The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007-07-18; Planning Commission; ; CDP 06-30 - TABATA BLACKRAIL ROAD ESTATES£ty of Carlsbad PJanning Department • A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION P.c. AGENDA OF: July 18,2007 Item No. 8 Application complete date: March 8, 2006 Project Planner: Corey Funk Project Engineer: Clyde Wickham SUBJECT: CDP 06-30 -TABATA BLACKRAIL ROAD ESTATES -Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit to allow for the construction of 16 single-family residences on a 5.64 acre site generally located on the east side of Black Rail Road, south of Poinsettia Lane, in the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 20. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6323 APPROVING Coastal Development Permit CDP 06-30, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The project consists of 16 single-family homes to be constructed on 16 residential lots previously approved by GPA 04-13/ LCPA 03-07/ ZC 03-05/ CT 03-06/ CDP 03-24/ HDP 04-02 -Tabata Residential Subdivision. The current request is for the approval of architecture and plotting for the homes. The project is located in the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and requires the approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) to approve the proposed homes. The CDP application was reviewed for consistency with LCP Land Use Plan policies and implementation standards, as well as the Carlsbad General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Zone 20 Specific Plan, and City Council Policies 44 and 66. There are no unresolved issues and the staff recommendation for approval with conditions is supported by the analysis as follows. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Background: On September 1, 2004 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Tabata Residential Subdivision, which included a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment to change the Citywide Zoning and Local Coastal Program Zoning designation from Limited Control (L-C) to One-Family Residential (R-1), and approved a Tentative Tract Map and Coastal Development Permit to grade and subdivide a 5.64 acre site into 16 residential lots and 2 open space lots. The City Council gave final approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Zone Change and Local Coastal Program Amendment on October 19, 2004. Architecture for the units was not proposed at the time of the subdivision~ hmvever. the applicant is now proposing architecture and plotting for the 16 residential lots under CDP 06-30. CDP 06-30 - T ABATA REslNTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18, 2007 Page 2 • Project Site/Setting: The project site is generally located on the .east side of Black Rail Road. south of Poinsettia Lane, in the Mello n Segment of the LCP and Local Facilities Management Zone 20. The project is not located within the Appeal Jurisdiction of the Local Coastal Zone, and the Planning Commission's decision on the CDP cannot be appealed to the California Coastal Commission. The site is bordered by the Twin "'D" Reservoir site on the north, single family residential on the south, habitat preserved as open space on the east, and single family residential on the west. Topographically from west to east, the site rises gently to the east from Black Rail Road to the center of the property, and then falls gently to the edge of the developable area. The far eastern portion of the site contains a steep manufactured slope that existed prior to the subdivision. At the eastern edge of the property at the bottom of the slope, there is a sman area of southern maritime chaparral habitat which is being preserved. Proposed Residential Construction: The proposed project consists of a request for a Coastal Development Pennit for the construction of 16 single-family homes and associated building floor plans, elevations. and plotting. The 16 residential lots are all greater than 7.500 square feet and range in size from 8.810 square feet to 11.894 square feet. The density of the approved single- family subdivision is 3.014 dulac. Access to the project site will be provided by Zephyr Court, which connects to Black Rail Road. The project consists of one-and two-story single-family homes with three floor plans ranging in living area size from 2,948 to 3,708 square feet. Each floor plan has two different elevation styles and a total of 8 different color schemes. Each home is provided with a two or three car garage for parking, and all third car garages are side loaded and architecturally treated to appear as part of the house. The following Table A provides a summary of square footage, garage parking, and elevation styles: TABLE A -SUMMARY OF FLOOR PLANS Plan 1st Floor 2nd Living Garage Total Elevation Styles No. Sq. Ft. Floor Area Sq. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Ft. One 2,948 N/A 2,948 464 3,412 Beach Cottage, 2 car Beach Bungalow Two 2,397 887 3,284 621 3,905 Beach Cottage. 3 car Beach Bungalow Three 1,897 1.811 3,708 641 4.349 Beach Cottage, 3 car Beach Bungalow Proposed Grading: A grading permit and improvement plans have been approved for the project under CT 03-06, and project grading is presently ongoing. Impact on Coastal Resources: The development is 16 single-family residences on 16 previously approved single-family lots; agricultural mitigation conversion fees have been assessed to CT 03-06. and the existing native habitat has been preserved as open space. No other sensitive resources, geological instability. flood hazard or coastal access opportunities exists onsite and the CDP 06-30 -TABATA RESINTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18. 2007 • Page 3 development does not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right- of-way or otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. Other items: Staff received a telephone call from a resident adjacent to south project boundary, who expressed a concern that the Recreational Vehicle parking allowed in the side yards would degrade the visual appearance of the neighborhood. IV. ANAL YSIS The project is subject to the following plans. ordinances and standards: A. Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM) General Plan Land Use designation; B. One Family Residential (R-I) Zone; C. Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program, the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone, and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone; D. City Council Policy No. 44 (Neighborhood Architectural Guidelines) and Policy No. 66 (principals for the Development of Livable Neighborhoods); E. Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP203(F»; F. Growth Management. The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the projecf s consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A. General Plan The General Plan Land Use designation for the project site is Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM; 0-4 dulac). The surrounding properties in Zone 20 also have General Plan Land Use designations of RLM. This designation allows single-family residential development at a range of 0-4 dwelling units per acre (dulac). The RLM range has a Growth Control Point of 3.2 dulac. The density of the previously approved single-family subdivision is 3.014 dulac. The project complies ",rith all elements of the General Plan as illustrated in Table B below: CDP 06-30 - T ABATA RES.NTIAL SUBDIVISION July IS, 2007 • Page 4 TABLE B -GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, PROPOSED USES & GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Land Use Site is designated for 16 single-family homes on Residential Low-Medium 16 lots previously approved Density (RLM; 0-4 dulac) with and found in compliance a Growth Management Control with the density range of the Point of 3.2 dulac. RLM Land Use designation (CT 03-06). Noise Residential exterior noise Project is conditioned to standard of 60 CNEL and mitigate noise and disclose interior noise standard of 45 noise generated by CNEL Poinsettia Lane and Palomar Airport. Housing 15% inclusionary housing The previously approved requirement per Objective 3.6 CT 03-06 was conditioned to purchase 3 credits in the Villa Lorna Apartment complex to satisfy the inclusionary housing requirement. B. One-Family Residential (R-l) Zone COMPLY? Yes Yes Yes As shown on the follo\\ing Table C. the 16 proposed single-family homes are consistent with the R-l Zone development standards for building height, setbacks, and lot coverage. Although the single-family homes are proposed on standard single-family lots, the Local Coastal Program requires review and approval by the Planning Commission of all residential plans, including building floor plans, architectural elevations, and plotting to ensure that the proposed homes are consistent with all required R-l Zone standards. This enables the Planning Commission to make the necessary fIndings that the project will not be detrimental to existing uses in the surrounding area and that the project site is adequate to accommodate the proposed single-family homes. TABLE C-R-l ZONE STANDARDS STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED Front Yard Setback 20' 20' or greater Side Yard Setback 10% Lot Width (5' min.) 1 0% and 5' or greater Street Side yard Setback 10' 10' or greater Rear Yard Setback 2 x Side Yard 01.S' min.) 11.S' or greater Max. Building Height 30' Max. 27.5" or less Lot Coverage 40% 3S% or less CDP 06-30 - T ABATA RESINTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18, 2007 PageS C. Conformance with the Coastal Development Regulations for the Mello n Segment of the Local Coastal Program, the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone, and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone 1. Mello II LCP Segment The project site is located within the Mello II Segment of t4e Local Coastal Program; however, it is not located within the appeal area of the Coastal Zone. The site is located within and subject to the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.202) and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project proposes to construct 16 new single family residences in an area designated for single family development. The subject site has an LCP Land Use Plan designation of RLM/OS (Residential Low-Medium Density and Open Space; 0-4.0 dulac), which allows for 3.2 dwelling units per acre at the Gro",th Management Control Point. The OS General Plan designation applies to the eastern slope portion of the site and no development is proposed within this area. The proposed 16 single-family residences are consistent with the land use type and density regulations for the property, and the 16 single-family lots have been previously found in compliance with the applicable Mello II LCP policies. The proposed one-story and two-story, single-family residences would be consistent ",ith the surrounding development of one and two-story single-family structures. The homes will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or the public right-of- way, nor othernise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. Agricultural conversion mitigation fees have been paid and no sensitive resources are located on the developable project area of the property. The proposed homes are not located in an area of kno"'TI geologic instability or flood hazard. No public opportunities for coastal shoreline access are available from the subject site. The residentially designated site is not suited for water-oriented recreation activities. 2. Conformance with public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. The property is located over 1 mile from Batiquitos Lagoon and 1.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean; therefore, the project will not interfere with the public's right to physical access to the sea, or water oriented recreational activities. 3. Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone Formerly, the project site had been used for agriculture. According to Map X of the LCP Land Use Plan. certified September 1990. the property is located ",ithin and subject to the provisions of the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.202 of the Zoning Ordinance). The previously approved CT 03-06 complied with the findings and requirements to convert the land from agricultural uses to residential uses and was CDP 06-30 - T ABAT A REslNTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18, 2007 Page 6 conditioned to pay the agricultural conversion mitigation fee. This fee was paid prior to recordation of the Final Map. 4. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone The project is consistent vvith the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the City'S Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) and Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP) to avoid increased urban run off, pollutants and soil erosion. No development is proposed in areas of steep slopes and no native vegetation is located in the developable project area of the property. The site is not located in an area prone to landslides. or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods or liquefaction. D. City Council Policy No. 44 (Neighborhood Architectural Design) and Policy No. 66 (Livable Neighborhoods) New single-family residential projects of five or more homes are required to comply with all provisions of City Council Policy No. 44 -Neighborhood Architectural Guidelines. These guidelines require some single story units, single story edges, separate building planes on front and rear elevations, increased average side yard setbacks, recessed or projected doors and \vindows, front elevations with porches, balconies, or courtyards, variation in roof ridges and heights, front entries that are visible from the street, and specific architectural design elements. Residential projects are also required to comply with all applicable provisions of City Council Policy No. 66 -Livable Neighborhoods. These provisions require varied and articulated front building facades, clearly identifiable front doors, front-facing windows, front porches, courtyards, and balconies, and a variety of garage configurations. The intent of these provisions is to enhance the street scene and create opportunities for greater social interaction within a neighborhood. The building floor plans, elevations, and plotting for the 16 proposed single-family homes comply with City Council Policy No. 44 and City Council Policy No. 66 as shown in Tables D and E below. CDP 06-30 - T ABAT A RESINTlAL SUBDIVISION July 18. 2007 Page 7 TABLE D -CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 44 -NEIGHBORHOOD ARCIDTECTURAL DESIGN GmDELINES Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments Floor Plans and Elevations 1 All residential projects shall be required to have a Three floor plans with two minimum number of different floor plans, different front elevations each (a total of six and corresponding matching rear elevations \"ith different front elevations) have different color schemes as identified below: been provided to meet this standard. D 2-4 dwelling units shall provide 1 floor plan and 2 different elevations. D 5-12 dwelling units shall provide 2 different floor plans and 2 different elevations. k8J 13-20 dwelling units shall provide 2 different floor plans and 3 different elevations. D 21 + dwelling units shall provide 3 different floor plans and 3 different elevations. 2 Every house should have a coherent architectural style. Each elevation has a coherent All elevations of a house, including front, side and rear. architectural style which is should have the same design integrity of forms, details represented on all building and materials. elevations. 3 In addition to the previous requirements, design details Each elevation style contains a should reinforce and enhance the architectural form and minimum of four design details style of every house and differ from other elevations of from the approved list which are the same floor plan. A minimum of 4 complimentary compatible with the specific design details. including but not limited to those listed architectural style. These elements below, shall be incorporated into each of the front, rear are specified on front and rear and street side building fa~ade(s) of the house. elevation of each building type. Design Details The elements vary depending on k8J Balconies k8J Knee braces elevation style. k8J Decorative eaves and k8J Dormers fascia k8J Columns k8J Exposed roof rafter tails k8J Exterior wood D Arched elements elements D Towers k8J Accent materials (i.e.; brick, stone, shingles, wood or siding) 4 Floor plans in a project shall exhibit a variety of roof All floor plans exhibit a variety of ridges and roof heights within a neighborhood. roof ridges and heights. CDP 06-30-TABATA RES.NTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18, 2007 Page 8 TABLE D -CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 44 -NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CONTINUED Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments Site Planning 5 Houses with both the same floor plan and elevation All of the homes comply. See style shall not occur on adjacent lots. plotting. 6 Reverse floor plans shall be included where possible to 63% of the homes are reverse floor add variety to the street scene. plans. See plotting. Single Story Requirements 7 A minimum of 15% of the total number of homes shall Plan 1 B is a single story floor plan be single-story structures. Single-story is defined as a designed to meet the 15% maximum plate-line of 15 feet and a maximum building requirement. Plan IB is plotted height of 20 feet. Lofts are permitted subject to CMC three times, or 19% of the total Section 21.04.330. number of units. See plotting. or A minimum of 10% of the total number of homes shall be single-story structures and 15% shall be reduced second story structures. A reduced second story structure shall comply with the following criteria: o A minimum of 60% of the roofline shall be single story; o A 2-story element may be added in the central portion of the front and rear elevation; and o The second story element may be no greater than 25% of the floor area of the first floor of the house (including garage). or For alley-loaded product, a minimum of 20% of the homes shall be single-story for the front 20% of the home (overall depth of house times 20%). 8 A maximum of20% of the total number of homes are All plans have a single story edge. exempt from the requirement to have a single-story building edge. CDP 06-30 - T ABA T A RES!NTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18, 2007 Page 9 TABLE D -CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 44 -NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CONTINUED Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments Single Story Requirements (continued) 9 The remaining total number of homes shall comply \"ith The project exceeds the minimum one of the following guidelines: requirement of Guideline #9 by providing the follO\\ing: D The home shall have a single-story building edge with a depth of not less than 8 feet and shall run the Plan 2 has a 7' single story edge length of the building along one side except for for the entire length on one side of tower elements. The roof covering the single-story the building. See roof plan. element shall incorporate a separate roof plane and shall be substantially lower than the roof for the Plan 3 has a one story element of at two-story element. Porches and porte-cochere least 3" deep for 44% of the elements shall qualify as a single-story edge. building perimeter. See Houses \\'ith courtyards that are a minimum of 15 calculations on roof plan. feet wide located along the side of the house and setback a minimum of 15 feet from the property line are not required to have a single-story building edge. ~ The home shall have a single-story building edge with a depth of not less than 5 feet and shall run the length of the building along one side. The roof of the single-story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the two-story element of the building. ~ The home shall have a single-story building edge with a depth of not less than 3 feet for 40% of the perimeter of the building. e CDP 06-30 - T ABA TA RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18, 2007 Page 10 TABLE D -CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 44 -NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CONTINUED Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments Multiple Building Planes 10 For at least 66% of the homes in a project, there shall be All elevations conform to this at least 3 separate building planes on street side requirement. See notations on roof elevations of lots with 45 feet of street frontage or less plans designating planes and and 4 separate building planes on street side elevations minimum separations. of lots with a street frontage greater than 45 feet. Balconies and covered porches qualify as a building plane. The minimum offset in planes shall be 18 inches and shall include, but not be limited to, building waIls, windows, porches and roofs. The minimum depth ben\'een the faces of the forv.'ard-most plane and the rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet. A plane must be a minimum of 30 sq. ft. to receive credit under this section. 11 Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria 100% of the units comply with this outlined in Number 10 above for front elevations except requirement. See notations on roof that the minimum depth between front and back planes plans designating planes and on the rear elevation shall be 4 feet. Rear balconies minimum separations. qualify as a building plane. 12 F or at least 66% of the homes in a project, one side 69% of the units comply with this elevation shall have sufficient offsets or cutouts so that requirement. Plan 2 has an avg. the side yard setback averages a minimum of 8.5 feet. side setback of9.6" and Plan 3 has an avg. side setback of 10.71'. WindowslDoors 13 At least 66% of exterior openings (door/windows) on All of the homes conform to this every home in the project shall be recessed or projected requirement by providing windows a minimum of 2 inches and shall be constructed with and doors recessed a minimum of 2 wood, vinyl or colored aluminum window frames (no inches and ",indow surrounds. mill finishes). 14 Windows shall reinforce and enhance the architectural All plans comply. See elevations form and style of the house through, the use of signature for conformance to the windows and varied ",indow shapes and sizes. requirement. CDP 06-30 - T ABATA RES.NTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18, 2007 Page 11 TABLE D -CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 44 -NEIGHBORHOOD ARCIDTECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CONTINUED Architectural Guideline Compliance Comments Front Porches 15 Fifty percent (50%) of the homes shall be designed with 94% of the homes comply. Plans a covered front porch, open courtyard, or balcony (each 1 A and 1 B provide a front porch. 'with a minimum depth of 6 feet and a minimum area of Plan 3B provides a front balcony. 60 square feet) located at the front of the dwelling. The Plan 3A and Plan 3B provide a front minimum depth for a covered front porch shall be courtyard. See plotting for measured from the front fa~ade of the home to the inside conformance to requirement. of any supporting porch posts. The front and sides of porches shall be open except for required and/or ornamental guardrails. A variety of roof elements shall be provided over porches. Porches may not be converted to living space. Front Entries 16 Seventy-five percent (75%) of the homes must have a 87% of the homes comply. Plan front entry to the home that is clearly visible from the 3B is the only elevation which does street. Walkways from the front door to the street are not conform to this requirement. encouraged. See plotting. Chimneys 17 Chimneys and chimney caps shall be in scale with the See elevations for conformance. size of the home. No more than 2 chimneys shall be allowed for homes on lots in planned developments having an area less than 7,500 square feet. Gara2e Doors 18 Garage doors for 3 or 4 cars in a row that directly face See elevations for conformance. the street must have a minimum of an 18" plane change between the garage doors after the 2 car garage door. Note #1: Fractional units of.5 or greater shall be rounded up to the neA't whole number and located in a manner to achieve the best project design as determined by the project planner. When a percentage of units are described in the guidelines, the intent is to have that percentage spread throughout the entire project. 1 2 3 CDP 06-30 -TABATA RES.NTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18. 2007 Page 12 TABLE E -CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 66 -LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS Principle Compliance Comments Building Facades, Front Entries, Porches Front porches, courtyards. visible Facades create interest and character and should be front doors, and balconies have varied and articulated to provide visual interest to been provided to conform to this pedestrians. Clearly identifiable front doors and porches standard. enhance the street scene and create opportunities for greater social interaction within the neighborhood. Building entries and ,vindows should face the street. Front porches. bay windows, courtyards and balconies are encouraged. Garages A variety of garage variations Homes should be designed to feature the residence as have been designed to meet this the prominent part of the structure in relation to the standard. Third car garages are street. A variety of garage configurations should be side loaded and designed to used to improve the street scene. This may include appear as part of the living area. tandem garages. side-loaded garages. front-loaded garages, alley-loaded garages and recessed garages. Street Design The street design was previously An interconnected, modified (grid) street pattern should approved with CT 03-06. The be incorporated into project designs when there are no project connects with the topographic or environmental constraints. existing street system in the area Interconnected streets provide pedestrians and which will provide both automobiles many alternative routes to follow, disperse vehicular and pedestrian traffic and reduce the volume of cars on anyone street connectivity in the neighborhood. Streets should be designed to provide both vehicular and pedestrian connectivity by minimizing the use of cul-de-sacs. The street network should also be designed to create a safer, more comfortable pedestrian and bicycling environment. Local residential streets should have travel and parking lanes. be sufficiently narrow to slow traffic, provide adequate access for emergency and service vehicles and emergency evacuation routes for residents and include parkways 'with trees to form a pleasing canopy over the street. Local residential streets are the public open space in which children often play and around which neighborhoods interact. Within this context, vehicular movement should be additionally influenced through the use of City-accepted designs for traffic calming measures. 4 5 6 CDP 06-30 - T ABA TA REslNTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18, 2007 Page 13 • TABLE E -CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 66 -LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS CONTINUED Principle Compliance Comments Parkways Parkways were provided for the Street trees should be planted in the parkways along all project in the previously streets. Tree species should be selected to create a approved CT 03-06 subdivision unified image for the street, provide an effective and grading plan. canopy, avoid sidewalk damage and minimize water consumption. Pedestrian Walkways Sidewalk improvements were Pedestrian walkways should be located along or visible provided for the project in the from all streets. Walkways (sidewalks or trails) should previously approved CT 03-06 provide clear, comfortable and direct access to subdivision and grading plan. neighborhood schools, parks/plazas and transit stops. Primary pedestrian routes should be bordered by residential fronts. parks or plazas. Where street connections are not feasible (at the end of cul-de-sacs), pedestrian paths should also be provided. Centralized Communi!y Recreation Areas The project site is not required to Park or plazas, which serve as neighborhood meeting provide community recreation places and as recreational activity centers should be areas. incorporated into all planned unit developments. As frequently as possible, these parks/plazas should be designed for both active and passive uses for residents of all ages and should be centrally located within the project. Parks and plazas should not be sited on residual parcels, used as buffers from surrounding developments or to separate buildings from streets. E. Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203) The project is within an area subject to the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203). SP 203 provides a framework for the development of the vacant properties within Zone 20 to ensure the logical and efficient provision of public facilities and community amenities for future residents of Zone 20. SP 203 also includes development standards for residential projects. SP 203 also includes architectural guidelines requiring a variety of architectural styles and elements, articulated building forms, varied garage designs. building materials, roof heights and masses, and window and door enhancements. In addition, SP 203 requires that 25% of the units in a development must be designed to accommodate a recreation vehicle parking space in a required side yard if a separate RV storage area is not provided. The side yard must have a minimum level area of 200 square feet with a minimum width of 10 feet. Also, SP 203 designated the project property ~ith a major ridgeline. and requires ten percent of the lots on major ridgelines to be single story structures. The project complies with the applicable requirements of SP 203 as demonstrated in Table F below. CDP 06-30 - T ABA T A RES.NTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18. 2007 Page 14 TABLE F: ZONE 20 SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS (SP 203) STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED Architectural Guidelines Variety of styles, elements, All floor plans comply with building forms, garage the SP 203 architectural designs, building materials, guidelines. See Policy No. 44 roof heights, building masses. -Neighborhood Architectural and window and door Design Guidelines above for enhancements. architectural details. RV parking 25% of lots with adequate side 25% (lots 4, 10, 11. and 14) yards to accommodate RV provide a 10' x 20' side yard parking (4 lots). on the garage side of the lot. Single story elements on 10% of the lots on major Plan 1 is a single story major ridgelines ridge lines designated by SP structure and provides a single 203 shall be limited to a single story percentage of 31 % for story structure. the project. F. Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 20 in the southwest quadrant of the City. Consistency with the Growth Management Plan for this development was analyzed with the previous subdivision and found to be in compliance. Please see Attachment #5 -Local Facilities Impacts Assessment form for specific information relating to impacts associated with this project. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has concluded that no potentially significant impacts would result with the implementation of this project that were not previously examined and evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Tabata Residential Subdivision project CT 03-06, dated October 19, 2004 (City Council Resolution No. 2004-318). The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program evaluate the potential environmental effects of the development. The City Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program on October 19, 2004. At that time CEQA "'Findings of Fact" were approved. All mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Tabata Residential Subdivision project applicable to this project have been completed. incorporated into the project design or are required as conditions of approval for this project. The proposed project would have no effects beyond those analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. This project is within the scope of the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and no further CEQA compliance is required. The previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Tabata Residential Subdivision project CT 03-06 are available at the Planning Department. CDP 06-30 -TABATA REStNTIAL SUBDIVISION July 18,2007 Page 15 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6323 2. Location Map 3. Disclosure Form 4. Background Data Sheet 5. Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form 6. Reduced Exhibits "A" -"V" 7. Color Scheme Sequence Sheet 8. Full Size Exhibits "A" -"V" dated July 18, 2007 • TR/TONST SITE MAP • N NOT TO SCALE Tabata Blackrail Road Estates COP 06-30 City of .Carlsbad 146, ..... 41.'.)4.141""4'" DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The fol1owing infonnation MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this infonnation is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, fim1. co-partnmhip, joint venture. association,. ~ -club. ~temal organization, corporation, estate. tJUst, receiver. syndicate. intbis and any other county .. city Ud~ctty municipality, district or other Political subdivmOD or any other jroup or combination actiDg as a unit. .. . . Azeuts may sign this docw:nent; however. the legal neme I!Dd tn1ity or-the -WlioaDt anO-PJOptIfy CWDCl ttlUSt be provided bclow~ .' . 1. 2. APPUCAA" (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ~ persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a COTDoration or partnership. include the' names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares ... 1F-NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF TIm SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN TIIE SPACE BELOW If a public1y-owned comOTation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the COIporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person ~. &f"rv rk~AiC I Title CEO Address /0;',1/ ?7?t'AIf..P1. S'l/Ik.lco S4t't ])/T/ c~ ~3131 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) . CotplPart ?@rlr ;kg d.,r/'!Jr:;;'C' Tille __________________ ~--~--- Address /t:J?iY ~<!f!..-tP, fot!'eI >SYI-I~ ~ .s~,., l>ieJoJ CA ~.;J.b/ Provide the COMPLETE. T,EGAL names and addresses of ALL. persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legaJ ownership (i.e, partnership. tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or Partnership. include the names, title, addresses' of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO lNDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF 1HE SHARES, PLEASE lNDICAT.E NON-APPUCABLE (N/A) IN 1lIE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- 2E1ed comoratiOli. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person A<~ ... iC (<JIfSok~{..7Rc. Title ________________________ __ Address/alqlJ 'lrt!~AII4S1: S'ul*~ S#i" ));eJo, CA f;t/..:? / 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314. (760) 602-4600. FAX (760) 602-8559 * e 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pmsuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust. list the names and addresses of ANX person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. ~ Non Profitffrust Non PrOfitlfrus1:..--________ _ Title:.-__________ _ Title '-----------------------Admess, _________________ __ Address'--_____________ _ 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or C01D1cil within the past twelve (12) months? DYes "0No Ifyes,pleaseindicateperson{s):, ______________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. Alhl:A¥A 'BlAck "RAJ ~ I~ LJ,.C w , Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicarlt J Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 • BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CDP 06-30 CASE NAME: TABATA BLACKRAIL ROAD ESTATES APPLICANT: Trans West Housing, Inc. REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit to allow for the construction of 16 single-family residences on a 5.64 acre site located on the east side of Black Rail Road, south of Poinsettia Lane, in the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and Local Facilities Management Zone 20 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 22. T12S. R4W. SBBM. in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. State of California APN: 215-080-20, 21, 28 Acres: 5.64 Proposed No. of LotsfUnits: 16 residential lots/units. 2 open space lots GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: Residential Low-Medium Density (RLM)/Open Space (OS) Proposed Land Use Designation: N~/A,-,,--___________________ _ Density Allowed: =0_-_4-=-d=uI=ac=--___ _ Density Proposed: =.3::...:.0c..::.1...::..4-=d=uI=-=a=c _______ _ Existing Zone: One Family Residential (R-l )/Open Space (O-S) Proposed Zone: "-.N:.:.,.:/A'-"-_________________________ _ Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site R-I/O-S RLM/OS Vacant North R-I RLM Twin "D'" Reservoir site South R-I-Q RLM Single Family East R-I-Q RLM Open Space West R-I-Q RLM Single Family LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: rgJ Yes D No Local Coastal Program Segment: =M=e=ll=o--=I=.I _____ _ Within Appeal Jurisdiction: DYes rgJ No Coastal Development Permit: rgJ Yes D No Local Coastal Program Amendment: DYes rgJ No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: RLM/OS Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: .::...;Nc:...;:/A-=--__ Existing LCP Zone: R-I/O-S Proposed LCP Zone: ;...N~/A,--=-_______ _ Revised 0 I 106 PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified \Vater District: Carlsbad Sewer District: ""'Cc.!::'ar"-'l""'sb""'a""d"---___ _ Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): -=-16~ ________________ _ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT D Categorical Exemption, _______________________ _ I2SJ Negative Declaration. issued for Tabata Residential Subdivision -CT 03-06, passed and adopted by the City Council on October 19, 2004 (City Council Resolution No. 2004- 338). D Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated _______________ _ D Other. ______________________________ _ Revised 0 1/06 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: CDP 06-30 TABATA BLACKRAIL ROAD ESTATES LOCAL FACILITY :MANAGEMENT ZONE: 20 GENERAL PLAN: =RL=~=1:....:...I--==O:....:::S,---___ _ ZONING:=R~-l~/~O~-=S ______________________________________________ _ DEVELOPER'SNAME:~T~r~~~VV~e~s~t~H~o~u~si~n~g,~m~c.~ ____________________________ _ ADDRESS: 10721 Treena St. #200, San Diego, CA 92131 PHONE NO.: (858) 653-3003 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 215-080-20. 21. 28 QUANTITY OF LAi'lD USEIDEVELOPMENT (Ae., SQ. FT., DU): :::..:5.=6-+....:...=ac=re=s ____ _ ESTI:MA TED COMPLETION DATE: As soon as possible A. B. e. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = =5::>::::..:.-_=6 ____ __ Library: Demand in Square Footage = =29::....:. . ..!-7 ____ __ \Vastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 16EDU Park: Drainage: Demand in Acreage = Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = .11 10.5 BasinD (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = 160 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = ....:...4 _____ __ Open Space: Schools: (Demands to be detennined by staff) Sewer: Acreage Provided = Demands in EDU -.6 acres Elementary -4 students Middle School - 2 students High School - 2 students 16 Identify Sub Basin = =2=OB=--________ __ (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) VVater: Demand in GPD = 3520GPD L. The project is 1 unit below the Grov.th Management Dwelling unit allowance. 41IB7f (/I'I SITE DEVElOPMENT PLANS FOR \\ r I i ,1 "c~:=~ __ "'-~~;~_~~-~lABATA BLACKRAIL ROAD ESTATES '. --, ~ , cr f)J-06 I \ , ~ ~'f) I~)~ ! • 1I:AUl1·-.JD' I' I 1 . ~ p AU. .... ItJIIIIIIIIIIPl'I1Icr .. f ,. AU. MrNIFC1UIE AND /f.fJ1IM1t 1'111 f ~~ LOT 1 ~ l' STEP IN GARAGE FINISH FLOOR TO HOUSE FINISH FLOOR ON LOTS 4, 12, & 13 ~ RV PARKING ON LOTS ",10, 11 & 14 20' X10' SPACE l2B't;.fL lOTSUBAW I1Ir:Wr-ItI' SIf)£. IU fT Lor //lOIN (S'IIN) IICM • 2;( IftrJIII1IrD SIf)£ SET llAar~ )I';~i/I~;~~ ~ lHECf)(JR7YAROWAlLSCWALLPlAN JIKJ(J$E$ SN4il GtlI.R YHflHIttICY #. WAIJ. HE!6H1S CAN ItfJr EXCEED !?PlANJLOTSAHELOTS 1.,( ~ '" 416. 1UN~lr, --.,. .... 1fM:E _ .. -""'-" ~'/'~44-N JI. iii.iii Ail' IU .( CDP 08-30 ~~ u.tsr .. ",.",._ ",AIl.,JlU MIl MIIIr It. .r.lM,.. AI IIUt ---INt __ lE~ _ .. - 1ffPjfllP IU8 f~«' ~aJ6l't! ~K-_#-I ~":::::tIIt __ r IIf_JIWIl ..1IIIoM' II-'. __ r..-.._ .. ,_ ..... - e l«llt c:tH$'1)fl JII\'.lIIIIW INtf) II!£ ~1IrN 1I/JI~""' __ 1>,l#-l _IM __ IIIIO __ , "U_IM_ "_JIWIl alfSllIl..1llloM' #-lftJNC~r_M1W;J u_ ..... _ fIIEN Sl'JffE JWW! f1)(JIME ICJII'JF~."n,."#/ 191C~ '.'J16"itl~ II/IIJJIN(I r:t11f11l46E' ""III If (I,." 1111) JIII:RUlJII FMfHItMI( 1f1I ___ 1JI-1A M II."'C.J\.IIL· 4,111 CK IIWf 'e" DtI'IIH A.I"~K ..... "'",t:r ~Mr e i It iii III •• " Ii "I " •• 11-• Ii "I -i: .~ ~" it it ;.q ~it itit itit. ~ Itlt "'. lilt "II lilt !tit ""II I .i ~ ~i ~ I !il ~ U .... !i I !i ~ ill ~ ::=11 ~ ij;! Sn ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ...... ...... ... !; 1111 " , 11'1 • II Illl 11'10 1I!:t • ~~ u u u u ,,~ ~u "'C ~ tEtE tE" .... :: .. " :::"" :::-.... ...... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ...... i~ ii~ U ;;i u ~ :; i!! iii .. .. .... .... .... .... .. .. .. .. .... • ... ... ... ... ..... ...... ... ... ...... ..... ..... lit U U U U U lit U .. '" .. '" .. '" .... .... "' .. .. '" .... U •• !II! l!l! l1li l!1I .!! III! II ~ .... .. .. ..... .. .. It'" .... "." ~ ~~ ~~ ~t3 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ i ~~ ~ c::s ~ ~~ t; ~~ ~iS5 c:s d d "i t lIi iii ::11 !.i.!I1~ 1:1 i!; !! 1< i r;; !i' I 2 ~ 8: ht I~: ~ I~I ~i I~: ~ ~ I fill' ~~ =: i : I !1 ~~ ~~ ~ ~i " • < lJ;.:I 0 ~ < ~o u~ ~ <~ ~:' .~ :" ~~ ~ ';~'~(~ ~ ~ , '.. ~ > ~ u.l U ~~ 1--4 00 < pJ 0 ~ ~ "~1 • I • b.. _______ ..D.- ;----- I I I I I I J L-__ _ ---__ ...J I ___ I ______ ....d "1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I ____ ...1 ~ • • I - "m: • I 1/ t III I I : I t.... ________ --' --., I I I I Ifr : I , I I I L ______ J tl---:l-------.L----1I------+1--1L~./Si\,;.~§[ =:IJt -------~----------~ - ·t • I I H 'I i IH III ~-em. IH ~' ~- HI ,\ , ~ \l ------------------------------------ 1 l ... i t . I S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I L ____ ..... I I I I I " I I as I I <m~ I I I I ~ 0 I :I: I I 0' l-I ---+ I ZU;:G I I <<e::: I I ....l ..... :PI'l I I Il.COZ I g r----...J I I I I I I ~ I I => I I !l I I .0 .. I I .1 ! I I I I I t I I L:· 1 I I l I I I i I I I L __ -----------! --+r.,-i--------------------------------~~ r., LJ LJ r--..r-1..--..r-~ I+----+ I 1 1 I I I I 1 I r-J I T i L - - -..J----------1r--lf--~~...! I I I I I L ____ -. I I I I I \ I I I 1 I I r----..J I r 1 I I I I I I I I +----+ o fj=-.. --+-L-~~--= tL: I +--I ---------------------- ,=---I--L----___ J 1 r----------'""\ I I I I I : I~ : I I 1 I ( I II I II 9a I II i~, I II II" I 1/ I II I I 11 _~~~~~~~--...J 1'== -------I' ~ ill I I r--------------------------------------------- I I I I I I I ( I ~-----, I ( ( I I I t t I I I I I I I I I I I r-----.J I 1 t I I I I _____ L, r I I I I I I I I ( I ~ I L _________________________________________ J --, I I r-----...... ------,- r----, , I : BI I" I II I II , I 'I I I II _~ ____ -_-___ -~-..J II == -------.-' Em ill r--------------------------------------------- I I I I I I I I I ~-----, I I I I I I I I I , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I j-------' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _____ 1-.., r' , I I I I I I I I t, L _________________________________________ ~ ----------------------- ------- ~~-1 I-I--I-f-f-I -; IJdi ilJ -I i I ill 0 o~~ ~ @ r: ~Uffj ~ <~ -P-,..JVl ~~ I- i i ----------------------------, j I I I I I ( I I I i l _____ , I f I I 1,.....---,,...-, I 1-----::-''/ I r-----J I I -i j I • -------------------------, ~T f ~ ~ T ---+ T 1 ~------~·--~+-~t I t., ~f II:.-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_..J--__ -__ -_-L __ -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-+-_-_-_-_-...,..Jf-I __ ~ I I I I I I I I I I L _____ , I I I I I I I I I f ( I r----..J , I I I I -. j T 1 T ! 1 I i -----1-------------------( ---+ 1 \ ____ L, _______ 5 I......J I L T 1 I I I t I t., ________________ ..J--____ -L ________ _ _ ____ ...J f I i '-------------------------_._---_.----_.- ~ ~ . ~ T ! ~ ~--~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I \. *-- II ~II II == =======~-W- I ill "= ;--------. I I 1 I I I 1 I~ I I m I I p_ I I I I I I I 1 I L_ _J ~ i -----I--w--I I I to I I • : r ........ ~1 ! \~~ i I I I I I I I I I [] [] _____ L, ____ ..J. I I I I --I I J I I I I J I I I I ~- L .. ------If II II II ~ 11 == =======*= I ~ I I ill r-------, ( I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I L_ 7_-:-::-'-- II II ~ P ~---- r-" ;.--J f r-" l..r ..... I I.. __ ..J r I I I I 1 I I I I J"""'=ii" ........ ===lill-.J I_~---l r I I I 1 I r I L, ------.1 ffr ... Itl '11 II n I --- I ~~-!M il~~~~~ -! :. i I h.hI i L~ __ ~~ __ ~ __ ~ ___________ ~~ ___ ~_~ ______ ~~_~ ___ ~~_~~ --~----~-----~--~------- , i I I L_ --------I .. I ! .. . . ! '------ r-" I I L_..1 T 1 r-" I I ",_.I i j Ii i r--"'-I I I I ! iJ------I,. T 1 l...._-, I I I I I I I T _..z----, t I I e I . . ! ! .. I i j l~ I I ----"L.J I r-' 1 r-, _..1 r, ~ ~ _______ J I I T I I T ---+ 1 I I 1 I I r ..1---""LJ i S I I L __ , _______ ~ _____ ~ ___________ _ ------------------------------------------- t f I 1 Attachment 7 Color Scheme Sequence Sheet Project: Black Rail Estates Revised: 05114/2007 Tract: Phase: 1 Contractor: Trans West Housing, Inc. 10721 Treena St., Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92131 Owner: Aviara Black Rail Road 16, LLC 10721 Treena St., Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92131 Color Roof Lot # Plan Elev. Orien. Sq.Ft. Address Scheme Color 1 3 B R 3.708 1600 Zephyr Court 6 SHE 8704 2 1 A R 2.948 1604 Zephyr Court 3 4687 3 2 B 3,287 1608 Zephyr Court 7 4697 4 1 B 2,984 1612 Zephyr Court 5 SCB 8805 5 2 A R 3.284 1616 Zephyr Court 2 SCB 8805 6 1 A 2.948 1620 Zephyr Court 4 4687 7 2 B R 3.284 1624 Zephyr Court 5 SCB 8805 8 3 A 3.708 1628 Zephyr Court 3 4687 9 3 B R 3.708 1631 Zephyr Court 8 SCB 8805 10 2 A R 3,284 1627 Zephyr Court 1 4697 11 1 B R 2,948 1623 Zephyr Court 6 SHE 8704 12 2 B 3,284 1619 Zephyr Court 8 SCB 8805 13 3 A R 3.708 1615 Zephyr Court 4 4687 14 1 B R 2,948 1611 Zephyr Court 7 4697 15 2 B R 3,284 1607 Zephyr Court 2 SCB 8805 16 3 A 3,708 1603 Zephyr Court 1 4697 co .,.... \ SIGHT CO RIDOR o « o 0::: ---1 -« 0::: ~ () « ---1 SITE CORRIDOR GRADING CT 03-06, TABATA \\ : 2~ ".;\;'"" :' fj fj I \\ 0.81' i, .\ ~ fl~r- -t---i ~ ~\, :~LOT 1 .. '. , I -V--t' - / --r--~~ ZEPHYR! ----Os s- --+-'--.~ 0 U R T W' ~,.,..,-.-_ ':: \ i _, I tr ____ _ CD I \ SIGHT CO RIDOR 0.97' I SCALE: i "=20 ' r- I I I I I I I h Lot # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Trans West Housing, Inc. Aviara Black Rail Road 16, LLC 8701039 Plan Elev. Orien. 3 B R 3,708 1 A R 2,948 2 B 3,287 1 B 2,984 2 A R 3,284 1 A 2,948 2 B R 3,284 3 A 3,708 3 B R 3,708 2 A R 3,284 1 B R 2,948 2 B 3,284 3 A R 3,708 1 B R 2,948 2 B R 3,284 3 A 3,708 Recap: 1A 1B 2 3 5 Roofing -Flat 2A 2B 2 4 6 3A 3B 10721 Treena St., Ste. 200 10721 Treena St., Ste. 200 Address 1600 Zephyr Court 1604 Zephyr Court 1608 Zephyr Court 1612 Zephyr Court 1616 Zephyr Court 1620 Zephyr Court 1624 Zephyr Court 1628 Zephyr Court 1631 Zephyr Court 1627 Zephyr Court 1623 Zephyr Court 1619 Zephyr Court 1615 Zephyr Court 1611 Zephyr Court 1607 Zephyr Court 1603 Zephyr Court 3 2 Color 6 3 7 5 2 4 5 3 8 1 6 8 4 7 2 1 5 Total: 16 San Diego, CA 92131 San Diego, CA 92131 Roof Color SHE 8704 4687 4697 SCB 8805 SCB 8805 4687 SCB 8805 4687 SCB 8805 4697 SHE 8704 SC88805 4687 4697 SCB 8805 4697 I~~.L' Added addresses per Danny. I=-=~':"_ Added color and roof schemes. SW2441 trim. roiIi.,.. post SW2441 Eagft Roofing 4697 Shtfwin Willilms paint Omtgo Stucco 5ch 1 fago! Roofing 4617 SW 0011 SW 2449 ocrOftl Sherwin Williims point SW2449 ShffWln Wlnl .... point Omeg. StuctO Eagel Roofing 5(88805 5ch 3 Omeg. Stucco 5ch 2 • J BULLOCK 81 ASSOCIATI •• CHtTfCTUUllllUSnAllOtt • ANlliAl SW 2448 SW 2448 Eldorado Stone Copper Mountain ledge Shorwin Williams paint O ... ga Stucco Eagtl Roofing SCB 8805 5ch 4 Eldorado Stant Mtsqu~t Cliffstant SW2421 Eldorado St ... . Manzanita Cliffst ... e 5ch 6 Sherwin Williams !Nil'll Orntga Stucco Eagel Roofing SHE 8704 5ch 5 • J BULlOCK&ASSOCIATI AIICHITKTUlAllUUSTlATIOIIa ANIMA~ !!J c: B ~-i ~ o ::l" ~~ § ~ a !" ;u ~ 5" 'FI 'T1 ~ I» .. ~ n or d'~ = Sl~ g f iI. !It ~ ~ .., a a g 2· ,,-t ~ 0::1. ~_3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ." I· d'~ )C )C !e.~ ~ f ~ jir ::a II> ;r. ::l ~ ~ OJ O. II> lj = "" ~ ~ 3-Y' ~ '" .$ ~ ~ g. ~ d'~ ~ It;3 ~ ~ a !!' :n !!!. 5' 'P "" OIl ~ iii'