HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-07-25; Planning Commission; ; CUP 248 - CITY OF CARLSBADSTAFF REPORT
APPL~ ~":'ION SUBMI'ITAL DATE: -IA
APRI!r ::..1, 1984 . C}'
DATE: July 11, 1984
Planning Commission
®
TO:
FROM: Land Use Planning Office
SUBJECT: CUP-248 -CITY OF CARLSBAD -Request for a Conditional
Use Permit to allow construction of a 2600 square foot
temporary office structure in front of the Carlsbad
Civic Center adjacent to Elm Avenue in the R-P-Q zone.
I• RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the
Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager
and ADOPT Resolution No. 2322 DENYING CUP-248 based on the
findings contained herein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City is applying for a Conditional Use Permit for the
construction of a 2600 square foot temporary modular building.
The building will be located adjacent to the Council Chambers
and the existing modulars housing the Personnel Department and
Purchasing Department. The office structure will constitute a
temporary relocation of two City departments, the Finance
Department and Research and Analysis Group. The area presently
occupied by the Finance Department will be occupied by the City
Clerk's Office. The Research and Analysis Group is presently
renting office space on Harding Street. The Zoning Ordinance
makes provisions for such temporary uses in all non-residential
zones with the following conditions:
1) The occupancy shall not exceed one year after the
issuance of the permit unless otherwise extended by the
Planning Commission. The conditional use permit shall
not be extended unless construction of the structure
intended for occupancy by applicant has begun and
reasonable progress toward completion is being made.
2) The method of placement of the trailer, the landscaping
and other design aspects shall be approved as part of
the conditional use permit.
The Civic Center is located in the R-P-Q zone and, as such, the
proposed use could be permitted in conjunction with the issuance
of a conditional use permit.
II. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1) Can the four findings, required for approval of a
conditional use permit be made? Specifically:
a) That the requested use is necessary or desirable
for the development of the community is
essentially in harmony with the various elements
and objectives of the general plan, and is not
detrimental to existing uses or to uses
specifically permitted in the zone in which the
proposed use is to be located?
b) That the site for the intended use is adequate in
size and shape to accommodate the use:
c) That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences,
landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust
the requested use to existing or permitted future
uses in the neighborhood will be provided and
maintained:
d) That the street system serving the proposed use is
adequate to properly handle all traffic generated
by the proposed use.
Discussion
Staff believes that the site is inadequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed use. Specifically, the existing
parking facilities are inadequate to handle the parking demand
at the Civic Center. Technically these parking facilities are
adequate to comply with the parking requirements for an office
facility of this size. However, many of the required parking
spaces are used for the large number of City service vehicles.
Also, City Hall receives a much greater number of visitors than
the average office building, so additional spaces above the
office parking requirements are needed. The inadequacy of the
existing parking facilities is evident on any work day by the
number of employee and visitor vehicles parked on Elm Avenue,
Laguna Drive and Pio Pico Drive.
The proposed modular buildings would necessitate an additional
nine parking spaces. The only room to put these spaces is
adjacent to the Parks and Recreation Departments storage yard on
the west side of Pio Pico Drive. However these spaces would be
over 360 feet from the proposed modular buildings. Generally,
City policy requires that all parking be located within 150 feet
of the building it serves. The parking situation adjacent to
the Civic Center is described in detail in the attached memo to
the City Manager.
-2-
In addition, construction of the proposed modulars would require
the elimination of a 25 foot wide heavily landscaped area between
the Council Chambers and the existing modular buildings. This
landscaped area would be replaced with a 3 foot wide landscape
strip.
Staff believes that this project must be considered the same as
any other project submitted for Planning Commission review.
Therefore, since staff can not make all of the findings
necessary for the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, staff
can not recommend approval of CUP-248.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that this project
will not have a significant impact on the environment and,
therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on June 26, 1984.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Planning Commission Resolution No. 2322
2) Memo to City Manager, dated June 19, 1984
3) Location Map
4) Background Data Sheet
5) Environmental Documents
6) Exhibits "A" -"D", dated June 20, 1984
MH:bw
6/28/84
-3-
JUNE 19, 1984
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: Land Use Planning Office
CITY HALL PARKING LOTS
This memorandum is intended to provide additional information on
the City Hall parking situation as you requested. Per your
instructions staff has re-evaluated the square footage of the
City Hall and included the library. The attached exhibits show
the City Hall parking lot and the library parking lot. Staff
was unable to obtain a blueprint of the library's floor plan. A
staff member from the library informed us that the library has
an area of 24,600 square feet. The following table summarizes
the parking situation for the city buildings:
Library
Parking provided
Parking required
City Hall
excluding Council Chambers
Parking provided
Parking available
for visitors & employees
Parking required
(as office use)
24,600 sq.ft.
57 -1:432 sq.ft.
64 -1:250 sq.ft.
19,170 sq.ft.
87 spaces
47 -1:408
64 -1:300
As shown by the table above the City Hall buildings do
technically comply with the office parking requirements. It
should be pointed out, however, that there is no parking
requirement for government buildings in the code. Office was
used because it was the closest in terms of land use. Office
parking, does not take into consideration the large number of
city vehicles which are parked in the required spaces. If you
subtract the number of city vehicles from the parking provided
(87-40=47) it leaves 47 spaces available to visitors and
employees. This is well below the required 64 spaces. The
parking shortage is even more evident when viewing the number of
employee cars parked along Elm Avenue, Pio Pico and Laguna Drive
at about 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M.
In considering the proposed modular, which would have a gross
floor area of 2700 square feet, nine additional parking spaces
would be required. The closest available location to construct a
parking area for nine cars would be adjacent to the Parks and
Recreation Department's storage area on the west side of Pio
Pico. This parking area would be over 360 feet from the proposed modular addition.
I '
Twenty-three of the existing 38 employee parking spaces are
already over 150 feet from the nearest portion of City Hall.
Generally, staff would like to see parking spaces within 150
feet of the building in which they serve.
In summary, the parking as proposed would meet the office parking
standards but would not be adequate considering the type of use.
Staff also feels that existing parking is inadequate because of
the number of city vehicles kept on site and because of the
amount of visitors received each day. The addition of the
proposed modular would only make a bad situation worse. If you
have any questions please let us know.
CG/ar
6/20/84
LQCA TION MAP
HIGHLAND DRIVE
CITY OF CARLSBAD
L_ __
w ::, z w > c(
CUP-248
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NJ: CUP-248
APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad
REQUEST AND I.DCATICN: Conditional Use Permit for construction of a nodular
building at the northeast corner of Elm Avenue and Pio Pico Drive.
LEGAL DESCRIPI'ION: A portion of Tract 117 according to Map thereof No. 1661
filed March 1, 1915. APN: 156-18-34
Acres 3.85 Prq,osed No. of Lots/Units ----------------
Land Use Designation
Density Allowed
GENERAL PIAN AND ZOO'ING
G --------
Density Prq,osed ------------------
Existing Zone RP-Q ____ __,;;;;'-------Proposed Zone ---------
Surrounding zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site RP-Q Office
North RP-Q & R-1 Office & SFD
South RP-Q Office
East R-1 Vacant
West Freeway Freeway
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer carlsbad EDU's -----
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated -----------------
ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
_!_Negative Declaration, issued __ J_u_n_e_2_6-,_1_9_8_4 ___ _
E.I.R. Certified, dated --------------
0th er, -------------------------------
..
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
LAND USFPLANNING OFFICE
C itp of Carlsbab
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989
(619) 438-5591
NEGATIVE DECLARATICN
PRO.JECT ADDRESS/IDCATICN: N:>rtheast ex>mer of Elm Avenue and Pio
Pico Boulevard • ..
PRO.JECT DESCRIPl'ICN: Conditional Use Permit for the oonstruction of
a tenporary 2600 square foot nodular building.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the california Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will oot
have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Justification for this action is oo .file in the
Land Use Planning Office.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive oocuments is oo
file in the Land Use Planning Office, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA. 92008. Carments fran the public are invited. Please
suanit conments in writing to the Land Use Planning Office within ten
(10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: June 26, 1984
CASE 10: a.JP-248
APPLICANI': City of Carlsbad
PUBLISH Dt\TE: June 30, 1984
Nlr-4
5/81
'-
i\~J~U~w~
Land Use Planning Manager