HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-07-19; City Council; Minutesa
'?
I I 1 *,\' 8 b'
I
I
I
i CITY OF CARLSBAD : Date of Meeting: July 19, 1960 $ ', + '8, '\ '. 9 0 I Minutes of: : Time of Meeting: 7:OO P. M. : of ",.rr,O', , 8PA i Place of Meeting: Council Chambers '?$*>&,4%& ~""""-""""""""""""""-""""""~~"""""""""""~~"""""""""~""~"~, i Member ,080,g.p\4'
I ::I
f Bierce, Sonneman and McPherson. Also present were i &:: i City Manager Slater and City Attorney Hayes. I I ;:e::
;a::,
1::::
i INVOCATION was offered by Mayor Sonneman. I I ;::I:
I I I I I;*:;
t I :a:::
I I I ;:::I )I)!
I I I !:;::
l a. Minutes of the regular meeting of July 5, 1860 i Guevara : ix !X: :
I i Sonneman : : ;x: i
I I ; McPhersonI : :x; :
1 I!'
I b. Minutes of the adjourned meeting of July 12, i Guevara i i ;xi ; ::i
: 1960 were approved as presented, i Bierce +: !x; ;
I : Sonneman I : :x: :
I I I i McPherson i !xixi ;
I I "a8; I CORRESPONDENCE: I I ::::: ::;I,
s I I I :::::
1 a. Letter dated July 7, 1960 from Edward J. I I i:: ;; I Lawson, declining his appointment to the Planning CommiF- 1';:; $1 i sion, and declaring his resignation from the Public Works: ; Cornmission effective immediately was presented. By I ;:::I i motion of the Council Mr. Lawson's resignation from the ; Guevara i ; i xi ; l;ll:
: Public Works Commission was accepted, and a letter of i Bierce fxi :x: : i appreciation and thanks was directed to Mr. Lawson for : Sonneman i ; :x! i : his services on the Public Works Commission. i McPherson ; jx:x; i Ilt)I
i submitting his resignation from the Planning CommissionJ! ::I:; : effective as of July 1 , 1960. By motion of the Council i ::::: i the resignation was not accepted, and the City Manager f Guevara l ;x:x; ; ; was directed to send a letter to Mr. Ward informing him i Bierce ; 'I ; :x: i i of the Councilts action, and requesting him to remain on : Sonneman : : :xi ; : the Planning Commission. i McPherson k i :x: i
i Marina, Inc., stating they had received a letter from the : :::;I 11
i Carlsbad Boat & Ski Club wherein they stated the Council i I had approved their request to close the lagoon for their i ~1:~:
I special event on October 1st and 2nd. They felt this ::':: I ::::: i decision was extremely unfair to them and requested the f :;::I : Council to reconsider their decision to allow them to 4 ; ; I :.i i conduct their business in a normal manner. The City i ::::; i Manager reviewed the letters from the Carlsbad Boat : i+::
I 4; : and Ski Club, in which they stated they would submit a i ::::; ! pattern of the event on the lagoon. He stated he would : :;::I
; contact the Boat and Ski Club and request them to sub- i ::I:: i mit their pattern, designating the areas to be used, and : ;:p: ; also he would write the Outboard Marina, Inc. J inform- i ;;;::
I*lo i ing them of the pattern. I
1::::
I I ? I :*I:;
I d. Letter dated July 6, 1960 from Ray C. Prewitt, i ;: 1:;
;::
i stating he had received the letter from the City Attorney i *;!!! ; regarding the policy of the Council in regards to water i i:;:: i inclusion fees, and requested the matter placed on the : 1;11;
;l:ll : agenda of the next meeting. The Council was advised I
1;::s i that Mr. Prewitt had had a subdivision approved in i:;:: ;:::: : November, 1958, in Terramar, and that the policy for i ,#I:: i water inclusion fees was adopted subsequent to that time : ;::;:
; in March, 1959. According to the policy Mr. frewitt i :p::
i would have to pay the $100.00 per .acre inclusion fee. I I ;::;I :::I: : The City Attorney had informed Mr. frewitt that any i ;I::: I deviation from the policy would have to come from the ; ;:;:; : Council. I I ;;;:;
1 I I I:::*
t 111:: i M&. RAY PWEWITT, was present and stated that at the i ::pi
i time they purchased this property from Mr. Cannon it : I::::
: was served by the Terramar Water Company. Subsequen! l:gl; :;;:; i to the purchase of this property, they presented a sub- : ::;:: : division map and it was approved. Mr. Cannon was I I:::;
I:::*
I , \\ ',, '\ ', '.
I ',, ', 8 ', '\,'<,
I Na me '8 '\%, '8, 'St city council ', ' '\ " '\ '\
B I I I ; ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Guevara, I ip:
I I I I I
i APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
I I
I 11: I were approved as presented. : Bierce :x: :x; :
I I
I
41
1 I
I
I I
I
I I
::::;
I I I I I I b. Letter dated June 30, 1960 from C. C. Ward : :;::: :a:::
:::I,
I t I I I ::;:;
I c, Letter dated July 7, 1960 from the Outboard i ::;:;
:I1 ;;::!
l;ll
I
I
I I 1 I
B I al:,
I
1 I I ! !l*l:
I
I I 1 I
I I b I I mi 1- I
1 1 I I
I I I t 4 I I 1 I t 1 I I I I 4 1 I I I I I 4 I I I I. I I I I I I i I I i I I I I I I 9 I I I I I I I I I * I I 1 I I t I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 4 I I I I 1 I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I
I 1 \ I I I I I I I Dl
I i I I I I I 1 I 6 I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I i !
I
I
-2 - I t 9 I I I I
I r """"""""""""-1-""""""""""""""""""""""""~-
I present and he would like to have the Council hear from ! him as to the history of this water matter, I I
A map was presented for the Council's review that had i been prepared by the Carlsbad Mutual Water Company, ; showing certain areas cross-hatched, which represented i the areas that were not water stocked. According to the : policy set by the Council, areas either inside or outside i the incorporated limits of the City of Carlsbad that are : cross -hatched on the map shall pay an inclusion fee of i
$100.00 per acre or fractional part of an acre. However; this area was not shown on the map. I
MR. CANNON, was present and.presented a map of the i Terramar Water Company district, Mr. Cannon stated : at one time he and Mr. Ecke awned approximately 1600 ! acres and they had developed their own water company, : which was under the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities i Company. At the time the City purchzised the Terramar I Water Company they purchased all the assets and liabili- i ties, and all of this area was to be served as it had originally been served by the Terramar Water Company. i This subdivision was approved prior to the water inclu- i sion fee being established by the Council. I I
The Director of Finance stated that he was only ca'rrying i out the policy established by the Council in requesting ! this inclusion fee. .I I
After considerable discussion by the Council Cmn. Bier& stated that due to the fact that the City bought the assets i
and liabilities of the Terramar Water Company, and this : subdivision was approved prior to the policy being Setd. : he felt the inclusion.fee for the Terramar Water Cornpa& area as'shown on the map, should be waived. By motion i of the Council the inclusion fee to the areas of Terramar : which were originally purchased by the City and served i by the Terramar Water Co, were waived. t 1
e. A notice of application before the Public Utili- i ties Commission of the State of California filed by the ; Greyhound Corporation for an order authorizing increase4 in intrastate express charges and intrastate passenger ; fares, except commutation fares, was presented. The i City Attorney stated that she did not feel any action by : the Council was necessary. By common consent of the i Council the notice was ordered filed. I I
I t I
I t 1
I I
4 I
I I
I I
I I t f. Two requests for sewer connections were * I granted by the Council to the following persons, ifi accor4- ance with the Engineering Department's recommendation: I
I I I * 1. Robert L, Watson
2. Claude Helton I 1
OEtAL COMMUNICATIONS: I I
'The City Manager informed the Council two gentlemen i were present who wished to present a plan for the im- : provement of Grand Ave., westerly of Ocean Street, I b to allow entrance to their property from Grand Ave., which portion of Grand Avenue is unimproved at the present time.
MR, SALWYN presented drawings of a proposed entry I to their property, where they propose to build apartment4 on three levels, The drawing showed the improvement : of Grand Ave, west of Ocean street down to the entrance i of their apartments. I I
It was the feeling of the Council members this plan as :
1 I I
I I I
I I I I I I 4 I I 1
I I I
I 1 I
I
x,,. \%.8 . 8,)'' '. \\ ' I I
'\ , +.e' *.e;., 8t, q;,, :
;:;:I; I1
;::::I ;I:,::
/l:;l
$::I!
@:;;:I
;:8;;:
;I;::# ;::;:I
1:~l;: i;!;::
::;!
:::;,I :::::;
:;;I;* ;:;::: ;:4+ 11 ::::
:;I:#:
I:;':: :;::i: :;::;:
11 1::;::
::I::: I1
::;I 8
al#;:8
:;It': :;J:i;
:11:1; :::;I1
llal::
;:::It
/;I;;
:!I::: i:::;:
1::;:: ;'; I ; ; ;
::I::: ;::;;:
l;:l I1
::::I: Guevara ; i %xi ; : Bierce' i x: ;xi ; : Sonneman ; I !x: I I McPhersoni ; ; ' !xi I
;;:I
1;;;;;
:I )Itl1I 11
1:;:;;
1:;:::
ttl;:;
::;*:I ;:'I:: ;:I:*: ;;I:;:
;;ad:
*I:;:;
;::I18
I:#:::
'., , '. y'. \, '\,'., 'x, 88 '8 9 f i
N a me 8, '-$x '8, 'x@. : 88 8 '\ 3 ' '8 1
of \,& '0. 9\,+y?$$ : Member 's@\+9\,0.8 I ""- .-"""" """-,""" d ;lt;ll
i{ I;:;:
iiiiii
:lt118
:#I1
I,:, I
iiIii; I:
18
I1
;81,41 ;:;14:
Guevara i I i i i i Bierce !xi i 4 ; i Sonneman ; ; i 3 : tI , McPherson! :x:"; ; i
11 I::::( s* ::;:;: :::I:: ::;::: :::I:; ;::I;;
::I:::
::::I:
;#I:;;
;::bs d:::: ;:;:;:
:+:I; I,:;:'
I ;,; I ; : ::;i:: !::;:I ;:I::;
:;I::; *I :;:::; :*:::; ':::I;
::!I!*
I* 11
.
I I I I I I I I I -3-
I 1 I I I I f .
I mi I I I I I t ("""""-"""~"""""""""-..""""""~""""""""""""~- I i I I presented would only be benefiting this property owner, i : and that if this street were opened, it would have to be i i opened to the public. Also the plan as presented would : : not allow sufficient space for cars to turn around.
i MR. EDWARDS, the property owner, stated they had : I already received permission to use the street for access^. ; The question was raised as to who had given the permis-! i sion. I
1 I I 1 I
I I
, I I
I I t I 1 I I * I 1 I I I I I I I I I
I I I I t 1 I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
t
I
B
I I I I I I I I I I t I t s I I 1 * 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I 1 I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
The City Clerk advised the Council these gentlemen had : been granted a variance last December by the Planning i Commission to build on this property, At that time a : plan of the development was submitted, and it was the i decision of the Planning Commission they had notobjec- : tion to the improvement of this street, but that it was i up to the Engineering Department as to how it should 1 be improved. I I
The City Manager stated he had requested these gentle- i men to appear before the Cowrcil in order to have a clarification as to how they wished this street improved,! After considerable discussion by the Council the matter i was referred to the City Attorney, City Manager and : City Engineer for further consideration.
PUBLIC HEARING:
I I
t I
I I I I I I I I I I a. Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commisi sion denying a request for a variance - reduction of 1 I minimum required frontage from 60 feet to 25 feet, on I one lot, and 60 feet to 0 feet on a second lot; said 4 1 property located on Forest Ave, between Highland Dr. i and Olive Dr., - R. P. Shea. I I
The City Clerk certified as to proper notification and I publication, 8 I
The application was reviewed by the Clerk, wherein the i applicant requested a variance for reduction of frontage ! from 60' to 25' for one lot and 60' to 0' on a second lot : to allow a lot split.
Letter dated June 13, 1960 addressed to the City Clerk i from Mr. and Mrs. Russell Grosse, opposing the I 1 variance as they felt the request would tend to change i the character of the neighborhood and possibly reduce : property valuations; also favorable consideration to 1 this case would certainly open the way for variances not i not contemplated. I I
Petition signed by three property owners within a 300 i foot radius of the property involved was presented, I I certifying they reside within a 300' radius, and that theyi favor granting the variance to permit the lot split. I I
Res, #165 of the Planning Commission was reviewed, I wherein they denied the variance for the following I I reasons:
(1) The lots created would not meet the require- I ments of Ord. #9060, and would be in violationcf Ord. :
#9050. I I (2) The Planning Commission could not grant the : lot split unless Ord. #9050 were amended, I I
(3) The lots created by the granting of the variancb
I I
k 1
I I I I I
I I
I I I
I I t I
I I
would be detrimental to public welfare. I I
(4) The applicants purchased the property in 1 I May, 1959, and they were no doubt aware of the zoning I
I I I
I I I I
'\ \\ -\, ', '\ '. '\' '\ '\ '\, 8, ', .\
8, '\ '', \ \ ' 9 2 ,, " '. '. '\
\ x '8 \, '\ '\ N a me \x, '+$& \,\ 'a\ of '+Jf&,,@.+ \, '$!+A
Member \$j'@,*\&'d'\
I""""""""""" -"- 'II(1 ::::i p:;; :!;::
::: ::I;:
:I::: :$i
!;!:E
l:l: I:::: :;;:: :::;I
:::I, ::::: ::;i: :::;I
::;I: :;;::
:I:::
/I1: ;:I
::;I,
11;:
:;:::
;SI;; :I::: 4::: ;::I;
11)1( :!!;;
::,:I :;::;
:;:;: :;::: ::::;
:i::;
;:::I
;::I: /4:: I::::; /::;;
;::**I ;:::::
I**::;
I:;!;;
::*Id :::;:: :::;:;
;::I1 ::;::; lI;:
;:dl; ::;;;: $:;: (IlI
i::!:! ;::::; ;;;:;: ::::;:
:!;!:I 81
:::I:: I::!:: :;:;:: :I::;: i:;:;: ;:::;:
4;;:::
l:;:;t I* I+:::
;I::::
1::;;: ::;:;: ;;+: It1 :::::; i;:::;
1:;:;
;::#:I ;;:I::
,;;:I:
;:;:;I ::; :I;;::
:;I 11 :+::
:I::, 8;
:i:;:1 11:
:::a:: :;::::
:!!:!:
I:
1: 1;;:: 8:
11::; I:::;
t:1a41
;I,
D
D
I I I I I 1 I I !
I I I I I" I &
i
1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I t I b 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I + I 1 I I 1
I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I # 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I' 1 '\ 8. '8
I 8' I ', 8. 'q I 8. .' I \' I .' -4- I Name '8 : of
1 Member ."""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""~"""~"""-~""""""
1 restrictions on the property at the time of the purchase. i
MR. R. P. SHEA stated he was representing his parents, who were the owners of the property in question; His parents acquired this property in May of 1959. Therk is an existing building and corrigated shed on the proper: ty now; they have found the maintenance on the property I is too great, and feel the solution to the problem is to : divide the property, therefore, they were informed they i would have to apply for a variance in order to create : three parcels. If this variance were granted iR is their i intention to tear down the existing shed, pave the pro- : posed driveway so that it would be of duel use. Also i they propose to dedicate 10 feet on Forest Ave. How- : ever this plan has been turned down by the Planning Corn! mission for four reasons. It is their feeling the pro- : posed improvement would stabalize the property; the i proposed improvements with replacements would certaint ly create a much nicer appearance; and this parcel is I large enough for three lots. They are also mindful of : the fact there are similar cases in Carlsbad, and concur! that the Planning Commission and Council should have I control over these cases.
CHARLES COCKRAN, 131 1 Forest Ave., stated he lives across the street from this property, and all of i the lots on this street are at least 70' frontage. He I t would like to see all the property remain with a reason- i able frontage. 1 I
Mfi. GEISSWGER, 2370 Spruce Street, stated that when i they bought their property he canvassed the area for the ; Purpose of running a street t;hrough. His property has : a similar length and he would have liked to split his I I Property, but was informed that it would be impossible ; according to the ordinance. If this variance is allowed ; he will perhaps ask for a variance on his property.
I I I I
I 1 I I l e I
I I
I I I
I JMR. RUSSELL GROSSE, 2619 Highland, stated he was i still in accord with his original statement. He does not :
know the contents of the ordinance. However, he felt : the Planning Commission had the concern of the area as i a whole in denying this variance, and not an individual. I
Mayor Sonneman suggested the improvement of a street : with a cul-de-sac. Mr. Shea stated they had considered ! this, however, it would not be feasible due to the fact i the right of way requirements for a street is 50 feet. It I was then suggested that a street be put through the I entire length of the property, and Mr. Shea stated the : property could not stand the expense of this type of im- i provement. I I
I I
I
I
Cmn. Bierce stated the Council is well aware of the fact that there are many such parcels such as this. Undir the present ordinance the Council cannot grant a varianc?. The present Council and the present Planning Commis- ; sion will definitely give property such as this considera-! tion, but it will have to be by ordinance. I I
The City Attorney stated that it would be impossible for i the Flanning Commission or Council to grant this variande under the present ordinances. If the Council desires : to grant such variances the ordinances will have to be i amended. I I
The public hearing was closed at 8: 15 P. M. I I
After discussion by the Council it was their decision : they concur with the findings of the Planning Commission; and that the following resolution be adopted: I I
I I I
I
I I I
I f t
I I I I I
\..
"8 '8, '*,", 93
\\
'8 '\ '\
\ \' .\ '\ x . ' ' '\\
''+&+\ ' '& '\\ *?&, .,L$p4,;--,;%+
:si;: i:;::
#;;:I I:;::
:,,I,
1::::
1":: !!I:;
i:n:s 11;
I:::; :i::; p::; i::;: ;;:::
:!I:; :a1
1::s:
;*I:: 4::; :::II ii::;
:;;la I:::: :: ::;:: It*
1'::;
::I
1::::
hl:;
;:::I
;;:I:
;l::1 ::: ;:
;;I:& $8: i;::: ;: :#I
:!I :i: I y;; I; $1 I:; i::;;
:::I,
1:::: i::;: ::::; ip:: :;'I; :;:::
I;:: i!;:;
:I;:; ;: ;: ::I
1:::: ii!i:
*I::;
I 4; ;;:ll iili; 81
!:::I
;:::I
l;;l; :::i: I1
;;I 1:: I:::! :::::
ii:Il ;:: 4;
a:, #I I!: :::i; :;I:; :;::; :;::; $::: !!:
:!Il; ::ii:
:;::I
::'I:
:I::: ::;:i I:;:: I:;:;
1:::: :;I:; ::;:; ;:I:;
1';::
::::I
::I;:
."""""""" \o '@ ,.e$ ',dt
;;l;l
I It
81
11
l!!l!
B
B
w
1
I
1
8
I I' I x, ', '8 ', '% .'
I > , '\ '\\ '\ '\ " I '\ '\ '- '. ', '* I I , " 94
-5- . ''\ ", 'x, '\ '\ ''
I 1 Name '\\ '*$, '\ '\ 'd* '& I of "$+'O,, 'O+, ',*@,+,;p ' 8
t :-."""~""""""~"""""""""""""""""""~""~""""~~"-""""-"",":-~--~"-- I Member ,o.o.c'\&*b.
I Ill) i Res, #66. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ; ::I;:
I ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PO€tTIO@ Guevara / i :xi I : OF LOT 1, CEDAR HILL ADDITION, ACCORDING TO: Bierce :x/ :xi ; 1 MAP THEREOF NO. 532 IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAI),Sonneman i I ;x: i i was adopted by title only and further reading waived. : McPherson ; :x! xi ;
: PLANNING:
I
: OF THE CITY OF CARISBAD DENYING A VARIANCE: :::I,
:I:::
I I I I :*I 1 I I /;::
I$:;:
l a. Tentative map of Las Flores Place, The I I::;, @'I,: : tentative map was presented for the Councills review. I ::I,: I I :*::I ! iEes. #I68 of the Planning Commission was presented i ;;::I 1 1:: i wherein they recommended approval of the map, subject i ;I;::
; to certain conditions. The City Manager informed the : :II:: $1
i Council the subdivider had taken exception to some of i ;::I: : the conditions, namely, 6'' water main installation on ; 1:::: I Forest Ave., sidewalks in the subdivision, street trees i :fl;l
,::I:
1lI;l ; and the placement of utilities poles in the street when ; :::I: i easements were provided for across the rear of the I property. Mr. Geissinger was in and the matter of street! :Ill : trees had been worked out; as far as the placement of the i i poles in the easements proGided for, the City would I ; notify the utility company the poles were to be placed in i i the easements provided for.
i Discussion was given as to the recommendation by the i : Engineering Department that a 6" water main be installed I i;::: i on Forest Ave. from Spruce street to Cipriano, which is i : the cul-de-sac and street provided for in the subdivision, : ::i:;
:I i The Council was informed that a 4'' water main had been : ;;:I; : installed approximately two years ago from Olive to Sprucb, 1;;:: i and the subdivider objected to having to install another : ::(I:
: line, as he felt he should be allowed to tie into this 4'' line: ;l::l
I) ;::r: i to serve his subdivision. I 1::::
# I ::'I; : MR. GEESINGER, one of the representatives of Allnav, i ;I::, i Inc. , subdivider, stated he felt there should be a 6" line : ::i:i
: on Spruce Street, but could see no reason for having to : $1::
i install a 6'' line onfii-&. when a 4" line had been installed! :::ii
~::~l ; about 18 months ago, Also they had no objection to install! I!;:: i ing sidewalks on Spruce and Forest Ave., but did object : 1,::; : to installing sidewalks within the subdivision, I :;::;
I ::;::
I I i:::: : After considerable discussion it was the concensus of i :::i: i the Council that a 4" pipe was sufficient for Forest Ave. i ::::i : and that the subdivider could tie into this line; that a 6" ; ::!:I
I line would have to be installed on Spruce Street; and I ;:I::
I ::::: i sidewalks would be required on Forest Ave. and Spruce i 18) ;:;:I : Street, but would not be required within the subdivision, i I:':;
I I I i;::: i The following resolution was presented for the Council's : e ::;
:::It i review: I I ::;:i 8 1 I :.I
i Res. #665. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i Guevara : k :x: i ;:I;I
I CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING TENTA- : Bierce :xi :xi : / ;&lH&P OF LAS FLORES PLACE SUBDIVISION, i Sonneman I 8 ix; I : was adopted by title only and further reading waived. I McPherson i i !x: i
; A short recess was declared by the Mayor at 9: 19 P. M. i :ir;; i The meeting reconvened at 9: 37 P. M. I
i ENGINEERING:
I I ;:/I ;is::
I I I I
I I I I
I
1
l)(lI
I I ::;:i ;in::
1 ::;;: ;; 1;::
I !i:$
I I ::i;:
:::I:
:I:::
I*;:;
4l;;
9 :I:
I
I 1
I
I 4
It
I I
I
I I
I I
I I I I* b I tal;;
;;::;
I I ;;:::
I I ::i::
I ;:I:;
I I 1::;
I a, 1911 Act proceedings - Carlsbad Blvd. Assess. : :;; :;
::::I :::::
I
0 I
& I
I I
I : Dist, NG 5-3959. The City Attorney advised the Council i i the assessment roll for the district had been filed with i ::::i: : the City Clerk by the Engineer of Work, and it was noi.;r i i::::; i necessary to give notice of the filing and of a hearing. 1 I ;:!:;: : The following resolution was presented: 11 I I 0 :::,:; ;:;:I'
I I I I 1 :#I 1;:;
I I I s :::::I I
I 1411:'
I : l!l:'!
I I I I I
I I I I
I' I \, ', '8 '\ ', .'
I \, ', '8, ', 't '*
I I , ',, x* '\ '\ " I '. ' " 95
; *f ''.+$@, ' 'ti!' '.fii.*&'+*
I ?::: #I
I
-6 - "\ '\\ '\ 8, *\ '\
Bj 1 N a me '\ q6, ",?&
'""""""""""""""""""""""""-"~""""""""""""~"""""""""~""~~". : Member ,o~o..~O\,o\~
! Res. #662. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF i {;:;; ; - OF CARLSBAD, DIRECTING NOTICE OF : 11;;1 i FILING OF ASSESSMENT AND OF THE TIME AND i Guevara ;x; ' : i i PLACE OF HEARING THEKEOF, for Assessment :x; I : Bierce I :x;x: i : District No, 5-1959, was adopted by title only and i Sonneman : ; !x; ; i further reading waived. : McPherson j : :x: ;
I I 1'4:
I b. Report on Highlands Drainage District, The : 41:;
t Assistant Engineer informed the Council the estimated i :::e, 1:::; i cost for the main trunk line from Highland :>ive and ,Par? 8"::
i Drive to the Agua Hedionda lagoon would be $100,366.00. : ::::I :'pi i The entire district would cover 481 acres; the estimated i ::I; I$ I cost per acre is $209,00; figuring three lots per acre, ; :;I::
; estimated cost of a 15,800 sq. ft, lot - $105,00; 10,000 i ::i:i i:$;
: portion of the fine were spread over the entire district, \ ::::I
1;;u: i at such time as the remaining portion of the main trunk : ::;:: : line were constructed, it would have to be spread over th$ :;:I:
"1:: : entire district. I I ;:I1: ::;I
I I 4; i Discussion was given as to the cost of the entire main ! : trunk line, The estimated cost would be $253,926.00; i jfh;
,e::: i approximate cost per acre - $528.00; three lots per acre,: ii'll : 15,000 sq. feet - $264.00; 10,000 sq. ft. $176.00; and i :::
::;I, i 7500 sq. ft. - $132.00. It was pointed out that the con- : :::\: I struction cost would be less costly if the entire project i ;::;:
I were constmcted at one time. I ::::i
I ;:;*I
I I I 1:;:: i The City Attorney requested the matter turned over to i :I::;
: her as to the legal proceedings involved for the district. 1 ::i+ :: 1;
I I ::::; : HARBOR COMMISSION: 1 I ;;I::
I I :;::;
l a. Two appointments to Harbor Commission. The i :;:;:
::
SI
I I
I
I Ill
i Sq. ft. lot - $70.00; 7500 sq, ft. lot - $53.00, If this :
I I Iiiif
I I
I 1
I
I 1
I
(::I: I Mayor informed the Council three names had been sub- i ;i;ii i mitted to her to fill the vacancies - Richard Scheetz, I k 1:1:: : Frank Ness and Max Miesse. Cmn, McPherson stated i :1::1 i that he had not contacted Mr. Miesse personally to see if ; : he wished to serve, but felt he was qualified for the 1 I Ill i appointment. Mayor Sonneman stated she would contact ; : Mr. Miesse to see if he would be willing to serve. Mayo< 41:; 1:: i Sonneman stated that with the consent of the Council she ;
I would like to appoint Mr. Richard Scheetz to fill one of i ;tl:l
i the vacancies, By motion of the Council the appointment : Guevara !x ! i xi :
f of Mr. Richard Scheetz to the Harbor Commission was i Bierce : jxjx: I i given the consent of the Council, which term expires : Sonneman : : :xi : : January, 1964. ! McPherson! i !xi I i PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSIQN:
i sion, Mayor Sonneman stated three names had been sub- i ::i:: i mitted to fill the vacancies on the Public Works Commis- : :;I::; : sion, and with the consent of the Council she would like I i to appoint Mr. George Grober and Mr, James Costigan. : ; By motion of the Council the appointma t of Mr. George I Guevara ;x : i x: ; ; i Grober, term expiring January, 1961, and Mr, James : Bierce : ; :xi : I ; Costigan, term expiring January, 1964, was approved i Sonneman ; i i x: i I I by the Council. : McPhersoni :xi xi ; i
t t81:l;
I 1::I;I
I:::: ::r:i ;::I: ;::
::;Il ::::I
I I I I :::I:
I a. Three appointments to Public Works Commis- i la::: :;::I
:I:::' $1;:) ;::::i
I ::;;:
I ::;:; I I I
I
1 B 1 -NEW BUSINESS:
I k ::/;8
I I :::;:I
:::::I
1:;:;:
I
1
l a. Resolution No. 66% declaring weeds and trash i ;I:#:# :j;::;
I I 1 ; : i I i,;
I I 1::;:;
I I :I::;:
I :i::::
i a public nuisance. The City Attorney informed the : Council this was the first step authorizing the abatement : : of weeds and trash. The following resolution was pre- I :8l:l: :::;:I ! sented for their review:
i Res, #663. A RESOLUTION OF @HE CITY OF : CARLSBAD DECMmG WEEDS AND TRASH. UPON i i CERTAIN PROPERTUES .TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE, i 4:;:;:
! ! !lI!l!
I 1
I I
I
I(
I :::;:;
:::I:I
I
I
- c 5
I I I I
*' t \\ ', .I, \, '\ .\
I 9 I I I ', \\ '\ 8 8, '\,",
,\ tb4
i Name '-\"$&,'\, '.$.
, \ '8 " \\,'\,
I I ',\'X, '\\ *\ 9 6
-?$@&-$,;%&
i:::i
I I I -7 - Di ,""""-"""""""""""-""""""""""""""~"""-*"""~~"~"""""~"-:-~"~"" 1 : Member of ,080.pp\,0',,
8$,0\ \ \?%
I I I : AND DESCRIBIIVG SUCH PROPERTY; ORDEBmG THE i 1:: I I PUBLIC WORKS DIWECTOlZ TO ABATE SUCH I
:::::
: NUISANCES, SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEAR-: Guevara : ix :x: ; :31:;
i ING OF OBJECTIONS TO THE PiWPOSED ORDEnE OF : Bierce : : :xi :
1 ABATEMENT, was. adopted by title only and further i Sonneman ; 88 ; :x: i i reading waived. : McPherson :x: :xi :
I 1 I::#:
I b. Res. #664 - iZesolution of Apgreciation for I I :::::
:::it 11 I Clyde L. Jenken. At the previous meeting the Council i I:::: i requested a resolution of appreciation prepared for Mr. : ::::: : &.&en, City Engineer, who submitted his resignation : p:,: 11 ;: ; effective as of July 31, 1960. The following resolution i ;'p; i was submitted 5 I I:'::
I I I I i:::: i Res, #664. A i3ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i ;::,I
: "CITY OF CARLSBAD, EXTbEXDING APFi3E- I ::iii
::,:I i CIATION TO CLYDE L. JENKEN FOR SEAVICES : Guevara ; i !x: : : RENDElcZED AS CITY ENGINEE3 OF THE CITY OF i Bierce bi :x: t* i
i CARLSBAD, was adopted by title only and further reading Sonneman 1 ; :xi : : waived. I McPherson i !x :x: i
"1::
: CITY ATTOIZNEY'S 8EPORT: ::::;
t I I I iii:: i The City Attorney informed the Council the State Board i !;I:: ::::: : of Equalization removed the tax exemption from the I 1 1::: i Carlsbad by the Sea, as they felt this was not a charitable: i:::;
: organization. The tax revenue from this property for the i ::::;
l:@tl i City is approximately $16,000. I i:i:; 1 I 1:::: ! The Council was advised that the City Attorney is working! :::::
t on a new business license ordinance and sign ordinance, ; ;:+ :I::; *I
I 1:;:: 16 i CITY MANAGER'S kEEPQRT I I ::;:;
I ::;I, $1 i The City Manager informed the Council he had received i :*I:;
1::;: @SII : a notice of a meeting to be held July 27, 1960, to discuss i ii::: i the North County sewer report. Also a notice of a meet- : : ing to be held by the Board of Supervisors on August 8, i ::::I
;l:Il ! 1960, for the same purpose, It was suggested that a t I
I:::*
11 1: : meeting of the Council be held prior to August 8, 1960, i ;I:;, ::it:
: committee be appointed, including some of the members ; 4;:: i of the Council and perhaps some of the citizens of I I ii I :I: i Carlsbad. It was agreed that an adjourned meeting be i :: 1: : held July 26, 1960 at 7:30 P. M. to discuss the report, i 8I:;l i A letter had been received from the property owner whom:
i had been contacted in regards to selling his property on I :I::; i State Street for street purposes, and he is not interested i ::::I i in selling his property at this time due to the fact he has ; : two other businesses in mind €or the location. I
i Jack Bsuna, Fireman, has requested that the Council i i give consideration to a meritorious pin for employees : : who have served five years or more, and perhaps a I I ::::;I 8~ i dinner to make the awards, Mayor Sonneman stated she ! 1:;::l : felt the dinner was superfluous. The Council approved i i the meritorious pins. I :::::i
: The Mayor asked if Harding Street was listed as one of :
i the streets to be rehabilitated, and she was informed i ;l::l; ; that it was on the list. I I ::;;:;
I :I : Planning Commission, I 1:::::
: Mayor Sonneman stated that due to a vacancy on the I I :::;:I i Planing Commission, she would like to appoint Mr.
1 G. A, Hardwick, who is a retired Lt. Colonel. The t I t::l;l i Mayor further stated that a five-man commission had : :::::I : been discussed at the last meeting, however, she did not i i feel this was the time, as the ordinance would have to : :;i:;:
1l 11;
1
I
I I
I
I I t
I I I
I
I
I
'I 11
I I
I I
I I
I
i to go over this report. Cmn. Bierce suggested that a i ;I::;
1:::; !I:;: :;::i
::::t i:ii:
t I I ;:::: :::I:
I-:: ::::; l;ll
ll;:l;
I I
I
*
I
i:I::;
;::;:; ;::;:; ::a::, $1 'I
$1 I::;
I 1
I I I I B;
I
1 I
I
I I
1 I i!::::
I I :4;;; I
::::ti
:;I:;:
:;::I:
I I I I!::::
:!:!I.
I
I
I
1 I
* r
4 .c
I I I 1 4 I
I' I \\ x, .\ ' ' . , ,, \, '* '8 " I
I I 8, \ '88 '8, '8 "
4 I
8 ' , 8888\, 97
: of .$\O', ',h 80 8 4' - 8p+8,
I -6- I
', '8 ', 8 \ 8 \ 8 \,'\ 8 4 I Bj i Na me '.,'?@& '.8 %*
1 Member ,o~,o.,~~&~,O'~ :"~""""""""""""""""""""""""""*""""~"""""~"""""""""""~~""
: be amended if this decision were made, and she does
y!;, pt+
1 ;I::: 'I
4 I ;:*I; I
NSERT - i not have sufficient information as to a five-man commis- : ;:ii:
,. ' r I sion to make a stand. Perhaps in April, 1961, would be I :ii;i
i the time to make this effective as there would be terms ; ::1:1
811 81
i expiring at that time. Cmn. Bierce stated that he would i 11;
i go along with the above, however, he felt the members : Guevara ;x : i xi ; : should be retained according to their qualifications. By i Bierce : ; ;XI ; i motion of the Council Mr. G. A, Hardwick's appointment : Sonneman : : :x: : ; to the Planning Commission was approved. I McPherson i !x :xi i
: PAYMENT OF BILLS AND RATIFICATION OF i FAYROLL:
i Authorization was given for the payment of bills for the i i general expenses in the amount of $9,392. '71, and for the : Guevara Sr i :xi ; : Water Department in the amount of $8, 315.34, from ; Bierce ; : :x: : : July 5, 1960 to July 19, 1960, as certified by the Directos Sonneman i i i xi i i of Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee. i McPherson i :x :x; i
i Ratification of the payroll for the first half of July, 1960 i Guevara ; ix ;x: l I was given in the amount of $13,003.00 as certified by the ; Bierce : : ;x: : : Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing Com- i Sonneman i i i x: i i mittee, ; McPherson :x: ;xi ;
I 1111) i ADJOUBNMENT:
I ;::;I [ By motion of the Council the meeting was adjourned to i Guevara i i I xi i : July 28, 1960 at 7: 30 P. M, in the Council Chambers. i Bierce : jxix: j
I : Sonneman : ; ;xi ;
I I i McPhersonixi :x; ;
I ::::: 1:
% 1:::;
1 ::;
I 1 :;:::
I :-:;
I I I 4 i+;I
I I I /:e: :::::
; I " 4'4 / 0 ;yr 4.J 1. % ./ >5 @&/< I I 1:;::
I :;;:;
1 ::;:; / Esty CZ:cf"rkADAMS I I :;:I:
I 4 !x;;
I asked I I ::::;
i INSERT Mayor-Sonnemadthat a: correction be made on i ;:::I ;:::I i Page. 8, line 2, changing the word "information" to I ::;:; I'll;
I "justification". 1 ;:::r
I 1 ,::e:
I 1::::
::I;: :;*
I I 4 1 )*I
1 ;::;I
I :;:::
I pi;:
I I lla:I i:;;:
::I:;
I I
I I
f 1 I I 1::11 pl::
I1
I I
1 I I 4::; i::::
I I
I
I
I I
t
I
I : The meeting was declared adjourned at 10: 30 P. M.
i Respectfully submitted,
I I I
11
I I
: ,/ .'7 I
I L'./ /-
I
I
I GAR
I
I
I
I I t
I I
I
I I I
I I i:;::
I I :::::
I I I:::; I$
I I i:: ;:
I I I I ;::::
I I la::
I I I i::;:
I i;:::
I I I 1;;::
4 I I ;I;::
I I I l i:: 8:
I I I ,;::I
I I I :;::; 8:
I I ii;:;
I I jiiii
4 I i;:::
I # :::
I I I ::/I
I I 1:;:;
1 I i;;::
1 I,,:,
I I ::::i
I i:::' Io
I :::::
I I :::::
I 1 1::::
I I I I ii::;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I 1;;1
I I
1
I 1
I
I I I
I 'Il(l
I I ;;lll
I 1:;::
I 111:1
I 1 I
I
I
I
I
Di I
I I
I
(It1)
I
4
a
1 t I
I
). I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4 I
I III'I I I 8 ::I::