HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-01-19; City Council; MinutesI l % 8* \8'
I s I 8, '\ \\ ', ', '* I I i CITY OF CARLSBAD I I '*, =\., ' 8 , 8,888,
I '\ ' 8 '8 88,'*8 6 : Minutes of: city co~mci 1 : Name , e8 i, \.?& '.,'*@\ i Date of Meeting: January 19, 1960 : Time of Meeting: 7: 00 P .bib ; of '$8,4, =.'Q+
1 : Member ,o~,o~.cn\C? 8?@+flJ,+y ;.~~~q~-~~-M~e~~~~---~g~~ci~--~~~~~~& ______________ - _____-.. -------~-----------------------.--
I la;''
:;)I!
:ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Sonneman, Ledgerwood, i x :::I : McPherson and La Roche, Also present were City Manager : ::I; i Slater and City Attorney payes. I 1:::
: I f ::;i I INVOCATION was offered by Hayor Ledgerwood* I :;#I '1:;
9 I ::;:
:4;81
I I I I i::;; llg:;
1 ', '8 '\ % \ I
Di I
:'
* I s i I' I
I APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
i e. The minutes of January 5, 1960, were approved as sub-: Sonneman ; I {XI ; : mirted. ; Ledgerwood : ; ; X; ~
I I I
I i McPherson i X! i X: j
I : La Roche i i X: X:
I I 4:; 11
I I pi: i:!:
1;:; :::I
ii::
I I
I
! CORRESPONDENCE:
: a. Letter dated January 13, I960 from E* A, Hilton pro- :
!testing the sewer service charge imposed €or a cleaning i !and laundromat in the City of Carlsbad. He stated that i :::I ;Nr. Stein and he are ready to go ahead with their plans ; :for this establishment, which will be an investment of i approximately $30,000.
i The City Manager painted out to the Council this charge !
:was a legitimate charge according to the ordinance.
!Mr. Hilton was present: and stated he has a business in ,;
;Oceanside and is not charged any sewer service charge, He ;
!asked what this charge was based upon, and he was informed 3 ::I: : that at the time the ordinance was prepared, several I i ordinances adopted by other cities were reviewed and this I
:was based OR an average fee charged by other cities. The ; I::! :City Attorney advised the Council that if they felt this i
:charge was unfair, it could be referred to a cclamittee for : i review,, Cmn, La Roche Stated he felt the matter should be I ::;; :given further thought, and something worked out that would : I::; i be equitable for all. s I I!:!
!By motion of the Council the City Manager, City Engineer i
:and City Attorney were instructed to review the ordinance ; I and report back to the Council at the next meeting, Mr. i ':*I
:Hilton asked how long he would have to wait, The City 'tl(
!Attorney suggested that the conmittee meet and if they felt! ii:' IB: change should be made in the ordinance, that an amend- i :::: I 1:
pent be prepared for the Council's perusal, and if the I $;;I
:Council agreed a change should be made, the amendment to i :;a:
:I:: i the ordinance could have a first reading at the next regu- : is; i lar meeting .
: b. Letter dated January ll, 1960 from Sidney A. Fuller, ! !in which he submitted a doctor bill in the amount of $12.50; :from Dr. John R. Carroll, for damages sustained to his, i
:daughter 8s a result of a fall from her bicycle when she ;
:hit a hole in the street on Chestnut Ave. He further
!stated that he would like to go on record stating that pay- i
$ent of this bill is not exoneration of the City for any :
:possible complications which his daughter may suffer in the: 1'1: :future as a result of this accident. Mr. Fuller also com- { :pfained of the road patching in the City and felt there :
!should be better canpaction under the patches,
tI11
{The City Manager recommended that the claim be rejected i Sonnernan :X ; :X : 1:ll
:and the matter referred to the City Attorney and insurance ; Ledgerwood i : $ I :carrier, By mot ion of the Council the claim was rejected I McPherson 1 i F : :and the matter referred to the City Attorney and insurance : La Roche : ?S X i jcarr fer , 8 lIIb I I I :;::
i C. Letter dated January 14, 1960 addressed to Mayor :Ledgemod and the Chief of Police, from Howard Demler, I I ;::; :I:: j156S Chestnut Avenue, stating his wife was bitten on the i :am and hlr coat torn by a dog owned by Tom Hawnond, 3234 : ;;I#
I ;:
I I t1 I I I:@:
1;;l
1
I 4 1 I 11 11:
I I I 11:: ::;I,
I I ;@I:'
t::*
I I I I I::;;
I * ::;:
I 1 I I;:!
\::b :::: ;*:'
I'li
;La :::;
i:( ':I: i!;:
I + 1::;
$ I@
11 I
I
I \
:#+I
;I:#
I ::;:
;:i:
I
I
' 8 I' I I t ::ii
:::;
;!:I ;:
I I iL:
I*:: ::': ;:i:
;:::
:::I
1::: r:::
I I la':
1. I I::!
I* I*(I
("1
:I
l a \
I I
0 :*
I
I I 1 I i::: lb:;
I
'I:#
I I 1 I I I i::: * I I : :::;
I * I I I I 9
ll#l !@I!
1 I I I
I
I
:
I' ,\' '8- I
L
1
I I \\ \\\\\ '\\'\,88\
I I '\,,'<, \. '\ '' '\, 7
: : -2- i N a me ~~,,'+$+,8~,~~J8 '?$$ ,+, ?$
% *'
I I 8, '\ '\, '\ '\, ',
I I I 8 I""""""~~.""~~"'"""""""""""""~""""""""""""""---"---"--"----------"
; of i Member ,08$&,+Fp\$ mi I I ;:ti
i Highland Drive; a Police Officer was called. He felt the 1 4;: : people have a right to be protected from dogs while walk- i ;:;I : ing, as the situation is getting intolerable. PIT, Demfer i ::If
1::; i asked for damages to his wife's coat, and Mr. Hamnd 1 I :::I I should be compelled to have a test made on his dog to see 1 ::@I
41:; i if it has rabies. I I 1:;:
;#I
I $11: / The City P'Ianager informed the Council he had not checked i ;:I;
i with the Police Department on this matter, as this letter : 1::: 0II
: had just been given to him by the Wayor. The City Attorn& ::;I
::I: : advised the Council the City is not responsible for any : 8 @I+; I :I I damages; the party would have to seek relief from the I 8 :::: i party owning the dog. As far as the matter of dogs running: :;a1
lb::l : at large, if the Council chooses a Leash Law can be adoptea I ;I i She suggested the Council review the ordinance now in I ;@I: : effect in the City regarding dogs before the next meeting. : l:II I By cotnmon consent the..Council requested copies of the I ' :;
; ordinance to review before the next meeting. I I *::I
I I ::I:
: ORAL COPMUN ICATIONS : ::*I
I 11;:
: There were no oral communications I :I!;
: PUBLIC HEARINGS: I 1:;;
I ::@I I I 8.5
I ::i: : a. Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission ; ;!;; i re: Reclassification of property from Zone pi-1 to Zone I ::it : R-3 - Archie Koyl. I I ::;: '11:
I ! a. 1:;:
I 1 I
'I
I I ::::
I I ii::
I
I I I
I I
#I
I I I 8 I ;;;i
I I I
1
3 I * :'
1 1 4
1
1
I r
:The City Manager certified as to the publication of the : i Not ice of Hearing.
i Res. 8141 of the Planning Corcanission was read wherein they i
i denied the request for reclassification. Mr. Koyl pre- 4 I i sented to the Council a written resume of the conditions I i and facts regarding the area in connection with the request: ; for reclassification, The Mayor declared the public I r hearing open. 1
i MR. KOYL was present and informed the Council that origin- i
:ally he had requested that all of hfs property be rezoned : i to R-3; however, he would be willing to have just the I I
:easterly 200' of his property rezoned to R-3, as he felt i i there was a need for multiple dwelling in this arear I
!MR. DAVID R. DINIUS stated he owns approximately 10 acres I
ton both sides of Nr. Koyl*s property. The other property : i owners have no object ion to R-3, but there should be some i
!plan developed in order that the entire area could be I I
I opened up as this land is land-locked. He is opposed to ani
IR-3 zone until such time as there is a plan developed for ; i the entire area.
ICm. La Roche stated he had looked over the entire area i
Iand felt this area is an ideal spot for industrial zoning, :
:due to the fact the railroad backs up against the property. i
:Mr. Koyl stated he is only asking to have the easterly 200 I
:feet rezoned to R-3, and there would still be sufficient :
\area to the west of his property for other development. I I
:His property faces on Eoosevelt and he has paid for the :
I I
I I t I
I
I I I I I I
I I
8 I I I
I I 1 I 1
I I
I I I I
I
I I I I I 0; '' jimprovement af Roosevelt, paid for sewers and water.
\It was pointed out that three property owners are involved. \
:Mayor Ledgerwood stated that he felt it was up to the I I
:three property owners to present a plan for the area.
!MR. TALBERT stated he was one of the property owners and i
!he was caught between two land owners; he has 180'frontage; i
jthis area. He feels Carlsbad needs .industryc Ne 8.18. ri&- f'
I I I I I
I I
:he was for anything that would be for the betterment of F t-:
I I 4 . _. :. ' @.
711;
:::I ::i,:
pI1
:I::
I : 1.:
::I;
1:;1 it::. ::::
:::I ::::
::I: ::i: !:;I :::; ::;:
::I1
11;;
::;I ::::
:*I:
;::e ;:::
11: I::; :ii: ii:i
iJt 11
11
8 I::; Io
,.:: i;::
;:::I
::;I' ::;ii
l!!l! I.' ltl;; ;::'I ;::::
1::::
;;It 1:;
::;:I :::i: ::I:) :;:::
I ::1:1 :ti
;;;I1 SI ::::;
:;::I $, f;, .?, i'd i
; i : :.I :;::I ::::I
;:;:I
'11
I!*:
1 ,r I I I
:I 'I i:;;i . . I.#
$ , 2' i: ,!. ;.
* ,*
I 6
I * I t L +
I f
I
. ,- I I I I I I I 4 I I
-3-
! I ;"""""""""""""""""-""-""""""""""""""~"""""
: feel this area was suitable for R-3 as it is too close i i to the railroad. Certain types of industry can be very i : attractive. Unless you have some place for people to i work you are not going to need housing, He further stated i
i that perhaps the front portion of the property would be : I suitable for R-3 but the back portion should be zoned for i
i industry, 1 t
i The Mayor suggested' an- improvement district for the area i I and it would be up to the three property owners to ini- i i tiate such a district, The City Attorney advised the ; Council that an improvement district could be formed, i however, they could not make the rezoning contingent upon i : the improvement district being fonned.
I I I
I
I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I L
\, \. \ 8.
\\ '\ '\\ '\ '\ '' ,,\,. ' " \, ~,,~.;..\'"~ 8 ', x \ '\'\"'. N a me '8, '+&, '\, '?@>x of ',$O. 0 '+, '\ +'
Member $%'@.F\p+ ',L '0 \ 4 \ +'$
:::; ;::i
:;I4 :;I; :I:: 11 ;;;:
,:If i:::
:::I
1::
::I:
4 ;I1 ;;
;I;!
1:::
:1I
1;s:
;I:: :::;
;i;I
;:'! ;:
.""""""""""""
1t11 ItIl
i Mr* Dinius presented a plan of his own for the area with ai i street cut through; he advised the Council that he had an :
1 easement from the Frys that gave him access to Tamarack, i i and he would be willing to dedicate a 60' roadway through i ; his property and pay his share of the cost, I I
: Cwn, Sonnemn stated she felt it was up to the property i i owners to ,come up with some plan; however, she did not : feel that .Mi,, Koyl should be denied his request as he has i i presented d.@pa"an for the easterly 200 feet of his property,': i but in order to avoid spot zoning she felt the two prop- ; i erties.'&joining Hr. KoyL's property should be rezoned I : wlxgch.%&wld make an R-3 zone up to where the KIP zone I i ,. cwence s ,
I Cmn, La Roche stated he felt some definite planning should i : be given this area before any rezoning is made, I
I I
I I
I 1
,,.., p...Y. . I I I I t I
1 I'
i t
:;;:
I:#;
;l:l
l:'l
;;SI
;:!I
'I
;::I
;::i
11
I1
ii ;4
14:
:::I iiii
I::: I;:: ;::I i:::
1:;: ::;i
:::I if:!
;::a
Ill:
I!*:
I I I;:I I i The Mayor declared the hearing closed at 8:30 P,M, I ::I: I !I!!;
t I
I I i After considerable discussion by the Council, by motion i : of the Council, it was agreed that a memorandum be sent i i to the Planning Commission stating their findings were 4 I : contrary to the findings of the Planning Commission, as 1 i this proposed Et-3 zoning would not be a piecemeal zoning !
I due to the fact that the Council contemplates the rezoning i i of the easterly 200 feet of Tax Assessor's Parcels 10 and :
I 11 in Assessor's Map Book No, 35, page 35, of San Diego 1 Sonneman i County, to Zone R-3, which would eliminate any piecemeal : Ledgerwood ; or spot zoning; and that the Planning Commission recon- i McPherson i sider Nr . by1 * s request at such time as they are consider-: La Roche : ing the rezoning of the other parcels. 1
: By motion of the Council the following resolution was i adopted:
i Resolution No, 627, RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY i
I COUNCU OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, DJXECTXMG THE PLANNING I i COMMISSION TO HOLD A HEARING TO CONS DER A PLOPOSED CIUIIGE : : OF ZONE FROM ZONE R-1 TO R-3 OF THE EASTERLY 200 FEET OF I Sonneman i PROPERTY LYING ON Ti-IE WEST S DE OF ROOSEVELT STREET : Ledgerwood
I BETWEEN CHESTEWT AVENUE AND MAGNOLEA AVENUE; AND DBECTlNG I McPherson I THE SECEETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO GIVE NOTICE OF i La Roche
I I I
I I t I I I I 1 I I 4 t
I THE PROPOSED CHANGE OF ZONE, 4 I
0
i I I I I I I I
1 i ENGINEERING :
i a. Report on request for sewer connection - Albert Stei& i At the meeting of January 5, 1960, the City Engineer was i i requested to report back on this request. The City Hana- :
1. ger informed the Council the City Engineer recommended the I Sonneman r granting of this request with the provision that: a sand : Ledgerwood ; and lint trap be installed, By motion of the Council the i NcPherson I request was granted to Nr. Stein, subject to the provision ; La Roche
; recommendec€.by, the:, City Engineer ,
I
: I 1 I I + I
I I * I .. . I
'. , .~ ..,.
,I . ,.. .
:ti 'I ;I:::
1:::: :;;:: 1:::: ::::: :';::
::I::
;;:;I ;::'I
1':::
; : ;$ I : :qx i * t ;d I
;:I::
:::I:
16;:; :L:: :I::: ::;::
::,,I
;:I:;
1;::: :;;;I I':::
i::$: : :4x i ::::x
;:a I!:!
ii p ; 81
id ii I
;I;';
:(I
::I:: ,:;I:
t::::
:I,,: ::I:: :; 1;:;
1 ;:: :i :x; ;
; : ;x: \ ; ICX: i ; : :x; I
:I#;: tI
:;;I:
:;I:: !*!!:
:I1
I I t I
I I
1 .. .> . . t :I .'I
:!::I
1 1::::
1 I I ::::; I
0
e
I 1 '\ . -, * -, I ' I+.'. I
t
\8
I I I '.,'X, '8, '\ ',,", ',\'\, ', '. , '
I I '\ y, I
\\ '\ ',8 , ', *
I -4- i Name '8 '\$&
I : Member ,$'@.*@
I I
1
I
I
'\\ '.?&
I of '.+\Cr, "?&%\+ '\ .f+, $9
:""""""""""""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""-.-.
4 I ;'#I I I!!# : b. Petition to open street from Basswood Ave. to Oak : I;'# i Ave., between Highland Drive and Valley Street, The Coun- I ! cil was informed that a petit ion had been received by the : Sonneman : i I $ ; Engineering Department for the opening of this street, i Ledgerwood i ; ! X: i which contained 60.24% signatures. By motion of the Coun- : McPherson I I I I$
; cil the matter was referred to the City Attorney for i La Roche : : X X i recommendation as to the procedure for this street opening,: It41
:e:: ::::
I::;
! ! !::: i C. Carlsbad Blvd, Sewer Assessment District No. 5-L959, : ; The Council was informed a public hearing was scheduled i i for this meeting, however, it was postponed due to the i
; fact the property owners were not prbperly notified. It ; i is therefore necessary that the following resolutions be I : adopted, which would set the hearing for the 2nd meeting : i in February: I I I Y I
t t
-111
:;'I i:ii :::; ;::: ;:::
l;ll :;::
::*I i::; 81
11
I:!* i Resolution No. 623. A RESOLUTlON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF i Sonneman : i : 4 : THE CITY OF CARLSBAD RESCINDING AND CANCELLING RESOLUTION ; Ledgerwood i i 1 X I NO. 617, was adopted by title only and further reading , : McPherson @: i 4 I waived. ; La Roche i 1 ! 4 I I t : Resolution No. 624. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF i i THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION i
I TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN SANITARY SEWERS AND : I APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK IN SAID CITY; DECLARING i : THE WORK To BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDWARY PUBLXC BENE- i i FIT: DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED BY SAID WORK i I AND TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COST AND EXPENSE THEREOF; I t ; DETERMfNING THAT BONDS SHALL BE ISSUED TO REPRESENT ASSESS-: Sonneman i MENTS TO BE LEVIED; AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR : Ledgerwood ; HEARXNG PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS TO SAID WOPX OR THE EXTENT i McPherson i OF THE DISTRICT TO 3E ASSESSED, OR BOTH, AND GIVING NM"LCE : La Roche : THEREOF, Assessment District No. 5-1959, was adopted by i i title only and further reading waived. I I
i d, Grant' Deed for off-site drainage easement - Brent- i I wood Village subdivision to Palm Avenue. The City Manager I i informed the Council a grant deed for a drainage easement i : had been received, and it wauld be necessary for the Coun- ; i cil to accept said easement. By motion,... the Council : Sonneman : accepted the grant of easement on behalf of the City, and i Ledgerwood i the City Clerk was instructed to prepare a certificate of i McPherson i acceptance and execute the same, and record the grant of ; La i;2oche ; easement .
I e. Petition to open street from Chestnut Ave. to Bass- i :wood Ave. between Highland Drive and Valley Street. The ; i City Council was advised that a petition had been received i !to open a street fran Chestnut Ave. to Basswood Ave. I I between Highland Drive and Valley Street, however, there i !were only 24% of the property owners who signed the I I ;petition. As there was not a majority of the property i owners in the area who signed the petition, by common con- ! ; sent of the Council the City Manager was instructed to !notify the property owners the matter is dropped.
: PLANNING:
: . a. Tentative map of Magnolia Hills Subdivision. The i :tentative map of the subdivision was presented for the i Counc il* s review. Resolution No. 146 of the Planning Com- i
:mission was read, wherein they recommended approval of the I !tentative subdivision map. Discussion was had in regards ; : ta a street being epmd from Oak Aver to Park Drive, t i between Highland Dri%,rand Valley Street, in the lowest
:portion of that area,'-& recownended by the Public Works i
!Commission and the Pl&&rtg Carmissimu The question was ; : raised as to whether thh #Cfi d&.$t%ff be Wcistrqctedi i at a later date as ~~~de$*,~~.~~~,.su~d,iyi~~,.~. wepe : : approved at this CfW,: ,a&i :the~,C;~~,:~~:;advl,se~;.tkat I I it could be,- Aft&@co%iderable dzWusdion by the Council :
I I I
I I I I #
I I
I I
I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I
I 1
I b
I I
I 8 t
*q* . '" ,
I I
1 * I I
t I I t *
I. I- I .. P
,.I1
1::: p',
lt;@
1::; ::;; i::: :':;:
::I: ;;:: :2q id : ; :$ : ; ;x i q4
1; 1 :;::
:I:;
t!!l
ll88
I
I
I I I I I 4 I I I 1
I
I I
I I I I I
i:*
('I
;d
1::
;'I
I:' 11: :'I ; x: g i !x: : :xi x: ;xi
;:e
*I8
!I! i;:;
;8!: ::;: ::I:
;:I: :ii:
;::: ;::; ;:I; ;::; ;::; :p: i::: ;:;:
*:ii I' '::I;
';;I i:::
1:;: ::4 :::: :+::
;;4*
1:iI
:;;I i:;: ;:I:
1s;: ;: 1 *;I; ::;;
:;,;I
:,. f >; I. [ :; 1 "
1:'l
:I*:
I;*: I 11
* I e .:
b ;.. ' ! !
i , \, \I, \'. t I
t I I
t
t t
,, '8 \\ ', '\ '\
t ' '\ '\\'\\'\, 18
t I I '\,"\ '\ 8, ,,,'\,
I - D<> *, '\ ', 8
I i N a me x\, ',%. '\ '.&\
-, . ; Member @@.+\p+ :"""""""""""""""""""-""""""""""""""""""l""""""""""""-. ,.
1 ;;:i i it was agreed that the tentative map of Magnolia Hill's : :I;: i be approved, subject to certain conditions being performed: 1:;:
; by the subdivider as recommended by the Planning Com- 'I
::::
i mission. The following resolution was presented for the i i:::
4::; 1 council's review: 1 i::;
I I i of \.A;$&,\', ,c$,*,+,;% 8!%
I
I .' III)
,!!I I I I Resolution No. b28. A RESOLUTION OF THE CIW COUNCIL OF i Sonneman ' : i 4 i i THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING TENTATIVE NAP OF MAGNOLIA I Ledgerwood : ' ; 4 ; HlLLS, was adopted by title only, and further reading i McPherson I 4 ! X i waived. I La Roche i i i 4 I r!!,
1'
I i LIBRARY:
I I
I I I
;;:;
I ;;:I
I I/: I.!* \ a. Appointment to Library Conmission. At the regular i i meeting of the City Council held on December 15, 1959, a ; : memorandum from the Library Conmission recomended the i : appointment of Donald C. Carr and Katherine Dunne to the ; i Conmission. The Council agreed that both parties would i
i be acceptable for the Conmission; however, no appointment : i was made at that time. By mot ion of the Council the Mayor i Sonneman i appointed Donald C. Carr and Katherine Dunne to the : Ledgerwood : Library Commission for a term of three years, commencing i McPherson i January 1, 1960 and ending December 31, 1962, and the : La Koche : Council confirmed the appointments. I I I I !
iij;
1:::
t::: i::: iJ'I :;
;i11 ; :id
I t :x : : id
IllI
II
ii p
:It:
I:!!
I : CITY CLERK:
I !
t I 1 I
!ii:
l;ll
SI!! 1 I ::I: I The Council was advised that the General Municipal Electioi i is scheduled for April 12, 1960. The following resolutiond : were presented for the Council's approval:
!
I I I $ I
I
:iG:
:;I' ;: i::: :I::
I:,! ; Resolution NO. 625. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF : i THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTLC$ :::: : OF THE HOLDING OF A GEPJERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ; i IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF APRIL, 1960 FOR i Sonneman i i i 4 : THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED ; Ledgerwood : i i X i BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA i McPherson i i 'f 4 : RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES, was adopted by title only i La Roche I ; ; X i and further reading waived.
i Resolution NO. 626. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF : i THE CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS i :;It i OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO PERMIT THE REGISTRAR OF : Sonneman f i i i i VOTERS OF SAID COUNTY TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE i Ledgerwood : : i X ; CITY OF CARLSBAD, RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL i McPherson i i ' d I MUN IC PAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON APRIL 12, : La Roche i i 4 X : 1960, was adopted by title only and further reading waived.: ltl;
I The City Manager requested authorization for the payment i 1:;: i of all expenses connected with the general election. By : Sonneman i i i d : motion of the Council the City Manager was authorized to i Ledgerwood i : ; i i pay a1 1 necessary expenses in connection with the general : McPherson i I i 4 : Municipal election on April 12, 1960. i La Roche : i 3 9
I" :::I
:ii:
1 I I I & :::I 8;:
I 1 ::;: ::;:
8 I
::::
4 i:;* I
I I I 1 !;:! : The City Clerk announced there were now 18 precincts in : i the City of Carlsbad, and there would be 9 yoting precincti
1 scheduled for this election. I t I
I I
;::: ::;: :;:: :I::
!II! 1 I a I
;It ; OLD BUSINESS :
: ab Second reading of Ordinance li9100 - reclassification I i of a portion of the Marron property. A second reading I ::i: : was given by the Council of the following ordinance:
i Ordinance No. 9100. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAI) i Sonneman i 4 : i i AMENDING ORDINANCE NO, 9060, CHANGING ZONE CLASSIFICATION : Ledgerwood i : I $ i OF A PORTION OF LOT R AND A PORTION OF UNNUElBERED LOT i McPherson ; i % X: i NORTH OF LOT J, PdJUCHO AGUA HEDIONDA D IN THE CITY OF : La Roche ; 1 i : :* : CARLSBAD, FROM ZONE R-1 TO ZONE M, was adopted. I I :;
I
I
1 I I 1::j :;:I
I :I;:
I :;:I
I I ;: I 1;:
I
I
:I::
I I I :::;
::;: ::;:
I I ::I:
I 1: I:
I :!!I
I I I
;+e I I
I I I I ::i:
I I 1 I
I I I I
I 1 1
1 t
I -6-
I \, x., - b' I \, '\ \\ \\ \\ 'x
i . ', '\ \\\'\\'\, 11
t I 1
', '\\'\,, ', \' "
8 I i Name ''.,'?!&. ', \ '.&.
t q ! of '\%$??\ ",'f&,
:"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""~"""""""~"""""~ 1 Member $'@,*\p+
I I i;:;
& I I I '\\ \\'
I '& .o \ 9 ',+"3
I I I ;:;; ! b. Request for business license - Tony Telebar, I The City Manager advised the Council that he had received i I::: : a report from the Chief of Police on this matter, and his i 1::; I report stated that Mr. Telebar is a man of good character : Sonneman i I $ 4 : and reputation and recommended that a business 1 icense be i Ledgerwood i ; i 3 i issued to Mr. Telebar, By motion of the Council a busig ; McPherson :Xi i X I ness license was granted to Mr. Telebar for a private i La Roche i I i $ ; investigator, I l:tI
i CITY ATTORNEY * S , REPORT: I 111'
!!#I
I
I I I I ::I: :;::
I I I ::;;
I I
I
I I East Carlsbad Annexation No. 2.1. The City Attorney ad- : i vised the Council that Judge Noon signed the Judgment 1 i i settling all law suits in connection with the annexation. I
i The Judgment was signed Nunc pro tunc July 1, 1959,
; Notice of sale of property, A letter had been received i i from Ray Wilcox CO., Realtor, stating they were handling : : Mr. Cottingham's property in Carlsbad, formerly the I i Carlsbad Journal Building, and Mr. Cottingham is desirous i : of t.!isposing of his property and would like to offer the ; i City of Carlsbad the first chance to purchase this prop- ; : erty; the lot is 27 x 159.90 feet, with improvements con- i i sisting of a block building 27 x 80 feet. The property : : is offered to the City for a cash consideration of $22,500; i By cmon consent of the Council the City Attorney was : : instructed to answer this letter and thank them for their i i offer, as the City is not in a position to purchase the i : property at this time, I I
: Legal action re: Business License, In reference to the i
t non-payment of a business license for a real estaCe busi- i I ness operated by Aleatha Vaughn, a letter was sent to Mrs. : : Vaughn and she was given until Monday, January 25, 1960 i I to pay the amount due.
i San Luis Key Water Rights, A written report prepared by i ; the City Attorney was presented to the members of the i Council regarding the water rights in the San Luis Rey :
t Valley,
I Palmar Road. The Board of Supervisors have requested that i i the portion of right of way lying within the City of I I
1 Carlsbad which forms a part of County Road Survey No, 1534; i became a County Highway with respect to its construction, : i maintenance, improvement and repair. The following : Ordinance had been prepared for the Councills review:
t I
1 I I I I
I 1
1 1
I I I I I 1
I I I
I I 1 I r ).
t 1 I I I I I I !
;;'I 11 i:;: :::; iiii
;:#I
!:I* :;
xal;
::;I ::;: ::I: :::: ::;I
:::I
4;;
:::I i:::
,:;I h;;
::I: ::::
i:::
$11
It':
iiii
I:! :ti: I:;:
I*#: ::I: :::; ;::: !I::
::;I
tt:
::I: i::i ::;:
::I; ;:::
1::; :::;
::;e :f;:
::I: ::i: ii;:
1:::
11
!#I! i Ordinance No. 7025. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, i : CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING AND PROVIDING THAT A PORT ION OF :
: A PART OF COUNW ROAD SURVEY NO. 1534 SHALL BECOME A i Ledgerwood : i X : i COUNTY HIGHWAY WITH RESPECT TO ITS CONSTRUCTION, MAIN- : McPherson 3 :X !X: i TENANCE, IMPROVEMENT AND REPAIR, was given a first reading i La Roche : ; iX i : by the Council. I :' I I ;:#I
1:;
:!!I
"1; ::I:
I ::I; i RIGHT OF WAY LYING WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD WHICH FORMS : Sonneman ;x i ;x i
$ I
'I I i Parking of large vehicles, At the last meeting of the : City Council the City Attorney was instructed to investi- i i gate some form of ordinance to prevent the parking of : large vehicles in residential areas. She and the Chief of i i Police had reviewed several model ordinances adopted by t i other cities, and the Chief of Police had recommended the i
; following ordinance be adopted for this City, and re- : quested that it be adopted as an urgency ordinance:
i Ordinance NO. 3037. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD i Sonneman : AMENDING AND ADDING TO ORDINANCE NU. 3005 OF THE CITY OF ; Ledgerwood i CARLSBAD, RELATING TO EXTENDED PARKING OF CERTAIN VEHICLES I McPherson : WITHIN THE CITY OF CmLSBAD, was read and adopted as an : La Roche
I I
I I
a: I I 1 I I I I
t;;l I::: :::I ;::; ;::; ;:::
::;I
1::: ii!i ::;: ki ti. i : a; : )i$: i ; x!
I'I
;I I
i urgency ordinancet 1 I I I I
;;*; ::i:, :::; 1.
::;I
I 1:;:
;:I:
i )x:
I I I I I I 1 I
1 I t 1. I f
t
).
t
*I
8 I'
J I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1
I 1 I 1 t I 1 I
1 -7 - I
~""""""""~""""""~""""""""""""""""""""""-:-
I I I Meeting of the Municipal Water District. The City Attor- i i ney, City Manager and City Engineer attended this meeting i : regarding the formation of District V3. The plan as sub- :
t mitted is for a primary distribution system. It was the i
f feeling of the City Engineer that the plan was feasible. : ! They were informed that the Municipal Water District has i : no intention of competing with the City for the retailing i \ of water, and if any lands are annexed to the City after i : the district is formed they assume that the City would : i take over and service the area annexed. The Municipal I ; further stated that as a member of the Metropolitan Water : i District they feel obligated to serve the people. I I I
',, *\ .\ '\ 8' .\
\ '\ '\\ '\ '\ '\'
ha me '\,,'&\ \, \?~8*
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :O'.O:C :.* 2
'\ ' 8, '\ '\ \ \' ', "\ '\ ', '\ '\ . \' 12
of 8$&@, 9' #p$
\ 8'
\$\%'\ '8, 'p&\,
Member ,(0\6\ l.',06
'I I , ..; ' I
I # ;. :.
11;;
:;'I
$1:; :::: i:::
1;rt 1:::
:ai: I:'I
1:tt
:~~l
11
3;t11
l*ltl 11'
(OtI
I,!'
#I I ii::
*@I(
J '1
i::I~
I I I 1 i The Council asked if the formation of this district would i
i hinder any of these properties from annexing to the City. : J The City Attorney stated she was quite pleased in that ; after the meeting some of the property owners talked to 1 i her regarding the annexation of their properties.
I I
I
I I I I I I I i Sale of Water Revenue Bonds. The Council was advised that i i O'Melveny and Myers had requested that they be informed i
::::
if:: p::
I:'1 11 ::#I I 11 IIIl
I:!!
.I
;'I
,st: If&*
II
::It
;:#I
-1
11
I 18 *!$I i as to the financial consultant employed by the City to i Sonneman jr i $ i i prepare the necessary information for the sale of the : Ledgerwood i i X i : bonds. When the previous revenue bonds were sold the i McPherson ; k $ : i f inn of Schwabacher & Co. were employed . By motion of the i La Roche i i X i : Council the firm of Schwabacher & Co. were employed to I I ,I:,, ! handle the sale of the bonds. t * :::::
I I 1 ;:':' 1,:s
I I CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
! The City Manager was contacted regarding the City's parti- i i clpation in the San Diego County's Traffic Safety Council, : ; The City has been asked to participate jointly with the i : City of Oceanside's Traffic Safety Committee in working : i with the County. The City Manager recommended that the i :City Manager, Chief of Police, City Engineer and the I I i Superintendent of the Carlsbad Elementary School District i Sonneman : be designated by the Council as Carlsbad's Traffic Safety : Ledgerwood i Cottunittee to work with the Oceanside group. By motion of i McPherson :the Council it was agreed that the group designated by the :La Roche i City Manager be appointed .
i At the previous meeting the Council requested that an in- ...:. :vestigation be made with reference to stop signs being i installed where alleys intersect a main thoroughfare in i : the downtown area. This matter had been referred to the : i Chief of Police who had recmended stop signs being placed:
:at certain locations where alleys intersect a main \ thoroughfare. The Council was informed that it would re- i :quire Ordinance No. 3005 being amended to include these :Sonneman istop signs. By motion of the Council the City Attorney !Ledgerwood
:was instructed to prepare an amendment to Ordinance No. :McPherson
I3005 to include the stop signs as outlined by the Chief !La Roche
:of Police.
i
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I I I I
:;It ::;; 81 I:::
1::;
i:'4
1::: ::I: ;::: i::: II I::: : : i*i
;:I ; : :x: ; : i xi x: :x: :xi
:::I ::;;
-.e
(1,. ;si:;
Ill I:@;'
pi:,
;:lt 11:
;;el 11 4:: ::if I:/
I'a: ixI ixi i i jx: ; :x:xi : t !x;
11;
8: la
::;I
ll,! I I :The Manager referred to a letter from the League of Cali- i
ifornia Cities appointing him as a member of the committee ; 1 on retirement . The City Manager requested the Counc il to i
;indicate their willingness for him to accept this assign- ;
Iment. By common consent of the Council it was agreed that i
:the Manager accept this assignment. I I
I I
;I;;
111 1:::
:::I ::;:
::I:;
;:it!
11 :i :;::
::!I 11
I I I I
I"
:PAYMENT OF BILLS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL; I 11'1
:Authorization was given for the payment of bills for the !Sonneman $ i k i :general expenses of the City in the amount of $8,130.38 I ILedgerwood . I : %;
:and $6,924.57 for the Water Department, from January 5, bcPherson ; i k i il960 to January 19, 1960, as certified by the Director of $a Roche : IXy; :Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee. I i !:;I I I 11:
*;I:
I 1 :I::
I 1 $1: I
I I I $ I I I:,::
I I ;I:;
I I I I :::: I I ;::I
I I I I i! I :'
I I I !:!;
9 I
I I
I I
L I I 1 I l
a I -8-
I
I I :"-""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
I : Ratification of the payroll was given for the first half i of January, 1960, in the amount of $12,664,37, as certi- : fied by the Director of Finance and approved by the Audit- : ing Committee, ,
I i ADJOURNMENT:
i By proper mot ion the meeting was adjourned at 10:40 P.M.
I I
I I I 1 I I I i Respectfully submitted,
I + I !HZ? d/A &F@i : MARG ET E. ADAMS i Deputy City Clerk
I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I i I 1 E . : ! \:.
1. I. I. I
I
I
I
I
I 8 I I I I I 1 I t t I I I I f
I i
I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I i I <
I I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I I I I I I I t I I I I
.. . ,
I i -..
I I I I I
I I !
'\ ,, '.\ " \\' .
1 '\\ \\ '\\ '\ ', '\
1 I I '\ \\,'\\ \\\'+\ p 3
; of '\,+'@& '\ 'FA ,CJJ@' 4' '??+
I t ', ', '\ '* '8 ! N a me '', '89. '\, "&h
1 Member $f@,&,< J"""""""""""~~"
I i::; i Sonneman t i $ 5 i Ledgerwood ; ; ! q : McPherson ! $ i ; i La Roche : : : q
I Ill1 :;ll I)#+
I 41:;
I I
I I I i::;
I I 1';;
I ;:I
I 1 I:::
1 I I:::
I 1 :I;l
I I :I::
+ I :::;
I I ::::
I I ::::
I I :::;
1 I ::ri
I :VI1 I * ;:la
l:I I :&I:
I I ii'I
I ::
l I it:; I 4:;
;l;l
1 I ii:i
I I i:::
I I ;: I:
I l8::
I I !I!:
I I 4::
I 1 I:;:
I I 4::
I I ii::
I I :::I 1:
I I :I;;
I ::II
I I :;::
I I i:::
I 1:: I I ::;I
:I;;
1 I ii:l
I I :::i 1'1
I I :::;
I I ::;i ;:I
I I 1:;:
e I ::I:
I :;::
I I i:!:
I I 1:::
I I :I;:
I l;~l I 11;;
I 1 i:;:
I I ;:I:
I I :::
I I 1:::
1 I ::;:
I I ;::;
I ;:::
I ;; g1 t I /::
I I 1:;:
1 :;:,I
I I I:.;;
I I ::;;
I i : :, ;.
I I ; :.:;
I 1 ;:I;
1 I 1:;;
I 1 :, :, ;,
I .. 8 2.2 I,
1 t I :::: ':#I
I I :hi
I I I ;;:;
I I :1:: :::I
I I :::: ;!I:
I
1 1111
1 1:
I I
I (11
I
I
1
I
I I
I I
I l:ll I
*
I
I
I I I
ts1;
I
I
1
1
I
I I I :::i 1:;:
1 I : 1 la
I :*I:
1
I
Ill
I I
Ill;
I
I 1
1 l;gl 1,:1
I : 8.1:
I
h : ' f. 4' {. .;1 i.