HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-10-18; City Council; MinutesI I . i CITY OF CARLSsAD : Minutes of City Cowrciz ! Date of Meeticg: Qctober 18, 1960 c Na t.. - :--.;! *I,.', ::+& : Time of Meeting: 7:OO P. Me ; of ' C\O', ,-$? I Place of Meeting: Council Chambers '.?!@,&?*,: ~""~""""~"~""""~"""""""~"""""""""""""~""-"-~~~"~~~~~~~~~~~"- i Member %%d"g.&?%b ""7""
I :;: I ! ROLL CALL was answered by Cowcilmen Guevara, L \ I I .: ,:
i Bierce, Sonnernan, McPherson and La'Roche. Also ; : ; ;'I
; present were City Manager Pro Tempore Scholink and : .) ; ; I .:
GIl* 1:s i City Attorney Hayes, *-;:
p:: I
I 1::3, :; i mVOCAT1C.N was offered by Councilman Guevara. I i :': ; ;
I l:'st i APPROVAL OF MINUTES: I ;! 1.;;
I :I:;;
I I ;::;t
I I a, The minutes of the regular meeting of October 41 GUevar?a 1 i !X: i : 1960, were approved as corrected, : Bierce ! ; ;x! ;
1 ,i Sonneman i i :x: i
I :. RlcPherson 1 :x ;x; I1 i
I i La Roche p i i ; ;
!::I:
81;;;
I 1::;;
l a, Eleven requests for sewer connections were I c?WWra I : !X: ;
I f ; McPherson 1 : :x; :
I I i Lti PEoche ; !x !x; I
; s, '8 ' -, -s '
I X,, '\ I I ', '88"\, '\, ","\88 2 5 3
I *, '.,"\, '8, ',, ',
B 1
1 . 1.
I 1 I 8 I
)*I1
.I
I I
t
I
I I
; 1,111
I I
b
I I
I I I
D I a 1
I i COIErlESPQNDENCE: I
! approved, in accordance with the Engineering Department! Bierce p i :X! i
; recommendation. ; Sonnemap ; i :XI ;
I
I 11
I
11..
0
nil; 19
1111
It:
1::: I1
*a :I:; qi
;' I 1;;t
;'I: ;i;: {::i ::;: ::;:
tlIl
'I 1: i i
:;I1 :::, :It: ::; 1:;; '8
1:: i:::
,.I ,I .I 1 {.i : * *,e I :
r,;: iii; iiii
i:::
'I,: ; ; ;;:' 4i ;I ,it!
at l*q: ii', 'I
'11
81
I !c
*!94
1 ..
1..
I : , 1. i .,. .. , ..
I I I I I !
;;:I :f\i
I'll il\[ I;:* 1 I!jl :I
:::; 1:
:Ii
;:I
'I,
1:
;I l1
;*a
It: :I1
11;
:,I
ti'
:I: ;:: 'I.: :;: :I;
101
I'
$81
!I1 ;'I
1:; ::; :!'
I 1 I I
6' 4 t '\'
I '8, '\.'',
I
I I
I
I
.'
I I *' \ ',
I -2 - I I Ram? \\
I : of
' ,.
I I
I Di ~""""""""""""""""""~""~~""""""""""~""""-"~"---~-----. : Member
I based on more water than we are eztitled to. 3 hen Los i ; Angeles will require its full entitlemeht of Colorado Zivet i water we will be unable to purchase their sarplus entitle-! : ment and an economic chaos will result. Therefore, the ; i City Council of Carlsbad should merely file this telegram: ; from the MWD and no action is required since the City : i Council reaffirmed its unanimous support of the Californib : w 5.ter bond issue within the last few weeks. I
t I
1- 1 1 I
I I I
I d. Carlsbad Woman's Club - re: Letter of opposi-! I tion to billboards along the Freeway. Letter dated I
i 'actober 4, 1960 from the President of the Woman's Club ; i of Carlsbad, stating she had been directed to advise the i : Council that at their meeting of September 14, 1960, the : i matter of billboards along the Freeway within the city i : limits of Carlsbad had been voted on, and that they were : i unanimous in their opposition to any such action. a
i Mayor Sonneman stated the Womanls Club had always gonk : on record as opposing any advertising along the Freeway i : in the City, and she had also received a similar letter. :
! The Mayor requested the letter filed until a future date I I when this matter would be discussed further. I
I
I I
* I I
1 I I I
I I I I
I t I I
l e. Henry Christiansen - re: Carlana Harbor I I : District. Letter dated October 13, 1960 addressed to : i the-Council from Henry Christiansen, pointing out certai4 : factors ih connection with the recent Carlana Harbor I i election: The Council requested the letter filed. i PUBLIC HEARINGS: ' (See Page 10 and 11 of these min4tes)
i MR. CHESTER JANIK, 286 Chinquapin, stated he wished: i to speak in regards to the proposed drainage ditch on i ; Chinquapin. The petition, previously presented to the : i Council represents about 90% of the property owners who I ; are opposed to this ditch being constructed. They do not : i feel this drainage ditch or a pipe is necessary. & I
i Mayor Sonneman asked Mr. Janik if he thought the : property owners would be willing to participate in the i i cost of having proper drainage installed in this area? I I
i Mr. Janik stated they would have to prove to the property i : owners that it was a necessity. If the city could prove to : i him this was necessary he would certainly pay his share. i : However, he felt the property owners who have the I I I problem were the ones who should pay the cost of this i : drainage. I I
! After considerable discussion by the Council the Mayor i i requested that a petition be prepared for the property ; : owners to see if they would be willing to participate in : I the cost for proper drainage. I 1
i MR. CANNON, Cannon Ttoad, stated that he had come i I before the Council to see what they are doing about the ; I sewers 1 We have property to the south where we can join i : with Leucadia. 8 I
: Mayor Sonnernan informed Mr. Camon that the North : ; County group have been working on this matter. There i : have been several meetings held; however, we cannot : ; give any answer at this time. Also we hzve been working i
i on a plan with Vista. If some of the communities lag in : i their decision they are planning to go ahead without them, i : however, it will have to be along the lines of the County : i Master Plan. I 1
I Mr. Cannon asked if this Council would give their bl3ssinds
I I I
I I I PONS: t I
I I 1
I I
I I I I *
1 I I I 8
t 4 I
I I I I I
I 1 I I I Dl
I a I 1 I
t I I I I I I I I I 1
I I 1 I I I t
... . 8 *' \ *' \ 8' ', '\ 'x\'\, 1 5 4 " \\ \\ \\ '\ \x '\$' '\, '.&, '.$$+, '\ '@;, '?$@y&,.$+ ,u '@ \,P'$\.d.O\. :rill
l1 l:dl
;!:I: ;::
::::: @I i::;; iii'. :; $;::
!:I:;
1::;:
iip; ::;
;' 1::::
I":;
a;:;: ;I
::;I'
::I::
:I:':
$8::
I:!:: I;::: :;i:;
;;I:#
;;:a: I::
:;I:#
11::: 01 :;::; :;::; i:!;:
1:;:; :+i :; ;: 1 :ii ;:::: /iI:
;:Is; ;:::: :il:: i;;::
I;':; :;::: :::i:
;I1
""""""i""
"'1;
:::I:
:it::
11*:: ::::I
;:::I ;:::: ::::i :x:: ;; 1::: ::;+; :;:::
:It:; :i;::
;I:#*
:;4;
1:;:: i:::: Il:i; p:::
#::I1 ::;:: i$:: i:: I:#
1: ::;:*
:::I:
11;:
::::: j::::
1": 1;'
::,I; ;:I
::e:;
1:::I 1::::
1:::; ::i:: ::::; i:::: *I
;::I, ;I::; :I;::
;:e:;
*I::; :::::
:; 1:::; :: I::
:I::: ;:::I
!!:I:
1::;
l11l1
#~I:4
!l,!I
4 I I 'i i ',8\ I I ', '\ ' t I \ " I I .' I '. " I I I
I
t I I ,~""""""""""""""""""~""".."..-~"'^""~-"~""""""""""-"'
-5- t U ,
I i Name \, ; os i Member Di I 1 : if they formed their own district? We cannot develop I ; our properties unless we have sewers.
i The Mayor stated she would like to ha-Je Mr, Cannon i attend the sewer meetings held by the North County group:
; Mr. Cannon stated he had attended one of the meetings in : I Eminitas, however, h r: had not been asked to Bny of the : i meetings and did not feel free to attend without being ask&. : Mr. Cannon suggested that a district be formed to build i t the main trunk lines and disposal plant, aild then each i ; community pay for the usage. He worked with one distri4 i in Orange County, The County formed the district that : ; constructed the tr& fine and disposal plant. Then each i I City formed their own separate district, and when they i
i tied into the main trunk line they were metered and I I i charged accordingly.
i Mayor Sonneman informed Mr. Cannon there were certai3 : restrictions which made it difficult to form the separate : i districts. This would have to be checked. Also the : Mayor pointed out that the County Engineers have been : i working with the North County group on this matter.
,: Crnri. La Roche stated he felt Mr. Cannon had hit on an i I important subject. He would like to have a progress : report made on the steps that have been taken or the : progress being made. Also he felt it would be helpful to ; ! the citizens if they knew what is being done. 1 + :. i 'NIR., GRAHAM KELLY, stated he was an attorney living i ; in $an Diego, and was representing the Kelly properties. i : Orange County was given special legislation to form their: i separate districts. He would like to propose a route for I ! the tPu& lines. Vista has the State's whip on their backs;; 1 they are going to have to lay out between $400,000 to i ! $450,000 for their sewer system. He has talked to the : i County Cfficials and they have provided $GO, 000 for sewe<s : at $he airport. The two total approximately 112 million : ! dollars. The route he would like to propose is that the i
; Vista sewage be brought over the Calaveras gap, then : i across El Camino Real at approximately the location of i
i i€i& bridge in the vicinity of the Allen Kelly property; then: ! Carried west to the railroad right-of-way, 2nd then south E : to the Las Encinas Canyon. This route would take care : : of a great many problems. Mr. Allen Kelly has talked p i with some of the property owners along the route he just ! : proposed. Mr, Allen Kelly has indicated his willingness I i to go along with this proposal, We sold a large parcel of ; : land some time ago, and this owner is willing to contri- \ i bute his share, as his land is valueless unless he can get : : sewers. Max Len, one of the owners of Carlsbad Proper; i ties, is planning an 80 acre industrial development, If ; : sewers are not available to him when he starts his I I i development he plans to pump through the Bressi land \ : and into the Leucadia plant. If Max Len puts in a pump- : i ing plant the Kelly properties will be forced to go into i : 'the Leucadia district also. : I i MF:~;; Sonneman asked Mr. Kelly if he knew of any i propkrty owner who would be willing to donate their : property for the plant?
: Mr. Kelly stated Irwin Kelly has some land, however, it i ; would not be satisfactory due to the high content of clay i : in the soil, and if a plant were located on it at best it ; i would only be of a temporary nature. He felt that the i : Las Encinas Canyon was the best location for aZ1 concerned.
!
I I 1 I I I I t L
I I I I
I I I I b
I I
I I I
t * I
I
1 I I I
I : I t I
+ I
4
I I I I I I I * t 1 I 0:
I I
I Mayor Sonneman informed Mr. Kelly the Council appre- i i ciated his interest and proposal, but tine location was 1 1 1 I : I f 1 I L
6 6 I I I I I I I
,. . \' I , ',, 'X\'\,
\, '\$$\ ',, '33' i .,+'\$+\ ' 'P&\ ; '?& \,o \ +\.t'*, I
;Il;:(
;;;;I;
4;: ;1 i:::;~
1:: I: i::I: i;p:
:::I: j::::
41:: !;!;; :;;:: 1:::; ;;!;I
1;:::
::;I: :;:::
:;::a
::'I: h::: ::::;
;:#I
1::s;
@*I!;
:;'I, ::ii:
:I:': 11
I::!: ::p:
:;I ::i
4;:;
:;;I: i:::: ;:::: ;::::
1'8:; 1*(11
1::
:I::;
1:::;
II,;l !I:;:
~1:~: ;llll ;iiii i:::: 4:::
*I::;
::;a, l;iii i::;: la
;:;::
:;I:;
*;::
:I;;#
:@;I1
dl;; I:::; :;::;
;;1;1 ::iii i;::: ;;:4
lI;:l
111;: :'::I
::;,I
$1:: ::;: 18' ;:::
t'l; ::::
:::I
I;*: :;:I :Ll :: (Ill i:::
1*11
:!:I
1,:
11:: ii:; :::; 1: i::' *;: !it! ;,!i
'%, 8,' \\\'\\ "55 f '. ', ., .\ -, I
'2 @\*X$? ',o b,: """""""""
I'
())It
)11,1
*I1
!:I ::;
::liI i::
:L illll 1:;
:: 1
1*I i
%:; ::;
:::8
l* I@
*!;:
I I
I I
.' ; , -,x , .'
I I '. ', '\, 8, '\,",
I - 4- ', '\$' '\\ '.%. j
I b?d+?'9 ',#$ \\
I I * t -:--I"-
I :::I:
I 1 ::::I
I ::;::
I reconvened at 8: 52 P. M. Ill;
I I . ", .' '8 '\- '\,, '\,'\, 156 1
I I : : Narne of '.$'$+, '"+&', 1
I I 8, '\ ', \ \ ', I I I
I
BI
: Member .$@\$-p%', f""""""""""~~"~~"""~"""~"""""""""-"-"----------~"~-----------"-~--"--
: going to be a big problem. I 1 11:;
: A short recess was called at 8: 30 P. M. The meeting : ::;::
:,,,I
::!!I
I I , I I 1 I Mayor Sonneman suggested that the City Attorney be in- ! : structed to investigate the procedure for the formation : \ of a district. The City Attorney asked if the Council I : would like her to meet with the Attorney for the Vista ! i Sanitary District and with the owners of the properties i : to the south?
: Cmn. La 3oche suggested that we obtain some technical i. i help on this matter, as to our needs, I I
i After considerable discussion the City Attorney was in- i i strueted to investigate the different types of .districts : : that could be formed, and that she meet with the Attomes i for the Vista Sanitary District and the property owners I : to the south. I I
I I I I I 1 1
t I t I
I I
4 : ENGINEERING:
I
I
I I I I 1 I 1 4 a. Vacation of a portion of Garfield Ave. between i i Cedar and Beech Street. Tmrequest of Menry Mayers j i : mciates was again reviewed. The matter was : i referred to the staff at the last meeting and the recom- i : mendation of the staff was that the street hot be vacated ; I due to the following reasons: (1) The,,potential develop- i i rnent for this property would warrant the need for a : circulatory traffic pattern in the area; (2) Eecause of the: : narrow right-of -way existing oh Oceai.1 St. it was felt : that with the potential developmerit & crowded traffic i condition would arise on Ocean St. ; and (3) Also with the i : improvement of Garfield, problems such as drainage, : i and grading would not necessarily occur.
i Cmn. Bierce stated he could not go along with the staff : : recommendation as he usually does. He did not feel that i i the City would be in a position to improve this street for i : a long time, as there are too many other streets that : i need work first.
i Mayor Sonneman stated she would certainly go along' with i i the staff recommendation. She did not feel that the : closing of any of our streets was feasible, Also she i could not see how this street would handicap any of the I : property owners. t I
: Cmn. La Roche stated he felt this matter was a planning i i matter and should be referred to the Planning Commis- : : sion. This Council should not be asked to act as an I I i arbitrator, There is too much time spent on matters i
.:': such as this when there are more important matters the ; .,.-i Council should be concerned with. We asked who the i
i Staff consisted of? t a !
I I
I I I
I 1
b I
I 0 I O
a
I I I I I
1 s L I
I I 4 I I
:*iiI :::::
8":;
I::l:
::::: t:; :; i:: IL ,4,:, ;.: 1 4: (.:; I :::;:
::;I:
::I:: /::: ;:::+
1';::
e:?t;
:;:I,
!;e:#
@:::I i:::: 4::;
:::?I
11;
a : Mayor Sonnernan stated this letter and request was ad- i i dressed to the Council, Perhaps before any action is 1 : taken by the Council it should be referred to the Planning: ! Commission; however, she did not feel that any matter I : was too small for the Council to consider.
: Cmn. McPherson stated he agreed that this matter had I : been presented to the Gomcil and has received a recorn- i i mendation from the staff. :: Cmn. Bierce stated he went over this area with the Chief i : of Police and he did not feel tke re would be any traffic i i problem if this street were closed,
I
I I I I 0:
I I I I I
I I I I I t I 1 I I 1 I I I 1
I I 1 I I I I I 3
\ 2
:*;;a
1:::: :::;: ::: I: :;:i: ::::I :::i: ;;:::
i:i:: ;:;::
I:::; I"
::,;I
:::I: :::I: i;i:I
;fil;t +::
!::!I *I
111
fit#:*
::'I;
;;;:: ::;I'
!:I:: ,;:::
'$:I: ;;I:& ::;:: !I::! ;x::
1'::) r:::: :;,:: ::it: ::::; ::
::::I i::;r
!::;I ::::; ,;::I i:::
::at
::I ::
It
(I1
'11;
(IIl'
11;
IIl: l!!l ).'I :::: :::;
;;It ;:i: lid I::: ::!: :i:; pi; ::;:
;*I1
1:::
st
'i;; ::;; :::: ii::
11;; :' 1::: :::: :;:: :;;: ::!:
st;:
:!t,
i
I I
I I
I I' \\ 8, .\ '\ '. .\
t I I \, ',,'x, ', 'x '',
\ \", \'
I I
'\ ', '\\ " , 8. \\ 151
I 1 t of 'y?ggj& \ ' $A, ,*, I I I
,\\\" -" + .- La i N a me' \, \.st \\, '\+
a \,A@\ + &+ I \ Member \$ @~~\~*,-~ ~"~"""""""~"~""""""""""~"""""""~-."--"""-------,"----------------~----~--,-~
I.. B I I I I I 1 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I !I '1 I I I I I I
4 4 I I I t I
; 9 I I I I I
I I I I I I i
I t I I I I I I I I I I
!
I I I I i j
j
t I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I f t I t I I I I I I I I I 4 I I I
I
I
b
4
I
I I 1
I I :;ip After considerable discussion, by motion of the Council i Guevara % I :x: i this matter was referred to the Planning Commission : Bierce : : :x: : for further study and report. ; Sonneman ; ; !x: : i McPherson ; ; :xi i I La Roche i ixix: i
b. Final Map of Las Flores Place Subdivision. I I ::;;I The Assistant Engineer presented the finar the i a,,,:
;;,:I
Council's review, and informed the Council the map met i 4 I :I;
with all the requirements of the city. 3y motion of the : :::::
Council the final map of Las Flores Place subdivision i Guevara : ix !x: : ;#I:;
was approved subject to the subdivider entering into an : Bierce h: :xi : improvement agreement, and the City Clerk instructed I Sonneman ; ; :x: i to sign the final map at such time as the improvement : McPherson : : :xi ;
11
t )1(11 I
)I(II
11
Z;T$S~-;:. ~d is zx'cuted. i La Roche ; ; :xi i
(11'1
118
11
I 11 I The Assistant Engineer advised the Council the subdivid6r is dedicating 20' for Spruce Street and the property ownets on the east side of Spruce are dedicating 30' of right of i way with complete improvements except €or sidewalks. i ;;I::
;;:::
::::I
$I*::
:;:I'
I ;::;:
111
I*!l!
C. Tentative map of Village Homes #3 subdivision. i The tentative map was presented for the Council's revie+.
Res. #182 of the Planning Commission was read, where21
they recommended the approval of the map subject to i certain conditions and requirements being performed. t
I Discussion was given as to sidewalks being required i within a cul-de-sac. Cmn. Bierce stated he had just : returned from Phoenix, kizona, which has been beauti-i fully laid out. He took time to look over the new section$
of town as well as the old. They have rolling curbs and I no sidewalks. I I
MR. ROBERT WATSCN, one of the partners of the subdivision, stated he has always felt that on all thoro- i fare streets sidewalks should be required; however, he ; did not feel that it was necessary to have sidewalks in a I cul-de-sac street. I I
I I I t
t
Cmn. La Roche stated that San Fernando also has rolled i curbs and no sidewalks. I I
JACK KUBOTA, engineer for the subdivider, stated he i would formally like to make a request to have the side- : walks deleted in the cul-de-sac. Also he would like the i Council to consider participation by other property ownegs in the area as to the fire hydrant. One fire hydrant cost4 $800.00 and will serve 50 property owners. This sub- I
, division consists of 8 lots. I u
After discussion by the Council it was their decision that: sidewalks would not be required within the cul-de-sac, : but that the subdivider should pay for the cost of the fire i hydrant. 4 P
I I
L I
I 0 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Oi I I I 4 I 'I I I
,' I
I I <I I I 1 I I
i
I
I
t
The following r.esolution was presented for the Council's i review: 0 a
J
Res. #697. A i3ESCLUTION QF THE CITY COUNCILi OF TI% CITY CF CARLSBAD APPBOWG TEMTA- 1 TIVE MAP OF VILLAGE HOMES UNIT NO. 3, I I SUBDIVISION, was adopted, with the exception of Item i #12, which. required sidewalks being installed within the : cul-de-sac.
Mr. Watson asked that the Council consider a solution i to the matter of fire hydrants, whereby each lot would : be required to pay a fixed amount towards a fire hydrant I in the area. I I
4 I 'I I I
I I I I I ;
t 1 1
:i:::
11;:; 111
1,1:* !p;:
1 (1)
::::I
a::*: ":::
::,:I
:llI; :i::: :::::
I (1, ;:::: ;:::,
1;*1; i:;:: :I:::
::I:* hi;!
::;I, I:: f:
/I;: I(* ;;;I:
1::;:
::;ti
:*I:;
:!:;I
:!!I!
*at
I~I)
It1
l"1; ::i:;
::;:I 4,;:
!:;I; ;;::: *"; ;:i:; ::;i: l1
4:;:
::'I: :I::;
:I::;
;:Ill ;::::
,e::;
1::::
/;::: ::i:: :::I;
:;a:; :::
:::a, :I;::
:# 1: ::i::
;:I:; :::;: 1:;l
41 ::;::
p:;: :i::: ::!:I i::;: "1;;
1;;1
I 11: ::$:
:I,,,
1:::: ::::;
iiiii
I*
!lI!l
1' I I ' ':\ ' . ' \' . e I I 8,. ', '\\ '8 '\\'*\ I I ! 1 '. " '\ '\. '. -, 158 1 I I I
I I I I I
-6 I t -. ' , -\ ' I \ ', '\\ ' , \ 8 i N a me "t, '+&,, '\, , ''* ,$$, : of 'i-+g+, 8, +', ! Member 6&&?.db '\L \$l x 4 ',+'$e
BI ,-,,,,,,,,-,-,,,,,-,-,-",-"-,,,"--------------------~,-,~----------------------'----------------~--~~--.--j----'
I :::#I
d. Final map of Village Homes #3 subdivision. I I i:::: Il 11 : The final map of Village Homes #3 subdivision was pre- { 1:;;: ; sented for the Council's review. The Assistant Engineel". :::I: i informed the Council the reason for the final map being i
! presented at the same time as the tentative map was due; 41:
i to the improvement of Chestnut Avenue, and the subdi- : :;11:
i vider was desirous of installing his improveme'nts at : a":: : the same time as Chestnut was being improved.
.. il I I 1::Il i By motion of the Council the Final Map of Village KomeG 1:::: i Unit #3 subdivision was approved, subject to the sub- : Guevara ; ix :x: l : divider entering into an improvement agreement with the: Bierce F: ;xi i i city, and the City Clerk was instructed to sign the final i Sonneman ; i :x: : : map at such time as the subdivider had executed the ; McPherson: : !xi I i improvement agreement. i La Roche i i !x: t
I I ::!:j
1
!I:::
:::;I ::i:;
I ::;I:
I I I :I::;
;#I:;
I I
I I I e. Weed Abatement Program. The Council was i : informed that a new list had been prepared of properties: i needing the abatement of weeds and trash, that were not i t listed on the first inspection of the city. 4 I I t I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I 4 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I * I I 1 I I I I * I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I
I I I I I 1 I I I I I I
I Bi
I
Cmn. Bierce stated that on the work that had been done I on the first list of properties, he felt the timing had bee4 very poor. He presented a bill that the property owner ; had received for $15.00, and he knew the property had i been cleared by the property owner himself and a build- : ing had been constructed on the property since the propet- ty was first posted. Cmn. Bierce further stated he knevrf of another case wherein the property owner had been : billed $60.00 for work that had been done in approxirnady 20 minutes. I t
The Assistant Engineer advised the Council there would i probably be errors made, as the city does not have suf- i ficient help to allow one person to devote full time on the: project. I I
I
I The City Attorney id ormed the Council a hearing would i be held on November 1, 1960, and the property owners : could protest at that time. 1 I
1 The following resolution was presented for the second liit of properties, declaring weeds and trash a nuisance: I I I
I;;#;
::;I, II
::I:* ::::i ::I;:
:::a:
11
!$I!$ i::;: ;:4;
1:::: i::;;
;t:11 :::$
I:I
:;a 4: :;:i;
::I:: ::;I: :x::
;:::;
:it::
11::; I::::
1;;:t ;II::
;:::I
::I::
1:;::
::!I!
11
1'11 1;ll;
11:11
11'
111
l"li
*1
1::::
1;::;
:I*::
;:::I .! I! Res. #694. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF I I::,: mD DECLARING WEEDS AND TRASH UPON i I:::: CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE; :::a, AND DESCRIBING SUCH PROPEBTY; ORDERING THl$ PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO ABATE SUCH : Guevara
NUISANCES, SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARLBierce ; ;xix: i ING OF OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED ORDER QT Sonneman : I :x; : ABATEMENT, was adopted by title only and further : McPherson i xi :x: i reading waived. ! La Roche ; : :XI :
I i~ll~
Is
$1:;
1:::; :xi I #I
11
I ::,:I ,!I!
f. Request for extension of time on tentative map I of Linda Estates Unit #2 subdivision. Letter from Donald K~lly,Tngineer for the subdivider, dated
I I I !
ijii :i::
!I:! October 14,- 1960; requesting a one year extension of i time for the filing of the final map of Linda Estates Unit i
#2 was presented. By motion of the Council an extensiod of timefy one ear from October 20, 1960 wa ra ed i for the i ing of The final map of Linda Estates b&t & : subdivision. 1 I
I I
Guevara Bie rce Sonneman McPherso La Roche
ii::
I : !x: 8: :x; : : :x:
i ; :x: sn; jx:x:
!::!
I*
11
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 4 I I I OLD BUSINESS: I I I ;::'I I( :;
# !l:!l
I I
I
1 a. Second reading of Ordinance No. 9107 - reclassf i fying certain property - A. H. Glissman. The following: : ordinance was given a second reading: I I
1 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I 1
I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I
I !
i:':: 'I
::I::
:I:;, :i::i
~l:~l
;:l:l
;I:1; ::::: ::;::
:::I, II
1::::
1:: la;::
!ll!l
I s I I I
1 . I I t
I I I i DL I"
I
I
1
I
I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I b 1 I 1 I t I I I I I I I , I I I t I I I
I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I f I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I
I I b I I
I
1 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 9
; I 1 I I I I I
I 1 t I I B I I I I I I I I I *
I I I
I L I
I I I I I I i I I I I I I I
I 1- \\ ', ' '\ -x '
I , ' 'X, '\ ', '\
I x '. '* '. \ 8
I I
I I '\ '* . '\ '\\'.\ 159 i .'
-3 - I I
7, \ \ .-
'\\ '$& '+& i : *a me +/&, '\ \&!>' : '?$$&,;$';?++ I
:;;!!:
CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY IN i Sonneman :+I I : :X: ; I
t of ! Member ,o ~o~..p0~,6\~ 1 ~~""""""~""""""""""""""~"""""""~""""""--~----"----------"~----~"--~
Ordinance No, 9 107. AN OiZDINAMCE OF THE CITY i Guevara : :x; xi : i -INDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, ! Bierce : ; :x; I I
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD FROM ZONE R-I-15,000 : McPhersoni : :xi i 8~ 1 TO ZONE X-1 -10,000 was adopted. i La Roche : 2 :xi : ~
I I :::I(
I *I. I b.. Cxos@ing guard at Tamarack and Jefferson Stre& This matter had been referred to the Chief of Police for :
an investigation. A memorandum from the Chief of Police dated September 27, 1960 was read and discussed; wherein he stated an investigation had been made regard+ ing providing better protection for the school children at i
both the Magnolia Street School and the Jefferson Street : School. The Police Department has maintained a police i unit with a uniformed officer in the area of Highland Dr. : from Magnolia, Basswood, Chestnut and in the vicinity i of the High School since the beginning of the school due : to the increased amount of traffic on Magnolia and Bass-: wood as result of the improvement of Chestnut for the : reason there are a large number of youngsters operating: motor vehicles to and from the high school area. Also : every effort will be made to give the intersection of I I Jefferson St, and Tamarack Ave. as much attention as i possible, however, it will be impossible to maintain an : officer at this location constantly due to the limited man-: power. The Chief of Police recommended that a school i Cr@sshg Guard be employed to work this intersection, i Which would give this intersection maximum protection. ;
I
t I
1
::ii;
;:I"
::,:I
;:: i::::
*I:*:
;11:1 ;pl:
I 1::
::::I
(:;I:
1*1) &I t:;;: ::::I pi:;
:::;:
:::I:
4:;::
;;I:'
1*;1:
;::;I :i:::
~1:~:
:;I:& :;::: ;t:::
*I:&: ::!if
!!iii *I I
:II:f
i:;;;
i :i"i Considera4l:e discussion was given this matter, and by ; GueGra ; :Xi Xi I
as th6 person to obtain a Crossing Guard for the crossinq hmeman i : IXi I located at the intersection of Tamarack Ave. and Jeffersgn McPhersoP i !X: i
Street. ; La Roche \x: :xi :
motiori of the Council the Chief of Police was designated i Bierce : i :x: I
I l..l I
c. Request for stop signs. At the previous meeting i a memorandum was read wherein the Chief of Police i requested certain stop signs installed at the following : locations: (1) NE corner of Grand and Harding; (2) SU; i corner of Grand and Hope; (3) SW corner of Elm Ave. 1 and Alley way (near Hope); and (4) NE corner of Alley i way and Grand Ave. (near Hope).. At that time the I I Council requested the matter deferred until the next meeting in order that the Council members could check : the locations. I I
4 t I
I
Cmn. La Roche stated he had made an investigation and i he did not believe the traffic warranted these stop signs; : however, the flow of traffic may be greater at certain : times, and if the Police Department felt they were needed he had no objection. I 1
Cmn. McPherson stated the City has an ordinance, Ordinance No. 3005, which requires all vehicles emergik from an alley shall stop, therefore, he could see no reas#n for having these stop signs. I I
Cmn. Guevara stated he was with the Chief of Police today, and in the opinion of the Chief there should also i be a stop sign installed at the NW corner of Madison and I Magnolia Ave. I I
I I I
I I I I I
I I
#i;l;
::I:( ::p: 4 1) !::I: ::: 9:
1;''' ::i:i
!:#;I ;::;:
:::t:
47:: It I;':;
;1::1
;:'I:
1:;::
I:*
:;;:;
;:1:1 ::!:/ ::I:: I:::: ;::::
*Id;
::::I
I::l:
llI;l :I::; i::::
1;;::
I:1l
!ll!l
:;:;I :::::
::'I:
1:::: :if::
i:::; 8;
1*1I
After discussion by the Council, by motion of the Council! :ti;:
it was agreed that the City Attorney be instructed to I Guevara ; :xixi : :::I,
prepare an ordinance, amending Ordinance No. 3005 to i Bierce :xi ;xi ; allow the stop signs as recommended by the Chief of : Sonneman I / :x: : Police in his memorandum, with the additional sign to i McPherson ; ; !x; : be located at the NW corner of Madison and Magnolia Avei La itoche i i !x; i
I l?4l! MR. JACK KUBQTA requested the Council to adopt a I resolution changing the plans and specifications on I 1 Chestnut Avenue at the location of Village Homes Unit #3,f
8 I 1
:;::;
::I::
I;*;1
:si:: 11
i:;::
,,!,! I I :isti I I 1:;::
!11!*
Or
B
B
I I 1 I I I I I
I I 1
.d 1 I ..J. . ! I I I I !
I I 1 I I I :"""""""--"""""""""""""~""""""""""""""""~"
f 1 in order that the improvements for the subdivision could i I be done simultaniously with Chestnut Avenue. The City : : Attorney was instructed to prepare a resolution for the i i next Council meeting. 1 I
1 1 1 I i CITY A.TTO&NEY'S REPORT:
1 I
I I I I i I I
1 I Lull property. Mrs. Lull requested this matter ; : deferred until the next meeting as Mr. Lull is out of 5 i town at the present time. I I I
I I I I & I I Catering Service Ordinance, : The City Aktarney i : informed the Council she had been unable to drraft a satis-: ! factory ordinance as of this date for Catering Service. I
i Street.Atitle search of this property has been requested : from the title company, and as soon as this info'rlnation i4 i received she will proceed with condemnatiah pkaceedings.:
I I I I 1 I Condemnation of property for cross street on State :
I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I $ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
.. Hesidence requirement, <or City Employeeki. In i checking with other cities in the County, Oceahs~dk, is i the only city that still has this requirement, Oc$ahside ; is under civil service, and if ybu have civil ser'vide you ! could justify this requirement since the empio$xies would : have job security. I I
Cmn. La itoche stated he would like to knotjy why these i cities had done away with this rkqtiireinent. I I
i 1
I I i Mayor Sonneman stated she felt there wbre many qualified : persons living within the city who would be capable of i i working for the city. I I
i After discussion by the Council it was agreed that the i i City Attorney prepare a Policy Statement regarding I I ; residence requirement for city employees. It was felt i i the employee should have six months in which to estab- : : lish residence. I I
i Attorney informed the Council she had registered Sunday : : for this event. The City Attorneys of the County enter- i i tained the officials on Monday evening. 1 4
i The Mayor stated she certainly wanted to attend this i Congress, but due to extenuating circumstances she had I : been unable to attend so far. Mayor Sonneman asked if I I the Council wished to approve any registrations at this ; : time, 2nd it was the feeling of the members this would : i not be necessary as they would be approved when pre- ! : sented for payment. I I
I 1 I I I
1 I I I I I I Inter-American Municipal Congress. The City I I
1 I I I f 1 1
I I I I 4 4 I I I
I I
I
I I I I I I I I I t I 1 I i 4
& $ I
I Cmn, La Roche asked what the purpose of this Congress : was, and he was informed that the purpose of the organ- i ization was for better understanding of the different types:
of municipal governments among the countries of the 1 , Western Hemisphere. Ah.0 it is a city to city organiza- i tion to establish and improve good will between our I I neighbors. I I
Sale of Pirates Cove property. The Council was i informed the investigation onide had not been corn-: pleted. I I
I 1 I
I I I : CITY MANAGER'S REPUdT:
I
I I I I t I I I Water Bond bids. The City Manager Pro Tern i i advised the Council that a tentative date has been set for : i December 6, 1960, to open the bids on the $300,000 watek : bond issue. I , I I I 1 I 1
I I I 1 I ! I I 1 I ;
',, ', .', '\ ', -*
8, ', ' 'x 'b,'', ', '.,'.\ '.\ \\ '\ '.\ '\\", \ \ '' ' ' 160 ~ \%. ", "&. Name "'.cc& '\ '& of ',Q~$+' .p" '*"
i:;::
It I I' i.! ;
::;I: : :.I : 1
4 1.; 1 t
:I,::
llts; l:ll I 11: $?;;
;:I:! :::I:
ll;ll
:!I:*
:I:;: 4::: ; 1 :.: :
1:;::
:::I: :::;:
::I::
:I::; 4::, ::I:; :::::
::::I
::I;1
1:;: i::;; :i::;
:I::;
11::; :p;;
:I::;
::::I :I::: 4:;:
"1,;
:(*I
::::;
I::':
1:::: ii"'
8 'I:: ::ii: ;::;I ;,::: ::$:
I:':;
;::'I
;I::: :I::: ::::I
;l;ll
1';::
;!I;; ::;;;
"I#:
I I: It i:;
;:I::
11:11
1:::: i:;::
1::::
:*I;: ::I:; ::::;
1:;It
:;a:; ::i:; i;:!:
;:'t: ::i:: '::: ::;;: l;::: J::!: ;::;: :::::
8t::l ::::i ::::: ii:::
:;::I :;i;:
;lstl
1:: :: :I,::
;::I:
;:a:: ::: 1:::
::I::
;:::;
Member @@,$@%\,
"""""""""""~""~
I11I*
81
l:a*:
;l:'l
1:111
1: I1
I:,
::::; 1::
*':: I :;/;
:st*l ,!::a
I
I I *# I' , .I .. \\ *, -.
I I 8\'
I I 1 I =.:=:.., 8' '\,, ' \,, \' ,,, 161
I I N a me '8,8'?$, b,, ,p-,
I t \'\ I I '\ '\ 8, " \
I : of 8 '@, ~"~"~"""""~"~"""-""""""*""""~"""""".~"-"""~"-,-~""""""-""----~----~ i Member .o\+po\,o.
League of California Cities Conference. The Counck i was reminded the League Conference would tje next week i : in Los Angeles.
t -3 - ',\ "\*,
# .?**,+,&$&,
i:::: ::::: 11
I : I i::::
I I I ::p:
I Employment of Consulting Engineer. The Council i ::;;: i was iniforwed that applications for the position of Consul- i : tirig Engineer for the City had been received, and the City : :::il
:::I: i Manager has recommended that the firm of Associated i ::I:'
: Engineers be employed. I I I !!lI: 11:::
I. I ':I:: : Cmn., Bierce stated we have two local engineering firms i iI::; i that ,are certainly qualified for consulting engineering worl/, I::::
i and he did not feel we should have to go to National City i ii;;:
i to employ a Consulting Engineer. I 1 ;: It;::
I I I I 1,;:: ::I:# 1 By common consent of the Council the matter was deferred l*i:i i until the next meeting. I : : I ;'I
i :lll;
I I I:: i I'CATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: I I J::':
I :#I:&
I I I;'!: i Ratification of the bills was given for the general expenses: Guevara i xi !x ; : 'I:::
! of the city in the amount of $5,654,43, and the LP ater ; Bierce : $;xi : i Department in the amount of $5,894.91, from October 4, \ Sonneman : ; !x: i : 1960 to October 18, 1960, as certified by the Director of : McPherson i : :x i : i Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee. i La Roche I ' :x: I
I Ratification of the payroll was given for the first half of i Guevara i ; 9 j ; 141:
: October, 1960, in the amount of $13,559.50, as certified i Bierce : : :x! ; i by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing I Sonneman i i !x i I : Committee. ; McPherson !x: $ ; i
i ADJOURNMENT:
i By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 10: 57 P, M(
D i, I ;;@I;
1:;'
I II
:I:, I
111
841
#. I
11
I
I + It
I I
11
I I
1 :L;1
I I I : La Roche I :x!x i ;
I I I ::I
I I ::;:!
I I I ::::: ;!:;I
I I ;::I,
8 I I$;;
I I I I iiiii
I I I I ;::I
I I ;:I::
I I *L;l Ill
I I I I i::::
I I 1 I ::i:i
1:;:: i pi? /a/@ .C%Z <?. (,,,/;<;[&;*</J t I :;b:@ 1:;:
I ;;I I
I I I 1 1::::
I I I I ;;:;I i:;;:
I I I I :::::
I 1 I :;:::
I I I I i::':
I I I I p:;;
I I I I ::::; 4:::
I I I I I::;I
1 I I ::;Il
I L I :;;::
I 1 I I ;;;:;
I 1 I 1 I-::
1 1 :::,I
I I 1 ;:'I:
::I:: :pi;
I I P ::;SI
I I I I :;I:: 111
I I II 8 i:p:
l I a e :::ii
I I 0 I:::,
I I 4 4 I::::
l I e I i::;:
L $ 1 :;I::
I I I :;,:I
I I 1 I i:::;
I I I ,a::;
I I I ::;::
I I ;:
4 I I 1: :I:
I I ::i:i
8 *(I I I
1 I
! Respectfully submitted,
1 I I* ' . .)-/'" , ...A ,,-- I
i MARGPRE i Deputy .it~cY~rkADAnrs I I I I :1{ii l4:i ;:
I
,, i I
I
I I
I I I I
I I t I I I
11'11
I
I 1
4 I b8l;
I I (I,+l I
I
I I:Il I I 1 I I I I t
9 D B I h 14
Q
0
1 1 I:'I: I I
1
I
I I
I
! t !*l!l
* .' .
I I I
t
8 * 4
I' , , .\ ' '\ .\
I .'
\\ '\ '\ ', \ ' i N a me '., '8$&,'\,y$, , , : of \,+ \o \
i Member ,o\ov.p+:,&, ;"""""""""""~"~""""""""""~"~"""""~""""""--;""-"-----------:"'~-.~~" ' I 1. 41
I PUELIC HEARINGS: I 1::11 I 1I)II I I !lI!l
I I I '\ '\,'\ '%, '\'\\
I I ', '\\ ', "J, ', 4162
..@Q#$&g$& 04\
I :ti1; :. ~4.
I I I -10- \' .\
Bj
I I
I I I (a) Resolution of Intention by the Planning Commis- i
$ion regarding an amendment to Ordinance No, 9060, I I kticle 7, Section 706, as to the minimum lot area per : awelling unit in the d- 3 Zone. I I I I 1
I I
:The Clerk certified as to proper publication of notice. Ais+ !hat there were no written protests received up to the time : Bet for hearing, I
!Resolution No. 179 of the Planning Commission was read, r :wherein they recommended that lot area per dwelling unit : :be reduced, for the reason that by reducing the number of I !square feet per dwelling unit from 1200 sq. ft. to 850 sq. 1 3%. would merely increase the economic use of d-3 proper-; :e, and thereby make the land's use more comensurate wit! %he increased land values,
:The Mayor declared the public hearing open, and asked if i $.here were any persons desiring to speak in favor of this i amendment, There were no persons desiring to speak in ; 9avor of the amendment.
!The Mayor then asked if there were any persons desiring i to speak in opposition to the amendment, As there were : bo persons desiring to speak in opposition the Mayor de- i :dared the hearing closed at 7:40 P. M.
I I
I I
I
1 4 I I I I
I I I t I I
I I I
i:;;:
;*I /I;:
:::::
Ill
111:: e:: ;:
l:;8:
!l*!l
I !After considerable discussion by the Council the following i !resolution was presented for the Council's review: I 8 I f
;+;*I
ll:l
;I ll::; :pi;
1::t:
ll,!l .'I
;::;I :!;;! !I;::
::I,: 1;o d:::
;:;It
1"::
!:::I
tllI;
!;:!I :::i:
:;;I;
::,:I
;I::!
:;;:a
111;: !ll.* ;#I* #;a:: i:;::
;:':I
1:::
;::I: ::;I:
l.!I :;p: ::;;:
l1 1::::
!C,!I I
hesolution No. 695. A aESOLUTION OF THE CITY i Guevara !x: !+ i L OF THE CITY OF CPGtLSBAD ANNOUNCING ; Bierce : ; :A ; s AND DECISION REGARDING LZEDUC'TION IN i Sonneman : : i i : :LOT AittEA PER DWELLING UNIT IN R-3 ZONE, was : McPhersoni i ; 4 i :adopted by title only and further reading waived, i La Roche ; !xi* :
!I!!:
1t;'t
I I I #I I
1 :The City Attorney presented the following ordinance for : $he Council's first reading: I I t
*l;'l
!l!!l
!:I:: :;::;
I 1
dinance No, 9108, AN OiXtDINANCE OF THE CITY OF! Guevara ; :x: 4 i AD A~ING ORDINANCE NO, 9060, SEClXO$ Bierce :xi i X: :
i706, REDUCING THE LOT AREA PER DWELLING UNY Sonneman : : ; 4 ; :IN AN It-3 ZONE, was given a first reading by title only. ; McPhersonI : I X: i
i;;:;
I ! La Roche ! ! : sd :
B
I I I
s I
I (b) Resolution of Intention by the City Council re- :
igarding an amendment to Ordinance No. 9060, Section 1814
!requiring any action by the City Council reversing the I :decision of the Planning Commission shall be by three :affirmative votes of the Council members.
:The Clerk certified as to proper notice having been given. i !Also that no written protests had been received up to the : :time set for the hearing.
Xtesolution #180 of t.he Planning Commission was read bherein they recommended approval of the amendment, i
:The Mayor declared the hearing open and asked if any per-: :sons wished to speak in favor of this amendment, There : were no persons desiring to speak. The Mayor then asked i :if there were any persons wishing to speak in opposition to i :the amendment. There were no oral protests. The Mayor! :Declared the hearing closed at 7:50 P. M.
!After di scussion by the Council, the following resolution i :was presented for the Council's review:
I I I I I I I I t I
I I I # 4 I
I I
I I I I
t I t I I I
I.. 8
t' *.
t I, t: :-
6.
I -: I I I I 1 t I I !
i:iq ::::;
I::;l i::;:
I**;: ;::
:;'I:
11;: ::I:: :;:::
:'I:; 4::; ::::; ::::I i:::; iii;, 11
;:::i ;.::; ~ :il:
;:::
1:::
!;I: 11
:::e ;:;:
a**: t;$# 5- 1: t' 8, 8. :: :
t ;: ;, ; : : r", $.
l$l I i;;:
e:;: $ f I .;
;#I;
Ill
i 't .r l
, ! I'I
#
D
D
l I I I I I
I.
I I I I I
-11 -
:"""""""""""""""""""-"""""""""""""-""""
i Hesolution No, 696. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ; COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING
j FINDINGS AND DECISION REGARDING ANY ACTION i BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN REVERSING DECISION OF i THE PLANNING COMMISSION was adopted by title only : and further reading waived,
i The City Attorney presented the following ordinance to ! i the Council for a first reading:
: Ordinance No. 9109. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i -ENDING SECTION 1814 OF ORDI- i NANCE NO, 8060, BY DELETING FitOM SAID ORDI-
i NANCE THE REQUIREMENT OF FOUR COUNCIL i VOTES TO OVERRULE THE ACTION OF THE PLAN- : NING COMMISSION was given a first reading by the i Council.
I I I I
I I I I
t I 1 I I I
I i I 1 ;
I I
I I
I I
t I
I 1 I I I. 1
I 1
I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I t I I I 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I s I I I 4 t 8 * I I 1 I I I I I I I I I * I t I I 6 I I I I I I 1 t I L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I t I I I t I I 8 I I I I * I I
I I
a * * I I I
I 1 I I I I I : I 1 I I I I I I 1 I
I I I I I I
I I
t I I
I I
I t
1 I I
I I I I
m I I 8 t I 8 : I I
I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I
I I 1 6 @ 0 1 I
6 0 O 0 U I P c I 8 I 1 + 4 I I I I I
I I
t #
I * * I 4
I
I I I 9
I *
I
8 I 1 t t 4 * t