The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1997-04-21; Parks & Recreation Commission; 497-3; Skateboard committee reportPARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - AGENDA BILL AB* 497-3 MTfi 04-21-97 DEPT.CSD TITLE: SKATEBOARD COMMITTEE REPORT (ACTION) g»-o RECOMMENDED ACTION: Consider the findings and recommendations of the Skateboard Committee as outlined h the attached report, and make recommendations to the City Council on issues related to the skateboard facility site selection, design criteria, operation issues and fiscal impact. ITEM EXPLANATION: In September of 1996, the City Council appointed a nine member committee for the purpose of making recommendations to the City Council through the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding suitable location(s), design and estimated cost for construction and maintenance of a city-owned skateboard facility. The committee consisted of the following members: Julie Baker (Chair Person) Gary Cox (Co-Chair) Seth Schulberg (Alternate) Derek Francoise Jason Groves Jeanne McFadden Chris Miller Ashley Mull Witt Rowlett Jerry Walker P&R Commission P&R Commission P&R Commission Jr. High Student High School Student Citizen at Large Professional Rider High School Student Local Business Representative Father of Rider This report, identified as EXHIBIT 1, outlines the findings of the committee; and a summary of their recommendations are as follows: Site Selection After a thorough analysis and ranking of possible sites for a skateboard facility, the committee has identified and is recommending, in order of priority, the following three (3) locations: 1. Calavera Park - future fire station site 2. Southwest comer of Monroe Street and Marron Road 3. Safety Center Design Criteria Although the committee has not developed a specific design for each site location, the committee has recommended that the skateboard park facility will have "low hazard" props; shall not exceed a 3 to 4 foot limit in height; and may include, but would not be limited to, the skating features and support elements identified h EXHIBIT 1 / Pages 4 and 5. 13 Operational Issues It is the recommendation of the committee that the following operational conditions be required for a skate facility: • Mandatory use of safety equipment (helmets, knee and elbow pads) • Facility would be unsupervised • No specific fee would be charged • Skatepark hours of operation: 8:00 am -10:00 pm • Post signs which identify rules, regulations, safety requirements, hours of operation and municipal code ordinances Fiscal Impact The industry standard for development cost ranges from $6.00 to $16.00 per square foot depending on a number of factors including but not limited to acquisition, architectural design, required support amenities, utilities, etc. Preliminary estimates* of development and maintenance cost for the three (3) alternative locations recommended by the committee are as follows: Site Development Costs Annual Maintenance Costs Calavera Park $120,000 -150,000 $2,000 - 2,500/yr. ^0 per sq.ft.) S.W. Corner $240,000 $6,000/yr. Monroe & Marron ($16+ per sq. ft.) Safety Center $120,000-150,000 $2,000 - 2,500/yr. "3-10 per sq.ft.) 'Development costs are preliminary estimates only at this time pending actual design, performance features and required support amenities. The committee is also recommending that two additional items be considered by the Parks and Recreation Commission. They acknowledge that at the time a skatepark is developed, there is a need to amend the existing skateboard ordinance to include but not be limited to such issues as rules and regulations, enforcement issues, hours of operation and authorized uses. The committee also recommends that additional skateboard facilities should be considered when designing future City park sites. EXHIBITS 1. Skateboard Committee Final Report, April 3,1997. 14 Aprils, 1997 TO: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: Skateboard Committee SKATEBOARD COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT As per the direction of the City Council, the Skateboard Committee has studied the feasibility of development of a city-owned skateboard facility in Carlsbad. The enclosed report will summarize the findings and recommendations of the Skateboard Committee. BACKGROUND On September 17, 1996, the City Council appointed a nine member committee for the purpose of making recommendations regarding the suitable location(s), design, estimated cost for construction and maintenance of a city-owned skateboard facility. The committee was requested to present their findings to the Parks and Recreation Commission and ultimately to the City Council. The goal of the committee was to create a recommendation which would produce an appealing opportunity for the City to provide an economically feasible skateboard park in a timely manner. To that end, the committee met a total of seven times over a period of four months to address the issues involved with the development of a skateboard facility including such topics as: reviewing existing skateboard parks currently in operation, site selection, design criteria, operational issues, development costs, liability concerns, etc. All meetings were open to the public and public input was solicited, received and incorporated within the recommendations of the committee. The following information represents the findings and recommendations of the committee regarding the proposed skateboard facility. SITE SELECTION Based upon the goal of the committee, with few exceptions, it was recommended that only city-owned property be considered for further evaluation of site selection. Accordingly, the committee utilized the City's Geographic Information System (GIS) to identify all publicly owned property within each of the City's four quadrants. After further review of property identified through the GIS search, the committee focused their interests on eighteen (18) individual site locations (Attachment 1). 15 EXHIBIT 1 Further analysis of the site selection process established a list of criteria (Attachment 2), which was used to prioritize each site in terms of its effectiveness for use as a skateboard park location. Paramount in the committee's selection analysis was to adhere to the council guideline that the facility will be located in a high visibility area. As a result of matching the initial 18 locations against the prioritized site criteria, the committee reduced their site considerations to six locations. Further discussion, analysis and ranking resulted in the committee identifying three (3) alternative locations. Each of these locations provide three distinct opportunities for a skateboard facility in terms of cost, timing, operation and design capability. The site locations recommended by the committee in order of priority are: 1. Calavera Park - future fire station site 2. Southwest corner of Monroe Street and Marron Road 3. Safety Center An explanation for the recommendation of each site in terms of its use as a skateboard facility is as follows: 1. CALAVERA PARK The committee acknowledges that this location is identified as the site for the future relocation of Fire Station #3 at a cost of $450,000 (FY 2000-05) in the City's Capital Improvement Program Budget. The committee also understands that there is a possibility that the fire station may not be relocated to the park site within the near future and perhaps not at all. With that in mind, this 19,250 sq. ft. parcel of land offers perhaps the most economical and timely development potential for a skate park. Site Selection Benefits: • All support amenities currently exist at the park site (parking, restrooms, utilities etc.); • The site is graded; • Location offers perhaps the lowest cost of development; • Contingent upon fire station relocation, development could begin immediately; • High visibility. Site Selection Concerns: • Fire Station #3 may ultimately be relocated to this site; • The site is located in relative close proximity to an existing neighborhood and may cause neighborhood disruption issues. 2 16 2. S.W. CORNER OF MONROE AND MARRON ROAD This approximate 30,000 sq. ft. area was formerly developed for use as a desiltation basin and is no longer functional for that purpose. The property was included within the voter mandated purchase area of Hosp Grove, is currently zoned as open space and will ultimately serve some function in relation to the Hosp Grove Open Space Plan/City Wide Trail System. It is currently identified to provide limited parking for those plans. Site Selection Benefits: • The site is somewhat obscure from existing neighborhoods, but offers high visibility from Marron Road and Monroe Street; • Located in close proximity to NCTD Hub, allowing excellent accessibility to the site via public transportation; • The development timeline could be relatively soon and the site is large enough to allow for expansion. Site Selection Concerns: • The entire site is undeveloped and therefore development costs would be significantly higher in order to provide site preparation; the required support amenities (parking, landscape, portable restrooms); and ingress & egress on Monroe and Marron; • Potential disruption to adjacent commercial business. 3. SAFETY CENTER The committee acknowledges that the Safety Center has existing plans to be the site of a future civic center complex. However, the City may purchase additional property in the immediate vicinity in order to insure that adequate property is available to construct the future civic center complex. If additional property is purchased, existing land at the Safety Center may be available for consideration as a skateboard facility. The committee recommends that a 15,000 sq. ft. skating surface adjacent to, and north of, the existing ballfield be considered as an alternative location. Site Selection Benefits: • The site is centrally located within the City; • Support amenities currently exist at the site (parking, portable restrooms, utilities etc.); • Timely development of a skate park could occur, if it is determined not to construct the Civic Center at this location; • Proximity to Police Department and Fire Station #5 offers extremely high visibility; • No neighborhood disruption issues. - 17 Site Selection Concerns: • Existing plans to construct civic center at this site would eliminate this alternative; • Ease of accessibility by users to this location. * More detailed information is enclosed on Attachment #3 which ranks site criteria for each of the recommended alternatives. DESIGN CRITERIA Acknowledging the City Council guideline that the skateboard park facility will have "low hazard" props, the committee has recommended that any design feature shall not exceed a 3 to 4 foot height limit. The committee understands this limit would comply with the guidelines of a "low hazard" skateboard facility as defined by the Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California (PARSAC). Although the committee has not developed a specific design for each site location, the committee has recommended the types of amenities which should be considered as part of any skate park design. Those amenities may include but would not be limited to the following skateboard park features and support elements. SKATING AREA FEATURES MAY INCLUDE: • Skating Surface of • Concrete Sealant Approximately 15,000 sq.ft. • Banks (Concrete Surface) . Curbs • Lighted (All Locations) 0 Hips • Separate Skill Level Areas . slalom Run (Beginner vs. Experienced) ^ Staae • Directional Flow and Design 0 gow( . Non-Vertical Riding Terrain ' Kick-out Fencing Surfaces and Features _ . „ ,_ . • Tool Bench• Merge Perimeter ..*,„.• Metal Pipe Inset or Angle Iron • Hails on Edge of Features• Steps • Pyramids SKATING AREA FEATURES WOULD NOT INCLUDE: • Any Performance Feature • Verticals (Ramps, Drops) over 3' to 4' . Large Deep Bowls • Half Pipes - 4 18 SKATE PARK SUPPORT AMENITIES: • Parking Areas . Spectator Area (Bleachers, • Restrooms Berms) (Permanent/Portable) • Electrical Outlets • Landscaping (Non- • Picnic Tables Shredding) • Drinking Fountains Depending upon which site is selected as a skateboard facility, the individual location would dictate individual design criteria including the various performance features and support amenities listed above. It is essential that the design of the skateboard track should involve input from City staff as well as input from skateboarders. OPERATIONAL ISSUES While the committee members reached general consensus on all other issues, the issue related to the mandatory use of safety equipment (helmets, knee and elbow pads) was debated at length. Because of the Council's guideline for mandatory use of safety equipment and perhaps more persuasively, Section 25906 of the State Health & Safety Code that requires it, the consensus of the committee ultimately acknowledges the need to comply. The committee also reached consensus on the Council's guidelines that the facility would be unsupervised and that no specific fee would be charged for facility use. In addition, the committee recommends that the hours of operation of the facility be consistent with the hours of operation of other park facilities (8:00 am to 10:00 pm). Although the committee believes that this facility should, and in all likelihood will become a self-regulating skate park, they did acknowledge the need to post the facility with signs which identify the rules, regulations and safety requirements including mandatory use of safety equipment, hours of operation, municipal code ordinances, etc. FISCAL IMPACT In review of a number of skateboard parks which currently exist or are planned for the near future, the committee understands the industry standard for development cost to range from $6.00 to $16.00 per square foot depending upon a number of factors, including but not limited to: acquisition, architectural design, required support amenities, utilities, public vs. private development, etc. (Attachment 4). 19j. Preliminary estimates* of development and maintenance cost for the three (3) alternative locations recommended by the committee are as follows: SITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Calavera $120,000-150,000 $2,000 - 2,500/yr. ($8-10 per sq.ft.) S.W. Corner $240,000 $6,000/yr. Monroe & Marron ($16+per sq. ft.) Safety Center $120,000 - 150,000 $2,000 - 2,500/yr. ($8-10 per sq.ft.) * Development costs are preliminary estimates only at this time pending actual design, performance features and required support amenities. ORDINANCE ISSUES The committee has acknowledged a necessity to amend or revise the existing skateboard ordinance, Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 10.58 (Attachment 5), at the time a skate park is developed. Amendments to the existing ordinance would address, but may not be limited to the following issues: • Rules and Regulations • Enforcement Issues • Hours of Operation • Authorized Uses In addition, the committee has suggested that when the skateboard ordinance becomes subject to revision, consideration be given to address the following concerns: • Establishing corridors which would allow for the use of skateboards as a means of transportation within the Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Zone; • The use of skateboards within community parks; • Provision to allow for skateboarding special events. FUTURE PLANNING The committee also recommended that additional skateboard facilities should be considered when designing future City park sites. ATTACHMENTS 1 - Map of Potential Skateboard Park Sites 2 - Skateboard Park Site Criteria 3 - Calavera, Southwest Corner of Monroe and Marron and Safety Center Site Criteria Detail Ranking 4 - Existing Skate Facility and Cost Survey 5 - Carlsbad Municipal Code-Skateboarding Chapter 10.58 6 20 POTENTIAL SKATE PARK SITE o Public Lands in Carlsbad LJ City and Local Agency Lands LJ San Diego County Lands @ State of California Lands ~*i Federal Government Lands Ixistino 1 E.C.R. - former site Boys 4 Girts Club T 2. Fire Station «1 Lot 3. Monroe & Marron (SE corner) 4. Monroe & Marron (SW comer) 5 New Library Site 6. Northeast Comer - El Camino Real/Tarr 7. Raceway (Zone 18) 8 Safety Center 9. Slate Land - South ol Cerezo 10 West Parking Lot • El Camino Real MaN Future 11. Alga Norte Park 12. Aviara Park Site 13. Calavera Fire Station Sile 14 Cannon Lake Park 15. Entina Waslewater Facility 16. Industrial Park (Zone 5) 17. Maxton Brown Ext. 18. Veteran's Memorial Park ATTACHMENT 1 Skate Park Site Criteria & Rank 5 4 3 2 1 1 . City Owned 2. High Visibility 3. Land >1 Acre 4. No Redev. Area 5. No Residential 6. No Seawall 7. Restrooms 8. Dev.Time Line 9. Central Location 10. Existing Park Site 11. Parking Available 12. Public Trans Access 13. Traffic Circulation 14. Utilities Availability 15. Ability to Expand 16. Joint Use Agreements 17. Land <1 Acre 18. Near School Sites 1 9. Near Other Activities 20. Food Available 21. Future Park Site 22. Lighted Area 23. Private Ownership Ranking is 5 (high) to 1 (low) 22 ATTACHMENT 2 <DJIT* (/) G O •S3frt ;43to•;e UL:Jkl"C/*•TOQLs Galavera Communoccrao: od (0 0> -4->'C.o 0).+* CO (£>OOCN ^~ O ^.o "OQJ D T30) ^=Oto "c<L> Q. O 0)><u"O O. 0 1501or o,c raO LU ~O C(0 3 Cs£o 13 Yes - Scheduled for relocation development of existing fire station site currentlyT3111 • >* o ••- Q)I/)3 0)E ££iD)'c J3 ^CDQ_ T3Cra I\- 13 «_ O)c £O) 15 tnCL 5 D>inro O E Yes - From Calavera Park by park users and facility staff. Vehicular visibility fro. High VisibilityCM 1 9,250 sq.ft. (.44 acres).. Land >1 Acrero Not located in redevelopment area.00<u< zTJOC£ o-z. •tr c cJ£c3 £ "oJo> "55d)g «<no on d CLo >-SJ) u. T38 Site currently located approximately 2 blocks from existing residential neighborh. No Residentialin Not on the seawall.. No Seawall(O Restrooms available inside community center and outside at ballfields.W> S*~ tr t^ 73a13oo<y "oc cg 13 too> OJM-3 C 0)croE Q. O ^* 2<nf/jo0.J c ±£ n JD T3 30U *r 'oJS 1Fire Station #3 to be relocated to this site in 2001 -2006 time frame. TemporaryDev Time Line03 ; ;W: ;;.:;>y:p:^In eastern portion of NE quadrant, not centrally located.c . Central Locatioen Located immediately adjacent to the 16 acre Calavera Community Park site.£COt03CL £ V,'x LU O Adequate parking exists within park site.£ n 5< 0) ftCL ^ $ XL8 "" t Nearest bus stop located at Carlsbad Village and Tamarack Avenue approximatac < 2EH(: Z a. CM n I £ oc io>s.to »> na. | C 'c O>c J 11 cc Traffic CirculatiCO Accessibility to all required utilities is immediately available.•>,&Utilities AvailabiTT :!:;;:'*;;;:;i-i;i!;;:f:;:-:.Very limited ability to expand beyond the vacant site as it currently exists.T Iuo Z 'i< in t | it •5•z. <a•£ 4 | •C < 0)jj 'c ^c <o •xi.BjM Developable site for skating facility only is less than 1 acre (approx. V> acre).<u o< V T3 Cn t-- •coc % CO£15 Q.Q.m $"n| en n LL 1X _ ±±w1 <.(/ v_fla 03 Currently, only existing other activities would be park-related amenities.U1OJ J "c< (Ejc O na eh CM 0) S*~ u .f 3EEou 73 0).a (D^£ 5' n</) c!co TO 13)C Snack bar exists at park ball fields. Operational only during game times. Vend!Food Availableo<N 09 73"n 15.Is E U) 1<n•a * ^CLo ? £ >•a (U.ts« 1 c 0>K CO J£ flQ. 0) LL. ^_ CM in 5!o "oo*: (D f^cOJ 5Q. o 75 o T30)C 13 eu TO § wre0 D)C O) 1 —5 CL 15 0)T3 'g cl >- 'c £ 3 U •3 \O)•^= 1!« ?n (AT3 01£= 1 13),C £c 1 'c CO roa < | 3:c CM (N T3 £135CLo •ocn 1 9£• b VI a 'ifi <n!cH Q. i Private OwnersCO CM 1 - CO ^^z UJsI O<I< 23 k. c oo CO 1 I 2co cao: (0'Cat O v>sp Grove Open space area.o 0)fry-owned and is part of the 49 + acro .2 Ol </)ity Owned0 *- •>o Q. T3 3OU ^0)EQ.O 0) 0)•o >; ^f*i M O) Era^: c.u idjoining sidewalks and roadways. Site is depressed, whira i pedestrian and vehicular visibility fr•F COX igh Visibilityx (N ft./.68 acres).crin o G. x 1_>. 'xo CLCLra .2 0> "n .2 K <uu A •oCra rj ed in redevelopment area.8 "5z CO0) CC aZ * : « Olw>s_c 3& "rao <u E 0u Eo Tu0) (U ^</)o ra 75Ho E ing residential neighborhood located within Hosp Grove.To 8 ted approximately 2 blocks from thera JSsw o Residentialz m u i 0Z o Seawallz (0 CD 1 n ^^<A.9* (3ra E j_ ~tfj(U atc E Q)Q. >ra 1 "of 1 s ble use. Anticipated that 5.5 acre Hosp Grove Park, 2 bkra 1 >oms currently at site - potential for || 0z estroomsor ^ 0>-"^ • zl ^ O**- 1 "cCU o ra CL "c0> n s the potential for a more timely development. No develojcra that the City owns this property enht: o> £ 0)c 01 p 0Q CO J3 C Q H-O o~cO)(Jra^•Q*ra>. 01"ra 1 E 'Hi"x01 in0)oT3 —•yj I of the City and is not considered centrally located. HoweraT3 is located in the northernmost boun£'5in'.c cc "rauc 1"ccO 01 0) 17) raQ_ ra c E01 LLJ CO To0)o <1)or T3cra VI raCL 0)>f Hosp Grove as open space. It is not currently listed inu n is part of the voter-mandated purch0).± ic (U.-ft nQ. ac 73 UJ o (U JDracotsQJ cr .SC 0)U) (O "~_ CU o.c "a* ^c ^ ot3ra B 1 in the skate park design criteria. Ample parking exists atSra would need on-site parking incorpoi3'u ti £ c 2_r 'c < crc < CL -is excellent. NCTO hub is across the street at the Mall.c ty to public transportation at this loc;i'n < init01ir iblic Trans A<o. CM * 5' O) 0) o>c Ien 0) 'ro d) •cS the SE lot for onsite parking and traffic flow. Would reqic(C offers perhaps a greater availability* 'JC. Cc 2 c C c. c CO "»ver, utility access is immediately adjacent to the site.i a 0) co "a'x01 a t t/ f oZ :§• IEjj 1 a 3 •» ^•est, the ability to expand beyond the .68 acres is not realic «te surrounding terrain and Eucalypti.!_ ^G C •ac su c -C jg fli e•5Z t1< ( to"tt2 'o 0) c(0 c £ in I I if'r.1- 0) c V T3CC h-i mile south.Ti"n 1 f &"cc jj j cu c3 T <T:«O 4 C J rj - CO ._ >>tf) •^% CN ^ "raE X0(3.CLra i/> ro0) ra01c T301CU 0D•D T3CroJK: ra ino Real and other shopping. A 5-1/2 acre Hosp Grove Pn rectly across the street from PlazaTJ y d Cf> a \ •< c O i Z 0, CN t, CD 1 1 n 41£available directly across the street at_i cou. J 1 o(N •f IDO ?£ 0. O c 0>c 3 0 croCL —3^ ^co 1— 1 ra 5rac space/trails development as part of the Hosp Grove/Buec c plans for this area call for a passive'cct t 1 •i c LL CN there is minimum spill over from existing street lights.1 ti'x01 "cc c 0 inaoT3 CD C < ( ( O • -1 CMCM -ie City of Carlsbad and zoned open spacei co ra T 1 U \n 'E oZ Q. ID 1 0 CU75 ct CO d> "c O CO c(9o: <* ***w 1o fi\*•*i/5 j> 'in Q> 0>veloped as a new Civic C0>T3 This site is City-owned. Current plans call for this area to be1^*^.£•b *- Bin 01ocrac Vc'ra ^\L a a.01a a>j—ular Police traffic and/or Fu!c Both potential locations at this site offer high visibility from vei f- D X CN intu ura \f> £' crin ^-~ (N 3] TDCra ino> ura CO ^£ inooo_o S 'x i potential skate park sites§S Total Safety Center site is approximately 14 acres; however, Io>c A •oCn ro Not located in redevelopment area.(0a 1or oz •t in i 2(0 esidential neighborhoodsh.c This site is located within the industrial corridor of the City, hTJ esidentiior cz in Not on the seawall.1pgCO ^Z! <0 rice the baseball field.oia i No permanent restrooms exist on site. Portables do exist to ;[ c•* < C£ t*- v> XO) "cQJE.Q. ^>0) ^.<D ^ *- ro "c0)"oQ. x" "o.£0o a* DO O "o 4) o.co i-0)a.o Q.or purchase of additional0)Pending development of additional civic center buildings on s0) OJ ' 6 Q GO 1 This site is centrally located within the City.ce Ticc 1 <O o> 'ca>E 4)u] co "roOJo o;_ crain^caa. Ic "S'S T3Cra (U ballfield does exist on sitra The Safety Center site is not considered a park site; however<.t;CO i Q_ o1 1 L O n considerations.'u Adequate parking could be made available through facility dej*i i .! •i C -ely 1/4 mile to the west.g P Closest bus stops are located along El Camino Real approxir(A^ ] i iii ..j Q_ CM n Traffic circulation patterns are excellent.c1 J i oi<ji H CO 25 All necessary utilities are readily available on site.4 1f '{ (.! 2 ~ •<r •^a1 Is.f a 1 |'i§i< c< tf O 1 I 1 1 L j -• < V) i"2i( 1i« i ' • . -t ••:,;*•> -j:2 'a c .2 "5cna. 0)co 1( (Q. 01CO ,_ - - r- .-2" "c-s ( "f 1 I 0)£ T(Tcj 4 1 1 .1U) J r - Z CO a I g « "i f a "c 2 =*j'i <c< i .1 5 O z O) CM IA few deli's/sandwich shops exist in the immediate area.': • t | yj n} "c c(Q 8. roco 1 o co TD(U (j0) i o £ "n "ca (Anjz center complex, this siteo "o ras <u0(1 1 c 1 Q. 1cC T r "c 0)j *•t i j l "•j C : <J ( » L r- c 't cc ( * 'x0) J 1( O)j J1 n < •1 "T- 1y ra No, this site is currently owned and operated by the City of C•— ^ o o_ (N •* >- UJ1 Mh-0) OOaz<: rACILITYJLcr<EXISTING SKATE P- 2 '5 CQ o•*^ to0 0 2o d d</>~) (A OO 10.2+3 'oreLL. 09 0)N CO 1 General£o(0«^coo 00 Q> EroZ </)_. </>g. a)2 cO -^;- (/)03^^ T- ^3 TDW — Q) "S 8 "ro<1> O C.2—00) p "O ^ 2^^,"- O 8.S*^ ro .0)Tf C (/)CM 0 OJ69 T3 T3 h~ OOti cn cr ^~JO >, CN 3(^ —3 ro "S-c |8. Hi1 £ c«— 5 £o a; § "1^x ^ E LO^ Wt ro o> *-; 08 a> ^ " feo- o cCO — Q 0 <? 0in .£ r-CM -^ "§ T- ro c i- Q. k= OJ Part of a 2.5 acre neighborhood park. Freunsupervised, unsecured. Sign requiressafety equipment.COo°a wj£ Q. ro Qo m §CM« o> "f ro CD CD >°5^^** r^- v^ 0 ° 1 to§§"in _ °3 T-" S^ J« SC *" O .^ II CO-OT *-• O CMCD c o VL;•o ro o. oo 5 ui S o 15 w» ii 0 3 II >OO C Q.T- c 52 ^t« < £ CO •t: en ci- enj/> T- CD -^" T- 3to- -> CO 0) 0> CM•i/ ro°a E ftCO (0 g) co « -55 -S 2-0 . •o % %IP! §|i«O u —-Q E en <-; in ° •— ***Js^^z °- J2 5 E^ 'E E E ITS In center of 40 acre community park. Safiequipment required, supervised w/31 interi& 8' perimeter security fence, participantssign waivers.o0)cr too CD "6 W CM O5 CD -o 0 "? =Q r~- ^^- in *- O h~ >, .^25 § O en UJ 0$ COc T3CO CO O)._ T3 "oX(U 0o0 o <£t*~ JZZ¥ cr enJ« eno '-m >, 06 ^«/» -o «3 ro vd w c trlia E c 55"- o ro•o = ^.to ~ <o 15 c 08 82 2T S w o 11! * n5 —. _: ^~ <^20,000 sq.flstructures,w/soccer, reUnder construction. Will charge a fee,require membership membership requiredsafety equipment mandatory (loaned free)= o.3 CO t i Escondido.91Carlisle, CS/Re(>«- UJ W°T c £-51?O £ < c O o |QO construo in CD</» « CDcr enco o> CN T"CN = Es. &<A < tok_ JO to </)"Q. E E ^concrete wipyramids.»^ *i 0 ^^o "<Jo m S-I Streetscape park recently closed due tonoise, litter , graffiti & aggravation to localresidents.o0)cr COo SS"' £ CM? 2 CM™ •S "*0 9? o £"§ roO ^ O o ro 28, o T3 O2 m 2 Sc O (/)-o ro ro y§!o °-ro 275 £ 2CM ~ •«- c ro -c _; °§£•C -o 03 2.ro o> -' . -£ c'^2 -2srl8 sllCM Q) 2 co in c/> <*5 T^Treated as an unsupervised playground,sign posted that safety equipment requirecparticipants use at own risk."5.13CO dO) en*as-S» °? ^2 ^ CL*. m °- O CM 0)~ i S0 ° 0 cO OJ~ 0o c:zi ro "£"?.§ S°l0 ra 5^u r~ 1-1— -5 ro•?! io E c 0 0 ro o o oo o o in in' Ln.cn T- r- tft tfr V* c c cr cr •<-co u> en 0 0 °>CO OO ^ CD CO C•r- t- rav> <f> —> i *L. 0) i_ 2| « § 0 °0 C li interconnec, & 8') w/isiati ><*> 6 6co .0 .0 Fenced, supervised, safety equipmentrequired. Skateboards only.o0)cr CO o ° < 5 S0 CN ^ ro <? =5o. en Q_ oS E .-£•£-§ 0 5 < C2g "Q <= W.2> cw oa; o-o ^ O CD O f- ^-cn' CD -q-<f> fA tii sr»- en </» T- — Eo §•! -o ro ™lit 3 E 9>concrete w/tforms, pyratanding wav^ ro « d-o-03 W CO W 8 &flo E co oo' E 5 ~nro S,._ ro^5 co ^-* e.^ *= ° flj|-o| -y OJ =ro -g 5 ~ 8^2 1S.E 8ro ^ « • S 8 I»* 1^°i& =5 £ w OT 0 «fti_ ro 55 o 2> jC O Sh- CN U) jC ^< (UQ.Plesanton4-8050ulford, Landsce•sfi ^•0 ^O in 2 «- " 0c o~~ o c u5 m" - 8£-^ ro I:03 o roo- « c= 5 .CT*~ ^: wi- ti OJo ro x>«- w a. " ft = ? ?21 1> CM ~ro p OJ TD^ t I— -I S)- o < w : .£ 4± !5 : o-^j "Sco *! SO cr <1>;r u) CT ooi P^: "O h*oo 2 3 ent/» «<^ xi i- T3ro « -*> "O-° ro•o ^aj oo <u(U T3 §1 ^2 il £1 ciCM ro ^ CO d- p "in OT 0 0 ^ §8 « « co" co SS ^(/) •= £ «a> ro . §-0)*^ S.| ST ° o5g T3 Q.O2 >.« 3?iQ) <D ><« t ^ "§"'0 ^^-4501-^ c I'l Tf« |0) CO c O CD d) S o o U- O C U-i<ucpCO 0- i£M ro E °i °^ %S r- -aj S«co CO en ^ o3> .^| §O -^ Qca U) p 8 «" So -Sis ut5 co3 P i= ^gl 0 g0 .S o o0 0o o en o"T- in 6* S 4± cr ufS -<2 o 2 S££ CO T- 309- t*» -J P CO ^ 5 « 55 § V- ^ ci^ .R^ g : reinforced i5') connectncrete aproC x 0cr g o"> E .a §^3o 5 o •*r o x T- XI 0 t/>o> os- J3 O j*fo 0) _c T3-•li O Santa Rosa3-3271ntgomery-- ^r oo in ^ O ° CD xD Q. 0. 03 O D m" w C CD O- gco 2? t • en 3</> -5 0 ^>1 2! .^ S w § 'g 55 c -° -o0) g c £o Q..2 rop ro - -*-• oolg^-^ ^— t CNJ - - 2«a dt^-^w> <u ro- ro O Q. <1J <0 8 | « « en » 55 §• ^ 5 5 Ex o to *- 2 "° N ^"o. ro jo ^ < T3 Q. O i_(U Fee, supervised, safety equipment & waivirequired. Park includes a roller hockeyarena, equipment rental, snack bar,restrooms & parking.-5.-i Temecula4-6480elletier, Rec. Si°l^>rcn —:i •-, ° 3 O en -j "ro Po <^"p — -Co ro cr.2 "— </> 5 Q.OO"O n) C/>ro S — 'Q- r-ti — w• ro •—crj= c W '= *S= 8-2o £ o w 08(1> O -2> o in 3 O'SCO 00 «»LL. <« «a <f Q- o J2 o•^ o enoo i- en 09 tf» r- "OPro Q.*- 2 x ° 55 S "3ro .- o -5 ro OT g 0.0 E - OTaj o5 <oc s^ 2~ 0) co 3 = c ^. _* o = « « - o cr-o *: J2w 0) o- o " » ?o S o -2°. 2 § : ^co -o °. xCM ro oo <D ofi 4-^Fee, supervised, fenced, safety equipmenwaivers required..£ ro0. 2"roj«: CO < .52y £S CD ,_ >- £ S !OCM£ g i 8 g =5MS 8 8LLJ en _i O _x <»>t>a o- O3o t <5 ^ =J 0.c. to E| £ ro o o ~c>0 -~ Or» _j o S £ SCD m i-0 C (D0 t >in' p o ro £ 0) !!o c 13 0 0O O U) -9 CM" g< </» E •t-i ^*r encr ento *— <? CT CN ^W < E* c to" .:-!!I5«a £ * cx ro tf ° -0 0) -0 Q. -> §Z £^ c/>- 3-11 *! S -^**! §|s?lt Fee charged, supervised, fenced, safetyequipment & waivers required.t_* Q c i Valley YMCA76Sleubacher, Prcf; in —.2 ro cin | " 00 > ;- 0> TO2 CM Q TJ- h- UJ 2 00ATTACHIo Q~ in«/» « CDcr en</) en 0 J3 CD <UW U. c S «j-S Ec w E £ «u >>E 0- 0. Q>'a.e9 <" si: £»o) ro :=*s r- j £ o- " H ro "I S3!==: a; o 5 0 "S. y ro« o Q-o- o o w T3 3O 0) -^0 -9 x-in 1_ <*S•v. zj or- o J3 At Community Center, no fee. Safetyequipment required per Municipal Code,posted, use at own risk, etc...u.a cccro 2 t Sro -p. ro °-o •<- ^_- ^CM£>^r 8•tr 0) JZ0 to oc ro CO 3 a> po *- th- CD -> 10.58.010 Sections: 10.58.010 10.58.020 10.58.040 10.58.050 Chapter 10.58 SKATEBOARDING Skateboarding prohibited in certain areas. Skateboarding prohibited-Where. Toy Vehicle use restrictions. Interference with pedestrians and traffic. 10.58.010 Skateboarding prohibited in certain areas. It is unlawful for any person to ride a skateboard on private property open to the public in a general commercial zone, a neighborhood commercial zone, or in the village redevelopment zone where signs prohibiting such activity are posted by the owner of the property. (Ord. NS-188 § 1 (part), 1991 10.58.020 Skateboarding prohibited- Where It is unlawful for any person to ride a skateboard at the following locations: (a) On any sidewalk, public street, public parking lot, or public property in the village redevel- opment plan and as further shown on the map labeled "Exhibit A" and found on file in the city clerk's office; (b) Along the public sidewalk on the westerly side of Carlsbad Boulevard extending from Oak Street to Cannon Road, the northern portion of which is commonly known as the Whale Watch Walkway; (c) The Carlsbad city hall and surrounding sidewalks, landscape barriers, and parking lot; (d) The senior center at 801 Pine and adjacent public parking lot, sidewalks and landscape barriers. (Ord. NS-339§ 1, 1995) 10.58.040 Toy vehicle use restrictions No person shall skate, or use or ride any roller skates, coaster, skateboard, bicycle, toy vehicle or other forms of transportation in any public drainage facility, culvert, ditch or channel, tennis courts or gymnasiums. (Ord. NS-246 § 1, 1993; Ord. 3143 § 1, 1982) (Carlsbad 1-96) 10.58.050 Interference with pedestrians and traffic. (a) Any person upon a skateboard, roller skates, coaster or any similar toy vehicle or device, shall exercise due caution and shall yield the right- of-way to and not interfere with pedestrians on any side walk or public right-of-way. (b) No person shall ride roller skates, coaster, skateboards, toy vehicles, or similar devices on the public right-of-way in such a manner as to interfere with or prevent the lawful use of a public right of way by vehicular traffic. (Ord. NS-246 § 2,1993) ATTACHMENT 5