Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-02-15; Planning Commission; ; SDP 94-03 - POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREAS E AND M• APPLICATIO.OMPLETE DATE: DECEMBER 7, 1994 STAFF PLANNER: ERIC MUNOZ STAFF ENGINEER: JIM DAVIS ~ STAFF REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1995 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SDP 94-03 -POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREAS "E" and "M" - Request for approval of a Site Development Plan for the construction of a recreation center in Area "M" and Recreational Vehicle (RV) storage space within Area "E" of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan located north of the Batiquitos Lagoon and east of the railroad right of way, in the Coastal Zone, within Local Facilities Management Zone 9. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3747 APPROVING SDP 94-03 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Both of these planning areas are intended to provide amenities to the future residents of the master plan as provided for by the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. Area "E" is the designated site for RV storage and, as proposed, meets all applicable regulations. The recreation center (Area "M") is provided for the use of residents of market rate units as provided for in the approved master plan. Area "M" will satisfy the common and active recreation requirements of all future planning areas ( consistent with the master plan, the affordable housing site, Area "D", has its own active and common recreation facilities). Future planning areas will typically provide private areas to fully satisfy applicable recreation requirements. Below is a project description for each planning area. Area "E" -RV storage This planning area consists of a net RV storage area of 9,480 square feet. Screen walls, landscaping, a driveway approach and circulation aisles complete the proposed components of this planning area (Exhibits "C" and "E"). SOP 94-03 POINSETIIA .ORES PIANNING AREAS "E" AND "M" FEBRUARY 15, 1995 PAGE2 Area "M" • Recreation Center This planning area consists of a 17 space parking lot, bike lock-up loop, a well integrated pedestrian circulation/walkway system, several open areas and hardscaped plazas and perimeter and internal landscaping (Exhibits "C" and "D"). In addition, the recreation center features the following components: • 30 x 75 foot long swimming pool and spa • two standard sized tennis courts (with fencing and lighting) • one full court basketball court (unenclosed with lighting) • one open turf/volleyball/play area (30 x 60 feet) • landscaping, open areas and several benches throughout the site • shade structure near the entrance/pool area (8 feet high maximum) • 16½ foot high on-site building ( approx. 490 square feet) with restrooms/showers/pool equipment storage (Exhibit "G") III. ANALYSIS The proposed project is subject to the following land uses plans and regulations: A. Poinsettia Shores Master Plan (MP 175(D)) B. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 19 (Environmental Protection Procedures) C. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance), including: 1. 21.06 Qualified Development Overlay Zone (contains required SDP findings) 2. 21.90 Growth Management D. West Batiquitos Segment of the City's Local Coastal Program A. POINSETTIA SHORES MASTER PLAN -MP 175(D) Since this project implements an approved master plan, the project is consistent with various elements and objectives of the City's General Plan. Below is a summary of master plan compliance for each planning area. Area "E" -RV storage site The provision of 9,480 square feet of RV storage space is required by the master plan. This requirement was based on the maximum potential market rate units allowed by the master sop 94-03 POINSETTIA loRES PIANNING AREAS "E" AND "M" FEBRUARY 15, 1995 PAGE3 - plan. Driveways and circulation aisles cannot comprise any of the 9,480 square feet requirement (Exhibits "C" and "E"). The master plan requires that the Master Homeowners' Association operate and maintain the site. This provision as well as allowing for administration and management of RV storage will be a condition of the project. Furthermore, the master plan states that no occupancy of any market rate units within the master plan can be granted until the site is available for RV storage. This project is so conditioned. Finally, the master plan requires that this site be adequately screened. The project's landscape concept was designed with the objective of screening in combination with a 6 foot high solid block wall (Exhibits "E" and "F"). This screening design will also be augmented by landscaping associated with Avenida Encinas. Area "M" -Recreation Center The development of a recreation center as proposed is in direct compliance with the governing master plan. The design of Area "M" is also consistent with applicable master plan design criteria because facilities and the proposed building are well integrated and provide adequate pedestrian scale circulation. All storage and equipment is required to be screened and/or architecturally integrated. The storage/equipment area within the proposed building (Exhibit "G") satisfies this criteria. In addition, the site design creates opportunities for open plazas and several open, usable landscaped areas (Exhibits "C" and "D") as required by master plan design criteria for Area "M". Serving the site will be a 17 space parking lot, bicycle loop for locking up bikes and adjacent sidewalk and master plan trail segments. B. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE-TITLE 19 Section IV of this report details the environmental review that relates to this project. C. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE-TITLE 21 1. 21.06, Qualified Development Overlay Zone (SDP Findings) The master plan requires the processing of a Site Development Plan (SDP) for the development of Planning Area's "E" and "M". The Qualified (Q) Development Overlay Zone regulates the processing of SDP's. Four findings are required by the Q-Overlay Zone in order to grant an SDP. The required findings with justification for each are contained in the Planning Commission Resolution No. 3747 for SDP 94-03. Below is a descriptive overview of the project's ability to make all four required findings. The requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environmental settings as the project design complies with the requirements of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan as discussed Section A of this report. Both of these master plan "amenity" planning areas (RV storage and recreation center to setve the master plan) will provide services and sop 94-03 POINSETTIA loRES PIANNING AREAS "E" AND "M" FEBRUARY 15, 1995 PAGE4 recreation opportunities and will not be disruptive to the community. Both sites are designed so that no adverse impacts will result to traffic circulation. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use as all applicable standards and requirements are satisfied. The RV storage site (Area "E") accommodates the master plan specified requirement of 9,480 square feet of RV storage space, exclusive of driveways, approaches and circulation aisles. Area 11M" (recreation center) can accommodate the proposed range of active and passive amenities. All features necessary to adjust the use to existing and permitted future uses will be provided. A solid wall and landscaping are proposed to screen the RV storage site while landscaping will screen the recreation center. Landscaping associated with Avenida Encinas will augment the screening concept for both planning areas. All walls and landscaping will be required to be maintained. Consistent with the master plan, required parking is provided as well as a bicycle lock-up loop. The proposed street systems serving the subject planning areas are adequate to serve the traffic associated with the proposed uses. The RV storage site will not generate measurable traffic. Engineering staff has estimated an Average Daily Trip (ADT) calculation for the traffic generation for Area 11M" of 140 ADT. This minor traffic amount can be easily accommodated by the street system serving Area "M". 2. 21.90 Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 9 in the City's southwest quadrant. Since no dwelling units are associated with the project, several Growth Management standards are not affected. However, all necessary infrastructure and public facilities/services required to serve the project will be available. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows: City Administration NIA Yes Library NIA Yes Wastewater Treatment Capacity NIA Yes Parks NIA Yes Drainage 44.1 CFS Yes Circulation 140ADT Yes Fire Station 4 Yes snP 94-03 POINSETTIA loRES PLANNING AREAS "E" AND "M" FEBRUARY 15, 1995 PAGES Open Space NIA Schools NIA Sewer Collection System 2EDU Water Distnbution System 2,640GPD D. WEST BATIOUITOS LCP Yes Yes Yes Yes The master plan site, which regulates Planning Areas "E" and "M", is located in the West Batiquitos segment of the City's Local Coastal Program. The approval of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan in January 1994 included a Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA 91-02) which was approved by the California Coastal Commission on May 12, 1994. Coastal Commission's certification of LCPA 91-02 established the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan as the implementing ordinance/document for the West Batiquitos LCP. All development consistent with the master plan, such as the proposal for these planning areas, is therefore in conformance with the West Batiquitos LCP and all applicable coastal regulations. A Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission will be required prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, whichever occurs first. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW As discussed in the Initial Study for this project (Environmental Impact Assessment Form, Part II), all potential environmental impacts associated with the development of this planning area have already been identified and mitigated to a level of insignificance. Environmental analysis and documentation for the master plan and subsequent planning areas was conducted for the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan (MP 175(D)) and the master tentative map (CT 94-01) resulting in the issuance and approval of Mitigated Negative Declarations. Since all applicable mitigation measures have either been completed or designed into the project, no environmental impacts will result from the proposed development of these planning areas. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance was issued and duly noticed on January 4, 1995, and involved review and distribution by the State Oearinghouse since the site is in the Coastal Zone. V. SUMMARY The proposed project is in compliance with the Carlsbad General Plan, the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan, the West Batiquitos LCP, and Carlsbad Municipal Code, Titles 19 and 21 as described in this report. Therefore, staff recommends approval of SDP 94-03, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained within Planning Commission Resolution No. 3747. SDP 94-03 POINSETTIA loRES PIANNING AREAS "E" AND "M" FEBRUARY 15, 1995 PAGE6 ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3747 2. Location map • 3. Environmental Impact Assessment Form, Part II, dated December 28, 1994 4. Notice of Prior Compliance dated Januaiy 4, 1995 3. Background Data Sheet -Planning Area "E" g. Background Data Sheet -Planning Area "M" 4. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 5. Disclosure Form 7. Reduced Exhibits "A" -"G" 8. Exhibits "A" -"G", dated Februaiy 15, 1995. ENM:lh January 16, 1995 \ F K BATIQUITOS LAGOON POINSETTIA SHORES P.A. E & M--SDP 94-03 LOCATION MAP \ \ F K BATIQUITOS LAGOON POINSETTIA SHORES P.A. D--CT 94-10/CP 94-03/SDP 94-08 P.A. E & M--SDP 94-03 BACKGROUND .e -ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSI\1ENT FORM-PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. CT 94-10/CP 94-03/SDP 94-08 and SDP 94-03 DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1994 1. CASE NAME: Poinsettia Shores -Planning Areas D. E and M 2. APPLlCANT: Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLlCANT: 7220 Avenida Encinas. Suite 200 Carlsbad CA 92008 (619) 931-9100 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: ~N=-o...._v __ em=be...._r __ 4_,__1 ____ 99 ___ 4 ____________ _ 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Three planning areas within the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan: an affordable housing planning area (PA D) consisting of 90 condominium dwelling units. a private planning area level recreation center. parking and a trail segment (CT 94-10/CP 94-03/SDP 94-08): a private master plan level recreation center (PA M) and a master plan recreational vehicle (RY) storage planning area (PAE). PA's E/M are both covered by SDP 94-03. All three planning areas are consistent with the provisions of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA. GUIDELlNES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indicate this determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively. Note: If "YES-sig" is checked, the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated; or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. -PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (sig) 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? 2. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? 3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? 4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? X 6. Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? 7. Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? 9. Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? 10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? -2- - YES (insig) NO _x_ _x_ _x_ _x_ _x_ --BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? _x_ 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _x_ 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? _x_ 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? _x_ 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _x_ HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? _x_ 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? _x_ -3- -HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? 20. Increase existing noise levels? 21. Produce new light or glare? 22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? 23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? 27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/ or goods? 28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? 31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? -4- YES (sig) - YES (insig) NO --MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. _x_ 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) _x_ 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) _x_ 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _x_ -5- --DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION PROJECT BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This project involves three planning areas (D/E/M) within the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan located west of Interstate 5, east of Carlsbad Boulevard and north of Batiquitos Lagoon in the southwest quadrant of the City (Location Map attached). Planning Area D (4.4 acres) is designated as an affordable housing site allowing up to 90 dwelling units. PA' E (0.5 acres) and M (1.5 acres) are the master plan's RV storage site and recreation center. Reduced exhibits are attached showing the proposed development for each of the subject planning areas. The project area has been mass graded with the approval of the Poinsettia Shores Master Tentative Map (CT 94-01) in August 1994. Approval of CT 94-01 followed the approval of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan (MP 175-D) in January 1994. Each of these approvals (CT 94-01, MP 175-D) involved Mitigated Negative Declarations which set forth the environmental mitigation measures required for the mass grading of the master plan property and development of the individual planning areas. Prior to the Poinsettia Shores approvals, the master plan property was known as the Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park which was approved with the certification of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR 84-3). All environmental impacts associated with the development of the master plan property have been identified. Based on all environmental review and documentation, the master plan contains required environmental mitigation measures on a planning area by planning areas basis. The development proposals for PA's D/E/M are in compliance with the master plans's mitigation requirements. This subsequent, planning area level, "Initial Study" is intended to supplement the existing environmental documents covering the master plan property. Pertinent mitigation measures have either been already completed or have been considered/implemented in the project's design. Because of this, no new environmental impacts will result from the approval and development of these planning areas and this project will be determined to be found in prior compliance with existing environmental review and documentation. Construction and development pursuant to CT 94-01 will provide the necessary infrastructure to allow the development of the master plan's planning areas including PA's D/E/M. This includes the construction of Avenida Encinas (a Circulation Element roadway per the City's General Plan) with a new bridge over the railroad tracks and a new intersection with Carlsbad Boulevard, mass grading of the site and required drainage facilities. Required grading for the development of the subject planning areas will require a grading permit, however, only represents final grading of mass graded areas. Since the approvals of the existing Mitigated Negative Declarations for the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan, the City, in September 1994, certified a Final Master Environmental Impact Report for an update of the General Plan. The certified Master EIR (and all referenced environmental documents) is on file in the Planning Department. The Master EIR serves as the basis of environmental review and impact mitigation for subsequent projects Citywide that are consistent with the General Plan. Subsequent projects under the Master EIR for the General Plan include the approval of development plans which implement General Plan land use designations including tentative maps, planned development permits, condominium permits, site development plans and other land use permits. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 1. As documented in EIR 84-03 and the Mitigated Negative Declarations for MP l 75(D) and CT 94-01, the site is not located near any active faults and no geologic conditions exist that would constrain the development of the subject planning areas or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards. Development of PAD will involve approximately 8600 cubic yards (c.y.) of cut, 4400 c.y. of -6- --fill with 4200 cy of export; PA E involves 200 cy of cut and export while PA M involves 3600 cy of import and fill. All grading will be pursuant to standard grading permits ·issued by the Engineering Department. This ensures that the project has proper erosion control measures and conforms with the City's Master Drainage Plan. - 2. The master plan property is mostly flat except for the lagoon bluff areas which has not been altered through mass grading. The subject planning areas have been mass graded to accommodate refined finished grading at the planning area level and have no unique physical features associated with them. 3. Mass grading associated CT 94-01 included drainage facilities and temporary detention basins to prevent the erosion of soils on or off the site. In addition, the subject planning areas will be conditioned to comply with the City's Grading Ordinance and standard landscaping and erosion control measures to prevent soil erosion as well as adverse soil erosion offsite into Batiquitos Lagoon. 4. Development of the subject planning areas will not affect the natural sand movement patterns of the nearby coastal littoral area. No changes will occur to the channels or any streams of the Batiquitos Lagoon. 5. Previous environmental documentation for the site including the Mitigated Negative Declarations for Poinsettia Shores discussed air quality, however, these discussions have now been superseded by the Air Quality Section (5.3) of the General Plan Update Master EIR (MEIR). Implementation of the updated General Plan, including projects in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan, will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. In tum, increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates will result. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions could be . considered significant. Therefore, continued development to Citywide buildout consistent with the General Plan, as partially represented by the development proposals for the subject Master Plan planning areas, will have impacts on the air quality of the region. Because of this, the checklist on page 2 is marked "significant" for this item. However, the certification of the MEIR, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for Air Quality Impacts. This "Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the MEIR, including projects in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. 6. Approval of the subject planning areas will not impact or substantially change air movements, odor, moisture or temperature. Standard grading conditions and procedures will minimize dust impacts during grading and construction phases. 7. The project will not have any impacts on the physical dynamics of the Batiquitos Lagoon or Pacific Ocean. Drainage infrastructure has been provided by CT 94-01 and the project will be subject to a grading permit so that compliance with the City's Master Drainage Plan and the drainage section of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9 (which covers the master plan property) will be maintained and no environmental impacts will result. This is also consistent with the existing Mitigated Negative Declarations for Poinsettia Shores. -7- --8. No significant surface waters exist on the mass graded planning area sites. In addition, ground water resources are not associated with the master plan property or planning area ·sites as noted in the existing Mitigated Negative Declarations. Appropriate drainage facilities are provided in conjunction with the infrastructure associated with· CT 94-01 to accommodate the increases in surface runoff and runoff velocities resulting from development induced impervious surfaces and reduced absorption rates. Drainage from roofs, streets, driveways, slopes and yards within the subject planning areas would constitute a potentially significant impact to water quality due to urban pollutant runoff. However, the project will be conditioned to comply with all grading permit requirements including provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) so that any potential water quality impacts including impacts to the Batiquitos Lagoon will be reduced to below a level of significance. This is also consistent with the existing Mitigated Negative Declarations associated with the master plan and master tentative map. 9. The Mitigated Negative Declaration for CT 94-01 documents the lack of any significant natural resources on the site and the previous use of the site for agriculture; the conversion from former agricultural uses to urban uses as been mitigated prior to the final map approval of CT 94-01 consistent with that project's Mitigated Negative Declaration through the payment and bonding of appropriate conversion fees. 10. Fuel and energy will be used during the grading and construction phases of this project in the form of gasoline and fuel. This will be a short term impact that will not create a significant adverse impact to fuel and energy resources. 11. EIR 84-3 for the former educational park master plan identified four archeological sites within the master plan property; three were determined to be significant. Follow up data recovery efforts were carried out by archeologist Brian Smith and summarized in the report, "The Archeological Excavations of Cultural Resources at Sites W-84, W-88, W-95, W-97 and W-2251" incorporated herein by reference and on file in the Planning Department. One of the sites had human remains which have since been reinterred in an open space area within the master plan with the coordination and direction of a qualified Archeologist and Native American Coordinator. This was done in compliance "1th the mitigation measures of EIR 84-3. As concluded in the above referenced report, the sites are no longer considered significant. As documented in the Mitigated Negative Declarations for MP 175(0) and CT 94-01, further mitigation to allow mass grading of the master plan property and planning area development involved the retention of an archeologist and paleontologist to monitor the mass grading effort. As part of the implementation of the approval of CT 94-01, all cultural resource monitorings have been completed in compliance with applicable City regulations and policies. No potential exists for adverse significant impacts to cultural resources from grading or development of the master plan or the subject planning areas. Ensuring the monitoring of cultural resources during mass grading of the site (through CT 94-01) is the only required environmental mitigation for PA's E and M per the master plan. No historical sites, structures or objectives are associated with the master plan site or subject planning areas as documented in previous environmental reviews for the area. BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 12/13. The Mitigated Negative Declarations for MP 175(0) and CT 94-01 outline the lack of sensitive biological resources on the master plan site. Sensitive biological resources are limited to the lagoon and bluff areas or other sites located offsite from the subject planning areas. Consistent with the existing Mitigated Negative Declarations, the development of the subject planning areas will not adversely -8- --impact any biological resources. No plant species exist onsite, therefore, barriers to the normal replenishment of existing species will not be created. Project landscaping-associated with the subject planning areas will be the only plants introduced into the area. Project level landscaping and associated erosion control does not constitute a significant environmental impact. Biological impacts resulting from the construction of major infrastructure (drainage alignments and facilities) have already been identified and mitigated with CT 94-01. 14. The Mitigated Negative Declaration for CT 94-01 outlines the historical use of the master plan site including the subject planning areas for agriculture. Pursuant to that project and associated environmental review, all outstanding agricultural conversion fees have been paid or bonded for with the mass grading allowed with CT 94-01. No further mitigation measures are required and no impacts to agricultural areas or farmlands of importance will result from the development of the subject planning areas. As also outlined in previous environmental documents for the.site, onsite soils are mostly Marina loamy coarse sang. (MIC) which is not considered "prime" agricultural lands per the Williamson Act definition. 15/16. As discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declarations for MP 175(D) and CT 94-01, there is minimum habitat value for animal species in the project area which has been recently mass graded. The exception would be the animal biodiversity associated with the lagoon and adjacent wetland areas which will remain open space and are located offsite and away from the subject planning areas so that there will be no impacts to the habitats or diversity of sensitive animal species associated with Batiquitos Lagoon; or their natural patterns of movements or migrations. The biological resources of the lagoon will not be impacted by the development of the planning areas within the master plan. Domesticated animals in the form of household pets will likely be introduced into the area by future residents; however, this will not significantly impact the diversity or habitat of animal species. HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 17. The project will not alter the planned land uses of the subject sites as designated by the General Plan and Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. Land uses and densities proposed for the subject planning areas are consistent the master plan. 18. The project is located within Zone 9 per the City's Growth Management Ordinance. As documented in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for CT 94-01, development of the master plan including the subject planing areas will not adversely impact any public services or facilities. The project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance and the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9. Public service and facility impacts, and financing, have been accounted for with the final map approval of CT 94-01 to accommodate the master plans's residential/planning area development. In addition, the applicant has entered into a schools agreement with the School District to mitigate school facility impacts. 19. Previous environmental reviews have documented the lack of a need for new or modified solid waste or hazardous waste control systems. Infrastructure needs including sewer alignments and service have been accounted for with CT 94-01. This project will receive standard conditions of approval ensuring adequate sewer service. -9- --20. The Poinsettia Shores Master Plan, which implements the mitigation requirements of the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for MP 175(D) on a planning area by plannihg area basis, requires that every residential planning area be subject to a noise study that ensures compliance with the City's noise policy. In accordance, PA ·D has been designed to attenuate noise levels impacting the pr~ect in conformance with the Cfty's noise policy to reduce noise impacts to the project to below a level of significance. The approval and development of the subject planning areas will not increase existing noise levels to a level of significant environmental impact. 21. Through the site design and conditions of approval for the subject planning areas, no light or glare will be directed offsite to adjacent planning areas or outside of the master plan property. Lighting within planning areas will be low intensity and shielded from upward reflections. New light associated with the development of the subject planning areas will not be a significant environmental impact. 22. The finish grading and construction proposed for the subject planning areas will not involve the application, use or disposal of hazardous materials or substances so as to create a significant environmental impact. 23. The approval and development of the subject planning areas will not substantially alter the density of the human population of the area since only the densities already allowed by the General Plan and the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan are proposed. The allowed densities associated with this project are also consistent with the City's Growth Management Program and the Zone 9 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP). The affordable housing density associated with PAD (20.4 du/ac) exceeds the General Plan designation of Residential-Medium (RM with a range of 4-8 du/ac); however, it is allowed by the master plan in conjunction the State allowed 25% density bonus permitted for affordable housing units. 24. The project proposes to construct affordable housing units on PA D. PA's E and M do not involve residential dwelling units. Existing housing stocks in the City will not be impacted by this project. There will be no demand for additional housing created by the development of the subject planning areas. This project will supply housing units; not create a need for additional housing. 25. The development of the subject planning areas will increase traffic in the area. However, as discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for MP l 75(D), the master plan at buildout will generate approximately half of the traffic associated with the former educational park master plan as documented in the applicant's traffic study by Urban Systems Associates, Inc. dated May 17, 1993. In addition, the project will comply with the circulation improvement requirements of the master plan (MP 175-D) as well as the master tentative map (CT 94-01) and the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 9 so that local traffic impacts would be mitigated to below a level of significance. While the Mitigated Negative Declarations and previous environmental documents that exist for Poinsettia Shores evaluated circulation impacts, those discussions have now been superseded by the Circulation Section (5. 7) of the General Plan Update Final Master EIR (MEIR); especially with regards to regional traffic impacts. Implementation of the updated General Plan, including projects in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan, will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all I-5 freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard including the intersection of Carlsbad Blvd/ Avenida Encinas which is associated with this master plan property. -10- --Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections Citywide are projected to fail adopted Growth Management performance standards at· buildout. Mitigation measures have been recommended in the MEIR to reduce circulation impacts. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need and provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, sidewalks and pedestrian linkages. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. While local traffic impacts for the subject planning areas can be mitigated to below a level of significance, regional impacts associated with the development and buildout of the master plan in general are still considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout due to regional through-traffic. Therefore, the checklist on page 4 is marked "significant" for this item. The recent certification of the General Plan MEIR, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for Circulation Impacts. This "Statement of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the MEIR, including projects within the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. Therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. 26. No existing parking facilities will be affected by the buildout the master plan including development of the subject planning areas. The demand created by each planning area will be accommodated by the provision of required parking spaces and facilities within each planning area. 27. Infrastructure associated with CT 94-01 including the Avenida Encinas roadway will provide alternative circulation routes which could alter the present patterns of circulation or the movement of people and/ or goods. The subject planning areas will contribute to the buildout of the master plan which will impact transportation systems and nearby intersections identified in the General Plan MEIR. Because of this, the checklist on page 4 is marked "significant" for this item for the same reasons as discussed above under #25 of this Initial Study. 28. The master plan site and subject planning areas are outside of the McClellan-Palomar Airport influence area so no impacts to or from air traffic will result. No waterborne traffic occurs in the vicinity and the operations of the railroad right of way will not be impacted by the approval and development of the subject planning areas. 29. The master plan circulation system as well as the design of the subject planning areas will include standard provisions for transportation systems accommodating vehicles, with bicycle lanes and sidewalks for pedestrian movements, so that there will be no increased traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians. There will· be no significant conflicts with competing modes of transportation. 30. As documented in the MP 175(D) Mitigated Negative Declaration, no impacts to City emergency response plans will result from buildout of the master plan including development of the subject planning areas. In addition, the subject planning areas have been reviewed by all pertinent City departments to ensure that there will be no impacts to any emergency response procedures or evacuation plans. -11- --31. Previous environmental documentation, including the MP 1 75(D) Mitigated Negative Declaration, does not identify any potential significant aesthetic or visual impacts associated ·with the development of the subject planning areas. Development of the proposed project will not obstruct any scenic vistas or create an aesthetically offensive public view. 32. No impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities will be created by the development of the subject planning areas. PA D is designed to accommodate its own private recreation center for the residents of the affordable housing site (area D). PAM is the master plan level recreation site available to the residents of the master plan excluding PA D residents who will have access to their own private recreation center as provided for in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. -12- e· -ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROTECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, · c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed project, and g) no project alternative. a -g) It has been determined through this initial study that this project will not have any significant adverse impact as conditioned or for which a statement of overriding considerations has not been made. Therefore, alternative analysis is not warranted nor required. -13- DETERMINATION (fo Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECI.ARATION will be prepared. _x_ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR/Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR/Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that have been imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Mitigated Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signature Date LIST MITIGATING MEASURES CTF APPLICABLE) -14- - APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES ENM:vd THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HA VE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature -15- City of Carlsbad ■GGhih•h·l•lA·i=iihei§hi PUBUC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Please Take Notice: The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the project described below have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed. Project Title: Poinsettia Shores -Planning Areas D, E, & M Project Location: Portions of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan, located north of Batiquitos Lagoon and west of Interstate 5. Project Description: Partial buildout of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan involving three planning areas: 1) PAD -90 affordable dwelling units; 2) PAM -Master Plan level recreation center; and 3) PA E -Master Plan level RV parking/storage. All are consistent with applicable Master Plan provisions. Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, Community Development, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California.92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to Associate Planner Eric Munoz, in the Planning Department within thirty (30) days of date of publication. DATED: CASE NO: APPUCAN(: PUBUSH DATE: EM:vd JANUARY 4, 1995 CT 94-10/CP 94-03/SDP 94-08 -PAD SDP 94-03 -PAE & M KAIZA POINSETTIA CORPORATION JANUARY 4, 1995 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 -BACKGROUND DATA SHEET - CASE NO: --=S=D=-P_.9;...:.4....::--0=3 ___________________ _ CASE NAME: Poinsettia Shores Areas "E" APPLICANT: Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation REQUEST AND LOCATION: RV parking/storage per the approved Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7 of Carlsbad Tract 94--01 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. according to Map No. 13181, filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder. APN: 216-140-32, 33 Acres 0.5 (Assessor's Parcel Number) Proposed No. of Lots/Units -=N..,,./=A=------- GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation RM Residential-Medium Density Allowed -=N_./=A=------Density Proposed -=N..,,.I ..... A;......__ Existing Zone -=PC-=-----Proposed Zone ....,P,...;:C~--- Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Site Zoning PC North PC South PC --- &st PC --- West PC PUBLIC FACILITIES Land Use Vacant -Designated RV parking Vacant (PA "B-1") A venida Encinas A venida Encinas Vacant (PA "D") School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) _--0-=---------------- Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated -=D=e=c=em=be=r-=9;.a....:.1=99 .... 4,..__ __________ _ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT _ Negative Declaration, issued ___________________ _ _ Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated _____________ _ Other, Notice of Prior Compliance January 4, 1995 ENM:lh -BACKGROUND DATA SHEET - CASE NO: -S ...... D ___ P __ 9 __ 4-0.......__3 ___________________ _ CASE NAME: Poinsettia Shores Areas "M" APPLICANT: Kaiza Poinsettia Cotp0ration REQUEST AND LOCATION: Master Plan Recreation Center. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6 of Carlsbad Tract 94-01 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 13181, filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder. APN: 216-140-32, 33 Acres 1.5 (Assessor's Parcel Number) Proposed No. of Lots/Units __ N....,/ ..... A _____ _ GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation -'O=-=S ____ _ Density Allowed _-0 ___ -____ Density Proposed _-0-=---- Existing Zone __ PC--=-----Proposed Zone --=PC--=---- Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: · (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Land Use Site Zoning OS Vacant -Designated Rec Center North PC South PC Vacant (PA "B-1 ") Avenida Encinas --- East PC Vacant (PA "A-1") West PC Vacant (PA "B-1 ") PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) __ 2 _________________ _ Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated __ D ___ e ___ c __ em=-be ..... r ..... 9 .... , ..... 1 ___ 99 __ 4 _____________ _ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT _ Negative Declaration, issued ___________________ _ _ Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated _____________ _ Other, Notice of Prior Compliance January 4. 1995 ENM:lh CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: SOP 94-03 -Poinsettia Shores Areas "E", and "M" LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE:_9_ GENERAL PLAN: __ O"'""S ..... IRM=-=-=-------- ZONING: PC -POINSETTIA SHORES MASTER PLAN DEVELOPER'S NAME: KAIZA POINSETTIA CORPORATION ADDRESS: 7220 Avenida Encinas -Suite 200 PHONE NO.: (619) 931-9100 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 216-140-32, 33 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): --=2:a...:a=c=re=s-=to=tal=-------- ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. Demand in Square Footage = Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADTs = (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Open Space: Schools: Served by Fire Station No. = Acreage Provided - (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer: Demand in EDUs - Identify Sub Basin - (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD - NIA NIA NIA NIA _IL 140 __4_ NIA NIA _L NIA 2,640 L. The project is N/A units N/A the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. _fte--=-· ~------t~~o f C if r, s b ad .. 46 I ,I ,ii ,t• I •tA•& I;; ,,t4 ,ii DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ----------------------------------------., APPLJC~NT"S ST~7EMENT OF OISCL.OSURE OF CERTAIN OWNEASiflP INT'E,;ESTS ON AU. APPUC\TIONS WHICH W1U. REQUIRE 01sc;:;E110NARY ACTION ON THE ?A.RT OF THE CITY COUNCll. OR ANY APPOINTEO BOARO, COMMISSION OR COMMCTie:, Please Prmr) -he following information must be disclosed: \. List the names and addresses of au persons having a financial interest in the application. Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenida Encinas Suite 200 Carlsoaa, CA 9~009 Owner List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in _the property involved .. Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenic:ta Encinas smte 200 Carlsbad, CA ::i2009 If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names an= addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation .or owning any partnersr.:;: interest in the partnership. · Saioa California, Inc. 7220 Avenia~ l:ncinas Suite 200 Carlsbad, C! 0 ?QQ9 If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust. list the names anc aadresses of any person serving as officer or directer of the non-profit organization or as trustee er beneficiary ot the trust. rt\.MCXXJ13 a190 2075 L..as Pai mas Drive • Cartscad. Cahto·rnia 92009~859 • (619) 438-1161 • • (Over) Disclosure Statement Page 2 s. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boar::s Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? · Yes _ No _ If yes, please indicate person{s) ___________________ _ ~ 11 defined u: 'Any individual, firm, copattnersl'lip, joint venture. uaociation, 10c1al club, lratemal organization. corporation. estate. m,st. receiver. syndicate, U,11 and any other county, city and county, city mun1c1pality, diatnct or other political 1ubdiv11ion, or any other groi.p or eomb1nat1on acting u a unrt • (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.) Signature of applicant/data Print or type name of owner Print or type name cA applicant FRM00013 8/90 ----------,, . ,:" .J EASEME!S:I rs:on;s; = = = 21 "'"" "'"" " ,owo, '"""' ,. --5""CO " RIGHT OF' WAY CAALS8'0 " OIWN>GE SOCl'CD PARKING SUMMARY; RtalEAT!ON LOT 15 R,V, STOR-'GE LOT 7 ~ 17SPACCS 9,480 SF Jl£I: 81( 7~. PG 30J,OR BK 760, PG 14!1 F/N 74-11!13!11,0R F/N 86-29•230 F/N 7._11!13~ ~ 1?SP.t.CtS 9,480 SF ~ 11r.,•,e 5/":'/18 5/;.74 7{"!/815 5r-7◄ = R<WO,t "''""" """" ""°"' '°"" -011$1 I~ :in,tlt GENERAL !S:OTES; CXISTlHG ZONING • EXtSTINQ: CENERAL Pl.Ml .DtSl~T10N PROPOStD GD,IEJW.. Pl.AH ~TION CONTOUII MtRVAl. • """"'°""· SCHOOi.= WATER OISTRICr Sf:WtR O!STRICT AVERAG(twl.YTRAFFIC ,oJAI.'°""' NUMBER or LOTS 21&-140-32.-33, PC (POI~ SHORts ==> PC (POIHS£mt. SHORES "'51DIPINI) lOT6•0S.L0T7:RM lOTl:OS.L0T7.RM (stE CIU.DING AHALYSIS) CAR1..SSAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CARI.SB.lrD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CARLSBAD MUHICIPA,1.. WATER OlStRlCT N/A LOT 6• 1.5 AC. CROSS LOT 7• 0.5 AC. GROSS , LOT 15• 1 LOT RECR(ATIOIU,L LOT 7• RV ~ LOT H/A N/A SAH-LO ~ SURYtYS M,Tt])-0-11-90 LOT KEY MAP SCALE-. 1"• 200' CARt..seA0 BLVD GRADING ANALYSIS; THESt sm:s WOlE CAA0£0 UNDER 'TH£ APPRCIVAL Of IUSTER TDlTATh't MAP, CT, Sl4-01 F'lfW. GRADING FOR THESE P.NiNlNC AREAS IH\IOL\£5: J:21...! ..!&!2. CUT: 0 C'I'. CUT: 200 C'I'. nu: :uoo er. FU.: o er. IMPORT. 3,f.00 er. IMPORT: EXJ>ORT: DPOtn': :zoo er. BENCHMARK; 0£SCRIPTIOfr. STANOAAD DISC S£T nt.rsH 1M EAST CORNOI ON NORTH AE!UTWENT Of' £AST 8RIOC[ LOCATION: APPROX. 300 rm SO\.trH or SOOTH [HTRY TO CAAl.S&l,D STAlI PARI< 40 Fm WT Of" C£NlIRUN[Of' NORTH 80UNO CliRI.SSID 81.W, OH PONTO STJIW BA10GE HO.A7a82 RrcoRO raow: HORTH COUHTY VERTICAi. CONTROL °"T• BOOK. PAGE 135 HO, 0C 0147 D.l'VA.llON: ~~MS.L 9 SHEET OF 3 SHEETS S.D.P. 94-03 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREAS E & M LEGEND: SUBOMSION BOUNOAR'r' EXISTING ctWl'OURS EXISTING WATD! MAP11 EXISTIHG SEWER 1.WH • M H. EXISTING STORM DRAIN OCISTlN~FlREH'l't>RANT EXISTING STREtl' UCHT PRO?OSED l'tNC£ PROPOSED FlNISHEO COKTOURS PROPO&IIWATIRMAIM PROPOStD St'WER loWN • M H PROPOSt() ~M OFWN 11: C,O PRO?OSEO CURB INLET PROPOSED PAO ElEVA.TION Cltl.OED SLOPCi (2.1 MAX) W/DAYIJGHT UN[ PROPOSED sP0T El.CVATION CONCROE f!I.OCK RCJA!Nlf,fC WALL PRO?OSal C1.W!DAA1L (M-9) PRO~ SEWER F'ORct MAIN PROPOSED, FlR[ KrOAAm ;:>ROPOSED STREa LICHT LOT UN[ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOni 8 & 7 Of" CAAI.SB,\O TRACt 94-01, IN THE CITY or CAAiSBAD, COUNTY OF" SAN DIECO, STATE OF' CAuF'ORNlA., ACCORl)INC TO IAAP THE:Rtor HO. 1311:lt, FlLED IN THE OF'FlCE or lli[ COUNTY RECOROOl or ~ DIEGO COUNTY ON JANUARY 26 1995 OF omcw.. RECORDS CML E!S:GI!S:EER/I,A!':ID SURVEYOR: O'OAY CCIHSULTANTS, WC. 7220 AYENIO,I, ENCINAS, STE 204 CAAI..SBAD, CA. 92009 OWNER /SUBDIVIDER: IWlA POINSETTIA CORPORA.TION A a.t,ll'ORHIA COliPOAATK)H 7,220 A~ ENCINAS, STt 200 CARLSBAD, CA. 92009 RC\IISEOJAt.27, 1995 RC'Vl'SEO JAN23 1995 RtvlSE0 JAN 1995 RtvrSEt>DEC.1994 RtvlSEO OCT 1994 RC\IISCO JUNE 1994 REVISED MAR 1994 '"'-:NOR=•"'o""""°'=--- ~ .,,__,, ,IAN27J99S ei,t,TI,,uHTl:D CNCi!NCt'R or \ol0RKr DATC•n;.-: RtE, 32014 EXHIBIT "A" T)'PICAt, HCTIOH -PRIVATE'.' sram .,..,., ,, Jr STRE:E:TS Mc£ , I , ,,. TYPICAi Sf'CT10N -.1,Y[NJQA £NC/HAS .,,.., BENCHMARK: OESCRIPOON' ST~ OISC SET Fl.USH JN E'.AST CCRNER ON NORTI-1 M3tJ'NENT OF EAST BRIOCE U)CATIOH• APPROX 300 Fttr SOUTH Of' SOUTli Etron' TO CAAl.Sa.l.O STATE PARIC 40 Fm EAST Of' CENrolUNE OF' tfOffl4 90UN0 CARt.SEIAO Bl.VO. ON PONTO STRE£t' 9RIOCE HO A7882 RECORO FROM NO,m., COUNTY VER1lCAl. CONtROL DATA 8001<. PAC€ 1l5 NO, OC 0147 Q.£VATIOH: 50~ W.S.l. SHEET · 2 OF 3 SHEETS S.D.P. 94-03 ENGINEE~ OF 'WORK, fo<-~ o't~? DATEu?;:a.. RCE, J2.01• EXHIBIT "B" .3:=' BOUNDARY DATA NO. OEUA OR 8£.tRING RADIUS I Jt5a'!l"Jl'£ 2 Jt21""..!'29"* ' A•tt25~ lO" . ll.•1/!JT&t ,.. ' A•SJ'l5'00" lO' . A•tr5-t-W ,.,. 1 H !9'l2"25" II . A•2J'l'''1• lO' " H 2{1'1TJZ' £ (10 I ---x---;1--"-------"'"--=~ __ 1._+--- \ \ / '!,\i.:!"a;,.=s1a==-;.,. SC,lt£.1°•'1Y l.£NG1H 7J01" 92.25 II 7S' 52.IS' ,.,. "" ,...,. 12.W ,..,,. SIGHT DISTANCE TABLE SlREET 0€SIGN STOf'O'NG SIGHT IF'iCATION SPEED OOiANCE \ BENCHMARK: SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS S.D.P. 94-03 LENCTrt ~--- IU.127199S ,a,,· IJ.!O' 2951' IJJO' 18.'I' 121n• 12!5' EXHIBIT "C" ::. PLANT MATERIAL PALETTE fbt..~f~~p 101 TREE CIOO'Jr • IS GAi ION Mlrtl l'odOClqMP'MUlor 0rn■ rt■• Trt,ta,,la to.fut. -Brlobaa~ •• c-, .. ..,.111 N-r-'lool .. -C•rr ....... Tn. Zoltff n. 111d n "' •pplkabl. ,~ 1h11 projttt. Irrl11tlo■ uk■laOou • a■nu■I 1mou11t of 111ppltffltnt1I watu r1q1lrtd, ZOl'tl: It .,.... s • .,,.i,.--,,, .. "'"'"' A••--''1 J..r P<T M-.tll ZONII: n ,.s-,-..w"" 1rs .. ,,1t-,wwa1"'A••--nr l.lS" P'"' '1-1.1; LJI'" ,w WNII. QTY • e• STEEL TUBE FENCE WITH VINF..S -----;- TF.NNIS COURTS FENCING SHALL HAVE CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ WIND SCREEN TYP. 10' HIOH l"t!IUMl!Tl!:II ,t:NCII 6' STEEL TUBE FENCE Makil-.... ll•hllilJ rw •ff.,.....••--.. pt1ti,Uc ~• 1,-c,, a...Uw -. 1"-11 bot 111'1 rnP'l""lbllllJ "'• 11-w~ A-1•15-or o,1,ff •P111'1prla 11111111 Ktt•C•bl<t It 11,, Cl17 "' Cut.Ill .... A u, ____ "-'•-'•• ..-'"11111 -<npt■bk ncl17 di■ll _..,,_ 1/1 !nil ••i•lnaa« -■d llabU,cr rn,,01111lb1Ulln. C":'..:~~ ... '~":!~,•~~~:i! ~i:.:=..:"...:."oc;°r."...i:!i:.:-'~ ,, 1111117 far lr■II •11r,01u. Tli, corrnpo11di111 CCAll't ol a r11-t-■1lbl1 ll•--Nt'1 A-1•1101, or 1111 fl•lro11L111 d<M:■--11 el -■~11,tt rll",...,11,k tJllitf lloaM I~ rd'tn11tt Jo IN ... 1111nalff 1■41 lq,1,1,1117 "'IIMn .... t H""'- • SHOWERS/RESTROOMS/POOL EQUIP. PARKING LOT TREES ACCESS GATF. THROUGH STEEL C) TUii£ FENCE TO AVENIDI\ 1-"NCINAS ( 1 \ \Q\\ 1 MAYRR Al>DFD WITH IMrROVEMF.NT PLANT ZONE PERCENTAGES ZONE ONE: 3.070 S,F, OR 14 2"' Of TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA TURF: 4,360 SF. OR 20.1% OF TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA ~!I:\ Qf lOTAL lAHQ$CAPf AREA TOTAL V.NOSCAPE AREA • ?] 6]5 5 f QB 3'.1 J"/C. I TOTA! 51T'E TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA■ 15,340 S,F, IBRIGAIJOH NOTE· All pra,11,no aru, 10 be 1rnqattd ..:c:otdng to pl1t11 'YP'I ar,c1 otnv1ronni.111w ••~ut•sha1 lfCt~ unlfonn lrr191tlon eove,119, by mu,,, ol an au1orn.blly c:onlfol1"6. alfflft«!ly 1dlv111'd und1r0tound plp,,d lm91tlotl •ist■m lo, -..,,., cons.rvatlon and lo minimize .rollOII, S1■1■ ol Iha art automatic COt'111oll., with mntlfl' ... a1v, eap11bil,tlea and low pi'90pltlltlon 1'111■ .p,menl shll be US<td. A teOuc>td p,n,._., Nd,Jlow pr■.....,te, WIii be 11$..:3 U1 p,ot8'CI 11'11 wurc-ol watltf from poss,bl<I beckllow OJnt:lmioatlon Aa pt.s&uriu,:I main~ and late, .. lonn .,.,Q be PVC Installed below Of~ A. Irrigation 1-,..t•rr. 111.w be lnstak<I ~ 1M local and l~IOl'lal starodards, Rtd,11m.d .-rig1ilon shall be Ulll<111d lo tl'f •l1-p)llllbieWlll'I In CQurily cl San 0,eQo Htalttl 0.pattm9'11 $tandards The landsc>lp.t lW!d lr"9a110n 'Ytl-lll'lalbe dHlQr>td l/lill1"'9 all M'Al'I cf ltM ~• cf ":,:itnsQ!p.t", • Geed dff>O'I wm b9 ~ by Npllfl\11'9 ln191IIOl'I sysllfl'l9 P"' U'l, mtel'O dimel>Candplll'lttOII"-• n,.,to,1~be~IJl..,,,,,,,_,.99"cn<lff'OOCl,oolll1'0011 • Cal■luly pt■ooe,d u,11 ol lhNb and ""1 ■rtH throughout 111• PfOJK1 l<I•, • Ubltilnq drcuohl lolat~ ~ low ••1« ~ plant ll'lllltnal .. rnud1 • pCSSlble • Ubli.zlrltl ,mofflt lrriQ•tlCII IM!hodS • Ut,IIZlnQ <flUlch lrl all 11-, IWid ahrub bws • Utlllllo; propu l1nd1c■p• malnt•n•nc• 1nd m1n•g1m1nt practlc••• 11••111.->LUWPS'J'Ot,,11C.., 1rxr,,~•JI.UW'sro,;1, l"ll:f"lll,SI.IJl4'h'CIC ,f>uu'-PLANS/ LANDSCAPE J'LANS. t.~C:,\~~s . ;.;::D:E:::ROVEMEl<T PLANS '/\';,U;~r.•·-' ------~g::i~~r,iie~T~r°tt~:rEiiEey~i~ BLOCK WALL~~ I t !~ ~ 5CJtL ( .. 2V' TESHIMA. DESIGN GROUP ~AA=-IJJ'l'D"-Al'll'lll'IQ ~~ -------------~\,.~\ ~ POfN~JCSOORES RECREATION CENTER ~~~P.E-PREIJMINARYPLAN AREAM _,__,..."'""~a.i.c .._a,,._CAIIQl.31 ~,e, .. _,,_ rAX.to11 .. -,..1,a DATE: 10/28/94 PL-1 - - EXHIBIT "D" ) I I I / I I I ----1---------\ / O' i' 10" 70' / I\ (.11,,. I PLANT MATERIAL PALETTE 9.!! i~~1f1l1 IRE& ()00'1, -1$ GAi I ON MIN) Cl--•-•• Qaplrtt,re • Ca..,..._. T"" lr.tlifdll~ ,.,,..i..-· lolllot Tm ~ _..aci1...., •Fen n■c r'JnM 11.■•■lla-'i • l."'"Cf'NII hw 0 ~ ral\r~~r I ox TREE "oo" . l:i G,\11 aN MIN, I c., .. io,.i. __,.._.. • c.,.,..._.._. Tnc I i:::C~i:°';':.:: ~:8~~--y...., Trbtu.la ce.fttt. ......... 1 .. 0 20 fil1PJ.!B.S. (Sllnbs 50'.JI, 5 Callotl, 50"" I Gil~ or Lll'ltn} ldNfS"tz GROUND COVERS (Gmud Conn 201, 1 Galla BO'I fT11t ml■ J A.NIis 'l:d_..,.,. G-.dtff' • N.CN. Aud■ ndeku • N C.N, ~:::!~•riv~1~:f~VE£!~:,:,c;::..:: Co,,-N•• klo-1111 • N,C.N. C910tl0llff' •t..,,f•I' -Dwuf ~ C.c--0.-letP"W,■ 'Alt-.'• Wloka Tr■dl■1 In 1'1■11t bcau .. a. •r,lrw ho1 D•arf' • D...-f a:.a.u..i. u<a1i..i. nM• • n■11 £a,;•11-i. g:::u':.'~ri1•~•~'tA.0_.. r::::-!:.,!~=; ?"-/,..~~:: L>,-t,,■-1Apl"Pf1'-"' KOt>f,~I•• • Nn, ~1.-d Tn Ttn it°'",=:~•fp"J~~~•.-;-:..~~':'J.;;=-.. ,...-l11•1e.n-n .. Plitolhll■ t, ... ..,.J • N C.N. Aot.....-ho111 JN'Ollnl■I • Dwarf ,:_,...,, Tirn•u!. u~••lt • Cape ll■"CJ••rlik Tr.cllelos~,...·-JN•l•..Wn • s, ... Ju..i .. Zontt • 1% ·ui:: ,pplli::,ble COf' lhlll projffl. lnl11•tk,a _c•k•l•llolU • •n1u1al , .. 0.111 ol 111ppkae•hl , .. lef nqulred. l.ONl:n I kOTl:t IS-S.,.,...._.1.a ,...._. A--'lr l.lS"l'ft'M-11 Ul"""'WfH TIie •kn "ppkantM lirrtpjlN -N' ak.l•tlo,,1 •oe l>eff <k~t...., r,-tdtt(k,w ...... """" I• n,c Cltr ., c ... w. ... Lll•do-car MHu,L AH pl-' -tnoM~ .... i.-•-on111,,...,pttinc _,.,, ••1c1t1ae-..... TESHIMA DESIGN GROUP LJ.NDSCAJ'I: AAcmn:cnnu: LNm Pu.NNfflO 090:39ulDnapaikA-re .. sau,c Su. Dlqo, CA a:u:n Teleptao■-: (819) IIIJ3•1H24 r~ (811i1Jll13-U8:I LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN POINSETTIA SHORES, AREA E PL-2 -----------------~---~-----------~'------'-------------'--'---...:...--'---~-------·· ----.. ·----------------------- EXHIBIT "E" 0 WOOD FENCING -•-2••••cu --J'.a 4• S,t,NOW!Ctw:DTJIIW : :---4'•4'l>OST I I I I I ~-•-1"••''1'.NC..OSLAT I I I ' ' SCALE :J/ll", 1'-o• AEVl510N5 BT EXHlalT "F" SOUTH FRONT ELEVATION NORTH REAR ELEVATION nrtChL FINIBllM~TERL\lll 11nor ~~~~: V!NII 1'1UM1t Fl•tpnfll.H11aot•lU.•ll11bo,,.Jt11e,..ni..w.e■n4lllpo, u ... ...,,.-,.,,.•rl•r•ll•l111 r.,.,i., 14.,1.,. h~,,.. ,,.-,..,, n .. ,..a. , .. ,.,, .. C81Yit.11d TILi►• l<f 1'tfCMl!l',e, MW•L I.D\Nfr<e,, r,1.a,1.,,,t•ot•r11, .. v.,,. ... ,.-1,.t1tt••wllH. ,1~ ·.:• .,. FLOOR PLAN WEST LEFT ELEVATION .. -.. -n_r-i COLOR LEGEND 0 ~=~'\f00111 AlllD ~ AOOINtlTUOOO <§> IAHITUOCO 0 0 illA!LIIHl,IHIIUflltl AttDAODt"TflLH 6-iMeoo~ LOOeND DI' o,tlNl'/Nb ~ Nij wmi:: tttATel'-1111t Ml!l-8M?i'klM-l'M~I'-Hl!.'<1111'- f;CA1.P. t 114"•1'-t• I l ◄ I PLANNING AREA M PRIVATE RECREATION AREA 2':;,C{➔+ (,C(IIOJ• I 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "G"