HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-12-10; City Council; ; Poinsettia Lane Traffic AnalysisMeeting Date:
To:
From:
Staff Contact:
Subject:
Dec. 10,2019
Mayor and City Council
Scott Chadwick, City Manager
John Kim, City Traffic Engineer
John.Kim@carlsbadca.gov, 760-602-2757
Poinsettia Lane Traffic Analysis
Recommended Action
CA Review ftL6:--
Receive an informational presentation providing the findings of the Poinsettia Lane Traffic
Analysis performed by LSA Associates.
Executive Summary
On March 14, 2017, a Minute Motion was proposed by Council Member Cori Schumacher,
seconded by Council Member Michael Schumacher, to direct staff to utilize the Carlsbad
Residential Traffic Management Program (CRTMP) to develop traffic-calming solutions to
discourage pass-through traffic in the Viadana and Pavoreal neighborhoods concurrent with the
completion of Poinsettia Lane; and complete a comprehensive traffic analysis in neighborhoods
encompassed by Viadana Homeowners Association (HOA), Pavoreal HOA, Poinsettia Heights
HOA and Voscana HOA located along Poinsettia Lane, including Mimosa Lane, Oriole Court,
Skimmer Court, Cassia Lane and the El Camino Real southbound turn onto Poinsettia Lane. The
Motion carried 4-0-1.
Discussion
On March 22, 2018, an Agreement with LSA Associates was signed to conduct a comprehensive
traffic study associated with the proposed construction of Poinsettia Lane, per City Council
direction. The study area included the following roadway segments:
• Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane)
• Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road)
• Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real)
• El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane)
• El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway)
• Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real)
• Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway)
• Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway)
• Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to El Camino Real)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 1 of 302
In addition, the study area included the following intersections:
• Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane
• Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road
• El Camino Real/Cassia Road
• El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane
• El Camino Real/Dove Lane
• El Camino Real/ Aviara Parkway
• Ambrosia Lane/ Aviara Parkway
• Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane/Oriole Court
• Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place
• Dove Lane/Moorhen Place
• Mimosa Drive/ Aviara Parkway
Level of Service Evaluation
The report included an analysis of vehicular and multimodal levels of service based on
guidelines and criteria available at the time, including the City of Carlsbad Transportation
Impact Analysis Guidelines, Carlsbad Roadway Capacity Tables Report and the Carlsbad Multi-
Modal Level of Service (MM LOS) methodology. An analysis was also conducted using vehicle
miles traveled consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines
issued on Dec. 18, 2018. All analyses show that the Poinsettia Project can be completed without
significant impacts.
Traffic control at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane/Oriole Court/Skimmer
Court
The report analyzed the intersections of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane/Oriole
Court/Skimmer Court for traffic control using California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (CA MUTCD) traffic signal warrant guidelines. Based on this analysis, it was determined
that both intersections met at least one or more of the nine warrants and that traffic signal
control was recommended for both intersections.
Southbound Right Turn Lane on El Camino Real at Poinsettia Lane
The report evaluated the need for a dedicated right turn lane on southbound El Camino Real at
Poinsettia Lane. Analysis of collision data, intersection level of service and environmental
constraints indicated that the intersection would perform satisfactorily without a dedicated
right turn lane and that the required roadway widening to accommodate a right turn lane
would require a retaining wall, relocation of a utility vault and would encroach on a hardline
preserve of the city's Habitat Management Plan.
Cut-Through Traffic Evaluation
The report evaluated the potential for cut-through traffic with the completion of Poinsettia
Lane and identified potential areas of concern including the Oriole Court/Mimosa
Drive/Moorhen Place/Dove Lane corridor and Cassia Road. Using baseline volume, speed and
collision measurements along these areas of concern, the report recommends utilization of the
CRTMP to analyze traffic conditions in affected residential streets after the opening of the
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 2 of 302
newly constructed portion of Poinsettia Lane and identifies potential actions by the city as
conditions warrant.
Public Outreach
A neighborhood workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2018, to hear public comments and concerns
regarding the Poinsettia Lane Project. Residents from the Viadana, Pavoreal, Poinsettia Heights
and Voscana neighborhoods were invited.
A follow-up neighborhood meeting was held on Nov. 21, 2019 to present the findings of the
Poinsettia Lane Traffic Analysis (Exhibit 1) to the public. Again, residents from the Viadana,
Pavoreal, Poinsettia Heights and Voscana neighborhoods were invited.
On Nov. 19, 2019, Exhibit 1 was provided in an additional information memorandum to City
Council for an item to approve plans and specifications and authorize bidding for traffic signals
at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane/Oriole Court/Skimmer Court.
This item was presented to the Traffic and Mobility Commission on Dec. 2, 2019 as an
informational item. Attached as Exhibit 2 are the draft minutes from that meeting.
Next Steps
Construction of Poinsettia Lane is expected to be complete by mid 2020.
City Council approved the plans and specifications for the traffic signals at Poinsettia
Lane/Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane/Oriole Court/Skimmer Court for the advertisement of
bids on Nov. 19, 2019.
Based on the findings in the report, staff will not be pursuing a project to install a right turn only
lane on southbound El Camino Real at this time.
Phase I of the CRTMP has been implemented on the Oriole Court/Mimosa Drive/Moorhen
Place/ Dove Lane corridor, including deployment of portable speed feedback signs on Mimosa
Drive and Oriole Court. A public meeting for the Oriole/Mimosa/Moorhen/Dove neighborhood
has been tentatively scheduled for January 2020.
Staff will continue to work with the Police Department to provide focused speed enforcement
on Cassia Road. Staff will take new measurements after Poinsettia Lane opens and compare
them to the report's baseline measurements to determine the city's future course of action.
Fiscal Analysis
This item is an informational presentation on the topic of traffic control, traffic calming and
traffic safety and as such there is no financial impact.
Environmental Evaluation (CEQA)
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065, receiving an informational presentation on
the work related to traffic control, traffic calming and traffic safety does not qualify as a
"project" within the meaning of the CEQA in that it has no potential to cause either a direct
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 3 of 302
physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment, and therefore does not require environmental review.
Public Notification
This item was noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public
viewing and review at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting date.
Exhibits
1. Traffic Investigation Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Report, November 2019
2. Draft minutes from the Dec. 2, 2019 Traffic and Mobility Commission
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 4 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
LSA
November 2019
EXHIBIT 1
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 5 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Submitted to:
John Kim
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Prepared by:
LSA
20 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92614
(949) 553-0666
Project No. HCR1803
LSA
November 2019
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 6 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... i
FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................................................................................ iii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................ iv
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1
METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 1
Study Area ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Study Area Intersections ............................................................................................................... 2
Study Area Roadway Segments (Classification and Priority Travel Modes) ................................. 2
Intersection LOS Methodology ...................................................................................................... 4
Roadway Corridor Capacity ........................................................................................................... 4
Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessments ................................................................... 4
Vehicle Level of Service ................................................................................................................. 5
LOS Descriptions ................................................................................................................................. 5
Carlsbad Multimodal Level of Service ........................................................................................... 6
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................................................................. 6
Roadway Volume ........................................................................................................................... 6
Vehicle Speed ................................................................................................................................ 8
Poinsettia Lane between Ambrosia Lane and Cassia Road ................................................................ 8
Cassia Road ......................................................................................................................................... 8
Ambrosia Lane .................................................................................................................................... 8
Mimosa Drive ..................................................................................................................................... 9
Dove Lane ........................................................................................................................................... 9
Intersection Volume ...................................................................................................................... 9
Intersection Performance ........................................................................................................... 12
Multi-Modal Level of Service ...................................................................................................... 12
Collision Locations ....................................................................................................................... 13
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ......................................................................................... 15
GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2035) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT POINSETTIA
LANE GAP CLOSURE .................................................................................................. 16
Roadway Volume ......................................................................................................................... 16
Intersection Volume .................................................................................................................... 17
Intersection Performance ........................................................................................................... 17
GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2035) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH POINSETTIA LANE
GAP CLOSURE ........................................................................................................... 20
Roadway Volume ......................................................................................................................... 21
Intersection Volume .................................................................................................................... 21
Intersection Performance ........................................................................................................... 22
\\vcorpl2\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 7 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 25
Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road ....................................................................................................... 26
Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................ 27
Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................. 27
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................ 27
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume ......................................................................................................... 27
Warrant 5: School Crossing .............................................................................................................. 27
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System ............................................................................................ 27
Warrant 7: Crash Experience ............................................................................................................ 28
Warrant 8: Roadway Network .......................................................................................................... 28
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a [Railroad] Grade Crossing ............................................................... 28
Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane ............................................................................. 28
Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................ 29
Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................. 29
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Vehicle Volume ............................................................................................ 29
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume ......................................................................................................... 29
Warrant 5: School Crossing .............................................................................................................. 29
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System ............................................................................................ 29
Warrant 7: Crash Experience ............................................................................................................ 30
Warrant 8: Roadway Network .......................................................................................................... 30
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a [Railroad] Grade Crossing ............................................................... 30
EL CAMINO REAL/POINSETTIA LANE .......................................................................... 31
Collision Potential ........................................................................................................................ 31
Intersection Performance ........................................................................................................... 31
Engineering Constraints .............................................................................................................. 32
Biological Constraints .................................................................................................................. 33
CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC EVALUATION ....................................................................... 33
CARLSBAD RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ................ : ................... 37
Speeding On Cassia Road ............................................................................................................ 38
Cut-Through Traffic on Oriole Court, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane ....................................... 39
Cut-Through Traffic on Cassia Road ............................................................................................ 40
Enhanced Measures .................................................................................................................... 41
SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MONITORING ............................................. 42
APPENDICES
A: TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA AND SPEED SURVEYS
B: EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
C~ MULTIMODAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
D: 2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
E: 2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
F: TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS
G: POINSETTIA LANE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT RESULTS
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) ii
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 8 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
FIGURES
FIGURES AND TABLES
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Figure 1: Study Area and Existing Geometrics and Traffic Control ........................................................ 3
Figure 2: Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................... 10
Figure 3: Collision Data 1/1/2008 to 4/12/2018 .................................................................................. 14
Figure 4: General Plan Buildout (2035) Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Peak Hour
Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................................ 18
Figure 5: General Plan Buildout (2035) With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Peak Hour Traffic
Volumes ....................................................................................................................................... 23
TABLES
Table A: Existing Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity .......................................................................... 7
Table B: Existing Peak-Hour Link Roadway LOS Summary ..................................................................... 7
Table C: Existing Travel Speed ................................................................................................................ 8
Table D: Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment ............................................................. 11
Table E: Existing Intersection LOS Summary ........................................................................................ 12
Table F: Existing Multi-Modal LOS Summary ....................................................................................... 13
Table G: Collison Data 2008-2018 ....................................................................................................... 15
Table H: Traffic Model Data and Traffic Growth Rates ........................................................................ 16
Table I: General Plan Buildout (2035) Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Daily Roadway
Volume and Capacity ................................................................................................................... 17
Table J: 2035 Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection Turning Movement Needs
Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 19
Table K: 2035 Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection LOS ................................................ 20
Table L: Traffic Model Data and Traffic Growth Rates ......................................................................... 21
Table M: General Plan Buildout (2035) Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity .................................... 22
Table N: 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection Turning Movement Needs
Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 24
Table 0: 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection LOS ..................................................... 25
Table P: Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road Traffic Control Comparison ...................................................... 26
Table Q: Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane Traffic Control Comparison ........................... 28
Table R: El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane Intersection Performance Comparison ............................... 32
Table S: Route Options from West Poinsettia Lane to Shopping Center ............................................. 35
Table T: Route Options from Cassia Neighborhoods to Shopping Center ........................................... 36
Table U: Route Options from North El Camino Real to West Poinsettia Lane ..................................... 36
Table V: Before Gap Closure (2018) Traffic Condition Summary ......................................................... 42
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) iii
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 9 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
CEQA
City
HCM
HMP
ICU
ITE
LOS
MMLOS
mph
MUTCD
N/A
NOS
SANDAG
SANTEC
V/C
PotNSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
California Environmental Quality Act
City of Carlsbad
Highway Capacity Manual
LSA
(City of Carlsbad) Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Institute of Transportation Engineers
level(s) of service
Multimodal Level of Service
miles per hour
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
not applicable
National Data and Surveying Services
San Diego Association of Governments
San Diego Traffic Engineers' Council
volume-to-capacity
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) iv
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 10 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
INTRODUCTION
Poinsettia Lane from Carlsbad Boulevard to Melrose Drive has been a part of the Carlsbad planned
roadway network since at least 1994. Poinsettia Lane is completed except for an approximately
1,800-foot segment between Aviara Parkway and Black Rail Road (where three of the planned four
lanes are constructed) and an approximately 1,500-foot gap between Cassia Road and Oriole Court-
Skimmer Court. Completion of Poinsettia Lane (including closure of the gap between Cassia Road
and Oriole Court-Skimmer Court) was included in the Carlsbad General Plan Update adopted by the
City Council on September 22, 2015, and had been included in previous General Plans. The General
Plan Mobility Element section titled "Future Operations and Street Improvements" states the
following:
Most of the envisioned Carlsbad street system is built out. The remaining planned
street improvements are summarized in Table 3-2; these facilities serve the needs of
land uses identified in the Land Use and Community Design Element. The planned
streets are identified on the Street Network map, Figure 3-1.
One of the projects included in the referenced table and figure is Poinsettia Lane, which is described
as "Complete improvements between Cassia Road and El Camino Real to connector street typology
standards."
Completion ofthe Poinsettia Lane gap closure is funded in part from the Bridge and Thoroughfare
District Fee Program. The proposed Poinsettia 61 residential development within and adjacent to
the roadway gap provided additional funding. At this time, the City of Carlsbad (City) is preparing to
close the gap in Poinsettia Lane.
Although the completion of Poinsettia Lane has been planned for some time, the existing conditions
have prevailed for so long so as to seem permanent. Residents ofthe Viadana and Pavoreal
neighborhoods have also raised concerns regarding future cut-through traffic through the
residential neighborhoods. This traffic investigation considers the potential effects ofthe gap
closure on the surrounding roadway system and adjacent intersections and provides potential
strategies for limiting the intrusion of cut-through traffic into the Viadana and Pavoreal
neighborhoods. Importantly, this traffic investigation also establishes baseline conditions for the
surrounding roadway network that can be used to determine the extent of intrusion if requests for
additional intervention are pursued through the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program.
METHODOLOGY
Study Area
Approximately 1,000 feet west of the gap closure, Poinsettia Lane intersects Ambrosia Lane.
Ambrosia Lane provides a connection to Aviara Parkway and a travel path around the current gap in
Poinsettia Lane. About 0.25 mile east of the gap closure, Poinsettia Lane intersects El Camino Real,
just north (0.50 mile) of the El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway intersection. These connections to
Aviara Parkway and a path around the current gap were chosen as the bookends of the study area.
Within this study area are the following intersections and roadway segments:
\ \vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 1
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 11 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Study Area Intersections
1. Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane
2. Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway
3. Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road
4. Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane
5. Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place
6. Dove Lane/Moorhen Place
7. Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway
8. El Camino Real/Cassia Road
9. El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane
10. El Camino Real/Dove Lane
11. El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway
Study Area Roadway Segments (Classification and Priority Travel Modes)
1. Poinsettia Lane between Aviara Parkway and Ambrosia Lane (Arterial Connector: vehicle,
pedestrian, and bicycle)
2. Poinsettia Lane between Ambrosia Lane and Cassia Road (Arterial Connector: vehicle,
pedestrian, and bicycle)
3. Poinsettia Lane between Cassia Road and El Camino Real (Arterial Connector: vehicle,
pedestrian, and bicycle)
4. El Camino Real between Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane (Arterial Street: vehicle and transit)
5. El Camino Real between Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway (Arterial Street: vehicle and transit)
6. Cassia Road between Poinsettia Lane and El Camino Real (Local/Neighborhood Street:
pedestrian and bicycle)
7. Ambrosia Lane between Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway (School Street: pedestrian and
bicycle)
8. Mimosa Drive between Oriole Court and Aviara Parkway (Local/Neighborhood Street:
pedestrian and bicycle)
9. Dove Lane between Moorhen Place and Black Skimmer Road (Local/Neighborhood Street:
pedestrian and bicycle)
Figure 1 illustrates the study area and the existing geometrics and traffic control for each study area
intersection.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 2
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 12 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
Intersection LOS Methodology
POINSETT!A LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
In April 2018, the City adopted the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. These
new guidelines reduce the emphasis of vehicle level of service (LOS) analysis at intersections. Traffic
analyses are to consider the ability for existing and future roadways to carry through traffic. For the
study area, the guidelines specify the following: corridor analyses based on roadway capacity,
turning-movement needs assessments for signalized intersections, and signal warrant analyses for
degraded unsignalized intersections. Because the report audience may be familiar with the previous
analysis methodology of assigning performance letter grades, this traffic investigation includes
intersection LOS for informational purposes.
Roadway Corridor Capacity
In February 2019, the City released the Roadway Capacity Tables Report for use in evaluating traffic
conditions in environmental documents and monitoring transportation facilities consistent with the
Growth Management Program. For 10 corridors within the City (including Poinsettia Lane and El
Camino Real), the report includes roadway capacity specific to the physical conditions of those
roadways, including the number of lanes, speed limit, and intersection spacing. The report also
includes general capacity values that can be applied to other corridors. General roadway capacity
values are provided in the table below. The analysis in this report applies the specific capacity values
for Poinsettia Lane and El Camino Real, which have specific capacity values published in the
Roadway Capacity Tables Report.
Lanes Speed Limit (mph) Daily Street Segment Capacity
LOSC LOSD
2 35 (undivided) 4,200 13,700
35 (divided) 4,400 14,600
35 12,100 32,200
4 45 13,900 36,200
50 19,700 39,200
55 24,400 41,700
35 15,800 41,700
45 --6 50 54,700 63,900
55 60,200 66,500
8 45 --
Source: Table 2, Roadway Capacity Tables Report (City of Carlsbad 2019).
LOS = level of service
mph= miles per hour
Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessments
LOSE
17,200
18,100
35,800
40,800
42,200
43,800
59,000
-
64,800
67,000
-
Peak: Hour Single: Direction Capacity
LOSC LOSD LOSE
180 590 740
190 630 780
520 1,390 1,540
600 1,560 1,760
850 1,690 1,820
1,050 1,800 1,890
680 2,230 2,540
2,040 26,660 2,700
2,360 2,760 2,800
2,600 2,870 2,900
2,780 3,560 3,620
The City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines explicitly define intersection turning-
movement needs: .~
Left turn queue assessment: Compare the left-turn volume with the length of the
left turn pocket(s). A general rule of thumb of one foot per left turning vehicle per
lane may be used for this analysis.
\\vcorpl2\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 4
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 14 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Left-turn volume: If the left-turn volume exceeds 250 vehicles per hour, a second
left-turn lane is recommended.
Right-turn volume: If the right-turn volume exceeds 150 vehicles per hour, a
dedicated right-turn lane is recommended.
To enhance the criteria provided above, this traffic investigation also examined the turning-
movement queues predicted by the traffic analysis software.
Vehicle Level of Service
Prior to the April 2018 adoption of the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines,
traffic studies in Carlsbad included calculations of intersection LOS. Two methodologies were used
to calculate intersection performance. The Intersection Capacity Utilization {ICU) methodology
compares the amount of traffic an intersection is able to process (capacity) to the level of traffic
during peak hours (volume). The resulting volume-to-capacity ratio (v/c) is expressed in terms of
LOS. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology calculates the average delay experienced by
vehicles at intersections. The resulting calculation of average delay experienced by vehicles at the
intersection is then used to determine the LOS at that location. LOS A represents free-flow activity,
and LOS F represents overcapacity operation. LOS is a qualitative assessment of the quantitative
effects of such factors as traffic volume, roadway geometrics, speed, delay, and maneuverability on
roadway and intersection operations. LOS criteria are presented below.
LOS Descriptions
• LOS A represents free flow travel for vehicles. Individual users are virtually unaffected by other
vehicles in the traffic stream.
• LOS B represents stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be
noticeable.
• LOS C represents a range in which the influence of traffic density on operations becomes
noticeable. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream and to select an operating speed is
now clearly affected by the presence of other vehicles.
• LOS D borders on unstable flow. Speeds and ability to maneuver are severely restricted because
of traffic congestion.
• LOSE represents unstable operating conditions at or near the capacity level where
maneuverability is severely limited.
• LOS Fis used to define forced or breakdown traffic flow.
The relationship between LOS and the delay (in seconds) or v/c ratio at signalized intersections is as
follows:
\ \vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx 111/12/19) 5
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 15 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Signalized Intersection Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection
Level of Service Volume-to-Capacity (ICU Delay in seconds Delay in seconds
Methodology) (HCM Methodology) (HCM Methodology)
A < 0.60 < 10.0 <10.0
B 0.61-0.70 > 10.0 and < 20.0 >10.0 and <15.0
C 0.71-0.80 > 20.0 and < 35.0 >15.0 and <25.0
D 0.81-0.90 > 35.0 and < 55.0 >25.0 and <35.0
E 0.91-1.00 > 55.0 and < 80.0 >35.0 and <50.0
F > 1.00 > 80.0 >50.0
HCM = Highway Capacity Manual
ICU = intersection capacity utilization
Carlsbad Multi modal Level of Service The City's General Plan Mobility Element developed the
Carlsbad Multimodal Level of Service (MM LOS) that is used to evaluate the transportation facilities
in the City. The City's MM LOS methodology provides a qualitative grade assigned to prioritized
travel modes in different street typologies, as identified in the City's General Plan. The LOS ranges
from LOS A to LOS F. The City General Plan requires LOS Dor better for the travel modes prioritized
on that street's typology. The four travel modes the MM LOS evaluates are vehicles, pedestrians,
bicycles, and transit. Vehicle LOS is determined by comparing roadway volume to capacity, as stated
previously. Pedestrian, bicycle, and transit LOS are determined by using the City MM LOS criteria.
The Carlsbad MM LOS evaluates pedestrian, bicycle, and transit LOS by assessing the attributes of
the pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facility. Each attribute corresponds to a point system that adds
together to correspond to an LOS grade, as summarized in the following table.
Level of Service
A
B
C
D
E
F
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Roadway Volume
Point Score
9.0-10.0
8.0-8.99
7.0-7.99
6.0-6.99
5.0-5.99
G--4.99
Roadway segment volumes were collected by National Data and Surveying Services (NDS), an
independent survey company, on Tuesday, May 22, 2018, by pneumatic tube. Traffic data are
provided in Appendix A. Data were collected for each direction of travel over a 24-hour period.
Table A presents the existing daily traffic volume for each of the study roadway segments and
compares that volume to the daily roadway capacity. As Table A shows, the roadway segments of
Poinsettia Lane west of El Camino Real, Mimosa Drive between Oriole Court and Aviara Parkway,
and Dove Lane between Moorhen Place and El Camino Real have existing traffic volumes that are a
particularly low percent ofthe roadway capacity.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 6
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 16 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Table A: Existing Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity
Roadway Segment Lanes Capacity Existing V/C Existing LOS D
at LOS D Volume or Better
Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 4 39,200 10,330 0.26 Yes
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4 39,200 9,789 0.25 Yes
Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 4 39,200 851 0.02 Yes
El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 5 54,100 33,236 0.61 Yes
El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 6 54,100 38,647 0.71 Yes
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 4 32,200 9,290 0.29 Yes
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 3,321 0.24 Yes
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 679 0.05 Yes
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 2 13,700 368 0.02 Yes
LOS= level of service
V/C = volume-to-capacity
Because traffic volumes were collected for each direction of travel, the volume of vehicles in each
direction during the morning and afternoon peak commute hours could be determined. Table B
presents the peak hour roadway link analysis. Similar to the analysis of daily traffic, Table B shows
the roadway segments of Poinsettia Lane west of El Camino Real, Mimosa Drive between Oriole
Court and Aviara Parkway, and Dove Lane between Moorhen Place and El Camino Real have existing
traffic volumes that are a particularly low percent of the roadway capacity during the peak commute
hours. For example, the portion of Poinsettia Lane west of El Camino Real has been built to arterial
standards in preparation for the gap closure, but has no more than one vehicle per minute traveling
in either direction during the busiest hour.
Table B: Existing Peak-Hour Link Roadway LOS Summary
Capacity AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Roadway Segment Direction Lanes at LOS D Volume V/C LOS Dor Volume V/C LOS Dor
Better Better
Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Eastbound 2 1,700 385 0.22 Yes 460 0.26 Yes
Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) Westbound 2 1,700 350 0.20 Yes 445 0.25 Yes
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Eastbound 2 1,700 514 0.29 Yes 397 0.22 Yes
Lane to Cassia Road) Westbound 2 1,700 422 0.24 Yes 463 0.26 Yes
Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road Eastbound 2 1,700 44 0.02 Yes 35 0.02 Yes
to El Camino Real) Westbound 2 1,700 26 0.01 Yes 62 0.04 Yes
El Camino Real (Cassia Road Northbound 2 2,100 1,620 0.77 Yes 1,336 0.64 Yes
to Poinsettia Lane) Southbound 3 2,900 1,026 0.35 Yes 1,714 0.59 Yes
El Camino Real (Poinsettia Northbound 3 2,580 1,782 0.69 Yes 1,709 0.66 Yes
Lane to Aviara Parkway) Southbound 3 1,920 1,408 0.73 Yes 1,854 0.97 Yes
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane Eastbound 2 1,540 515 0.33 Yes 356 0.23 Yes
to El Camino Real) Westbound 2 1,540 331 0.21 Yes 456 0.30 Yes
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Northbound 1 590 424 0.72 Yes 122 0.21 Yes
Lane to Aviara Parkway) Southbound 1 590 356 0.60 Yes 104 0.18 Yes
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court Northbound 1 590 34 0.06 Yes 28 0.05 Yes
to Aviara Parkway) Southbound 1 590 60 0.10 Yes 35 0.06 Yes
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place Eastbound 1 590 22 0.04 Yes 19 0.03 Yes
to Black Skimmer Road) Westbound 1 590 8 0.01 Yes 23 0.04 Yes
LOS = level of service
V/C = volume-to-capacity
\\vcorpl2\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 7
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 17 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Vehicle Speed
For five of the roadway segments included in the study, traffic survey data included collection of
vehicle speed for 2 days. Vehicle speed surveys are provided in Appendix A. Table C summarizes the
existing traffic speeds observed on the survey days. Because the 85th percentile speed (the speed
not exceeded by 85th percent of vehicles) is used to set the speed limit for a street, Table C provides
the 85th percentile speed. Table C also indicates whether vehicles were observed excessively
exceeding this typical speed. Below is a brief discussion of the speed observations for each surveyed
roadway.
Table C: Existing Travel Speed
Roadway I Poste_d ~peed I 85th Percentile I Observations Exceeding 85th Percentile by mph
Segment LImIt Speed I 10mph I 15mph I 20mph I 25mph
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road)
Day 1 I 50 I 33 I 4 I 0 I 0 I 0
Day 2 I I 33 I 4 I 0 I 0 I 0
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real)
Day 1 I 35 I 29 I 30 I 16 I 5 I 0
Day 2 I I 29 I 29 I 12 I 3 I 0
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway)
Day 1 I 40 I 33 I 5 I 0 I 0 I 0
Day 2 I I 34 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway)
Day 1 I 25 I 25 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
Day 2 I I 25 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to El Camino Real)
Day 1 I 35 I 29 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
Day 2 I I 30 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
mph= miles per hour
Poinsettia Lane between Ambrosia Lane and Cassia Road
The posted speed limit (west of Ambrosia Lane) is 50 miles per hour (mph). The observed 85th
percentile speed was 33 mph. Ofthe 19,442 vehicles using this link over 2 days, eight were observed
to exceed 45 mph. The highest speed vehicles were evenly spread between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
Cassia Road
The posted speed limit is 35 mph. The observed 85th percentile speed was 29 mph. However, ofthe
18,234 vehicles using this link over 2 days, 28 were observed to exceed 45 mph (of which 8
exceeded 50 mph). It should be noted that the 8 vehicles exceeding 50 mph were all traveling in the
eastbound direction, which is downhill. The highest speed vehicles appear to be more common in
the early evening hours.
Ambrosia Lane
While Ambrosia Lane is classified as a School Street in the Mobility Element, the speed limit of
25 mph is only in effect near the school when children are present. In the northern portion of
Ambrosia Lane, where surveys were conducted, the posted speed limit is 40 mph. The observed 85th
\ \vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 8
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 18 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
percentile speed was 34 mph. Ofthe 6,609 vehicles using this link over 2 days, 5 were observed to
exceed 45 mph, all of which were traveling in the southbound direction (downhill). These were
evenly spread between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
Mimosa Drive
The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The observed 85th percentile speed was 25 mph, consistent with
the prima facie speed limit of a residential street. Of the 1,344 vehicles observed over 2 days, 10
were observed exceeding 30 mph. No vehicles were observed exceeding 35 mph.
Dove Lane
The posted speed limit is 35 mph. The observed 85th percentile speed was 30 mph. Of the 721
vehicles observed over 2 days, 6 were observed exceeding 35 mph. No vehicles were observed
exceeding 40 mph. This is consistent with the posted 35 mph speed limit signs.
Existing speed data for most ofthe surveyed roadways appear consistent with expectations based
on posted speed limits and the prevailing speed of most vehicles. The exception is Cassia Road.,
which is the only surveyed roadway where vehicles were observed in excess of 5 mph over the
posted speed limit on both surveyed days. Although a small percent of the total traffic volume, the
presence of any vehicles traveling in excess of 20 mph faster than 85 percent of the other vehicles
raises potential safety concerns. Strategies for addressing excessive speeding on Cassia Road will be
discussed later in this report.
Intersection Volume
The independent survey company that collected roadway volume data also collected intersection
turn-movement volumes at the 11 study intersections on Tuesday, May 22, 2018. Traffic volume
data are provided in Appendix A. Figure 2 illustrates the existing turn volumes. These turning
volumes were analyzed consistent with the Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment in
the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. Table D examines whether right-turn
volumes meet the City's 150 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending a dedicated right-turn
lane, whether left-turn volumes meet the City's 250 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending
dual left-turn lanes, and whether the left-turn queue is anticipated to exceed the available turn
pocket.
As Table D shows, right-turn volume at many of the intersections meets the threshold for
recommending dedicated right-turn lanes. Four left-turn movements have single left-turn lanes but
meet the threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes. However, three of these movements
could experience lower traffic volume with completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. Six left-
turn movements are estimated to have peak queues exceeding the turn pocket. Again, three of
these movements may have lower traffic volume with completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap
closure.
\\vcorpl2\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 9
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 19 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Table D: Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment
Right-Turn Existing Left-Turn Existing calculated
Intersection Volume1 Dedicated Volume1 Dual Queue
Right?2 Left?3 Length1
1. Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane (s) NB 216 No 364 No 471
SB 63 No 44 No 74
EB 184 No 46 No 47
WB 63 No 168 No 197
2. Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 13 No 10 No 178
SB 158 No 210 No 504
EB 29 No4 268 No 386
WB 256 No4 49 No 48
3. Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) NB 0 No 0 No -
SB 0 No 495 No
WB 444 No 0 No -
4. Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane/ NB 27 No 0 No 3
Oriole Court (u) SB 0 No 6 No 2
EB 0 No 0 No 0
WB 13 Yes 39 No 2
5. Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u) NB 9 No 0 No 0
SB 0 No 7 No 0
WB 5 No 10 No 0
6. Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) NB 4 No 9 No 3
EB 16 No 0 No 0
WB 0 No 6 No 0
7. Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 42 No 28 No 34
SB 69 No 16 No 28
EB 23 No4 26 No 24
WB 24 No 65 No 46
8. El Camino Real/Cassia Road (s) NB 14 Yes 198 No 229
SB 404 No4 15 No 24
EB 187 No 418 No 538
WB 19 No 17 No 39
9. El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane (s) NB 492 Yes 23 Yes 15
SB 14 No 243 Yes 98
EB 5 No 17 Yes 12
WB 234 No 438 Yes 187
10. El Camino Real/Dove Lane (s) NB 56 No4 --90 No 101
SB 225 No4 87 No 120
EB 79 No 156 No 252
WB 69 No 72 No 105
11. El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 536 No 450 Yes 239
SB 131 No 191 Yes 148
EB 330 Yes 178 Yes 114
WB 103 No 664 Yes 409
Note: Shaded cells do not meet guidelines.
1 Higher volume of either a.m. or p.m. peak hour
LSA
Left-Turn
Storage
N/A
N/A
265
265
N/A
N/A
130
125
N/A
160
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
300
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
135
195
250
260
270
100
250
250
315
380
190
235
60
80
265
310
150
200
' City of Corlsbod Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that a dedicated right-turn lane is recommended when volume
exceeds 150.
3 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that dual left-turn lanes are recommended when volume exceeds
250.
4 Dashed bicycle lane provides for a lane width of at least 19 feet indicating vehicles may treat this as a right-turn lane.
(s) = signalized intersection N/A = not applicable WB = westbound
(u) = unsignalized intersection NB= northbound
EB= eastbound SB= southbound
\ \vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 11
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 21 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Intersection Performance
The traffic volumes illustrated on Figure 2 were analyzed using both the ICU and HCM
methodologies at signalized intersections. Only the HCM methodology applies at unsignalized
intersections. Table E presents the results ofthe intersection performance analysis. Analysis
worksheets are provided in Appendix B.
Table E: Existing Intersection LOS Summary
Study AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Area No. Intersection Methodology
1 Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane
2 Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway
3 Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u)
4 Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/
Poinsettia Lane (u)
5 Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u)
6 Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u)
7 Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway
8 El Camino Real/Cassia Road
9 El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane
10 El Camino Real/Dove Lane
11 El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway
Note= Shaded cells exceed LOS D.
(u) = unsignalized intersection
HCM = Highway Capacity Manual
LOS = level of service
sec= seconds
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
HCM
HCM
HCM
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C = volume-to-capacity
V/C Ratio V/C Ratio
or Delay LOS or Delay LOS
0.68 B 0.36 A
27.7 sec D 13.3 sec B
0.72 C 0.35 A
75.8 sec E 13.2 sec B
0.0 sec A 0.0 sec A
7.9 sec A 6.7 sec A
8.9 sec A 8.7 sec A
8.7 sec A 8.6 sec A
0.30 A 0.34 A
9.3 sec A 9.3 sec A
0.76 C 0.77 C
34.4 sec C 34.5 sec C
0.52 A 0.53 A
24.1 sec C 20.7 sec C
0.48 A 0.57 A
17.3 sec B 33.6 sec C
0.78 C 0.72 C
50.1 sec D 45.9 sec D
Table E shows that most of the study intersections deliver a satisfactory LOS. Although, as shown in
Table D, some individual movements may experience delay and queueing, overall the intersections
are capable of accommodating the peak hour traffic volume. The exception is the intersection of
Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway in the a.m. peak hour. This intersection is used to access both Aviara
Oaks Elementary School and Aviara Oaks Middle School. As such, traffic volume during the morning
drop-off period is high and places strains on the intersection during the brief duration of school
traffic.
Multi-Modal Level of Service
As described in the methodology section, the City's Mobility Element identifies different travel
modes that should be accommodated by different street types. Existing physical conditions were
entered into the City's multi-modal level of service (MM LOS) worksheets for each of the study
roadways. Table F displays the resulting MM LOS for the modes applicable for each roadway
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 12
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 22 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Table F: Existing Multi-Modal LOS Summary
Roadway Segment Street Typology LOS for Accommodated Modes
Vehicle Pedestrian Bicycle
Poinsettia Lane {Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) Arterial Connector A A B
Poinsettia Lane {Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) Arterial Connector A A A
Poinsettia Lane {Cassia Road to El Camino Real) Arterial Connector A A B
El Camino Real {Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) Arterial Street C
El Camino Real {Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) Arterial Street C
Cassia Road {Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) Neighborhood/ A A Loca I Street
Ambrosia Lane {Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) School Street A C
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) Neighborhood/ A A Loca I Street
Dove Lane {Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) Neighborhood/ A A Loca I Street
LOS = level of service
LSA
Transit
C
C
segment. MM LOS worksheets are included in Appendix C. As Table F shows, all ofthe study roadway
segments achieve the City's LOS Dor better target for their accommodated travel modes.
Collision Locations
The City Public Works Department/Traffic & Mobility Division provided collision data for Poinsettia
Lane, Cassia Road, El Camino Real, Ambrosia Lane, Dove Lane, and Mimosa Drive. These collision
data were provided over a period of 10 years from January 1, 2008, to April 12, 2018. Figure 3
displays the locations of collisions in the study area over the last 10 years. As expected, collisions are
clustered near intersections. Table G summarizes the collisions reported to the Carlsbad Police
Department in the study area in the past 10 years. It should be noted that over half of the collisions
in the study area occurred along El Camino Real (131 of 204). Of the 204 reported collisions, the
most common (40 percent of the total) have been rear-end collisions. The second most common are
broadside collisions (27 percent) followed by hit objects (15 percent). A total of four collisions
involving pedestrians have been reported in the study area over the past 10 years.
Statements regarding the frequency of broadside and hit objects collisions may be a little misleading
because of the concentrations of this type of collision at specific intersections. In total, 28 percent of
the broadside collisions occur at the intersection of El Camino Real/Cassia Road where that type of
collision represents over half of the total collisions. In total, 40 percent of hit object collisions occur
at the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road where that type of collision represents two thirds
of the total collisions. At both of these locations, the Poinsettia Lane gap closure has the potential to
alter traffic volumes and patterns, potentially affecting the number and types of collisions. The
Poinsettia Lane gap closure will construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia
Road, which is likely to reduce the number of vehicles hitting objects at the intersection as it was
recently configured.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 13
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 23 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
Location
Aviara Pkwy/ Poinsettia Ln
Black Rail Ct/ Poinsettia Ln
Ambrosia Ln/ Poinsettia Ln
Poinsettia Ln/ Cassia Rd
El Camino Real/ Cassia Rd
El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
El Camino Real/ Swallow Ln
El Camino Real/ Dove Ln
El Camino Real/ Aviara Pkwy
Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy
Mimosa Dr/ Aviara Pkwy
Along Poinsettia
Along Cassia
Along El Camino Real
Along Ambrosia
Along Mimosa Dr
Total
Percent
POINSETT/A LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Table G: Collison Data 2008-2018
cu cu ... "t, C: "t, 0. "t, C: u cu -~ C: 0 cu E ... w "§ ·;;; "if, ... cu ... "t, "t, :, Ill .t: Ill "' "' 0 ~ cu ... "' cu cu "t, e cu ... ~ "t, 0 a: ::c :f cu iii a:i 0 Q.
8 2 6 1 -1 -
-1 5 1 - - - -
2 ----1 - -
--1 -12 1 -4
7 -15 2 -2 1 -
13 3 11 1 4 - - -
8 - - -2 - - -
11 2 4 -3 -1
15 1 9 1 1 -2 -
1 ---1 - - -
--2 1 -- - -
1 - - -2 --
2 -1 -1 -1 1
11 1 - - - - - -
3 4 --4 - -1
.-----1 --
80 14 54 7 30 6 4 7
40% 7% 27% 3% 15% 3% 2% 3%
LSA
Total
18
7
3
18
27
32
10
21
29
2
3
3
6
12
12
1
204
100%
Of note in the data is that only one reported collision occurred within the Viadana and Pavoreal
neighborhoods. On a Saturday morning in March 2015, a vehicle traveling north on Mimosa Drive hit
two parked vehicles and overturned. The police report indicates that the driver was under the
influence of drugs or alcohol.
The frequency of rear-end collisions at the southbound approach to El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane
was also examined. Two collisions of this type occurred in 2008, two in 2009, and one in 2011. From
the collision data, it does not appear that rear-end collisions have increased since the southbound
right-turn lane was converted to a through/right-turn lane.
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
On December 28, 2018, the California Office of Administrative Law cleared revised California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines for use. Among the changes to the guidelines was the
removal of vehicle delay and level of service from consideration under CEQA. With the adopted
guidelines, transportation impacts are to be evaluated based on a project's effect on vehicle miles
traveled. Lead agencies are allowed to opt-in to the revised transportation guidelines, but the new
guidelines must be used starting July 1, 2020.
As discussed above, the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines has eliminated
vehicle delay from consideration, but the City has not yet established thresholds related to vehicle
miles of travel. However, the State law provides sufficient guidance to evaluate the Poinsettia Lane
gap closure impacts related to vehicles miles traveled.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 15
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 25 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
California Public Resources Code Section 15064.3(b)(2) states that:
Transportation projects that decrease vehicle miles traveled in the project area
compared to existing conditions should be presumed to have a less than significant
transportation impact.
LSA measured the travel distances associated with the alternative paths used to divert around the
gap in Poinsettia Lane. To travel from the intersection of Aviara Parkway/Poinsettia Lane to the
intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane using existing Poinsettia Lane, Cassia Road, and El
Camino Real requires 1.9 miles oftravel. To travel from the intersection of Aviara Parkway/
Poinsettia Lane to the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane using Aviara Parkway and El
Camino Real requires 2.7 miles of travel. Upon completion of Poinsettia Lane, the distance required
is 1.7 miles.
For each vehicle taking a diverted route today, completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure results
in 0.2 to 1.0 fewer miles traveled. Because the Poinsettia Lane gap closure decreases vehicle miles
traveled in the project area compared to existing conditions, the project would be presumed to have
a less than significant transportation impact under the revised CEQA guidelines.
GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2035} TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE
GAP CLOSURE
The San Diego Association of Governments (SAN DAG) Transportation Forecast Information Center
provides traffic forecast data using the regional travel demand model. Traffic projections using the
Series 12 (land use based) model were compared between 2008 (without the gap closure), 2020
(with the gap closure), and 2035 (with the gap closure) to determine an annual traffic growth rate in
the study area and the effect of the gap closure. Table H provides the raw traffic model data and
calculations of annual growth rate.
Table H: Traffic Model Data and Traffic Growth Rates
2020Model 2035 Model Annual Existing Projected 2035
Roadway Segment Projection Projection Growth (2018) No Gap Closure
(1,000s) (1,000s) Rate Traffic Volume Volume
Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 8.5 9.7 0.9% 10,330 11,983
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4.6 5.8 1.7% 9,789 12,683
Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 5.1 6.2 1.4% 851 1,059
El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 31.2 33.8 0.6% 33,236 36,375
El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 34.0 39.5 1.1% 38,647 45,732
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 6.1 6.8 0.8% 9,290 10,498
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2.4 2.7 0.8% 3,321 3,791
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 1.3 1.6 1.5% 679 857
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 2.4 3.5 3.1% 368 559
Roadway Volume
Model data in 2020 and 2035 were compared for each roadway segment to determine the annual
growth rate. This annual growth rate was applied to existing traffic volumes collected in 2018 to
estimate 2035 traffic volumes without the Poinsettia Lane gap closure (i.e., 2018 volume x [1 +
annual growth rate x 17 years]). Table I analyzes the resulting 2035 roadway traffic volume.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 16
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 26 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Table I: General Plan Buildout (2035) Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Daily
Roadway Volume and Capacity
Roadway Segment Lanes Capacity 2035 No Gap V/C LOS Dor
at LOS D Closure Volume Better
Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 4 39,200 11,983 0.31 Yes
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4 39,200 12,683 0.32 Yes
Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 4 39,200 1,059 0.03 Yes
El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 5 54,100 36,375 0.67 Yes
El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 6 54,100 45,732 0.85 Yes
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 4 32,200 10,498 0.33 Yes
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 3,791 0.28 Yes
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 857 0.06 Yes
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 2 13,700 559 0.04 Yes
LOS= level of service
V/C = volume-to-capacity
As Table I shows, the roadway segments of Poinsettia Lane west of El Camino Real, Mimosa Drive
between Oriole Court and Aviara Parkway, and Dove Lane between Moorhen Place and El Camino
Real would still have traffic volumes that are a particularly low percent of the roadway capacity in
2035 without the proposed Poinsettia Lane gap closure.
Intersection Volume
Annual growth rates calculated in Table H for roadway segments were applied to the corresponding
approach for the study intersections. Figure 4 illustrates the resulting projected intersection turn
volumes in 2035 without the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. These turning volumes were analyzed
consistent with the Intersection Turning Movement Needs Assessment in the City of Carlsbad
Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. Table J examines whether right-turn volumes meet the
City's 150 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending a dedicated right-turn lane, whether left-
turn volumes meet the City's 250 vehicles per hour threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes,
and whether the left-turn queue is anticipated to exceed the available turn pocket.
As Table J shows, right-turn volume at many of the intersections meets the threshold for
recommending dedicated right-turn lanes. Compared to existing conditions, one additional
movement (southbound right turns at El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway) would meet the City's criteria
for a dedicated right-turn lane. Four left-turn movements have single left-turn lanes but meet the
threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes, which is the same as existing conditions.
Intersection Performance
The traffic volumes illustrated on Figure 4 were analyzed using both the ICU and HCM
methodologies at signalized intersections. Only the HCM methodology applies at unsignalized
intersections. Table K presents the results of the intersection performance analysis. Analysis
worksheets are provided in Appendix D.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx 111/12/19) 17
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 27 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Table J: 2035 Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection Turning
Movement Needs Assessment
Right Turn Existing Left Turn Existing Calculated Left Turn Intersection Dedicated Dual Queue Volume' Right?2 Volume' Left?' Length' Storage
1. Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane NB 245 No 414 No 594 N/A
(s) SB 63 No 44 No 50 N/A
EB 212 No 46 No 42 265
WB 81 No 168 No 260 265
2. Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway NB 13 No 10 No 137 N/A
(s) SB 179 No 239 No 516 N/A
EB 32 No4 300 No 392 130
WB 282 No4 54 No 51 125
3. Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) NB 0 No 0 No -N/A
SB 0 No 562 No -160
WB 572 No 0 No -N/A
4. Skimmer Court/Poinsettia NB 34 No 0 No 3 N/A
Lane/Oriole Court (u) SB 0 No 6 No 1 N/A
EB 0 No 0 No 0 N/A
WB 16 Yes 48 No 2 300
5. Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place NB 11 No 0 No 3 N/A
(u) SB 0 No 14 No 0 N/A
WB 6 No 13 No 0 N/A
6. Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) NB 5 No 11 No 3 N/A
EB 20 No 0 No 0 N/A
WB 0 No 8 No 0 N/A
7. Mimosa Drive/Aviara NB 46 No 31 No 36 N/A
Parkway(s) SB 87 No 20 No 30 N/A
EB 29 No4 25 No 26 135
WB 26 No 72 No 49 195
8. El Camino Real/Cassia Road(s) NB 15 Yes 218 No 492 250
SB 445 No4 17 No 40 260
EB 212 No 475 No 600 270
WB 19 No 17 No 41 100
9. El Camino Real/Poinsettia NB 584 Yes 27 Yes 21 250
Lane(s) SB 15 No 268 Yes 119 250
EB 6 No 21 Yes 18 315
WB 286 No 535 Yes 218 380
10. El Camino Real/Dove Lane(s) NB 66 No4 107 No 122 190
SB 267 No4 103 No 166 235
EB 121 No 238 No 428 60
WB 69 No 72 No 125 80
11. El Camino Real/Aviara NB 636 No 534 Yes 409 265
Parkway(s) SB 155 No 227 Yes 201 310
EB 364 Yes 196 Yes 120 150
WB 114 No 732 Yes 516 200
Note: Shaded cells do not meet guidelines
1 Higher volume of either a.m. or p.m. peak hour
2 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that a dedicated right-turn lane is recommended when
volume exceeds 150.
' City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that dual left-turn lanes are recommended when volume
exceeds 250.
4 Dashed bicycle lane provides for a lane width of at least 19 feet indicating vehicles may treat this as a right-turn lane.
(s) = signalized intersection N/A = not applicable WB = westbound
(u) = unsignalized intersection NB= northbound
EB= eastbound SB= southbound
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 19
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 29 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Table K: 2035 Without Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection LOS
Study AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Methodology V/C Ratio V/C Ratio Area No. or Delay LOS or Delay LOS
1 Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane ICU 0.78 C 0.39 A
HCM 43.4 sec D 12.5 sec B
2 Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.79 C 0.38 A
HCM 124.5sec F 13.7 sec B
3 Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) HCM 0.0 sec A 0.0 sec A
4 Oriole Court-Skimmer HCM 7.9 sec B 6.6 sec A Court/Poinsettia Lane (u)
5 Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u) HCM 9.0 sec A 8.8 sec A
6 Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) HCM 8.7 sec A 8.6 sec A
7 Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.33 A 0.37 A
HCM 10.0 sec A 10.1 sec B
8 El Camino Real/Cassia Road ICU 0.84 D 0.85 D
HCM 43.8 sec D 50.4 sec D
9 El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane ICU 0.61 B 0.62 B
HCM 27.1 sec C 24.1 sec C
El Camino Real/Dove Lane ICU 0.57 A 0.70 C 10 HCM 30.0 sec C 44.8 sec D
El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway ICU 0.88 D 0.83 D 11 HCM 70.2 sec 60.7 sec E E
Note: Shaded cells exceed LOS D.
(u) = unsignalized intersection LOS= level of service
HCM = Highway Capacity Manual sec= seconds
ICU= intersection capacity utilization V/C = volume-to-capacity
Table K shows that most of the study intersections are anticipated to continue to deliver a
satisfactory LOS. Although, as shown in Table J, some individual movements may experience delay
and queueing, overall the intersections are capable of accommodating the peak hour traffic volume.
The intersection of Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway would continue to be impacted by school traffic
in the a.m. peak hour. The intersection of El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway is anticipated to degrade
with increased traffic volumes in the future.
GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2035) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP
CLOSURE
Comparisons between traffic projections using the SAN DAG Series 12 (land use based) model were
again used to project traffic conditions with the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. The annual growth rate
calculated in Table H was applied to 2008 (without the gap closure) model data to determine the
potential model data in the future without the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. These potential model
data were compared to the model predicted traffic data in the same future year to identify the
redistribution of traffic calculated by the traffic model. These calculations are shown in Table L.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 20
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 30 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Table L: Traffic Model Data and Traffic Growth Rates
2008 Model Annual 2020 2020 Model
Roadway Segment Projection Growth Volume Projection Effect of Gap
Based on Closure (1,0005) Rate Growth (1,0005)
Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 8.8 0.9% 9.8 8.5 (1.3) (13.2%)
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4.8 1.7% 5.8 4.6 (1.2) (20.7%)
Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 1.6 1.4% 1.9 5.1 3.2 171.8%
El Camino Real (Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 28.9 0.6% 30.8 31.2 0.4 1.2%
El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 28.7 1.1% 32.4 34.0 1.6 4.9%
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 7.8 0.8% 8.5 6.1 (2.4) (28.4%)
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2.5 0.8% 2.8 2.4 (0.4) (12.7%)
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 1.8 1.5% 2.1 1.3 (0.8) (39.0%)
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 1.6 3.1% 2.2 2.4 0.2 9.8%
As Table L shows, the traffic model predicts that the completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure
would reduce traffic volumes on Cassia Road (28.4 percent lower) and Ambrosia Lane (12.7 percent
lower) as using these routes around the existing gap will no longer be necessary. The traffic model
similarly predicts that the Poinsettia Lane gap closure will reduce daily traffic volume along Mimosa
Drive (specifically, south of Moorhen Place) possibly because access to Poinsettia Lane would have
greater utility. The traffic model also predicts that traffic volumes along Dove Lane would increase
by 9.8 percent, which is likely to mean that traffic volumes along Moorhen Place and Oriole Court
would also increase. This could be due to either redistribution of neighborhood traffic or cut-
through traffic. Although not included in Table L, the same exercise was conducted for Aviara
Parkway. The traffic model predicts that the Poinsettia Lane gap closure would redistribute
approximately 10 percent of traffic along Aviara Parkway.
Roadway Volume
The percent of change in traffic volume with the gap closure calculated in Table L was applied to the
projected 2035 traffic volumes without the gap closure previously described in the report. For the
segment of Dove Lane where traffic volumes are projected to increase, 55 additional daily trips are
anticipated, which equates to 5 additional vehicles during a peak hour or 1 additional car every 12
minutes.
In the case of the segment of Poinsettia Lane between Cassia Road and El Camino Real, traffic
volumes were smoothed by applying the ratio of model data provided for the segments of Poinsettia
Lane between Cassia Road and El Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane between Ambrosia Lane and
Cassia Road. In other words, because the model predicted that the segment between Cassia Road
and El Camino Real would have a higher traffic volume, this relationship was maintained when
projecting future traffic volumes. Table M analyzes the resulting 2035 roadway traffic volume.
Intersection Volume
The effect of the gap closure identified in Table L was applied to the 2035 intersection turn volumes
displayed on Figure 4. For intersections immediately adjacent to the gap closure, turning
movements were directly shifted to account for new and potentially shorter travel paths.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 21
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 31 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Table M: General Plan Buildout (2035) Daily Roadway Volume and Capacity
Roadway Segment Lanes Capacity at 2035 With Gap V/C LOS Dor
LOS D Closure Volume Better
Poinsettia Lane (Aviara Parkway to Ambrosia Lane) 4 39,200 10,400 0.27 Yes
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 4 39,200 10,056 0.26 Yes
Poinsettia Lane (Cassia Road to El Camino Real) 4 39,200 10,750 0.27 Yes
El Camino Real {Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane) 5 54,100 36,815 0.68 Yes
El Camino Real (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 6 54,100 47,970 0.89 Yes
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 4 32,200 7,520 0.23 Yes
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 3,309 0.24 Yes
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 2 13,700 522 0.04 Yes
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 2 13,700 614 0.04 Yes
LOS = level of service
V/C = volume-to-capacity
Figure 5 illustrates the resulting projected intersection turn volumes in 2035 with the Poinsettia
Lane gap closure. These turning volumes were analyzed consistent with the Intersection Turning
Movement Needs Assessment in the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines.
Table N examines whether right-turn volumes meet the City's 150 vehicles per hour threshold for
recommending a dedicated right-turn lane, whether left-turn volumes meet the City's 250 vehicles
per hour threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes, and whether the left-turn queue is
anticipated to exceed the available turn pocket.
As Table N shows, right-turn volume at many ofthe intersections meets the threshold for
recommending dedicated right-turn lanes. One of the movements where a right-turn lane would be
recommended is southbound El Camino Real at Poinsettia Lane. Compared to without the gap
closure, two fewer right-turn lanes would be deficient by this measure. Two left-turn movements
have single left-turn lanes but meet the threshold for recommending dual left-turn lanes, which is
two fewer than without the gap closure. More intersections comply with the City's turning-
movement needs assessment with the Poinsettia Lane gap closure.
Intersection Performance
The traffic volumes illustrated on Figure 5 were analyzed using both the ICU and HCM
methodologies at signalized intersections. Only the HCM methodology applies at unsignalized
intersections. Table O presents the results of the intersection performance analysis. Analysis
worksheets are provided in Appendix E.
As described in detail in the following section, concurrent with construction of the Poinsettia Lane
gap closure, traffic signals would be constructed at the currently unsignalized intersections of
Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane. The analysis
presented in Table O reflects the future traffic signals at these locations.
\\vcorpl2\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 22
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 32 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Table N: 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection Turning
Movement Needs Assessment
Right Turn Existing Left Turn Existing Calculated
Intersection Volume' Dedicated Volume' Dual Queue
Right?2 Left?' Length'
1. Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane (s) NB 214 No 414 No 477
SB 63 No 44 No 58
EB 184 No 46 No 54
WB 64 No 168 No 188
2. Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 13 No 10 No 174
SB 156 No 239 No 483
EB 28 No4 300 No 366
WB 245 No• 54 No 59
3. Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u) NB 15 No 0 No 95
SB 0 No 197 No 108
WB 222 No 20 No 56
4. Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane/ NB 41 No 34 No 34
Oriole Court (u) SB 6 No 6 No 11
EB 20 No 8 No 11
WB 8 Yes 39 No 26
5. Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u) NB 7 No 0 No 0
SB 0 No 20 No 0
WB 4 No 8 No 0
6. Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u) NB 5 No 12 No 3
EB 22 No 0 No 0
WB 0 No 9 No 0
7. Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 46 No 31 No 37
SB 53 No 12 No 23
EB 22 No4 25 No 23
WB 23 No 62 No 44
8. El Camino Real/Cassia Road (s) NB 15 Yes 40 No 69
SB 112 No4 17 No 35
EB 38 No 85 No 68
WB 19 No 17 No 25
9. El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane (s) NB 592 Yes 221 Yes 151
SB 364 No 271 Yes 136
EB 114 No 255 Yes 80
WB 286 No 519 Yes 201
10. El Camino Real/Dove Lane (s) NB 69 No4 112 No 185
SB 280 No• 108 No 178
EB 122 No 241 No 320
WB 69 No 72 No 107
11. El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway (s) NB 667 No 464 Yes 317
SB 135 No 238 Yes 220
EB 316 Yes 170 Yes 130
WB 99 No 635 Yes 472
Note: Shaded cells do not meet guidelines.
1 Higher volume of either a.m. or p.m. peak hour
LSA
Left Turn
Storage
N/A
N/A
265
265
N/A
N/A
130
125
N/A
160
N/A
N/A
N/A
50
300
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
135
195
250
260
270
100
250
250
315
380
190
235
60
80
265
310
150
200
1 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines state that a dedicated right-turn lane is recommended when volume
exceeds 150.
• City of Carlsbad Transpartatian Impact Analysis Guidelines state that dual left-turn lanes are recommended when volume exceeds
250.
4 Dashed bicycle lane provides for a lane width of at least 19 feet indicating vehicles may treat this as a right-turn lane.
(s) = signalized intersection EB= eastbound NB= northbound WB = westbound
(u) = unsignalized intersection N/A = not applicable SB= southbound
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 24
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 34 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Table O: 2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Intersection LOS
Study Intersection Methodology Area No.
1 Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane
2 Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway
3 Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road (u)
4 Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia
Lane (u)
5 Mimosa Drive/Moorhen Place (u)
6 Dove Lane/Moorhen Place (u)
7 Mimosa Drive/Aviara Parkway
8 El Camino Real/Cassia Road
9 El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane
10 El Camino Real/Dove Lane
11 El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway
Note: Shaded cells exceed LOS D.
(u) = unsignalized intersection
HCM = Highway Capacity Manual
LOS = level of service
sec= seconds
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
HCM
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU
HCM
ICU = intersection capacity utilization V/C = volume-to-capacity
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
V/C Ratio V/C Ratio
or Delay LOS or Delay LOS
0.68 B 0.36 A
27.7 sec C 23.8 sec C
0.70 B 0.34 A
70.4 sec E 13.7 sec B
0.44 A 0.40 A
10.5 sec B 26.8 sec C
0.26 A 0.27 A
8.9 sec A 8.8 sec A
9.2 sec A 8.8 sec A
8.8 sec A 8.7 sec A
0.28 A 0.33 A
9.2 sec A 9.3 sec A
0.60 A 0.61 B
12.5 sec B 13.5 sec B
0.72 C 0.74 C
40.3 sec D 35.7 sec D
0.60 A 0.73 C
24.8 sec C 39.2 sec D
0.84 D 0.83 D
59.5 sec E 54.3 sec D
Table O shows that most of the study intersections are anticipated to continue to deliver a
satisfactory level of service. No additional intersections would exceed LOS D compared to the
scenario without the gap closure. Although the two intersections previously identified as exceeding
LOS D (Ambrosia Lane/Aviara Parkway and El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway) would continue to
exceed LOS D, the performance of these intersections is somewhat improved by the redistribution
of traffic resulting from completion of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure.
SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
Section 4C of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) establishes a
framework for traffic control signal needs studies. These guidelines help to identify areas of
consideration but do not establish mandates. The MUTCD specifically states, "The satisfaction of a
traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal."
The reverse is also true. Ultimately, the decision on control and operation of an intersection lies with
the engineering judgment of the local jurisdiction. The local jurisdiction is most familiar with
circumstances not captured by the guidelines in the MUTCD. The nine areas identified in the MUTCD
are the following:
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 25
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 35 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
• Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
• Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
• Warrant 3, Peak Hour
• Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume
• Warrant 5, School Crossing
• Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System
• Warrant 7, Crash Experience
• Warrant 8, Roadway Network
• Warrant 9, Intersection Near a [Railroad] Grade Crossing
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Other factors such as road grade, sight distance, the number of lanes crossed by vehicles exiting the
minor street, and driver behavior may be extenuating circumstances. LSA considered traffic control
options, the MUTCD signal warrants, and potential circumstances for the two intersections
immediately adjacent to the Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure: Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Oriole
Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane.
Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road
At the time existing conditions were collected for this report, this intersection was unsignalized with
a stop sign on the Cassia Road approach. Completion of the Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure would
result in a third leg at this intersection and introduce conflicting movements. Table P uses the traffic
volume displayed in Figure 5 and identifies the intersection performance under different traffic
control options. As Table P shows, any form of traffic control would result in a satisfactory level of
service.
Table P: Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road Traffic Control Comparison
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS
Roundabout 6.6 A 8.0 A
Two-Way Stop Control 14.5 B 27.1 D
All-Way Stop Control 12.8 B 34.3 D
Traffic Signal 10.5 B 26.8 C
LOS = level of service
LSA used the gap closure growth rates identified in the traffic model data comparison above and
applied it to existing intersection and roadway data to develop Existing plus Gap Closure traffic
volumes for Signal Warrants 1, 2, and 3. This data set, existing pedestrian volumes, and the collision
history displayed on Figure 3 were evaluated against the MUCTD signal warrants. Signal warrant
worksheets are provided in Appendix F. The MUTCD establishes different thresholds for urban and
rural settings. The rural setting may be used in the built-up area of an isolated community with a
population of less than 10,000 or where the speed limit on a major street is greater than 40 mph.
Although the City is an urban setting, the speed limit on Poinsettia Lane is 50 mph. Therefore, the
rural settings were examined for Warrants 1, 2, and 3.
\\vcorpl2\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 26
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 36 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume
This warrant considers whether a large volume of minor street traffic is the principal reason to
consider installing a traffic signal or whether traffic volume on the major street is so heavy that
minor street traffic suffers extensive delay or conflict. The MUTCD states that this warrant is met if
thresholds are exceeded for each of any 8 hours of a typical day. For the intersection of Poinsettia
Lane/Cassia Road, this warrant is satisfied.
Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume
This warrant considers whether the total volume of intersecting (i.e., conflicting) traffic is the
principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. The MUTCD states that this warrant is met if
thresholds are exceeded for each of any 4 hours of a typical day. For the intersection of Poinsettia
Lane/Cassia Road, this warrant is satisfied.
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Vehicle Volume
This warrant considers whether undue delay on the minor street during the busiest hour of the day
is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant is met applying either delay
or volume thresholds. For the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, this warrant is satisfied
based on volume.
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
This warrant considers whether pedestrian volume is sufficiently high to be the sole reason for
installing a traffic signal. In order to meet this warrant, pedestrian volume would have to exceed at
least 93 crossings of the major street in an hour. For the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road,
no pedestrian crossings were recorded when surveys of the intersection were completed, and this
warrant is not satisfied.
Warrant 5: School Crossing
The School Crossing warrant is intended for application where the need for schoolchildren to cross
the major street is the principal reason in considering the installation of a traffic control signal.
While some children may walk to school from these residential neighborhoods, the intersection of
Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road is not part of a designated school route (identified by the use of yellow
crosswalk markings); therefore, this warrant does not apply.
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
This warrant may apply where maintaining platooning of vehicles through a coordinated system
necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where other conditions would not
otherwise meet warrants. The MUTCD specifies that this warrant should not be applied where the
resultant spacing of signals would be less than 1,000 feet. Currently, the spacing between Poinsettia
Lane/Cassia Road and Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is approximately 2,175 feet (with
the gap closure). An additional traffic control signal will be constructed with the gap closure
approximately 1,065 feet from the Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road intersection at Artemisia Court.
However, spacing between the Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road intersection and the existing traffic
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 27
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 37 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
control signal at Ambrosia Lane/Poinsettia Lane is approximately 640 feet. Therefore, this warrant
does not apply.
Warrant 7: Crash Experience
If an intersection experiences a high frequency and severity of collisions that could be alleviated by
the installation of a traffic signal, then this warrant may apply. The threshold established in the
MUTCD is a minimum of five collisions resulting in injury occurring within a 12-month period. The
collision history illustrated in Figure 3 is for a 10-year period. The collision data shows no more than
two collisions in a 12-month period. For the intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, this
warrant is not satisfied.
Warrant 8: Roadway Network
Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration
and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network. Examples given include the intersection of
two major routes, locations with entering volume of more than 1,000 vehicles per hour for 5 hours
outside of normal business hours, and rural highways entering or traversing a city. This warrant does
not apply.
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a {Railroad] Grade Crossing
This warrant could be considered if an intersection is located near an at-grade crossing of railroad
tracks. The intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road is not located near railroad tracks, and this
warrant does not apply.
While unsignalized traffic control could provide a satisfactory LOS, traffic volumes at the intersection
of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road meet Warrants 1, 2, and 3. Traffic signal control at Poinsettia
Lane/Cassia Road is recommended.
Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane
At the time existing conditions were collected for this report, this intersection was unsignalized with
stop signs on the Oriole Court and Skimmer Court approaches. Completion of the Poinsettia Lane
Gap Closure would result in a fourth leg at this intersection. Table Q uses the traffic volume
displayed in Figure 5 and identifies the intersection performance under different traffic control
options. As Table Q shows, any form of traffic control would result in a satisfactory level of service.
Table Q: Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane Traffic
Control Comparison
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS
Roundabout 5.1 A 4.4 A
Two-Way Stop Control 15.4 C 18.8 C
All-Way Stop Control 10.6 B 11.3 B
Traffic Signal 8.9 A 8.8 A
LOS = level of service
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 28
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 38 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Signal warrant worksheets for this intersection are provided in Appendix F.
Warrant 1: Eight-Hour Vehicle Volume
LSA
This warrant considers whether a large volume of minor street traffic is the principal reason to
consider installing a traffic signal or whether traffic volume on the major street is so heavy that
minor street traffic suffers extensive delay or conflict. The MUTCD states that this warrant is met if
thresholds are exceeded for each of any 8 hours of a typical day. For the intersection of Oriole
Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane, the threshold is met for some, but not for 8 hours of the day,
and the warrant is not satisfied.
Warrant 2: Four-Hour Vehicle Volume
This warrant considers whether the total volume of intersecting (i.e., conflicting) traffic is the
principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. The MUTCD states that this warrant is met if
thresholds are exceeded for each of any 4 hours of a typical day. For the intersection of Oriole
Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane, the threshold is met for 1 hour but not for 4 hours of the day,
and the warrant is not satisfied.
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Vehicle Volume
This warrant considers whether undue delay on the minor street during the busiest hour of the day
is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant is met applying either delay
or volume thresholds. For the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane, this
warrant is not satisfied.
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
This warrant considers whether pedestrian volume is sufficiently high to be the sole reason for
installing a traffic signal. In order to meet this warrant, pedestrian volume would have to exceed at
least 93 crossings of the major street in an hour. For the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer
Court/Poinsettia Lane, six pedestrian crossings were recorded when surveys of the intersection were
completed, which does not satisfy this warrant.
Warrant 5: School Crossing
The School Crossing warrant is intended for application where the need for schoolchildren to cross
the major street is the principal reason in considering the installation of a traffic control signal.
While some children may walk to school from these residential neighborhoods, the intersection of
Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is not part of a designated school route (identified by
the use of yellow crosswalk markings); therefore, this warrant does not apply.
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
This warrant may apply where maintaining platooning of vehicles through a coordinated system
necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where other conditions would not
otherwise meet warrants. The MUTCD specifies that this warrant should not be applied where the
resultant spacing of signals would be less than 1,000 feet. Currently, the spacing between Poinsettia
Lane/Cassia Road and Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is approximately 2,175 feet (with
the gap closure). An additional traffic control signal will be constructed at Artemisia Court
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 29
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 39 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
approximately 1,110 feet from the Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane intersection. This
spacing would leave 1,065 feet between the Artemisia Court traffic signal and the intersection of
Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road where this report recommends a traffic signal. The distance between
the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane and the existing traffic signal at El
Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane is approximately 1,400 feet. Therefore, this warrant could be
considered at the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane. The appropriate
infrastructure is present along Poinsettia Lane for interconnection and coordination of traffic signals
between Ambrosia Lane and El Camino Real. A traffic signal at the Oriole Court-Skimmer
Court/Poinsettia Lane intersection would maintain platooning of vehicles to facilitate this
coordinated system. Therefore, this warrant is satisfied at the intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer
Court/Poinsettia Lane.
Warrant 7: Crash Experience
If an intersection experiences a high frequency and severity of collisions that could be alleviated by
the installation of a traffic signal, then this warrant may apply. The threshold established in the
MUTCD is a minimum of five collisions resulting in injury occurring within a 12-month period. For the
intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane, this warrant is not satisfied based on
past collision history.
Warrant 8: Roadway Network
Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration
and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network. Examples given include the intersection of
two major routes, locations with entering volume of more than 1,000 vehicles per hour for 5 hours
outside of normal business hours, and rural highways entering or traversing a city. This warrant does
not apply.
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a [Railroad] Grade Crossing
This warrant could be considered if an intersection is located near an at-grade crossing of railroad
tracks. The intersection of Oriole Court-Skimmer Court/Poinsettia Lane is not located near railroad
tracks, and this warrant does not apply.
While unsignalized traffic control could provide a satisfactory LOS, delay would be experienced by
vehicles entering Poinsettia Lane from the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Traffic volumes
exceed thresholds for some, but not all, of the hours specified in the signal warrants. Pedestrians
cross Poinsettia Lane at this intersection, but not in sufficient quantity to meet the pedestrian signal
warrant. The intersection has not been the location of traffic collisions, but the width and grade of
the major roadway could contribute to increased collisions when paired with driver error.
An additional factor that should be taken into consideration is driver expectation. The new
intersection at Artemisia Court will be signalized, although the thresholds of the signal warrants are
partially, but not fully, met. The only full-access unsignalized intersection along Poinsettia Lane
would be at Brigantine Drive, and the neighborhood accessed by Brigantine Drive also has the
option of using the signalized intersection at Black Rails Road to exit the neighborhood. Drivers on
Poinsettia Lane may not be prepared for cross traffic at an unsignalized Oriole Court-Skimmer
Court/Poinsettia Lane intersection. Additionally, Warrant 6 is satisfied based on the distances
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 30
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 40 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
between signalized intersections and the necessity to maintain vehicle platooning through the
coordinated traffic signal system. Based on these factors, a traffic signal at Oriole Court-Skimmer
Court/Poinsettia Lane is recommended.
EL CAMINO REAL/POINSETTIA LANE
In 2012 El Camino Real was widened to provide three southbound lanes between Cassia Road and
Aviara Parkway. Prior to this project, the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane provided
two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane at the southbound approach. As part
of the expansion, the exclusive right-turn lane was converted to a through lane. Right-turning
vehicles share the outside lane with vehicles traveling through the intersection. In the existing
condition, 14 vehicles make the southbound right-turn in either peak hour, which means that the
outside lane primarily functions as a through lane.
As Table N shows, the southbound right-turn meets the City's intersection turning-movement needs
assessment for a dedicated right-turn lane with the traffic volumes redistributed at completion of
the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. This section examines the potential benefits and constraints of
adding an exclusive southbound right-turn lane.
Collision Potential
As a further complication, El Camino Real slopes downhill as people travel south. The public has
raised a concern that vehicles traveling straight through the intersection will require longer to stop if
approaching a vehicle slowing to turn right -and that a higher risk of collision is present without an
exclusive turn lane.
Analysis of collision data from 2008 to 2018 indicated that southbound rear-end collisions have not
increased since the southbound right-turn lane at this intersection was converted to a through/
right-turn lane. In fact, all five southbound rear-end collisions occurred prior to the 2012 conversion
of the right-turn lane.
It should be noted that El Camino Real provides a bicycle lane. At other intersections along El
Camino Real with an exclusive right-turn lane, a bicycle lane is provided at the intersection with an
appropriate transition in advance of the intersection. A similar treatment would be require9 if an
exclusive right-turn lane were added at the southbound approach of El Camino Real/PO'irisettia Lane.
This transition, however, requires bicycles to cross the vehicle path to remain in the bicycle lane.
Other than collision history, concern regarding the potential for collisions should be tempered by
the fact that turning vehicles likely have to slow when entering an exclusive turn lane. Drivers of
through vehicles traveling in the outside lane always have to consider the potential that vehicles in
front of them may desire to turn. The speed of vehicles traveling in the outside lane should take
these possibilities into account.
Intersection Performance
Table E shows that the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane functions at LOS Dor better in
existing conditions with the current lane configuration. Table O shows that the intersection of El
Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane is anticipated to continuing functioning at LOS Dor better without the
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 31
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 41 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
addition of a southbound right-turn lane. However, to demonstrate the potential benefit of adding a
southbound right-turn lane, the intersection was reanalyzed with that configuration. Table R
displays a summary of previously disclosed intersection performance data and compares that to
intersection performance with a dedicated southbound right-turn lane.
Table R: El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane Intersection Performance Comparison
Shared SBR Dedicated SBR Effect of Adding Scenario V/C Ratio or I V /C Ratio or I
Delay
Existing AM
ICU 0.52 I
HCM 24.1 sec I
Queue in Southbound Through Lanes 234 feet
Existing PM
ICU 0.53 I
HCM 20.7 sec I
Queue in Southbound Through Lanes 297 feet
2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure AM
ICU 0.72 I
HCM 45.3 sec I
Queue in Southbound Through Lanes 407 feet
2035 With Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure AM
ICU 0.74 I
HCM 35.7 sec I
Queue in Southbound Through Lanes 542 feet
Note: Shaded cells exceed LOS D.
(u) = unsignalized intersection
HCM = Highway Capacity Manual
SBR = southbound right-turn
sec= seconds
ICU = intersection capacity utilization
LOS = level of service
V/C = volume-to-capacity
LOS
A
C
A
C
C
D
C
D
Delay LOS SBR Lane
0.52 I A 0.00
23.8 sec l C 0.3 sec
231 feet 3 feet
0.53 I A 0.00
20.3 sec I C 0.4 sec
293 feet 4 feet
0.69 1 B 0.03
43.3 sec I D 2.0 sec
345 feet 62 feet
0.68 l B 0.06
31.6 sec I C 4.1 sec
397 feet 145 feet
As Table R shows, adding a southbound right-turn lane would have minimal effect on the
performance of the intersection in existing conditions. If southbound right-turn volume increases
with the completion of Poinsettia Lane as anticipated, then adding a dedicated turn lane would
provide some benefit to the intersection. It should be noted, however, that the benefit to the
intersection does not improve any deficiency. The intersection is forecast to function at a
satisfactory level of service with or without a dedicated southbound right-turn lane.
Engineering Constraints
The addition of an exclusive right-turn lane would require widening of El Camino Real by
approximately 12 feet on the west side of the intersection. In order to accommodate the maximum
anticipated queue, the turn pocket should provide approximately 80 to 100 feet of storage. While
the west side of the intersection appears to be vacant land, some of the facilities near the roadway
may present constraints. Some of the items needing relocation present a typical amount of effort
for this type of widening project. These include the traffic signal controller, recycled water irrigation
lines (and valves located approximately 110 feet from the back of curb return), and the cathodoic
protection testing station for the in-street petroleum line.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 32
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 42 of 302
TRAFF!C INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
Widening the roadway by 12 feet will extend beyond the currently graded area. An elevation
difference of as much as 12 feet will require construction of a retaining wall as part of adding the
right-turn lane. A retaining wall like the one required at this location is not unusual for this type of
widening project in a hilly area.
Also located on the west side of El Camino Real is an underground SDG&E natural gas line and a
vault, which does not appear to have a traffic-rated lid. This vault will have to be rebuilt or relocated
to complete the widening. The cost of addressing the vault depends on the whether SDG&E has an
easement or prior rights associated with the natural gas line. The range in cost for the vault could be
from $100,000-$500,000, bringing the total construction cost of adding an exclusive southbound
right-turn lane at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane to potentially $1.35 million.
Biological Constraints
Perhaps more significant than the engineering constraints are the biological constraints in the area
west of El Camino Real that would be disturbed by the project adding a right-turn lane. A
memorandum detailing existing conditions in that area is included as Appendix G. According to the
Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP), the area that
would be disturbed by the addition of the southbound right-turn lane is within an existing hard line
preserve (Preserve Number P/A#705) and is within the Coastal Zone.
Because the area is within a hardline preserve, impacts to biological resources (such as the southern
maritime chaparral that occurs on the site) are not allowed unless: (a) they are associated with a
covered project as defined by the HMP, (b) an equivalency finding results in a minor amendment
and adjustment to the hardline boundary, or (c) a major amendment to the HMP is approved.
Approval of impacts to southern maritime chaparral within a hardline boundary requires 3:1
mitigation. Special-status species have the potential to occur in the area, and focused surveys for
Orcutt's brodiaea, Del Mar Mesa sand aster, and coastal California gnatcatcher would need to be
performed (likely between May and July) to confirm the initial assessment that these species are
absent from the site. The HMP provides additional conservation standards related to areas subject
to the constraints of being within the California Coastal Zone. Permitting through the resource
agencies will add to the total cost of adding an exclusive southbound right-turn lane at El Camino
Real/Poinsettia Lane.
CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC EVALUATION
The Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element defines the uses of different street classifications.
Arterial Streets and Arterial Connectors connect people to different areas of the City and to different
land uses. Local/neighborhood streets connect people to residential neighborhoods and local areas.
This section examines the potential for cut-through traffic, which is arterial traffic using local streets.
The section following provides options for reducing cut-through traffic.
In the existing condition, the gap in Poinsettia Lane results in arterial traffic using Cassia Road (a
Local/Neighborhood Street) and Ambrosia Lane (a School Street). This is cut-through traffic that
occurs because the arterial connector is not yet available. As noted earlier, the Poinsettia Lane gap
closure has the potential to redistribute traffic in the vicinity of the project. Traffic currently using
Ambrosia Lane or Cassia Road to travel around the gap would be able to stay on Poinsettia Lane to
\\vcorpl2\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 33
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 43 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
complete their trip. Analysis of traffic model data shows that the completion of Poinsettia Lane is
anticipated to reduce traffic on Cassia Road (28.4 percent lower) and Ambrosia Lane (12. 7 percent
lower). The traffic model also predicts that traffic volumes along Dove Lane could increase by 9.8
percent, which is likely to mean that traffic volumes along Moorhen Place and Oriole Court would
also increase. The traffic model data indicate the potential for cut-through traffic in the Viadana
neighborhood.
Cut-through traffic occurs where a local street provides time savings compared to remaining on the
arterial network. Time savings is affected by distance, speed, and delay at intersections. These
factors were measured to determine which cut-through routes may be attractive. Travel speeds
were surveyed and reported in Table C. The speed data are summarized as follows:
• Poinsettia Lane: 50 mph posted speed limit; 33 mph typical speed
• Cassia Road: 35 mph posted speed limit; 29 mph typical speed
• Ambrosia Lane: 40 mph posted speed limit; 34 mph typical speed
• Mimosa Drive: 25 mph posted speed limit; 25 mph typical speed
• Dove Lane: 35 mph posted speed limit; 30 mph typical speed
• Aviara Parkway: 40 mph posted speed limit
• El Camino Real: 55 mph posted speed limit
Not all possible routes have the potential to be attractive. Vehicles on Aviara Parkway can enter the
Post Office/Library/Shopping Center area from a signalized driveway on Aviara Parkway or a right-
in/right-out driveway. Vehicles on El Camino Real can enter the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center
area from a signalized intersection with Dove Lane. Diverting from these direct paths and traveling
through neighborhoods would not be attractive. Indeed, these alternatives are available today and
cut-through traffic is not present.
Many potential routes through the study area were evaluated in a screening process that
considered distance and speed. Routes that far exceeded the travel time of direct routes were
eliminated from consideration. Routes examined in detail due to their cut-through potential include
the following:
• From the west on Poinsettia Lane to the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center along Oriole Court,
Mimosa Drive, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane instead of Poinsettia Lane, El Camino Real, and
Dove Lane
• From the Cassia neighborhoods to the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center along Cassia Road,
Poinsettia Lane, Oriole Court, Mimosa Drive, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane instead of Cassia
Road, El Camino Real, and Dove Lane
• From the north on El Camino Real to westbound Poinsettia Lane along Cassia Road and
Poinsettia Lane instead of directly to Poinsettia Lane
The analysis of route travel time included the distance and typical travel speed along each roadway
on the route and average delay for each movement needed at intersections along the route.
Calculations of intersection turning-movement delay come from the HCM analysis of future traffic
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 34
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 44 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
conditions. Therefore, the analysis presents a worst-case accounting for the potential for cut-
through routes to increase in attractiveness as arterial traffic volumes increase. It should be noted
that delay to vehicles traveling through the new traffic signal on Poinsettia Lane at the entry to the
Poinsettia 61 residential project is accounted for in the analysis.
Table S provides a summary of travel time for routes from West Poinsettia Lane to the Post Office/
Library/Shopping Center and the reverse trip. As Table S shows, the cut-through route is about 0.10
of a mile shorter and anticipated to save 1 minute of travel time. The reverse trip leaving the
shopping center is anticipated to save 2 minutes of travel time due to the increased delay for
making left turns at El Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane. This is sufficient time savings that some of
the vehicles traveling between the shopping center and Poinsettia Lane to the west may desire to
cut through the local streets.
Table S: Route Options from West Poinsettia Lane to Shopping Center
Route Segment Speed Distance Time Intersection Delay
(mph) (miles) (minutes) (minutes)
Poinsettia Lane 33 0.27 0.49 0.86
To Shopping Center on El Camino Real 55 0.32 0.35 0.78
Arterials Dove Lane 30 0.06 0.13 0.17
Total 0.6S 2.78
Oriole Court-Mimosa 25 0.31 0.74 0.42 To Shopping Center Drive-Moorhen Place
through Neighborhood Dove Lane 30 0.21 0.42 0.12
Total 0.S2 1.70
Dove Lane 30 0.06 0.13 0.17
From Shopping Center on El Camino Real 55 0.32 0.35 1.56
Arterials Poinsettia Lane 33 0.27 0.49 1.29
Total 0.6S 3.99
Dove Lane 30 0.21 0.42 0.25
From Shopping Center Oriole Court-Mimosa 25 0.31 0.74 0.57 through Neighborhood Drive-Moorhen Place
Total 0.52 1.98
mph= miles per hour
Table T provides a summary of travel time for routes from the neighborhoods around Cassia Road to
the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center and the reverse trip. As Table T shows, the cut-through
route is about 0.10 of a mile longer and anticipated to require about 15 seconds more to get to the
shopping center. The reverse trip leaving the shopping center is anticipated to save 10 seconds of
travel time due to the increased delay for making left turns at El Camino Real and Cassia Road. Some
of the vehicles leaving the shopping center to go back to the neighborhoods along Cassia Road may
choose to cut through the local streets rather than wait to turn left from Dove Lane to El Camino
Real.
Table U provides a summary of travel time for routes from El Camino Real north of Cassia Road to
Poinsettia Lane west of Cassia Road and the reverse trip. As Table U shows, the cut-through route is
about 0.50 mile shorter and anticipated to require about 1.4 minutes less time. The reverse trip
traveling east on Poinsettia Lane and eventually north on El Camino Real is anticipated to save less
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx 111/12/19) 35
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 45 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Table T: Route Options from Cassia Neighborhoods to Shopping Center
Route Segment Speed Distance Time Intersection Delay
(mph) (miles) (minutes) (minutes)
Cassia Road 29 0.27 0.55 0.76
To Shopping Center on El Camino Real 55 0.67 0.73 0.78
Arterials Dove Lane 30 0.06 0.13 0.17
Total 1.00 3.12
Cassia Road 29 0.21 0.44 0.49
Poinsettia Lane 33 0.40 0.73 0.13
To Shopping Center Oriole Court-Mimosa 25 0.31 0.74 0.29 through Neighborhood Drive-Moorhen Place
Dove Lane 30 0.21 0.42 0.12
Total 1.13 3.36
Dove Lane 30 0.06 0.13 0.17
From Shopping Center on El Camino Real 55 0.67 0.73 1.56
Arterials Cassia Road 29 0.27 0.54 0.87
Total 1.00 4.00
Dove Lane 30 0.21 0.42 0.25
Oriole Court-Mimosa 25 0.31 0.74 0.41 From Shopping Center Drive-Moorhen Place
through Neighborhood Poinsettia Lane 33 0.40 0.73 0.29
Cassia Road 29 0.21 0.44 0.55
Total 1.13 3.83
mph= miles per hour
Table U: Route Options from North El Camino Real to West Poinsettia Lane
Route Segment Speed Distance Time Intersection
(mph) (miles) (minutes) Delay (minutes)
El Camino Real 55 0.32 0.35 0.87
North to West on Arterials Poinsettia Lane 33 0.67 1.23 0.55
Total 0.99 3.00
El Camino Real 55 0 0 0.25
North to West through Cassia Road 29 0.49 1.00 0.35
Neighborhood Poinsettia Lane 33 0 0 0
Total 0.49 1.60
Poinsettia Lane 33 0.67 1.22 1.13
West to North on Arterials El Camino Real 55 0.32 0.35 0.14
Total 0.99 2.84
Poinsettia Lane 33 0 0 0.38
West to North through Cassia Road 29 0.49 1.00 0.77
Neighborhood El Camino Real 55 0 0 0
Total 0.49 2.15
mph= miles per hour
time (about 40 seconds) due to the increased delay for making left turns at Cassia Road and El
Camino Real. Because the route is obviously shorter and drivers have been accustomed to traveling
this route around the gap in Poinsettia Lane, many of the vehicles making this trip may choose to cut
through Cassia Road.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 36
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 46 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Traffic model data reveal that cut-through traffic could increase traffic volumes along Oriole Court,
Mimosa Drive, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane by 10 percent. Cut through traffic on Cassia Road
between El Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane occurs today due to the gap in Poinsettia Lane. Vehicles
to/from South El Camino Real will use Poinsettia Lane, but vehicles to/from North El Camino Real
may continue to use Cassia Road resulting in up to 400 vehicles per peak hour cutting through on
Cassia Road.
CARLSBAD RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program (Carlsbad, May 2011) was created to provide
a process for minimizing disruptions to residential neighborhoods from excessive speeds and high
volumes. The program only applies to residential streets and should not be directly applied to non-
residential streets. No residential homes take access from Cassia Road. However, upon completion
of the Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure, regional traffic will have alternative connections not relying on
Cassia Road. At that time, the City may determine that traffic calming solutions outside of the
Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program could apply to Cassia Road.
As stated previously, the Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element defines the purposes of different
roadway classifications. Cassia Road, Oriole Court, Mimosa Drive, Moorhen Place, and Dove Lane are
classified as Local/Neighborhood Streets and should be connecting people to residential
neighborhoods. Connections to different areas and land uses of the City should occur on Arterial
Streets or Arterial Connectors.
This report identifies three potential disruptions to residential neighborhoods in the study area:
• Speeding issues on Cassia Road, particularly westbound (downhill) traffic
• Potential for cut-through traffic along Oriole Court-Moorhen Place-Dove Lane by vehicles
traveling between the Post Office/Library/Shopping Center and Poinsettia Lane to the west
• Potential for cut-through traffic along Cassia Road by vehicles traveling from eastbound
Poinsettia Lane to northbound El Camino Real and from southbound El Camino Real to
westbound Poinsettia Lane
This section describes potential measures to minimize neighborhood disruption. The Carlsbad
Residential Traffic Management Program requires a high level of resident involvement to ensure
that the measures being implemented are desired and accepted by a majority ofthe residents.
Potential measures to be taken can fall into the categories of Education, Engineering, Enforcement,
or Enhancement. The Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program defines these as:
Education: Providing resource materials and information to residents to inform
them about all aspects of traffic calming.
Engineering: Physical measures and other techniques utilized in the traffic calming
program that are based upon input and concurrence by residents, engineering
principles, financial and environmental considerations.
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 37
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 47 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
Enforcement: Police presence and selective enforcement of vehicle code violations.
Enhancement: Using special treatments in the physical measures through design
and/or landscaping features to improve livability, aesthetics, community pride.
A traffic calming toolbox is provided describing various strategies within these categories.
Speeding On Cassia Road
The posted speed limit is 35 mph, which is reinforced by four speed feedback signs. If vehicles are
traveling at this speed, adequate sight distance {250 feet at 35 mph) is provided at intersections
along Cassia Road. Most drivers are complying with the posted speed limit in the existing condition
(the observed 85th percentile speed was 29 mph). However, many vehicles were observed exceeding
the posted speed limit by 10 mph (with a few exceeding 15 mph over the posted speed limit). At
these speeds, intersections on Cassia Road do not have sufficient stopping sight distance {430 feet
at 50 mph). This pattern of majority compliance and several extreme outliers is consistent with
observed patterns of cut-through traffic.
The Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program lists several measures for reducing traffic
speeds. Narrowing on Cassia Road (for the addition of bike lanes) has already been applied. Vertical
traffic control measures, such as speed tables, work best when they are needed for speed reduction
at a particular location, such as a pedestrian crossing. The downside is an increase in noise at the
location of the vertical traffic control measure as vehicles brake and then accelerate to gain back the
lost speed. Traffic Calming State of the Practice, {ITE 1999) describes many ofthe measures
contained within the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program toolbox. The Carlsbad
Residential Traffic Management Program recommends 300 feet to 700 feet spacing between speed
control devices for residential streets with a 25 mph speed limit. As each of these locations would
generate increased noise, the most residents along Cassia Road would experience increased noise.
Therefore, vertical traffic control measures are not recommended. The MUTCD provides warrants
for the placement of stop signs and discourages use where warrants are not met. Traffic Calming
State of the Practice discourages the addition of unwarranted stop signs to residential streets as
compliance with these signs is low, an undeserved expectation of safety is introduced, and collisions
increase as a result.
The surveys taken for this report showed that outlying non-compliant speeds were most common
traveling westbound (downhill) in the early evening hours of 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Targeted police
enforcement {Measure TB-5) during these times may have a positive influence on driver behavior.
As the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program reports, benefits are sometimes short-
term without regular periodic enforcement.
A new traffic signal at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road may assist to reduce the number of vehicles
exceeding the speed limit on Cassia Road. In the existing condition, vehicles traveling westbound
(downhill) do not have opposing traffic at and might not comply with the stop sign at the
intersection of Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road. Without an expectation of having to stop, some vehicles
allow for the steady increase in speed as they travel downhill. This likely contributes to the
concentration of hit object collisions at this intersection. The future traffic signal will require a
complete stop on a red signal indication, which may moderate the number of vehicles traveling at
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 38
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 48 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
vehicles leaving the shopping center, cut-through deterrents at the Dove Lane entry to the
neighborhood are perhaps even more important than at the Oriole Court entry. Speed Cushions
(TB-13) are a vertical traffic control device designed to reduce vehicle speeds, but can also lead to
traffic volume reductions. Traffic Calming State of the Practice provides data that indicates these
devices can reduce traffic volume by 20 percent. The deterrent effect of these devices would be
enhanced by placing the first set of speed cushions just west of the intersection with Black Skimmer
Drive and pairing it with a warning sign that would be visible to drivers exiting the shopping center
intersection with Dove Lane.
The City could explore signal-timing changes at the intersection of El Camino Real/Dove Lane that
could reduce delay along the arterial route and thereby reduce the incentive to cut-through local
roads. The westbound approach of Dove Lane has lower volume than the eastbound approach of
Dove Lane. The City could consider either protected left-turn signal phasing that would reservice
eastbound left turns and the end of the east-west phase or east-west split phasing with restriping to
allow left turns from either eastbound lane. Either of these changes would increase the number of
eastbound left turns per cycle, decrease delay for eastbound left turns, and reduce the incentive to
cut through local roads.
Cut-Through Traffic on Cassia Road
Given the shorter distance and time savings for vehicles traveling between North El Camino Real and
West Poinsettia Lane, Cassia Road is likely to continue to be used by drivers completing this trip.
Because cut-through traffic is a possible source of existing speeding problems, measures that reduce
cut-through traffic have the potential to reduce speeding concerns as well.
For traffic traveling eastbound on Poinsettia Lane to northbound on El Camino Real, the time savings
of the cut-through route is less than one minute. Changes to the delay experienced at the traffic
signals along the route could impact the time-savings advantage and alter driver behavior.
Specifically, if the delays experienced when making eastbound left turns at Cassia Road and at El
Camino Real are less than the delay making an eastbound left-turn at El Camino Real/Poinsettia
Lane, than the time savings of the shorter travel path might be eliminated.
As mentioned previously, the traffic signal at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road should prioritize a green
light for through traffic on Poinsettia Lane. In this configuration, vehicles approaching Cassia Road
from eastbound Poinsettia Lane would encounter a red light for the left-turn lane. If the traffic signal
changes westbound Poinsettia Lane to a red light so a green arrow can be provided to left turns
onto Cassia Road, then delay is reduced. If the traffic signal is programmed to provide a green left-
turn arrow only after the Cassia Road green light phase, then delay to the Poinsettia left turns is
increased and this cut-through movement would be discouraged. Indeed, some drivers intending to
cut through Cassia Road may give up on waiting for a green arrow and merge back into Poinsettia
Lane through traffic.
The time savings for cut-through traffic for southbound El Camino Real to westbound Poinsettia
Lane is about 1.5 minutes. This advantage could not be overcome solely through signal timing, but
traffic signal timing can moderate the time-savings advantage. It is possible that grade differences
and a curve in Poinsettia Lane may prevent sufficient corner sight distance (550 feet at 50 mph). If a
traffic signal is constructed at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road, the City should investigate whether
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 40
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 50 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MONITORING
Poinsettia Lane from Carlsbad Boulevard to Melrose Drive has been a part of the Carlsbad planned
roadway network since at least 1994. A project to complete Poinsettia Lane between Cassia Road
and El Camino Real was included in the Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element when it was
adopted by the City Council in September 2015. At this time, the City is preparing to complete the
gap closure of Poinsettia Lane.
This traffic investigation considered the potential effects of the gap closure on the surrounding
roadway system and adjacent intersections and provided potential strategies for limiting the
intrusion of cut-through traffic into the Viadana and Pavoreal neighborhoods. Baseline conditions
were also established that can be used to determine the extent of intrusion if requests for additional
intervention are pursued through the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program.
Table V summarizes the baseline roadway volume, travel speed, and collision history for local/
neighborhood roads near the Poinsettia Lane gap closure. These data can be monitored to
determine the effects of the Poinsettia Lane gap closure.
Table V: Before Gap Closure (2018} Traffic Condition Summary
Roadway Segment Roadway Typical >S mph over Collisions over
Volume Speed Speed Limit? Past 10 Years
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road) 9,789 33 N 3
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real) 9,290 30 y 6
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway) 3,321 34 N 12
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway) 679 25 N 1
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road) 368 30 N 0
mph= miles per hour
This traffic investigation found that the Poinsettia Lane gap closure is not expected to alter travel
patterns in a way that would cause a currently functioning intersection to operate at an
unsatisfactory level of service. It is anticipated that the Poinsettia Lane gap closure will reduce some
traffic on Ambrosia Lane, Aviara Parkway, and Cassia Road. However, not all cut-through traffic
currently using Cassia Road would be removed after the Poinsettia Lane gap closure (while traffic
to/from the south on El Camino Real would find Poinsettia Lane a shorter route, traffic to/from the
north on El Camino Real would still find Cassia Road a shorter route). In addition, the Poinsettia Lane
gap closure opens an opportunity for some traffic to cut through the Viadana neighborhood on their
way to and from the shopping center at the northwest corner of El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway.
A number of recommendations are made for consideration by the City.
• A speeding issue is present on Cassia Road which could be addressed with directed police
enforcement focusing on westbound (downhill) traffic between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m.
• If constructed, a traffic signal at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road should have signal timing
supportive of the goals of deterring cut-through traffic and excessive speed:
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19) 42
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 52 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
o The signal should default to providing a green light for east-west traffic on Poinsettia Lane;
o The delay between detection of vehicles approaching on Cassia Road and a green light for
Cassia Road should be timed so that vehicles approaching at a speed greater than 35 mph
would be required to stop for the red light;
o A green arrow for left turns from Poinsettia Lane to Cassia Road should be provided only
after the Cassia Road phase; and
o The City should consider whether sufficient corner sight distance is available to allow right
turns on red from Cassia Road to Poinsettia Lane.
• Traffic calming features such as entry treatments (TB-19) and speed cushions (TB-13) may be
considered based on the monitoring of traffic after completion of the Poinsettia Lane Gap
Closure.
• Signal timing or striping at El Camino Real/Dove Lane could be modified to increase the number
of eastbound left turns per cycle thereby reducing delay to vehicles traveling on arterials rather
than cutting through local roads.
This traffic investigation also examined the intersection of El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane to
determine the following: how the operation of the intersection would be affected by the addition of
a dedicated southbound right-turn lane, whether engineering constraints to adding a dedicated
southbound right-turn lane are present, and whether constraints to adding a dedicated southbound
right-turn lane are present.
The traffic investigation found that adding a southbound right-turn lane would have minimal effect
on the performance of the intersection in existing conditions and only some benefit after
completion of Poinsettia Lane. The benefit to the intersection does not improve any deficiency. The
intersection is forecast to function at a satisfactory level of service with or without a dedicated
southbound right-turn lane.
Construction of the southbound right-turn lane would face some ordinary engineering constraints
and an additional constraint for reconstructing or relocating an SDG&E vault for a natural gas line.
This portion of the construction could cost anywhere from $100,000-$500,000, bringing the total
cost of construction to potentially $1.35 million.
Construction of the southbound right-turn lane at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane would also face
constraints due to biological resources. The area of roadway widening is within a hard line preserve
in the Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP) and is within
the Coastal Zone. Resource agency approval of impacts within a hardline boundary requires 3:1
mitigation. Permitting through the resource agencies will add to the total cost of adding an exclusive
southbound right-turn lane at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane.
\ \ vcorp 12\projects\H CR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic I nvestigation3.docx I 11/12/19) 43
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 53 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX A
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA AND SPEED SURVEYS
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19)
LSA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 54 of 302
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Poinsettia Ln Bet. Aviara Pkwy & Ambrosia Ln
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4193_001
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 9 8 17 12:00 79 65 144
00:15 6 1 7 12:15 62 53 115
00:30 9 3 12 12:30 77 80 157
00:45 3 27 3 15 6 42 12:45 83 301 60 258 143 559
01:00 4 0 4 13:00 76 74 150
01:15 4 3 7 13:15 84 58 142
01:30 5 1 6 13:30 55 60 115
01:45 7 20 1 5 8 25 13:45 95 310 71 263 166 573
0~:00 1 1 2 14:00 90 80 170
02:15 1 2 3 14:15 84 164 248
02:30 2 0 2 14:30 84 111 195
02:45 1 5 2 5 3 10 14:45 116 374 108 463 224 837
03:00 1 0 1 15:00 101 109 210
03:15 2. 2 4 15:15 90 110 200
03:30 0 0 0 15:30 76 124 200
03:45 0 3 4 6 4 9 15:45 113 380 105 448 218 828
04:00 0 5 5 16:00 99 95 194
04:15 1 7 8 16:15 75 86 161
04:30 6 10 16 16:30 89 106 195
04:45 8 15 15 37 23 52 16:45 105 368 81 368 186 736
05:00 7 20 27 17:00 108 109 217
05:15 12 20 32 17:15 133 143 276
05:30 13 22 35 17:30 114 103 217
05:45 19 51 35 97 54 148 17:45 98 453 100 455 198 908
06:00 27 41 68 18:00 100 82 182
06:15 22 40 62 18:15 95 70 165
06:30 42 60 102 18:30 104 81 185
06:45 60 151 82 223 142 374 18:45 111 410 67 300 178 710
07:00 51 99 150 19:00 102 82 184
07:15 99 115 214 19:15 69 62 131
07:30 109 161 270 19:30 51 47 98
07:45 74 333 131 506 205 839 19:45 56 278 43 234 99 512
08:00 103 137 240 20:00 54 29 83
08:15 84 125 209 20:15 66 32 98
08:30 75 88 163 20:30 52 49 101
08:45 117 379 78 428 195 807 20:45 51 223 55 165 106 388
09:00 75 96 171 21:00 40 17 57
09:15 68 77 145 21:15 38 20 58
09:30 56 78 134 21:30 30 17 47
09:45 60 259 60 311 120 570 21:45 25 133 16 70 41 203
10:00 57 72 129 22:00 25 14 39
10:15 54 64 118 22:15 12 16 28
i0:30 56 59 115 22:30 16 8 24
10:45 66 233 43 238 109 471 22:45 16 69 6 44 22 113
11:00 73 56 129 23:00 19 13 32
11:15 53 63 116 23:15 13 9 22
11:30 66 86 152 23:30 7 8 15
11:45 62 254 78 283 140 537 23:45 5 44 5 35 10 79
TOTALS 1730 2154 3884 TOTALS 3343 3103 6446
SPLIT% 44.5% 55.5% 37.6% SPLIT% 51.9% 48.1% 62.4%
DAILYTOTALS . . ,, ~
AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:15 PM Peak Hour 16:45 14:15 17:00
AM Pk Volume 385 554 929 PM Pk Volume 460 492 908
Pk Hr Factor 0.883 0.860 0.860 Pk Hr Factor 0.865 0.750 0.822
7-9Volume ' 712 934 1646 4-6Volume C 821 823 1644
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:15 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:45 17:00 17:00
7 -9 Pk Volume 385 554 929 4 • 6 Pk Volume 460 455 908
Pk Hr Factor "' 0.883 0.860 0.860 Pk Hr Factor J.IJ<J 0.865 0.795 0.822
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 55 of 302
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Poinsettia Ln Bet. Ambrosia Ln & Cassia Rd
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4192_002
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 0 4 3 7 12:00 0 0 84 62 146
00:15 0 0 5 1 6 12:15 0 0 63 45 108
00:30 0 0 4 2 6 12:30 0 0 66 68 134
00:45 0 0 2 15 1 7 3 22 12:45 0 0 75 288 74 249 149 537
01:00 0 0 4 0 4 13:00 0 0 89 62 151
01:15 0 0 1 2 3 13:15 0 0 69 46 115
01:30 0 0 5 0 5 13:30 0 0 64 56 120
01:45 0 0 4 14 0 2 4 16 13:45 0 0 67 289 77 241 144 530
02:00 0 0 1 2 3 14:00 0 0 63 91 154
02:15 0 0 i 1 2 14:15 0 0 146 108 254
02:30 0 0 2 1 3 14:30 0 0 111 100 211
02:45 0 0 0 4 3 7 3 11 14:45 0 0 118 438 100 399 218 837
03:00 0 0 3 1 4 15:00 0 0 108 97 205
03:15 0 0 1 1 2 15:15 0 0 83 110 193
03:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 81 127 208
03:45 0 0 0 4 4 6 4 10 15:45 0 0 85 357 121 455 206 812
04:00 0 0 1 2 3 16:00 0 0 .78 105 183
04:15 0 0 1 3 4 16:15 0 0 76 60 136
04:30 0 0 5 4 9 16:30 0 0 93 83 176
04:45 0 0 9 16 11 20 20 36 16:45 0 0 88 335 98 346 186 681
05:00 0 0 10 12 22 17:00 0 0 85 136 221
05:15 0 0 18 14 32 17:15 0 0 111 106 217
05:30 0 0 16 11 27 17:30 0 0 113 100 213
05:45 0 0 19 63 27 64 46 127 17:45 0 0 77 386 100 442 177 828
06:00 0 0 30 21 51 18:00 0 ·o 72 106 178
06:15 0 0 34 27 61 18:15 0 0 74 96 170
06:30 0 0 48 49 97 18:30 0 0 83 118 201
06:45 0 0 78 190 53 150 131 340 18:45 0 0 81 310 73 393 154 703
07:00 0 0 57 57 114 19:00 0 0 110 80 190
07:15 0 0 96 128 224 19:15 0 0 55 55 110
07:30 0 0 139 126 265 19:30 0 0 48 60 108
07:45 0 0 153 445 91 402 244 847 19:45 0 0 29 242 53 248 82 490
08:00 0 0 115 77 192 20:00 0 0 34 36 70
08:15 0 0 107 95 202 20:15 0 0 61 35 96
08:30 0 0 91 60 151 20:30 0 0 74 30 104
08:45 0 0 88 401 114 346 202 747 20:45 0 0 46 215 43 144 89 359
09:00 0 0 102 72 174 21:00 0 0 25 24 49
09:15 0 0 74 70 144 21:15 0 0 30 22 52
09:30 0 0 70 83 153 21:30 0 0 21 22 43
09:45 0 0 65 311 56 281 121 592 21:45 0 0 25 . 101 17 85 42 186
10:00 0 0 62 58 120 22:00 0 0 18 16 34
10:15 0 0 62 53 115 22:15 0 0 14 16 30
10:30 0 0 59 47 106 22:30 0 0 15 4 19
10:45 0 0 49 232 36 194 85 426 22:45 0 0 12 59 6 42 18 101
11:00 0 0 70 62 132 23:00 0 0 9 7 16
11:15 0 0 48 57 105 23:15 0 0 4 9 13
11:30 0 0 60 65 125 23:30 0 0 6 .8 14
11:45 0 0 57 235 72 256 129 491 23:45 0 0 10 29 7 31 17 60
TOTALS 1930 1735 3665 TOTALS 3049 3075 6124
SPLIT % 52.7% 47.3% 37.4% SPLIT% 49.8% 50.2% 62.6%
. DAILYTOTALS . ., ~
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:15 PM Peak Hour 14:15 15:15 14:15
AM Pk Volume 514 422 925 PM Pk Volume 483 463 888
Pk Hr Factor 0.840 0.824 0.873 Pk Hr Factor 0.827 0.911 0.874
7-9Volume 846 748 1594 4-6Volume 721 788 1509
7 • 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:15 4 • 6 Peak Hour 16:45 17:00 16:45
7 • 9 Pk Volume . 514 422 925 4 · 6 Pk Volume 397 442 837
Pk Hr Factor r.r, 0.840 0.824 0.873 Pk Hr Factor ,_I)., 0.878 0,813 0.947
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 56 of 302
Day: Wednesday
Date: 5/23/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Poinsettia Ln Bet. Ambrosia Ln & Cassia Rd
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4192_002
DAIL V TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 0 8 5 13 12:00 0 0 58 67 125
00:15 0 0 10 4 14 12:15 0 0 82 59 141
00:30 0 0 4 3 7 12:30 0 0 60 55 115
00:45 0 0 0 22 3 15 3 37 12:45 0 0 62 262 77 258 139 520
01:00 0 0 1 3 4 13:00 0 0 88 57 145
01:15 0 0 2 0 2 13:15 0 0 68 49 117
01:30 0 0 0 2 2 13:30 0 0 75 62 137
01:45 0 0 3 6 2 7 5 13 13:45 0 0 77 308 86 254 163 562
02:00 0 0 1 0 1 14:00 0 0 64 82 146
02:15 0 0 1 0 1 14:15 0 0 142 100 242
02:30 0 0 3 0 3 14:30 0 0 106 94 200
02:45 0 0 . 1 6 1 1 2 7 14:45 0 0 126 438 99 375 225 813
03:00 0 0 2 1 3 15:00 0 0 94 82 176
03:15 0 0 3 1 4 15:15 0 0 72 94 166
03:30 0 0 1 2 3 15:30 0 0 81 81 162
03:45 0 0 1 7 1 5 2 12 15:45 0 0 85 332 101 358 186 690
04:00 0 0 2 2 4 16:00 0 0 75 96 171
04:15 0 0 4 3 7 16:15 0 0 81 101 182
04:30 0 0 11 4 15 16:30 0 0 84 93 177
04:45 0 0 6 23 8 17 14 40 16:45 0 0 100 340 112 402 212 742
05:00 0 0 6 12 18 17:00 0 a 83 109 192
05:15 0 0 19 11 30 17:15 0 0 93 124 217
05:30 0 0 21 12 33 17:30 0 0 100 109 209
05:45 0 0 24 70 25 60 49 130 17:45 0 0 60 336 89 431 149 767
06:00 0 0 26 21 47 18:00 0 0 72 115 187
06:15 0 0 40 37 77 18:15 0 0 84 94 178
06:30 0 0 58 45 103 18:30 0 0 77 91 168
06:45 0 0 78 202 60 163 138 365 18:45 0 0 88 321 68 368 156 689
07:00 0 0 61 66 127 19:00 0 0 66 62 128
07:15 0 0 95 99 194 19:15 0 0 46 60 106
07:30 0 0 159 101 260 19:30 0 0 54 49 103
07:45 0 0 124 439 80 346 204 785 19:45 0 0 46 212 so 221 96 433
08:00 0 0 103 95 198 20:00 0 0 73 54 127
08:15 0 0 125 77 202 20:15 0 0 66 65 131
08:30 0 0 86 62 148 20:30 0 0 56 44 100
08:45 0 0 112 426 102 336 214 762 20:45 0 0 37 232 35 198 72 430
09:00 0 0 111 69 180 21:00 0 0 35 34 69
09:15 0 0 71 52 123 21:15 0 a 20 38 58
09:30 0 0 78 55 133 21:30 0 a 28 21 49
09:45 0 0 71 331 71 247 142 578 21:45 0 a 19 102 28 121 47 223
10:00 0 0 69 51 120 22:00 0 0 19 18 37
10:15 0 0 49 56 105 22:15 0 0 15 11 26
10:30 0 0 62 so 112 22:30 0 0 16 13 29
10:45 0 0 62 242 42 199 104 441 22:45 0 0 17 67 2 44 19 111
11:00 0 0 61 57 118 23:00 0 0 10 8 18
11:15 0 0 61 48 109 23:15 0 0 12 6 18
11:30 0 0 55 59 114 23:30 0 0 10 6 16
11:45 0 0 49 226 55 219 104 445 23:45 0 0 3 35 3 23 6 58
TOTALS 2000 1615 3615 TOTALS 2985 3053 6038
SPLIT% 55.3% 44.7% 37.4% SPLIT% 49.4% 50.6% 62.6%
_DAILY TOTALS . . ~
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 PM Peak Hour 14:15 16:45 14:15
AM Pk Volume 511 375 864 PM Pk Volume 468 454 843
Pk Hr Factor 0.803 0.928 0.831 Pk Hr Factor 0.824 0.915 0.871
7-9Volume 865 682 1547 4-6Volume 676 833 1509
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 -9 Pk Volume 511 375 864 4 -6 Pk Volume 376 454 830
Pk Hr Factor :,_._,._'<J. {'!'1u 0.803 0.928 0,831 Pk Hr Factor ,. ,·.a '10 0.940 0.915 0.956
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 57 of 302
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Poinsettia Ln Bet. El Camino Real & Cassia Rd
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4193_003
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 1 1 12:00 4 6 10
00:15 1 0 1 12:15 5 9 14
00:30 0 0 0 12:30 5 1 6
00:45 0 1 0 1 0 2 12:45 4 18 5 21 9 39
01:00 0 1 1 13:00 3 7 10
01:15 0 0 0 13:15 9 8 17
01:30 0 0 0 13:30 3 3 6
01:45 0 0 1 0 1 13:45 7 22 6 24 13 46
02:00 0 0 0 14:00 11 6 17
02:15 0 0 0 14:15 16 17 33
02:30 0 0 0 14:30 27 31 58
02:45 0 0 0 14:45 5 59 15 69 20 128
03:00 0 0 0 15:00 8 10 18
03:15 0 0 0 15:15 7 11 18
03:30 1 1 2 15:30 6 15 21
03:45 0 1 1 2 1 3 15:45 8 29 10 46 18 75
04:00 1 0 1 16:00 8 7 15
04:15 0 0 0 16:15 5 11 16
04:30 0 1 1 16:30 10 11 21
04:45 2 3 0 1 2 4 16:45 10 33 9 38 19 71
05:00 1 0 1 17:00 7 12 19
05:15 3 0 3 17:15 a 7 15
05:30 1 0 1 17:30 7 6 13
05:45 0 5 0 0 5 17:45 6 28 10 35 16 63
06:00 2 0 2 18:00 4 10 14
06:15 1 0 1 18:15 0 3 3
06:30 4 2 6 18:30 4 8 12
06:45 14 21 1 3 15 24 18:45 3 11 6 27 9 38
07:00 12 3 15 19:00 3 5 8
07:15 7 20 27 19:15 4 7 11
07:30 11 9 20 19:30 4 8 12
07:45 8 38 6 38 14 76 19:45 1 12 4 24 5 36
08:00 8 8 16 20:00 3 4 7
08:15 4 5 9 20:15 2 6 8
08:30 11 4 15 20:30 1 5 6
08:45 7 30 3 20 10 so 20:45 3 9 6 21 9 30
09:00 11 8 19 21:00 0 4 4
09:15 3 3 6 21:15 1 5 6
09:30 8 5 13 21:30 2 3 5
09:45 4 26 8 24 12 50 21:45 1 4 3 15 4 19
10:00 7 5 12 22:00 1 0 1
10:15 4 2 6 22:15 0 2 2
10:30 2 9 11 22:30 1 0 1
10:45 4 17 4 20 8 37 22:45 0 2 0 2 0 4
11:00 2 5 7 23:00 1 3 4
11:15 3 4 7 23:15 0 2 2
11:30 10 5 15 23:30 2 1 3
11:45 5 20 6 20 11 40 23:45 0 3 1 7 1 10
TOTALS 162 130 292 TOTALS 230 329 559
SPLIT% 55.5% 44.5% 34.3% SPLIT% 41.1% 58.9% 65.7%
DAILYTOTALS _ . ~
AM Peak Hour 06:45 07:15 06:45 PM Peak Hour 13:45 14:15 14:15
AM Pk Volume 44 43 77 PM Pk Volume 61 73 129
Pk Hr Factor 0.786 0.538 0.713 Pk Hr Factor 0.565 0.589 0.556
7 -9Volume 68 58 126 4 -6Volume 61 73 134
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:15 07:15 4-6 Peak Hour 16:30 16:15 16:15
7 -9 Pk Volume 38 43 77 4 -6 Pk Volume 35 43 75
Pk Hr Factor '),'JC} J_,;i, 0.792 0.538 0.713 Pk Hr Factor c,_;,:·,i ,.,, 0.875 0.896 0.893
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 60 of 302
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Cassia Rd & Poinsettia Ln
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4193_004
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 19 12 31 12:00 233 239 472
00:15 6 14 20 12:15 220 251 471
00:30 8 10 18 12:30 255 297 552
00:45 4 37 8 44 12 81 12:45 297 1005 257 1044 554 2049
01:00 8 6 14 13:00 258 258 516
01:15 8 2 10 13:15 259 204 463
01:30 4 4 8 13:30 242 253 495
01:45 3 23 0 12 3 35 13:45 258 1017 218 933 476 1950
02:00 6 4 10 14:00 271 293 564
02:15 4 6 10 14:15 173 264 437
02:30 1 1 2 14:30 175 283 458
02:45 2 13 4 15 6 28 14:45 351 970 336 1176 687 2146
03:00 5 4 9 15:00 317 294 611
03:15 4 5 9 15:15 339 284 623
03:30 15 6 21 15:30 342 323 665
03:45 8 32 9 24 17 56 15:45 348 1346 302 1203 650 2549
04:00 12 11 23 16:00 346 381 727
04:15 15 13 28 16:15 365 410 775
04:30 20 17 37 16:30 347 409 756
04:45 40 87 40 81 80 168 16:45 318 1376 423 1623 741 2999
05:00 41 29 70 17:00 306 496 802
05:15 51 33 84 17:15 327 458 785
05:30 63 45 108 17:30 275 451 726
05:45 99 254 74 181 173 435 17:45 256 1164 427 1832 683 2996
06:00 114 77 191 18:00 255 300 555
06:15 124 113 237 18:15 252 311 563
06:30 189 151 340 18:30 209 294 503
06:45 214 641 251 592 465 1233 18:45 186 902 227 1132 413 2034
07:00 241 324 565 19:00 171 195 366
07:15 278 315 593 19:15 173 162 335
07:30 309 447 756 19:30 147 141 288
07:45 439 1267 364 1450 803 2717 19:45 108 599 126 624 234 1223
08:00 433 367 800 20:00 121 116 237
08:15 396 332 728 20:15 98 117 215
08:30 352 295 647 20:30 110 111 221
08:45 380 1561 284 1278 664 2839 20:45 88 417 105 449 193 866
09:00 298 292 590 21:00 82 75 157
09:15 290 244 534 21:15 73 77 150
09:30 290 208 498 21:30 76 65 141
09:45 246 1124 249 993 495 2117 21:45 60 291 59 276 119 567
10:00 238 227 465 · 22:00 62 43 105
10:15 194 202 396 22:15 45 32 77
10:30 194 224 418 22:30 52 47 99
10:45 236 862 206 859 442 1721 22:45 . 29 188 30 152 59 340
11:00 211 251 462 23:00 41 28 69
11:15 218 230 448 23:15 39 17 56
11:30 251 211 462 23:30 21 29 so
11:45 251 931 248 940 499 1871 23:45 20 121 21 95 41 216
TOTALS 6832 6469 13301 TOTALS 9396 10539 19935
SPLIT% 51.4% 48.6% 40.0% SPLIT% 47.1% 52.9% 60.0%
' DAILVTOTALS ' . ~
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:30 07:30 PM Peak Hour 15:45 17:00 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1620 1510 3087 PM Pk Volume 1406 1832 3084
Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.845 0.961 Pk Hr Factor 0.963 0.923 0.961
7-9 Volume 2828 2728 0 5556 4-6Volume 2540 3455 5995
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:30 07:30 4-6 Peak Hour 16:00 17:00 16:30
7 -9 Pk Volume 1620 1510 3087 4 -6 Pk Volume 1376 1832 3084
Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.845 r,,)() ) 0.961 Pk Hr Factor 0.942 0.923 0.961
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 61 of 302
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Poinsettia Ln & Aviara Pkwy
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4193_005
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 21 15 36 12:00 265 259 524
00:15 8 11 19 12:15 249 305 554
00:30 7 10 17 12:30 296 339 635
00:45 6 42 7 43 13 85 12:45 348 1158 280 1183 628 2341
01:00 13 5 18 13:00 301 265 566
01:15 10 3 13 13:15 312 257 569
01:30 6 5 11 13:30 288 278 566
01:45 5 34 1 14 6 48 13:45 336 1237 248 1048 584 2285
02:00 7 3 10 14:00 353 341 694
02:15 4 7 11 14:15 355 293 648
02:30 1 1 2 14:30 370 307 677
02:45 3 15 5 16 8 31 14:45 404 1482 374 1315 778 2797
03:00 3 4 7 15:00 375 350 725
03:15 6 7 13 15:15 372 341 713
03:30 15 10 25 15:30 414 382 796
03:45 8 32 12 33 20 65 15:45 402 1563 340 1413 742 2976
04:00 13 17 30 16:00 386 406 792
04:15 16 17 33 16:15 459 418 877
04:30 20 22 42 16:30 420 441 861
04:45 39 88 56 112 95 200 16:45 396 1661 458 1723 854 3384
05:00 41 40 81 17:00 434 494 928
05:15 49 49 98 17:15 361 453 814
05:30 75 65 140 17:30 385 515 900
05:45 90 255 111 265 201 520 17:45 352 1532 415 1877 767 3409
06:00 118 112 230 18:00 314 353 667
06:15 134 174 308 18:15 331 310 641
06:30 207 216 423 18:30 294 289 583
06:45 220 679 342 844 562 1523 18:45 242 1181 242 1194 484 2375
07:00 266 401 667 19:00 214 222 436
07:15 311 438 749 19:15 199 183 382
07:30 416 523 939 19:30 175 166 341
07:45 509 1502 440 1802 949 3304 19:45 141 729 158 729 299 1458
08:00 458 407 865 20:00 160 112 272
08:15 399 427 826 20:15 133 118 251
08:30 385 364 749 20:30 135 115 250
08:45 390 1632 364 1562 754 3194 20:45 119 547 110 455 229 1002
09:00 331 286 617 21:00 119 79 198
09:15 300 297 597 21:15 95 85 180
09:30 296 275 571 21:30 87 61 148
09:45 278 1205 276 1134 554 2339 21:45 76 377 61 286 137 663
10:00 237 267 504 22:00 72 41 113
10:15 206 264 470 22:15 61 38 99
10:30 236 257 493 22:30 52 47 99
10:45 243 922 235 1023 478 1945 22:45 35 220 37 163 72 383
11:00 247 270 517 23:00 51 29 80
11:15 239 254 493 23:15 44 20 64
11:30 272 257 529 23:30 26 28 54
11:45 261 1019 283 1064 544 2083 23:45 22 143 17 94 39 237
TOTALS 7425 7912 15337 TOTALS 11830 11480 23310
SPLIT% 48.4% 51.6% 39.7% SPLIT% 50.8% 49.2% 60.3%
t;:>AILYTOTALS . ·,, ~
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 PM Peak Hour 16:15 16:45 16:15
AM Pk Volume 1782 1808 3579 PM Pk Volume 1709 1920 3520
Pk Hr Factor 0.875 0.864 0.943 Pk Hr Factor 0.931 0.932 0.948
7-9Volume 3134 3364 6498 4-6 Volume 3193 3600 6793
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:15 16:45 16:15
7 -9 Pk Volume 1782 1808 3579 4 -6 Pk Volume 1709 1920 3520
Pk Hr Factor 0.875 0.864 ,lQ ,. 0.943 Pk Hr Factor 0.931 0.932 '·-''1 o.~--, 0.948
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 62 of 302
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Cassia Rd Bet. Poinsettia Ln & El Camino Real
City: Carlsbad
Project II: CA18_ 4192_006
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 0 5 6 11 12:00 0 0 79 54 133
00:15 0 0 3 1 4 12:15 0 0 60 38 98
00:30 0 0 4 2 6 12:30 0 0 67 68 135
00:45 0 0 1 13 1 10 2 23 12:45 0 0 69 275 78 238 147 513
01:00 0 0 4 1 5 13:00 0 0 81 53 134
01:15 0 0 1 1 2 13:15 0 0 69 47 116
01:30 0 0 4 0 4 13:30 0 0 60 53 113
01:45 0 0 4 13 1 3 5 16 13:45 0 0 70 280 72 225 142 505
02:00 0 0 1 1 2 14:00 0 0 55 83 138
02:15 0 0 1 2 3 14:15 0 0 126 104 230
02:30 0 0 2 0 2 14:30 0 0 108 93 201
02:45 0 0 0 4 3 6 3 10 14:45 0 0 96 385 94 374 190 759
03:00 0 0 2 1 3 15:00 0 0 85 78 163
03:15 0 0 3 1 4 15:15 0 0 66 90 156
03:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 90 88 178
03:45 0 0 0 5 3 5 3 10 15:45 0 0 101 342 85 341 186 683
04:00 0 0 1 2 3 16:00 0 0 72 100 172
04:15 0 0 1 1 2 16:15 0 0 58 89 147
04:30 0 0 6 4 10 16:30 0 0 84 82 166
04:45 0 0 11 19 12 19 23 38 16:45 0 0 74 288 112 383 186 671
05:00 0 0 12 11 23 17:00 0 0 77 117 194
05:15 0 0 18 11 29 17:15 0 0 94 131 225
05:30 0 0 16 12 28 17:30 0 0 111 89 200
05:45 0 0 22 68 23 57 45 125 17:45 0 0 69 351 119 456 188 807
06:00 0 0 29 15 44 18:00 0 0 45 103 148
06:15 0 0 39 26 65 18:15 0 0 53 83 136
06:30 0 0 53 34 87 18:30 0 0 63 75 138
06:45 0 0 81 202 46 121 127 323 18:45 0 0 66 227 84 345 150 572
07:00 0 0 60 59 119 19:00 0 0 73 46 119
07:15 0 0 90 75 165 19:15 0 0 49 64 113
07:30 0 0 150 89 239 19:30 0 0 31 61 92
07:45 0 0 131 431 71 294 202 725 19:45 0 0 26 179 37 208 63 387
08:00 0 0 116 87 203 20:00 0 0 35 36 71
08:15 0 0 118 84 202 20:15 0 0 41 40 81
08:30 0 0 93 so 143 20:30 0 0 32 33 65
08:45 0 0 111 438 76 297 187 735 20:45 0 0 26 134 35 144 61 278
09:00 0 0 107 56 163 21:00 0 0 19 26 45
09:15 0 0 77 68 145 21:15 0 0 17 17 34
09:30 0 0 72 70 142 21:30 0 0 21 11 32
09:45 0 0 71 327 58 252 129 579 21:45 0 0 19 76 13 67 32 143
10:00 0 0 61 54 115 22:00 0 0 38 13 51
10:15 0 0 61 42 103 22:15 0 0 19 10 29
10:30 0 0 53 46 99 22:30 0 0 12 8 20
10:45 0 0 60 235 39 181 99 416 22:45 0 0 9 78 6 37 15 115
11:00 0 0 61 58 119 23:00 0 0 7 3 10
11:15 0 0 52 61 113 23:15 0 0 5 2 7
11:30 0 0 53 59 112 23:30 0 0 7 3 10
11:45 0 0 56 222 69 247 125 469 23:45 0 0 9 28 6 14 15 42
TOTALS 1977 1492 3469 TOTALS 2643 2832 5475
SPLIT% 57.0% 43.0% 38.8% SPLIT% 48.3% 51.7% 61.2%
DAILY TOTALS , ~
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 PM Peak Hour 14:15 17:00 17:00
AM Pk Volume 515 331 846 ·PM Pk Volume 415 456 807
Pk Hr Factor 0.858 0.930 0.885 Pk Hr Factor 0.823 0.870 0.897
7-9Volume 869 591 1460 4 -6Volume 639 839 1478
7 • 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 4-6 Peak Hour 16:45 17:00 17:00
7 -9 Pk Volume 515 331 846 4 -6 Pk Volume 356 456 807
Pk Hr Factor J 0.858 0.930 0.885 Pk Hr Factor ,.,,·!) -)(' 0.802 0.870 0.897
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 63 of 302
Day: Wednesday
Date: 5/23/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Cassia Rd Bet. Poinsettia Ln & El Camino Real
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4192_006
DAIL V TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 0 9 7 16 12:00 0 0 65 65 130
00:15 0 0 10 3 13 12:15 0 0 72 58 130
00:30 0 0 4 4 8 12:30 0 0 63 57 120
00:45 0 0 0 23 3 17 3 40 12:45 0 0 60 260 77 257 137 517
01:00 0 0 1 2 3 13:00 0 0 85 60 145
01:15 0 0 2 0 2 13:15 0 0 60 49 109
01:30 0 0 0 3 3 13:30 0 0 80 70 150
01:45 0 0 2 5 2 7 4 12 13:45 0 0 81 306 79 258 160 564
02:00 0 0 1 0 1 14:00 0 0 61 82 143
02:15 0 0 1 0 1 14:15 0 0 127 97 224
02:30 0 0 4 0 4 14:30 0 0 106 90 196
02:45 0 0 1 7 1 1 2 8 14:45 0 0 114 408 100 369 214 777
03:00 0 0 2 1 3 15:00 0 0 84 74 158
03:15 0 0 2 1 3 15:15 0 0 70 101 171
03:30 0 0 3 2 5 15:30 0 0 67 79 146
03:45 0 0 2 9 3 7 5 16 15:45 0 0 77 298 88 342 165 640
04:00 0 0 2 0 2 16:00 0 0 73 92 165
04:15 0 0 5 2 7 16:15 0 0 83 95 178
04:30 0 0 12 4 16 16:30 0 0 75 90 165
04:45 0 0 7 26 10 16 17 42 16:45 0 0 78 309 103 380 181 689
05:00 0 0 7 8 15 17:00 0 0 94 117 211
05:15 0 0 18 11 29 17:15 0 0 78 116 194
05:30 0 0 23 12 35 17:30 0 0 88 102 190
05:45 0 0 21 69 22 53 43 122 17:45 0 0 65 325 90 425 155 750
06:00 0 0 31 16 47 18:00 0 0 53 117 170
06:15 0 0 45 30 75 18:15 0 0 85 96 181
06:30 0 0 56 38 94 18:30 0 0 68 100 168
06:45 0 0 78 210 51 135 129 345 18:45 0 0 84 290 69 382 153 672
07:00 0 0 72 62 134 19:00 0 0 so 55 105
.07:15 0 0 94 82 176 19:15 0 0 48 62 110
07:30 0 0 141 79 220 19:30 0 0 52 49 101
07:45 0 0 124 431 62 285 186 716 19:45 0 0 39 189 53 219 92 408
08:00 0 0 98 82 180 20:00 0 0 64 63 127
08:15 0 0 133 70 203 20:15 0 0 65 59 124
08:30 0 0 94 53 147 20:30 0 0 so 43 93
08:45 0 0 108 433 94 299 202 732 20:45 0 0 37 216 44 209 81 425
09:00 0 0 111 54 165 21:00 0 0 33 33 66
09:15 0 0 72 43 115 21:15 0 0 18 41 59
09:30 0 0 74 52 126 21:30 0 0 -27 23 so
09:45 0 0 73 330 68 217 141 547 21:45 0 0 21 99 25 122 46 221
10:00 0 0 73 46 119 22:00 0 0 16 13 29
10:15 0 0 54 51 105 22:15 0 0 11 12 23
10:30 0 0 67 54 121 22:30 0 0 14 11 25
-10:45 0 0 63 257 42 193 105 450 22:45 0 0 15 56 2 38 17 94
11:00 0 0 52 59 111 23:00 0 0 11 8 19
11:15 0 0 61 so 111 23:15 0 0 10 6 16
11:30 0 0 61 54 115 23:30 0 0 10 6_ 16
11:45 0 0 48 222 59 222 107 444 23:45 0 0 3 34 . 5 25 8 59
TOTALS 2022 1452 3474 TOTALS 2790 3026 5816
SPLIT% 58.2% 41.8% 37.4% SPLIT% 48.0% 52.0% 62.6%
DAILY TOTALS . ~
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 PM Peak Hour 14:15 16:45 14:15
AM Pk Volume 496 305 789 PM Pk Volume 431 438 792
Pk Hr Factor 0.879 0.930 0.897 Pk Hr Factor 0.848 0.936 0.884
7 -9Volume I} 864 584 1448 4-6Volume 634 805 1439
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 -9 Pk Volume 496 305 789 4 -6 Pk Volume 338 438 776
Pk Hr Factor ( aJ 0.879 0.930 0.897 Pk Hr Factor 0.899 0.936 0.919
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 64 of 302
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Ambrosia Ln Bet. Poinsettia Ln & Aviara Pkwy
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4192_007
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 1 0 0 1 12:00 9 16 0 0 25
00:15 0 0 0 0 12:15 19 10 0 0 29
00:30 0 0 0 0 12:30 13 12 0 0 25
00:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 12:45 15 56 17 55 0 0 32 111
01:00 0 0 0 0 13:00 13 30 0 0 43
01:15 0 0 0 0 13:15 29 23 0 0 52
01:30 0 0 0 0 13:30 23 28 0 0 51
01:45 0 0 0 0 13:45 19 84 54 135 0 0 73 219
02:00 0 0 0 0 14:00 35 57 0 0 92
02:15 0 0 0 0 14:15 145 51 0 0 196
02:30 0 1 0 .0 1 14:30 104 55 0 0 159
02:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 14:45 68 352 34 197 0 0 102 549
03:00 0 1 0 0 1 15:00 50 20 0 0 70
03:15 0 0 0 0 15:15 42 18 0 0 60
03:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 24 19 0 0 43
03:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 15:45 29 145 22 79 0 0 51 224
04:00 1 0 0 0 1 16:00 26 16 0 0 42
04:15 0 0 0 0 16:15 17 18 0 0 35
04:30 0 0 0 0 16:30 27 17 0 0 44
04:45 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 3 16:45 21 91 18 69 0 0 39 160
05:00 0 0 0 0 17:00 20 27 0 0 47
05:15 2 0 0 0 2 17:15 33 18 0 0 51
05:30 0 4 0 0 4 17:30 31 32 0 0 63
05:45 3 5 8 12 0 0 11 17 17:45 19 103 20 97 0 0 39 200
06:00 4 5 0 0 9 18:00 18 13 0 0 31
06:15 4 3 ·o 0 7 18:15 19 15 0 0 34
06:30 3 17 0 0 20 18:30 31 28 0 0 59
06:45 8 19 12 37 0 0 20 56 18:45 36 104 12 68 0 0 48 172
07:00 37 40 0 0 77 19:00 25 13 0 0 38
07:15 133 119 0 0 252 19:15 21 5 0 0 26
07:30 155 108 0 0 263 19:30 14 10 0 0 24
07:45 85 410 48 315 0 0 133 725 19:45 8 68 5 33 0 0 13 101
08:00 78 75 0 0 153 20:00 7 2 0 0 9
08:15 58 13 0 0 71 20:15 8 6 0 0 14
08:30 15 12 0 0 27 20:30 8 22 0 0 30
08:45 21 172 10 110 0 0 31 282 20:45 5 28 6 36 0 0 11 64
09:00 11 14 0 0 25 21:00 3 3 0 0 6
09:15 10 20 0 0 30 21:15 1 10 0 0 11
09:30 8 16 0 0 24 21:30 4 4 0 0 8
09:45 10 39 18 68 0 0 28 107 21:45 3 11 .2 19 0 0 5 30
10:00 23 14 0 0 37 22:00 3 2 0 0 5
10:15 14 19 0 0 33 22:15 3 2 0 0 5
10:30 10 11 0 0 21 22:30 1 0 0 0 1
10:45 8 55 19 63 0 0 27 118 22:45 2 9 2 6 0 0 4 15
11:00 10 10 0 0 20 23:00 4 5 0 0 9
11:15 14 18 0 0 32 23:15 0 0 0 0
11:30 28 14 0 0 42 23:30 0 0 0 0
11:45 16 68 10 52 0 0 26 120 23:45 0 4 3 8 0 0 3 12
TOTALS 770 661 1431 TOTALS 1055 802 18S7
SPLIT % 53.8% 46.2% 43.5% SPLIT% 56.8% 43.2% 56.5%
·,,, DAILY TOTALS , · . ~
AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 PM Peak Hour 14:15 13:45 14:00
AM Pk Volume 451 350 801 PM Pk Volume 367 217 549
Pk Hr Factor 0.727 0.735 0.761 Pk Hr Factor 0.633 0.952 0.700
7 -9 Volume 582 425 1007 4-6Volume 194 166 0 360
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:45 17:00 16:45
7 -9 Pk Volume 451 350 801 4 -6 Pk Volume 105 97 200
Pk Hr Factor 0.727 0.735 I ~ 0.761 Pk Hr Factor 0.795 0.758 J.! 0.794
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 67 of 302
Day: Wednesday
Date: 5/23/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared by National Data & SurveyinQ Services
VOLUME
Ambrosia Ln Bet. Poinsettia Ln & Aviara Pkwy
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4192_007
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 1 2 0 0 3 12:00 16 16 0 0 32
00:15 1 1 0 0 2 1°2:15 12 11 0 0 23
00:30 0 0 0 0 12:30 17 13 0 0 30
00:45 1 3 0 3 0 0 1 6 12:45 16 61 10 so 0 0 26 111
01:00 0 0 0 0 13:00 16 22 0 0 38
01:15 2 0 0 0 2 13:15 42 18 0 0 60
01:30 1 0 0 0 1 13:30 23 32 0 0 55
01:45 0 3 2 2 0 0 2 5 13:45 14 95 55 127 0 0 69 222
02:00 0 0 0 0 14:00 30 65 0 0 95
02:15 0 0 0 0 14:15 161 60 0 0 221
02:30 0 1 0 0 1 14:30 100 48 0 0 148
02:45 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 14:45 72 363 29 202 0 0 101 565
03:00 0 0 0 0 15:00 51 10 -0 0 61
03:15 0 0 0 0 15:15 28 16 0 0 44
03:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 28 18 0 0 46
03:45 0 0 0 0 15:45 28 135 18 62 0 0 46 197
04:00 1 0 0 0 1 16:00 33 31 0 0 64
04:15 0 0 0 0 16:15 33 22 0 0 55
04:30 2 0 0 0 2 16:30 23 23 0 0 46
04:45 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 4 16:45 22 111 18 94 0 0 40 205
05:00 1 0 0 0 1 17:00 25 30 0 0 55
05:15 0 0 0 0 17:15 32 33 0 0 65
05:30 2 6 0 0 8 17:30 33 12 0 0 45
05:45 0 3 5 11 0 0 5 14 17:45 22 112 16 91 0 0 38 203
06:00 2 2 0 0 4 18:00 16 17 0 0 33
06:15 2 8 0 0 10 18:15 28 19 0 0 47
06:30 2 12 0 0 14 18:30 26 16 0 0 42
06:45 12 18 27 49 0 0 39 67 18:45 12 82 22 74 0 0 34 156
07:00 25 29 0 0 54 19:00 22 18 0 0 40
07:15 92 135 0 0 227 19:15 27 7 0 0 34
07:30 149 98 0 0 247 19:30 13 11 0 0 24
07:45 97 363 57 319 0 0 154 682 19:45 15 77 5 41 0 0 20 118
08:00 86 66 0 0 152 20:00 17 17 0 0 34
08:15 50 24 0 0 74 20:15 10 6 0 0 16
08:30 19 14 0 0 33 20:30 12 15 0 0 27
08:45 16 171 10 114 0 0 26 285 20:45 10 49 5 43 0 0 15 92
09:00 13 16 0 0 29 21:00 7 3 0 0 10
09:15 10 11 0 0 21 21:15 4 3 0 0 7
09:30 11 10 0 0 21 21:30 5 2 0 0 7
09:45 14 48 20 57 0 0 34 105 21:45 2 18 3 11 0 0 5 29
10:00 18 12 0 0 30 22:00 4 4 0 0 8
10:15 11 10 0 0 21 22:15 1 0 0 0 1
10:30 15 14 0 0 29 22:30 2 2 0 0 4
10:45 11 55 15 51 0 . 0 26 106 22:45 6 13 2 8 0 0 8 21
11:00 17 15 0 0 32 23:00 2 0 0 0 2
11:15 15 13 0 0 28 23:15 1 2 0 0 3
11:30 21 10 0 0 31 23:30 0 1 0 0 1
11:45 16 69 11 49 0 0 27 118 23:45 1 4 1 4 0 0 2 8
TOTALS 736 658 1394 TOTALS 1120 807 1927
SPLIT% 52.8% 47.2% 42.0% SPLIT% 58.1% 41.9% 58.0%
DAILYTOT~LS _ . ~
AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 PM Peak Hour 14:15 13:45 14:00
AM Pk Volume 424 356 780 PM Pk Volume 384 228 565
Pk Hr Factor 0.711 0.659 0.789 Pk Hr Factor 0.596 0.877 0.639
7-9 Volume 534 433 ( 967 4 -6 Volume 223 185 408
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 4-6 Peak Hour 16:45 16:30 16:30
7 -9 Pk Volume 424 356 780 4 • 6 Pk Volume 112 104 . 206
Pk Hr Factor 0.711 0.659 0.789 Pk Hr Factor 0.848 0.788 0.792
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 68 of 302
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Mimosa Dr Bet. Oriole Ct & Aviara Pkwy
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4192_008
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 0 0 0 12:00 3 6 0 0 9
00:15 0 0 0 0 12:15 4 3 0 0 7
00:30 0 0 0 0 12:30 4 3 0 0 7
00:45 0 0 0 0 12:45 3 14 4 16 0 0 7 30
01:00 0 0 0 0 13:00 6 10 0 0 16
01:15 0 0 0 0 13:15 5 5 0 0 10
01:30 0 0 0 0 13:30 6 3 0 0 9
01:45 0 0 0 0 13:45 3 20 6 24 0 0 9 44
02:00 1 0 0 0 1 14:00 4 8 0 0 12
02:15 0 0 0 0 14:15 11 9 0 0 20
02:30 0 0 0 0 14:30 10 18 0 0 28
02:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 14:45 14 39 9 44 0 0 23 83
03:00 1 0 0 0 1 15:00 6 11 0 0 17
03:15 0 0 0 0 15:15 6 8 0 0 14
03:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 2 5 0 0 7
03:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 15:45 7 21 6 30 0 0 13 51
04:00 1 1 0 0 2 16:00 5 0 0 0 5
04:15 0 0 0 0 16:15 7 8 0 0 15
04:30 0 0 0 0 16:30 4 7 0 0 11
04:45 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 16:45 8 24 4 19 0 0 12 43
05:00 0 2 0 0 2 17:00 4 5 0 0 9
05:15 1 1 0 0 2 17:15 5 5 0 0 10
05:30 0 0 0 0 17:30 8 6 0 0 14
05:45 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 5 17:45 6 23 6 22 0 0 12 45
06:00 2 3 0 0 5 18:00 4 5 0 0 9
06:15 2 4 0 0 6 18:15 6 3 0 0 9
06:30 1 8 0 0 9 18:30 4 3 0 0 7
06:45 2 7 4 19 0 0 6 26 18:45 4 18 3 14 0 0 7 32
07:00 1 5 0 0 6 19:00 6 1 0 0 7
07:15 6 20 0 0 26 19:15 1 3 0 0 4
07:30 6 16 0 0 22 19:30 2 2 0 0 4
07:45 9 22 10 51 0 0 19 73 19:45 2 11 6 12 0 0 8 23
08:00 13 14 0 0 27 20:00 3 0 0 0 3
08:15 0 3 0 0 3 20:15 1 2 0 0 3
08:30 10 3 0 0 13 20:30 4 5 0 0 9
08:45 3 26 4 24 0 0 7 50 20:45 1 9 1 8 0 0 2 17
09:00 7 3 0 0 10 21:00 0 2 0 0 2
09:15 4 6 0 0 10 21:15 1 1 0 0 2
09:30 5 4 0 0 9 21:30 1 0 0 0 1
09:45 8 24 6 19 0 0 14 43 21:45 2 4 0 3 0 0 2 7
10:00 9 11 0 0 20 22:00 0 0 0 0
10:15 7 4 0 0 11 22:15 1 1 0 0 2
10:30 3 6 0 0 9 22:30 0 0 0 0
10:45 3 22 5 26 0 0 8 48 22:45 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 3
11:00 4 6 0 0 10 23:00 0 0 0 0
11:15 5 5 0 0 10 23:15 0 1 0 0 1
11:30 4 6 0 0 10 23:30 1 0 0 0 1
11:45 4 17 1 18 0 0 5 35 23:45 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
TOTALS 123 162 285 TOTALS 186 194 380
SPLIT% 43.2% 56.8% 42.9% SPLIT% 48.9% 51.1% 57.1%
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 PM Peak Hour 14:15 14:15 14:15
AM Pk Volume 34 60 94 PM Pk Volume 41 47 88
Pk Hr Factor 0,654 0,750 0.870 Pk Hr Factor 0,732 0,653 0.786
7 •9Volume 48 75 123 4 -6Volume 47 41 0 88
7 • 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 4-6 Peak Hour 16:45 16:15 16:15
7 • 9 Pk Volume 34 60 94 4 • 6 Pk Volume 25 24 47
Pk Hr Factor 0.654 0.750 u .L ,Q " 0.870 Pk Hr Factor 0.781 0.750 ' l\.t.,,"J 0.783
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 71 of 302
Day: Wednesday
Date: 5/23/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Mimosa Dr Bet. Oriole Ct & Aviara Pkwy
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4192_008
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 0 0 0 12:00 6 8 0 0 14
00:15 1 0 0 0 1 12:15 6 3 0 0 9
00:30 0 0 0 0 12:30 3 7 0 0 10
00:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 "12:45 8 23 9 27 0 0 17 so
01:00 0 0 0 0 13:00 7 4 0 0 11
01:15 0 0 0 0 13:15 6 6 0 0 12
01:30 0 0 0 0 13:30 7 7 0 0 14
01:45 0 0 0 0 13:45 4 24 10 27 0 0 14 51
02:00 0 0 0 0 14:00 2 9 0 0 11
02:15 0 0 0 0 14:15 14 12 0 0 26
02:30 0 0 0 0 14:30 12 15 0 0 27
02:45 0 0 0 0 14:45 10 38 4 40· 0 0 14 78
03:00 0 0 .0 0 15:00 6 10 0 0 16
03:15 0 0 0 0 15:15 5 5 0 0 10
03:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 6 5 0 0 11
03:45 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 15:45 5 22 5 25 0 0 10 47
04:00 0 1 0 0 1 16:00 8 7 0 0 15
04:15 1 1 0 0 2 16:15 3 6 0 0 9
04:30 0 0 0 0 16:30 8 4 0 0 12
04:45 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 4 16:45 6 25 7 -24 0 0 13 49
05:00 0 0 0 0 17:00 4 12 0 0 16
05:15 2 1 0 0 3 17:15 6 10 0 0 16
05:30 0 1 0 0 1 17:30 12 6 0 0 18
05:45 0 2 1 3 0 0 1 5 17:45 4 26 6 34 0 0 10 60
06:00 0 2 0 0 2 18:00 8 4 0 0 12
06:15 0 6 0 0 6 18:15 13 3 0 0 16
06:30 1 1 0 0 2 18:30 3 4 0 0 7
06:45 1 2 9 18 0 0 10 20 18:45 4 28 3 14 0 0 7 42
07:00 0 4 0 0 4 19:00 6 3 0 0 9
07:15 5 24 0 0 29 19:15 3 4 0 0 7
07:30 5 13 0 0 18 19:30 2 2 0 0 4
07:45 8 18 10 51 0 0 18 69 19:45 3 14 2 11 0 0 5 25
08:00 8 9 0 0 17 20:00 5 1 0 0 6
08:15 5 2 0 0 7 20:15 2 4 0 0 6
08:30 4 3 0 0 7 20:30 6 3 0 0 9
08:45 5 22 3 17 0 0 8 39 20:45 0 13 1 9 0 0 1 22
09:00 3 1 0 0 4 21:00 4 0 0 0 4
09:15 5 3 0 0 8 21:15 2 5 0 0 7
09:30 6 6 0 0 12 21:30 1 0 0 0 1
09:45 4 18 8 18 0 0 12 36 21:45 2 9 2 7 0 0 4 16
10:00 3 2 0 0 5 22:00 1 1 0 0 2
10:15 3 2 0 0 5 22:15 3 0 0 0 3
10:30 1 3 0 0 4 22:30 1 0 0 0 1
10:45 3 10 4 11 0 0 7 21 22:45 1 6 0 1 0 0 1 7
11:00 1 1 0 0 2 23:00 0 0 0 0
11:15 3 5 0 0 8 23:15 0 0 0 0
11:30 5 6 0 0 11 23:30 1 1 0 0 2
11:45 6 15 7 19 0 0 13 34 23:45 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
TOTALS 91 139 230 TOTALS 229 220 449
SPLIT% 39.6% 60.4% 33.9% SPLIT% 51.0% 49.0% 66.1%
. DAILY TOTALS . . ~
AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 PM Peak Hour 14:15 13:45 14:15
AM Pk Volume 26 56 82 PM Pk Volume 42 46 83
Pk Hr Factor 0.813 0.583 0.707 Pk Hr Factor 0.750 0.767 0.769
7-9 Volume 40 68 108 4-6 Volume 51 58 109
7 • 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 4 • 6 Peak Hour 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 -9 Pk Volume 26 56 82 4 • 6 Pk Volume 28 35 . 63
Pk Hr Factor 0.&13 0.583 0.707 Pk Hr Factor 0.583 0.729 0.875
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 72 of 302
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Dove Ln Bet. Moorhen Pl & El Camino Real
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4192_009
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 2 6 8
00:15 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 3 0 3
00:30 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 2 3 5
00:45 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 1 8 3 12 4 20
01:00 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 0 4 0 4
01:15 0 0 0 0 13:15 0 0 6 4 10
01:30 0 0 0 0 13:30 0 0 1 3 4
01:45 0 0 0 0 13:45 0 0 1 12 2 9 3 21
02:00 0 0 1 0 1 14:00 0 0 1 3 4
02:15 0 0 0 0 14:15 0 0 5 4 9
02:30 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 1 3 4
02:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 14:45 0 0 6 13 5 15 11 28
03:00 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 2 5 7
03:15 0 0 1 0 1 15:15 0 0 3 4 7
03:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 3 3
03:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 15:45 0 0 2 7 2 14 4 21
04:00 0 0 1 1 2 16:00 0 0 7 7 14
04:15 0 0 0 0 16:15 0 0 2 3 5
04:30 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 2 3 5
04:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 16:45 0 0 4 15 4 17 8 32
05:00 0 0 1 0 1 17:00 0 0 1 2 3
05:15 0 0 0 0 17:15 0 0 2 6 8
05:30 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 4 2 6
05:45 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 17:45 0 0 7 14 3 13 10 27
06:00 0 0 3 1 4 18:00 0 0 3 3 6
06:15 0 0 2 1 3 18:15 0 0 2 4 6
06:30 0 0 3 2 ·5 18:30 0 0 2 3 5
06:45 0 0 3 11 2 6 5 17 18:45 0 0 1 8 4 14 5 22
07:00 0 0 1 1 2 19:00 0 0 2 2 4
07:15 0 0 4 3 7 19:15 0 0 2 4 6
07:30 0 0 5 1 6 19:30 0 0 0 3 3
07:45 0 0 5 15 0 5 5 20 19:45 0 0 0 4 3 12 3 16
08:00 0 0 8 3 11 20:00 0 0 1 3 4
08:15 0 0 1 0 1 20:15 0 0 4 0 4
08:30 0 0 5 3 8 20:30 0 0 0 0
08:45 0 0 4 18 1 7 5 25 20:45 0 0 0 5 2 5 2 10
09:00 0 0 4 2 6 21:00 0 0 2 0 2
09:15 0 0 1 1 2 21:15 0 0 1 1 2
09:30 0 0 8 1 9 21:30 0 0 0 1 1
09:45 0 0 3 16 3 7 6 23 21:45 0 0 0 3 1 3 1 6
10:00 0 0 5 5 10 22:00 0 0 0 0
10:15 0 0 2 1 3 22:15 0 0 0 0
10:30 0 0 2 0 2 22:30 0 0 0 1 1
10:45 0 0 3 12 6 12 9 24 22:45 0 0 0 1 2 1 2
11:00 0 0 3 4 7 23:00 0 0 0 0
11:15 0 0 2 1 3 23:15 0 0 2 2 4
11:30 0 0 6 4 10 23:30 0 0 2 1 3
11:45 0 0 5 16 1 10 6 26 23:45 0 0 0 4 0 3 7
TOTALS 93 48 141 TOTALS 93 119 212
SPLIT% 66.0% 34.0% 39.9% SPLIT% 43.9% 56.1% 60.1%
DAILY TOTALS . ~
AM Peak Hour 07:15 10:45 07:15 PM Peak Hour 17:15 14:15 16:00
AM Pk Volume ~2 15 29 PM Pk Volume 16 17 32
Pk Hr Factor 0,688 0,625 0.659 Pk Hr Factor 0.571 0,850 0.571
7-9 Volume (l 33 12 45 4-6Volume { 29 30 59
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 4 - 6 Peak Hour 16:00 16:00 16:00
7 -9 Pk Volume u 22 7 29 4-6 Pk Volume 15 17 32
Pk Hr Factor 11/JO'J 0,000 0,688 0.583 0.659 Pk Hr Factor o,r,-J , ,j 0.536 0,607 0.571
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 75 of 302
Day: Wednesday
Date: 5/23/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Prepared l;)y National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Dove Ln Bet. Moorhen Pl & El Camino Real
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4192_009
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 0 0 0 1 1 12:00 0 0 2 2 4
00:15 0 0 1 0 1 12:15 0 0 5 2 7
00:30 0 0 1 0 1 12:30 0 0 1 1 2
00:45 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 12:45 0 0 4 12 5 10 9 22
01:00 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 0 7 1 8
01:15 0 0 0 0 13:15 0 0 3 3 6
01:30 0 0 0 0 13:30 0 0 2 5 7
01:45 0 0 0 0 13:45 0 0 7 19 5 14 12 33
02:00 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 3 2 5
02:15 0 0 0 0 14:15 0 0 4 1 5
02:30 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 0 0 0 14:45 0 0 6 13 7 10 13 23
03:00 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 4 8 12
03:15 0 0 0 0 15:15 0 0 4 1 5
03:30 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 2 2 4
03:45 0 0 0 0 15:45 0 0 4 14 3 14 7 28
04:00 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 3 5 8
04:15 0 0 1 1 2 16:15 0 0 2 3 5
04:30 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 3 5 8
04:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 16:45 0 0 3 11 5 18 8 29
05:00 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 4 8 12
05:15 0 0 0 1 1 17:15 0 0 4 5 9
. 05:30 0 0 1 0 1 17:30 0 0 8 5 13
05:45 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 3 17:45 0 0 5 21 2 20 7 41
06:00 0 0 0 1 1 18:00 0 0 2 5 7
06:15 0 0 2 2 4 18:15 0 0 3 3 6
06:30 0 0 3 1 4 18:30 0 0 2 5 7
06:45 0 0 2 7 1 5 3 12 18:45 0 0 3 10 6 19 9 29
07:00 0 0 2 2 4 19:00 0 0 2 1 3
07:15 0 0 3 4 7 19:15 0 0 0 5 5
07:30 0 0 0 3 3 19:30 0 0 1 2 3
07:45 0 0 4 9 2 11 6 20 19:45 0 0 2 5 1 9 3 14
08:00 0 0 .7 3 10 20:00 0 0 0 3 3
08:15 0 0 0 1 1 20:15 0 0 0 2 2
08:30 0 0 3 2 5 20:30 0 0 2 4 6
08:45 0 0 3 13 1 7 4 20 20:45 0 0 1 3 1 10 2 13
09:00 0 0 8 1 9 21:00 0 0 1 4 5
09:15 0 0 2 1 3 21:15 0 0 1 0 1
09:30 0 0 4 2 6 21:30 0 0 1 0 1
09:45 0 0 8 22 3 7 11 29 21:45 0 0 1 4 1 5 2 9
10:00 0 0 3 2 5 22:00 0 0 0 0
10:15 0 0 4 1 5 22:15 0 0 0 1 1
10:30 0 0 1 1 2 22:30 0 0 1 1 2
10:45 0 0 3 11 4 8 7 19 22:45 0 0 0 1 0 2 3
11:00 0 0 3 1 4 23:00 0 0 0 0
11:15 0 0 2 2 4 23:15 0 0 0 0
11:30 0 0 0 2 2 23:30 0 0 1 1 2
11:45 0 0 1 6 2 7 3 13 23:45 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 3
TOTALS 73 48 121 TOTALS 115 132 247
SPLIT % 60.3% 39.7% 32.9% SPLIT% 46.6% 53.4% 67.1%
DAILYT~TALS _ ~
AM Peak Hour 09:00 07:15 09:00 PM Peak Hour 17:00 16:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 22 12 29 PM Pk Volume 21 23 42
Pk Hr Factor 0.688 0.750 0.659 Pk Hr Factor 0.656 0.719 0.808
7 -9Volume 22 18 40 4-6Volume 32 38 70
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 4 -6 Peak Hour 17:00 16:30 16:45
7 -9 Pk Volume 14 12 26 4 -6 Pk Volume 21 23 42
Pk Hr Factor ··,£,:, O.,Jr l 0.500 0.750 0.650 Pk Hr Factor { ,'•0 0.656 0.719 0.808
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 76 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX B
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
\ \ vcorp 12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic I nvestigation3.docx (11/12/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 79 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
:--;OVEMRER 2019
APPENDIX B
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
ICU Worksheets
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 80 of 302
01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 3-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle ( sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
35
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.675
xxxxxx
B
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 364 5 216 22 9 14 6 267 184 168 239 9
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.62 0.01 0.37 0.49 0.20 0.31 1.00 1.18 0.82 1.00 1.93 0.07
Final Sat.: 996 14 591 782 320 498 1600 1894 1306 1600 3084 116
------------1---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.37 0.37 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 81 of 302
01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 4-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
39
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0. 715
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 370 29 11 329 256
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 370 29 11 329 256
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 370 29 11 329 256
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 370 29 11 329 256
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 8 104 13 210 11 158 268 3 70 29 11 329 256
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.06 0.84 0.10 0.55 0.03 0.42 1.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 1.12 0.88
Final Sat.: 102 1331 166 887 46 667 1600 2967 233 1600 1800 1400
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.18 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 82 of 302
01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 9-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
17
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.299
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------1---------------1 I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 27 7 42 7 1 69 26 509 23 29 491 10
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.36 0.09 0.55 0.09 0.01 0.90 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 568 147 884 145 21 1434 1600 3062 138 1600 3136 64
------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.02 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 83 of 302
01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 10-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 El Camino Real/ Cassia Rd
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
44
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.755
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 143 1390 11 8 1304 190 418 4 187 17 4 3
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.02 0.98 1.00 0.57 0.43
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 4190 610 1600 34 1566 1600 914 686
------------I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.43 0.01 0.01 0.3: 0.31 0.26 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 84 of 302
01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 11-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
25
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.524
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234
------------1---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 2.00 1.54 0.46 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4751 49 3200 2462 738 3200 1600 1600
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.29 0.28 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.15
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
***********~********************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 85 of 302
01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 12-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #10 El Camino Real/ Dove Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
0
44
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.478
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 27 1623 26 50 1624 114 76 9 36 58 14 69
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 2.80 0.20 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 0.17 0.83
Final Sat.: 1600 4724 76 1600 4485 315 1600 320 1280 1600 270 1330
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 86 of 302
01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:21:22
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 13-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #11 El Camino Real/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
48
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.780
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 137 1416 200 69 1564 102 178 167 280 664 290 103
OvlAdjVol: 211
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.63 0.37 2.00 2.82 0.18 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.48 0.52
Final Sat.: 3200 4206 594 3200 4506 294 3200 3200 1600 3200 2361 839
------------I ---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.35 0.35
OvlAdjV/S:
Crit Moves: **** ****
0.06 0.05 0.17 0.21 0.12 0.12
0.13
**** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 87 of 302
01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 3-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
19
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.355
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 77 16 47 44 28 63 46 315 100 69 298 63
------------I---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.55 0.11 0.34 0.32 0.21 0.47 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.65 0.35
Final Sat.: 880 183 537 521 332 747 1600 2429 771 1600 2642 558
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 88 of 302
01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 4-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
18
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.346
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 10 6 10 68 5 16 22 603 17 49 568 68
------------1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.39 0.23 0.38 0.76 0.06 0.18 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.79 0.21
Final Sat.: 615 369 615 1222 90 288 1600 3112 88 1600 2858 342
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.20 0.20
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 89 of 302
01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 9-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
18
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.343
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I ---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 28 4 37 16 3 18 16 585 19 65 710 24
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.40 0.06 0.54 0.43 0.08 0.49 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.93 0.07
Final Sat.: 649 93 858 692 130 778 1600 3099 101 1600 3095 105
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------1 I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 90 of 302
01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 10-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 El Camino Real/ Cassia Rd
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
47
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.772
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 198 1031 14 15 1680 404 234 2 185 11 10 19
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.42 0.58 1.00 0.01 0.99 1.00 0.34 0.66
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3869 931 1600 17 1583 1600 552 1048
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.32 0.01 0.01 0.43 0.43 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.02 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 91 of 302
01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 11-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
25
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.530
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 O 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 2.00 1.47 0.53 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4759 41 3200 2358 842 3200 1600 1600
------------1---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.23 0.31 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 92 of 302
01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 12-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #10 El Camino Real/ Dove Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
0
53
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.574
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 90 1474 56 87 1538 225 156 24 79 72 29 55
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I ---------------1 I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.35 0.65
Final Sat.: 1600 4624 176 1600 4187 613 1600 373 1227 1600 552 1048
------------I ---------------1 I ---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.37 0.37 0.10 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 93 of 302
01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:02
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 13-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #11 El Camino Real/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
40
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.722
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------1 I ---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 450 1448 536 191 1395 131 144 342 330 294 283 86
OvlAdjVol: 105
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.19 0.81 2.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.53 0.47
Final Sat.: 3200 3503 1297 3200 4388 412 3200 3200 1600 3200 2454 746
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.41 0.41 0.06 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.11
OvlAdjV/S:
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
0.21 0.09 0.12 0.12
0.07
****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 94 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
~O\'EMBER 2019
APPENDIX B
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
HCM Worksheets
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 95 of 302
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Ambrosia Ln & Aviara Pkwl
,,> -+ l' 'f +-..... ~ t ~ ',. +
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations 'llj t~ 'llj t~ ~ ~
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 22 603 17 49 568 68 10 6 10 68 5
Future Volume (veh/h) 22 603 17 49 568 68 10 6 10 68 5
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 635 18 52 598 72 11 6 11 72 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 51 1025 29 100 1015 122 23 12 23 112 8
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.08 0.08
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3529 100 1781 3194 384 674 368 674 1338 93
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 23 320 333 52 332 338 28 0 0 94 0
'Grp Sat Flow(s ,veh/h/ln1781 1777 1852 1781 1777 1801 1715 0 0 1747 0
Q Serve{g_s), s 0.5 5.7 5.7 1.0 5.7 5.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0
Cycle Q Clear{g_c), s 0.5 5.7 5.7 1.0 5.7 5.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.21 0.39 0.39 0.77
Lane Grp Ca11_(c), veh/h . 51 538 100 573 58 0 0 147 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.62 0.52 0.59 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00
\ll.vail Cap(c_a), veh/h 243 911 248 891 1233 0 0 1241 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream FilterCT 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.5 11.2 16.8 10.5 17.4 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0
Iner De ay (d2), s/veh 6.2 1.2 4.1 1.0 6.1 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ 50% ,veh/lr1l3 1.9 0.5 1.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnG!'R Delay{d),s/veh 23.7 12.5 12.4 20.9 11.4 11.4 23.4 0.0 0.0 20.8 0.0
LnGre LOS C B B C B B C A A C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 676 722 28 94
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.8 12.1 23.4 20.8
Approach LOS B B C C
[fimer 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.8 6.3 16.8 7.7 5.2 17.8
Change Period +Re , s 4.6 * 4.2 6.2 4.6 * 4.2 6.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.3 * 5.1 18.0 26.0 *5 18.1
Max Q Clear Time _c+l1), s 2.6 3.0 7.7 3.9 2.5 7.8
Green Ext Time {p_c), s 0.1 0.0 2.9 0.4 0.0 3.0
ntersection Summa~
.HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.2
HCM 6th LOS B
otes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
.,,
SBR
16
16
0
1.00
1.00
1870
17
0.95
2
27
0.08
316
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.18
0
0.00
0
1.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
A
01 Existing PM .syn
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 107 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
!\OVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX B
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
Signal Queueing
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 116 of 302
Queues
8: El Camino Real & Cassia Rd
~ -+ f +-
ane Groue EBL EBT WBL WBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 440 201 18 7
v/c Ratio 0.87 0.34 0.18 0.07
Control Delay 59.3 6.8 59 .1 45.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 59.3 6.8 59.1 45.6
Queue Length 50th {ft) 336 2 14 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) #538 60 39 19
Internal Link Dist (!!) 870 249
Turn Bay Length (ft) 270 100
Base Capacity (vph) 508 597 508 503
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.87 0.34 0.04 0.01
ntersection Summa
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
~ t ,..
NBL NBT NBR
151 1463 12
0.74 0.76 0.01
74.1 26.2 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
74.1 26.2 0.0
118 463 0
#229 #686 0
1330
250 185
204 1913 892
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0.74 0.76 0.01
\.
SBL
8
0.11
60.6
0.0
60.6
6
24
260
74
0
0
0
0.11
01 Existing AM .syn
!
SBT
1573
0.77
34.1
0.0
34.1
397
470
311
2031
0
0
0
0.77
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 4
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 120 of 302
Queues
9: El Camino Real & Poinsettia Ln
_,,.
--+ 'f +-
ane Groue EBL EBT WBL WBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 14 461 263
v/c Ratio 0.06 0.04 0.81 0.41
Control Delay 27.5 24.0 38.4 7.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 27.5 24.0 38.4 7.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 2 78 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 10 #187 33
Internal Link Dist (!t) 1388 764
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 380
Base Capacity (v h 291 1862 571 1992
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Ca2 Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.01 0.81 0.13
ntersection Summa!)'.
# 95th i:_,ercentile volume exceeds capaci!}', ~ueue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
"' t ~
NBL NBT NBR
24 1396 469
0.08 0.60 0.48
27.6 13.9 3.3
0.0 0.0 0.0
27.6 13.9 3.3
4 116 0
15 225 52
1747
250 240
291 2339 981
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0.08 0.60 0.48
\.
SBL
157
0.54
35.2
0.0
35.2
26
#70
250
291
0
0
0
0.54
01 Existing AM.syn
l
SBT
1440
0.48
9.3
0.0
9.3
73
234
298
2993
0
0
0
0.48
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 5
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 121 of 302
Queues
2: Ambrosia Ln & Aviara Pkwl
. ane Grau
Lane Group Flow (vph)
. v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Internal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vRh)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback CaR Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
ilntersection Summa!}'.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, A Y
..> -+-
EBL EBT
23 653
0.09 0.38
25.5 13.6
0.0 0.0
25.5 13.6
6 63
28 157 .
346
130
243 1748
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.09 0.37
'f +-
WBL WBT
52 670
0.21 0.34
26.1 10.5
0.0 0.0
26.1 10.5
13 36
48 160
1948
125
248 1983
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.21 0.34
t
NBT
28
0.10
18.7
0.0
18.7
4
26
136
1129
0
0
0
0.02
+
SBT
94
0.27
20.2
0.0
20.2
19
63
1460
1133
0
0
0
0.08
01 Existing PM .syn
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 125 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
'.'\OVJ:MBER 2019
APPENDIX B
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
With Southbound Right-Turn at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 131 of 302
MITIG8 -01 Existing AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 18:17:20
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 1-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
25
Critical Vol. /Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.524
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------1
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol:
Growth Adj:
Initial Bse:
Added Vol:
PasserByVol:
Initial Fut:
User Adj:
PHF Adj:
PHF Volume:
Reduct Vol:
23 1326
1. 00 1.00
23 1326
0 0
0 0
23 1326
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
23 1326
0 0
446
1.00
446
0
0
446
1.00
1.00
446
0
149 1354
1. 00 1. 00
149 1354
0 0
0 0
149 1354
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
149 1354
0 0
14
1.00
14
0
0
14
1. 00
l.DD
14
0
17 10
1. OD 1. DO
17 10
0 0
0 0
17 10
1. 00 1.00
1. 00 1.00
17 10
0 0
3
1.00
3
0
0
3
1.00
1.00
3
0
438 16
1. 00 1. 00
438 16
0 0
0 0
438 16
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
438 16
0 0
234
1.00
234
0
0
234
1.00
1.00
234
0
Reduced Vol: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 23 1326 446 149 1354 14 17 10 3 438 16 234
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.54 0.46 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 2462 738 3200 1600 1600
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I ---------------1
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.05 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.15
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
*************************************************,*******************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 132 of 302
MITIG8 -01 Existing PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 18: 18: 03 Page 1-1
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Existing
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
25
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.530
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------1
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pas serByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 19 1089 492 243 1606 14 14 14 5 290 12 130
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------1
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.47 0.53 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 2358 842 3200 1600 1600
------------1 ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I 1---------------1
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.23 0.31 0.08 0.33 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 133 of 302
Queues
9: El Camino Real & Poinsettia Ln
ane Graue
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (f!)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Internal Link Dist @}
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Ca Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
ntersection SUmma!)'.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
..> -+
EBL EBT
15 20
0.06 0.07
34.6 28.5
0.0 0.0
34.6 28.5
3 3
12 14
1388
315
244 1553
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.06 0.01
"f +-
WBL WST
305 150
0.61 0.25
35.6 8.0
0.0 0.0
35.6 8.0
60 2
116 28
764
380
508 1689
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.60 0.09
"' t I"
NSL NST NSR
20 1146 518
0.08 0.51 0.53
34.7 16.4 3.9
0.0 0.0 0.0
34.7 16.4 3.9
4 111 0
15 203 58
1747
250 240
244 2235 986
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0.08 0.51 0.53
\.
SSL
256
0.54
34.1
0.0
34.1
49
98
250
51 7
0
0
. 0
0.50
01 Existing PM.syn
!
SST
1691
0.56
12.0
0.0
12.0
97
293
298
3010
0
0
0
0.56
03/14/2019
.,I
SSR
15
0.01
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
1004
0
0
0
0.01
Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 137 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX C
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
MULTIMODAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
\ \vcorpl2\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19)
LSA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 138 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX D
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 155 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
SO\'EMRER 2019
APPENDIX D
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS
ICU Worksheets
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 156 of 302
02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 3-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
48
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.778
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 414 6 245 22 9 14 7 308 212 217 308 12
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.62 0.01 0.37 0.49 0.20 0.31 1.00 1.18 0.82 1.00 1.92 0.08
Final Sat.: 996 14 589 782 320 498 1600 1895 1305 1600 3080 120
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.10 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 157 of 302
02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 4-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
49
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.786
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 8 104 13 239 12 179 300 414 32 12 363 282
------------I ---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.06 0.84 0.10 0.55 0.03 0.42 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.13 0.87
Final Sat.: 102 1331 166 889 45 666 1600 2970 230 1600 1801 1399
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.20 0.20
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 158 of 302
02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 9-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
18
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.332
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 30 8 46 9 1 87 29 561 25 32 541 11
------------I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.36 0.09 0.55 0.09 0.01 0.90 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 571 152 876 148 16 1435 1600 3063 137 1600 3136 64
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.18 0.18 0.02 0.17 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 159 of 302
02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 10-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 El Camino Real/ Cassia Rd
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
61
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.836
xxxxxx
D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 158 1532 12 9 1437 209 475 5 212 17 4 3
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.02 0.98 1.00 0.57 0.43
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 4191 609 1600 37 1563 1600 914 686
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.48 0.01 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.30 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 160 of 302
02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 11-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
30
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.614
xxxxxx
B
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------I ---------------1 I ---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 27 1574 529 164 1492 15 21 12 4 535 20 286
------------I---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 2.00 1.50 0.50 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4752 48 3200 2400 800 3200 1600 1600
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.33 0.33 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.01 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 161 of 302
02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 12-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #10 El Camino Real/ Dove Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
0
54
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.574
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------I---------------I I ---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69
Reduct Vol: o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 32 1927 31 59 1928 135 116 14 55 58 14 69
------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 2.80 0.20 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 0.17 0.83
Final Sat.: 1600 4724 76 1600 4486 314 1600 325 1275 1600 270 1330
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 162 of 302
02 Future No Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:22:45
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 13-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #11 El Camino Real/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
78
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.884
xxxxxx
D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 163 1681 237 82 1856 121 196 184 309 732 320 114
OvlAdjVol: 228
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.63 0.37 2.00 2.82 0.18 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.47 0.53
Final Sat.: 3200 4207 593 3200 4506 294 3200 3200 1600 3200 2359 841
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.40 0.40 0.03 0.41 0.41 0.06 0.06 0.19 0.23 0.14 0.14
OvlAdjV/S: 0.14
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 163 of 302
02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 3-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
20
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.394
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------1 I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 87 18 53 44 28 63 53 363 115 89 384 81
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.55 0.11 0.34 0.32 0.21 0.47 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.65 0.35
Final Sat.: 881 182 537 521 332 747 1600 2430 770 1600 2643 557
------------1---------------I I ---------------1 I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.15 0.15
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 164 of 302
02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 4-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
19
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.380
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 O 1 1 O
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I ---------------1
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 675 19 54 626 75
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 6 75 19 54 626 75
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 675 19 54 626 75
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 675 19 54 626 75
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 10 6 10 77 6 18 25 675 19 54 626 75
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.39 0.23 0.38 0.76 0.06 0.18 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.79 0.21
Final Sat.: 615 369 615 1220 95 285 1600 3112 88 1600 2858 342
------------1---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 165 of 302
02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 9-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
19
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.374
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 31 4 41 20 4 23 18 645 21 72 782 26
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.41 0.05 0.54 0.43 0.08 0.49 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.94 0.06
Final Sat.: 653 84 863 681 136 783 1600 3099 101 1600 3097 103
------------I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.25 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 166 of 302
02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 10-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 El Camino Real/ Cassia Rd
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
65
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.849
xxxxxx
D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 218 1136 15 17 1851 445 266 2 210 11 10 19
------------I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.42 0.58 1.00 0.01 0.99 1.00 0.34 0.66
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3870 930 1600 15 1585 1600 552 1048
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.36 0.01 0.01 0.48 0.48 0.17 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.02 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 167 of 302
02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 11-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
30
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.617
xxxxxx
B
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------I ---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 23 1293 584 268 1770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 23 1293 584 268 1 770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 23 1293 584 268 1770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 23 1293 584 268 1770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 23 1293 584 268 1770 15 17 17 6 354 15 159
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 2.00 1.48 0.52 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4760 40 3200 2365 835 3200 1600 1600
------------1---------------1 I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.27 0.37 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 168 of 302
02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 12-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #10 El Camino Real/ Dove Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
0
77
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.704
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 O 1 O
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 107 1750 66 103 1826 267 238 37 121 72 29 55
------------I---------------I I---------------I I--------------. I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.35 0.65
Final Sat.: 1600 4626 174 1600 4188 612 1600 375 1225 1600 552 1048
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.38 0.38 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 169 of 302
02 Future No Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:23:25
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 13-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #11 El Camino Real/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
59
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.831
xxxxxx
D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 O 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 534 1719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 534 1 719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 534 1719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 534 1719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 534 1 719 636 227 1656 155 159 377 364 324 312 95
OvlAdjVol: 97
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.19 0.81 2.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.53 0.47
Final Sat.: 3200 3504 1296 3200 4389 411 3200 3200 1600 3200 2453 747
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.49 0.49 0.07 0.38 0.38
OvlAdjV/S:
Crit Moves: **** ****
0.05 0.12 0.23
0.06
****
0.10 0.13 0.13
****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 170 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
'.\'OVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX D
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS
HCM Worksheets
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 171 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
'.\:OVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX D
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
2035 WITHOUT POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS
Signal Queueing
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 192 of 302
Queues
1: Ambrosia Ln & Poinsettia Ln
~ --+-f +-
ane Graue EBL EBT WBL WBT
Lane Group Flow {vph) 7 547 228 337
v/c Ratio 0.07 0.77 0.87 0.27
Control Delay 42.0 32.9 70.2 21 .6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 42.0 32.9 70.2 21.6
Queue Length 50th (ft 4 111 129 67
Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 #177 #260 118
Internal Link Dist (ft) 509 264
Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 250
Base Capacity (yph l 101 709 266 1270
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback CaR Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.77 0.86 0.27
95th _percentile volume exceeds capaci!}', queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
t
NBT
700
0.96
45.7
0.0
45.7
336
#594
1550
764
0
0
0
0.92
+
SBT
47
0.07
8.4
0.0
8.4
9
25
354
711
0
0
0
0.07
02 2035 without Poinsettia AM .syn
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 193 of 302
Queues
2: Ambrosia Ln & Aviara Pkwl
_,,.
-+ 'f +-
, ane Graue EBL EBT WBL WBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 400 595 16 860
v/c Ratio 1.10 0.43 0.19 1.18
Control Delay 116.7 24.8 53.6 125.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 116.7 24.8 53.6 125.3
Queue Length 50th (ft -298 134 10 -312
Queue Length 95th (ft) #392 182 28 #337
Internal Link Dist ft) 346 1948
Tum Bay Length (ft) 130 125
Base Capacity (vph) 363 1393 86 731
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Ca Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.10 0.43 0.19 1.18
Intersection Summa!}'.
~ Volume exceeds caP.acity, ctueue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, ctueue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
t
NBT
167
0.64
52.0
0.0
52.0
101
137
136
489
0
0
0
0.34
!
SBT
574
1.15
124.2
0.0
124.2
-431
#516
1460
497
0
0
0
1.15
02 2035 without Poinsettia AM.syn
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 194 of 302
Queues
2: Ambrosia Ln & Aviara Pkwl
· ane Graue
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th {fl)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Internal Link Dist {ft
Turn Bay Length {ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
,ntersection Summa~
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
.,.> -+
EBL EBT
26 731
0.11 0.41
23.4 12.9
0.0 0.0
23.4 12.9
6 73
29 182
346
130
235 1768
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.11 0.41
'f +-
WBL WBT
57 738
0.24 0.36
24.6 10.0
0.0 0.0
24.6 10.0
14 41
51 182
1948
125
235 2033
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.24 0.36
t
NBT
28
0.10
17.1
0.0
17.1
4
25
136
1206
0
0
0
0.02
!
SBT
106
0.29
18.7
0.0
. 18.7
22
68
1460
1170
0
0
0
0.09
02 2035 without Poinsettia PM.syn
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 201 of 302
Queues
8: El Camino Real & Cassia Rd
-..> ~ 'f +-
ane Grou EBL EBT WBL WBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 280 223 12 31
v/c Ratio 0.75 0.44 0.11 0.25
Control Delay 53.6 7.8 54.8 34.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 53.6 7.8 54.8 34.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 190 1 8 8
Queue Length 95th (ft) 290 62 30 41
Internal Link Dist (!!) 870 249
Tum Bay Length (ft) 270 100
Base Capacity (vph) 566 657 566 551
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.34 0.02 0.06
-Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretical! infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th ercentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
"' t
NBL NBT
229 1196
1.08 0.57
130.5 18.7
0.0 0.0
130.5 18.7
-191 263
#394 492
1330
250
213 2082
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.08 0.57
02 2035 without Poinsettia PM.syn
/" \,.
NBR SBL
16 18
0.02 0.22
0.0 61.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 61.3
0 13
0 40
185 260
963 83
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.02 0.22
i
SBT
2416
1.06
65.4
0.0
65.4
-723
#967
311
2288
0
0
0
1.06
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 4
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 203 of 302
Queues
9: El Camino Real & Poinsettia Ln
_.,.
-+ 'f +-
bane Groue ESL EST WBL WBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 24 373 183
v/c Ratio b.08 0.09 0.67 0.30
Control Delay 39.8 31.9 40.1 8.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 39.8 31.9 40.1 8.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 4 4 86 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) 15 17 #164 32
Internal Link Dist (!t) 1388 764
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 380
Base Capacit (vph) 213 1360 555 1605
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.02 0.67 0.11
Intersection Summa!)'.
~ 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue ma_y be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
~ t
NBL NBT
24 1361
0.11 0.59
40.0 18.6
0.0 0.0
40.0 18.6
• 5 159
19 272
1747
250
213 2324
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.11 0.59
02 2035 without Poinsettia PM.syn
~ \.
NBR SSL
615 282
0.59 0.59
4.4 39.3
0.0 0.0
4.4 39.3
3 64
71 119
240 250
1049 521
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.59 0.54
!
SST
1879
0.61
13.1
0.0
13.1
134
362
298
3082
0
0
0
0.61
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 5
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 204 of 302
Queues
10: El Camino Real & Dove Ln
~ _. f ,._
ane Graue EBL EBT WBL WBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 251 166 76 89
v/c Ratio 0.97 0.73 0.33 0.58
Control Delay 111.2 42.8 64.7 42.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 111 .2 42.8 64.7 42.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 248 54 69 30
Queue Length 95th (ft) #428 130 125 88
Internal Link Dist (ft) 345 406
Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 80
Base Capacity (yph) 259 552 229 425
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback CaR Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.97 0.30 0.33 0.21
ntersection Summa~
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
"' t
NBL NBT
113 1911
0.90 0.68
125.8 25.9
0.0 0.0
125.8 25.9
112 469
#236 600
1002
190
125 2823
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.90 0.68
02 2035 without Poinsettia PM .syn
\..
SBL
108
0.59
76.9
0.0
76.9
102
166
240
183
0
0
0
0.59
!
SBT
2203
0.75
24.6
0.0
24.6
545
660
1747
2955
0
0
0
0.75
03/15/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 6
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 205 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX E
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS
\ \vcorpl2\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 207 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
~0VEMBER 2019
APPENDIX E
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS
ICU Worksheets
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 208 of 302
03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 3-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
35
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.675
xxxxxx
B
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I ---------------1 I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 1 72 244 10
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 172 244 10
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 172 244 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 172 244 10
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 361 5 214 22 9 14 6 267 184 1 72 244 10
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.62 0.01 0.37 0.49 0.20 0.31 1.00 1.18 0.82 1.00 1.92 0.08
Final Sat.: 996 14 590 782 320 498 1600 1894 1306 1600 3074 126
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.36 0.36 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 209 of 302
03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 4-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
37
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.700
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I ---------------1 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 8 104 13 209 10 156 260 359 28 10 315 245
------------I ---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.06 0.84 0.10 0.56 0.03 0.41 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.12 0.88
Final Sat.: 102 1331 166 892 43 666 1600 2968 232 1600 1800 1400
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.17 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 210 of 302
03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 5-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Cassia Rd/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
21
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.442
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Cassia Rd Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l! 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 376 10
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 376 10
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 3 76 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ()
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 376 10
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 0 0 0 20 0 222 193 416 0 0 3 76 10
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.92 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.05
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 132 0 1468 1600 3200 0 0 3117 83
------------I ---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 211 of 302
03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 6-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #4 Skimmer Ct-Oriole Ct/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
17
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.264
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Skimmer Ct-Oriole Ct Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 O 1 1 O
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 34 6 41 5 2 6 2 414 20 39 346 2
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.42 0.07 0.51 0.38 0.15 0.47 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.99 0.01
Final Sat.: 672 119 810 615 246 738 1600 3053 147 1600 3182 18
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 212 of 302
03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 9-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr/ Aviara Pkwy
**************************************~*****************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
17
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.282
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I ---------------1 I ---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .o 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 30 8 46 5 1 53 25 487 22 28 470 10
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------1
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.36 0.09 0.55 0.08 0.02 0.90 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 571 152 876 136 27 1437 1600 3062 138 1600 3133 67
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.15 0.15
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
,Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 213 of 302
03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 10-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 El Camino Real/ Cassia Rd
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
29
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.598
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I ---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 30 1550 12 9 1613 53 85 4 38 17 4 3
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.90 0.10 1.00 0.10 0.90 1.00 0.57 0.43
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 4647 153 1600 152 1448 1600 914 686
------------1---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.48 0.01 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 214 of 302
03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 11-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
39
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0. 717
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 1 76 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1 76 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1 76 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286
------------1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.67 0.33 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4276 524 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.32 0.33 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.03 0.07 0.16 0.02 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 215 of 302
03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 12-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #10 El Camino Real/ Dove Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle ( sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
0
57
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.597
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1----·----------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------I ---------------1 I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 11 7 14 56 58 14 69
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 11 7 14 56 58 14 69
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 117 14 56 58 14 69
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 11 7 14 56 58 14 69
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 34 2021 33 62 2022 142 11 7 14 56 58 14 69
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 2.80 0.20 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 0.17 0.83
Final Sat.: 1600 4723 77 1600 4485 315 1600 320 1280 1600 270 1330
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.43 0.43 0.04 0.45 0.45 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 216 of 302
03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:13
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 13-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #11 El Camino Real/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
63
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.843
xxxxxx
D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------1 I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------1
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 141 1763 249 86 1947 105 170 160 268 635 278 99
OvlAdjVol: 198
------------I ---------------1 I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.63 0.37 2.00 2.85 0.15 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.47 0.53
Final Sat.: 3200 4206 594 3200 4554 246 3200 3200 1600 3200 2360 840
------------I---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.03 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.05 0.17 0.20 0.12 0.12
OvlAdjV/S: 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 217 of 302
03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 3-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Ambrosia Ln / Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
19
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.356
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 76 16 46 44 28 63 46 315 100 71 305 64
------------I ---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.55 0.12 0.33 0.32 0.21 0.47 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.65 0.35
Final Sat.: 881 186 533 521 332 747 1600 2429 771 1600 2645 555
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.12 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 218 of 302
03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 4-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Ambrosia Ln / Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
18
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.339
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Ambrosia Ln Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 O 1 1 O
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 10 6 10 67 5 16 22 586 16 47 543 65
------------I ---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.39 0.23 0.38 0.76 0.06 0.18 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.79 0.21
Final Sat.: 615 369 615 1218 91 291 1600 3115 85 1600 2858 342
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I ---------------1 I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 219 of 302
03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 5-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Cassia Rd/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec) :
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
20
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.402
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Cassia Rd Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------1 I---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 68 197 308 0 0 562 15
------------I ---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.87 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.05
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 205 0 1395 1600 3200 0 0 3117 83
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 220 of 302
03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 6-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #4 Skimmer Ct-Oriole Ct/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
17
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.268
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Skimmer Ct-Oriole Ct Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 9 4 34 6 2 2 8 295 15 31 566 8
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I ---------------1 I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.19 0.09 0.72 0.60 0.20 0.20 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.97 0.03
Final Sat.: 306 136 1157 960 320 320 1600 3045 155 1600 3155 45
------------1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.18 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 221 of 302
03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 9-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Mimosa Dr/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
18
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.334
xxxxxx
A
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Mimosa Dr Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 31 4 41 12 2 14 16 560 18 62 679 23
------------I---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.41 0.05 0.54 0.43 0.07 0.50 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.93 0.07
Final Sat.: 653 84 863 686 114 800 1600 3100 100 1600 3095 105
------------I ---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 222 of 302
03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 10-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
**************************************~*****************************************
Intersection #8 El Camino Real/ Cassia Rd
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
29
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.607
xxxxxx
B
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Cassia Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 40 1150 15 17 2211 112 48 1 37 11 10 19
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I ---------------I I ---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 0.03 0.97 1.00 0.34 0.66
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 4569 231 1600 42 1558 1600 552 1048
------------1---------------I I ---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.36 0.01 0.01 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 223 of 302
03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 11-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
42
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.743
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159
------------1---------------1 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.49 0.51 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 3989 811 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------I---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.25 0.37 0.08 0.45 0.45 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.02 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 224 of 302
03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 12-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #10 El Camino Real/ Dove Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
0
85
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.730
xxxxxx
C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Dove Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------1 I---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 112 1836 69 108 1915 280 241 37 122 72 29 55
------------I ---------------I I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 2.62 0.38 1.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.35 0.65
Final Sat.: 1600 4626 174 1600 4188 612 1600 372 1228 1600 552 1048
------------I---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.07 0.46 0.46 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 225 of 302
03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 00:24:39
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 13-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #11 El Camino Real/ Aviara Pkwy
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
59
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.829
xxxxxx
D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Aviara Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
------------I ---------------1 1---------------I I ---------------1 I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 464 1803 667 238 1737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 464 1803 667 238 1737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 464 1803 667 238 1737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 464 1803 667 238 1737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Volume: 464 1803 667 238 1 737 135 138 327 316 281 271 82
OvlAdjVol: 84
------------1---------------I I ---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.19 0.81 2.00 2.78 0.22 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.54 0.46
Final Sat.: 3200 3504 1296 3200 4454 346 3200 3200 1600 3200 2457 743
------------I ---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.51 0.51 0.07 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.10 0.20 0.09 0.11 0.11
OvlAdjV/S: 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 226 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
S'OVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX E
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS
HCM Worksheets
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 227 of 302
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Poinsettia Ln & Cassia Rd
k
ovement SBL
Lane Configurations V
Traffic Volume (vph)_ 10
Future Volume (vph) 10
Ideal Flow (v!illQI) 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00
Frt 0.88
Flt Protected 0.99
Said. Flow (prot) 1634
Flt Permitted 0.99
Satd. Flow (eerm) 1634
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 11
RTOR Reduction (yph) 51
Lane Graue Flow (vehl 32
Turn Type Prat
Protected Phases 2
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 22.9
.Effective Green, g (s) 22.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29
Clearance Time ~ 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0
Lane Gr Ca (yph 467
v/s Ratio Prat c0.02
v/c Ratio 0.07
Uniform Delay, d1 20.8
Progression Factor 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.3
Delay (s) 21 .1
Level of Service C
Approach Delay (s) 21 .1
~pproach LOS C
: ntersection Summa~
HCM 2000 Control Delay
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
~nalysis Period (min)
C Critical Lane Group
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, A Y
,J
SBR
68
68
1900
0.95
72
0
0
J ~ ' \
SEL SET NWT NWR
~ t+ +~
562 15 197 308
562 15 197 308
1900 1900 1900 1900
4.5 4.5 4.5
1.00 0.95 0.95
1.00 1.00 0.91
0.95 1.00 1.00
1770 3539 3215
0.95 1.00 1.00
1770 3539 3215
0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
592 16 207 324
0 0 277 0
592 16 254 0
Prat NA NA
3 8 4
31.9 48.1 11.7
31 .9 48.1 11.7
0.40 0.60 0.15
4.5 4.5 4.5
3.0 3.0 3.0
705 2127 470
c0.33 0.00 c0.08
0.84 0.01 0.54
21.7 6.4 31.7
0.65 0.49 1.00
8.5 0.0 1.3
22.8 3.1 32.9
C A C
22.3 32.9
C C
26.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service
0.52
80.0 Sum of lost time @)
62.5% ICU Level of Service
15
03 2035 with Poinsettia PM.syn
C
13.5
B
03/13/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 241 of 302
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 03 2035 with Poinsettia PM.syn
11: El Camino Real & Aviara Pkwl/Al9a Rd 03/14/2019
.,> -+-l" 'f +-4-.. .... t ~ \. + ,.I
ovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations "tlj"tlj tt ., "tljl!j tt+ "tljl!j ttf+ "tlj"tlj ttt+
Traffic Volume veh/h) 138 327 316 281 271 82 464 1803 667 238 1737 135
Future Volume (veh/h) 138 327 316 281 271 82 464 1803 667 238 1737 135
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj{A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/hnn 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 145 344 333 296 285 86 488 1898 0 251 1828 142
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 191 690 548 303 613 181 524 2485 262 2060 159
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.23 0.23 0.15 0.49 0.00 0.08 0.43 0.43
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1585 3456 2703 800 3456 5274 0 3456 4833 374
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 145 344 333 296 185 186 488 1898 0 251 1286 684
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1726 1728 1702 · 0 1728 1702 1803
Q Serve{g_s), s 6.2 13.0 26.2 12.9 13.6 14.0 21.0 45.7 0.0 10.9 52.4 52.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.2 13.0 26.2 12.9 13.6 14.0 21 .0 45.7 0.0 10.9 52.4 52.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.21
Lane Gr Cap{ct veh/h 191 690 548 303 403 391 524 2485 262 1451 768
V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.50 0.61 0.98 0.46 0.47 0.93 0.76 0.96 0.89 0.89
Avail Ca..12.(c_a), veh/h 262 735 568 303 403 391 524 2485 262 1451 768
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
URst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 70.1 54.1 40.7 68.4 50.2 50.4 63.0 31.5 0.0 69.3 39.8 39.9
Iner Delay (d2), s/veh 8.2 0.6 1.8 45.0 0.8 0.9 23.6 2.3 0.0 44.1 8.3 14.7
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 . 0 },veh/lrB.0 5.9 10.6 7.6 6.2 6.2 11 .0 19.2 0.0 6.4 23.5 26.4
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
78.3 54.6 42.5 113.4 51.0 51.3 86.7 33.8 0.0 113.4 48.1 54.6
LnGr LOS E D D F D D F C F D -D
Ap 822 667 2386 A 2221
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.9 78.8 44.6 57.5
Approach LOS D E D E
imer -Assigned Phs 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), U.9 79.7 17.4 35.4 27.0 70.6 12.5 40.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.5 * 6.5 * 4.2 6.2 * 4.2 6.5 * 4.2 6.2
Max Green Setting (Gmat!,.4 * 73 *13 31.1 * 23 61.8 * 11 32.9
Max Q Clear Time {g_c+l1J,!s 47.7 14.9 28.2 23.0 54.8 8.2 16.0
Green Ext Time {p_c), s 0.0 16.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 5.9 0.1 2.0
' ntersection Summa
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 54.3
HCM 6th LOS D
, otes
• HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Synchro 10 Report
LSA Analyst, AY Page 11
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 249 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
:-.:O\'EMRER 2019
APPENDIX E
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS
Signal Queueing
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 250 of 302
Queues
8: El Camino Real & Cassia Rd
.Lane Grau
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Internal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
ntersection Summa
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
~ -+
EBL EBT
89 44
0.45 0.20
44.3 16.2
0.0 0.0
44.3 16.2
41 2
101 34
870
270
769 721
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.12 0.06
f +-
WBL WBT
18 7
0.14 0.05
42.6 34.3
0.0 0.0
42.6 34.3
8 2
33 16
249
100
690 681
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.03 0.01
"' t ;--
NBL NBT NBR
32 1632 13
0.22 0.67 0.01
43 .2 12.6 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
43 .2 12.6 0.0
15 171 0
49 567 0
1330
250 185
239 2423 1109
0 . 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0.13 0.67 0.01
03 2035 with Poinsettia AM.syn
\.
SBL
9
0.09
44.6
0.0
44.6
4
22
260
101
0
0
0
0.09
!
SBT
1754
0.56
13.2
0.0
13.2
182
364
311
3145
0
0
0
0.56
03/14/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 6
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 256 of 302
Queues
10: El Camino Real & Dove Ln
_,,.
-+ 'f +-
bane Grau~ EBL EBT WBL WBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 74 61 88
w/c Ratio 0.89 0.34 0.61 0.51
Control Delay 107.2 21.7 80.4 27.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delax 107.2 21.7 80.4 27.1
Queue Length 50th (ID 96 11 47 11
Queue Length 95th (ft) #212 57 #107 62
Internal Link Dist (!t) 345 406
Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 80
Base Capacity (vph) 138 538 103 '514
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
'Reduced v/c Ratio 0.89 0.14 0.59 0.17
llntersection Summa!}'.
# 95th ercentile volume exceeds capacity, ~ueue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
~ t
NBL NBT
36 2162
0.47 0.70
76.4 18.6
0.0 0.0
76.4 18.6
28 391
#69 528
1002
190
76 3068
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.47 0.70
'-.
SBL
65
0.42
59.5
0.0
59.5
48
93
240
155
0
0
0
0.42
03 2035 with Poinsettia AM.syn
!
SBT
2277
0.66
13.3
0.0
13.3
370
480
1747
3426
0
0
0
0.66
03/14/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 8
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 258 of 302
Queues
11: El Camino Real & Aviara Pkwl/Al9a Rd
_,,. --,. "t f
• ane Grou EBL EBT EBR WBL
Lane Group Flow (vph) 179 168 282 668
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.54 0.67 0.87
Control Delay 65.5 63.5 33.5 62.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 65.5 63.5 33.5 62.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 76 72 117 282
Queue Length 95th (ft) 117 111 218 #394
Internal Link Dist ft) 1135
Tum Bay Length (ft) 150 130 200
Base Capacity {vph) 347 840 419 768
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Ca Re uctn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.20 0.67 0.87
ntersection Summan'.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, ueue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
+-~ t
WBT NBL NBT
397 148 2118
0.51 0.70 0.87
43.1 78.7 34.6
0.0 0.0 0.0
43.1 78.7 34.6
142 64 565
197 #115 667
601 320
260
1247 210 2438
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0.32 0.70 0.87
03 2035 with Poinsettia AM.syn
'-.
SBL
91
0.67
85.3
0.0
85.3
40
#81
310
136
0
0
0
0.67
+
SBT
2160
0.92
40.2
0.0
40.2
610
#721
1002
2350
0
0
0
0.92
03/14/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 9
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 259 of 302
Queues
7: Mimosa Dr & Aviara Pkwl
ane Groue
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Dela,'.
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Internal Link Di.st ft)
Tum Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity vi,h
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Ca Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
ntersection Summa!}'.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
.J---+
ESL EST
17 608
0.08 0.28
18.9 8.4
0.0 0.0
18.9 8.4
4 54
17 96
1948
130
212 2206
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.08 0.28
"f +-
WSL WST
65 739
0.30 0.29
22.0 6.0
0.0 0.0
22.0 6.0
15 37
44 120
1135
200
217 2507
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.30 0.29
t
NST
80
0.30
12.7
0.0
12.7
8
35
222
1011
0
0
0
0.08
+
SST
30
0.12
12.6
0.0
12.6
3
19
1401
980
0
0
0
0.03
03 2035 with Poinsettia PM.syn
03/14/2019
Synchro 10 Report
Page 5
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 264 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
~OVEMRER 2019
APPENDIX E
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
2035 WITH POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE LEVEL OF SERVICE
WORKSHEETS
With Southbound Right-Turn at El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane
P:\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation.docx (03/19/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 269 of 302
MITIG8 -03 Future Ext AM Thu Mar 14, 2019 18:18:45
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
AM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 1-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
36
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.691
xxxxxx
B
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 176 1531
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 176 1531
Added Vol: 0 0
PasserByVol:
Initial Fut:
User Adj:
PHF Adj:
PHF Volume:
Reduct Vol:
0 0
176 1531
1. 00 1.00
1. 00 1. 00
176 1531
0 0
529
1.00
529
0
0
529
1.00
1.00
529
0
166 1510
1. 00 1.00
166 1510
0 0
0 0
166 1510
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
166 1510
0 0
185
1.00
185
0
0
185
1.00
1.00
185
0
255 41
1. 00 1.00
255 41
0 0
0 0
255 41
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
255 41
0 0
114
1.00
114
0
0
114
1.00
1.00
114
0
519 36
1. 00 1. 00
519 36
0 0
0 0
519 36
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
519 36
0 0
286
1.00
286
0
0
286
1.00
1.00
286
0
Reduced Vol: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 176 1531 529 166 1510 185 255 41 114 519 36 286
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.32 0.33 0.05 0.31 0.12 0.08 0.03 0.07 0.16 0.02 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 270 of 302
MITIG8 -03 Future Ext PM Thu Mar 14, 2019 18:19:27
Poinsettia Reach E (LSA Project No. HCR1803)
Future Plus Extension
PM Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 1-1
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length%) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #9 El Camino Real/ Poinsettia Ln
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
5
35
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.680
xxxxxx
B
********************************************************************************
Street Name: El Camino Real Poinsettia Ln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------1---------------I 1---------------I I---------------I 1---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 221 1190
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 221 1190
Added Vol: 0 0
PasserByVol:
Initial Fut:
User Adj:
PHF Adj:
PHF Volume:
Reduct Vol:
0 0
221 1190
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1.00
221 1190
0 0
592
1.00
592
0
0
592
1.00
1.00
592
0
271 1 791
1. 00 1. 00
271 1791
0 0
0 0
271 1 791
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
271 1791
0 0
364
1.00
364
0
0
364
1.00
1.00
364
0
142 42
1. 00 1. 00
142 42
0 0
0 0
142 42
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
142 42
0 0
113
1.00
113
0
0
113
1.00
1.00
113
0
334 35
1. 00 1. 00
334 35
0 0
0 0
334 35
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
334 35
0 0
159
1.00
159
0
0
159
1.00
1.00
159
0
Reduced Vol: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 221 1190 592 271 1791 364 142 42 113 334 35 159
------------1---------------I I---------------I I---------------I I---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------1---------------1 1---------------I 1---------------I 1---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.25 0.37 0.08 0.37 0.23 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.02 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 271 of 302
Queues
9: El Camino Real & Poinsettia Ln
..> -+ f +-
ane Graue EBL EBT WBL WBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 268 163 546 339
v/c Ratio ·1.41 0.47 0.77 0.42
Control Delay 248.5 21.2 42.4 20.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 248.5 21.2 42.4 20.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) ~106 17 152 55
Queue Length 95th (ft) #191 48 #222 94
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1388 764
Turn Bay Length (ft) 315 380
Base Capacity vph) 190 1181 714 1613
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Ca Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.41 0.14 0.76 0.21
~ Volume exceeds ca acity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, ueue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure
LSA Analyst, AY
.... t I"
NBL NBT NBR
185 1612 557
0.97 0.78 0.61
104.7 26.8 7.3
0.0 0.0 0.0
104.7 26.8 7.3
55 285 34
#127 363 131
1747
250 240
190 2066 916
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0.97 0.78 0.61
03 2035 with Poinsettia AM.syn
\. +
SBL SBT
175 1589
0.72 0.74
59.4 24.8
0.0 0.0
59.4 24.8
51 271
#102 345
298
250
243 2145
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.72 0.74
03/14/2019
..,'
SBR
195
0.25
4.7
0.0
4.7
7
49
767
0
0
0
0.25
Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 273 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX F
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORN!A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19)
LSA
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 276 of 302
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California)
700
600
400
TOTAL OF ALL 500
PEDESTRIANS
CROSSING
MAJOR STREET-
PEDESTRIANS 3oo
PER HOUR (PPH) 200
100
Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour
i'-... .....
"'" I'-.. ... ... , ...
---........... ..........
------133"
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Note; 133 pph applies as the tower threshold volume.
Figure 4C-8. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour (70% Factor)
500
400
TOTAL OF ALL
PEDESTRIANS 300
CROSSING
MAJOR STREET-
PEDESTRIANS 200
PER HOUR (PPH)
100
200
, ...
300
"--"'" I'-r-,..._
~'-..... ....__ -93•
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Note: 93 pph applies as the lower ll1reshold volume.
Page 839
Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 282 of 302
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHW A's MUTC:D 2009 Edition, including Revisions l & 2, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of 5)
WARRANT 6 · Coordinated Signal System
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
SATISFIED YES O NO 0
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL
~ 1000 ft N __ ft, s __ n, E __ rt. w __ n Yes □ No□
On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction. the adjacent
traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of
vehicular platooning. Yes □ No□ ----------------------------------QR, On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary
degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively
provide a progressive operation.
WARRANT 7 • Crash Experience Warrant
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
SATISFIED YES O NO 0
Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to Yes □ No □ reduce the crash frequency,
REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period
Yes □ No□ susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and involving injury
or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash. -------------------------------------------------5OR MORE
REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS ✓
Warrant 1, Condition A -
Minimum Vehicular Volume
ONE CONDITION QR, Warrant 1, Condition 8 -Yes □ No □
SATISFIED 80% Interruption of Continuous Traffic
OR. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition
Ped Vol~ 80% of Figure 4C-5 through Figure 4C-8
WARRANT 8 -Roadway Network
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
SATISFIED YES O NO 0
MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES -ALL APPROACHES ✓ FULFILLED REQUIREMENTS
During Typical Weekday Peak Hour Veh/Hr
and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more
1000 Veil/Hr of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday.
YesO NoO ------------------------i--
OR
During Each of Any 5 Hrs. of a Sat. or Sun ___ Veh/Hr
CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR MAJOR
ROUTE A ROUTE 8
Hwy. System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic --------------------.----Rural or --------
Suburban Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a City ---------------------------------
Appears as Major Route on an Official Plan
Any Major Route Characteristics Met. Both Streets YesO No □
Page 844
Tl1e satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 283 of 302
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-1 01 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5)
WARRANT 9 -Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
(Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied)
SATISFIED YES □ NO □
PART A
A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the Yes □ No□ center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield
line on the approach. Track Center Line to Limit Line ___ ft
PARTB
There is one minor street approach lane at the track crossing -During the highest
traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above
the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9.
Major Street -Total of both approaches: ___ VPH
Minor Street -Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection):
__ VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calculate AF) = __ VPH -----------------------------------Yes □ No□
QR, There are two or more minor street approach lanes at the track crossing -
During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing,
the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10.
Major Street -Total of both approaches : ___ VPH
Minor Street -Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection):
__ VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calcualte AF)= __ VPH
The minor street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three following adjustment factors (AF)
as described in Section 4C.10.
1-Number of Rail Traffic per Day _____________ Adjustment factor from table 4C-2 __
2-Percentage of High-Occupancy Buses on Minor SireetApproach __ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3 __
3-Percentage of Tractor-Trailer Trucks on Minor Street Approach ___ Adjustment factor from table 4C-4 __
NOTE: If no data is availale or known, then use AF= 1 (no adjustment)
Page 845
Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 284 of 302
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California)
700
600
TOTAL OF ALL 5oo
PEDESTRIANS
CROSSING
MAJOR STREET-
PEDESTRIANS
400
300
PER HOUR (PPH) 200
100
Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour
' '"' I'-.. ..
-..... I'-,. ...
----r----,.... ......... ----133•
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100011001200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
•Note: 133 pph applies as the lower threshold volume.
Figure 4C-8. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour (70% Factor)
500
400
TOTAL OF ALL
PEDESTRIANS 300
CROSSING
MAJOR STREET-
PEDESTRIANS 200
PER HOUR (PPH)
100
200
, ...
300
........... "-~i"-.
~ --I"-r----..... -93'
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 11 00 1200
MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
•Note; 93 pph applies as the lower threshold volume.
Page 839
Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 290 of 302
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions l & 2, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 4 of 5)
WARRANT 6 -Coordinated Signal System SATISFIED YES O NO 0
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied) ·
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL
.::; 1000 ft N __ ~ s __ n, E __ ~ w __ n Yes □ No □
On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent
traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of
vehicular platooning. Yes □ NoO ~----------------------------------QB., On a two-way street. adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary
degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively
provide a progressive operation.
WARRANT 7 -Crash Experience Warrant
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
SATISFIED YES O NO 0
Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to
reduce the crash frequency. Yes □ No □
REQUIREMENTS Number of crashes reported within a 12 month period
Yes □ NoO susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and involving injury
or damage exceeding the requirements for a reportable crash. -------------------------------------------------5ORMORE
REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS ✓
Warrant 1, Condition A -
Minimum Vehicular Volume
ONE CONDITION QR, Warrant 1, Condition B -Yes □ NoO
SATISFIED 80% Interruption of Continuous Traffic
OR, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition
Ped Vol:: 80% of Figure 4C-5 through Figure 4C-8
WARRANT 8 -Roadway Network
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
SATISFIED YES □ NO □
MINIMUM VOLUME ENTERING VOLUMES · ALL APPROACHES ✓ FULFILLED REQUIREMENTS
During Typical Weekday Peak Hour Veh/Hr
and has 5-year projected traffic volumes that meet one or more
1000 Veh/Hr of Warrants 1, 2. and 3 during an average weekday Yes □ No□ --------------------------OR
During Each of Any 5 Hrs. of a Sal. or Sun ___ Vel1/Hr
CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR MAJOR
ROUTE A ROUTEB
Hwy. System Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic ---------------------------------Rural or
Suburban Highway Outside Of, Entering, or Traversing a City -------------------------------
Appears as Major Roule on an Official Plan
Any Major Route Characteristics Met. Both Streets YesO No □
Page 844
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall nol in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.
Chapter 4C -Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 291 of 302
Califorrua MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FI-IW A's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 5 of 5)
WARRANT 9 -Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
(Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied)
SATISFIED YES O NO 0
PART A
A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or Yi ELD sign and the Yes □ No□ center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield
line on the approach. Track Center Line to Limit Line ___ ft
PARTB
There is one minor street approach lane at the track crossing -During the highest
traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point falls above
the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9.
Major Street -Total of both approaches: ___ VPH
Minor Street -Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection):
__ VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calculate AF) = __ VPH
----------------------------------Yes □ No□
QR, There are two or more minor street approach lanes at the track crossing -
During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing,
the plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10.
Major Street -Total of botll approaches: ___ VPH
Minor Street -Crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection):
__ VPH X AF (Use Tables 4C-2, 3, & 4 below to calcualte AF)= __ VPH
The minor street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three following adjustrnentfactors (AF)
as described in Section 4C.10.
1· Number of Rail Traffic per Day _____________ Adjustment factor from table 4C-2 __
2-Percentage of High-Occupancy Buses on Minor Street Approach __ Adjustment factor from table 4C-3 __
3-Percentage ofTractor-Trailer Trucks on Minor Street Approach ___ Adjustment factor from table 4C.4 __
NOTE: If no data is availale or known, then use AF= 1 (no adjustment)
Page 845
Chapter4C-Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 -Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 292 of 302
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION
NOVEMBER 2019
APPENDIX G
POINSETTIA LANE GAP CLOSURE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA LSA
POINSETTIA LANE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT RESULTS
\\vcorp12\projects\HCR1803\Doc\Draft Traffic lnvestigation3.docx (11/12/19)
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 293 of 302
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Arthur,
Patrick Somerville <psomerville@HNTB.com>
Thursday, March 14, 2019 9:42 PM
Arthur Black
RE: Carlsbad
I swung by on my way back up from SD. That vault is for SDG&E gas and it appears that it does not have a traffic rated lid
on it. It also may not be able to be adjusted to the new street grade without rebuilding the vault in its entirety (or
relocate elsewhere). One of two things will happen ... 1) they are in franchise and all costs are on SDG&E or 2) they have
an easement or prior rights and the City will pick up the tab of the work. It's really difficult to understand what that cost
might be ... range might be $100k to $500k (or more for full relocation).
There is a 16" Kinder Morgan petroleum line in the street. There is a cathodic protection testing station in the curb
return, this is a simple adjust to grade.
Traffic signal controller will be in the way and require relocation.
Retaining wall will reach 12' in height at the corner. This should be a typical/standard plan retaining wall. Assuming it'll
go this route instead of slope to minimize impact to mitigation area.
I took some pies while I was out there, sent you a Dropbox link to them.
Width-Total-
Length Depth Conversion Unit Cost Cost Item
200 8 1600 $ 6.00 $ 9,600 SW
200 $ 30.00 $ 6,000 CG
2100 1 0.074 $ 150.00 $ 23,310 AC
2100 2 27 $ 75.00 $ 11,667 AB
3700 3 27 $ 50.00 $ 20,556 RX
200 8 $ 100.00 $ 160,000 Wall
$ 100,000 TS Mod
$ 2,500 S&S
500 $ 10.00 $ 5,000 Planting & Irrigation
20% $ 66,226 Misc Items
$ 404,859 Subtotal Construction
30% $ 121,458 Soft Costs
2100 $ 50.00 $ 105,000 R/W
30% $ 189,395 Contingency
$ 820,711 Total Estimate
Pat
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient and receive this communication, please delete this
message and any attachments. Thank you.
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient and receive this communication, please delete this
message and any attachments. Thank you.
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 294 of 302
LSA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
October 2, 2018
The City of Carlsbad
Jaime Morales, LSA Senior Biologist
Poinsettia Lane Reach E Project -Biological Resources Assessment Results (LSA
Project No. HCR1803)
CARLSBAD
FRESNO
IRVINE
LOS ANGELES
PALM SPRINGS
POINT RICHMOND
RIVERSIDE
ROSEVILLE
SAN LUIS OBISPO
This memorandum describes the results of a biological resources assessment performed at the
project area at the northwestern corner of the intersection of Poinsettia Avenue and El Camino Real
in the City of Carlsbad, California (see attached Figure 1 for project location; all figures attached).
METHODOLOGY
On September 18, 2018, LSA Senior Biologist Jaime Morales walked the entire study area (a larger
area surrounding and including the impact footprint) and mapped vegetation communities
according to the Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP)
vegetation classifications. Mr. Morales used a field map containing a recent aerial photograph to
record vegetation communities on site. Mr. Morales documented all plant and wildlife species
observed and/or detected during the assessment.
RESULTS
With respect to the HMP, the study area is within the Coastal Zone, within the eastern edge of the
central section of Local Facilities Management Zone 21, and within an existing hardline preserve
(Preserve Number P/A#705). A portion of the study area (southern end) is within a standards area
that will be a future preserve. A very small portion (southeastern corner of the study area) closest to
the intersection of El Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane is outside of existing hardline preserve and
standards areas. Figure 2 displays the boundaries of the preserve and standards areas.
Soils within the study area are composed of Loamy alluvial land-Huerhuero complex, 9 to 50 percent
slopes, severely eroded. This complex occurs on old coastal ridges. The landscape is one of strongly
sloping to steep, severely eroded soils and alluvial fill along drainage ways. There are barren
exposures of soft marine sediments, sandstone, and shale.
The vegetation within the study area was dominated by southern maritime chaparral that appeared
to be recovering from a recent fire, as evidenced by the charred remains of several bushes. The
southern maritime chaparral comprises the following species: Del Mar manzanita (Arctostaphylos
glandulosa ssp. crassifolia; federally-listed as endangered, California Rare Plant Rank [CRPR] lB.1,
Narrow Endemic Species), summer holly (Comarostaphylis diversifolia ssp. diversifolia; CRPR lB.2),
703 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 260, Carlsbad, California 92011 760.931.5471 www.lsa.net
LSA is a business name of LSA Associates, Inc.
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 295 of 302
LSA
coastal goldenbush (lsocoma menziesii), common sun rose (Helianthemum scoparium), virgated
wreath plant (Stephanomeria virgata), bushmallow (Ma/acothamnus densiflorus), laurel sumac
(Malosma laurina), deerweed (Acmispon glaber), brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), California
buckwheat (Eriogonum fascicu/atum), black sage (Salvia mellifera), lemonadeberry (Rhus
integrifolia), chamise (Adenostoma fasciculata), coyote brush (Baccharis pi/u/aris), coastal prickly
pear (Opuntia littoralis), and Mojave yucca (Yucca schidigera). A row of mostly mature coastal
golden bush and brittle bush shrubs occurs west of and adjacent to the sidewalk on the west side of
El Camino Real (east of the eastern property fence). An area near the center of the study area lacks
vegetation and was mapped as bare ground. Figure 2 displays the boundaries of vegetation
communities within the study area.
The following wildlife species were observed during the biological resources assessment: western
tiger swallowtail (Papi/io rutulus), western fence lizard (Sce/oporus occidentali), American crow
(Corvus brachyrhynchos), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus),
and mourning dove (Zenaida macroura).
Del Mar manzanita and summer holly were the only special-status plant species observed during the
biological resources assessment. No special-status wildlife species were observed or detected during
the biological resources assessment. Based on a review of the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife's California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and the California Native Plant Society's
Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California, the following special-status plant and
wildlife species have a potential to occur within the study area due to the presence of suitable
habitat: Del Mar Mesa sand aster (Corethrogyne filaginifolia ssp. linifolia; CRPR lB.1, Narrow
Endemic Species), Orcutt's brodiaea (Brodiaea orcuttii; CRPR lB.1, Narrow Endemic Species),
Nuttall's scrub oak (Quercus dumosa; CRPR lB.1), wart-stemmed ceanothus (Ceanothus verrucosus;
CRPR 2B.2), coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila ca/ifornica californica; federally-listed as
threatened, CDFW Species of Special Concern), and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse
(Chaetodipus fa/lax ssp. fa/lax; CDFW Species of Special Concern).
Nuttall's scrub oak and wart-stemmed ceanothus are conspicuous, perennial shrubs that would have
been identified had they been on site. Orcutt's brodiaea and Del Mar Mesa sand aster are perennial
herbs that would be difficult to identify when not flowering. Orcutt's brodiaea flowers between the
months of May and July, while Del Mar Mesa sand aster flowers from March through September.
Neither of these species was identified within the study area during the survey. A focused survey for
Orcutt's brodiaea and Del Mar Mesa sand aster would need to be performed to determine
conclusively that these species are absent from the study area.
Although coastal California gnatcatcher was not detected during the biological resources
assessment, the southern maritime chaparral within the study area is suitable to support this
species. A focused survey for coastal California gnatcatcher would need to be performed to
determine conclusively that this species is absent from the study area.
Because burrows were generally absent from the study area and the most recent occurrence of
northwestern San Diego pocket mouse in the vicinity of the study area (per the CNDDB) was in 1992,
this species is not expected to be present within the study area.
10/2/18 (P:\HCR1803\Bio\Bio Assessment Memo.docx) 2
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 296 of 302
LSA
No aquatic resources subject to City of Carlsbad or resource agency jurisdiction were identified
within the study area during the biological resources assessment.
CONCLUSION
Portions of the study area are within existing hard line preserve and standards areas. Per the
Guidelines for Biological Studies (Technology Associates 2008), impacts to biological resources are
not allowed within hardline areas, unless (a) they are associated with a covered project, as defined
by the HMP, (b) an equivalency finding results in a minor amendment and adjustment to the
hardline boundaries, or (c) a major amendment to the HMP is approved.
If impacts within hardline areas are approved, the HMP will require a 3:1 mitigation to impact ratio
for impacts to southern maritime chaparral. An impact area that includes the workspace necessary
to perform the proposed road improvement and all necessary access and staging areas will be
required to quantify impacts to southern maritime chaparral and to determine the total mitigation
requirement. Furthermore, because the project site is within the Coastal Zone, the project must
comply with additional conservation standards in the HMP (Conservation Standards 7-1 to 7-14 on
page D-114 of the HMP).
Focused surveys for Orcutt's brodiaea, Del Mar Mesa sand aster, and coastal California gnatcatcher
should be performed to determine the presence/absence of these species.
Please contact me at (760) 934-5471 or at Jaime.Morales@LSA.net if you have any questions or
comments.
ATTACHMENTS
• Figure 1: Project Location Map
• Figure 2: Vegetation Map
10/2/18 (P:\HCR1803\Bio\Bio Assessment Memo.docx) 3
Dec. 10, 2019 Item #18 Page 297 of 302
December 9, 2019
Re: 12/10/2019 City Council Agenda Item #18 -Poinsettia Lane Traffic Analysis
Honorable Mayor Hall and Members of City Council:
/\II Receive -Agenda Item# \~
For the Information of the:
CITY COUNCIL
Datenlf1_CA__:f2._CC.:f!_
CM¥ COO'£_ DCM (3) f
At the 3/14/2017 council meeting, staff stated that, due to the importance of the Poinsettia Lane issue, the
street improvements would come back to the council only after recommendations are made by the traffic
commission. Instead, the decisions apparently were made sometime prior to 11/2018, and the final project was
approved as part of the council's consent agenda on 11/19/2019. The results were only presented to the
commission for informational purposes on 12/2/2019, so there is minimal record of our discussion.
Below are a few of my observations from the two traffic studies conducted by LSA Associates (Poinsettia 61 FEIR,
January 2017) and Poinsettia Lane Gap Closure Traffic Investigation (November 2019). My complete comments
and questions for staff are available upon request, or from the City Clerk's office:
• It is surprising that the predicted traffic on the segment of Poinsettia Lane will only increase from the
current maximum of 10,330 average daily vehicle trips (ADT) to 10,750 ADT in 2035, despite the new
residential development and the availability of the now contiguous east-west corridor to which traffic
from neighboring congested corridors like Palomar Airport Road might be expected to be diverted.
• If it is accurate that ADT will remain below 11,000 through 2035, I believe that alternative lane
configurations and intersection controls for Poinsettia Lane could have been investigated and discussed
(e.g., by our advisory commission) prior to final decisions being made.
• The segment of El Camino Real between Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane was exempted from having to
meet the vehicle level of service (LOS) standard by the 2015 General Plan update, but the new traffic
studies predict that the LOS grade will be no worse than D through at least 2035, suggesting that there is
no need for the exemption at this time.
• The 2017 LSA study indicated that pedestrian LOS is F, while bicycle LOS is D, on Poinsettia Lane. In
contrast, the 2019 LSA Study suggests that both pedestrian and bicycle LOS are A or B (questionable on a
50+ MPH four-lane street). An LSA representative stated at our commission meeting that the reason was
that the city changed the LOS worksheets between the completion of the two studies.
I believe all of the LOS methods need to be reviewed (to make sure they reflect real-world conditions) and
locked down (to maintain consistency over time). Perhaps we would have ended up with the current
configuration of Poinsettia Lane anyway, but it should be through a transparent process with realistic LOS
information.
Best regards,
Steve Linke, Carlsbad
1
Paz Gomez, Deputy City Manager, Public Works
John Kim, City Traffic Engineer
Dec. 10, 2019
Poinsettia Lane Traffic Analysis
Background
Approved minutes of the March 14, 2017 City Council meeting:
“ACTION: On a Minute Motion by Council Member C. Schumacher, seconded by Council Member M. Schumacher, Council directed staff to utilize the Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program to develop traffic-calming solutions to discourage pass-through traffic in the Viadanaand Pavoreal neighborhoods concurrent with completion of Poinsettia Lane; and complete a comprehensive traffic analysis in neighborhoods encompassed by the Viadana HOA, Pavoreal HOA, Poinsettia Heights HOA and Voscana HOA located along Poinsettia Lane, including Mimosa Lane, Oriole Court, Skimmer Court, Cassia Lane, and the El Camino Real southbound turn onto Poinsettia Lane. Motion carried 4/0/1 (Mayor Pro Tem Blackburn –Absent).”
2
Background
•Public meeting held on Nov. 7, 2018 to hear
public concerns
•Report finalized in November 2019
•Public meeting held on Nov. 21, 2019 to
present report findings
•Report presented to Traffic and Mobility
Commission on Dec. 2, 20193
Traffic Investigation Looked At…
I. Potential traffic impacts of Poinsettia
completion
II. Traffic control analysis at intersections
III. Response to public concerns raised at Nov.
7, 2018 meeting
4
Traffic Study
•Data compiled in October 2018
•Evaluated 11 intersections
•Data points include collisions (10 years), speeds, delay, traffic patterns, etc.
•Emphasis on potential cut-through traffic in neighborhoods
5
-Read compJerlOIJ Avtaro Pkwy
-Stvd1tdll'tft,jttll(m
I. Traffic Analysis
•Used both city’s previous traffic study guidelines and
current traffic study guidelines
•Potential effects on vehicle miles travelled consistent
with CEQA guidelines issued December 2018
•All show that the project can be completed without
significant impacts
6
Results of Traffic Analysis
•Traffic expected to transition to
Poinsettia Lane
•Traffic volumes should decrease on
Ambrosia Lane, Aviara Parkway and
Cassia Road
•Poinsettia Lane can be completed with
no significant impacts
7
II. Traffic Control Evaluation
•Traffic volumes at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road
are expected to meet Warrants 1, 2, and 3
•Warrant 6 for coordinated signal systems is
met at Poinsettia Lane/Oriole Court/Skimmer Court
•Traffic signals are recommended at both
intersections
8
III. Public Concerns
A.El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane
Southbound Right-Turn Lane
B.Existing conditions
C.Future cut-through traffic
9
A. Right Turn Lane at El Camino
Real/Poinsettia Lane
•Dedicated southbound right-turn lane was removed to provide an additional through lane in 2014
•No rear end collisions since 2014
•Analysis shows intersection will perform at a satisfactory level of service without the dedicated right-turn lane
•Widening of roadway for a dedicated lane would require a retaining wall and relocation of a utility vault
•Widening of roadway would encroach on a hardline preserve within the Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad
10
B. Existing Conditions –Vehicle Speed
Roadway Segment Posted Speed Limit 85th Percentile Speed Observations Exceeding 85th Percentile by mph
10 mph 15 mph 20 mph 25 mph
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road)
Day 1 50 33 4 0 0 0
Day 2 33 4 0 0 0
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real)
Day 1 35 29 30 16 5 0
Day 2 29 29 12 3 0
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway)
Day 1 40 33 5 0 0 0
Day 2 34 0 0 0 0
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway)
Day 1 25 25 0 0 0 0
Day 2 25 0 0 0 0
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to El Camino Real)
Day 1 35 29 0 0 0 0
Day 2 30 0 0 0 0
mph = miles per hour11
C. Potential For Future Cut-Through Traffic
Two identified routes for potential
cut-through:
•Oriole Court/Mimosa
Drive/Moorhen Place/Dove Lane
•Cassia Road
12
Establishment of Baseline Conditions
•The report establishes baseline conditions against which
future (with gap closure) conditions can be measured
•If future conditions warrant action, the report provides
recommendations for City consideration
Before Gap Closure (2018) Traffic Condition Summary
Roadway Segment Roadway Volume Typical Speed >5 mph over Speed Limit?Collisions over Past 10 Years
Poinsettia Lane (Ambrosia Lane to Cassia Road)9,789 33 N 3
Cassia Road (Poinsettia Lane to El Camino Real)9,290 30 Y 6
Ambrosia Lane (Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway)3,321 34 N 12
Mimosa Drive (Oriole Court to Aviara Parkway)679 25 N 1
Dove Lane (Moorhen Place to Black Skimmer Road)368 30 N 0
mph = miles per hour13
Recommendations
•Focused police enforcement on Cassia Road between 4-7 p.m.
•Signal timing at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road to prioritize through traffic on Poinsettia Lane
•Signal timing modification at El Camino Real/Dove Lane to reduce delay for vehicles leaving Plaza Paseo Real shopping area
•Utilize Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program (CRTMP) to address vehicle speeding/cut through
14
Next Steps
•Construction of Poinsettia Lane is expected to be complete in mid 2020
•Budget approved for signals at Poinsettia Lane/Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane/Oriole Court/Skimmer Court
•Meeting for Oriole/Mimosa/Moorhen/Dove
neighborhood scheduled for January 2020 for CRTMP
process
•Post-construction monitoring after traffic patterns established
15
Thank you!
16