Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-11-15; City Council; Minutes# I I' ,'., t'' 4 I I ,\\\" i CITY OF CAELSBAL) : Mnutes of: City Council '\ '\ ', <, ' '\ i Date of Meethg: November 15, 1960 i N a me ',\ '8%. ' ''38 : Time of Meeting: 7:OO P. 34, ; of : Place of Meeting: Council Chambers i Member ~"";"",,,""","~~"""-""~"""""""""~"""""-"""""~"-------"-"-"------~-- ,o '0 %.P9', I I :ti: i RQLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Gwvara, I I 4,: : Bierce, Sonneman; McPherson and La Roche. Also I fltl) I I;:, i present were City Manager Slater and City Attorney Hay&,. 1;:: t 111: { ALLEGIANCE to the flag was made by the Council. I 1(11 i APPROVAL OF MINUTES: I \\ \\ ' '\ '. '\ I \, *\ '\ \\ ','8 17 .$a%\ 'X\ +&', ',k'-'.O'\ yp, q' ;'* + I , , '. *, '\ ' 'I I I : :,,I ;::; i * I !::I 4:; I I 1 I I I I I I I 1:4 11;; I::* i Guevara : ; ;xi : November 1, 1960 were approved as corrected. : Eiierce pi :x: l a. The minutes of the regular meeting of I i Sonneman : ; i xi b : McPherson I ; :x: I I La itoche : ix:x: I I I I::: ; 1 ;I 1 I I I I;#; 'I:; I a. Request :,for sewer connections. Tae following 1 ;::; 1 requests for sewer connections were approved in accord- ! Guevara ; : :x: : ance with the recommendation of the Engineering Depart- i Bierce 5r: ;xi ! merit : Sonneman ; ; :x: I Clark N. Johnstone i McPherson : : :xi I Roberta Truss i La 3oche i !x :x: I I I::: I ii:: I I I I I I It1) i CORRESPONDENCE I I I - " 11 11 1 I I I I $ i Sewer Connection Policy abolished. : By motion of the Council it was agreed that the Policy i Guevara ; ; 1x1 i established by the Council requiring all requests for sewet Bierce $c i !x: ; Connections to be approved by the Council, be abolished, ! Sonneman I i :xi i and that all future requests for sewer connections be left i McPherson ; : :x; : up to the discretion of the Engineering Department. : 9 La Roche I :x:x : 1 I :::: I I I I b, Request for refund of monies for wzter main, i i Letter dated November 4, 1960, from Wesley 0. Denison,; : stating he is building two duplexes at 765 and 775 Palm : I Ave., and in order to provide water to these properties it i i is necessary to build a new water main from Madison Ave.: ; down Palm Ave, The Engineering Department is requiring : a 6 inch main for future expansion, fire protection, etc. i ; Accordingly, he has on deposit with the city sufficient : i monies to pay for the six inch pipe, However, as the ; requirement for an adequate water supply to these proper-! i ties does not exceed a four inch water main, he requests i : that a refund be made for the difference in cost between : I a six inch and a four inch line. I I I I I I I :ii' 1: :*I1 :::I ::11 8;: :::; i;:: ;::: tlIl 1:;1 '11: :::I ::;i i;:: ::;: 4:: I::: 1;;1 :::: !,I! I 1 i As the next matter of correspondence pertained to the i : same matter, the following letter was presented before : i any action was taken by the Council. ! Gerken, stating he has an equitable interest with Mr. W. 8. i Denison in residences being constructed on property I I : located at 765 and 775 Palm Ave., and since there are no : i more potential users of water in this block, he feels that i i a 6" line is far more than adequate, and since it would be : : a direct benefit to the residents on Jefferson St. and to the: i city for fire protection, he appealed to the city for financidl : assistance to make this replacement, : The City Manager advised the Council that he, the Assist- i i ant Engineer and Mr- Scholink had a meeting this morning! : in relation to this type of condition, and it was their feeling I this matter should be held over until some future date I i when they can come up with some form of policy. By ; common consent of the Council the matter was deferred i i until further study could be made. I I I I I I I I I I C. Letter dated November 9, 1960 from J, F. I I I I I I I I 1 I 0 I I 1 I I I I i ORAL COMMTJNICA.TIOlJ'.TS: r I I I 1 ! 'I :dl :I:{ I::: 1;;1 :::: : 1 I1 1;;; ::It i;:: la:: '::: :::I ::;: :::; :::i ::I: :::I 181 !I#! :;:: :;:: :;I: :a:: :::' $18 :::i ii;: I**: ii;: :I El+ 11;' :::: :!!: ; There were no oral communications. i I" 11': I 1 I ;::: I I I I :' '::; I I I & :::: 1 I I I 1::: I I :;:: * I 11;; I I I I t::; I I :::I I L I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 ',\.,\\. \\ '\ \\ \\ '\ '8 1 , \ ', '\ '\ : ~a me \,, '+\ '\, '3s I '\ \\,\\\\ \\ \\ '\ 175 I I : of '\c$f~\ a'\ &>X, .&h\ \\ %?&, ~""-""""-""""""""""""""""""~.""""""""~""""""""""""~~-~~-~"- \o PC), &a Q I I x:;: I 1:::: 1 i;:lI I a. Request for reduction of cost for sewer cor,nectic$n - 1;; i Lull roperty. At the regular meeting of October 4, 1960 ; 1,;:: ::I : t us matter was discussed, and it was the decision of the i If :::;i i Council that the City would assume the line costs for Mr. ; ::::: : Lull to connect to the Chinquapin sewer line, and that he i al;*l ~1l;l i shodd pay the lateral charges, capital contribution ::11: I 1:::: : charges. for_,the. pumping station inclusion fees, which i ::I;: i would be $100,00 per living unit, Also the City Attorney : :'Itt i was instructed to work out a plan as to how the fmds ;;;:; 1 would be transferred. I I ::::: I :li:l I 1 :;::; i The City Attorney informed the Council that at that meet- ! ::1:1 i ing it was determined that the approximate cost for the i 11:s: ~1I;l :ti 1 ; Lulls to connect to the Chinquapin sewers would be as : I:':: Id;; ; followsi I I :,:a: ;: I I 1;; I Line cost @ 122 lin. ft, I I $480.00 I :;;;I I 40 lin. ft. of laterals 170.50 I ::i;; 6: 1 Capital contribution charge @ :i:;; I $100.00 per living unit 300.00 I :;;:: 1 I I I ::;;; i At the time the Garfield sewers were installed the Lulls : ::!:: I appeared before the previous Council and asked for relief i ::::I I as they were unable to connect to the Garfield sewers i :::: i without excess cost. It was the decision of the former : :I;: : Council that at such time as the Chinquapin sewers were I :::I #'I: i installed they be allowed to connect to that line without : ::;; : charge. Legally this Council is not bound by the action I :::I i of the for'mer Councilj however, morally they are. At : ::I: I ;I : the meeting of October 4, 1960, it was the decision of thid ::I: :::I i Council that the line costs be waived, which was in the : l*t: :li: i mount of $480,004 but that the Lulls would have to pay I : for the laterals and the Capital Contribution charge for : IiiI :::i i each living unit. As far as the transfer of funds there i I' : : would be nb funds to be transferred. ;I* I I 1:: i MR. . LULL asked what the $100.00 contribution charge i ::I: i was for. The previous Council told them they would not I :I:: 1;;1 ; be charged anything. I t :I!! ;lli I Mr. Lull was informed that this particular sewer district: :i:i I has a pumping station, and each property owner within i 1;s: :;:: : the district contributed towards the cost of this station. ; lI;* ::I: I :I;; ! MRS. LULL stated that each member of the Council has : ::It i before them a copy of the letter that was sent to them i l!bl :;:: ; advising them of the decision of the former Council that : :::I I they would be allowed to connect to the Chinquapin sewerg :I:: 1;: : without any additional charge when they were avaihble. v ::I: i is only right that they be allowed to connect to the Chin- ; : quapin sewers without any additional charge as they paid i ::I: 11;; i their assessment on Garfield Ave. and were not able to : ::;; : connect to that sewer. We have checked with an attorney: :; 1: i in Selma, California, who is the City Attorney there, and: ::;I ::I: i he feels they should not have to pay any additional cost I :1:1 I because of the decision of the former Council. They : It': :::: : talked with Mrs. Hayes last evening and she talked to i Il'l ;::; I this attorney regarding this matter. I I :it: ! Mrs. Hayes stated she called Mr. Hansen, and when she i i::: : explained to him that the Lulls would be receiving relief i ;::I ; in the amount of $480.00 for line costs, he felt different13 $1: I about the matter, I 1 :ii: i Cmn. Bierce stated that the Lulls paid $540.00 for two I : lots on Garfield as their share of the assessment, which : ::I: i lots were not connectable. This Council is waiving the i :;:: : line cost in the amount of $480.00, We have legally and : i::: i morally done just what the former Council agreed to do. I lfi:; : Since 1954 an ordinance was adopted, which provides for : l:;l I I I -2 - '., ', X\ '\ '\J, I I i Member I :Ill ,<h \ 6 ..A, B 1 ENGINEERING: I I I I - I I 1 11 I I I I 1 I I 4 I 8 I I I I 1 ::'a: llt;l I I 1;:: I I I I I1 I I :I i:p I I I l ea I 11 ;ii: 1 I I 1 ::;: I::: :;i: I :::i I I I I :::I 1 I I 1 ;:;; I I I I .: I j::: 1 B I I I i i ,. %,' I , '\ \\ '\ ', '\ '. I - 3 .. I I I I I 8,' \, '\\ '\\ ".",8 2 7 [ t : of \?$&&\9$\&\V ~"""""""~"""""""""~"""""~"""""""~"""""""-~-----------------~-----"- ! Member ,o \Q ..e+$ "1;; ;:;II i pumping station contribution charges, and which the other: I*# i property owners in the district have had to pay for. I I :I::: 1:::; I \\',' \ .b , , '\ '.\ '\ \\ s I I I i N a me ".\;$$;.' '\ '\,, "&\ $+> I I I 1 I I @l,!l 1 I i MR. LULL stated there was a pumping station discussed i I at the time the Garfield sewers were beicg considered, I I and that is why this porticn of town was deleted from that : f dia trict. I I I .I :I1 11:: ill I::II ::;:a ::!!I I1 #kt:: ::::I I I I ::::I .'I i After considerable discussion by the Council, by motion I Guevara I i ixi 1 I of the Council it was agreed that the line costs in the ; Bierce : :x:x; 1 1 amount of $480.00 be waived, and that tDe usual cost for i Sonneman i i ;x\ I : laterals and the capital contribution charge for the pump- : McPherson i : :x: ~ i ing stationbe paid for by the Lulls. i La Roche 3 i !xi I I 11'. 1 L I b. Greenwood Park Eubdivision - R. T. and L, C, i ; Cantarini - Request for extension of time for filing final I i map, Letter from B. T. and L. C. Cantarini was pre- i : sented, wherein they requested an extension of time for : i filirig the final map of Greenwood Park Subdivision. It I ; was pointed out that one extension had already been grant-l i ed in 1959, which expired in October of this year. The : : City Attorney reviewed the State Planning Act and Ordinanbe i No. 9050, pertaining to the filing of final maps for subdi- ; : visions, and advised the Council they could not grant i another extension yf time. Also the owners would have i f to refile the tentative map with the Planning Commission i i for their cofisideration. I I i The City Manager was instructed to inform the owners of i i the Council's action, and advise them that the City Attorndy : would assist them in expediting the filing of the subdivisiors " 1 I I 1 I I 11;' :;I: i:ii :::; 1::: ::;; :I:: I::: 1::: ;:': ,;:: ;;:: ::;: #I :;di ::!! :Ill l:ls ;1I 11 :ti: 4:; :;#I :::I :;ti 11:: 11 \ map I I"; I I t I t 4;i :!. 4 I I c. Final map of LeBarr Estates subdivision. The i :::; I:;: : : :.: ti:: : Assistant Engineer presented the final map and informed ; i the Council the map complied with all the provisions and i I::: : conditions required by the city. By motion of the Council : i the final map of LeBarr Estates subdivision was approved,! Guevara : ixix ; :'#I : and the City Clerk was instructed to sign the final map on : Bierce !xi :x; I behalf of the City at such time as an improvement agree- i Sonneman : ; !x : I ment had been entered into between the subdivider and : McPherson i : :x i i the city. i La Roche 8 : ix I I I ::. I i PUBLIC HEARINGS: I t I I I I I I I I I 1 l a. Continued hearing - Resolution of Intention - I : 191 1 Act Proceedings - Valley Street sewers - Assess, i !Dist. #2 - 1960. Th e Mayor announced this hearing had I I I been continued from the previous meeting, and declared i : the public hearing open at 7: 36 P, M, I I i JACK DUCY, 3431 Valley Street, informed the Council i i the Health Officer had inspected his property and had i condemned the property because of the sewers. Cmn. i McFherson has looked at the property, and was sure Cmn.: i McPherson could verify that the water level is approxi- i : mately 4 feet. i Cmn. McPherson stated he had inspected the property, I : but he could not verify the wgter level, I I :'-The letter from Dr. Askew was reviewed wherein he I i stated a health problem did exist in that area due to the I : sewer situation, : MR, JACK McCOY, 3464 Valley Street, stated that the i i recommendation of the Health Officer does not state any i : specific problem other than sewers zre necessary as a : i health measure. They must think anyone that is cn a : cesspool is a health problem, It is not clear to him what i i the problem really is. He is aware of Mr. Duty's proble4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I *iii !:*I l4:: :::: :::: :iii :I;l :I1: i::: $11 1::: :;;: 1::: 1::; $1: :::; ll;l a:, :'I: :'!:: It ,Ill L: :::: ;; ;::I ;;:: ;I:: :;:: i::: *!I ;::I :: ii;; i:;: $1: ::;; ::;; i::; :;I: 1:;: 1 I ,' 1:: :&I' !ll! I I -,*\- I I \\ '\ ' '\ '\\'\\ ! I '. '\ "\ ' 8. '. '\ 17 I I I -. 5 - -,, ', t, ' ', * '\ '. I I i N a me \,, '+$$ \,, '3.3. I : Member bo '$3 ..PO' c '?*P&$\+ p ~"""""""""""""""""".""""""""""""""""~""~~"""""""--,"""-~-~. I 111 I ri::: : He has talked with people liviilg on the opposite side of I "I! : the street and also people living on the. same side of the i ii::; : street as Mr. Ducy and they do not feel they have any : :;::; :,:;I: Ill ! problem. I I :'I 11 I t :I::: I I I ; of 'S\$?+, \.'??+, Di I I / As there were no other persons desiring to be heard, the i :i::: : hearing was closed at 7: 44 P. M, I I ::::; I I I ::::I : After consideration by the Council it was the decision of : I:;I: ::;:I i the Council that sewers were necessary in this area. Th{ IIIII : following resolutions were presented for the Counci1,'s i i consideration: I I ;:::; I Res, #698. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiL i Guevara ' I ;xi ; I;11; : --CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, MAKINq Bierce :: ! FINDINGS AND OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OB- : Sonrleman I ; ; XI I Ill i JECTIONS, was adopted by title only and further reading i McPhersoni : : x: 1 &I : waived. : La Roche : :x; xi ~ i Res. #699. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i Ill; i OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, ORDERING CONSTRUC; : TION OF CE:i%I'AIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND : Guevara : : ;xi 1 i ORDEKING POSTING AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICES! Bierce : :xix: 1 : INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS OR BIDS for Assess, : Sonneman : ; ix! 1 i Dist. No. 2-1960, was adopted by title only and further i McPherson j i : x: I : reading waived. : La Roche ;x: ;x! i specifications for Chestnut Ave. Improvement - 191 1 Act : :!I:; +::I : proceedings;- Assess. Dist. 1-1960. The Mayor : announced the hour of 7: 30 P. M. had arrived, and this i :;:I 1 : was the time and place fixed by this City Council for 1 hearing objections or protests on the proposed change in I l4:; :::I i work under Resolution of Intention No. 701, providing for i 1':; : the construction of certain street improvements in I ::II i Chestnut Ave. from its intersection with Pi0 Pic0 Drive : ;::: l::l : to the intersection with Monroe Street. I :a;: :;I: i The Clerk presented the affidavits of publication, mailing i Guevara : : ;xi i and posting. By motion of the Council the affidavits were i Bierce !x; :x: ; approved and ordered filed. : Sonneman : ; :x: *I I I 111 !i::; 1:; I I -1 I 4::l 1x1 :x: j 11 I I 111 I I :Il:I I:, x:;; :I::; 18 I I I I) I.$:; I I b. Resolution of Intention #701 - Changing plans and f :: I. 1 .I I I I :::i: I I :;; I ;I I I I 1 I I :::: 1 I I McPherson i i !xi' I : La Roche I :x :xi I I :ai: i The Clerk. advised the Council' that up until the time set i :I 11:; i for hearing, no written protests had been'filed. I I I::: i The Mayor announced that the Council would now hear any! I:!: : oral protests or objections concerning the change in work.: ::I: :1:1 I I I I:#; 11:; i JACK KUBOTA, 3039 Jefferson, stated he was represent: ::;; i ing-Donabob, and this change was requested by them due i :::: : to the construction of Village Homes #3 subdivision. I :;:: I I I :::; i As there were no other persons desiring to be heard, the i ;::: : hearing was declared @osed at 7: 50 P. M. I I :I:: I :::: I I I ::ll i The following resolution was presented for the Cou,ncil's i la:: I::: : review: l I 4:; I I :::: i Res. #703. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ' 'I :::: : OF, THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, MAKING; Guevara : ; !x: :i:: : JECTIONS, AND ORDERING CHANGE IN WORM, for i Sonneman : : ixi i Assess, Dist. No. 1-1960, was adopted by title only and. : McPherson i :x :x: : further reading waived. i La Roche ~i :x: : OLD BUSINESS:. I I I I I 11 I 'I I B ! FINDINGS AND OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OB- : Bierce i i :xi 1 I : I 1 I I :::: I I 1::: I :::: I a. Second reading of Ordinance No. 3042, Requirink ::I: i::: i certain stop signs. The following ordinance was presented #1:: : for a second reading: 1 l:ll I 11:; I I :; I I lli: I I ;;a; 1 1 ll:: I I l:;l I I I I I I I I I I I I. '. \ , \. \. .'> I I -\, '\ '\ -. \\ '\ I I \ ', 8, '\ \ t 1.7 i I I - "I. U .,.,-- , ' ' '\ '\ '\ t i N a me ", 't& \\,'q)+J, t i of ' +'?6'\ ', \%8, I \Ob+\ ',L \O' .p \,++ ~""""""""""""~~""-"""""~"~""~"""~""""""""-"~-"-""-""----------~--- : Member $'.C;j\.$-p\s I I :;I 1 t Ordinance No. 3042. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY I " Il$: :::I: i OF CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCES NO. 3005 (83% I:::; : AND NO. 3032 (83.1) SUBSECTIONS (b) AND (g), AND I Guevara ; ;x:xi I ;I1 tl i ORDINANCE NO. 3038 (83.2) REQUIRING CEaTAIN : Bierce I : :x! ; ; TiZAFFIC TO STOP AT DESIGNATED INTERSECTIONS : Sonneman : ; :x; I: I i AND ALLEYS, was adopted by title only, and further i McPherson :xi i xi ; : reading waived. : La Roche : : :x; : 1 ;!!I! B I I I I : A short recess was called at 8: 10 P. M. The meeting i [ reconvened at 8: 22 P. M. I I I I ! I :i:;i :I:;: :Id;: ;::;i i CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: I I 1 ;'I 'I I I 1:;:; I!#:! I ;' The City Attorney informed the Council she had prepared i i an ordinance for food .vending. vehicles for their consider- i : ation, and that it was essentially the same ordinance that ; i the City of San Diego uses. After reviewing the ordinance: : the City Attorney stated the Council might wish to make ; i the requirement that the food be prepared in the City of I : Carlsbad, or in an area that is inspected'by the City of : i Carlsbad's Health Officer. It was agreed by the Council i I that Item (l), Page 3, should be changed to read: 1 I i ,"lo Every oyr and operator 'of vending vehicles shall i i establish with/ e County of San Diego, subject to I I : Carlsbad's Health Officer's inspection, a service room i i wtiich shall be used for the preparation of food sold from : : vending vehicles. 'I After consideration by the Council i i the following ordinance was given a first reading: I I I I I ;i::; ::i:i ::':I Ill ;::;: ::::I I:;:; I.; ; : 1 I:::; lltl; I:;:: I;;;; :SI 1:;:: ;:I:: Ill;; :11:4 #::I1 ;:$I; /;I; ; : r" ;- I 1.: ; I ; ;,,I, 11 !I,!I i Ordinance No. 5033. AN ORDINANCE OF TE-IE CITY 0-i 'Guevara ; ;x :xi ! ;*I 'I I 33 ING ORDINANCE NO,% 50~5: OF'. THE: Bie,rce y ; !X! ; : Ei:'TRy"SoFADCLEEL, BY ADDING:. y:BaET6 SECTI~H? Sonribman I : :xI : I REGULATING THE OPERATION AND PARKING OF ; NicPherson: i i~i 1 i FOQD VENDING VEHICLES, was given a first reading. i L& Iioche : I :x; I !ll.l I i A letter was received from a Mr. Grable, representing i ; the owners of the land in fee in the Pala vicinity, request-: i ing the city to relinquish certain rights. The' City ac- I i quired these rights through the Mutual Water Company fori : a dam and reservoir, and the right to drill wells and a i i pumping plant. The City Attorney informed the Council : ; she had written Mr. Crable and informed him the City : i. would not be interested in waiving these rights. The 1 I ; Council requested a plat of the lands where the city owns i i these rights. I I I :I:;: 'I ;;::; 1:::: I:::: I:;:; :::I: ::a:: :I::: 1::;: :::;I #I :;I;! :;I:: :I;:; !I.!, I t i'i i Chamber of Commerce akreement. :The 'City Attorney ! $::; : presented an agreement between the .City and the Chamber: i of Commerce for the fiscal year 1960-61 for the Council'si :;I: I review. After reviewing the agreement it was the feeling : ::;i ! of the Council that on Page (l), Item 3, that the billing ; :I:: i should not exceed 1 /4th of the monies appropriated by the i ' . : City to the Chamber, By motion of the Council the agree-: Cuevara : ; :x: i ment was approved, subject to the stipulation that on : Bierce $: !x: 1 : Page 1, Paragraph 3 read "Not to exceed 1 /4th of the 1 : Sonneman ; i !x [ I I amount appropriated, and the City Manager authorized ; McPherson i ; :xi I : to execute the agreemefi't'bn behalf of the City. i La Roche ; ix :x; ~ I,; t : ; I:;:! :I:' 1:;: t1 I I,.l! B : Policy - ;E: Sewer line costs. Mr. Watson has asked fori i rellief on e front foot charges for sewers on Chestnut t : Ave. He has only one lot in his subdivision that will be . i i served from the Chestnut Ave. Sewers; however, he is i : paying for the main -line through the subdivision street ; i which line will have to connect to the main sewer line on : i Chestnut Ave. It was the opinion of the City Attorney that i ; a definite policy should be established for cases such as I i this. It was agreed that a policy should be established and ; the City Attorney was instructed to prepare a draft for the: : Council's review. The City Attorney stated she would : i check with other cities to see how they handle such con- : ; ditions. ' 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1.1 1:::; :;;I1 *#I;; l:;l; :::I; lll;l :::II I: :; i:; ;+i ;L*l 1:::; :;:I; ::;:: ;;:I' ;::I: i;; :'; ; ,! : ,I 'I : ; ; ,I# I;: I : ! r,; :ol;l :;!;I ! @' I I;;'; v * 0 I I I I I I I I' \ ,., \ \. I *\ '\ \ '\ '. '* I I \\ X$\,, '\\'\\'\, 17: 1 I 'L, '.\ '., '\. '\..'\\\ I I i N a me 'x,, '\$, '\\ ''9 I I ; of '*$, '\\ %\ I i Member \,6 $$@,*.$?2$ k0 \ q\,+\q I I 1:;: :;st I $ -- CI - :"~""""""""~""""""""~"""""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""-"- I ;:I; i Executive session. The City Attorney requested that an i :::: : executive session be called for the purpose of discussing : i:ii i possible litigation. :'I, i The Council adjourned to an executive session at 9: 10 P. 1\12. 4::; i The meeting reconvened at 9: 35 P. M. 1 I l!#t :a:: I 11:: I !Ill I I I I I I SI 11 I I I Proclamation. Mayor Sonneman proclaimed the week ! ; of November 18 to November 24, 1960 as National Farm i i City Week. I I I I I I i CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 1 I 1 I [ Letter dated October 21, 1960, from the Vi estern Outboa& : Association, requesting permissiori to hold racing events i i on January 8, 196 1 and Markh 19, 196 I, to be held at : i Whitey"s Landing on the lagoon. The first race will I I start at 9:OO A. M. arid the events should be completed byi i 4:OO P. M, Liability insurance and property damage in- i i surance will be furnidhed in the required amounts. A : : copy of their By-Laws and regulations was attached to i i the letter. I The City Manager informed the Council this matter had i i been referred to th& Haxbor Commission, who met last : ; evening, and they have recommended permission be gran$- i ed to the Western Outboard Association to hold this event: : Also in the event inclement weather makes it impossible : i to hold the events on the days scheduled, that the dates ofj : January 15, 1961 and March 26, 1961 be allowed. i Cmn: Bierce asked that if all the landings are created i i dqual, why does one landing have all the events and the : I rest have to close? I i MI%, SMITH, operai0.r of Whitey's Landing, advised the i ; Gouncil that the other landings will not be closed. Mr. : : Fbx, owner of one of the landings was present and con- I i curred with the program. ! Crnn. La Roche asked about the traffic problem. Mr. ! i Smith stated he would be in charge of the parking. I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I $ I I I I I I I I I t I I ! i::: :I:: I;'# ::I; !I:! "ti ;:Ii ::el ;r:: 4::: :::I :::i I::: :::: ::;: :;:: :::: @I :111 l:ll :I1 I1II 1:'s :*#I l!!l *I 'I I. l':: ;i:: 1::: :;:: :::: ::;; ::I: 1: I I :: I::: i;:: ;I:: :;v 1:; I::: 11 :Ii *!!I 1;;: :::I ::a: :;:: It;: I:;I :I;: ::I: ;::: :::: i::: i By motion of the Council the Western Outboard Associa- i Guevara i i i $ : tion was granted permission to hold racing events at the i Eierce i x: i 4 r lagoon on January 8, 196 1 and March 19,196 1, and in the : Sonnernan : i : A : event of inclement weather the dates of January 15, 1961 i McPherso4 : i < i and March 26, 1961, may be used. : La Roche : !x; f i Claim for damages. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph : Co. have filed a claim in the amount of $1 33.00 for i Guevara i i iG i damages done by the trenching machine to their line on : Bierce :xi 'x: : Chestnut Ave. By motion of the Council the claim was i Sonneman i : : xi i denied and the matter referred to the city's insurance : McPhersoni i i X: ; carrier, : La Roche ; !xixi I ! !!a: I 1 I :::: :::I i i Pal Day Luncheon. The City Manager informed the i members of the Council that an invitativn was extendd tw i : all the members of the Council to attend the Pal. D2y i Luncheon at the El Carrino Country Club on Thursday, : : November 17, 1960, at 12:OO noon, The Mayor and 1 Councilman Guevara indicated they would attend. i San Diego Water Authorities meetinp An invitation has i : been extended to all the members o the Council to a i luncheon to be held at Marty's Valley Inn on November 284 i 1960 at 1200 noon by the San Diego County Water Author-: : ities. i Friends of the Library. The City Attorney informed the i : CGuncil the Friends of the Library have asked that she i I I I I a 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I ::!I ::I: ;l:l 1::: ;!I: !::: 1:;t ::;: i;:: ;::: 1:;: :::: I!;: ::#I ;: ::;I :::I ::I; I::' I)*: :I:' ;:;I IIII 1:;l "i Ill( ! 118 1 8. I !#I! c I I I I I I I I * I '\\.\\'. i ,I, x'8 c \\ \, ', '\ '\ I ', ', '\ I I \ \\'\\'\\ 18 1 \\\ '\ \\\ '\\ '.\'X\ I i of \?$$&q\p& 1 -7 - I Na me \\ '\.$..$&\ '\$\ '8, '\\ ''&\ $!*, I Bj ; Member %s$f.--$\@ :"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-l-."""""""""""". I ;;I; : prepare the necessary documents for incorporation, and : i::: i she is in the process of preparing these documents at the i : present time. ::I1 I :'I1 1::: 1 I II ,!It I I i prepare the necessary documents for incorporation, and : I she is in the process of preparing these documents at the I :rii :;;; i:;: c * i present time. I I "I} ,!It :'I1 1 I I I I I I I I I '\\.\\'. i ,I, x'8 c \\ \, ', '\ '\ I I \ \\'\\'\\ 18 1 \\\ '\ \\\ '\ '\ '\ I i of \?$$&q\p& I ; Member %s$f.--$\@ I . ',', , \\ 1 -7 - I Na me \\\ '\.$..$&\ '\$\ '8, '\\ ''&\ $!*, :"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-~-."""""""""""~-. I.. I I ! Mayor Sonneman asked that an announcement be placed 1 I in the paper givin the dates on which the trash and garbagb : is picked up. LE CORRECTION BELOW) t t I I I I I I I \ RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLE: I j;;; 1:'I 1;:: 11 pi :Iii ;;a* :I:: I!!I i Ratification of the bills was given for the period Novembe6 l;Il 11 :' : 1, 1960 to November 15, 1960, for the general expendes i Guevara ,K i :x\ ;*It I of the city in the amount of $11,158.56, and the Water ; Bierce f :xjx: ; Department in the amount of $8,719.76, as certified : Sdnneman i i :xi i by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing I McPherson ; ; !xi : Committee. i La Roche i I :x; 1 Ratification of the payroll was given for the first half of i Guevara i I :x: i November, 1960, in the amount of $13,345.50, as certi- : Bierce ; : :xi ; fied by the Director of Finance and approved by the Audit-: Sonneman i i !x: i ing Committee. : McPherson: x; ;xi I $11: 1 1 I I :::: 'I I I I i La Roche i ixix: I I :;I; I i::; ::;; I::: I I ::;: t I :;;: I I :::I I 1 ::;* 1 I :::i I I :::I I :::: I I i::: I ;;:: I I :::: I I ::I: I :I :I I 41) ;: 1 i; ;i I ::;i I I :I:: ;:I 8:: 11:: I :;:; I I 4 ;Iq I 1 I;;: I I :;#I I 1 ;f:l I I 1::: I I ::;i I :;;: I I ::;: I 4 :::; I :::I I 1:;: 1 :I:; L I :;I1 I :::: I I I :I:: 1;:1 I I ::I: I I :I:: 1 t::; I I ,:I1 I I :I:: 811 I 1 :;:: I :::I I I ::;: I I :ill I 1 i::: I I 1;:: I I i::: I I I $::: :::: I I I :;:: ;I:: I I I i ADJOURNMENT: ! By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 9: 55 P. M. i I I I 11 I I I 1 I i Respectfully submitted, * I I 1 I I 1 7/~,4&2:,2? E ,,,glrz6G& I 1 NIlSRG4R)i;T E. ADAW i Deputy' City Clerk I I l;a I I I I I I I I I 4 I I ::I i NOTE: I i Mayor Sonnernan requested that the following mrrection i : be made to Paragraph 2 above: I ;pi ; Mayor Sonneman asked that arr announcement be $laced i 1 in the paper as to the time limits for placing and removing i trash or garbage cans from the street. I* ::;I I I I :: I 1 I I I I I I 4 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I J I I I 1 I p:: #I:: I I I I I I I I I I I 8 1 I I I & I I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IJ: I 1 0 I I 1 IIIS 1 I I 1 I I I 11: I I I I 1 I I I I !ti: