Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-07-19; City Council; Minutesa '? I I 1 *,\' 8 b' I I I i CITY OF CARLSBAD : Date of Meeting: July 19, 1960 $ ', + '8, '\ '. 9 0 I Minutes of: : Time of Meeting: 7:OO P. M. : of ",.rr,O', , 8PA i Place of Meeting: Council Chambers '?$*>&,4%& ~""""-""""""""""""""-""""""~~"""""""""""~~"""""""""~""~"~, i Member ,080,g.p\4' I ::I f Bierce, Sonneman and McPherson. Also present were i &:: i City Manager Slater and City Attorney Hayes. I I ;:e:: ;a::, 1:::: i INVOCATION was offered by Mayor Sonneman. I I ;::I: I I I I I;*:; t I :a::: I I I ;:::I )I)! I I I !:;:: l a. Minutes of the regular meeting of July 5, 1860 i Guevara : ix !X: : I i Sonneman : : ;x: i I I ; McPhersonI : :x; : 1 I!' I b. Minutes of the adjourned meeting of July 12, i Guevara i i ;xi ; ::i : 1960 were approved as presented, i Bierce +: !x; ; I : Sonneman I : :x: : I I I i McPherson i !xixi ; I I "a8; I CORRESPONDENCE: I I ::::: ::;I, s I I I ::::: 1 a. Letter dated July 7, 1960 from Edward J. I I i:: ;; I Lawson, declining his appointment to the Planning CommiF- 1';:; $1 i sion, and declaring his resignation from the Public Works: ; Cornmission effective immediately was presented. By I ;:::I i motion of the Council Mr. Lawson's resignation from the ; Guevara i ; i xi ; l;ll: : Public Works Commission was accepted, and a letter of i Bierce fxi :x: : i appreciation and thanks was directed to Mr. Lawson for : Sonneman i ; :x! i : his services on the Public Works Commission. i McPherson ; jx:x; i Ilt)I i submitting his resignation from the Planning CommissionJ! ::I:; : effective as of July 1 , 1960. By motion of the Council i ::::: i the resignation was not accepted, and the City Manager f Guevara l ;x:x; ; ; was directed to send a letter to Mr. Ward informing him i Bierce ; 'I ; :x: i i of the Councilts action, and requesting him to remain on : Sonneman : : :xi ; : the Planning Commission. i McPherson k i :x: i i Marina, Inc., stating they had received a letter from the : :::;I 11 i Carlsbad Boat & Ski Club wherein they stated the Council i I had approved their request to close the lagoon for their i ~1:~: I special event on October 1st and 2nd. They felt this ::':: I ::::: i decision was extremely unfair to them and requested the f :;::I : Council to reconsider their decision to allow them to 4 ; ; I :.i i conduct their business in a normal manner. The City i ::::; i Manager reviewed the letters from the Carlsbad Boat : i+:: I 4; : and Ski Club, in which they stated they would submit a i ::::; ! pattern of the event on the lagoon. He stated he would : :;::I ; contact the Boat and Ski Club and request them to sub- i ::I:: i mit their pattern, designating the areas to be used, and : ;:p: ; also he would write the Outboard Marina, Inc. J inform- i ;;;:: I*lo i ing them of the pattern. I 1:::: I I ? I :*I:; I d. Letter dated July 6, 1960 from Ray C. Prewitt, i ;: 1:; ;:: i stating he had received the letter from the City Attorney i *;!!! ; regarding the policy of the Council in regards to water i i:;:: i inclusion fees, and requested the matter placed on the : 1;11; ;l:ll : agenda of the next meeting. The Council was advised I 1;::s i that Mr. Prewitt had had a subdivision approved in i:;:: ;:::: : November, 1958, in Terramar, and that the policy for i ,#I:: i water inclusion fees was adopted subsequent to that time : ;::;: ; in March, 1959. According to the policy Mr. frewitt i :p:: i would have to pay the $100.00 per .acre inclusion fee. I I ;::;I :::I: : The City Attorney had informed Mr. frewitt that any i ;I::: I deviation from the policy would have to come from the ; ;:;:; : Council. I I ;;;:; 1 I I I:::* t 111:: i M&. RAY PWEWITT, was present and stated that at the i ::pi i time they purchased this property from Mr. Cannon it : I:::: : was served by the Terramar Water Company. Subsequen! l:gl; :;;:; i to the purchase of this property, they presented a sub- : ::;:: : division map and it was approved. Mr. Cannon was I I:::; I:::* I , \\ ',, '\ ', '. I ',, ', 8 ', '\,'<, I Na me '8 '\%, '8, 'St city council ', ' '\ " '\ '\ B I I I ; ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Guevara, I ip: I I I I I i APPROVAL OF MINUTES: I I I 11: I were approved as presented. : Bierce :x: :x; : I I I 41 1 I I I I I I I ::::; I I I I I I b. Letter dated June 30, 1960 from C. C. Ward : :;::: :a::: :::I, I t I I I ::;:; I c, Letter dated July 7, 1960 from the Outboard i ::;:; :I1 ;;::! l;ll I I I I 1 I B I al:, I 1 I I ! !l*l: I I I 1 I I I b I I mi 1- I 1 1 I I I I I t 4 I I 1 I t 1 I I I I 4 1 I I I I I 4 I I I I. I I I I I I i I I i I I I I I I 9 I I I I I I I I I * I I 1 I I t I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 4 I I I I 1 I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I 1 \ I I I I I I I Dl I i I I I I I 1 I 6 I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I i ! I I -2 - I t 9 I I I I I r """"""""""""-1-""""""""""""""""""""""""~- I present and he would like to have the Council hear from ! him as to the history of this water matter, I I A map was presented for the Council's review that had i been prepared by the Carlsbad Mutual Water Company, ; showing certain areas cross-hatched, which represented i the areas that were not water stocked. According to the : policy set by the Council, areas either inside or outside i the incorporated limits of the City of Carlsbad that are : cross -hatched on the map shall pay an inclusion fee of i $100.00 per acre or fractional part of an acre. However; this area was not shown on the map. I MR. CANNON, was present and.presented a map of the i Terramar Water Company district, Mr. Cannon stated : at one time he and Mr. Ecke awned approximately 1600 ! acres and they had developed their own water company, : which was under the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities i Company. At the time the City purchzised the Terramar I Water Company they purchased all the assets and liabili- i ties, and all of this area was to be served as it had originally been served by the Terramar Water Company. i This subdivision was approved prior to the water inclu- i sion fee being established by the Council. I I The Director of Finance stated that he was only ca'rrying i out the policy established by the Council in requesting ! this inclusion fee. .I I After considerable discussion by the Council Cmn. Bier& stated that due to the fact that the City bought the assets i and liabilities of the Terramar Water Company, and this : subdivision was approved prior to the policy being Setd. : he felt the inclusion.fee for the Terramar Water Cornpa& area as'shown on the map, should be waived. By motion i of the Council the inclusion fee to the areas of Terramar : which were originally purchased by the City and served i by the Terramar Water Co, were waived. t 1 e. A notice of application before the Public Utili- i ties Commission of the State of California filed by the ; Greyhound Corporation for an order authorizing increase4 in intrastate express charges and intrastate passenger ; fares, except commutation fares, was presented. The i City Attorney stated that she did not feel any action by : the Council was necessary. By common consent of the i Council the notice was ordered filed. I I I t I I t 1 I I 4 I I I I I I I t f. Two requests for sewer connections were * I granted by the Council to the following persons, ifi accor4- ance with the Engineering Department's recommendation: I I I I * 1. Robert L, Watson 2. Claude Helton I 1 OEtAL COMMUNICATIONS: I I 'The City Manager informed the Council two gentlemen i were present who wished to present a plan for the im- : provement of Grand Ave., westerly of Ocean Street, I b to allow entrance to their property from Grand Ave., which portion of Grand Avenue is unimproved at the present time. MR, SALWYN presented drawings of a proposed entry I to their property, where they propose to build apartment4 on three levels, The drawing showed the improvement : of Grand Ave, west of Ocean street down to the entrance i of their apartments. I I It was the feeling of the Council members this plan as : 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I x,,. \%.8 . 8,)'' '. \\ ' I I '\ , +.e' *.e;., 8t, q;,, : ;:;:I; I1 ;::::I ;I:,:: /l:;l $::I! @:;;:I ;:8;;: ;I;::# ;::;:I 1:~l;: i;!;:: ::;! :::;,I :::::; :;;I;* ;:;::: ;:4+ 11 :::: :;I:#: I:;':: :;::i: :;::;: 11 1::;:: ::I::: I1 ::;I 8 al#;:8 :;It': :;J:i; :11:1; :::;I1 llal:: ;:::It /;I;; :!I::: i:::;: 1::;:: ;'; I ; ; ; ::I::: ;::;;: l;:l I1 ::::I: Guevara ; i %xi ; : Bierce' i x: ;xi ; : Sonneman ; I !x: I I McPhersoni ; ; ' !xi I ;;:I 1;;;;; :I )Itl1I 11 1:;:;; 1:;::: ttl;:; ::;*:I ;:'I:: ;:I:*: ;;I:;: ;;ad: *I:;:; ;::I18 I:#::: '., , '. y'. \, '\,'., 'x, 88 '8 9 f i N a me 8, '-$x '8, 'x@. : 88 8 '\ 3 ' '8 1 of \,& '0. 9\,+y?$$ : Member 's@\+9\,0.8 I ""- .-"""" """-,""" d ;lt;ll i{ I;:;: iiiiii :lt118 :#I1 I,:, I iiIii; I: 18 I1 ;81,41 ;:;14: Guevara i I i i i i Bierce !xi i 4 ; i Sonneman ; ; i 3 : tI , McPherson! :x:"; ; i 11 I::::( s* ::;:;: :::I:: ::;::: :::I:; ;::I;; ::I::: ::::I: ;#I:;; ;::bs d:::: ;:;:;: :+:I; I,:;:' I ;,; I ; : ::;i:: !::;:I ;:I::; :;I::; *I :;:::; :*:::; ':::I; ::!I!* I* 11 . I I I I I I I I I -3- I 1 I I I I f . I mi I I I I I t ("""""-"""~"""""""""-..""""""~""""""""""""~- I i I I presented would only be benefiting this property owner, i : and that if this street were opened, it would have to be i i opened to the public. Also the plan as presented would : : not allow sufficient space for cars to turn around. i MR. EDWARDS, the property owner, stated they had : I already received permission to use the street for access^. ; The question was raised as to who had given the permis-! i sion. I 1 I I 1 I I I , I I I I t I 1 I I * I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I t 1 I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I B I I I I I I I I I I t I t s I I 1 * 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I The City Clerk advised the Council these gentlemen had : been granted a variance last December by the Planning i Commission to build on this property, At that time a : plan of the development was submitted, and it was the i decision of the Planning Commission they had notobjec- : tion to the improvement of this street, but that it was i up to the Engineering Department as to how it should 1 be improved. I I The City Manager stated he had requested these gentle- i men to appear before the Cowrcil in order to have a clarification as to how they wished this street improved,! After considerable discussion by the Council the matter i was referred to the City Attorney, City Manager and : City Engineer for further consideration. PUBLIC HEARING: I I t I I I I I I I I I I I a. Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commisi sion denying a request for a variance - reduction of 1 I minimum required frontage from 60 feet to 25 feet, on I one lot, and 60 feet to 0 feet on a second lot; said 4 1 property located on Forest Ave, between Highland Dr. i and Olive Dr., - R. P. Shea. I I The City Clerk certified as to proper notification and I publication, 8 I The application was reviewed by the Clerk, wherein the i applicant requested a variance for reduction of frontage ! from 60' to 25' for one lot and 60' to 0' on a second lot : to allow a lot split. Letter dated June 13, 1960 addressed to the City Clerk i from Mr. and Mrs. Russell Grosse, opposing the I 1 variance as they felt the request would tend to change i the character of the neighborhood and possibly reduce : property valuations; also favorable consideration to 1 this case would certainly open the way for variances not i not contemplated. I I Petition signed by three property owners within a 300 i foot radius of the property involved was presented, I I certifying they reside within a 300' radius, and that theyi favor granting the variance to permit the lot split. I I Res, #165 of the Planning Commission was reviewed, I wherein they denied the variance for the following I I reasons: (1) The lots created would not meet the require- I ments of Ord. #9060, and would be in violationcf Ord. : #9050. I I (2) The Planning Commission could not grant the : lot split unless Ord. #9050 were amended, I I (3) The lots created by the granting of the variancb I I k 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I would be detrimental to public welfare. I I (4) The applicants purchased the property in 1 I May, 1959, and they were no doubt aware of the zoning I I I I I I I I '\ \\ -\, ', '\ '. '\' '\ '\ '\, 8, ', .\ 8, '\ '', \ \ ' 9 2 ,, " '. '. '\ \ x '8 \, '\ '\ N a me \x, '+$& \,\ 'a\ of '+Jf&,,@.+ \, '$!+A Member \$j'@,*\&'d'\ I""""""""""" -"- 'II(1 ::::i p:;; :!;:: ::: ::I;: :I::: :$i !;!:E l:l: I:::: :;;:: :::;I :::I, ::::: ::;i: :::;I ::;I: :;;:: :I::: /I1: ;:I ::;I, 11;: :;::: ;SI;; :I::: 4::: ;::I; 11)1( :!!;; ::,:I :;::; :;:;: :;::: ::::; :i::; ;:::I ;::I: /4:: I::::; /::;; ;::**I ;::::: I**::; I:;!;; ::*Id :::;:: :::;:; ;::I1 ::;::; lI;: ;:dl; ::;;;: $:;: (IlI i::!:! ;::::; ;;;:;: ::::;: :!;!:I 81 :::I:: I::!:: :;:;:: :I::;: i:;:;: ;:::;: 4;;::: l:;:;t I* I+::: ;I:::: 1::;;: ::;:;: ;;+: It1 :::::; i;:::; 1:;:; ;::#:I ;;:I:: ,;;:I: ;:;:;I ::; :I;;:: :;I 11 :+:: :I::, 8; :i:;:1 11: :::a:: :;:::: :!!:!: I: 1: 1;;:: 8: 11::; I:::; t:1a41 ;I, D D I I I I I 1 I I ! I I I I I" I & i 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I t I b 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I + I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I # 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' 1 '\ 8. '8 I 8' I ', 8. 'q I 8. .' I \' I .' -4- I Name '8 : of 1 Member ."""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""~"""~"""-~"""""" 1 restrictions on the property at the time of the purchase. i MR. R. P. SHEA stated he was representing his parents, who were the owners of the property in question; His parents acquired this property in May of 1959. Therk is an existing building and corrigated shed on the proper: ty now; they have found the maintenance on the property I is too great, and feel the solution to the problem is to : divide the property, therefore, they were informed they i would have to apply for a variance in order to create : three parcels. If this variance were granted iR is their i intention to tear down the existing shed, pave the pro- : posed driveway so that it would be of duel use. Also i they propose to dedicate 10 feet on Forest Ave. How- : ever this plan has been turned down by the Planning Corn! mission for four reasons. It is their feeling the pro- : posed improvement would stabalize the property; the i proposed improvements with replacements would certaint ly create a much nicer appearance; and this parcel is I large enough for three lots. They are also mindful of : the fact there are similar cases in Carlsbad, and concur! that the Planning Commission and Council should have I control over these cases. CHARLES COCKRAN, 131 1 Forest Ave., stated he lives across the street from this property, and all of i the lots on this street are at least 70' frontage. He I t would like to see all the property remain with a reason- i able frontage. 1 I Mfi. GEISSWGER, 2370 Spruce Street, stated that when i they bought their property he canvassed the area for the ; Purpose of running a street t;hrough. His property has : a similar length and he would have liked to split his I I Property, but was informed that it would be impossible ; according to the ordinance. If this variance is allowed ; he will perhaps ask for a variance on his property. I I I I I 1 I I l e I I I I I I I JMR. RUSSELL GROSSE, 2619 Highland, stated he was i still in accord with his original statement. He does not : know the contents of the ordinance. However, he felt : the Planning Commission had the concern of the area as i a whole in denying this variance, and not an individual. I Mayor Sonneman suggested the improvement of a street : with a cul-de-sac. Mr. Shea stated they had considered ! this, however, it would not be feasible due to the fact i the right of way requirements for a street is 50 feet. It I was then suggested that a street be put through the I entire length of the property, and Mr. Shea stated the : property could not stand the expense of this type of im- i provement. I I I I I I Cmn. Bierce stated the Council is well aware of the fact that there are many such parcels such as this. Undir the present ordinance the Council cannot grant a varianc?. The present Council and the present Planning Commis- ; sion will definitely give property such as this considera-! tion, but it will have to be by ordinance. I I The City Attorney stated that it would be impossible for i the Flanning Commission or Council to grant this variande under the present ordinances. If the Council desires : to grant such variances the ordinances will have to be i amended. I I The public hearing was closed at 8: 15 P. M. I I After discussion by the Council it was their decision : they concur with the findings of the Planning Commission; and that the following resolution be adopted: I I I I I I I I I I f t I I I I I \.. "8 '8, '*,", 93 \\ '8 '\ '\ \ \' .\ '\ x . ' ' '\\ ''+&+\ ' '& '\\ *?&, .,L$p4,;--,;%+ :si;: i:;:: #;;:I I:;:: :,,I, 1:::: 1":: !!I:; i:n:s 11; I:::; :i::; p::; i::;: ;;::: :!I:; :a1 1::s: ;*I:: 4::; :::II ii::; :;;la I:::: :: ::;:: It* 1'::; ::I 1:::: hl:; ;:::I ;;:I: ;l::1 ::: ;: ;;I:& $8: i;::: ;: :#I :!I :i: I y;; I; $1 I:; i::;; :::I, 1:::: i::;: ::::; ip:: :;'I; :;::: I;:: i!;:; :I;:; ;: ;: ::I 1:::: ii!i: *I::; I 4; ;;:ll iili; 81 !:::I ;:::I l;;l; :::i: I1 ;;I 1:: I:::! ::::: ii:Il ;:: 4; a:, #I I!: :::i; :;I:; :;::; :;::; $::: !!: :!Il; ::ii: :;::I ::'I: :I::: ::;:i I:;:: I:;:; 1:::: :;I:; ::;:; ;:I:; 1';:: ::::I ::I;: ."""""""" \o '@ ,.e$ ',dt ;;l;l I It 81 11 l!!l! B B w 1 I 1 8 I I' I x, ', '8 ', '% .' I > , '\ '\\ '\ '\ " I '\ '\ '- '. ', '* I I , " 94 -5- . ''\ ", 'x, '\ '\ '' I 1 Name '\\ '*$, '\ '\ 'd* '& I of "$+'O,, 'O+, ',*@,+,;p ' 8 t :-."""~""""""~"""""""""""""""""""~""~""""~~"-""""-"",":-~--~"-- I Member ,o.o.c'\&*b. I Ill) i Res, #66. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ; ::I;: I ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PO€tTIO@ Guevara / i :xi I : OF LOT 1, CEDAR HILL ADDITION, ACCORDING TO: Bierce :x/ :xi ; 1 MAP THEREOF NO. 532 IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAI),Sonneman i I ;x: i i was adopted by title only and further reading waived. : McPherson ; :x! xi ; : PLANNING: I : OF THE CITY OF CARISBAD DENYING A VARIANCE: :::I, :I::: I I I I :*I 1 I I /;:: I$:;: l a. Tentative map of Las Flores Place, The I I::;, @'I,: : tentative map was presented for the Councills review. I ::I,: I I :*::I ! iEes. #I68 of the Planning Commission was presented i ;;::I 1 1:: i wherein they recommended approval of the map, subject i ;I;:: ; to certain conditions. The City Manager informed the : :II:: $1 i Council the subdivider had taken exception to some of i ;::I: : the conditions, namely, 6'' water main installation on ; 1:::: I Forest Ave., sidewalks in the subdivision, street trees i :fl;l ,::I: 1lI;l ; and the placement of utilities poles in the street when ; :::I: i easements were provided for across the rear of the I property. Mr. Geissinger was in and the matter of street! :Ill : trees had been worked out; as far as the placement of the i i poles in the easements proGided for, the City would I ; notify the utility company the poles were to be placed in i i the easements provided for. i Discussion was given as to the recommendation by the i : Engineering Department that a 6" water main be installed I i;::: i on Forest Ave. from Spruce street to Cipriano, which is i : the cul-de-sac and street provided for in the subdivision, : ::i:; :I i The Council was informed that a 4'' water main had been : ;;:I; : installed approximately two years ago from Olive to Sprucb, 1;;:: i and the subdivider objected to having to install another : ::(I: : line, as he felt he should be allowed to tie into this 4'' line: ;l::l I) ;::r: i to serve his subdivision. I 1:::: # I ::'I; : MR. GEESINGER, one of the representatives of Allnav, i ;I::, i Inc. , subdivider, stated he felt there should be a 6" line : ::i:i : on Spruce Street, but could see no reason for having to : $1:: i install a 6'' line onfii-&. when a 4" line had been installed! :::ii ~::~l ; about 18 months ago, Also they had no objection to install! I!;:: i ing sidewalks on Spruce and Forest Ave., but did object : 1,::; : to installing sidewalks within the subdivision, I :;::; I ::;:: I I i:::: : After considerable discussion it was the concensus of i :::i: i the Council that a 4" pipe was sufficient for Forest Ave. i ::::i : and that the subdivider could tie into this line; that a 6" ; ::!:I I line would have to be installed on Spruce Street; and I ;:I:: I ::::: i sidewalks would be required on Forest Ave. and Spruce i 18) ;:;:I : Street, but would not be required within the subdivision, i I:':; I I I i;::: i The following resolution was presented for the Council's : e ::; :::It i review: I I ::;:i 8 1 I :.I i Res. #665. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i Guevara : k :x: i ;:I;I I CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING TENTA- : Bierce :xi :xi : / ;&lH&P OF LAS FLORES PLACE SUBDIVISION, i Sonneman I 8 ix; I : was adopted by title only and further reading waived. I McPherson i i !x: i ; A short recess was declared by the Mayor at 9: 19 P. M. i :ir;; i The meeting reconvened at 9: 37 P. M. I i ENGINEERING: I I ;:/I ;is:: I I I I I I I I I 1 l)(lI I I ::;:i ;in:: 1 ::;;: ;; 1;:: I !i:$ I I ::i;: :::I: :I::: I*;:; 4l;; 9 :I: I I 1 I I 4 It I I I I I I I I I I I* b I tal;; ;;::; I I ;;::: I I ::i:: I ;:I:; I I 1::; I a, 1911 Act proceedings - Carlsbad Blvd. Assess. : :;; :; ::::I ::::: I 0 I & I I I I : Dist, NG 5-3959. The City Attorney advised the Council i i the assessment roll for the district had been filed with i ::::i: : the City Clerk by the Engineer of Work, and it was noi.;r i i::::; i necessary to give notice of the filing and of a hearing. 1 I ;:!:;: : The following resolution was presented: 11 I I 0 :::,:; ;:;:I' I I I I 1 :#I 1;:; I I I s :::::I I I 1411:' I : l!l:'! I I I I I I I I I I' I \, ', '8 '\ ', .' I \, ', '8, ', 't '* I I , ',, x* '\ '\ " I '. ' " 95 ; *f ''.+$@, ' 'ti!' '.fii.*&'+* I ?::: #I I -6 - "\ '\\ '\ 8, *\ '\ Bj 1 N a me '\ q6, ",?& '""""""""""""""""""""""""-"~""""""""""""~"""""""""~""~~". : Member ,o~o..~O\,o\~ ! Res. #662. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF i {;:;; ; - OF CARLSBAD, DIRECTING NOTICE OF : 11;;1 i FILING OF ASSESSMENT AND OF THE TIME AND i Guevara ;x; ' : i i PLACE OF HEARING THEKEOF, for Assessment :x; I : Bierce I :x;x: i : District No, 5-1959, was adopted by title only and i Sonneman : ; !x; ; i further reading waived. : McPherson j : :x: ; I I 1'4: I b. Report on Highlands Drainage District, The : 41:; t Assistant Engineer informed the Council the estimated i :::e, 1:::; i cost for the main trunk line from Highland :>ive and ,Par? 8":: i Drive to the Agua Hedionda lagoon would be $100,366.00. : ::::I :'pi i The entire district would cover 481 acres; the estimated i ::I; I$ I cost per acre is $209,00; figuring three lots per acre, ; :;I:: ; estimated cost of a 15,800 sq. ft, lot - $105,00; 10,000 i ::i:i i:$; : portion of the fine were spread over the entire district, \ ::::I 1;;u: i at such time as the remaining portion of the main trunk : ::;:: : line were constructed, it would have to be spread over th$ :;:I: "1:: : entire district. I I ;:I1: ::;I I I 4; i Discussion was given as to the cost of the entire main ! : trunk line, The estimated cost would be $253,926.00; i jfh; ,e::: i approximate cost per acre - $528.00; three lots per acre,: ii'll : 15,000 sq. feet - $264.00; 10,000 sq. ft. $176.00; and i ::: ::;I, i 7500 sq. ft. - $132.00. It was pointed out that the con- : :::\: I struction cost would be less costly if the entire project i ;::;: I were constmcted at one time. I ::::i I ;:;*I I I I 1:;:: i The City Attorney requested the matter turned over to i :I::; : her as to the legal proceedings involved for the district. 1 ::i+ :: 1; I I ::::; : HARBOR COMMISSION: 1 I ;;I:: I I :;::; l a. Two appointments to Harbor Commission. The i :;:;: :: SI I I I I Ill i Sq. ft. lot - $70.00; 7500 sq, ft. lot - $53.00, If this : I I Iiiif I I I 1 I I 1 I (::I: I Mayor informed the Council three names had been sub- i ;i;ii i mitted to her to fill the vacancies - Richard Scheetz, I k 1:1:: : Frank Ness and Max Miesse. Cmn, McPherson stated i :1::1 i that he had not contacted Mr. Miesse personally to see if ; : he wished to serve, but felt he was qualified for the 1 I Ill i appointment. Mayor Sonneman stated she would contact ; : Mr. Miesse to see if he would be willing to serve. Mayo< 41:; 1:: i Sonneman stated that with the consent of the Council she ; I would like to appoint Mr. Richard Scheetz to fill one of i ;tl:l i the vacancies, By motion of the Council the appointment : Guevara !x ! i xi : f of Mr. Richard Scheetz to the Harbor Commission was i Bierce : jxjx: I i given the consent of the Council, which term expires : Sonneman : : :xi : : January, 1964. ! McPherson! i !xi I i PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSIQN: i sion, Mayor Sonneman stated three names had been sub- i ::i:: i mitted to fill the vacancies on the Public Works Commis- : :;I::; : sion, and with the consent of the Council she would like I i to appoint Mr. George Grober and Mr, James Costigan. : ; By motion of the Council the appointma t of Mr. George I Guevara ;x : i x: ; ; i Grober, term expiring January, 1961, and Mr, James : Bierce : ; :xi : I ; Costigan, term expiring January, 1964, was approved i Sonneman ; i i x: i I I by the Council. : McPhersoni :xi xi ; i t t81:l; I 1::I;I I:::: ::r:i ;::I: ;:: ::;Il ::::I I I I I :::I: I a. Three appointments to Public Works Commis- i la::: :;::I :I:::' $1;:) ;::::i I ::;;: I ::;:; I I I I 1 B 1 -NEW BUSINESS: I k ::/;8 I I :::;:I :::::I 1:;:;: I 1 l a. Resolution No. 66% declaring weeds and trash i ;I:#:# :j;::; I I 1 ; : i I i,; I I 1::;:; I I :I::;: I :i:::: i a public nuisance. The City Attorney informed the : Council this was the first step authorizing the abatement : : of weeds and trash. The following resolution was pre- I :8l:l: :::;:I ! sented for their review: i Res, #663. A RESOLUTION OF @HE CITY OF : CARLSBAD DECMmG WEEDS AND TRASH. UPON i i CERTAIN PROPERTUES .TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE, i 4:;:;: ! ! !lI!l! I 1 I I I I( I :::;:; :::I:I I I - c 5 I I I I *' t \\ ', .I, \, '\ .\ I 9 I I I ', \\ '\ 8 8, '\,", ,\ tb4 i Name '-\"$&,'\, '.$. , \ '8 " \\,'\, I I ',\'X, '\\ *\ 9 6 -?$@&-$,;%& i:::i I I I -7 - Di ,""""-"""""""""""-""""""""""""""~"""-*"""~~"~"""""~"-:-~"~"" 1 : Member of ,080.pp\,0',, 8$,0\ \ \?% I I I : AND DESCRIBIIVG SUCH PROPERTY; ORDEBmG THE i 1:: I I PUBLIC WORKS DIWECTOlZ TO ABATE SUCH I ::::: : NUISANCES, SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEAR-: Guevara : ix :x: ; :31:; i ING OF OBJECTIONS TO THE PiWPOSED ORDEnE OF : Bierce : : :xi : 1 ABATEMENT, was. adopted by title only and further i Sonneman ; 88 ; :x: i i reading waived. : McPherson :x: :xi : I 1 I::#: I b. Res. #664 - iZesolution of Apgreciation for I I ::::: :::it 11 I Clyde L. Jenken. At the previous meeting the Council i I:::: i requested a resolution of appreciation prepared for Mr. : ::::: : &.&en, City Engineer, who submitted his resignation : p:,: 11 ;: ; effective as of July 31, 1960. The following resolution i ;'p; i was submitted 5 I I:':: I I I I i:::: i Res, #664. A i3ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i ;::,I : "CITY OF CARLSBAD, EXTbEXDING APFi3E- I ::iii ::,:I i CIATION TO CLYDE L. JENKEN FOR SEAVICES : Guevara ; i !x: : : RENDElcZED AS CITY ENGINEE3 OF THE CITY OF i Bierce bi :x: t* i i CARLSBAD, was adopted by title only and further reading Sonneman 1 ; :xi : : waived. I McPherson i !x :x: i "1:: : CITY ATTOIZNEY'S 8EPORT: ::::; t I I I iii:: i The City Attorney informed the Council the State Board i !;I:: ::::: : of Equalization removed the tax exemption from the I 1 1::: i Carlsbad by the Sea, as they felt this was not a charitable: i:::; : organization. The tax revenue from this property for the i ::::; l:@tl i City is approximately $16,000. I i:i:; 1 I 1:::: ! The Council was advised that the City Attorney is working! ::::: t on a new business license ordinance and sign ordinance, ; ;:+ :I::; *I I 1:;:: 16 i CITY MANAGER'S kEEPQRT I I ::;:; I ::;I, $1 i The City Manager informed the Council he had received i :*I:; 1::;: @SII : a notice of a meeting to be held July 27, 1960, to discuss i ii::: i the North County sewer report. Also a notice of a meet- : : ing to be held by the Board of Supervisors on August 8, i ::::I ;l:Il ! 1960, for the same purpose, It was suggested that a t I I:::* 11 1: : meeting of the Council be held prior to August 8, 1960, i ;I:;, ::it: : committee be appointed, including some of the members ; 4;:: i of the Council and perhaps some of the citizens of I I ii I :I: i Carlsbad. It was agreed that an adjourned meeting be i :: 1: : held July 26, 1960 at 7:30 P. M. to discuss the report, i 8I:;l i A letter had been received from the property owner whom: i had been contacted in regards to selling his property on I :I::; i State Street for street purposes, and he is not interested i ::::I i in selling his property at this time due to the fact he has ; : two other businesses in mind €or the location. I i Jack Bsuna, Fireman, has requested that the Council i i give consideration to a meritorious pin for employees : : who have served five years or more, and perhaps a I I ::::;I 8~ i dinner to make the awards, Mayor Sonneman stated she ! 1:;::l : felt the dinner was superfluous. The Council approved i i the meritorious pins. I :::::i : The Mayor asked if Harding Street was listed as one of : i the streets to be rehabilitated, and she was informed i ;l::l; ; that it was on the list. I I ::;;:; I :I : Planning Commission, I 1::::: : Mayor Sonneman stated that due to a vacancy on the I I :::;:I i Planing Commission, she would like to appoint Mr. 1 G. A, Hardwick, who is a retired Lt. Colonel. The t I t::l;l i Mayor further stated that a five-man commission had : :::::I : been discussed at the last meeting, however, she did not i i feel this was the time, as the ordinance would have to : :;i:;: 1l 11; 1 I I I I I I t I I I I I I 'I 11 I I I I I I I i to go over this report. Cmn. Bierce suggested that a i ;I::; 1:::; !I:;: :;::i ::::t i:ii: t I I ;:::: :::I: I-:: ::::; l;ll ll;:l; I I I * I i:I::; ;::;:; ;::;:; ::a::, $1 'I $1 I::; I 1 I I I I B; I 1 I I I I 1 I i!:::: I I :4;;; I ::::ti :;I:;: :;::I: I I I I!:::: :!:!I. I I I 1 I * r 4 .c I I I 1 4 I I' I \\ x, .\ ' ' . , ,, \, '* '8 " I I I 8, \ '88 '8, '8 " 4 I 8 ' , 8888\, 97 : of .$\O', ',h 80 8 4' - 8p+8, I -6- I ', '8 ', 8 \ 8 \ 8 \,'\ 8 4 I Bj i Na me '.,'?@& '.8 %* 1 Member ,o~,o.,~~&~,O'~ :"~""""""""""""""""""""""""""*""""~"""""~"""""""""""~~"" : be amended if this decision were made, and she does y!;, pt+ 1 ;I::: 'I 4 I ;:*I; I NSERT - i not have sufficient information as to a five-man commis- : ;:ii: ,. ' r I sion to make a stand. Perhaps in April, 1961, would be I :ii;i i the time to make this effective as there would be terms ; ::1:1 811 81 i expiring at that time. Cmn. Bierce stated that he would i 11; i go along with the above, however, he felt the members : Guevara ;x : i xi ; : should be retained according to their qualifications. By i Bierce : ; ;XI ; i motion of the Council Mr. G. A, Hardwick's appointment : Sonneman : : :x: : ; to the Planning Commission was approved. I McPherson i !x :xi i : PAYMENT OF BILLS AND RATIFICATION OF i FAYROLL: i Authorization was given for the payment of bills for the i i general expenses in the amount of $9,392. '71, and for the : Guevara Sr i :xi ; : Water Department in the amount of $8, 315.34, from ; Bierce ; : :x: : : July 5, 1960 to July 19, 1960, as certified by the Directos Sonneman i i i xi i i of Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee. i McPherson i :x :x; i i Ratification of the payroll for the first half of July, 1960 i Guevara ; ix ;x: l I was given in the amount of $13,003.00 as certified by the ; Bierce : : ;x: : : Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing Com- i Sonneman i i i x: i i mittee, ; McPherson :x: ;xi ; I 1111) i ADJOUBNMENT: I ;::;I [ By motion of the Council the meeting was adjourned to i Guevara i i I xi i : July 28, 1960 at 7: 30 P. M, in the Council Chambers. i Bierce : jxix: j I : Sonneman : ; ;xi ; I I i McPhersonixi :x; ; I ::::: 1: % 1:::; 1 ::; I 1 :;::: I :-:; I I I 4 i+;I I I I /:e: ::::: ; I " 4'4 / 0 ;yr 4.J 1. % ./ >5 @&/< I I 1:;:: I :;;:; 1 ::;:; / Esty CZ:cf"rkADAMS I I :;:I: I 4 !x;; I asked I I ::::; i INSERT Mayor-Sonnemadthat a: correction be made on i ;:::I ;:::I i Page. 8, line 2, changing the word "information" to I ::;:; I'll; I "justification". 1 ;:::r I 1 ,::e: I 1:::: ::I;: :;* I I 4 1 )*I 1 ;::;I I :;::: I pi;: I I lla:I i:;;: ::I:; I I I I f 1 I I 1::11 pl:: I1 I I 1 I I 4::; i:::: I I I I I I t I I : The meeting was declared adjourned at 10: 30 P. M. i Respectfully submitted, I I I 11 I I : ,/ .'7 I I L'./ /- I I I GAR I I I I I t I I I I I I I I i:;:: I I ::::: I I I:::; I$ I I i:: ;: I I I I ;:::: I I la:: I I I i::;: I i;::: I I I 1;;:: 4 I I ;I;:: I I I l i:: 8: I I I ,;::I I I I :;::; 8: I I ii;:; I I jiiii 4 I i;::: I # ::: I I I ::/I I I 1:;:; 1 I i;;:: 1 I,,:, I I ::::i I i:::' Io I ::::: I I ::::: I 1 1:::: I I I I ii::; I I I I I I I I I 1;;1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 'Il(l I I ;;lll I 1:;:: I 111:1 I 1 I I I I I Di I I I I (It1) I 4 a 1 t I I ). I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I III'I I I 8 ::I::