HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-06-06; City Council; Minutesr . 9.
I I I
< I I 1 I : CITY OF CARLSBAD i Minutes of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting) I I ; Date of Meeting: June 6, 1961 i Time of Keeting: 7:OO P. M. i Place of Meeting:Council Chambers
: ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Guevara, Bierce, i La Roche, and Sonneman. Also present were City Manager i : Slater and City Attorney Hayes. I I
i ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was givenc
I I I I I I I
1""""""""""--""""~""""""""""~"""""""--"""""" * I I 4
t
I I
1 I I I I I
I : INVOCATION was offered by Councilman Bierce.
I
1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
I I I I I I I I I I
t I
I
l a. Minutes of the regular meeting of May 16, 1961 i i were approved as correcred. I I I I I I I 4
1 r ; CORRESPONDENCE:
I I
I I I I I I I I 1 I t
I * I I
I a. " Mrs. Alice Ratcliff - re: Thank you note. I I A note of thanks from Shorty and Alice Ratcliff was pre- i : sented far kindness and thoughtfulness during Shorty's i 3 illness. Also a card of appreciation from Alice Ratcliff : : and family was presented,
I b. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. re: extension of I i lease. Letter dated May 29, 1961, from the San Diego Gas i ; 6r Electric Company stating their intent to offer an ex- J i tension of the present lease between the City and the I I : Company covering use of the Upper Agua Hedionda Lagoon. i
; The Mayor asked if this offer was not substantially what i
: had talked with Mr. Forward, attorney for the San Diego i i Gas & Electric Co., and he was not sure what the Company's: : intension was. Also after talking with several of the i i people in Sacramento, she did not feel a lease would have ; : any effect upon the Bills in the event the Council chose i i to negotiate for a lease with the Company. I I
I I
I I I
I I I I I
I I I
I I
.I : we now have? The City Attorney advised the Council she ;
I I I i The Council requested the letter filed,
I I
I I f I I I
9 I C. A,T. & S, F. Railway Co. -re: Request for opposi- i
:.tion to HR 3229, 87th Congress, Letter dated May 19, 1961j i from the A.T. & S. F. Railway Co. advising that the City's: : occupancy on the railroad right of way is in jeopardy if i i HR 3229 becomes a law. As the City's interests would be ; : adversely effected by this bill, they urged the city to t i write Congressman Aspinall, as well as other members of thh : Committee, protesting and making such suggestions as occur; i By motion of the Council the City Manager was instructed : : to write the proper representatives opposing HR 3229. I I I I
I I I
I I I *
i
I 1 I I I I I I I t Dl
I I 1 I 4 *
I 1 I I I
b d. Trf-City Hospital District -re: Letter of appre- i
ciation for use of Council Charnbers. Let-fer dated May 18, ;
1961. from the President of the Tri-City Bospital District!
expressing the Board of Directors sincere appreciation ;
of the cooperation and assistance offered to the Tri-City i
Hospital District in allowing the District to use the 4 $
Council Chambers as the official-board meeting place
since January, 1959. By ctnrnnon consent the Council order-;
ed the letter filed.
s I $
I I I I I
eb Mrs. Jack Estes -re: Use of the school playground ;
durina the summer months Letter dated May 22, 1961, from:
Mrs. Jack Estes, President of the Jefferson P. T. A., fav-i
oring the plan of the Carlsbad Parks and Recreation Corn- :
mission to keep the school playgrounds open during the i
sunmer with adequate supervision, I I I
I I i Also a letter was presented from the Magnolia Parent : Teacher Association stating they would like to go on re- i i cord as favoring a summer recreation program for the
I I t
4 I
I I 1 I
'.' 8. .-, '= *. *\ 8,
8' 8 *8 '\\ 88 '8 '\
'\\ ', * 8, '\ " I \, '\ '\, '8 '\ '*,
N a me 's, '*$& ' '\, '89 @A
Member $3@.*.9
:'+I
of '5 '%'\ ' 8% *?LO \+ $4
;::; ;:::
1:::
-""""-"""""""5-
::;;
:;I:
1::: I;::
;: -;: Isi:
:::I 11
::e:
Guevara ' :X!Xi
~ierce I I !X!
La Roche i i :X:
Sonneman !X! :X:
11:;
:*+I
:::I
1:::
I 11 1:,t I $8
I"1
:;'I ill; I::: ;:::
+a;$
::I: *;! ::::
:I41 ;::; :ii:
;11; :::; ;::;
4:::
:'*I i::; iii; ::;; 111 :;;: ::I: jii: iiii
I;:! 14 :::: iiii;
:l*l; ::::;
;::;! ':::I
;;a:; ::i:;
!;;:I ;:'I' I'
*a:;; Guevara : IX~X: ;
Bierce i I :Xi I La Roche : ; !X: 1
Sonneman i XI :XI I
;::a: ::'::
1:::; :;;:I ii::; 81 ::;:; :;;:: ::;:; :;;:; ;;*:;
1;:::
;*::I ;::if ;::;: :::;: ;::;: :;:;: ;:::I
::::e ;::::
I:::,
:'I:: ;:I;: ;i:::
41;::
::!I !
;;$I
ii;:; ::I
-a
I , .,,.." I I * 8'
I t
I # I ',,".. ,, ', ', '.
1 t , ' \ ', '.*'*, 7 ; Name' ,., '\*&, *. 'p * : of y?P\O, '\ @+ t I .$?d$&P'.,$
I t I :ill
8 ; '; :
:::I
I
I I $ 0
02- ', '8, '%, ', 'i % , \ '* ', '.
~"""""""""""""""""""""""-"""""""""""-""-~"-""""""""----~- : Member -@@.&
I I :;#I : children of Carlsbad, 4 '4:
I I4 : Discussion was given as to whether or not they were reques{- :,It I ing the City to furnish the personnel for such a program. i :*:: : The City Manager informed the Council there were no funds : 1;;;
i provided for such a program in the tenative budget. The i ::; I : Hayor requested the letters referred to the school district: i::;
8 1:;l i for their study. I I:;:
l a f I I 4;:
! 25, 1961, from Ralph W. Maas, stating it was his understan.. i ding the city does have a leash law, but either the owners! ;;i: : of dogs are not aware of it or don't care. Mr. Maas re- ; ;:;: ;::: i quested the City to post signs along Tierra del Oro and I ;::: : Shore Drive giving notice of the leash law. I I f;4
I I I i::;
; The City Manager informed the CounciZ the County will not i :!I: i pick up stray dogs until such time as we adopt their ord- i :*I' ;;:: : inance. Later in the meeting the City Attorney will pre- : ::I: 1;' i sent an ordinance for the Council's review which will I I !;I: I adopt the County ordinance by reference. I :!;I I ;::I i ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: I l 1::; I t :::;
I f i MRS. MATHEW JARVIE, stated as a teacher and as a citizen ; !:;I
,I*: i of Carlsbad it is her feeling there should be an under- i :::: I standing between the City and the school district as to : ;::: : come form of recreational program €or the youth of Carls- i 0;: :::: : bad. The Jefferson P.T.A.sre in hopes the city would have: 1 It i sufficient funds to employ some person to supervise an i ::;:
16:: i occupational recreation program, However, she thought : I::: ; the Council was very wise in referring the matter to the i :+Il 1: : school district.
i Councilwoman Sonneman stated Mrs. Roberts had called her : i:i:i ; and asked that a communication be sent her regarding the i ::;:I i Council's action in waiving their sewer and water line i 1:;:; ; costs in the amount of $325.97 per lot. The City Manager ; I:*:; i stated he would take care of this matter.
i Councilwoman Sonneman also stated she would like to have ; f1;84 : the possibility of a cross walk checked across State Streef i in front of the Carlsbad Theater. The City 'Manager stated: 1::'l
: he would have a study made and report back to the Council.; :;;I1 ::I
I 'I '; : PLANNING :
l a. Memorandum from the Planning Comission -re: 4
I
# f, Ralph W. Maas -re: Dogs on beach. Letter dated May I ': iii;
I
a ::
I
I
I f :;::;
I :a::; 8 I 14' 1;;:;
f I ;*:#I 1::::
t I r I:::! 81 ii:ii
ii4:
I I :4:; 4::;
a I I I i:::;
I
I 8
I I * 4
f 8 I ::::: i:;:: I I Conditional Use permit for South Coast Asphalt Products, I : Inc,, Memorandurn dated May 31, 1961, addressed to the City; iiii; i Council from the Planning Commission, stating that at. the ' $I !it:; : regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Planning Commission i ,,::: : held on May 23, 1961, by a unanimous vote the Commi.ssion i I:::: i concurred in the additional conditions to be added to the ; ; conditional use permit to be granted to the South Coast i : Asphalt Products, Fnc. as found by the Council at their ; 11(11 i meeting of May 16, 1961.
i The City Attorney presented the following resolution for I :I;:: : the Council's consideration.
441
(I::; ::::; ii:;i
+ I I:::,
I I ::::I
I i:::: :I::: ::i:i :I::; :;::;
s {::It 'I
I ;:;:;
1;;:;
I I
7 37 B f Resolution No, W. A RESOLUT'ZON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF i I THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING AND DECLARING FINDINGS, : : AND DENYING AN APPEAL FROM THE COMDITICNAL USE PERMIT I GRANTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO SOUTH COAST ASPHALT i ;1::: : PRODUCTS CO., INC.
i Cm, Bierce moved that Resolution NO. ?S? be adopted. Cmn. i i:::: ! Guevara seconded the motion. Before the roll call vote on: : the motion, a Writ of Mandzmus, was served on each of the i iiiii i Council members present, and the City Clerk on behalf of ' : :::a*
I I It:'
I
I I f 7Jg I I ;i::: 1:::
I r :!!e! I
s
I)
l
I I
t
I
t
I I
l"---"-"""""""""--""""""""""""""~~""""~ 8
-3-
I I I I I I I * I I * f
I """"-2.
I i
I 1
I I : I
I
1
I f
I I
I I I I I
I I I # 1 1 I
I f
I
I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I 8 I 1 I t 1 I I !
~ thie City and individually by Rudy Carpenter, Deputy Marsh- i I all of the Oceanside Municipal Court. I
The City Attorney advised the Council. that since this Writ.:
'of Mandamus has been served it might be well to adopt the ;
resolution if they so desire, but that no permit or work i
order be issued until after the hearing on June 15, 1961. :
By roll call vote Resolution No. 747 was adopted by the i
~ title only and further reading waived, I I
f
I
I I
, I *
I I I I b. Tentative map of Laguna Vista subdivision. Letter i
dated June 2, 1961 from Donald H, Holly, agent for the I 1
developer of Laguna Vista subdivision, requesting that the i
City Council 8ction''be deferred for an indefinite period :
of time, as the developer is presently seeking a solution i
to the problem of access into the proposed subdivision ;
which will-be satisfactory to all concerned. By common i
consent of the Counci1,the matter was deferred for indef- :
inite time,
ENGINEERING : I I
I I I I I
I L l a. Birch Street. 8 : 1 I
I I 1 . Resolution No. 754 - vacation of a portion of : : Birch Street. The Council was informed several months ago : ! the Engineering Department requested a realignment of I 8 i Birch Street. At that time the Engineering Department was ! : instructed to prepare plans for the realignment. The Plans: ! were presented for the Council's review and the City Attor-: : ney presented a resolution for the Council's approval: I
i Resolution NO. 754, A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION i I 1 I I I
i OF THE CITY COUHCIL TO VACATE A PORTION OF BIRCH STREET IN : ; THE CITY OF CARLSBAD BETWEEN CSRTAIN DESIGNATED POINTS AND i i ESTABLISHING A TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING was adopted by :
I title only, and further reading waived. I : t 1
I I I I 2. Resolution No, 755 - Street opening on a por- i i tion of Lot rtI", Rancho Agua Hedionda as Birch Street. The I
:City Attorney informed the Council she was unable to have ! I the- necessar; documents ready for this meeting and would ! : try and have them prepared for the next meeting. The matt-! i er was deferred until the next regular meeting. I I
I I I
I I :
k t b. Eureka Place sewers - 1911 Act proceedings, The i :City Attorney infomed the Council the Engineering Depart- ; i ment was ready to proceed with the construction of the t I
:Eureka Place sewers, and she would like to present the i following resolutions for the Council's action:
I 1 t 1 I
1 I * I I Resolution No. 750. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF :
i DETERMINING THE NATURE, LOCATION ANI) EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED:
:Assessment District No. 1-1961 was adopted by title only :
I and further reading waived. I I
:Resolution No. 751. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF i
:RATE OF PER DIEM WAGES for Assessment District No. 1-1961, I I was adopted by title only and further reading waived. #
; Resolution No, 752. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF i i THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION : : TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN SANITARY SEWERS AM) i i APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENAHT WORK IN SAID CITY; DECLARING :
: THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING PLAT OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT,!
: IMPROVEMENT, AND APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, for i
I I * I
I THE CITY OF CAPLSBAD DETERMIN.INQ..THP; GENERAL PREVAILING :
I I I I
! THE WORK TO BE OFMORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY PUBLIC BENEFIT:
I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I ! !
-8 -, , -, -, \ . .Y'' " ' '. ', 8, ',8;;. '.,", '.* " '* .
Na me''\* =A$& **., ''9
*f ''&?P, '* *\
3 ', ', 8. t h ' 7-7
Member *?$#$$ ,o* 0 +g\4 % +ql
""""""-"-p-""~~".
t10; :;::; ;:::; :i::r
p:'I
::::I I:::; :;::;
:iiji iii$
Guevara i i $ $ i
Bierce i 3 : X! I
La Roche : : i X i
Sonneman I ! : X! I
;:t;t ;::I: ;::;I
I'f ::::!
1:;:: ::::: :::i:
;::I: ;;::: I:::;
1:::; :;::; iiii;
ii:!;
*I
;$Ill
81ai1
In l;:*1 pa;;
;::a:
f::::
::e:: iiil 1:;:
;t*:! ;::ti ::::1 ::::j
I::::
;;::I
l'tlI
#;*Il
Guevara : ; X{ X: ;
Bierce I X: : Xi I
La Roche i i :X: i
Someman : i :X! : i:::: ;;;::
I:::; CI :::;; !I::;
:a!:: ;: #;:!;
l'::; iii;; 'I :;':I
;I:;I ::I:; :::;;
1:::: I:;::
e;:: ::;:;
t1
I*((
):I
I*(
:*,;I
Guevara i iXiX: i Bierce ; X: :Xi :
La Roche : ; :Xi i
Sonneman : : : X; i
Guevara ! { XjX! :
Bferce ; 11 : ;XI i La Roche : : !X: i Sonneman i X: :X: I
::'I:
$4:; :::;: ;:::: ::::; :it:*
:!I:; i;::; :I:::
I 41:
;::I
1::::
!!I!:
I'
:/:::
;Is
I'
I I l \',x" I \ ', 8\ '8
I I
'X, '\ '\ 8 ' ',
I I \, ', \8 ', '\ 8, I I ,\ .* yg
I -4-
1 I i N a me *>, '$8 '8, '?&,
I I of '\+\0'8 ' ' t ; Member ~\$f+..+'+?+ 0 'It\ ;- "_ "" "" * "" """"" ""- - - "" - - "" - " - _"" -" -" - ".." - " - "- - ";- -"" - "" "" >oe:.c..e:: ::I"
ti::: ;::::
11;:;
i 1 \x8 ', 88,8'\ s, '8 '8
I
I 1 D: I i DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED BY SAID WORK AND 1 ; TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COST AND EXPENSE THEREOF; DE- i : TERMINING THAT BONDS SHALL BE ISSUED TO REPRESENT ASSESS-. ; ::::/ i MENTS TO BE LEVIED; AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR i Guevars) ; : :X! i
i HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS TO SAID WORK OR THE EXTENT: Bierce : iXiX: j i OF THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED, OR BOTH, AND GIVING NOTICE i La Roche i i :Xi i : THEREOF, Assessment District No. 1-1961, was adopted by 1 Sonneman :X: !X: j i title only and further reading waived.
:la
I I I 1'8:;
1 I:$&,
1 I I I !:::I
I C. Beech Street. I @)II
/::;
I I I I i;:;;
1 1. Acceptance of Improvement Plans, Improvement i i:i;i I I :::'I
$:I:
I ::I:: I!::: :x::
I I ii:::
$1,: :;: ::::;
I I I fi1:;; I :::i:
I I : ix: i
I : Sonneman i i :X! I I 2. Designation of authority to sign contract. By! :;1:1 I1
I
1 I
I f
! plans were presented for the new cross street between i State Street and Roosevelt Street. The Engineering Depart+ ;::il i ment stated they took it upon themselves to name the
; street vcBeech Street" as it is practically in line with i ::; :. Beech Street to the West. After reviewing the plans it :
, i was pointed out that it would be necessary to acquire add-i ytl : itional property on the four corners for curb returns. It : :i: i was suggested the Engineering Department contact the i property owners to see if they would be willing to deed ; ; the property to the City without cost to the City in re- i i turn for their property being improved without cost to f ;i::: : them. I I ;;;:i
! After consideration by the Council, by motion of the Coun- I Guevara : !X :X I ; i cil the plans were accepted by the Council as submitted. i Bierce !X: iXi :
I
I
OI
I I ; La Roche : 1
i motion of the Council the City Manager was authorized to I Guevara i :X !X I i : sign the Contract for the improvement of Beech Street on ; Bierce :Xi !X: i i behalf of the City of Carlsbad. i La Roche i i :X i i
! Council the City Clerk was instructed to invite bids for ; Guevara i iXiX i i i the improvement of Beech Street. : Bierce ; I :X; ;
I
I 1 : Sonneman i ; !X : :
t 3. Notice of inviting bids. By motion of the i :::ii
1 i La Roche I ; !X : ;
I d. Palomar Airport Road load limit report. A report i Sonneman :X : ;X i :
;::I: :;::I iIi/:
I
I
: on the proposed load limit for Palomar Airport Road by : :::a: i the Engineering Department was presented. The report stat! ;,:I: : ed the San Diego County Road Department plans to place a : i no load limitation other than that of the State (1959) i
I Vehicle Code on the County portion of the newly constructed :,:I: i road ; the road has been designed for medium traffic, and I ;:;:: : their check of allowable load design indicates that the : I::!:
1s
i road should be adequate for the maximum load limitation se< i:: 1:;::
! forth in the State Vehicle Code - 18,000 lbs, per axle; i Also the enforcement of a load limit may impose certain I ::ii: : practical problems such as (a) It would not be coordinated: :;' I with the Couhty Requirements. (b) Vehicles would be forced i : to attempt to execute a hazafdous U-turn at the City limit$ ::Ill i (c) limitations would apply to all vehicles including thos$ ::::: i not intended to excluded by the City (dl enforcement may : : prove difficult €or the City due to the distance separatingj ;It:*
i the road from areas more frequently patrolled. I
i After consideration by the Council it was agreed that ther4 18'1:
I was no necessity of a load limit as the road is construct- ! ;:::: : ed for such traffic.
i Mayor La Roche inquired as to Chestnut Avenue. The Eng- i ,:::I i ineering Department informed the Council that Chestnut ! ; Avenue was not constructed for such heavy traffic, however4 :I;:* i it was the only through street to El Camino Real, I 1; 1;
i After consideration there was no action taken by the Coun-: i:: ;: : cil at this time.
I I ::;::
I $!
:*I 8;:::
I :!;:I
I t I I::::
::::I
1 ::::I
I I * I :;::;
I:;!;
I t I ::::;
4 I :;+
* sa;:
I I ,:: i i 1 :
. .. ;' ; ; # : ;
I e. Requests for vacation of a portion &f$arlsbad Bl& ;:I::: i Letter dated June 1, 1961, from Charles B.:arie?$olet A. : ,.I: 1:;
I ; .. .~. y <-, I I I. I
; ; z ,:. I'
t I :],,A '- :
I . .I . I I I I :;, 1. I I I I :::::
1)
:hi:
I
:*I:;
;it B $
I t I I
~. . . .. .
I I I 1 I I ::;;!. ::;I,
I I ! !@It1
'X I I 1 4
I .,\.\\*
I ' 8, 8\ '\ \\ 8.
I L, *\ '\ 8
t I I 888 '8,8'\, 8 88,',8' 8' 7:
1 i Of ',b\o'p+$
8 -5, 1 '\ ' b \ 8:'.
e i N a me ', '8$8 ''\ "6' 1 I '.,+8$8 8 '@8
:"""""""""""~"""""--""---"~""""--"""~""""""-I """"_""" "" 2 "" y-?
!:'I
4::
I ::::
I I :I:!
I
1 08,+', '8 ..9/' : Member .%@,*.Od
I I D: i Ledgerwood, requesting the Council to consider the vacatiol :I::
I of a portion of Lots 81 and f2, Bbock '*GP', Palisades, 1 I ::at : which is now a portion of Carlsbad Blvd.
t!Il
I
I I ! Letter dated June 1, 1961 from Frank and Mabury Novak re- i : questing the City to consider the vacation of a portion : : of Lots C3, #4 and $15 in Block "G" of the Palisades, ad- i i jacent to Carlsbad Blvd. It is their Intention to main- : ; tain and improve said frontage at their own expense and i I without cost to the City of Carlsbad. I L
I I
t I i Letter dated June 5, 1961 from Patrick O'Conner, requestin$ : the Council to consider the vacation of a portion of Lots i i til, #2 and 83, Block eqH*g, Palisades, as they are in the : I process of developing plans for this property, and it is i I necessary for good orderly development that this property :
i be relinquished, I I
: Letter dated June 5, 1961, from Harry M, Walker, request- i i ing the Council to consider the vacation of a portion of : I Lots #4 and 85, Block "Hg9, Palisades, which is presently i i a portion of Carlsbad Blvd., as plans are in the process : : for the development of this property. I I
: The Engineering Department pointed out the area to be I considered, and by motion of the Council the Engineering i : Department was requested to study this matter and make ; i their report, and that it then be referred to the Planning: : Commission for their consideration. I I
t I
I 1
I I
I 4 I I I
I I I : NEW BUSINESS: I I I 1 I
I I i
i to sivn application for Public Law 560 funds. The City i : Manager informed the Council an application had been pre- ; i pared for Public Law 560 funds for engineering funds for i : the joint sewer project. A resolution would have to : accompany this application authorizing a person to sign i : the application on behalf of the City. The following I 1 : resolution was presented for the Council's action: i Resolution No 756. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE:
: APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC LAW FUNDS t1560, ON BEHALF OF THE :
i CITY OF CAKLSBAD, was adopted by title only and further i : reading waived,
l a. Resolution No. 756. Authorizing the City Manager i
I I
I I I I t
i CITY OF CARLSBAD, AUTHO~IZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE!
I * I t I
I I I I 4 b. Adoption of County Ordinance No. 1041 (Dog control! I by reference. The City Manager informed the Council in ; : order for the County to do our dog control they request I i that we adopt their dog ordinance, The City Attorney has ; : prepared an urgency ordinance which adopts the County : ordinance by reference, The following ordinance was pre- : ; sented for the Council's review. !
I I t
I I
* 1 1 I
I
1 I I I I I I
I
I I 1 Dl
t
I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I !
I Ordinance No, 3046. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF :
THE CITY OF CARLSBAB AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3015 OF THE i
CITY OF CARLSBAD, REPEALING SECTIONS I AND 11 OF ORDINANCE
NO, 3015, AND ADDING SECTIONS TO OXDINANCES 3015 AND 3039,:
RELATING TO THE CONTROL AND LICENSING OF DOGS, KENNEL
PERMITS, COMPULSORY VACCINATION OF DOGS AND CONTROL AND i
ERADICATION OF RABIES, was read in full and adopted 8s an ;
urgency ordinance. I I
I I
I I
OLD BUSINESS : I I I I I
a. Resolution No. 757, supporting the application of {
the A. T. & S. F. Railway to the LCC for control of the i
Western Pacific Railway. At the previous meeting of the ;
Council Mr. Fuller appeared on behalf of the A.T.& S,F. :
requesting the Council to support their application to the! I I I I I I 1 # I I I
I I I I 1 1 l a
Guevara
B ierce
La Roche
Sonneman
Guevara
8 i erce
La Roche
Sormeman
Guevara
Bierce
La Roche
Sonneman
).I1
;;I#
I::: ::;: ::;;
::;I i::: ::::
Ill
:!#I ((1
,-I
1:;: I:;: ;: I :: 8;; I:::
1;:: 1:;:
:I;: I:;;
;:II $:;i
I:#
11:::
::'I:
:;::I I;:':
6 :x: i ix: ;x; ; : : :x; i
:I I :xjx: :
;;':I :;::;
1:;:: ::$:
1:;:: ::;:: i:::: ::::: 4::; :L:: ::;:; ;I;:: :I:;: ::i:i :I/
1 I :xi i :x; :x; i i : :xi : : i x; x: i
:;::I
:I#;: :;:;; I:;:: ;:;:: :I:!:
ll'l; :;;:;
;l**l I*;; ::::;
:::;I
I;##; ::ii: :::;:
:-I; :I::; : :+x: :
I : :q : i: ,x:! :$ ;x: ;
:I::;
;::I,
1:;:: ::::; I:;::
1:::: :;i;i I:::: :::::
::::! 4:;:
I::;:
;I:;: ::::: :::;:
11
18';
I'
:,I
8 0)
:I
11
l!!l!
,I I I I
I I I
I I 1 I . -6-
f !
I I I 1 I I I I
I t I I :~""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""*"""~~.
I 1 0 I I : KC for control of the Western Pacific Railway. At that : i time the Council by motion supported their efforts. How- i : ever, they have found that a resolution is necessary to ; I attach to their petition and have prepared a resolution i : for the Council's approval, The following resolution was ; i presented for action by the Council: I 1
i Resolution No. 757, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CAALSBAD :
i COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 5 (2) OF THE INTER* i : STATE COMMERCE ACT TO ACQUIRE COh'TROL OF THE WESTERN PAC * : I IFIC RAILROAD COp"sANy, was adopted by title only, and I I : further reading waived.
I I
t I 8
: IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION OF THE A.Te& S.F. RAILWAY :
I I I
I I I I t s b. Second reading of Ordinance No, 9116, reclassify- i i ing certain property on the easterly side of Pia Pic0 I t
f Drive from Zone R-1 to Zone R-3. Ordinance No. 9116 was I i presented for a second reading. I I
i 6 rdinance No . 91 16. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ! ; THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, CHANG - ; i ING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PitOPERTY FROM ZONE R-1 TO ZOME R-3 I : IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, was adopted by title only and : i further reading waived. I t
t 1 I I
I I I I I I I I I c, Second reading; of Ordinance No. 9117, granting I I i a conditional use permit on certain property to Woman'% : ; Club of Carlsbad, The following ordinance was presented i : for a second reading. I I i Ordinance No, 9117, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THi : CITY OF CARLSBAD GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR PROP- i i ERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF TRACT 252 AND 253, : ; THUM LANDS, MAP NO. 1681 IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD was I i adopted by title only and further reading waived.
i CITY ATTORNEY *S REPORT:
; Senate Bill C1084 and Assemb€y Bill !I3036 - Agua Hedionda i i Lagoon. The City Attorney reported on the status of the i : Senate Bill and the Assembly Bill in detail. I I
: Long condemnation suit. A hearing on this matter will be ; i held on June 12, 1961 in the Superior Court in San Diego. i
8 I I
I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I 1
I s t I
I : I i South Coast Asphalt Products CO., fnc. - Conditional Use { : Permit Lawsuit, In reviewing the documents just served on: ! the members of the Council and Cit o oCarlsbad, there will : be a hearing held on June 15, 1961,$t XR e validity of the ; i Writ of Mandamus. I I
! I t I ; CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: I
I I I I
t
i t I I I I I I I I I I l a 1 I 4 I I I I e l Dj
I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I 4
1
I Public Law Funds 660. The City Manager informed the Counk:
cil a temporary rating list had been received and Carlsbad:
is number 24 on the list, which is Class 8mAA".. If this list J
is adopted the City of Carlsbad has a good chance of re- ;
ceivlag $250,000 for sewers.
Water Report. All the members of the Council received a i
copy of the water report completed by Boyle Engineering. :
A bill in the amount of $3500.00 has been received for i
this report and the City Manager requested the Council to i
approve the report and authorizer payment in the amount of ;
$3500. The staff has gone over the report and it is their:
opinion .this is a very good report, By motion of the b I
Council the water report was accepted by the Council and i
the amount of $3500.00 was authorized for payment of the ;
report I
I I I I I
I I I 6 t
I I
t * I I
y\,-~., ', 88 '.
', \\,'X, \.\ ', 8,
of \?&&\g.,+
\ ¶'
8\ '\ 8 ', '\,'\, 1
N a me "b, '*%, 88,,"?@?$ y+ \O'. '8 ',?
Member x$$@,+.$
;I I: :::I
l;:l :::I :::I !;:: 88 11
:;;I I::! ;: I ::;; 11;;
Guevara i ! :x: Bierce !Xi iXi La Roche : ; :X: Sonneman i :X !X i
;I::
;!:I ::,; ;: iii:
8 8'. 8 \ '8
.""""""""""-
I*
;;;!
:;It
:;;I Guevara i i :Xi
Bierce I ixjx: La Roche i i :Xi
Sonneman {X; !X: ::::
;:a 1;::
:a11
11;; ;::; ;::; ': i: :I;:
13
Guevara I :X:X!
Bierce 1 I :XI La Roche : i :X: Sonneman :X; IX i
;l:l I:::
1:;:
;#I; ;:I: ;::; 4:; I;;: ::;i
::;I
;:I ,ti:
111 1:::
!if'
1:: i::; :;;:
::lI If
;::I
1;;: i:;; ;::; :::I
;:#I ;::: ;:I:
,*:I
I;;: I::; I::! :::;
;;;I; *I:
I":; Guevare I IX~X! ;
Bferce ;X i :X ; : La Roche! : !X: i
Sonneman: : !X: : +':
::I:;
;:;
;:::I ;::;: ;;;;: !:;I;
I:;::
;:
I;# ;#I;
t 1:
I1 I :::;
:I::
'I
:It;
!ll!l
,,
B
I I I
I 1
I I I I -7.. I I
I 8
I I I
i I I I 1 I I
("""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-~- f
I I i Anti-Litter Committee. A letter was received from the War:
! Against Litter Committee addressed to the Mayor, strongly : i urging the City of Carlsbad to adopt the following two i : actions: (1) Establish the position of a Litter Control : i Officer, and (2) Erect sufficient warning signs within the: : city limits which will carry a warning message such as i i $100 fine Unlawful litter,
i Mayor La Roche stated he felt this was an excellent sug- i
i gestion and the City shoufd participate in such a program.:
: By motion of the Council the City Attorney was instructed : i to prepare an Anti-Litter ordinance for the Council's con-:
i sideration at the next regular meeting,
i Parking of large trucks on State Street. Cmn. Guevara i : stated something should be done about these large trucks : i parking on State Street, It was pointed out to the Council : this matter was discussed approximately four years ago, i i and the business people agreed to request the delivery i : trucks to make their deliveries from the alleys in the : i rear. After discussion by the Council it was agreed that i : the City Manager request the Police Department to warn : I the business establishments about these trucks parking on J
1 State Street. I I
t I I I I I 1
I 1 I I
I L I I I t I
I I I t
'8\,-.
\\ '\ '\ '8, '8 "
'8."',8'', 8 8\8 '\,'*,\ 8, , $ p '\ ' ' \, 8.4 N a me t\8 '8$8 \, $,+A
of Y?&$!& 8 ',& \&, 9" '??+ Me rn ber $'@,$@$ ;:;;: :::::
:;::I
SI*;: :I:::
::;I:
::1:1 ;;pi
1,t:: h::;
::I ;:I:: i::;:
;::I: ;i;;;
:::I:
1:;:: :::::
,!;I::
1:;1
::;e: :::::
JI,;,
:::I:
1::::
:;::I I4 ;I:':
::It
11;' :::;
::;I :::: I::!
.""""""_"""""""
I11,a
,II:I
I:#
l!!j I : Library Committee - re: City property for Library. The I i Council was informed there was no meeting of the Committee: : appointed by the Mayor, as he was unable to arrange a I I i meeting convenient for all the members; however, he would I : arrange a meeting prior to the next regular meeting of the: i Council,
: 4- Knats. The City Manager informed the Council the City is i ; still trying to solve the knat situation. The County i HeaPth Department called in a Doctor from the University i ! of Riverside for advice. Also a flight service has been : i contacted in relation to dropping chemical granules. The i : City and County will continue to try and work out a solu- ; I tion to this problem.
I 1 I I I I I
I 1
I I I I I ! I i Councilwoman Sonneman inquired as to the status of the i : property deeded to the City by the Buena Vista Lagoon I I i Association. The Council was informed the Engineering I : Department must survey the property before any planting I i can be done, and they have had too much work scheduled wit6 : priority. I I
: RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL. I I
: Ratification of the bills was given for the general ex- : I penses in the amount of $129,287.91, and the Water Depart-: i ment in the amount of $1,791.41, for the period Hay 16,1963 ; to June 6, 1961, as certified by the Director of Finance : : and approved by the Auditing Committee. I I
I I I I I
I I I I @
I I !
Guevara
Bierce
La Roche
Sonneman
IllI -SI
:::I
::I: ::::
;:I1 :;:: I;:: I::: .!I
18
:::; ::I: i;:: ;:i: 0;:
::f:
1:::
::;I ::;: q;: ::;:
!ll! i::i Iii:
1:;:
:;I:
::Il ;:
;;;I
#+I(
::::
1'1: ::::
1;:1 :4 ii I : ;$
; : Ix : +(
;::I :::!
817
: 11
i Ratification of the payroll was given for the second half i Guevara $ i # i i of May, 1961, in the amount of $14,550.82, as certified I Bierce : : X i : by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing : La Roche i : # i i Commit tee. i Sonneman ; $ F ; , :!!: I I I
0
i FINANCE:
i Proposed budget for the fiscal year 1961-62. The City I : Manager presented the proposed budget to the Council and 1 ; discussion was given to the various departmental expend- i : itures. It was agreed that the following changes be made. :
i Page 3 - Insurance & Retirement. Councilwoman Sonneman i : suggested the City consider survivors insurance for the ; : Police and Fire Department employees. It was pointed out :
I I I t I
I I
I I 1 I
* I I I t I I I I I
I I I I I I I I 4 I
:ii:
;#I: ::::
814:
1;;1 ::;; ::;:
:::I $4
1;::
:'I1
:;a:
1:;1
i:ii
*;I la ::;: i::i
::I:
O(I
l;!l
Id
0
1 I
I t I
I I '\ \\ .\ \ . . I
I
I
1 '\ \\ '\ ', '\ '\
I I '\ '\ '., \\, '\,'\,
I i N a me '\, '\!$$,,'%,,'$ :"-""""""""""""-"""""~~~~~~~~""""~"""""""~"""~"~""""""~~"~"" '.$@,+,;
I -8- I ', , , ' \\
\, '\ 8, '\ \\ '\
I I
I I of '9.0 0 ..t\ \ 8 \d i Member \o,~,.~\!
I
i there would be 17 employees eligible. Mayor La Roche stat: 1 I ed he did not feel we have too great a hazard here in the : : City of Carlsbad to warrant such a plan.
I I I
I 1 I
: After discussion by the Council it was agreed to pole the I I i employees to find out how they stand on such a program. :
I I I cwn* sonnemat I i Page 4. - General Government Administration. ; stated she felt the City should Consider the Purchase Of : i a parcel of land that is for Sale fronting on the lagoon* '
; The Owners are asking around $135,000, however, she though! i perhaps reasonable terms could be arranged*
I I I I J Mayor La Roche stated he would not be in favor of such a I : : purchase due to the fact the City has no control of the i : lagoon.
I
I
B
I I I i It was the general feeling of the majority of the Council I : : members the selling price was too high. After consider- i ; able discussion, it was agreed that the owners be contact-: i ed to see if they would be willing to have an appraisal i
I made of the property.
I I
I I I I i Page 9. Advertising & Publicity, The Chamber of Commercei I i has asked for an additional $1,000 towards promotional : ; advertising, It was the feeling of the majority of the : i Council the additional $1,000 was not necessary, and the ; ; budget should remain at $4,000. I I I
I I I I
; Page 11, - Public Works. Discussion was given '3s to I i
I Page 19. - Police Department. The Director of Finance ; I
i City vehicles being kept under cover when not in use, It ; : was agreed: that the City Manager work out some plan for I J housing the city vehicles when not in use,
I I
I I I I
: informed the Council the salary of the crossing guard i I was overlooked, and that an addition of approximately : ; $750.00 should be added to this budget.
I
I I e l I Page 20. - Fire Department. The City Manager informed the: I i Council the Fire Department has requested the purchase of :
; a fire rescue salvage rig, however, this is not included i i in the budget as submitted. The Fire Chief stated he
i Capital Outlays if this were agreed upon. After consider-: : able discussion it was agreed that the Fire Department i I Budget be adjusted to include this item in the amount of : : $5,500. I
I
i would be willing to do without some of the equipment under: I
I
I I I i Page 23 - Contingency Fund. The City Manager stated he is! I
i Discussion was given to this matter and various proposals I :
i asking for a 5% cost of living salary increase for the ; : employees and monies for this increase are available in i I this fund.
I I
I I + I
: were considered. Discussion also developed concerning i ! the enforcement of the ordinance granting 15 working days i : vacation.
: ADJOURNMENT : I
I I
I I I
I k 8 I 1% I i By proper mtion the meeting was adjourned at 12:30 It. M, : I
I I I 1 ; 'Respectfully submitted, I
I I I I I
I I I I I I i 7i&p?&f [E flJ&*. i MARGARE'T E. ~AMS t
: Deputy City Clerk
I
I I I I I I I I I I I 1
I I I I f I I
I I
I
I I I I I I t' I I I I
!
ill :::
1::
;It ;:: Ill
.I,
'1; Ill
III,
I:#
!,I!
$4,
;lli ::;I
I:;I ::;: ::I: I::: ;::i ;::; ;::;
;::I
::;I 1:
:I I( *ll! ::ii ;I :::i iii: :::: :I:!
l:;l
::I:
:I::
l;;l ::I: :;;: i::: ::;: $4
18:; :;ii :::: I:::
:::a :I:: :;:I :::: :::: :;:: ::I: :;;:
:ii:
1:;: I:;:
I:;: :::: ::;:
::a: ;I::
&I!; ::::
:(I
1::: :,:;: :::I
;:;I
1:;: i:::
1:;: i:;: :::: ::$
I1;:l
::I:;
::!;[ ::;:; I:;:;
1:::: i:;::
1":; ::I;; ;: (1
::::I
1:::;
#'I;: :*I :::;:
:,I::
l;;ll
; ':::: .I
:;l;l
I:':
;*:'I
1::::
:11:1
l1l1
1'1:
;*I1
118:
;tll
J:::
11
:!:;I 11;
I!!,!