Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-04-20; Parks & Recreation Commission; 492-5; Alta Mira ParkPARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - AGENDA BILL AB# MTG. DEPT. TITLE: ALTA MIRA PARK (ACTION) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept staff project report, review park alternatives and adopt "PLAN A." Direct staff to forward the recommendation to the City Council and to proceed with development of Alta Mira Park. BACKGROUND: On December 3, 1 991 , the City Council awarded a contract with the Dike Partnership, landscape architects, and their design team, to begin the park planning process for Alta Mira Park. Staff and the consultants have been meeting bi-weekly, and park design progress to date has been substantial. Several alternative plans have been developed showing similar programs but slightly different layouts. The general park program is as outlined in Exhibit 2. On March 1 1th, the City sponsored an "open house" from 3 p.m. to 8 p.m. to present work to date on the park design. Approximately 200 members of the community attended and provided valuable input into the design process. Three (3) alternative park layouts were presented at the open house, "Plan A, B, and C." The majority of those present indicated a preference for "Plan A." (Refer to attached memo, Exhibit ITEM EXPLANATION: Subsequent to the "open house," the consultants have further refined the alternative park plans based on public comments and staff input. They concentrated their efforts on Plan A due to the preference of the general design features of this plan by staff and the public. The culmination of this effort has produced two variations of "Plan A" (A, and A2). (Refer to Exhibit 3.) The two variations are similar with "Plan A2" having an additional ballfield and less passive areas than "A,." Staff will make a complete report on the progress to date and will review the alternative plans and recommendation at the meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: The 42-acre Alta Mira Park has been identified in the Capita! Improvement Program (CIP) to be developed in three (3) phases, as follows: PHASE I (92-93) - _ 5.6 million Grade the total site...and construct all improvements except the tennis center and community center/gymnasium. (Phase I may include a portion of the tennis courts.) PHASE II (95-96) - _ 3 million Construct the tennis center (remainder of the tennis courts , the "center court," and the tennis clubhouse). ~ PAGE 2, AB #_ PHASE III (96-2001) - 3 million Construct the community center/gymnasium. TOTAL PROJECT COST: 11.6 million NOTE: The Commission is being asked to take action on the Alta Mira "Master Plan" which includes conceptual design for all three phases. EXHIBITS: 1. "Open House" Memo 2. Park Program 3. Park Plans (A, and A2) 14 March 30, 1992 TO: PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR FROM: Park Development Coordinator ALTA MIRA PARK OPEN HOUSE On Wednesday, March 11, 1992, the City sponsored a public information meeting or "open house" related to the upcoming Alta Mira Park project. The purpose of this meeting was to introduce the public to the park design process, related issues, and to gather public input for park design purposes. The meeting was staffed by members of the Parks and Recreation Department, Municipal Projects, and the park planning consultant design team. The meeting was held at the Public Safety & Service Center, from 3 p.m. until 8 p.m. The extended period of time was provided to accommodate a wide spectrum of the public. The large room was decorated with many exhibits showing the park planning process underway for Alta Mira. Approximately 15 colored exhibits were displayed which helped the public understand progress to date on the park design. Staff and consultants were positioned around the room to assist people by explaining the meaning of each of the exhibits. All the preliminary studies presented at the open house culminated in three (3) alternative park layouts labeled, "A," "B," and "C." City staff handed put a questionnaire form at the door to each of the approximate 200 citizens that attended the open house. A total of 117 forms were turned in, and the information contained in these forms was analyzed by staff. The attached chart synthesizes all the comments into several major concerns. Additionally, the citizens were asked to vote on which conceptual plan they preferred. "A," "B," "C," or "No preference." The open house was highly successful in exposing the work done on the park to date to the public and getting their input for park design purposes. This information will be used by staff and the consultants in both selecting which alternative park layout to recommend and in refining the design. Staff will be presenting this information to the Parks and Recreation Commission on April 20th. MARK STEYAERT Attachment c: Municipal Projects Manager Associate Civil Engineer, Pat Entezari 15 Alta Mira Park file " •' dm EXHIBIT 1 IU SQ>:< »- < H < Q ta . >otra.a d ccUl 0 Ulo :; 2: o rcZ Ul fccca. p ca" • 0icc 1 •ALTERNATE'S•icc§•- tf)zccUlozou o - CO $ to ~ 0 o Z "cU Ot|3 *-J j— :», nj Too congested; too man1The use is too intensive,like anything about this pipassive area.>..C O CDif Ii O ^ (D OL_ *— *^ 4-. O 0)jjgEfc at ^ S a> in 5 :|£ ?) **• > *Sd&oig-2 c •S 8 * 1 -m <J CO i-Q) 0) Q)a « -is g •§I as S §•2 U) Q. CD S Biminate indoor soccer field. Greatview of green & open space fromPaseo del Norte. Like theseparation of active and passivearea. Increase picnic area.o'5u'a. rtW 0)OCDQ.ui 010. O 0 - 0 j fC CD i3 Promotes too muchConveniently located.01 01 "C2 o No vehicle access sfallowed from Paseo del Nthe baseball field.A traffic signal should be installed atCamino de las Ondas & HiddenValley Road. Emergency access isnot provided.T3CDQ..i '"*00 UlUl01u CD Q) T3 Q) «- 04 04 O ai EC 0o •*= >,•^ ffl ^ ul i?" 0) CO °- Q. M ° 1 oui >- z CO — o •^ «> S oa£ aiBz "53T) Oa>UlCDa.o UlUla> CJuCD ,ti O Like the access, need handicapaccess. Provide ramps forhandicapped. Definitely need trails.•• Ul CD.•oUCD CD5Ul 0) 0) Q_ 04 - CM C\l 01 -5 = •S 5 r~ ^~h 01 c-Q CD Will have adverse impaacondos. Reduce numathletic fields. This piproduce less noise.o Ul-o 01tcu Reduce number of athletireduce noise.Reduce number of athletic fields toreduce noise.« - ^. 00 O).c 1/5•— m Good planning to save inatural habitats.£ in.Q Remove view blocking shPaseo del Norte.<D 55 0)Ul 0 CD Q. D) O &S3Is CD CD 't; olu> ^^zCDti 01 c OQJ v^ Ul ' "> 0 CZLU ^. • O4 ir> >T301r-Sufficient parking is planr. *-y*. c"C Q) 8 — CD(0Is OJ 0)o 8 ~ o Ul <" o Q 2 • CD S>cnc-r, C. 01 0 'S. D O Q- Q.Well planned. Parking accessible toall activities. Parking on Paseo delNorte not addressed.enc CDQ_ ,_ in §^jcri 03 01a 2 o 10 SEm Q. ui 01 Eo 0} '•5"ID o 01Ul0o o B| t3 t CD OQ. ~ Ul "j r= •— * Q) D) £_CJiJ • n - 0> o (D T~ n(O y ^ < H™oH ,MflR 25 '92 09=17 fi O 9 <Da 0> O.a. X ro Q M <D"= cr§i I o ^ t't3- £o m S,m m m m S. X So X X N> 5R 3 02 ^•£> - **Q *n •~* O O ^ >-•^ o o. ci o aC c co 5. £. <D ^3=^ ^^8« « o^S I § <D Q o c1 €ffs to <D 3 TJ 5" Sg 1s" sg•no *- ^ -o *o a $ "0a o <5 ° o I IS« S" °s Pi 8 x-> ^ W"^g flo. oi <D <F * 5 _ O •3 5 §• 8go i CO Si 0 =( 33 > <TSift Q r. 17 I ! i EXHIBIT 2 MflR 25 '92 09:19 THEDDIKEDPflRTNERSHlP •oo 2.O 0 O /-> o OB a ro o5 CDa oQ CO 8 2 i — • 8& NJ» X«s "-J X "vla« q X$ 10en r-sK)- CJW- O*10 CS'^lQ -— ^^x> ^F^-0 ^1?.^ ^5* J9.Q ^^^Ig Ee-g Q^30 a 0? * - QQ 8 TJ 5 «QO<D ! TJ CD Q1 Q O Oi rt "O <D !** " Q.-£.o- 0! * "§(D CD 5, « s* ^> a i O 3Q « 8^3 5188 1 5o P.3 l , i i. i N5 10 i: IQ I M .1.1 I i-i .- i 18 MftR 25 '92 09=16 THEQDIKE°PPRTNERSHIP e t 10 co g | 2 3" it 35 a2!o -o-8*3- P®S | S 8 '« 0)M 8o 9 PVioO 531 89 £ - S P. 4 Sr 5 I 19 d ii -shi i • ii ir .MflR 25 '92 09:19 THEdDIKEDPftRTNERSHIP " <A O I ai *0 ga$ 7? Q85 ff o 9 S o"o S. <jT c yon 8 IS, fS S ! § f=? ! trt "3 ™o z $ ffi. < o 8 P.5 il Sm I 3> • 19 B R 25 '92 09'19 THEODIKEOPPRTNERSHIP P.6 111 g 1 1 ?vsx 5? X£ 2303 o 15^'Pc C*f»°5 jtf -• £ p?3 8 5 s¥i•o'TJ Prelimil! o 8 1 2U EXHIBIT 3 O'J