Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-02-16; City Council; Minutes* I >' ,..\\'. $ I I . \\ '\ '\ '\ '\,'\\\ ! CITY OF CAXLSl%iIl \, '\ '\ '\\ ' \ ', '. > *x- '8, 2Q I Minutes of: city Council i Date of Meeting: Febrtiary 16, 1960 : Time of Meeting: 7: 00 P. Me ; of \?&$&q\,.t'\/t : Place of Meeting: Council Chambers ________ _______________ ____ i _."_________ "A? ____-- %-- I Member ~~'@~~~P.fl :"""""~""""""""""""""-"----~- ')II; i ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Sonneman, [ ;;I:( 11:: ; Ledgerwood and NlcFDherson. Also present were City ; ()I( :::: I Manager Slater and City Attorney Hayes. I I :::I lIl( I1II ! INVOCATIOH was offered by Mayor Ledgerwood, I ,-. '.. ', '\ ', *, ' '. I Na me ',, ',$. ' 8\~' .,+'%*\"., '?+\,, B I I 111 1 I I I I I I::: I I :::: I ::!! I : RPPRQVAL OF MINUTES: I 4 I I I 1 *(I$ '11 It!: II @I:! ., I 1 I ae The dnutes of the regular meeting Of the city i SOnneman : !x: i I Council held on February 2, 1960, were approved as : Ledgerwood : :Xi ; presented. i McPherson :x i i 4 I :::! I I 1 I 1 COBRESPONDENCE I ! 4,!* I1 11:; I :;I1 .. I I I a. Division of Highways Agreement:, Letter dated I i February 5, 1960 from the Division omlghways, with i I copies of "Master Agreement for gas tax funds" attached, ; : in which they stated this Master Agreement would re- I place the Memorandum of Agreement for engineering ex- I I ecuted annually by each City, and will remain in full hrcd i and effect until revoked. They requested the agreement i t be approved by resolution of the City Council. After i consideration by the Council the following resolution was i : presented for the Councills review: I I I I I & s . ! I * i" 11:: :::I 111; ;;*I *I;; :I:: ;:la ::41 #I $1;: 81 :::': I ()I :;': I:;: :::I SI ItI( (11, !II! I : Res. f632. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL I ;l*i I OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, ADOPTING. AND I It:: ,leu I i::: i PENDITUBE CF FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER SECTIQN~ Sonneman g i :X: i 2107.5 OF THE STLlEETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, was i Ledgerwood i !x: : adopted by title only, and further reading waived, : McPherson I : x;xi I !I:! I I I : APPROVING THE MASTEB AGREEMENT FOR EX- 11 I I I I I b, Requests for sewer connections, The following I i requests for sewer'connections were made and approved : : by the Council upon recommendation of the City Engineer: i I I I ;ai; ;::I ::;; i:;1 1: I4I !*I! 8 I I I I E, J. Bale Co. Anita Leverette i Sonneman ix i !x; -. I I Guaranteed Homes Mrs. S. H, Tripp : Ledgerwood! : :x; I I Gregory Vi. Losa i McPherson ; Ixix:, I I ! :II l!l; i OWAL COMMUNIICATIQMS: i There were no oral communications, ! 8 1 i PUBLIC HEABING - 7: 30 Po Me: I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a. Carlsbad Blvd, Sewers - 191 1 Act proceedings, : : Assess. Dist. #5-1959. I I l a I I i The Mayor announced this was the time and place fixed I i by the City Council"for hearing objections or protests on ; : the proposed work, or the extent of the assessment I district, or on the proposed grades under the Resolution i : of Intention No. 624, providing for the construction of : : sanitary sewers and appurtenances, and appurtenant work i I in Carlsbad Blvd. from Chinquapin Ave, to Hemlock Ave. i 1 Also chinquapin Ave., Sequoia Ave. , Tamarack Ave., I Redwood Ave. and Hemlock Ave. from Carlsbad Blvd, : to Garfield Street. I I t I I I L I I I I ! ;"I ;::I ;::: ;::: Is*: 4!!1 11*1 i' ;:I: 1::; ;:;I 1p; ::i: ::;I :::: i::: iii: l:l; i:!: ::I: ::ii :::; i::' ;:a: 1;; :':I ;:,a .II! i The Clerk presented the affidavits of publication, mailing ~So~em~ i 4 i i I and posting. By motion of the Council the affidavits were :LedgerWood i ; : 4 : approved and ordered filed. jMcPherson ; I xi X: i The Mayor requested the Clerk to read all protests that i ;::; : had been filed. The Clerk presented the following : written protests: 1;;1 a I I I i::; t :::; I I 1 I ;::; ! I !Il! I 1 I I Letter dated December 28, 1959, from Orville C, Jeffersi i 155 Chinquapin Ave,, protesting the cost of construction, i : and pointing out that in all previous projects where I pumping stations have been necessary, the City has I I I I I t I ! I I I I 1 I I I I i;:: ;I4 ,;:: ;I;: :::: :;I; ::;I :*I 1:: !,I I I I I I I I I -2 .. t I I I. )~"""-"""""""-~""""""""""~""""~"""""""""~ i participated; also the pedestrian walkway that would be : constructed at the wdst end of Chinquapin Ave. ; and re- J quested clarification of ihe status of the most westeriy : lot on the south side of Chinquapin Ave,, as he was in- ! formed this lot is not a part of Sewer District $2, and : must pay its full share of the cost of the present sewer I prdject. I .> , '\ '\ ' I \, \' 8 ' I 8' " i Name '- " I ' : of i Member """"""_ I I I I I t I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I i The Council was informed that at the meeting of January i : 5, 1960, tHis letter was read and discussed, and the last i ! two items in Mr. Jeffers letter had been clarified at that : : time. The only item before them at this time was the i : cost of the project and the request for City participation : i in the pumping station. I I : Letter dated February 11, 1960 from Grville C, Jeffers, i I in which he discussed the separation of the State Park :. I Beach from this proposed sewer district, and its method i I of acceptance to the City Sewer System, claiming this as : ; one of the main factqors for City participation in this % i proposed pumping station, i A petition was presented signed by resident property i owners in the area, in which they petitioned the City to i ; participate in the cost of the pumping plant and appurt- i i enant installation to the extent of SO%, and set forth I I : certain reasons to justify this request for City participa- i I tion. The following names were affixed to the petition: : i QrviUe C. Jeffers Frank Novak ; Mrs. Sally S. Tico P. F, Valentine i Josephine F, Kellett Henry C. Sauer i I 1 Guiseppe Angello Robert J. Becker i C, B, Ledgerwood James E, Farrell : Bertha GUlingham Helen McConnaughay i i Harry M, Walker Edward C. Mitchell : : Ida L, Walker Ernest J. Litchfield i i Vere Goff Estelle G. Gumming : i W. H. Syme Van A, Norman t i Thelma L, Virgil I I i For further particulars said petition is on file in the : office of the City Clerk. I .The Council was informed that identical petitions were : i filed by non-resident property owners, and that the I I ; following names were affixed to the petitions: : Major R. Rix Nessa L. Robusson i i J, Ha Hlgman Grace Moore I : J, W. Crilly Preston B. Griffhg, J+. i Alva Finley Lenora A. Griffing : ; Irene P, Duro Lucian F. Ramley i i EdityW. Lyman Ruth McNevin I I ! Harold Lister ; For further particulars said petitions are on file in the i i office of the City Clerk, I I i After hearing all written protests, the Mayor asked if i : there were any persons, or their representatives, who i i had filed written protests, that wanted to be heard? L I i UgVILLE JEFFESS, was present and presented a map i i of the proposed district. Ze informed the Council there ; ; were 69 lots in this proposed district, with 41. property : I ownerst and that only 19 owners lived in Carlsbad, 80% i : of the property owners have signed the petition, He felt : : the City should participate in the pumping plant cost I I because it would benefit future development in the area, i i and did not- think it fair to have the area residents pay the i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 * I I I I I I s I I I I I I I 1 I I I I # I I I I I I I t 1 I I 9 I 1 a I I I I I I I 1 I 1 t 4 I I I I I I I I I 1 I '8' " \\ '. x, '8 '8,'\\ ""3 8, '\, ', ', '\ 2- - , '$\ 8, '\;ps', '$$+ 8, '?&, '?&' 4' $'4 .&@,+*e , ;::I ;11; :/:: :I:: ;;:I ;I:: ::;: :::; 11'1 i::; ::@I :;:I 11:; :I*: 1:;I :;:i :* 1:;; :::I i:;: 1:v: 81:: I;:: 1;:: ::I: :;e: !I:' ,I:! ::;I I* iiii i::: :::I ::II :I ;::: :::: :::: ::i: :::: ;::: :::a 1::: i::: :::: ;:'I 1;:: :::: I::: ::;: ::;: :;I: ;l;l 1;: ii;: i;:; ::;: $1 :::: i::: 1;: :;:: ii:: :I:: :;:: ii:: I:;; :I:: 1;11 4:; ::;I :::i ii:; :I:: ;:I* 4;:: :;:: :;:: :t:: ;::; ;::: :i:: :ai; :I:: ::I: :;:I ;: +: i::: ;::: ;::: ;::: 8' """"""7- 1411 Ill 11 ;I t ::I: ,:VI :'*I I t: 1;' I*') 11 I@ Io 11 *I I* 11 .a+! I I I I * I I - 3- I. I \, ', -8 '\ '\ " I \ ', '8, ', '\,'\, I I ',\.' t, 'x, .8 '8, '88'8, 2' I 8 ,'. \ \'. I \- I t : N a me '8 '\e&, '*8 '~$8 i *f ''$@+., 8\ 't+ I f 0 ',& .d 8 $'\.$< ~"""""""""""""-"""~"""""""""~""~~""""-""""l""-""-"--""~----~- i Member 6'@.+\0 I 1 i::' i entire cost. The property on the west side of Carlsbad i 1:;; I was owned by the State and they had their own pumping ! :::: i station, and they were allowed to have a free ride when i ;iii : they connected to the City sewer line. I 4:; I ::!I I I I I I : Mayor Ledgerwood stated he intended to abstain from : i voting on this matter as he owned property within the pro-: i posed district. He was a member of the Board of Direct-: ; ors of the old Carlsbad Sanitary District for 14 years and i i Secretary of the Board in 1952 when Sanitary District #2 : : was formed, This area was excluded from Sanitary I i District #2 upon the recommendation of the Engineer, as J : he felt this area and Terramar should be included in a i i separate district. However, due to the high cost to the : ; property owners .in certain areas they were r.equired to i : pay $25,00 per lot towards this cost; therefore, he felt : i it only fair that the City should contribute towards the i i cost of the proposed pumping plant, I I t I I I 'i" 11 11 ::;I :::: I;:: :::a ::I: :a:: 4:: 11;; ::el i::: 1::: :Ill ::p ;;I: :;@I :::: :;:: i::: .!I 11 11 i .Cwn, Sonnenan stated she. felt the City had set a prece- i ;;'I : dent by contributing to other pumping plants in the City, : 1;:; :::: i It was pointed out that the City had contributed towards i ::; : these other plants due to the fact that these funds would : ::;! i be recovered by the City as there were outlying areas i ::@I :I:: : that would be required to use the plant in the future. I I ':;:: l:I, f I 1 1,!1 I i The Council was advised that the estimated cost of the ! : pumping lant is $8,735.00 and if the City were to con- i i tribute 1 B 2 of this cost, it would amount to $4,362.50, I I I I I I :i:; :;'I I,!: ::;i 'I :Ill (!!I i The City Attorney stated that due to the fact that there i : were only three members of the Council present, and i i that one member was going to abstain, the hearing should i 1:;a : be continued, By motion of the Council the hearing as i Sonneman :x i : xi : ordered by Resolution of Intention No. 624 was continued ; Ledgerwooq : i xi : to March 1, 1960 at 7: 30 P, M, in the Council Chambers, I McPherson: !XI x: I ::!! I;;# :::; ::I: I t t : PLANNING: I I I I I 1 4 I l a, Res, #I49 of the Planning Commission - re I I i Resolution of Zneention f627 of the City Council to reclass! : ify certain properties from Zone R-1 to Zone 8-3. The ; ; resolution from the planning Commission was read where! : in they denied the request for rezoning the easterly 200 f i feet of Tax Assessor's Parcels No, 10 and 11, Assessorf$ : Map Book 35, Page 35 of San Diego County, said property: i lying on the west side of Roosevelt Street between Chestn9 : Ave, and Magnolia Ave., for the following reasons: I 1 I I t I I I I 1, This reclassification would adversely affect i I I I the comprehensive general plan as it would not be i I consistent with the future development of the sur- I I I rounding area; and I I 2, Two property owners out of the three involved i I I I I 1 I I I I I I were not in favor of the rezoning, I I I I I I ! The City Attorney advised the Council that under their i i Resolution of Intention #627 they were the applicant; the : ; fact that the .Planning Commission field a hearing and i i denied the request, the matter is dead; however, if the : I Council so desired they could appeal the decision of the i 9 : Planning Comaission. * 1 I 1 t I 8 I I I I I i Cwn. Sonneman stated this property fronts on a good : street and all utilities are in, therefore, she felt the i property lends itself to R-3 zoning. The Council should : t take into consideration the valuation of other properties I i in the area, The area has been discussed for industrial j : zoning, She further stated that even if this 200' were i : rezoned to R-3, there would still be sufficient area to the! i west that could be rezoned industrial, and if the entire : I I I I I I 1 * t e I I I ::;I ::;; ;: ::;: I;:! :it; ::;I ::;I ::;: ::;i i::: :::I :::I #*I :I*: 1:'I :I:! ii:i /;! ;:I: :::I $1; ::!I &*I :ii; *::I :::I $1~ I!l ;I' :;; i:: ::: ::: i:: ::: ;:: ::: 1:: ::: i:: ;:: ::; ::: ::: :(I 1:: ::: :#I $1 *(I 41 i:! II ' 4' . ,,, I I t I I I I I ',, '\\ ',, '\ ' b , . \ \\'*,, 23 \, '\'\, '\ . ' '. '\ I I 4 -4- -. ', \\ ',\ '8, .,, " e I N a me \\,, '\*\ ',, '\4Q\ f \$@,, '\ pa!, I i of ,?&O ,a, \?+ ~"""~"""~"""""""""""""""""""""""--"--""""-~--"-----""---------- Dl 1 Member $'@.*% -1 I :::I I area were to be rezoned for industry there would be many: {It: Ii'1 i protests fro& the surrounding property owners. Cwn, i i::; : Sonneman moved that the decision of the Planning Corn- : 4:: I mission be appealed and that a hearing be set. The motiob :Ill 4;: : died for lack of a second, as Mr. McPherson stated he : ::;I i felt the Planning Commission had made a thorough study 1 lull :;;I ; of the area, and he concurred with the decision of the ; ;;I1 ;: i I Planning Commission, I t ::I; !;I; I $1 I I I 1 @l!l i Cwn, Sonneman stated that she did not feel this was right i ; and would like to go on record as so stating, I I I I ! t I b. Memo - Planning Commission's reconsideration : i of Mr. Koyl's request for reclassification, The City 1 I : Council requested themanning Commission to reconsider: I their decision on this matter at the time the above matter : i was being considered. Memorandum from the Planning i : Commission dated February 11, 1960, stating that after : i considerable deliberation it was the opinion of the Corn- i : mission that their former position was well taken and : i that the zone change should be denied. They pointed out i : that a committee of the Planning Commission is working f i on a plan for the development of the entire area, in view 1 f of the fact that there has been no overall plan submitted, t I I 'I :I:: i;;; :I:: ,!I1 iiil :;#I :::; :::; 1::: :::; :::: :' lI:: 1:'s ::ll :I;: ;:*I :::: 4:; :::; :;!I *)I1 11 *I 'I I 1 The City Manager informed the Council that Mr. Koyl i I i: i had called him late today, and requested the matter be i ,:'I 11*1 ; continued for two weeks. By motion of the Council Mr. : SOMeman k i :X: ;a i Koylrs request was granted and tie matter continued for I Ledgerwood ; ;si f two weeks, i. e,, March 1, 1960. 8 McPherson : i xi XI $41 ! I. I I I I I cc Memo - Sidewalks in Subdivisions. Memorandum 1 i from theTlanning Commission dated February 11, 1960, : : stating a great deal of discussion was given to the subject I i of sidewalk requirements in subdivisions, and it was I : concluded that the present Ordinance No. 9050, Article i I IV, Section 417 (e) is adequate, A motion was duly made i I and passed, respectfully requesting the City Cowncil to : ; make a statement of policy requiring sidewalks in all # i subdivisions on the recommendation of the City Engineer ! : and the Planning Commission. The City ,Manager recom- I i mended.that sidewalks should be required in subdivisions ; : where lots contain less than 15,000 square feet, or the I i topographical conditions, i, e,, Hillside areas, would I I : make sidewalks unfeasible. It was felt this might create i i a problem as some lots in an area might not be dll the : : same width, I I I Commissioner Stringer of the Planning Commission stated I that it was the understanding of the Planning Commission i I all subdivisions would be required to have sidewalks, I i except under certain conditions, such as topographical i i conditions, then a recommendation would be made by the : : Engineering Department and the Planning Commission. i I DONALD BRIGGS, JR. , was present and informed fhe f : Council he would be presenting a tentative map of a I i subdivision at the next meeting of the Planning Commissiib, i and would appreciate having a decision reached in regards: : to the requirement of sidewalks in subdivisions, The i i property being subdivided is located in a canyon, and the : : topography of the -land would make it difficult to construct i i sidewalks, Mr. Briggs was informed this condition I I : would be considered at the time the map was being con- I i sidered. I I I I I I e I I I ! I The City Engineer stated he was not very much in favor i i of requiring sidewalks for subdivisions unless they were i I located within a certain radius of schools, i After considerable deliberation by the Council it was I I I I I I I I I * I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I t ' 1 I 1'41 ;::; ::I: ;:I: ;;I1 1;:: ;;I; :::I :I:: ;:I: :::, 1::; i:;: ;:/ ::,: ';: ;* 1::: &; 1: ::I: :;;; i::: :If: it;; ::Il ;::: ;::: 1::; :I:: ::;; ;;:: I,Il l!!l ;i:: I;:: t:11 :I:: :;It ;::; 1:;1 :'I: ;::: 4;: 1;:: ;:SI :8l1 1;;: ::r: :!:: 11 11 i;li I' I :t ::;: :::: ::I; I:, ;I:: 1::: 111' ::I: 1;;: ::I: *,!I !I.! I B D l I I I 6' , \;, % ' . I ,\ \\' \ \' I 1 '\\ ', '\' ', ', '\ I I -5- I I ', ', '\, '\ '\\'%,\ 2 4 . 9. x '. ' I I 1 ,..- I I N a me ', ',$\ '\, ''& I : of ',+\CJ, \\ \pa- -.o.\.L1, '. -3,' 1 4 I Member 'C$iiy&.y~,4.~ ,o~,o..c.$.' :"~"""""""""""""""""""""""""*""""""""""~"~"""""""""" I 7" :!El ! agreed that a policy should be established. By motion of ! Sonneman 'x i i xi ! the Council it was agreed that a policy be established I Ledgeswoocf i :x: : requiring sidewalks in all subdivisions, ! McPherson ; : xi x! ! I i!!t ;'SI I i ENG1NEER;ZNG: ! 1 I I I I p;: 11 *I.! 1:;l I I a. Petition €or alley opening, A petition has been i ::i; I received for an alley opening running from Chestnut Ave. i :::: :;:I : to Magnolia Ave. , between Ruosevelt Street and Madison : ' )::: I Street, The Council was advised the petition does not i $11 l*:; ; indicate whether improvements are to be made or not; ; :i'1 i it covers only a street opening, of which 56.9% of the i :: : people in the area are in favor of the street opening, ::;; I f::; : Previously when such a request has been made to the t I i::: : Council, before the Council would consent to a street I 1 1;;1 I opening, improvements were required. It was the feeling: :;I: :;I: I of the Council a petition should be circulated for the im- : 11;: ; provement of tk alley before any decision is made by the I i::: i Council, By motion of the Council it was agreed that a : I:;# all; : petition for the improvements of the alley under the 191 1 i f:;; 1 Act be circulated for the alley, and that it be presented : Sonneman :x ; :xi :;;I ; to the Council prior to any decision by the Council for a i Ledgerwood i :x: i street opening. : McPherson i ix:xi ,!I: 11 L I I 1 ! I' i NEW BUSINESS I 1 1 I :;x: :!I: I I I b a. Proclamation. The Mayor declared the month of : ::I: t I :;:: I :::: I :;;: I I :$: t I a, A second reading was given the following ordinanc$s: :;:: 14;: ::;; 1 Ordinance No, 3038. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY 1 I::: : -WDING ORDINANCE NO, 3005, ::;I I :;': i OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, BY ADDING SECTION i i;;; : 83,2, REQUIRING CERTAIN TRAFFIC 'TO STOP AT : Sonneman Sr ; :xi i DESIGNATED INTERSECTIONS, was adopted by title ! Ledgerwood i ;x: i only. : McPherson: :x:%: I 111; I b. Ordinance No, 7026, AN ORDINANCE OF THE i :::I ! CITY 0 I::! -PEALING ORDINANCE NO. i Sonneman 1 ixix: I 7022, Wp~~$Rk!~A%~b€?OR CERTAIN SEWER : Ledgerwood ; :xi : SERVICE CHAELGES, was adopted by title only. i McPherson :xi i x: t ;::: i;'~ 11 :;:I i February as "American History Month", as requested by i 811 i the Daughters of the American Revolution, 1 i OLD BUSINESS: I 1 8 I I I I l a I I I I ! I 1 I cb Ordinance No. 7027. AN ORDINANCE OF THE i i CITY 0-G AND ESTABLISHING I I : CHARGES FOR SZRVICES AND FACILITIES FURNISH- I : ED BY THE CITY SEWEBAGE SYSTEM; AND PRO- : ! VIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SAID CHARGES, i i was adopted by We only, I I I i CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: I I I I I I ! I I l a. Mail of elective officers, Recent legislation has i i made it a felony to open any official's mail without the : : written consent of the official. The genera3 concensus i 1 is that this would also apply to appointive and administra- : :ti=. officials. I€ they desire to have their mail opened i i by someone else, the authorization must be ha writing. : l.'l ;::: :i:: ;:I: :;:: I;:: 1;:: :;:I :::; 11 :;::l ::i:: i:::: ::I:: ;::;; ::pi ::;:; ::::: 'l:l !l*!l I I 1 i I ;:;:: I b, Off-duty Police Officers. The Council was infor&- ;ll~l 1;::: I ed that at the present time any?olice Gfflcer a'&ir&iLhi4 i:;:: i capacity any place in the State ' is. fully covered under : ;:::I : liability insurance carried by the City, unless the City : 1:;:; i has an ordinance to the contrary, The Council requested i ::::I i:;:; : the matter deferred. I I 1:;:; I ::!:! I 'Ill1 I I I b. Formation of drainage district. At the previous i i meeting the City Alkorney was instructed to investigate : I I 1 I I I I I I I I + I I I I 1 I I-:; ;:::I I::,, ::;:I :I':; ::::; ::::I I;;'; I!!(! m. 0 I I' \, \\ '\ ', '\ '8 + I ' \' I I I 4 8, yt. ', "\',\ I ', 8' 8 i N a me 't, '$$. '\, +& I I I I I \ ', '8, '* '\a'*\ 2: 1 I Member ',& -%@,*x$)- .o \ 9' +'g I t :I;: ;:'I ::;: -6- I I I I \\ ' ' ', \,a I ; of Y?f*\$?&', ', x\+ ~"~"""""""""""""""""""~"""""~""""""""""""""""---"""""" i as to whether a drainage district could be forced. Upon i : investigation, under the 1921 Act you could not proceed ; i with the formation of a district without the consent of the i :ti; :::I : majority of the property owners. However, under the : :.i i :t i 191 1 Act the Council could proceed without the consent : :::i : of a rnajority of the property Owners by a 415th~ vote of i :::; i the Council. I I 11:; I :!I, I I 11 I I I :;I: i Cwn. Sonneman stated the drainage ditch being constructeb i::: : along the railroad was frightening; she did not Cealize it : 1::: i::: i was going to be so large and deep, She felt that funds i 111 : should definitely be provided in the next budget to have : ::;: ::;I i the ditch fenced, I I I::! i reviewed a letter from Michie City Publications Co. dated :::I :::: i September 29, 1959, in which they requested additional i i;:; I compensation for their services in connection with the : I*:! I codification in the amount of $500.00, due to the delay in i ::;: I the completion of the codification and the additional ordi- : :;I; :I:* i nances involved. Also in accordance with the contract i :I:: i they were to receive $6.00 per page for pages in excesa : :@I: : of 210, and they would like to have authority to charge i 4:: :::I i $7.00 per page in excess of 210. pages. After discussion : ::I: : by the Council it was agreed that the City Attorney corn- i ::;: I municate with Michie City publications Co. and inquire : ::#I ;::: ; as to the nwnber of pages they estimate there will be, I I ::;: I ii:: i CITY MANAGEB'S REPQRT I I ;;:: I I 1 i:i: l a. Schwabacher & Co. report. A contract has been i ;if: ;:I: i received from Schwabacher & Co, for the preparation of i k::: : the sale of the water revenue bonds, and it is necessary ; :II; i for $he Council to authorize the Mayor's signature on said: ;::I 1:;: : contract. By motion of the Council authorization was givq Ill: :::I i for the Mayor to execute said contract on behalf of the I Sonneman {x i ;xi t City, ; Ledgerwood : !xi I 9 i McPherson i ;XI x: I 'I)( i Display of Red Cross flags, A request has been received I ii:: i by the Chairman of the Red Cross in this area for per- : :;;: : .mission to display flags in the downtown area during the i ;l:a ;:;: i month Q€ March. The City Manager inquired of the I 1 :;;: ; Council as to their policy in such matters as this, I 8 I:;! I t :::I I fill; i The Mayor stated that he had received a complaint as to : :::I : the lack of flags being displayed on National Holidays. It ! ::;I :@I; i was pointed out that at one time the business people in I :I,,, ~::ll i the downtown area contributed funds to the VFW, who : ::*:: I arranged €or the display of flags on National Holidays, i 1:::; I The CiQ Manager was instructed to contact the Chamber : ::;I: ::::I 'I ; of Commerce to see who might be responsible for the i @I 1:::: i display of flags. I I :I::I I 1 I:;:; ! Cwn, S~meman asked what is being done about the water ! :i:i; : filteration. The City Engineer advised the Council the : i:ii; i Engineering Department is working on plans, however, : ::::1 : at the present time there are no funds available to proceed l::l; i with the work, :;: !I I 1 1;; i Cmn, McPherson asked when they were going to start ! : work on Chestnut Avenue. The Council was advised that I ,;I I the Engineering Department. was working on the grades : ':;I1 : etc, , but due to the volume of work in the Ehgineering i :;;:: i Department, they have been unable to devote too much : 1:;:: : time to the project. I :ii:: I i:: :: i PAYMENT OF BILLS ANI) RATIFICATION OF PAYRO4L: :;::: 114; I 4::; t Authorization was given for the payment of bills for the i i;:;; i general expenses of the City in the amount of $9,557.72, : ;Ill, :;;:: I 1 I t I:::! I I I I :;::: I I I I ;:::I 81 I I * t I I $ ;+ d, Codification of ordinances. The City Attorney i 18 11 1 1 I I I a I t 4 I * * I I I ::;;I 11 :::ti :::;! B I ;tlIj I I I t I I I ::;I, I I ,!!I! , *& 0 B u I I I I I I t I I I I. I I I I I I 8 I 6 I 1 I 1 I -7 - '"""""""""""""""""""""""""""~~~""~""~"""""~, !' I I i and the Water Department in the amount of $2,464.89, i I from February 2, 1960 to February 16, 1960, as certified! i by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing : I Ctmmittee. 1 1 I i Ratification of the payroll was given for the first half of : I ! February, 1960, in the amount of $12,761.07, as certified : by the Direc4hr of Finance and approved by the Auditing r I Committee, I 1 I I i ADJOURNM,ENT: 1 I I I 1 I I I i By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P. M, ! I I I I I 1 b 1 : Respectfully submitted, I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 MARGARET E. ADAMS : Deputy City Clerk I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I a I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I & I 1 I I I I I I I * I I t I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I * I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I l a I I I I I I 1 1 4 1 t I I I I I I I I + I I I I * I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I 1 I I I I I I I t I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I P I I + ! '\\. \*. , '\ '\ ', '\ '\ ', 8, '\ \ \ ' ',, ', \. '','+,' !& f N a me '\. "$6, '\, '.&. '\$ ,O'\ '\ .PA Member \$$Q?,F\o- of '$%, ;\ 43 """-""""""""~- :;&I :I:: Sonneman k i ;X; 11:: Ledgerwood: ; :x; McPherson ; :xtx I :*a, Sonnernan l ;x:xi Ledgerwood! i ;x; McPherson i x: :xi ,*:I I \\ '. ', ', I iii: $4 :;;i :;i: ::I: ;:I l8:; l;:: i::; ::;; ;I:@ $I*: ;:#I :iii :I:: ;::: :i:: :I:: f::; ;;:: ;::; ;::: :::: :::: :: 1 It:, *'i! ;: ::;:: ::;: :;;;: ;;;:; ::;:I I:::' ;,I #*I;: $1:: ii::: 1::: :;I:; I 11; {#;;I ;:;I; ;:::: b::! ::: :I::; ::::: 1:;:: ::;:: ;L'* :I;:; :I::' I:':: i;;:: ::::: I:;:' i:::: ::;:: 1;::; ::::: !::I: l;al; ll:;l ::;I: ::;:: ::::I ::::: :::;,: :::;I ;:::: :::;: I;::& ;;'I: :*I:: ll;l* ;; I* 1::;: :I:*: :;I:# *#;:I @I 'I '4 IIIl 1111 I:#' :,I:l !;;;; ;; ;:;;; 1': :##:I :;B@I I:*; !ti!: