Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-09-24; City Council; ; Update to the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan and appropriation of funds for implementation of the plan's goals, strategies and recommendationsCA Review At ,(;,, 6) S~~f i R~port Meeting Date: To: From: Staff Contact: Subject: Sept.24,2019 Mayor and City Council Scott Chadwick, City Manager Kyle Lancaster, Parks & Recreation Director Kyle.Lancaster@carlsbadca.gov, 760-434-2941 Update to the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan and appropriation of funds for implementation of the plan's goals, strategies and recommendations. Recommended Action Adopt a Resolution approving an update to the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan and appropriating a total of $345,000 of ongoing funds to the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget for implementation of the plan's goals, strategies and recommendations. Executive Summary Section 4.3.10 ofthe Carlsbad General Plan Lawsuit Settlement Agreement executed in March 2017, between the city and North County Advocates, states "Within 18 months, the city shall present to the City Council for consideration an update to the Community Forest Management Plan which includes a program to identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable, and will include provisions for protection and enhancement of the urban tree canopy." On Sept. 18, 2018, the City Council received a staff report on the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan (CCFMP), which included discussion of various chapters and sections of the document that were eligible for updates (Exhibit 2). Staff estimated that the consultant services necessary to complete the update would entail $135,000 in expenditures and take a minimum of one year to complete. The City Council adopted a resolution authorizing staff to update the CCFMP, in response to the General Plan Lawsuit Settlement Agreement (Resolution No. 2018-168). The update to the CCFMP is complete and has been recommended for City Council approval by the Historic Preservation Commission (specific to the Heritage Tree Reports) and the Parks & Recreation Commission. Discussion Background In negotiations to settle the lawsuit challenging the city's certification of the General Plan Environmental Impact Report, North County Advocates expressed their desire that the city update its Community Forest Management Plan. In March 2017, the City Council approved the General Plan Lawsuit Settlement Agreement between the city and North County Advocates (Resolution No. 2017-228), which includes Section 4.3.10 that states: "Within 18 months, the September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 1 of 26 city shall present to the City Council for consideration an update to the Community Forest Management Plan which includes a program to identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable, and will include provisions for protection and enhancement of the urban tree canopy." The agreement did not obligate the City Council to approve an update to the plan. On Sept. 18, 2018, the City Council received a staff report on the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan (CCFMP), which included discussion of various chapters and sections of the document that were eligible for updates. The City Council adopted a resolution authorizing staff to update the CCFMP, in response to the General Plan Lawsuit Settlement Agreement. Staff subsequently sought and hired two qualified consultants, Wisniewski & Associates and West Coast Arborists, Inc. (WCA), to assist in the process of updating the CCFMP. The assistance of Wisniewski & Associates was specific to the updating of the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports -i.e., The Historic Village District, and Phase II. The assistance of WCA was critical to updating the full CCFMP, minus the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports. WCA has also been the city's primary contractor for tree maintenance services over the last 15 years. Tree Inventory As a foundation of updating the CCFMP, staff ensured that WCA brought current the full inventory of city managed trees. -i.e., street, median, park, facility, trail and urban forest interface trees. The inventory includes tree characteristics such as species, height, width and condition, as well as Global Positioning Systems location and inspection/pruning history. As a result of those recent efforts, the full inventory of city managed trees is at 28,066 trees, of 284 different species. In addition, the city's urban forest areas -i.e., Hosp Grove, Woodbine Banks, Batiquitos Drive and Village H -consist of an estimated 15,000 trees, predominantly of Eucalyptus species. Combined, the city successfully manages an estimated 43,000 trees, using industry standards and best management practices. Goals and Strategies of the Updated CCFMP As with the original CCFMP, the updated CCFMP specifically addresses the portions of the community forest that the city can influence directly. The plan is focused on city-managed landscapes and areas within the street tree assessment districts. The updated CCFMP includes the following goals and strategies for the protection and enhancement of the urban forest canopy: 1 Promote citywide tree preservation and community education about the community forest and sustainability. A. Maintain the Tree City USA designation in perpetuity. B. Encourage residents to participate in city tree planting events held on occasions such as Earth Day, Arbor Day and National Public Lands Day: Such events typically include collaboration with staff from the Communications and Environmental Management Divisions to further assist in promoting quality tree care in the community. C. Showcase specimen trees or heritage trees on the city's website and on social media throughout the year to generate interest in the diversity and significance of trees. September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 2 of 26 2 Expand the community forest in areas with lesser tree canopy density and maximize its benefits. A. Add an average of 500 trees per year to the city's tree inventory or affect an increase in Carlsbad's Total Tree Canopy by 5% (whichever occurs first) through the end of calendar year 2025, so as to further enhance the community forest. 8. Plant two inventoried trees for every one inventoried tree removed, to ensure the longevity of the community forest. Only one each of those planted trees shall count toward the addition of an average of 500 trees per year to the city's tree inventory. C. A concentrated effort will be made to install new trees in sparsely forested areas in Hosp Grove that Jack shade canopy. 3. Manage an estimated 43,000 City of Carlsbad-owned/ controlled trees using industry standards and best management practices. A. Continuously review the condition and recommended maintenance of the city's community forest and look for opportunities to improve health. 8. Utilize best management practices and industry standards when all work is performed on city trees. C. Continuously train staff on new technology and scientific discoveries to ensure the most up-to-date information is in the hands of tree care professionals. Consistency and Alignment The updated CCFMP is consistent with, and/or aligned with, each of the following: • Carlsbad Community Vision and Values • Carlsbad City Coundl Policy No. 4 -Street Trees • Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 11.12 -Trees and Shrubs • Carlsbad Municipal Ordinances Nos. 43, 44 and 46 -Water Conservation/Irrigation • Carlsbad Landscape Manual • Carlsbad Climate Action Plan • Carlsbad Sustainability Environmental Guiding Principles • Carlsbad General Plan • Carlsbad Local Coastal Program • Carlsbad Village and Barrio Master Plan Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports Chapter 6 of the updated CCFMP is dedicated to a program to identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable. As another foundational element of the updated CCFMP, staff ensured that Wisniewski & Associates brought current the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports -i.e., The Historic Village District (also known as Phase I), and Phase II. Phase I identified heritage tree candidates that were predominantly within the Historic Village District (depicted via maps in Appendix A to the report). Phase II identified heritage tree candidates in a wider geographical area, some near the original zone, and some within further outlying areas (depicted via maps in Appendix A of the report). The Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports contain both city-owned and privately-owned heritage tree candidates. The original Phase I report of 2002 contained 110 total heritage tree candidates. September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 3 of 26 The updated Phase I report reflects 74 of those tree candidates remain, and one tree candidate has been added, for a net of 75 he ritage tree candidates. Of those 75 heritage tree candidates, 41 are city-owned and 34 are privately owned. The original Phase II report of 2009 contained 51 total tree candidates. The updated Phase II report reflects 41 of those tree candidates remain. Of those 41 heritage tree candidates, 11 are city-owned and 30 are privately owned. Both Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports contain the same Management Recommendations Summary (Phase 1-Page 91; Phase II -Page 257). The summary contains 15 recommendations, some of which are solely administrative and others of which have operational and/or financial impacts. As stated in both reports, the recommendations are to: ... provide for the health, safety and longevity of Carlsbad's Heritage Trees. These recommendations should be adopted by the City Council as mandatory for all city owned Heritage Trees, and are advisory only recommendations for any privately-owned and non-city owned public Heritage Trees. The Carlsbad Heritage Tree Report -Phase II also contains six Supplemental Recommendations (Page 260). Like the initial recommendations, some of the supplemental recommendations are solely administrative and others have operational and/or financial impacts. As stated in the report: The trees in the Phase II Study have some additional requirements, especially those located in historic parks or in natural open space areas. Some of these recommendations are of a general nature, and others are specific to individual trees. As in the Phase I Study the recommendations should be adopted as mandatory for all city owned Heritage Trees and are advisory only for privately owned and any non-city owned public Heritage Trees. Both Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports additionally contain the same Heritage Tree Nomination Process (Phase 1-Page 93; Phase II -Page 261). A ten-step nomination process is suggested. As stated in the report: A process should be developed for the city to allow for the nomination of additional Heritage Trees by its citizens. Review, Input and Action The process of updating the CCFMP involved review and input from staff of the Parks & Recreation, Public Works, Library & Cultural Arts, Community & Economic Development, Communications, Finance and Fire Departments. Additionally, the process included review and input from North County Advocates. In late June 2019, staff sent a preliminary draft of the updated CCFMP to North County Advocates. In early July 2019, North County Advocates provided comments to the preliminary draft of the updated CCFMP and in late August 2019, staff responded to those comments (Exhibit 3). In late August 2019, staff also posted a revised draft of the updated CCFMP on the city website for public review, sent social media alerts, and notified the Historic Preservation Commission September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 4 of 26 and the Parks & Recreation Commission. On Sept. 9, 2019, the Historic Preservation Commission received a presentation on the updated CCFMP (specific to the Heritage Tree Reports) and voted to recommend its approval by the City Council. On Sept. 11, North County Advocates provided further comments to the revised draft of the updated CCFMP and on Sept. 12, 2019, staff responded to those comments (Exhibit 4). No other comments from the public were provided. On Sept. 16, 2019, the Parks & Recreation Commission received a presentation on the updated CCFPM and voted to recommend its approval by the City Council. Fiscal Analysis Staff is requesting a total appropriation of $345,000 of ongoing funds to the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget for implementation of the CCFMP's goals, strategies and recommendations. The below table provides the distribution of the requested appropriation. Community Forest Management Plan-Goals, Strategies & Recommendations Amount Landscape materials for adding an average of 500 trees/yr. to city's inventory $75,000 Contractual services for adding an average of 500 trees/yr. to city's inventory $98,000 Part-time Program Coordinator for administration of adding 500 trees /yr. $25,000 Part-time Maintenance Technician for field oversight of adding 500 trees/yr. $20,000 Contractual services for public outreach of tree plantings and Heritage Trees $35,000 Landscape materials for de-compacting drip lines of city-owned Heritage Trees $31,000 Contractual services for drafting annual reports on city-owned Heritage Trees $35,000 Contractual services for arborist's direct pruning of city-owned Heritage Trees $26,000 Appropriation of Ongoing Funds to the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget $345,000 Next Steps Staff will take steps to implement the above listed goals, strategies and recommendations of the update to the CCFMP. In particular, staff will commence recruitments and subsequently fill the noted part-time positions. Staff will also seek proposals for the noted contractual services and pursue the execution of formal agreements. Environmental Evaluation (CEQA) An environmental review concluded the potential environmental impacts associated with the update to the CCFMP were exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA}, per CEQA Guidelines Section 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land). Public Notification and Outreach This item was noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public viewing and review at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting date. Exhibits 1. City Council Resolution 2. City Cou ncil Staff Report, dated Sept. 18, 2018, authorizing staff to update the CCFMP 3. North County Advocates comments/staff responses on prelim. draft of update to the CCFMP 4. North County Advocates comments/staff responses on revised draft of update to the CCFMP 5. Update to the CCFMP, on file at the City Clerk's Office September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 5 of 26 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN UPDATE TO THE CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN AND APPROPRIATING A TOTAL OF $345,000 OF ONGOING FUNDS TO THE PARKS MAINTENANCE OPERATING BUDGET FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN'S GOALS, STRATEGIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS WHEREAS, Section 4.3.10 of the Carlsbad General Plan Lawsuit Settlement Agreement executed in March 2017, between the city and North County Advocates, states "Within 18 months, the City shall present to the City Council for consideration an update to the Community Forest Management Plan (CCFMP) which includes a program to identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable, and will include provisions for protection and enhancement of the urban tree canopy"; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 2018, the City Council received a staff report on the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan (CCFMP), which included discussion of various chapters and sections of the document that were eligible for updates; and WHEREAS, staff estimated the update would entail $135,000 in consultant services expenditures and take a minimum of one year to complete; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing staff to update the CCFMP, in response to the General Plan Lawsuit Settlement Agreement (Resolution No. 2018-168); and WHEREAS, staff subsequently sought and hired two qualified consultants, Wisniewski & Associates and West Coast Arborists, Inc. (WCA), to assist in the process of updating the CCFMP; and WHEREAS, the assistance of Wisniewski & Associates was specific to the updating of the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports -i.e., The Historic Village District, and Phase II; and WHEREAS, the assistance of WCA was critical to updating the full CCFMP, minus the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports; and September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 6 of 26 WHEREAS, as a foundation of updating the CCFMP, staff ensured that WCA brought current the full inventory of city managed trees; and WHEREAS, the city successfully manages an estimated 43,000 trees, of 284 different species, using industry standards and best management practices; and WHEREAS, the updated CCFMP includes goals and strategies for the protection and enhancement ofthe urban forest canopy; and WHEREAS, the updated CCFMP is consistent with, and/or aligned with, several other Carlsbad planning and management documents; and WHEREAS, Chapter 6 of the updated CCFMP is dedicated to a program to identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable; and WHEREAS, as another foundational element of the updated CCFMP, staff ensured that Wisniewski & Associates brought current the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports; and WHEREAS, the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports contain a Management Recommendations Summary and Supplemental Recommendations; and WHEREAS, these recommendations are to be mandatory for all city-owned Heritage Trees; and WHEREAS, the process of updating the CCFMP involved review and input from staff ofthe Parks & Recreation, Public Works, Library & Cultural Arts, Community & Economic Development, Communications, Finance, and Fire Departments, and from North County Advocates; and WHEREAS, in late August 2019, staff posted a revised draft of the updated CCFMP on the city website for public review, sent social media alerts, and informed the Historic Preservation Commission and the Parks & Recreation Commission; and September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 7 of 26 WHEREAS, on Sept. 9, 2019, the Historic Preservation Commission received a presentation on the updated CCFMP (specific to the Heritage Tree Reports) and voted to recommend its approval by the City Council; and WHEREAS, on Sept. 16, 2019, the Parks & Recreation Commission received a presentation on the updated CCFPM and voted to recommend its approval by the City Council; and WHEREAS, staff requests appropriation of $345,000 of ongoing funds to the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget for implementation of the updated CCFMP's goals, strategies and recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the City Council hereby approves the update to the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan. 3. That the Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services is authorized and directed to appropriate $345,000 of ongoing funds to the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget for implementation of the updated CCFMP's goals, strategies and recommendations. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 24th day of September 2019, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Hall, Blackburn, Bhat-Patel, Schumacher. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Hamilton. Mx~ fr, ~ lltr:1ru btJtntz, JJepvt-4 (Jf BARBARA ENGLESON, City Clerk Cif ( 1,,,"'""""""' c fe 1/ (SEAL) ~'~o~''f CA/1('111¼ ~--··•··.\$'~ ff!::/~\~ \ 0 l~)(~f'J ~ ,. · .... ..,,, ....... ·· ~ ~'".:..l• .......... •·~..._.-~ ~✓,..:", lr:-na.'""~~,,'°" September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 8 of 26 EXHli3lT 2 ll~ CA Review=== _ CITY CO UN CH ~ Staff Report Meeting Date To: from: Staff Contact: Subject September 18, 2018 Mayor and City Council Scott Chadwick, City Manager t<yfflelancaster, Paliks Services Manager lcyleJancaster@carlsbadca.gov ,o,r 760-434~2941 Authorizing staff to• update the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan Recommended Action Adopt a resolution authorizing staff to update the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, in response to the General Pfarn Lawsuit Setti:ement Agreement. Executive Summaa Section 4.3.10 of the Ca,rlsbad Gener.al P]an Lawsuit Settlement Agreement executed in March 2017, betv.teen the City of Ca,dsbad and North County Advocates, states "Within 18 months, the Ctty shall present to the City Council for consideration an update to the Community Forest Management Plan (CCFMP} whkh indudes a program to, Identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable, and will lnclude provislons for protection and enhancement of the urban tree canopy." ln response, staff is asking the Oty Council to consider a,n updait•e to the CCFMP. Discussion In negotiations to settle the lawsuit against the citls certification of the General Pl'.an E.nvlronmental Impact Report, North County Advocates expressed th.eir desire that the city update its community forest management plan. In March 2017, the Crty Council approved the Genera! Plan lawsuit Settlement Agreement between the City of Carlsbad and North County Advocates (Council Resolution No. 2017-228}. \11.~hid1 includes Section 4.3.10 that states: "Within 1& monthst the City shall present to the City Council for consideration an update to the Community Forest Management Plan whkh includes a program to identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable, and w111 fndude provisions for protectron and enhancement of the urban tree canopy_,-, The settlement agreement does not obligate the City Coundl to approve an update to the plan. Bac~ground In November 1999, the dty formed a Street Tree Policy Committee to addr,ess tree removal and tree care within the community forest under its managernent The committee ultimately drafted a report. That report contained accessory recommendations, induding the· creation of a CCFMF\ In June,, 2000, the City Council appropriated funds and directed staff to-fmplement the report's recomrnendatTons (Council Resolutron No. 2000-183). September 18, 2018 Item #4 Page 1 of 7 September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 9 of 26 To that end, a natural resources and urban forestry consulting firm was retained by the city to create a community forest management plan. Shortly thereafter, a project team was organized, which included the consultant, several city staff (i.e.; Public Works, Library, and Fire Departments/Divisions), Parks & Recreation Co.mmissioners, and a Street Tree Policy Committee member·. The team ultimately drafted the CCFMP. In April 2002, the draft CCFMP was completed. In addition to standard public noticing, the project team also notified all Street Tree Policy Committee members that the draft CCFMP was available for review. During the review period, staff received suggestions from the public to . add different tree species to the proposed tree list within the draft CCFMP. · Staff agreed with those suggestions, and incorporated the species into the list. In May 2002, the CCFMP was presented to the Historic Preservation Commission, which was responsible for the development of a companion heritage tree program. The Heritage Tree Report (Ph. I and II) was to be incorporated as an addendum to the CCFMP, upon adoption by the City Council. This commission supported the advancement of the draft CCFMP for adoption. In May 2002, the draft CCFMP was presented to the Parks & R~creation Commission. This commission likewise supported the advancement of the draft CCFMP for adoption. In April 2003, the City Council adopted the CCFMP (Council Resolution No. 2003-085). The vision statement of the CCFM P is: Through proactive management, achievement of a safe and healthy community forest that continues to include rich species and age diversity, provides maximum canopy cover by utilizing available planting space, unites neighborhoods with familiar tree themes, and replaces trees to sustain the forest in perpetuity, while fostering community support through education and involvement. According to the CCFMP, the document's vision statement and policies are applicable to trees · throughout Carlsbad; both private and public, but they specifically address the portions of the community forest that the city can influence directly. Those portions of the forest that the city can influence directly are within the Street Tree Assessment District's (STAD) public rights-of- way. Boundaries of the STAD align with boundaries of Lighting and Landscape District No. 1. The CCFMP is a comprehensive, functional document, divided into the following ten chapters: 1. Introduction 2. Community Education 3. Uniform Street Tree Planting Map 4. Replacing Old Age Trees 5. Removal of Trees Not iri the City's Rights-of-Way 6. Tree Selection 7. Heritage Trees 8. Emergency Plan 9. Hosp Grove Management Plan 10. Operations Plan September 18, 2018 Item #4 Page 2 of 7 September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 10 of 26 As a result of changes that have occurred in the community forest since the CCFMP's adoption, various chapters and sections of the document are eligible for updates. Those updates could reflect items such as: modifications to the city's organizational structure and administrative processes regarding the protection and enhancement of the community forest, amendments to City Council Policy No. 4 -Street Trees and Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 11.12 -Trees and Shrubs; revisions to tree species names, conditions and growth patterns; and the status of tree specific reports/studies. One example of these tree specific reports/studies, is the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Report (CHTR) -Phase I and II. According to Carlsbad Municipal Code 11.12.020.A.4., "Heritage trees shall be trees with notable historic interest or trees of an unusual species or size." Phase I of the CHTR - which focuses on trees within the Historic Village District -was initially compiled by the Historic Preservation Commission's consultant in 2002, and was brought current by that consultant in 2006 and 2007. Its scope includes both city trees and private trees proposed for heritage tree designation because of one or more of the following characteristics: species, rarity, size, age, shape, historic or cultural significance. Phase I of the CHTR contains: • Botanical and common names of the heritage tree candidates for each site, with photos • Identifications of trees that are rare or endangered in their native habitat ■ A collection of media coverage and other literature on several trees within Carlsbad • Recommendations to be utilized in the ongoing maintenance of heritage trees After incorporation of the latest data, Phase I of the CHTR was submitted to the Historic . Preservation Commission and the Parks & Recreation Commission for review. In November 2007, both commissions accepted the report and supported its forwarding for further action. Upon the commissions' acceptance of Phase I of the CHTR, a·notification letter was mailed to the property owners of all private heritage tree candidates. In addition, Phase I of the CHTR was posted for public review and comment from December 2007 through January 2008. In October 2009, the City Council accepted -not adopted -Phase I of the CHTR. The report was not adopted largely due to the cost implications of the above referenced recommendations to be utilized in the ongoing maintenance of (city) heritage trees. Phase II of the CHTR -which focuses on trees within the balance of the STAD -was initially compiled by the Historic Preservation Commission's consultant in 2009, and was brought current by that consultant in 2011. Its scope and contents are consistent with those of Phase I of the CHTR. To date, further processing of Phase II of the CHTR has not been pursued. Current Consideration The recently adopted CVBMP also references trees within three distinct chapters and sections. Chapter 1, Introduction, Section 1.5 of the CVBIViP details the Goals and Policies established to reinforce the vision of the plan. The first of the four categories of Goals and Policies is Land Use and. Community Character. Subsection l.E of the category notes a goal to "Recognize and support ttie historical roots of the Village and Barrio." Item 2 of that subsection identifies a policy to "Support a program to identify and protect heritage trees in the VIiiage and Barrio as part of a future update to the citywide Community Forest Management Plan." September 18, 2018 Item #4 Page 3 of 7 September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 11 of 26 Chapter 4, Mobility and Beautification, Section 4.3 of the CVBMP details the goal to Create Livable Streets in Carlsbad, specifically creating a safe environment for walking and biking. Subsection 4.3.8, Provide Shade, describes street trees as being "essential for a thriving village environment." It also indicates that street trees within the Village and the Barrio have been a point of discussion for merchants and residents. It further provides specific recommendations to address street trees in the plan area. Item 1 of that subsection notes "The Community Forest Management Plan sets forth standards for planting, removal, replacement, maintenance and the preservation of street trees. Using a similar palette of species, including the use of more palm trees or other beach character flora, will help add to the small-town character of the Village and help unify it with the Barrio ... " Chapter 5, Implementation, Section 5.6 of the CVBMP details the Implementation Action Plan. The vision and goals presented in the plan are supported by project/program recommendations outlined in Table 5.1, Implementation Action Matrix. Row nine of the Regulatory Programs, Plans and Studies subsection of that matrix includes a short range action to "Identify top priority streets to plant trees to provide more shade and increase connectivity between the Village and the Barrio (consider through Community Forest Management Plan Update.)" As noted above, various chapters and sections of the CCFM Pare eligible for updates. Processing an update to the CCFMP would, however, require additional expenditures and resources, including staff time from the Parks & Recreation, Public Works, Library & Cultural Arts, Community & Economic Development; Communications, Finance, and Fire Departments/Divisions. In addition, an update to the plan will necessitate the hiring of qualified consultant(s), and the re-engagement of the public. Staff estimates an update to the CCFMP would entail $135,000 in expenditures, and would take a minimum of one year to complete. The reallocation of staff time from the above departments/divisions to update the CCFMP will also impact work capabilities on other projects and initiatives. Staff is recommending that the City Council authorize staff to update the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, in response to the General Plan Lawsuit Settlement. Fiscal Analysis Sufficient contingency funds are available in the Parks & Recreation Department's operating budgets to account for the estimated $135,000 in expenses associated with an update to the CCFMP. Next Steps Staff will seek qualified consultant(s) to initiate a process to update to the CCFMP. Environmental Evaluation (CEQA) Consulting services to process an update to the CCFMP are statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies). However, the implementation of the plan will require completion of an initial study to determine the level of environmental review that would be required to implement the plan. This determination will occur after the plan has been updated. September 18, 2018 Item #4 Page 4 of 7 September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 12 of 26 Public Notification This item was noticed in accordance with the Ralph M . Brown Act and was available for public viewing and review at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting date. Exhibits 1. City Council Resolution 2. Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, 2002, (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) and available online at: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/services/depts/parks/facilities/pest management.asp 3. Carlsbad Village and Barrio Mater Plan, 2018, (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) and · available online at: http://www.carlsbadca .gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload .aspx?Blob lD=36580 September 18, 2018 Item #4 Page 5 of 7 September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 13 of 26 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO UPDATE THE CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN, IN RESPONSE TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1:XIIIBII I WHEREAS, on March 14, 2017, the City Council approved the General Plan Lawsuit Settlement Agreement between the City of Carlsbad and North County Advocates (Settlement Agreement) [Council Resolution No, 2017-228); and WHEREAS, Section 4.3.10 of the Settlement Agreement requires that "Within 18 months, the City shall present to the City Council for consideration an update to the Community Forest Management Plan (CCFMP) which includes a program to identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable, and will include provisions for protection and enhancement of the urban tree canopy"; and WHEREAS, in April 2003, the City Council adopted the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan (CFMP) [Council Resolution No. 2003-085]; and WHEREAS, as a result of changes that have occurred in the community forest since the CCFMP's adoption, various chapters and sections of the document are eligible for updates; and WHEREAS, those updates could reflect items such as: modifications to the city's organizational structure and administrative processes regarding the protection and enhancement of the community forest, amendments to City Council Policy No. 4 -Street Trees and Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 11.12 -Trees and Shrubs; revisions to tree species names, conditions and growth patterns; and the status of tree specific reports/studies; and WHEREAS, one example of these reports/studies, is the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Report; and WHEREAS, the recently adopted Carlsbad Village and Barrio Master Plan references trees within three chapters: Chapter 1, Introduction, Section 1.5; Chapter 4, Mobility and Beautification, Section 4.3; and Chapter 5, Implementation, Section 5.6; and September 18, 2018 Item #4 Page 6 of 7 September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 14 of 26 Comments on Draft Community Forest M anagement Plan Dated June 2019 Overall Recommendations Staff Responses EXHIBIT 3 Ju ly 2,2019 August 29, 2019 -The settlement agreement item 10 includes that the Community Forest Management Plan (CFMP) '"will include provisions for protection and enhancement of the urban tree canopy." The update to the CFMP thoroughly addresses this item. The CFPM is focused on the city owned/maintained trees. Pe r Appendix A this only represents about 24% of the total urban tree canopy. (UTC) The CFMP needs to also include the other 76% of the UTC. Please see the City Council Staff Report of September 18, 2018 for information on the focus of the CFMP. This would include guidelines for new development such as mitigation requirements for impacts to trees, species lists and maintenance requirements. It would also include guidelines for trees on private property. These items are addressed via the Carlsbad Landscape Manual, and project specific Conditions of Approval. The Porks Division is already actively involved in the review and approval of new development plans. Throughout this process, staff reviews plans and requires adherence to tree related requirements for the projects. Since the city does not have authority over those trees that would take a different form such as incentives, support for neighborhood tree planting projects and public education. But the intent is to treat the canopy as a whole with the entire community engaged in its protection. The CFMP is an opportunity to engage the entire community in recognizing the value of and caring for their trees. Further work is needed to make it a more comprehensive plan. The pion discusses community outreach and education as a means of engaging the public and informing them of proper tree core and maintenance. With this update, we hove done the some. We will continue our outreach and education programs through community events such as our Arbor Doy events and trail volunteer events. We will pursue collaboration with our Environmental Management Division to supplement other outreach and education events throughout the city with tree related programs. -The required enhancement of the UTC appears to consist of adding 2025 trees -or a .8% increase in the identified number of trees {2025/25,000). Since the objective is to increase the canopy this should be stated in terms of that ie an increase to the 16.66% UTC shown on page 330. We really think this is a ridiculously low target considering all of the benefits discussed throughout the report, the requirement for enhancement in the Village/Barrio plan and the benefits of reduced GHG from a larger UTC. This section of the CFMP hos been revised/expanded to read as follows: 112. Expand the community forest in areas with lesser tree canopy density and maximize its benefits. A. Add on overage of 500 trees per year to the city's tree inventory, or increase Carlsbad's Total Tree Canopy by 5% (whichever occurs first) by the end of calendar year 2025, so as to further enhance the community forest." September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 16 of 26 Furthermore, replacing large mature trees, even with a 2:1 replacement ratio, is no assurance that the canopy will increase. Some species have larger canopies, age and condition, and where t hey are planted can all impact the size of the canopy. Replacement planting at 2:1 ratio is a net gain of trees that will typically provide increased canopy coverage in less time that a simple 1:1 ratio. Staff will choose species based on numerous factors, including expected canopy size. In their CAP the city of San Diego established a UTC goal of 35%-that is something to aspire to. The CFMP sets a goal that is S.M.A.R. T (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Timely) for the City of Carlsbad. -It is unclear if the Phase 1 and Phase II heritage tree studies now cover the entire city. If not, then that should be clarified. The process for nominating candidate trees could then be used to expand coverage citywide. The maps included within the Heritage Tree Reports clearly depict the areas that were studied for each phase. -For readability the detailed heritage tree reports and appendices should be an appendix to the CFMP. The chapter in the CFMP that addresses heritage trees would then just summarize key information and recommendations. The layout is consistent with the following provision of the original CFMP, Chapter 7 -Heritage Trees, Pg. 28, "When completed, this information will be provided to the City for review and adoption and incorporated in the CFMP." -Formal policies are not clearly specified in a consistent way. Some are listed as specific · recommendations, others are not. See pages 86 and 252-255. Revisions have been completed for greater consistency. -The process for integrating formal recommendations into actual ordinances or regulations is not clear. For example, on page 86 there is a recommendation to prohibit "topping." Is there an intent to actually include this as a formal requirement? If so, the report should clearly identify such regulations as well as the process that will be used to implement them. If the plan is to first accept the report and then come back at a later time with related regulations this should be specified. No changes to the Carlsbad Municipal Code are anticipated as a result of adoption of the CFMP. City staff and its contractors already operate under most of the provisions noted in the CFMP. The 'recommendations' within the Heritage Tree Reports would become 'requirements' for the care of city- owned heritage trees, upon adoption of the CFMP. These inclusions would be addressed operationally. -There will be a cost associated with implementing many of the recommendations. What is the plan for addressing that? The costs associated with the implementing the recommendations will be addressed in the City Council Staff Report seeking adoption of the CFMP, and appropriation of the corresponding funds. September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 17 of 26 -We would like to see a clear preference for native tree species. While th_ere certainly is a place for ornamental trees the final report should provide some balance between natives and ornamentals and recognize natives as preferred for their value in creating a sense of place and for sustainability. Native trees typically require less water than ornamentals, and generally support the local ecology better than ornamentals. Sustainability also needs to consider those species better adapted to climate change. Native street trees: https://www.pinterest.com/formlainc/la-native-parkway-trees/ The parameters for the selection of species are detailed in Chapter 3 of the CFMP. Specific Recommendations {Page references are to electronic 330 page doc) P6 says "the benefits of trees are well known" without listing any. In several other places (see p 14 and 15 for example) some of those benefits are specified. Have a single clear statement about the benefits of trees. This item has been addressed in the revisions to the CFMP. P9 "sense of being in a distant land" in reference to the eucalyptus trees in Hosp Grove is really out of place. This item has been addressed in the revisions to the CFMP. P14 add reference to a requirement that no invasive species will be included and reference key sources including SDNHM and CAL-IPC-lists. This item has been addressed in the revisions to the CFMP. PlS discussion of 2:1 replacement achieving a net reduction in GHG is not correct, and is not consistent with the appendix showing the value of trees for carbon sequestration. The amount of carbon sequestration varies by species, age, and size of trees. Replacing a single large canopy tree with 2 small container plants has a net increase in GHG. If there is a real intent to use tree planting to help reduce GHG then there needs to be much clearer guidelines about how this will be accomplished. One of the benefits of a 2:1 planting ratio is a reduction in GHG -over time. It is not the only purpose for planting a tree and GHG reduction is not the only outcome desired when planting a tree. P 16 there needs to be a clear explanation about the differences between LLDl and 2 and city- maintained areas. The information on page 329 makes this clearer than the body of the report, but more information is still needed. How do these districts differ from each other in terms of their tree maintenance? Are they completely consistent with the proposed CFMP? How will the fees in these districts be adjusted to support consistency with the overall program-or will they remain outside of it? This item has been addressed in the revisions to the CFMP. P 17 Fire safety should also be a factor considered in identifying tree species-several of the pine and eucalyptus species are high risk. Also please indicate how replacement of trees not on the list will be addressed. Will they be replaced with a tree that is on the list? Are there exceptions and if so under what conditions would this be allowed? September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 18 of 26 The approved species list guides the selection of new trees; a variety of factors are taken into consideration when selecting a species. The Fire Department has reviewed the approved species list. Replacement of trees which species are not on the list will be made by species which are on the list. P22 Unclear how wildlife protection is being added. This needs to be incorporated into guidelines and not just be a general discussion. The CFMP references a recent publication "Tree Care for Birds and Other Wildlife" that will be used as a resource to guide management decisions regarding wildlife. P23 Why isn't the CCC recommendation for non-invasive and drought tolerant species used in the Village/Barrio included for the entire city? Are any of the trees included on the p 17 species list not in compliance with this? There are no invasive species on the approved species list. Some of the species are more drought tolerant than others, but the list does not include species that have a high water requirement. There should be a figure that distinguishes what the text describes as four existing urban forest areas where trees have not been counted. This item has been addressed in the revisions to the CFMP. Also this should reference any site specific plans. We are aware of one that was done for Hosp Grove that should be integrated. Where there are area specific plans it needs to be clear what prevails. P27 This sounds too much like these areas will be preserved as is, when in fact that is not consistent with the Hosp Grove management plan and likely would not be for the others if they have plans. Ideally there would be plans for all of these areas to gradually convert them to a more sustainable, and site appropriate species mix. The four urban forest areas will all be addressed in like manner, in accordance with Chapter 5 of the CFMP. P30 says that all of the recommendations from the heritage tree reports "are applicable." Hopefully that means all are adopted and will be implemented. This needs to be clarified. This item has been addressed in the revisions to the CFMP. P 78 it is sad that by 2019 there was only one native heritage tree remaining. We would like to see additional effort put into identifying and preserving more of these native trees. Staff would follow the Heritage Tree nominating process detailed in the Heritage Tree Reports P 88(and 256) Will this process for nominating heritage trees be implemented. If so, that should be clear. Adoption of the CFMP would include implementing the Heritage Tree nominating process. September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 19 of 26 P 39 and 162 the loss of heritage trees from the original surveys until the 2019 update is very disturbing (Phase I down from 110 to 74. Phase II from 51 to 41). What is the ongoing plan for monitoring and reporting on the number of added/lost heritage tees? City staff and its contractors are already monitoring and collecting data on the heritage trees candidates that are within city owned or controlled properties. This information can be reported to the Historic Preservation Commission upon request. P314 Sustainable species list would be clearer to just include this as a column on the page 17 species list and preferably the majority of species included on the list would be sustainable. Staff and its consultant determined this list is appropriately placed in current chapter for added emphasis. P316 Appendix A. This information is very helpful for establishing carbon sequestration and other values of trees. But the text in the report is not consistent with the detailed information shown here. This item has been addressed in the revisions to the CFMP. September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 20 of 26 Kyle Lancaster, CPRP Parks & Recreation Director Parks & Recreation Department . City of Carlsbad 799 Pine Ave., Ste. 200 Carlsbad, CA 92008 · September 12, 2019 Staff Responses Dear Mr.Lancaster: EXHIBIT 4 North County Advocates 7668 El Camino Real, Suite 104-258, Carlsbad CA 92009 September 12, 2019 We appreciate the effort that has gone into this comprehensive update of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan.(CCFMP) This update was done partially to address a requirement of our settlement agreement over the General Plan. Trees are an important part of the heritage of this community. Enhancing and protecting them is one of 9everal ways our settlement was intended to provide community benefits to offset the adverse impacts of the growth included in the General Plan. It is therefore important that this update of the CCFMP address both the letter and the intent of our agreement. There are four issues that we believe require further action to be in full compliance. They include: 1. CCFMP is essentially limited to city owned/managed trees There are some comments about trees not managed by the city. But although these trees account for 76% (seep. 335) of the tree canopy within the city they are not really incorporated into this plan. Please see the City Council Staff Report of September 18, 2018 for information on the focus of the CCFMP. This reference was also included in staff's August 29, 2019 responses to North County Advocates July 2, 2019 comments to the preliminary draft of the CCFMP. Of course the city has more limited options about what can be done with trees on private property. But they can have clear policies and goals about new development, both residential and commercial. These items are addressed via the Carlsbad Landscape Manual, and project specific Conditions of Approval. The Parks Division is already actively involved in the review and approval .of new development plans. Throughout this process, staff reviews plans and requires adherence to tree related requirements for the projects. This reference was also included in staff's August 29, 2019 responses to North County Advocates July 2, 2019 comments to the preliminary draft of the CCFMP. Landscape plans for new development projects are reviewed by licensed landscape architects, certified arborists; and other landscape professionals as a matter of practice of the Planning Division (for new private development projects) and the Parks Division (for new public development projects). Tree quantity and placement are routinely taken into account as part of the landscape plan review/approval process. Other support documents used in this review process include the California Invasive Plant North County Advocates is a non-profit 501© 3 public benefit corporation. TIN 27-3158348. www.northcountvadvocates.com September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 21 of 26 --North County Advocates - 7668 El Camino Real, Suite 104-258, Carlsbad CA 92009 Council Inventory, the Water Use Classification of Species IV, Storm Water Best Management Practices Design Sheet, andany specific plan associated with the development area. And they can include more robust programs to support community education, stewardship and enhancement of trees on private property. The related goal and strategy within the final draft CCFMP has been expanded upon as follows: 1 Promote citywide tree preservation and community education about the community forest and sustainability. A. Maintain the Tree City USA designation in perpetuity. B. Encourage residents to participate in city tree planting events held on occasions such as Earth Day, Arbor Day and National Public Lands Day. Such events typically include collaboration with staff from the Communications and Environmental Services Divisions to further assist in promoting quality tree care in the community. C. Showcase specimen trees or heritage trees on the city's website and on social media throughout the year to generate interest in the diversity and significance of trees. The costs associated with the implementing the recommendations will be addressed in the City Council Staff Report seeking adoption of the CFMP, and appropriation of the corresponding funds. This reference was also included in staff's August 29, 2019 responses to North County Advocates July 2, 2019 comments to the preliminary draft of the CCFMP. In particular, the draft staff report includes a request for appropriation of $35,000 per year, for services related to public outreach of tree plantings and heritage trees. Further action is needed to address trees in new developments and on private property and to integrate them into this overall CCFMP. 2. Goal statement is not clear or consistent with the requirement to "enhance the urban tree canopy" The stated goal is to plant 500 trees/year through 2025 or increase the canopy by 5%, whichever comes first. The CCFMP says that at a minimum 2 trees will be planted for every tree removed. Over the 5 years that means 1,250 could be removed while 2,500 are planted. That could mean only a net increase of 1,250 trees. Since tree sizes are unknown this could likely result in a net loss of canopy cover as mature trees are replaced with much smaller, younger trees. The objective is to increase the percentage of the city with tree canopy cover. As the goal is stated the city could meet their goal yet have no increase in the tree canopy. The related goal and strategy within the final draft CCFMP has been expanded upon as follows: 2 Expand the community forest in areas with lesser tree canopy density and maximize its benefits. A. Add an average of 500 trees per year to the city's tree inventory or affect an increase in Carlsbad's Total Tree Canopy by 5% (whichever occurs first) through the end of calendar year 2025, so as to further enhance the community forest. B. Plant two inventoried trees for every one inventoried tree removed, to ensure the longevity ofthe community forest. Only one each of those planted trees shall count toward the addition of an average of 500 trees per year to the city's tree inventory. North County Advocates is a non-profit 501© 3 public benefit corporation. TIN 27-3158348. www.northcountvadvocates.com September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 22 of 26 North County Advocates 7668 El Camino Real, Suite 104-258, Carlsbad CA 92009 C. A concentrated effort will be made to install new trees in sparsely forested areas in Hosp Grove that lack shade canopy. The standard container size for new city trees is a 15-gallon minimum. Adding an average of 500 trees per year to the city's inventory through the end of calendar year 2025 equates to a total of 3, 125 added trees (i.e ., 500 trees x 6.25 years= 3, 125). Per Appendix B the baseline tree canopy cover is 16 .66%. Is the goal intended to increase cover to 21.66% (16.66% plus 5% = 21.66%) Yes, as the alternate to the above -whichever occurs first. or to merely increase the cover to 17.49% ( 16.66% x 1.05)? No. In their Climate Action Plan the City of San Diego included a goal to increase their Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) to 35%. In comparison, 21.66% seems rather modest and 17.49% is an almost insignificant increase from current baseline. The CCFMP sets a goal that is S.M.A.R. T (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Timely) for the City of Carlsbad. This reference was a/so included in staff's August 29, 2019 responses to North County Advocates July 2, 2019 comments to the preliminary draft of the CCFMP. Please restate the goal to clearly specify a UTC percentage-hopefully greater than 21.66% by 2025 or some future date. 3. Insufficient guidelines for placement of additional trees to insure other related objectives are met. Trees provide multiple benefits to a community. Careful site selection of trees is important to ensure that those secondary benefits are achieved. These could include social equity as poor neighborhoods often have fewer canopy trees. Compliance with Village/Barrio Master Plan requires enhanced landscaping, yet many recent buildings have included no trees. To reduce heat island effect, trees need to be placed to shade buildings, sidewalks or asphalt. And, water quality is improved when trees are planted where they would impact run-off. What matters most is not just planting a specific number of trees, but placing them where the community will receive optimum benefit. Please see response to comment No. 1 of this letter. Please provide further guidance on factors to consider on tree placement and how this is integrated with the overall plan. 4. No preference for native tree species. Many native tree species meet the requirements for low water use and sustainability. Part of retaining the natural heritage of a community is through protecting native plant species. The parameters for the selection of species are detailed in Chapter 3 of the CFMP. There are no invasive species on the approved species list. Some of the species are more drought tolerant than others, but the list does not include species that have a high water requirement. These references were also included in staff's August 29, 2019 responses to North County Advocates July 2, 2019 comments to the preliminary draft of the CCFMP. North County Advocates is a non-profit 501© 3 public benefit corporation. TIN 27-3158348. www.northcountvadvocates.com September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 23 of 26 Tammy Cloud-McMinn From: City Clerk Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 9:14 AM To: Subject: Mia De Marzo; Tammy Cloud-McMinn; Sheila Cobian FW: Comments on Community Forest Management Plan Hello, Please see the below Council Correspondence. Thank you, (cicyof Carlsbad Hector Gomez Deputy City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008-1949 www.carlsbadca.gov _ 760-434-5021 I hector.gomez@carlsbadca .gov From: Council Internet Email Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 8:07 AM To: City Clerk <Clerk@carlsbadca.gov> Subject: FW: Comments on Community Forest Management Plan From: Diane Nygaard Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 7:14 AM To: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov> Subject: Comments on Community Forest Management Plan Honorable Mayor and City Council On September 24th you will be asked to approve the city's Community Forest Management Plan. We appreciate that substantial work has gone into this plan and it includes many important new provisions-particularly for the protection of heritage trees. However, there are still a few areas where the full benefit of trees to this community will not be realized. We ask you to take a few minutes to review a recent PBS program on urban trees by Nan Sterman. https://www.pbs.org/video/urban-forests-trees-and-plants-in-the-city-8iu1 lg/ Urban Forests: Trees and Plants in the City Season 5 Episode 5 I 26m 45s The words "urban" and "forest" may sound like contradictory terms but our urban environments are, or could be, vast forests of street trees,park trees, and backyard trees. Trees are very important in the urban 1 September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 25 of 26 environment, where they serve many valuable purposes. Meet the founder of Tree People, learn about San Diego's urban forestry efforts, and how to select trees for our own gardens. And then consider the following additional changes to this very important Community Forest Management Plan: 1. Link this to landscape manual requirements for planting trees as part of new development. The CFMP is really limited to city owned/managed trees,. But tree planting in new developments is something the city also has control over. It needs to be clear that landscaping requirements for new developments are part of the strategy to improve the overall tree canopy cover. 2. Planting x numbers of trees should not be the goal . Other cities have included tree planting programs to increase the urban tree canopy as part of their Climate Action Plans. Carlsbad did not. But increasing the tree cover is what sequesters more carbon , reduces the heat island effect, and results in a need for less energy for cooling homes and businesses. The goal statement needs to be to increase the urban tree canopy. Planting trees is not the goal-it is a means to achieve the goal. The City of San Diego Climate Action Plan has a goal to increase the Urban Tree Canopy to 35%. Carlsbad's goal to increase theirs to 21 .66% is modest by comparison. But allowing an alternative to just plant trees makes this meaningless. 3. Insufficient guidelines for placement of trees We believe that further guidance is needed on factors to consider in placing trees. Careful site selection for trees should consider things like: social equity as poor neighborhoods often have fewer canopy trees; reducing the heat island effect by placing tees where they will best shade occupied buildings; enhancing alternative transportation by making it more pleasant to walk or bike; water quality improvements by helping to retain soil, etc .. Thank you for considering these comments. Diane Nygaard On behalf of Preserve Calavera 2 September 24, 2019 Item #8 Page 26 of 26 1~ ~ DELANO & D ELANO VIA E-MAIL City Council c/o City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 September 23, 2019 AII_Heceive -Agenda Item# .il_ For the lnform.ition of the: CITY COUNCIL D.iteC1t2Blf01cA__.'i__ cc~ CM_;£ COO _x DCM (3) .K_ Re: City Council Meeting September 24, 2019, Agenda Item No. 8: Proposed Community Forest Management Plan Update Dear Honorable Members of the City Council: This letter is submitted on behalf of North County Advocates ("NCA") in connection with the proposed Community Forest Management Plan ("CFMP") Update. NCA supports the City of Carlsbad's ("City") efforts to improve the health and environment of the City by enhancing the community forest and urban tree canopy. NCA believes that an important revision to Community Forest Management Program Goal & Strategy ("Goal & Strategy") 2.A. is necessary to ensure success of the City's CFMP Update. Moreover, on March 14, 2017 the City and NCA entered into a settlement agreement as part of the resolution of the lawsuit, North County Advocates v. City of Carlsbad, San Diego Superior Court Case No. 3 7-2015-00035458-CU-WM-NC. Among other things, the settlement agreement requires the CFMP Update "include provisions for protection and enhancement of the urban tree canopy." As currently proposed, the language of Goal & Strategy 2.A. is inconsistent with the intent of the settlement agreement. A goal of the CFMP under Goal & Strategy 2 is to: "Expand the community forest in areas with lesser tree canopy density and maximize its benefits." To achieve this, Goal & Strategy 2.A. proposes to: "Add an average of 500 trees per year to the city's tree inventory or affect an increase in Carlsbad's Total Tree Canopy by 5% (whichever occurs first) through the end of calendar year 2025, so as to further enhance the community forest." NCA urges the City to revise Goal & Strategy 2.A. accordingly: "Add an average of 500 trees per year to the city's tree inventory eF and affect an increase in Carlsbad's Total Tree Canopy by 5% (vihichever occurs first) through the end of calendar year 2025, Office: (760) 741-1200 www.delanoanddelano.com l 04 W. Grand Avenue, Suite A • Escondido. CA 92025 City of Carlsbad City Council September 23, 2019 Page 2 of2 so as to further enhance the community forest." NCA believes these important revisions will ensure the success of the CFMP Update in protecting and enhancing the urban tree canopy. As currently proposed, Goal & Strategy 2.A. could result in an overall lessening or reduction of the City's tree canopy. Under proposed Goal & Strategy 2.A., even if the City added an average of 500 trees per year through the end of 2025, this could result in a reduction of the community forest and reduction of the urban tree canopy. For example, if, in the process of adding 500 trees the City removed older trees with larger canopy area and replaced them with younger and smaller trees, the City would experience a reduction of its urban tree canopy. Such a reduction in the urban tree canopy would have a negative impact on the community forest's many positive effects including, among other things, cleaning the City's air, oxygen production, reduction in heating/cooling costs, and enhancement of ecosystems. Under NCA's proposed revisions for Goal & Strategy 2.A., the City would be able to safeguard against such a scenario. Indeed, with NCA's proposed revisions, the City would add more trees to the community forest and ensure that the City's urban tree canopy, along with its many positive effects, is enhanced. These revisions would guarantee the CFMP's goals are accomplished and would be consistent with the requirements of the March 14, 2017 settlement agreement between NCA and the City. NCA appreciates the City's efforts and looks forward to a healthy, thriving community forest. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, cc: Celia Brewer, City Attorney i l ., I! i : .j::' ; ' i ' 1. I i . I.':. \, . '· : I ii I ! .,, i ,, : ' . .. r .i: -.• ._ '-~. "7-'-" -~·· .,··.:· -~ :-:~ . :·.:·--:_-?:"'::-t':"~:~~~-'.~.~':_: ,'.~-~~:'f~::~Jf~~~:T. . ·-__ fEftC;~an J3itg(l ~Olt-~mibUllt. Saturday,.July 7, 2007 .. ' ,,_..,~- ! .. !·'-~ ... ;· ... - RAMONA ·d ··saving.tllestreet~~·one~power pole at a time· :· . ' ''_:, ,'. ... :\:.: ' .· Joe Cahak is on a crusade·_ .• public utilities to move uiult\, pole~ away from ter District hydrant was in a bad spot It w~ the road-:---where they are wtentially danger-too close to the road at the comer of Ramona to, mov_, _e r __ o. adsid_e obiects ous.for', drivers -no matter the cost Street and Warnock Drive, and motorists kept· J So how's his power-to-thei-,people crusade hitting it So water district officials installed By Lisa Petrillo STAFF WRITER In his quest to Ii.µlke the world a safer place, engineer Joe Cahak has been trying to move 2,000-pound power poles single-handedly. 1be Ran;ona resident ·has spent the past seven years ba~g government agencies and going so far? ' : \ . . · two steel-and-concrete poles to protect the "I feel pretty good," Cahak ~d. '"I just got plug. But where cars could glance off the··-· my :first victory.'' , \ hydrant, the poles could stop them dead, He got a Ji.replug moved .. : · { ·. Cahak said. Now the hydrant is farther from . That victory may seem small, faut it sums up the road~ · his crusade. He got a governn;ient agency to Cahak's quest inyolves hydrants, power recognize a looming danger and its own liabili-poles, road-hugging trees, badly placed ty for poorly placed utilities. \ . By all accounts, t;he _Ramo.ga Mti;nicipal W a- -----------------·-·-----·-... ----------~ . . -' --·----·--------·---··--- :::+~ -Pro vV' . ~ ~ 6.BJifnw_J · >tyf" .LCf ,20/7 Joe Cahak crouched nexf to a power pole he said is dan·gerous because it sits too close to a trail and ro~d. Don K.ohlbauer I Union-Tribune . . 7-~~ 17-t~f /g;lf )~ ;2D Kyle Lancaster, Parks & Recreation Director Tim Selke, Parks Superintendent Sept. 24, 2019 Update to Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan Recommended Action Adopt a Resolution approving an update to the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan and appropriating a total of $345,000 of ongoing funds to the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget for implementation of the plan’s goals, strategies and recommendations Summary •Section 4.3.10 of the Carlsbad General Plan Lawsuit Settlement Agreement executed in March 2017, between the city and North County Advocates: –Within 18 months, the city shall present to the City Council for consideration an update to the Community Forest Management Plan which includes a program to identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable, and will include provisions for protection and enhancement of the urban tree canopy Summary •On Sept. 18, 2018, the City Council received a staff report on the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, which included discussion of various chapters and sections of the document that were eligible for updates –Staff estimated the update would entail $135,000 in expenditures and take a min. of one year to complete Background •The City Council adopted a resolution authorizing staff to update the CCFMP –Staff subsequently sought/hired qualified consultants: Wisniewski & Associates and West Coast Arborists To update the Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports (Ph. I & II), and the balance of the CCFMP -sans those reports Tree Inventory •Staff ensured that WCA brought current the full inventory of city managed trees –i.e., street, median, park, facility, trail and urban forest interface trees –Includes species, height, width, and condition, as well as GPS location and inspection/pruning history Tree Inventory •Full inventory of city managed trees is at 28,066 trees –284 different species of trees •City’s urban forest areas consist of added ~15,000 trees –Predominantly of Eucalyptus species •Combined, the city successfully manages ~43,000 trees Goals and Strategies of Plan •As with the original CCFMP, the updated CCFMP specifically addresses the portions of the community forest that the city can influence directly –The plan is focused on city-managed landscapes and areas within the street tree assessment districts Goals and Strategies of Plan•1.Promote citywide tree preservation and community education about the community forest and sustainability –A.Maintain the Tree City USA designation in perpetuity –B.Encourage residents to participate in city tree planting events held on occasions such as Earth Day, Arbor Day and National Public Lands Day –C.Showcase specimen trees or heritage trees on the city’s website and on social media throughout the year to generate interest in the diversity and significance of trees Goals and Strategies of Plan •2.Expand the community forest in areas with lesser tree canopy density and maximize its benefits –A.Add an average of 500 trees per year to the city’s tree inventory or affect an increase in Carlsbad’s Total Tree Canopy by 5% (whichever occurs first) through year 2025 –B.Plant two inventoried trees for every one inventoried tree removed, to ensure the longevity of the forest –C.Concentrate effort to install new trees in sparsely forested areas in Hosp Grove that lack shade canopy Goals and Strategies of Plan •3.Manage over 43,000 city-owned/controlled trees using industry standards and best management practices. –A.Continuously review the condition and recommended maintenance of the city’s community forest and look for opportunities to improve health –B.Utilize best management practices and industry standards when all work is performed on city trees –C.Continuously train staff on new technology and scientific discoveries to ensure up-to-date info is at hand Heritage Trees •According to Carlsbad Municipal Code 11.12.020.A.4.: –“Heritage trees shall be trees with notable historic interest or trees of an unusual species or size.” •Chapter 6 of updated CCFMP is dedicated to a program to identify and protect heritage trees, where practicable. –Contains both city-owned and privately-owned trees Heritage Tree Reports •As a foundational element of the updated CCFMP, staff ensured the Heritage Tree Reports were brought current –Phase I identified heritage tree candidates predominantly within the Historic Village District –Phase II identified trees in a wider geographical area, some near the original zone, as well as outlying areas Phase I Report •The original Phase I report contained 110 tree candidates •The updated Phase I report reflects the death of 36 tree candidates and the addition of one tree candidate –A net of 75 present heritage tree candidates 41 are city-owned and 34 are privately owned Phase II Report •The original Phase II report contained 51 tree candidates •The updated Phase II report reflects the death of 10 trees –A net of 41 present heritage tree candidates 11 are city-owned and 30 are privately owned Recommendations •Both Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports contain the same Management Recommendations Summary –The summary contains 15 recommendations, some of which are merely administrative and others of which are operational and financial impacts Recommendations •Recommendations provide for the health, safety and longevity of Carlsbad’s Heritage Trees. These recommendations should be adopted by the City Council as mandatory for all city owned Heritage Trees, and are advisory only recommendations for any privately-owned and non-city owned public Heritage Trees. Supplemental Recommendations •The Carlsbad Heritage Tree Report –Phase II also contains six Supplemental Recommendations –Like initial recommendations, some of supplemental recommendations are solely administrative and others are operational and financial impacts Supplemental Recommendations •The trees in the Phase II Study have some additional requirements, especially those located in historic parks or in natural open space areas. Some of these recommendations are of a general nature, and others are specific to individual trees. Supplemental Recommendations •As in the Phase I Study the recommendations should be adopted as mandatory for all city owned Heritage Trees and are advisory only for privately owned and any non- city owned public Heritage Trees. Nomination Process •Both Carlsbad Heritage Tree Reports additionally contain the same Heritage Tree Nomination Process. –A ten-step nomination process is suggested: A process should be developed for the city to allow for the nomination of additional Heritage Trees by its citizens. Review, Input and Action •Staff from Parks & Recreation, Public Works, Library & Cultural Arts, Community & Economic Development, Communications, Finance, and Fire Departments reviewed •Representatives from North County Advocates reviewed •Plan posted online for other members of public to review Review, Input and Action •On Sept. 9, 2019, the Historic Preservation Commission received a presentation on the updated CCFMP (specific to the Heritage Tree Reports) and voted unanimously to recommend its approval by the City Council –No comments were received from the public Review, Input and Action •On Sept. 16, 2019, the Parks & Recreation Commission received a presentation on the updated CCFMP (general to the duty to review tree-related issues) and voted unanimously to recommend its approval by the City Council –No comments were received from the public Fiscal Analysis •Staff is requesting a total appropriation of $345,000 of ongoing funds to the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget for implementation of the CCFMP’s goals, strategies and recommendations COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN–GOALS, STRATEGIES & RECOMMENDATIONS AMOUNT Landscape materials for adding an average of 500 trees/yr. to city’s inventory $75,000 Contractual services for adding an average of 500 trees/yr. to city’s inventory $98,000 Part-time Program Coordinator for administration of adding 500 trees /yr.$25,000 Part-time Maintenance Technician for field oversight of adding 500 trees/yr. $20,000 Contractual services for public outreach of tree plantings and Heritage Trees $35,000 Landscape materials for de-compacting drip lines of city-owned Heritage Trees $31,000 Contractual services for drafting annual reports on city-owned Heritage Trees $35,000 Contractual services for arborist’s direct pruning of city-owned Heritage Trees $26,000 APPROPRIATION OF ONGOING FUNDS TO THE PARKS MAINTENANCE OPERATING BUDGET $345,000 Recommended Action Adopt a Resolution approving an update to the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan and appropriating a total of $345,000 of ongoing funds to the Parks Maintenance Operating Budget for implementation of the plan’s goals, strategies and recommendations Questions?