Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-08-07; City Council; MinutesI I : '\, '8 *8, '8 '\ 8 I CITY OF CP-RLSBAD i Minutes of: CITY C@UNCpL (Regular Meeting) i '88 ,*' ; Date of Meeting: August 7, 1962 i Time of Meeting: 7:OO P. M. : of :""""""""""- 1 Place of Meeting: ~"""""""""""""""""""-""-"~-"""--"--"-"- Council Chambers : Member &\e\ ,o\@\.pp.d &'+e i 3OLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Guevara, : Bierce, NcPherson and Neiswender. Councilman Hughe$ i was present atAQ8. P.M.. ..Also. present were City Manager i Slater and City Attorney Betts. I ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. 8 I ;:::: i INVOCATION was offered by Councilman Neiswender. i 1:' t i APPLZGVAL OF MINUTES: I : ----- I (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of July 17, 1962, i Guevara : ; :x; !: : : were approved as presented. I Bierce Li !xi ; I I *8 '\ ' 8, ..;*., 12 E ', '+, '\, '8 ', , 8 's ', ', '\ I Na me ', '.!& '\ '?$& '.&& 8 '.?.@, ;, '\92 I 1 1 1 1 :Ip: :L,n ;:::: ::I:; !:I a1 4 I ;:;:; I ;:I;: I i;;i: I I I I:::, 1:; ;:;I: I I I:':; ;;p "4; * I # )*a I I I I I I I I 1 ; McPherson I : :x: : I I i Meiswender: ixix! i I t I ::'I: i COi3i3ESPCNDENCB * I :;::: I :::I' ! (a) San Diego Pipeline Company re: Application for i :*a:: 1:;I: i Franchise. Letter dated July 27, 1962, from the San i ::;I: : Diego Pipeline Company, showing Engineering Manage- . ; i:: :I /I;: i ment Company, Inc. , as their Agent, stating Southern ; ::'I: : Pacific Pipe Lines, Inc. and Santa Fe have merged into i ,a::; ;::'I i the corporation known as San Diego Pipeline Company, : ;:::: i which now purposes to construct, operate and maintain th4 ;:::; ; petroleum products pipeline heretofore discussed with : ;::VI :;::I : the City by the Southern Pacific Pipe Lines representativeb. 9 11 i In lieu of their application, the San Diego Pipeline Compatiy ::::: ;:':: : submitted their application. They propose, if the franchiqe ;I:;: *' i is granted to them to pay to the City of Carlsbad two per- i ;::,: t cent (2%) of its gross annual receipts arising from the ; ::;:: :*::1 i The company requested that the Council adopt a resolution; ;:::; *4;:1 ; declaring its intention to grant this franchise and state ; ;:,:: i the time and place when any persons objecting thereto ma$ ;::I1 ;f It: : appear and be heard. I I 1::; q I ::;:: : The City Manager advised the Council this resolution i would be presented under New Business on the Agenda. i ;:I:; I I I ::ii: i (b) Miss Ida M. Snyder - re: Claim for damage cause4 I;*: ; x/riss Ida M. Snyder, stating there was damage caused to i :iii; I her property €ram tree roots in the sewer line belonging : #I ::::I ; to the City. The City was notified and Mr. anger, an i i:ii: i employee of the City, witnessed the removal of the roots I $:': : from the pipe by the plumber she called. She requested i ::;:: 1:;:: i that the city do something about the pipe now while Jeffer-: (1111 : son Street is in the process of being paved. Also that she i :I::; :,I:, : be reimbursed in the amount of $24.25, the amount she i ;I::; i paid the plumber from the A & R Service Company. I I i:::: ! The City Engineer informed the Council this item had beei :'ll; ,;I i investigated. The pipe was cleaned out and root cleaner i :::'I : put in the pipe. ,#I:: I )~Ol i By motion of the Council the claim was denied and the i Guevara F i :x: It : i matter referred to the insurance carrier. I Bierce ; ixix: 1: ; I ::':; i Cmn. Hughes was present at 7:08 P. M. I I ::::: '11 i. (c) Kamar Construction Co. re: 33-equest for City I ;#*,a I participation in improvements for Ho~i~Zy-IHanor Subdivi- j 1;Il: ::::; i sion. Letter dated May 25, 1962, from Kamar Construe- i ;,:;I :::I! : tion Co. , Inc., requesting the City of Carlsbad to partici-: i pate in a contribution to the improvements for Holiday I I::;, : Manor Subdivision as follows: I I Ii:;; I :I::# I :::a: ! s!@:! t I 1s I 18 i use, operation of, and possession of the franchise. 6 I ::all 1:;:: I t I 8 1 I I I ::;:; "I:; I by sewer stoppage. Letter dated July 24, 1962, from : iii;; 7; I I ;: I I I /I:; :;:'a 8 1 :f: ::::; I I I I I : McPherson t ; :xi I I I i Neiswender i i :x: i I I:;;: iiiii I I I * I I I I I I 1 I I b I l 8 . \\' I I t I * I I 88,'\8,*,, 8' ', '* s , , '\ '. '.,'., I I ', 8 88 \\ 1Z ', '\8 '\, ', '\ '8, I -2 - i Name 8%,,\\$\ *\ "q I I +?*,o,.$!\& * I i *f 8$$+, '8 '\ '$$& .4/' i Member 8;o\ot.PP$ ;"~"""~""""""""""""""""""~"~""~"""*"""-"--"~"--"------"------"-~-~ i (1) Compensate the Subdivider's contractor for the i : School District's share of the necessary street improve- : i ments on Tamarack; ! (2) Contribute the cost of additional street improve- i : ments on Tamarack as needed for secondary or major : I street construction, which will include additional depth of i : pavement as required and additional width over and above i i the 40 feet curb to curb for a local collector street; i (c) City pay 50% of the lift station and force main i system required for the subdivision; and '*1, i (d) City participate in the drainage Line required along ! :;[I i the.westerly street in the subdivision. I i A map of the area was presented. The City Bngineer in- i : formed the Council the past policy of the City has been to i i contribute 50% of the cost of the lift station where there : : are other areas that would benefit. As to the storm drain i i this matter was discussed at the time the final map was ; ?('I ; presented, and it was pointed out at that time this is a i '1:; i natural storm drain area. If the City would contribute ; '1:; : towards the storm drain project it would run between i $8500.00 and $10,000.00 for the City's share. He recom-i i mended that the City participate only in the cost of the coni 1::: i struction of the storm drain project and not the engineering : costs. (11) i Cmrr. Bierce pointed out that an agreement could be enterdd :*I1 i into with the school district, and that contribution by the ; ()(I i City of the additional street width has been a policy of the I i::: i City. :: By motion of the Council it was agreed that the City parti- \ CUeVara : i ;X! I ;I i cipate SO% in the cost of the lift station and force main : E3krce I* ; system, and 50% in the cost of the construction of the stor& McPhersod : i X: :drain system. : Neiswender: : :x; i f I iil: I:'$ ;':: :::; I I 1::: I t :'SI I 1:;: ::;: I::: l4;t ;;I* 11:; :;'I I 8 81:; I I ;;#I I ;::: 4 1::: 1 L ::;: t :::: ::i': i I :::, 141; !::I :::: :I:: ;:1: :;:: li:: I I ;:;I ::;i i::: :;I4 * I I::! I I :::; :::; 4:; 1 1 :::: I :'::: ;x; :x; I I i Hughes : !xi.' I I ;*I i (d) Secretary, Board of Library Trustees - re: 6 I ;:I 1 ;:: : Request for Council verification of Library Building Corn-: 1:; i mittee representatives. Letter dated August 2, 1962, I t I::: I stating the Library Board of Trustees wish to verify the : :I: : representatives to the Building Committee for the new ye&. 1'; ;I: : They requested the Council to reappoint two members to : :\: i serve on this committee, Also the City Manager and clityi :it i Attorney are automatically included as committee membe$s. ::i I I ::; i The Mayor stated there were already two members of the i ::: ; Council appointed to this committee, ,namely, Cmn. Bier% ;I1 1:: i and Cmn. Guevara. I I I:: I I It* I ::: i Crnn. Guevara stated he would like to be relieved of this i ::: : appointment. Cmn. Neiswender stated he would like to : ;q i volunteer for this appointment. I I ::I: i By consent of the Council the Mayor appointed Cmn. : Neiswender to serve on this committee, and asked that : 1 the Library Board of Trustees be notified of the appoint- i iii ; ments. I 11 I 1': ! (e) Petition for sidewalks on Tamarack Avenue. ': J 4 4:: i A letter in the form of a pe~~~~-~~~"J~y~~~-~~2 , Was i ::: ; .presented by property owners on Tamarack Avenue, re- ! ::: ; questing that immediate consideration be given to the : ::: :*I : urgent need for sidewalks on Tamarack Ave. from Carlsbid ::: 1:: i Blvd. to Jefferson St. Children walking to and from schodl ::: i in the Jefferson Elementary School area are forced to use i ;'I : the sides of the street. The improvement of the state i ::: ; Beach facilities at the foot of Tamarack has greatly in- I I!! I B I 11 I I i 01 I I I I I I 1 I * I II I I I 91 I I I I t ::: 1 I ::; :!I I1 8 8 I ::: * I I 0 844 ,; : : t I I8 I 1 ', '8 *' I I 88 I I '.. '\ *- I I I 1 I I I b -3- I ' '1 '* ' '. i Name '8, I ; of : Member ;"""""-"""""""""""""""*""""""""""""""""-I"""""" i creased both vehicular and foot traffic during the summer! : months. until improvements of the street can be started,; I they requested the following measures be taken: ( 1) I I : Double line to prevent passing; (2) More speed limit sign4 i in conspicuous places; (3) Stricter enforcement of the 25 i : M. P. H. speed limit; and (4) A four-way stop at the I i corner of Jefferson and Tamarack and at the corner of I : Garfield and Tamarack be installed. 8 ; Cmn. Hughes stated in the interest of the safety for the i i children in the area he would certainly recommend that : i these precautions be taken. Cmn. Neiswender suggested i ; this matter be referred to the City Engineer. I i The City Manager informed the Council the Engineering 3 : Department already has a great many projects they are : i working on. Mrs. Johnson, one of the property owners, : i was in to see him, and she is willing to circulate a petitioh ; for the improvement of Tamarack. I i By common consent of the Council it was agreed that a ! I petition be prepared for circulation for the improvement : i of Tamarack Avenue. I I i OiZAL COMMUNICATIONS: i MS. D. 8. DlZNIUS, was present and stated he owned i i property at 468 Tamarack Avenue. Se purchased this : ; property approximately two years ago from Lois Fry, an4 i was assured by Mrs. Fry there were no sewer assessmenp ; against the property. He has rented this property and has; i had considerable trouble with the cesspool this past year, 3 : and instructed the lessee to come into the City and apply ; I for a sewer connection. He received a letter from the : : City stating he would have to pay for the front foot cost of i : the sewer, which has never been paid, before he would be: : allowed to connect to the sewer line. I I ; Considerable time has been spent with the City trying to i i clarify this matter. The City records show the line costs: : were paid up to his property on both sides. Mr. Coe, whq i did the books for Mr. Fry stated he was sure it had been : : paid, however, Mr. Fry's books were destroyed after his! ! death. I i The Council was informed that the records show 148. 35' i ! on the original property owned by the Frys was paid for : ; by cash, however, it does not indicate what portion of the i i original frontage this applied to. The original plat showed ; that 195' benefited by this cash sewer main installed in i i 1957. Presuming this 148. 35' was to be accredited to thii : 195', this would leave a balance of 47' not paid. Mr. I i Dinius is willing to pay the cost of the 47' at $4.00 a front! : foot. t i It was also pointed out that Mr. Dinius's property purchask i ed from Mrs. Fry, with 92' of street frontage and requir-: ; ed area, has never been approved by the City of Carlsbad.; i Mrs. Fry furnished the Engineering Department with the i : plat some six months ago, showing that she had had it . ; I surveyed and mo.mrnented by Mr. Weeks, Licensed Sur- i ; vteyor. The City's re~cords show that it had not been ap- ; i proved and recorded by the City of Carlsbad. The Ehgin- i i eering Department found the monumentations of subjecx" i : lot and measured the westerly side yard and fo~nd.it to be i : 5-35', and the zoned area requires 9.2' side yard. The : i City notified Mr. Dinius by letter that this Would have to ! : be processed by a variance application through the plan- : i ning Commission. I I I # I 1 1 I 6 I J I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I 4 88. ' \ 8. ' . \8 L '+, '. 138 '.&, '*, '',$ ', \ 8' b 8b88 ''*$g$, ' ", $&8 ,p8 ',L~U'9'4+ ~sQ?.*p'r ;;1;1 ;:::: I;;I: ;1111 ;::I: ;:::: ;:::; I:;# :t::; ': I+: ;: ;I *4:! ,I:,, +:I ;:'#I '1; 1:p: i;::: :I::! 'I::; i:::; ::::; i;::; :ii:; ;::I: ::;:; pa:' (18 :::I: ::;I; i:::: :$:I ::;:; i:: ii::: i:iii a:;:: :a;:: :I;:; ::#;I ;::I: 1:::: ::I:; 41 ::::* 10:;: $1 ::::: # Ill $::! ;Vtl 1:::; :;::; ;:!:: ;::;: rip: 2::: ;:b; 1'::; ;:I:( ;:::: ::::: :::;: ;::': ;:4: ;L:I ::,:I :I::: ::::; 11 :;I:: i:::: i:, 1;:: $1:: I&: ;: l;::: ;I:1: l~l;l ::::: ;:"; t .&. .: 3 I !'I 1 :*I;; I:::, !::;: :;::; ::::I ::::; :::it :i:G .""""""". I $18 I1O1 :al;t 1:*1 :It1, 1:4: I ;Il llsl; I:( 1:'s: (#I 1 :la 11 I #II l*ll: I.!:! I I I I 1% I s, ', '8 '\ *8 '\ I \, 8, '*, "\'.\8~\ I '"'\\'\, '\ '\ '\ * I 1 I ', '\ '\ ', ', '8 131 I I f N a rn e 'S, '8+d;t.~$8 I i of ''?L@, a, ;$$8 i """""""""""""""""""""""""" - """" _"- """"" ;""""* """""_ :*f"-:< i nect to the sewer by paying for the additional 47' of sewe4 McPherson: ; I i x: 1: ; I 1:::: i;I:l i ings for Assess. Dist. #2-1961. Construction of sanitary; ::; I I ;:::; ;::I1 4 8 -4- I , ?A I Member '@Qb'\Od 'l*;l I I I I 1 p::: i After consideration by the Council, by motion of the : l Guevara : I !x; : : Council it was agreed that Mr. Dinius be allowed to con- : Bierce ;x; ;x: I : main line costs, and that he apply to the City for a : Neiswender: ; :xi : i variance on his lot in order to make it a legal lot. i Hughes i :xi x: 1 I I ::Ia1 4: i PUBLIC HEARINGS: I ::;'I i (a) Resolution of Intention No. 809. 191 1 Act Proceed: 3::: :i : sewers In Pi0 Plco Dr., Chinquapin Ave. , Tamarack Avei J Iiii; : Adams St. J Highl and Dr. , and easements in public rightst ::: :i i of-way. 1 * i:::: i The Mayor announced the hour of 7: 30 P. M. having arriv4d, ,ti:: : this was the time and place fixed by the City Council for : ;hi; i hearing objections or protests on the proposed work, or i 1:;'l ::::: i the extent of the assessment district, or on the proposed : : grades under the Besolution of Intention No. 809, providing i:::: 111:1 1:;t; : for construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances, ankl i appurtenant work in Pi0 Pic0 Dr. , Chinquapin A.ve., i::i: I Ill* ! Tamarack Ave. , Adams St., Ilighland Dr. , ard ease= nti i:::: i in public rights-of-way in Tract 237, Thum Lands, Map I 1:::; : 1681. I ::I:: I I(I( I I 1 I ;:ill i The Clerk presented the affidavits of publication, mailing i Guevara ; : ;x! : ;:::: : and posting. By motion of the Council the affidavits were i Bierce xi :xi i i ordered filed. : McPherson i ; :x: i I 1 i Meiswender: :.!xi ; I 1 : Hughes : : :x: I I I ;I 1::;: i The Mayor requested the Clerk to read all protests that I ::::: I I I I 1:::: 1 ii:ii I I 1 I:::: I*@:; I OII ::::: 'x;: :::;i 8 ::::: i short distance of this proposed construction area, and he : 111:; II ::I:: :?'I ,I:', 1:::: I:::: ; causing a nuisance to everyone in the area. He could see i i:::: I::: 4: :;;:: I I i:: :; ::::: ::I ::i ::'I; :;ii: I I I 1:::; ;;;I: I;':; ;;::I I I \:!I; 1:. I:::; ;::a 1s: I area to be assessed for the improvement is represented : I::;: : by written protests or objections filed with the City Clerk,: ;::I: ;::;; ;:: ::::: t:::; !:;I i The Engineer of Work presented a plat giving evidence i ::a:: I I I I I I 4 I I I : had been filed. I ;!/I ; The Clerk stated up until the time set for hearing no I i written protests had been filed. I 't:ll i The Mayor announced the City Council will now hear any i ; oral protests or objections concerning the work, extent of; i assessment district or grades. I I :::'I i Ma. CLINT PEDLEY, stated he raises flowers within a i ;:::: ; is in hopes this project will progress in a much better i i manner than previous projects. On previous occasions i : the dirt has been allowed to lay in the streets for several ; I weeks, thereby causing dust to blow in all directions, a I 1:;:: I I I I t * i no reason for the dirt not being put back into the ditch : :; :::I, I I I I I ! instead of being allowed to lay in the street. : MRS. GLISSMAN, stated she and her husband operate i i Whitey's Landing, and as this is their peak season, she I : requested the project delayed until after the summer I I *I;* I season is over, as this would make travel to the lagoon 1 ; difficult. : The Engineering Department informed the Council this i i project would probably not start until the middle of Septe+- : ber. I I 11:: : As there were no other persons present desiring to be : 1:; i heard on the matter, the Mayor asked the Engineer of Wo& : to please advise the City Council what percent of the total : ::,:I i and the Engineer of Nork reported that written protests i ; and objections had been filed with the City Clerk by the : l*t:l i owners of 0% of the total area. I I :I1 I 11 l a I I I I t I ; that all of the lands included in the district are benefited. : 11:1: !:::I . I I I I I I I I , '\ \ -* \\ ' . , '\ , '\ '* I I \\\, 'X,:,, '\\:\\:\\\ 13 ; I -5 - I , , '. '\ ' '\ I I I ~ame 8%. '\?+, \\,'x?&, I '.%o\o? ' \%X I i of \,&',g,;\ +$A I 1 Member *@$%Fp$ :"""""""~"~"""~""~""""""""""""""""""""~""~""""-"""""-""~--. I I !:::I I The Mayor declared the hearing closed at 7:40 P. M. ;:I:: .::::: i The City Attorney presented the following resolutions for i :iii; ! the Council's review: 1 :~;o I I I I ::I:: la1 olution No. 836. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i Guevara : :xixi ; 1;;1; WCLL OF TEE CITY OF CAXLSBAD, CALIFORMIA; Bierce ixi I x(: i i MAKING FINDINGS AND OVE;t&ULING PntGTESTS AND McPhersoni : : x; : : OBJECTIONS on Assess. Dist, No. 2-1961, was adopted i Neiswender; 11 : ;x; ; 8 i by title only and further reading waived. : Hughes I : :x; : i Resolution No. 837. A KBSCLUTION OF THE CITY : ::;:; I L OF TEfE CITY OF CAEtLSBAD, ORDERING : :;:I' I ?z(%NSTEtUCTION OF CERTAIN STitEET IMPdOVEr Guevara :xi :xi I ! MENTS AND OfitDERING POSTING AND PUBLICATION i Bierce ; :xixi ; i OF NOTICES INVITING SEALED PrZOPOSALS Oft BIDS : McPhersoni I :x: I ! for Assess. Dist. No. 2-1961, was adopted by title only i Neiswender; ; :x: I i and further reading waived. ; Hughes ~l:*l : I ,x: I 1 I I:;(: ::I:; i 8esolution No, 838. A itESOLUTION OF THE CITY i ;till i gByg&g THAT CERTAIN STaCEET WO&K BE DONE: Guevara ; ixjx; i t TJNDEii THE DIRECTION AND TO THE SATISFA.CTIONI Bierce I I :xi ; ! OF TBE ENGINEEA OF WOitK, for Assess. Dist. : McPherson i i !x: i : No. 2-1961, was adopted by title only and further reading i Neiswenderix: :xi : i waived. i Hughes ; : :x: ! i The Engineering Department presented three easements i I:':: i for public rights-of-way necessary for the construction of: ::ii: i that the Council accept these easements. I 8 ;::I; i By motion of the Council the easements were accepted and Guevara ; :x:xi : ; the City Clerk instructed to record the same. ; Bierce Fi ;xi i I * t 8, x' S \' I I I b I I 1 I "8,; 1 t 1 1 I I :::;: ::I:{ I I F THE CITY OF CABLSBAD, CALIFO8NIAj I:;;: *:t 1 1 iii:: I the sewer line in the above assessment district, and asked ::;I: I * 1 ;:::: ::::: I I ; McPherson ; : ;x; i I 1 i Meiswender: : ;xi ; I ,I::: I:: i district. Also the other two parties granted the easement! :;i;: ! the City Manager was instructed to write a letter of appret ltl:8 i:::: ! all of lots 15 and 16, from Zone R-P to Zone C-2, said i 11) 1;;:: I I I 1 I I I i Hughes : :: ; :x: i i The Council was informed that Mr. Losa granted one of : ;:-I : the easements necessary, and he will not benefit from the i I;::; ; without compensation. By common consent of the Council: :;;I: !I,'l : ciation to all three parties. $;*la 8 :'I*: I I r :::;I ! (b) &eclassification of property located at the south- I ;Ib:! i easterly corners of iioosevelt and Walnut Street (Lots 17 i : and 18) ,,*:t , and the northwesterly 12 1/2 ft, of Lot 14, and : ;:::: I proceedings being initiated by the Carlsbad City' Planning : I:::! : Comrmssion. I I ;:::I dl;: I I 4::: i The Clerk presented the Affidavit of Publication, and by i Guevara l :x: ; i motion of the Council the Affidavit was ordered filed. : Bierce Sr: :x; : I (fa 81 I I I ~~~~~ t 1 I ! McPherson i f !xi \ f s : Neiswender I ix ;x; i I I i Hughes 1 1 !x: 8 i The Clerk informed the Council there were no written i ;::;: I protests received up to the time set for hearing. I ::i:: ;:,;: I I , b:;i: : The Mayor asked if there were any persons present who : i:;:: ::;:; I wished to state their protest or objection to the proposed I ::I!: I 8 ;:::I i 'Shere were no persons present wishing to state their pro4 ;:::; : test or objection. 4:;: t I I:::: i &solution No. 254 of the Planning Commission was read i :::I: I:::' I wherein they recommended reclassification of said properl- ::;II 1: ; ty from Zone R-P to C-2 due to the fact the property is i :;;:: ::,:I : actually being used for commercial business now and was ; !,!!: 1 1 8 I ;:I:: 1 I I I I i reclassification. I :I::! I I 1 8 (IIt I I ! I I I I * I I 1 I d I '\ 8.8 \'. I I I I 8\ ', 8 '\ '8 '% 8, '\ "8 't8 '\,'\. 88 133 -6 - , 8, '\, ', ', 8\ 8, b 8, \, ' 8 I i Name '\, 'Y$$, '\ '$J f : of '."o.%*\ '8 $8 I I i Member ''@&+:@@& I ("""""""""""""""~"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""----- 1~ 1:~11 # f I i::': i before the city was incorporated. I-:; I I I i:;:: i The Mayor declared the hearing closed at 7:50 P. M. I ;:::: I I I 1:::: :::I, II : The following resolution was presented for the Council's i ::I:: I review: I ;I:;# I I I ;::I: 11:; I :;::a t Resolution No. 839. A RESOLUTION OF TBE CITY : CfL OF m CXTY OF CARISBAIP, ANN~~c& :I::! ;:I 1::: NGS ANL?DECISION BEX2P"XNG CHANGE OF I Guevara i :x;x: I I PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF CAi'lLSBAD FROM ZONE! McPherson l ; ;x: : i 8-P To ZONE c-2, was adopted by title only and further! Neiswender: i :xi i : reading waived. : Hughes i I :xi : : The following ordinance was presented for a first reading i I Ordinance No. 91 33. AN CdDINANCE OF THE CITY i ;!::I : ZaNE R-P TO ZONE C-2, IN THE CITY OF CARLS- : McPherson i ; ;xi ; i BA4 was given a first reading by title only and further i Neiswender ; jxk : I : reading waived. : Hughes i i :x: : : PLANNING: tl:I: I i::$ )I1*I I :;::: : (a) Memorandum from the Planning Commission re: i i:::: I Seconds!: 8;:: i mission dated July 27, 1962, stating at their meeting held : lIIi: : July 24, 1962, a motion w'as unanimously passed recom- i ::::: I mending to the Council that all future secondary streets : ::;I: ;;I:* ; have a 82' right-of-way with a 48' curb to curb travelway, i p:: i with sidewalks contiguous to the curbs; excepting that : . 4:: ; portion on Tamarack Ave. from Pi0 Pic0 Dr. to Park Dr. i ::::; i which will have a 68' right-of-way with 48' paved curb to ; Ii:;1 Ill:' ;,:I: : curb width. $1;: I( t ;:!:: i Discussion was given as to 62' right-of -way on secondary i ;:,'I I :.I: I streets. I I ;::I: I ;::;I 14 t I I I I I i ZONE CLASSIFYCATION OF CERTAIN DESIGNATm ; Bierce r; ;x: 1: I a & I i:::: ;:::: I D3? CRmSBAD AMEXDING OAXDIINANCE No. 9060, : Guevara i : :xi ! i CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PBOPERTY FROM I Bierce :xi !x: i I I I 1 ::;:: :;$:' i by the Council: I :I: I 1 I t I I I I I I I ii 'b I 1 i I I I I t b I I i Cmn. Bierce stated he was certainly in favor of this :;!I! : design. He pointed out this is quite an economical factor i :;;:; i when property has to be condemned. Ee has talked with i :; ;:I!: I Cmn. Etzghes stated it is not the obligation of the property! I ;:a:: ::::: I Mr. Pedley, Parks and itecreation Commissioner, re- I : ::;:: :'I:: I Southern California that has done away with parkways. : ;:I:: :I i talked about for a year. If too wide a street is constructe$ ;: 1::: I I :+;; :;I i parkways the trees, utility poles would have to be placed I ("I I ;:::: I:*, I I :;:it I 11: ; property owners on Harding Street and they do not want ; $,:I i parkways. I :::;: I I 4 1 I ;::I: : owners to keep the parkway up, therefore, he would go : /::; $1:: i I I ::::I ::,:I i along with Cmn. Bierce's thinking. I quested the Parks and Recreation Commission be consider:- ::::; : ed in this planning. He knows of no other community in i I!::: : MS. GENE PIEBCE, stated this is something he has : ::::: ;I,,, i then it will take many of the trees away that now exist in : ;:If1 ; the city. ::: 4: *I : The City Engineer pointed out that if you do away with i ;:::; 1::1; : on the inside of the sidewalk. I ! Cmn. Neiswender requested this matter deferred until the i ::;:: i next meeting. I ::::; i Mr. Frank Devore, representative of the San Diego Gas I ;:::; : & Electric Co. stated they have a problem with a 62 * stree#. I(* ;;::I I However, it has been worked out satisfactory in new stree:s. I;':: *o;!l I ! !:ti: I I #I I t 1 I I ::i:i I I I $ I I +:: I t I I I I I i I I I I l I' \\ '\ .\ ', '\ .\ , \,', \ ' ' * I t 1 '%, \,,'\, "\:8\"8 1 3 c I -7 - I '\, '\ '\\ \\ '\, '*, 1 : N a me '., '$$, "., '%\ $ i of .$\o', 8 '$% * I ,?&?**, 2, '?& i Cmn. Bierce stated this would only be for new streets. i I!!! I 1 I :;:: I Cmn. Guevara stated he favored parkways, as he felt they: :a:: ;::: I were a safety factor. I I ;:I: I I ::i; i The Mayor requested this matter be carried over to the i ;:I ;::I :; : next meeting and asked that all the members make an in- i '::;: i ves tigation. 8 I ::;;: I I * I ::;I: i Mr. Pedley requested the Parks and Recreation Commis- : :;;:: i:;!: ; sion be considered in this matter, and also the Garden i ::;;I 11 i Club. $ I I : iii:i ii::; 'I i The Council requested the Parks and Recreation Commis-i : sion to present their report in time for the next meeting. i ;:I:: I I ;I::: ! (b) Memorandum from the Planning Commission re: i i:;:: i Washington Street. Memorandurn from the Planning 1 ::::: t 1*111 ; Commisslon dated July 27, 1962, stating that at their i $4: ;;:SI i meeting of July 24, 1962, the subject of the development : 1:::: : of Washington Street from Tamarack Ave. to Cedar Ave. i *I :,::; 81 I was discussed. By a unanimous vote of the Commission ; :::,I i it was recommended that the City Council take appropriat4 ;:;:: ,I:', $':: I action to initiate a street opening and improvements of I i Viashington Street from Tam-arack Ave. to Cedar Ave. ; 4:;: :I1 I I I :;::; i By motion of the Council it was agreed that this street be i Guevara : :xixi ; I Ill i added t~ the Engineer's list of projects. : Bierce K i :x; : i McPherson : 1 !xi i I I i Neiswender I 1 !x; i I I I Bughes ; : :xi ; I I ::::I : The Mayor declared a short recess at 8:45 P. M. The i ;::I: I I + I ::a ::i $8 * I I $1'8 1::: ; Garfield Street and the A. T. & S. F. Railway Co. westerly i Ia :;::: I I 88 :""""""""""""""~""""""""""""""--~"""~~""""""""~":"~"~~~ i Member .e@,-$%< I I I I '1; I 1 1% t I I I r .i t1) ISfi I I I I I i meeting reconvened at 8:55 P. M. i I ::::; i ENGINEERING: I i (a) 1911 Act Proceedings on proposed Assess. Dist. i 2:;: ir, i No. 1-1962 - Improvement in Chinquapin Ave., between : t;;:i i right-of-way line. 8 I ::::: ! I ::::: i The Council was informed some of the property owners in i ::;;; : this area have requested street improvements for this : ii::: 1' i portion of Chinquapin Avenue. I I :;:i: \ The City Attorney presented the following resolutions to i :::I' I commence proceedings under the 1911 Act: I I :I;:, 1 1 I:;,; esolution NO. 840. A msaurrcm OF THE CITY i Guevara ;X; ;X: : :;;:I UNCIL OF TSE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPOINTING i Bierce ; i ;x: I i PEASCN TO PXEPAM3 ALL PROCEEDINGS FOR pro- : McPherson I : :x! : : posed Assess. Dist. No. 1-1962, was adopted by title i Neiswender: :x jx: i i only and further reading waived. : Hughes : : :xi i I I I I I I I I t ;:I:: :i::: ': I I I) 1 8 I :a:*l i Resolution No. 841. P- dESGLUTION OF THE CITY i ;; 1::; I i CITY OF "tAIELSBAD APPOINTING : ;::;: ;tl:8 i SIBLE FOR PREPAitATIQN OF TBE EXGINEERING : 8:;: ::,,; i:::; i ENGINEER OF WOBK AS THE SUFENNTENDEST OF i Bierce 1 $;:Xi : i -As ENGIMEEg oF WoaK, DESI(;NJATt ;;;i: i ING ENGINEER OF WBIWC AS THE PERSON &ESPON- i ::a:: : DOCUMENTS, ASSESSMENT DUG"S, ASSESSMENT : i a0LL AND WARRANT; DESIGNATING THE ENGINEER I ::::; I OF WORK TO SUPEKVISE ALL WCEGK; APPOINTING : Guevara i ; :x: ! : STREETS AND FIXING COMPENSATION FOR SERVICE$McPherson i i !x: i i for proposed Assess. Dist. No. 1-1962, was adopted by : Neiswenderjx: :X! : ; title only and further reading waived. i Xughes : : :x: i 1;11 I I I I I I :;;:: I I I 1 I:::: I I : I ;:::: I I I 1 :::;: & a I :ii:i I I 1 I *I ::;:; 11 I :!::! I I I t I I I 1 '\" . 8, '\ ". ', ' '\ ' I 1 I I I ',, 8, '8 ',',.,'\\ 13 F I I I '\ \*,", 8\, y., 1 t t N a me' x,, ',$\ " '.&* I : of .,b',@, 2 '?+ .%$@, =, Y% I : Member ,p ,o \p. '8*.c"$?-\& P*4 - 4 ;~""""""""""""""~""""""""""""""""""""~""~~~-""-""-"---------~ : I t I ;;I*: i Resolution No. 842. A dESCLUTION OF THE CITY I 1::;: : CClUNC& OF THE CITY OF CA3LSEAD DIdECTIMG : Guevara 1 ix;xi : !;;I: 1 i PREPALtATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND! Eierce k: ;xi I1 ; I DESIGNATING ENGINE338 333 PiiEPAilE PLANS, . for : McPherson I : :x; i i proposed Assess. Dist. No. 1-1962, was adopted by title i Neiswenderi i !xi ; : only and further reading waived. i Zughes ; i ;xi i I ::p: : (b) Status report of Engineering Projects. The City I ::::': i Engineer presented a status report on projects being undei- ::::I : taken by the Engineering Department, consisting of nine : i:::: i pages, which included Public Works, Streets and Water I ;I::; : Department. PL suggested priority for these projects was : ;I!:; i indicated on the report, and the City Engineer requested t$e ::pi : Council to study this report and if they wished to maky an$ :!!:I :I changes in the priority suggested, that they notify the ; ::;:; .: Engineering Department. J I::!; t $;IS I 4 I pv: I lo( : State Street report: At the previous meeting the Engineer! ::;:: i bg Department was directed to submit an estimate of the ; I:*:: #:;a : cost to rehabilitate State Street from Elm Ave. north to : :::I: i Carlsbad Blvd. * 8;:: i The City Engineer informed the Council to improve this i !;I:; 11 i street on an interim basis, which would include removing i :::;; 1;;1 ; some of the worse areas of the cement, put in a leveling : ::p, I course, and then place hot plant mix over the existing coni ;;I:' ; Crete, the approximate cost would be around $10,000. He; ::*1; 11::: i pointed out that as long as the drainage is not taken care i @ti;; ; of the concrete will move, therefore, this method of re- ; I:, I i::;: i habilitation would probably last two and at the most five ; ;;::: ; years. A rough estimate was also made as to a full pavini :I:;: i job and it would run approximately $33,000, plus the re- i ;ii;i : mod of the concrete would cost approximately $15,000. ; :::it i An estimate was not made for a proper drainage system. 1 ;It ;:I:: : ed in street and road materials for the fiscal year. There: I should be $25,000 left in this fund for rehabilitation of ex-: In 1; : isting streets, such as patching, spandrels, seaiing, etc. : ::;;I $:': i Between $2500.00 and $2000.00 will be used for Jefferson i !:/a ;:: : Street between Pine Ave. and Elm Ave. I l'l:a 1 1;'l; I I 'I:;; i The question was asked by Cmn. Bierce if the 15C tax fundi l)t( lItlI i for Parks and Boulevards could be used for some of the i ::::I : items. The City Attorney informed the Council the funds ; ::;I: i may be used in some instances. 8 I ::::I i It was the concensus of the Council that State Street should: :Is ;be placed in top priority, and the Engineering Department : :pi: J was instructed to commence work immediately on this i @I '1; ;project. It was agreed that the entire project be done by i iii!; ; contract. I I p::; '*l; i The City Engineer informed the Council at the next meet54 a:::, I;::: ; he would like to make a recommendation as to how to ac- I I 11: : complish these various engineering projects. At this time! ;:' s::: 1 he would like to recommend that the City use outside help ; I:::; ":: :in regards to legal descriptions. The City Manager was : ;:p1 18,:: :instructed to employ outside engineering help when needed.: ;ip; t I ;:!:; i LIBdA&Y: * I I' 1:;:: I 6 ;;:;I i (a) Contract with Library Architect. The City Manager; ;::;: :informed the Council the City Attorney and he were in- I I ::r;i jstructed to meet with Mr. Melvin, the Architect, and Mrs.: ;:::I :Cole; the City Librarian, to discuss a form of contract. A f ::;:: :!:&I 'I !meeting was held and a contract has been prepared by the i :Architect. The City Attorney reviewed the proposed con- : 1:;:: :::i: jtract €or the Council. Mr. Melvin was present and in- !:::: ;formed the Council the schematic plan referred to in the i ,:;I: icontract will be for financing purposes only. Then when ; ::;;; I :a I;{:; I I 8 I ::;:; 'k '1 ' I :(::I I -8 - , s'. ' I 8 4 1 1 I ' 1 +i: ;::;: I I I I :::;: I The City Engineer pointed out there is only $35,000 budget'- .. I:::, :I**; ;:!:I I :::;I I I I 1 "ii; ;::;: ,I I I I I 1 I I $1 I I .I 4 I I 1 I ,!!c! I " I I' I l 8, '8 -* '\ '\ 8 I I I I I 8, '\,'., '\, '\ '\ I I I I I ', .. ' \, '.,q 3 [ I -9 - 1 i N a me '*%, 't%,, %,. '? ! : of '\ \\\'*\\ 8' \8 ', ? \+: -~ '.e. :o' .( &, I : Member .T$$p&% ,O~O..P$?\ ; """""""""""-""""""""""" - """"" -"" """ "- "-"; "" """"""".-".,-~ I I i:!! I the final stages are commenced, it behooves the Council i : and the Commission to make all changes on the prelimi- : ::;: i nary plans. I ::;I I I ::;: i After consideration by the Council, by motion of the ; Guevara ; :x:x: ::I: ! Council the City Manager was authorized to sign the con- i Bierce sr: :xi I tract on behalf of the City of Carfsbad, i McPherson i i ' !x; :ai: b I;;: I I I I I I I : Neiswenderi : ;xi I 0 I Hughes 1 : !x: I 1 1 :I ,?t:i I i T&.AFFIC SAFETY: I I ;'II' ! I ::::I '! tI I 8 I i" i (a) Stop signs at the intersection of Valley St. and i Oak Ave. Memorandum from the Chief of Police was prei Ill ::I: : sented, recommending that stop signs be placed at the i 1;11 : intersection of Oak Ave. and Valley Street. These signs : I would stop east and west bound traffic intersecting Valley I I Street. The City Engineer concurs in this recommendation. i By motion of the Council the City Attorney was instructed i Guevara $ I ;xi ti i to prepare an ordinance requiring east and west bound i Bierce : Ixjx: I traffic on Oak Ave. to stop at Valley Street intersection. : McPherson : : :xi I ;:I:; l8;:i :;:; I:!: !::I ;I:; I $'I 'I I I I I t I Neiswender i i !x: I I : Hughes : : ;xi !I I i NNv BUSINESS: ! I I I I I I;;;, ::Ill I !I:!! :it:: i (a) San Diego Pipeline Co. re: Application for franchihe. $18' : A letter concerning this matter was read under corresponq- ;::: I ence. The City Attorney presented the following resolu- : 1;:; : tion for the Council's consideration: I i::: I 1::; ! I ::!I :1i:1 1)' I : Resolution No. 843. A iEESULUTIQN OF THE CITY i I UPJCIL OF THE CITY OF CAALSBAD DECLArtING : 4Bi ';i: : !#I! 1:: i ITS INTENTION TO GitANT A. FhANCHISE TO SAN : i DIEGO PIPELINE COMPANY FOR THE XCGRT TO CO4- : STaUCT, MAINTAIN, OPEL~ATE, REPAIi3, dENEW ; i AND L~EMOVP: PIPE LINES FOR THE TAWSPO~~TA- : : TION OF OIL, GAS AND OTHEi3 SUBSTANCES THEAEi i OF IN AND ACBGSS PUBLIC HIGHNAYS IN THE CITY: Guevara t k:x; : OF CARLSBAD; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FQ& A i Bierce i HEAitING TIIEREUN AND PdOVIDING FOS THE PUB- I McPherson i : :x; ; LICATION OF SAID HEAJSNG was adopted by title only ; Neiswenderjx i :x! J and further reading waived. : aughes * ' :x: :ti; 0:;l 1: :::; :::: !;I: i::i : ; :xi I ' 8: 4 I #I . !I#. I 1 I I 1 , I I I : The City Attorney pointed out to the Council there were i i;::; i two methods by which the City could proceed with this i :':i: I franchise. She chose to use the proceedings under the ; :::: Il,I ! 1937 Franchise Act, as the City would commence receiv- i :;;: i ing their 270 upon completion of the project. I I :e*; 'El: I I ;::; i (b) First reading of Ordinance No. 8038, adding I I :ii: : section 10 to Ordinance No. 8009, regarding industrial i i:;; I .asd- commercial buildings in excess of $100,000. At the : :::; ;I:: : xaSt-fe-@aF meeting of the Council the City Attorney was 1 1:;; i instructed to prepare an ordinance requiring all plans for i ::;I i industrial or commercial buildings in excess of $100,000 ; :::: !::I : be approved by the City Planning Commission and the City: 1;;1; : Council prior to a building permit heing issued. I 1 :;;:; :tl:f t The City Attorney presented the following ordinance for a i I:::; i first reading by the Council: t *;;I; : Ordinance No. 8038. AN ORDINPXCE OF TXE CITY OkGuevara i ;x:xi { DING SECTIONS 10 AND 11, 3E@PABDING XNDUSTIUAL: McPherson i : :xi : OIZ COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS LN EXCESS OF $lOO,OOOi Neiswenderjx i :xi i was given a first reading by the Council. : Hughes ; I :x; I I I I I a I 1:::: I * ::::I I ::;:I 1 I I CAdLSBAU AMl3mING OiWINANCE hT0. 8009 BY AD- i Bierce : ; :x: 1 I I I I I I I I I :::: 6 I ; : ;.; I I :::: ::,I I I 4 1i;: 8 ix: i s I I I I i I 1' I * I I I t I \,\' \ I , p,, '\ '\ .'* ' I 1 4 I I I I 't, '%,'\\, 1 3 r 8 -10- I \' ., '\ '\, '\ '\ '\ I : ~a me ', '\$$$, %, ?& 1 : of '.$',08, '\ '?A ! \$!$+.&&,@ :"""""""""""""~"""""""""""""-""""""""""~~~"-"""""""""~~" ; Member ,o.g.,c',. e.. 'b, '\ " , , I \ \' I I I I i OLD BUSINESS: I s I 1 I I I I 1 i The following ordinances were presented for a second I : reading by the Council: I I I I I i (a) Ordinance No. 8037, amending Ordinance No. i 8035, regarding real estate sip. e l I I I I 6 I t I !:!I 1's: ;::: 1::: :;;; $;: :;;: li'' "t :Ill ))&I ;: :'#I f!!* i Ordinance No. 8037. AN OXDINANCE OF THE CITY i Guevara ; i~i 4 f No. 8035J REGABDING &EAL ESTATE SIGNS, was 1 McPherson; ; ;+ i given a second reading by title only and adopted. : Neiswender! i :x: 1 a I!!# 1-11 I AlVfENDING SECTION 1 OF OBDINANCE Bierce :xi ; q i I i Hughes : : :xi I I i (b) Ordinance No. 3060, amending Ordinance No. : 3027, regarding speed limits upon Carlsbad Blvd. I I I I I I 1 I ;;'I :::: 1:::; :::I; 'I I I ; Ordinance No. 3060. AN OLZDINANCE OF THE CITY I Guevara ;x I !x: i I OF CARLSBAD AM ENDING ORDINANCE NO. 302'7, : Bierce : : :xi 1 : SECTION 2, REGASDING SPEED LIMITS UPON : McPherson: : :x: / I CATtLSBAD BOULEVARD, was given a second reading by! Neiswender: !x i x! I : title only and adopted. i Hughes : I :x: ~ :ii;i I :!!I t I : (c) Ordinance No. 9132, reclassifying certain desig- i I nated property from Zone R-1 to Zone R-T. I I 1 I I I I;;*, :'I: I:;# ::I: r:j: i Ordinance No. 91 32. AN OSDmANCE OF THE CITY i Guevara ; :x ;x: : ! CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY FitOM ! McPherson i i :xi : i ZONE R-l TO ZONE R-TJ IN TEE CITY OF CAaLS- i Neiswenderx i :x; i : BAD, was given a second reading by title only and adopted, Hughes i i ;x; i I t !I!!l ; I-i ; v I CABLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060,' i Bierce ; i !x: : ! (d) Greyhound Bus Company's use of Carlsbad Blvd. i \ The City Manager informed the Council that he and the I : Chief of Police met with Mr. Jerome, a representative : i of the Greyhound Bus Co. Mr. Jerome state he would : t do everything in his power to have the bus drivers enforce: : the speed limit on Carlsbad Blvd. Signs would be posted i i in the Los Angeles office and the San Diego office. In- : I quirey was made as to rerouting the buses off Carlsbad i : Blvd. and Mr. ..Jerome indicated by this change it would : i cost the bus company $5,000 per year, as it would mean : : an additional 7 1/2 miles. The City Manager also inquire; i of Mr. Jerome as to what position the company would take: : if the City petitioned the public Utilities Cornmission to : \ have the buses rerouted and he stated they would oppose i : the application. Mr. Jerome also stated the company has 1 i a policy that when a driver receives a ticket for speeding ; : he has to pay the fine, and in turn the company also fines I i the driver. I I i The Police Department has been checking the speed of the i : buses and so far they have been conforming to the law. i t 8 I I I I i (e) Trash trucks on Carlsbad Blvd. The City of : Oceanside was contacted and they have rerouted their i trucks off from Carlsbad Blvd. I I I I I I I I I I I I i (f) Tamarack and Carlsbad Blvd. intersection. The i : work has been completed at this intersection andit seems : i to be working out qke satisfactory. I I I I I I I I CITY ATTO&FfEX'S dEPOi3.T: 8 I I 4 I I I i (a) Negotiations for right of way of Cannon Road. Mr. i I Ecke is in Alaska. The City Attorney stated she met with I i Mr. Cannon regarding the dedication of the right-of -way ; :of Cannon Road. Mr. Cannon informed her he has dis - : i cussed this matter with Mr. Ecke. A map was presented i :and the City Attorney pointed out the different ownerships ; !lying within this right-ofway. The State owns 85OS east i I I I I t t I I I I I 8 I I : ;;;;; !:::I *I ':::I iiy :'::I :;ill ;:ti; I::;: ::::; 1:::: ::::I :::;: ;::'I ::I,, I:, ;::a: :::ii ::::I *::'; I;;:: 411;; ::::I It 'I::; 1;' !:!!I 1I;'I :I,:; 111 1';;; ;L;l ::'I: lt:;l ::::; ::i:: ':I;; :::;I :2;; ::I:; i;::; 1:;:: l(1B1 @ii8i :II:I ;:'I: ;:::: 1::: ::I:; 4,:: ::: 1:::: :;a I ::: ,114 I( ;:;:: :::I ;; 1:'I; It!:; ::dl ::!:: :*I ,11:1 81 r D 1 I s 8 I I k 8 I I I t I -11 - I '\ \ -8 I I I I I ' " ' '8 * '. t " \' \' \' I Name 'h, : of i :"""""""""""""""""""~-""""""""""""""*"""~"""""" i Member I t I 1 i and west of the 101 Freeway. Each terminal end is 60' i : in width. It was the City Attorney's recommendation that : i legal descriptions be prepared of this needed right-of -way; : She would contact Mr. Ecke as soon as he returns from ; I his trip. Mr. Cannon feels he has a moral obligation to i : the people of Terramar to dedicate the portion owned by : I him, however, he would only be willing to give this land i : if the City can obtain the ramps. I : Also the San Diego Gas & Electric Co. was contacted and : i discussion was given as to the width the city would requirt$ I The name of the road should be made uniform. Part of i : the road is Terramar Drive and part is known as Cannon ; i Road. The City Attorney recommended that it be called i i Cannon Road. 0 I By common consent it was agreed that the City Attorney : : prepare the necessary documents to have the name legally! i changed to Cannon Road. I ! I I I I I I 1 I * 1 I I I I I I I I i I (b) San Diego Gas & Electric Co. lease on beach i propr?. A rough draft of a lease to the City of the area i i nort o the discharge plant has been received. The I : terms are almost exactly the same as that in the lagoon i i lease. Under the section of permitted uses she felt there i : should be a clarification as to commercial enterprises. 8 I After further discussion the City Attorney stated she would f contact the Gas Company as to a clarification of this sectiqn. : Cmn. Bierce inquired as to the tide lands, and the City i i Attorney stated she has been working back and forth with i : the State officials. a ; The Division of Beaches and parks was contacted and she ! i was assured by them that they have no objections to the i : La Costa Downs Beach being within the City limits of 4 i Carlsbad. i The City Attorney informed the Council she attended some! : of the sessions of the American Bar Association on City : i Government. I I I r I I I I I I I I I 1 I I t I I t * I CITY MANAGER'S ZEPOZT: I I I I I 1 ! (a) Planning Tecnnician. Five applications have been i i received so far. An ad has been placed in the August issu! : of Western City Magazine. P-lso notices were sent to the : i County and City of San Diego. I i (b) Sale of Police Boat. Authorization has been re- I ! ceived to sell the patrol boat. Under the OCD require- : i ments we have to receive three bids for the sale of the I I boat. A notice of sale has been placed in the newspapers. : I I I I I I 1 I I : (e) Report on off-ramps within the City of Carlsbad; i i traffic count on off-ramps at Elm Ave. and Las Flores Drj I A report was received from the State Uivision of HighwaysI : setting forth certain information as to the distances be- : : tween the off-ramps within the City of Carlsbad. Also : i included was a traffic count on the off-ramps at Elm Ave. I i and Las Flores Drive. i I I I 1 - " - I ; (dl Letter from State Division of Eighways - re: Re- i ; quest for City representation in State Highway planning. ; 'I At the request of the Council a letter was sent to the Statt I 31 : Division of IdXghways, requesting city representation in i i State Highway planning south of Carlsbad, and a letter has: : been received acknowledging receipt of our letter. I ! (e) Portable signals. The City Manager informed the i I I I I t I I I I I I I I 8 I I 4 I 8 k I ... 8 \' 'X\ 'A8 I 3 ', X, " '. "\ '\, \\ '. ' '%e. \. '\ '.5& '.O&&, a, \*4 $-$@,&! !iii '1 1::: iiii ;::; ?I:: ii:; :!I: vi! ii;: :::: :::: ii:: :;I: :;I: :I i; ::;: 4: 1; I :;I *I:;! ::;I: ::::~ ::::I ;;;l; 4, :ii: I4 1; I::: I;Jl !I:: :; ::Is :::: :;i: ill:: l;~ll :;::, ::::; ::::I ::;:: *I ;:::I 1: ;:::i :;i:; !:;I; ::I:: :I: 'i ;;;:: :ii:; 1; ::/I :';:: ;: 1::: ::::, ::p; :::;; $1:; I'I ;::ti 1:':: 'I::: :!!:; :::;: ::::; I:;:' $1:: iii:' ,41:: ;::I: 1:::: ::':' ~1;~: 114;l ;:::: :::;: ::::, ::'I: ::i:: ::::: ::::: :;::; I;::: ::::: ::;:: ::!I; $1 :; ii::i ::I ::; !;l:l ;:: '.+',Q\ X '?% """ ""_ 7-. :I 14 1114 'I:, 8 I :' IPIO I* '~I:J ,,:I I 14 'I,iI '::'J 11; I 81 411: I I < I I I I -12- 1 I \,\.'\. , '\ '\ ' ' '. I \'\ ,\8 I '\ ". \'. ', ', 8.~ 1 I I '\\ '\ 'x, "\\"."*\ 1 3 9 I : ~a me x,, '\$. '\,"& \&$. '\ %PA, I '+$$$,$J,+%+ :""-""""""""""""""""----"""""""""""""~"""~"""~"""~"~""""" ; Member ,o',o..p$?\,d I * ;:i:: -1 :::$ I I plus the batteries. I ;:;:: I I :!!I, 1:; ,-.- * I t : of I i Council he was in error as to the cost of portable sign&, i :a : and the approximate cost of a portable signal is $1,000, i 611 I t I i Las Flores Drive. Mr. Patske was in to see him regard-: ; ing his property on Highland Drive. The former Council i ! approved Las Flores Dr. as a secondary St. and Buena : : Vista Ave. as a local street. They also directed that a i i precise plan be prepared for Las Flores Dr. In making : : Las Flores Dr. a secondary street Las Flores will be i I rerouted, and will necessitate taking a portion of Mr. I I : Patske's property. Mr. Patske's is asking that the City i i take steps to purchase his property as soon as possible. : : The City Manager informed the Council there is money in i i this year's budget for this project. 1 I i By common consent the City Manager was instructed to i : commence negotiations for the purchase of Mr. Patske's i I property. t I i Overtime pay for Engineering Department Employees. : The City Manager stated under the present policy only i i emergency crews will receive cash for overtime worked i ; on a straight time basis. The Engineering Department ; i employees have been working overtime, such as Saturday?, I on precise plans for secondary streets. Under the Gas ; ; Tax Funds the City is allocated approximately $2,000 for : : Engineering projects. The City Manager recommended 1 i where Gas Tax projects are involved that the Engineering : i employees receive cash remuneration for overtime worked ; on a straight time basis. I I 1 I ? I 1 I I & * I I t L I i By common consent of the Council it was agreed that the I : Engineering Department employees be allowed cash re- : i muneration €or overtime worked on a straight time basi s i i for Gas Tax projects. I I t I 4 t t" ;i::; :;:I! ::p: ::::; :;;:I :::I, *I ::::: i:: :: I;':1 ;::': :i:i: :;i:: ::I:: 4: :I, ::!I; 11;;: :::!I ::I:; 4:::; :::;: ::;;: ::I *I:! ;;!:: I::;: 141 1:;:: ::;:: :;;I: ::I" :I$: t'::; I@ ;:::: 1:;:: :::;I !r 1::i: :x:; 11 :i::: :::SI 1,;:: :::p ::!!: :I Ill;, i Codification of supplements to the City Code. The Council i ; was informed that Mitchie Publications have been codifying i the supplements to the City Code. Under contract we are : : to have two supplements codified during the year; howeverj i they have been over six months doing this last supplement; : and after making several phone calls and writing to them, i i they cannot give us a definite answer as to when we may i : receive this supplement. I i i The City Manager was instructed to send a letter to Michi{ i Publications Co. regarding the delay in their service. I I I I I 1 I & : "JXFICATION OF BILLS AND FAYROLL: ! I I I 1 I 6ii:I :::I; ::;:: :;:I@ ::4: I' 1:::: ::::: i:::; 81 I::;, i:::: :J::; l!!l! ii;:; 1:i:: 111'1 !l,!l i;::: ::::I l!!l! b' i Ratification of the payment of bills was given for the i Guevara i ; ;;'I; i general expenses of the City in the amount of $20,064.46, : Bierce 1x; :xi : I and for the Water Department in the amount of $8,626.68, i McPherson! ; i x: i i for the period July 17, 1962 to August 7, 1962, as CertifiedNeiswender: : :xi I : by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing i Hughes ! :x :x: i i Committee. I I ::::; 'I : ikatification of the payroll was given for the second half i Guevara i : ;xi \ i by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing i McPherson : 1 :xi i i Committee. ; Neiswender! k :x; l ;x: ; : of July, 1962, in the amount of $17,200.13, as certified : Bierce ;: 1 ; :x: 1 I ' i Hughes ?I 'x; 1 t I ! I!#* I ADJOURNMENT: I I 1 4 ! 8.11 1111 .!:! $*I 6 t ! By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at lO:54 P. l@ 1::: ;:ti 1 ! :!I: : ! Respectfully submitted, I I I $ * I I I ;;I1 I I' I I I :i;: I I :;;: I I ::e: :!:: i Deputy by Clerk 6 I :ii: I 1 :::: :I:: ;:/ I I * I I & I I ! *!a: