HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-11-21; City Council; Minutese i Minutes of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting) : b, x, -, '\ -, \,- ', \ *\'3 4
: Date of Meeting: November 21, 1961 i N a me \\, '\?&,, '\, 'yf?$ 1 Time of Meeting: 7:OO P, M. i of y4.o. ..&y,;. ' .* : )"""""""""-r- Place of Meeting: """"""""""~"""""--"~~~"""""""~~""""""""""".*~ Council Chambers : Member ~~Q,~~~
t ::;*
:;I: i ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Guevara, :I:: : Elierce, La Roche, Sonneman and McPherson. Also 1 I ;::I i present were City Manager Slater and City Attorney Haye#, 1;s:
8 I:'
I III: t :::I I ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. I I;':
I ,,I: i INVOCATION was offered by Mayor La Roche. I 1 :I::
s 4 ;ti;
t :I!: i APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
,\
1 I 1
I 1 B I I
I
I
I
I t
I * 111: l;b*
(a) The minutes of the regular meeting of Novembet Bierce :x I i x: f 7, 1961, were approved as corrected, : La Roche 1 : :xi
'
4 I i Guevara : ; !x!
I : COSRESPONDENCE:
!
i Sonneman i !xi xi : McPherson! : :x;
I t:!! ' (a) Dr. Grant Beckstrand - County Refuse Area, J i::: ;: i Letter dated November IO, 1961, addressed to the Mayor i ::I; '114 I and City Council from Grant Beckstrand, stating there : i::: ; may have been some misinformation relative to the 8 :::; I present site of the Carfsbad city dump. This more than : :::: ; three acres does belong to the city, and when it is aband- i ;:I: ; oned as a dump, he believes it is a desirable location for : :.I i ! i the establishment of a park, as previously discussed. :I81
i The Council ordered the letter filed. I!@#
i Letter dated November 14, 1961, from George Carpenter,! ::j: i owner of the Daisy Donuts, stated he paid $1 1.25 for a i i::: '$1 ! business license in May of 1961, and due to the fact that : :{'I 1 f: i he was unable to operate the business, requested that the i :;;: i amount be applied towards the license fee for 1962, as he I ;::: : plans to open up his business in the early part of 1962. i ;;:: 11
i The City Attorney stated the fee cannot be refunded. The ! I::: I City Manager was instructed to write the owner and ; inform him the money cannot be transferred. I I;;@ 181:
! ::is
I
I 4 I ;::' ;:::
4 1 I :;::
I I * I :I:;
I (b) George Carpenter - Business License fee. I :;:: I I
t I 4 ::;:
t ::;:
I :::: I
I I
I i O8AL COMMUNICATIONS: . i There were no oral cornmunications. I !
I
I t
ti;:
:::I
I I ::I:
0 I ;: :: I :;
I :it! I ENGINEEiUNG: I I I
ti;: ((1, ! I ill: I I I (a) Petition for sewer improvements - Pi0 pic0 Dr.!, i Tamarack Avenue, Adams Street, Chinquapin Avenue and i : easements to be provided for. The City Engineer presentea i a petition signed by 31.4% of the property owners. It is i i estimated that the project will cost approximately I I i $27,824.00. It was pointed out that approximately 758' is i
f along Pi0 Pic0 Drive, and the west side of pi0 Pic0 Dr. ; i is owned by the State, therefore, there would be no prope4- : ty owners participating on one side of Pi0 Pic0 Dr. The ; i City Engineer felt the City would be justified in partici- : i patii in this project. If the City did choose to participatd ; their share would be around.$2900. The estimated cost i i does not include the purchase of any easements. f t *
i;:;
::if ::;;
!:*I ::;: :*
::I: :!$ :;;: i!:: :::I 4:; i::; ;:;; ;i;:
I**:
01,
$81
IlI,
I I :i;
! The City Attorney recommended that before any action : 4:; I is taken by the Council that the Health Officers Opinion i :i: :I,
I be obtained as to the feasibility of this sewer project. * 4?: * :::
I I
a
0
I I i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the Health : Officer's opinion be requested.
4
I f * I 1
I I I 1 I I I 8
I I * I #
I I I
i * :ii : Guevara I : :x I Bierce r; ;x ; La aoche ; : ;x i Sonneman ; ixix ; McPherson i : ;x
I 0::
I I ::;
I i::
I 1:: I ::;
t a ::: * I ::: I ;I*
t 1 I:: * ;::
1 I!'
I
t
I
* I # I I '\ ' -< '.,.\,-',~ <
I ',$, '5 '.9
4 i Qf ',L 0 4% .o . + $: "9 :"""""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""*"~"~""~"""""""*,. ; Member *@@,-&? as.
I -2- '\ ', ',
I 1 ! N a me "\,$%,, '\, '$>*
1 I I # l ? i The City Attorney also recommended that a further : attempt be made to contact more of the property owners ; i to see Y they would be willing to sign the petition.. I
I The Council was informed that Mr. Watson had been work; : ing on this project for several weeks. I
D I I
I I 1
I 1 I I I t
I (b) Extension of Elm Avenue. Sometime ago the f i Council requested the Engineering DepartmenGto work i : out a route for the extension of Elm Avenue and Tamara& i Avenue. Due to other priorities they have not been able i : to devote too much time to these projects. However, a i : property owner came in for a building permit on his I I : property, which property would be within the direct line i i of the proposed extension of Elm Avenue.
i The City Engineer presented a plat of the area, stating i ; they contemplated aligning the street just west of Elmwoo< i A.venue and swinging over to Oak Avenue, thereby making ; : Oak Avenue a dead end street. By this plan there would i i be only two properties t hat would actually be damaged. : : Mr. Smiley who desires a building permit at this time is I 1 willing to have the city purchase his property now, or : i otherwise he is going ahead with the improvement of the i ; property. If this happens it will certainly cost the city : i a great deal more at such time as Elm Avenue is extended!
: After considerable discussion the Council requested the ! i staff to inquire of Mr. Smile? as to what he is asking for : ! his property. b $
I
I I
I I
1 I I
:;;;
:::I
'?I!
1:;: ::;+ :::I
:lvl
1:;;
:::!
I 'L
:ii'r
li;;
:';I
::I: 1'1:
it:: :::I ;p: ;;': ;:I:
;::; :!;: :;:: :::I ::p i;:;
it:: ::ii :i:: ::;: ::p :;;:
1::: :::;
!:'I
::!I
I(
#I*)
1';s
I I* ::@I
1'11
::
i I NEW BUSINESS:
I
i
I I I I
I t I
I (a) Documents for joint sewer bond election. The : i City Attorney informed the Council the necessary dmumeks i had been received from O'Melveny & Myers for the bond i : election in January, t I
; Mayor La Roche inquired about an article in the paper in ; i regards to Vista. The City Manager stated there were i : some members of the Town Council in Vista who wanted 'i i water reclamation facilities in connection with the sewer ; i project. This is a gigantic problem and it is his belief i
t that the Board of Supervisors will call for the election as : ; scheduled.
i The City Attorney stated she had received a copy of a 1 i fetter dated November 20, 1961, addressed to Governor : ; Brown from Mr. Deitz, regarding another matter, howeve$ I it did state it was the County's intention to call a special ; I election for sewer bonds in January, 1962.
i The following resolution was presented for the Council's i ; review: I
I I
I I I
I I a I I I
I I I 1 t I I
I I I
;;;I :;ti :::I
k'
t-91 :::; :::I
I.: ; 1
11:: ii;i :ii:
:I;: ::;:
:it: ::I:
;:I' :;!I :::I
;::I ;:: ::: ::: :I: ::; 1:: ::: I;; I:: i::
ii;8
IltI
1(11
11
1.
1 I i fiesolution No. 784.. rEESOLUTION OF THE CITY
j-
1:'
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFOitNLA,~ I!! ! DETERMINING THAT THE PUEZLIC MTEaEST AND ; Guevara : 1 :x :NECESSITY DEMAND THE ACQUISITION AND CON- I Bierce Li ix I STHUCTION OF A CEWAIN MUNICIPAL IMPIEOVE- : La Roche : ~X:X i MENT, AND MAKING FINDINGS RELATING THERETO, i Sonneman : : !x :was adopted by title only and further reading waived. : McPhersonI i ix
I I :::
I
A . 11.
0 i The following ordinance was presented €or a first reading1
I * I ! Ordinance No. 1075. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY : LIFORNIA, ORDERING, CALLING, i ! m%TD GIVING NOTICE OF A SPECIAL:
I I I
I t
I ?
I 1
I I * :
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I *
I A I
:i;
1:: ::; ::; ::: i::
1:'
;L$
1:: I:: ::;
:I1 ::: ;::
!if
I(*
If'
I ? I I I
Y I 1:
I "*,'\\ '\\ 'X, , -\. ',& '4 5t -1 8 ! Name '8\,y$, '8\, 8$,,
I I 1 of .Q&@, .p" $?+ I i Member \&@,p\p$ !~~~""""","~"""""~"""""""~""""~""""-"--""--"--~"-"--"-"---""------- I*,! I - - - - - - - - . - - . -
I !Ii: i ELECTION TO BE HELD ;IN. THE CI+Y OF CARLSBAD~ :*;; : ON THE 16th DAY OF'.JAhUARY, 1962, FOR THE I rip i PURFBSE OF SUBMI%'TfNG TO THE QUALIFIED iGuevara ; t !x: ;III
: VOTERS OF SAID CI%Y A; PROP&3ITION TO INCUrZ ; Bierce ,x: ;x: i BONDED INDEBTEDNESS BY SAID CITY FOR A i La Roche ! : :x\ i CERTAIN. MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT, was given a I Sonneman i Ixlx i : first reading by title only. i I McPherson i : !x:
I;;* t I !#I:
"I;
B 1
If
I i The City Manager informed the Council he has a list of i i organizations in the city who are willing to serve on a ; : committee to help with the promotion of this election.
i Au$horizat'ionfor County Registrar of Voters to handle [ i sewer bond election. The Council was informed the : County Registrar of'Voters is willing to handle the i election, however, it will require authorization from the i : Council. The following resolution was presented for the !
I 4 I I I I
I 1 I I
'lli
Illt
::;I i ; :.:
1::: !:::
'ili
I 11 (tII
,(It
t la
:;et
l::I
:&I;
!::: r:,::
- i Council's review: ;#I.
i Resolution No. 785. A LtESOLUTION OF THE CITY ;:I1 I Guevara : ; !xi
1 F CITY OF CARLSBAD DBECTING jBierce :x\ !XI 1 %?gkN"m ?&ISTRAX OF VOTERS TO HANDLE I La Roche i t :xi
I THE SEWEriE BOND ELECTION IN JANUARY, 1962, wa4 Sonneman : !x\": : adopted by title only and further reading waived. : McPherson i : :x: ! 1 I::!
I I I * I I 1:;:
1
I I I
I I (b) Amending the Master Street Plan. The City i : Attorney advised the Council after the hearing on the ! i amendment to the Master Street Plan she had been instrucb i ed to prepare an ordinance, however, the original Master \ ; Street Plan was adopted by resolution, therefore, it : should be amended by resolution. The following resolu- i I tion was presented for the Council's review:
I I
1 I I
11ii :::: ::::
!;I:
;:It :: ::::
::il
111
))*I
1'0
I ;I b:'I
.Ill i I I i::i i Resolution No. 783. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ! Guevara ; : :xi
i THE MASTER STREET PLAN, was adopted by title only I La Roche ! : :X; i and further reading waived. ; Sonneman k i !X:
!'SI
I t me& OF TEE CITY OF CARLSBAD AMENDING i Bierce : +;xi
t I : McPherson 8 : :x:
I i OLD BUSINESS: a t ;;ti I 11:;
!I:!
I I 11
I I 1
I
I (a) Second reading of Clrdinance No. 9124, amendin4 r Ordinance No. 9060, changing certain designated property: : from Zone R-1 to Z,one R-3. The following ordinance was: i presented for a second reading: 8 I I I *
i::i
1:::
IIII ;I:: :::: (IIl
;:I, I;: I 1 Ordinance No. 9124. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i Guevara : : :xi ENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, i Bierce F i :x: i E*&:=$:&$& DESIGNATED PROPERTY FROM i La Roche ; : :xi : ZONE R-1 TO ZONE R-3, IN THE CITY OF CAi3LS- ; Sonneman : i !xi i BAD, was adopted by title only and further reading waived; McPherson i Ix :x:
:;!!
;*r
I
! Ill I
I
1 I (b) Second reading of Ordinance No. 6032, amendin.
! the Uniform Local Sales Tax and Use Tax ordinance. .kef i following ordinance was presented €or a second reading: i I
j::;
;:::
I(' *;*;
111:
!I:! ! Ordinance No. 6032. AN OiEDINANCE OF THE CITY OiGuevara 1 i !X: : CAiXLSBAD TO AMEND THE UNIFORM LOCAL SALES ! Bierce F i :x/ I AND USE TAX ORDINANCE was adopted by title ody an? La Roche i i :XI
I further reading waived. ; Sonneman l ; :xi
0 I 14:
I I : McPherson i Ix:x
I !*I i CITY ATTORNEY% REPORT: I
I I ;f:
I ::: I l a I Schuyier condemnation action. Condemnation proceedings 1 i have been filed, however, the parties concerned will not ; ! be served until a future date, Mr. Robert Berry of the I : County Counsel's ofi'ice wanted to be sure that action had ; i been filed and that no intervening actions were filed.
i::
11: ::: ::; ::;
I :::
I :::
a :::
::;
I ::I
I * :::
I I ::;
I I I :::
4 I ;::
I I
I I 1 k
I
I I
I
I 1
I I I I I
I
I
4
i I!'
\ *
$ 1 I 1 -4-
I : of
~""""""~""""""""""""~"""""""~.."""--""-"-----~-"------- i Member
',
I I Name L
t I
I I
B
:: Drainage easement condemnation proceedings, This actiob i was filed and all parties have been served. Also she took: i the liberty of hiring the appraiser, Jerry Carll. Mr. i W-ight, owner of the property, is of the opinion the City i
I I
i cannot take his property. I I i The City Attorney read from a copy of a letter addressed !
f to Governor Brown from Mr. Deitz, asking that the i Governor put on the agenda for the 1962 session, a bill i : that would amend the Code by allowing sanitary districts i \ to issue bonds in excess of the present 5% bond limitation.:
i The City Attorney suggested that the City of Carlsbad alsd i write a letter in favor of amending the Code. By common! : consent it was agreed that a letter be sent on behalf of : i the City of Carlsbad in favor of this amendment.
I I 1
I
I
I I I
t I
I 1 CI TY IVLC1.NAGER'S TCEPORT:
I
I I I I I 4 I i Used car lot lease - Keenan. The lease an the City's ; property, which is now being used as a Used Car Lot, wili i expire at the end of this month. Mr. Keenan has not
I I
I I i indicated his intentions as yet.
! Mayor La Roche stated he felt the City should improve : i the property or sell it. It is too valuable property to : lease for $125.00 per month.
: The Council was inforAmed there was a party in this last : i week inquiring about the property on a lease basis.
i It was pointed out by the City Attorney this property would! : be very difficult to sell due to the water bond assessment I i on the property.
1 Plans for 101 Freeway south of the City. Mr. Dekema i : from the State Highway Department was in and gave the I i city a copy of the drawings showing the re-routing of the ; : Freeway south of the city. The Engineer will study the I i plan.
i Fallout shelters. An inquiry has been made as to allowini : fallout shelters within the front yard setback area of a lot.! i The entrance is above ground and the rest of the building ; i will be under the ground. The City Manager pointed out i : this could create quite a problem. The City of Oceanside : i did allow part of the building to be built within the setback i : line.
t Cwn. Sonneman stated she felt we should be very careful : i in allowing these constructions within the setback areas. i I
i Mayor La Roche stated this would necessitate amending r I the ordinance in order to allow any structure within the i : setback area, and did not feel this should be done.
{ No action was taken at this time on the matter.
I I
i Also a copy of a letter has been received addressed to i : Governor Brown from Dale Austin, City Attorney for the i i City of Oceanside, regarding the use of the 191 1 Act for ; : the building of fallout shelters.
i Real Estate Signs. Mayor La Roche stated he did not feel 1 ;It is practical for the City to allow real estate signs all : i over the city. It looks as if the city were for sale. If an i : individual owner wishes to put a "for sale'' sign on his : i property that is different.
t 4
; It was agreed that the staff make a study of the ordinance ; i regarding these real estate signs and make a report back I 1
I I I 1 I
I I I
I I 1 I I I I t I
1
I I I I I
$ I I 9 I I .I
I I f i I I
I I s I I
1 I I
I
t I I
I I 1 I
t I
I
I 1 8 I I I 1 e I I 1 8
t
i to the Cmmcril,
I I I I I I I I
I t I I I I I I I 1
"8,m8. '*, ","$ 9 1
'8, '4&. \, \\
'~~$~5!3~, , 8, '\%, ,e, \?dy5?.y$ \$j@,+O\. _"""""""" ;bl; ;:I::
I;:@
::I: ::i; :::: :::: iii:
::I:
:I I: :ii: !::I
::I: ::;:
:;a:
I 11
ItI
)*I
*Il1 i;::
:::; I::; :::; :::: ::;: I:::
;I:: ::i:, iir:
;;I1 11
1,;: :I;;
:::: ii:: :i;; :' $*I ;:;;
$89
1::; !:::
1::: ::;: :q; ::::
1;:: ii:: ;::: I::: ::;: ::;:
1::; p:
lt:: ::I! i:::
It:; ::::
:Ill :::: :::: il:;;
;;I4 ::;: 4:;
iiii
:I'*
1::; ::;: f:;: ii::
4:: I::; ;::I
1::; :::{
;:: ;::
I::
;I1 :::
1:: ::f
i::: ::
'8,
811 :Ill
:Ill
;+: 'I
18;;
:I
'11
:III
11
:::I
Ill
@I 1
I))t
(11t
:IIi $1
;!I
0'
i1:
i -5- I I '8,, '\,-'\, '88 *'' .'\L $ I
J
1 I I N a me 8, '\%, '.88'%b
1 I ; of \'+%* \,L\@8 a\,.$$ ' .*\
I i Member ,%'Q,*\y-\! :"""""""""""""""""""""""""-"-~"*""""""""-~"""""""""""-
8 I :;;; i Vacations for City Employees. Cwn! Sonn$man inquired i- :::;
; as to whether or not an amendmeht to the ordinance. had I :::I i been prepared regarding vacations for dity eknployees. ; iii;
: Considerable discussion was given this matter and it was i ::'I
$1:: i agreed that the City Attorney prepare an amendment to : ::*I
: .the ordinance, reducing the number of days vacation I 1s:; I I'(( I allowed to city employees. I I i:::
I I I :I!: i EtATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: I 1 :!-
I I l :,:i
1::; :'I i rtatification of the bills was given for the general expense4 ;:I: I of the city in the amount of $16,585.33 and for the Water 1 Guevara :x ; !x: I Department in the amount of $?, 447.48, for the period ; Bierce ; :x$ ! November 7, 1961 to November 21, 1961, as certified by i La Roche i : !X) I the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing : Sonneman i f ;xi ; Committee. i 1 McPherson I I !x:
I: 1 i Batification of the payroll was given for the first half of i Guevara I 1 ,x: x: i November, 1961, in the amount of $14,615.74, as certi- : Bierce : ; :x: : fied by the Director of Finance and approved by the i La Roche i : :x: i Auditing Committee. : Sonneman i :: :xi
I '98
B
I
l1 1
I
I I i:::
I I I i McPherson:~; :x:
I I ::::
I I :::: I I1Ii 1 I ::::
:all
I :i;:
t ; $8 I :ii:
I :xi
I '11: 4 t i::;
I ;;I1
I I 1:
I ::::
! ;it; \ DeputiCity clerkAD I !I!!
I l8:;
1 I ;:::
:::I
1 # :;ii
I ::I:
I ::;:
I I ;J:
I I I :!;:
I I * : ADJOURNMENT:
i By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 8: 25 P. M.!
I I I I I I I
I
1 I
I I ! Respectfully submitted,
t I I I I I
11
t
I
I &qG8 "* gEF g2&zb?u I I ;:al SI i / &AH& 1;11
I RE . AMS
t I
I
I
I I I
$ I I I
t I I I I I I
I I * I I I I
b
I 1
I
1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
1
I
I I a I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I *
J
I 1 l
I I
1
1
I I I
I I
:!I:
'I 1 I I :a::
I ::;1
I 101 I lit1 I
J I 1 t I:;
1 I :::
8 I :;;
I ;::
I I :::
t i::
I I f::
I I :::
I I :::
; I ;\:
! I :! * ::; I I \;:
+ *;
1 I I i;;
I I ;:;
It' llt I I 1': I I I;*
;I1
I I 1::
I I i:i
I I :ii
t I :I;
811 I
I
i (11 I I
I
Ill
I It'
1 1;:
I1 I
1
I
I
I
I :I1 I I1 1
1
I l e I I
I I
I I
I t I I I
I I I + I * I 1 I I t I I 1
I I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
1 Ill
I' ;I,
I :a;
IS 1.:
;: 11
I 1 :;
I 1 I: I
11
I