The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998-12-16; Planning Commission; ; LCPA 97-10|MP 177W|CT 97-17|CP 98-10|CDP 97-46 - BRINDISI-The City of CARLSBAD • Planning Depanment A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION P.C. AGENDA OF: December 16, 1998 Item No. Application complete date: June 9, 1998 Project Planner: Adrienne Landers Project Engineer: Clyde Wickham SUBJECT: LCPA 97-10/MP 177(W)/CT 97-17/CP 98-10/CDP 97-46 -BRINDISI - Request for the approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Master Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit and Coastal Development Permit to construct a 90 unit, multi-family, attached airspace condominium project on 8.2 acres located in Planning Area 19 of the Aviara Master Plan, at the northeast corner of Ambrosia Lane and Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 19. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4435, 4436, 4437, 4441, 4438 and 4439 respectively, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, LCP A 97-10, MP l 77(W), CT 97-17, CP 98-10 and CDP 97-46 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION This proposal involves the construction of 90 multi-family, attached, airspace condominium units on two pre-graded lots within the A viara Master Plan, Planning Area 19. A master plan amendment and accompanying Local Coastal Program Amendment are proposed to revise development standards required by the master plan for this planning area. The project's location within the Coastal Zone also necessitates the processing of a Coastal Development Permit. The project complies with all applicable zone and master plan regulations. All issues have been resolved. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval of a local coastal program amendment, master plan amendment, tentative tract map, condominium permit and coastal development permit to allow the construction of a 90 unit, multi-family, airspace condominium project. The subject site, located at the northeast corner of Ambrosia Lane and Poinsettia Lane, is composed of what originally were two planning areas within the A viara Master Plan, PA 19 and former PA 32A. PA 32A was reserved for park use until July 1, 1995, unless the City determined that the land was not needed for park use, at which time it could then be allowed for residential development as part of PA 19. That determination was made by the City with the understanding that the mass -•· LCPA 97-10/MP 177(W)/CT 97-17/CP 98-10/CDP 97-46 -BRIND.1~l December 16, 1998 Pae 2 grading for A viara, including PA 19, would also provide improved access to the future park site. PA 19 was included in the original mass-grading of the master plan with pad elevations of the subject site and Ambrosia Lane approximately 1 O' lower than the park site. The subject site is adjacent to 184 condominiums at the east with 288 luxury apartments proposed to the south. The site is bounded on the west and north by the future, but unplanned, City park. Early conceptual park plans propose a driveway, parking lot, and basketball courts north of the subject site. Development in this portion of the Aviara Master Plan terraces downslope from north to south and from west to east. Again, the future park pad is approximately 10' -15' above the subject site which then steps down about 25' to the condominium project to the east. Poinsettia Lane varies from 6' to 20' below the subject site. The proposed condominium development with 13 sixplexes and 4 triplexes is designed in somewhat of a circular fashion with units fronting along a 32' wide private street with parking on one side of the street. Each of the buildings is designed around an interior courtyard complemented with enriched pavement treatment, trellises, fountains, etc. to allow this space to function as a neighborhood gathering area rather than as only a driveway/courtyard. On the average sixplex, the courtyard provides internal access to four units with two units in each building fronting directly on the private street. Approximately 30 percent of the units face the private street while providing 20' driveway opportunities for guest parking. Additional guest parking is accommodated on the street and at two dispersed locations. Private recreational amenities are provided through 15' x 15' rear yards or 10' x 10' balconies. Common active recreation requirements are met through the provision of a swimming pool, spa and attendant facilities. Consistent with the A viara Residential Guidelines, each of the proposed structures features a mix of Spanish Colonial and Mediterranean design elements. These characteristics include articulated facades, tile roofs, shutters, accent tiles, painted wrought iron railings, wood trellises and enhanced rear elevations. Unit sizes range from 1,341 sq. ft. to 2,198 sq. ft. The Carlsbad Municipal Code allows a master plan to override normal development standards. Because the A viara Master Plan serves as the zoning for the master plan area, amendment of those standards redefines the required development standards for Planning Area 19. The proposed revision to standards would permit: 1) A setback of 40 feet from Poinsettia Lane; 2) A 15 foot setback from top of slope along the eastern boundary of the planning area; 3) A 36 foot wide garage-to-garage distance and 34 foot distance between livable space in the courtyard area; 4) A varied front yard setback of 10 and 20 feet on the internal street; 5) A building height reduction from 35 feet to 28.5 feet; and, 6) Solid fencing instead of open fencing along the park. The new development standards and product type provisions are proposed via master plan text changes and the introduction of a graphic depicting the typical six unit design for the Planning -. LCPA 97-10/MP 177(W)/CT 97-17/CP 98-10/CDP 97-46 -BRIND'I December 16, 1998 Pa e 3 Area 19 chapter of the A viara Master Plan. The proposed master plan text changes are attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 4437, as Exhibit X. Because the A viara Master Plan is both a land use plan and implementing ordinance for the Local Coastal Program, an amendment to the LCP is necessary to provide consistency between the two documents. Affordable housing requirements for the development of this planning area have already been satisfied at a master plan scale through the construction of the Villa Loma project. The proposed project is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan B. Mello I Segment of the Local Coastal Program C. P-C -Planned Community Zone D. Aviara Master Plan (MP 177 and its amendments) E. Planned Development Ordinance F. Subdivision Ordinance G. Growth Management Ordinance H. CEQA and Environmental Protection Ordinance. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. General Plan When the A viara Master Plan was approved, the finding was made that the master plan implements the General Plan and was consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. The finding was based on the fact that the master plan provides for the following: ( 1) the provision of the necessary circulation element roadway improvements including Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane; (2) the protection and enhancement of native vegetation and wetland areas; (3) the construction of public trails; ( 4) the provision of affordable housing within the Villa Loma development; and (5) compliance with the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 19 for public facilities and services. Based on this implementation and consistency relationship between the A viara Master Plan and the General Plan, it can be assumed that if the Brindisi project is consistent with the Master Plan, it is also consistent with the General Plan. _, LCP A 97-I 0/MP 177(W)! 97-17 /CP 98-IO/CDP 97-46 -BRIND.I December 16, 1998 Pae 4 B. Local Coastal Program/Coastal Development Permit Planning Area 19 lies within the Mello I segment of the City's Coastal Zone and is subject to the corresponding land use policies and implementing ordinances. The implementing ordinances for those portions of the Mello I segment within A viara are contained in the A viara Master Plan. This section addresses only conformance with the Land Use Plan since implementing ordinance conformance is addressed in Sections D and E below. The policies of the Mello I segment emphasize topics such as preservation of agriculture and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access, and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The land uses allowed through the Mello I Segment are the same as those allowed through the Aviara Master Plan, therefore the proposed multi-family residential use is consistent with the LCP. Because the A viara Master Plan serves as the implementing ordinance of the Local Coastal Program for this site, consistency with the master plan also represents consistency with the LCP implementing ordinances. The proposed development creates no impacts to coastal resources. There are no steep slopes on the subject site. The very narrow strip of disturbed native vegetation along the north side of the site adjacent to the proposed park was included in the Habitat Loss Permit approved by the Department of Fish, and Game for the A viara Phase III project. No additional mitigation is required. City erosion control standards will be maintain~d throughout the project site to deter off-site erosion and potential lagoon sedimentation. No agricultural lands exist on the graded site, therefore no impacts to such will occur. The project site is located 1 + miles from Batiquitos Lagoon and no existing or future coastal access routes exist through the site. No significant visual resources exist on or near the project site. Given the above, the project is consistent with the applicable overlay, namely, the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone Mello I Segment. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the Mello I land use policies. C. Planned Community Zone The underlying zoning of the proposed project is Planned Community (P-C). In accordance with that designation, the Aviara Master Plan was created to implement that zoning. No specific development standards or design criteria exist in the P-C zone, however, and all applicable standards and criteria are contained within the master plan documents. Therefore, conformance with the master plan requirements also indicates conformance with the Planned Community Zone. D. andE. Aviara Master Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development Ordinance The Aviara Master Plan designated Planning Area 19 for a maximum of 109 multi-family dwelling units. The proposed 90 unit airspace condominiums are consistent with the multi- family designation and density. Per the master plan, all development within Planning Area 19 must comply with the requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance, except as modified in the master plan. As noted above, the municipal code allows a master plan to override normal development standards. The applicant is proposing to modify several existing development standards for Planning Area 19. The proposed revisions will permit a lower profile development LCPA 97-10/MP 177(W)! 97-17 /CP 98-JO/CDP 97-46 -BRIND'I December 16, 1998 Pa e 5 that maintains an articulated streetscene with varying setbacks while maintaining compatibility with surrounding development. The existing master plan requirements and proposed revisions are discussed in Table A below: Table A. PROPOSED MASTER PLAN REVISIONS MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT PROPOSED REVISION AND RATIONALE Building Height: 35 feet except that structures may not Maximum height of 30 feet or two stories. All units exceed 28 feet within 50 feet of the measure 28.5 feet in height. The proposed reduction creates park. 50 % of structures must be no better compatibility with surrounding land uses. The 6 inch more than 2 stories. increase near the park site will not be noticeable. Setback from Poinsettia Lane: All units are at least 40 feet from Poinsettia Lane. The 50 feet proposed setback is consistent with existing the City requirement for a 40 foot setback from major arterials. A similar 40 foot setback already exists on the adjacent Poinsettia Hill project to the east. Setback from interior ~treet: 49% of the structure adjacent to the private street must 20 feet maintain a frontyard setback of 20 feet. The remaining 51 % of the structure may maintain a 10 feet frontyard setback, if the garage unit is side-loaded. The proposed building footprint provides varied building setbacks similar to requirements of the RD-M (multi-family) zone. Setback along easter}~ boundaO'. 15 foot setback from top of eastern slope line (average 50 feet distance from top of eastern slope is 21.5 feet, average distance from eastern property line is 40 feet). The Poinsettia Hills project was approved with a similar 20 foot setback. The 60 foot distance between development will provide sufficient visual separation between the two multi- family projects. Distance between structures on 36.5 feet from garage door to garage door; 34 feet from courtyard livable space to livable space. Code requires a 30 foot 34 feet driveway plus a 5 foot setback from each side of the driveway. The intent of the code requirement is to provide a wider driveway when there are a larger number of units and increased ADTs, and to provide a setback from that driveway to ensure privacy, etc. The proposed 24 foot driveway handles no through traffic and needs to accommodate only backup from homes on the courtyard. The 5 foot setback for privacy is still provided. A vehicular field test indicate no problems with a 36 foot backup. Open fence or wall along northern Solid fence or wall. The proposed park parking lot could property line near park adversely impact the privacy and security of residents. As amended, the proposed project is consistent with the applicable regulations of the Aviara Master Plan and the PUD (condominium standards) regulations as shown in Table B below. LCP A 97-10/MP 177(W)!: 97-17/CP 98-JO/CDP 97-46 -BRIND'I December 16, 1998 Pae 6 Table B: MASTER PLAN AND PUD/CP COMPLIANCE STANDARD MP/CP STANDARD PROPOSED Density/Product type (MP) 109 multi-family 90 multi-family units Min. lot size (MP) n/a air space ownership only Setbacks: (MP) Poinsettia Lane 40' 40' Ambrosia Lane 20' 20' Front yard setback on 49% of structure adjacent to 20'/10' interior street street must have 20' setback. 51 % of the structure may have a 10' setback if garages are side- loaded (see Exhibit A). Min. distance b/t structures 20' 20' (MP) Min. street width (private 30' (no parking) 32' (parking on 1 side) streets) 32' (parking on 1 side) 36' (parking on 2 sides) Min. private driveway widths 24' 24' (MP) Max. building height (MP) 28.5' 28.5' Resident parking (CP) 2 full-sized covered spaces/du 2-car garages Visitor parking (CP) 25 spaces 25 spaces ( dispersed along private streets and in two small parking areas) Recreational space (CP) 200 sq ft/du/18,000 total sq. ft. 18, 148 sq. ft. through private patios/ balconies as well as common active area. Storage space . 392 cf/du Provided within individual garages RV storage (MP & CP) n/a 1800 sq. ft already provided in (provided in Planning Area 23) Planning Area 23 Miscellaneous (MP) Open fence or wall near park Solid wall or fence Solid fence or wall along easterly Six foot solid fence property line Access to park site Site graded to interface with future park pad elevations. Grading approved by Parks and Recreation. LCP A 97-I 0/MP 177(W)! 97-17/CP 98-10/CDP 97-46 -BRIND'I December 16, 1998 Pae 7 Subdivision Ordinance The proposed tentative map complies with all requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. All infrastructure improvements and the extension of existing drainage and sewer facilities will be installed concurrent with development. Access to the site will be provided from Ambrosia Lane at the northwestern comer of the project site. The proposed setbacks, structure separations and the design of the units will allow for adequate air circulation and the opportunity for passive heating and cooling. The project is conditioned to install private, interior street improvements to a 32' width including curbs, gutters, sidewalks. The proposed street system is adequate to handle the project's pedestrian and vehicular traffic. As agreed to by the City and the developer, the proposed subdivision design includes grading of a 20-40' wide area on the adjacent park site as an interim design of the shared boundary condition. This graded area will approximate the finish grade of the future park site. However, because the final design of the park is uncertain, grading, access, and drainage could necessitate a re-grading condition on the park property. In the event that additional grading is necessary, the project is conditioned to grant an irrevocable construction and slope easement to the City. This easement has been noted on the final map and will be included in the CC&Rs to advise potential homeowners of this condition. G. Growth Management Ordinance At the time the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 19 was approved, all facility impacts were analyzed and it was determined that all facilities would be provided prior to or concurrent with need pursuant to the facilities performance standards of Growth Management. Because the proposed project is consistent with the master plan in which all facilities were determined to be in compliance with adopted performance standards and the project has been conditioned to comply with all requirements of the LFMP for Zone 19, no further growth management analysis 1s necessary. Facility impacts are noted on the attached Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form. V. ENVIRONMENTAL The proposed project and revisions within Planning Area 19 were reviewed with respect to their potential environmental impacts, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project site has undergone two previous environmental reviews: the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort and the Master Environmental Impact Report for the 1994 General Plan Update. Upon review of the current proposal, it was determined that there will be no additional significant impacts that were not analyzed in the previous environmental documents. The current proposal conforms to the parameters established through the previous reviews. The General Plan land use designation, zoning and density remain the same, and the project falls within the scope of the City's MEIR for the City of Carlsbad General Plan update (EIR 93-01) certified in September, 1994, in which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for cumulative impacts to air quality and traffic. All feasible mitigation measures identified by the MEIR which are appropriate to this project have been incorporated into the project. An additional 720 ADT would be generated by the project, however, Poinsettia Lane was designed and constructed to accommodate this ADT. No additional roadway improvements LCP A 97-10/MP 177(W)/~ 97-17 /CP 98-10/CDP 97-46 -BRIND'I December 16, 1998 Pa e 8 are required. Mitigation measures related to noise and disclosure of noise impacts from Poinsettia Lane were brought forward to the present environmental assessment and included as mitigation measures; however, no new noise impacts are anticipated. Based on findings that no significant environmental impacts would result from the proposed development, the Planning Director issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 1, 1998. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4435 (Neg. Dec.) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4436 (LCP A) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4437 (MP) 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4441 (CT) 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4438 (CP) 6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4439 (CDP) 7. Location Map 8. Disclosure Form 9. Background Data Sheet 10. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 11. Reduced Exhibits 12. Exhibits "A" -"O", dated December 16, 1998 AL:eh:mh I I I J BRINDISI LCPA 97-10/MP 177(W)/CT 97-17/ CP 98-10/CDP 97-46 - City of -Carlsbad ■4 Gi h,i 1,i· • •14·Ei,;, ,i§ ,ii DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require I discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Comminee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application subminal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, assoc1at1on. social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county. city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. I. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) ') Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership. include the names. title, addresses of all individuals owning more than I 0% of the _shares. II: NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW, If a publiclv-owned corporation. include the names. titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person ____________ _ Corp/Part See Attached Title _____________ _ Title _______________ _ Address ___________ _ Address --------------- OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership. tenants in common. non-profit. corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership. include the .names. title. addresses of all individuals owning more than I 0% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation. include the names. titles. and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person ____________ _ Corp/Part See Attached Title _____________ _ Title. ______________ _ Address ___________ _ Address --------------- 2075 Las Palmas Dr.• Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 3. NON-PROFIT O'GANIZATION OR TRUST -If any person identified pursuant to (I) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust. list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust ---------Non Profit/Trust ·----------- Tit 1 e ____________ _ Title ---------------- Address ___________ _ Address _____________ _ 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? D Yes ~No If yes, please indicate person(s): ______________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above infonnation is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. See Attachment #1 Safo~ . Brehm-Aviara III Development Assoc. L.P. Brehm-Aviara III Development Assoc. L.P . Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant" s agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMlN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 Attachment # I Applicant: BREHM-A VIARA ID DEVELOP:MENT ASSOCIATES, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership By: Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC, a California limited liability company, its general partner By: The Brehm Companies, LLC, a California limited !iability company, its manager By: Owner: BREHM-A VIARA III DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership By: Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC, a California limited liability company, its general partner By: The Brehm Companies, LLC, a California limited liability company, its manager By: . ___________ , 1. Applicant: 2. Owner: -Attachment to Disclosure Stateme.At Brehm-Aviara ill Development Associates, L.P. 2835 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92108 Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC 283 5 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92108 The Brehm Companies 283 5 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92108 Lumbermen' s Investment Corporation P.O. Box 2030 Austin, TX 78768 Prudential Insurance Company of America CO-P AMG-Real Estate 4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 205 CALPers Investment Office P.O. Box 2749 Sacramento, CA 95812-2749 Brehm-Aviara III Development Associates, L.P. 283 5 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92108 Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC 283 5 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92108 The Brehm Companies 2835 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92108 Lumbermen' s Investment Corporation P.O. Box 2030 Austin, TX 78768 Prudential Insurance Company of America CO-P AMG-Real Estate 4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 205 CALPers Investment Office P.O. Box 2749 Sacramento, CA 95812-2749 -BACKGROUND DATA SHEET - CASE NO: LCPA 97-10/MPA 177(W)/CT 97-17/CP 98-10 /CDP 97-46 CASE NAME: Brindisi -Planning Area 19 APPLICANT: Brehm-Aviara Development. Ltd. Partnership REQUEST AND LOCATION: A Local Coastal Plan Amendment, Master Plan Amendment. Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit and Coastal Development Permit to construct a 90 unit multi-family, attached condominium project on 8.2 acres located in Planning Area 19 of the Aviara Master Plan, at the northeast comer of Ambrosia Lane and Poinsettia Lane. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 3 and 4 inclusive of City of Carlsbad Tract No. 92-3 A viara Phase III, Unit No. 1, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 13434. filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County. June 23. 1997. APN: 215-841-02 & 03 Acres: =8=.2,___ ____ Proposed No. of Lots/Units: .... 9.:.:...0 _______ _ GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: =RH="'---------------------------- Density Allowed: 109 multi-family units Density Proposed: ..._9"'-0...,m=u=lt=i-...... f:=am.........,ile.,;..y--=u=n=it=s ______ _ Existing Zone: ~P-C _______ _ Proposed Zone: ~N~A ______________ _ Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning Land Use North PC OS (future park site) South PC RMH (proposed 290 unit apt site) East RDM-Q RM ( 184 condos) West PC OS (future park site) PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: ~C=a=rl=sb=a=d,___ ________ _ Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): .... 90,.__ __________________ _ Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: _S=iep~t=em=b=er.....,2=9'"""", ...... 1~9~9~7 ______________ _ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT [:8J Mitigated Negative Declaration, issued ~J-u=-ly,-=2 ....... 7,-1~2~9-8 ______________ _ D Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated~----------------- D Other,_ ___________________________ _ CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMP ACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Brindisi, LCPA 97-10/MP 177(W)/CT 97-17/CP 98-10/CDP 97-46 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: =RH~------ ZONING: PC -Planned Community DEVELOPER'S NAME: Brehm-Aviara III Development Associates, L. ADDRESS: 2835 Camino del Rio North, Suite 220, San Diego, CA 92108 PHONE NO.: 619-293-7090 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 215-841-02 and 03 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 8.2 acres, 90 condos A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage= 724.2 sq. ft. B. Library: Demand in Square Footage= 386.6 sq. ft. C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) -9=0=E=D~U~---- D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. Park: Drainage: Demand in Acreage = Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = · (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) 1.45 acres NA D 720ADT Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = Station No. 4 Open Space: Schools: (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer: Water: Acreage Provided = ,,_N.._A..,__ ____ _ Demands in EDU Demand in GPD = CUSD 90 19,800 GPD L. The project is 65 units under the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance and 19 units under the Master Plan unit allowance. ==-~-.. ·-;/ / . . , .-:· .· ... ✓- L. -. --------- .. ········•-... A.I',,., ., Zl5-IU1-0l -·- . • :,I • , ... r CCA.RTYARD RIGHT B£VAl1CJN - B..EVATXJNS "A" CCIU'!TYARD LEFT B£VA11CJN 114":ej'.Q" BRINDISI BREHM BUILDERS 97041 100298 • STE SP[Cl'l:;-OCQ.f W!-£RE SO: EXf'OSED TO \JEW. B..EVAflCJ\18 "A" lHN-IANCB) 81:1: B..EVA"TO-l 114•,._r-o- BRINDISI BREHM BUILDERS 97041 100298 - . .) . .._ - - B..EVA"JOIIS 'B' EN-iANCED REAR B..EVATDN 1/4" ~ 1'·0' BRINDISI BREHM BUILDERS 970A1 10.02.98 . .. . .. CONCIETE S TU AOCfflG l.£TAL GARAGE 000A REVATIONS "A" E!IHMa:O REAR B.EVATOII 114·,.,•,o· BRINDISI BREHM BUILDERS 97041 100298