Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-03-19; Parks & Recreation Commission; 301-8; Swim Complex UpdatePARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION -AGENDA BILL AB# 301-8 SWIM COMPLEX UPDATE MTG. DATE: 3-19-01 TITLE : Ix( INFO ACTION STAFF: PRICE RECOMMENDED ACTION : Accept and file Staff Report. - ITEM EXPLANATION : During the January Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, the Commission directed staff to give an update on the development of an additional swim complex in Carlsbad. Although staff will give a verbal update regarding the history of the development of an additional swim complex, the current development schedule most recently approved by the City Council as part of the FY 2000-01 CIP Budget (Exhibit 1) is as follows: Alga Norte Land Acqui.sition - $4,800,000 in FY 2000-01 Alga Norte Park Phase I (30 ac.) - $6,060,000 0 Planning ($500,000) in FY 2001-03 0 Development ($5,560,000) in FY 2003-04 Alga Norte Park Phase II (50 Meter Pool) - $5,300,000 in FY 2005-10 Also attached as Exhibit 2 is a detailed report regarding the issue of an additional swim complex in Carlsbad. The report outlines several design options, estimated construction and operation costs, alternative locations, applicable facility guidelines and standards, opportunities for public/private partnerships, City/school/private agreements and public funding issues. Staff will give an update on issues related to the Commission’s request for an update on the additional swim complex and be available to answer specific questions. EXHIBITS: 1. FY 2001-02 Approved Capital Improvement Program Budget 2. Swim Complex Report - June 26,2000 U 0 i ,June 26,2000 - TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: Recreation And Finance Team SWIM COMPLEX - - During the past several months there have been considerable requests from the public regarding the need to build an additional 50-meter pool in Carlsbad. In the current CIP Budget, the City Council has allocated $5.3 million dollars for the construction of a pool in F.Y. 2005-2010. This complex is proposed to be a three (3) pool concept on approximately five (5) acres at Alga Norte Park with a dedicated fifty (50) meter pool, a polo / springboard and diving pool, and a recreation / instruction pool. The five acres would allow for adequate deck space, parking, staff offices, storage, locker and equipment facilities. Per your request, staff has prepared a report on the following items: design options and estimated construction/operating costs, alternative locations, applicable facility guidelines / standards, private/public partnerships, City / School / private agreements, and public funding. In addition we have provided some alternative options showing the possible impacts of advancing the construction of the pool. I COMMUNITY POOL FACILITY DESIG~~OPTIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS - 1 There are at least four options for the design and construction of a City of Carlsbad community swim facility. For each of the options staff has provided estimated annual gross revenues. These estimates are based upon limited research collected in a short time period and assumptions of presently unknown factors, i.e. facility location, designs and features (whether or not there will be concessions, and what type for example), as well as fees and budget for staffing, maintenance and operation, etc. 0 OPTION 1: 50 METER POOL WITH DEDICATED WATER POLO / SPRINGBOARD AND SCUBA DIVING WELL AND A RECREATION / INSTRUCTION POOL Option 1 is a three pool complex with a fifty-meter pool along with a dedicated water polo/springboard and scuba diving well (deep water) and a recreational/instruction pool. This option would require a minimum of 4-5 acres, which would accommodate the three- pool design, storage, locker, training, equipment facilities, and a minimum requirement of 250 parking spaces. The estimated construction cost for this type of complex is $5 to $6 million which includes the design, permits, processing costs and environmental. The Maintenance and Operation costs would be somewhere around $650,000 to $750,000 annually depending on actual programming and specific designs. Gross revenue for option 1 is estimated to be approximately $495,000 annually. EXHIBIT 2 iin 1 0 ” OPTION 2: 50 METER POOL AND EITHER A WAT.ER POLO DIVING WELL OR RECREATIONAL I INSTRUCTIONAL POOL Option 2 would have a two pool design with a fifty-meter pool, and either a water polo/diving well or a recreational/instructional pool. This option would require a minimum of 3 to 4 acres, which would accommodate a two-pool design, storage, locker, training, equipment facilities, and provide a required 150 parking spaces. This option would cost less to construct and operate compared to a three pool complex; $4 to $5 million to construct and $600,000 to $700,000 annually for the maintenance and operation. Gross revenue for Gtion 2 is estimated to be approximately $330,000 annually. OPTION 3: A SINGLE 50 METER POOL A single fifty-meter pool that would incorporate shallow pool and deep-water areas. Depending on the shape and design options, a fifty-meter pool could possibly accommodate the variety of anticipated programs. Possible shapes for a fifty-meter pool include “C”, “L”, “T”, “Z“, and “E”. This would cost less to build and operate than a two pool complex; $4 to $4.5 million to build and $600,000 to $650,000 annually for maintenance and operations. This option would require a minimum of 2-3 acres, which would accommodate the pool, storage equipment locker and training facilities, and a minimum of 125 parking spaces. OPTION 4: 25 YARD X 25 METER COMPETITIVE /WATER POLO / DIVING POOL The last option would be to have a twenty-five yard by twenty-five meter competitive/water polo/diving pool in conjunction with a recreational/ instruction pool (similar to the existing pool complex). This would require a minimum of 2 acres and 100 parking spaces. This option would of course be the least costly ($3 to $4 million to build and $400,000 to $500,000 annually to operate). It is questionable whether or not it would meet the long- term needs of Carlsbad’s aquatic oriented community (i.e. to buildout and beyond) Gross revenue for Option 4 is estimated to be approximately $230,000 annually. The ‘main advantage of having separate pool shells or structures is the ability to have different water conditions for each pool, such as temperature and chemistry. Having separate pools also makes it easier to schedule a variety of programs at the same time without having to compromise space needs. Another possible advantage is the ability to shut down a pool that is not in use, thereby reducing operating expenses. The main disadvantage of separate pools is the significantly increased construction and operation costs. Each pool needs its own circulation, filtration, heating and chemical control systems. As a means of distributing the costs of a pool over time, staff also reviewed the feasibility, or possibly phasing the pool. This could be done, however, staff feels it would increase costs in several ways: 1) smaller incremental projects are more expensive overall, and 2) the inability of contractors to match existing work from previous work completed typically causes increased expenses. 112 2 ALTERNATIVE SITES 1 “- Taking into consideration the City has a swim complex in the northern part of the community; staffs focused their analysis in the central and southern areas of Carlsbad and looked at possible sites that were a minimum of 3-5 acres in size. Our analysis has identified five (5) .alternative sites for consideration: 0 Poinsettia-Park Zone 19 Park Business Park Recreation Facility 0 Alga Norte Park 0 La Costa Canyon High School Poinsettia Park is an existing, partially developed park located in the Southwest Quadrant of the City. The next phase of development scheduled for F.Y. 2003-2004, calls for the construction of a variety of amenities including a 22,500 square foot community center / gymnasium. As an alternative to constructing the center / gymnasium, another option to consider for this site is to constrltct a swim complex. Staff feels this option is not desirable for several reasons. 1) The park has been previously master planned. This process included extensive community input as well as a concerted design effort to make sure all the pieces fit ci shesively affect the integrity of the overall park plan. In addition, new environmental review and Conditional Use Permits would be required based on elimination of one or more major elements of the Master Plan. - into the given site. Elimination of one or more major elements from the Master Plan could 2) It would require elimination of all or part of the tennis complex. The tennis complex, as outlined in the park Master Plan, will include ten (10) tennis courts, one center court, and a tennis clubhouse. This complex is intended to meet the recommendations of the Recreation Facility and Financing Committee (adopted by Council, 1989) to develop a “multi-court tennis facility adequate for tournament play.” Also in review of the current tennis court guidelines, adopted by the Parks and Recreation Commission, we will be one tennis court short at buildout (if all eleven (1 1 ) courts at Poinsettia are built). Eliminating courts at Poinsettia Park by substituting a pool would further negatively affect meeting our guidelines. Taking this into consideration, staff would not recommend a swim complex for a community center / gym as this location will be the only center / gym within the Southwest Quadrant, Zone 19 is a 24-acre future park located in the Southwest Quadrant of the City. Anticipated facilities may include one (l), each stand alone, lighted softball / baseball and soccer field; one (1 ) softball / baseball field with a soccer field overlay, three (3) tennis courts; restrooms, picnic areas, tot lot, two (2) outdoor basketball courts; and a 10-15,000 square foot banquet style . community center. ,In the current CIP Budget, this park site is scheduled to be developed in two (2) phases. Staff is currently working on the Master Planning of the park. The planning is scheduled to be completed in F.Y. 2000-01 with the construction taking place in F.Y. 2002-2003. The community center is _- scheduled for Phase I1 with construction in F.Y. 2010-2020. Conceptually, the three (3) pool complex could be located at this park site. In doing so the community center, and as many as two fields would have to be eliminated. (Each field requires 2.5 to 3 acres including parking). Elimination of the ballfields will prevent the City from meeting our ballfield standards in this quadrant. Due to the displacement issues, it is staffs recommendation not to locate a swim pool in Zone 19 Park. Business Park Recreation Facilitv (Zone 5) is a 13-acre future park site and is located in the southeast corner of the Northwest Quadrant. The intended use of the site is to provide recreation amenities to serve the needs of the industrial based population. Proposed amenities may include: ballfield, soccer field, basketball, volleyball, handball, picnic areas, fitness center, and jogging trails. The Zone 5 Review Committee initially recommended a swimming pool, however, the expectation of the developers' representative at that time was that the swim facility should be more geared towards a smaller lap pool. Although building a pool in the central portion -bf the City will. probably satisfy the immediate needs of the swimming population, the demand to build a pool in the South may continue even if a pool is constructed in the industrial area. Staff would recommend not considering a pool for this particular park site. Alqa Norte is a 2 33 acre future community park located in the Southeast Quadrant of the City. Anticipated facilities may include; lighted ball fields, soccer fields, tennis courts, rest rooms, - oicnic area and a 50-meter swim complex (Attachment 1). With this park being located in the Southeast Quadrant of the City it would appear to be an ideal location for a swim complex. In the current CIP Budget, this particular site is scheduled for design / construction in 2004-2009. The timing is primarily due to lack of current access to the park site. In discussing the timeline with the Engineering Department, they have indicated it would take a minimum of three (3) years to complete the section of Poinsettia Lane that will provide access to the park It should be noted that the entire park development process would take approximately 3 to 3.5 years from the beginning of park planning to completion of construction. This includes master planning the entire park, design, public outreach, Parks and Recreation, Planning Commissions, and City Council approvals, taking the project to bid and construction. The Villages of La Costa, through a Park's Agreement, has set aside 33 acres for park purposes. Currently, it is estimated that they will be obligated, as part of their park requirements, to dedicate approximately six (6) of the 33 acres. The City must then purchase, using Park-in-Lieu funds, approximately 9.5 acres to meet our park standard at buildout. The City has the option to purchase an additional 17.5 acres, at a predetermined price, for a total of 33 acres. Based on preliminary layouts, staff believes the entire 33 acres is required in order to accommodate a pool complex and meet our ballfield standards (Attachment 2). It would be staffs opinion that this park is adequate in size and is located in an ideal location for a swim complex. 4 La Costa Canyon Hiah School site was originally master planned for a’ swim COmpkX. According to Sari Dieguito School District Superintendent Bill Berrier, due to budget limitations at the time, a pool was never incorporated in the school project. During my recent conversation .- with Mr. Berrier, he felt that even though there is a special interest from some of the parents, whose sons and daughters are participating in school water activities, he could not justiw building a pool and paying the high maintenance costs each year. Staff did discuss the possibility of constructing a pool at this school site and he indicated that the site is really not master planned for a pool at this time. Our recommendation woutd be not to consider this as an option and that the City should consider building a pool on City owned property first. FACILITY I GUIDELINES I STANDARDS The “Facility / Activity Goals and Guidelines” adopted by the Parks and Recreation Commission outlines three (3) swimming pools Citywide. If the pool is located in a park other than future Alga Norte Park (e.g. Zone 19), the misplacement of ballfields will cause the standard to be deficient. Staff will be reviewing and updating facility standards and guidelines with the Parks and Recreation Commission in the near future as part of a comprehensive strategic planning effort. The Coinmission will take into account recent surveys, current trends in recreation needs, local “stakeholder’s” needs, etc. The effect on the current standards is currently unknown. I FINANCING OPTION‘S AND-PUBLICIPRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS I PARTNERSHIPS c PubliclPrivate Asreements Staffs current research shows there are limited examples of successful public/private agreements, Two known cities that have entered into partnerships with private operators are the cities of San Diego and Oceanside. The City of San Diego bought the land, designed and built the facilities at Mission Beach Plunge and at Carmel Mountain Ranch, then leased the facilities to Fitness Advantage (which was just bought out by Frogs). The contract between the two parties stipulates that the facilities are open for public use a specified number of hours per week and that the aquatics fees are within a percentage of what the City charges at their City operated facilities. Also, a percentage of the revenue from the aquatics program goes to the City. The City of Oceanside has an agreement with the Santa Margarita YMCA to construct and operate a park site near the corner of College Boulevard and Mesa Drive. The City has provided $500,000 and the land to build a six-lane pool and a gymnasium. The YMCA is supposed to come up with additional funding to build the facilities then operate them. Apparently the timeline to break ground and begin construction has been delayed twice due to the inability of the YMCA to raise the necessary capital. The agreement only stipulates that the facilities will be available to the public, with no restriction on the fees. It has been suggested that the “Carlsbad Pool Company” would be interested in sponsoring or lonating funds to building a community aquatic facility. As far as staff can determine, this reference is actually to the Aquatic Design Group, which is an architectural firm that has expressed interest in being hired by the City to design and plan an aquatic facility, not build or oDerate one. - Meetina with Developer from Villaaes of La Costa At. the January 18, 2000, City Council meeting, Fred Arbuckle, President of Morrow Development, suggested that a public / private partnership could possibly be formed to identify _- funding sources for the construction and maintenance of the pool. City staff representatives from the Finance and Recreation Departments were invited to attend a meeting with representatives from Villages of La Costa and other interested parties (Attachment 3). The group expressed an interest in getting information from the City regarding the scope and finances of a future pool. There was a lot of energy and willingness by the parties to help with all aspects of building a poot including providing information based on their individual expertise, as well as pursuing fundraising activities to help pay for costs. The representative from Aquatic Design Group attending the meeting has had experience designing over 600 pooVrecreationa1 water facilities. Based on his experience, he noted that the facilities, which had better success recovering operating expenses, include both a competitive and recreation component. A recommendation was made that the City's pool facility include both a competitive and recreational component with an appeal to families - a more upscale relaxed facility with expanded character - with possible other uses (rented out for special occasions, etc.). City tWp" staff also met with Mr. Arbuckle on May 23, 2000, in which he reconfirmed his desire to advance the timing of the pool by obtaining funding from the private sector. In order to do so he would like to have a conceptual plan of the new pool design, which would allow him to be more specific in soliciting financial support. We informed him that it was a little premature, considering the City did not own the property or have access to the park site. Staff is - recommending that the City Council acquire the property in the F.Y. 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program Budget, work on the planning / design of the park could then begin in F.Y. 2001-2003. The construction of the park would then begin in F.Y. 2003-2004, with the 50-meter pool scheduled for construction in F.Y. 2005-2010. - PubliclSchool Partnerships The City has extensive experience with joint use agreements with school districts and is familiar with the pros and cons of this type of partnerships. If a city/school partnership is considered viable, staff recommends that the local school districts be formally asked whether or not they are interested in forming a partnership and what they might have to offer as well as what they would want in return. PUBLIC FINANCING The current CIP for the City contains $5.3 million from Public Facilities Fees (PFF) for a 50-meter pool complex at Alga Norte Park in years 6-10 (2004-2009). The funds for a pool were originally earmarked for the construction of a community center. Several years ago, when the need for a pool first arose, the funding was increased and the program for the park was changed to include a pool complex rather than a community center. The CIP currently has no funding allocated for a community center at this park. 6 ,If Council were to move up the funding for the pool, financing of other projects such as Pine School or the last phase of Poinsettia would have to be re-evaluated. These options are discussed further in the last section of this report. In addition, we have seen significant increases - in the construction costs of many public projects in the past year. Thus, funding availability would need to be reviewed closely as each stage of the design was accomplished. If the project exceeds budget or if development slows considerably, projects financed with PFF funds may need to be delayed further. As an alternative to PFF fqnding, Council does have available balances in the General Fund. In order to use these funds In an amount greater than $1 million for any of the park projects, a vote would be necessary. If Council were to take this issue to the voters, they could also consider other projects to be included in the authorization. In order to pursue a ballot initiative for the November election, Council would need to call for the election and approve a resolution to initiate the ballot measure in July. The adopted resolution and related paperwork would then be due to the County by the beginning of August. Proposition 12 Bond Act Of 2000 On March 7, 2000, California voters approved a $2.1 billion parks bond (Proposition 12) About 57 percent ($1.2 billion) of the bond funds will be expended by about a dozen state departments to acquire-and improve property. The other 43 percent ($913 million) will be provided as grants to local governments and nonprofit organizations. Of this amount, about 42 percent ($388 million) is to be allocated to local governments on the basis of population. An additional 30 percent ($272 million) is earmarked for recreational areas and cultural facilities in urban areas. The remaining 28 percent of the grant funding ($253 million) is provided for a variety of purposes. These are primarily competitive grants, although a small portion is designated for specific projects and - recipients. Carlsbad may be eligible for approximately $700,000 to $900.000 from this bond act. An application process is being developed and funds may be available by June 2001. Once the timing and amount of the grants are determined, staff will provide some recommendations to Council on the use of these funds. . . OPTJONS TO ADVANCING THE CONSTRUCTION OFTHE POOL Staffs recommendations for the park projects are shown in the 2000-01 CIP which was submitted to Council on May 16th. However, staff has developed some options for Council to consider if they wish to advance construction of a pool complex. In addition to describing the options below, a diagram is attached which graphically portrays the various scenarios (Attachment 4). Option 1 This option would involve moving the pool out of the 6-10 year CIP timeframe, and constructing it in year 5, immediately following construction of Alga Norte Park. Although current cash flows show sufficient balances, it uses essentially all of the projected PFF funds. If development did not occur as projected or if any of the PFF projects went over budget, there may not be sufficient funds to construct all the projects on schedule. In addition, there may be possible workload - rnpacts due to the simultaneous park development occurring at Pine School and Poinsettia. Option 2 This option would involve moving out the development of the Poinsettia Community Center by 2 - or more years, and moving up the development of Alga Norte Park by 1 year and constructing the pool at the same time as the rest of the park. The existing park shortage in the SW quadrant will be met with the construction of Zone 19 Park. Since there is no growth management standard for community centers, moving out the community center at Poinsettia Park would not compromise the City’s growth management plan. However, this option may cause some response from the public, because there was the expectation of having a community center at Poinsettia Park sooner. - - ODtion 3 Under this alternative, the pool is built at the Zone 19 park site, replacing 2 ball fields originally planned at that location. There would be a slight savings from the elimination of the ball fields at Zone 19 park ($0.5 to $1 .O million) which would slightly offset the additional costs of adding the pool complex. However, this site is not considered ideal due to the issues discussed earlier in this memo. This option also requires moving out the construction of the Poinsettia community center by 2 or more years in order to insure that there are sufficient capital funds available. RECREATION AND FINANCE TEAM Ken Price Mark Steyaert - Carl Pope Attachments 1, Alga Norte Conceptual Park Plan 2. Alga Norte Park Acreage Requirements Memo 3. March 8, 2000 Meeting Notes 4. Options to advance construction of the pool c: Assistant City Manager Administrative Services Director Lisa Hildabrand Helga Stover ,- Note: This plan was prepared by Fieldstone for the purpose of determining the viability of the proposed Alga Norte Park Site for park purposes. It depicts typical amenities found in the City's community parks. The plan has not gone through any public input. process, nor- has it been reviewed or approved by any City commission or Council other than as part ot tne parK requirement analysis. - .. I April 4, 2000 TO: RECREATION DIRECTOR From: Park Development Coordinator - ALGA NORTE PARK ACREAGE REQUIREMENT At the CIP meeting with the L2(3/28), the question arose as to how many acres we will need at Alga Node Park to meet our GM standaas? According to our current calculations, based on a buildout population of 40,165 in the SE Quad. (the figure we are currently using for park acreage calcs) shows we will be 17.6 acres over our standard at buildout. Therefore: 32.9 acres reserved for park dedication at Alga Norte Park 15.25 acres required at Alga Norte Park to meet standard UPDATED INFORMATION ON VILLAGES OF LA COSTA PARK DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS - -17.6 acres over standard at buildout L After speaking with the Planning Department today, we have new information concerning the acreage that Villages of La Costa (VLC) will be required to dedicate. The residential units currently proposed in the VLC Master Plan are less than the numbers previously used to calculate how much of the remaining 32.9 acre park the City would have to buy (assuming we decide to acquire the entire 33 acres). In other words, estimated. " LC will probably be dedicating less land, and the City buying more, of the 32.9 acres than we previously The current situation is as follows: 16.62 Gross acres required to be dedicated by VLC (per current development proposal) -1 0.99 Acres credit to VLC for previous park dedication (i.e. Stagecoach Park) 5.63 Net acres required to be dedicated by VLC 32.90 Total acres at Alga Norte Park 27.27 Acres available to be purchased by City - 5.63 Net acres required to be dedicated by VLC FISCAL IMPACT $4,800,000 (rounded) To purchase remaining acres up to 32.9 acres (27.27 acres at $175,00O/acre) - 2,800,000 Currently in CIP for Alga Norte Park land acquisition (PIL) $2,000,000 Additional funds needed in the CIP (if City wants all 32.9 acres) Mark Steyaert C. t City Manager Administrative Services Director Assistant City Manager Senior Management Analyst, Recreation Finance Director Senior Accountant Finance 120 " March 14,2000 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: RECREATION DIRECTOR - - MARCH 8TH POOL MEETING WITH FRED ARBUCKLE Per your request, here is a brief summary of the comments and agenda items that were discussed at the March 8", Fred Arbuckle meeting regarding a new pool at Alga Norte Park, Those in attendance: Fred Arbuckle, Frank Bower from Burton & Associates, Lisa Rodman, Scott Farrow from Aquatic Design, A Carlsbad Citizen and Fred Arbuckle's Marketing Specialist. City Staff: Ken Price, Helga Stover, Mark Steayert and Carl Pope. Highlights L of discussion included: Burton Associates, a landscape architect firm, spoke about their experience in designing parks and how swimming pools could be incorporated into parks. Scott Farrow, from Aquatic Designs, a Carlsbad based group, spoke about their experience in designing and constructing pools. He spoke about pool designs, costs, revenue, and the different types of pool components, i.e. Competitive, Waterpark theme and Recreational. City staff informed everyone that we were in the process of finalizing a report and submitting it to the City Manager outlining such issues as: - Alternative locations - Partnership Opportunities - Design Options costs - Funding, etc. ' After review of this report, he would then provide further direction to staff. 0 There were also discussions on the: - Public Input Process - Partnership Opportunities - Privatization Concept - Having the private sector pay for and construct a pool then turn it over to the City. 0 A question was also asked as to how many staff and how long it would take to design and construct a pool, Staff indicated that normally it would take 1 person approximately 3 - 4 years. This would include design, public input, the bid process, obtaining environmental, commission, and City Council approvals, and also time for construction. If you have additional questions, please let me know. - lanks 121 KEN PRICE ATTACHMFNT 2 1 I PROPOSED CIP . . .. . . .. .: . , n , Pine School Poinsettia Community Center Zone 19 (24 acres) Alga Norte Park Leo Carrillo Phase II - - 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2010 I OPTION 1: Construct the pod in year 5 at Alga Norte immediately following the park construction. > may not be sufficient capital funds available ;. may impact workload (3 parks under construction) Year 5 Year 6-10 Ouaa " NW Pine School sw Poinsettia Community Center SW Zone 19 (24 acres) P Quad NW sw sw SE SE OPTION 2: Move up Alga Norte construction with pod; move out Poinsettia Community Center >there is an expectation that Poinsettia will be completed sooner > Poinsettia not needed for Growth Management Pine School Poinsettia Community Zone 19 (24 acres) Alga Norte Park Leo Carrillo Phase II I 2000-2001 I 2001-2002 I 2002-2003 I Center I I 2003-2004 Design 2004-2005 2005-2010 I OPTION 3: Build pod at Zone 19 Park > may not be sufficient capital funds available > this will displace 2 ballfields planned at Zone 19 Park > will reduce cost of Zone 19 portion by $500,000 to $1,000,000 I Year 1 I Year 2 I Year 3 I Year 4 Year 5 Year6-10 I Quad NW Pine School SW Poinsettia Community Center SW Zone 19 (24 acres) SE Leo Carrillo Phase II ' SE Alga Norte Park 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2010 wp Master Plan Design y. Master Plan Design Design Design