler, a resident, stated that he is the owner of the world's smallest skateboard shop,
Elm Street Board Shop with murals, which will be torn down if this proposal passes. He had the
opportunity to take a vacant building five months ago and turned it into the current shop. He is
opposed to the glassblowing shop, because he thinks it emits dangerous chemicals into our
atmosphere in a residential and restaurant area.
Chelsea Cullinan, a resident, stated she is opposed to the project and supports the skateboard
shop.
Alex Whittingham, a resident, stated he is opposed to the project and supports the skateboard
shop.
Jace Mullen, a resident, stated he is opposed to the project and supports the skateboard shop.
He stated his concern of a collapse of the business on the current site.
Cole Keller, a resident, stated he is opposed to the project and supports the skateboard shop. He
stated his concern of health risk of the glass facility.
Alex Pickard, an Oceanside resident, stated he is opposed to the project and supports the
skateboard shop.
Judy Devlin, an Encinitas resident, stated she is in support of the project and supports the
skateboard shop.
Mary Birnbaum, a Vista resident, stated she is in support of the project and supports the
skateboard shop.
Maria Hrisanthoponles, a resident, stated she is opposed to the project. She likes having the
skateboard shop in the village. She stated that the other two skateboard parks are located at
Alga Norte Community Park and on Faraday Avenue and is hard for them to get there.
Stephanie Wohlfiel, a resident and a business owner, stated she is opposed to this project. She
would like to see a skate park in the village.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 28 of 44
Planning Commission Minutes -Amended September 5, 2018 Page4
Vice Chair Anderson stated that this is all the speaker slips that were submitted to the Minutes
Clerk, and asked if any person in the audience wished to speak on the project that did not fill out
a speaker slip.
The following additional speakers spoke who were opposed to the item:
Samantha Parker, an Oceanside resident.
Jake Genewich, a resident in 8th grade.
Cameron Wexler's mother (name not stated).
Huckleberry Garcia, a resident and a high school student.
Bertha Sterling, a resident.
Priscilla Lopez, a Carlsbad resident and business owner.
Oscar Aparicio, a resident.
Steve (inaudible), a Vista resident.
Ian Levy, a resident.
Adam Bright, an Oceanside resident.
Josh (inaudible), a resident.
Jack Packard, a resident.
Brock (inaudible), a resident.
Brian Rodriguez, a resident and middle school student.
Amanda (inaudible), an Oceanside resident.
Astrid Denija, a non-resident (City not stated).
Marco (inaudible) a resident.
Blake Vogel, an Oceanside resident.
Joshua (last name not stated), a former resident.
Julie Adjour, a resident stated she is opposed to the project and supports the skateboard shop
because it does not cause a parking problem.
Vice Chair Anderson closed public testimony and asked if the applicant would like to respond.
Mary Devlin addressed the parking concern and stated it will not be a problem with her business
either. There is plenty of parking there. She stated that the building is not 26 feet it is 16 feet.
The building is not two stories. She stated that she thinks this business fits within the Village
Barrio Master Plan and has worked with the city planners. She stated that her business does
have the resources to keep it around for the next 5 years and has a long-term plan.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if staff would like to respond .
Assistant City Attorney Kemp stated that he does not see a legal issue to comment on at the
moment. He stated that the Commission has an application before them that they need to take
an action on.
Commissioner Meenes asked the Assistant City Attorney to provide some clarity and some
background regarding the city's responsibility and the commission's responsibility in reviewing
this application.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 29 of 44
Planning Commission Minutes -Amended September 5, 2018 Page 5
Assistant City Attorney Kemp stated that it is not the purview of the commission to weigh the
merits of one business versus another. It would be a private decision for the land owner to decide
what business he wants there as long as the application before you fits into the master plan which
staff is recommending that it does. He stated that the city has an Economic Development
Department that does help businesses in the city to find locations and depending on the
Commission's decision would be able to assist the skateboard shop on relocating. He stated that
the issue of emissions and that the decision the Commission makes has to be based on findings
of fact and you need to have evidence that a business proposed would not be a polluting
business.
Commissioner Geidner stated she had the same question on emissions and what research staff
had done.
Associate Planner Dan stated he contacted an engineer at the San Diego District Air Quality
Control District (AQCD) and explained the proposed project and the square footage of the
building and how many glass blowers typically are going to be operating in the structure. The
conclusion from the engineer was that it does not exceed any of the thresholds that AQCD
currently has. He stated that the engineer guided him to their Title 11 under exemptions and
Section D that glassblowing and an electrical furnace is exempt from AQCD permits. He stated
that he also reached out to another glassblowing private business that is currently in operation
in San Marcos and asked them if they had any permits that were required to be in operation and
they said no.
Commissioner Segall inquired if staff had any findings on the chemicals or paints used at this
glassblowing shop would generate any pollutants.
Associate Planner Dan stated that he did not get into the specifics of chemicals or paints. It was
more on dealing with the particulate matter and whether it exceeded 2.5 and it did not.
Commissioner Segal asked if the Carlsbad Fire Department reviewed this from a safety
standpoint.
Associate Planner Dan stated that yes, the Carlsbad Fire Department had reviewed this project
and did not provide any specific comments.
Vice Chair Anderson asked Ms. Devlin if some part of your process involves gas. Is that natural
gas that you're burning? When you are reheating the glass?
Ms. Devlin stated that when you are reheating the glass it goes into a gloryhole which is gas
operated.
Commissioner Segall asked if there are any need for exhaust systems.
Ms. Devlin stated that the two-major pieces of equipment include the furnace which is electric
and the gloryholes which are gas and does not require an exhaust plus the design of the hot shop
is such that the windows will all be open. It has a roll up door. There will be ventilation for how
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 30 of 44
Planning Commission Minutes -Amended September 5, 2018 Page6
hot it gets inside. She stated that she has worked in a number of hot shops and there are no
chemicals and no one is wearing masks.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION:
Vice Chair Anderson opened the Commission discussion.
Commissioner Geidner stated that it is not the Commissioners job to decide one business over
another. She would like to see a creative solution for both businesses to go forward. She stated
the reality is the property owner makes the decision between which tenant to rent to.
Commissioner Segall concurs with Commissioner Geidner that it is a landowner issue between
the people who own the property and what they want to do with that property. He stated that
the Commission can only decide if the proposed business meets the standards of Carlsbad. He
stated that the research that staff has done does meet that. He would like to see the skateboard
shop relocated and it sounds like it has been great for the community. He stated that he supports
this project but would also like to see opportunities for young people. He thanked Mr. Wetzler
for bringing this community together.
Commissioner Anderson thanked Mr. Wetzler for his entrepreneurial business spirit. She stated
that the Commission cannot take away property owners rights who are asking to do something
else with the property.
MOTION:
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Segall and duly seconded by Commissioner Luna to Adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 7309 APPROVING a Minor Review Permit
(RP 2018-0004) and a Coastal Development Permit (CDP 2018-0014) and Errata Sheet
dated 9-5-18, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
VOTE: 5-0-1
AYES: Vice Chair Anderson, Commissioners Geidner, Luna, Meenes, and Segal
NOES: None
ABSENT: Chair Montgomery
Vice Chair Anderson closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 1.
RECESS
Vice Chair Anderson called for a 5-minute recess at 7:25 p.m.
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Vice Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. with all Commission present.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 31 of 44
Planning Commission Minutes -Amended September 5, 2018 Page?
Vice Chair Anderson opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 2.
2. CT 2018-0003 (DEV2018-0010) -MAGNOLIA-BRADY -Request for approval of a
Tentative Tract Map for the grading and subdivision of a 2.0-acre property at 1534
Magnolia Avenue into seven single-family lots and one detention basin lot within Local
Facilities Management Zone 1. The City Planner has determined that this project is
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Section 15332 "In-Fill Development Projects" of the State CEQA Guidelines
and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment.
City Planner Neu introduced Agenda Item 2 and stated that Associate Planner Harker would make
the staff presentation.
Associate Planner Harker gave a brief presentation and stated she would be available for any
questions.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if any members of the Commission have any ex pa rte communications
to disclose for this item.
DISCLOSURES:
Commissioner Segall stated that he drove by the site.
Commissioner Meenes stated that he drove by the site.
Commissioner Luna stated that she drove by the site.
Commissioner Geidner stated that she drove by the site.
Commissioner Anderson stated that she drove by the site.
Commissioner Meenes asked about the fencing if it would be constructed prior to the
construction of the dwellings on the lot.
Associate Planner Harker stated that according to the applicant it would be constructed as part
of the landscaping that is installed and concurrently with the development of the homes.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if there were additional questions of staff. Seeing none, she asked if
the applicant would like to make a presentation.
Bob Ladwig, Ladwig Design Group, made the presentation and stated he would be available to
answer questions.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if there were questions for the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if
there were any members of the public who wished to speak on the project. She opened public
testimony.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 32 of 44
Planning Commission Minutes -Amended September 5, 2018 Page 8
Chris Swindull, a resident stated he is in support of the project but had some concerns and hoped
to work with the applicant. He stated he was concerned about the dust from the construction,
gopher infestation, and nails from the construction and getting flat tires.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if the applicant would like to address the questions addressed by the
public.
Bob Ladwig stated he would like to know about any issues and gave his business card to the public
speaker.
Commissioner Segall asked about the gophers and how to mitigate them.
Bob Ladwig stated that there are a lot of gophers on the property and he would ask his landscaper
about this issue.
Commissioner Meenes asked what the applicant's plans are for the construction of the homes.
Bob Ladwig stated he did not want to spend a lot of time on the design before the approval. He
has done some preliminary work on the architecture.
Vice Chair Anderson asked staff to address the issues the speaker brought up on dust, gophers,
and nails.
Associate Planner Harker stated that there are construction measures in place that a developer
needs to use water to control the dust during construction. She stated she is not a gopher
relocation expert.
Vice Chair Anderson asked if there were any additional questions for the applicant or staff. Seeing
none she closed Commission discussion. She asked if there were any Commission comments.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commissioner Segall stated that he supports the project.
MOTION:
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Segall and duly seconded by Commissioner Meenes to
Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 7308 APPROVING Tentative Tract Map
(CT 2018-0003) with Errata Sheet dated 9-5-18, based upon the findings and subject
to the conditions contained therein.
VOTE: 5-0-1
AYES: Vice Chair Anderson, Commissioners Geidner, Luna, Meenes, and Segall
NOES: None
ABSENT: Chair Montgomery
Vice Chair Anderson closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 2.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 33 of 44
Planning Commission Minutes -Amended September 5, 2018 Page 9
CITY PLANNER COMMENTS: City Planner Neu reminded the Commission of the Boards &
Commission appreciation event held on September 6, 2018. He also reminded the Commission
that there will not be a Planning Commission meeting held on September 19, 2018 and the next
meeting will be held on October 3, 2018. He stated the Planning Commission workshop will be
held on October 5, 2018.
CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS: None.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of September 5, 2018, was adjourned at 7:50
p.m.
'LLrt
City Planner
Michele Hardy-Minutes Clerk
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 34 of 44
My name is Michael Hernandez. I am currently a Professor and Head of the
Glass Program at Palomar College. Over the past 15 years, I have designed,
built, and maintained glass facilities for public institutions and private enterprises,
including the Glass Program at Ball State University (IN) and the Museum of
Glass in Tacoma, WA. I have a great deal of experience of glass facility
processes, equipment, materials, safety systems, etc.
Over the past 18 months, I have been a consultant on the glass studio design of
Barrio Glassworks. I would like to address some of the public safety issues that
have been brought to your attention. As you can imagine, in glass studios,
whether for private business or public institutions safety is always the first priority
when designing and maintaining a facility.
A concern was stated from the community on some toxic compounds of glass
composition. Glass is comprised of a range of heavy metals and other potentially
harmful compounds. However, all of these compounds are added to the glass
prior to the initial melting stage and have no reasonable means for leaching,
burning/gassing out, or otherwise becoming airborne outside of the factory where
these glasses are manufactured. Because Barrio Glassworks will only be using
pre-melted glass, this is simply not a concern.
A recent environmental issue in operation at Bullseye, a manufacturer of glass
located in Portland, OR, was mentioned by a community member in opposition to
Barrio Glassworks as a factor of public safety. This was based on inadequate
scrubbing/exhaust equipment from manufacturing glass from raw materials. This
issue was corrected and their product, much like the glasses that Barrio
Glassworks will use, and, as previously described, has no reasonable means to
become harmful to the environment or Carlsbad community.
As per manufacturer equipment specs, no air purification or filtration systems are
needed. However, specs do call for fresh air to circulate through the work space
3-4 times per hour. A mechanical engineer will design the specific
extraction/exhaust system to accomplish this. These minimums specs will be
exceeded by use of the extraction system (exhaust fan), ceiling and roof exhaust
vents, large number of windows and cross ventilation. Nothing discharged into
the air is harmful, therefore there is no concern to the neighbors, community,
environment.
Electric furnace and annealing ovens use electric heating elements, and
therefore, are non-combustive and do not require hood or exhaust system, only
circulating fresh air 3-4 times per hour.
Glass furnaces (glory holes) use same natural gas as local restaurants, and your
own home and the service is regulated by SDG&E. It is the same as your gas
ovens, only hotter. Again, no air purification or filtration system required for these
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 37 of 44
as they are simply combusting in an insulated heating chamber. Safe work
environment standards require only fresh air to circulate through work space 3-4
times per hour. Heated air arising from heating Spectrum System 96 glass in
ovens is non-toxic and not harmful to the environment.
Safety systems will be on furnace equipment and gas lines with auto shut-off
features to protect users and the building. These are all installed by equipment
manufacturers and/or licensed plumbers in regulation with fire and building
codes.
With a focus on ethical and conscientious studio practices, Barrio Glassworks will
have a water extraction system installed. This is a sand filtration system that
collects particles to prevent solids from entering the city sewer line. Any solids
removed through this system are non-toxic, non-harmful, and can be put into the
public refuse system, or isolated for recycling or other disposal.
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 38 of 44
My family and I are the property owners of 3060 Roosevelt Street in Carlsbad Village since the
early 1960s
I would like to give you a little background on my family. We are a family of artists. My sister
and I have grown up surrounded by art, discussions of art, trips to museums all around the
country, and more. All of this has influenced our lives. My father made his living as a
commercial artist and in his personal time was a sculptor, my mother a fine artist, I worked as a
graphic artist and in recent years got involved in woodturning, which is the art of making bowls,
platters, enclosed forms, and other wooden objects. Members of our extended family are also
deeply involved in the art field. Needless to say, we all have a true appreciation for various art
forms.
When Mary and her husband approached us with a proposal to set up a glass blowing studio on
the property, it is an understatement to say that we were very excited. Glass blowing is not a
familiar process to most people even though it has existed for about two thousand years. Glass
blowing artists create absolutely stunning objects and the process is fascinating to watch. My
family and I felt that this was a perfect "fit" for the Village. It would bring an exciting new form
of art to the heart of the Village.
This business is not going to be a behind the scenes process with the public only seeing the final
product. It will be an environment that will attract the public to watch how-it's-done. Mary and
Gary will have a viewing area in their working studio so people will be able to safely watch the
process while it is taking place. They are enthusiastic about what they do and are interested in
educating curious people and answering questions. They are also planning on inviting local glass
artists as well as artists from other parts of the country to participate in events at their shop.
There will also be a glass gallery where items will be for sale. The gallery will contain their own
glass pieces as well as works of local Carlsbad and North County artists.
In North County there are only two glass blowing locations that I am aware of, one is at Palomar
College and another a private studio in San Marcos. This new location will be the third.
My family and I believe that bringing this exciting art form to the Village will enrich the
neighborhood.
Marguerite Montalbano
January 8, 2019 Item #5 Page 39 of 44
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO: CITY CLERK
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: _ _____._,-=--l__;;'ifc........,_J_, __,C, ________ _
SUBJECT: ~ (\ 7(k £\-<)LA jr)/<JiS
LocAT1ON: /2co ~,Q l), ilc'-f12-, ,0,JA_.
DATE NoT1cEs MAILED To PROPERTY owNERs: 12/ axb x::
NUMBER MAILED: / 3 7
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am
employed by the City of Carlsbad and the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
~/!rrk1tl:.,__,
(Signature) • (Date)
SENT TO FOR PUBLICATION VIA E-MAIL TO: 0 Union Tribune
[)(coast News
PUBLICATION DATE: Union Tribune --------------
CoastNews_~/~J_/____._d:~8--./~f_'i? ______ _
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am
employed by the City of Carlsbad in the City Clerk's Office and the foregoing is true and
correct.
Date: /;;J/J.u/t?
(Signature)
Attachments: 1) Mailing Labels
2) Notice w/ attachments
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City
of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chamber, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's
decision to approve a Minor Review Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow 2,323 square feet
of new additions to an existing 573-square-foot commercial building, and allow the operation of a hot
glass blowing use located at 3060 Roosevelt Street and more particularly described as:
The Southwesterly 90.00 feet of the Northeasterly 140.00 feet of Lot 1 of
Industrial Tract, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, States of California,
according to Map thereof No. 1743, filed in the office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, January 3, 1923, and the Northeasterly 50.00 feet of Lot,
Industrial Tract, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to Map thereof No. 1743, filed in the office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, January 3, 1923
Whereas, on September 5, 2018 the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 5-0-1 to Approve of a
Minor Review Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow 2,323 square feet of new additions to an
existing 573-square-foot commercial building. This project is not located within the appealable area of the
California Coastal Commission. The existing use would be converted to a hot glass blowing operation
located at 3060 Roosevelt Street in Land Use District 1 of the Carlsbad Village Master Plan, the Village
Segment of the Local Coastal Program, and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The City Planner
has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 New Construction of Small Structures of the State CEQA Guidelines
and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies
of the staff report will be available on and after Thursday, January 3, 2019. If you have any questions,
please contact Paul Dan in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4614 or paul.dan@carlsbadca.gov.
If you challenge the Minor Review Permit and Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited
to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village
Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE:
CASE NAME:
PUBLISH:
RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 (DEV2018-0023)
BARRIO GLASSWORKS
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2018
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
NOT TO SCALE
SITE MAP
Barrio Glassworks
RP 2018-0004 / CDP 2018-0014
09 ~8/09 ~g@ f.Ja11v ::J8A8 81Q!l8dWO::J WW L9 X WW gz ll?WJO! op auanb!l~
09 ~8/09 ~g@ Fuat.v lll!M 81Q!l8dwo::i .. 8/9 l X 11 ~ 8Z!S 18Q81
VILLAGE CORNER LLC
2978 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
AVIS DOUGLAS MAND LORI TRUST
550 LAGUNA DR
STE B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KNAPP CLARK R
2889 OCEAN FRONT WALK
APT C
SAN DIEGO CA 92109
LA CIENEGA PROPERTY GROUP LLC
PO BOX 5723
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90209
LAKRITZ FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
75%
8502 E CHAPMAN AVE
PMB 614
ORANGE CA 92869
RYBURN BUILDING LLC
2019 ESTERO ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
WILLIS GEORGE RAND JACKYE E
TR
2050 LAURIE CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
VILLAGIO CARLSBAD COTTAGES
LLC
3085B ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STATE AND OAK-CARLSBAD LLC
3080 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RAY GENES AND MARGARET A
2959 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GARCIA ABEL C LIVING TRUST
1502 ROLLING HILLS DR
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
STATE STREET CBAD LLC
4649 GRANGER ST
SAN DIEGO CA 92107
GUNTER FAMILY TRUST
PO BOX 749
SAN PEDRO CA 90733
GARCIA PAUL J
300 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
STE 108
CARLSBAD CA 92008
EHS ENTS-STATE STREET LLC
150 ROCKLEDGE TER
LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651
VIGNE PROPERTIES LLC
3880 HIBISCUS CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BALIAN ANAHID 1-:i
PO BOX 206
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
CLARK KATHLEEN M
3060 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STATE AND OAK-CARLSBAD LLC
• 542 OAK AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PYO FAMILY TRUST
5487 WHITE OAK LN
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
PACHECO LEO AND DIANNA J
2100 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
2921 ROOSEVELT LTD CALIFORNIA
BU
2921 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HYLEN-CARLSBAD LLC
5146 CHELTERHAM TER
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
GONZALES BELYNN R TRUST ETAL
2728 CHESTNUT AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92010
BUTLER PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 4050
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92661
NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY
TRANSIT D
399 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PETERS JERRY 2004 TRUST
270 LISZT AVE
CARDIFF BY THE SEA CA 92007
STATE AND OAK-CARLSBAD LLC
3068 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ESFAHANI MOJTABA
. 14824 VISTA DEL OCEANO
DEL MAR CA 92014
MISSION FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
5785 OBERLIN DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92121
~TADl'S:~® r'.1.!-00-LL-.J-Z----.L n~ --.. ,,..., -------.1.:1...1--··--A••--• ~t:'-t~n,n◄~n
VtO
BANK OF COMMERCE
2800 E LAKE ST
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55406
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2936 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
1111 POLARIS PKWY
COLUMBUS OH 43240
MAND MG TRUST
PO BOX 1667
CARLSBAD CA 92018
OAK AND MADISON LLC
7851 MISSION CENTER CT
STE 200
SAN DIEGO CA 92108
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
BANK L
300 LAKESIDE DR
OAKLAND CA 94612
MONTALBANO MARGUERITE TRUST
1151 WILD CANARY LN
ENCINITAS CA 92024
JC R RESOURCES LLC
162 S RANCHO SANTA FE RD
STE B85
ENCINITAS CA 92024
BENNETT RUSSELL L
PO BOX 356
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
MADISON AND OAK LLC
4225 SKYLINE RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
~T4PPF~®
09 L8/09 Lg@ fi.J.a11v :)8/l'B 81Q!l'BdWO:J WW L9 X WW gc:: l'BWJOJ op aiianb!l~
09 L8/09 Lg@ fi.J.a11v lll!M 81Q!l'BdWO:J .. 8/g G X "L az1s 1aqe1 .
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2922 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2992 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PARKER FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC
560 HIGHLAND DR
DANVILLE CA 94526
RAPPAPORT PAUL
,2538 NAVARRA DR UNIT B
iCARLSBAD CA 92009
GUSKY MICHAEL K TRUST
16315 BERNARDO OAKS DR
SAN DIEGO CA 92128
BULLOCK SHERYL F TRUST
300 LAKESIDE DR
FL 8
OAKLAND CA 94612
SIMS LAURIE A
PO BOX 1696
HILO HI 967 21
ACUNA FAMILY LIVING TRUST
· 91 MAYNARD AVE
• NEWBURY PARK CA 91320
'FIRST BM S PROPERTIES LLC
8528 RUETTE MONTE CARLO
LA JOLLA CA 92037
MCNULTY FAMILY TRUST
PO BOX 1879
CARLSBAD CA 92018
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
CITY OF CARLSR",D
PUBLIC AGENCY
C~RLSBAD CA 92008
GORDON FAMILY TRUST
2892 S SANTA FE AVE
STE 107
SAN MARCOS CA 92069
STERLING DEVELOPMENT CORP 25%
162 S RANCHO SANTA FE RD
STE B85
ENCINITAS CA 92024
CROOKSTON MARTINE E
145 S 530
SMITHFIELD UT 84335
KORNBERG FAMILY TRUST
509 N MAPLE DR
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210
BANK OF AMERICA NT AND SA
101 N TRYON ST
, STE NCl-0
CHARLOTTE NC 28246
CARLSBAD VILLAGE PARTNERS LLC
3303 LILAC SMT
ENCINITAS CA 92024
MANNO ILARIO AND MARIE
1309 VISTA COLINA DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
CHILINGIRIAN KEAN R
219 FLORITA ST
• ENCINITAS CA 92024
PRIETTO JOHN G REVOC LIVING
TRUS
3071 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
l=tino,otto rln fnrm<>t ?i; mm v r>.7 mm rnmn<1tihlo '"'"" lluon, @i;1 Rn/A1r>.n nAA
\ft70 09 l8/09 l9® fua/\v 00/\B BIQ!lBdWO:J WW L9 X WW 9l lBWJOJ op aiianb!l~
09 l8/09 l9® fua/\v lll!M a1q1iedwo:i .8/9 G x "l BZ!S 1aqe1
PRIVATE PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 669
POWAY CA 92074
M BAKER MANAGEMENT INC
PO BOX 340
CAPITOLA CA 95010
HALL MATTHEW REVOCABLE TRUST
2604 EL CAMINO REAL
STE B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HOECK MICHAEL A AND LISA M
FAMILY
1571 VIVALDI ST
CARDIFF BY THE SEA CA 92007
3170 CARLSBAD LLC
6435 CAMINITO BLYTHEFIELD
STEC
LA JOLLA CA 92037
JEFFERSON STREET APARTMENTS
LLC
3147 JEFFERSON ST
APT 2
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CUNNINGHAM COASTAL LLC
PO BOX 3634
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
HELMUTH FAMILY 1996 TRUST
12118 OBISPO RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92128
SHAPIRO ROBERT H
12867 E SUMMIT DR
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85259
GONZALEZ MIGUEL AND FRANCISCA
TRUS
3119 MADISON ST
APT B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
VITALIE FAMILY TRUST
3037 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BOUTELLE FAMILY TRUST
4939 RANCHO VIEJO DR
DEL MAR CA 92014
NORTH S}Hl DIEGO COUNTY
TR1',NSIT D
PUBLIC }'£ENCY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PEDDLE DAVID
453 WESTMORELAND ST
FREDERICTON NB CANADA
E3B 3M8
CARLSBAD MAC PROPERTIES LLC
2152 FALLS CITY CT
HENDERSON NV 89044
ANDERSON MARY G REVOC LIVING
TRU
3121 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
T AND J
1909 COLORADO AVE
. SANTA MONICA CA 90404
BASILA DAVID AND PAMELA
3950 N HILLWOOD CIR
TUCSON AZ 85750
CASSOLATO ANNE W 50%
1483 TENNIS MATCH WAY
ENCINITAS CA 92024
GREENE JIM AND MARYANN M
3143 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
\.
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
EH S ENTERPRISES LLC
5553 TRINITY WAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92120
3135-3181 TYLER STREET LLC
2604 EL CAMINO REAL
STE B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DK REALTY HOLDINGS INC
4005 SUNNYHILL DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BAM AD I LLC
1494 UNION ST UNIT 601
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
RICO MARTHA PACHECO
910 WOODLAKE DR
CARDIFF CA 92007
COLES ROBERT J TRUST
3111 JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HARRINGTON JEFFREY J
515 PINE AVE UNIT C
. CARLSBAD CA 92008
COLESANTI BELINDA
515 PINE AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SMITH KALIM
675 OAK AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MONTION DOLORES A
3729 HATCHERS CIR
STOCKTON CA 95219
~TAPPI=~® C'+in11.o.++.o. rln fnrm,.,,+ l)h. mm v a,7 mm r,,nmn'.:lfihlo o:lUOI"' J\uan, f6"1J:;,1~n/J:1:1,=:;n ft A A
'o'tO
GOMEZ MICHAEL T
3159 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
09 L8/09 L9® fua11v :ia11e a1q1iedwo:i WW L9 X WW 9C:: lBWJOl op auanb!l~
09 L8/09 L9® fua11v lll!M a1q1iedwo::i .. 8/9 c:: x • L azis 1aqe1
WALTERS JOHN C
7426 LANTANA TER
CARLSBAD CA 92011
SANTANA FAMILY TRUST
3183 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STOUT FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST
2914 LUANA DR
HAMILTON FAMILY TRUST
407 PACIFIC AVE
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
PINAMONTI MARY J NUMBER ONE
1983
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
FRIEDRICHS JOSEPHS AND ROSIE
3160 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
3110 ROOSEVELT STREET
INVESTMENT
11321 SHADOW RANCH RD
LA MESA CA 91941
LT H REVOC TRUST
3149 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RICARDEZ ROBERTO
3177 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
-108 PRINTED -
* DUPLICATE OWNERS REMOVED
NOTE: THERE IS 1
INTERNATIONAL ADDRESS ON PAGE
3
DU SHAUNE JESSICA
3150 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF
CARLSBAD
3115 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JAMES JOYCE A ~RUST
3931 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OROURKE SHEILA
3176 TYLER ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
2244 S SANTA FE AVE
STE B2
VISTA CA 92084
TYLER LUCAS PROPERTIES LLC
10432 RESERVE DR
STE 110
SAN DIEGO CA 92127
ROOSEVELT VILLAGE LLC
PO BOX 1264
KILAUEA HI 96754
RICARDEZ ROBERTO M
422 SAN DIEGO ST
OCEANSIDE CA 92058
VINE CHURCH
7040 AVENIDA ENCINAS
STE 104-3
CARLSBAD CA 92011
STAP~ES® l=tinr 1AttA rln fnrm::it ?<; mm v r;7 mm rnmn::itihlA ::ivAr AvArv @<;1 r;n/R1 r;n n.llA
'o'tO
OCCUPANT
3096 ROOSEVELT ST
APT A
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPI',NT
VAC.",NT / GOMBERG IAL
C~RLSB~D CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3081 MADISON ST
STEC
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3055 MADISON ST
APT C
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3065 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
645 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3045 ROOSEVELT ST
STE B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3055 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3085A ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3091A ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
~T4Pl'F=~®
09 l8/09 l!i® fJar.v oar.e a1q11edwoo WW L9 x WW SC: lBWJOJ op a11anb11~
09 l8/09 l!i® fJar.v lll!M a1q11edwoo .. 8/9 c: x .. l azis 1aqe1
OCCUPANT
3096 ROOSEVELT ST
APT B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3081 MADISON ST
STE A
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3055 MADISON ST
APT A
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3055 MADISON ST
APT D
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
675 CARLSBAD v=LLAGE DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3060 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3045 ROOSEVELT ST
STEC
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3067 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3085B ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3091B ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
OCCUPANT
3096 ROOSEVELT ST
APT C
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3081 MADISON ST
STE B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3055 MADISON ST
APT B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3055 MADISON ST
FRNT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUP,",NT
VAC.",NT/COMMERCL",L MISC
C~RLSB~D C~ 92008
OCCUPANT
3045 ROOSEVELT ST
STE A
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
VACANT/ PARKHlG LOT
C~RLSB~D C~ 92008
OCCUPANT
3085 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
3091 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCCUPANT
30910 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C+in,1otto. tin fnrm-:Jt ?~ mm v ~7 mm rnmn!ltihlo -:Juor Auon, t'R)"-1,=;,n/R1&:;;n nAA
OCCUPANT
3025 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C:TADl'S:C:®
09 L8/09 L!i@ f.Ja11v 08/ll? a1qnedwo:i WW L9 X WW gz ll?WJOJ op auanb!l~
09 L8/09 L!i@ f.Ja11v ln!M a1q11edwoo .. 8/!, l X .. L 8Z!S 1aqe1
-31 PRINTED -
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 .....
Barrio Glassworks
Paul Dan, Associate Planner
January 8, 2019
RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014 (DEV2018-0023)
Location Map
Existing
Existing
Proposed Elevations
Proposed Site Plan
r
r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I
I
I I I I I
I I
I I I I I I I
I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I
bl ~y~"I
I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I
~ ---
- --Q )-, --------L ______ _ ------
(E! PARKING LOT
LEASED TO
NEIGHBOR
<BANK OF
AMERICA!
<E! CONCRETE
FLAT~
I ,------I r--------~ • L ____________ !3}1?~'.?~ lJJ_ -_, ~--
L
<E!CURB
·I I I ® I I w I I
;,
I
,.',-~~ <E! SHUT OFF ,,v
I~::!
VALVE TO BE
""'
REMOVED
-u\
® I Q!z
I
Project Analysis
•Village (V) General Plan Land Use Designation;
•Village Review (VR) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35), Land
Use District 1, Carlsbad Village Center;
•Coastal Development Regulations for the Village
Segment of the Local Coastal Program;
•Growth Management (CMC Chapter 21.90).
Appeal
•Planning Commission, September 5, 2018;
•Approved 5-0-1; and
•Appealed September 14, 2018.
Recommendation
That the City Council adopt a resolution denying
the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission’s
decision to approve RP 2018-0004/CDP 2018-0014.