HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-04-03; City Council; Minutes.. I I '\ \ -\
I \' I \'
I
I I \\ '. '\ i CITY OF CARLSBAD i Meeting of: CZTY COUNCIL : (3.egdar meeting) i ; Date of Meeting: April 3, 1962 ; Name ', I Time of Meeting: 7:OO P, M. : of
\' \'
b
: Phce of "tins- -*C9-F.!!L-C3eb9xS """ ""_ - "_" "- ""* ":- """""
: Member
("-"""""""""
I I I I t I I
I ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen euevara,
I Bierce, La Roche, Sonneman and McPhersori. Also I i present were City Manager Slater and City Attorney Hayet.
i ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given.
: INVOCATION was offered by Councilman McPherson. !
1
I I I I t I
I I 1 I I 4 I I 1 APPdOVAL OF MINUTES:
I
I L 1
I 1
I I i (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of March 20, 1952, i : were approved as presented. I I 1 * i CORRESPONDENCE
I
I I I I I I I ' (a) County of S% Diego re: Elimination of per diem i i charge for County Honor Camp. Letter dated March 27, I
i I 962, from the Chief Administrative Office of San Diego : 3 County, stating in 1959 the Benal Code was amended to I : elirxiinate the 50$ per day charge for the care of city i prisoners sentenced to a county Honor Camp. In order I
I for the City to cease making payments for the care of the : i prisoners in Honor Camps, the city was requested to , . : : adopt a resolution indicating their acceptance. The Board: { of Supervisors received a copy of the resolution adopted i i by this city and has adopted another resolution, copy i attached, to close this action.
f The Council requested the letter filed.
i (b) Petition re: , Storm drains for Juniper Avenue. A i : petition dated March 19, 1962, signed by 11 property i owners, and three tenants, was presented, requesting i
! that some immediate action be taken to eliminate the i flooded condition on Juniper hve. s between Carlsbad Blvd.: i and Garfield Street.
I The City Manager informed the Council this was another i ; one of the trouble spots in the city, The property owners i i on Juniper Ave. between Garfield St. and the railroad I : tracks participated in having proper drainage installed : i by paying for the materials and the city furnished the labo?. 1 The portion of Juniper Ave. between Carlsbad Blvd. and ; i Garfield Street is a more acute situation due to the fact ! ; they will have to jack under Carlsbad Elvd. The City i Manager further stated he proposed to budget funds to i : help alleviate such problems in the city. Dr. Staley, i 3690 Carlsbad Blvd. circulated this petition.
i The City Manager was instructed to contact Dr. Staley : : and inform him the Council proposes to budget monies for t I problems such as these in next years1 budget.
i (c) Glenn Metcalf re: Appeal of Kesolution No. 805, i ; relative to tentative map of Glenview subdivision. An I appeal dated March 30, 1962, relative to fiesolution No. i : 805 of the City Council and Resolution No. 234 of the i Planning Commission, which requires that the subdivider i ; install Sewers on Magnolia Ave, to a point 256.65 feet : i westerly from the intersection of Magnolia Ave. and : Highland Drive, was presented.
i The City Engineer presented the tentative map of Glenview! I Estates subdivision for the Council's review.
i The City Attorney pointed out that at the hearing held by : : the Planning Commission the City Engineer recommended i i that an 8" sewer line be installed 256.65' plus westerly i ; from the intersection of Magnolia and Highland Drive, i which would being the line to the most ezsterly point of i ; Mr. MetcaWs property. 'The Planning Commission
1 I
I I 6 I i
I I I 1 I I I
I I
I $
I I
I I
I I I
I I
I I
I t
t I I I i 4 I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I
1
I I 9 1 I i I I
& I 1 b B t I
I I
I I I
I 1 I t I
t I I 1 I 1
'.' *" , ', '\ '*
' \\' 4' .'"&, '\ . '.Q. ',+ \O*, '\ 'a y&y, $, '%$
.$$Qb$&$) 4
i::: ;::;
I:'*
'1:: ::;; ::I:
:'*I :::: ;:::
I*;$
;:I:
1:;; i;:;
11;; ::I:
:'I; li;; 11
:::: ;::; :I::
4:; i:::
:;I1 ::it :::I :::; :::;
:::I
\ '\ ', '\
'x ', x, 8, '\
"""-2"":" *Il)
iiri
I 11
Ill1
11
1)'
I 1%
:;:; ti
SI
iiii I:;: 'I
i:;i
:::; :::: :I:: ;;i: ,'*:
9::; 1:;;
:'#I &'*I ;::: :t:: :fl: ;::: ::::
:;@I
:I::
;:I1
;::; ::::
;;'I
i :: ::;:
1:::
:::I i::i
:::I !I::
&;;I i::! :2:
:SI: :::I
I;;& :;;i
:;;I
::I:
I :: :I;;
;::I
,;a:
:I:: ;::; ;I::
:I:: ;:::
1;;l :;;:
:tI: ;::; ;: :t ,' ::::
;;It
1:tI
:tal
11
11
1'11
)I1
4IIt 11
lltl '11
Ifti
l;gl 41
$ 'I
Iili
,!t\
I
# I I I ', .., 'a 8 ' '
1 I 8 >' I I I ',' *,"*, '\ '\ '\ 41
I I : Of ''$'?&88 +&.o\.p,qq ", '<+,
I I
I
t .I 8'
I .-2- I \\\,"
1 "8 '."',, ',, "\",
8 I i Name' ', '\$& '*,'*$&
:""""-""."""------.-""--"-------"""""""~""""""~~"~~"""""""""""~ : Member \a@,$q8 I
! '. 7"
# I I I
I ', <, 'a 8 * ' I
t I I I I
I I
I ', '\ '* '\ '\\'\\ 41
I .-2- I I \\ , \\ ', " '\
! I N a me 'x, , r), ,- &+
',+' " "4
&-
t i%mber ,d .p\.pj?-: '\<~P&'T$\Fq
8 >'
1 't ', ', '\ , '
'8 \' '\ \ ' '
I
1
~""""-""~"""------~-""------------"~"""""""""""""~~l"""""""""""~ ! I '. I i recommended this as a requirement in their resolution I i to the City Council. At the time the tentative map was i : discussed by the Council, the resolution of the Planning ; i Commission was read in full, and the Council adopted i ; Resolution No. 805, which concurred with the findings ; I and recommendations of the Planning Commission. Mr. i
I Metcalf was present or was represented at both meetings.;
i representing Mr. Metcalf. The matter of extending the I ; sewers for a distance of 357' was not brought up to Mr. : I Metcalf. It is 357' from Highland Dr. to the most easter?
I ly point of the property owned by Mr. Metcalf. Mr. I
; easterly point of his property, but can see no need for : i the additional line.
D
I I I I MR. EARL THOMPSON, Attorney at Law, stated he wad I
! Metcalf is agreeable to extending the sewer to the most i I
I !
1 8 i Cmn. Bierce stated Mr. Thompson must have a different i 1
i The tentative map that was approved by the Council shows: I
I map than the Council. The figure of 357" is in error. I
I 256.65'. Extending the line the entire distance of the : i property line has been the policy of the Council for some-: i time. This requirement is not just for this particular ; ; subdivision.
1 I
I I 1 i MR. METCALF was present and stated he was not aware: I i that he would have to extend this sewer to the most east- : : erly point of his property. He thought he would have to i : 'ust bring it up to the center line of the cul-de-sac, or : i "A" Street. He was unaware of this until the subcontract; ; or came to the City. Hall to get a permit. He is being : i required to install 141' of sewer line that will not be used i ; which will cost him an additional $1,000. He contacted : ; the property owner across the street and he does not need! i the sewer line now, and does not have any plans in the i i near future. Mr. Metcalf stated he would be willing to ; : put up a cash deposit with the city until such time as the i i sewer line is extended, as he has no use of the line from : ; "A" street east. He is willing to put curb and gutter in i i up to the easterly point of his property as he knows this : : will improve all his property.
i Mayor La Roche stated the resolution was read in full at i i the time the tentative map was considered. The Mayor : t asked the members of the Council if they wished to chang6 i the requirement in the resolution. There was no indica- i : tioa from the members of the Council that they wished 3 i any change in the resolution.
I Mr. Thompson thanked the council for their consideratiod
1 ORAL COMMUNICATION I
I There were no oral communications. I
i PLANNING: I
1 I
I I I I
I I
I I I t
I I I
I I I I
I 6 I
I I t s
I f
I
I !
1'11 ;I::
11:: :i::
11;; 1:::
::;I
Ill: ::;* ::I:
::I:
:::I :::;
:::I i:;: ;::I
l:;l
::I:
:;;a 4;: 1;
;: I :!::
I!':
I4
i;Ii
11;;
;I 11;
:111
:,I
;;;;
b1 i;
1::; :i:: :::; 1: j::: ii;i ::::
1:;: ::;1 :;:I
4:;
;:
1:;: ;::: $4
,I:; :::I I::: :;i: i:::
1:' l1iI :::: ::;: :I:: !::I: :::;~
::::I I:::;
l;@l;
;#:#I
1:;:; :::I'
't(li
:;l:l
;#I: iiIi
:#I1
(11
iiiii
i:;:: 181
I: a;;:;
:I:!:
88'
;#!'I le;:;
:!I:! i (a) Planning Commission Resolution No. 241, estab- i i i lishin a policy for panhandle lots. Resolution No. 241 :
J a policy for panhandle lots with the City of Carlsbad, and : : was adopted by the Planning Cornmission after a thorough i i study of this problem bd been made by the Commission. :
:0 dPlanning Commission was read, which established I
i Cwn. Sonnernan suggested that a provision be made to i I
I i require sufficient area for a turn-a-around at the end of :
I I I
: the panhandle in case of fire, etc. f I
8 I
f I i Considerable discussion was given this suggestion and : t
; after checking with the fire department RS to the required i { space needed for a fire truck to turn around. it was felt i
i
8 I I I I
I I I I I
I !
;;;I; ;!::I
::I::
;:; ;ii:; ::;:;
1::::
;'#;I ;:I;:
:I::; ':
;:::I :;:;;
i:::1 'I it::: :ii:i
:*Ill
,;::I :I$:
;@I4: ;:I::
I::::
1'1
:1111 .Ill1
* r, ,,- .\a * % " I I
I 1
4 t '\ 'a,''., '\ '\ '\\
I I - 3 ... I '~.,"\,'*\'~\\\,'~~ 4 9
I I : l\ja me ",,'$., \, x%\
t : of \ *,c&" 8ph
e I *,$+,&.?&
~""""_"""~""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""""~""""""""":"~*~~" ,o \O. ("'e'<
1 an I I::): ! this would belunnessary requirement. I I ;;;::
I I '1: ;q:; ! After further discussion, the following resolution was I I t:+ll ;:l:l i presented for the Councilfs consideration: I Il:I1
;:lit 1'
i Besolution No. 816, A r2ESOLUTION OF THE CITY a
:I;:;
: mCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CONCU3RJNd ;::e;
,'I:; i VJITX THE FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIOrj Guevara 1 l Ix: I : RELATIVE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A POLICY I Bierce gi ;x: i FOR PANHANDLE LOTS WITHIN THE CITY OF : La Roche 1 :x ;x; I I CAitLSBAD, was adopted by title only and further reading Sonneman i / :x! ~ 1 waived. i McPhersonr i :x:
I I '' * '\ ', ', ', I
i Member
I
I I
I
$ I I
I I
I;1
I t !#I, 11
1 I i (b) Memorandum from the Planning Commission re: i
I Recreational area at Hoover and Adams Street. Memo- : i randurn. from the Carlsbad City Planning Commission i I dated March 30, 1962, requesting a progress report from ; : the Council on the acquisition of the subject property, in I i order that the Planning Commission may continue its : study for the use and development of the lagoon area.
! The City Manager stated he was instructed by the Council i i to contact the Parks and Ekecreation Commission as to :
1 their thinking on the minimum facilities needed for the i i recreational area. They indicated the following needs: i : (1) Pave Hoover Street; (2) Install portable rest rooms; i i (3) Picnic tables; (4) Life Guard service; (5) Rope off : : area for swimming; (6) Provide water service; ('7) Pro- t i vide parking area; and (8) Barbecue facilities.
I The City Manager further stated that he and Mrs. Hayes I 3 were instructed to prepare a rough draft of a lease. Mr. : : Ecke was contacted in regards to having the property in i i question appraised, and he felt it would be possible to ; : include an option in the lease if the city would accept the i i County Assessor's figures as 207'0 of the value of the I property, as he felt the Assessor's office is more familia% i with the property.
i The Assessor's figures were checked, and excluding the ! : Sportsman!s Club property, and the amount would be i $100,300.00. This covers approximately 6 acres. The i : cost of the lease would be the amount of the taxes which i I is $1,904.00 per year.
i The CiQ Attorney stated she felt the Council would want i i a statement from Mr. McQuillen's office as to what ; percent they based their assessed valuation on.
i Mr. Ecke also informed the City Manager the only restricf : tion would be that the city would not be allowed to have an$ i commercial use of the property, such as a boat landing. I
I I i I I I I I I
I I I 1 I t I
4 I
4 I L 1
1
I I I I * 1
I I I I I 8 8 I I
f * * i The Mayor requested that Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Slater, Cmn. i : Eierce and Guevara meet with Mr. Ecke to see if any i better terms could be worked out.
i A short recess was called at 8: 10 P. M. The meeting i reconvened at 8: 30 P. M.
i ENGINEEBfNG:
I I t * I ? I I I I I I I t I t t 1 I I I I 1 I
B
I i (a) Awarding of bid €or construction of Public Works i
! shop building. Memorandum from the City angineer was i i presented, stating sedled bids were received for the I construction of a rigid frame steel shop building for the i : Public Works Department on the existing foundation.
I Several sets of specifications were taken out, however, i i only one bid was received, which was from the Dunphy I : Construction Company. The contractor suggested chang- ; i ing the specifications on the dimensions of the building i I in order that a standard structure as fabricated by their ; I
8 I
I I
I * : I I I I I
;::; i:::
I :I4
I*:; i:::
1::: i::; ::i:
;:I:
819
1:;s
!I*! :; 1; :::; :::: I:;:
::SI
I ::I& I:
;:at ::ii
p1
$:;e 1:
!lI! ;:;i :::: :;:: i:i:
I*;: 6,;
:;'I I::: ::::
14:: ;::: ;::: ::::
:i;: iii:
:In: ;;I: ,;i:
::I:
11:; :::; :::; i:::
I:'*
:I:: :I:: 4:; :;/
11'
;;ar
:I
!+I! i::: ::i':
;:I* I;:! ;::: ::::
;;*I
1;:: : ; r" I::: It
I:;& ilii I::! ;::I ;::I ii:;
;I:: ;::
4;: I:: :::
1:: ::;
:VI (I!
'1 I
It* It*
c I I' ' \\. I I '\ '\* '\\ '\ '\ \.
I I '\ ' \ '\ "'"' I 4
I I I I I ", ".:'., ",' ', '.b 50
I I i N a me' \. '8%. ',:%\
I : of \'*$+, \,& ,o, 9'. ' *$>\ 9'/"
I ! Member \@@,@$$!
:-.a- \' .' ' I
I
:"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""-~"""""""""""-7".
I :!*I!
c I I' ' \\. I I '\ '\* '\\ '\ '\ \.
I I '\ ' \ '\ "'"'
! : N a me '%8 '\$J>- '.,"a,.
* I -7$+-p.('9$&:+
:"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""-~"""""""""""-7". b '$2 .,P$?'..L
I 4
I I I I I ", ".:'., ",' ', '.b 50
:-.a- t '\ ' .. ,' .
I
! Member
I :!*I! ! figm could be used. This would be a savings of $244.00. i i Tize combined total is $5,631.00, which would complete i
i hoist. Only $4500.00 was budgeted for this project. It :
f was redommended by the Engineer that this bid be accept-:
I : the building except for crane and bridge beams for a chai4
I* ;:i:i
iip: I'd:
ti;::
::I:'
:ti::
I::!: i ed.
! I !I!!:
I I ; I' I I :it:: I~j'c i By motion of the Council the City Manager was authorized; Guevara 1 :x :xi i : to accept the bid as recommended by the City Engineer, ; Bierce 55; ;xi ; i and that if sufficient funds are available in the Capital i La Roche ; 'I ; :x; : : Outlay budget that tk funds be transferred to the Public : Sonneman : : :x: I i Works Budget for this project. i McPherson I : :x; i
1 I lI*I
11
l!'l! t i (b) Agreement with State Division of Highways for the I : relocation of water main at Mission and Faussat Road. 1 1 ! Memorandum from the City Engineer, in which he submit: i ted three copies of a "Notice to Relocate" and "Utility : ; Agreement" prepared by the State Division of Hi..hways i i requiring relocation of a portion of the city's 24 diameter: : water transmission main at Faussat Road and Mission Avq. I This work was necessitated by the construction of a hrge I : box culvert across Mission Ave. for storm drainage pur - i i posses at this point. After several conferences with the ; : Division of Highways, it was agreed that it would be more i i desirable for the city to reconstruct these facilities prior t
I to the highway construction. The Division of Highways i i will reimburse the city in the amount of $1490.00. In : order to further improve the city's system the City i Engineer recommended that additional facilities be con- i
i structed by the city in the amount of $600.00. I
I I I I
! I 1
,'#I' 1,~l;
1::::
!::$I
,;::e
::I::
;;4'
,:I:#
;a,::
l:;l:
:;::; ::a::
I 1:: ;::I1
It ,II:I
l:;l: bl*I;
:It /I$
IIII]
*::SI ~14;l
!::I;
1p:; ::!;;
*l:1:
:::I# ::I
8 1'1
I :;;:I ! BY motion of the Council the agreement was accepted and i Guevara : : :X! i i the Mayor authorized to execute the agreement on behalf : Bierce $ i :x: I ; of the City of Carlsbad. i La ~oche : : :xi I
4 I I i Sonneman i Ix:x; ~
I : McPherson: i !xi
I ::I .I*!
I ! I
f NEW BUSINESS:
I
I I I ! i (a) Resolution No. 814, relative to federal income i : taxation of interest derived from public bonds. At the i i previous meeting the City Attorney was instructed to : prepare a resolution opposing any amendment to the I Constitution which might subject the income from State and
i Local Bonds to a Federal tax, as requested by the State i i Treasurer. The following resolution was presented for I : the Councilfs review: I I
I I I I I
I I t
:si;
1:::
!!I' i:@i :; ti:
::I;
;:
:::I
:t+l l:ll
:si:
;;I; ::;:
;::I
1::
I 01
!*I! i Resolution No. 814. A RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY i :I;; ! COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD OFWSING i ;::;
1:;1
I ;;I* i STITUTION, OR ANY OTHER ACTION BY CONGRESS i Guevara ; ; :xi : OR THE EXECUTIVE BMNCH WEiIECH MIGHT' SUE?JEC$?Bierce # i :xi i THE INCOME FROM STATE AND LOCAL BONDS TO i La 8oche ; : :x; i A FEDEZAL TAX, wax adopted by title only and further : Sonneman : $ !xi : reading waived. i McPherson I : :x:
I I 14'1
'I
; ANY AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES COM- bo
' ,!I,
1
I I Resolution No. 815, authorizing the making of a populatiori I estimate by the State Department of Finance. The Clty r I Manager informed the Council he directed a letter to the i i State Department of Finance regarding a population esti- :
; mate, and received back forms authorizing the survey, i i It will be necessary for the Council to adopt a resolution : : authorizing the State Department of Finance to prepare i i a survey. The following resolution was presented for the : : Council's review: I I
I & t I I I I I +
i"i :::: ':::
:::I :::: :::: ::;: i::: $4
I I :' s
:a::
1;s:
1::; I::: ;:::
l::l I I ? r I I I I t 8 I I I I I I
I I * I
;ii;
$1:
I IIIt
I!#:
* I :i+
$ I i;;;
I :a: ::::
*
I
I 1 I Io
I I ', 8, 'x ', ', *\ I I I '\ '\ '\\ '\\ '\,'\\ 1 I \' I 1 '. \. '. '. ', '\ 53 I 1 '\ ' .-
I I I "5- -., ', '\\ ', '\ '8,
I I : N a me \, 88* '\.'bF
i" """""""" ""_ - """""" < """"""""_"""""""""""; """""""_ 1L"---.
1 I 1 ! of '<&3, .c+$$?&)%+
i Mcrnber *@,.PP'd
(l&.I t I ~l*!l i Resolution No. 815. A RESCLUTION OF THE CITY i : ?OUNclcL OF THE CITY OF CAEELSBAD HEX2UESTI& i I THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT QF I : FINANCE TO PREPARE A POPULATION SURVEY ANd
i BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCq AND I THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, was adopted by title only and i further reading waived. I
i (c) Policy statement concerning annGxations. A
f memorandum was presented by the City Manager setting : I forth certain recommendations made by the Sewer Corn- i
I mitted, concerning the use of the proposed sewer facilitieb 1 to be constructed join*/ between the City of Carlsbad and i i the Vista Sanitation District. , At a meeting of the sewer ! i committee with representatives of the Carlsbad Municipal: I Water District and Euena Sanitation District, it was de- : i termined that the Carlsbad Municipal Water District : would construct a trunk line in conjunction with Buena. ; I Also discussed was a method whereby properties present-:
i ly outside the Carlsbad City limits could be annexed to : i the city. It was the feeling of the group assembled that i i a program be established along the following lines:
1
I AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIQN OF AN. AGREEMENT!
I I
I 1 I I I
I I I
I I I
1
t t I I
ll.'l 81:'l 11111 :!::I
ll;;; i::;
l;;l
111;
:;*I :;:;
11:a :;';
11:;
:;SI
tl;; 11.. 11.1
11;;
::;I
:;I:
11:;
I:'1
'$1:
11:;
11:; :::I
I 81
1bl
11
11
111)
411, '(II
11:' :f*: I*lf
I::+
::a:
41;; 1:::
11;v ::I: ::::
*I
11
I I I 1 i (1) One ownership within the land traversed by the : annexation strip will be allowed one free connection to the!
i trunk line. At the time a request for other connections : I are made, annexation of all sewered land will be initiated.:
i (2) The initial connection fee of land outside the prese4t i city limits will be the same as that which is charged with-! : in the city, Such fees outside the city limits will be in- : i creased yearly by adding to the initial charge made €or : : connection an amount that would approximate the revenue ; I that would be received from the city tax rate in effect at i : the time the property were annexed. I I
I I I I
f I
:~i'
$1 4:: ,I,;
::::
:+:I
#;I: ::': ::I: :::; ;i l::;
f:;: ::::
:Il;
;I1 11: :::I
It;#
I::#
ltl:
! After discussion by the Council by motion of the Council i Guevara i i !x: i it was agreed that the policy as recommended be accepted i Bierce : pixi : and adopted. ; La Roche t : :xi
.I
I
I
I 1
+ i Sonneman !x i !x; + ; McPherson i ; ;xi
t 4 ;;:: 4 1 : The City Manager stated he would advise the representa- : i fives of the various districts as to the Council's action. i
! (d) Amending Ordinance No. 9050, rescinding require: i rnents that utility poles be located in rear yards. At the : ; previous meeting the City Attorney was instructed to pre- i I pare an ordinance for the Council's review. The City i : Manager informed the Council the CiQ Attorney did not ; I prepare the ordinance for this meeting as this would re- i : quire two readings of the ordinance, and this would be : i the last meeting of this Council, therefore, it would re- i : quire two readings of the next Council. 1 I
I 8 I I
I I I
;;;: :I;: :::;
*I. al-l i:;:
1;1: :;I: i;i:
lib:
1::: i::: :i:: r:ii
8;;: ii::
:ti
!*I! i Cmn. Guevcsra asked that the Council reconsider their I Guevara 5r ! ki i instructions to the City Attorney. By motion Of the i Bierce i:ii: : council it was agreed that the City Attorney be instructed i La Roche ; : : I: i to not prepare an amendment to the ordinance rescinding : SOm%?man ; k :X f i requirements that uitlity poles be located in rear yards. i McPhtxwon i 1 !Xi
! 8 ;;si
I !I;!
01
D
i OLD BUSINESS: a I I i I i (a) Second reading of Ordinance No. 9127, -ending i i Ordinace No. 9050, regarding certificates of title. The : : following ordinance was submitted for a second reading : i by the Council: I 8
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I i 8 I I t I I
I i (a) Second reading of Ordinance No. 9127, -ending i i Ordinace No. 9050, regarding certificates of title. The : : following ordinance was submitted for a second reading i i by the Chmcil: 1 I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I
I I I
I I I I 1 I i I t I
i;i; ;+:
1:;: : ;':
11;;
:Ill '::; ::;: i::;
::i:
::I: :;:: i:,:
11*1 1;Il
; 'I
';:!
I I \\\'X\. I I
I I I I
I I I I \\\ \\,'\,, 'x, '\'\*\
I I ; of .,.?&%$. \ ,*
1 : Member \,L'.O\, $3'@.&?%< ;. +.q>
I : -6- \ '\ ' '\ '8 '\,'\\)\8 5 2
I 8 88 '%\ '\ \ '\ '\
1 I I i Na me '\\,'.$< '.,'TdJ\
:""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""~"""""""-~"""""~"~""""""""" : 1 ;:::I 'I
I
i Ordinance No. 9127. AN OSDINANCE OF THE CITY i ;11i;
a::*1 ; OF CARLSBAD AMENDING SECTION 412 OF ORDI- : Guevara I I x: 4 : :II1I
I NANCE NO, 9050 OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, 1 Bierce :::gi ; RWARDINC' CEi3TIFICATES OF TITLE, was given a ; La Roche I : ; $ ; ;#I I second readihg by title only and further reading waived, - i Sonneman :xi i X: i
I and was adopted, : Mcfhersonj I : 4 I
! I 'Ic?; 11 i CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
; South Coast Asphalt lawsuit. A letter has been received t ;:4:' ! from Mr. Karpinski, attorney €or the plaintiffs, indicatink )(II] If' ; they were not going to file an appeal, and requesting that I Guevara i i : x: I i the city waive its costs. After consideration by the i Bierce ; i :xf !
i Council, by motion of the Council it was agreed that : La Roche t I is 1 i whether or not the City would waive the costs would be i Sonneman !xi ; XI I i at the discretion of the City Attorney. i McPhersoni !x: x:
1 II"I 3 1 ;;I::
::I;:
I I
I 1 I !!!:I I11
I #.lI I I I City Attorney's Department of the League of California I : Cities. The City Attorney's Department of the League' of: i -rnia Cities will be holding sessions at the Stardust i \ in San Diego, commencing Wednesday, April 4, 1962, I I : through Friday, April 6, 1962. The City A.ttorney's from: i san Diego County will welcome attorneys from all over : i the state. I t I I I Wight condemnation suit. There is nothing new in this i : case. J I 1 I ! I ; Kelly and Hicks water suit. The two suits have been con-! i solidated and will both be heard in the Superior Court. i
I I I ! Cmn. McPherson asked why a fire hydrant was allowed to: ; be placed behind a fence. After further discussion the : i City Manager was instructed to notify the property owner I : and request him to remove the fence in order to make the ; i hydrant more accessible. 1 I
i CITY MANAGER'S REPORT?
i Fire convention. The Fire convention will beiheld at the i
j El Cortez Hotel in San Diego on April 26th to 29th. All : i members of the City Council are invited to attend. I *
i Fire rating. A request was made to have a new fire ratind i for the City of Carlsbad. The City received a Class Six i
I rating. I I
: The Council asked what would be required before the city ! i could receive a Class Five rating. The City Manager i : reviewed certain items that would be needed before the : i City could obtain a Class Five rating.
I t
I I I I 1 1 t
I I
I I 1 I I
I I I 1 I !
;;;I :;:i
;!'I tl
; I :'
#:I: ;;::
:!I: ;*I; (:::
(;'I
I $1
l!'I -11 :;*;
::I; ii'' ::
:;*I i:::
1;::
::!I
11
i needs on City property. Cmn. Guevara asked what the i I City planned to do about the weeds on city property. The : : City Manager informed the Council he intends to ask for i : bids for having the weeds removed from all. city property. :
: Vacations for city employees. Cwn. Sonneman inquired ! i as to what had been done in regards to the vacation time i : for city employees. 1 t
: The City Manager informed the Council that the Council ; : committee met with the employees association committee. i
! Several items were discussed at this meeting such as I vacations, job reclassifications, longivity plan, etc. It I i was agreed that the department heads submit job descrip- I : tions to the City Manager for review-, and then both com- ; i mittees would meet again to discuss job reclassifications. :
I I t I
I 1 I t 1
I 1
D
! i
; i;' 1,:
:::I I:;: i! ;i
::!I I::! !:I; ::I; ;I:;
:I::
::I: i:::
:::I
1::
I:#: i:::
;::I
1::
::!; 4:;
::SI
:I::
I ; ;. 1
;11;
,:$I
:!If
I;:I
11'1
'I
i Library funds. Cmn. Bierce asked if it would be possiblei i to transfer the funds designated for the Library Board of i
I I I I 1 I I I I I I I
;::I
I;*:
:I::
i;ll
11;:
:frl ::::
.!#I ,;I ,I i:;;
$!I
l:jl * :;
:!!I I;'!
("I
;I:;
II'I :::; ii::
:I:*
181: :::I :::: :::I
11
$11
:!?I 1;;1
;:I2
l;tl
l;!l
I::!
1;;;
:I::
I I !I;!
I I I 1
I I I I
I ', \', 8 \*
I
t
., ', \ ', '\ '8
I I \ ', \\ '\ '\,'*,
: -7 - I I 'y,;.,'.. '\,'\\ 53
I i Name '\.,'$& '\ ',, 'e& .$J\
4 i of ',CJ%\+,$$;
'\
I 1 Member b&@,!+p\4 :""""""~"""""""""""""""""""""""-"""~""""~"""""""""""-~" i Trustees, in or'der that they could invest this molney. I I i;::
4 ;:;I i The City Manager stated he would check the ordinance i 1;fI : with the City Attorney and see if this would be possible. i it::
1:;:
I I I::: i Architects for Library Buildihg. The Council was inford- :::; i ed that the City Manager, Mrs. Cole, Dr. Spivey and t ::::
: Mr. Carr inte,rviewed six architects. Mrs. Str.auss, I
4:; i President of the Library Board of Trust&, infor'rned I ;:;:
::;I
! Mri Slater the Board had reduced the nrimbei- of architectb i::i i to four. I 1:::
i MK, FOX, 4215 Harrison Street, was present and asked i ;:::
11;;
I if any information had been received as yet concerning i ;' 1::: i the purchase of the patrol boat. I I :;I:
i The City Manager advised Mr. Fox and the Council no i p: : word had been received as yet. The City Manager was ; lt:; 4:; i requested to send a fomk. -up letter. I ::I*
4 i:fl i RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: I:'
I :;I1 I f :;ii i ktatification of the bills was given for the general expensei 811:
!:;I 1 of the city in the amount of $6, 305. 33 and for the Water i Guevara :xi i 2 ; Department in the amount of $1,687. 31, for the period i Bierce I :x : xi
! March 20, 1962 to April 3, 1962, as certified by the ; La Roche : : i xi i Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing Commit! Sonneman I i i 3
I tee. ; McPherson: : ; xi
[ fiatification of the payroll was given for the second half I Guevara i !xi xi ; of March, 1962, in the amount of $15,011.96, as certifieq Bierce i ; :x; I by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing : La 3oche : I i x: ; Committee. i Sonneman l l ; x',
I ; McPherson jx 1 ; +
I ;::I
I 'Il1 1:::
I I I I:;: I:;:
I I I I:;;
1 I :;I1
1 I I :::a ;I::
I ;;r;
I I :I:: I I I $11
I I; I4
I UAitGAKET E. ADAMS l :I:: I 1:::
1 II'I 11:;
I ::;I
I i:::
I t'i;
I : ;I 1
r t 1:: I :"I I ;:::
I 4;;
I i:::
I 4:;
I I :::: :;:;
I J i:::
I 1 lJ;: I 1:::
I I ::;I
I I :I I* 1:;:
I 1 :;I:
t I :I:: I ;:;;
I t 1::;
I I ;:;; I
1 I I
I
I I
I '4
I
I I I I :;::
f I I 6 I 1::: *I
I
I
I I 1 I
I 11
I
I I I ::;;
;;
I
I I I [ ADJOURNMENT:
i By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 P, M.:
t
I I I
I I
I despectfully submitted, I
1 I I I
i ~&~&Z~~& I I I :; 1;: I
I
1
i Deputy City Clerk I
I i
I
I
I
I
I I I t I I I
I
I I L I I I I I I
I I I t
I
I I I
I
1 I
3
I I
I
I
I
I
I * 1 I
I
1*
I I Ill
I
I I
I
!
I
,!I, B I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I I I I
I I .SI I ::::
I I :;::
1 !I::
1 1 i::;
I IIII I I 1:::
i 1 I:::
1 l;II
I 11;:
I I :;'I
I $;I
I I 1;;;
I I !:I' ,!I
1
I
I
*I