Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-03-15; Planning Commission; ; CT 99-01|SDP 99-02|PUD 99-01|CP 00-001|CDP 99-02 - CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES"""" / '-.I ~e City of Carlsbad Planning Department ~ A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION P.C. AGENDA OF: March 15, 2000 Item No.@ Application complete date: June 26, 1999 Project Planner: Elaine Blackbum Project Engineer: Jeremy Riddle SUBJECT: CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 -CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES -Request for a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Planned Unit Development/Condominium Permit, and Coastal Development Permit · · · on a site located on the south side of Chinquapin Avenue between Garfield Street and the AT&SF Railroad tracks and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4727 APPROVING a Mitigated Negative Declaration and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4728, 4729, 4730, and 4731 APPROVING CT 99-01, SOP 99-02, PUD 99- 01/CP 00-001, and CDP 99-02 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposed project is a request for a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Planned Unit Development/Condominium Permit, and Coastal Development Permit to develop a residential project on a 1.113-acre in-fill site. The project would create ten new residential units and retain one existing residential structure and would provide both single-family detached units and single-family attached condominiums. Inclusionary housing requirements for the project would be satisfied by provision of a second dwelling unit and payment of a fee for the remaining partial unit requirement. The project site has a two General Plan designations (.322 acres of RMH and . 791 acres of RH) and RD-M zoning. The applicant is proposing 3 units fewer than allowed on the RH portion of the site and 1 unit more than allowed on the RMH portion. The density on the RMH portion exceeds the low end of the range but does not exceed the growth control point. The increase over the growth control point would require approval of specific findings by the Planning Commission. Staff believes the necessary findings can be made and has included these in the attached resolutions. There are no unresolved issues associated with the project, and, therefore, staff is recommending approval of all requested permits. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Site Description The project site is an irregular shaped property consisting of 3 existing adjacent lots on the south side of Chinquapin A venue just east of Garfield Street. The site is located approximately 500 feet west of the AT &SF railway line, approximately a quarter of a mile north of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon, and approximately a quarter of a mile inland from the Pacific Ocean. The () ,,-~ ' ~ CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD~9-0l/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 -CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pa e2 total site size is approximately 1.113 gross acres, is approximately 260 feet deep, and has about 225 feet of frontage along Chinquapin Avenue. Topographically the site slopes downward from the west to the east and to the south. The westernmost portion of the site is undeveloped and is sparsely covered with native grasses and a few small trees. The middle portion contains a single- family structure which will be demolished. The easternmost portion of the site (the proposed Lot 4) contains a single-family dwelling unit with a detached garage. This residential unit and garage are to remain on the site. (The applicant plans to continue to occupy this unit while the remainder of the site is developed with new structures.) Project Description The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Planned Unit Development/Condominium Permit, and Coastal Development Permit for eleven residential units on a 1.113 gross acre in-fill parcel. The • a ·• ld zjgt f#rree new single- family residential structures on individual lots ( one with an attached second dwelling unit), one existing single-family detached structure on an individual lot, and six single-family attached condominium units on a single common lot. The four single-family detached units would be on the front of the site along Chinquapin A venue. These units would maintain the predominately single-family atmosphere of the properties to the east of the project site and would keep the mass of the development lowest along the street scene. The detached unit (Unit A) on Lot 1 would also incorporate an attached second dwelling unit. The six attached units would be located on the interior and rear of the project site. The scale of these attached units would be in keeping with, and less than, the scale of the condominium units on the neighboring site. The proposed buildings would have a Mediterranean architectural theme incorporating an off-white stucco exterior and red-blend concrete tile roofing. These materials would compliment the existing surrounding development along Chinquapin A venue. Required guest parking would be provided by five open parking spaces dispersed on the site. Additional, non-required, guest parking would also be available for the detached units in the proposed driveways for those units. Each of the detached units has a 20' setback from the Chinquapin Avenue. The required parking space for the second dwelling unit (Lot 1/Unit A) would be within the 20' driveway for that unit. All other resident parking would be provided by a two-car garage attached to each unit. The proposed project would include both private yards for each unit and a common active recreation area consisting of a volleyball court. In addition the project includes patios and decks for some of the units. The project would provide an on-site RV parking area for one vehicle. This area would be gated and screened by landscaping. The RV enclosure and all patio railings would be of wrought iron painted white. A centralized trash enclosure would be provided behind Lot 1 and screened from the street. A 30-foot wide private drive would provide access to the interior units. No parking would be allowed or proposed within this drive. Some small retaining walls ( each less than 3 feet high) are proposed. These walls would be primarily internal to the site. A 6-foot wooden privacy fence would enclose the rear yards of the detached units. The proposed detached units range in size from 1,780 square feet to 3,256 square feet. The attached units range from 1,733 square feet to 2,367 square feet. All of the units contain at least three bedrooms (except, of course the second dwelling unit). Table 1, below, provides a detailed breakdown of the proposed structure sizes and floor plans. CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD~-Ol/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 -CARLS2n BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pae 3 Table 1 -FLOOR PLAN/AREA SUMMARY FLOOR TYPE OF #OF BED-#OF SQUARE #OF UNITS LOT# PLAN UNIT ROOMS STORIES FEET 1 A SF detached 3 2 3,256 1 1 2nd du Attached 1 over garage 593 1 2 B SF detached 4 2 2,758 1 3 B SF detached 4 2 2,758 1 4 Existing SF detached 1,780 1 du 5 C SF attached 3 2 1,733 1 5 D SF attached 3 2 1,888 1 5 E SF attached 3-4 2 2,091 1 5 F SF detached 4 2 2,367 1 5 G SF attached 3-4 2 2,101 1 5 H SF attached 3-4 2 2,066 1 The project site has two General Plan designations. The majority of the site (the western two- thirds) is designated RH. The eastern one-third is designated RMH. The areas surrounding the project site reflect this transitional nature. The properties to the north, west and southwest are designated RH. The properties directly east and southeast of the site are designated RMH. The properties immediately to the west and to the southeast are zoned R-2. All of the remaining surrounding properties are zoned RD-M. (See Exhibits "X" and "Y", attached.) The area surrounding the project site is developed with a variety of residential uses. Directly across Chinquapin Avenue (to the north of the project site) is the Carlsbad Beach Villas condominium development. Other developments on that side of the street include single-family residences and attached residential projects. Immediately west of the pr.oject site (along Garfield Street) are several single-family detached homes. To the southwest of the site is the Llewellyn Shores condominium development. To the east of the project site most of the development consists of older single-family detached residences. Most of the existing single-family detached structures in the area were built approximately 30-50 years ago. As redevelopment of these parcels occur, the single-family detached units are being replaced with higher density housing in the form of attached product types, including .c;:ondominiums and apartments. These higher density developments more accurately reflect the density of development anticipated by the existing General Plan designations on those properties. The proposed project addresses the issue of compatibility with the transitional nature of the area by incorporating a combination of single-family detached and single-family attached products on the subject site. The proposed single-family detached units would be located along the street frontage, thus keeping the overall scale of the project lower along the street scene. This also preserves the more single-family detached character of the site as it exists to the east. The higher density attached product is proposed for the rear (southwestern) portion of the project site. This places the higher density attached portion of the development directly adjacent to the similar existing condominium developments to the southwest and further removed from the street ·""'"" CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD~-01/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 -CARLSB~ BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pa e4 frontage along Chinquapin Avenue. This design reflects the applicant's concern with maintaining compatibility with existing surrounding developments. The proposed grading for the project includes 281 cubic yards (cy) of cut, 2,824 cy of fill and 2,543 cy of import. The import is required to bring the front yards up to street grade. A grading permit will be required. No off-site grading is proposed. The geotechnical report prepared for the project indicates that there are no major grading or soils-related issues associated with the proposed project. In general, the differences in elevations between existing grades and proposed pad elevations range from -2 feet to +4 feet. The western portion of the site would be lowered from the existing grade by 1 to 2 feet. The southernmost point of the site would be raised from the existing grade by approximately 1 ½ feet. The greatest elevation change would be approximately +4 feet. That change would occur at the southwest comer of proposed Lot 4 on the interior of the project site and would be necessary to transition from the street grade to the currently-low spots at the interior and rear of the site. The proposed building pads would follow the natural topography of the site and the differences between the existing and proposed grades are necessary to create level pads for construction. The project does not create major slopes along property lines of adjacent properties. IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following regulations and requirements: A. Section 65590 of the California Government Code (affordable housing in the Coastal Zone); B. Carlsbad General Plan RMH (Residential Medium-High) and RH (Residential High) designation regulations; C. Subdivision Map Act and City of Carlsbad Subdivision Regulations (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); D. RD-M (Residential Density-Multiple) Zone, BAOZ (Beach Area Overlay Zone), PUD/CP (Planned Unit Development/Condominium Permit), and Parking regulations (Chapters 21.24, 21.82, 21.45, and 21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); E. Coastal Development regulations for the Mello II Segment of the Coastal Zone, and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapters 21.201, and 21.203 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); F. Inclusionary Housing regulations (Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); G. Growth Management regulations (Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); The recommendation for approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable City regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD~-Ol/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02-CARLSi BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pae 5 A. California Government Code Section 65590 of the California Government Code limits the conversion or demolition of low and moderate income housing within the Coastal Zone. While the two single-family residential structures on the project site were built many years ago, they have not been used to provide low or moderate income housing. Further, this Code section provides for exemptions for projects which would demolish 10 or fewer such units. Therefore, the demolition of one ( or even both) of the existing units is consistent with the California Government Code. B. General Plan The project site is subject to two residential General Plan designations (RMH and RM). The easternmost portion of the site is designated RMH. (This area consists of the easternmost 63' of the site, and coincides with the western property line of the old Lot 4 from the northern to the southern edges of the project site.) The remainder of the project site is designated RH. (Again, see Exhibits "X" and "Y", attached.) Table 2, below, demonstrates how the project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. Table 2 -GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE USE, GOAL, PROPOSED USES OBJECTIVE, OR OR ELEMENT PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE Land Use (Growth Goal A.1. "A City The proposed project Yes Management & Public which ensures the would provide all Facilities) timely provision of public facilities adequate public necessary at the time facilities and of development. services ... " Land Use Objective B.2. "To The proposed project Yes (Residential) preserve the would preserve the neighborhood single-family atmosphere and atmosphere to the identity of existing north of the project residential areas." site and the higher density atmosphere to the south and west of the site. As stated above, this project site has General Plan designations of RMH and RH. Generally the allowed density on a site is determined by the General Plan density range and growth control point. However, on sites zoned RD-M, and developed as PUD's, there are other City regulations which affect allowed density. Therefore, although these other regulations are zoning matters, they are being included in the General Plan section of the staff report because they affect project density. First, when a PUD project site is subject to two or more General Plan designations, the density for the project cannot be averaged across the two designations to give a single overall density ~ r--J ..,I CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD "9-01/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 -CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pae 6 calculation. Each General Plan area must be analyzed separately. Thus, the densities for this project have been analyzed separately for the two designation areas. Second, in the RD-M Zone the density allowed for a project is assumed to be the density at the low end of the range (rather than at the growth control point) unless the decision-making body finds that a higher density is justified by the provisions of the General Plan. Since this entire project site is zoned RD-M, the allowed density is the low end of the range unless specific findings are made to allow additional density. Table 3, below, provides a detailed breakdown of the acreage in each General Plan designation on the site, the allowed density and number of dwelling units, and the proposed density and number of dwelling units for the proposed project site. This table demonstrates that: A) On the RH portion of the site, the proposed project density (10.1 du/ac) is below the low end of the range (15 du/ac); and, B) On the RMH portion of the site, the proposed project density (9.31 du/ac) is slightly above the low end of the range (8 du/ac) but does not exceed the growth control point. Therefore, the proposed project would need approval of specific findings by the Planning Commission to develop the RMH portion of the site as proposed (i.e., with 3 units rather than 2). Staff believes the necessary specific findings can be made for the proposed project to allow the one additional unit requested on the RMH portion of the site. The project would provide all necessary public facilities for the additional density/dwelling unit. No additional facilities are necessary for the one additional unit, and all necessary facilities are being constructed at the time of development. The existing street system is well able to accommodate the 88 total average daily trips to be generated by the project. The existing water, sewer, and wastewater facilities can also easily accommodate the proposed project. Further, the project would be allowed an additional 3 units beyond what is proposed on the RH portion of the site. Therefore, independent of any other projects which have been approved at densities below the allowed density, the proposed project itself is proposed at a lower density than allowed on the RH portion. Therefore, staff analysis concluded that all necessary public facilities would be provided at the time of construction and there would be sufficient additional units available for the requested one additional unit on the RMH portion of the site. Further, staff believes the development of the project as proposed is acceptable since the overall scale of the project is in keeping with the scale of the neighborhood. ,-... 'l CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD ~01/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 -CARLSB'!n BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pae 7 Table 3: PROPOSED DENSITY AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS Prop'd Prop'd Gen'l Prop'd Prop'd Lot Size Lot Plan Allowed Prop'd Allowed# # of Lot# (sf) Size Desig. Density Density ofDU's DU's (ac) 1 4,410 .101 RH 2 2 3,780 .086 RH 1 3 3,798 .087 RH 1 5 (part) 22,470 .515 RH 4 Tot Tot 34,458 .791 RH 15 du/ac 10.1 du/ac 11.86 du's 8 du's 4 6,930 .159 RMH 1 5 (part) 7,110 .163 RMH 2 Tot Tot 14,040 .322 RMH 8 du/ac 9.31 du/ac 2.57 du's 3 du's C. Subdivision Map Act and City of Carlsbad Subdivision Regulations The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project satisfies all requirements of Title 20 (Subdivisions) and the State Map Act. The project site is served by Chinquapin A venue, and has direct access to that public street. All lot sizes proposed meet or exceed the minimum lot size requirements (minimum 3,500 square feet for the single- family detached lots) and comply with lot configuration requirements. No through lots or flag lots are being created. The site contains no slopes which would affect the proposed lot line locations. Finally, no off-site improvements are required for the project, and no standards waivers are required. A public easement dedication to encompass the proposed potable water and sewer system is required. The project will require a grading permit. However, the proposed grading is limited to that necessary to bring the front yards up to the street level and provide the necessary flat building pads throughout the site. No excessive grading or pad elevation changes are proposed. D. RD-M (Residential Density-Multiple) Zone, BAOZ (Beach Area Overlay Zone), PUD/CP (Planned Unit Development/Condominium Permit), and Parking Compliance The project site is zoned RD-M and is also within the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ). Because of the BAOZ and the inclusionary housing requirements, the project requires an SDP. The PUD/CP is required for all small-lot (i.e., less than 7,500 square feet) and condominium developments. Because the project creates small single-family lots (i.e., less than 7,500 square feet), it is also required to comply with the applicable architectural guidelines identified in City Council Policy 44 for small-lot single-family developments. These guidelines would apply only to the detached single-family structures in the project. ~ •:) CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD~-Ol/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 -CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pae 8 As noted previously, this project would create 10 new units and retain one existing unit. The applicant intends to continue living in the existing unit until the project is otherwise fully developed. At that time, he anticipates remodeling or rebuilding that structure. In anticipation of that occurrence, staff has included a specific condition ensuring that any remodeling or rebuilding of that structure would require a PUD/CP Amendment and would, of course, be required to maintain compliance with all applicable regulations in place at the time of approval. Table 4 (below) illustrates how the project complies with the RD-M zone, BAOZ zone, PUD/CP regulations, and the parking regulations. Exhibit "Z", attached, demonstrates how the project complies with the Small-Lot Single-Family Guidelines. Table 4: ZONING COMPLIANCE RD-MZONE BAOZ PUD/CP STANDARD STD STD STD PROPOSED Max. Density RMH=8 du/ac NIA Per underlying RMH 9.31 du/ac RH=15 du/ac zone RH 10.1 du/ac Unless PC approves more Min. Lot Size NIA NIA 3,500 sf 3,780 -6,930 sf (SF det'd) (SF det'd) 10,000 sf 29,580 sf (SF att'd) (SF att'd) Max. Lot 60% NIA NIA 33-44% Coverage (SF det'd) 26% (SF att'd) Max. Bldg. Ht. NIA 30'/2 stories 30' 12 stories 29'8" A (w/pitch) (w/pitch) 26' 8" B 26' 4" C,D, & E 24'6" F 25'6" G & H Min. Front NIA NIA 20' 20'-24'9" Setback (from ROW) (from ROW) Min. Side Setback 5' (interior lots) NIA NIA 5' Min. Rear Setback 10' NIA NIA 10' Min. Bldg. NIA 5' 5' 5' Setback from Open Parking Min. Dist. Bit NIA NIA 10' (I-story 10' Structures structures) Min. Street Widths Private Dwy NIA NIA 30' 30' Resident Parking NIA NIA 20 covered 20 (in garages) Spaces (2 covered /du) Guest Parking NIA NIA 5 5 Spaces (lsp./2 du's) C ~ CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01/CP 00-00llCDP 99-02 -CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pa e9 Max. Compact NIA NIA 2.25 sp's 2 sp's Parking (45% ofreq'd) (40% ofreq'd) Recreational Space NIA NIA Total: 2,000 sf Total: 3,225 sf (200 sf/du) 1. Private Passive 1. 1,000 1. 2,250+ sf 2. Common Active 2. 1,000 2. 1,200 sf RV Storage NIA NIA 200 sf 200 sf Storage Space NIA NIA 480 cf/du or 510-988 sf 392 cf (if all for 1 unit is in 1 area) E. Coastal Development Regulations The project site is within the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program. Mello II land use policies address conservation of agricultural lands and environmentally sensitive habitat areas, sites for active recreation areas, scenic vistas, and erosion control. The site contains no agricultural uses or sensitive habitat. The site also could not reasonably provide any water recreation opportunities and is designated for residential uses. The site also contains no scenic vistas. Erosion control will be ensured by compliance with all applicable city regulations regarding grading activities. Therefore, the project complies with all applicable Mello II land use policies. The project site is within approximately a quarter of a mile of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Any site within 300' of a tidal wetland (e.g., the Agua Hedionda Lagoon) are within the Coastal Commission Appeal Area. Since the southwestern edge of the subject property is within approximately 150'-200' of the Lagoon (based upon older aerial photos of the area), it is assumed that the project is within the appeal area. Therefore, any City approval of a Coastal Development Permit for the project would be subject to appeal to the Coastal Commission. The Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone applies everywhere within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, the project site is located within the Resource Protection Overlay Zone. However, due to the absence of slopes and the absence of any sensitive native vegetation, no resource protection standards or requirements apply. The project will require a grading permit and will be required to comply with the City's Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan and Grading Ordinance to control increased runoff and soil erosion. F. Inclusionary Housing The City's lnclusionary Housing regulations require that a minimum of 15% of all approved units in any residential specific plan or qualified subdivision be made affordable to lower income households. The inclusionary housing requirement for this project would be 1.5 dwelling units. (This is based upon the 10 new residential units being built. The existing unit does not go into this calculation. However, if it is replaced at a later date, that action will have its own inclusionary housing requirement for payment of an in-lieu fee.) The developer of this project proposes to satisfy this requirement by providing one second dwelling unit ( on Lot 1) and to pay a fee for the remaining .5 partial unit requirement. The second dwelling unit would be an attached unit to be located above the garage of the primary unit on Lot 1. The second dwelling CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD <;-OllCP 00-001/CDP 99-02 -CARLS:2n BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pa e 10 unit would contain a total of 593 square feet including a separate bedroom. The second dwelling unit would also have a small balcony/deck which would overlook the front yard. Access to the second dwelling unit would be by two means. The first would be direct access from the primary unit by a connecting door. This door would have a deadbolt lock which could be used to lock off the second dwelling unit from the main unit. The second would be by means of a private entrance stairway. The stairway would be contained within the garage, but a door to the stairway would be located on the side of the garage. Parking for the second dwelling unit would be in the driveway for the primary unit. This is allowed since the primary unit is set back at least 20' from the street. The project's compliance with the City's inclusionary housing requirements is demonstrated in Table 5, below. Table 5: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING COMPLIANCE STANDARD REQUIRED PROVIDED Inclusionary 1.5 du's 1 2nd du and Requirements(Units/F ees) .5 fee credit Location of Units NIA Lot 1 Mix of Bedrooms (10% 3 NIA NIA BR) Incentives Requested NIA NIA 1. Density Increase 2. Standards Modifications 3. Direct Financial G. Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the northwest quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table 6 below. Table 6: GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE City Administration NIA Yes Library NIA Yes Waste Water Treatment NIA Yes Parks NIA Yes Drainage 2 cfs Yes Circulation 88ADT Yes Fire Stations No. 1,2,3,&4 Yes Open Space NIA Yes Schools -CUSD 4.57 Yes Elementary School Students 2.53 NIA Middle School Students .67 NIA High School Students 1.37 n/a Sewer Collection System 10 EDU (CMWD) Yes Water 2,200 GPD (CMWD) Yes CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD c;,-01/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 -CARLSB~ BEACH ESTATES March 15, 2000 Pa e 11 The project is 3 dwelling units below the low end of the range allowance of 11 dwelling units for the RH portion of the site and 1 unit above the low end of the range allowance of 2 dwelling units for the RMH portion of the subject property. Thus, the project would add 2 dwelling units to the excess dwelling unit bank for the Northwest Quadrant. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The initial study prepared for this project concluded that the project would not have any potentially significant impacts when mitigated pursuant to the mitigation monitoring report made a part of that initial study. The mitigation monitoring report addresses only one issue: traffic at the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real. Traffic impacts to the P AR/ECR intersection will be mitigated by the payment of a fee to provide for short-term improvements to the intersection. (See the EIA Part II, attached, for a detailed discussion of the issues and mitigation measure.) On the basis of the initial study and the mitigation monitoring plan prepared by staff, the Planning Director issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 31, 2000. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4727 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4728 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4729 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4 730 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4731 6. Exhibit "X", dated March 15, 2000 7. Exhibit "Y", dated March 15, 2000 8. Exhibit "Z", dated March 15, 2000 9. Location Map 10. Background Data Sheet 11. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 12. Disclosure Statement 13. Reduced Exhibits 14. Full Size Exhibits "A" -"R" dated March 15, 2000 EB:cs:mh GENERAL PLAN SITE EXHIBIT "X" March 15, 2000 CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/ PUD 99-01/CDP 99-02 - SITE ZONING EXHIBIT "Y" March 15, 2000 CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/ PUD 99-01/CDP 99-02 .,.,,., EXHIBIT "Z" March 15, 2000 CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE TABLE GUIDELINE MIN.STD. COMPLIANCE PROJECT DESIGN GUIDELINE 1: Where there are 3 2-story units in NIA We only have three (3) two story a row which are less than 15' apart, at least 1 of houses: Plan A, Lot 1 and Plan B, the 3 Units must have a 1-story building edge not Yes Lots 2 & 3. All have 12' single less than 1 O' deep running the length of the 100%+ story edge. building pad. GUIDELINE 2: Where there are 3 2-Story units in NIA a row which are 15' to 20' apart, at least 1 of the 3 See Above units must have a 1-story building edge not less Yes than 5' deep running the length of the building pad. 100% + GUIDELINE 3: Per project, 33% of all units must 1.32 (2) units Yes Of the Four (4) Units, Lot 4 is an have a 1-story building edge for 40% of the 100% + existing single story. Lots 2 & 3 perimeter of the building. are 37%. GUIDELINE 4A/4B: A: Lots 1,2,3 Yes Lot 1 has three building planes. A. At least 50% of the units in a project must have 100%+ Lots 2 & 3 have four building at least 3 separate building planes on street side planes. elevations of lots with frontages of 45' or less. B. At least 50% of the units in a project must have B: Lot4 No Lot 4 has an existing single story at least 4 separate building planes on street side house which will remain. If rebuilt, elevations of lots with frontages greater than 45'. it would have a four plane. A & B The minimum offset in planes shall be 18" A&B: All Units Yes All houses have at least a 15' and shall include, but not be limited to, building 100% minimum depth between forward walls, windows, and roofs. The minimum depth and rear plane. between the faces of the forward-most plane and the rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10', and a plane must be a minimum of 30 sf to receive credit under this section. GUIDELINE 5: Real elevations shall adhere to the Lots 1,2,3 have three planes. Lot same criteria outlined in Guideline 4 (above) for 4 existing 1 story house. All front elevations except that the minimum depth All Units Yes houses have 3' or deeper back between front and back planes on the rear 100% planes. elevation shall be 3'. GUIDELINE 6: Per project, at least 50% of the 2 Units Yes Lot 1 has a minimum 7' setback. units must have 1 side elevation with an average 100% Lot 4 has an 11' average setback. setback of no less than 7'. GUIDELINE 7A/7B: A. Where the average lot size is 5,000 sf or Jess, A: 3allowed Yes All houses have 2 car garages no more than 75% of the units can have a 3-car 100% garage. B. The project must include a mix of 2-door, 3-B: NIA door, and offset (2 planes minimum 12") 2-door garages. GUIDELINE 8: 50% of exterior openings doors, 100% of exterior doors and (windows) must be recessed or projected a Yes windows are recessed 2+ minimum of 2" and must be of wood or colored All Units 100% inches. aluminum window frames (no mill finishes). GUIDELINE 9: The predominant roof framing for Lot 1 has 3 directional roof each floor plan in a project shall exhibit directional NIA Yes framing elevation. Lots 2 & 3 variety to the other floor plans and to the street. 100% have 4. Lot 4 is an existing single story house. ' I • SITE AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES CT 99-01 /SD P 99-02/ PUD 99-01/CDP 99-02 ,,,_.,. BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 CASE NAME: Carlsbad Beach Estates APPLICANT: =M=e=ri=t..::aG=ro=u~P=·=In=c::..:..•--------------------- REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for an 11-unit residential development on the south side of Chinguapin A venue between Garfield Street and the AT &SF Railroad. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Part of Lot 7 of Palisades No. 2 Map 1803 and the SW 63 feet of Lot 6 Block T Palisades No. 2. APN: 206-080-10, 11 & 12 Acres: 1.113 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 5 lots/11 units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: =RM=H~an=d~RH==--------------------- Density Allowed: 8 du/ac (RMH) & 15 du/ac (RH) Density Proposed: 10.1 (RH) & 9.4 (RMH) Existing Zone: =RD=---M=-=-------Proposed Zone: N=--:.:..::/ A=------------ Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site RD-M RMH&RH Single-Family Residence North RD-M RH Residential -Condo's South RD-M&R-2 RH&RMH Residential -Condo's East RD-M RMH Single-Family Residential West R-2 RH Single-Family Residential PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: CUSD Water District: CMWD Sewer District: CMWD Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): -=-10""------------------ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ~ Negative Declaration, issued ""'Ja=n=u=ary~3~1~, =2~00~0~-------------- D Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated ______________ _ D Other, ___________________________ _ CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMP ACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Carlsbad Beach Estates -CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01/CP 00- 001/CDP 99-02 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: l GENERAL PLAN: =RM=H~&-RH ____ _ ZONING: =RD=--=-M=------------------------- DEVELOPER'S NAME: =M=e=ri:..a...t =G=ro=u~p.,__, I=n=c.,_. ________________ _ ADDRESS: 2171 El Camino Real #202, Oceanside, CA 92054 PHONE NO.: (760) 721-6499 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 206-080-10, 11, & 12 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): =lOa....:D;;a-U=------- ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:N """"-"-IA.:.._ ______________ _ A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage= Library: Demand in Square Footage = Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = Open Space: Acreage Provided = Schools: (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer: Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin = (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD = NIA NIA NIA NIA 2 Agua Hedionda 88 1, 2, 3, & 4 NIA 4.57 10 2 200 L. The project is 3 dwelling units below the low end of the range allowance of 11 dwelling units for the RH portion of the site and 1 unit above the low end of the range allowance of 2 dwelling units for the RMH portion of the subject property. Thus, the project would add 2 dwelling units to the excess dwelling unit bank for the Northwest Quadrant. ( ...... City of Carlsbad ■£h=iU,iiei•l•l§•kiii,,t§,il DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, finn, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. I. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) 2. Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership. include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than I 0% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) . . If .. D a.u; J I_? ...,,:,ic MA.;:..,.>J.,, Person Per ~ ..-: c ,;, H-GJ,: c'-; mc. .Jfer Title OW1,,c,ru t:;c/'fi<.,·~;; Address :;JG,~-C/11;.,t:-~<-< .. 4,;_, //,,:.t G1-LC~i C~ I OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Corp/Part /file..-/+ Cro1.1p /pc. Title ~k;~,u:; Jvlen-1 t-o-· Address ;J 17 I 8 t,, Cyll(I//.)(.) llP/1/l it 201- Cccc;.~.:; i (.Je , C:. 9 !)-O<;;'f Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership. include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) H. 0 (:l...,J d f3 vd.: ~ '4 ~ .fr 1 Person V o.j:; co. ,ti . Buck:~ A•·,,~ /0~ .., re~,..J.J /;1 Cc,,.,,rCI"-' Title /4,c,/ ~ex:,-<25µ • 3'i Address ;}e, ~-· Clui.lc, ...... /11;, /1-v..P Co,/) i ... ( c:. C, /,:,,<.,~ Corp/Part Gu!Jo J fled. {jr""'j? kve)-k,1 t,.~t:.. ICP"'., Title 0(.,.),-.,ert ;Je;,p/; ,'foG • Cie,o -· '3 2-3'3' Address d 11 I Ii t-CN/1-1/M; 1]/fdl If._;)(./}_ CJ Cl?u1-J-1ic£,1 C_ Cjc;i O ~'f 2075 Las Palmas Dr.• Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 t 3. NON-PROFIT OR~IZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to ( 1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust ________ _ Non Profit/Trust __________ _ Title ____________ _ Title ______________ _ Address ___________ _ Address _____________ _ 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? D Yes @ No If yes, please indicate person(s): ______________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of owner/date Signature of applica~d~te Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 I I i ; r I I ! i I I !i i I I ! 5 ~ ~ I I l i r I ; I I i I I ' i SITE DATA EXISTING LOT& llfORMATION, IDdlTNI......_. PUN•....,._., .. ===.:~~·~ EXISTING LOT&, '·-·--~ ..... ,-~:c---· ....,.,_(.Jfl.., .. ---•.NJ..r.t..n-1 .. ........ ..,_,_,..., .. --a ...,....,_, _ _, - PROPO&ED LOT n-,:o,;iMATION, ~ ~-· •=• I --• ,._ -• .. ... -. ·--• -- !I...~ ~~· ·-·-·-·- 5~EET INDEX A-1 SITE f'LAN, SITE DATA A·2 LANDSCAPE f'LAN A·3 WATER CONSERVATION f'LAN A-4 STREET ELEVATION& A-~ lNIT A • FLOOR • ROOF f'LANS A·& lNIT A· ELEVATION& A-1 I.NIT e ·FLOOR• ROOF f'LAN& A•S LJ,,IIT B • ELEVATION& A•'!I LJ,,IIT& C/D/E • FLOOR f'LAN& A•le> I.NIT C/D/E • ROOF !"LAN/ELEVATION& A•II I.NIT C/D/E • ELEVATION& A-12 I.NIT F • FLOOR • ROOF f'LAN& A•IJ I.NIT F • ELEVATION& A-1<4 LJ,,IIT& 6/H • FLOOR • ROOF f'LAN& A•~ lNIT& G/M • ELEVATION& PROPO&ED DENSITY AND N.NBER OF DUELLING lNIT&. =n --, ... ,' I.UI '":""--=-:-!"'' 1-~~ I -... .... • .. ._ -.. • ..... -.. ·-· »-· -.... _..._ TO,AL .... -_,. • ·-... -·-· ·-... -_..._ _..._ --.... ~D eulLDING&. LOI' ...---""• .. -::- I ,. ---I ....... ... ..,,. • • .__ -• • .. --• """'· ,_ -• C "" ... • " --• • -..,. • • --, -• .. ·--• M -- RECREATION AREAS REQUIRED, """"""" ·----.==- ....!....__ I -I -• ·-.,_ .... . ..... ,____ I ,____ • ·-._._ .... . ..... OUNER& ........,.,_ CONSUL TANT& ,lflN,-..,..._12•11 ~aaACNCIIIIIICIP--TCIMU.C IM'IAIIICWffaC1l.la ,_,Glla.P.NC. M.o.&YIDalCIO"IMTIR.....aN1' -.11. ....... TCINITlll81' nac.-...o....._..,.c MN~CA,... .M'N:ae..-..s, ~CA..... ,.,.,,...., ,.. ....... auclCNAlta: na.,"DI .... neeJ"al•... R.IIIICCICl'i'IL ...,._ ........... TCNlia.T MNDmO.CA1121N•--t6111:N6•11N LEGAL DESCRIPTION ft.a ICILffWlal1mL T N ..aT 0,. Uff 6 MG A&.L 0,. t,OI' 1. aoacT.O,.t-.AI. .... INTJG.JNnaCln'o,.~. c:c»f1T CP MN DIMO, ITA,W. a, c:M.~ .tCCCIIW)IO TO tW9 NI.PLmAIIIIUtTa.M4. NCMINCCINT't" cc:l'P.tc:TICIN IIICII-IIUC ----CA-,,.., ....... I fiU'lllll!III.O,~fll!II09ffllrLn.NIQPTJ .. i RECREATION AREAS PROVIDED, ,,_,. -LOT •<• ONTO> , .... ,ror.&a. ._...-,a,.-..vAta:P' ......... .... .,a, CO'l'1CIN AC1'IVIE SCALE: 1"•'l(f.(f' J.-a afO,, ~A,,a .. Al6fv'a flBllOllT~NQ.--ff .. J•fl. QA.TE)~.,_,..._ GIW'HIC SC,\LE CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 _ ... SITE PLAN i ,.m-,TOT'AL NON!NO'rmi-elllll>el.lTYNATICINAL.nTLeco,,pMff 1"1111!1.~ .,.. ., (JI-CCll"l"l0N ACTM! tYCILLeTIMLL CQIIITJ ,,,_._ I ~------------------------------------------------------------------'-"_'_'_'·--~"-· ________________ J - ' l □ □ --9814 1·0212,.w ~ IOI t<JE .... A-1 ~-=~ I ! ~ I I ~ I I ~ I I • i i i I ' ! I ~ I I I i ~ I i I I i I I I i ; ¥ I ~ 0 0 0 • PLANT LEGEND PALM ]'.SEES ....... ,CNA ... fA•l'SCIC#il,._,aAL.r,(9J ........ ffllNC ..... CQLLl"NAR GBQU.NING! IBEES SMALL B-QUEBINC; ACCENT JfiEES --,.,,..IIOllt 11111 a CMLLCIN MEPILM C,ANQPY ]'.SEES --,.,M•IICD( ,...,..,.aow ,...,.CMLI.OI YJNES AND EM'AblEl!!O <~ !> GALLON, 2~ I GALLON) Dla1'JC'N ..,.....,.. .... TIIU'PaT Via NtCIQll&6.......,.,.. ....... ..,...,,.. ----.....,,._..,....,.,..,.a.. ........ C#&LIA~-...,..._..CM9.,IA ...,,,..,. .. cauw.A~ ~A&. ..,._ LOQIAT 48Q\WCOVE8& (RIOOTED CUTTING&& FROM FLAT&J L'l'W9'l,t0,U NNt.lL.AIIIA• ~ MZtlM ,..,.....,.....,,..,._...,....o.urr ~ ........... fl'Cll. .. ~A&. ......... D( .......... Mlil,,N'9..,.,. .,,..,IIBCla lCO•MOC091CIN ..... EAWAIIQi SH&IM (1~ !> GALLON, ~ I GALLON) ............... lrDICA, ............... ..,........,.... ....... ~....., flCIUCloall"-.....,. ....... tlf110IIIOIIII' 'fCl8IIU. 'Y.tllaAATA"-v..-...tllD 'fllTtOIPCIIU1 l'lffmllQIIPffCIIMIA ......... Cllli6II"'. 011,WS'fllTtOIPCIIUI ~..._, • ....,.. .. ....,.._T-..-00 IICILIMNY'IU.&& ......... ~ .........,.~.a>cll"IA••NOc::x:t'l"D\INM'9• c.t&.L•llt'l'IClN "IJTl'I.T .JOt/ltt'• _...~ UNTMA'tlllliMIINC l"9lc:AMM.,.... CIIIII ICI-· .. ~ u.ALIACIIIAN ______ ...,.. l'MOl'N,A ........ NOC0'9'1CNNM'a •TMLITJIA ....... __, ,:p l"AIUO• -.,n.,.........,~•1•JM1-aa EbQUE81NCii PEfiEttMb CQLQF! ACCENTS (~IGALLONJ ~-.... •DAILY ~'Qllllil##'•LLToO'•fla ..... Colllfi4 ..... c:Af1NALLT CI.IY\A ...... TA-KMl'llll:U.T QPt,11.4 W'r'NCIN'QI.LA• MLM 14Anmt OPI.AOINA "MD IIIIXINI NOCID"• NO c:oNCIN Nll"a ZAN1WCIUCMIA~c:AL.U.UUT" -,., ,., ,.., ,.., ,., -,.., ,,., ,_ ,,., ,., ,., ,., ,., ,.., ,., u ,,., ,,., -· ......,,,,. , .. , ,.., ,,., , .. , ,.., ,.., ,.., LEGEND D ~ CIIWYWIIAT Ill c::o&.DMD .,....., ~ . --....... __ -.....,......,CO\l'BI -~·~~':': .. .,. tlQIES J ALL ---.Al'ICl'4. ~ ~ aL. • .. TAU.m M:CCIII090 TO na Cl1'T ~ N#U,IL ---J ALL Clllll:UDCOYIDI ...... TO~ 1• ~,_....,_ TCP 0lalllll...,.. NHMJ.AffQN t:P ALL PUNT """TBMil. J CCl'l"ICN ....... Al.00 11a PIIIYATI: o,ew ULL -P'l,Uff.um) 11T n,a MCf"IICUaM MIOCIATICN. ~A-Y.MIIC>a 11-W.L -f1o\NTANID ..,. ..... ~CIINIII. • ....... ~R.LCCl'PL"l"Wffl4ffe~LNTAT10ill0 Nfl.e ~~ 1\alc:AL.0&.ATIONIILL•MC:llllaO. CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 i,,. ,.SCALE._',,.'"_.,,,_ ... ""'I, LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN ~NORTH GRA,•t•IICSCALE 't'•L-0 12 S 10· 20 ~'------------------------------------------------------------- -l!!IT f.IJ 1i1 . ~ 11 ~I ::i s " E-- ! u & f.IJ ! E--" -::i:: J t u I! If ~ < ~,1-i m §.i.~ □ □ i-,. 9114 r"~1AX1 ~ .,,. ... RJE -·-A-2 i....,..,t.NCJ8CN'El'\JIH I I i I ~ I I I I II i i I I ! 8 ' ~ I I I i ! I I I i I I I I i I i I WATER CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES TO BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE PROJECT l CIOCZ1 .,.._. .,.._, °' 'ne -..cTICIN 0,, .t. ......-cm> fllALWTla O...,.,.. MG LClll-191 ,..._,..,.........,....AG ......... naM......,..NTOUtZMTlll ... fClrra. ..,._,. IOL ...-AlltATICIN _,. .. Cfl flflOCUaD .._,.CIIIWNCa 11o1CW MMi'I: _, MTIII WQ.OINII ~ MC BT a«:QAt6NI NIIM l.l'ALI, 0, l"IClllalAI. ACTMTT N na aol.. TO l"ICl"fOIIE Tia UflATION Cfl oetCAL ...,._.._ 10'°"'"'.t.N CIOCID fll.Mff Olll:IUIM MO ...._TM. I. c:.ua'ILI.T.......,_IMl: ..... MO~ ...... .,.~OU., ...... NLCICATICINa 'IWAT AC'JILfl.LT MIIIM!fll9IACTIC.AI. P\R'OII IITN...-.:T ff)N0a'IIMNNIDOl,MO ..... l& ~TOrlill.UIIMIIAND.tccallalJTYTOCfflml.....,,..IPW:al, 4. ...:rtCINCfl LCIIJMTIIIClal"WGPUN'l'lffill.UM ,av_,flll.ANT ..___, ~taD CN....-r .U, a. ~MOIMCeff_,_~La.CR:UT'Jll:lalaME>IPOl_..,.Dl'OIUII ADtl.Olla..._l.9YILIIUNSMl ....... tllDP,_, ...... __,CIIDN)~ ....... ,._,. MONL.-.. ... Cfl...-,~--~--o,IIIANMONOIMIIIR ..... oa-.ca ALCINltllllW A ~n A0.11'1 ft'PMa.a -,f."IDrl CClffllOLM .ttm OltAN VAL.\19 TO._...... ... I.GIi l&ADCAINtd&MOIINAL.1.'l"CIOOD~ .-..cnc:a TOcaTKT llHf D#UM TO~ MD ..... ffNA,..._Y....,.. 6. flll.O'AU. ... MO....,CO\IM..,_..TO--=aliOll...,.....IIY,lllll!M,AfrOfMOfD ....,_,.IOI. MIU:IIIIII aT ....,.a,,-OIIIMNCP'ILCWo.91.,.._ ,. ~UIOICAPI:~ .-c,........-r .......... -ACCCll'PI...,.,. .._ ... ~ UN:::IICM-a ~ CCN'IIUC'fOII IMO..,_ AO flltllCTICD AOCID ~ ~Ala:UCRClrDTO'llellUINOll'...:IICT'Pal,.._,..LftCflflCUNDICM'S. ZONE I PLANT USAGE JUSTIFICATIONS l flUNT ....... .-LOCATmN .... ~rPACf ........ APll:lllla~AL ~•ca11ac>.,.naaoU1111. J. na • .... ■WUND CO¥mtl'IMM9Ullll)IINTN naa::ta Alll lffllNA~ ......., ........... ,.OW9UL,L,~ .... J. na.....,.,.,.., 0, fttl ................. Mia N cu:IIR ~ TO flC -...oNl6 N OM:1111 TO T.tlCII ADvMTAGI' Cfl LNnO'M ~OUIIATICNCfltouill......._ 4 ,....__, .. ,..._ ... ~IIIMa-~ TOT.-aPUCl#IC>..._., AT.t.tcALSTO~'al~ ....,_TIOl...ucnca. ACCQMQDATIONS FOR RECLAIMED WATER l NO~w..tNe ... ....,.Pal~Olllf!U'ILMUIIIO~-,a- lllB>TO.....,_Ta~......_ ~0 LOT& AND U&E, • -,.,....__ PLANTING ZONE&IIRRJGATION, --··-•·-"""" .... CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 ::::======i='•:g~~._~,;.J::~-~-10-:J 201 . WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ~ 012 5 10 - □ □ "'"' RJE ~-----------------------------------------------------------------=--===~ ) I I i I ~ I I g I I I i i ' I ! 5 ~ ~ I I I i ! I i I i !i I I I I i ~ 8 I ,------2· .... ~ ,----1r-1· oe.-..rr ,------2'·0" Ce-MT 1l'-1° OEP"MT ---- -------------------- CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 -------- ::::================================================]l=;_.;::,,,::,..::I••·:E::.-STREET ELEVATION A ,-------•··•·DEJDMT w.• .. ~·DEP'MT ---------------------- HI'••• DEflMT-----, •·-•·oe-MT--~ ::::=============================================================================~=f:1,;[,~,,..'.::0 11]•.-:; STREET ELEVATION B Wl"'WCl"U'1Ml!IGWT ---- ::::========================================~~;]-,,..~.:z,·.-[J STREET ELEVATION C ~,___ __________________________________________________________ _. □ □ -• N14 1·-av21m •-KN RJE --A-4 _,.,... SllEEI.EYATlONS I I i I ! I I 15 I I • !i i I I ! ! ~ ~ I ! I i i I I I i I I I I i I I I ; • ™,,,..., ... I UNIT A-ROOF PLAN PLAN A STORA.GI! CALCULAffONS IIJll-eN0E0 ITQl!Udl! t~> 11' CU. ,r. PJLL t-EIGMT C&NltAGEJ 2# CU. FT. LICelt 9T.4111 tdr,,IIIACil!J 2H C:U. plT. 'TOTAL M10J.fS1' • - rn ,,... , ... I UNIT A -2ND FLOOR PLAN I ... I == 1-=- CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 -- -= / -·-----,-!'!---ct SCALE ,,... ,·.-I UNIT A -1ST FLOOR PLAN ~L-.--------------------------------------------------1 □ □ --11114 rm,.vo ...... •• IUE ~--A-5 ---·..,.. I I i I ! I I ~ i I I i i i I I ! ~ ~ I I I I J I I I i i I I I I ; i I -------------------------------- ::::=======~1CALE~:Jl"""~·3•·rEJj UNIT A. RIGHT ELEVATION ------------------------,_ _________________ _ I =,.,.., . ., I UNIT A-LEFT ELEVATION CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 =~~-------------..r------------- IICME,,,...,., j UNIT A· FRONT ELEVATION -------------------------- SCALE,,,...,., I UNIT A. REAR ELEVATION ~'------------------------------------------------------- □ □ --.,. r02121100 IP ,-,... ,...,. A-6 ...,_ -~~ PLAN B IITORAGE CALCULATIONS N...L "4!1CiMT 6TGJlll,,116E (~) 4S2 QI. PT. ~ 6TOIUGI!!! (6,l,IUCIV ~ cu.~. TOTAL Ne QI. PT, = ,,.. · , ... I UNIT B -ROOF PLAN =,,..., ... I UNIT B-2ND FLOOR PLAN CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 SCALE ,,... , ... I UNIT B • 1ST FLOOR PLAN - □ □ i I ~ I I ! I I 8 I I I !i i I I ! 5 ~ ~ I I I i ! I I I i I I I I i I i I ....._ ___ ____,11CAUC=·-=wc.a.••'""·.-_,1 UNIT B -RIGHT ELEVATION --------------------------------------------- c========:;;=;;;lG·1ir~•JJ1·.-;:J1 UNIT B -LEFT ELEVATION CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 ----------_. j OCALE,,,..., . ., 1 UNIT B -FRONT ELEVATION .._____ ---------------------------- jsc@,,..., . ., 1 UNIT B -REAR ELEVATION ~.._ ______________________________________________________ ___. □ □ i.a• N14 r-1w21100 "" ·-AJE -· A-8 ,...._ ..... ...,,. I I ~ I I ! I I 8 I I I ll i I I ! ! ~ ~ I I I i 1 I I ~ i i I I I i I i PLAN C IITOIIAOE CALCULATIONS 111,LL ... DMT ITOIU&I! CGrrMIAGII!) J2e CU. PT. IIUIPl!NDED 8TOIU6I!!! CCi;,IAAGI!) 164' QI. 1ST. ITQUGE CAISNET CQITaf0EJ _., 01. FT. TOTAL e,c, 0.1. FT. PLAN D IITOIIAOE CALCULATIONS Fl.LL ... GMT BTOIIIAcie C~J 12& OJ. FT. TOTAL && Q.t. FT. PLAN E IITOIIAOE CALCULATIONS l'LI..L. J.EGUT 4TOIIUCil! f&AltAtll!) Mil: CL 1"r. 6TOIIIIAGE CAelNl!T CQUT610EJ 5-J6 CU. 1ST. TOTAL &24 CU.. PT. CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 a---+--__J.__!1--=====-+--H 1.-=====---1..:====-!-..,.-/.-- c==========================================:J=i§!i:iJi,,ir!:;•::i:•·:EJ" UNIT CDE • 1ST FLOOR PLAN L ---------------J I ,-----------------------..:.CAl;;;-E~,,;;;;:,,,.,;-,.,;:;;.,.:-, UNIT CDE. 2ND FLOOR PLAN ~L----------------==========================::'.=:~~::.:.:..:==.....=:..:.::.:.=~=-____J -un· Ill ~ 11 ~I :::> E-< t ! u I Ill I E-< ' j ::i:: r la ~ f: I < ~,1;;j m ~1-1. □ z C.) C . wen w< 11111~~ 0=~ c.,_:::>..J men oo::: enw ~< .I :I: 0 Ill: 0 ~ □ i-• 9114 r~r.mao . ICLN ~ RJE ~--A-9 _.,.,,..INTaJE.11TflA(I,) I I i ; ~ I I 8 I I I i i I I ! 5 ~ ~ I I ! i ! I i I i ¥ I I I I I ¥ I --------------------------------------------- ..,...,,,..., • ., I UNIT CDE-RIGHT ELEVATION -.. : ......... ::::::::::;: ::::,:::-:-::::::::,:,:,:•:•:•:•:;:,:;-.:::::::::-:::::::::=:::: .. :::::-·• iiniiniiiiiiiiiiiiUiiii1t?~;3 iiiiii=;~i CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 ---------------------------------------.;..:.:...:. ..,...,,..., . ., I UNIT CDE -LE" ELEVATION ::: ::: : : : ::: : : : :.:-::::::::: :::::::::::: :,::;~:=:::=:: :-:::":·,: ::::::-:: :::: : : ::: ;::::::::::::::::::-:::::nu:::: unnu::.:: n:: :::::/;=:~ :=::::: :.::::::: ._ .. _,: .. · •-•:•:• ... _. : : :·:,! n-!-:-p:-:::::-:: :-: ::::: :-: ::::::::: :::-.::::r:::::::::,::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:::-:.:::::::::::;.::-:::::-::: :: :::::::=::::::::::::111111:-::::::::nn:n::::::::::::::::::::::: ,:-·:: :-: :·:·::::: :-: M►::=◄: :-:-: : : : : :-:,:·:·::::: :·::::: :·: :·:: :·::: ~: :·:·:··: ,: : : : : :·:::::: :·t-: ,:, I.I 11 ,·,,:..,:,.,:,·,:,I,::::·:·:-::-:-::::·:::·:::::·::::::::::: 111 ~~~:l.l!llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilll;/Jii~lllll/llJll.!IJll!J! 1 :t~llllililillllllllll!llllllllll!!!1i1 : : ::::: : : : : :'::: ::::: : : : :::-n:::: ·••'•'••···············••.•······ ::::::::::::::::.:::::::•:::·:·::::: ···•····· ······••'• •·o:•···· •.••······•·-:• ;J;Tt;};}~:;:;:; ;:;:;:i ni;:;:r; ;,;;; c================================~=~~c11ri:I••~-., UNIT CDE -ROOF PLAN ~..._ ______________________________________________ _ -iii!j Ill ~ 11 ~ :::> t " ... ! (.,) I Ill I ... \ ) :i:: □ □ -· 111" r~1100 ~ ICLN ..,. --A-10 _,..,. \NTaJl.•EL£\IS I I i I ! I I 5 I f I § i I I ! ! ! I I I I i ! I I I i I I I I i i I CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 c::===============~ac.,ue-]!w::]•1!:E]·o-j UNIT CDE-FRONT ELEVATION -----------------------------------------~~~--------- SCALE: w-• t· rr UNIT CDE -REAR ELEVATION IL __________________________________ _ □ □ .-• 111• rlrm-,100 IQ.N ,. RJE --A-11 1-nwu UNJTQIE-EL£VS ! I i I ! I I 8 I I I !i i I I ! 5 ~ ~ I I I I ! I I ~ i I I I I I I I I PLAN F STOIIAGE CALCULATIONS ""-1. 1-RJGMT CAelNIT (&.611UciiEI ~16 CU. PT, TOTAL .,. 0J. PT. CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 - - c::======:::]SCAL£,~-,if::1r•::i:J•·""E:JI UNIT F • 1ST FLOOR PLAN □ 1/00 '-------==='',.."-'"-'-''."''-'I UNIT F • ROOF PLAN ::::========::JSCALE~~,,~ir-~,· .. [Jj UNIT F. 2ND FLOOR PLAN ~1---------------------------------------------------......i=""""""'""'-~ \ I I i I t I I ! I I I i i I I I 5 ' ~ I I I i * I !! I I !i I I I i I !! I IICALE,,....,., t UNIT F • RIGHT ELEVATION ------------------------------------------ =,,.,.., . ., f UNIT F • LEn ELEVATION CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 11CALE,,,..., . ., t UNIT F-FRONT ELEVATION ---~:::;:;;:_..: ____________________________ _ IICALE,,,..., . ., t UNIT F • REAR ELEVATION ~ ...... ________________________________________________ __,1 , □ □ • • •1• r"'b21.100 KlH ""' -·· A-13 -~ 1,NTF-~ I l ~ I I ! I I 5 I I I ~ i i I ! ! ' ~ I I I i ! I I I i I I I I i ; I PLAN GH STORAGE CALCULATIONS 1'1\1.L .,_IGUT ITCl!Ual! C~J !61 QL ,T. &TOIIUGE "°°"' t2ND fL.OCNIV »4 C:U.IIT. TOTAL ua QIFT. 1::==================:;;SCAL;;;se:::;;;,,,..C:::-1:IJ·.-UNIT GH • ROOF PLAN CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 c:========::!!li=~,J!1ir:::J•1i:!:J·.-I UNIT GH -1ST FLOOR PLAN c==================SCALE!91g,1!:1ir'3-,·~.-j UNIT GH -2ND FLOOR PLAN ~L----------------------------------------------------- □ □ --111• 1•mn,.o:i ,PIKN ,. JUE ..... A-14 ----~ I I ~ I I i I I a I I • § i I I ' ii ' ~ I i I i J I I I i i I I I I I i i 1CALE:w•1·0-j UNIT GH •• RIGHT ELEVATION ........_ ___________________________________ _ OCALEc,,...,,. 1 UNIT GH. • LEFT ELEVATION CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01 99-01/ CDP 99-02 ::::===========::JICALE:~;;;J· w~-~•·o-~j UNIT GH • FRONT ELEVATION ·------------------ c============::J=~~-,~ir-~1·0-§::1 UNIT GH • REAR ELEVATION ~----------------------------------------------------- " I Ill i E-< ) ::i:: l, r r; < =ii~. ; ab~ .. □ :c u cc . wen w< mw~0 Cl~~<-cc I-::> Cl) men~~ enw :co _. 0 D:: cc u □ --•14 r?rm1m ..... RJE --A-15 ...,,-.1.NTGIIIR£V-a£1/S MARCH 15, 2000 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: CARLSBAD BEACH ESTATES CT 99-01/SDP 99-02/PUD 99-01/CP 00-001/CDP 99-02 Planning Department staff would like to expand a condition of approval for the above-referenced project. The following wording should be added to Condition No. 17 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4728: "G. Parking. Parking on the private drive which serves the project shall be prohibited at all times."