The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1997-05-07; Planning Commission; ; SDP 96-16|HDP 97-02|V 96-01|CDP 96-19 - SEA BISQUITle City of CARLSBAD Planning Departmef A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION P.C. AGENDA OF: MAY 7, 1997_ Item No.@ Application complete date: February 21, 1997 Project Planner: Teresa Woods Project Engineer: Ken Quon SUBJECT: SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N 96-01/CDP 96-19 -SEA BISOUIT -Request for approval of a Negative Declaration, Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit, Variance and Coastal Development Permit to construct two new condominium units on a .16 acre site located south of Cypress A venue on the west side of Ocean Street, in the R-3 Zone, the Beach Area Overlay Zone, the Coastal Zone and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4087 APPROVING the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4088, 4089, 4090 and 4091 APPROVING SDP 96-16, HDP 97- 02, V 96-01 and CDP 96-19 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The applicant proposes to construct two new condominium units on a .16 acre site and to demolish an existing unit on the site. The project is located on the west side of Ocean Street south of Cypress A venue within the appeal area of the Coastal Zone. The applicant has requested three variances on the project. The requested variances are similar to those approved previously on the west side of Ocean Street and can be supported by staff. Except for the variances, the project does comply with all City ordinances including R-3 zoning, Planned Development Ordinance for condominiums, Hillside Development regulations, Beach Area Overlay Zone and the Mello II Segment of the City's Local Coastal Program. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant has requested approval of a Site Development Plan, Hillside Development Permit, Variance and Coastal Development Permit to construct two new condominium units on the site. The applicant is also processing separately an administrative condominium permit (CP 96-01) and minor subdivision (MS 97-01) to create the two airspace condominium units. The condominium permit is being processed administratively pursuant to the standards of the Planned Development Ordinance, Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The parcel contains .16 gross acres and has been previously disturbed by development including an existing single family residence (proposed to be demolished), paving and landscaping. This is an in-fill lot in which the surrounding properties have already been developed with residential uses. The site is »!'. '"•+;' SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N lovcnP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT • MAY7, 1997 PAGE2 zoned R-3, has a General Plan designation of Residential High (RH), and is located within the Beach Area Overlay Zone. The applicant has requested three variances: (1) increased building height on the west portion of the structure; (2) a tandem parking garage with reduced interior dimensions; and, (3) a reduced front yard setback. The proposed structure would be two stories with a basement and mezzanine and be a maximum of 32-feet in height as measured on the west portion of the building (30-feet permitted with a 3/12 pitch and 24-feet permitted with less than a 3/12 pitch of roof). Five parking spaces are provided, two in a standard 20' X 20' garage, two in a tandem two-car garage with interior width dimensions varying from IO-feet to 12-feet (12-feet required), and one standard covered guest parking space. The units have been designed with contemporary architecture consisting of white stucco exterior, tiled roof, glass block treatments, balconies and tiled accents. The proposed two condominium units have been designed as stacked flats and contain 2,957 and 2,936 square feet of area. The units have a height of 21-feet and two-stories as measured from Ocean Street and a height of 32-feet (with flat roof) and two-stories with basement as measured at its highest point along the western portion of the structure facing the ocean. A portion of the roof has been designed with a roof deck. Architectural roof facade treatments have been added to the building design so that the flat roof deck appears to have a 3/12 roof pitch, except as viewed from the ocean (see height variance discussion in Section E, below). Recreational amenities provided on the project include balconies, a roof deck, ground level patio with showers, barbecue and planter areas and a 25-foot deep sandy beach area. There is an existing revetment on the western portion of the site protecting the property from wave erosion. The development provides minimum 5-foot side yards and a 25-foot useable rear yard. The required front yard is 20-feet which has been reduced to zero feet (see variance front yard setback discussion in Section E, below). This project is subject to the following regulations: A. RH (Residential High) General Plan designation; B. Beach Area Overlay Zone, Condominium Permit and R-3 Zoning Requirements (Chapter 21.82, 21.16 and 21.45 and of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); C. Hillside Development Regulations (Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); D. Variance Regulations (Chapter 21.50 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); E. Coastal Development Permit Regulations, Mello II Segment of the City's Local Coastal Program (Chapters 21.201, 21.203, and 21.204 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and F. Growth Management Regulations (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1) SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N lo11cnP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT • MAY7, 1997 PAGE3 IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation of approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies. A. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT The proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. The discussion below indicates how the project complies with the elements of the General Plan which are particularly relevant to this proposal. The Property has a Residential High (RH) General Plan land use designation. The RH designation allows the development of multiple family residential units in a density range of 15 to 23 du/acre with a growth management control point of 19 du/acre. The project contains two condominium units developed at a net density of 17.99 du/acre, therefore, the project is below the growth management control point and is consistent with the allowed density and land use designation of the General Plan. HOUSING Program 3.6b of the Housing Element states that, "A minimum of fifteen percent (15%) of all approved units in any residential specific plan or qualified subdivision shall be made affordable to lower income households." The inclusionary requirement for this project would be .3 units. Section 21.85.050 of the Inclusionary Ordinance specifies that residential projects of six or fewer dwelling units may satisfy lower-income inclusionary requirements through the payment of an in-lieu fee or other in-lieu contribution. The project has been conditioned to pay an in-lieu fee equivalent to the inclusionary requirement on two units as provided for in Section 21.85.050 of the Inclusionary Ordinance. This project would therefore be consistent with the General Plan. California Government Code Section 65590 requires the replacement of low and moderate income housing within the coastal zone, when units are demolished. The applicant is proposing to demolish one unit and to construct two new units. The unit proposed to be demolished is vacant and the owner proposes to occupy one of the new units. The applicant has owned the property for approximately 8 months. The previous owner was not a low or moderate income household and the unit was not rented. The house was used by the previous owner as a vacation home. Consequently, the proposed residential unit demolition is not subject to the requirements of Section 65590 of the California Government Code. Therefore, this project is consistent with the City's General Plan and the State coastal housing requirements. B. BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND R-3 ZONING REQUIREMENTS The site is located within the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) which requires the processing of a Site Development Plan to ensure consistency with the BAOZ standards. The BAOZ is intended to supplement the underlying residential zoning by providing additional development SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N fol/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT • MAY 7, 1997 PAGE4 regulations to ensure that: adequate parking is provided; developments are compatible with surrounding uses; and, adequate public facilities are provided. As proposed, the project is consistent with the resident and guest parking requirements for the project (four covered resident spaces and one on-site guest parking space provided). The applicant has requested variances to meet required parking with a tandem garage with reduced interior dimensions, to exceed maximum building height and to provide a reduced front yard setback (see section D, Variance Requests, below). The proposed two unit condominium project is also subject to the regulations of the R-3 Zone and the Planned Development Ordinance (condominium standards). As illustrated in the table below, the project complies with all BAOZ, R-3 Zoning and Planned Development Ordinance requirements for two condominium units ( except as discussed in section D, Variances, below). BAOZ, R-3 ZONING AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE STANDARDS COMPLIANCE TABLE STANDARD BAOZ, R-3 & PD PROVIDED REQUIREMENTS Lot Size 3,500 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft. Building Height 30' I 2-stories 32' /2-stories (see variance discussion below) Open Space 200 sq. ft. /unit ( 400 sq. ft. for 3,570 sq. ft. project) Front Yard 20' O' (see variance discussion below) Side Yard 5 feet 5 feet Rear Yard NIA 45-feet (25' useable) Resident Parking 2 full-size covered spaces/unit 2-car garage/unit ( see variance discussion below) Visitor Parking 1 space 1 space Storage Space 480 cu. ft./unit Unit A 1,014 cu. ft. Unit B 1,224 cu. ft. C. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT A Hillside Development Permit is required for any project site which contains a slope of 15% or greater and an elevation differential of greater than 15 feet. The proposed project complies with all requirements of the Hillside Development Ordinance. Only minor grading is proposed (500 cu. yds.) and the grading volumes are within the acceptable amounts permitted by the ordinance. The site slopes down from east to west with slopes 25% to 40% being located in the middle of the site. The project has been designed with a low-scale, 21-foot facade along Ocean Street to SDP 96~16/HDP 97-02N fol/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT • MAY7, 1997 PAGES minimize visual impacts of the project as viewed from the street. The table below summarizes the requirements of the Hillside Development regulations and the way in which the proposed project design complies with the requirements. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE TABLE STANDARD REQUIREMENT PROVIDED Max. Slope Ht 30' None Grading Volume 0-7,999 CY/AC 5,000 CY/AC Contour Grading Provide a variety of slope Grading limited to directions and undulation. development area. Roadway Design Follow the site contours. NIA Hillside Architecture Use terraced pads and/ or Pad stepped down hillside. foundations. Building mass reduced as Maintain natural slopes with viewed from Ocean Street. structures and roofs. Decrease building mass with increased steepness. D. VARIAN CE REQUESTS As stated previously, the applicant has requested that three variances be granted: (1) increased building height on the west portion of the structure; (2) tandem parking garage with reduced interior dimensions; and, (3) a reduced front yard setback. Similar multiple variance requests have been previously approved on the west side of Ocean Street as illustrated on Exhibit "AA". Below is a discussion of the variance requests. BUILDING HEIGHT The applicant is requesting increased building height on the west portion of the structure (to 32- feet with a flat roof). The proposed structure is two stories with a basement and mezzanine and is a maximum of 32-feet in height with a flat roof (30-feet permitted with 3/12 pitch and 24-feet permitted with less than 3/12 pitch of roof). The project has a height of 21-feet and two-stories as measured from Ocean Street and a height of 32-feet and two-stories with basement as measured at its highest point along the western portion of the structure facing the ocean. A portion of the roof has been designed with a roof deck. Architectural roof facade treatments have been added to the building design so that the flat roof deck appears to have a 3/12 roof pitch, except as viewed from the ocean. The variance is necessary as a result of site topography which slopes towards the beach. There have been several projects on the west side of Ocean Street with height variances with similar topography as the proposed development (including V 90-02 which was approved for a maximum height of four stories and 47 feet). Many other projects were SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N fo1/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT • MAY 7, 1997 PAGE6 approved with similar building heights under the City's old building height standards which were less restrictive than the City's current code, as illustrated on Exhibit "BB". The proposed building height will therefore be compatible with surrounding development. Staff believes that the necessary findings can be made for the approval of this variance request as discussed in the table below. TANDEM PARKING The applicant is requesting two variances associated with parking (1) for a tandem two-car garage (a standard 20'x20' garage required) and, (2) a tandem garage with reduced interior dimensions (12' required and minimum 10' provided). The proposed project has been designed with five parking spaces, two in a standard 20' X 20' garage, two in a two-car tandem garage with interior width dimensions varying from IO-feet to 12-feet (12-feet required), and one standard covered guest parking space. Due to the narrow width of the site (50 feet) and site topography, there is limited area to provide the required amount of parking on the site pursuant to ordinance standards. Due to constrained site conditions and narrow lot configurations, variances for tandem parking with reduced garage parking dimensions have been approved previously on Ocean Street. As designed, all required parking would be provided on site and out of the required side yard setback. Staff believes that the necessary findings can be made for the approval of this variance request as discussed in the table below. FRONT YARD The applicant is requesting a reduction in the required front yard setback. A 20-foot front yard setback is required in the R-3 Zone. The applicant has proposed a five foot front yard which would be reduced to zero feet because of the City's requirement for dedication of five feet of the front yard for future street right-of-way. Other projects on the west side of Ocean Street have been approved with front yards reduced to zero feet because of site topography and the City's street dedication requirement. An Engineering standards variance (previously approved by the City Engineer) is also required because the driveway exceeds 40 percent of the lot width. Staff believes that the necessary findings can be made for the approval of this variance request as discussed in the table below. VARIAN CE FINDINGS The findings required for a variance are as follows: (1) that there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone; (2) that the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question; (3) that the granting of this variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and, (4) that the granting of this variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. As illustrated in the table below, these findings can be made for each of the requested variances discussed above. SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N In/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT e MAY 7, 1997 PAGE7 FINDING Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to other property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. Requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question. The granting of this variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located That the granting of the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan RESPONSE Tandem Parking -The project site has sloping topography and a narrow lot width (50- feet) which makes providing required parking to city standards (two 20' X 20' garages plus one 10' wide guest parking space) impossible without approval of a variance for either reduced side yards or tandem parking with reduced dimensions. Front Yard - The site has a sloping topography which limits automobile access to the eastern third (approximately 50 feet) of the site, which makes it impossible (without a large amount of fill) to provide a street level garage without encroachment into the required front yard setback. Height -The project has sloping topography on the western two-thirds of the site which makes it difficult (without a large amount of fill) to design livable levels within the structure (as the structure steps down the hillside) while meeting building height requirements. Tandem Parking -Without the approval of a variance for tandem parking with reduced dimensions ( or variance for reduced side yards which is not requested), the applicant could not construct two units on this site, which has a RH General Plan designation, permitting 2.147 units on this .113 net acre site. The property owner would, therefore, be denied a substantial property right (to construct two units) which is possessed by other property owners on Ocean Street who have been previously granted approval of multi-unit projects with variances for tandem garages with reduced interior dimensions, (or for variances for reduced side yards). Front yard -Without the approval of a variance for a reduced front yard setback, the applicant could not construct any units on the site, as construction of a garage at street level would not be possible, as the portion of the lot which is at street level is only 50 feet deep and, therefore, the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property right to construct two units, which is a right possessed by other property owners on Ocean Street who have been previously granted approval of multi- unit projects with variances for reduced front yards. Height -Without the approval of a variance for increased building height, the applicant would be required to substantially reduce the scale of the project, while other property owners along the west side of Ocean Street enjoy the right ( conveyed through previous height variances including V 301 and V 90-2 and under previous less restrictive height limitations) to construct similar-scale projects. Therefore, the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a development of similar size and scale to other approved projects on the west side of Ocean Street, which is a right possessed by other owners on Ocean Street, but which is denied to this property owner. The requested variances for increased building height, tandem parking with reduced dimensions and a reduced front yard setback will not be a detriment to the public welfare in that the project height and front yard setback are similar to, and compatible with, nearby projects, the project is similar in intensity and scale to surrounding developments, and the parking is designed in a similar fashion as other approved developments on Ocean Street. Therefore, the proposed project is compatible with surrounding development. Additionally, the project is conditioned to construct curb and sidewalk improvements along its Ocean Street frontage thereby improving pedestrian and vehicular access in the area. These variance requests will not adversely affect the General Plan in that the proposal is consistent with the land uses designated for the area by the Land Use Element; the residential density range proposed is under the Growth Management density control point; and, the project is in compliance with the Housing Element policies as conditioned. SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N lo1/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT • MAY7, 1997 PAGES E. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The project site is located within the appeal area of the Coastal Zone and within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP). The appealable area of the coastal zone is generally located between the sea and the first public roadway paralleling the sea, or within 300 feet of the inland tide extent of any beach or the mean high tide line where there is no beach, whichever is the greatest distance. Within the appeal area of the coastal zone, a Coastal Development Permit is appealable to the California Coastal Commission within 10 working days of the Commission's receipt of a written notice specifying the City's final action on the matter. The proposed project is consistent with the Mello II segment of the LCP which contains land use policies for development and conservation of coastal land and water areas within the Segment boundaries. The property is designated Residential High Density (RH) in the LCP and is being developed consistent with this designation. Soils and geologic analysis of the project site were prepared in conformance with Mello II Segment requirements. These studies determined that with the existing revetment and soil type on the site, the proposed development will have a useable life span of at least 75 years and that the development will have no adverse effect on the stability of the coastal slope west of the building site. Further, consistent with Policy 7-12, the proposed structure, decks and balconies comply with the "stringline" method of measurement with adjacent and nearby structures, decks and balconies to the north and south. The project site is also subject to the special requirements of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203) and Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.204) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project complies with these special coastal overlay zones as discussed below. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone The Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone is intended to supplement the underlying zone by providing additional resource protective regulations within designated areas to preserve, protect and enhance the habitat resource value of lagoons and sloping hillsides. This overlay zone requires that for steep slope areas not containing endangered plant/animal species and or coastal sage scrub and chaparral plant communities, that development of steep slopes (25% or greater) may be permitted subject to specific findings. As illustrated in the table below, these findings can be made. FINDING RESPONSE That a soils investigation be conducted A soils and geologic analysis of the project site was prepared in to determine that the site slope areas conformance with City requirements. The study determined that with the are stable and grading and existing revetment and soil type on the site, the proposed development development impacts mitigable for at will have a useable life span of at least 75 years and that the development least 75 years, or the life of the will have no adverse effect on the stability of the coastal slope west of the structure. building site. Grading of the slope is essential to The proposed grading is essential to the site since the steep slopes are development of the site. located in the middle of the site less than fifty feet from the eastern property line. SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N lo11cnP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT • MAY7, 1997 PAGE9 FINDING RESPONSE Slope disturbance will not result in Slope disturbance will not damage or alter major wildlife habitat or native substantial damage or alteration to vegetation since the site was previously developed with a structure, major wildlife habitat or native ornamental landscaping and paving and there is no native vegetation vegetation. located on this in-fill site. In projects of less than IO acres in size The site is not predominated by steep slopes in that only approximately which are predominated by steep 1/3 of the site contains steep slopes, nevertheless, no wildlife corridor slopes, complete grading may be would be interrupted by the proposed project. allowed only if no interruption of significant wildlife corridors occurs. No grading or removal of steep slope This project does not contain north facing slopes and the project site is areas will be permitted unless all fully developed, therefore, this requirement does not apply to the proposed environmental impacts have been project. mitigated. As designed and conditioned, the proposed project with the existing revetment, complies with all other requirements of this overlay zone including provisions for proper drainage and erosion control. No development on the property is proposed within the one-hundred year floodplain and the project has been conditioned to limit grading to the period of April 1 to October 1 of each year. Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone The Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone is intended to provide land use regulations along the coastline area to protect the public's interest in maintaining the shoreline as a unique recreational and scenic resource. This overlay zone addresses use of beach area, beach access and shoreline development standards. No development of the beach is proposed with this project. The proposed project has been designed in conformance with the applicable requirements of this overlay zone as described in the table below. STANDARD Lateral Access 25-feet dry sandy beach Bluff Top Access Applies to lots where no beach present or where beach is not accessible Vertical Access Determine public need to gain access, constraints to access beach, and privacy needs of property owner PROVIDED 25-feet of dry sandy beach seaward of existing revetment. Dedication of land seaward of revetment. Beach is accessible via existing stairway located within 100-feet of the subject site. Beach is present, therefore requirement does not apply to project. Vertical access exists within I 00 feet of project site. The site is fully developed and there has been no historic use of site for vertical access. No vertical access warranted for this development based on ordinance criteria. SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N lol/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT • MAY7, 1997 PAGE 10 .:, .l ftl". •?, Rn PROVIDED Geotechnical Report A soils and geologic analysis of the project site was prepared in Analyze cliff erosion and conformance with City requirements. The study determined that with the geologic conditions existing revetment and soil type on the site, the proposed development will have a useable life span of at least 75 years and that the development will have no adverse effect on the stability of the coastal slope west of the building site Appearance The structure has been designed with attractive architectural features which Building developed on site will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and natural with a general attractive environment to the west. appearance related to surrounding development and natural environment. Ocean Views The project has been designed with a low-scale building facade on Ocean Building designed to preserve Street and the structure has been sited to preserve the required side yard to the extent feasible ocean setbacks which will, to the extent feasible, preserve views of the ocean from the street. views. Natural Features The building has been designed with a low-facade along Ocean Street and To extent feasible, retain the structure has been designed to step-down the hillside consistent with this natural features and requirement. topography. Grading Approximately 500 cubic yards grading proposed with project. Grading is Grading executed so as to designed to blend with existing and natural surroundings. blend with existing terrain. "Stringline" The project adheres to coastal "stringline" setback measurements requirements for the placement of structures, balconies and decks. F. GROWTH MANAGEMENT The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 in the Northwest Quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE City Administration 6.95 sq. ft. Yes Library 3.48 sq. ft. Yes Waste Water Treatment 2EDU Yes Parks .01 AC Yes Drainage NIA Yes Circulation 16ADT Yes Fire Station # 1 & 3 Yes Open Space NIA Yes SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N .)I/CDP 96-19-SEA BISQUIT • MAY7, 1997 PAGE 11 STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE Schools CUSD Yes Sewer Collection System 2EDU Yes Water 440 GPD Yes The project is .147 dwelling units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance of 2.14 7 dwelling units for the property V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The property is a previously developed, in-fill lot which slopes from east to west at an incline of approximately 15 to 30-percent from Ocean Street to the sea. The site contains no native vegetation, and as a result of past development, the site has no biological or cultural value. The environmental review for this project relied upon the MEIR for analysis of cumulative air quality and traffic impacts. Therefore, the project was determined to be in prior compliance with MEIR 93-01. The Planning Director has determined that based on the initial study and field review conducted by staff, no significant environmental impacts will result from this project, therefore, a Negative Declaration was issued on March 14, 1996. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4087 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4088 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4089 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4090 5.. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4091 5. Location Map 6. Background Data Sheet 7. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 8. Disclosure Statement 9. Exhibit "AA" Partial Listing of Approved Variance Requests on Ocean Street I 0. Exhibit "BB" Building Heights 11. Reduced Exhibits 12. Full Size Exhibits "A" -"G" dated April 16, 1997. TW:kr • • EXHIBIT "AA" PARTIAL LISTING OF APPROVED VARIANCE REQUESTS ON OCEAN STREET ADDRESS REQUEST 2623 Ocean Street 0' front yard, 3' side yard, building 66'6" deep, 19' interior garage variance approved 8/15/86 #86-7 2895 Ocean Street 7000 SF lot, 4200 SF building; 60% bldg coverage allowed. Resolution #579, reduction in front yard from 20'-5'; rear yard from 15'-10'; north side from 5' to 3'; south to 3' 2805 Ocean Street Resolution # 105, V 17 4-Res#51 6 front yard 20 to 5, north side yard 6' to 3', south side 6' to 4'. 2795 Ocean Street V301 front yard to 4', north side yard to 7', building height to 40' (@ beach side) measured from top of slab to top of plate. 2775 Ocean Street V-143 front yard 20' to 5', side 1 0' to 5', 20' to 5' rear yard. 2747 Ocean Street V-76 side yard 5' to 2' 2650 Ocean Street V-1 29 front yard 16' to 1 0', side yard intrusion 2' to 3' for stairway. 2651 Ocean Street V-91 front yard 20' to 6', lots 21-22 2687 Ocean Street V-197 front yard to 5', side yards to 5', rear yard to 5', front and rear approved, side denied. 60% bldg coverage allowed. 2729 Ocean Street V-90 front yard 20' to 0', side yard 5' to 3' 31 50 Ocean Street V-148; 10' to 5' side, rear 12' to 5' 3100 Ocean Street V-141 -5' side, 5' rear yard 3021 Ocean Street V-92 side yard 5'2" to 2'5" 2977 Ocean Street V-13; north side to 5', south side to 2-1 /2', front yard to 5' 3083 -3085 Ocean Street AV 92-07; side yard 4'10" & 3'4" from 5' 2901 Ocean Street V-90-2, setbakcs 1 0' to 6', bldg height from 25' to 47'6", number of stories from 2 to 4, six unit condo 24 79 Ocean Street V-332 front yard from 20' to 17'5", side yards 7'5" to 5' & permit tandem parking (looks like they're 9' wide spaces). 2679 & 2677 Ocean Street V-375 0' front yard setback. (7164 SF of bldg) 3 car enclosed garage & 2 guest parking in side yard setback 261 7 Ocean Street AV 93-05 side yard 5' to 3', front yard 20' to 5', reduced side yard for uncovered parking space from 5' to 2' 2643 Ocean Street V-373 tandem parking, compact parking "!,+.7 i~T-P'U.~ ------ ; ' 2901 Ocean St. 203-234-01 203-234-02 (St. Tropez) = EXHIBIT "BB" BUILDING HEIGHTS ·• FOTIADI ENG INEERil CONSULTING ENGINEERS le PLANNi 740 13th Sl Suite 407 San Dle10, CA 112101 Tel.: (!1111) 234-377~ -,r;.~ r/t7r=F1c..e_ ~.?f _ ______ __ ____________ _ _ ' ·, ' . '· 2955 Ocean St. 203--234-01 through 203--234-21 (Sea Slope) = EXHIBIT "BB" BUILDING HEIGHTS :,&.t,_ .. , . . FOTIADI ENGINEERIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS I PL.ANNE 740 l3lh Sl. Sulle 407 San Dleco, CA 112101 Tel: (819) 234-37711 t,.<,., 1 sr. ~ . . ·" ,,_ ---------. ---t-~-......---,...:.,__;~ ~', " 2895 Ocean St. 203-235-06 (The Mooring) -~ -\ ~ EXHIBIT "BB" BUILDING HEIGHTS • •· FOTIADI ENGINEERINC CONSULTING ENGINEERS It PLANNER 740 l3lh Sl Sulle 407 San Dleco, CA 112101 Tel.: (11111) 234-377~ ' ' ' . . ", '·"' 2677-2679 Ocean St. 203-140-36 EXHIBIT "BB" BUILDING HEIGHTS • r]· FOTIADI ENGINEERINC CONSULTING ENGINEERS cl: PLANNER 740 l3lh Sl Sulle 407 Sen Dle10, CA 112101 Tel.: {8111) 234-3n5 1~S f½'~E f~_f. __ _ 17.? 2641-2643 Ocean St. 203-140-09 EXHIBIT "BB" BUILDING HEIGHTS = • FOTIADI ENGINEERIN1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PI.ANNF.1 740 13lh St. Sulle 407 San Dleco, CA D2l01 Tel.: (lllg) 234-3775 1-f,(o [½,of ~f __ .. 1.e.r P~ '~ ',,_ '" '· EXHIBIT "BB" BUILDING HEIGHTS /. ~-->.,------------~----~----.--4 ____ nJ __ ' ' ',._ ""' """" ""',,_ 2623 Ocean St. 203-140-06 ', ,, ·, ',,,, ',,,_ ' 'a--' ti" • ~- FOTIADI ENGINEERINr COKSULTING ENGINEERS I: PI.ANNEf· ?4-0 13th SL Suite 407 San Dleco, CA 02101 Tel.: (9111) 234-377~ ' . ·, '· ' ' '· ·, ' ' .. 2599 260 203-140-2~~of603 Ocean St. 02 03 EXHIBIT "BB" BUILDING HEIGHTS ---11·? • 'A 0 r-----------:----~-------------~ 7~-~ 2729 Ocean St. 203-140-27 ~- FOTIADI ENGINEERING CONSULTING ENGINEERS I PLAHNERS '7'0 l:llh SL Sull.e 407 San 0la&o, CA 112101 Tel (8111) 234-377:1 • • "°'"" DIM Ck~$ !>i-oo1'1N ON TICS 0111. ... 0"ll"'-S ... I'll! ,,,_l'lOJQM ... TI! •"'•D hooTCt<Ot:O TO l'l?.1"11!.t:!.CNT ..... NU_.CGINOITION!, l'Oft Sl"l!Glf'IG,t!Cld,l,IT 01 ... l! .. '!IIO~TO C~T1Ndo6<'tAPI! GONTOUl'lS 111.t!.l'C" TO -,,"-Ol'ti.e: !,CG TION!," ON !,HCCT :, AOOI"' Tll..t: PLAT GCNGlll.t:TC r-.e: !,-A TO °MONIC1111."~TCST'1'Le. SNGGOi s,,..,'-"'" ro exi-o s~ •2~11 ... •?IO'llo INS ... NO/t,41!!,!,IONTC)1tT1,1lll.e_ 6,,VtA,H! OOOl'ls. OVCIII.HC,r,,o se:GTIONAI,. 1"'1000 ...... IN~O l"IHTC rel'l GOI.Oft K><ePIA-C. ..... TCS.ll'Cl'IGl!S. 1".-.e111.1GJ,,T1io,_.CTAL-"Oo'IOC111.GCATl!O n11t GO\.o,t ~ .. COIA.C. ~ l'A8111.IGATt:O"'l!1'AJ..-l"O"Oe:111.cc.-.rco nMTC l"'tlll. Gal.Oft ~l<Cp!,11.C "'-"S!>et.OGIC ,.!NOOl"'I ""LL!. SIMILAlt TO r't'"dt a• i<e'"OCG.Ollt.A' ,.,,.rrC,cN. ~-.s~ C>Ot,t,,S,OJT!,, l'Olll:...,COGOl"P'1:..,_ All!T ,r,Jt,l!Hd, r1Al..L$, ST ... N0.-.111.0 -CY M.-.SQHl'l-,'• \.16,tjT !1-AND•BLASTCO l'l~t< 1'0ftl!.l(l"~COV'll!t1SV"'-l'J.GC~ s ... ,erv 6l.""S!, 1H !"AIHTl!O 1"'1000 l'l'l ... MCSOftOl"'TIO"""l."""""JG"re:o ... er ... 1.,-onoe:" Go,..re:o • ,.,i-cni TO M.-.TGMlt...-..,11'16!; l'OllMCOG~lltCNGL~C!, '.-.CIPl"IAS..e.D"S ... r,<,UT!"J;.f'T'flll.N GONGl'lCTC IN1NTC6"t"'I. GO\.O"'-"'!, SCLCGTCO 8TU.NO~.,.r'C .,.llG .. fl!C:.T i ! ---i SOUTH ELEV A TION NOR.TH ELEVATION ! ! I § I ! I ~ ! ; ! ! EAST ELEVATION Y'IEST ELEVATION g i ! i r-(/) a. :l ·! ( -';) ► > 0 [ <( a: ,--"'°) jCN1co10 neo\ 11"1.oro.,.,1 12-;i,,.,u,I 1""0.ltCf-.0 .. 0111 5 MEZZANINE LEVEL FLAN -UNIT 'A" I I 7 ---~ -------GIL OGl!AN !-nteeT ----- 2ND. LEVEL FLAN -UNIT 'A" STREET LEVEL FLAN -UNIT '8" M!~~p~~11•11~ _Pall,;,tP,<1l~Qny~trllJC_~taragc unit,.. 2 4-lc,:.1 -1, ~ ,.r ---- O~C'.,.~, _ Dll'~ltln,;i _e,1tl<,;>/C-:>'{, "'J __ <,,.-,,;,: _ ~I _,r.,iJ,: 1.1, .. ,1~ 1.2,<;,,.t ::I.?,:).,/ ... _, :·:~ .. t -, --.. --T1 t : I ' l_ __ J:_T __ I iJ w :1: I :l: 11 i -j------~r-==i : .. r.~ ·l ·r r-i ~ --------G-/'L. OGeAN ~meeT---- BASEMENT LEVEL FLAN -UNIT •e• ~CJ.Lt ,n,·-1.0· ~fl.f'J,,;!--l?w:~Q~.1111o/!341GODI/ 6or:«Q~QC' Unltl:l 1 ... ~2,.( 6SO~f. "-'-'C..f r-en c. H . ! .;-=~ ( -::, :§ .. :, .. '& ► · l >0 i~ ;l .. [ < cc :l :! :, ,. i l C Cl :~ \DAA-nc.c,j jc .. u:•10 neo I 11"\.0TO,,J( 12•:l'f••t,I 1~"°"''1"° •t>11) , .. u,"'u P'L.00~~AN$ ROOl'l"l.,..t-1 SCG,TION □ l ,_,_......,_... ......... ---•o- -·-·-·-----------------·-·-·-·~""~ . ..._. .. ~•-·· -~~l'~i=-----------......... ............ _ SITE PLAN A00,..1!5~ 2•0'1 °' ... :Stn,rt GM'lt-o-.::1 G"' "2008•2258 l!.M~~Z~ILAMO',ISI! lit:, •f1,r11Gll...,.H0....,.1 ... (DAOJ l!•U1'tin40..C~U..t ~Of"O$f?OZ~IU,MO',ISI!, "'-:S•!S•-c.ll""••O......,..(&AOJ f'WOG~D<o,,r~un,t• !SIAl.DIN6C:.OVl!:•U•6i:, 9,1"1.-4051' / 'i000'!11' • -4:,:,oa, ~~tc':~::"::,.~no•1o.c.eocr..r."Of' ....................... D-t>lL...,d•IMlt"IS" :Strir•tL,t¥ci•Unlt1'" Unlt'tl"Tot.it SU'UtLC¥ci•i.wt• ... • 2"<1Llf¥d•l.lnlf.""'" l'<CtO,lllnc-L..,ci•IJNt"A" 1.Wt"IS"f'otM , •• 02 .. , 1,2,:s ., 2.1:s, ., 2 .. , ... ,. , .. 0.1• 21:s •• , •-so-.1, :soa..i, •ao .. , t.l:S8tl, •UOtf !t52t,f :SS2c.f, ••2 .. , ,oo._,-1:soc.1 l,1•2•f. !U2Lf 402C.f • l'<•U........,P'loo.-Ce>9111'1l,oto"dof'ut111.oa...-~-1C.1tc.t,cn•.-,,.o4 100:S•f oirtowJ .-.•c,,.,..t>•e ,..e,,..a, ~~• ul IIJ,v ,...,,.,,~1.,..,/ 1 O.;:>:> .. ~.:,..., • ~<,J:, ~~I, -1<\0 • t J -i.o.if:. .. ,Dc<.l ~-....... < .m.t,-11.,:H, .. l ~""'"''""·'·l"if>l(:I 11e:..r~.,>,(.. ,~::,.,,21IJ ------------------ !. ------------- ,t,r'\W•d :Z5p-.C::Up.r"llnitll2UNh•& 1Vf"t0!'$p-.c::•p.,.;atlolltl• I ~opowd 25p-.c;npff'u,,tt112Ur>1t••• I Vl"to,-$p..c.,pc,2u,,,tt,. I r'l"Nat•Op,m:59-.C::•, ~•1•0pcn"9K•• Go--'Ol'l0p•l'l~6'·• UR1,.,.,·,e-c:°"'1,111.oolPir,1.J 1,1•2•1 lln!t"IS"f'&dote"""""J 1,15011 !>-Dc,oc.11 1,20011 0eN$/TT (,._4J 20 unit• P..,-/l>U'c (0 I. II 20 • 5 2 u,,lt1J OCM51f'T(,ropou·4J 2u..11 tJOMc.6',o-•Or,~t.~ 500:Slt'VC'f'•Strut,,-.,it• 51 I :tot_,•et•.u\GA'!20"J!t ,., .. ,, ....... 201 Patr!c.k."4G4,u,r• tJo>,!c;6'<,r•Oc"~~ 500 St..,...,• 5tt'Ht. Wt• 5 11 ~C,c6d1,GA120't:S , .... ,, .... -"1201 "---"-"1,.1>, t:IAY~~• ..... '1,tt,r,:t....c41"1IIIVWlf 'f•i•t1•tM"dC...1>t..-Drlvc,"""taSOO :S .. C>ki0.GA"l2100 ,.11J-4SO•O•oo .... ....,...,. 2•0"1 OGt!!AMSTl'I.Cl!:T GMUBAPG.i.ul'OIII. ...... 2 VMIT 111.l!,-OCHTIAL PCVl!Lor'Ml!HT G,.,t.l'l,4,51!JA0MJNIGll'"""1.""'ttl'I.Cl$T,UC:,T S'!:SOCLGA~/11.l!:AI.. GA~"Sl!l"'O•G"'- c:.M!.515"'0.....,.,e.o ~011,f'III.JGT •oo,,,,.l! ... VCl'OU'C VICINITY MAP oeveLOl"'Ai,/.f $Ire "'"-I!:"' ,,.,. z-"'90.-.,,..-.c 2 1 ,:s 2,01 L.'.:::=================-=-=--=-=--=--=--=-=-=.:::::::::. __ =--:---:-====~=-=~-=-=:-:=-=-=--=--====---------:-:.==:--__ -_--__ -_-_-_-_-_-_-_ ---------~-________________ __, r-(/) 0. H . i .f ( ~~ _::, .. ·= !3 : ! ► . l >O ii ~J .. [ < cc :l :! :1 ,.. .z C c, =~ ,~~ n,o! 1~c,uo "eol lN.010.,.!f IJ•.l1·<1101 1-, .. ,0 '10111 l~~:·~LAN I CJ I I I I I I I / I ______ ... ort.TTL'"'( --+- 00 \ I! \ ,..l \ ll \ V\. \ '\,) \ ,, \ \ i • i n . I I I I I I ' I I I I I I ' ' I 1 'ti! I~" \:~ '. ' I I •• \ i~ ~, \\ i~ 8~ ' . ' . S" \ & 0 I ~ iF \ i ~ I .. i I ~ • i I • ' I ' ' ' \ \ ¥! !~ 8• -~ i~ ~ ~ , i \ \ ' ' ' ' I ' I ' IL-~---..1 -------;------ > > ! I~ ' ! I I I I I I I I ------... Cl"f .. TTL...C __ -\--,. ;; •l l• ~f \)\ !i!H 1~ m :£ •1: •i 1•1 "11.o-°t·f•~l ~ ~!E I 5i' ! -~ OJ OJ ~ • \ \ \ \ iH ls;: . ' .. i 6 ' ~ -, i I-< K I • I I \ \ \ \ \ I ~ I i I I I ' I i \ I tJ \ \ \ 1t il,'. :~ if i ~ ~ i n---i , . I • I l ' ' I ' ' I ' I I I I I ' ~ --~•-•-• (';11,~ ..... tT•ltT •---•-'T-•-• Cll.0GIANtTllH1' -~ ,l~~r -• SEA BISQUIT A 2 Unit Residential DeveI6 ment i ; ¼ ~ ~ 2609 Ocean Street • Carlsbad, aliforn I I I I I I I I ~.!~--~ ----\ '' \ u \ l • ' •! \ !J_ \ ~ .. \ I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I ' I ' I '· I I I ', .\ i ' ', ' I ' D \ Ji ~[1 '._, lf I ~ ~ I I --•• ••.,..t•TTL..,_ I (\ (\ I -•-'--•-• (.11,0(;f,o.10tT011lT • I. ,... ...,. n "' D A V I s G R 0 u p ••c111trc1u .. , .I. ., ...... 11 • WATIOI Io•--· • Al J'lll~ ... C.-.,0,-• --• ... °'"""'f;ANIOf • ltltl-•- CYPRESS AVE SEA BISQUIT SOP 96-16/HDP 97-02/ V 96-01/CDP 96-19 CASE NO: • BACKGROUND DATA SHEET - CP 96-01/SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N 96-01/CDP 96-19 CASE NAME: =SE=A=B=IS::;....;O"--'U=--=I=-=T __________________ _ APPLICANT: Patrick McGuire ~~=~~---------------------- REQUEST AND LOCATION: To construct two new condominium units on a 0.16 acre site located on the west side of Ocean Street, South of Cypress A venue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3 and 4 of Block of Map No. 2 of the Hayes Land Company (incorporated) addition in Carlsbad, according to Map thereof No. 1221 filed in the Office of the County Clerk November 3, 1909. APN: 203-140-03 Acres: 0.16 acres -----'~--=-~-'-=-----~~~~-Proposed No. of Units: --=2 __ GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: =RH==--------------------------- Density Allowed: -=-1~9 _______ Density Proposed: -=-17-'--'.-=-9"'"'"9 _________ _ Existing Zone: ~R_-3 ________ Proposed Zone: ~R~-3~----------- Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Zoning Land Use Site R-3 RH North R-3 RH South R-3 RH East R-3 RMH West OS OS PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad --~~-- Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): _2=E=D~U~-------------- Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: =D--=-e=ce=m=b=-=e=-r--=-3-=-0,_1=--:9""'9"""'6 ____________ _ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ~ Negative Declaration, issued =M=ar=c=h=-=-14~1"'"-9-=-97-'----------------- D Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated ______________ _ D Other, ________________________ _ CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMP ACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Sea Bisguit -CP 96-01/SDP 96-16/HDP 97-02N 96-0 I/CDP 96-19 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: I GENERAL PLAN: -=RH==------ ZONING: =R:...::-3'-------------------------- DEVELOPER'S NAME: =-Pa=t=ri=ck:=..=-M=c--=G=u=ir..;:;..e _________________ _ ADDRESS: 2725 Jefferson Street, Suite 7, Carlsbad, California 92008 PHONE NO.: (619) 729-5200 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: ~20~3~-1~4~0-_03~------ QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): _2 _un_it_s _____ _ ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: -=U=nkn=own-'-'--=--------------- A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 6.95 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage= 3.48 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 2EDU D. Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.33 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = NIA Identify Drainage Basin = NIA (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 16 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = I and 3 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = NIA I. Schools: Carlsbad (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demands in EDUs 2EDU Identify Sub Basin = NIA (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD = 440 L. The project is 0.147 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. PACIFIC VIEW LLC P. 02 APR-18-97 FRI 9:44 APR-18-97 FRI 09:32 01.F CARLSBAD COMl1 DE _ FAX NO. 7295260 FAX NO. 43808. P. 02 ____ c_:..c.:;; __ :_i_t __ .'.lr---:-~--t-· .... 9~. n'"'"'a .. ,.!l ..... !!lfl!!!l_,.1~11'111!, .. _!l!!J.,!l!'!.llll!f=l."II!!!.,.?".,., DISCLOSURI: STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownemhlp lh1erens on all appllc:atlons whleh wm reqwe discmmanarv actSon on the part of tM Ci1y Council Dr illny appointed Boan:I, Commission or Committee. The following Information mugr be disclosed; 1, APPLICANT List the names and eddresses o1 all persons having ii finenciel interest in the application. Patrick McGuire 2725 Jefferson Street Suite 7 Carlsbad, CA 92008 2. OWNER 3. 4. List 'the names and addresses of all persons having any ownershlp interest in the propeny involved. Patrick McGuire 2725 Jefferson Street Suite 7 Carlsbad, CA 92008 If any person identified pursuant to t 1 J or f 2) above is a corDoration or partnership, list 1:he name~ ond addresse$ of all individuals owning more than 10% Df the shares in the corporation or owning any partncmship Interest Jn the partnership. · If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (21 above is a non-profit orgooi-ietiQn or a trust, fist ,:he names end addre:sscs of pny person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organizstion or as uustee or bli!neficiarv of the trust. 2075 L.ae Palrnas Dr. • Ce.rtSbad, CA 92009•1576·• (619} 4;38-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 APR-18-97 FRI 9:45 APR-18-97 FRI 09~32 PACIFIC VIEW LLC O.OF CARLS~AD COMM DE FAX NO. 7295260 F~ NO, 4380a P.03 P.03 6. Have you had snoro than ♦250 wurth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, commissions, Commtttees and/or Councll within th• past twelve (12) months? 0 Yes O No If yes, please Jl'ldi~e porcon(e}!. _________ _ fteJSon.'-ls •:defined .as -~Any.~inaividuat/'.''fi~•. =;:co;;pa~hip~: joint •ventu~;. illiSOCiation, .50Cii!I club, fraternal organiz~tion,..co,poration;•cst~~•:tr.ust~ recei)ler-,:8lfldic11te,':'thl1 end any other coumy, ciW ,anf. county.~ .ci1y·:~m.uhlei~~)Jivii{~li~}~~/~~r,~~Ji~~J-:3,u~~~on~-or :any'. .other group or comblmr;Jon .. actfng ~:Uf!J~~;< ·. :. ~· : .. ; ~.; ,i..,,.~:-,;;•:;f1~•:·t:~:·:::.,i · .i-....... ,~ .':: · . : • · · . NOTE; Attach additi0Qal sheets if neeessary. Signature of owner/date Sigo~ture of appfioanT/d.ate Patrick W. McGuire Print or type n~me of own1r Print or type name of applie.int Dlsclosure Statement 10/96 Page 2 of 2