The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988-01-20; Planning Commission; ; LFMP 87-11 (LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 11) AND LFMP 87-12 (LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 12--APPLICAT. 1 SUBMITTAL DATE JULY 23, .L.987 STAFF REPORT DATE: JANUARY 20, 1988 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: LFMP 87-11 -LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 11 AND LFMP 87-12 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 12. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 2710 recommending APPROVAL of LFMP 87-11 and Resolution No. 2711 recommending APPROVAL of LFMP 87-12. The Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 11 and 12 are being brought together before the Planning Commission due to the Zones 1) locational proximity, 2) interrelated public facilities impact, and 3) unified public facilities financing program. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND As shown on Exhibit A Zones 11 and 12 are located in the southeastern corner of the City adjacent to Local Facilities Management Zone 6. As shown on Exhibit B Zone 11 is primarily residential. Of the Zone's 2,117 total acres 1,619 are residential. General Plan residential densities range from low (0-1.5 du/ac) to medium-high (8-15 du/ac). Non-residential General Plan land uses include 48 acres of Community Commercial, 11 acres of Office, and 4 acres of Government/Office. Most of Zone 11 is governed by the La Costa Master Plan (MP-149G) as shown on Exhibit C. Zone 12 is also primarily residential. Of the Zone's 669 acres, 555 are residential. Exhibit D shows the Zone's General Plan land use designations. Exhibit E shows the Land Use Zoning in Zone 12. All of Zone 12 is within the La Costa Master Plan (MP-149G). -STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 2 III. ANALYSIS - 1. Do the proposed Local Facilities Management Plans for Zone 11 and 12 fulfill the purpose, intent, and specific requirements of the Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management Program)? 2. Are the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zone 11 and 12 consistent with and implement the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan (1986 CFIP)? DISCUSSION The Growth Management Program requires that a Local Facilities Management Plan be prepared for each Management Zone in order to show how compliance will be maintained with the City's adopted public facility performance standards as growth occurs. The first step in this process requires determining the buildout development potential in the zone. The buildout projections for both these zones are consistent with the methodology contained in the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and the provisions of Proposition E which was approved by the Carlsbad citizens on November 4, 1986. Both plans are proposing to modify the original buildout projections by transferring residential dwelling units out of Management Zones 10 (206 units) and 12 (179) into Management Zone 11. All dwelling unit transfers are proposed on La Costa Ranch Company property. The Carlsbad General Plan allows "density transfer" incentives to encourage the dedication of significant areas of open space. This open space would be determined as the La Costa Master Plan revisions are made and would be located in Management Zone 10. The Growth Management Program anticipated dwelling unit transfers and these may be allowed within a quadrant so long as the transfer does not violate the provisions of Proposition E which established dwelling units caps in each of the four quadrants of the city. Buildout numbers have been confirmed for Management Zones 10, 11, 12, and these are consistent with Proposition E. The transfer of these dwelling units was proposed by the La Costa Ranch Company to assist in the financing of public facility improvements in Zone 11. With this transfer and confirmation of buildout projections in Management Zones 10, 11, and 12, the City can be assured that compliance with the STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 3 -- provisions of Proposition E will be maintained in the southeast quadrant of the City. Second, the Plans phase the buildout development of each zone based on estimates of yearly development activity. The phasing estimates are consistent with generalized phasing assumptions used in the 1986 CFIP. From these buildout and phased development projections, yearly phased demands for public facilities may be projected and buildout demands identified. Both plans analyze each of the 11 public facilities. This analysis compares the projected public facility demands with the available and planned supply of public facilities to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. Where demands for facilities exceed supply, the plans propose the necessary mitigation to maintain conformance with the standard. This analysis is consistent with both the 1986 CFIP and the Growth Management Program. Both Local Facilities Management Plans identify three facilities which currently do not conform with the adopted performance standards. 1. 2. 3. Circulation - Parks - Fire Station No. 6 - I-5 at La Costa Avenue A shortfall of 28.18 acres in Park District 4 Is needed now. These three facility shortfalls were also identified during the preparation of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 6. As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan, an attempt has been made to bring these facilities into conformance with the adopted performance standards. Of these three facility shortfalls, the developers in Zones 11 and 12 are proposing to provide mitigation to bring Parks and Fire into conformance with the adopted performance standards. These plans do not provide an immediate solution for the interchange of I-5 and La Costa Avenue. The developers of these plans will be proposing a Mello-Roos district to provide for the upfront funding of the interchange improvements. The following two charts provide a brief summary of the 11 public facilities analyzed in both plans. STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 4 -- LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 11 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY As of ___ 1 1. City Administrative Facilities 2 • Libra:ty 3. wastewater Treatment capacity 4. Parks lMc.ption date to be added. As of 1/1/87, existing facilities meet the adq:rt:ed performance standard. Existing and planned facilities are projected to meet the adq:rt:ed perfonnance stamard until 2005. With the constructicm of the Saith carlsbad Librai:y in 1992, lihrai:y facilities meet the adopted performance st:amard, arxl are projected to meet the adopted perfonnance stamard until 2002. Existin;J facilities meet the adq:rt:ed perfo:r:manoe stamard. Facilities in Park District 4 presently do not meet the adopted performance st:amard. As of 1/1/87 there was an inadequacy of 3.28 acres of park larxl in Park District 4. Adilticmal Park demard created by develq:ment between 1/1/87 arxl 10/31/87 increased park demam to 10.55 acres. AR;>:roved wt unb.rllt develcpnents in Park District 4 increased this inadequacy to 28.18 acres. As a oc:,nsequeo=e, the plan prcposes mitigaticm that will irci.me revisin;J the existin;J parks agreement with the Ia COsta Ran:h CClrpany arxl City STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 5 5. Drainage 6. circulation to do the followin;J: 1) dedicate 32. 3 acres of park land and 2) guarantee coostructiat am q:>eratiat of 28.18 acres of park lam. arx::e this new agreement is executed the Parks stamard will be met. Drainage facilities will meet the adopted performance stamard with the prq>OSEd mitigatiai measures. Existin:J oomiticns require that prior to the issuance of aey develcpne:nt pennit within Zale 11, a finan:;in:J program guaranteein:J constniction of the I-5/Ia Costa Inte:rc:harge nust be ag,roved. As this zeme clevelq,s, the follor,rin:J road segments will require up:Jradin;J: a) Rancho santa Fe Road b) Olivenhain Road c) Ia Costa Avenue d) El camino Real e) Melrose Avenue 'Ihe mitigation section within the circulatiai analysis of this zeme plan imicates the time frame when these improvements will be required. Also, a finan:;in:J program guaranteeing the cnrpeltion of the necessary improvements prior to grantin:J ocx::upancy of l.D'llts within Zeme 11 nust be ag,roved. '!his mitigation plan will ensure conformance with the adcpted stamard through ruildout of the Zeme. STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 6 7. Fire 8. ~ Space 9. Schools -- Fire facilities servirg Zone 11 p:resentl.y do not neet the adc.pted perfonnance stamard. The proposed mitigation measures will aa:el.erate the oonstruction am q>eration of Fire station No. 6. '1he Ia Costa Randi carpany will be providing the upfront financing necessary to oonstruct am q>erate this station ahead of the City's prqx:,sed C.I.P. Once the perfonnance stamard is met, residential develcpnent can resmne in the zone. Existing permanent open space meets the adc.pted perfonnance stamard. An CDJOil'g "WOrk program will ensure that the q:>en space perfonnance stamard will be maintained t:hra.tgh b.rlldrut. For areas of Zone 11 within Erx:initas Union Elementary School District am San Dieguito High School District, the adopted performance standard is p:resentl.y beirg met. Sdlool facilities are projected to continue to meet the performance standard to b.rlldalt if prcposed school facilities are const:ructed. '1he area of Zone 11 within the San MarcxJs Unified Sdlool District does not presently meet the adc.pted perfonnance standard. Proposed mitigation once inplemented will provide school facilities that are projected to meet the perfonnance stamard for the portion of STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 7 - 10. Sewer Collection System 11. Water Distribution System Zone 11 se:r:ved by the san Marcos Unified School District to b.rlldout. Existin;J Sewer facilities in Zone 11 meet the aclcpted perfo~ st:amard.. For the area of Zone 11 se:r:ved. by the san Marcos camty water District existing sewer facilities meet the aclcpted performance standard to b.rlldout. '1he remainin;J area of Zone 11 which is se:r:ved by the Leucadia County Water District will require additiooal. facilities to meet the adopted performance st.amard thralgh b.rlldout. 'lhese additiooal. facilities are irx:luded in the proposed mitigation. When inplemented, the mitigaticn is phased to assure oonfo~ to the aclcpted perfo~ st.amard thralgh b.rlldout. Water facilities servirq Zone 11 meet the aclcpted perfo~ st.amard. '1he proposed mitigation once implemented will assure maintenance of the aclcpted perfo~ starrlard thralgh to b.rlldout of the zone. For Zone 12 the analysis summary of the 11 public facilities is as follows: STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 8 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 12 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY As of ____ 2 1. City Administrative Facilities 2. Library 3. Wastewater Treatment Center 4. Parks 2Adoption date to be added As of 1/1/87, existing facilities meet the adq,ted performance standard. Existing and programmed facilities are projected to meet the adq,ted perfollllal'lCe stamard tmtil 2005. With the oonsb:uction of the Scuth carlsbad Library in 1992, library facilities meet the adopted performance stamard, am are projected to meet the adopted perfollllal'lCe stamard until 2002. Existin;J facilities meet the adopted performance stamard. Facilities in Park District 4 presently do not meet the adopted performance stamard. 'As of 1/1/87 there was an inadequacy of 3.28 acres of park lam in Park District 4. h:klitional Park demani created by developnent between 1/1/87 am 10/31/87 increased park de.mam to 10.55 acres. .AR>roved but unruilt develqmmts in Park District 4 increased this inadequacy to 28.18 acres. 'As a consequence, the plan proposes mitigation that will irx::lude revisin;J the existin;J STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 9 5. Drainage 6. Circulation - parks agreement with the Ia Costa Ranch carpany arx1 City to do the followin;J: 1) dedicate 32. 3 acres of park land and 2) guarantee oonstructioo arx1 operatioo of 28.18 acres of park larxl. ExistinJ drainage facilities will meet the adopted perfonnan::e stamard. '1he prq>osed mitigatioo measures when inplemented will assure compliance with the perfonnan::e stamard thrrugh ruil.da.It. ExistinJ oorditions require that prior to the issuance of aey developnent pennit within Zone U, a finarx:inJ program guaranteeirg ccnst:ructiai of the I-5/Ia Costa Int.ercharge nust be awrovea. As this zone develc:p;, the followin;J road segments will require ~= a) Randlo Santa Fe Road b) Olivenhain Road c) Ia Costa Avenue d) El camin:> Real e) Melrose Avenue '1he mitigatiai sectioo within the circulatioo analysis of this zone plan imicates the time frame when these improvements will be required. Also, a finarx:inJ program guaranteeing the carpeltioo of the neoessaey improvements prior to grantinJ oocuparx::y of tmits within Zone 12 nust be aw:roved. '!his mitigatiai plan will ensure cxmfonnan::e with the adopted stamard thrrugh builda.It of the Zone. STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 10 7. Fire 8. Open Space 9. Schools - 10. Sewer Collection System Fire facilities servi.D} Zone 12 presently do not meet the adopted perfonnarx=e starrlard. The proposed mitigation measures will acx::elerate the oonstructicn am operaticn of Fire staticn No. 6. 'lhe Ia Costa Rardl carpany will be providing the upfront financing necessary to oonstruct am operate this staticn ahead of the City's C.I.P. Orre the perfonnarx=e starrlard is met, residential develcpnent can resume in the Zale. Existing permanent open space meets the adopted perfonnarx=e starrlard. An orgoi.D} work program will ensure that the q,en space perfonnarx=e starrlard will be maintained throogh l::uildcut. Zale 12 is within Encinitas Union Elementary School District am San Dieguito High School District. 'lhese school districts have indicated the adopted performance standard is presently bei.D} met. 'lhe school districts have i.rxlicated the ability to meet the adopted performance starrlard throogh l::uildcut if proposed school facilities are constnJcted. ExistiD} Sewer facilities in Zone 12 meet the adopted performance standard. Mlitional sewer facilities will be required to meet the adopted perfonnarx=e starrlard thraigh l::uildcut. 'lhese additional facilities are -STAFF REPORT LFMP 87-11/87-12 Page 11 11. water Distribution System ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: inclu:ied in the prqxJSEd mitigation. When inplemented, the mitigatioo. is phased to assure confonnance to the adq,ted perfonnance stamard through 1:uildalt. Existing water facilities serv~ Zale 12 meet the adq,ted perfonnance stamard. '1he prqxJSEd mitigation cn:::e implemented will assure maintenarx,e of the adq,ted perfonnance stamard through 1:uildalt. The Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 11 and 12 are public facilities planning documents. The plans establish parameters that ensure Carlsbad's Public Facilities Performance Standards are met and public facilities inadequacies mitigated to accomplish this goal. The plans for informational purposes occasionally estimate locations and costs of public facility improvements. The plans fully recognize that complete environmental review will be necessary once specific public facility improvements are established. Therefore, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zones 11 and 12 will not cause any significant environmental impacts and Negative Declarations for both plans have been issued by the Planning Director on December 11, 1987. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 2710 and 2711 2. Exhibits - "A" -Citywide Map of Local Facility Management Zones "B" -LFMP-11 General Plan Land Use Map "C" -LFMP-11 Land Use Zoning Map "D" -LFMP-12 General Plan Land Use Map "E" -LFMP-12 Land Use Zoning Map. 3. LFMP-11 Dated / / 4. LFMP-12 Dated / / 5. Environmental Documents LBS/PC:af LFMP 87-11 LFMP 87-12 LFMP 87-12 15 - RO 17 Exhibit A I I 18 LFMP 87-11 City of Cerlsbact Growth Managemenl Program JANUARY 198 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANS C!7'.' OF :;,H.; MARCOS ,-------------r:;-T~-~-r .. i\ l I v~~ JI ~:,,'..¢' :I ---------RL-2 --.ii~ ' ' RL-1 ~ ~~ >' ,~ ZONE 6 CIRCULATION Existing ••••••• !1:1Inm111 •••••• Prime arterial Major arterial Secondary arterial Proposed 0 300 tiOO 1200 -,....- 0 eMo\toti•O:. ~ ,; .-, -6~ RL-2 ' --~~ ) I I --=c•:J:lim. .. M-2 • I ZONE 6 LEGEND LAND-USE RESIDENTIAL RL Low density (0-1.5 DU/Ac.) RLM Low-Medium Density (0-4 DU/ Ac.) .;:"':'·~ ::► :;:~;CIN!i ;.5 __ _,__----------7 RLM-7 ) \ I I __ J I RM Medium density (4-8 DU/Ac.) RMH Medium High Density (8-15 DU/Ac.) NON-RESIDENTIAL I C Community Commercial 0 Professional & Related ZONE 12 G/0 Governmental Offices. E Elementary Schooi H High School U Public Utility OS Open Space RLM-5 CITY OF CARLS8AO NOTE: The new conceptual alig~ment of ~ancho Santa Fe)Rd. --was approved by the City Council on October 20, 1987. GROWIH .... ' ....... r--. ·-,1-,·n,-.,\~r\\.:iCiVIC.i'l i PROGRAM uGenerai Fian Oes1 nations 7one 11 Exhibit B I c:;-y OF SAN MARCOS /! ,---=-=~=-------~-~, ··1 l J : _-:::,, : """ '"'""" -----, ----, -------' --, ---=-' -, ' ----R-1-25 1 -"'--// ' ,__ ' I ·,,_~--~---/,( \\ / ; •'I ------¾---=---.---" ;,--.. \ \ / --um•----~ 1\ / . . ,,, ~ \\ P-~-..-.,;,-4$ CG) '\).,_ &~sta Master Plr-IVI \__ \:::: '----::: :::c--.._ ~ Sania •• Knells - 1 CITY/:~~~--1;~-M l --\\\ "~ l._ -~- 0 I •P u """ I .. ._ \\ •• , ~ I • / ZONE 6 / ;· .. .. \ \ f". / ~ \ \ ' .;:::; .. ,,._ . 1--, /" / >=• ', \ f< <••·-\,.., .. , \~ P-C 149 (G) / ,/ '-...._,_~l. ,1,-v-✓ R-1-10 I I ,\ \}',.-~"\La Costa Maste, Piao -MP ,6 Llf;;E~G~E;!N~D;;~====~~~=• /!.••~::; -~"~ .. ~~.. ?-· -~.x_./,;~ t~ __ ...... ting) R-1 One Family Residential "" zoNe • -~ ~,-:.:,. ·, 1, _ 40 : 40 , 000 s.f. lots ' , -25-25,000 sJ. Iota ' \,__ 1/ ;,, -lO: 10,000 a.f. lots \,_ •.", "'¾t.4 nity /La Costa ' P-C Planneijci~~~ 149(G) Master a . Multiple , RD-M Residential Density- • -Q: quafifying overlay u Public Utility OS Open Space CITY OF CARLSBAD 0 300 600 1200 --- PROGR .. !' / ,.,o : I I I __ _J Exhibit C ) ZCNE 6 ZONE 23 LR CDStR RROCH ca. 26 c:,v OF ::"lCiN!T AS LEGEND: LAND-USE RESIDENTIAL RLM RM RM_H Low-Medium Density(0-4 DU/ Ac) Medium Density (4-8 DU/ Ac) Mecf~igh Density (8-15 DU/ Ac) ZONE 11 NON-RESIDENTIAL TS u OS J E Travel Services Commercial Public Utilities Open Space Junior High School Elementary School ) _______ __G~ROWLLJJTHu__~~---------=-=-= ---=MANAGE_ME_NL • GENERAL PLAN DESlGNA-TIONS . · -----____________ __,__P-'-'R=OGRAM . : ~~---~Zone fa~ Exhibit D ZONE6 ZONE 23 LR C□StA RROCl-f ca. '27 CITY OF ENCINITAS GROWTH MANAGEM~NT ---~ -----------PPROGRAM ) LEGEND: ) P-C Planned Community La Costa Master Plan MP 149(G) R-1 One Family Residential Zone e LAND-USE Z.Qt-JING Zone 12 · Exhibit E ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -PART II (To Be Completed by the Planning Department) CASE NO. LFMP 87-11 DATE: 12/03/87 I. BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: THE WILLIAM HOFMAN COMPANY 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 6999 El Camino Real SUITE 208 G CARLSBAD CA 92009 3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be Written Under Section III -Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) 1. Earth -Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X 2. Air -Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water -Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? -2- -- YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X ---- 4. Plant Life -Will the proposal have significant results in: 5. a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life -Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise -Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? 7. Light and Glare -Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use -Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -3- YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X -- 9. Natural Resources -Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset -Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population -Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing -Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation -Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilit- ies, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transporation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -4- --- YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X -- 14. Public Services -Will the proposal have a. b. C • d. e. f. 1 5. a. b. a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Other governmental services? Energy -Will the proposal have signif- icant results in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities -Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. b • c. d. e. f • 17. Power or natural gas? Communications systems? Water? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solid waste and disposal? Human Health -Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X -- 18. Aesthetics -Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? 19. Recreation -Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeological/Historical -Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? -- YES MAYBE 21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: NO X X X a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. A) Phased planning for public facilities will not efficiently address public facility adequately B) The project is a public facility information and planning study. C) The project is a public facility information and planning study. D) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on the General Plan. E) The plan considers phased development. F) The project is a public facility information and planning study. G) Would not assure adequate public facilities to meet demand. -6- 22. Mandatory Findings of Significance - a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION -- YES MAYBE NO X X X X The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 is a facilities planning document. The intent of the plan is to establish parameters that assure adequate and acceptable public facilities are available when needed. To accomplish this occasionally locations and costs of public facility improvements are estimated for informational purposes. It is recognized that CEQA Review for these public facilities estimates is general, and does not satisfy CEQA requirements for the project's themselves. The Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan requires complete CEQA review prior to initialization of any public or private project discussed in the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11. -7- IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed by the Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant ---effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. ---I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 12.-8-87 Date V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) -8- -- MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature -9-