Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-01-16; City Council; Minutesq., I 6 8, \. *" i CITY OF CARLSBAD ; Minutes bf: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting) i ', \ 8 ' 'x '\ I : Date of Meeting: January 16, 1962 i Na me \, 'X%\ 'x,"%, i Time of Meeting: ?:OO P. pdf. : of '.&$\, ', '9%. : Place of Meeting: . Council Chambers 1 Member $3@,$&'% :;:;: ! ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Eierce, :it:; i La Roche, Sonneman arid McPherson. Councilman i and City Attorney Hayes. I t 8 a, '\ ', ', '. I I 's, 'x,88., 'x, '8,". C '+&. ;, %+', ~~"""""""~""""~~"""~"""""""~~"""~"""""""""~~""""""~""~"""". : Guevara absent. Also present were City Manager Slater i 1l1'1 I ::;:: I I I 1:;:: I I :::I, :; 1 I :;;I; t 1 I :;::: I i Someman : i !X: ; I I : McPkersoni : x: $ I ! CORRESPO$DENCE: I Ill$ ::;I# i (a) 'F.:J, FOX - re: Offer to purchase Police Patrol ! :*:I8 8: : boat. LetteF from F. J. Fox, operator of FOX'S Snug : ::::I i Ebor, offering to purchase the former Police patrol i ;+:; ; boat. I I ::::: I :;::; i The City Manager informed the Council he had talked to : :;::; ! Mr. Fox regarding the purchase of the boat, and informed ::p: ; him this boat was purchased through Civil Defense Surpl4 :;;:: ; *.I : ; i properties qd the city is required to either sell the boat ; ::::: ; to another S$ate, County or Federal agency or hold the i 4::; :::;I i boat for five jyears before it would be available for the : ;:; : general public to purchase. * I l;;I* :i I \ 1 I :; 8;:: i Mr. Fox was present and advised the Council this boat i ;+i 41;l i has had no niaintenance and is deteriorating to a point : :;fil: : that it could founder any day. He would like the boat for 1 ;;::: ;,:,I i a utility boat! I I#;:; ! I :L:; i After consideration by the Council it was agreed that the i ;:dl 1'::; ; City Manage+ be instructed to correspond with the Civil ; ;i;:; I' i Defense Suqlus agency and explain the condition of the i ;:I:: : boat to the agency. I I ::I:: ! (b) Widm A. Martin - re: Claim for damages to i l;ll; : vehicle. The Council was informed that a claim in the i :p:: i amount of $545.30 from Viiilliam A. Martin and Pauline : *,:I, ; Martin has been received, as result of an accident with i Bierce $i :x: : i one of the city's vehicles. Ey motion of the Council the : La Roche : ; :xi 11 : : claim was debied and ordered referred to the city's in- i Sonnetnan i i xi X; :r i surance carrier. ; McPherson: ; ;xi ; 1 (c) Ted Rbssell - re: Petition protesting the change i :(::I : of Las Flores drive to a Secondarj. street. A petition i :::.;: i signed by 707 of the property owners on Las Flores was : ;:::: :::I: ; presented, protesting the change of Las Flores Drive to z ;::ti i #:':a 8 ;,::I i Cmn. Guevada was present at 7:18 P. M. * I ;I:;: s ;:::: i The City Mmiager reviewed the action by the Council 1 I ::'I: : wherein a public hearing was held by the Planning Com- I ;;::: ;:::: ! mission and $he City Council to amend the Master Street i 1:::: i Plan by chanking Las Flores Drive to a secondary street. ; :+* 1:: ; The action by the Council was to amend the Master Street i :;;I;: :::i:: i Plan to show )-,as Flores Drive a secondary street. I I :;;;:: I :a::;, : did not receite notice of any hearing, and failed to see a ; $1 /:::; I notice in the ~aper as he does not take the local paper. : ;::;I; : The property jowners on Las Flores are very unhappy; i ;::::I i making this a1 four lane streee would certainly make this ; ;::I:: $48: : unpleasant fop a residential area. It is his understanding i 1::::: I it is the Counbilfs perrogative to reconsider this matter. : :; 1,::;; $1 I * # ::a:;: ?l:?l! I 1 \\ ', '\ " \ ', I I I I b I 1 'I::; ii:;; i ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. I I ::; :%I:; I I i:::i 41;1 Ill0 I I r I i INVOCATION was offered by Councilman Bierce. i APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ! (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of January 2, 1962 ! Bierce :xi ;I i i were. approved as corrected. : La Roche i : ;$ I I 4 1'1 I I I I I I1 J ;(I 11: I I I I 1;s I I I b;;: ;;::: I I I I I I I I I I * I ::::: :$: ::;:: 1 I 8% ::::i .I i a secondary street. I I :;::I I 8 I a 'I 1 MK. TED RbSSELL, 1203 Las Flores Drive, stated he 1 :::::: I I I 'I I 'I I ,I ,I I I 1 I I I I .I 1- 1 . -2- I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I :""""""""~""""""""""-.""""""""""""""""""~~" I I i Mayor La Roche stated there is. always two sides to a [ : matter and regardless as to what decision is made there I i is always someone unhappy. It is almost impossible to i : satisfy everyone. This is a small town and it makes it I i doubly hvd because we are all neighbors. However, I I : hearing/were held and a decision was made. I MR. JAMES BERTELSEN, 1270 Las Flores Drive, stateb i his main objection was the widening of the street from 60 [ : feet to 68 feet. This would take four feet off -his property.: I Mr. Russell stated the people on Oak Street were notified ; i and after registering their protests the Planning Commis-I : sion reversed their decision. Buena Vista was.a second- ; i ary street, and now it has been changed to a local street. i i If Las Flores is changed to a secpndary street and there : : are four lanes it will be right next door to the back gates i i of the elementary school. The property to the east is : : bu.ilding up and there will be additional children traveling I i that street. It would distress him terribly to have a child: : of his crossing a four lane street. I : Mayor La Roche informed Mr. itussell the people who \ i have children attending the school were the ones who I 1 : wanted Las Flores a secondary street. I .The City Engineer pointed out the reason for changing i i Buena Vista Avenue to a local street was due to the fact I ,: that if Buena.Vista Avenue were improved from the school: i east to Highland Drive it would necessitate removing a i i number of trees, hedges and some walls. 1 I Cmn. Bierce stated that any well planned city has to have i : proper traffic flow. As the city grows we have to have : i additional traffic flow. If Buena Vista Ave. were improveb : as a secondary street nearly every house would be damagj i ed. I I .I i Cmn. McPherson stated that if the property owners did i : not know of the hearing it would only be fair to listen to i i these property owners, I I i The City Attorney pointed out that all legal notices are I : published in the local newspaper. I : Crnn. Bierce suggested that the street be made a 60' i right-of-way, leaving 48' of pavement'with the sidewalk i i designed as on Chestnut Avenue, thereby deleting the I I : parkway. , I I : The City Engineer stated he would prefer to have an I I i additional 1 foot on each side for utility poles so that they i : would not have to be placed within the sidewalk area. I ! After considerable discussion it was agreed. by the Councix i that the Engineering Department work on this premise. : i ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: i Ma. TED rZUSSELL, 1273 Las Flores Ave. , stated i I Mr. Walker, the minister of his church, has.purchased i i property next to one of the city's water tanks, and he has : : written the City Manager regarding the condition of the I I fence around the tank. 1 I i The City Engineer stated this matter was referred'to him.: i He has referred this item to the I4 ater Foreman who is to : : make a report back to him. I I i MATHEW JARW,E, asked if the Council could not have ! : the Council Chambers enlarged and some decent chairs i I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. I I ,I 1' I I I I I * I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I' 1 I 'I I 'I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I '", '\,, '8, '\ '\ ', ' \ , 8, ', '\ 6 of , '+gi&>.$$.+ ',.*. . \' .'a, ',, '\ . s ' ~d a me \\, '.$, ',,'" \$>, \\ \' \ " . \' Mem'ber ~~@,~~q\,d , l l 7--,- ."""-""""""" ::;i: : :.:; I : I:;:: :::I: ::::: ::I:: :::I; II I:{:: ;*:'I I!::: :It I:# .l:l:: It**:, ::ii: :::I: :I;:' ::::: 1 I 1 ;,' : I(ll!l :I1 ;;:I: /I:: Ill:: ;l::I :;;:; ::I:; ;lI:l ::::: 4::; ;::I: :;;;I :;pi :: I;:[: : ;.; : i i;;:: I 1;: I:* I ;I: ;: :I!;; #::'I ;I I ;.I 4::: I.::;: 1.: 1 I : .::::: 11 ;:Ill I:@# i:::: ::ii: I( 1st ::;:i ;:;I: 11 ;I::, I I.: 1; :11*1 I:':: 1;;:: :::I: :I::: ;:I:: :::I: (:I:: /p: ;: ; ; I :.: ::::I III 1::;; ii;:: ::a:; :a::: :x:; *:;I' ;;Ill III ::::I :;I:: 1I:~l I:::; ::;:; ::;:: I:::: ::ii: :I:,: 1:~:~ pi;: 11'1: I::,, ::I:: :;i:: :.: ; I: II :; :I::* ;:'I: 1:::; :;:;; ,::::: :I::I ,:;I: :!#:I * 1-1 f 4 ;41;* 11; 11 11 11 11 1 I I' , \\ -\ ', ' . I I I I I I I I I ',, \, '\, '\ ","8 1 I I ', '\, 't, '8, 8','8, J I I : Na me '+& ,,;,;, \,. '. ',d $4' I : of I ',L'\O', ;, \?% '0.t' ' I : Member ' \@Fp'.@$$ ~""""""""~""""""""""""""""".""""-"--"----""-~""------------ [' ,"; "" - I 1 )Ill ;: : installed for the public. I ;:'I: I 1 I 1:::: 1 I. I:: : The Mayor informed Mr. Jarvie this matter has been' : ! ; :*; ; I considered. This will eventually be done, however, ther4 .I( .' : have been a great many things pressing that have had to : I::;: i be taken care of first. t I .;l:b I s I I:':: -! ENGINEEiiING: I I 1:::; : .I .I : ; I I I:::l i:;:: i (a) E. Lamont Geissinger property on Spruce Street. i Ill@ I' The City Attorney informed the Courrcil that by Resolution i ' ::p: : No. 710 of the City Council they accepted the entire sub- : *#I :: i:::: i ject property for street purposes. However, the intent ,i : was to only accept the westerly 30 feet. In order to I <- ::::i I \ ::'I: I clarify this error it will be necessary to have the City. I :ti:: : Council adopt a new resolution quitclaiming the property : .- I:::; ::I;; i back to the Geissingers, except for the westgrly 30 feet. ; :i::; : The following resolution was presented for the Council's : b::: I "consideration: )*I( Ill i Resolution No. 798. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i Guevara : 1 I x: i . :I,:, : COUNCIL OF THg CITY OF CARLSBAD, A.UTHORIZ- I Bierce ;x :xi : i ING THE MA.YOR OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD TO i La Roche : ; ;X: ! i EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED, was adopted by title : Sonneman : : x: xi : ; only and further reading waived. i McPhersoni i :x; i I i:::; ! MEW BUSINESS: I I I!;' :: 1 ;::a: i .(a) ites. #799, calling for a general City Election to i ,I,:, I::,: i be held April 10, 1962. The Council was informed this : ::1:1 : matter would be deferred unti1.a later date due to further ! ; I-: 8 : I,:, i information being needed for the'preparation of the resoluf ; tion. I ::;I, ::I:: I @,:I I The Mayor informed the Council his thinking on this matt+ i::: : is that if we don't have precise planning on these streets : i it is going to cost the city an enormous amount of money i : in the future. It is only fair to property owners who pur- : i chase property in these areas to know what the plan is. I ::'I; : In our. planning we are neglecting the Master Plan of the : i:::: i city. He would like very much to initiate precise plans i i for these two streets. i The City Engineer stated that in adopting a precise plan ; i you must first establish a center line and a route. It is : ;allI *,:a i his belief that the Engineering Department can have preciie i:::: : plans'for Elm Avenue, Tamarack Avenue and Las Flores I :::I: lll;a ::::: : Drive within a few months. As soon as we are able to ; ;:@I1 i establish a route for Elm Avenue we will recommend a :' ::x:; i hearing on the proposed route. I I ::I:# I I (I( .I i:::; I (c) Mayor's committee on future planning for the City. I ::::I : A meeting was held by the Mayor's committee and the' i 1:::: ::::i ! Chamber of Commerce in regards to future planning of : :I::: : the City of Carlsbad. Subsequent meetings will be held, I iii:: i in the near future to determine future goals of the city. : ::I:; ' 1, ::::; i Pehabilitation of El Camino Real. Cmn. Guevara stated i .' I :. I I :;::: : El Camino Real is in poor condition in the unincprporated I I 11; ;:::; i areas, and he has been informed that the Board.of Super- : I:::, : visors have monies set aside to widen and rehabilitate i ::;I: i that portion of the road that lies within the County. He : p::: :::I: : asked if the City could contact the Board of Supervisors i ::;I, ,,:I i to see if they could use these funds now to bring the road : '11;; : up to standard. ::; I I #I8:: :11:; : The City Manager was instructed to contact the Board.of i ::::: 1:::: i Supervisors on this matter. 8. I .::::; 1. I:::: I I I I ::;:I I' 1 1.1 1 4 I I :;I:I I I :I: I -3- '\ 8 ', ', '8 I I I I .. 1.1 : ; I I:#*: 111 I 1 I (11 11 I I I I I :I,:: I:;#: I I I I I I I I I :::;i I 2::: : (b) Precise Plan - Tamarack Ave. and Elm Ave. I ;l:nl ::::: :::I: ::: :: I I I I I ;:::[ 814 ;:;:I I :::ii I I 1- :::;: :ii:i )I( I 1 I I I I I I I I 8 1 I 1 I I I I I I 11111 ;I::; 1 !~l!~ I I I, \ ', * ' ' I I , <, \ ', '* '. I .I 8.. '\ '<, :,, '.\'\\ =€I I -4- I I I '\ '<\,$\ '*, \,*; 8 .; Name "8, $, \ I I 8 , 14. * \O' ,y, '8; s I , ,. ' i Member Of '&80,9'4?% '~~'@,,+$\O\~ i _"""""~""~""""""~""""""""~""""""~ """ """"- ~"---"--""--~~-~-~--~-" I Acquisition of the Santa Fe Depot. . Cmn. Guevara inquire.4 :+: I 1: \ as to the possibility of the city starting negotiations on i ::I:! ; acquiring the Santa Fe Depot. After considerable discus- : - :;p; i sion the Council instructed the City Manager to contact i ::::I Io1 I: ; the Santa Fe Railroad to see if they are still interested in : :::I: i giving the depot to the City. I I ::: I :I 1. I ::':: I I (IIII i CITY MANAGER'S 8EFORT: ; ;,: ; * I I;lll I 11: I Contract re: ..Dog control. The City Manager presented i .::::I :~~l; I a contract between the City of Carlsbad and the San Diego : ::I;: i County Livestock Department in regards to the control i t::ll 1,,:, I of dogs. 1 I :::I: I I I ::*I: : : i i.; : After consideration by the Council, by motion of the i Guevara i :x: 1(: : i Council the Mayor was authorized to execute the contract i Bierce ix: ;* ; I on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. : La Roche 1 : i x: i I i Sonneman i i ;x! ; I I : McPhersonI i i x: i ,::l:1 ;a;:; I : 1.: I I :': : : i :;:no 1:;:: ,;::1 :I,:: ::::I ; ": ,: I : 1 .;I::: I I @::I: t :;1:1 l I 11::; ;:::I ':I;@: lll:s I :ii:: I : :.: I I 0: . .I )l1(1 .I 1:::: 1 I I I I I '1 '\ '\ '., '\ ',\'.\. I I ,I I ;:at: I Ill ,. . , . I , _, I 118 I 1 I I I I I I 01 48 I Sign for "Future site of Carlsbad City Library". The . ' I I City Manager informed the Council that he had been asked: ; by Mrs. Strause, President of the Library Board of i Trustees, permission to erect a sign on the property . i .I i recently purchased from Mrs. Vaughn, which sign would i : state "Future Site of Carlsbad City Library", By commor) i consent of the Council permission was granted,for the I ; erection of a sign on the property. : Cwn. Sonneman inquired as to the terms of office'for i Mrs. Strause and Mr. itichardson. The City Manager i ; informed Mrs. Sonneman he would check and report back : ! at the next regular meeting of the Council. I i RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYKOLL: i Ratification of the bills was given for the general expense4 i': ; ; ; ' i of the City in the amount of $18,902.98, and the Water I Guevara" k i Ixi 1 ; Department in the amount of $849. 67, for the period .: Bierce . : ;x !x: I : January 2, 1962 to January 16, 1962, as certified by the : La Roche i : :xi : i Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing Commit: Sonneman 1 : !xi i : I tee., .. : McPherson : : :x: : 1 Ratification of the payroll was given for the first half of i Guevara ; jx:x: ~ ; January, 1962, in the amount of $14,834.21, as certi- : Bierce : : ;xi j i fied by the Director of Finance and approved by the Audit-! La Roche ; ; :x: I : ing Committee. : Sonneman "; : :xi I ADJOURNNLENT: I :111 I I 1;J I I I :I:: i By motion of the Council the meeting was adjourned to , I Guevara :., i xix i : January 23,' 1962, at 7:OO P. M. in the Council Chambers, : Bierce ;x: :x: i 2960 Pi0 Pic0 Drive, Carlsbad, California. i La Roche : i !xi 11:11 I I 'I I e I I I I I & 1 I :: .I I;: I I I @I :::I, I .; d I, 1' 1 I I I I i McPherson :xi ix : 1 t I 4 iix; I I I : Sonneman ; : :x; I i McPherson : : :x I I :::I : : 1.: I b I ;: t 8 :, i I ;!'I I I lIii 'C I i::; I I $81 I I 1::: I 'I ::i: I 1::: I I ::;I I iI;i I I I ::;; I I*#: 1.: : ; 'I I:;: I I :&:I I I ::;I 1 I ::;; 11 I I I / The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 8:50 P. M. . \ ::;: I I ;I I I ,. I i Respectfully submitted, I I I I I I 1 I ', I 'I 'I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I :#I I a> I I I \ ! :&I,