The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1962-08-21; City Council; Minutes,> -1 * I I : bt.~Y UF CAi.LSEAD , 8,'8 \ ' ' I *, \, '\ '8, '*,8'8 .* 8 148 : Minutes of: em COUNCIL (aegdar Meeting) i ', '\, *\ '8, '\, '* i Date of Meeting: August 21, 1963 i ~a me x,, '*?& ', '$3. 8, \ ', x, '\ ' : Time of Meeting: 7: 00 P. PJi. ; of '+p, 8\,8F+*8 I Place of Meeting: Council Chambers i Member 8868$&?..e,$ ,o~~.,pQ @ .... ,"""L--""--"-""""""~-"-"--""""~"""~"""""""""~~""""""."""~""""~ I I ''1;: :;' ::: i HOLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Guevara, I :; i Bierce, McPherson and Neiswender. Cotlncilman Bughesi 11;:: :::I: i was present at 7:07 P. M. Also present was City Manage: :::I: 1 : Slater. City Attorney Eetts absent. I ::;I: * I I :::I' I :*:;#I ::I : ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given, I I I ii:::: ! INVCCATfON was offered by Councilman Bierce. i ;::::: I I I :::I:: : APPrZOVAL OF MINUTES: I .::sgl I 1 I ::;::: 11 114 I::;:: I I i Mci'herson: ; i x' i i I I : Neiswender: 'x : xi : i I I I I I I I I lll,i( ltl;l' i (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of A.ugust 7, -1962, i Guevara ; ; i x: ; ; I were approved as submitted. : Bierce !xi : x! : : 1 ;I1 i COiiiZESFONDENCE: ;+i;! #!I* I I 1 I 1s 1 I 1 11 * I I i (a) Amedio Fiore - re: Painting of diagonal lines - I I ' Carlsbad Blvd, Letter dated August 4, 1962, from 1 -0 Fiore requesting the City to give early considera: i tion to the painting of diagonal parking lines on Carlsbad ; i Blvd. in front of the Melrose Pizzeria, in order to have i i parking conformity along the boulevard and bring about a ; : greater degree of space utilization. i The City Engineer suggested that all lining be withheld : i until Carlsbad Blvd. has been relined for traffic, 1 By common consent it was agreed that this project be I : withheld until Carlsbad Bfvd, has been relined for traffic I i purposes. The City Manager was instructed to answer ; : Mr. F'iore's letter and advise him of the Council's deci- i I sion. i (b) Morris L. Sims - re: Parkways. Letter dated I s ; August 9, X , from Mr. and Mrs. Morris L, Sims, I I expressing gzir desire for parkways. They also inquired : as to why the hazards of fire have not been cleaned up or I ; why people have not been forced to get them cleaned up. : ; They pointed out there was a 4 112 acre inferno bordering! i their property, which, if a fire started they would not ; : have a chance. They asked that prompt action be taken I i by the City to clear this hazard. t I I 1 1 I i I I I 8 I I I I 1 1 * $ I I 'I I I I I I I i The City Manager informed the Council the owner of the ; I t property had been contacted and it will be cleared this i i week-end. i By common consent the letter was ordered filed. i fc) Mrs. John J. Batista - re: Street Improvements. * t i Letter dated August 11, 1962, from Mrs. John J. Batista,! i stating she would like to offer her opinion and suggestions: : in regards to the improvement of Sarding Street, 3er I i property is located on Pine A ve. , the dead end portion of : i the street, and the property owners on this street can see: : no reason for sidewalks. The street definitely needs re- : i surfacing, but not until the water lines are repaired. As i ; far as curbs are concerned she suggested the same type i i of curb that is used in the Highlands and the Seacrest ; : area. There is a definite need of sidewalks on Eardi.ng : I in the area of the Pine Avenue School, however, she dia ! ; not favor having ffarding Street widened so as to encour- i i age the racing of cars. In closing Mrs. Batista asked : : that the Council consider the individual budgets of the i I property owners as well as their own. I ! By common consent of the Council the letter was ordered I i filed. I I I I I I I 3 I I I I I I 1 8 I * I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I :*i;~: a::::1 i::l:: ;:;::: ;::;;: 4;::: :::::: ;;:fI; 1) ;: :ii: 1::;:: ::;;i; ;:If:: :I 1;:q :'I::; $1 :::;I: ;::::; ;!:I:# ::81" 1;::: ::I::: ;:::I' I( I 4;: ;;:lll :::;*a 1::::: 4;:;: 8: ::p,1 ::':;: ;;:#I* :;i;ii #::I:: :::;I1 '1 8 ;::a:: ;::::: +;:: :::'I; I* ;;:;:; :;:;;I 't i::::! I::::, i:: 1': ::;,Il ::: ;:;;;: #I:;:; ;#;;I: ::I I::!:; 1s ::i::: :i:::* ;8;;l; 11;; it::;: :::::: :i'fll :::: I::::: ;:I :ii: li:::; 1;1 :i:::* iIiI:l 8: i::::; I::*:; ::;:;, 1:; :': ;:I::: ;::::: 1;;;;: :I I ';* :I, :ll;l~ ll*;l; 1;~l;I I :I: :*I1 11 '*'I :!!If: I I f;::;! I I I I I t I I I -2 - I I '* ' I *' 8' I I , I . I Name ; of I I :""""""""""""""""""""-""""""""""""""""""""""- 1 Member I I : (d) Mrs. Jonn L. Wick - re: Parkways. Lettey dated ! i' August 13, 1962, iromn/irs.Sof-rna Vi.rck, st$ci.ng she i i would like to see plznning in the City to inelude parkways i : and trees planted in same. If pzrkways are not feasible, ; i it should be mandatory that trees be planted on lot side : I of sidewalk. Properly planned Carlsbad could be the sholc; i place on the coast and trees are a must. I I I I i The Council requested the letter filed. I I I I i (e) F. Vi;. Devore - re: Utility pole location. Letter i : dated August 14,. 1962, from Frank Vd. DeVore, Govern- i i mental itight of Ray Supervisor, stating this letter wss in: : reference to recent discussions by the Council regarding i I the placement of utility poles behind the sidewalks in streqts : that are to have contingeous curbs and sidewalks. In this ; i regard he set forth some of the problems that would be i I connected with an established policy by the City. Mr. t i DeVore further stated the Company had no objection to ! : installing poles behind the sidewalks where the dedicated : i street right of way is wide enough to save them from the i ; obligation of acquiring additional private rights of way, ; i and in this regard they would be pleased to cooperate if I : the city is desirous of installing combination curbs and : i sidewalks within such street rights of way. t I I I i By common consent the letter was ordered filed. I I $ I i (f) Notice of Nearing - re: Proposed San Diego Unified i ! Port District, TcCouncil was in€ormed that a Notice ; i of Hearing on the proposed San Diego Unified Port Distric# i has been received, which will be held on Tnlxrsday, Sep- : ; tember 6, 1962, at 9: SO A. M., in the chamber cf the i i Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego. I I i The Mayor stated this Council has adopted a resolution I ; opposing this proposed District, however, he would like i I to have the CiQ represented at this hearing. The City I : Manager has stated he would appear. b I I I I I i The City Manager recommended that the City Aitorney i i also attend this hearing. 1 I I I i By common consent of the Ccpcil it was agreed that the I : City Manager and the City Attorney attend this hearing on i i behalf of the City of Carlsbad. .- I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OBAL COR'IMUNICATIONS: $ I I I I I ! I Md. DONALD BMGGS, JrE., stated that after a hearing i i on the extension of a street, namely, Tamarack Ave, , & i held by the Planning Commission, the progosed extension ! I was denied. After the hearing was closed, action was i i taken by the Cornmission to have Tamarack Ave. made a I I secondary street with a 68' right of way Zrmn Zig'nland ; I Dr. to Park Dr. There is no such pmposed street from I : Highland Dr. to Pa.rk Dr. , and h.e certair11-y Aid not feel : i that it was legal for the Planning Commission to take ac- i I tion on a matter after the hearing was closed, sild he : would like to have this portion of the minutes st.ricken fro* : the Planning Commission miautes of July 24, 1W2. I I I Cmn. Bierce addressed the Mayor and statsd he did not : : think the Council had the prerogative to correct the Plan- i i ning Commission's minutes, I $ I I I I I I I t i Ma. BiiIGGS stated if this is the case he would then like : : at this time to make an oral protest as to the legality of i I this action by the Commission after the hearing was closed, : and request that the City Attorney check this matter out. i I I I I I 1 I I I ! I I I I I I I 1 I I t I I I ', -, -\ ' '\ x '. ', 8, '\ "%>', ,\, 8, ',.'b' *, '\ 1 4 f ', ',*\ ', 'a,, '.,+x$* ', ?% \O&, ;. ;?&, $$@,$3@@, \:::I :I::: ;;;;: I::{: :!::I 81 ;I::: *;fl* 1,:;: :;'I; ,I:;, !:;I: :i::: I ,:I :ii:i ;#I' );I:: :;i:i 1:::; I:::: !I::: '1 I:;;! ;;Ill 11;:: ::I:! ::I ::I:; &I;:: ii:;: ;I:#: ii':i :::I, I1 I i;::: Il:$ :::;I ::;I; ::a;' pi;: I:::: :I::, 1: :::e: !:I1# I:: ;: 11 Id:; ::!;I '111 :: :::I: $ I;1 t:::; :;;:I ;::;; :!:I1 l*l ::::: ":: Iiii! I1I11 +!: t:::: ::I:: I:::: I;;:: a1 :i::: I$ ::Il, :;; i:::; ;::;I :;:;; $8 ,I::: ,I::: ;::It I1 ,:::I ;I 1: I:!:; ::;I: ;*I:: ;:::I ;::I: :;::I t-:; ;:I /::: ::::I :::I, ::; 1:::; ::I:l 'I:*: ::;:a ;::i: .""""" "" "" '(1) *I :I::, 11'1: a:;!: 1:;s: ;,,:I $I:& :el:!. ::::: ::::; 1'; I* !::#I ;< ,!I! 11 1 I I I I 1 I 1 \\ -, -, b - I I ', \' , '\ '\\ \'\ ','+, ' 1 42 I I I Name '\.,?&, ',, '9%' I I : of -?d& 4, &%&, ;:::I *la:: (11 @Il:: ;I::: :!;I; t1 I I I ;;::I 4111; :;I:' fi11:: 1 I&; ,; : I I ;la;! I ;:::: I - 3- :""""""~"""""""""""~"""~"""~"~*""--""--"~""-~"*,~~--"--""""----~---~ : Member @@,$+D : The City Manager informed the Council a memorandum : ;e,:: i from the Planning Commission regarding the Master Stre4t I&*( i Plan will be presented later in the meeting, I I :!&I i MH. HARRY MC EJLILLAN asked if there was going to be f ; further discussion on this matter, or if it was to be dis- ; 1 cussed now. t I i Mr. McMillan was informed this matterwould be discuss-: ; ed later in the meeting. 1 : PUBLIC HEAMNG: I ', '\ *\ " '\ '* '\ ''& * I I '1 11; I ::: &I:: 1 I 11 I 0)') I * $1 '11 I I I 81 Il I I*!#! I I i (a) Reclassification of certain property located on the i i south side of Magnolia Ave. between Jefferson St. and I I : bosevelt St., Parcels 2 and 3, Book 204, Page 280, i Assessor's Office, from Zone 8-1 to Zone a-3. Applicanb I I t I I al V. and Douglas Law. I I I f ! i The Mayor announced this was the time and place fixed fo6 i hearing all protests and objections in regards to the pro- i I posed reclassification of certain property located on the ; j south side of Magnolia Ave. between Jefferson St. and i I Soosevelt St. t Parcels 2 and 3, Book 204, Page 280, I i Assessor's Office, from Zone R-1 to Zone R-3, i The Clerk reviewed the application. Also the Affidavit of :: i Publication was presented, certifying that proper notice ; ; had been given. ! Resolution No. 255 of the Planning Commission was read i i wherein they recommended reclassification of said proper: : I * I I I I f I I I I i tY. 1 I c 11;s. ;;I:: ;!!:! :;I:: :,:'I ,:*:I :;::; ::::I SI!!: ;;;;; ::I:; 1 11) $:; :,I:, *:;*: ::I:' '11 ::::I :' 1:;:: ;;;:; ::::; 1:::; :!!;! ; ,:;:: 1 as :;i'i l:I SI!': I:::; ;;I:* I I 1 ! The Mayor requested the Clerk to read all protests or i i objections that had been filed. The Clerk informed the : : Council that up until the time set for hearing no written i I protests had been filed. * I 8 ! vi'; I'::: (It ;;:;* 11;;: i:::: 1:;:; ;!/I I!* i The Mayor announced the City Council would now hear frob : the Applicant or any persons who wished to speak in favor i I of the proposed reclassification. i Ma, ARCHIE KOYLE, 834 Piekering, Whittier, stated i ! he was the owner and builder of "The Village", which ; I adjoins this property, and he is in hopes of building a i i convalescent home on the subject property, which will ; i cost an additional $550,000, plus additional two-bedroom { : homes of approximate $350,000. An ?pplication is before: i the FHA now for this additional improvement, however, i : this reclassification is necessary before any action can : i be taken on the loan. ; The Mayor announced the City Council would now hear i i any oral protests or objections concerning the proposed i ; reclassification. There were no oral protests or objec- ; I I I I 6 * I 4 i::i: ;:I:: 1;::; ;;;:I !I,!: i:::; "I ;::ai tp:: ;::*I 1:: !:;I, $(I ::/# ::: i:':: /;:I ;::I: :::ii ~::~l 8% !#I!# i;i;t I;::; :e: :;a:; !&;!I i tions, I I f I I I I I I 4 i The Mayor declared the hearing closed at 7:37 P. M. I '1". ::I:: ::::: 1:::: ::!I: I I I After discussion by the Council the following resolution i i was presented for the Council% consideratioa: .I f I ;;;si :::I, 4: I:::: .l.!I i Resolution No. 844. A ;EESOLUTION OF THE CITY i * IL OF Tam CITY OF CAa3tSBAD ANNOUNCING J ,;'" i FINDINGS AND DECISION REGARDING CHANGE QF : Guevara i ix:xi I 1,;:: : ZONE CLASSIFICATION OF CEaTAIN DESIGNATED i Bierce $: !x: I i PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD FFIOM ZONE McPherson: : :xi : : R-1 TO ZONE 8-3, was adopted by title only and further: Neiswender: ; ;x: i i reading waived. ; Hughes 4s : : ;xi ; ;I1 .I ;:;:i t t* 1 * I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I s * fli'i I I I ;;f'l I ;L:I :I; I 4:;; I I ::::: I I ::I;; I 4 1:;:: I f 1'1 !ll!l I .,,\.- I \\ '\ ' '8 '\ " I I I I I ', ',,'\, '\ '\\'*\ 143 I t I Ha me \\, '\?& '*, 'qh, I ; of *,+ +??\, ' I I '?*@.+,G%$ ~""""""""""~"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""" 1 Member ,~~\4..<n~p,o'. I I I i:: ;; :c:; I I :I;:: I I ::,,: ::!I; t -4- I >' \ '\ '\ \ 8 , \ 8 ', '\ '\ t 1 The following ordinance was presented for a first reading; : by the Council: : Ordinance No. 91 34. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY : &)I1 1 OF CAiELSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, t'81; ; Guevara : I xi $ ; i CHANGING CElhTAIN DESIGNATED PROPEitTY FSOM i Bierce !x! i 3 i : ZONE- 13-1 TO ZONE R-3, IN THE CITY OF CAitLS- ; McPherson: ; ; X: ; i BAD, was given a first reading by title only and further i Neiswende4 ; ; 4 ! I reading waived. ; Hughes I : i * i i PLANNING: ;::;: I :::I; 1 (a) Memorandum from the Planning Commission - re: i Master Street Plan. Memorandum dated August 17, 1962: 1:'11 ::::; ; &om the Planning Commission, concerning the Master i ::ir: : Street Plan, was presented, wherein it was stated that ; !:':: i certain revisions to the Master Street Plan were discus- I :;ti: :;:I: : sed at their meeting of August 14, 1962. The Secretary : ,l':: i was directed to advise the City Council of the changes I ;:::: i under consideration and invite the Council's comments. i 4::; ::;:; ; The changes under consideration are as follows; ? I !:#:I I 1 !!+ ! (1) Delete the proposed extension of Tamarack Ave. i IF i from pi0 Pic0 Dr. to El Camino Bed via West E-Iaven and : :x:; ; Chestnut Ave. as a major street. I :ip I I t I I ;fi 1 (2) Designate Chestnut Ave. from Monroe St. to El i :!:I: "1:; i Camino Beal as a secondary Street with 62' minimum : ;I1 ::I:: : right of way with a 48' paved curb to curb roadway width. I l'ii; ::*I: I 1 ;:::: ! (3) Tamarack Ave. from Pi0 Pic0 Dr. to Park Dr., I :!!;; i at a point approximately 1,100' south of the intersection : 81 ; of Park Dr. and Monroe St., be designated as a secondary: ::I:: I:i:: i street with 68' right of way with 48' paved curb to curb i I :i l:t : roadway width. I I I :I ;:ll: iii I I ,::;I i M3. DONALD ELEIGGS, JR,, was present and vigorouslg 8l:J: I opposed Item #3 of the proposal due to the fact he could i ::;:; : see no reason for dead-ending a secondary street at Bark \ ::;:: i+:: i Dr., causing a right angle intersection, the property I ;:: ! owners 2re not in favor of a secondary street and desire i ::#:I I;;:: ; Tamarack as a local street from Highland Ave. to Park I $1:: : Dr. A 60' street with 40' of pavement would be sufficient ! ;:llI I:; i to carry all traffic in this area. ~t was also his opinion i :!!:; : that Tamarack should extend south around the lagoon. Mr: :i::: i Briggs pointed out that two hearings had been held on the i ;*I;* i proposed route of Tamarack, and the property owners : *:;I; :;::: : voiced their objections at both hearings; further, he has i ::;:I i filed a tentative map €or a subdivision in the area of Park I ::;:: : Drive, and if a 68' street is allowed it would certainly put! I him on the spot. i Ma. HARRY MC MILLP!, stated he would not go into I : the previous arguments presented at the hearings held by : 1:::: i the Planning Commission; however, it seemed to him versf :;;I: i odd that after two hearings, which were held three months: ; apart, and fhe property owners vigorously opposed the : I proposed routes, that this matter is being brought up agaitk ::::: ; It was his feeling this extension would be forced upon the i i property owners. He asked that the Council consider the : ;:/I I:';! ; wishes of tk majority of the property owners in the area. i *I:;; I ;;)'I i Cmn. Bierce explained the first hearing was held by the / lll:1 : Planning Commission to consider an 80' right-of-way : ;:;'I i through the Highlands, and due to the protests registered, i i this was not adopted. The Council at that time requested : : the matter brought up again, and that a narrower street i i be considered. : During the discussion, Cmn. Bierce inquired of the City i 1 Engineer if it were important to have Tamarack a second-! I ary street when Chestaut is so close and is already desig-: 1's:: I I I I I I t ;!, I 9:: I 1 :#I;; I I f I I I I I (I'll ,111: I * ::::; I I i:::: I I I ::;ii :I,:: I:l1 i:;;; I; ;' 1;;:: i:iii 1 I ::;I: 11::; ;::I: ;I::: :::I: I;:* I I i:,:: I t I :;I:: ::I4 ;:; :a 11;;; ;: ,I::: I I t ;:::: I I 1 I ;?;; II I I I i:::: I:(' '1 i I I I ! ! $!'I! I $ I I .' .. 8- I I 8, '\\"* '\\ 8, ', I I 6 I '\ \ \ \ > ' 144 I -5- ,' 8 I : of '.+T\P&\, '\ \*' \ %\ I \,L.,0\9\ +?y& I I \ \\ X\, '\ '\,'x8 I I i N a me' 8,. '\%\ \\, '\+ ~"-""""""""""""""""-"""""""""""~"""""""-~"""""""""""- i I Member \% I QL+\~ I . 7°F- \,o, I I I I I I I i nated as a secondary street. I i The City Engineer stated he was not in a position to answek : this question, however, Tamarack and Elm Ave. are the : i only through streets from the ocean. The Master Street i : Plan calls for two major streets. From a standpoint of : i simply serving the city, he felt it was only reasonable tha! : Tamarack Ave. extend through to Park Dr. It is not un- : i usual for a secondary street to be used as a feeder. I i MRS. JANE SONNEMAN, a member of the Planning Comf I mission, stated she felt we are losin&ight of the fact there i is a school in the area. There will be cars parked along i : the street, therefore, it is important to hold to the 68' : i street width. Also the street would not be dead-ending at I : Park Dr. as you would be able to turn either left or right. ; : Cmn, Neiswender asked about the area to the south and : i around the lagoon. i Mi%. MAX EWALD, Clairman of the Planning Commis - I i sion, was present and informed hte Council the Planning ; : Commission has requested the Engineering Departrrient I i to initiate a plan for a southerly route along the lagoon. i i Mr. Briggs stated he still would object to a 68' street as : ; he felt a 60' width was sufficient. i Cmn. Hughes stated he felt the Council was losing sight of! i what the Planning Commission has requested. All they i : have asked is for comments and if the Council concurs : ! with the changes under consideration. I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I i I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 8 I t I:;:; 1:;:: ;:::I ;::;: :::;: ;;;*I 4: ::::; :l;ll ::;:: ;:/I ;I::: 1:::: :;,:1 ::;:: i:::: I:':: i:::: 1:::: 1:::: I;::; :tl;8 $1 ;!!I! l;'li 1:::: 1:;;: :::I: :I::: ;Il:l 1:::: : ; ; t.: 1:::: ::,:I ::i:: ::I:: :;4:: ;I,;: :I I( l!!l! :i;:; I::;: I:::: 1:::: !I ::;:I 1;:I: ~l.~! + i By motion of the Council it was agreed that a memorand4Guevara W'' *: : ; be sent to the Planning Commission informing the Corn- : Bierce Jr: :x: i i mission the Council concurs with the three changes to the i McPherson I r p i i 1 Master Street Plan under consideration. :Neiswender : : :x i : I I I i Hughes ; !x?: : I I..I! ! ENGINEEitING: I I I I *. ;:;:I :!!:! I I 1:;:: 8; i 40' driveway for operating headquarters. Letter dated ::I:: i requesting approval of an additional 10 foot widening of : :: ::iii i for the driveway presented on August 3, 1962. A drawing: iy: i was presented with the letter of the proposed plan. :; ; tional 10 foot widening of the driveway as requested by : Bierce j, i :x: I I I : Neiswender i i ;x! i I I i Hughes I I :xi I I I ::+I: i PARKS AND lEECREATION COMMISSION: ::;:I I I ;It;: I :I::! i (a) Two appointments to the Parks and Recreation i ;:-I /::: : Commission. The Mayor requested this matter deferred i 'I i until the next meeting, and asked if any of the members ; !:I'1 4: ;::a, : of the Council wished to submit names. I 4: I t I i;::: ! Cmn, Neiswender submitted the name of Ray Leggett for i ;&:I4 ::::: I consideration. I 1:::: ::;I; : By common consent it was agreed that this matter be de- : I :;I:: I 4; I ferred until the next regularmeeting. 1'4 1:;:: I ;i: 1 (a) San Diego Gas & Electric Co. - re: Request €or I ''I:; I August 7, 1962 , from the San f)iego,Gas & Electric eo. i :::;; : the driveway, which is a variance from the final plans ! I:::: ;'$Il i By motion of the Council approval was given for the addi- i Guevara : :x :XI ; J the San Diego Gas & Electric Co. i McPherson ; ; :x: i I I I I I t I & ::::: ::::; I I II I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I ::;:; I NEW BUSINESS 8 I ::::: ;:I:: f (a) Resolution No. 845, Honoring 20th Anniversary 1 i ,l:Il ::::I I 1:: I I I t I;::: I a :I::' I t I I 1:;:; :!,!: I I t 1 I I I I I I I I ;I 11; 1 I 1 I I I 9 I *, 8, -\, '\ ' - I '\ \ , \ =,", I I \\\' * -6 - I I '\ '\ ' \\ '\,'\\ 14: I I : of \$$+ ,Q&@,$, 8, .PA *% ~""""--"-"""""-"-"""""------""-""~"""""""""""~;"~,"~""""~"""","" f Member $$Q,&\f&, \, '\ '\, '\ b x ' ,' I i N a me x,, 'x%., %, 83, I I 1 fll.1 i of Camp Pendleton. Letter dated August 14, 1962, from 1 i : Pendleton has played in the development of this area, a I : : Headquarters, Marine Corps Ease, Camp Pendleton, : i stating the 20th Anniversary of Camp Pendleton will be i ; observed next month at the base, and in the event the i i Mayor desires to take public recognition of the part I copy of the resolution adopted by the State Senate was i : attached for information. I I I ! I :::: :;!: ::I: :;;: I;:! ::i: :::: 'I -I :In; l:ll ::a: 11:; ::!I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I ! I i The Council was informed a resolution of the City Counci$ ; had been prepared for the Councilfs consideration, honor: i ing the 20th Anniversary of Camp Pendleton. ! CO'IJNcIL OF Ti33 CITY OF CARLSBAD, HONOfiING i j THE 20th ANNIVERSARY CF CAMP PENDLETON, I I C I 1 I I : Resolution No. 845. A SESOLUTION OF THE CITY : I ! was adopted by title only and further reading waived. r I ! I 1 t I I I 1 I I i (b) First reading of Crdinance No. 3061, amending 1 i : Ordinance No. 3032, Section 83. 1, requiring traffic to : i stop on Oak Ave. at Valley Street. At the prevlous meet- i : ing of the Council, in accordance with a request made by : I the Chief of Police, the City Attorney was instructed to i : prepare an ordinance requiring traffic to stop on Oak Ave.: i At Valley Street. The following ordinance was presented i : for a first reading: ! I I 1 i Ordinance No. 3061. AN CADINANCE OF TEE CITY i OF CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.. 3032, : SECTION 83.1 , BY ADDING SUBSECTION "w", RE- I QUL3ING TRAFFIC TO STOP ON OAK AVENUE AT f VALLEY STREET, was given a first reading by title onl$ i and further reading waived. i I I I I I I I I I I I I * I I 1 i OLD BUSINESS: I I I ;i;;; ::::I i:;:: $4: ::: Guevara ; :I i : 2 : Bierce :x: ;x: : McPherson; i : $ i Neiswended ix I fL: ; Hughes : It ; :x: : 111:i ::;I, :!I:# ::::; ::f:: ::::I :I::, 1;'l: i:::: 'l::l :::;: :::;: :I::; i:::: :i::; :*I Guevara , ;: :x! x! i Bierce : : ;xi : McPherson i i !xi i Neiswenderix: :x; , Hughes : ! :xi i :;;I! ;;I:' ,!::: i (a) Report on width of secondary streets and parkwaysj I i Cmn. Bierce stated that at the last meeting he made a : i request that a policy be established by the Council for i I secondary streets and parkways; however, after checking i ; around, it was his feeling that on all existing secondary ; i streets the personal opinion of the property owners should! ; be considered. On new secondary streets a standard ; : policy should be adopted. The Flanning Commission has : i requested that all future secondary streets be 62' in width! i with 481 of travel way, with sidewalks contiguous to the i : curb. i Cmn. Neiswender stated he had gone to considerable length i to make inquiries. The newspapers were very helpful. I : He received letters and many phone calls that brought to : I light many problems to be considered, i. e., if curbs and i i sidewalks are contiguous you have a utility pole problem, : ; and driveways could also be a problem, However, he i : would be in favor of considering each individual street at : i the time of improvement. I I 4 I * # 1 I I i After further discussion it was the concensus of the Councjl I i Cmn. Guevara inquired about the petition being circulated I i i Cmn. Bierce stated this was a prime example. He has : I i that on aU existing secondary streets each street should : : be considered individually. i for the improvement of Harding Street. I I r I I : * I I I I : contacted many of the property owners on this street, and i i he feels sure that if the plans are not given more consider! : ation this petition will fail. He suggested that due to the 8 ! fact Harding Street has an 80' right-of-way that it be made; ; a uniform width with 48' of pavement. This would give ; : 16' on each side which would be ample for sidewalks, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I iiii' ::I:: !::'I ;:::: :;::; ;:::: ::::: :;::I :t:tt 1:::: I'l:; :::;, ii':! :ti:: ;I 1:;; 1:::: ::::: I;::: ::::: 'd;! 1:;:; t:::; ::::; :::;: 11 $1 :#::I :I::! ;t:ll I;':; ;:ii: ::::I I f::;:~ :::::I :::::I ::::i~ 1;;1 :::::; 8; ::;:!I :: ;::I :!I::; :iiii 8: :ii;i :*I :I (11'1 )Ill ;l:ll: I;;::, :':::I ;; 8 l!;::: I I I I I * -7- I I \, '\ ', -b I I I '\\ '\\ ',, +:'\\ , '8 p 4 6 I ', '\.'x. '\ ',". 4 I I I 8. '1 I 1 t 1 I I :""""""""""""""""""""-""""""-""""""""""-:~ I i parkways, etc. Also he would like to suggest that the ; f small side streets be deleted from the district, except I i for the curb return, as they are dead-end streets and : ; the majority of the property owners do not want the im- i i provement. I i The Engineer pointed out it is normal to include I / 2 way I : back to Lhe next intersection in spreading the assessment. : i Many times if the properties are not included the owners I i want to know why. I : MR. GENE PIEiXE, stated he was a property owner on ! i Harding Street, and about a year ago he discussed this i i matter with Mr. Bierce. It was his opinion that Barding ; ; Street should be made a uniform width, and inquired of i i the Engineer why part of the street should be 56' in width. : i The Engineer informed the Council this policy was set by i : the former Council. 1 I Mr. Thornton, Assistant Engineer, informed the Council i i a petition is being circulated at the present time for the : : improvement of Harding Street by Mrs. Norman, and the i i property owners are being fully informed as to the im- ; I provement under consideration. If the petition is changed! i now, it was his opinion the property owners would lose : : interest and would not go along with any improvements. i I After further discussion it was agreed that this matter be i I deferred until the petition has been received from the : : bearer. I I I I I t I 1 I I t I I I I I t 1 I I I 1 I I $ I I 1 I Na me '-, '?&, \, ,pA '\ "&, of '="o.$, '. 'S' ',L '0 \ 9.4',++ Member $3'@,%.p.\6'. ::i:i ::::: ;:::: I::;: 4::: i;::: :;::I 11;;: I::;: ::ii: ::::: :*114 I:;I; :::i: ::; 1(181 ::I ii :::;i ::IBl ::; ::::; :i::; ::i;: i:::; 4::; I:: 11;; ::::I i:::; "It: ;::a, l:::I #I#;; :::I' :i;:: I:;;: I* ::'I; +;: ;I I' :::ii \..- """"""""""""". ;I8;1 It tlIl I 11) l;ll: SI l!*l! t I I I I I I I a t 1 I I I I I (b) Second reading of Ordinance No. 8038, amending i Ordinance No. 8009, regarding industrial or commercial : buildings in excess of $100,000. The following ordinance i was presented for a second reading: 8 I I 8 I i Ordinance No. 8038. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY : ; OF LSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8009 BY I i AIPDEt SECTIONS 10 ANI2 118 REGARDING INDUS- i i TRIAL OR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN EXCESS OF : : $100,000. I : Cmn. Neiswender moved that this constitute the second i I reading of Ordinance No. 8038 by title only, and that it : : be adopted. The motion failed for lack of a second motio4. : (e) Second reading of Ordinance No. 9133, amending : I Ordinance No. 9060, changing certain designated propert3 I from Zone R-P to Zone C-2. The following ordinance I i was presented for a second reading: I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I :::I :I*: IiiI :;:: ltI; ;:;I I;:: !I:! T'l 11 I I I 4 I I t I I I 8 I I 1 .I ::::; ::::I ::::: :::*: 1:;:: ::;:; ::;I1 jjiij *I ;;4:; i:BII I. 1:: ::;:I ::I I: ;:$; $1;: 11 ;;:I: 1:; :::!I I 1 I~i;j i Ordinance No. 9133. AM OitDINANCE OF TBE CITY i Guevara I :* :xix: 8 ; OF CAEtLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, I Bierce :xi :x; ; I CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY FaQM : McPhersonl ! !xi ; : ZONE R-P TO ZONE C-2, IN THE: CITY OF CARLS- i Neiswenderi i :x; i i BAD, was adopted by title only and further reading waived. Hughes I I :x: : i A. short recess was called at 9: IO P. M, The meeting i i reconvened at 9: 25 P. Id. i FINANCE: I (a) Approval of final budget for fiscal year 1962-63. i : The City Manager presented lusletter of transmittal, i stating the final budget reflected the changes that were rei ; quested at the time the preliminary budget was presented.i ;I:,: i Also this final budget is based on the same tax rate as ; : the previous year. *;#I; ! By motion of the Council the final budget for the fiscal i Bierce :x; :x: i ! year 1962-63 was approved as submitted. : McPhersonI I : x\ 1 I t * ::i:; :I!:; I ::I:: I I 1:;:; I ;:':: I I 1;::; :;;:: :I,:; a:::: I I ::;I, :;I:: :I::' :::i: I ::::; I I I I I I -7 I I Guevara i : :xi : I I i Petmender: i I X: i I I I i Hughes i :x: $ i I I 1 SI* I t ?{,!I I I 1:;;: # * I .. .- I I I 'b, y\, '.\'\\:\,' I '\, '\ ' 'b '\ " 8 i Rame ', +&. 8 \, .%. '+@, ' 2% : """"""" """"""""""_ * ""_ - """""""""" - """ - ""- f """"""_ - """"_ ;;:I: 4: ::;I, -::I I !::!I I1 t : I I '\\ +, 'b, " '. 147 I I Member \\A ,Q.@,'$@@, \o , 4\\ '3$' I I -8- I I of I I I ; ; l :"i- : (b) Ordinance No. 1078, fixing amount of revenue to i i support City Departments and pay bond of Sewer District i i No. 2 for fiscal year 1962-63. The following ordinance : ;;/I : was presented for adoption: I pi;; ! I 1 I I : Ordinance No. 1078. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY : OF pdRLSRAD FIXING THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE : FRGM PROPERTY TAXES NECESSASY TO SUPPOi%T i 'XI33 DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY OF CARLS3A.D : AND FIXING TXE AMCUNT OF REVENUE FitOM : ED INDEBTEDNESS OF TZE "CITY OF CPA3LSBAD i SEWER DISTitICT NO. 2'' FOR THE FISCAL YEAR : 1962-63, was read in full and adopted. ; (e) Ordinance No, 1079, setting the tax rate for the i City of Carlsbad and Sewer District No, 2. The following : ordinance was presented for adoption: I Ordinance No. 1079. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i OF CABLSBAII SETTING THE TAX gATE FOR THE I CITY OF CAi3LSBAD AND THE "CITY OF CAlZLSBAD i SEWER EISTMCT NO. 2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAS i 1962-63, was read in full and adopted. i PSOPERTY TAXES NECESSARY TO PAY TXE BOND- 4 # I I I I I I I I 1 I I e l I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I * I I I 1 I I I I I I I b I I I I I I I I I I I * 8 I 1 1 1 I I r Guevara i Bierce + McPherson : Neiswender! Hughes : I I I I I I I I I I I I I Guevara : Bierce k McPherson I Neiswenderi Hughes ; 11 ::q I;:; :I:: I!:: i ;xi i : :x; i i !xi ; : :x; : ;.:x: I ::I; I::! :ill I::: :::; &I:! ixix: i Ist: 8 :x: 1 I :x: i i :x: : I :xi ! JIII #I 1 I I I;:': : the fisca x; year 6 - ":: ::I:: I presented for consideration by the Council: I ::if: i Resolution No. 846. A itESOLUTION OF TlB3 CITY ! : COUNCIL OF TIYE CITY OF CA8LSBA.D ADCPTING i Guevara 7 1 !x: ! : TBE SALASY PLAN kNJ3 WCiW CONDITIONS FOfi ; Bierce I : :x; ; i THE CITY OF CAfiLSBAE FOR THE 1962-63 FISCAL i McPhersonl I :x: : i YEA%, was adopted by title only and further reading : NeiswenderI ; :x: i : waived. i Hughes i jxixi i i (dl Hesolution No. 846, adopting the salary plan for i 1:;:: 6 I I ::::: i:::; I:;;: t I I t I *I.!. i CITY MANAGESfS i3EPGRT: I ! I I I ;l;;i I ! ;;:;; !ll!l I i (a) Clarification of City participation in Holiday Manor! p:': i Subdivision. The City Manager requested the Council to : ;:::I 1:::; I refer to the Minutes of A.ugust 7, 1962, Item (c) under : lsl;l : of Holiday Manor for City participation. The last two I 1:;:; i items were included in the motion, and he would like a : :;::I ! clarification of the first two items. I :::;: I :i:;: i By motion made by Cmn. Bierce, the motion of August 7, i 'I::: : 1962, was amended to include that the City participate i Guevara I i :xi ; ::;:; i in the school districts share of the necessary street im- ; Eierce 5E: ;xi ; : provements on Tamarack A.ve. , that an agreement be : McPherson i : :x: : ; entered into between the City, Subdivider and school dist- 1 Neiswendert i !xi i I rict, and that the City participate in the additional street i Hughes : :x:x: : i improvements on Tamarack Ave. as needed for secondary: ::PI : or major street construction. # I -I ; Correspondence, concerning the request by the subdivider! ::I:: It ::::I 4: 1 I i v I 1;;:; ::::: 1. I (b) National Fallout Shelter Survey, The Council was i i;;;; i informed a letter was received from the Civil Defense : ;:::: I!!I! ; Survey Branch, providing advance information regarding i :I;:! i Phase 1 of the National Fallout Shelter Survey. The re- : : sults of the survey indicate there are no existing buildings: i within the City that meet the minimum shelter criteria. I i Phase I1 of the survey will be made of special facilities, ! : such as mines, caves, tunnels, etc., which may lend i i themselves for use as a public shelter. This information I ::I:; i will be forwarded to the County Civil Defense Director fori i promulgation to the interested cities. I I ,I:*: ;;lll 1 1:;:: I By common consent the letter was ordered filed. I !::I: t I : ;:::: i (c) T= information leaflet. Sometime ago a letter i I;':: i:::: I I I I ;:I:: lt::l I I # t::;: I I ;::,: I t ;:;:: ::;:; ::$i :::;I I ::::i I I :1'11 :q:; ::#:I ::::: Ii;I :I,;: I k I I + * 1 I * I 1 I + I I I I:!:! * I I 1 I \- \' '. I . I I I I -9- 1 \ -. I i Name I I 1 I : of :""""""~"""""""""""""~""""~""""""""""""-~""-""- i Member : ing that certain city tax information be included in the : i County-only tax leaflet that is mailed to property owners i ; at the time the tax statements are mailed. The Board of ; i Supervisors referred the matter to the Chief Administra-I I tive Officer, and after considerable study he has con- ; i cluded that many problems and complications would arisei : He suggested the project be abandoned for the present : i time, as the County contemplates the installation of a 1 I computer within three to four years, at which time the : ; placing of both amounts and tax rates can be placed on i i the County Tax bills. I Discussion was given as to the City having a leaflet print4 : ed giving this information to the citizens. i By common consent the letter was ordered filed. i (dl Proposed amendment to ordinance re: Dismant- I i ling and repair of motor vehicles in residential districts. : : The Council was informed some months ago the former i i City Council discussed ways of prohibiting the storage of : : automotive vehicles, parts, airplanes, storage of trailer;, i etc. , in front and side yards in residential areas. Due I : to opposition to the requirements no action was taken. i i The City Manager stated since that time he has investi- ; ; gated a regulation adopted by the City of iiayward, which i i he sent to the Council for study. I I I i was directed to the County Board of Supervisors request-! I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 8 I I I t I i I I i After considerable discussion by the Council it was the I i : concensus of the Council more study should be given this ; i matter, and also comments from the citizens should be i I considered. ! (e) Annexation of City property (formerly County Dump i area) to the City o€ Carlsbad. In view of the fact the t I 3orrner County ~ump area, consisting of approximately i i 2 1/2 acres, has been deeded to the City, and in order to I : alleviate the City paying taxes to the County for this I i property, the City Manager recommended that a petition i i be filed by tne Council with the Board of Supervisors, : I requesting this annexation to the City. It was pointed out i i that if this property is annexed to the City, this could not : ; be used as a basis for establishing contiguity in future i ; annexations. I I I I I t I ? ! I I I 1 i By common consent of the Council it was agreed that a 1 : : petition be prepared. The City Manager was directed by i i the Mayor to direct the City Attorney to .prepare a petitiod ; to present to the Board of Supervisors to annex said prop@- : ty to the City of Carlsbad. I I 1 8 I i (f) Codification of supplements to City Code. Michie I : 1 Publications was contacted concerning the delay in the i ; recei t of the su plements to the City Code, and they : ; la state the delay Rad been caused because of repairs to i i their building. The supplements should be received by ; i Friday of this week, or not later than Monday of next wee$. I They further stated because of the inconvenience caused : i by this delay, they would deduct 1 /4 of the cost of the I i next supplement. i Discussion was given as to parking and sleeping on the i I beach. The City Manager informed the Council the Polic4 : have been patrolling the area, and he is having new signs : ! made to post on the beach. 1 Cmn, Neiswender stated he had spent time with the Polici : Department in observing their patrol operation, and felt i i they should be complimented. 1 I I I 1 I t I I I I h I I I I I 1 I I I I $ I I 1 I t I I I I I 1 I I I x-- '. ', '. ' ' 148 \\ '\ 8, '\ \\ .. '\ "\=. '.,''$&. '\\ X%', '\?$\$?? , \PA .*', , L '\ \, ', '\ \,sG .0'-.4\' &$ ' \$y@,$'O e, ::::I *I :4:: ::;:: I:::; ::::: ::::: I:: 81 ;:1:i i:;:: I;@;1 :;::; :;::; Pi:: ;:$;I :::I: I::!: ::: 1:: I:::; $4: 1:::: :(I:: i:: 1:::: 111:1~ ::::i: I# 1;::; :lrl:: 1;;1 :is':; ::::I; 4;; :::;:I ::;I:; !:;ltl 81 I 11:;; i;:;;; !yl:' ':::I :;:;:I :;la:! 31,:1~ :::ifl :::1(~ 1::::; 811 ::::I; ;;?ii: 1::::; ;:;I;; e::;:: :ra $4;; i::;:; """ "-"" t "": II *I 8 311 Ill) 1 ll,;t' :I(' 1::::; I:;:;] i:: ::;::I t:I IIol( 2:::; +I' ;@ 1::::; i::;;: ;::I/ t:;:;: i::::: ;:;i:1 1;;:;: ;*+a*; ;::::I 1' :;;:;; ::;::I :;;il; ;;;::: <:;::; :::::I ;::;;: ;;:;;; :yq: :a ;:;::: ~1:~#4 1:' I1 I"( I :::::I :11::; ;::::I ::$:I ::$:1 I:@; :i ::!:;I +!I;;: ;:'I,l a:!::: ::;;;: :I& It :::::: $Is#: 1;: 'I ::::$ i::;:: l*l I;!I!h I 4 $ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I f I I I I I I I I I 4 I I J I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I 1 b I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I t I I I & I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I L I I I 1 I I t I I , I I I I I I i I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b I I I I & I I 4 1 I I I I I I I I I I I -10- 1 1 1 I I I 1 I """"""""""""""""""-""-""""""""""""""""~~, I RATIFICATION OF3 BILLS AND PAY&ULL: I I I I I Ratification for the payment of bills was giveri for the i general expenses of the City in the mdunt of $18,857.04, i and for the Water Department in the amount of $15,162.60; for the period August 7, 1962 to August 21, 1962, as I certified by the Director of Finance and approved by the : Auditing Committee. : # I I iZatification of the payroll was given for the first half of i August, 1962, in the amount of $16,651.24, as certified : by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing i Committee. 1 I I I I I ADJOURNMENT: I I I I I I By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 10: 15 B. Mi I Respectfully submitted, Deputj City Clerk I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 / .-, x$,&$ &&J? 2: /,4&,>yH// klAXG.PLRET E. ADA INIS .. I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 8 t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t 1 I I I I 1 I I I I + I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I + I I 1 I 1 I I 3 b l e t I I 4 I I I I I 1 4 I 1 r '\, ', -8 ', '\ '% , 8, '\\ '\\'\\'X, '. 8, ' 'x ' ', '\ '\,'\, 149 & d ;.ne ', '+& '\\ '&,, ,\\' of '.,&& 't '?.k \,A 0 4' .Q', $% '?& Member &\@\#'d .o.$,,~\p\,o" """""""""""""" :;;:: :;I;# ::;:: ::i:i Guevara : ; :xi : ::I:: Bierce b I :x; : McPherspn : i {xi 1 Neiswenderi : :x: ; Hughes i :x ;xi i Guevara ; k !xi i Bierce : f :x: : McPherson ; ; :xi i Neiswender i I :x; i Hughes p; ;xi f '18'1 ::I:: 11 :ii:: ::::; ii::; I((1 :,:I: r:::: 1:::: VI;: :::I: 41 :q:; ::,;I 18 1:::: ;. I : I I:: ::I:; a:::, ii::: 'I:;: I::;: ::: ;: ::;:i ;;::: *:;I( I:::; ;:::I +I:; ;:::: ::;I: ;::t; $11: ::;:; It ;: 81 p1:1 :I, a:::: :I::: It I;;!: :::': $;:' ::I); 9: ;::5 I:':: ;I:' 1:;:; I:;:; 11 ::* :I::: ::if: 1: ;$I:; 1:::; ::::: ::p; f:::: ::: ;I :::I; 1;::; i:::: 1'1 ;:;:I I;':; :;;:; ::::; ::::I 11 !:;I; ;:;;: 1;*1; ::;i; :::I: :;::I ::I:; i:i;i :i;:i ::;:: ::::I ;Il': :;:I: :I11 11 (tl'l @lI:l #;:*I ;I,*,