HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-11-01; City Council; MinutesI * ', %, *\ 8 ' ' i CITY OF CARLSBAD
November 1, 1960 : Date of Meeting: ! Time of Meeting: 7:OO P. M. f Na me "b, '*$&,, '\, '$I
; place of Meeting: Council Chambers f Member ',L'O\Q'+t.p $'@,*x@,d,
I ;;t1; : ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Guevara, : Bierce, Sonneman, McPherson and La R0ch.e. A?.so I I !:::I ('1 i present were City Manager Slater and City Attorney Haye$, ::;i:
i INVOCATION was offered by City Manager Slater. I I ::;;:
i APPROVAL OF MINUTES: I Guevara : ; ;xi ;
i October 18, 1960 were approved as submitted. ; Sonneman ! : !x! I
I \ *'
I '\, '\ " '\ \\ \*
f of '%$*, ', *'2,
I I ;;::;
~. . t I I ,, 8, '\ ', ' ' ; Minutes of: City Council I , '\ ", 164 '\ '.\., y,, \
Bi ~~~""""""""""""""~"""""~"""""""""""-"""-"~""-""-"---"-~--~"*-"-
I
I ;;::;
I ::;::
I I :;;:;
I I ::;I:
I :;;::
1 a. The minutes of the regular meeting of i Bierce :xi :x: i
I I I
I I
I I
I I I CORRESPONDENCE:
1 I
i McPherson i i :xi .'I ; : La Roche i ;x:x: :
I 811 !ll!:
I I
I a. Letter dated October 28, 1960 from Claude J. I i Fennel, stating his intention to improve Lot 23, Granville : : Park, which faces south on Pacific St., between Garfield i i and Mountain View Dr., and for which property there is f I no water service. He requested the City to install 54 feeti ; linial feet of 4" T. A. C. water main, from the present ;
i main, easterly along the southerly line of Lot 21, and he i i would continue the line easterly for service to his lot. ;
1 ! The Assistant Engineer presented a map of the location I i of the lot, and stated a check had been made with the past i : Forkman of the Carlsbad Mutual Water Co. and it was : i thehpolicy at that time to bring the line down to the I : copher of the property making the request, and then the i i dwnei- would bring the line to his property. 1
I I c
:in;:
ti:;; !iii:
:+I'
;I I:;
s:;:: ::;:: If::;
::::I 81 i:: 8:
I@;:' I! I! I *
I
I I I I I I I I I I I 1 i Mayor Sonnernan stated she was sure that at one time this ; w&,not their policy, as she knew of one instance where : the property owners had to pay for the entire line being ; britkght to their properties.
i cf'hd Assistant Engineer further stated it has been the i polit$ of the City to treat sewer lines such as this in this ; manneb, and he would like to inquire as to what policy : the &Unci1 wished to establish for water lines such as thi !
!
I 1..
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I 4
I I I # I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I i t I I s 5,
I t i Cmn. La Roche state he felt this was an administrative i : broblem and matters such as this should not have to be : ! brought before the Council. I
i Mayor Sonneman stated the reason for this coming before i : the Council is that it would involve an expenditure by the i i City if the request were granted. I
i After considerable discussion by the Council, Cmn. Bier4e I moved that the request be granted and that 54 lineal feet i ; of T. A. C. water main be installed by the Cit,?. Seconded ; : by Cmn. La Roche. The vote was two "ayes , Cmn. * i i Guevara, .Someman and McPherson voting "no". The i i motion failed for lack of a majority, and the request was i : denied. I
I ditional Use Permit. Zetter dated October 27, 1960, fro4 ; Alice K. Amundsen, stating that a Conditional Use Permit: I for a playground had been issued to the Union Church on I : October 11, 1960, by the Planning Commission, but due td I the fact that the notice of hearing giving notice of a public ; : hearing was mailed to her former address in San Diego, : i she did not receive the notice, therefore, she was not i : present at the hearing to protest. Also due to the noise i I created by children playing in the area belonging to the :
i church, her two renters have moved, and she feels her : i property has been severely damaged. She has personal i :knowledge that the renters on the, Johnson property ad- I i jacent to her property have also moved due to this play- ; :ground. Mrs. Amundsen requested the Council to give : i some form of relief from this situation. 8.
I I I 1 t
I I
I I I
I I I I
1
I b. Alice K. Amundsen - re: Union Church Con- I
B
I I I I I $
i
I I I I I
I I
I I I I I
::i
:!I
'I; ::: :;; :::
:*I 4;
:;e
!I! -. ;::; I:::
1:ll IIII
::I: I:::
11;;
I;:'
#I 11::
11;:
41;: I:::
I 1;
11
$1
!!I: ;;::i :;::; :;::: :;::: :;I::
!I,!i vti'~ :;I:* :;::i :;::; ;;::;
!#!!I * * I 6 I I 4 I * I I 1 I 1 I
I t I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I s I I I I !
i'i
I(*
;I: ::'
I:: 111 ;:; ;::
;:e
1:: I:: Or! :;::; ;:I:: :I::;
a':::
:::;I
::;I: ::::; ::$I
:;;I,
:e::,
I:':;
1;;l'
:SI;: ;:::: I::;: ;::::
Ill I:;:!
;:: :It;; *,::
;:I::
0::; :I::,
::!s!
I I I I :i;:i
I 1 #:!I!
I I I' I I ls:': I I ,*:;I
1 I l!!l!
B
c
* I I * I I I I I I I I I I
-
.; I "* L -
~"""".""~""I"""~""""""""-.".""""""""""""""-"
I i The City Mcmager informed th? Council he had received i another letter regardirqg the same matter whic:~ he would : like to pl-ssexlt,
I
I 1 1 I
1 I t I i I I
I I
I 1 I I I f 8 I 1
-"
b,,' \.' , \\ '\ \ ' '
'\* 'x,\'\ ', \, 8, 1 6 5 ', \+\
:<; ~ Yr.rg '.. '..d$,. '\ 'da
of "\"o.% \,L'\O\\ .p'. +'\ Member \ss\+@$~
:: 1,:;: 1:::: 4:;:
:;*I1
'\ \\ '8 ', \ \ \\ ,', . \'
'\ y>,
'1';: .""""""^_"""""".
l.!l! 1 I Letter dated October 31, 1960, fro= Ehes Biackburn, i Oceanside, stating she was forced to move from the : Johnson property when they learned of this project, as i
! they knew the noise and confusion would corn-pel them to : : move.
i As there were persons in the audiecce wiho wished to i speak in reference to this matter, the Mayor advised the& : they would be able t:, speak under Oral Communications. :
I I 1 8 I I
I I I I I I 1
I I
! i I : ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
I
I I I I I : MRS. DOROTHY JOIXNSUN, 987 Oak Avenue, stated she i i had not received a notice of the hearing. The rent they i
i receive from their property constitutes the major part of I i tbeir livelihood, and the renters have moved due to the ! i playground proposed on the church property. She con- ; ; curs with Mrs. Admundsen's letter and asked tbl'a't the . : i Council consider relief for the property owners in this i ; area.
i NL3S. WALTER JONES, 2041 Janice Way, stated she was : i the daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Johnson.., One. of .the apart-! : ments on the Johnson property was built for her. Due to i i the lights and noise she was forced to move. I I
i Cmn. McPherson asked if this playground Would cause i : more noise than the basketball coui-t that has Bqen in use i i for sometime? The property owhers stated th&i it would ; : as the basketball court is located on another kection of i i the church property. I I
i The City Attorney advised the Council tlld a conditional i ; use permit can be revoked.. There is a procedure under I i Ordinance No. 9060 in which a hearing can be held to i : consider as to whether or not the conditional use permit i i should be revoked. The Council can initiate a motion i i. to adopt a resolution of intention and set a hearing to 4 f : consider this matter. Due to the fact that some of i the property owners do not feel they have had adequate / ; opportunity to present their objections to the granting I i of a conditional use permit, the City Attorney stated she : : would certainly recommend that a hearing be set in order! : that the opponents and proponents of the conditional use ; : permit might be heard.
8 s Q 1
(i
I I
I I
I I
1 t t
I I
t I :
i I I
;;:I;
I:::' p;::
;:I:: ::iii
:::I:
::I:;
::::I
:I:::
:::a:
1 ; ;,: ; ::::; :::I: :::!: ;;i;:
::::I
$,!a: :;;:i
:::it
:I#;: 11 ;::I: ;ii:i
:;I:I i;;;:
i::;:
::;I,
::;I'
4::: :::I:
::::I :;'&;
11:;1
11:
@I:&
i:::; :;
!ll,l .11;1 ::I:: i;:;; :'::I ::::: :I:::
:; ': i; j
I.!'! ;ii:j
I ; '1
;I::; ;:':I /::I
*:;ll i::i; ;:p
:;*I ::::: ::;:
::'I :;::
:I::
*:;*I
;:I:; v;:; i:::
1::;
:::I
1:
11
i By motion of the Council Resolution No. 702 was adopted,! Guevara ; p Ixi I stating the intention of the Council to initiate a hearing : Bierce ' I :xi : to consider whether or not the conditional use permit i Sonneman ;x: :x; ;a1
i should be revoked. ; McPherson : i !XI
t I :I11 i Also by motion of the Council the City Manager was in- i Guevara I I :x: Ii'l
: skucted to notify the Building Inspector to withhold all I Bierce :: 8 x: I building permits on this project untj.3. this hearing has bee4 Sonneman ; ; Ix: :::I
t completed and a decision has been msde. : McPherson I :xix I
1-
I
I r i La Roche : : :x;
I I i La Roche Si !x: 1
I I B : MR. ANGAROLA, 3152 Jefferson Street, stated he has a i i problem of people dumping trash on his property.
i The City Manager informed the Council th.e City has an i : ordinance prohibiting such nuisiance, and setting the i maximum fine as $500.00 for anyone caught violating the i I ordinance. However, you have tc catch the partv in the i
I I
I I I I
' I
-. i::; :::; :I:: ::::
:1:1 ::;:
$8:
1::: :::: ::!: I act. * ;:'a
I I ;; I I ::;;
1 :::I
I 8 I I :;;: * I I I :i::
I I la I e 1 l ::;:
I :!I:
I
,I I
1 I
t l:!i
B
a
* I . \. ,..
I I I I .\\ \\,'\\ \\ \\\'\,
I '., .\,'.\ "x,, '\\'\, '\ \ ', \\ ',\>\
I
I _. _. - ' I I I *
! 264
; ~a me ' ., '\$$ \, \?~2, , +\P ', '?.A i *. I t .?.G&\ \ +>\ I I Member ~;~..~..,+ ,d .,o \,\oy ,-.-* 'X<> i e"__""""C_"~I_ _,"_ """""~"""""""~.~. _- """-.. """""--{-"""""-"""""""- i:::;
I ::::;
I i::::
:I;':
I ::I!;
1 ::;::
I + I *'I;;
1 if ip, 7HeI;e po::s;ible for the City to psi "No UUimpiIlg'' Signk ' :;l:b 11: : on :his property,
i 'kn, L:& ~~&~ sqsgested the city have sip8 mad2 for i :x:: I this p;~q-;~~e, 2nd acy property 0wncl.r deSi2.hg to hlave ; :;I:: 11s i such a sign colxld purchase a si@. from thz city at cost E
; and then post the sign themselves,
i fiqfs. P_llgaroj,;?b s+:ai;ed he had c~:G&; -~;VO ~~~?ii.~S3 ?;e asked: IS) I::,;
I
I I I I
I I i Mr, Angarola asked if he purchased the sign 2nd posted
i the sign himself and someone removed th4 sign fmm his i property, would the city enforce the law for the sign ; being removed?
i The City P+tForney stated that if he purchased the sign he i then owned the sign. However, if the property owners i would give their perdssion to allow the city to enter ; upon their property to post the sign, then the city would i enforce the ordinance,
I I
I
1 I I I I t I I 9 I 1 I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I 1
1~. 111;'
I::':
:a,:: ;:::; :ii;: ::::I ::::;
;I 11::1 lllt:
I::$ pt;:
;I:: ;;~
)')I
)(*I
I:::
!::! I i Mr. Angarola stated he would certainly be willing to pur- i i chase the sign and give the city permission to enter upon : ; his property for the purpose of posting the sign.
i By common consent of the Council it was agreed that the i
i City Manager be authorized to have signs printed in urder: i that the property owners could purchase these signs ai i
I I I I L I I
I cost. I I I I
I I I I
* t I PUBLIC HEARINGS:
i::;
:;:: )IIl
11:: ::!!
:'SI
I:'&
1:::
::&I
l:ln
;;a1
;:;I I1li
::I9 ;;!:
-,
I 14
I I*
*I
$1
1 I I a, Resolution of Intention - 1911 Act: Proceedings; t 1;;; ::,: :::;
I 1*1) !I!:
::I: ::!I ::::
!Jl
1,;;
! Valley Street sewers - Assessment District No. 2-196c i I The Mayor announced that the hour of 'I: 30 P. M. had : arrived, and this was the time and place fixed by this City': i Council for hearing objections or protests on the proposed: ; work, br the extent of the assessment district, or on the I i proposed grades under the Resolution of Intention No. 6914 : proiriding for the construction of sanitary sewers and : i appurtenafices, and appurtenant work in Valley Street : Guevara $ i ;x; : from Basswood Ave. to 645.73 feet south of Basswood Av&Bierce : F:xi i The Clerk presented the affidavits of publication, mailing I Sonneman i i :x; ! and posting, By motion of the Council the affidavits were 1 McPherson i : :xi I approved and ordered filed. : La Roche ; I!.) ! !x:
4
I 1st
D
4 : The Mayor asked the Clerk if there were any written i protests, The Clerk presented the following written : protests:
: Letter dated October 31, 1960, from Bert Olson and i Annette B. Wilder, stating they owned Assessor's Parcel i ; No, 35-148-7, which is located on the SE corner of i Basswood and Valley, They feel the sewers on Valley are;
i not necessary as they have 155.13 feet on Valley and i 507.69 feet on Eitsswood, and if necessary they could ' \ : connect to the Basswood sewers; they cannot afford this : ! additional expense, as they have no intention of building i I on the &her portion of their property now or in the future.: : Their present home faces on Easswcrod.
I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I 1
I
I I
I I I I 1 ! i Letter dated October 24, 1960 from htonia Patterson and! i Bobby Joe Patterson, stating they owned property on : Valley Street, and they could see no necessity for a sewer! i on Valley Street. They had a new segtic tank and cesspooI : installed within the past four months; if these sewers are i i approved it will mean a great hardship on them as they : : are now in debt for repairs and improvements on their ! i home. They have 9'7* 486 frontage,
! Letter dated October 28, 1960 irom 3)ell.a C. Clark, i stating she owns Assessor's Fa:xd No, 35-149-Is which i
I I
I I I
1 I I
I I I
I I I I
I I t t I I
I I
I I f t
!
L I
: i;' :rr: ;:::
;yl
1:: :::: ::); :::; :;::
rIii ::::
::;I :::: ::::
:::I
::I: ::::
::I* ::i: :::i
::a1 i:;;
1::;
:;:a I::!
::*I ::ii 4::
::a1
'1:;
ii:I 11 ;::; :I:' :::
11'1
:Ill
'111
It
+I
:I:
!,I
;!I
$1
D
B
I ; .%\ '\ ' , x ''
I '\ '\ '
I \' \'
I L I 1 I I \'
I . I
1 I
. 'i'
I i Name x%*
f i of 1 i Member :""""-"".."~"~""~"-""""""-~""""""""" .""""""""""-"""
: has a 226,185 frontage, and she wickled to go cn record i i as opposing sewers for Valley Street at this tirr,e, I I
i Letter dated October 28, 1960 from John H. h&Coy, : stating he wished to protest the construction of sewers on: i Valley Street. His property is located at 3456 Valley St. ,;
t with a 105' frontage on Valley. I I
t The Mayor asked if there were any persons who have i filed protests that wish to be heard in support of their i i written protests? I I
I MRS. ANTONfA PATTERSON, 3424 Valley, stated she !
f did not feel that sewers were necessary on Valley St.; I I they have just paid for a cesspool and septic tank, and : : felt this was unfair; This is Mr. DUCY'S project and they! i did not feel they should have to pay for something that i
I would benefit Mr. Ducy. Also she did not see why she : I should have to pay more than Mr. Ducy, This payment i
; for sewers would entail a great hardship for them. I I
: MR. CLARKE, 3464 Valley, stated they have 220' front- 1 i age oh Valley St. and they do not feel they can pay for I : such a qroject. They have one building and glass huuses : i on this property and have no intention of building further i
f on theik property as the school will probably purchase ; i their property, in fact they would like to purchase the i i bare @bund now for a baseball diamond, but they will :
; not sell unless the school will purchase the entire parcel. I i He felt the school would no doubt purchase all the propertg : iri this block eventually. I f i MR. JACK McCQY, 3456 Valley St,, stated his protest i I was the same as Mr. Clarke. He has also invested in a I : cesspool and septic tank and does not feel that he should. ; I be assessed for something he has no need for. I I
i The hearing was declared closed at 8: 10 P. IVi.
i There being no further protests the Mayor asked the : Engineer of Work what per cent of the total area to be : i assessed for the improvement is represented by written i i protests or objections filed with the City Clerk? The : ; Engineer of Work stated there were 37.9% written pro- i i tests filed. I I
i The Engineer of Work presented the Assessment Diagram! : and stated that all of the lands included in the district I i would be benefited. I I
i Cmn. La Roche asked how all the properties would be i ; benefited if the School is eventually going to purchase this! i land? Cmn. La Roche was informed there is no written : : commitment by the school that they will purchase this i i property. I I
i The Council asked how many residences there were in i : this area and they were informed there were three resi- : i dences on the east side of the street and 5 residences on i : the west side of the street. I I
I The Council was informed this proceeding was initiated i ; by a petition which contained 32% of the property owners i i in favor of this project. A health report was requested ; : from the County Health Officer for this area which stated i i sewers were needed in the area. I I
i The Council reopened the hearing in order for one of the I : property owners to speak. I
8 1 I
I I
I I
I I I I
I I
e I I I 1
I 1
I I I
I
I I
I I
4
$
I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I 4
1 I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I
I : MR.
I I I I I I I I I I
JACK DUCY, 3431 Valley Street stated he camot I I I I 1 I I I Q # u
'\ .% 8
\, ',\ =.:'', 1 6 7
'.?-$&, $\,;%;c
iiii; iiiri
;/2;;
!:I:: :ii::
*I/:
1:: :: ::I:: pi:: ::;:i ::: I1 ::: :: It :; :;I:: i:::: ::::i
::ii: ;!I*:
1,;:
::::I
:::I: ::::: :::::
11 1:;
:::II
1:;
\ \'
\' 3. , '\ '. \ ', ',$, '\, '\'6.
',,$,\$x ', '$$>x
\@@,&?\d
I:: *I ;;
:11;*
"""""""-.
*I4;$ :SI
51
:;*I:
,?,:I
;::a: !!;;;
::I@: j:::;
::::; 'I::; ::::: J:r 41
dl:; ;:::; :I:$
"1::
:!:;I
;I:*:
1;~:~ ::iii
:;;I:
:;/I :::
::I,; 1:1 ::if; ::;:: ::I ': 1:;:: :;;:;
l,,:1
;#I1
~1:~:
;::I:
/I::
,:I:: ::::: i:;::
;;':a
l I :*:
I;a I:( i::::
1:::;
::::I I1 I::;; ::i:I
::I::
::::I : : f'l a
11:: ii:::
;l:1l ::+
18 $4;
1:;:; :'$: :: 11
1:::;
:::a:
::::; ii;:: *I1 ::::; ::;:: :I::; I1 i::::
I@:::
::::I
1)'
$9
$11
:@l:t
:tl;a
1::::
::,::
B
c
I I \\\e \-.
I I ,\ \\'
I I I I \, ', \X\ '\ \\ \\
I '8, \\\\\\ '\, \\,'\\ I I r- I 1 \\ \\,'X, '\,\\,\\\ 16 f
I f Member '\$.@\ \&@,&d%..d T',/$P
I '.., -
I i ?%!!a %2 \% 48% \ \$$A,
4 ; of 84;u.,"k, \;.p;\
;::I:
;::I:
I :ii:i
:"""""-""""""""""-"""-""~""""-~"."""""""""~""~""""~""""."~"-
! OCCUPY his property until sewers are imtalled, and he had ! circulated the petition. I 1 :::::
I
I I i After consiaerable discussion by the Council, by motion i Guevara !x: i i i ; of the Council the hearing ordered by Resolution No. 691 i Bierce ; I ; 2 i i was continued until PJovember 15, 1950 at 7: 30 P, ftl. ir, : Sonneman : ; ! $ ; : the Council Chambers, 2960 Pi0 Pic0 Drive. i McPhersoni :xi q i
11'
I I I I : La Roche I i ; !x;
I i Cmn. La Boche stated he voted,t'no'' because he could see: : no reason for continuing the matter as he felt it should be: i decided at this time. I I
1 I I I I I 1 I b. Weed Abatement Hearing - Determining costs i ; of work done. I
: The Council was informed this hearing was called for the i i prpose of he,aring ,dl protests or objections to the cost of : : having the wbrk done, and that all the property owners i I had received A bill as to the amount owed. I I
I
I I I I
I I I
1;;:;
::;I, 11,:;
:::::
::::I
::!I! ;i;:i ::::; i;:!:
I:':; ;::::
1::::
:I::;
;:I::
I;::'
;ll;:
11
1!!1! ! The Mayor declared the hearing open at 8: 20 P. M. I :::I, ti
I I :;1:1 I I *I!$:
I
I
.I
I i MR. Ri J, RICHARDS, Montebello, stated he owned I : property on Chestnut Ave. which consisted of approximate- ! ly i 12 acre. Last year the city had the property cleaned ! i and he received a bill for $9.60. This year the city I I : deatied the property and he has received a bill for $22.50) i X& felt the bill would be a little higher this year, but felt :
! that $22.50 was out of line. They had the city do the war$
1 ih order to give the money to the city. I
i 'The City Manager informed the Council this year they had 1 illcluded $7.00 per hour for administrative costs; the i I contractor charges $8.00 per hour for his work. He sug-: : gested that Mr. LZichards have an individual do the work i i next year instead of the city. I I
I MR, GEORGE GROBER, 2266 Jefferson Street, stated i : he was representing the Buena Vista Lagoon Association. [ i The Association had the property disked in April; now the$ i have received a bill for $15.00 for work that the city has ; : done. He felt there were other lots that looked worse I I than this one. I I
[ MR. M. W . JZRVIE, 1175 Hoover, stated sometime agd : he advised the Council of a parcel of land containing 3 or i i 4 acres, which included weeds and dead lime trees on it, ; : and he noticed that nothing had been done about it. I I
i The City Manager informed the Council he had checked i i with the City Attorney and the city cannot legally go on : : private property and pull out trees. As to weeds, this : i property is included on the second list of weed abatement :
I
1 I I I ,h I
I
I I I I I
I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I
I I I 1 I I 1 I I I t I I B
projects. I I I I , Cmn. Bierce stated there are many people who cleaned i their lots in April and since that time the weeds have I I grown and have been charged for having their lots cleaneq again. 1 I
Mr. George Grober stated that he is very much in favor i of these proceedings and is very proud of the way the city! looks. 1 1
I
I I I i Cmn. Bierce stated he had a bill he would like to protest : : which was on Parcel No. 35-14 28x1, as there was never! i any work done on this property and the owner received a : : bill for work done. 8
I 1
ai;:!
;I 1;;:;
::I:; i:!::
1::::
;;l1l
::#*I
;:: :::i;
:(I:;
I:::,
::!I: 1"l;
;:::I :I::;
i!'ll ::::: ;::;:
:(::I
1::r:
;:I:#
'a!': I"li
:::*I
I*#:: :::I:
l*;ll
::I:: ::::: ::::: ;;;:;
111:1 ::!I: :;i1i 4: i:::; 4;;;
::*Il h:;;
:;;I
ll.!: I(.I.
:a::;
I::;, 81 ::::: I:::; :d:: 1"I. I:;I; ::::;
:::a1 I1
11111
1:;:: ::::; :::i;
:::I: ::I::
;::I: ::;:;
;:::: ::I:;
;::'I
::;:: 4:::
::I :I
;*l;l
,tl:I
;;:::
I,!,! I I Mr. Thornton, Assistant kgineer, stated he had receive$ :I ::::i lisi
I I ,!#:I
I I je1-1 I t I I ;:: I t I I 1:::; * I I I ::;:I
I 1 ::;;I
; 'I
I I I 1 I 8, ',,'., '\ '\ '% I
f ',, \, -8 , . ' \b'
f I - \'. ' \ " b'. 169 1 ,a t i I I
- IJ .. 8, \- \ ~
1 \\ '\ '8, ', '\ '8,
1 I ! Name '8 'x%,, ' '\, 'X%\
I I 'r of "+p#, ' '*\
I Bi
\\& \&, 4\\ '?+
I ;:;I:
;II::
1 Member -$'@,-$$%. ~~"~~~,~~"~~~""~""~""""""""""""""""""""""""~"~..""""""~.."~~~~~"~~"-
1;'
; a letter of protest, with the bill attached, for Parcel I I :;;:' ; No, 35-87-9, owned by Lillian E. Anderson, 806 East i I;:!1 : Magnolia, stating there must be an error in the billing ; :I;!: i as this is just a city lot, and the bill was for $30.00, I II,II I ;,I:,
I The Mayor declared the hearing closed at 8: 25 P. M, : After discussion by the Council, by motion of the Council ! Guevara i !x: x: : i the Director of Public Works was authorized to make the i Bierce :x; !x: ; I:
: necessary adjustments for any inequities, and the report : Sonneman : : ;xi : i was approved as submitted. i McPhersoni i :x: i
I
I (11
I I I I I 4:::
1 :I:;:
I
I I ; La Roche I ; !x: :
1 I 1 :;,:I : Cmn. La Roche stated he felt that if the persons making ; ;;:::
i these inspections were qualified to do this work, that the i Guevara : I I I :x: i :::
i Council should abide by their findings. By motion of the : Bierce ; :x:xj : : Council it was agreed that the staff make an investigation 1 Sonneman : i !xi i i as to the qualifications of the persons making the inspec- : McPherson i I :x; i
; tions. I La ~oche txi !x: ;
! I !11!1
I
I I * c, Declaring weeds and trash a public nuisance. i i The Council was informed this hearing was €or the second: : list of properties that had been declared a nuisance, and i i the property owners had been notified and the properties i : had been posted. I 1 r
VI1 :::l; i: iii;; ::::: it:::
I:':; :;::;
!11!1
I I I i:;!:
! I I ::I:!
: The Mayor declared the hearing open. I I
#::!I ; Mayor Ssnneman stated she would like to protest on her ! i notice, however, they would take care of the nuisance I : themselves. I I
t ERNEST MAJIA, 3430 Roosevelt Street, stated he owns ! i property on State Street, which backs up to the railroad !
t tracks. He thought his property just included the part ; i that was fenced, and he had taken care of that portion. i i He did not feel he should have to take care of the weeds : : on the other portion near the tracks as he thought that i i belonged to the Santa Fe Railroad. I I
i It was suggested to Mr, Majia that he find out the exact : :, line of his property, and that would be the only portion i i he would be responsible for. I I
I I
I t
I I
I t 1
I 1
I I
::;:; :::::
:;I:I
:I:::
::'I:
,!:;! ;rl;f ;:i:: :I::: ::::; I:: 61
I;$! i;:;; 41
::1::
ls*:l
:!::I ji:i:
;81:*
'11:; ::pi
:ii::
:!I:! i The hearing was closed at 8: 50 P. M.
I I*# I After consideration by the Council, by motion of the ,*,:I : Guevara ; ; :x: i i Council all protests were overruled, and the public Works! Bierce k: ;x: i : Director instructed to abate all nuisances. i Sonneman ; : :xi :
I .I1
I I :;:::
:t1:I I I I
*I
I I I : McPherson I :xIxi i
I I ; La Roche : !I : !x: .I ; I
t I A short recess was called at 8: 50 P. M. The meeting i : reconvened at 9:OO P. M. I ! I 1
;::i:
:;1:1 ::I::
!ll!l t i Proclamation - Army and Navy Academy 50th Anniversari. :;:::
::,:I i The Mayor informed the Council the Army and Navy : Academy will be celebrating their 50th Anniversary I :;I i November 12th and 13th, and with the consent of the Coundil Guevara i ! :x! I I ;::
i she would like to proclaim November 12th and 13th as : Bierce pi ;xi i I Army and Navy Academy day. By motion of the Council : Sonneman ; : fx: i 1 it was agreed that November 12th and 1 3th be proclaimed I McPherson ; :xixi : : as Army and Mavy Academy Day. i La Roche I 1 :x; i
: Northern San Diego County Sewer report. I The City Manager advised the Council that Mr. Warren !
I I I ::::: 11;
B' 1
I
I ::;::
I :-I;
::::I
I::[! i Barney,- Chief -kngineer for San Diego County Public Work@ i Division was present, and would like to explain what has : ; been done in regards to the northern San Diego County i i sewage problem. * I ' I
l-.l;
$:::a
:::I: I::::
::I:: I:!::
!lI!l I I .I.. I MR. WARitEM BARNEY stated he had been asked by the i :;::i
!l:!l I
I
I
t
*
I
I
I
I I ;;;;I
I I ;;:::
I I :;::i
I I I ::::; 11 ! I ;!!I!
B
\\.
\ ' ', \ '\ ' '\ \ 170
, ',$, "\'q-& \,$$+, '\ 9%
'\ '\ ',
' ,.\
\\ '.\ k, '\ '*
'%+$,;J,$?+ ,u ',o \.P$?\\o\\
;;I;1
1 4:;: 11
:I1 8 ltl;l
I!:;; : 'I( ::;:; i::::
;:;'I
::I::
::lal 1:::
::I:@ ;::::
I 1;;
:i:;f
:*;Sb 11:
~:l:l ::p: I:::: ::::: ;:::: 4::; ::;
;llll 1) ;:':'
.; :. I :, I
.I. 1 ; '. ' ; 1 I ;
;If::
;:all ,$: : I .: ,; ; ;.i i: I
:I,::
1.:;;: : ,: ; .; ;
:I:::
;.I ;; i I:;:: :.!;; i i,; 1; i i:ii;
;: ,t::\
i; 1;:' 1 i.1
iiii: ii:!
""""""""" i;;:; 1:::
ll;gl
!;:;[ 1::
till;
::; :;I:' i;
,. I:* ; ; ::I $ t
..
LI .SI
1;'
11
kl!l:
;:tll
-1:;;
:;It :::: ::;: .: * 1
1';;:
Ill: i;::
.I I : :; :' :i;:
::t* f: ::::: :;:: ,; I : :
:::: 1 ,I
'1k'
I*
l* *
., ; 5 I
iiii
; 1.: I
11': $:;I
:1.1: ;::: ;::; ;: :.;
#:;I
::I: vi: 1:' ;:
11:
::I1
;:Il :;
l:;l ::;: )a,* ;el1 ;.: i i ::;:
1'11
;': 1;
I!!I
I I I I I 1
3
I \, \, ., \ \ 8 -.' ' I I \, ,', , x' I I ', '8, \\, '\, '8,::,, 1 7 z '. < . '. I I 4 I ; t
1 I l" 1 I 1 4 I I I
D
I I I 1 I I I I t t I I I I I I I I I I I
-8 - .- I : ~a me \,,'\%\ .,'\st -" '* '\ .\ b '\
E of \c$%\;,,;%&
t Member $'@.*.p,,c """""""""""""""""""""""""""*"-""""""""~"""~""""-,"""-~"-
4 #*I; the Council this matter had been referred to the Chief i ::if;
::#:I of Police for investigation. A memorandum from the i ::;I: Chief of Police was presented wherein he recommended : ::,:i
the license be granted to Ralph Burnette and John Butooni :;:::
The City Manager also recommended the license be I ::a::
1 ;:: I: granted to the applicants. By motion of the Council a i Guevara ; f : 2 i card room license was granted to Ralph Burnette and : Bierce : ;xi* ; John Button, said business to be located at 370 Grand J SOnneman : I : 4 ! Ave, , in accordance with the recommendation of the ; McPhersonj ; i d ; Chief of Police and the City Manager. : La Roche i i : $ ;
I 4,!#!
,$"', '\ .$.!A\
111
I I I
I
1 b. Second reading of Ordihatlce #9108 - Reducing i :,:I:
I ;:I;:
I;;I;
:;':I i the lot area per dwelling unit in an R- 3 Zone. The t following ordinance was given a second reading: I 1::::
1 :!!I:
I I
I I i Ordinance No. 9108. AN OkDINANCE OF THE CITY I CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060,
I SECTION 706, REDUCING THE LOT AREA PER i DW ELLIPJG UNIT IN AN R-3 ZAX-JE, was adopted by
i title only and further readirig waived.
I :I
i Amending Ordinace No. 9060, Sec. 1814, requiring
f three affirmative vo$es. $Q overrule the Planning Com- i mission. The following ordinance was given a second I reading by the C6uncil:
I
I I c. Second reading of prdinance No. 9109 -
I
I
OF
I
I I I I I 1 I I I ,
I I I I I 1 I I I & I I I I
Guevara I i : 4 i Bierce !x: I xl : Sonneman ; I ; $ I McPherson: ; ; xl : La Roche : :xi 4 i
::I II
:;l:l
li;*i
::i;: ::+ p::;
+::I;
:I;:)
::1:4
4 111
l!*l! I : Ordinance No. 9109, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i 1;;;; :::;I
I i ENDING SECTION 1814 OF I I :::I; : ~RD%&L%A$0~1060, BY DELETING FRGM SAID : Guevara I i i 1 ~ : ORDINANCE THE REQUIREMENT OF FOUR COUNCIL i Bierce !x: f 4 l : VOTES T) OVERRULE THE ACTION OF THE PLAN- ; Sonneman : : : x I NING COMMISSION, was adopted by title oricy and furthe? Mcfghersoni i i f i reading waived. ; La Roche : i xixi
I ;1I *?t: I I i Cmd. McPherson asked why the power poles were set i : So far in on the sidewalks on Chestnut Avenue, The i Assistant Engineer informed the Council there were two i : that were set too far in and they have communicated with i i the San Diego Gas and Electric Company regarding this I : matter.
i CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT:
i The City Attorney informed the Council a resolution had i : been prepared authorizing condemnation proceedings for i i the cross street between State Street and Roosevelt St. : : The following resolution was presented
I I
I I 1 I I I I I I
I
I I
I I I I
I I
;r:;
l:;l
,:*I
ii:i
pi; i::: ::::
lI::
1:;;
1;:: -:i::
:I:; :ii: ::;: :;:i :::*
I $1
:4I
.I
I : Resolution No, 700, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i 1i.l
:I::
I Oz]NCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AUTHoBIzIN'$ Guevara I !Xi $ i CONDEMNATION QF CERTAIN REAL PRGPERTY OR i Bierce 1 : !x; i ~TERESTS THEREIN FOR STREET AND BOULEVARQ Sonneman i i :x! ; PURPOSES, was adopted by title only and further reading McPhersoni : : x: i waived. : La Roche :x: i x!
I I i::: i Changes in the plans for the improvement of Chestnut Ave: I::# : K-z- . .".._"" __ ue o me approval omage Homes unit #3 subdivision, i let: ::I: i the following resolution has been prepared, setting a I l;fl : hearing for the changes necessary for the improvement i ::i: i of Chestnut Avenue: I I 1;::
;I It
I Res. #701, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i ;VI;
I
I I
I
811
I
I 1 I I :I;:
HE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DE- ;:::
I I ::I;
i 1 1:::
: CHANGES IN THE STREET IMPiEeZVEMENTS AND I I ::;I
! APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT 'WCRK IN I I I::! :!x:
: MATED DECREASE IN THE COST OF THE VJO.RK :I:;
::I i BY REASON OF SAID PROPOSED CFXNGES AND I sf*: * t ;:::
I 1 I I ;::a
4 I I I ::::
I + III: I I 7 I ::I:
I I I % :ii;
J *#If I I::,
[ :!A&NG ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN
1 : SAID CITY; STATING THE AMOUNT OF THE ESTI- i
1 I
1 I
!
t
I I I I
I
t i *8,, '\, ', '8, -8 '
I I 8, , ', 8 '\,''8
I -3 - i N a me *\, .'& '* "\$$ I I , ,$8 '\,
I I Member ,@@,+$\$ ~"""""""""""""~""""""~"""~""""""-""""-"---.~"---------"-------------
I I ;'I ::;:I / GIVING NOTICE OF ;A TIME Ah9 PLACE WHEN AND i Guevara ; : (Xi i ; WHEitE, FOR HEAdING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS i Bierbe ; :xixi ; i TO SAID CHANGES IN SAID WOKK, AND GIVING ; Sonneman ; ' i x: I ; NOTICE THEREOF, Assess. District No. 1-1960, was i McPherson ' : &Xi j i adopted by title only and further reading waived. : La Roche ;x : ;k; I ;: I.
I
I ** I 8, \\,\,* \ %, '\\'\\ 17;
I 8 i of '%%> %\&i&.+/t.+, ' '?4;88
\\\' 8
I
D -1
I I I :.!!:I i Council policy for l'esidence requirement for City Employ!
! ees. At the preVious,meeting discussion was given as : i to a pdlicy being established requiring all employees of i : the city to reside,w$thin the city limits of Carlsbad. The I i City Attcirney stated she had prepared a draft for the : Council to revied, requiring all employees after November i 1, 1960, to reside in the City of Carlsbad within six montys i after employment; all employees now residing outside : i the city lirhits &ho change their residence must move I i withiri the city iimits. The City Manager stated he would i ; like one Pe4uirement added, wherein any policeman or I i fireman employed be required to live within the city at :
; the time of employment. I
I I
1 I
1. ;:i:~ :::I ;i::
Ill 1: i : :.: :; 1I;;
ll;:
1:::
:;#I i:::
1:::
:I:: ;:::
1::; I;::
:t::
I@)
11
I!!! I I ;i:: i After cobsiderable discussion by the Council, by motion I Guevara F; ;x; i of the Council it was agreed that the policy be adopted as : Bierce I ;x:x: ; presented, with the addition of the requirement for the ! Sonneman i : !xi : police and firemen to reside within the city at the time : McPherson i : :x: I of employment. i La Roche I f :xi
I ::: 1 i Inter-American Municipal Congress. The City Attorney i : reported the Congress was considered a great success. : i San Juan Porto Rica was selected as the new headquarters! : for thk organization, and Mayor Dail was elected Presiderjt.
I Brown Act - Secret meetings of Councils. Attorney : Gene2 osk, at the League Conference, gave his ! ititerpzittion of the Brown Act, and the City Attorneys i i as a wH6le disagreed with Mosk's interpretation. Mrs. : ; Hayes stated she would continue to rule that all meetings i i should be held in public. I I
I I I I I t I I
! I I I i CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
I
I I I ! I I i The City Manager advised the Council he had received : : an invitation from the Qceanside-Carlsbad College to I i have the members of the Council ride in their Eiome- i coming Parade on Saturday, and he would like to know ho4 ; many of the members would be available. Mayor Sonnem$n i and Councilman Guevara stated they would be available. :
: Water Pollution Control Board. According to the order i i issued by the Water Pollution Control Board, the city I i must indicate to the Board what the city intends to do ; about the sewer situation in the city. The City Manager i i stated he has prepared a draft of a letter setting forth ; : what has been done by the city. The City Manager asked i I the Council if they wished the action taken by the Council ; : at tonight's meeting included in the letter. By unanimous i I consent the Council instructed the City Manager to ; indicate their action to the Board.
i -&l&ter was presented from the Acting City Manager of i : Oceanside, thanking the City of Carlsbad's Fire Depart- i I ment for their help in curtailing their recent brush fire. :
I Letter from the Boat and Ski Club of Carlsbad, thanking \ : the City for their fine cooperation in the Ski meet held i I on October 1st and 2nd, was read. a I
i Employment of Consulting Engineer. The City Manager i ; advised the Council kat the firm ofAssociated Engineers i
! had been employed as consulting engineers, and within ; i the next month he would like to come before the Council :
i to recommend that the Council consider the hiring of a i ! full time City Engineer. I I
1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I b 1 I I 1
I I
I t a
I I
t I
P I
! 1 I 1 I
1 1 !
1 I I I
:'" 1::
:::I ::::
::I:
;::a
:::I 1:
;ii; :!:: 4;; ::::
:::I ::;I
:::I ::::
::!I
' 1:
:ii:
.!I
1' ;:::
si:: ::;; ::;; I;::
!:I: ::i:
::I: ::::
)(*
l*!l I' 1::: :::: :I:: :;:: i::: ;:ii
:I
:::: ::ii
,:I1 :;:: is:: :;::
11
'11
i;'I
11;: ::: i:: ::: ((1
I.
:ti f:: :::
I:: :;:
!*I i:: :::
1:: i:: ::: ::: ::; ::; I:: ;::
11
la( If1
1 I I
1' , ., -, ', -\ -. I \' , \\ '\ \ ' ..
I \ '\ 8, ', '\ I .\ ', '\\ , \ '\
I
I I ; ). I I I \\ , '\\ "\'\\'\\ 17;
I t +&s, ;\,;?$$
I I 1;:;:
I :::;: t :::::
:!\;I $1
!:I;:
i:;:;
I I :I::/
I I I ::::I I 14:
I ::I:;
I I $X;; ::;:; ::!:I
t I I - 10- I '\ '\%\ ! : i Name of ".,;$&,;., .PA,
I B i Member ~$'$%$$?~,<
Il(II
:;I:!
)""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""""""""""~"""""""-"""""""-. .I I I I'
; The Mayor stated she had noticed a student from the i High School in the audience, and would like to know his I ; name. The student informed the Mayor his Game was I Bob Ness from Terramar, and he was a Junior at the i ;i;:; : Carlsbad High School. He was here to get information ; !:::I i on a report for his speech class at school. (INSERT) Sek below
I 'I,;, i Cmn, Bierce stated there have been complaints about i I speeding on Basswood Avenue. He suggested that this : ;IIl;
i matter be checked and that stop signs be installed if
i necessary, I I
: RATIFICATION ,OF BILLS AND PAYROLL:
i Ratification of the bills was givkn for the period October 1/8, ; 1960 to November 1, 1960j for the general expenses of ; Guevara : the city in the amount of $20,844.84, and for the Water I Bierce i Department in the amount of $10,254.69, as certified by i Sonneman I i :x: i i the Director of Finance 'ad approved by the Auditing Comb McPherson I ; :xi j ; mittee, i La ~0ct1e 8 : :x: j
i Ratification of the! payroll was given for the second half I Guevara : ; !xi ~ i of October, 1960, in the amount of $13,559.50, as : Bierce : I :x; ~
! certified by the Director of Finance and approved by the : Sonneman : ; :XI i Auditing Committee. : McPherson i 5 :x;,
I
I
I I t
I
*I ;;#I; * I
1
I
7;x;$[ ~
I I I :;GI, :;::; I
11
I I t i La Roche : :x :x:
I I ::I: ; ADJOURNI?IENT: f :a:: I )Ill i I'II 1 1::s i By propgik motion the meeting was adjourned at 11: 10 P. & :;I:
I I !;:!
I I ;:I:
I I I*;;
411
I I :::I
I I :::I
I ;La
I 1;:1 i Deputy City Clerk I I ::;:
1 I :;I; i INSERT: I ;; I1 I 3: I I I ::;: i Mayor Sonneman requested the following statement be ; :Ill
ll;l i made a part of the minutes: I
*L:
1 11 Mayor Sonneman stated she would welcome any of the : :::I
! students at any time that wished to attend the Council i ::;;
:::I I meetings. I I ::;i
I I ::;:
I 1 ::::
I I ::;i
I :::;
I I I :I;;
41,
1 I :::;
1 I ::;I
I ::;:
I :;::
I I
I
I ,-
I I I
1 I
I
1
I I I q
I I l it;;
I l1 I 11(1
t Respectfully submitted,
I I
I I
I
1
I
I
I
I
11 1
I
I I
I
1
I
I
I
I
8 I I
I I
I
I I I
I
I t I I
I I 1 I I I 1
I I
I
4
I
I
I I I I ir:; $11
I * I ;::; It:;
1 ::;:
I :::I
I 1 :It: I ;:I
I I ;: :;
I I 1;;:
I I ::;I
I :SI: I ::::
I 1:::
I ::::
1 ;:::
I :::I
I ;:::
I :;a: I ;*:a
I ::I:
1 1 11:: f I :::I I:;:
I I 11; I I ::;:
8
I I
1
I
Ill
mi I
I I I I I I I I I I I I * I I I 1
I I I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I I *I
I
1
I I
!ll.