Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-11-01; City Council; MinutesI * ', %, *\ 8 ' ' i CITY OF CARLSBAD November 1, 1960 : Date of Meeting: ! Time of Meeting: 7:OO P. M. f Na me "b, '*$&,, '\, '$I ; place of Meeting: Council Chambers f Member ',L'O\Q'+t.p $'@,*x@,d, I ;;t1; : ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Guevara, : Bierce, Sonneman, McPherson and La R0ch.e. A?.so I I !:::I ('1 i present were City Manager Slater and City Attorney Haye$, ::;i: i INVOCATION was offered by City Manager Slater. I I ::;;: i APPROVAL OF MINUTES: I Guevara : ; ;xi ; i October 18, 1960 were approved as submitted. ; Sonneman ! : !x! I I \ *' I '\, '\ " '\ \\ \* f of '%$*, ', *'2, I I ;;::; ~. . t I I ,, 8, '\ ', ' ' ; Minutes of: City Council I , '\ ", 164 '\ '.\., y,, \ Bi ~~~""""""""""""""~"""""~"""""""""""-"""-"~""-""-"---"-~--~"*-"- I I ;;::; I ::;:: I I :;;:; I I ::;I: I :;;:: 1 a. The minutes of the regular meeting of i Bierce :xi :x: i I I I I I I I I I I CORRESPONDENCE: 1 I i McPherson i i :xi .'I ; : La Roche i ;x:x: : I 811 !ll!: I I I a. Letter dated October 28, 1960 from Claude J. I i Fennel, stating his intention to improve Lot 23, Granville : : Park, which faces south on Pacific St., between Garfield i i and Mountain View Dr., and for which property there is f I no water service. He requested the City to install 54 feeti ; linial feet of 4" T. A. C. water main, from the present ; i main, easterly along the southerly line of Lot 21, and he i i would continue the line easterly for service to his lot. ; 1 ! The Assistant Engineer presented a map of the location I i of the lot, and stated a check had been made with the past i : Forkman of the Carlsbad Mutual Water Co. and it was : i thehpolicy at that time to bring the line down to the I : copher of the property making the request, and then the i i dwnei- would bring the line to his property. 1 I I c :in;: ti:;; !iii: :+I' ;I I:; s:;:: ::;:: If::; ::::I 81 i:: 8: I@;:' I! I! I * I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 i Mayor Sonnernan stated she was sure that at one time this ; w&,not their policy, as she knew of one instance where : the property owners had to pay for the entire line being ; britkght to their properties. i cf'hd Assistant Engineer further stated it has been the i polit$ of the City to treat sewer lines such as this in this ; manneb, and he would like to inquire as to what policy : the &Unci1 wished to establish for water lines such as thi ! ! I 1.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I I # I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i t I I s 5, I t i Cmn. La Roche state he felt this was an administrative i : broblem and matters such as this should not have to be : ! brought before the Council. I i Mayor Sonneman stated the reason for this coming before i : the Council is that it would involve an expenditure by the i i City if the request were granted. I i After considerable discussion by the Council, Cmn. Bier4e I moved that the request be granted and that 54 lineal feet i ; of T. A. C. water main be installed by the Cit,?. Seconded ; : by Cmn. La Roche. The vote was two "ayes , Cmn. * i i Guevara, .Someman and McPherson voting "no". The i i motion failed for lack of a majority, and the request was i : denied. I I ditional Use Permit. Zetter dated October 27, 1960, fro4 ; Alice K. Amundsen, stating that a Conditional Use Permit: I for a playground had been issued to the Union Church on I : October 11, 1960, by the Planning Commission, but due td I the fact that the notice of hearing giving notice of a public ; : hearing was mailed to her former address in San Diego, : i she did not receive the notice, therefore, she was not i : present at the hearing to protest. Also due to the noise i I created by children playing in the area belonging to the : i church, her two renters have moved, and she feels her : i property has been severely damaged. She has personal i :knowledge that the renters on the, Johnson property ad- I i jacent to her property have also moved due to this play- ; :ground. Mrs. Amundsen requested the Council to give : i some form of relief from this situation. 8. I I I 1 t I I I I I I I I I 1 I b. Alice K. Amundsen - re: Union Church Con- I B I I I I I $ i I I I I I I I I I I I I ::i :!I 'I; ::: :;; ::: :*I 4; :;e !I! -. ;::; I::: 1:ll IIII ::I: I::: 11;; I;:' #I 11:: 11;: 41;: I::: I 1; 11 $1 !!I: ;;::i :;::; :;::: :;::: :;I:: !I,!i vti'~ :;I:* :;::i :;::; ;;::; !#!!I * * I 6 I I 4 I * I I 1 I 1 I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I s I I I I ! i'i I(* ;I: ::' I:: 111 ;:; ;:: ;:e 1:: I:: Or! :;::; ;:I:: :I::; a'::: :::;I ::;I: ::::; ::$I :;;I, :e::, I:':; 1;;l' :SI;: ;:::: I::;: ;:::: Ill I:;:! ;:: :It;; *,:: ;:I:: 0::; :I::, ::!s! I I I I :i;:i I 1 #:!I! I I I' I I ls:': I I ,*:;I 1 I l!!l! B c * I I * I I I I I I I I I I - .; I "* L - ~"""".""~""I"""~""""""""-.".""""""""""""""-" I i The City Mcmager informed th? Council he had received i another letter regardirqg the same matter whic:~ he would : like to pl-ssexlt, I I 1 1 I 1 I t I i I I I I I 1 I I I f 8 I 1 -" b,,' \.' , \\ '\ \ ' ' '\* 'x,\'\ ', \, 8, 1 6 5 ', \+\ :<; ~ Yr.rg '.. '..d$,. '\ 'da of "\"o.% \,L'\O\\ .p'. +'\ Member \ss\+@$~ :: 1,:;: 1:::: 4:;: :;*I1 '\ \\ '8 ', \ \ \\ ,', . \' '\ y>, '1';: .""""""^_"""""". l.!l! 1 I Letter dated October 31, 1960, fro= Ehes Biackburn, i Oceanside, stating she was forced to move from the : Johnson property when they learned of this project, as i ! they knew the noise and confusion would corn-pel them to : : move. i As there were persons in the audiecce wiho wished to i speak in reference to this matter, the Mayor advised the& : they would be able t:, speak under Oral Communications. : I I 1 8 I I I I I I I I 1 I I ! i I : ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: I I I I I I : MRS. DOROTHY JOIXNSUN, 987 Oak Avenue, stated she i i had not received a notice of the hearing. The rent they i i receive from their property constitutes the major part of I i tbeir livelihood, and the renters have moved due to the ! i playground proposed on the church property. She con- ; ; curs with Mrs. Admundsen's letter and asked tbl'a't the . : i Council consider relief for the property owners in this i ; area. i NL3S. WALTER JONES, 2041 Janice Way, stated she was : i the daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Johnson.., One. of .the apart-! : ments on the Johnson property was built for her. Due to i i the lights and noise she was forced to move. I I i Cmn. McPherson asked if this playground Would cause i : more noise than the basketball coui-t that has Bqen in use i i for sometime? The property owhers stated th&i it would ; : as the basketball court is located on another kection of i i the church property. I I i The City Attorney advised the Council tlld a conditional i ; use permit can be revoked.. There is a procedure under I i Ordinance No. 9060 in which a hearing can be held to i : consider as to whether or not the conditional use permit i i should be revoked. The Council can initiate a motion i i. to adopt a resolution of intention and set a hearing to 4 f : consider this matter. Due to the fact that some of i the property owners do not feel they have had adequate / ; opportunity to present their objections to the granting I i of a conditional use permit, the City Attorney stated she : : would certainly recommend that a hearing be set in order! : that the opponents and proponents of the conditional use ; : permit might be heard. 8 s Q 1 (i I I I I I I 1 t t I I t I : i I I ;;:I; I:::' p;:: ;:I:: ::iii :::I: ::I:; ::::I :I::: :::a: 1 ; ;,: ; ::::; :::I: :::!: ;;i;: ::::I $,!a: :;;:i :::it :I#;: 11 ;::I: ;ii:i :;I:I i;;;: i::;: ::;I, ::;I' 4::: :::I: ::::I :;'&; 11:;1 11: @I:& i:::; :; !ll,l .11;1 ::I:: i;:;; :'::I ::::: :I::: :; ': i; j I.!'! ;ii:j I ; '1 ;I::; ;:':I /::I *:;ll i::i; ;:p :;*I ::::: ::;: ::'I :;:: :I:: *:;*I ;:I:; v;:; i::: 1::; :::I 1: 11 i By motion of the Council Resolution No. 702 was adopted,! Guevara ; p Ixi I stating the intention of the Council to initiate a hearing : Bierce ' I :xi : to consider whether or not the conditional use permit i Sonneman ;x: :x; ;a1 i should be revoked. ; McPherson : i !XI t I :I11 i Also by motion of the Council the City Manager was in- i Guevara I I :x: Ii'l : skucted to notify the Building Inspector to withhold all I Bierce :: 8 x: I building permits on this project untj.3. this hearing has bee4 Sonneman ; ; Ix: :::I t completed and a decision has been msde. : McPherson I :xix I 1- I I r i La Roche : : :x; I I i La Roche Si !x: 1 I I B : MR. ANGAROLA, 3152 Jefferson Street, stated he has a i i problem of people dumping trash on his property. i The City Manager informed the Council th.e City has an i : ordinance prohibiting such nuisiance, and setting the i maximum fine as $500.00 for anyone caught violating the i I ordinance. However, you have tc catch the partv in the i I I I I I I ' I -. i::; :::; :I:: :::: :1:1 ::;: $8: 1::: :::: ::!: I act. * ;:'a I I ;; I I ::;; 1 :::I I 8 I I :;;: * I I I :i:: I I la I e 1 l ::;: I :!I: I ,I I 1 I t l:!i B a * I . \. ,.. I I I I .\\ \\,'\\ \\ \\\'\, I '., .\,'.\ "x,, '\\'\, '\ \ ', \\ ',\>\ I I _. _. - ' I I I * ! 264 ; ~a me ' ., '\$$ \, \?~2, , +\P ', '?.A i *. I t .?.G&\ \ +>\ I I Member ~;~..~..,+ ,d .,o \,\oy ,-.-* 'X<> i e"__""""C_"~I_ _,"_ """""~"""""""~.~. _- """-.. """""--{-"""""-"""""""- i:::; I ::::; I i:::: :I;': I ::I!; 1 ::;:: I + I *'I;; 1 if ip, 7HeI;e po::s;ible for the City to psi "No UUimpiIlg'' Signk ' :;l:b 11: : on :his property, i 'kn, L:& ~~&~ sqsgested the city have sip8 mad2 for i :x:: I this p;~q-;~~e, 2nd acy property 0wncl.r deSi2.hg to hlave ; :;I:: 11s i such a sign colxld purchase a si@. from thz city at cost E ; and then post the sign themselves, i fiqfs. P_llgaroj,;?b s+:ai;ed he had c~:G&; -~;VO ~~~?ii.~S3 ?;e asked: IS) I::,; I I I I I I I i Mr, Angarola asked if he purchased the sign 2nd posted i the sign himself and someone removed th4 sign fmm his i property, would the city enforce the law for the sign ; being removed? i The City P+tForney stated that if he purchased the sign he i then owned the sign. However, if the property owners i would give their perdssion to allow the city to enter ; upon their property to post the sign, then the city would i enforce the ordinance, I I I 1 I I I I t I I 9 I 1 I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I 1 1~. 111;' I::': :a,:: ;:::; :ii;: ::::I ::::; ;I 11::1 lllt: I::$ pt;: ;I:: ;;~ )')I )(*I I::: !::! I i Mr. Angarola stated he would certainly be willing to pur- i i chase the sign and give the city permission to enter upon : ; his property for the purpose of posting the sign. i By common consent of the Council it was agreed that the i i City Manager be authorized to have signs printed in urder: i that the property owners could purchase these signs ai i I I I I L I I I cost. I I I I I I I I * t I PUBLIC HEARINGS: i::; :;:: )IIl 11:: ::!! :'SI I:'& 1::: ::&I l:ln ;;a1 ;:;I I1li ::I9 ;;!: -, I 14 I I* *I $1 1 I I a, Resolution of Intention - 1911 Act: Proceedings; t 1;;; ::,: :::; I 1*1) !I!: ::I: ::!I :::: !Jl 1,;; ! Valley Street sewers - Assessment District No. 2-196c i I The Mayor announced that the hour of 'I: 30 P. M. had : arrived, and this was the time and place fixed by this City': i Council for hearing objections or protests on the proposed: ; work, br the extent of the assessment district, or on the I i proposed grades under the Resolution of Intention No. 6914 : proiriding for the construction of sanitary sewers and : i appurtenafices, and appurtenant work in Valley Street : Guevara $ i ;x; : from Basswood Ave. to 645.73 feet south of Basswood Av&Bierce : F:xi i The Clerk presented the affidavits of publication, mailing I Sonneman i i :x; ! and posting, By motion of the Council the affidavits were 1 McPherson i : :xi I approved and ordered filed. : La Roche ; I!.) ! !x: 4 I 1st D 4 : The Mayor asked the Clerk if there were any written i protests, The Clerk presented the following written : protests: : Letter dated October 31, 1960, from Bert Olson and i Annette B. Wilder, stating they owned Assessor's Parcel i ; No, 35-148-7, which is located on the SE corner of i Basswood and Valley, They feel the sewers on Valley are; i not necessary as they have 155.13 feet on Valley and i 507.69 feet on Eitsswood, and if necessary they could ' \ : connect to the Basswood sewers; they cannot afford this : ! additional expense, as they have no intention of building i I on the &her portion of their property now or in the future.: : Their present home faces on Easswcrod. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 ! i Letter dated October 24, 1960 from htonia Patterson and! i Bobby Joe Patterson, stating they owned property on : Valley Street, and they could see no necessity for a sewer! i on Valley Street. They had a new segtic tank and cesspooI : installed within the past four months; if these sewers are i i approved it will mean a great hardship on them as they : : are now in debt for repairs and improvements on their ! i home. They have 9'7* 486 frontage, ! Letter dated October 28, 1960 irom 3)ell.a C. Clark, i stating she owns Assessor's Fa:xd No, 35-149-Is which i I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I t t I I I I I I f t ! L I : i;' :rr: ;::: ;yl 1:: :::: ::); :::; :;:: rIii :::: ::;I :::: :::: :::I ::I: :::: ::I* ::i: :::i ::a1 i:;; 1::; :;:a I::! ::*I ::ii 4:: ::a1 '1:; ii:I 11 ;::; :I:' ::: 11'1 :Ill '111 It +I :I: !,I ;!I $1 D B I ; .%\ '\ ' , x '' I '\ '\ ' I \' \' I L I 1 I I \' I . I 1 I . 'i' I i Name x%* f i of 1 i Member :""""-"".."~"~""~"-""""""-~""""""""" .""""""""""-""" : has a 226,185 frontage, and she wickled to go cn record i i as opposing sewers for Valley Street at this tirr,e, I I i Letter dated October 28, 1960 from John H. h&Coy, : stating he wished to protest the construction of sewers on: i Valley Street. His property is located at 3456 Valley St. ,; t with a 105' frontage on Valley. I I t The Mayor asked if there were any persons who have i filed protests that wish to be heard in support of their i i written protests? I I I MRS. ANTONfA PATTERSON, 3424 Valley, stated she ! f did not feel that sewers were necessary on Valley St.; I I they have just paid for a cesspool and septic tank, and : : felt this was unfair; This is Mr. DUCY'S project and they! i did not feel they should have to pay for something that i I would benefit Mr. Ducy. Also she did not see why she : I should have to pay more than Mr. Ducy, This payment i ; for sewers would entail a great hardship for them. I I : MR. CLARKE, 3464 Valley, stated they have 220' front- 1 i age oh Valley St. and they do not feel they can pay for I : such a qroject. They have one building and glass huuses : i on this property and have no intention of building further i f on theik property as the school will probably purchase ; i their property, in fact they would like to purchase the i i bare @bund now for a baseball diamond, but they will : ; not sell unless the school will purchase the entire parcel. I i He felt the school would no doubt purchase all the propertg : iri this block eventually. I f i MR. JACK McCQY, 3456 Valley St,, stated his protest i I was the same as Mr. Clarke. He has also invested in a I : cesspool and septic tank and does not feel that he should. ; I be assessed for something he has no need for. I I i The hearing was declared closed at 8: 10 P. IVi. i There being no further protests the Mayor asked the : Engineer of Work what per cent of the total area to be : i assessed for the improvement is represented by written i i protests or objections filed with the City Clerk? The : ; Engineer of Work stated there were 37.9% written pro- i i tests filed. I I i The Engineer of Work presented the Assessment Diagram! : and stated that all of the lands included in the district I i would be benefited. I I i Cmn. La Roche asked how all the properties would be i ; benefited if the School is eventually going to purchase this! i land? Cmn. La Roche was informed there is no written : : commitment by the school that they will purchase this i i property. I I i The Council asked how many residences there were in i : this area and they were informed there were three resi- : i dences on the east side of the street and 5 residences on i : the west side of the street. I I I The Council was informed this proceeding was initiated i ; by a petition which contained 32% of the property owners i i in favor of this project. A health report was requested ; : from the County Health Officer for this area which stated i i sewers were needed in the area. I I i The Council reopened the hearing in order for one of the I : property owners to speak. I 8 1 I I I I I I I I I I I e I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 4 $ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : MR. I I I I I I I I I I JACK DUCY, 3431 Valley Street stated he camot I I I I 1 I I I Q # u '\ .% 8 \, ',\ =.:'', 1 6 7 '.?-$&, $\,;%;c iiii; iiiri ;/2;; !:I:: :ii:: *I/: 1:: :: ::I:: pi:: ::;:i ::: I1 ::: :: It :; :;I:: i:::: ::::i ::ii: ;!I*: 1,;: ::::I :::I: ::::: ::::: 11 1:; :::II 1:; \ \' \' 3. , '\ '. \ ', ',$, '\, '\'6. ',,$,\$x ', '$$>x \@@,&?\d I:: *I ;; :11;* """""""-. *I4;$ :SI 51 :;*I: ,?,:I ;::a: !!;;; ::I@: j:::; ::::; 'I::; ::::: J:r 41 dl:; ;:::; :I:$ "1:: :!:;I ;I:*: 1;~:~ ::iii :;;I: :;/I ::: ::I,; 1:1 ::if; ::;:: ::I ': 1:;:: :;;:; l,,:1 ;#I1 ~1:~: ;::I: /I:: ,:I:: ::::: i:;:: ;;':a l I :*: I;a I:( i:::: 1:::; ::::I I1 I::;; ::i:I ::I:: ::::I : : f'l a 11:: ii::: ;l:1l ::+ 18 $4; 1:;:; :'$: :: 11 1:::; :::a: ::::; ii;:: *I1 ::::; ::;:: :I::; I1 i:::: I@::: ::::I 1)' $9 $11 :@l:t :tl;a 1:::: ::,:: B c I I \\\e \-. I I ,\ \\' I I I I \, ', \X\ '\ \\ \\ I '8, \\\\\\ '\, \\,'\\ I I r- I 1 \\ \\,'X, '\,\\,\\\ 16 f I f Member '\$.@\ \&@,&d%..d T',/$P I '.., - I i ?%!!a %2 \% 48% \ \$$A, 4 ; of 84;u.,"k, \;.p;\ ;::I: ;::I: I :ii:i :"""""-""""""""""-"""-""~""""-~"."""""""""~""~""""~""""."~"- ! OCCUPY his property until sewers are imtalled, and he had ! circulated the petition. I 1 ::::: I I I i After consiaerable discussion by the Council, by motion i Guevara !x: i i i ; of the Council the hearing ordered by Resolution No. 691 i Bierce ; I ; 2 i i was continued until PJovember 15, 1950 at 7: 30 P, ftl. ir, : Sonneman : ; ! $ ; : the Council Chambers, 2960 Pi0 Pic0 Drive. i McPhersoni :xi q i 11' I I I I : La Roche I i ; !x; I i Cmn. La Boche stated he voted,t'no'' because he could see: : no reason for continuing the matter as he felt it should be: i decided at this time. I I 1 I I I I I 1 I b. Weed Abatement Hearing - Determining costs i ; of work done. I : The Council was informed this hearing was called for the i i prpose of he,aring ,dl protests or objections to the cost of : : having the wbrk done, and that all the property owners i I had received A bill as to the amount owed. I I I I I I I I I I 1;;:; ::;I, 11,:; ::::: ::::I ::!I! ;i;:i ::::; i;:!: I:':; ;:::: 1:::: :I::; ;:I:: I;::' ;ll;: 11 1!!1! ! The Mayor declared the hearing open at 8: 20 P. M. I :::I, ti I I :;1:1 I I *I!$: I I .I I i MR. Ri J, RICHARDS, Montebello, stated he owned I : property on Chestnut Ave. which consisted of approximate- ! ly i 12 acre. Last year the city had the property cleaned ! i and he received a bill for $9.60. This year the city I I : deatied the property and he has received a bill for $22.50) i X& felt the bill would be a little higher this year, but felt : ! that $22.50 was out of line. They had the city do the war$ 1 ih order to give the money to the city. I i 'The City Manager informed the Council this year they had 1 illcluded $7.00 per hour for administrative costs; the i I contractor charges $8.00 per hour for his work. He sug-: : gested that Mr. LZichards have an individual do the work i i next year instead of the city. I I I MR, GEORGE GROBER, 2266 Jefferson Street, stated i : he was representing the Buena Vista Lagoon Association. [ i The Association had the property disked in April; now the$ i have received a bill for $15.00 for work that the city has ; : done. He felt there were other lots that looked worse I I than this one. I I [ MR. M. W . JZRVIE, 1175 Hoover, stated sometime agd : he advised the Council of a parcel of land containing 3 or i i 4 acres, which included weeds and dead lime trees on it, ; : and he noticed that nothing had been done about it. I I i The City Manager informed the Council he had checked i i with the City Attorney and the city cannot legally go on : : private property and pull out trees. As to weeds, this : i property is included on the second list of weed abatement : I 1 I I I ,h I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I t I I B projects. I I I I , Cmn. Bierce stated there are many people who cleaned i their lots in April and since that time the weeds have I I grown and have been charged for having their lots cleaneq again. 1 I Mr. George Grober stated that he is very much in favor i of these proceedings and is very proud of the way the city! looks. 1 1 I I I I i Cmn. Bierce stated he had a bill he would like to protest : : which was on Parcel No. 35-14 28x1, as there was never! i any work done on this property and the owner received a : : bill for work done. 8 I 1 ai;:! ;I 1;;:; ::I:; i:!:: 1:::: ;;l1l ::#*I ;:: :::i; :(I:; I:::, ::!I: 1"l; ;:::I :I::; i!'ll ::::: ;::;: :(::I 1::r: ;:I:# 'a!': I"li :::*I I*#:: :::I: l*;ll ::I:: ::::: ::::: ;;;:; 111:1 ::!I: :;i1i 4: i:::; 4;;; ::*Il h:;; :;;I ll.!: I(.I. :a::; I::;, 81 ::::: I:::; :d:: 1"I. I:;I; ::::; :::a1 I1 11111 1:;:: ::::; :::i; :::I: ::I:: ;::I: ::;:; ;:::: ::I:; ;::'I ::;:: 4::: ::I :I ;*l;l ,tl:I ;;::: I,!,! I I Mr. Thornton, Assistant kgineer, stated he had receive$ :I ::::i lisi I I ,!#:I I I je1-1 I t I I ;:: I t I I 1:::; * I I I ::;:I I 1 ::;;I ; 'I I I I 1 I 8, ',,'., '\ '\ '% I f ',, \, -8 , . ' \b' f I - \'. ' \ " b'. 169 1 ,a t i I I - IJ .. 8, \- \ ~ 1 \\ '\ '8, ', '\ '8, 1 I ! Name '8 'x%,, ' '\, 'X%\ I I 'r of "+p#, ' '*\ I Bi \\& \&, 4\\ '?+ I ;:;I: ;II:: 1 Member -$'@,-$$%. ~~"~~~,~~"~~~""~""~""""""""""""""""""""""""~"~..""""""~.."~~~~~"~~"- 1;' ; a letter of protest, with the bill attached, for Parcel I I :;;:' ; No, 35-87-9, owned by Lillian E. Anderson, 806 East i I;:!1 : Magnolia, stating there must be an error in the billing ; :I;!: i as this is just a city lot, and the bill was for $30.00, I II,II I ;,I:, I The Mayor declared the hearing closed at 8: 25 P. M, : After discussion by the Council, by motion of the Council ! Guevara i !x: x: : i the Director of Public Works was authorized to make the i Bierce :x; !x: ; I: : necessary adjustments for any inequities, and the report : Sonneman : : ;xi : i was approved as submitted. i McPhersoni i :x: i I I (11 I I I I I 4::: 1 :I:;: I I I ; La Roche I ; !x: : 1 I 1 :;,:I : Cmn. La Roche stated he felt that if the persons making ; ;;::: i these inspections were qualified to do this work, that the i Guevara : I I I :x: i ::: i Council should abide by their findings. By motion of the : Bierce ; :x:xj : : Council it was agreed that the staff make an investigation 1 Sonneman : i !xi i i as to the qualifications of the persons making the inspec- : McPherson i I :x; i ; tions. I La ~oche txi !x: ; ! I !11!1 I I I * c, Declaring weeds and trash a public nuisance. i i The Council was informed this hearing was €or the second: : list of properties that had been declared a nuisance, and i i the property owners had been notified and the properties i : had been posted. I 1 r VI1 :::l; i: iii;; ::::: it::: I:':; :;::; !11!1 I I I i:;!: ! I I ::I:! : The Mayor declared the hearing open. I I #::!I ; Mayor Ssnneman stated she would like to protest on her ! i notice, however, they would take care of the nuisance I : themselves. I I t ERNEST MAJIA, 3430 Roosevelt Street, stated he owns ! i property on State Street, which backs up to the railroad ! t tracks. He thought his property just included the part ; i that was fenced, and he had taken care of that portion. i i He did not feel he should have to take care of the weeds : : on the other portion near the tracks as he thought that i i belonged to the Santa Fe Railroad. I I i It was suggested to Mr, Majia that he find out the exact : :, line of his property, and that would be the only portion i i he would be responsible for. I I I I I t I I I t 1 I 1 I I ::;:; ::::: :;I:I :I::: ::'I: ,!:;! ;rl;f ;:i:: :I::: ::::; I:: 61 I;$! i;:;; 41 ::1:: ls*:l :!::I ji:i: ;81:* '11:; ::pi :ii:: :!I:! i The hearing was closed at 8: 50 P. M. I I*# I After consideration by the Council, by motion of the ,*,:I : Guevara ; ; :x: i i Council all protests were overruled, and the public Works! Bierce k: ;x: i : Director instructed to abate all nuisances. i Sonneman ; : :xi : I .I1 I I :;::: :t1:I I I I *I I I I : McPherson I :xIxi i I I ; La Roche : !I : !x: .I ; I t I A short recess was called at 8: 50 P. M. The meeting i : reconvened at 9:OO P. M. I ! I 1 ;::i: :;1:1 ::I:: !ll!l t i Proclamation - Army and Navy Academy 50th Anniversari. :;::: ::,:I i The Mayor informed the Council the Army and Navy : Academy will be celebrating their 50th Anniversary I :;I i November 12th and 13th, and with the consent of the Coundil Guevara i ! :x! I I ;:: i she would like to proclaim November 12th and 13th as : Bierce pi ;xi i I Army and Navy Academy day. By motion of the Council : Sonneman ; : fx: i 1 it was agreed that November 12th and 1 3th be proclaimed I McPherson ; :xixi : : as Army and Mavy Academy Day. i La Roche I 1 :x; i : Northern San Diego County Sewer report. I The City Manager advised the Council that Mr. Warren ! I I I ::::: 11; B' 1 I I ::;:: I :-I; ::::I I::[! i Barney,- Chief -kngineer for San Diego County Public Work@ i Division was present, and would like to explain what has : ; been done in regards to the northern San Diego County i i sewage problem. * I ' I l-.l; $:::a :::I: I:::: ::I:: I:!:: !lI!l I I .I.. I MR. WARitEM BARNEY stated he had been asked by the i :;::i !l:!l I I I t * I I I I I ;;;;I I I ;;::: I I :;::i I I I ::::; 11 ! I ;!!I! B \\. \ ' ', \ '\ ' '\ \ 170 , ',$, "\'q-& \,$$+, '\ 9% '\ '\ ', ' ,.\ \\ '.\ k, '\ '* '%+$,;J,$?+ ,u ',o \.P$?\\o\\ ;;I;1 1 4:;: 11 :I1 8 ltl;l I!:;; : 'I( ::;:; i:::: ;:;'I ::I:: ::lal 1::: ::I:@ ;:::: I 1;; :i:;f :*;Sb 11: ~:l:l ::p: I:::: ::::: ;:::: 4::; ::; ;llll 1) ;:':' .; :. I :, I .I. 1 ; '. ' ; 1 I ; ;If:: ;:all ,$: : I .: ,; ; ;.i i: I :I,:: 1.:;;: : ,: ; .; ; :I::: ;.I ;; i I:;:: :.!;; i i,; 1; i i:ii; ;: ,t::\ i; 1;:' 1 i.1 iiii: ii:! """"""""" i;;:; 1::: ll;gl !;:;[ 1:: till; ::; :;I:' i; ,. I:* ; ; ::I $ t .. LI .SI 1;' 11 kl!l: ;:tll -1:;; :;It :::: ::;: .: * 1 1';;: Ill: i;:: .I I : :; :' :i;: ::t* f: ::::: :;:: ,; I : : :::: 1 ,I '1k' I* l* * ., ; 5 I iiii ; 1.: I 11': $:;I :1.1: ;::: ;::; ;: :.; #:;I ::I: vi: 1:' ;: 11: ::I1 ;:Il :; l:;l ::;: )a,* ;el1 ;.: i i ::;: 1'11 ;': 1; I!!I I I I I I 1 3 I \, \, ., \ \ 8 -.' ' I I \, ,', , x' I I ', '8, \\, '\, '8,::,, 1 7 z '. < . '. I I 4 I ; t 1 I l" 1 I 1 4 I I I D I I I 1 I I I I t t I I I I I I I I I I I -8 - .- I : ~a me \,,'\%\ .,'\st -" '* '\ .\ b '\ E of \c$%\;,,;%& t Member $'@.*.p,,c """""""""""""""""""""""""""*"-""""""""~"""~""""-,"""-~"- 4 #*I; the Council this matter had been referred to the Chief i ::if; ::#:I of Police for investigation. A memorandum from the i ::;I: Chief of Police was presented wherein he recommended : ::,:i the license be granted to Ralph Burnette and John Butooni :;::: The City Manager also recommended the license be I ::a:: 1 ;:: I: granted to the applicants. By motion of the Council a i Guevara ; f : 2 i card room license was granted to Ralph Burnette and : Bierce : ;xi* ; John Button, said business to be located at 370 Grand J SOnneman : I : 4 ! Ave, , in accordance with the recommendation of the ; McPhersonj ; i d ; Chief of Police and the City Manager. : La Roche i i : $ ; I 4,!#! ,$"', '\ .$.!A\ 111 I I I I 1 b. Second reading of Ordihatlce #9108 - Reducing i :,:I: I ;:I;: I;;I; :;':I i the lot area per dwelling unit in an R- 3 Zone. The t following ordinance was given a second reading: I 1:::: 1 :!!I: I I I I i Ordinance No. 9108. AN OkDINANCE OF THE CITY I CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, I SECTION 706, REDUCING THE LOT AREA PER i DW ELLIPJG UNIT IN AN R-3 ZAX-JE, was adopted by i title only and further readirig waived. I :I i Amending Ordinace No. 9060, Sec. 1814, requiring f three affirmative vo$es. $Q overrule the Planning Com- i mission. The following ordinance was given a second I reading by the C6uncil: I I I c. Second reading of prdinance No. 9109 - I I OF I I I I I I 1 I I I , I I I I I 1 I I I & I I I I Guevara I i : 4 i Bierce !x: I xl : Sonneman ; I ; $ I McPherson: ; ; xl : La Roche : :xi 4 i ::I II :;l:l li;*i ::i;: ::+ p::; +::I; :I;:) ::1:4 4 111 l!*l! I : Ordinance No. 9109, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i 1;;;; :::;I I i ENDING SECTION 1814 OF I I :::I; : ~RD%&L%A$0~1060, BY DELETING FRGM SAID : Guevara I i i 1 ~ : ORDINANCE THE REQUIREMENT OF FOUR COUNCIL i Bierce !x: f 4 l : VOTES T) OVERRULE THE ACTION OF THE PLAN- ; Sonneman : : : x I NING COMMISSION, was adopted by title oricy and furthe? Mcfghersoni i i f i reading waived. ; La Roche : i xixi I ;1I *?t: I I i Cmd. McPherson asked why the power poles were set i : So far in on the sidewalks on Chestnut Avenue, The i Assistant Engineer informed the Council there were two i : that were set too far in and they have communicated with i i the San Diego Gas and Electric Company regarding this I : matter. i CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT: i The City Attorney informed the Council a resolution had i : been prepared authorizing condemnation proceedings for i i the cross street between State Street and Roosevelt St. : : The following resolution was presented I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ;r:; l:;l ,:*I ii:i pi; i::: :::: lI:: 1:;; 1;:: -:i:: :I:; :ii: ::;: :;:i :::* I $1 :4I .I I : Resolution No, 700, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i 1i.l :I:: I Oz]NCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AUTHoBIzIN'$ Guevara I !Xi $ i CONDEMNATION QF CERTAIN REAL PRGPERTY OR i Bierce 1 : !x; i ~TERESTS THEREIN FOR STREET AND BOULEVARQ Sonneman i i :x! ; PURPOSES, was adopted by title only and further reading McPhersoni : : x: i waived. : La Roche :x: i x! I I i::: i Changes in the plans for the improvement of Chestnut Ave: I::# : K-z- . .".._"" __ ue o me approval omage Homes unit #3 subdivision, i let: ::I: i the following resolution has been prepared, setting a I l;fl : hearing for the changes necessary for the improvement i ::i: i of Chestnut Avenue: I I 1;:: ;I It I Res. #701, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i ;VI; I I I I 811 I I 1 I I :I;: HE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DE- ;::: I I ::I; i 1 1::: : CHANGES IN THE STREET IMPiEeZVEMENTS AND I I ::;I ! APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT 'WCRK IN I I I::! :!x: : MATED DECREASE IN THE COST OF THE VJO.RK :I:; ::I i BY REASON OF SAID PROPOSED CFXNGES AND I sf*: * t ;::: I 1 I I ;::a 4 I I I :::: I + III: I I 7 I ::I: I I I % :ii; J *#If I I::, [ :!A&NG ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN 1 : SAID CITY; STATING THE AMOUNT OF THE ESTI- i 1 I 1 I ! t I I I I I t i *8,, '\, ', '8, -8 ' I I 8, , ', 8 '\,''8 I -3 - i N a me *\, .'& '* "\$$ I I , ,$8 '\, I I Member ,@@,+$\$ ~"""""""""""""~""""""~"""~""""""-""""-"---.~"---------"------------- I I ;'I ::;:I / GIVING NOTICE OF ;A TIME Ah9 PLACE WHEN AND i Guevara ; : (Xi i ; WHEitE, FOR HEAdING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS i Bierbe ; :xixi ; i TO SAID CHANGES IN SAID WOKK, AND GIVING ; Sonneman ; ' i x: I ; NOTICE THEREOF, Assess. District No. 1-1960, was i McPherson ' : &Xi j i adopted by title only and further reading waived. : La Roche ;x : ;k; I ;: I. I I ** I 8, \\,\,* \ %, '\\'\\ 17; I 8 i of '%%> %\&i&.+/t.+, ' '?4;88 \\\' 8 I D -1 I I I :.!!:I i Council policy for l'esidence requirement for City Employ! ! ees. At the preVious,meeting discussion was given as : i to a pdlicy being established requiring all employees of i : the city to reside,w$thin the city limits of Carlsbad. The I i City Attcirney stated she had prepared a draft for the : Council to revied, requiring all employees after November i 1, 1960, to reside in the City of Carlsbad within six montys i after employment; all employees now residing outside : i the city lirhits &ho change their residence must move I i withiri the city iimits. The City Manager stated he would i ; like one Pe4uirement added, wherein any policeman or I i fireman employed be required to live within the city at : ; the time of employment. I I I 1 I 1. ;:i:~ :::I ;i:: Ill 1: i : :.: :; 1I;; ll;: 1::: :;#I i::: 1::: :I:: ;::: 1::; I;:: :t:: I@) 11 I!!! I I ;i:: i After cobsiderable discussion by the Council, by motion I Guevara F; ;x; i of the Council it was agreed that the policy be adopted as : Bierce I ;x:x: ; presented, with the addition of the requirement for the ! Sonneman i : !xi : police and firemen to reside within the city at the time : McPherson i : :x: I of employment. i La Roche I f :xi I ::: 1 i Inter-American Municipal Congress. The City Attorney i : reported the Congress was considered a great success. : i San Juan Porto Rica was selected as the new headquarters! : for thk organization, and Mayor Dail was elected Presiderjt. I Brown Act - Secret meetings of Councils. Attorney : Gene2 osk, at the League Conference, gave his ! ititerpzittion of the Brown Act, and the City Attorneys i i as a wH6le disagreed with Mosk's interpretation. Mrs. : ; Hayes stated she would continue to rule that all meetings i i should be held in public. I I I I I I I t I I ! I I I i CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: I I I I ! I I i The City Manager advised the Council he had received : : an invitation from the Qceanside-Carlsbad College to I i have the members of the Council ride in their Eiome- i coming Parade on Saturday, and he would like to know ho4 ; many of the members would be available. Mayor Sonnem$n i and Councilman Guevara stated they would be available. : : Water Pollution Control Board. According to the order i i issued by the Water Pollution Control Board, the city I i must indicate to the Board what the city intends to do ; about the sewer situation in the city. The City Manager i i stated he has prepared a draft of a letter setting forth ; : what has been done by the city. The City Manager asked i I the Council if they wished the action taken by the Council ; : at tonight's meeting included in the letter. By unanimous i I consent the Council instructed the City Manager to ; indicate their action to the Board. i -&l&ter was presented from the Acting City Manager of i : Oceanside, thanking the City of Carlsbad's Fire Depart- i I ment for their help in curtailing their recent brush fire. : I Letter from the Boat and Ski Club of Carlsbad, thanking \ : the City for their fine cooperation in the Ski meet held i I on October 1st and 2nd, was read. a I i Employment of Consulting Engineer. The City Manager i ; advised the Council kat the firm ofAssociated Engineers i ! had been employed as consulting engineers, and within ; i the next month he would like to come before the Council : i to recommend that the Council consider the hiring of a i ! full time City Engineer. I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I b 1 I I 1 I I I t a I I t I P I ! 1 I 1 I 1 1 ! 1 I I I :'" 1:: :::I :::: ::I: ;::a :::I 1: ;ii; :!:: 4;; :::: :::I ::;I :::I :::: ::!I ' 1: :ii: .!I 1' ;::: si:: ::;; ::;; I;:: !:I: ::i: ::I: :::: )(* l*!l I' 1::: :::: :I:: :;:: i::: ;:ii :I :::: ::ii ,:I1 :;:: is:: :;:: 11 '11 i;'I 11;: ::: i:: ::: ((1 I. :ti f:: ::: I:: :;: !*I i:: ::: 1:: i:: ::: ::: ::; ::; I:: ;:: 11 la( If1 1 I I 1' , ., -, ', -\ -. I \' , \\ '\ \ ' .. I \ '\ 8, ', '\ I .\ ', '\\ , \ '\ I I I ; ). I I I \\ , '\\ "\'\\'\\ 17; I t +&s, ;\,;?$$ I I 1;:;: I :::;: t ::::: :!\;I $1 !:I;: i:;:; I I :I::/ I I I ::::I I 14: I ::I:; I I $X;; ::;:; ::!:I t I I - 10- I '\ '\%\ ! : i Name of ".,;$&,;., .PA, I B i Member ~$'$%$$?~,< Il(II :;I:! )""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""""""""""~"""""""-"""""""-. .I I I I' ; The Mayor stated she had noticed a student from the i High School in the audience, and would like to know his I ; name. The student informed the Mayor his Game was I Bob Ness from Terramar, and he was a Junior at the i ;i;:; : Carlsbad High School. He was here to get information ; !:::I i on a report for his speech class at school. (INSERT) Sek below I 'I,;, i Cmn, Bierce stated there have been complaints about i I speeding on Basswood Avenue. He suggested that this : ;IIl; i matter be checked and that stop signs be installed if i necessary, I I : RATIFICATION ,OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: i Ratification of the bills was givkn for the period October 1/8, ; 1960 to November 1, 1960j for the general expenses of ; Guevara : the city in the amount of $20,844.84, and for the Water I Bierce i Department in the amount of $10,254.69, as certified by i Sonneman I i :x: i i the Director of Finance 'ad approved by the Auditing Comb McPherson I ; :xi j ; mittee, i La ~0ct1e 8 : :x: j i Ratification of the! payroll was given for the second half I Guevara : ; !xi ~ i of October, 1960, in the amount of $13,559.50, as : Bierce : I :x; ~ ! certified by the Director of Finance and approved by the : Sonneman : ; :XI i Auditing Committee. : McPherson i 5 :x;, I I I I t I *I ;;#I; * I 1 I 7;x;$[ ~ I I I :;GI, :;::; I 11 I I t i La Roche : :x :x: I I ::I: ; ADJOURNI?IENT: f :a:: I )Ill i I'II 1 1::s i By propgik motion the meeting was adjourned at 11: 10 P. & :;I: I I !;:! I I ;:I: I I I*;; 411 I I :::I I I :::I I ;La I 1;:1 i Deputy City Clerk I I ::;: 1 I :;I; i INSERT: I ;; I1 I 3: I I I ::;: i Mayor Sonneman requested the following statement be ; :Ill ll;l i made a part of the minutes: I *L: 1 11 Mayor Sonneman stated she would welcome any of the : :::I ! students at any time that wished to attend the Council i ::;; :::I I meetings. I I ::;i I I ::;: I 1 :::: I I ::;i I :::; I I I :I;; 41, 1 I :::; 1 I ::;I I ::;: I :;:: I I I I ,- I I I 1 I I 1 I I I q I I l it;; I l1 I 11(1 t Respectfully submitted, I I I I I 1 I I I I 11 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 8 I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 4 I I I I I I ir:; $11 I * I ;::; It:; 1 ::;: I :::I I 1 :It: I ;:I I I ;: :; I I 1;;: I I ::;I I :SI: I :::: I 1::: I :::: 1 ;::: I :::I I ;::: I :;a: I ;*:a I ::I: 1 1 11:: f I :::I I:;: I I 11; I I ::;: 8 I I 1 I Ill mi I I I I I I I I I I I I I * I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I *I I 1 I I !ll.