HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-09-06; City Council; MinutesI i' . ,\' ' t ',, '8, '\, ', ', '\ ! CITY OF CARLSBAD I t \, ', 8, '\,'+\
; Date of Meeting: September 6, 1960 i N a me '\,, '\$\ 8' \, "3. i Time of Meeting: 7: 00 P. M. ; of *.$$j+ '' '?+,,
;I1 1
I I
I
\x I Minutes of City Council '\ iX8'\,, ", 't8 4-23 '8
I,I;lac~*,,sf,"e_- _cO-~~i~"c~am~~~~.""" "- "" - "- -." -" "- + f - --.. Member """"* - "" ,o \,o ""- \,pg 7"" d'.?
; BOLL CALL was answered by Couzcilmen Guevara, I I ;;4'
\\*@,9>,#@
,e;:!
l;;ll :if:;
;;l:I
;I;:: ;I:;:
B' I
1
I i Bierce, Sonnernan, McPherson and La i3oche. Also I : present were City Pdanager Slater and City Attorney Elaye&
I INVOCATION was offered by City Manager Slater. I :u;: 11
I ,!'I!
I I I
I I
I : APFSGVAL ...-. OF MXNUTES: I I I
I 1
I
I a. The Mayor asked that this matter be deferred I I i until the next regular meeting of the Council, as the
i minutes of August 16, 1960 had not been completed. I I
: COBitESP(PNDENCE:. I 1
i 3167 Highland Dr. , commenting in general about the I i tax increase, and suggesting that it not be used for salary! ; increases, increased personnel, expensive legal advice i i and surveys. By common consent the letter was ordered ; ; filed. I
i b. Letter dated August 16, 1960 from the San Diego i i Chamber of Commerce in relation to the census Tract : : Street Index, requesting that a Master Street Index by i i Census Tracts be kept up-to-date with new streets as, i : they are added, in order that it will be available for I i business planning purposes. The City Manager advised i : the Council Mr. Price, City Clerk, has been taking care : I of this matter and the City does have a directory of street! : up-to-date. By consent of the Council the letter was I i referred to Mr. Price.
C. Letter dsted August 25, 1960 addressed to the 1 I : members of the Council from Henr? J. Betzmer, request; : ing a public statement of the members of the Council to i I justify their action by indicating approval and support of : ; the forrnaticx of the Carlana Harbor District, to be voted i i on October 11, 1960. Mr. Betzmer was present and I : stated tkl if a District were formed the Board could I I I levy a 75~ per $100.00 tax rate; also if there is a bond i
; issue they could also levy a 75$ tax per $100.00 assessed i i valuation. The burden will be on the taxpayer. Mr. I I : Betzmer asked the Council where, Row and in what I I i manner will the funds be raised?
i Mayor Sonneman asked that this matter be brought up i : again for discussion at some later date. I
: d. Letter dated August 25, 1960, addressed to the i i members of the Council from Carl L. Lough, requesting :
; the Council to rem nsider the harbor matter, in which i i they recently voted their approval of the formation of a i
I harbor district.
I I I
I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I a. Letter dated August 22, 1960 from €3. C, Franse, : l
I
I I I
1
I I I b 1 I
I I I
$
I
I # I I 1 I I
I I
I I I
I
I 1
in 1::;;
!!I:! -8lil
::;I:
:;1:1
11;:: :: I:
it: ,!I:: i;:i: :::/;
:I qi;: :ii:i
;:::: ;:::;
:::;I :I::/ i::::
1:;:; :i::i 81 :::i: i::::
::::: ;::I:
1:::;
:::I, It
;:p: ;:'I:
::I,:
1:::;
:::#I
;::I:
::1:1
4;:;
)I::: ;;::i ::::: 4;; ii:::
:I:::
::::I
1:::~
::::I'
:I:::~ ;::;:I ri:::~
:I:::~ :::I:; ::::::
:*i:4
;8l:l
I!:;; ::;
,II:I
i'"Ii ;;;::I
f;:;:. !::::I ;:::ii
';::I; :;:;;; ;: l!:!:i
I I i::i:i i Mayor Sonneman stated she felt the Harbor matter was i ;:!{!/
; a very timely matter and should be given further consider! ;::::I I# i ation at some future date. I :::::I
I
I 1:;::;
l e. Letter dated August 17, 1960 from the County of I ::;::I i San Diego, enclosing a form of termination of coctract ; ::I:;:
: between the CO:J.Q~ of §an Diego, Escondido iiumane :;::*; i Guevara ;x: I x: i : : Bierce I 8 , :xx; l i i i Society and the City of Carlsbad, They requested the
I document executed by the proper officials. By motion of i Sonneman ; : ;xi ; :
: ment and the Clerk directed to attest to such signature, : La Roche i ; ;xi : ;
l!!l!!
I
I
B i the Council. the Mayor was authorized to execute the docum: ' TCcPhersoni i i x; I' : ;
I .I
I 8 i f, Letter dated August 29, 1960 addre.ssed to the City i : Council irom Melvin F. and Jeannette L. Lull, 3981 I I i Garfield Street, requesting permission to hook on the i ; city sewer line which has recently be constructed on I I : Chinquapin Street without cost to them. The City Manage< i informed the Council excerpts from the minutes of the :
I I I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I I
ii:;:;
:::I:. ;I;::: ;:;::: ;::;:: ;::;:;
;::::I ;i:i::
at;1;: :::::: :!::f:
11';
81'
i
I I I I I I I I I I
I I I -2 - I
I I
I I I t I I I I
:I '
.I Di "-""""""-""""""--"--"-""""~~~~~~"""""""""""".."~. I I I : meeting of July, I954 were sent to the members of the i ; Council. The ':.m1.+s paid for the assessmefit on Garfield :
i Street, b.& du : io the expense of havirqg to change the i ; plumbing they did not hook on to the Garfield sewer line. ; : The Chkx- ,...spin sewer line is under a completely differ- I i ent assess-ment tkan the Lulls paid into on Garfield. Mr.: I Lull was as7:ed if it were possible to connect any part i i of their p:-.-,yerty to the Garfield sewer line? I I
'I
I I I I I 1
I
I * I I I I I 1 I I I I I f
t I
'4
L
I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I 1 i I I
I
Mr. ?dull informed the Council they could have separated: their plumbing but it would have had to been done at I considerable expense. The way the house was plumbed i all the plumbing went to the lower floor, and the only i way it could have been done was to go into the petition. :
Cmn. La Roche asked if there was any way the funds : that Mr. Lull has paid into the sewers on Garfield St. i could be transferred to the Chinquapin Ave. sewers, and Mr. La Roche was informed that these funds were i
paid into a district and not to any city fund, therefore, i they could not be transferred. Cmn. La Roche further ; asked if Mr. Lull paid for something he could not use. I The City Attorney stated that at the time the assessment : was spread the Engineer of Work had to prove that all i of the properties within the district were benefited. I 1
I 1
I I
t i Mr. Lull statedthe only thing they are requesting is that ; they be granted permission to connect to the Chinquapin i i sewers, as the line comes up to their property line, i and it would be cxsiderable less expense for them to i 1 connect to thi;. i:A1e.
! I The City Manager stated the sewer on Chinquapin is a : I completelJ- differe-rit distyict, which the property owners i i have recently formed, The City Attorney suggested the : i matter be rzferred to her for further study. By commo4 i consent; it \-> as agreed that the matter be referred to the i : City Attorney for further study. I
I ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
I
I I
I 1 I 3
I I I I I I I *
I I : There were no oral communications,
!# PUBLIC HEALZINGS:
I I
I
I I I t I I I I I *
I t t I 4 a. Reclassification of certain property between I i Grand Avenue and Hope Avenue from Zone R-l to Zone i ! R-2 - John and Norma Ortega.
$ The Mayor announced this was the time and place set i : for the hearing of all protests and objections for the : i reclassification requested by John and Norma Ortega. i 3
I I I I I
I I
I I
I
I
1 1
I & I I I I 1 I 1 I i Dl
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
The Clerk informed the Council that proper notice had i been given to all property owners in the area. Up to : the hour of '7: 30 P. M. he had received no written pro- i tests.
The Mayor deek:>ed the public hearing opn, and asked i if there was E.*yone present who wisk.ed to speak in favoq of this clrssiiication. There were no persons present I who wished to spec& in favor of this classification.
The Mayor asked if there were any persons present ! who wished ,:o protest or object to the reclassification i of this pzope rty. There were no persons present who I wished to speak in opposition to the granting of the. reclassification.
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I t I
The Mayor declared the hearing closed at 7:40 P. M. I * I i 1 I I I I I I I
'\ \.\ \ ' , b 8 ' "9 '\,'\\ '\, '\, 'x, '\
N a me \. '\@\ '8, "& '+@' \ WP'.
, ' \ ', ', '8 124 \'\ ,..\ .' , .', b \ .I
of Q\% ', '$8
!;ember ~$$$?,~~p~,o. '\,d%% 4 \ ++\,
;;;I;
I:!;: :::::
:I I;!;:
i::::
1::;;
:::I*
t1;;:: :::::; ::::;: :::;:; *I ::::I:
:I::;: :i:::: :q::;
::I/;
;:::I;
I::;;&
::;a*:
;:;I
-1;;;
;:: ::I ;:I:!:
1:;:;: ::::;i ;' 1::;;;
11 4::: i:::::
4:;8&l I:;::: Iii;;!
:::I::
;:*:I;
,I;:;:
:::;:f
::::I, I1 ;::::; I!;:::
;:4s1
1;::::
:::I;: :;:::; ::iiii
:I,:::
::;I
1':;:: ;:
1:::;
:::;I# :I I1
:;:I/
::I;
;; 11;
tt:;;l
!ill:;
It!::: i:;;:: :ii:ii
;#::I; ;:;;::
:::*:I ::::::
;:dl' v4:: 1::::
;::gl@ :;;:::
t::t1
l::I:; I*:
::@:at :;::;: ::!;::
:I, :::;;; I' ::;:;:
,:I::: :::::; i:::::
1:;::: i;:::: ::I;:; :i;;:;
;*I::; :x::;
::::I; !::::@
It;:;:
;:I;:; ::::i:
l;;l:: ::::I:
-"-"""""""- """" 3 ;*1;1
;::I:
:l;ll
"1:;
;:/I
I:'::
:I**:
I@;l;,
I'
11 111
I1
'l#'l(
:I
IIII
!ll!l!
I I t
I
1
I I
t ! BI l"-
I b
1 , ,. \.' : I '\, 88,'8,\ \\, '\,''
I I ', ' \ " ?., 12 5
: of \&'& 8 '. $3,
."""""-""""""""""""""""""~"""~""""~""""~""""""""~"""~"" : Member '\9@,+@1
I I ::;:I :I
- 3- \, '\ ' . ..
1 \, '\ '1, ', '\ '\ : Na me \.,, ',$, '\ '\.d
.Ob@, .p" 4%
i::;; 4:;: I
The City Attorney presented the following resolution \ for the Council's review: I I :::
l!*l! es. #683, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFi HE CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING FINDINGS :
1;' ;:i
;:I:: ::::: i AND DECISION kEEGARDING CHANGE OF ZONE : Guevara : jx:x; : I CLASSIFICATION OF CESTAIN DESIGNATED FROPE443ierce : I !X! ; { TY IN THE CITY OF CABLSBAD FROM ZONE R-1 I Sonneman : i !X: i : TO ZONE 2-2, was adopted by title only and further ; McPherson: : :X I : i reading waived. i La Hoche k! :xi i
It
I I ! 11 .!#I! i The City Attorney presented the following ordinance to i : the Council for a first reading: I I
! I I
;:;I1
lit;:
:::I;
::; ::
!l,!l
t Ordinance No. 9105. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY 1 Guevara I :x:xi : ;l;'l
i CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY rpJ : Sonneman i i ;xi : i THE CITY OF CARLSBAD FaOM ZONE R-l TO I McPherson ! i :xi / : ZONE R-2, was given a first reading. : La Roche :x; :xi i
i b. Abatement of Nuisance - Weeds, trash, rubbish, ; i:::: l.!l
1 I CAlclLSBAD AMENDING Uj3DINANCE NO, 9060, i Bierce : : ;x: i
& I I 11 I
i etc.
:I The Council was informed that all of the properties had i i been posted and notices sent to all the owners of property i ; needing to have a nuisance abated. I I
; The Mayor announced that the public hearing was open, I i and that all persons desiring to be heard would be heard i ; at this time, I I
-1 I 1 I r I I
I I
i I
I
t I MR. F, G, JtAMSEY, Olive Drive, advised the Council i his property has been posted twice. The first time it i was posteg, he hired a man and had the property disced; : however, the school has since purchased the land, and : he received a card to abate the nuisance, Mr. fiamsey i was informed that due to the recent sale of the property, : the a6sessor's records -have not been corrected as yet, ! and the City would notify the new owner, which is the i school district..
I
I I 1 I I 1
I I t t I I $ 1 I 8 I I I 8 I I t I I i MIE. DYKE,. 3120 Madison Street, stated his property wai : posted, and he has taken care of the nuisance, but he I i would like to know if the property owner is suppose to i ; take care of th3 City property adjoining their property? ; i Mr. Dyke was informed that he did not have to take care : ; of the City property. The City Manager stated he would i i look into this matter of the city property,
i A gentlem n in the audience stated he was representing i : G, P . and A, E, Deheyser, who owned parce1.48-12 Bxl. : t The property owners live in Massachusetts, and intend ; i to build a permanent home on this property. He did not i
I feel this was a good way to welcome new residents to the : i State of California. The City Manager advised the I gentleman this procedure is followed each year in order i : 30 keep the city protected from fire, and also to beautify i i the city. All property owners are notified where the : property needs to be cleaned or cleared of trash or weeds4 i The City Manager was instructed to write the owners and : : explain the method of abating such nuisance. I I
! MR, GEORGE WILLIAMS, 2906 Madison Street, stated i i he cleaned up his 'property as soon as the property was i : posted, and he still received a card notifying him to I i dean up the property. He.felt these inspections were ! : very pporly handled. The Council and Mr. Viilliams were: I advised that a list of all the properties is made prior to i : posting the property; and another inspection is not made ;
: : prior to sending the cards. However, before any work ; i is ordered by the city there would- be another inspection. i
1 I I I I I
I 8
I I
I B
I 1 t I I
I I I * I I I ! 1 I
I 1 I !
:::;i
:I ,I::,
:;I::
I:;,:
::::I
::;:I ;::;!
-1 ;I::: ::::i
l1 ::ii:
:::I: .l.?l i1i.i ;I;::
1:;::
111::
::p:; ::;;: i;;;:; :;; 11' :;I::! ::;::: ::;:I ::;I;
;x::,
!l@!l' '1;;l
:::I: ::I:;
;::It la
1;41: :;::::
@I:;:'
:;;I;
$4;;
I!::!!
:;a ;*;::I 81 ~
l~ljl- ::::;: 11 :::::: :!!:;; :-:;:
;::I &t4:;:
::;I:; 8: i::;:;
1;t :;;:::
I:;:;: !!!;;; II'
*I :1:1::
I:;::I ::I::: i:: Ill:;: ;:;i:i
;:;1;t
/I;:;
::/I1
::;::: 4:: 1 : :'I I
:II;:; ;i:::;
1I:l
:::ll;
;::::I
1:;::: ::::;:
11 l:;::1
It 1;:
1:;1
III'
:*::I!
B
B
I I I
I
t I
I '\ 8, ., \ ' .
I
I I
x, \' . 8 <' 8'
4 I \8 ', '8, \\, '\,'\,
8 -4- \' ', \x\"\ 8 8, \' ', '\ 126
8 t i N a me \'\, '$$, *\ \ '\&
I ; of '\+Jp, '?&
I ; Me m, bet .,&OW ,08@.~$\d, &$T :::::
1::::
::::a I:::: :i::: 411
I :;::: ii:::
~~""""""""""""-"~""""""~"-"~"""""-""-"".~"-""~~"""""""-"--"""" ;'I 1 i MR, q. W. ~ JARVIE, 1175 Hoqver, , stated theke are i : apy)i%ximately two hcres df dead lime trees at the cqrner I ::I:: i of Adams and Chinquapin, and he feels this ,is a greater ; ; hazard than a small patch bf weeds. it is his understand-! i ing the owners live in Colorado. I I
i The City Manager was instructed by the Council to make : 1': ; an inspection of this property. I ::!::
I ,i I
t I k I :::;:
I
I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I ?
I
1 I I I I I 4 1 I 4 I I 1 I I I t I I
I I
I 1 : Crnn. McPherson asked if the property at the corner of i i Pio Pic0 Drive. and Pine Avenue had been posted, as I I : there is a great deal of trimmings and trash on the propet- i ty. The City Manager stated he would investigate the i : property. *I
: MR. MELVIN LULL stated he thought this method of i i cleaning up the City was wonderful. I
i As there were no further protests or objections, the t Mayor declared the hearing closed at 8:02 P, M.
I 1
I L I
I I
I I I
t t
I I I I !
!:iiil /I;:; 4:::; :::::i
:::::I :::::I
;:;@:I ;:::;:
;::;I1
l:;l;; !:; ::I #;1:L'
sl!I:;
3i:i' :I I( ::*;:i ;::::I
l!ll!!
: By motion of the Council all protests and objections were : Guevara : : :XI ; i i overruled, and the Public Works Director was ordered i Bierce I :xjx: i i
i ;;;a;;
: to proceed with the abatement of the nuisances, ; Sonneman i i ;x; : 1
1 i McPherson i : !x: ; 1; l
I I : La Roche h i :xi : 1
i PLANNING: I
::I::;
I I 8 ::!::; I I:;;:' ! The City Manager informed the Council a resolution had i ;:::Il I1 I been received from the Planning Commission, recorn- i ;;ll:l
$;I :I:; : mending reclassification of certain designated property : :"::~ i in the City of Carlsbad from Zone R-1 to Zone 8-3, 4:::;
I said request having been made by Archie and Fawn A. I ::;;I1 I ;:::1; :8bo11 i Koyl. The next procedure was for the Council to set a i : time and place of hearing on the matter. It was agreed : ;::::I
1::::; i that the hearing be set for September 20, 1960, at 7: 30 I i:: I' (;:::I *1 i o'clock P, M. in the Council Chambers, 2960 Pi0 Pic0 Dr.: I::::'
I r::::i i PARKS AND BECREATION: I I i+:;i
I I !a!!:;
1
I
1 t
I
(11 It
I
I I1
I I 1
1 I I : a. Appointments to Parks and Recreation Commission; ! The Mayor stated there were two vacancies on the Parks : /I:; i and Recreation Commission, and with the approval of I
i 3137 Roosevelt Street, a business man, and Mrs. James i ::; I; : Silhavy, 1021 Magnolia, who has been a member of the : Guevara i ; :x i ;
: the appointment of Leonard Nevares and Mrs. James : Sonneman : : :xi : i Silhavy were approved for a four year term, expiring i McPherson ; :x :x; i : August of 1964. : La Roche i i !XI I
;~i'i ;;:::
::::;
;:::I : the Council she would like to appoint Leonard Nevares, ; :::I:
1:;::
i Garden Club for several years. By motion of the Council i Bierce F: !x: i
I I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1
I i b, Application for tree removal - Juniper Street. 8 I
! and Mrs. Welch for removal of three trees on Juniper ;
i Street located on city property. The city has received : i three bids for the cost of removing these trees, and the i : low bid was in the amount of $595.00 submitted by Lange : i Tree Service, Carlsbad, All but three parties on Juniper i i Street have paid their money to have the drainage install- i : ed on Juniper, and it is felt that the other three will pay : i if these trees are removed. At the previous meeting a I : memorandum from the Tree Committee of the Parks and : 1 Recreation Commission wa0 read wherein they recommenqr 1 : ed the removal of these trees. After considerable dis- ;Cuevara i cussion by the Council, by motion sf the Council it was i Bierce ; agreed that the trees be removed at city expense in : Sonneman i accordance with the low bid of Lange tree Service in the i McPherson : amount of $595.00. : La Roche
: An application has been received from Mrs. Grandchamp I i
I I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I
:iiiii
:::::I
;:*I;; ;::::I ;:::;I
1:::;; :::::I
:8l:l; ;::;::
$;SI;
;::::I ;:::ti :;;;:;
1;1:1;
:I
*I:::;
1;;:;;
:l;:l;
I I' :$x; i 1
:: I a :x:
I ; :x: ; I: 4 i : :xi ; i
8;;l:l ::;I::
::I:;: :!::!:
b: :x: ; I: i
I I
I
I
I
1
I I ;;:;i;
8 1 ::I:::
! I ;::;::
I I a' , \', ' \' I I \, ', .8 ', '8 '8 I I I
I I I I ,~,,',,,~,,8'8,,'~8~~,, 12 7
I I
8, '\ ', ~. \ b ',
I I -5 - i N a m e ',, '*%, ',,:a'
I I *%e8 ','%\,
I 1 i Member *f ',L*O\.p .$?'."o\.*p,d +'@@ :"""""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""""-~""""~~"""---~"~~""~:""~"~ ::::: I
I
I I I I
'I B i NEW BUSINESS: 1 I pt:
I!::!
I I
~. I 8, '\ ', \ b ',
I I -5 - I N a m e ',, '*%, ',,,''a'
I I *%e8 ','%\,
:"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~~"""~"~"~~""~:""~"~ I 1 i Member *f ',L*O\.p .$?'."o\.*p,d +'@@ B: :!a,!
I 1Y.CJW ut51
I I 1; 'I: I a, Proposed sign ordinance. The City Attorney in- i i formed the Council some time ago a request was made i i to amend Ordinance No. 9060 permitting advertising I I ; displays dong 101 Freeway. There are three ways this I i amendment can be initiated, either by the Council, Plan- : : ning Commission or a request by an individual. A I I i resolution of Intention has been prepared for the Council I I to initiate this change if they so choose. I
: Cmn. La Roche stated he felt the entire advertising pro- i i cedure for signs should be considered, as advertising : : signs can get completely out of line. However, he realiz4s I there should be certain signs for business purposes. I
: Mayor Sonneman stated this matter had been discussed i i previously and it was definitely frowned upon, and it is I : her understanding it is frowned upon by the State. I
I Cmn. Bierce stated that if you wish to promote business i : and if you want to bring business into the city you have i i to consider advertising displays. If you are traveling : : across country you look for a place to eat and sleeh I I i therefore, you are looking for signs.
i Mayor Ponneman stated she was definitely against having ! I signs placed along the Freeway. I I
I I
I I I
I I
I I 1
I I
I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I
::I:; .I
11:;:
;;;ti
1::::
:II:;
;::I, ::;ti
;: /::; /:::
:;;:; +;: I:!
Ii'Y.
:I::;
:::I, ::::: $4:
4::::
:!I:! ;;,;I ::i:i
;:I::
l((l
l!!l!
:I::, G;:i i::;; :::::
::::I ;::::
;::I:
:;l:t
1::::
:I::! :::::
:::*I ::;:: *!!:! i Cmn. McPherson stated he would go along with Cmn. I I I
I I I $
: Bierce - if he is traveling he looks for signs, t
I I i Cmn. La Roche stated he does not like to see signs litter i
I up the town and freeway, however, he is sensible enough : i to realize that some type of advertising is necessary. I
i The City Manager informed the Council the City of : Oceanside contracts with a sign company to advertise i i the City. Santa Barbara has a sign as you enter the town i ; pointing out certain streets for motels, etc. t
I I
I I I * I I
1 I
I I I I I I I 8 I I I I I I I I 1 I I * I * I I I
I Cmn. La Roche suggested that a committee be appointed I to study this matter. Cmn, Bierce stated this proposed : ordinance is the work of a committee, consisting of I 4 Mr. Price, the City Attorney and Himself. However, he would certainly go along with a sign for the city as i suggested. The Mayor appointed the City Manager, I I Cmn. Bierce and herself to a committee to work out some type of sign for the city. I I
I I I
I I I
I I .
I.' I**:: ;x;:
;::e,
::I:: i: 81
$1
ii:
* 1:;::
:;::I I:::: i::::
;::I:
i;::: :p:: I:'::
11:'1 :il:i ::I:: ;:;I:
;:::I , I::
;::I:
1'::: ;I ll::;
;:::I :x;:
Ill
I(
,Il:l
1!11!
I i b, Mutual Aid Agreement for Fire Protection Aid ; ;;;a: $4: i with Division of Forestry. The City entered into an t I*!:; ; agreement previously with the State of California, De- : ;: @I
1::: i partment of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry, i :::::
: which will expire on September 15, 1960. We have I Ii::;
I ::p: i received a new agreement under the same terms for a i : five year period. If it is the Council's wish to renew it;::
I i:::: i this agreement the adoption of a resolution approving the i ll/: ; agreement and authorizing the execution of the agreement! ::I:: i is necessary. Res. #682 was presented for the Council's: :::::
1;::; ; review: 1 I ::::I
I :;:;I i Res. #682. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL I 11 #:::I ' 1 FB%i&33CTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF ItI:;
::I i Guevara : : i B i r CARLSBAD AND THE STATE OF CALIFBZNZA, DIVI-: Bierce ;x: :$ : i SION OF FORESTRY, AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING i $omeman : i ix: I : OF AGREEMENT, was adopted by title only and further : McPhersonj : ; 4 ; i reading waived. i La Roche : jx:~ i I I I ;I;@:;
I
I
I 1
ITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING MUTUAL :
I
I I
I I I I t;;:;, 'Il!I'
I I I i::;:~
I I ;:;:i; I@
t I
.L
I
I
I
I
I
I I ;:;:;I
1 I 1::::;
4 ? !lI!l'
I I .,\".
I I I I \\ \\ \ '\ 8 '.
I I "8 '\, '\& ", '8 8.
t I I I , 8, '\\ '"\+ g 2 8
I I . , \-, , r -, I I I
1
-e - t ~lo mo \, x\?, '\
I ; of -Yg&-\ '5p 'q$*
I : Member @@,ptp$Y, ',L to \ +@$.
I I ::;::
I $11
:""""""..""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-~"""""""","""""" SI D i OLD BUSINESS: I 1 ;: :ii
! ! ,!II! t a. Donald R. Briggs, Jr. - Lot variance. The City I ! Attorney informed the Council she had prepared a resolu-j j tion in accordance with the motion made by the Council i
I at the last meeting. There was a vote of 3 to 1 on the i i motion, and at that time she asked that she be given time ; : to study the amendment to the ordinance, There are two i i separate sections as to overruling the decision of the ;
I Planning Commission. Sec, 1814 relates to variances i i and conditional use permits, and Sec, 19 12 relates to i
I reclassification of properties and amendments to the 1 1 ordinance, Section 19 12 was amended in January of
i 1958 changing the required number of affirmative votes : \ to overrule the decision of the Planning Commission fro4 : at least four affirmative votes to at least three affirma- : i tive votes. However, Section 1814 relating to variances :
1 and conditional use permits was not amended, therefore, i i the motion made by the Council on the Briggs matter did i ; not pass due to the lack of four affirmative votes, there- ; i fore the matter was not referred back to the planning I I Commission. It is the duty of the Council at this time : : to adopt a resolution setting forth their findings and de- i i cision, I I
i Cmn, Bierce asked the Attorney if a member were absen4 i at the time of the hearing, could he now vote on the adop-: ; tion of the resolution, which sets forth the Council's I i findings? The City Attorney stated it would be up to the ! : discretion of the member, however, he could be leaving i i tk City open for legal action, if this matter were taken : : to Court. I 8
: Mayor Sonneman stated Cmn, La Roche was present at i i the first hearing, and there was no new evidence pre- i sented at the second hearing.
t 4 I
1 I I
I I
I *
0 8 D 0 D I 8 I
.,&I;
;:::I ::ii; :i::; ::: ::; :;
t ;: ;:!
#:I:l 11: i:;ll
::':I
1:': :It1,
I;':: ::i:: i;:::
::::; 1:;
:*;Il ::;:I
:;'I:
II1:I pi;: $il: I: ::::; ;::;; p:: :q! I:':; I::::
It' 1:;::
1:;::
;II;# *:I;: I::::
:::I ':
I:;,: :;::;
:tl;8 ;I:;: 1::::
1'::: t1 I:;::
1:;::
::':I
l:'l
!I!!: I : The following resolution was presented for the Council's i i review;: prior to Cmn, La i3oche's vote he stated that he i
i was in the middle on a matter that seems to be of monu- : i mental concern; no matter what his decision is, he is I i going to have to make it in justice to himself and to the : : City of Carlsbad because he took an oath. If he votes he i I is leaving himself open for legaf action, and he does not : : choose to leave himself open for legal action; therefore, I i he could not honestly see any other way than to abstain : : from voting on this matter. I ! I !
::I::
-;;I
;::I: ::::I
1;;:: i:;:: :;::: :;::: :I::;
;I:::
I:::$
:;;I:
:::I, #I
11 !#:;:
81
: Res. #684. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL : ! -CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING FINDING$ : AND DECISION GZ€ANTING THE APPmL AND DENY- ; i ING A VARIANCE ON PBOPERTY DESCRIBED AS A : Guevara k i :x: : POSTION OF TRACT NO. 2, LAGUNA MESA TRACTS: Bierce :;:!x i ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO, 1719 OF THE i Sonneman I : :x: i CITY OF CARLSBAD, was not adopted due to the lack : McPherson i :x /xi : of four affirmative votes, : La Roche I ! : :
':ti :::; ::I; ::i:
4 I I I :::a
!I.! I ; Mayor Sonneman stated she felt this was a most dis- i graceful thing. When we have an ordinance requiring i : certain setbacks and then grant a variance with no set- i i back, we have certainly fallen flat on our face, and it I
t I ;I;; :::; f::; ::::
:::I
l!t;
I
1 B f is certainly setting a precedent. I i:::
I ;I:' ! Cmn. La Roche stated this statement was directed at himi 1;s: i and he appreciates the Mayor's thoughts on this matter, : :I::
i nevertheless, he is on the Council to give his best, and i ;:I: :::: i he was acting in the best interest of the City of Carlsbad. : 11:: : He further stated he did not believe the Council was abrohting ;::;
I!!*
1'1
I
18'
I I I ,
i any of their legd forms and that there has been no great -I
I harm done.
- ;;:; ;::;
I :::I
I ;;::
I I ;:I:
I I 181:
I ::::
I 1:::
I I ::;;
I ::!I
I
1
I
I
I I I
I
I 1 I I
I
I
I I
I '. 8 'fr I '\ ' -
I 8'
I I I I
1 I ', 8 ' 8'
! I *' 8' I
I
I !
-7 - 8 I Namb ' : of
I I Member :"""~""~""""""""""""-~""~"""""""""-"-"""""~~"--"---" Bi l a ; Mayor Sonneman stated that Cmn. La Roche has express! ; ed himself and she has expressed herself, and she felt : i this was a very sad situation. This does effect me very : : much because it is setting a precedent, I I
i b. Closing of Grand Avenue and Elm Avenue westerly: i of Ocean Avenue to vehicular traffic, The City Attorney : ; informed the Council that at the meeting of August 2, * I i 1960 she was instructed to prepare a resolution prohibi- i : ting vehicular traffic on Elm Avenue and Grand Avenue : I west of Ocean Street, The resolution was reviewed by I : the City Attorney, I
I I I
! I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
Cmn, La Roche asked if there were any commitments i at present where there might be any repercussions, The i City Attorney read the excerpts from the minutes of the : Council meeting held on August 16, 1960, relating to the i permission granted to the owner of the property at the : northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Ocean Street, to i improve Grand Ave. west of Ocean Street in order to : have access on Grand Ave. 1 I
I t i Cmn. McPherson stated that if we ado ted this resolution: : we would be defeating our own motion P o grant the proper: I ty owner permission to improve Grand Avenue for use. i
i Mayor Sonnernan stated that she could not see haw this i : could help but create a traffic hazard if this street were : i improved, as it would be impossible to turn around due i : to the width of the street. k I
i MR. L. J. ALEXANDER, stated he was the attorney i : for the owner, and he also had an interest in the property1 i They oppose very strongly the closing of an existing I t : right-of-way. It is their belief that the City does not hav4 i the right to deprive the property owners of access; he :
f does not know the engineering aspects, however, this : i should be done by the engineers. They propose to install: : at no expense to the City a street and stairway; now the : i people use the beach below the mean high tide line by : : passing over private property. They have plans for a i i building that will add to the City of Carlsbad. It is not unl : common to have a street benefit just certain property : i owners. The access to their property is a great problem; : however, by having access to their property on Grand : i Avenue will avoid the necessity of backing directly out on! i Ocean Street, which is a very narrow street, They have ; ; gone to a great deal of expense in designing this building. I i This lot is a corner lot and that is why they purchased it.;
I 1 I :
1 I
I 4
I I I I I I I I I i' ;&&p&;-
I I
s I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I Di I
I I I I I I I * 1 I I I I I I I
4
Mayor Sonneman stated she is in hopes of a pier someda$ soon, and this street would have to be used. Also children g3ing down this street would have to cross this i driveway. J It was pointed out that a 3' sidewalk will be ! coYGEiiitZ?d on the side of the street where the proposed i building would be.
Mr. Alexander further stated that as far as the children : crossing the driveway, children have to cross many I I driveways every day,
Cmn. La Roche stated he felt the Council was a little i late in adopting this resolution if these people have I & previously been granted permission to improve this street, However, he agreed with the Mayor this street ! should be closed to vehicular traffic.
MR. SELWIN, one of the owners of the property, in- formed the Council he has attended several meetings of i the Council, and they purchased this property because i this was a corner lot; they went through the procedure ;
I s
-
t I I I I
I I I I I
I I
I I I I I I I
I
I I I f I 1 t 1 I
I I I I I I # I 1
8 8 ',
*, '*, '88'', 12 9 ', \ 8'
.* \ 8'
b8
8 <,& 'A& \, 8 .', ' '\
'8$%8$', "\, '& 'fg*>,&%#+, ,O'@ ..+f '4.
'I :::I:
:I:::
::(I: I :a:
;:I 4;:
::ii: iii:;
;:::; ::I::
11 ::d: :ii;i :4:;
I;* 4; ijii:
:::I: ::;:; ::'I: ::pa ::::: I:::: 81
l1 1;;:: ::;:I
:;I:; jjii:
l'~1;
:::;I :I:::
:I:;:
;::a:
:;I::
:: ti:(
::I 4;
;I:::
;:I::
I::!:
;$I:
1,::; ::::I ii:::
t1 ;;;::
;::$
t:;1
;I1::
;::I: ;:I:: ::;:: ;::i: 4:;; :ti::
:t'l; iiil:
*11;
::::I
;:;:; ;::a:
;:::;
11:; :x;:
;:::4
411,: ::::; :x:: ;:lb
1::::
:I:::
,I::: ;:
::p: :;;:; $4;
1:::: ;;;;:
;:I::
a+::
41::
:i:;1 :;::I ;:i::
1:::; ::;:: :;;:: I!:::
;I:::
1:;:: ::;q I;::; ;I:::
s:::
::::I I*
:!!I!
"""""" "...
1;1:1
::'Il
:illl
iiii:
,al;l
;I1#:
I' I I
I 1 I
" l 8, '\ '\ '\ ', .b,
I , ' '\, ', '8 8 I I \' \ ' '\ '\\'\, 1 3 [
I -8- ! ', ",'*,, \ '\ ', '\
I '*, ",& .., '.& I I Name % .$,
I : of '\.$ \c& '\ 'f$, '$-LO\+ .t'* ...................................................................... : Member QS"p'~$+.<
I ;,:a: i required, and were granted permission to improve the i ;::j:
: street in accordance with city specifications. t::t;
I I I ii::;
4
I
B 'I
I I
I
11!!4 I ! Mayor Sonneman informed the Council she certainty did i : not feel a 3 foot stairway was sufficient, and would not ; : go along with the present plan.
i Cmn. McPherson stated that he would like to go along i : with their original motion to grant the owner permission ; i to improve this street in accordance with city specifica- i : tions, We should have faith in our engineering depart- : ! ment.
i The Engineer for the owners stated they were willing to : : work with the City Engineer as to the city's requirement& I
I I I I f I I
1 I I I I 1 1
I !
li.11 :;::;
;;:::
V:$ :!:it
;at:: 1;: I'
:l,:l I:;*:
ik$;t
st;t:
:I,,'
I::;: ::::I :::::
:;*I; ::::I
:;I*, 81, :!:: ! By motion of the Council it was agreed that the resolutioi Guevara i i i 4 :
t Avenue west of Ocean Street be abandoned. ; Sonneman : : ; :xi
! I La Roche I ; : ! :
i prohibiting vehicular traffic on Grand Avenue and Elm I Bierce ;x: i? ;
I I i McPherson: !x! xi ;
I I
I I i Mayor Sonneman stated she certainly wanted to see the ! : plans before they were approved by the Engineering De- i I partment, I I
I
I i CITY ATTORNEY'S REPOGT:
I
I I I * * ! I I I 1 : The City Attorney reported she had received a letter i from Michie Publication Company and the codifications i : were shipped on August 25th, so the City should be re- i i ceiving them at any time. 1 I
1 ! I i CITY MANAGER'S REPORT !
, I I I 1 I i Letter dated August 24, 1960 addressed to the Mayor in i i regards to the1 nter-American Municipal 'Congress to be i : held in San Diego October 16th through the 22nd. The i purpose of this organization is to attempt to further re- I : lations with cities in the United States and other countriesJ i They are asking that each City provide some remunera- ;
; tion in order to provide entertainment for this organiza- I i tion while they are in San Diego. The Mayor stated she : : felt it was a great privilege for the County of San Diego i i to have this Congress held here. The City of San Diego : : is planning many events, and she is in hopes that the City : i of Carlsbad can provide some form of entertainment. C&. : Bierce suggested this matter be taken up with the Chamberf i of Commerce to see if they would be willing to cooperate : : with the City in this matter. I t
I I
::::I .'I
:::I1
::I:: lil;
::#:I ::::I ::#:I
::*I' I :I1 ::I1 I:;:: ;;::: I::!: ;:::I ::::I
I!!I!
;;:I'
,a!:;
;!;I tlI I:::
:I;: :I:: ;:::e ::::;
;::ll
I:;::
;llll
I;':: : ; i I-; ii!:: :;::j :,:;:I :I::; ,:::i I:::
!;::I 8;
ii;;
!#I! I I : The City Manager informed the Council he had received I i a memorandum from the Chief of Police requesting the : I(;*:
I City Manager to make a request to the State Highway Corn: i mission to have the Highway Patrol police that portion of : : 101 Freeway that lies within the city limits, By common i ;I::) iconsent the City Manager was instructed to write a letter :
t to the State Highway Commission requesting the policing { l1 1:;:; !of the 101 Freeway by the State.Highway Patrol that lies I :I::; )within the City limits. I I ::;:I
I I !$I!
i:lii ; I I i.4
::,:I
:I;:;
:!/I
/;:; ::;:I
I I ::::
B iCmn. Guevara asked about the sign that is located on the i :Elm Avenue northbound off-ramp, which he feels is a jhazard because it obstructs the view of a driver making i :an approach on to Elm Avenue. The City Manager inform-: ied the Council he would take care of this matter. I I
:Cm. La Roche stated he felt tLe Council should certainly i :give consideration to collecting revenue from the lagoon. i iAs long as we have to police the lagoon we should receive ; :some revenue. The City' Manager informed the, Council he i
I I
I I
e I I I 1 I 1 I I l a I I I 4
I 8 I
I
i::i
Ill: :I::,
:::a:
1;;::
pl:1 4;; ::::I
~::~l ::;:I ::;:I ;J:: ' ;: ;::
/;:I ::::;
;I'll
I ;:
'9111
l!.l
I ,. . I 1 '\" 8, 8\,8\, ''. 'x '\ "
I v.13 1
I i N a me '8, ',$. '\8 'x&
f$@8&,+ 6 :"""-""""""",,,",,""""""""""""""~""""""""~""~~"""""""""""-,""! i Member \o ',o \.(.'&.,& :I
I
I t I
I
I I \ , \ '\ \\ '8 I '\\ '\ '88 '\
I -9- I \8 \, \\ '\ \ ,
t I I I : of y5tgi&8 8\ '(++ Bi 1 ;:;
I is working on this matter. He has contacted some of the I ii::: ! cities that have a like situation and is waiting for their : :;::: : reports, I ::p:
!#I!: I
I ! Ill
+ I : The City Manager requested permission to employ two i I temporary employees for the Water Department for a : : couple of months to take care of the extra work that is in-! I vofved while Chestnut Avenue is under construction. By i : common consent of the Council authorization was given ; i for the employment of two temporary employees for the j : Water Department for a period of approximately two I i months.
i Mayor Eonneman asked what had happened in regards to i : the reduction in the water rates of the Municipal Water : ! District. The Mayor was informed there would be a i meeting with the staff and Mr. Swirsky, Attorney for the i : District on Thursday morning of this week.
i Mayor Sonneman requested that an adjourned meeting be I i held on Monday, September 12, 1960 at 7: 30 P. M. in 4 I : order to discuss some of the ordinances.
: The City Manager informed the Council that in regards i i to the potential sale of the North Carlsbad water system : : to the City of Oceanside, a check had been made with i I O'Melveny and Me.yers as to whether the bonds could be :
i transferred 20 the City of Oceanside for payment in the i i event of a sale, and he was informed that the City of : Carlsbad would have to continue paying on these bonds. i
I I I I t I I t
I I
t I I I 1 I
4 t I I I I I
I I
I I I
i::i:
:::I:
::;a, 'I :::I: I:::: :::i;
!:::I
1:;4:
::::; ,,,:I
::::I
1l)l
!*I,# 'I :;iii
g8;:; ;:;::
'I 1:;::
::;:a ::I:! ::::: l,il-
;:I::
::;;: 1:::
:::;:
::!I: :illl
#:::I
"I
i;::: I:::; ::p:
::I:I :;i:i ::;:;
;II:I
l:!l: i PAYMENT OF BILLS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYfioGL:
i Authorization was given for the payment of bills for the I ::;:; i Water Department in the amount of $17,309.17, and for : Guevara :xi i 4 i ; the General Expenses in the amount of $4,733.18, from i Bierce : :x:* ; i August 16, 1960 to September 6, 1960, as certified by i Sonneman i i i x: i : the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing ; McPherson: ; ; $ ; i Committee. I La Roche i i :$ i
: Ratification of the payroll was given for the second half : Guevara i i i x: ; i of August, 1960, in the amount of $13,449.60, as certi- i Bierce l I :x;xi : I fied by the Director of Finance and approved by the : Sonneman ; I ix I ! Auditing Committee. i McPherson jx : ; x! :
I I I La Roche ; i !xi i
I 'It#: at1 i ADJOURNMENT: I I ::'::
I I I !:::I i By motion of the Council the meeting was adjourned to : Guevara ; !XI x: I
/::;
: Monday, September 12, 1960 at 7: 30 of clock P, M, in the i Bierce !x i { xi ! i Council Chambers. I Sonneman ; ; ;xi i
I I : McPhersoni : ;x; i
I i La Roche ; i :x! i
I !:::I
:;i:i ::;:: + ::;:; I
I I I i I:::: 'I4
I I
I I
I I
I
t
I * I i The meeting was declared adjourned at 11:OO P. M. I I ;::;I
I !I.!! I1 b I : Respectfully submitted, I I 1 ::iri 4:
I 1 !:I:; I
I
I I
! ! ;:::I
l!Il!
I !'fl7 #F(/pL ; -jf" &,&&&& ' - _* &- &&' R /iEETxi ADAMS D i Deputy'City Clerk
I I 4 I I I I I I I I 4 I
: NOTE: Mayo-r-Someman requested 8 correction in i i the minutes on Page 6, Paragraph 6, celeting the wo.rds: i %we have certainly fallen flat on our face", I I t I I t I 1 t 1
I
1 I ,I I
I
:i::i ;:I::
:*:;I
:;I:: *I
:I::: ::I::
tal ::::: ;:::: ;:::: :::;: I: ::i:;
::I::
1;' I/::
::!I! II
I 1
,I
I
I I I i:;si : .:, ;
1 1 I I :;I;+
I 1 I I ::::i I .,
'l:ll
I * t I ::::;
I I !:,!I