HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-06-17; Planning Commission; ; DI 92-02 - AVIARA PLANNING AREA LOT 296 (CT 85-35)DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I.
STAFF REPORT
JUNE 17, 1992
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DI 92-2 - AVIARA PLANNING AREA 13 LOT 2% (CT 85-35] - Request for
an appeal of the Planning Director's decision to deny a single family home
on Lot 296 of Planning Area 13 in the Aviara Master Plan in Local Facilities
Management Zone 19.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3399
UPHOLDING the Planning Director's decision to deny a single family home on Lot 296 in
Aviara Planning Area 13, based on the findings contained therein.
11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
According to Chapter 111, Section B5 of the Aviara Master Plan, each proposal for a custom
single family home in Planning Area 13 must be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to submittal of a building permit application. The Planning
Director is responsible for checking the proposed custom home's conformance to the
applicable development standards and design criteria of the Aviara Master Plan and the
Carlsbad Municipal Code including, among other things, building height.
On April 1, 1992, the Planning Commission approved a minor amendment to the Aviara
Master Plan (MP 177(F)), redefining the maximum building height for the custom single
family homes in Planning Areas 13 and 28. The maximum building height for those homes
in Planning Area 13 was established at 30 feet to the peak of the roof. The 30 foot height
limit was placed in the Master Plan text to provide consistency with recently adopted
amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, more specifically Section 21.10.020. Only those
items referred to in Section 21.46.020 may protrude above the 30 foot high maximum.
Those items include flagpoles, chimneys, and towers that could not provide additional floor
space.
As shown on Exhibits "D" and "E", dated June 17, 1992, the proposed single family home
for lot 296 of Planning Area 13 contains a stair tower that protrudes 4 feet above the
allowed 30 foot high maximum building height. The roof area of the tower is over 185
square feet and has the potential of containing a stairway and landing above the second
floor elevation. After review of this proposed custom home, it was determined that the
proposed tower did not qualify as a permissible protrusion above the height limit and the
Plahing Director denied the request.
c
' DI 92-2
AVIARA PLANNING AREA 13 LOT 296 (CT 85-35)
JUNE 17,1992
N. ENVIRONMENTAL, REVIEW
Since the Planning Director review is a ministerial action, the Planning Director has
determined that the proposal is statutorily exempt from environmental review per Section
15268 of the State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
SUMMARY
Given that the proposed custom single family home does not conform to the height limits
as defined in the Aviara Master Plan and the Carlsbad Municipal Code, staff recommends
that the Planning Commission uphold the Planning Director's decision to deny the proposed
development.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3399
2. Location Map
3. Attachment "A", determination letter from Planning Director, dated April 15, 1992
4. Attachment "B", appeal letter from applicant, dated April 21, 1992 5. Exhibits "A'' - I' E It , dated June 17, 1992
MG:h
May 4, 1592
SITE
4
City of Carisbad
t
c
April 15, 1992
Paul Klukas
2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206
Carlsbad, CA 92008
SUBJECT: CUSTOM HOME FOR LOT 296, AW PLANNING AREA 13
After review of the preliminary plans for the single family residence proposed for lot 296
in Aviara Point, staff has determined that the structure exceeds the required 30 foot height
maximum. The stair tower includes a clerestory that extends 4 feet above the maximum
allowed height. Since this area could be converted to habitable space, the tower does not
qualify as an allowed protrusion above the recently adopted 30 foot height limit.
One set of plans is accompanying this correspondence for your reference. Please feel free
to contact the project planner, Mike Grim, at (619) 438-1161, extension 4499, if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
P
MICHAEL, HOLZMImR
Planning Director
Attachment
C: Robert Green
Brian Hunter
MG:h
PA13Cust.Lu
20- . !-as Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 (61 9) 438-1 161
Attachment IIBII
AVIARA
April 21, 1992
Mr. Mike Holzmiller
City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas
Carlsbad, CA 92009
RE: Letter of Appeal: Custom Home Lot 296 - Aviara
Dear Mike:
We are in receipt of your letter of April 15 in which you state your determination that the structural height of a proposed single-family home on the above referenced lot exceeds the allowable height restriction for the area. Enclosed with this letter is the $1 10.00 processing fee to appeal this decision to the Planning Commission.
As I understand it, although Code section 21.04.065 (a)(4) allows a variety of architectural features to protrude above the height limit, you have determined that the
proposed structure's architectural tower could be converted to habitable space without the City's knowledge, and as such does not qualifi as an allowed protrusion.
In an effort to eliminate any misunderstanding there may be regarding the proposed design, I would like to reiterate the following points:
The proposed architectural tower is a clearstory which, in addition to comtituticg L: substantive elcmezt cf the prcposcd hlediterrmsan architecture, allows light from a series of small upper windows to travel down
to the stairwell and entry foyer.
There is only one staircase in the structure. That staircase runs from the 1st floor to the 2nd floor. There are no stairs up to the area you are suggesting could be converted to habitable space.
To add floor (habitable) area to the upper tower area, an additional staircase would have to be constructed, and a circular floor constructed at the top of this staircase. These additions, particularly construction of the floor, would, by any measure be a difficult structural achievement after the fact.
2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD SUITE 206 CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92009 (619) 931-1190 F~x:(619) 931-7950
Mr. Mike Holzmiller
April 21, 1992
Page 2
D) Any additional habitable space could only net about 100 square feet (with a
very low ceiling). The proposed home already exceeds 4,400 square feet in
area (without garage). It is certainly not likely that an owner would desire
awkward, expensive additional floor area. The proposed structure already
possesses an expansive golf course, lagoon abd ocean view. Any additional
view one could achieve from the tower would be minimal.
E) The tower is only as high as necessary to provide 2-foot high windows for
light.
In addition, as you can imagine, we believe that the tower adds interest, character and relief to the elevation. The design was a product of an architectural competition involving more than 100 of California’s best architects, and is a strong example of the architecture encouraged in the Aviara Design Guidelines, approved by your office. The
tower is situated in the center of the structure, surrounded by a variety of roof heights
and angles. It will in no way obstruct any adjacent views. We have concluded that
reducing the architectural tower height by four feet would be destructive to the
architecture of the structure.
I hope the Planning Department will reconsider its denial of the tower element. If not, please schedule this appeal for the earliest possible Planning Commission hearing. I have enclosed 10 sets of folded plans for your distribution to the Commission.
Sinsrely,
Paul J. Klukmw
Director of Community Planning
PJK/er
cc: Gary Wayne
Mike Grim