The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-06-15; Parks & Recreation Commission; 692-6; 1992-93 to Buildout Capital ImprovementPARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - AGENDA BILL AB* MTG. DEPT. TITLE: 1992 - 1993 TO BUILDOUT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (INFO) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept and file. : ( f " ITEM EXPLANATION: \ Attached is the proposed Capital Improvement Program (C.I. P.) as prepared by the Finance Department and submitted for City Council review. The initial presentation to the Council was made on June 9, 1992. The C.I. P. is scheduled for public hearing and adoption by the Council on June 1 6, 1 992 Staff will give an update relative to funding availability and scheduling of current and future park development projects. EXHIBITS: 1 . Council Agenda Bill # 1 1 ,733 - June 9, 1 992. .\ t, ' WP51 \AGENDA.BLS\692-6.CIP .**- AB* //,733 MTG. 6/9/92 DEPT. pIN TITLE: 1992-93 TO BUILDOUT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEPT. HD. H^T CITY MGRT^^ oo RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff report, no action required. ITEM EXPLANATION: The 1992-93 to buildout Capital Improvement Program (CIP) totals $428.2 million and funds 174 future projects. Capital Improvement Projects scheduled for 1992-93 total $31 million which will fund 25 projects. This represents a decrease of $19.1 million or 38% from the adopted 1991-92 CIP. Revenues for the 1992-93 projects total an estimated $33.9 million and come from a variety of funding sources which include development fees, Community Facilities District bonds, and Transnet sales taxes for road improvements. The largest single source of 1992-93 revenue is from the Community Facilities District (CFD) at $13.6 million, or 42% of the total. The second largest revenue is a $5 million water reclamation State loan anticipated to be received, while the third major resource is through Transnet at $4.5 million, or 14% of total revenues. Development fees bring in a total of $1.1 million or 3% of the total projected revenues. Projects funded through development fees include community parks, traffic signals, and roadway improvements. While development related fees appear to represent a small part of the total revenues, the completion of many scheduled projects are dependent upon these fees, and their importance should not be underestimated. Historically, projects have been scheduled to meet or exceed growth management standards. The slow economy has resulted in less growth than anticipated, which has affected the scheduling of projects. The 1992-93 to buildout CIP includes the deferral of most park and roadway projects until funds become available. These actions maintain a balanced fiscal position while continuing to meet the standards of a growing citizenry. Revenues for 1992-93 to buildout CIP have been projected using the Growth Management Plan phasing schedule which now reflects a reduced level of development over the next 5 years. Major projects scheduled for appropriation in 1992-93 include the South Carlsbad Library and the Interchange at 1-5 and Palomar Airport Road. Additional funds will be appropriated to the Alta Mira Park project, allowing it to proceed into the construction phase. The CIP presented to Council is intended to be a working document which can be modified or adjusted as Council sees fit. The final CIP will be brought back to City Council in one week for a public hearing and adoption. 62 EXHIBIT 1 Page Two of Agenda Bill No. '{, FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of the CIP is very broad and pervasive as all projects are scheduled concurrent with available revenues or debt financing. The funding for the majority of projects depends on development revenue and if growth does not occur as projected, the City may defer projects. EXHIBITS: 1. Capital Improvement Program Summary 1992-93 Capital Improvement Program Introduction The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 1992-93 totals $31 million, which is $19.1 million or 38% below the 1991-92 adopted budget of $50.1 million. Projected revenues for the 1992-93 program total $33.9 million and are down by $7.5 million or 18% from the 1991-92 budget. Weak economic conditions nationally and locally, in conjunction with low construction levels, have resulted in reduced development related revenues. Revenues collected as the result of new residential and commercial/industrial development are down by $3.3 million or 64% from the 1991-92 projections. This has resulted in modifications to the scheduling of projects. This report and the accompanying CIP documents reflect the actions taken to address the issue of funding availability weighed against the demand for facilities, and growth. As the City continues to monitor growth in conjunction with revenues, it has become apparent that there is a correlation between the amount of funds that can be spent on projects, and the amount of growth. If development subsides, so too do revenues, which in turn impacts expenditure schedules. Most expenditure schedules were established using the Growth Management standards as guidelines. Interwoven into this formula are fiscal constraints which have become important to the scheduling of projects. This year, lack of available funds has resulted in deferring most major projects reliant upon development related revenues. Previously, the City chose to build facilities to meet maximum population expectations. The philosophy has shifted to one where phasing of projects will more closely match the incremental growth demands. Further, in cases where facility availability fails to meet growth management standards, developers may be required to finance design and construction costs. The Growth Management system used by the City needs to be viewed with flexibility, as well as in concurrence with other external issues, including the general economy. The fiscal resources, and the assumptions used in projecting those resources, as well as specific expenditures will be addressed separately. Revenue Revenues for Capital Projects may be broken down into three major categories as follows: 1) fees generated by development in Carlsbad, 2) the Community Facilities District and 3) other sources including grants, bond issues, and letters of credit. The pie chart on the following page provides an overview of the estimated revenues which are projected to support the OP projects. Approximately 53% of all CIP revenues are received as a result of development, and are dependent upon assumptions made about the City's growth in dwelling units and commercial/industrial square feet each year. These revenues include the Public Facilities Fee (PFF), Traffic Impact Fee (TIP), Park-In-Lieu (PIL), Major Facility Fee and Sewer Construction revenues. Community Facilities District revenues occupy 21% of the total with resources coming in as a result of project scheduling. The remaining 26% of revenues are related to the receipt of grants, the county sales tax program (Transnet), the issuance of bonds, and the Water District's Replacement Fund. 63 FUNDING SOURCES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1992-93 TO BUILDOUT SEWER l 8 13% TRAFFIC IMPACT $241 5% MAJOR FACILITY FEE $79 16% REPLACEMENT $50 10%TRANS NET $258 5* PUBLIC FACILITY FEE $724 15% PARK-IN-LIEU 118 8 4% CMNTY FAC1U CHSTR $101 1 21% Total RcwnuM - $4ts Million Several assumptions about the rate and type of growth were made in order to project the revenues which rely upon development. Growth assumptions were compiled using the projections used in the Growth Management Program, which continue to change along with the economic climate. For example, this year residential and non-residential growth rates have been reduced from earlier projections to reflect the volumes of growth anticipated in a weak economy. The table below compares the number of residential units used for projecting for the 1992-93 CIP revenues with the number of units used in the 1991-92 CIP. As can be seen, the number of residential units projected for 1992-93 has been decreased by 411, while in 1993-94 a decrease of 1,138 is shown. The changes shown reflect development information compiled by the Planning and Engineering Departments, while the Finance Department overlaid the economic forecast. The total number of residential units projected at buildout is 53,082, while the total remaining to be built from this point forward is 25,091. 1992-93 OP Growth AMumpUo V m-ts 99-94 M-98 90-96 M-97 YMT* I - 10 • YMI* - J008+ ' 91-HT«M No. Unto torto- ise 1.306 1.3S6 1.3SO 1,246 1.246 1.066 9B-HT«M No. Unto PMM 119 170 MS 490 490 1,114 1,338 DM. 91 -92 to 92-93 (411) (1.136) (1.011) I860) (7S6) 269 244 91-92T«M TOWS4.F1 1.000.000 1.000.000 1.000,000 1.000,000 1.000.000 1,000,000 1*OOOiOOO 9C-6»T«W ToMSq-Ft ComnVInd 119.000 170.000 390.000 430.000 430.000 , 700,000* . 1,000,000 DM. 91 -62 M62-M (669.000) (630.000) (710,000) (570.000) (570.000) (300,0001 0 Rgura* •boom nMUel MragM tor twM lm« periods. The line chart below further demonstrates the growth and development patterns which have occurred and are projected to occur in Carlsbad. As can be seen, the development rates fell dramatically in 1987-88 and have continued to decline since that point. It is anticipated that permits will be issued on 55 residential units during 1991-92. Current Growth Management projections show a slight recovery to 115 units in 1992-93. Non- residential growth patterns and projections were also reviewed, and modified downward. CITY OF CARLSBAD RATE OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS ISSUED UNITS 3000 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 FISCAL YEAR — DWELLING UNITS Using the Growth Management forecast identified above, revenue projections show similar declines. This has resulted in changes in project scheduling that have occurred as development remains low. Growth Assumptions The mix of attached and detached residential units is assumed to be 55% and 45% respectively. This is the same ratio as has been applied in the past and continues to be the anticipated mix of residential development. The building permit valuation used for computing public facilities fees was $89,500 per attached dwelling unit, and $153,000 per detached dwelling unit. The mix of commercial and industrial is assumed to be 40% and 60% respectively. The commercial category also includes office development. In order to calculate estimated revenues for the Traffic Impact Fee (TIP), the number of average daily trips had to be computed for each type of use. An attached dwelling unit was assigned eight trips per day, and a detached unit ten trips per day, based on data used in developing the TIP. Each residential trip was valued at $77.00. The trips-per-day value for commercial/industrial was averaged at 17 trips per 1,000 square feet of development. The volume of trips generated by commercial/industrial development can vary widely depending on the ultimate land use. The value of each commercial/industrial trip was established at $63.00. Sewer fees were calculated by assessing each residential unit (EDU) $1,675. Commercial was assessed $1,675 for each 1,800 square feet of development and industrial was assessed $1,675 for each 3,400 square feet based on the City's procedure for calculating EDU's for non-residential uses. Park in Lieu revenue projections have increased by 45% throughout the life of the CIP. This is the result of applying the new fees which were implemented in May, 1991. This is the second year that the Community Facilities District (CFD) funding mechanism has been incorporated into the CIP. The implementation of the CFD in 1991 has reduced the total amount of PFF, and TIP revenues projected, as projects which were previously funded from these sources will now be funded through the CFD. Revenues for the PFF and TIP have been reduced accordingly. »•• Expenditures The 1992-93 to buildout CIP outlines a total of 174 future projects at a total cost of $428.2 million. The pie chart below indicates that the largest segment of expenditures are within the Water category at $93 million or 22% and include new and replacement pipelines and reservoir maintenance. Water Projects are followed in dollar value by Park projects at $89.4 million and include acreage within all quadrants of Carlsbad as well as Veteran's Memorial Park. Other major park projects include Alta Mira Park, the Golf Course, Larwin Park, Alga Norte Park, and a community park in Zone 19. Major street projects in the CIP total $73 million and include the widening of the railroad overpasses at Poinsettia Boulevard, and Palomar Airport Road, La Costa Boulevard widening, and the extension of Faraday Boulevard. The smallest expenditure category for projects is Traffic Signals, at $3.5 million or 1%. Specific timing and cost estimates for projects are identified in the table immediately following the narrative. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT ALLOCATION 1992-93 TO BUILDOUT PARKS TRAFFIC SIGNALS $89421% LOAN REPAYMENTS $351% ^ -^ $9^2% SEWER ' ^ ^~sss~ $557 13% $71 7 17% | "V. jfSSSSSSSSSSS\ 1-5 INTERCHANGES $322 8% WATER '—' STREET PROJECTS $93 22% $73 17% Tvtel CIP to MMM • MMJ Specific phasing of projects is reliant upon fund availability as well as efforts taken to meet established growth management standards for facilities. Wherever recommended project scheduling changes occurred, they were based upon a thorough review of the Growth Management Plan, in unison with revenue projections. In order to balance the first five years of the CIP in conjunction with the decline in projected revenues, selected park and street projects have been phased and deferred. The altered projects were funded by either TIP or the PFF, and both are now balanced as a result'-of the timing changes. These projects and related issues are identified on the following page. Southeast Quadrant Parks Alga Norte Park - Construction for this park is now scheduled in two phases, using a letter of credit for the first construction phase, which has allowed construction in 1995-96 versus 1996-2001. Phase I was moved forward as it is anticipated that the developer will begin construction within the 1995-96 time period. The City's share of the funding for Phase II has been deferred until 2002+ whereas the 1991-92 CIP had both phases scheduled for the same time. The deferral was necessary to balance the PFF. Carrillo Ranch Park - This park has also been deferred and placed in the 2002+ time frame. The 1991-92 CIP had this park scheduled for 1994-95, however sufficient funds are not projected to be available until 2002+. Southwest Quadrant Parks Alta Mira Park - The construction of Alta Mira park has now been phased in three segments. The prior year CIP showed the construction of about two thirds of the 42 acres in 1992-93. Due to fund availability, construction funds for the first phase will be reduced by $2.5 million for a total 1992-93 appropriation of $2.9 million, including carry forwards from 1991-92. The remainder of the funds are shown in the 2002+ time frame, which include the remaining park construction as well as a community center. Zone 19 Park - The first phase of this park will be funded with $1,687,000 in the form of a letter of credit from the developer, and will be used to construct 15 acres of the Zone 19 Park. Phase I has been deferred from 1992-93 until 2002+ as the decline in growth in this area has alleviated the immediate need for construction. Northeast Quadrant Parks Larwin Park - The 1991-92 CIP contained an appropriation of $2.5 million for Larwin Park. Due to lack of immediate funds, staff is recommending that this amount be disappropriated and rescheduled in 1996-97 at $1.5 million. Streets Several street projects using a variety of funding sources have been deferred until funds become available or anticipated growth requires their construction. Examples of these projects include Carlsbad Boulevard/Cannon to Monzano, La Costa Ave Widening, and Poinsettia Lane Widening/I-5 to Batiquitos. ,•;* 1992-93 Projects The 1992-93 CIP identifies 25 projects which have been budgeted at a total cost of $31 million. The following chart shows that Civic projects occupy just over one third of the total 1992-93 expenditures at $11.5 million. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1992-93 PROJECTS BY MAJOR CATEGORY PARKS $1 6 5% SEWER $1 7 5% WATER S3 10% STREET PROJECTS $28 9% CIVIC $11 5 37% OTHER $06 2% 1-5 INTERCHANGES $98 32% « M1 Thirty two percent or $9.8 million of the budget is allocated to 1-5 Interchange projects. Sewer projects account for the least amount of expenditures at $1.7 million or 5% of the total. Following is a detailed explanation of the significant 1992-93 CIP projects by category. Civic Projects The significant project scheduled for 1992-93 appropriation is the expenditure of CFD funds toward the South Carlsbad Library at $11.1 million. Design funds of $100,000 for the Cole Library Remodel are also budgeted in 1992-93. Park Projects Alta Mira Park contains an appropriation of $1.6 million in 1992-93 and is the only park project which wffl be immediately pursued. Sewer Projects The CIP reflects Carlsbad's share of funding the Encina Budget. Included is $844,000 in funds to repay the debt for the Phase IV Expansion, and $539,000 for the Outfall Reballast. In addition, $300,000 is scheduled in the 1992-93 budget to complete the Home Plant Lift Station project. Water Projects This is the first year the CIP reflects the Water Certificate of Participation payments at $1.5 million for 1992-93. The Water District will begin design on the Maerkle Dam Lining and Covering at $587,000 in 1992-93. Construction is scheduled to begin in 1993-94 for which a bond issue will need to be considered. Sufficient funds are not available to complete this project on a pay as you go basis. Traffic Signals There is one traffic signal requiring appropriation in 1992-93 and it is located at Rancho Santa Fe and Questhaven at $125,000. Street Projects A total of $2.8 million in new appropriations are scheduled for street projects. The largest expense is for the undergrounding of utilities in Districts 12 and 14 at $1.5 million and is funded by San Diego Gas and Electric. Transnet Local funds totaling $750,000 will be used to construct Hidden Valley Road which is needed to access Alta Mira Park. These funds will be reimbursed by developers within this area as units are built. 1-5 Interchanges The I-5/Palomar Airport Road Overpass is budgeted for a total $7.5 million during 1992- 93. The majority of funds will come from the CFD at $6.9 million. Design work on I-5/La Costa will continue with an additional $1 million appropriation in 1992-93 from the CFD. Construction is scheduled for 1994-95. Summary While many projects need to be deferred due to lack of available funds, there are several major projects which will be accomplished during the next two years. Carlsbad's circulation plan has been of concern to the City Council as evidenced by prior year appropriations within this area. Palomar Airport Road east of El Camino Real will begin construction with the installation of a larger pipeline and subsequently widened. Also, the segment of El Camino Real from Faraday to Palomar Airport Road will be widened in conjunction with die previously mentioned widening project. Last, the overpass at Palomar Airport Road and 1-5 will begin construction in 1992-93. Review of the CIP finds that all projects identified in the 1991-92 CIP continue to be included in 1992-93. There have been some significant project scheduling changes as the effects of the slow economy are felt on Carlsbad's revenue .stream. Lack of funds has caused the City to rethink how it can accomplish its capital projects. Generally the 8 philosophy has been to build quality capital facilities which meet, and at times exceed, growth management standards whenever economically beneficial. This philosophy worked when growth and related revenues were substantial. Concepts such as phasing projects over a period of years, and timing them when funds are available have now been implemented. As the new philosophy emerges, the City still expects to provide quality capital facilities which meet the needs of Carlsbad's citizens. The 1992-93 CIP reflects these concepts. 67 u i! *ii s : ! I II ii| s s j_ 1? s? " i I§1 i«- :i! Ii S sc :c :<v * ^li 88it § § 8 IIc a §s § B § S § S § B "523 IIS51J.s s" R « a 5 I38S B « | g t a c - s g £; % ^«S« " e a » a" a § » | § s s >g c R s s s 3 1 1 g = § g a a e « s a s i i S s ii & 152 S---P-5 58j|? i 3 «t -J W 10 • » |i ' a **.g * *5 s ;? «{ 2 5su ™ 5u* ^i si s * jjj s| S w K o v fi (N| •• to. ;1! ij "H |r' iS 8 Si * * - 1s i u W lit.J k»•• . 1— cla §§ SB K» § 5s s 5S i * i § §§§§1 s * S § S10 |gg§g I ^ e 52 i *xs i S i 2 i i * 1 1 a 3 1 S ss 2 s i r 3 s s 5 i • §1 a § 3 (M 1 S , * § * § -" §s •• E S 1*•^ | f * 5 u u1 j j s j! I : § g l.SJ ; §§§ IIS *" (J • O* as5 ^a £l 8 1 1 5 I CHANNEL ,KMI*LAGE M SIOMI DMDESILTATION iASIM^ ill in §s 2 5 § § *" M I SUITOTAL DM1I111 | i i j :s : • 3 \ «\>*intr S 88 «. C ^" • : * § 1 \§ S A | O jIgj §§oV § s S 5 1 5 S 5~ s S § § § S s S § S § 5-,-„- * g § £ a x I 8*° = i i <* i 1 [si|i| •^ 8 8 at 3 Sfic D* "*s S u 68 -5- «S N § § § 58i§g i s 583 2 828 i! :• sIf: 5 ** - a »05 a. a -ioa o i! '?; I S i^£ i5 1.5 I \l • i i 8 (r § g ii! E i li X | i .• 5 V Km 3 a*C 5ft s N g «" I M IM. SS*^MM ite a tu ii-1 iil8Sil w Q •• w g > £ 2»'§ 8 ig | 55125^2 $5 !i!f! B e M i"Hi ? 8 8 C CR R 12 <J 5 :*Is 1'-* S •"•»3 * r iss 11 Isi If §2s « i! § §§5§.825 5 S88 T A V ~ s 3 s § § § I 3 s 3 § & 2 § §<+ § £££?£;£::&&&? 5^;«c Ij si s c <* Uf Ul ^O ii i I 2 » 3 $ § I I 2Sa s" « s"»" i §s s a a 2V S 3 •o 82 SI a ~ - - M »*. 8 = 13 I ili Isi* * §M Si 1 r 8 Iw - g S *! Ii §§ 5S" I 8 5 § §i I~i~§ S - S 2 Sa a §§§§§§§§§!§2 S 2 a 8 r 525*31-<•--• 5 g iis & t >|i^s•<<»«• ii^ttf^*usa.i; §1 a aS S K H. s sss ss 15 8 I £ §s«sa"i"5i § § 8 g 5 3! i * *M •- «M 222 1 2 £ s ^ S IM ^ ?SS8 * U*s 14 ; §88888 82 s R s is 8ll^s §3 I a8~ w § S f* •» « 1 I "" 5| -?3 -> «< S 1 i> s | 5 g • II If £a § 1 §§§ J18 §gIA 88 ;2§saa"§c 1 1 52 S3" S i £ ££ S £ 8 a.is 8 ^ i I 11222 S S S S » 2 I Siiilaii i!! !!!i^i HSssiii5--5 _m M5MZ9°£^^^^^ s^a-z-'Sis = 3iz^ = i 8333383 W IW W Ui Ul IM HI fc fc iiii;||||||lll s s R R S B ItR R R § 15 §1 i il 9 eB| ii :? §§M 3 m • . . S *8 : §S S§ S5 §s 511 § S I i § $ la^ -- i 2 ^ w tu 5G§§ 8 2 8S i II II 2"S ?S5g 535fc g s M.1J.s'ss'g i § *£§§?§§ §§ § §§§§§§§g 5 58*58«88S HIWHIWHIHIHIHItyUIHlUiiiiiiiiiii' « « Ml HI : •™ *^* • 8 8 • • S *• • o 8 < •• m a i 5 = w « = •So w i 11 S w s i =2» 5tia2|5S|,|Ss= SrZiszZiiiiSia- *2 T???iiifi8£lli-l| |iiiiiiiisii| O*> ^U||t|lUltlHIWHIUIIWU<U'iEtaJ^^>-^.^h.^^*-*»^"- »*** 3 111-> -J X S 2 8 i I c c r £ «d u d d u ujg g g g » i-j vV • 16 S is; i * s I as" 88 !£§£ = I 5 * *i 2 s i :« " :s* S : • • • * *: s 3 s s: e. •".* s.l 8 U $. - Iff I «9; = r II3 i i II.2 S « 1111 2 2" S 2" 11.1.1 11 2" 8 fi S S S 11 1 S 1 1 Cm fc ** IS §i§i§§i§§§lllilil§i§§§ i i s i- is "5 s Ss M *S»fl It 17 § 2 § § '« S .28 s fii! ft I| S '5 § R«1 a s 9 *? S ? Hi ii § ! i I I;• S 32 s : *• K K B 3 §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ S 8 8" S S S S « « S 8 « « S S g" S ; 5 ££&££&£&£££ 11g : il • • il• •5 i §1 S :: §1 1 i!i «£ : 2 s sisisssSsssssis fc B Ba a a SS 5 2 as s " 8 S V §*§§§§£§§ m ^- « > I i o Si u % S j jf"""-- "8222 ill!! i§ 18 3§S 3 1 §§§ S S 8 §§ S3 U. il58 55 i*Is § S *i §s i I §§ g*I 5a s 3 1 ~ s < «u >- 3 ii 8i = I 8! I 8= a *&sfi*^ p^ *•" issi § ""sf a* 58 s - 5»83 §§§§§§§§§§8§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§J§ ": 8 8 IfeU^lfclbtfclbUblfclk 5 :* - «.^ ss : . « s S illa | > $ . ^iiiil^iifiiiiiiissslsssisisiieI33335a3<B<»<»!»«i» ^**8S585l"*IB!i'IB"!!!aooS»i2iuSgjggggg i 3 ii S id - * » ina S O M » S SgiB*iSSS8S*BiiBBBe!S33SSaaaa*888888888""^!*-lllSSSiiiililiiiiiiiiiiii ^ •• K » ^ •• ' T i N 3 I 8 si si 8 %««««« M M Mt M M M M 8S833II3— U»<M*O<IU = iN- |Un iSa i ES B- S 5S 8 19 i|i >> u ^ Si1 §§as ia §§ § § * §n r%» fi §§ !-!- §§u! 9 e sis §§ §8.8 88" §§ § §& *lA 8 § § § § *8.8. 83" i 8| : R ; : 5 : H ill - ttis :O» M li i< ' " I til.s : E : • w. * §! if Si iI 8 -a 5 i rf S S M S S3 M.l§ 888 2SS >3! : 5! m K N 9 8 !S 5 S I 8888 3 = 8X «!«iists; 5^? a = I i • I ! i * _ • :!* SMi::|llll|Ej2, 88iSiSi8iitt-S888--ilii'83 . Xwuiw««*«««> •« SEE!$l»»Si22S2SS iiiiveisSiiii 2 » § i!M!iiii •.. •- M ~ UN iiai*1 's551^2 xi cstii-sasBli 22222 i 3 : 20 9 ?S *£! $ is ii 1 9 ~•4 Ul >2 >> 5 a *:it fi ! i s §§| §3 § §4 ^ ? •« Qe » ^ K 5 £ 8 5 g§ 11 SB" : s : s S55lis 1:1 S : % S i sT• K»* IA * • •» : a « : 8 "I? £: *S-J~ : s s su u » u * S S s i=== ii ||iii|iii *i liiiliiii 3: i ill! ill ] §§§s s z §§§§§ O W ifc u, ikS < S £ = Bi sees 3§*lt<H:• H M g g jg g 8 SiaSS S « S 2 S u 2 £ £ ^ 21 ii- « I g i»• * &M ** £« ^ 9 tftIf _ ^if i| ^ i Si" Mii ? • M8 ii «nss i§gg ft S 1/1 S(J . , I 1; . • §§§§ g § g | *»* 1 ' fO *w* QiV §•§ §I »" s o> *- i 2 <c 1i o *™ < 2 ? J^ ss 5 1 S! R §! <wi ^ I " i 3i; N. K> | 1 Ka S ^ 8 1 B iis * a a «««!5 s f : 2 • « a " •• a :s S 8 s g * \• O < •!?||! || i ! « • * I1! Ii\\ §§§§§§§§§§§§§§ § S 8I.! 5 • w \\\\\\\\\\\ll\ 22 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES 1992 TO BUILDOUT YEAH 1 1992-93 FUND GCC PFF ZONE 5 PARK FEE PIL AREA 1 NU PIL AREA 2 NE PIL AREA 3 SW PIL AREA 4 SE TIF PLD SEWER BONDS SEWER CONST TRANSNET/BIKE TRANSNET/HIGHUAY TRANSNET/LCCAL CAL TRANS PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FEDERAL HWY SDG&E COUNTY GRANTS GOLF BONDS PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LETTER OF CREDIT - Z19 L/C FIELDSTONE REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BOND STATE GRANTS CDBG CMMTY FACILITY DISTR WATER DISTRICT FUNDS -RECLAIMED WATER -MAJOR FACILITY -REPLACEMENT BEGINNING BAL 7/1/92 1.290,212 3,189,025 1,537,000 1,498.985 400,023 657.224 693,681 630,731 1.072,090 10.057,894 (250.000) (1.581.767) (2.597,144) 363,668 726.165 44,171 1,881,038 116,509 16,981 (386,006) (713,046) 6,397,036 (4,949,000) 2,047,827 1,604,308 REVENUE 326,669 23,000 25.720 51,440 6,430 27,006 111,043 977,108 250,000 1,600,000 3.350,000 1,043,000 566,667 1,450,000 165,375 3,170 1,687,500 520,000 713,046 13,615,000 5,000,000 300,000 2,050,000 EXPENDITURES 317,000 1,910,000 140.000 1,708,178 750,000 1,043,000 566,667 1.450,000 95,000 20,011,000 51,000 1,841,843 1,128,399 ENDING 973,212 1,605,694 1,560,000 1,524,705 451,463 663.654 720,687 601,774 1,072,090 9,326,824 18,233 2,856 529,043 726.165 47,341 1,881,038 1,687,500 116,509 16,981 38,994 1.036 505.984 2,525,909 TOTAL 23,747,605 33,862,174 31,012,087 26,597,692 23 74 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES 1992 TO BUILDOUT YEAR 2 1993-94 FUND GCC PFF ZONE 5 PARK FEE PIL AREA 1 NU PIL AREA 2 NE PIL AREA 3 SU PIL AREA 4 SE TIF PLO BEGINNING BAL 7/1/93 973,212 1,605,694 1,560,000 1,524,705 451,463 663,654 720,687 601,774 1,072,090 REVENUE EXPENDITURES 482,902 2,085,000 34,000 25,720 51,440 5,504 20,576' 164,151 240,000 ENDING 973,212 3,596 1,594,000 1,550,425 502.903 669,158 741,263 525,925 1,072,090 SEUER BONDS SEWER CONST TRANSNET/BIKE TRANSNET/HIGHUAY TRANSNET/LOCAL CALTRANS PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FEDERAL HUY SDG&E COUNTY GRANTS GOLF BONDS PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LETTER OF CREDIT - Z L/C FIELDSTONE REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BOND STATE GRANTS CDBG CMMTY FACILITY DISTR WATER DISTRICT FUNDS -RECLAIMED WATER -MAJOR FACILITY -REPLACEMENT TOTM. 9,326,824 1,022,072 1,751,885 8,597,011 18,233 2,856 529,043 726,165 47.341 1,881,038 1,687,500 116,509 16,981 38,994 456,000 456,000 566,667 566.667 630,000 630,000 173,650 14,000,000 14,000,000 2,241,265 18,233 2,856 702,693 726,165 47,341 1,881,038 1,687,500 2,241,265 116,509 16,981 38,994 1,036 17,265,000 16,263,000 1,003,036 505,984 2,525,909 10,366,000 7,050,000 8,820,176 8,724,796 2,051,808 851,113 26,597,692 54,554,947 53,537,524 27,615,115 24 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES 1992 TO BUILOOUT YEAR 3 1994-95 FUND GCC PFF ZONE 5 PARK FEE PIL AREA 1 NW PIL AREA 2 NE PIL AREA I SW PIL AREA 4 SE TIF PLO BEGINNING BAL 7/1/94 973,212 3,596 1,594,000 1,550,425 502,903 669,158 741,263 525,925 1,072,090 REVENUE EXPENDITURES 941,969 405,000 58,000 55,298 92,592 10,946 37,294 304,144 240,000 ENDING 973.212 540,565 1,652,000 1,605,723 595,495 680,105 778,557 590,069 1,072,090 SEWER BONDS SEUER CONST TRANSNET/BIKE TRANSNET/HIGHUAY TRANSNET/LOCAL CALTRANS PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FEDERAL HUY SDG&E COUNTY GRANTS GOLF BONDS PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LETTER OF CREDIT - 2 L/C FIELDSTONE REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BOND STATE GRANTS CDBG CMMTY FACILITY DISTR WATER DISTRICT FUNDS -RECLAIMED WATER -MAJOR FACILITY -REPLACEMENT 8,597,011 1,269,760 9,124,232 18,233 2,856 702,693 726,165 47,341 1,881,038 1,687,500 2,241,265 116,509 16,981 38,994 566,667 550,000 182,300 375,000 4,450,000 4,450,000 566,667 742,539 18,233 2,856 550,000 884,993 726,165 47,341 1,881,038 1,687,500 2,241,265 116,509 16,981 38,994 1,003,036 8,503,000 8,500,000 1,006.036 375,000 2.051,808 851,113 712,000 2,050,000 1,320,564 410,108 1,443,244 2,491,005 TOTAL 27,615,115 20,158,970 25,391,571 22,382,515 25 75 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES 1992 TO BUILDOUT YEAR 4 1995-96 FUND GCC PFF ZONE 5 PARK FEE PIL AREA 1 NU PIL AREA 2 NE PIL AREA 3 SU PIL AREA 4 SE TIF OTHER BEGINNING BAL 7/1/95 973.212 540,565 1,652,000 1,605,723 595,495 680,105 778,557 590,069 1,072,090 REVENUE EXPENDITURES 1,890,398 1,170,000 86,000 74,588 2,380.000 131,172 104,860 51,440 441,520 540,000 ENDING 973,212 1,260,963 1,738.000 (699,689) 726.667 784,965 829,997 491,589 1,072,090 SEWER BONDS SEWER CONST TRANSNET/BIKE TRANSNET/HIGHWAY TRANSNET/LOCAL CALTRANS PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FEDERAL HWY SDG&E COUNTY GRANTS GOLF BONDS PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LETTER OF CREDIT - Z19 L/C FIELDSTONE REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BOND STATE GRANTS CDBG CMMTY FACILITY DISTR WATER DISTRICT FUNDS -RECLAIMED WATER -MAJOR FACILITY •REPLACEMENT TOTAL 742,539 1,567,315 1,752,380 18,233 2,856 550.000 884,993 726.165 47,341 1,881,038 2,241,265 116,509 16,981 38,994 3,435.000 3,450,000 3,245,000 1,585,000 566,667 566,667 191,450 910,000 2,241,265 564,741 656,250 557.474 3.233 1,662,856 550,000 166.443 726,165 47.341 1,881,038 25,000 16,981 38,994 1,006,036 16,950,000 16,950,000 1,006,036 1,443,244 3,628,000 5,008,210 63,034 2,491,005 2,050,000 3,950,844 590,161 20,695,015 34,978,151 41,160.616 14,512,550 26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES 1992 TO BUILDOUT YEAR 5 1996-97 FUND GCC PFF ZONE 5 PARK FEE PIL AREA 1 NU PIL AREA 2 NE PIL AREA 3 SU PIL AREA 4 SE TIF PLO BEGINNING BAL 7/1/96 973.212 1,260,963 1,738,000 (699,689) 726,667 784,965 829.997 491,589 1,072,090 REVENUE EXPENDITURES 1.350,398 2,235,000 86,000 74,588 131,172 104,860 51,440 441,520 240.000 ENDING 973,212 376,361 1,824,000 (625,101) 857,839 889,825 881,437 693,109 1,072,090 SEUER BONDS SEWER CONST TRANSNET/BIKE TRANSNET/HIGHUAY TRANSNET/LOCAL CALTRANS PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FEDERAL HUY SDG4E COUNTY GRANTS GOLF BONDS PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LETTER OF CREDIT - Z19 L/C FIELDSTONE REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BOND STATE GRANTS CDBG CMMTY FACILITY D1STR WATER DISTRICT FUNDS -RECLAIMED WATER 557,474 1,567,315 3,101,180 3,233 1,662,856 300,000 300,000 1,006,036 3,915,000 (976.391) 3,233 1.662,856 550,000 166,443 726,165 47,341 1,881.038 25.000 16.981 38,994 566,667 566,667 550,000 201,025 367,468 726,165 47,341 1,881,038 656,250 681,250 16,981 38,994 4,921,036 -MAJOR FACILITY -REPLACEMENT 63,034 590,161 2,628,000 2,050,000 2,364,468 1,886,684 326,566 753,477 TOTAL 14,512,550 14,124,235 10,693,999 17,942,786 27 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES 1992 TO BU1LOOUT YEAR 6-10 1997-2002 FUND E GCC PFF ZONE 5 PARK FEE PIL AREA 1 NU PIL AREA 2 NE PIL AREA 3 SU PIL AREA 4 SE TIF PLO SEWER BONDS SEWER CONST TRANSNET/BIKE TRANSNET/HIGHUAY TRANSNET/LOCAL CALTRANS PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FEDERAL HUY SDG4E COUNTY GRANTS GOLF BONDS PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LETTER OF CREDIT - Z19 L/C FIELDSTONE REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BOND STATE GRANTS CDBG CMMTY FACILITY DISTR WATER DISTRICT FUNDS -RECLAIMED WATER -MAJOR FACILITY -REPLACEMENT BEGINNING IAL 7/1/97 973.212 376,361 1,824,000 (625,101) 857,839 889,825 881,437 693,109 1,072,090 (976,391) 3,233 1,662,856 550,000 367,468 726,165 47,341 1,881,038 681,250 16,981 38,994 4,921,036 326,566 753,477 REVENUE EXPENDITURES 19,192,828 9.995,250 700,000 700,000 1,523,910 1,908,424 2,033,346 308,750 617,280 5,165,519 5,307,000 15,310.575 10,927.700 1,500,000 1,500,000 566,665 566,665 1,128,700 1,332,500 26,385,000 30,300,000 16,086,000 17,223,532 14,250,000 1,724,215 ENDING 973,212 9,573,939 1.824,000 898,809 2,766,263 2,614,421 1,498,717 551,628 1,072.090 3,406,484 3.233 1,662,856 550,000 163,668 726,165 47,341 1,881,038 681,250 16,981 38,994 1.006,036 (810,966) 13,279,262 TOTAL 17,942,786 106,368,247 79,885,612 44,425,421 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES 1992 TO BUILDOUT 2002 FUND BA GCC PFF ZONE 5 PARK FEE PIL AREA 1 NU PIL AREA 2 NE PIL AREA 3 SU PIL AREA 4 SE TIF PLD SEWER BONDS SEWER CONST TRANSNET/BIKE TRANSNET/HIGHWAY TRANSNET/LOCAL CALTRANS PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FEDERAL HWY SDG&E COUNTY GRANTS GOLF BONDS PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LETTER OF CREDIT - 219 L/C FIELDSTONE REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BOND STATE GRANTS CDBG CMMTY FACILITY DISTR WATER DISTRICT FUNDS -RECLAIMED WATER -MAJOR FACILITY •REPLACEMENT BEGINNING L 7/1/2002 973,212 9.573.939 1,824,000 898,809 2,766,263 2,614,421 1.498,717 551.628 1,072.090 3,406,484 3,233 1,662,856 550,000 163,668 726,165 47,341 1,881.038 681,250 16,981 38,994 1,006,036 (810,966) 13,279,262 REVENUE 4,843,000 48,170,779 3,983,815 2,790,620 3,975.026 3,292,006 1,503.334 17,517,019 6,882,560 40,045,670 1,600,000 6.020,000 14,500,000 45,300,000 20,500,000 EXPENDITURES 40,033,015 5,807,815 3,689,429 6,741,289 5,906,427 3,002,051 15,763,000 300,000 6,882,560 36.912,582 2,700,000 1,687,500 14,500,000 32,856,087 9,737,404 ENDING 5,816,212 17,711,703 0 0 2,305.647 772.090 6,539,572 1.603.233 4,982.856 550,000 163,668 726,165 47,341 1.881,038 681,250 16,981 38,994 1,006,036 11.632,947 24,041,858 TOTAL 44,425,421 220,923.829 186,519,159 80,517,592 29 77 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE BALANCES 1992 TO BUILOOUT GRAND TOTALS ALL YEARS FUND BEGINNING BAL GCC 1 PFF 3 ZONE 5 PARK FEE 1 PIL AREA 1 NW 1 PIL AREA 2 NE PIL AREA 3 SW PIL AREA 4 SE T1F PLD 1 SEWER BONDS SEWER CONST 10 TRANSNET/BIKE TRANSNET/HIGHWAY (1 TRANSNET/LOCAL (2 CALTRANS PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FEDERAL HWY SDGSE COUNTY GRANTS GOLF BONDS PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 1 LETTER OF CREDIT - Z19 L/C FIELDSTONE REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BOND STATE GRANTS CDBG CMMTY FACILITY DISTR 6 WATER DISTRICT FUNDS -RECLAIMED WATER (4 -MAJOR FACILITY 2 -REPLACEMENT 1 .290,212 ,189,025 ,537,000 ,498,985 400,023 657,224 693,681 630,731 ,072,090 ,057,894 (250,000) ,581,767) ,597,144) 363,668 726,165 44,171 ,881,038 116,509 16.981 (386,006) (713,046) ,397,036 ,949,000) ,047.827 .604,308 TOTAL REVENUE 4,843,000 72,355,943 4,970,815 4,570,444 6,341,266 5.557.953 2.308,370 24,144,916 6,882,560 61,759,815 250,000 6,635,000 18,865,000 1,043,000 456,000 3,400,000 2,630,000 2,042,500 14,000,000 3,170 1,687,500 2,616,265 1,220,991 520,000 713,046 101,133,000 5.000,000 79.020,000 50,000,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 317,000 57,833,265 6,507,815 6,069,429 6.741,289 6,215.177 3,002,051 22,470,000 300,000 6,882,560 65,278,137 3,450,000 11,285,000 1,043,000 456,000 3,400,000 2,080,000 2,242,500 14,000,000 1,687,500 2,616,265 656.250 95.000 106,524,000 51,000 69.434,880 27,562,450 ENDING 5,816,212 17,711.703 0 0 2,305,647 772,090 6.539.572 1.603,233 4,982,856 550,000 163,668 726,165 47,341 1,881,038 681.250 16,981 38,994 1,006,036 11.632.947 24,041,858 TOT* 23,747,605 484,970,555 428,200,568 80,517,592 30 CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECTED FUND BALANCES FOR FY 1991-92 UNRESERVED PROJECTED BALANCE ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE FUND CAPITAL FUNDS GENERAL .CAWAL CC^STRUCtlOl^ REVENUE SHARING PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE ZONE 5 PARK FEE PARK DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE SEWER CONSTRUCTION TRANSNET/LOCAL TRANSNET/HIGHWAY TRANSNET/BIKE GOLF COURSE PUBLIC ART (1% FUND) STATE GRANTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LTR CREDIT/ZONE 19 CDBG BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE COMMTY FACILITIES DISTR #1 COUNTY GRANTS WATER DISTRICT RECLAIMED WATER MAJOR FACILITIES REPLACEMENT REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BONDS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TOTAL CAPTTAL FUNDS JULY 1,1991 2,799,184 235,600 11.021,483 1,534,000 (290.663) 2,276,507 1,810,850 10.802,818 717,856 (19,320) 0 1,029,294 324,123 (14,586) 3,579,443 0 2,492,596 (312.223) 606,059 0 7,040,932 5,848,823 3,250,434 308,952 $55,04ai61 REVENUES EXPENDITURES TRANSFERS JUNE 30, 1992 250,000 300,000 3,000 518.000 81,000 150,000 1,123,000 0 1,164.000 0 349.800 5,000 200.000 200,000 0 40,000 3,025,000 157,500 0 200,000 1,710,000 100,000 25,000 $9.601.300 176,812 1,529,117 0 8,230 60,919 58,272 932,841 382.424 0 116,207 29.810 246,632 (135.583) 0 39,343 365,858 0 21,652 107,128 482,752 499,383 7,797 $4,929,594 246,800 3,119,172 (235,600) (2,574,777) 7,217,589 1,537,000 219,107 (477,500) 1,819,088 1 ,902,578 10,992,977 717,856 762,256 0 1.262,887 299,313 (61,218) 372,277 4,287,303 0 657 (2.492,995) 0 5,172,595 7,519,514 763,559 (21.652) 7,133.804 7,076,071 2,851.051 326,155 $11.200 $59,725,067 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $80.533,067 $75,901,235 $73.568,248 $0 $82,866,054 32 CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECTED FUND BALANCES FOR FY 1992-93 FUND CAPITAL FUNDS :•: •:••• ., :-••:•:-:•:• •:-:.>•.:•:•: •:-:-:.:.:v:-Xv:-:o:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:.: :•:•:-:•-•:-••:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:- •:-:•.-:•••••:-:•:•:•:•>:•:• GENERAL CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PUBLIC FACIUTIES FEE ZONE 5 PARK FEE PARK DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE SEWER CONSTRUCTION TRANSNET/LOCAL TRANSNET/HIGHWAY TRANSNET/BIKE CAL TRANS SDG&E GOLF COURSE PUBLIC ART (1% FUND) STATE GRANTS COUNTY GRANTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LTR CREDIT/ZONE 19 CDBG COMMTY FACILITIES DISTR #1 FEDERAL HIGHWAY WATER DISTRICT RECLAIMED WATER MAJOR FACILITIES REPLACEMENT REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT BONDS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS BALANCE JULY 1,1992 ;;; 3.119,172 7.217.589 1,537.000 219.107 1,819.088 1,902,578 10,992.977 717.856 762,256 0 0 1,262,887 299,313 (61,218) 763,559 4,287,303 657 7,519,514 0 (21,652) 7,133.804 7,076,071 2,851,051 326,155 $59,725.067 ESTIMATED REVENUES 0 326,669 23,000 110,596 111,043 0 977,108 3.350.000 1,600,000 250.000 1.043.000 1,450,000 0 3,170 520,000 165,375 1,687,500 713,046 13.615,000 566,667 5,000,000 300,000 2,050,000 0 0 $33.862.174 1991-92 CARRY- FORWARD . 1,828.960 4,980,564 0 19,194 2,231.357 1.130,488 935,083 3.315,000 2.344,023 250,000 0 0 536.722 255,142 324.788 399,891 2,406.265 713,703 1,487.478 0 4.927.348 5.085,977 5,471.763 Z834.070 200,646 $41,687,462 1992-93 PROJECTED NEW APPROP 317.000 1.910,000 0 0 140,000 0 1.708.178 750.000 0 0 1.043.000 1.450,000 0 0 95,000 365,375 0 0 0 20.011,000 566,667 51,000 1,841,843 1,128.399 0 0 $31.377.462 TOTAL BALANCE APPROP. JUNE 30, 1993 2,145,960 6.890,564 0 19,194 2,371.357 1,130,488 2,643,261 4,085,000 2,344,023 1,043,000 1,450,000 536,722 255,142 419.788 2,406,265 0 713,703 21.498,478 566.667 4,978,348 6,927,820 6.600,162 2,834,070 209,646 $72,049,658 973.212 653,694 1,560,000 310,509 (441,226) 772,090 9.326,824 2,856 18.233 250,000 0 0 726.165 47.341 38,994 928.934 1,881.038 1,687,500 0 (363,964) 0 0 505,984 2,525,909 16,981 116,509 $21,537,583 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $82,866,054 $106,195,216 $115,734,844 $105.424.844 $72,049,658 $42,964,230 33 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUDGET EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE 1990-91 TO 1992-93 FUND CAPITAL FUNDS SlNlR^tclpWAtcONlf PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE PARK DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE SEWER CONSTRUCTION TRANSNET/LOCAL TRANSNET/HIGHWAY TRANSNET/BIKE CAL TRANS SDG&E , GOLF COURSE PUBLIC ART (1% FUND) STATE GRANTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LTRCREDnVZONE19 CDBG CMMTY FACIUTIES DISTRICT #1 FEDERAL HIGHWAY COUNTY GRANTS WATER DISTRICT -RECLAIMED WATER -MAJOR FACILITY FEE -REPLACEMENT REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS -TAX INCREMENT BONDS -REDEVELOPMWT PROJECTS TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS TOTAL BUDGET 1990-91 ACTUALS :;; 493,728 4,416,423 2.681,514 223,034 393,184 1,587,117 213,235 524,834 0 0 0 527,104 85,558 202.675 14,346,746 0 173,501 0 0 0 0 0 497,300 469.036 154,601 $26,989,590 $90,782246 1991-92 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 176,812 1,529,117 8,230 60,919 58,272 932,841 0 382,424 0 0 0 116,207 29,810 246,632 (135,583) 0 39,343 365,856 0 0 21.652 107.128 482,752 499,383 7,797 $4,929,594 $73.568,248 1991-92 BUDGET 56,200 3,560.000 0 1,710.000 0 1.494,366 3.315,000 2,000.000 250,000 14,000,000 0 503.416 0 0 0 0 0 5,000,000 2,535,000 2,277,500 730,100 0 $37,431,581 $111,950,165 1992-93 BUDGET 317,000 1,910,000 0 140,000 0 1,708,178 750,000 0 0 1,043,000 1,450,000 0 0 95,000 0 0 20,011.000 566,667 365.375 51,000 1,841,843 1,128,399 0 0 •:«XW.«:«W»HW*K< $31,377,462 $105.424,844 %INCR (DEC) 91 -92 BUDGET TO 92-93 BUDGET 464.06% -46.35% -91.81% 14.31% -77.38% -100.00% -100.00% | -100.00% -81.13% -98.98% -27.34% -50.45% -100.00% •'•'• -16.17% -5.83% 34 79 CITY OF CARLSBAD REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1992-93 REVENUE SOURCE CAPITAL FUNDS GENERAL CAPITAL CONSTR PUBLIC FACILITY FEE ZONE 5 PARK FEE PARK DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE SEWER CONSTRUCTION TRANSNET/LOCAL TRANSNET/HIOHWAY TRANSNET/BIKE CAL TRANS SDO&E GOLF COURSE PUBLIC ART (1% FUND) STATE GRANTS COUNTY GRANTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LTR CREDIT/ZONE 19 CDBG CMMTY FACIUTIES DISTRICT #1 FEDERAL HIGHWAY WATER DISTRICT FUNDS -RECLAIMED WATER -MAJOR FACIUTIES -REPLACEMENT REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS -TAX INCREMENT BONDS -REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TOTAL CAPITAL FUNM GRAND TOTAL REVENUE ACTUAL REVENUES FY 1990-91 ill 505,847 5,458,933 274,832 559,712 743,529 172,371 2,906,724 649,054 9,390 0 1,188,759 261 ,231 420,573 339,277 16,691,991 0 326,999 1,622 0 0 1,779,841 871,917 262.655 25.000 $33.450,257 $96,908,426 PROJECTED REVENUE FY 1991 -92 250.000 300.000 3.000 518,000 81.000 150,000 1,123,000 0 1,164,000 0 349.800 5,000 200,000 157,500 200,000 0 40,000 3,025,000 0 0 200,000 1,710,000 100,000 25,000 $9,601 ,300 $75.901,235 ESTIMATED REVENUE 1992-93 0 326.669 23,000 110.596 111,043 0 977.108 3,350,000 1,600,000 250,000 1.043,000 1.450,000 0 3,170 520,000 165.375 0 1,687,500 713,046 13,615,000 566,667 5,000,000 300,000 2,050.000 0 0 $33,862,174 $108,195,216 AS% OF FY 91 -92 PROJECTED -100.00% 8.89% 666.67% -78.65% 37.09% -12.99% 37.46% 100.00% -100.00% -36.60% 160.00% 5.00% -100.00% 100.00% 1682.62% 100.00% 100.00% 50.00% 19.88% -100.00% -100.00% 352.68% 13941% DIFFERENCE 1991 -92 TO 1992-93 (250,000) 26,669 20,000 (407,404) 30,043 (150,000) (145,892) 3.350,000 436,000 250,000 (349,800) (1.830) 320.000 7.875 (200,000) 1,687,500 673,046 10,590,000 5,000,000 100,000 340,000 (100,000) (25,000) $24,260,874 $30593,981 35 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION NOTES OF MAYS, 1992 1. CORRECTIONS TO MINUTES A.) Page 3, top of page should read Southwest quadrant instead of Southeast quadrant. B.) Page 4, middle of page should read interested artists, not architects had submitted slides for potential art work. C.) Page 7, 2nd paragraph, Cindy requested references for viewing sites apply to all proposed parkland dedication maps. D.) Page 9, 3rd paragraph should be she instead of he. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS All items were approved, 4 - 0 , no items pulled for discussion. 3. BATTING CAGE Commissioner Castner noted wrong date on draft Agenda Bill (August 1992). Commissioner also suggested staff visit Batting Cage in Irvine Park which was visited on park tour (Alta Mira planning). Also, some concern was voiced if LYCO would provide maintenance in perpetuity. Item passed 4 - 0. 4. XERISCAPE Commission passed the item but requested commission ideas be incorporated into plan. Commission suggestions were; add accent lighting, make walls for sitting purposes, add a pathway around to the south going towards Library. Mr. Lawson also mentioned his firm may be able to provide some assistance with this project. Mr. Castner thought that would be a great idea and suggested staff explore feasibility and if any conflict of interest may be involved, Item passed 5-0. 5. PARK MITIGATION FEE FOR INDUSTRIAL AREAS The commission should send a message to council that no private parks be built with public funds. All parks should be open to public. Dr. Castner was also concerned that the fee was not being reviewed annually as stated in original zone 5 agenda bill. Tony Lawson requested an audit of monies in this industrial recreational facility account. Commission requested the status of funds in these accounts be brought back to commission as information item. 6. NAMING OF PARKS SUB COMMITTEE • Staff updated the current park naming committee assignments. • Three current members committee they are; D. Castner, C. Ward, R. Finnila • Courtney Heineman was selected as an alternate. NEW ITEMS: The Commission requested a report on City Finances and the status of Park projects in the new C.I.P. The date of the commission workshop was brought up and staff notified commission, Sat., June 13 was not a good day. Staff will call commissioners to see if workshop should be part of a commission meeting or to see if an early evening workshop would be possible. Monday evening was the most desirable evening of the week to have a workshop. Staff told commission they would contact each commissioner and try to select a date preferably early evening that is compatible with all commissioners schedule. \WP51 \PRC\COMNOTES.592