HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-05-21; City Council; ; A Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan to construct a five-unit condominium project on a site located at 2569 Roosevelt Street. Project Name: Roosevelt Townhomes~ CITY COUNCIL
~ Staff Report
Meeting Date:
To:
From:
Staff Contact:
May 21, 2019
Mayor and City Council
Scott Chadwick, City Manager
Chris Garcia, Associate Planner
chris.garcia@carlsbadca.gov or 760-602-4622
CA Review ~
Subject: A Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan to construct a five-unit,
residential air-space condominium project on a 0.22-acre site located at
2569 Roosevelt Street.
Project Name: Roosevelt Townhomes
Project No.: CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV#2017-0213)
Recommended Action
That the City Council hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution approving Tentative Tract
Map No. CT 2017-0006 and Site Development Plan No. SDP 2018-0013 to construct a five-unit,
residential air-space condominium project on a 0.22-acre site located at 2569 Roosevelt Street.
Executive Summary
The applicant, 2569 Roosevelt, LLC, is seeking approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Site
Development Plan to construct five residential air-space condominiums, three detached and
two of which are proposed to be attached as a duplex. Access is proposed to be provided by a
private drive-aisle on the south side of the site from Roosevelt Street. Each home includes an
attached two-car garage with a direct entrance into the unit. All five units contain two
bedrooms and two and one-half bathrooms and range in size from 2,079 square feet to 2,129
square feet. The units are three stories tall with a maximum building height of 34'-10" as
measured from the new finished grade. The proposed density for the project is 22.7 dwelling
units per acre (du/ac), which is consistent with the density permitted for the site.
On April 3, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and unanimously
recommended approval of the project to the City Council (6-0, Commissioner Stine abstaining).
Discussion
Project Description and Background:
The subject 0.22-acre site is located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive
to the north and Beech Avenue to the south; it is not located within the Coastal Zone. The
property is generally flat and is currently vacant after recent demolition of a single-family home
and detached garage. The project is located within the Village General (VG) District of the
Village and Barrio Master Plan (VBMP).
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 1 of 68
As discussed in the VBMP, properties within the VG District do not have an assigned residential
density as it relates to Growth Management Plan compliance. Therefore, the minimum and
maximum densities for residential development are established in the Village and Barrio Master
Plan. The VG District allows residential density at 18-23 du/ac and the proposed project has a
density of 22.7 du/ac.
Pursuant to the Housing Element of the General Plan, because a Growth Management Control
Point has not been established for residential development in the VG District, all residential
units approved in the Village must be withdrawn from the city's Excess Dwelling Unit Bank
(EDUB). The EDUB is implemented through City Council Policy No. 43. Pursuant to City Council
Policy No. 43, an applicant for an allocation of dwelling units shall agree to provide the number
of inclusionary units or fee as required pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) Section
21.85.110. As discussed in Section D of the Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 3,
2019 and Planning Commission Resolution No. 7326, the proposal to pay the in-lieu
inclusionary housing fee is consistent with the inclusionary housing requirement as set forth in
City Council Policy No. 43. The project is conditioned to pay an affordable housing in-lieu fee for
four units ($4,515 per unit x 4 units= $18,060), or five units ($4,515 per unit x 5 units=
$22,575), if building permits for the five-unit project have not been applied for by February 28,
2021 (two years from demolition of the former single-family home). The applicant is not
required to pay the affordable housing in-lieu fee for replacement of a home if the new home is
permitted for construction within two years of the demolition of the original home. Otherwise,
the project applicant must pay the in-lieu fee for all five units.
The architectural design is characterized as contemporary with a coastal influence. Primary
building materials include hardi-plank horizontal wood lap siding, hardi-panel vertical board and
batten siding, and asphalt roof shingles. A mixture of window styles and roof pitches are
proposed for each unit and the building materials are carried around all four sides. In addition,
photovoltaic panels are proposed on the roof of each unit.
As detailed in Attachment 4 of the Planning Commission Staff R~port, the proposed project
meets the design guidelines ofthe VBMP. Specifically, the proposed project reduces the
appearance of tall buildings by stepping back the top floor from the street, changes textures
and colors throughout the project, minimizes blank walls by adding windows and accent
materials, and is designed to accommodate photovoltaic panels on the roofs. Covered porches
and balconies are provided to create pedestrian environments, and support the walkable,
connected character of the Village and Barrio. Garages are also located so that they have a
minimal visual impact on the street.
Planning Commission Hearing:
The Planning Commission considered the Roosevelt Town homes project on April 3, 2019.
At the Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission heard the staff presentation and
asked clarifying questions related to affordable housing in-lieu fees, project design, bicycle
storage, and trash bin locations. The project architect further clarified some of the Planning
Commission questions. No members of the public spoke on the item. The design of the project
was positively received by the Planning Commission and minimal discussion took place. The
Planning Commission recommended approval of the project to the City Council (6-0,
Commissioner Stine abstaining). Per City Council direction and as set forth in the approved
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 2 of 68
VBMP, the City Council is the final decision-making body for all new construction projects in the
Village neighborhoods.
Fiscal Analysis
If approved, all required improvements to serve this project will be funded and/or constructed
by the developer.
Next Steps
The City Council's action on this item is final.
Environmental Evaluation {CEQA)
The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State
Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it
is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental
documents pursuant to Section 15332 {In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical
Exemption of the State CEQA Guidelines. The project is consistent with the General Plan as well
as with the Zoning Ordinance. The project site is within the city limits, is less than five acres in
size, and is surrounded by urban uses. There is no evidence that the site has value as habitat for
endangered, rare, or threatened species. Approval of the project will not result in significant
effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and the site can be adequately
served by all required utilities and public services. In making this determination, the City
Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do
not apply to this project. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the City Planner upon final
project approval.
The five-unit residential air-space condominium project will be required to comply with the
recently adopted Climate Action Plan Ordinances.
Public Notification and Outreach
The project is not subject to City Council Policy No. 84 -Development Project Public
Involvement Policy, since the project was filed prior to the effective date of the policy.
Information regarding public notification of this item such as mailings, public hearing notices
posted in the newspaper and on the city website are available in the Office of the City Clerk.
Exhibits
1. City Council Resolution.
2. Location Map.
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7326.
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 3, 2019 (without Planning Commission
Resolution).
5. Planning Commission minutes dated April 3, 2019.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 3 of 68
RESOLUTION NO. 2019-071
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND SITE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A FIVE-UNIT, RESIDENTIAL AIR-
SPACE CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON A 0.22-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 2569
ROOSEVELT STREET IN THE VILLAGE GENERAL (VG) DISTRICT OF THE
VILLAGE AND BARRIO MASTER PLAN AND WITHIN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: ROOSEVELT TOWNHOMES
CASE NO.: CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has determined that pursuant to
the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on April 3, 2019, hold a duly noticed
public hearing as prescribed by law to consider Tentative Tract Map No. CT 2017-0006 and Site
Development Plan No. SOP 2018-0013, as referenced in Planning Commission Resolution No. 7326; and
the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 7326 recommending to the
City Council that it be approved; and
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider
said Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if
any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors relating to the Tentative
Tract Map and Site Development Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of Tentative
Tract Map No. CT 2017-0006 and Site Development Plan No. SOP 2018-0013, is approved, and that the
findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolution No.
7326 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions
of the City Council.
3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council. The Provisions
of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply:
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 4 of 68
"NOTICE"
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil
Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad
Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in the
appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision becomes
final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record is filed with
a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such record, the time
within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following
the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of
record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be
filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 21st day of May 2019, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Hall, Blackburn, Bhat-Patel, Schumacher.
None.
Hamilton.
MATT HALL, Mayor
(SEAL)
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 5 of 68
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7326
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A FIVE-UNIT,
RESIDENTIAL AIR-SPACE CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON A 0.22-ACRE SITE
LOCATED AT 2569 ROOSEVELT STREET IN THE VILLAGE GENERAL (VG)
DISTRICT OF THE VILLAGE AND BARRIO MASTER PLAN AND WITHIN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: ROOSEVELT TOWN HOMES
CASE NO .: CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)
Exhibit 3
WHEREAS, 2569 Roosevelt, LLC, "Developer/Owner," has filed a verified application with the City
of Carlsbad regarding property described as
The Northwesterly half of the Northwesterly half of Lot 22 of Seaside Lands, in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No.1722,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921. Excepting
therefrom that portion thereof described as follows: The most Easterly portion, 8 feet
in width, along the Easterly Boundary of said lot bearing North 34 degrees, 33 minutes
West and 62.165 feet in length, as granted to the City of Carlsbad on document recorded
June 28, 1991 as Instrument No. 1991-0316665, of Official Records
("the Property''); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract Map an~ Site
Development Plan as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" -"R" dated April 3, 2019, on file in the Planning Division CT
2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013-ROOSEVELT TOWN HOMES, as provided by Chapters 20.12, 21.06, and 21.35
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on April 3, 2019, hold a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if
any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Tentative Tract
Map and Site Development Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 7 of 68
B)
Findings:
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 -ROOSEVELT
TOWN HOMES, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Tentative Tract Map CT 2017-0006
1. That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any applicable
specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State Subdivision Map Act,
and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the proposed one lot tentative tract
map for a five-unit residential air-space condominium subdivision is consistent with the General
Plan as described below and satisfies all minimum requirements of the Village and Barrio
Master Plan, and Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code with respect to public
facilities, access and parking as discussed below and in the project staff report dated April 3,
2019.
2. That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since surrounding
properties are developed, are currently designated as Village-Barrio (VB) in the General Plan
and are located in the Village General (VG} District or Village Center (VC) District of the Village
and Barrio Master Plan. The subject property in the VG District is bordered to the north by a
parking lot used for an existing commercial development, to the south by an existing auto repair
business, to the west by a warehouse/photography studio, and to the east by a professional
office building. The adjacent properties to the north, south and east are also located within the
VG District of the Village and Barrio Master Plan (VBMP}. The property to the west is located
within the Village Center (VC) District of the VBMP which allows a wide variety of uses.
Residential uses are permitted by right in the VG District. Given the variety of uses allowed in
the surrounding VG and VC districts, the proposed five-unit residential air-space condominium
project is compatible with existing and fu ture land uses.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density proposed, in
that the VG District within the VBMP allows residential development at a density range of 18 to
23 dwelling units per acre. Based on a net acreage of 0.22 acres, the proposed five-unit
residential condominium units have a density of 22.7 dwelling units per acre. As the proposed
project falls within the allowable density range and meets all required development standards,
the project site will accommodate the proposed density.
4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the public at large, for
access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in that the project has been
designed and conditioned such that there are no conflicts with established easements.
5. That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land Conservation Act
of 1965 (Williamson Act).
6. That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural
heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that structures have been designed to
include operable windows on all elevations and balconies to maximize exposure of each unit to
natural light and ventilation from nearby coastal breezes.
PC RESO NO. 7326 -2-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 8 of 68
7. That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing proposed by this
subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing needs against the public
service needs of the city and available fiscal and environmental resources in that the proposed
five-unit residential project is conditioned to pay an inclusionary housing fee for four units, or
five units if building permits for the five-unit project have not been applied for by February 28,
2021 (two years from demolition of the former single-family home).
8. That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, in
that the previously developed lot is devoid of sensitive vegetation and any natural water
features. Therefore, the proposed project does not impact any fish, wildlife or habitat.
9. That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing California
Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project has been designed in
accordance with the Best Management Practices for water quality protection in accordance
with the City's sewer and drainage standards and the project is conditioned to comply with the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES} requirements.
Site Development Plan SDP 2018-0013
10. That the proposed development or use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable
master plan or specific plan, complies with all applicable provisions of Chapter 21.06 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code, and all other applicable provisions of this code, in that the proposed
one lot tentative tract map for a five-unit residential air-space condominium subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan as described below and satisfies all minimum requirements of
the Village and Barrio Master Plan, and Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code with
respect to public facilities, access and parking as discussed below and in the prc;,ject staff report
dated April 3, 2019.
11. That the requested development or use is properly related to the site, surroundings and
environmental settings, will not be detrimental to existing development or uses or .to
development or uses specifically permitted in the area in which the proposed development or use
is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that
the project consists of the construction of a five-unit residential air-space condominium project
on a 0.22 acre infill site located at 2569 Roosevelt Street within the VG District of the VBMP.
The adjacent properties to the north, south and east are also located within the VG District of
the VBMP. The property to the west is located within the VC District of the VBMP which allows
a wide variety of uses. Residential uses are permitted by right in the VG District. Given the
variety of uses allowed in the surrounding VG and VC districts, the proposed five-unit residential
air-space condominium project is compatible with existing and future land uses. The five-unit
residential air-space condominium project will not adversely impact the site, surroundings, or
traffic circulation in that the existing surrounding streets have adequate capacity to
accommodate the 40 Average Daily Trips (ADT) generated by the project. The project complies
with all minimum development standards of the VG District and the VBMP, and the project is
adequately parked on-site and does not result in any significant environmental impacts.
12. That the site for the intended development or use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the use, in that the VG District within the VBMP allows residential development at a density.
range of 18 to 23 dwelling units per acre. Based on a net acreage of 0.22 acres, the proposed
five-unit residential condominium units have a density of 22.7 dwelling units per acre. As the
PC RESO NO. 7326 -3-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 9 of 68
proposed project falls within the allowable density range and meets all required development
standards, the project will accommodate the proposed density.
13. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the
requested development or use to existing or permitted future development or use in the
neighborhood will be provided and maintained, in that as demonstrated in the project staff
report, the five-unit residential air-space condominium project complies with all development
standards (i.e. setbacks, lot coverage, parking, and height restrictions) of the VG District and
the VBMP. Landscaping along the outer edge of the property, including the areas along
Roosevelt Street, will be provided consistent with the requirements of the city's Landscape
Manual. In addition to the above, privacy walls/fences on the property will be provided or
maintained.
14. That the street systems serving the proposed development or use is adequate to properly handle
all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that the five-unit residential air-space condominium .
project will take access from Roosevelt Street, which is identified as a local street, and is
designed to adequately handle the 40 Average Daily Trips (ADT) generated by the project.
Roosevelt Street is already improved with pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalks. The project
will reconstru~t portions of the curb, gutter and sidewalk along the project frontage due to the
modification of the driveway.
City Council Policy No. 43, Allocation for Excess Dwelling Units
15. That the project location and density are compatible with the existing adjacent residential
neighborhoods and/or nearby existing or planned uses in that the surrounding properties are
developed, are currently designated as VB in the General Plan and are located in the VG District
or VC District, of the Village and Barrio Master Plan. The subject property in the VG District is
bordered to the north by a parking lot used for an existing commercial development, to the
south by an existing auto repair business, to the west by a warehouse/photography studio, and
to the east by a professional office building. The adjacent properties to the north, south and
east are also located within the VG District of the VBMP. The property to the west is located
within the VC District of the VBMP which allows a wide variety of uses. Residential uses are
permitted by right in the VG District. Given the variety of uses allowed in the surrounding VG
and VC districts, the proposed five-unit air-space condominium project is compatible with
existing and future land uses.
16. That the' project location and density are in accordance with the applicable provisions ·of the
General Plan and any other applicable planning document, in that the VG District within the
VBMP allows residential development at a density range of 18 to 23 dwelling units per acre.
Based on a net acreage of 0.22 acres, the proposed five-unit residential condominium units have
a density of 22.7 dwelling units per acre. As the proposed project falls within the allowable
density range and meets all required development standards, the project is consistent with the
General Plan and VBMP.
17. That there are an adequate number of units in the Excess Dwelling Unit Bank in the Village to
allocate four (4) units (net unit increase on-site). Per the city's Quadrant Dwelling Unit Report
dated January 31, 2019, 571 units remain available for allocation in the Village.
PC RESO NO. 7326 -4-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 10 of 68
General
18. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with
the Elements of the city's General Plan, and the development standards of the Village and Barrio
Master Plan, based on the facts set forth in the staff report dated April 3, 2019 including, but not
limited to the following: .
. a. Land Use -The proposed project, which includes the construction of five new residential
condominiums, would enhance the vitality of the Village by providing new residential land
uses near the downtown core area. The project reinforces the pedestrian orientation
desired for the downtown area by providing residents an opportunity to walk to shopping,
recreation, and mass transit functions. The project's proximity to existing bus routes and
mass transit would help to further the goal of providing new economic development near
transportation corridors. Overall, the residential project would contribute to the
revitalization of the Village area.
b. Mobility-The proposed project has been designed to meet circulation requirements, which
include maintaining or enhancing frontage improvements consisting of sidewalks and
landscaping. In addition, the applicant would be required to pay traffic impact fees prior to
the issuance of building permits that would go toward future road improvements. The
proposed project is located approximately one-third mile from the Carlsbad Village train
station which provides rail and bus service throughout the day. The project's proximity to
the transit station would provide residents with the opportunity to commute to major job
centers, thereby reducing vehicle miles traveled {VMTs) and their carbon footprint.
Furthermore, the project supports walkability and mobility by locating the project near
existing goods and services within the Village.
c. Noise -The proposed project is consistent with the Noise Element of the General Plan in
that the project's building design, with windows closed, adequately attenuates the noise
levels for the new condominiums as described in the noise analysis report (ABC Acoustics,
Inc., dated August 28, 2017). Since the windows are required to be closed to meet a 45 dB(a)
CNEL interior noise level, mechanical ventilation is conditioned to be required.
d. Housing -The inclusionary housing requirement may be satisfied through the payment of
an in-lieu fee for projects that have less than seven units. Therefore, the project has been
conditioned to require the payment of the housing in-lieu fee for four (4) units prior to
issuance of a building permit, or payment for five units if building permits are not applied
for by February 28, 2021 (two years from demolition of the former single-family home).
e. Public Safety-The proposed structural improvements would be required to meet all seismic
design standards. In addition, the proposed project is consistent with the applicable fire
safety requirements. The project would be required to develop and implement a program
of "best management practices" for the elimination and reduction of pollutants which enter
into and/or are transported within storm drainage facilities. The project has been
conditioned to pay all applicable public facilities fees for Zone 1 and meet with the fire
marshal to determine if public fire hydrants are required.
f. VG District Standards -The project as designed is consistent with the development
standards for the VG District, the VBMP Design Guidelines and all other applicable
regulations set forth in the VBMP as discussed in the project staff report. The project is not
PC RESO NO. 7326 -5-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 11 of 68
requesting any deviations to the development standards and all required parking is located
on-site.
19. The project is consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 1 and all city public facility policies and ordinances. The project
includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all
facilities and improvements regarding sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage;
. circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government
administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new
development prior to or concurrent with need. Specifically,
a. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified School
District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities.
b. Park-in-lieu fees are required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 20.44, and will be
collected prior to issuance of building permit.
c. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected
prior to the issuance of building permit.
d. The Local Facilities Management fee for Zone 1 is required by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Section 21.90.050 and will be collected prior to issuance of building permit.
20. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction
tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by
a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative
impacts created by the project.
21. · This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
22. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will be
constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by
this project and in compliance with adopted city standards.
23. That the project is consistent with the city's Landscape Manual and Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 18.50).
24. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to
mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree
of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
NOTE: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to the issuance of a
grading or building permit, or approval of the Final Map, whichever occurs first.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented
and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained
PC RESO NO. 7326 -6-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 12 of 68
according to their terms, the city shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein
granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further
condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted;
record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their
compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained
by Developer or a successor in interest by the city's approval of this Tentative Tract Map and Site
Development Plan .
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and
modifications to the Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan documents, as necessary
to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any
fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged,
this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such
condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council
determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, -and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and
costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the city arising, directly or indirectly,
from (a) city's approval and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan, (b)
city's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in
connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and
operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities
arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or
emissions. This obligation-survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues
even if the city's approval is not validated.
6. Prior to submittal of the building plans, improvement plans, grading plans, or final map, whichever
occurs first, developer shall submit to the City Planner, a 24" x 36" copy of the Tentative Map,
conceptual grading plan and preliminary utility plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final
decision making body. The copy shall be submitted to the City Planner, reviewed and, if found
acceptable, signed by the city's project planner and project engineer. If no changes were required,
the approved exhibits shall fulfill this condition.
7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Building
Division from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied _its obligation to
provide school facilities.
8. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part
of the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to
the issuance of building permits.
PC RESO NO. 7326 -7-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 13 of 68
9. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within
24 months from the date of project approval.
10. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and
sewer services to the project provides written certification to the city that adequate water service
and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the
building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until
the time of occupancy. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Final Map.
11. Developer shall pay the Citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the
License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFO
#1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone
1, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If
the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall
become void.
12. Prior to the issuance of the approval of the Final Map, Developer shall submit to the city a Notice
of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be
filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying
all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a(n) Tentative
Tract Map and Site Development Plan by Resolution(s) No. 7326 on the property. Said Notice of
Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project
details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for
inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an
amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause
by the Developer or successor in interest.
13. The project is subject to the Prescriptive Compliance Option (PCO) of the City of Carlsbad's
Landscape Manual. Developer shall construct and install all landscaping and irrigation as shown
on the PCO plan approved as part of this project and on file in the Planning Division. Prior to
issuance of a building permit, Developer shal,I submit an application pursuant to the landscape
plancheck process on file in the Planning Division; however, no landscape plans are required, and
Developer shall only be responsible to pay the landscape inspection fee, with said application. The
approved PCO plan will be utilized by the city as part of the project's final inspection process.
14. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions
and restrictions (CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior
to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide the
Planning Division with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the
Department of Real Estate and the City Planner. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the
following provisions:
a. General Enforcement by the City: The City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to
enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor of, or in which the
City has an interest.
b. Notice and Amendment: A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the City in
advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right to disapprove.
A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City within 30 days for the
official record.
PC RESO NO. 7326 -8-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 14 of 68
c. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements: In the event that the
Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the Association's Easements" as
provided in Article---~ Section _____ the City shall have the right, but not the
duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance,
the City shall give written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to. the Owners in the
Project, setting forth with particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required
and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days
from the giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such
maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the period
specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to be completed
and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided
herein.
d. Special Assessments Levied by the City: In the event the City has performed the necessary
maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements, the City shall
submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the City to perform such
maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's Easements. The City shall provide
a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the
Association fails to pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue
collection against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said
invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the
Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified,
payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount equal
to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection
from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the
City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for
an equal pro rata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall
constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon.each Lot against which the
special assessment is levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right
and power to levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to
bring all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and
his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in accordance with
the procedures set forth in Article ____ of this Declaration.
e. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities: The HOAs and individual lot or unit owner
landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in Exhibit ____ _
f. Balconies, trellis, and decks: The individual lot or unit owner allowances and prohibitions
regarding balconies, trellis, and decks shall be as set forth in Exhibit ___ _
15. This project is being approved as a condominium permit for residential ownership purposes. If
any of the residential units in the project are rented, the minimum time increment for such rental
shall be not less than 31 days. The CC&Rs for the project shall include this requirement. Should
the City Council adopt an ordinance that would permit rental of the units for less than 31 days,
this condition shall be null and void.
16. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner a recorded ·
copy of the Condominium Plan filed with the Department of Real Estate which is in conformance
with the City-approved documents and exhibits.
PC RESO NO. 7326 -9-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 15 of 68
17. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and
concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance
as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of
Community Development and Planning.
18. If satisfaction of the school facility requirement involves a Mello-Roos Community Facilities
District or other financing mechanism which is inconsistent with City Council Policy No. 38, by
allowing a pass~through of the taxes or fees to individual home buyers, then in addition to any
other disclosure required by law or Council policy, the Developer shall disclose to future owners
in the project, to the maximum extent possible, the existence of the tax orfee, and that the school
district is the taxing agency responsible for the financing m~chanism. The form of notice is subject
to the approval of the City Planner and shall at least include a handout and a sign inside the sales
facility, or inside each unit, stating the fact of a potential pass-through of fees or taxes exists and
where complete information regarding those fees or taxes can be obtained.
19. Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map, or an alternative, suitable to the City
Planner, in the sales office or inside each unit, at all times. All sales maps that are distributed or
made available to the public shall include but not be limited to trails, future and existing schools,
parks, and streets.
20. Developer shall post a sign in the sales office, or inside each unit, in a prominent location that
discloses which special districts and school district provide service to the project. Said sign shall
remain posted until all of the units are sold.
21. No outdoor storage of materials shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. When so
required, the Developer shall submit and obtain approval of the Fire Chief and the City Planner of
an Outdoor Storage Plan, and thereafter comply with the approved plan.
22. Developer shall submit and obtain City Planner approval of an exterior lighting plan including
parking areas. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on
adjacent homes or property.
23. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Developer shall pay to the city an inclusionary housing
in-lieu fee as an individual fee on a per market rate dwelling unit basis in the amount in effect at
the time, as established by City Council Resolution from time to time. If building permits are not
applied for by February 28, 2021 (two years from demolition of the former single-family home),
credit will no longer be given for the former single-family home and an in-lieu fee shall be paid
for all five (5) units instead of for four (4) units.
24. Mechanical ventilation for each unit shall be shown on the plans submitted for building permit
since windows are required to be closed to meet the maximum 45 dB(a) CNEL interior noise
level.
Engineering
General
25. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within
this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer for the proposed
haul route.
PC RESO NO. 7326 -10-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 16 of 68
26. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for
the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has determined that
adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of permit issuance and will continue
to be available until time of occupancy.
27. Developer shall submit to the city engineer an acceptable instrument, via CC&Rs and/or other
recorded document, addressing the maintenance, repair, and replacement of shared private
improvements within this subdivision, including but not limited to private driveways, utilities,
street trees, sidewalks, landscaping, lighting, enhanced paving, water quality treatment
measures, and storm drain facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such
maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within this subdivision.
28. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections and driveways in
accordance with City Engineering Standards. The property owner shall maintain this condition.
Fees/ Agreements
29. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and sul:i'mit to the city engineer for recordation,
the city's standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement.
30. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation
the city's standard form Drainage.Hold Harmless Agreement.
31. Developer shall cause owner to execute, for recordation, a city standard Local Improvement
District Agreement to pay fair share contributions for undergrounding of all existing overhead
utilities and installation of street lights, as needed, along the subdivision frontage, should a future
district be formed.
Grading
32. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative
map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall prepare and submit plans and
technical studies/reports as required by city engineer, post security and pay all applicable grading
plan review and permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule.
33. Prior to issuance grading plan approval, the contractor shall submit a Construction Plan to the
city engineer for review and approval. Said Plan may be required to include, but not be limited to,
identifying the location of the construction trailer, material staging, bathroom facilities, parking
of construction vehicles, employee parking, construction fencing and gates, obtaining any
necessary permission for off-site encroachment, addressing pedestrian safety, and identifying
time restrictions for various construction activities.
Storm Water Quality
34. Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall
implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are
not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during
construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational prac~ices,
maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the
PC RESO NO. 7326 -11-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 17 of 68
discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the
maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above
requirements. ·
35. Developer shall complete and submit to the city engineer a Determination of Project's SWPPP
Tier Level and Construction Threat Level Form pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Developer
shall also submit the appropriate Tier Level Storm Water Compliance form and appropriate Tier
Level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee
schedule.
36. Developer shall complete the City of Carlsbad Standard Stormwater Requirement Checklist Form.
Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans, grading plans, and building plans
incorporate applicable best management practices (BMPs). These BMPs include site design,
source control and Low Impact Design (LID) measures including, but not limited to, minimizing
the use of impervious area (paving), routing run-off from impervious area to pervious/landscape
areas, preventing illicit discharges into the storm dr;:iin and adding storm drain stenciling or
signage all to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
Dedications/Improvements
37. Developer shall design the private drainage systems, as shown on the tentative map to the
satisfaction of the city engineer. All private drainage systems (12" diameter storm drain and
larger) shall be inspected by the city. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check
and inspection fees for private drainage systems.
38. Developer shall design all proposed public improvements including but not limited to sewer
lateral, driveways, sidewalk and water services/meters as shown on the tentative map. These
improvements shall be shown on one of the following, s_ubject to c_ity engineer approval:
a. Grading plans processed in conjunction with this project; or
b. Construction Revision to an existing record public improvement drawing
Developer shall pay plan check and inspection fees using improvement valuations in accordance
with the city's current fee schedule. Developer shall apply for and obtain a right-of-way permit
prior to performing work in the city right-of-way.
39. Developer shall design, and obtain approval from the city engineer, the structural section for the
access aisles with a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with city standards due to truck access
through the parking area and/or aisles with an ADT greater than .500. Prior to completion of
grading, the final structural pavement design of the aisle ways shall be submitted together with
required R-value soil test information subject to the. review and approval of the city engineer.
40. Developer shall provide all-weather maintenance access roads to the public drainage facilities
(e.g.: headwalls, rip-rap field, etc.) for this project to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Where
maintenance access roads are not practical and/or permitted, developer shall incorporate low-
maintenance design features to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
Non-Mapping Notes
PC RESO NO. 7326 -12-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 18 of 68
41. Add the following notes to the final map as non-mapping data:
Utilities
a. Developer has executed a city standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement and has posted
security in accordance with C.M.C. Section 20.16.070 to install public improvements shown
on the tentative map. These improvements include, but are not limited to:
i. Water services.
ii. Sewer service.
iii. Driveway approach and sidewalk.
b. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the
appropriate agency determines that sewer and water facilities are available.
c. The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has agreed
to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may arise through
any geological failure, ground water seepage or land subsidence and subsequent damage that
may occur on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to its construction, operation or
maintenance.
d. No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or permitted to
encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor as defined by City of Carlsbad
Engineering Standards or line-of-sight per Caltrans standards.
e. The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has agreed
to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may arise through
any diversion of waters, the alteration of the normal flow of surface waters or drainage, or
the concentration of surface waters or drainage from the drainage system or other
improvements identified in the city approved development plans; or by the design,
construction or maintenance of the drainage system or other improvements identified in the
city approved development plans.
f. There are no public park or recreational facilities to be located in whole or in part within this
subdivision. The subdivider is therefore obligated to pay park-in-lieu fees in accordance with
section 20.44.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and has either paid all of said park in-lieu
fees or agreed to pay all of said park-in-lieu fees in accordance with section 20.16,070 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
42. Developer shall install potable water and/or recycled water services and meters at locations
approved by the district engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public
improvement plans.
· 43. The developer shall agree to install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the city
engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans.
PC RESO NO. 7326 -13-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 19 of 68
Code Reminders
44. Developer shall pay planned local area drainage fees in accordance with Section 15.08.020 of the
City of Carlsbad Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
45. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section
13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor
area contained in the staff report and shown on the tentative map are for planning purposes only.
46. Subdivider shall comply with Section 20.16.040(d) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code regarding the
undergrounding of existing overhead utilities.
47. Developer shall pay park-in-lieu fees in accordance with Section 20.44 of the City of Carlsbad
Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
48. . Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Developer shall pay a Public Facility fee as required by
Council Policy No. 17.
49. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Developer shall pay the Local Facilities Management
fee for Zone 1 as required by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.90.050.
50. Developer shall pay a landscape inspection fee as required by Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
51. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable city ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance,
except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
52. This project shall comply with the latest nonresidential disabled access requirements pursuant to
Title 24 of the California Building Code.
53. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal Code
Section 18.04.320.
54. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with
the city's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the City Planner prior to
installation of such signs.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest
them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the
protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent
legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
PC RESO NO. 7326 -14-May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 20 of 68
(i). PLANNING COMMISSION
.
Staff Report .
Exhibit 4
ltemNo.G)
P.C. AGENDA OF: April 3, 2019
Application complete date: April 23, 2018
Project Planner: Chris Garcia.
SWBJECT:
Project Engineer: David Rick
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213) -ROOSEVELT TOWNHOMES -Request
for a recommendation of approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan
to construct a five-unit, residential air-space condominium project on a 0.22-acre site
located at 2569 Roosevelt Street in the Village General (VG) District of the Village and
Barrio Master Plan and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The City Planner has
determined that this project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for
Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and is
therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of
environmental documents pursuant to section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) ofthe
State CEQA guidelines.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 7326 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 2017-0006 and Site Development Plan SDP 2018-0013 to the City
Council based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The subject 0.22-acre site is located on the west side of Roosevelt Street, between Laguna Drive to the
north and Beech Avenue to the south. The property is generally flat and is currently vacant after recent
demolition of a single-family home and detached garage. The project is located within the Village General
(VG) District of the Village and Barrio Master Plan (VBMP).
Table 1 below includes the General Plan designations, zoning and current land uses of the project site and
surrounding properties.
TABLE 1-SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USE
Location General Plan Designation Zoning Current Land Use
Village/Barrio (VB) Village/Barrio (V-B) -Vacant
Site Village General (VG)
District
Village/Barrio (VB) Village/Barrio (V-B) -Commercial parking lot
North Village Center (VC)
District
Village/Barrio (VB) Village/Barrio (V-B) -Auto repair
South Village General (VG)
District
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 22 of 68
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)-ROOSEVELTTOWNHOMES
April 3, 2019
Pa e 2
Village/Barrio (VB) Village/Barrio (V-B) -
East Village General (VG)
District
Village/Barrio (VB) Village/Barrio (V-B) -
West Village Center (VC)
District
Professional office building
Photography studio/
Warehouse
The project proposes the construction of five residential air-space condominiums, three detached and
two of which are proposed to be attached as a duplex. Access is proposed to be provided by a private
drive-aisle on the south side of the site from Roosevelt Street. Each home includes an attached two-car
garage with a direct entrance into the unit. All five units contain two bedrooms and two and one-half
bathrooms and range in size from 2,079 square feet to 2,129 square feet. The units are three stories tall
with a maximum building height of 34'-10" as measured from the new finished grade. The finished grade
for measuring building height at the rear half of the property is proposed to be established at a slightly
higher grade (approximately two to three feet) than the existing grade to provide a uniform design and to
facilitate drainage on the property. All units include a private balcony off the second floor, as well as an
exclusive use yard area at the ground level. The· underlying lot will be held in common interest divided
between the five air-space condominiums. The common area includes, but is not limited to, the private
drive aisle and landscaped areas. Grading for the proposed project includes 78 cubic yards of fill and 356
cubic yards of remedial grading. Retaining walls up to three feet in height are proposed along the north,
south and west property lines, with wood fences on top not to exceed a combined height of six feet.
The entrance for Unit 1, which includes a covered porch, is oriented toward Roosevelt Street. Pedestrian
access to the remaining four units is provided by a common sidewalk which parallels the northern (side)
property line. The architectural design is characterized as contemporary with a coastal influence. Primary
building materials include hardi-plank horizontal wood lap siding, hardi-panel vertical board and batten
siding, and asphalt roof shingles. A mixture of window styles and roof pitches are proposed for each unit
and the building materials are carried around all four sides. In addition, photovoltaic panels are proposed
on the roof of each unit.
Ill. ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following ordinances, standards, and policies:
A. Village-Barrio (VB) General Plan Land Use Designation;
B. Village-Barrio (V-B) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35), Village General District (Village and Barrio Master
Plan);
C. Subdivision Ordinance (CMC Title 20);
D. lnclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85); and
E. Growth Management Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.90), Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1.
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency
with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations
and policies is discussed in the sections below.
A. Village-Barrio (VB) General Plan Land Use Designation
The subject property has a General Plan Land Use designation of Village-Barrio (VB) and is within the
Village General (VG) District of the Village and Barrio Master Plan (VBMP). As discussed in the VBMP,
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 23 of 68
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)-ROOSEVELTTOWNHOMES
April 3, 2019
Pa e 3
properties within the VG District do not have an assigned residential density as it relates to Growth
Management Plan compliance. Therefore, the minimum and maximum densities for residential
development are established in the Village and Barrio Master Plan. Table 2 below identifies the
permissible density range for properties within the VG District, as well as the allowable density range
based on the size of the project site and the proposed density and units.
TABLE B -PROPOSED DENSITY
Allowable Density Range; Project Density; Gross Acres Net Acres Min/Max Dwelling Units per VG District Proposed Dwelling Units Village and Barrio Master Plan
0.22 0.22 18-23 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). 22 .7 du/ac
Five dwelling units
Minimum: Four dwelling units
Maximum: Five dwelling units
As identified above, the project's density of 22.7 du/ac falls below the maximum density of 23 dwelling
units per acre and, therefore, complies with the allowed density for the VG District.
Pursuant to the Housing Element of the General Plan, because a Growth Management Control Point has
not been established for residential development in the VG District, all residential units approved in the
Village must be withdrawn from the city's Excess _Dwelling Unit Bank (EDUB). The EDUB is implemented
through City Council Policy No. 43 . Pursuant to City Council Policy No. 43, an applicant for an allocation of
dwelling units shall agree to provide the number of inclusionary units or fee as required pursuant to CMC
Section 21.85.110. As discussed in Section C below, the proposal to pay the in-lieu inclusionary housing
fee is consistent with the inclusionary housing requirement as set forth in City Council Policy No. 43. The
project is conditioned to pay an affordable housing in-lieu fee for four units, or five units if building permits
for the five-unit project have not been applied for by February 28, 2021 (two years from demolition of the
former single-family home).
In order to approve an allocation of excess dwelling units, the project shall meet the findings identified in
City Council Policy No. 43. Specifically, the project location and density shall be found to be compatible
with adjacent land uses and the project is consistent with the General Plan and any other applicable
planning document. As the proposed project requires action by the City Council, the City Council is the
final decision-making authority for the allocation from the EDUB.
Lastly, the project is subject to compliance with the Elements of the General Plan as outlined in Table C
below:
TABLE C-GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
Element Use, Classification, Goal, Objective, Proposed Uses & Improvements Comply? or Program
Land Use Goal 2-G.30 The proposed project, which includes the Yes
Develop a distinct identity for the construction of five new residential
Village by encouraging a variety of condominiums, would enhance the
uses and activities, such as a mix of vitality of the Village by providing new
residential, commercial office, residential land uses near the downtown
restaurants and specialty retail core area. The project reinforces the
shops, which traditionally locate in a pedestrian orientation desired for the
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 24 of 68
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 {DEV2017-0213) -ROOSEVELT TOWN HOMES
April 3, 2019
Pa e 4
Element Use, Classification, Goal, Objective,
or Program
pedestrian-oriented downtown area
and attract visitors and residents
Proposed Uses & Improvements
downtown area by providing residents an
opportunity to walk to shopping,
from across the community by recreation, and mass transit functions.
creating a lively, interesting social The project's proximity to existing bus
environment. routes and mass transit would help to
further the goal of providing new
Policy 2-P.70 economic development near
Seek an increased presence of both transportation corridors. Overall, the
residents and activity in the Village residential project would contribute to
with new development, particularly the revitalization of the Village area.
residential, including residential as
part of a mixed-use development, as
well as commercial, entertainment
and cultural uses that serve both
residents and visitors.
Comply?
Mobility Policy 3-P.5 The proposed project has been designed Yes
to meet circulation requirements, which
include maintaining or enhancing
frontage improvements consisting of
sidewalks and landscaping. In addition,
Noise
Require developers to construct or
pay their fair share toward
improvements for all travel modes
consistent with the Mobility
Element, the Growth Management
Plan, and specific impacts associated
with their development.
Goal 3-G.3
the applicant WOl:Jld be required to pay
traffic impact fees prior to the issuance of
building permits that would go toward
future road improvements.
Provide inviting streetscapes that The proposed project is located
encourage walking and promote approximately one-third mile from the
livable streets. Carlsbad Village train station which
Goal 5-G.2
Ensure that new development is
compatible with the noise
environment, by continuing to use
potential noise exposure as a
criterion in land use planning.
Policy 5.P.2
provides rail and bus service throughout
the day. The project's proximity to the
transit station would provide residents
with the opportunity to commute to
major job centers, thereby reducing
vehicle miles traveled {VMTs) and their
carbon footprint. Furthermore·, the
project supports walkability and mobility
by locating the project near existing
goods and services within the Village.
The proposed project is consistent with Yes
the Noise Element of the General Plan in
that the project's building design, with
windows closed, adequately attenuates
the noise levels for the new
condominiums as described in the noise
analysis report (ABC Acoustics, Inc.,
dated August 28, 2017). Since the
windows are required to be closed to
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 25 of 68
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)-ROOSEVELTTOWNHOMES
April 3, 2019
Pa e 5
Element
Housing
Public
Safety
Use, Classification, Goal, Objective,
or Program
Require a noise study analysis be
conducted for all discretionary
development proposals located
where projected noise exposure
would be other than "normally
acceptable."
Policy 10-P.15
Pursuant to the lnclusionary Housing
Ordinance, require affordability for
lower income households of a
minimum of 15 percent of all
residential ownership and qualifying
rental projects.
Goal 6-G.1
Minimize injury, loss of life, and
damage to property resulting from
fire, flood, hazardous material
release, or seismic disasters.
Policy 6-P.6
Enforce the requirements of Titles
18, 20, and 21 pertaining to drainage
and flood control when reviewing
applications for building permits and
subdivisions.
Policy 6-P.34
Enforce the Uniform Building and
Fire codes, adopted by the city, to
provide fire protection standards for
all existing and proposed structures.
Policy 6-P.39
Ensure all new development
complies with all applicable
regulations regarding the provision
of public utilities and facilities.
Proposed Uses & Improvements
meet a 45 dB(a) CNEL interior noise level,
mechanical ventilation is conditioned to
be required.
Comply?
The inclusionary housing requirement Yes
may be satisfied through the payment of
an in-lieu fee for projects that have less
than seven units. Therefore, the project
has been conditioned to require the
payment of the housing in-lieu fee for
four units prior to issuance of a building
permit, or payment for five units if
building permits are not applied for by
February 28, 2021 (two years from
demolition of the former single-family
home).
The proposed structural improvements Yes
would · be required to meet all seismic
design standards. In addition, the
proposed project is consistent with the
applicable fire safety requirements.
The project would be required to develop
and implement a program of "best
management practices" for the
elimination and reduction of pollutants
which enter into and/or are transported
within storm drainage facilities.
The project has been conditioned to pay
all applicable public facilities fees for
Zone 1 and meet with the fire marshal to
determine if public fire hydrants are
required.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 26 of 68
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)-ROOSEVELTTOWNHOMES
April 3, 2019
Pa e 6
B. Village-Barrio Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35) and Village General District
The subject property is located within the Village General District (VG) of the Village and Barrio Master
Plan (VBMP). One-family dwellings are permitted in the VG District when developed as two or more
detached units on one lot. Two-family dwellings (i.e., duplex) are also permitted. No variances or
standards modifications are being requested for the project. The project's compliance with the
development standards specific to the VG District, as well as the area-wide standards within the Village
and Barrio Master Plan, are provided in Tables D and E below. Please see Attachment 4 for an analysis of
the project's compliance with the Design Guidelines of the VBMP.
Standard
Front Yard
Setback
Side Yard
Setback
Rear Yard
Setback
Building
Height
Building
Coverage
Building
Massing
Open Space
TABLED -COMPLIANCE WITH THE VILLAGE AND BARRIO MASTER PLAN
VILLAGE GENERAL (VG) DISTRICT
Required/ Allowed Proposed
Minimum of five feet; maximum of ten feet to ist floor: 10'
building. 2nd floor: 10';
balcony 8'
Additional depth permitted where area includes 3rd floor: 13'-6";
a plaza, courtyard, or outdoor dining. Additional balcony 8'
depth is also permitted to accommodate
electrical transformers, utility connection, meter
pedestals, and similar equipment only if other
locations are infeasible as determined by the
decision-maker.
Awnings, canopies, upper floor balconies, plazas,
courtyards, and outdoor dining are permitted to
encroach within the setback up to the property
line.
Minimum'ten-foot landscape setback where
surface parking areas are located adjacent to a
public street.
Minimum of five feet North Side: 6'-3";
South Side : 18' -5"; 13' -
8" to balcony
Minimum of ten feet Main building: 10'
Projections: 8'
Maximum 35 feet, 3 stories 34'-10" maximum, 3
stories
80% maximum 44.4%
Maximum wall plane and roofline variation: N/ A-the length of the
No building fac;:ade visible from any public street front elevation of Unit
shall extend more than 40 feet in length without 1 is 32 feet.
a 5-foot minimum variation in the wall plane, as
well as a change in roofline.
20% x 9,612 square feet (site size) 31.6% = 3,045 square
= 1,922 square feet feet provided at
ground level.
Comply?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 27 of 68
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)-ROOSEVELTTOWNHOMES
April 3, 2019
Pa e 7
Standard
Parking
Standard
Ingress and
Egress
Property
Line
Walls/Fences
Building
Orientation
Required/ Allowed Proposed
Minimum of 80 square feet of private open space
per unit; minimum dimension of 6 feet in any All open space
direction. proposed is private.
Open space may be dedicated to landscape Unit 1 balconies {2}:
planters, open space Jpockets and/or 124 square feet
connections, roof gardens/patios, balconies or
other patios, and/or outdoor eating areas; no Units 2-5 grivate yards:
parking spaces or aisles are permitted in the Exceeds 80 square feet
open space. each and provided at
ground level adjacent
No common open space required for projects to each unit.
with 10 or fewer units.
**Units 2-5 also
include a balcony for
each unit. However,
the area does not meet
minimum
specifications.
Two garaged spaces. Tandem parking is Two-car garage
permitted. proposed for each unit.
No guest parking required.
TABLE E -COMPLIANCE WITH THE VILLAGE AND BARRIO MASTER PLAN
AREA-WIDE STANDARDS
Required/ Allowed Proposed
Development shall be permitted a maximum of One access point is
one access point from the public street. proposed off
Roosevelt Street. The
A driveway curb cut shall not exceed 20 feet in width of the proposed
width and maintain a free line of sight. driveway, exclusive of
the approach, is 20'
and it provides a free
line of sight.
Maximum height in front yard setback: 3.5' Front yard setback:
Maximum height in side/rear yard setback: 6' 3.5 feet
Wall/fence height shall be measured from the Side/rear yard
lowest side of finished grade. setback: 6 feet
Buildings shall be oriented toward primary street The entrance to Unit
frontage. 1, which includes a
covered front porch
and two balconies, is
oriented toward
Roosevelt Street. Due
to the limited width of
the lot, the remaining
Comply?
Yes
Comply?
Yes
Yes
Yes
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 28 of 68
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213}-ROOSEVELTTOWNHOMES
April 3, 2019
Pa e 8
Standard Required/ Allowed Proposed
units are located
behind Unit 1 and the
entries cannot be
oriented toward
Roosevelt Street.
Roof All roof structures/protrusions shall complement Photovoltaic panels
Protrusions and be consistent with the design of the building are proposed on the
and not taller than necessary to accommodate, roof areas and do not
screen, or enclose the intended use. project more than
necessary to
accommodate the
use. No other roof-
mounted equipment
or protrusions are
proposed.
C. Subdivision Ordinance
Comply?
Yes
The Land Development Engineering Division has reviewed the proposed Tentative Tract Map and has
found that the subdivision complies with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the
city's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20} for Major Subdivisions. The subdivision is considered major because
it involves the division of land into five or more condominiums (five residential condominiums). The
project has been conditioned to install all infrastructure-related improvements and the necessary
easements for these improvements concurrent with the development.
D. lnclusionary Housing
For all residential development less than seven units, the inclusionary housing requirement may be
satisfied through the payment of an inclusionary housing in-lieu fee. The proposal to construct five
residential condominium units has been conditioned to pay the applicable housing in-lieu fee for four
units prior to building permit issuance or five units if building permits for the five-unit project have not
been applied for by February 28, 2021 (two years from demolition of the former single-family home).
E. Growth Management
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the Northwest Quadrant of
the city. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted
performance standards, are summarized in Table F below.
TABLE F -GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
Standard Impacts Compliance
City Administration 17.69 sq. ft. Yes
Library 9.43 sq. ft. Yes
Waste Water Treatment 5 EDU Yes
Parks 0.04 acre Yes
Drainage Basin A; <1 CFS Yes
Circulation 40ADT Yes
Fire Station 1 Yes
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 29 of 68
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)-ROOSEVELTTOWNHOMES
April 3, 2019
Pa e 9
Standard Impacts
Open Space N/A
Schools Carlsbad (E:1.17, M:0.59, H:0.72
Sewer Collection System 5 EDU
Water 1,250 GPD
Compliance
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Properties located within the boundaries of the,Village General District of the Village and Barrio Master
Plan do not have a Growth Management Control Point or an allocation for dwelling units. Therefore, as
the construction offive residential units are proposed following the recent demolition of one single-family
home, a total of four (4) dwelling units will be deducted from the city's Excess Dwelling Unit Bank.
Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 7326, the allocation from the EDUB can be supported
since 571 units are available for allocation in the Village according to the city's Quadrant Dwelling Unit
Report dated January 31, 2019.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary
for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore
categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to
Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption of the State CEQA Guidelines.
The project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with the Zoning Ordinance. The project site is
within the city limits, is less than five acres in size, and is surrounded by urban uses. There is no evidence
that the site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Approval ofthe project will
not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The site can be
adequately served by all required utilities and public services. In making this determination, the City
Planner has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not apply
to this project. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the City Planner upon final project approval.
The five-unit residential air-space condominium project is not subject to Climate Action Plan measures
because the project is below the 70-unit multi-family housing screening threshold listed in the city's
Climate Action Plan (Section 5.3).
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 7326
2. Location Map
3. Disclosure Statement
4. Village and Barrio Master Plan Design Guidelines Analysis
5. Reduced Exhibits
6. Full Size Exhibits "A" -"R" dated April 3, 2019
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 30 of 68
VILLAGE AND BARRIO MASTER PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)-ROOSEVELT TOWNHOMES
INTENT
The Design Guidelines (guidelines) intend to implement and enhance the existing character within the Village and Barrio as new
development and property improvements occur. Together, the Village and Barrio are a unique, mixed-use environment. They
serve as both a shopping and entertainment destination as well as a place to live and work. The guidelines aim to improve the
character of the Village and Barrio while improving livability. Guidelines address many components of building style and
orientation, including site layout, building massing, roof form, building fa~ades, and appurtenances. Images are intended to
provide a visual example of a targeted topic described in the caption and may not represent all aspects and direction provided
within this document. Through these areas of focus, the guidelines strive to foster authentic designs with straightforward and
functional construction.
All development should align with the spirit and intent of the design guidelines presented in this chapter. Designers and
developers should consider at a minimum that these guidelines are a starting point for quality development, and do not
comprise every possible strategy for achieving high quality design. Therefore, it is prudent that designers use their own
techniques for achieving authentic, high quality design. The following guidelines apply to all new and remodeled development
within the entire Master Plan Area unless exempt as determined by Section 6.3.2.
2.8.2 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES CONSISTENCY STATEMENT
A. Site layout
1. Place buildings adjacent to, and oriented towards, the street. Locate prominent
architectural features near corners and intersections.
2. Orient storefronts and major building entries towards major streets, courtyards,
or plazas.
3. Minimize gaps between buildings in order to create a continuous, pedestrian-
oriented environment.
4. Place parking lots so as not to interrupt commercial street frontages.
s. Incorporate functional and aesthetic vehicular and pedestrian connections to
adjacent sites.
6. Create small pedestrian plazasalongthestreet wall through the use of
recesses in building form.
7. Provide easily identifiable pedestrian access from the street and/or sidewalk to
key areas within the site.
8. Incorporate plazas, landscaped areas, fountains, public art, textured pavement,
and vertical building features to create focal points that enhance a pedestrian's
experience.
9. Utilize atriums and outdoor courtyards to increase the variety and number of
views and to bring additional sunlight into large developments.
10. Give careful design consideration to corner lots, as they are typically a focal
point in the urban fabric.
11. Utilize courtyards or other methods to break up the building mass and provide
natural ventilation, wherever possible.
B. Parking and access
1. Locate parking behind buildings and away from the street, wherever possible.
2. Use pervious paving materials, whenever possible.
3. Buffer residential uses from commercial parking lots by landscaping, fencing,
and/or walls.
1
The proposed site layout for the five-
unit condominium project takes
advantage of the configuration of
the lot, which has a limited street
frontage width of 62 feet and no ·
alley access. Vehicular access to each
unit is provided by a 24-foot-wide
private drive-aisle off Roosevelt
Street. The entrance to Unit 1 is
oriented toward Roosevelt Street
and includes a covered porch and
front-facing balconies to activate the
street frontage a_nd enhance the
residential context. A sidewalk with
landscape planters paralleling the
northern property line provides
pedestrian access to the units. The
detached condominium design
breaks up the massing of the project
and allows for private courtyards for
each unit.
Parking for each unit is provided by a
two-car garage off the private drive-
aisle. Due to the narrow street
frontage of 62 feet and 154-foot
depth of the lot, the garage
elevations are oriented toward the
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 34 of 68
4. When walls or fences are utilized to screen parking, provide breaks to allow for
pedestrian circulation and limit height for safety and security purposes.
5. Divide large parking lots into smaller areas with landscaping and clearly
marked pedestrian paths.
6. Highlight primary pedestrian access paths within parking areas with decorative
paving, trellises, canopies, lighting, and similar improvements.
7. Create pedestrian paseos to parking lots of buildings.
8. Locate parking below grade or in structures, where feasible.
9. Design parking structures so their height and bulk are consistent with
adjacent buildings.
10. Provide bicycle parking at convenient locations such as entrances or other
visible and accessible areas.
11. Provide electric vehicle charging stations and equipment where feasible and
as otherwise required.
c. Plazas and open space
1. Provide private or common open space and pedestrian connections to such
spaces to enhance the living environment and contribute to a walkable
neighborhood character.
2. Semi-public outdoor spaces, such as small plazas and courtyards are
encouraged between private and public spaces to support pedestrian activity and
connectivity.
3. Design plazas and building entries to maximize circulation opportunities
between adjacent uses.
4. Provide landscaping and high-qualitypaving materials, such as stone,
.concrete or tile, for plazas and open spaces. -
5. Place outdoor furniture, such as seating, low walls, trash receptacles, bike racks
and other elements, in outdoor pedestrian spaces.
6. Site buildings to define open space areas. Ensure that outdoor areas are visible
from public streets and accessible from buildings, as well as, streets and pedestrian
and bicycle networks.
F. Mechanical Equipment and Service Areas
1. Carefully design, locate, and integrate service, utility, and loading areas into the
site plan. These critical functional elements should not detract from the public view
shed area or create a nuisance for adjacent property owners, pedestrian circulation,
or vehicle traffic.
2. Locate loading areas in the rear of a site where possible.
3. Locate mechanical equipment and service areas along and accessed from alleys
or the rear of properties, wh.erever possible.
4. Place public utility equipment, meter pedestals, and transformers underground
or away from sidewalks and pedestrian areas, where feasible.
5. Screen all mechanical equipment from public view.
6. Ensure roof mounted mechanical equipment and screening do not interfere
with required solar zones or installed solar photovoltaic or solar water heating
systems.
2
south or side property line, which
reduces the visibility and
prominence of the garages as
viewed from Roosevelt Street.
Pervious pavers are included in the
private drive-aisle to assist with
storm water compliance and to
visually enhance the project design.
Visitor access to each of the units is
provided by a walkway adjacent to
the north property line. A
combination fence/retaining wall up
to six feet in height is proposed
along the north, south and west
property lines to facilitate drainage
and to provide privacy screening
between the subject residential
project and commercial uses to the
north and south.
The proposed five-unit condominium
project complies with the private
open space requirements of the
Village General (VG) District of the
Village and Barrio Master Pfan
(VBMP), which requires a minimum
of 80 square feet per unit. Each unit
has a private ground floor area that
exceeds 80 square feet in addition to
private balconies.
Four of the five units have their
ground-mounted air conditioning
units screened by buildings. Unit l's
ground-mounted air conditioning
unit will be screened from Roosevelt
Street by landscaping.
Each unit will have its own trash and
recycling bins within the exclusive
use area. Roof plans demonstrate
adequate solar zones for the
proposed photovoltaic systems.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 35 of 68
7. Design trash and recycling enclosures to be consistentwith the project and
building architecture, and site and screen them to minimize visual impact.
G. Landscaping
Landscaping shall meet the policies and requirements set forth in the City of Carlsbad
Landscape Manual.
1. Utilize landscaping to define building entrances, parking lots, and the edge of
various land uses.
2. Utilize landscaping to buffer and screen properties.
3. Consider safety, environmental impacts, and accent elements when selecting
and locating landscaping elements.
4. Landscaping, between the front property line and the building creates a visually
interesting transitional space. Select and place plants to enhance and soften
architectural elevations, screen undesirable building features and contribute to the
overall quality of the streetscape.
5. Select species that are compatible with Carlsbad's semi-arid Mediterranean
climate, and that will grow to an appropriate size at maturity.
6. When there are minimal landscape areas between the building and the street,
incorporate planters onto porches, recessed building entrances, and planters on decks
and balconies.
7. Minimize paved vehicle areas such as driveways and parking areas. Design
driveways to be no wider than necessary to provide access. Incorporate permeable
surfaces, such as interlocking pavers, porous asphalt, power blocks, and lattice blocks/
grass-crete or ribbon driveways where feasible.
8. Utilize planting to screen less desirable areas from public view, i.e., trash,
enclosures, parking areas, storage areas, loading areas, and public utilities.
9. Provide landscaping between any parking lot and adjacent sidewalks or other
paved pedestrian areas, as well as, within surface parking lots.
10. Incorporate native and drought tolerant vegetation whenever possible.
Avoid use of invasive or noxious plants.
11. Incorporate lattice work and landscaping onto existing blank walls to support
flowering vines growing out of planters placed at their base.
12. Plant trees and fast growing and flowering vines along fences and walls to
soften the appearance of the fencing and screen views tofunctional on-site work
and storage areas.
13. Utilize vines, espaliers, and potted plants to provide wall, column, and post
texture and color and to accentuate entryways, courtyards, and sidewalks.
14. Incorporate large planters into seating areas. Planters should be open to the soil
below and should incorporate permanent irrigation systems.
15. Maintain landscaping and yard areas regularly to keep a desirable, healthy
appearance, eliminate trash, and control vermin.
16. Incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) strategies, site design, and source
control measures into projects. Examples include rain gardens, rain barrels, grassy
swales, soil amendments, and native plants.
17. Utilize seasonal shading from trees and shrubs when developing planting
schemes for courtyards and streets capes on south and west facing facades.
H. ·Fences and walls
1. Construct fences of quality and durable materials, such as, wood, vinyl or
3
The proposed landscape plan
complies with the city's Landscape
Manual.
Landscaping is provided between the
back of the sidewalk and the front of
the building facing Roosevelt Street
which creates a visually interesting
transitional space while screening
the utility transformer.
Planters are incorporated in the
porch areas of each unit.
Interlocking pavers are provided in
the drive-aisle with trees located
along the south side of the drive-
aisle where they do not conflict with
vehicle turning movements.
To facilitate drainage on the
property, retaining walls up to three
(3) feet are proposed along the
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 36 of 68
wrought iron.
2. Architecturally treat all site walls to complement the building design.
3. Chain link fences and other "see-through" fences are not appropriate for
screening.
4. Fences and walls directly adjacent to sidewalks and pedestrian plazas in
commercial and mixed-use areas should be avoided unless designed as a
pedestrian amenity or a low wall landscape feature.
2.8.3 BUILDING FORM AND MASSING GUIDELINES
A. Building Form and Articulation
1. Reduce the imposing appearance of tall buildings by stepping back from street
level on elevations above the ground floor.
2. Utilize horizontal and vertical articulation to break up monolithic street walls
and facades.
3. Utilize techniques to reduce massing, such as variation in wall plane and height
and variation in roof form and levels.
4. Surface detailing may be used, but does not serve as a substitute for distinctive
massing.
5. Consider adjacent low density uses when designing and orienting a building.
For example, avoid balconies overlooking rear yards.
6. Minimize the vertical emphasis of architectural design elements by
incorporating features such as horizontal bands, reveals, trims, awnings, eaves, and
overhangs or other ornamentation, along different levels of the wall surface.
7. Minimize blank walls by:
a. Adding window openings and/or entrances and other relief.
b. Providing recessed glazing and storefronts.
c. Adding vertical pilasters which may reflect internal building structure.
d. Changing color and texture along the wall surface.
e. Varying the planes of the exterior walls in depth and/or direction.
f. Adding trims, projections, and reveals along different wall surfaces.
8. Articulate the building fa<;:ade by varying building elements to create
contrast. Integrate all architectural elements into the building design to
avoid the look of "tacked on" architectural features.
9. Utilize facade projections and recesses such as bay windows, planter boxes, roof
overhangs, and entry way recesses.
10. Arrange columns such that they appear to support the weight of the
building or feature above and are balanced in height, weight, and depth. Spindly
columns can appear out of proportion with the element it is supporting.
11. Size shutters appropriately, when used to cover the window opening.
12. Avoid exterior sliding or fixed security grilles over windows along street
frontages.
13. Discourage and avoid "chain" corporate architecture and generic designs. Each
project should strive to achieve the unique architectural style or character.
14. Design roofs to accommodate a solar photo-voltaic system and/or solar water
heating system, as required by California Building Code.
15. Utilize details such as wall surfaces constructed with patterns, changes in
4
north, south and west property lines.
Wood fences are provided in
combination with retaining walls
along the perimeter of the property.
Wood fences are also provided
between the units which define
exclusive use areas.
CONSISTENCY STATEMENT
The third floor of the unit facing
Roosevelt Street is stepped back
from the street helping to reduce
bulk and mass. The elevation facing
Roosevelt Street has been designed
with an entry door and two
balconies to activate the street
frontage. Balconies of the remaining
four units are located overlooking
the drive-aisle and set back from the
adjacent property to the south.
The pitched roofs are designed to
incorporate solar panels for each
unit.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 37 of 68
materials, building pop-outs, columns, and recessed areas to create shadow
patterns and depth on the wall surfaces.
16. Ensure that proportions are consistent with selected architectural styles.
17. Incorporate the characteristic proportions of traditional facades in new infill
development.
18. Balance the ratio of height, width, and depth of arches and columns to
emphasize strength and balance.
19. Ensure consistency between the height of a column and its mass or thickness
with the weight of the overhead structure the column supports.
20. Infill buildings that are much wider than the existing facades should be broken
down into a series of appropriately proportioned structural bays or components.
21. Consider transitions between the height of new development and the height
of adjacent existing development.
22. Utilize vertical building focal elements. Towers, spires, or domes may foster
community identity and serve as landmarks.
23. Utilize windows and open wrought iron balconies to provide opportunities for
residents to passively observe and report suspicious activity.
24. , Utilize accent materials to highlight building features and provide visual
interest. Accent materials may include any of the following:
a. Wood
b. Glass
C. Glass block (transom)
d. Tile
e. Brick
f. Concrete
g. Stone
h. Awnings
i. Plaster (smooth or textured)
25. Use building materials and finishes that are true to the structure's architectural
style.
26. Windows, doors, and entries should be designed to capture the desired
architectural style of the building.
27. Generally, use no more than three different materials on exterior wall surfaces.
While certain styles may successfully incorporate multiple surface materials, caution
must be used as too many materials can result in a less than aesthetically pleasing
building.
28. Ensure material changes occur at intersecting planes, preferably at inside
corners of changing wall planes or where architectural elements intersect, such as a
chimney, pilaster, or projection.
29. Utilize light and neutral base colors. Generally muted color schemes will
promote visual unity and allow awnings, window displays, signs and landscaping
to be given proper emphasis.
30. Ensure lighting is architecturally compatible with the building.
31. Articulate storefronts with carefully arranged doors, windows, arches, trellises,
or awnings, rather than blank walls.
5
Horizontal and vertical siding is
provided to break up the exterior
walls and to provide visual interest.
Open wood balcony railings are
provided so that residents can
observe the property below.
Accent materials such as decorate
support columns, awnings above the
second-floor balcony doors, and
textured siding panels provide visual
interest.
No more than three main exterior
materials are provided creating a
cohesive and aesthetically pleasing
project.
The project is conditioned to provide
an exterior lighting plan.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 38 of 68
32. Ensure that the main entrance to a building is clearly identifiable and unique, as
it is the primary point of arrival and should be treated with significance.
33. Window type, material, shape, and proportion should complement the
architectural style of the building.
34. Utilize recessed windows where appropriate to the architectural style, to
provide depth.
C. Balconies
1. Place balconies adjacent to operable doorways. Faux balconies or those that do
not appear usable are discouraged.
2. Visually support all balconies, either from below by decorative beams and/or
brackets, from above by cables, or by other parts of the building.
3. On corners, balconies may wrap around the side of the building.
D. Roof Forms
1. Ensure that roof materials and colors are consistent with the desired
architecture or style of the building.
2. Utilize multi-roof forms, hips, gables, shed roof combinations, and sufficiently
articulated flat roofs to create interesting and varying roof forms that will reduce
building mass, add visual appeal, and enhance existing Village and Barrio character
and massing.
3. Avoid long, unbroken, horizontal roof lines.
4. Avoip flat roofs unless sufficient articulation of detail is provided, such as
precast treatments, continuous banding or projecting cornices, lentils, caps, corner
details, or variety in pitch (sculpted), height, and roofline.
5. Avoid the "tacked on" appearance of parapets, and ensure their appearance
conveys a sense of permanence. If the interior side of a parapet is visible from the
pedestrian and/or motorist area of the project, utilize appropriate detail and properly
apply materials.
E. Lighting
1. Provide exterior building lighting, particularly in commercial and high-
pedestrian areas.
2. Design or select light fixtures that are architecturally compatible with the
building.
3. Integrate light fixtures that are downcast or low cut-off fixtures to prevent
glare and light pollution.
4. Design lighting in such a way as to prevent the direct view of the light source
from adjacent properties or uses, particularly residential properties or uses.
5. Utilize lighting on architectural details, focal points, and parking areas to
increase safety, help with orientation, and highlight aRa site attributes and the
identity of an area.
6. Use energy-efficient lamps such as LED lights for all exterior lighting along
with adaptive lighting controls to contribute to energy conservation and potentially
reduce long-term costs.
F.
1.
Residential Design
Design with architectural features such as porches, balconies, chimneys, door
6
Unit 1 has the main entry directly
facing Roosevelt Street. Additionally,
balconies on the second and third
floor are visible at the front of the
building. All other entries are located
along a clearly identifiable
pedestrian walkway on the north
side of the property.
Usable second floor balconies are
provided for each unit. The balconies
are supported by decorative wood
beams and utilize decorative wood
safety railings. In addition, the front
unit has second and third floor
balconies that wrap around the
southeast corner of the building.
The proposed roof plan provides
multiple roof forms and varied roof
pitches. The composite roof i.s
consistent with the desired
architecture and consistent with the
traditional Village and Barrio
character.
Exterior sconce lighting fixtures will
be located on each unit and
consistent with other typical
residential lighting.
The five-unit residential
condominium project has been
designed with porches and
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 39 of 68
placement, window proportions, dormers, wood detailing, fencing, siding, and
color scheme to complement the overall building design, site and neighborhood
context.
2. Incorporate porches, trellises, landscaping, and other features to extend the
living area toward the street, soften the transition between the street and the
dwelling, and encourage community.
3. Design and site units as much as possible to front primary streets to provide
"eyes on the street," create pedestrian environments, and support the walkable,
connected character of the Village and Barrio.
4. Articulate windows with accent trim, sills, kickers, shutters, window flower
boxes, balconies, awnings, or trellises authentic to the architectural style of the
building.
s. Incorporate safe, efficient, and convenient access to usable open space within
multifamily developments.
6. Locate garages and parking areas to have the least amount of visual impact on
the street.
7. Design garages so that they are subordinate to the main living area, when
viewed from the street. Where possible, recess the garage behind the dwelling unit
and do not locate it between the main living area and the street.
8. Recess garage doors into the exterior wall, rather than keeping them flush.
9. Design detached garages and accessory structures to be an integral pa rt of the
architecture of the project. They should be similar in materials, color, and detail to the
principal structures of a development.
7
balconies. The exterior siding and
trim materials and colors
complement the overall building
design. Unit 1 fronts on Roosevelt
Street. Landscaping is provided
consistent with the city's Landscape
Manual and designed appropriately
for the residential site. Exclusive use
yards are located directly adjacent to
each unit. Garages are located off a
side drive-aisle and do not face
directly onto the street.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 40 of 68
37, IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED fOR TiiE USEOFPOTABLEWATEROHLY, A5 PER TliE CMWO,TlilSPROJECTISt-lOTACAHOIOIITEFORFI.ECYCl£DWATER.
lB. ATT>tETIMEOFfJIUJ.IHSPECTION,THEPERMITAPPLIU.NTMUSTPROVIOETHEOWNEROFTHE
PROPEl\1'YWITHACERTIFICATEOFC:OMPLIT1DH. CERTIFlCATEOFIHSTM.1..ATION, IRRIGATION SCHEDULEAHDASCHEOULEOflAHDSCAPEAHOIMIGAllONIMIHTDIANCE.
39. THERlGHTOFWAY,EXlrnNGGRADE.S,ElEVATIOtllai.HOBUILDIHGLOCATIONASSHOWHOHTliESE DRAWINGS WAS FIJRNISHEOTO TiiE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTASAPORTIOtl OF THE SUPPORT OOCUMOOATIOHASPROYIDED IHTiiECOHTRACTDOCUMENTS.WlCHIMNNLANDSCAPE
ARCHrTECTUREISNOTRESPOHSIBLEFORVERIFYIHGTiiEIHFOP./MTIOHASSUPJ'LtEO,AHPTHE
INCLUSION OH TliESE DRAWINGS DOES HOT IMPLYAHY WARRAITTYOFTHE ACCURACV OR COAAECTHESSOFntESUPPORTDOCUMENTATIOH. TliESUPPORTIHFORJMTIOHISSHOWNFORi INFORM,\TlONOHLYAHOSHAl..1.BEV£111FIE!IBYTifECOtmlACTORPRIORTOTHESTARTOfWORIC.
~o. NOTICE TO OWNER/CLIENT! Nit CHANGE TO lliE EXlSTIHG SrTE IHCLUDIHG BUT HOT LIMITEOTODEMOLITIOH,GIIADIHG,COHSTIIUCTIONORPlANTIHCiMAYDISRUPTCUR/1.ENTSURFACE
OR,1,IHAGEPATTERHS. ITIMYSEHECES.SAAYTOADJUSTORIHSTAl.LSURFACEAH0/00.SUBSURFACE
ORAIHACiESYSTTJi\SNOTll.LUSTIIAT£DOHPl..&l.
25. COITTRACTORSHALl.lHSTALl.VEllTID.LSTAND PIPES ONAU. TREESWHERESOILOR,1,INAGE IS IMPAIRfDAND/ORPUHTCULTURE/1.EQUIRESFASTERORAIHIIICiSOILSTilEHEXISTIHGCONDITIOH
PROVIDE, IHSTAU.(1)8'0EEPX<4"01A.STAHDPIPEFOREACH15GALTREE,(1)FOREACH2◄'
l!OX,l3)FOREACH36"B.◄8"BOXAND(◄)8"DEIPX◄"D!A.STANDPIPESFO/I.AlLTREfSLAAGER THAN◄8"80X. EACHSTANDPIPESHAlLBEWRAFPEDWITH/I\IR,l,Fll1◄0HLFILTERFABRICAHD UCKflLLEOwmll/l"·J/◄'DIA.CIIUSHEDROCK.
26. •:::=.:i~~~~~;~~~~.s=~,~~~~~~i,:r=~~~u~~~R=
SPECIFICATIOl!S AND Will. NOT WRAP Afl.OI/HD THE ROOT BALL THE ROOT BARRIERS Will. BE
IHSTALLEDUHEARLYALOHGTHE EDGEOFHARDSOOE FORAMIH. Dl!iTANCEOF10'1H BOTil OIRECTIOHSF/1.0MTHECENTERUHEOFTM.ETRUHKFORAMIH. TOTALLEHGTHOF20'.
27. IMIHTEHAHCEPERIOOBEGIHSONTHEfl/lSTOAYAFTtRfillANDSOOEAHDJRRIGATIONWOI\KON THEPROJECTISCOMPLffi,CHECKEDANDWRITTDIAl'PROVALFROMTHEL.ANOSCAPEARCHITECTI
ISGIVEHTOBEGIHTHEIMIITTDIANCEPE!IIOD.
ZS. AU.PI.ANTlHGAREASCOIISISTIHGOFW.TIVESITESOILSHAU.BELEACHEDTOREDllCESALTLEVELS PRIORTOPLANTIHG.LEACHIHGSHAU.BEREPEATEDUHTILSATIJR,1,TIONOORACTCOHDUCTIVITY (EC~~1,000)LEVELIS2.00RWSATADEPTHOF12". COHTIIACTORTOCOHDUCTSAUHITY
AHALYSISFORVElllFICATIOHBYlAHOSCAPEAACHITECT.
29. POSTFERTIUZATIONFORALJ.PUNTINGAAEA5(16-6·8)SttAl.LOCCU/l.◄50AYSAFTIRPUNTIHG ATAR,i,TEOF15l.BS.PE/l.1,000SQ.FT.
30. THEllEISNOCONMOHAAEAUNDSCAPIHGONTilEPROJECTANDALtl.ANDSCAPEJJIEASAfl.ET08E IMIHTAINfDBYPRIVATEHOMEOWHERS.
J1. MINIMUMTI\EESEPARATIONDISTAHCE·IMPflOVEMENT/1,\INIMUMDISTANCETOSTIIEETTREE:TIW'flC SIGH.tlS(STOPSIGH)·20FEET.UNDERGROUHDUT1LITYLINES·SFEIT,ABO\IEGROUHOUTlt.J'n'
STI\UCTURES • IO FEIT. DRIVEWAY (ElfTRIES) • 10 FEET, B. IITT"l'RSECTIOHS (IHTERSECTIHG CURB UHESOFTWOSTREITS)·llFEIT.
l2. CONTRACTORANDOROWNERSHALtOBTAJNAUHECESSARYAPPROVALSAHDORPERMITSFORANY
ANDAU.WORKWITHIHTHER/GHTOFWAY(Ol/TSIOETHEPROPERTYLIHES).
lJ. COITTl!ACTORANDOR0WNERSl!AU.08TAINAU.NECESSAIIYAl'PROVALSAN00/I.PEllMITTFORAl.l
COHSTI\UCTIONWITHINTHEBOUHOSOFTHEPROPERTY.
l◄. COHTRACTORSHAllTAGAHOPHOTOGRAFHYAl.lSELECTED1llffiANDSPECIMEHPlANTSATTHE
HURSEllY.PKOTOG!W'HSOFTAGGEOTREESAHDSPECIMEHPLlN"TSSHALLBESUPPLIEDTO
UUDSCAPEA/1.CHITECTFORAPPROVAI.PR.IORTOPLAHTIMTERIAI.BEINGSHIPPEDAIIPORPICKEO-
UPFROMHURSERY.
35. IR/I.IGATIOHSYSITl,\TOHAVEARA!HBIRDPSl·l,\.JOX·0750RPSl·IMOX·100(DEPEHDIHGONLATERAI. UNESIZE)IIHIHEPRESSUllEREGUUTORINSTALL£DITT£/I.AV8VALVE.
36. PUNTINGAAEASWSntANTEH(10)FEETIHWIDTHIHANYO)RECTIOHSHAU.BEIRRIGATEDWITH
SUBSURFACEIRRIG.i..TIONOROlliERMEANSlliATPRODUCEHORUNOfFOROVERSPRAY.
1J. AU.PUffrMATEJllllt.SHOWIHGSIGHSOfOEFOUATIOH,LEANIHG.CHLOROSIS(YEl.J.OWIHGj,OR smLINGPRIORTO,ORATTHE[HOOfMAIHTEHANCESHALLBER!PI.ACEDBYlliECONTRACTOR, rncLUDIHGGROIJNOCOVEIIANDHYORO,EEDIHG.
!~. l.ANDSCAPECOHTRACTORTOPROVlDEGUARAHTEESNORMAL TOTI,ETIIAOEFORLOHGEVITYOFA!.L PlAHTMATE!IIAl.S;TilRE£N,OlffilSFOR5HRUBSANDGROUNOCOVEllS,AHDOHEYE/IIIFORT1\EfS.
15. l.ANDKAPECOHTRACTORTOPROVIDEMAIHTEH.tHCEFOR900AYSFOU.0Wlr-lGCOMPLETIOHOf
IHSTAUATION AS DITERMINED BY 1.ANOSOOE ARCHITECT. TilE CONTRACTOR SHAU. R!CElvtl NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT CONFORMANCE FROM l.ANOSCAl'E ARCHITECT OHCE SITE IS DEEMED ACCEPTABLE.
16. COHTRACTORTOINFORMLAHDSOOEAACHITECTOFANYDISCIIEPAHCIEIBETWEEHPLAHSAND
ACTUALSITECONDmOt-15.
17. l'I.AHTOOAHTmESA!IEFORCONVENIENCEPURPOSESOHLY.WDSCAPc:COHTIIACTORTOVERIFY
~~~S~.:::.DSUPPLYQIIAH'TITY OF PLAHTIMTIRW. TO IMPL.EMEITTTHE IITTEHTOFTHE
18. ALLPl.AHTIHGAAEASPREVIOUSLYCOVEllfDWITHCOHCRETE,ASPlt.l.LTORANYOlliERIMPEAVIOUS
MATERW.SHAU.BERIPPEDTOAOEPTHOf12.,AMENDEDASPERAPPROVEOSOILSA.EPOIITAND TREATEDWm-lSAR~OHSOIL TRUTMDITPEllMAHUFACTURER5SPECIFICATIOHS.
19. IF ANYEXISTIHGHARDSOOEORU.HDSCAPEIIID\CATEDOHTHEAl'PROVEOPI.AHSISOM\AGEDOR
REMOVEDDURINGDEMOLmONORCOtlSTRUCTION,ITSlt.l.U.BEREPAlll[OORREPLACEOINKIND WlTHEQUIVAl.fHTSl?EPEI\TilEAPPROVDIPlAHS.
20. TI\EESAHDSHRUBSSHALLBELOCATEOAHDIMINTAIHEDTOPRESEllvtACLEAR20NEOFATl£AST
TEH FEET FROM FIRE Hl'DRANTS, \JTILITY POI.ES, OVERHEAD UTILITY WIRES. STREET UGlfT,
LUMIHARIESANDAIIQVEGROUHDUTIUTYSTRUCTURESSUCtlASTRANIFORME!iENCLO'lURES.
11. TREESSHAlLBEPlAHTEDATLWTFIVEFEETFROMAHYUHDERGROUNDl/TILITYSUCHASCiAS,
ELECTIIIC, TElEPHOHE;TEHFEETFROMSEViER.
ll. OWNER TO VERIFY AND STAKE PROPERTY LIMES. HO OEMOLITIOH, CONSTRUCTION OR fUHTIHG SH.I.LL OCCUR OUTSIDE PROPE!ITY UHES WITttOl/TlliE PRIOR COHSEHT Of"THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER.
23. OWNER TO INSURE NEWLY INSTAl.l.H) PUNT IMTERIAl. ll[CEIVES EHOUGH WATER TO MAINTAIN
GOOD HEALTH AND VIGOROUS GROWlli WITHOUT OVER WATIIIIHG. PU.NT MATERIAL SHAU BE WATER!OPERIODICALLYATSUCHTlMEJUSTPRIORTOI.EAf'WILTIHG. AOJUSTWATERIHGTO
~~=o~;~~:~~lONS IH R,1,111 FALL, TEMPERATURE, SOI.AA EXPOSURE ANO SEASOH.tl.
24. OWHERTOIMlHTAIHAHOkEf:PClU/1.Al.lDRAIHAGESWALESAt/D IHSUREPOSITI\IESURFACE
DRAIHAGEAWAYFROM8UllDINGS TOWAROSSUBSURFACE OFtAIHAGEOROFFSITESTORMDRAIN
SYSTEMSATAMIHIMUMOFl.'ISLOPE.
LANDSCAPE NOTES
Al.l.LAHD!iOOESHALLBEDEVELOPIDIHACCOROANCEwmlTHESTANDAAOSADOPTEllBYTilECITY OFCAALSBAOAHDAU.OnlEllAPPUCABt.ESTAMDARDSASOFTHEAPPROVDIDATEOFTilE5EPUHS.
~1~~\~w~~~.::~~~~~~BlLSTATE, COUNTY AND CITYORDltwlCESASWEU.AS
ANEHCROACttMfITTAGREEMEHfSHAI.LBEOBTAIHIDBYTilEGENER,1,LCOHTR,1,CT0/1.TO/I-ISTAU.
E"HHANCEDPAVINGWITHINTNELITIUTYU.SE.11!:MT.
PREPAAEAI.LPI.ANTlNGAAEASASFOl.LOWS,ALLQUAKTTTlESAfl.EIIASEDON\OOOSQfT.:SCAAJFY EXISTIHGSOILTOAOEPTHOF8";REMOVEAl.LOE!IRIS,WEEDSANO/I.OCKSI..AllGE/l.lliAN2"01A.;
Al'PLY◄CU.YOS.MIN.COMP05T(UHLESSCOHTilAIHDICATEDBYASOILTEST).ISO L.BS.
AGRICVLTURALGYPSUM,10UIS.IROOSUlPHATE,50U!S.TRl.C HUIMTEAt/015l.BS.6·2P.lD ~~~~R,\,~~::!o~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~.MIENDMOOS IITTOTHE TOP 6" OF EXISTING SOIL.
FERTILI2ERISOILMIEHDMENTTREATMEHTABO\IE15FORBIODIHGPURPOSESONLY.SOILSTESTIMY
~~i~.IH~::~6~~:U.AMJ~~~~~~t;~~~~EtITT~~~O~IM~;~~
SAMPLLSOFFlMALROI/GHGRADEATSITEAHOSUBMITFIBULTSTOLAHDSCAl'EARCHITECTFOR IITTIRPRETATIOHANORECOIM\EtlOATIOH. COSTOf LAllTESTSHAllUEPAIDBYOWHER. SOIL
TESTIHGKITSAAEAVAll..AlllLBYOJ.I.IHG1·801HZ7·3l11.COHTRACTORTOSUlll,\ITMODIF1EDSOIL PREPAAATIOHBIDTOlANDSCAPEA/1.CHfTECTANOOWHERFORAl'PROVJ.l.PRIORTOSTAATIHGSOIL PREPAR,1,TIOHWORll.
CiROUNDCOVEl!SIHCLUOINCiBERMIJDACiRASSANDOTHEI\HOXIOUSWEEOSSHAU.BESPR,1,YEDWI
'ROUH[).UI''. WArTlWOWEEKSMIH. AHO SPRAY A SOCONOTIME IF NECESSARY AHDTil£NREMOVE.
~L EB~~~~i\~i ~~~!vs~Ho~~n~o;=~~o~~~:b~:
CiROUHDCOVER !SHOT SHOWN UNOE!ISHRUBS AHDSMALL£RTREES FORCiRAPHICCI..AAITY.
~o:i;i!1:o:~~OHTIHUETOORIPUHE (ATTIM.EOFPI.ANTIHG)OF AU.SHRUSSAHDTO
ALLPI.J.NTIHGAREASEXCLUDINGAREASWllliCOB8t.ESHAU.BECOVEllEOWITHAl"U.YE!IOF1 112"1/tlHUSFORESTflNESfROAAAGRISERVICE,76(H95-62S50RAl'PROVEDEQUAL.
11. E\IERYPI..AHTDELIVER!DTOTHEJOBSITESHAll8EINGOODCONOITIOH.Wm-lAt.EG18lLPLANT TAG IDEHTIFYIHGTHEBOTANICALGEHIUS, SPECIESAHOVARIETYOfPI..AHTFORVERIF1CATION8Y UNDSCAPEAIICHJTECTWITHAPP/1.0VEOPl.At&AHDORPI..AHTlLGEND.PI.AHTMATERIALWITilOUT
TAGSWIUBERE.JECTEOANORET\JRNEOTOTHEHURSEAYATTI-IECOHTIIACTOl!SCOST.
APPROVED FOR
/RR/GA TION AND PLANTING
ONLY. INCLUDING PRECISE
LOCATION OF PLANTING
AREA.
"AS BUil T"
ll<E--""·--•• ,. ........ .,,
NPtCT0R ~ i::r:11 CITY.]l.C,!!SBAD II~
jW11iCD1 WWI MDI M I
1---:~~~k-f~~~§~~f~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J~~~f~~f~~~§~3 Roosevelt Village Residences
~===t::t:::::::::::::::::::j:::t:::t:::t:::l -~;;:;:;:::;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;J
Rn1SON DESCRIPTION :=.,:: :,..:: llji===II C:o:6 llritA-4
RP2017·0012
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 58 of 68
(i) PLANNING COMMISSION
M . 1nutes .
Exhibit 5
City Council Chamber
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Wednesday, April 3, 2019
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Luna called the Regular Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Chair Luna, Commissioners Anderson, Geidner, Lafferty, Meenes, Merz, and Stine
Assistant City Attorney Kemp, City Planner Neu, Senior Planner Goff, Associate
Planner Garcia, Associate Planner Drew, Engineering Manager Geldert,
Associate Engineer Chua and Administrative Secretary Flores
STAFF PRESENT:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Merz led the Pledge of Allegiance
Chair Luna directed everyone's attention to the slide on the screen to review the procedures the
Commission would be following for that evening's public hearing.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA:
Chair Luna asked if there were any requests from the public to speak on items not listed on the agenda.
Seeing none, she opened the public hearing. ·
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING:
Chair Luna opened the public hearing for Item 1.
1. CDP 2018-0020/V 2018-0013/NCP 18-0005 (DEV2018-0036) -BUCCOLA ADDITION -Request for
approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Minor Variance and Nonconforming Construction Permit
to l} allow for a 3,325-square-foot one-and two-story addition to an existing 3,499-square-foot
one-story single-family home with basement; and 2) allow for a reduced front yard setback from 20
feet to 10 feet on property located at 5031 Tierra Del Oro within the Mello II segment of the city's
Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 3. The project site is within the
appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that the
project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have
a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the
requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Sections 15301(e}{2} -
Existing Facilities; and Section 15305(a)-Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations of the state CEQA
Guidelines.
City Planner Neu introduced Agenda Item 1 and stated Senior Planner Goff would make the staff
presentation (on file in the Planning Division}.
STAFF PRESENTATION:
Senior Planner Goff gave the presentation.
Chair Luna asked if there were additional questions of staff.
Commissioner Lafferty asked forfurther information on the property almost doubling in size.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 59 of 68
Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 2019 Page 2
Senior Planner Goff stated the non-conforming construction ordinance was expanded awhile back and as
long as the setbacks are met, the amount a property can expand is not limited.
Commissioner Lafferty asked if the size ofthe expansion will increase facility demand.
Senior Planner Goff stated no, it does not.
Commissioner Lafferty asked if fire sprinklers would be required due to the size of the expansion.
Senior Planner Goff stated he does not have the answer to that question. He stated the City Building
Official would make that determination, however the building would have to meet all California building
codes.
Commissioner Lafferty asked how the property design is consistent with the neighborhood.
Senior Planner Goff stated the general design is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
Commissioner Geidner asked if there was a geotechnical study conducted since the building will become
heavier with the addition.
Senior Planner Goff stated there was a study done in relation to the property and the bluff. He stated the
report came back stating the addition will not have a significant geotechnical impact to the bluff.
Chair Luna asked if the applicant would like to make a presentation.
APPLICANT PRESENTATION:
James Chinn, Architect, Del Mar CA, made a presentation and stated he would be available to answer
questions.
Commissioner Geidner asked how storm water will be handled on the site.
Mr. Chinn stated the storm water will come through the landscaped areas and percolate through the
ground.
Commissioner Lafferty stated her concern that because this is an addition the project will most likely not
be required to install sprinklers.
Mr. Chinn stated if sprinklers are required they will install them.
City Planner Neu stated if the project is approved, the next step for the applicant would be a plan check
review by the Fire Prevention and Building departments to determine if sprinklers will be required.
Assistant City Attorney Kemp stated the Planning Commission does not determine if sprinklers are
required that will happen in the building and plan check area.
Chair Luna asked ifthere were additional questions for the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if there were
any members of the public who wished to speak on the project. Seeing none, she opened and closed
public testimony.
MOTION:
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 60 of 68
Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 2019 Page 3
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Anderson and duly seconded by Commissioner Meenes to Adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 7325 APPROVING Coastal Development Permit 2018-
0020, Minor Variance V 2018-0013, and Nonconforming Construction Permit NCP 18-0005,
based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
VOTE: 6-1
AYES: Chair Luna, Commissioners Anderson, Geidner, Meenes, Merz, and Stine
NOES:. Commissioner Lafferty
Chair Luna closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 1.
Chair Luna opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 2.
2. CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213) -ROOSEVELT TOWNHOMES -Request for a
recommendation of approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan to construct
a five-unit, residential air-space condominium project on a 0.22-acre site located at 2569
Roosevelt Street in the Village General (VG) District of the Village and Barrio Master Plan and
within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The City Planner has determined that this project
belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a
significant impact on the environment, and is therefore categorically exempt from the
requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to section 15332 {In-
fill Development Projects) of the State CEQA guidelines.
City Planner Neu introduced Agenda Item 2 and stated Associate Planner Garcia would make a staff
presentation (on file in the Planning Division).
DISCLOSURES:
Commissioner Stine recused himself due to a conflict of interest.
Commissioner Lafferty stated she drove by the site.
Commissioner Merz stated he drove by the site.
Commissioner Meenes stated he drove by the site.
Chair Luna stated she drove by the site.
STAFF PRESENTATION:
Associate Planner Garcia gave the presentation.
Commissioner Meenes asked why one of the buildings is a duplex and the others are stand alone.
Associate Planner Garcia stated the original design came in as standalone units however the space
between the units were very small providing little usable yard. He stated it was recommended by staff to
attach at least two of the units to create usable yards between the structures at ground level.
Commissioner Anderson asked where the trash receptacles would be stored.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 61 of 68
Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 2019
Associate Planner Garcia stated storage is located within the exclusive use area.
Commissioner Lafferty asked for an explanation on the in-lieu fee for the inclusionary housing.
Page4
Associate Planner Garcia stated the City's requirement for projects under seven units, this one is five,
qualifies for the in-lieu housing fee which is currently $4515 per unit for four units. He stated they get
credit for the existing single-family home on site unless they do not build the project within two years of
demolishing that home.
Commissioner Lafferty stated that seems to be a low fee to be exempt from creating inclusionary housing.
She stated the area is situated near transit and has there been any discussion about bicycle storage on
the site.
Associate Planner Garcia stated bike storage is currently not a code requirement, however each two-car
attached garage will have adequate storage inside or in the front entry on the ground level.
City Planner Neu stated the way the in-lieu fee is currently set up it is to allow smaller projects to have a
reduced impact to their finances by complying with the inclusionary ordinance. He stated City Council has
asked housing staff to review the fee since it is quite dated.
Commissioner Lafferty stated her concern is that the area is readily accessible to transit and would like to
see inclusionary units in the area.
Commissioner Geidner asked if the project was submitted.under the new village and barrio master plan.
Associate Planner Garcia stated the project was submitted under the old village and barrio master plan,
however, the new master plan was approved during project review. Therefore, the project was
reanalyzed to ensure it was consistent with the new master plan.
Commissioner Anderson asked if the project was at the highest possible density for the site.
Associate Planner Garcia stated yes, the site allows for a minimum of four units and a maximum of five.
He stated the project is five units.
APPLICANT PRESENTATION:
Scott Frontis, Architect, San Diego CA, made the presentation and stated he would be available to answer
questions.
Chair Luna asked if there were questions for the applicant.
Commissioner Anderson stated the design is very nice.
Commissioner Lafferty stated the design is well articulated.
Chair Luna asked if there were additional questions for the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if there were
any members of the public who wished to speak on the project. Seeing none, she opened and closed
public testimony.
MOTION:
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 62 of 68
Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 2019 Page 5
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Meenes and duly seconded by Commissioner Merz to Adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 7326 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Tentative Tract
Map CT 2017-0006 and Site Development Plan SDP 2018-0013, based upon the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
VOTE: 6-0-1
AYES: Chair Luna, Commissioners Anderson, Geidner, Meenes, Merz, and Lafferty
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Stine
Chair Luna closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 2.
Chair Luna opened the public hearing on Agenda Item 3.
3. AMEND 2018-0007/AMEND 2018-0008 (DEV2018-173) -ENCINA WATER POLLUTION
CONTROL FACILITY-Request for a recommendation of approval of a Precise Development Plan
Amendment and a Coastal Development Permit Amendment to allow for the: 1) construction
of a new grit and screenings annex including applicable equipment; 2) repair, rehabilitation
and replacement of existing aging infrastructure through the preliminary and primary areas; 3)
construction of 21 new parking spaces to the east of the existing administration building; and
4) construction of a waste hauling truck turn-around area, all within the Mello II Segment of
the city's Local Coastal Program and located at 6200 Avenida Encinas within Local Facilities
Management Zone 3. The project is appealable to the California Coastal Commission per
Section 30603(a)(5) of the Public Resources Code of the California Coastal Act, which states
any development which constitutes a major public works project or major energy facility
costing $100,000 or more is appealable to the Commission. The City Planner has determined
that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found
do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt
from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section
15301 (Existing Facilities).
City Planner Neu introduced Agenda Item 3 and stated Associate Planner Drew would make the staff
presentation (on file in the Planning Division).
DISCLOSURES:
Commissioner Stine stated he drove by the site.
Commissioner Lafferty stated she went by the site.
Commissioner Meenes stated he drove by the site.
Commissioner Geidner recused herself due to a conflict of interest.
STAFF PRESENTATION:
Associate Planner Drew gave the presentation.
Chair Luna asked if there were additional questions of staff.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 63 of 68
Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 2019 Page 6
Commissioner Stine asked if after the project is complete, will staff of Encina Wastewater be better
protected from exposure to odors.
Associate Planner Drew stated yes, that is her understanding.
Commissioner Meenes asked what the current parking is on site.
Associate Planner Drew stated the parking is spread out around the building. She deferred to the plant
manager for a better explanation.
Commissioner Meenes asked if there was a noise study done.
Associate Planner Drew stated there was not a noise study done, there was an environmental study done.
She stated the equipment is housed inside the building and no additional noise pollution would occur.
Commissioner Anderson asked about the electrical vehicle charging station requirement. She stated that
the plant is already highly energy efficient and that she feels they are being penalized. She asked if there
is an alternative to the electric vehicle charging station such as solar panels due to the estimated cost of
the charging station.
Associate Planner Drew stated the ordinances that were recently approved by city council are in effect.
She stated there were other energy efficiency conditions that were removed due to the current energy
efficiency of the plant. She stated the Transportation Management Plan was kept on and the charging
stations are required. She stated that is not necessarily related to energy efficiency but to the City's
Climate Action Plan ordinance.
Commissioner Anderson asked if there was any leeway since the applicant is a public utility.
Associate Planner Drew stated that each development is treated the same. She stated staff is working
with the applicant to determine what thei.r options are such as the charging station being placed in an
adjacent property where employees or visitors could have access to use it. She stated that if it is
determined that it is infeasible, then they do not have to install the charging stations however, the
applicant has not had time to research the installation of the charging station.
Assistant City Attorney Kemp stated they would be required by State EV Codes and that the City's
ordinance is an enhancement of State codes.
Commissioner Anderson asked if the city could cut back the requirement for the stations to be EV ready
and not install them.
Assistant City Attorney kemp stated that the Planning Commission does not have that authority because
it is an ordinance that was passed by the City Council.
Commissioner Merz asked how the feasibility of cost on the EV requirement is made.
Assistant City Attorney kemp stated the State code doesn't define how feasibility is determined. He stated
we will have to look at that on a case by case basis.
Commissioner Lafferty asked what other municipalities or jurisdictions are reviewing the project.
Associate Planner Drew stated she was not sure. She deferred to the applicant.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 64 of 68
Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 2019 ' Page 7
Assistant City Attorney Kemp stated the ordinance contains two conditions related to infeasibility. He
stated one would be insufficient electrical supply and the second is where there is evidence suitable to
the local enforcing agency substantiating the additional local utility infrastructure design requirements
directly related to the implementation may adversely impact the construction cost of the project.
Chair Luna asked if there were any additional questions of staff. Seeing none, she asked if the applicant
would like to make a presentation.
APPLICANT PRESENTATION:
Scott Mclellan, Managing Director of Encina Wastewater Authority, Carlsbad CA, made the presentation
and stated he would be available to answer questions.
Chair Luna asked if there were additional questions for the applicant.
Commissioner Stine asked if any other member agency cities have reviewed the project through their
planning commission.
Mr. Mclellan stated the project does not go directly to those governing bodies. He stated it only comes
to Carlsbad since they are the host city when it comes to land use.
Commissioner Lafferty asked if the plant generates its own power.
Mr. Mclellan states yes, approximately 86 percent of the power used by the plant is self-generated.
Commissioner Meenes asked what has prompted the improvements to the facility.
Mr. Mclellan stated the project is a repair project and an upgrade to the equipment on the site.
Commissioner Meenes asked how they determined the project will take two years to complete.
Mr. Mclellan stated the project timeline was designed to allow the plant to continue functioning while
the work is being done.
Chair Luna asked if there were any further questions of the applicant. Seeing none, she asked if there
were any members of the public who wished to speak on the project. Seeing none, she opened and closed
public testimony.
MOTION:
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Stine and duly seconded by Commissioner Meenes to Adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 7327 and 7328 RECCOMMENDING APPROVAL of
Precise Development Plan Amendment AMEND 2018-0007 and Coastal Development Permit
Amendment AMEND 2018-0008, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein.
VOTE:
AVES:
NOES:
6-0-1
Chair Luna, Commissioners Anderson, Meenes, Merz, Lafferty and Stine
None
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Geidner
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 65 of 68
Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 2019 Page 8
Chair Luna closed the public hearing on Agenda Item 3.
A five-minute recess was called.
Meeting called back to order at 7:26 p.m.
4. DISCUSSION OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS:
City Planner Neu made a staff presentation on residential design standards {on file in the Planning
Department).
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION:
Commissioner Anderson stated she would like to craft a specific plan for residential design standards. She
stated she would like to see the standards that address all four sides of a building, or four-sided
articulation. She stated she is in favor of creating objective guidelines.
Commissioner Stine asked ifthere are applicants or developers who are not clear on current standards or
is it an issue for staff.
City Planner Neu stated it has been a mix. He stated some applicants like freedom in their design and
others like to have specific standards laid out with expectations they will get a positive response on their
design. He stated from the perspective of staff, having a clear set of standards is helpful.
Commissioner Geidner stated having specific design guidelines would be beneficial in the larger density
projects to get a good-looking project. She stated the presentation given by the City of Livermore broke
design standards down by building type and focused on the new building being in context with the existing
ones.
Commissioner Stine asked if the standards would mostly be geared towards new condominium and
apartment developments.
City Planner Neu stated yes, mostly towards apartments. He stated the city does not currently have
specific design standards for apartments.
Commissioner Stine asked if a consultant would need to be hired to accomplish this project.
City Planner Neu stated yes, a consultant would need to be involved and does not currently have a specific
cost.
Commissioner Lafferty asked if any properties in Carlsbad were registered as historical sites.
City Planner Neu stated he believes parts of Carrillo Ranch are nationally registered.
Commissioner Lafferty stated that perhaps the City of Carlsbad can look at what community character
looks like in relation to historical buildings. She suggested that design guidelines incorporate historical
buildings. She suggested getting historical preservation involved or someone serving as a liaison between
the Planning Commission and the Historical Preservation Commission. She stated her big concern is the
height of new development.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 66 of 68
Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 2019 Page 9
Commissioner Geidner stated many design guidelines she reviewed from other cities strongly encouraged
certain standards, not required them. She stated this is really needed in the larger density projects.
Commissioner Stine stated the city already has many master planned communities, design standards in
the village and barrio area and he does not think the time and cost it would take to develop new design
standards are currently justified.
Chair Luna stated the commission should consider where funds would be best spent if they were to
request them for any project. She stated there are many master plans that have design guidelines and if
there is an issue with one then the commission can request to amend them.
Commissioner Merz stated most master plans design standards are broken up geographically. He
suggested having objective guidelines towards a product type, specifically multifamily residential, and not
necessarily by geographical location.
Commissioner Geidner suggested re-writing a portion of the city's municipal code.
Assistant City Attorney Kemp stated they could look at where in the code something could be changed
and make a recommendation. He stated any changes would need to be approved by the Coastal
Commission.
Commissioner Anderson stated she would like the Planning Commission to make a recommendation to
the City Council for the commission to explore developing Citywide design standards.
Commissioner Meenes stated he would like the commission to wait on making a recommendation until a
work plan for the Planning Commission is developed.
Commissioner Stine stated he would like the commission to wait as well until the work plan is developed.
Commissioner Geidner asked when the workplan would come to the Planning Commission.
City Planner Neu stated the proposal would come to the Planning Commission between June and July.
MOTION:
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Anderson and duly seconded by Commissioner Lafferty to make a
recommendation to the City Council that the Planning Commission create residential design
standards.
VOTE: 2-5
AYES: Commissioners Anderson and Lafferty .
NOES: Chair Luna, Commissioners Geidner, Meenes, Merz and Stine
MOTION:
ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Meenes and duly seconded by Commissioner Stine to table the
recommendation to the City Council, request that City Planner Neu look at the most time
efficient way to add or create residential design guidelines, request that City Planner Neu
consider the item as part of the work plan and that the Planning Commission discuss the item
at that time.
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 67 of 68
Planning Commission Minutes April 3, 2019 Page 10
VOTE: 6-1
AYES: Chair Luna, Commissioners Geidner, Meenes, Merz, Lafferty and Stine
NOES: Commissioner Anderson
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS:
None
CITY PLANNER REPORTS:
City Planner Neu stated there was an appeal filed on the Romeria Pointe Apartments project that will go
to City Council.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS:
None
ADJOURNMENT:
The Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of April 3, 2019, was adjourned at 8:56 p.m.
Don Neu -City Planner
Melissa Flores -Minutes Clerk
May 21, 2019 Item #7 Page 68 of 68
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO: CITY CLERK
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: _5i=---.....#,./ ...... J-~>-L~J__,_7 _________ _
SUBJECT: kt)°'-S?i ~',, hsnbox:f\R s. w/ map
LocAT10N J2c:o C¼.A a J::x,.Q tL ila 95,L Q/l .
DATE NOTICES MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS: :S/Jo /J 9
l ~, NUMBER MAILED: _ Q --------<,_____'--I,'------
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am
employed by the City of Carlsbad and the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
\~~w~ Signature)
s/td19
(Date)
SENT TO FOR PUBLICATION VIA E-MAIL TO: 0 Union Tribune
~ Coast News
PUBLICATION DATE: Union Tribune --------------
CoastNews _ ___,5-=----,,_/...__.(plo<-,/~/'---,;,_2 _______ _
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am
employed by the City of Carlsbad in the City Clerk's Office and the foregoing is true and
correct. •
Date: 5/tvfl9 \jtumql\u,/Zr(t 111,,.,..,,__,
(Signature)
Attachments: 1) Mailing Labels
2) Notice w/ attachments
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City
of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chamber, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 21, 2019 to consider approving a Tentative Tract Map and Site
Development Plan to construct a five-unit, residential air-spc1ce condominium project on a 0.22-acre site
located at 2569 Roosevelt Street and more particularly described as:
The Northwesterly half of the Northwesterly half of Lot 22 of Seaside Lands, in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1722,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 28, 1921. Excepting
therefrom that portion thereof described as follows: The most Easterly portion, 8 feet
in width, along the Easterly Boundary of said lot bearing North 34 degrees, 33 minutes
West and 62.165 feet in length, as granted to the City of Carlsbad on document recorded
June 28, 1991 as Instrument No. 1991-0316665, of Official Records
Whereas, on April 3, 2019, the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 6-0-1 to recommend approval
of a Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan to construct a five-unit, residential air-space
condominium project on a 0.22-acre site located at 2569 Roosevelt Street in the Village General (VG)
District of the Village and Barrio Master Plan and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The City
Planner has determined that this project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for
Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment and is therefore categorically
exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to section 15332
(In-fill Development Projects) of the State CEQA guidelines.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies
of the staff report will be available on and after Thursday, May 16, 2019. If you have any questions, please
contact Chris Garcia in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4622 or chris.garcia@carlsbadca.gov.
If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Plan in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE:
CASE NAME:
PUBLISH:
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)
ROOSEVELT TOWN HOM ES
FRIDAY, MAY 10, 2019
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
BUENA
VISTA
LAGOON
SITE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Roosevelt Townhomes
CT 2017-0006 I SOP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)
PUR CARLSBAD LLC
777 CALIFORNIA AVE
PALO ALTO CA 94304
CITY OF CARLSB!\D
PUBLIC AGENCY
C~RLSB~D C~ 92008
PENMAN MICAH A
2431 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KNOWLES JEFF AND KARI FAMILY
TRUST
5210 MILTON RD
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KAIRATH JOHN E AND ANDRA A
2450 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MANZANO MARIO B
3830 VALLEY CENTRE DR
STE 705-4
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
UNIAT TRUST
11 771 OPAL AVE
REDLANDS CA 92374
GRENGS GEORGE AND KAREN TRUST
20430 VIA CELLINI
NORTHRIDGE CA 91326
SANDERS RICHARD AND JANE
FAMILY 19
672 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GONZALES JANICE C TRUST
684 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ST!\TE OF CALI FOmH!'r
PUBLIC .'\GENCY
C~RLSB~D CA 92008
M J F N HOLDING LLC
2501 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BENCHMARK PACIFIC LTD II
550 LAGUNA DR
STE B
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KURNER 2015 FAMILY TRUST
2461 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CHRISMAN DAVID BAND ANNA C
2440 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PAVAGADHI MAYUR
624 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FELDMAN FAMILY TRUST
107 BRIAN CT
PALM DESERT CA 92260
FAHEY PATRICK J
668 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
VILLAS DE LA PLAYA TRUST
265 CHINQUAPIN AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NASKIEWICZ JANE TRUST
686 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HYSPAN PRECISION PRODUCTS
INC MO
2725 JEFFERSON ST
STE 2
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PEELLE FAMILY TRUST
2441 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MURPHY VIRGINIA H TRUST
1737 ROGUE ISLE CT
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MEMEL RONN AND DIANNE L
2451 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MILLENDER ROY J III AND
DIANE L
2430 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCONNELL FAMILY TRUST
654 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HAYNES RAY MAND PATRICIA K
TRUST
PO BOX 387
CARLSBAD CA 92018
HARPER VM LIVING TRUST
670 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BURKE ANTHONY G AND DIANA K
676 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LOH REAL ESTATE LP
PO BOX 1021
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
SMITH TODDS AND ELIZABETH K
278 VALLE VISTA DR
DANVILLE CA 94526
VENSTROM FAMILY TRUST
2933 LANCASTER RD
CARLSBAD CA 92010
SPEERT ELLEN FAMILY TRUST
2633 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TH STATE STREET LLC
PO BOX 7050
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
BRADLEY NEIL J AND KATRINA E
2517 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LYLE FAMILY TRUST
PO BOX 2148
CARLSBAD CA 92018
SALTON FAMILY TRUST
2505 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SWEENEY FAMILY TRUST
2525 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CLAWSON MITCHELL AND
JACQUELYNE
2537 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DAVIS MARC RAND HEATHER M
2549 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BERNAUER BRIAN
·692 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY
TRANSIT D
2647 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J KS G EDWARDS FAMILY TRUST
3980 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
2659 STATE PARTNERS LLC
375 VIA LINDA DEL SUR
ENCINITAS CA 92024
ILG RAYMOND P AND OLENA
591 CAMINO DE LA REINA
·STE 300
'SAN DIEGO CA 92108
ELLER TOM AND REBECCA L
2509 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARSHALL WILLIAM J AND DAWN
2503 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JAMTAAS KRISTOFER AND JOAN B
2529 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SASSCER RYAN J
2541 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PADILLA FAMILY TRUST
6708 CAMPHOR PL
CARLSBAD CA 92011
LADHOFF DON AND MARY
694 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CANTABRANA 2005 TRUST
2639 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ERE PROPERTIES LLC
1054 LA SOMERA DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY
TR.P,~JSIT D
PUBLIC .".CENCY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MARSON MARKE
2513 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
POVAR PAULETTE H LIVING TRUST
2507 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HEFFNER ERIC AND DIANNA
2521 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NASON FAMILY TRUST
2533 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DELHOMME JOSHUA
2545 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LOT 31 TRUST
2555 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STEWART FAMILY TRUST
2551 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SKINNER GEORGE AND CAROL P
2539 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LUKAS RIMAS T
2527 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JANSEN JAMES H
2591 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BASTA NICHOLAS AND ROSE
2597 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HOLT FAMILY TRUST
2561 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GREY BRIAN AND ANDREE
2573 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HURVITZ FAMILY TRUST
14125 CAMINITO VISTANA
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
NORDBURG JUDITH A LIVING
TRUST
2575 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GOETZ MARY
2563 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INGLE ERICA LAND DANIEL R
REVOC T
2547 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MACHADO ELIZABETH
2535 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
EATON FUCSHIA INVESTMENTS LLC
1106 2ND ST
PMB 282
ENCINITAS CA 92024
FIK CHRISTOPHER LAND TORIE N
2593 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WRIGHT SARA J
2599 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MCDONOGH KACIE E 2012 TRUST
ETAL
2565 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LUSSENDEN JEFFREY AND KELLY
2577 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BILLANTE FAMILY LIVING TRUST
, 2583 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
YATES MATT C
2571 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HESFORD DARRELL AND DEANNA J
2559 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NAVEIRA FAMILY REVOC LIVING
TRUS
2543 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BELTRAN ANTONIO
2531 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NEWMAN JANET L
2589 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FERNANDEZ HENRY J JR
2595 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CATLAGIRONE CHRISTOPHER D
AND HIKA
PO BOX 234100
ENCINITAS CA 92023
HAWKES WILLIAM D JR
2569 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARPENTER THERESA
2581 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SELLERS JASON T AND MELISSA K
2579 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KC URBAN RENEWAL GROUP INC
PO BOX 339
CARLSBAD CA 92018
TAYLOR MORRISON OF
CALIFORNIA LL
100 SPECTRUM CENTER DR
STE 1450
IRVINE CA 92618
SEAGROVE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
25531 COMMERCENTRE DR
STE 100
LAKE FOREST CA 92630
TREJO FAMILY TRUST
3383 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HUSTON FAMILY TRUST
PO BOX 547
CARLSBAD CA 92018
CSTATE LLC
2244 S SANTA FE AVE
STE 82
VISTA CA 92084
HESS AND HARTMAN TRUST
28348 ROADSIDE DR
STE 204
AGOURA HILLS CA 91301
WOODD TERRI G TRUST
541 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FARES DAVID AND KATHLEEN
551 LAGUNA DR
, CARLSBAD CA 92008
EDNOFF DAVID WAND JANICE P
REVOC
557 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DUSOLD FAMILY REVOC LIVING
TRUST
38686 FLORENCE ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
HERRING RICHARD W
579 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SMITH EDMUND AND EDITH
3271 WESTWOOD DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
2646 SEA GLASS LLC
2646 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
2621 ROOSEVELT LLC
PO BOX 1707
FALLBROOK CA 92088
CABO ANNA M TRUST
PO BOX 583
PAUMA VALLEY CA 92061
2569 ROOSEVELT LLC
PO BOX 448
CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625
TRUST
BLANTON COOPER AND MARYE
49155 RANCHO POINTE
LA QUINTA CA 92253
WESTFALL JEREMY SAND
TAMARA D
PO BOX 18167
PHOENIX AZ 85005
HULBERT MICHAEL J REVOC TRUST
563 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HORNER CARLA A
571 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BUSSEY KATHRYN I REVOC LIVING
TR
581 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BLACKBURN 2000 TRUST
202 RAINBOW LN
OCEANSIDE CA 92054
CHAMBERLAIN MICHAEL
KIMBERLY
2653 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JONES RICHARD TRUST
2608 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
A AND
LANCER INDUSTRIES INC 3/7
1547 AVENIDA LA POSTA
ENCINITAS CA 92024
SYCKS FAMILY TRUST
539 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HEATER JAMES AND DEBORAH
2241 2ND AVE NORTHWEST
CALGARY AB 2TN OHl
CANADA
GLAZE CHARLOTTE M
, 555 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
565 LAGUNA LLC
6904 DOVER CT
HIGHLAND CA 92346
TEMPLETON TRACY S
577 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
EARDLEY MARGARET
583 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OLLIVIER MIKE AND LORIE TRUST
2479 W FIR AVE
FRESNO CA 93711
GHARABIKLOU FARHAD AND RENEE
M REV
595 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TREJO FAMILY TRUST
2687 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JARMOLOWICZ JEANMARIE AND
EDWARDS
46 PERRY HENDERSON DR
FRAMINGHAM MA 01701
APODACA JOE P AND FRANCES L
FAMILY
327 HILL DR
VISTA CA 92083
SHEA PATRICK O AND SUE J 0
2605 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ALCANTAR MARTIN V AND MARIA I
2560 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LOPEZ LUISA
2570 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DWYER CHRISTA
2580 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ERGIN H S
PO BOX 218
CARLSBAD CA 92018
PORCHIA FAMILY REVOC TRUST
591 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NUDEL DENIS
597 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROOSEVELT CARLSBAD LP
1707 E HIGHLAND AVE
STE 100
PHOENIX AZ 85016
KATZ STANS
PO BOX 235481
ENCINITAS CA 92023
BROWAR MS FAMILY TRUST
PO BOX 81007
SAN DIEGO CA 92138
VASQUEZ ANGELINA
2564 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RECINOS PEDRO E AND MYRNA Y
, 2566 ROOSEVELT ST
'CARLSBAD CA 92008
PAGE THOMAS
2572 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
. SCHEXNAYDER JEANIE
2578 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SD C PROPERTIES LLC
2155 RAMONA LN
VISTA CA 92084
SOUMBASAKIS JOHN
23 TENNESSEE
IRVINE CA 92606
B WR 16 LLC CO
2922 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705
JACKSON FAMILY LIVING TRUST
5511 STROHM AVE
NORTH HOLLYWOOD CA 91601
SEVILLE HOLDINGS LLC
1630 VALDES DR
LA JOLLA CA 92037
SOTO SOLEDAD M TRUST
2615 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LLEWELLYN RYAN
2562 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROBBINS KAREN C
2568 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STAVRON BEVERLY A
2574 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BOLAND JENNIFER
2576 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TASTE AND SEA VACATIONS LLC
605 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OWNER NAME UNAVAILABLE
2650 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STROTHER 1996 TRUST
3811 MARGARET WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KUDREN FAMILY REVOC TRUST
2660 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STROTTO JUANITA M
2678 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 1
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 4
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 7
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 10
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 13
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 16
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BALAKER VICTOR AND ANGELA
3811 ALDER AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OSULLIVAN DENNIS J FAMILY
TRUST
8462 DEEPVIEW DR
HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646
MORISON SOMOR K
2664 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BLEICH FAMILY TRUST
13176 W SKINNER DR
PEORIA AZ 85383
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 2
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 5
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 8
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 11
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 14
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 17
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FARLEY TIMOTHY R
PO BOX 1622
CARLSBAD CA 92018
LAGUNA BREEZE CONDOMINIUMS
LLC
1868 CREST DR
ENCINITAS CA 92024
MR CARLSBAD 11 LLC
1818 1ST AVE
STE 100
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
NORTH COUNTY TR.l',NSIT DISTRICT
-P-U
PUBLIC AGENCY
CARLSB~D CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 3
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 6
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 9
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 12
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 15
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 18
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 19
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 22
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 20
CARLSBAD CA 92008
'INFORMATION ONLY
1
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 2A
iCARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST 21
CARLSBAD CA 92008
-185 PRINTED -
* DUPLICATE OWNERS REMOVED
PLEASE NOTE: THERE IS 1
INTERNATIONAL ADDRESS ON PAGE
4 OF THESE LABELS
CT 2017-0006/SDP 2018-0013 (DEV2017-0213)
Roosevelt Townhomes
Location Map
Project Information
•VG District of Village & Barrio Master Plan
•Density –22.7 du/ac proposed
•Lot Size –0.22 acre or 9,612 square feet
•Building Height 34’11”
•Lot Coverage –44.4% (80% permitted)
•Parking –Two -car garage for each unit
..,,CCI.OR==S~ITE_P_LAN ______________ ~ ~
~,.,..~ ~ JR .i===I A
Elevation -Front
EAST ELEVATION -UNIT 1
Rendering -South
Rendering -North
CAP Consistency
The proposed project will be required to:
•Comply with solar requirements in place at time
of building permit issuance (Project estimated to
require 2.1 kW per unit or about 10.5 kw total).
•Require one EVSE ready parking space per unit.
•Comply with water heating requirements
effective upon approval by the CEC.
Project Consistency
•General Plan –Village-Barrio (VB);
•Zoning –Village-Barrio (V-B);
•Subdivision Ordinance;
•Inclusionary Housing Ordinance;
•Growth Management;and
•California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Recommendation
That the City Council ADOPT the resolution
APPROVING Tentative Tract Map CT 2017-0006
and Site Development Plan SDP 2018-0013,
based upon the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein.
Backup Slides
Inclusionary Housing
The proposed five-unit project will be required to
pay a housing in-lieu fee for four units;or fiveunits if building permits are not issued by
February 28,2021 (two years from demolition oftheformersingle-family home).
References:
CMC Section 21.85.030(D)(3).
CMC Section 21.85.110(A).
CMC 21.85.110(A)
“For any qualifying residential development
or development revision pursuant to
Section 21.85.030(A)of less than seven
units, the inclusionary requirements may be
satisfied through the payment to the city of
an in-lieu fee”.
CMC 21.85.030(D)(3)
This chapter shall not apply to:
“The construction of a new residential structurewhichreplacesaresidential structure that wasdestroyedordemolished within two years prior tothe application for a building permit for the newresidential structure, provided that the number ofresidential units is not increased from the numberofresidential units of the previously destroyed ordemolished residential structure”.
City Council Policy 43
The number of excess dwelling units allocated
shall be at the sole discretion of the decision-
maker designated by the Carlsbad Municipal
Code.
The Village and Barrio Master Plan designates
the City Council as the final decision-maker on
this particular development project.
154'-& 112"
10'~• SET8ACK 20·..e· 41'..g' 10'""2" 20'~· T•10" 23• .. ,r
20'-10' 20·-10·
~ ,..i ,,__ __ f -,_,., ,.____,:_=._c: _= _,... _-=_ -:t:==--===-=±---,.-... -"!_;_= =_ ~-1 _ _}_= =_ :#;;~~f:;,~t~f~t~~::~~~~~~=-=-°=-'=-~t':.."',._=~<r:-_·t.=.=-.="'-~,~~:":-:""'":-"j=:~,...-.i~==..::=_:_::~t .... ~ ...
I
~1
Ii
l j
GARAGE uocc,
ij,-
1
~~ \ -- -J
11 \_~c5vrFlOOR
,.
~~
[\.....:.:;,
UNIT◄ Roose'vfi:'T ST 585,7'2 SO, FT, -D GAAACE uocc,
0
10'-7"
L ____ J
UNIT3 R~ST. SM.62SO.l-"T. v~p
GARAGE uooc.
UNEOf'FlOOR ASOI/E
GARAGE uocc. -----------
0 ,. i= ·~~-~ 7};.::;
L ____ J
LINE OF FLOOR
ABOVE
I L
...... ::_, -! ....... __ =t _ +-=-~ --=-=-~ --=-=-~ ""'"=· '"" -=-~ --=-=-~ --=-=--
PROJ:CT TRUE
ti . lt~ni
-~-/~-.□--U_1IO_~_□_F_L_OO_R_P_LA_N ____________________ ~@G)
10'~" SET8ACK
,~.
10'-0° SETBACK ,u-o·
+~
I
I
I
~I
;II ~·-
~ $ ® Iii 11
lj @ -w-~
--'k---~----~---:-,,,;0;=,M _ _.,...,.~®~
e
®
41•-a·
PROPERTY Ltr.'E• S55°59:lTW• 15' 72'
-~-~ LIVING ROOM
R-2 0
11 1 1 11
~
---E3--
UVl'IG ROOM
R..2 0
Cl)
@
Ii i i ii
~
-E3--
UVINO ROOM ...,
0
r-11r
PffOECT TRl.e
HCRTH NORTH
SECOND FLOOR PLAN @i) ..............,.........,.._.. ____ _
1/B" -1'-0"
10'-0° SETBACK
fif}=~====1
154'""8 1/T'
10'.01tr ,o•.g 112" r-10-
I
~1
~I !I
$ij
PRO.£CI TRIF-
~TH NORTH
THIRD FLOOR PLAN @&) _.;;..;;;...___ ____ _
1/B"-1'-0"
I PHOTOVOLTAIC PAN£~"J
&I
ii
~I
11
~I ~,
PHOTOVOLTAIC P~LS.TYP.
154'~ 112~
PRO.ECT TRL'=
NORTI-4 tiORTH
-------ROOFPLAN @G)
1/8" = 1'-0"
10"-0' SST8ACK , ....
STW<