HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-09-04; City Council; Minutes.'
I $I!PY OF CARLSBAD
!Minutes of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular meeting) i '\, '\\ '*, ', '.\'.\
!Date of Meeting: Septeniber 4, 1962 I N a me b,, \,$X \\, '\+.
:Time of Meeting: 7:OO P.N. y&+, '\* 'f&,
:Place of Meeting: Council Chambers
!ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Bierce,
jGuevara, McPherson and Neiswender, Councilman i :I:::
!Hughes was present at 7:05 P.M. Also present 1 ::@Is !were City Manager Slater and City Attorney Betts.:
:ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given.
i INVOCATION was offered ,by Councilman Guevara.
I' I '\ '+, '\ '\ ', \8'
'\\ '* ', '.\'+\ 15 3
i Of \?$*>,?,,.*-'$$
I ;:;i:
'I ;;:::
I 4:::
!:;A* :::
t 4 I pi;; "4:;
I I I :a;; :1:::
\X\'
("""-""""-""""""""""~""""""-~""""""""""""~"""""~"""~""""-, i Member ,d~~,.p\px,d
I 1
I I
'*I *I
1
1
*
I F
s I ::I:;
F ': 1, I
I 1 i;:;:
s I :*:I:
8 I 4::;:
I i :::::
I (a) Mirmtes of the regular meeting of iGuevara :xi !xi ; :August 21, 1962, were approved as submitted, jBierce i : pi I
? I IMcPherson i i ;x: i * INeiswenderi k :x[ i $ORRESBONDENCE: a 4 4:: ::; a:
I I :; I ;;:'I :!::: I::';
I
i
t I I
!APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
I I
t
'1 I I
1s
I
I
I
1
: (a) Doris M, Simpson - re: Parkways and aide- i 4 4;
:walks. Letter dated August 21, 1962, from Doris I
iM. Simpson on behalf of the Carlsba6 Garden Club, i ;:iii
irequesting the City have parkways with the manda- I :ii::
!tory planting of trees therein, and where there : ;:;::
jis not space for a parkway that trees be planted i 1::::
;:I::
:on the lot sic?e, and that any place of business .i ::;::
:putting in a large shopping center and parking; i ;;;:I at
!lot make a scale provision according to the lot I ;4/:
I::!: !for the planking of trees and flowers in the cen- I :;;:; iter or bordering the lot. 1 1:; I ' I ::iii
IB~ comon consent of t3e Council, the letter was i :;'Il
lordered filed, I ;:' *
I I I ::;:: I (b) Mrse A, E, Wollrich - re: Parhays and side-! ::ri:
:walks. Letter dated August 20, 1952, from Mrs. i :::,; :;
!Arthur E. Wollrich, expressing her desire for t 1 iiiii
!parkways, She suggested all secondary streets : :L:; ii:;: :should have parkways with the planting of trees i :ii:i
jmandatory therein. She stated if the Council fel4 (1,11
:contiguous sidewalks were best, theG a space I ilili
{should be allotted Eor the planting of trees. She i ::i::
!also stated that trees that must be taken down i ::@:I
1::::
!should be replaced, and that commercial parking i p:::
11:;
:lots should be required to have a percentage area ! ::*it
:I::;
:in tree planting, I I ::::I ::;;:
:By common consent, the letter was ordered. file6.. i I:$!
I' I I i:::: '11 I
I (c) Ted Russell - re: Parkways and sidewalks. I i:::;
' !Letter dated August 21, 1962, from Ted Russell I ;:;;I ii 'I
!stating 'ne felt the City of Carlsbad residents ! It,
i;;
!wanted Carlsbad to have good streets, but that i ::I:; ::: ;i :they wanted local streets instead or' four-lane i ::::1
:highways because of the traffic hazard and the i ii;:; fj :expense. He stated he felt the City should have i 1t:II
:improved residential streets, with sidewalks and i :';; ;; Io$ :parkways, and to keep secondary streets to a min-; ::i: iimum without sidewalks and parkways. I I :;;: ' I :'4* a I I::I I ;la;
:BY common consent, the letter was ordered filed. i :::; I ::ii
l I 4:; I a I:::
I I ;I:#
I ;:::
1:11
111 I
I
1
I
I I ::::: ::!I;
4 I
11
t
1 It
I I *
I
I I ;:I
I
I 'I
I
F I I I
4
I 1 ;:
t
I I
I
1 I Ill t a &;a:
! 1 1' !:I!
I
I
..
t I ',\. \'.' 1 I
I I
I '\ <\,'X,, '\,'\\ *\
8 I '\ ' ' '. '\ 15
I I ', \.,'\. '*, '\ '\
6 '\ ,', ' "
I 8 -2- I N a me '-,,';!$&,, '\ *%X
t : of ,/,.o+,, " '9%
1 1::: I:;:
I
t I
I \ \'
i blember ''!?$%e3 ~""""""""""""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""~"""""""""~"" i (d) Jack R. Estes - re: Parkways and sidewalks, i I , 2"
I#' :Letter dated August 20, 1962, from Jack R. Estes i 1 4 1 I.
!stating that Councilman Neiswender should be i commended for asking the people's. opinion on park{ :::I
!ways and sidewalks in the City- He stated if the: ::;I :*
!Council decides that a uniform plan must be I 1:at
i adopted for future second-ary streets, that he and! :; :I::
jhis wife favor the plan asked for by Clint Pedleyj I:!: : and asked that authority for the removal of trees! ;I::
!be returned to the jurisdiction of the Planning i 4::; ::;: i omission. 8 I :::; :::; 'I :Ill
!By common consent oE the Council, the letter was ! ::::
lordered filed. I I ::ii
I I ::It
,()I i (e) Board of Supervisors - re: Amointment of i ;:It 'I
l:~l
ICitv Ensineer to mecia1 committee on road stan- I :;:: 81
Idards. Letter from the Board of Supervisors, I I ii::
jaated August 27 , 1962, stating Lowell A. Ratinbun, i ;':I
1;::
:City Engineer, was appointed to represent the I I :::;
Is11 :City of Carlsbad as a member of a special commi- i :::;
ittee to review and recommend stanGards for the i :x:
:construction and improvement of County roads, s t :::;
:The letter stated notices of the-/time and place i ,:::
;of the first meeting will be sent by the County i '1:: iiii
!Surveyors Road Commissioner. 1 1 :::I
1 I 111:
I ;!I: :By common consent, t3e letter was orderee filed. i 1::;
I I ::*I i(:f) F. L. Bollman - re: Repair of vehicles. I i :;I:
I I::! !Letter dated August 24, 1962, from F, L, Bollman,i i;ii
!stating if a law is passed to the effect that 1 911: ;private c,itizens will not be allowed to work on i :::I
:cars at their homes, his house will be up for I J::!
l;;l
: sale. 8 I :;::
1 I I ::::
I '8,:
:By common consent, the letter was ordered filed. i ::;:
:;#I
I I I I :;ii
I(g) Kelly E. Day - re: Repair of vehicles. I !::I
:Letter dated August 25, 1962, from Kelly E. Day, I :::; ;:::
lstating that he did not feel minor repairs to a l ii::
:car made too much noise or was trashy looking, I i ;I1! lt::
:He cited the overgrowrS weedsin lots in residentiai :::I
(areas and the trash on local streets were a worse I 1:;: :::i
:sight. He stated prohBiting commerbQal:. repair- i ::;I
ring in residential areas is reasonable, but if i i::: t::: jrepairing of cars by a private individual, such i ;:It
:as replacing a battery or other small repairs to i lI:: ::::
his own car was to be prohibited, he wouId oppose ; ::::
:it on the basis it is an invasion of his rights ! :::a
r!::
:as a citizen. I i: kt I I :;
I 1 I 1 ::;;
by cornon ConseEt, the letter was ordered filed. i :;;I
I I I I ii;;
:(h) A. L. Parsqns - re: Drainnqc, - Betla Vista : :I::
::I;
pract. Letter d.ated! August 20, 1962, from A. Le ! ::::
:and J, L. Parsons, stating they tvould like t%e la;*
I :::: bity to correct tk situation of dxahage coming i lle: I;;* bow from the subdivisions of Gallinger and Brigg$ ;Il:
1::: ion their property, whic3 creates a cut in the reaq ;::I
!or their lot, before the wet season. approaches, a$ iiii
:the uater$,:.rage through their property and it is : i:;: 11:
!impossible to drive -a car at the rear of the lot. ! +: I 1::
! :!!I
;: 1
;e:: 1 I
t ";
I
I I 8 '11
I I
I
11 I 1
1144
I
I I
1
i I
I a
I t
I I
1
@I%
I
I I
1 I
I)
8 I I I 1 ::;;
.>
I I I 1 1 I
I I
I 8, ,, ., s * . I 8 C'
I ',, '\ '\ '\ '\ \,
I I , * '\ 8' '\ ', 152
t -3- t I *\ ', '\ '\\\\, 8,
I I 1 Name '*,\*%& '.,'?+,
t i of \,+'\O' \
I fg&&\4?+ :""-""""""""""""""""""""""""""~~"""~"""-~~"""""""","""~"". ; Member ,o '0 .p\e \,d
ii:;:
'\ '\ '\ \ \ ',
I
!The City Engineer stated that a portion of the i ;::;+
!natural drainage went through vacant area; that : I::,:
i area is now developed as Valley Manor. He stated: ;I:$ #I1 i that an easement had not been secured and since i :::I, : there was no easement the pipe was cut off. He i 1'4;
#:;I1 ! also stated he did not feel the Parsons problem i :;;:;
:::I, 11 !was severe and that the cut could. easily be filleg i::!: I with dirt, He stated the problem was only temp- I la# ;:I::
i orary and as soon as the Tamarack extension to ; 1:::: i Park was completed, the drainage would bypass all! ii:::
*I*:; i private properties, and that he was sure an ease-! I 11) :::::
iment coul'd be secured along the route of Tamarack! o*tl ::;:: i extension. I I 1'::; 1: 'I
I t ;;::;
!A. L, Parsons, 10124 Valley de Paz, El Cajon, I I p::: "I
i stated that the culvert was put in by the County I 4:::
::::I i and. after the City took in the land the drainage i :::I:
:was made to go around other properties, but all i i::::
:the drainage came down on his property, I I iirl: 0::
I t 1::1t I I 1;:::
{The City Engineer stated if the damage was caused! it*:;
!by the drainage, the City could restore the :I;:;
!ground back to where it originally was. He I I !::;:
I 4::; I stated although there may be more than natural i ::I:;
:itrainage on the property, the drainage would be i !;::I
:taken down tne extension of Tamarack when comp- i :I::;
;:::I : leted, I :::;:
I ;::::
I ;;#I:
:Mrs. Parsons inquired about Lot 6. :I1 I
i The City Engineer stated that lot is in the area ! 11 i;:::
i of Valley Manor and that a portion of the water i 11:*:
:goes to a dead-end street on the right, Althea i ::;:: :!2:; $1 :Lane. He stated it was left because it was felt i ::::; i it was a natural drain, 8 :at::
1 I I 1 ;::I1 1::::
:Mrs. Parsons asked what was to be done with the : I:;::
I CUlV&Eti . 1::::
I I:'::
:;:a:
.I
1 tI
'I .I I
t
I
I 1
I t I
I
I
i 8 8 1::::
t I t
s I I :;I:: 4;
I
I I I
I
I I I I 8 I ::ii:
:.The City Engineer stated that the cut created by i 11:::
:the drainage could be restored, and at such time I :;:;:
:as a new culvert were constructed,,;the old cul- i ;I:;;
:vert would be cut off, I I :I;::
"1::
:::I
I ::;:: :The Mayor asked if this problem could be taken ! :II:; 11 i care of before the rainy weather begins. t :;::;
I I I I;::: ;):;I :me City Engineer stated he hoped it could, but i ;:'I:
,*::I :an easement had to be secured first. I I ;::':
:The Mayor suggested that each of the Councilmen I ;::::
t:::: Itxy and take a look at this property and defer : ;;:::
jt3li.s until the next meeting. I I i::::
1 I I 8:s:' :;::; :By comm~n consent of the Council, it was agreed \ ;l:ll
Ithat the Councilmen look into this drainage I I 1:;::
ill11 : ; 1 :.: /;:; I ing , 1 I ::;:a ::#::
1 :::;:
I 1 1 ,111: ltl;:
: 1 ;:pi
I t I:':;
I I I :I::: :::;:
I ;::::
I ;c;!
t
I t
I I *
$
I I I
I *I1
I
I I
t I I ;:I:: *1;4
1
81
I
I
&
I !problem further and defer it until the next meet-;
t
4 I I I t
& I
t
1
I I I I I
a
4 I It&
8 ;I
t
I
I
t
t I I I I I I I I 1
I I I
I
I\ l \, '\ ', '\ '. *\ , \,', , ' ' \, , ', '.\'\,'\,
I -4- \' \, \\\'\, ', ', '\ 153
I :""""""""~""""""~""""""""""-""""""~""""""~""""~~"""""""~" i Member *?*p&,+,;%& ,a 'Q y?$?'.ss
, \ 8, ', ',
I I N a me ', '*%, *,, '3%
I I ! of ''$\e;., 8 ""
i (i) A, 0. Innis - re: Temmrarv buildins - I ;;ti: I ,::::
i!;;;
:I:::
::'ti
1::; :I::: ;;;:;
I I :::::
I i:;::
ICarlsbad Boulevard. Letter dated August 20, 19626 "1:: I from A. 0, Innis, asking if the building on the I
:Gas Company property on the west side of Carlsbad: ::::: i Boulevard and the south side of the State Park is:
:proper for the zoning and building codes of the i i City. He stated it was an eyesore and something i ::i:i i should be done about it. 1
I I I
I I :: 11
!The Building Inspector stated the building will : ;::;; 'I
i allowable in its present location, which is an i ::::; I R-T zone, as Long as the building is not attached! 8":: ::;;; ;;::; ::
!Councilman Meiswender stated that when this 1 I pi:;
I matter was brought up before, he was under the : I iii::
::::I
1:;::
{building was an eyesore and asked. if anything i i:;:i ll$!
1 I ;: :I,
I I ;: ;*I@ I!::
I i :;;:: i:::;
I I t :ii:;
!The Mayor instructed the City Manager to contact I i :::'I 1:;:: ]I I the owner in regard to the building. and ask him i :;;:; ::::: :to impmve the appearance of the Building. 11 :;::;
I I :$:
:ORAL COlWltJNICATIONS : I I i::::
I I I 1:;::
;*I;&
iNr. Jack Blackburn presented the Council with a i ;:::: :::;: !letter with nineteen (19) signatures asking that : ;::a:
:the improvement of State Street on a temporary ; 1:;:;
:basis be abaniloned and that the improvement be ::'::
111:l
:permanent under a joint improvement program. t I !;:;:
I 1 I :;;:I 1":
!Councilman Bierce asked what percentage of proper{ ;:::I ;:@o: Ity owners or? State Street these signatures repre-j I$; i sented . I
::,I:
t I I ::;;: I I I::::
:The City Manager stated he did not know, He I I ::4: 1:::: :;;:' !before and referred him to the Engineering Depart{ 8 1;: ;:;I;
:::$
:;:I:
I I:::: ;B ;:;;:
!represented, present it to the Coumil, so the i :(::I
4;
:Council could decide6 on what action to take. b :::;: :':I;
I I I t ::I:;
:Councilman Hughes inquired as to how long it would ::: ;: ;::::
I I I I :::;:
I 8 I :::::
I I I I::::
1 I 1 I :::::
I I ': ::I:: :::
i be moved into the inner lagoon on Ecke *s property: :::::
!within a short time and t3at the building is 1::tl ;11::
e::*l
I I
i to the ground.
I I 'I::;
I 1
I i
I
: impression this was to be a mobile unit rather i 1;;: i than a temporary building. Be agreed that t'ne i
i could be done about this, I
:The City Attorney stated that under the laws and ; ;;I;:
:codes of the City, the building is allowable. I
!Councilman Bierce suggested the owner of the I I :*I
!building be contacted and asked to clean up the i :!i:i
:building, I 1 ;illl
:l
1
I
I
I
I
I I I
:;'::
I ;:*:I
I
L I
I I I I 1 I
I
I I I
t I
I
I
I
I
I
:stated he had d.iscussed this with Mr. Blackburn i
jrnent, after which Mr, Blackburn requested to spa$ 1:;::
:before the Council. I
:Councilman Bieree suggested the Engineering De- i
ipartment find out what percentage these signature4
I
I I 1 I :::I I
1;'
I 6 I
I ;::I
pe before the drains on State Street are completed, 1,:;
I
I
I
:
I I 1
Ill
II 3;
:li!r
I
I I I ! f
I'
I
I I I' l \, ', '8, '\ '\ .'
I I I 1 '\ '\* " \\\'\,'\, 15 1
I -5- I ', , " \ ' '\ '\\'\\'\\
I ! ~a me \,, '$A ' *q 1 I '\ >$$\ 4 of Y?@$, ',,44,4\ '\ ..p, '+ :"""""""""-""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~"" : Member \QS,+?$.CC i The Assistant City Engiyleer stated that the Engi-i i;::; i neering Department had been instructed to prepare: ::::I I::; i a master drainage plan and that it will be pre- ! ;;;:I
:sentea to the Council. He stated he felt the 1 t::l~
:City should participate in the cost of improve- i :;t;~
:,I l;a:~ la1
lments of the new drainage system, and that it was: :::;: I necessary to have a new drainage system as the i ;;SI;
!present storm drain system is not adequate, He i ::/:; f::; i also stated this plan could be done along with th+ ;:II;
:cost estimate for street improvements. This I I;*
1 :::;~ :estimate b7ould take about six (6) months. I I :::;I ;::it
I I I:!: ;Councilman Hughes asked what was on the present i i::: : plans, I I ::::
I I I I
I
', \'\ \ " \ -8'
I I 'I",
$1
I
#
I
I I I I
I I I I I I ::;:~
:::;; 1;
+:I
imately eight months for construction, if this I I :; ': ~
I :;I::
:@;:I :::: jpetitions are turned in and! approved, these pro- : ::I;
I 1 :I::
I 1 I I:ii
t ::;I
;:::
:::;
1 I :;I1
1 I I I i:::
I ;:Is ;I
I ;; !The Assistant Engineer stated that it was now on i I;:: ::is; !a "first come, first serve" basis. I ;~l;~
:::,
:Ile stated. it would take about six (6) months to I l*;ll
!prepare a cost estimate and petition and approxi-: 1;::;
:project were given top priority, However, if the! ;*I;; If
!improvement of Buena Vista and Harding Street i
jjects possibly would take all the monies provided! ;: I,
:for street improvements.
!Mre Blackburn asked Eor a cost estimate as he
!had only a general idea of the cost to give the i ;:I:
!the property. o€mers, He stated that because of i :::I i the lack of time and knowledge of the owners, no : ,*I;
:more people %'ere contacted, Of the ones he did i ::::
Icontact, however, only two did not express favor-! :il:
:itism for the permanent street improvement,
!The City Attorney informed t3e Council that the i ;;:: i letter read represented a show of good faith only! ;::; (:and! that a petition with specifications and plans: ;::I ,I$
jwould have to be made and passed around to the i ::I:
!property owners to see if they wanted the perm- :
:anent street improvement. t I:;;
:::I
I '14: :The Mayor asked if the Engineering Department or i :::: :::: iHr. Blac&urn should contact the rest of the I I :;;I I property owners o
..I 1 1 ; :I::
1 ? I I ::::
!Mr. BXacklourn stated he would be glad to contact i I::; II
ithe rest of the owners if he coulc? be assured of i :;;: 1:;;
la list of the owners. He asked what percentage i :;;I
io€ names are required to start proceedings. I
::I: :;:: ; ; i ;.
iCouncilman Bierce iilforned Mr. Blacl&urn a 60% ; ;;::
jminimum was required. t a :ill :I
I 1;:: :The Mayor asked Mr. Blackburn to present his I ::;i ifindings at the next meeting, if possible, I ii:;
:a::
I 1l:l !The Mayor instructed the City Marzager to prepare I ::I:
!a list of the property owners on State Street and i ii!: ;::: /give this list to lbtr- Slacldxnm, I I 1:::
I I I i:ii ;::: ;::;
I 1:::
4 ;:I1
I ::i:
I I t 1 I I 1
I I f I I
(III ::I;
I
I 81
;:!I 1:;;
I
i 4 I I
I I I 1 I
I I I 1 I
I 1 I
I I
1 I I I i:::
I I
I I I 1 I
I I
I I
I
I I I I
t
I
I I 8 t 1 I I
((11
!
I I I
I I
t
I ',\-\\" \, '\ ', '8 '\ ''
I I ,\, \"
I I '\\'>\ '\ '8\''.'*.,J 5 5
I -6- i Na me '\\ 'b~6, \,, NS.,
I I ; of ".$.?&, \QL ,# , $, x '6% %&
I : Member $3'@,%?@e :"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""~"""""""""""-~"- : PUBLIC NEARINGS: I I I !:pi
I :!!:! i (a) Proposed amelldmeat to Ordinance Eo, 9060, t i:::; *I i d.eheting the words (Auto Courts) from Article 2, i I ;::;I 11) i Section 2538 Article 7, Section 700 (61, Article ; ;::a: i 9, Section 900 (3) , and Article 10, Section LOO0 i ::;i:
1;11; i (4). I :::::
I 1 I :L;I It::;
I I (I) Resolution No. 847, announding findings: :;I:!
I and decisions. I I :$: 1 ::'I;
1"; I The Clerk read Resolution No. 258 of the Planning: :;:::
i Commission, recommending an amenhent to Ordi- : ::i:i ii:$ i nance No. 9060 of the City of Carlsbad by dele- ! 'I i ting the wor& "Auto Courts." I I ;::::
* I ::ii:
1 I ::;I: ! The Mayor announced the City Council would hear i ::;;:; :;;;; I from any persons who wished to speak in favor of i :I1 ;:a:: I the proposed amendment. There were no persons ; 1:;; I wishing to speak in favor of the proposed amend- : i:::: ;:::; i ment. I ::: #I
9 I I I ;:':: l1II
I I 'I 11:;: : The Mayor announced. the City Council would hear i ::;I: ! any oral protests or objections concerning the I II ::I:: st : proposed amendment, There were no oral protests i 8":: :;~ll I or objections, I I ;::::
I
I I \ ', '\, '8 '\ 8, \*
8
I
1
1 I
I
I I
I
1
I I
+ I I
I1
tL
I
I
I t
I I I I I I :;!;: : The Mayor declared the pu3lic hearing closed at i :pi: Io
I I ::;I:
I I ;!I:;
I :; !::
;:;::.
I I t I ::i:i It I i::;; 81
; 7:37 P.M.
i After discussion by the Council, the following i :;:;: i resolution was presented for the Council's consi-I I i : ;.:
i deration : 8 :I:,:
: Resolution No, 84.7. A FtESOLUTION OF THE CITY . , i i:;1;
i CQUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ANPI;SOUEJCING FIND- i Guevara ; !xi? : i INGS AHD DECISIONS REGARDING AMENDING ORDINANCE i Bierce k: Iq i i NO. 9060 t BY DELETING THE WORDS "AUTO COURTS", i McPherson : *I ; i x: i i was adopted by title only and further reading i Neiswended ! i $ ! i waived, : Hughes l : I ; l ;xi :
I
I
I
I I
I 1 I 1 1 t ::I::
I I (2) First reading of Ordinance No. 9135, 1 I i:,:: :I: : amending Ordinance Eo, 9060, I' ;:;::
1:;:1
;;It: i Ordinance No. 9135, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i Guevara i i ;x: : 1::
i CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, BY DELETING: Bierce k ; i xi : i THE WORDS "AUTO COURTS", was given a first read- i McPherson i ; ;xi i i ing by title only and further reading waived. i Meiswender! !x i x! i
I (b) Granting of Franchise to Sal1 Diego Pipeline I iLl; i Company, pursuant to 1937 Franchise Act.
t
8 I I I a I I
I I i Hughes I1 ;x; i
I I ,11;1
I I I :::;:
I (1) First reading of Ordinance No, 1080, I :#I:: ;:'I;
1:::;
I I :I::;
I ::I:;
;+;I
4::;
I I I :::;; ;>:'I
I I ;:;1:
1;::;
I I I:;:; $':: ;;p:
I :::
I I I ;: :ii
I
I I 81
!Granting a Franchse to San Diego Pipeline Company!,
:The Mayor announced this was the time and place i :;::I i fixed for hearing all protests and objections in I I;::; i regard to the franchise ta San Diego Pipeline I I $1:: !Company, pursuant to 1937 Franchise Act. There i ;a/: !were no oral protests or Objections. I
I
I
11
I 'e
I 1 I I I I I I I I I
I
I I
I I 1 1 I ! l::I!
i 1 i I
I 8, ', ', , ' '
I ', \\ '1 '\ ', '' I 'X'
I I I I I I '\\ ." ', '\, '.'",",,J 5 f
I -7- [ Na me 't,, 'x$\ x, '%?+
:""""""""""""~""""""""""~"-""~""""""""""-~"""""""""""""- I Member ,o\,o.p$?\,< !The Mayor announced the City Council would hear i 'I1;l i:::: i from those persons wishing to speak in favor of ! ;::;: 4::: I the granting of the Franchise to the San Diego ! ;:l:l : Pipeline Companya I 1 4:::
% a :;&I* I #I!':
I \ ', ', '\\ '\ ', I
I I I I : of \*;g$, '.$+$&.$?& 'b CJ;,,
I
4 i Mr. Eugene Freeland, Kt%orney, . representing the i ! San Diego Pipeline Compmy, stated he had dis- i i cussed this wit11 the City Attorney and CiBy Engi-j i neer, and felt that a workable franchise had been: i made and asked the Council to grant same franchisk.
: The Mayor deklared Lhe public hearing closed at i
:7:45 PaM. I I
i The City Attoraey stated there was an ordinance i i for the Council to consider, granting the fran- : i cliise. I I
:Councilman Bierce asked the City Attorney if she I i felt the franchise was acceptable,
!The City Attorney st'&ted she felt it was accy i eptable and that the City was fully protected i and that provisions had been made in case of
i future annexations.
i The following ordinance was presented for a firsti : reading by the Council:
I i I I 1
1 8 1 I I I
I I I I I I
I I
I 1 I 1 I .. 1 I I 3 I 1 I t I I I t I
I I r I I
i I t +
k I
I 8 !
;;;ai
!:::I
1::;: ::p;
:::I: ::;:: ::::; ::;:; ::;::
::'I; :i::; ::;;: :::;; i;:::
~l::I ::;;:
;:I::
:::I(
I:::; ;::::
;::I,
;;I:I ;:I ::':i ::p: $1 i::::
Iy;j :it:l I:::: :::'I
,;;:I i!:l( :I
I:@
:':j:
11;
1181
s,!l:
!Ordinance No. 1080, AI? ORDIPaANCE OF THE CITY OF I ::::I i CARLSBAD GRANTING SAH DIEZO PIPELINE COMPANY, A i ;:::: e1 : CORPORATION, A FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, IJSAINTAIN, I /:~! : AND OPERATE PIPE LImS FOR THE TRANSPOSTATION OF i 1:;:; i:;!~ : CRUDE OIL PETROLZUl4 TOGETIlER WITH NATURAL GASO- I /;;:
I 1: : LIME, LIQUID HYDROCARBON SUBSTAWES, AND OTHER i :::I
i LIQUID SUBSTANCES COPJTAINED W SAID CRUDE OIL i Guevara ; !x !x; :a::
i PETROLEUM IN, WIDER, AND ACROSS ALL PUBLIC STREETS Bierce 3K i ;x! I AND HIGHWAYS NOW OR HEREAFTER DEDICATED TO PUBLIC; BfcPherson i : :x! i USE IN TI= CITY OF CARLSBAD, was given a first :Neiswenderi i ;xi i readirtg by title only ad €urther reading waived. i Hughes : : ;xi
I I + 41t
I I :::I
i PLANNING: * :la: I ; i ;'
I I lit: $*!I
;;;I, 1;
I
I I
i The City Manager read a memoranclum dated August i i 30, 1962, from the Planning Commission recommend-! I ing that the Council approve the proposed amend- :
jment to Ordinance No. 9050, Suvdivisions, to I I
irepeal and supersede Article V, Section 500, Per-:
:mission to Split Lots. 1 I I I I
; I" I: ::;; t::;
:;*I
:I::
I:;* :;::
::a:
I)Il
#I;+
:!a: I i:fi I By motion of the Council, the City Attorney was i Guevara : i" :xi
:instructed to &aft an ordinance amending Ordi- :Bierce pi :xi i nance NO, 9050, Subdivisions, to repeal and superb IlcPherson; ; !xi i sede Article V, Section 500, Permission To Split i Neiswenderi : :xi : Lots, i Eiughes : ; ;xi
:::I
8:
I a t I ! !el: ! ENGINEERJXG : I I
I I 1 I
I i (a) 1911 Act. proceeding for sewers in Pi0 Pico, i
!Chinquapin, Adams, etc. I I
I I
I I I I ! (1) Resolution No. 84.8, awarding contract for i
:work, Assessmeat District 2 - 1961.
!
I x
I I I I I
t
;;;; ::;: :;I: :::: pi:
;:I:
l!t ;4i:
Ill I;** ;:
!it;
,:'I :!::
I I I I 1
I I
1 I' \\ '\ ., '\ '\ .\ , \\, % 8'
I 1 \, '\ , ', '. '\
I I I I \\ \ y, ,', '., ' '.J\ 3' 15'
I
1 I
-8- ; N a me \X\ ',$, '\ 'x48
I I
,=b" '. $?j>, I of ' @@,), q+ I :"""""""""-""""""""""-""""""""""~""""""~~"""""""""""""~ 1 Member ,r?\p\&+\<h' ,o~s..pp\c
'll;& :The Clerk presented the affidavit of publication i ;:11:
!and stated that up to the hour of 1:OO P.M. on i 1:;::
!August 31, 1962, the bids were delivered to his I ;**:I
:::I:
joffice. The bids were opened at 1:OO P.M., August! t:;::
;I,,, : 31, 1962, There were five bids received, which i :::::
1::11 'I :were as follows: 1 I "'1:
I I ::I
I 8 :* ;I:
I I M.I,S,K.. Construction Company $31,040.27 I I ;:::: $4;
I Cavar, Incor,porated $38,506-92 I::
I McKema Construction Company $42,551.04 t :: l,al;
I Einer BrOS., Incorporated I I I $43,914.30 1 I :::I:
::ii:
I I I ;;I:: !The Clerk presented the Council with a summary i ;:::;
1:*1 I sheet of the bids. I I :::it
I I :I,
::::;
:The City Engineer stated the only acceptable bid i $1::
18':; I received was the biA of W.S.K, Constructors, whicb ::::I
:was 7.15% over the Engineer's Estimate of $28@28. PO. 1:::: ::::;
!He explained the project would be a joint venturei ::::I
ibetween the S.K, Construction Company and Masano-: I::::
1::I:
ivich and Savlovich Construction Company. He I I I$! It
:*lfl
i stated he had no in€ormation regarding past pro- i ;tl:z
ijects of Masanovich and Savlovich Company, but i ::::I
:that S.K. Construction Company had recently corn- i
:pleted two projects for the City of Los hgeles i :::::
::'I; ! and is presently working on two more projects fori 1;::: ;ti:; i same city, The Engineer stated. he felt this to : :;::;
:be a valid and re-ponsible bid and recommended the! :;I::
!Council award the bid to M.S,K. Constructors. ::;::
;aI;a
f I I I ::;;i
:After discussion by the Council, the following ! ::I,: ;!:*
:resolution was presented for the Council's consi-! /I:: ;;I;; SI
ideration: I I I I :;;::
I I :;I' 1':
!Resolution No. 848. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY :I::: i Guevara : :x :xi : i COUNCXL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ATVARDIBG THE CON-! Bierce ; ::I : ; x: : i TRACT FOR WORK, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2-1961,TO THE: McPherson I ; I XI 8: ;
:M, S, K, CONSTRUCTORS COMPAHY, A JOINT VENTURE 8 was! Neiswenderi 4 i x; i i adopted by title only and further reading waived, i Hughes ; i ;x: I
I I ::: :: i PARKS AND RECREATION: I I ::;:: I1
I I I ::p:
i I ::;I' i (a) One appointment to the Parks anti Recreation i ::I::
I: Commission, 1 I :::;:
1 llI;
1 I I I :::bl
I I :!;:; :The Mayor stated since Mrs. Hildabolt had not yet: 1; It ;:::: :given her decision as to whether she will remain : ;::;: i on the Parks and Recreation Commission, he would 1 ::::; i like this matter deferred until the next meeting.! :::::
I I I :,:f:
8 I ;::I: :Councilman Bierce suggested the Parks and Recrea-i :::::
:tion Commission submit names to the Council for i I::::
:consideration. I I :::!I
i Mr. Harry McMillan, Secretary of the Commission, ! ;;?I l:l
i former Councils had-. not followed the recommenda- I i tions, this new procedure had been developed.
! The Mayor asked Wr, NcMillan to ask the Comissio$
i ing, He stated the Council would be happy to I I I:::: i consider the names subnitted :by the Commission, i 'I:i; ! ! !lI!l
I I
I I I I
I I I I E. Lo Corzine I k :!::;
I I I
I t I I
$38,800,13 f t:i:;
I I I. I
18
::::I 4:
I I I I
I I
J I
I
1 11'
lt
I
I I I I ;;;:: I' ;:!::
I i stated this had been past procedure , but because: ::::; ;::;:
'::I;
I I (III) :,I:;
I I ::: 1, ,Il:I
:::a: ;::I: i to submit names to t'ne Council at the next meet-: 4:::
:;:::
I
I I
I
I
I I 1 '\ ', -\, '\ '\ '\,
I t 8.' '\ ' '\ '.
I -9- I
t I , '\ '\ '\ ','\, I I 4 158
I i NE me '\\ 'x?&\ \\ \\ '2% 'g2\
.$ : of ''$$!$\ '\ +'
I i Member \?6 ~$jX&~di$s tU % 9\49 8 :""""""""""""""""~"""""-""-"""~-""--"""""""""""""""~"~~~~~". I (b) Report from Parks and Recreation Commission,! i::a: 1;;:: i concerning width of secondary street and parkways; ;' I t ;:I:: I 1:;;; i The Clerk read the report from the Parks and Rec-i ;:!:! I reation Commission, dated August 20, 1962, xeco-.: t
::::;
;::1,
:mending that all new sec0nda.w streets and all i 8;::
:extensions of presently existing streets be I
; i; :;
I 1:;:: i planned tu include a minimum of a four foot park-: ::I::
!way on each side of the street between the curb I 1I;;l i!:;; i and sidewalk, that for changes or improvements to: ::::: 41 i existing streets the Council consider the reco- i It*::
Imendation oE the Commission concerning street i I;*:&
;,:I:
: tree planting before such changes are finalized, i :::::
I:!::
!and .that if the Council should decide on placing i ;;ii: i the sidewalk contiguous to the curb that at least; '1;;: i four feet (4 '1 be allowed beyond the sidewalk on : :::::
!each side for a street tree planting area. t I ::::: I:
I I I ::::I
1 ;:;I;
!Councilman Bierce suggested since this report ! :!;Il I;#
i concerned Item "C" in Old Business, that this be i It;;; ::I:: : carried over to Stem "C", Old Business. I I !:;I,
I I I I ::;::
1 I::!:
1 I 1:;
I 't, \\,'\,, ", y"
I
s
I
I
I
I
I*(
:::I
t
I
I
:The Council agreed, by common consent, to carry I ::t ::::i
t I I I :I;+ :;is;
i this matter over to Item 't" of OM Business. 4
f
: A short recess was called at 8:25 P,M. The meet-! !:::I It
I + I :;:a: 1:1 :ing reconvened at 8:45 P,M.
I $!:; i HEN BUSINESS I "1:;
;:::I
I I;:I: i (a) Chamber of Commerce Agreement for fiscal year; i:;:: i 1962-63. 1;;:;
t I I:::;
t I I iiiii
!The Clerk read the Agreement. I
"a:;
t I i::::
I I :2:; i Councilman Meiswender inquired if the $1500.00 i ::;:I i spend on the tenth year celebration of Carlsbad I jwould be an annual expenditure. 'f
I 1
I I
6 I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
;;/I ::::i ,:I
I 1 I I ::I ii: ;::ii
;i::;
I I I I #;If1 :;:::
I ;;
I I :The Mayor stated since there will be an annual i l::1; t celebration from now on, that it would be an I I :;::: 1 anma1 expenditure for *e Chamber of Commerce. i t 1.1
i By motion of the Council, the Mayor was author- i ::;:: 111;: I ized to sign the Agreement for the fiscal year, : Guevara i 1 :x; i j1962-63 with the Chamber of Commerce. : Sierce ;x: :xi :
I
%
I SEE INSERT - PAGE 14. iMcPherson i I :xi i
8 I I iNeimender: h :x; i
1. i Hughes : : ;x: I
;The City Manager read a letter from the Chasriber: i :;I:*
io€ Commerce stating there was $54.07 left over i i from the budgeted amount €or the celebration and ; I' 1:;:: ! that a check in that amount was enclosed. He 8 I ;I,,, : also read a d.istribution of the expenses.
I I i.i i i I
:By common consent, the Letter was ordered filed, i i;;;:
I 1 I I ::;I, I1 I ::;:I i @I Notice from palic utility Commission - re: i ;:I:: i Application for rate increase, Tm nscontinental i lu;: ;:::; : Bus Lines. I I !;G:
I lll;l :I,
I I :a :The City Manager stated this was a usual notice i :::::
;;::;
::::I
::I:;
I 1:::: I
I
I I
I
I
11
4 t
I
i in regard to rate increases. I ;:,;: )I;)I :a I I
1 1 ;;I*;
1 !::2 I I
1 I '\ -\, ', -\ ' - I . \' I i I 1
1 b I
'' \'\ \ '
I I ', 'x,,'\, ", "\"\ 1 5 !
t -10- i N a me '\, '$$, 8'. \$),
I +$-+$+,&,;%, :"""""""""~"""""""""""-"""""--"""~"""""""-~"""""""""""""- ; Member ,o'~..~\p',d
'48 :;::: -1
I '\ . "' ' '.a
I : of *S'O' I
I The City Attorney stated unless the Council had i i received protests from citizens, it would be a i :;::;
:;l:l i waste of time and money to protest ae increase, i ::i:i
i By motion of the Council, this notice was tabled.! Guevara ; : j, I :
I I I I ::::; i;:::
t 1 I i Bierce :xi k i i
I I McPherson : i k : :r
I I i Neimende< i k i i
I i Hughes I i k i i
I
I I
I i OLD BUSINESS: : I :;:::
I ::!:! I I 1
I i (a) Second readinq of Ordinance No. 3061, amendf i ins Ordinance No. 3032, Section 83.1, requirinq i : traffic to stop on Oak AveRue at Valley Street, i i The followins Ordinance was presented for a I 1 i second readinq: 4 & 4 I 8 I
I I 1
:I;';
1::::
:;I:; :::::
:;::I
:I::; :i::; 1;:::
I *I;
1:::: i Ordinance No. 3061, AX ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i Guevara :x: i 4 ; 1;'';
i 83.1, BY ADDXNG SUBSECTION "w" REQUIRING TRAFFIC i McPherson : ::I ; i i i
i adopted by title only and further reading waived,: Hughes i i i 3 i
I CARLSBAD AMEHDIPJG ORDINANCE NO, 3032, SECTION i Bierce I ! :d i
i TO STOP ON OAK AVENUE ... AT VALLEY STREET, was i NeiswendeG !xi { I
I 1 t I I : (b) Second readinq of Ordinance No. 9134, amend-: ! ins Ordinance No. 9060, c'hansins certain desisnaJ : ted property from ZorLe R-l to Zone R-3. The 4 i followins Ordinance was presented for a second i i readinq: I
8
b 1
I 1 I
iiil. 1:;
+I: :;;:; I:;:; :;;:: ::;:; i:::;
;:a::
1:;::
I :ii:i i Ordinance No. 9134. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF I Guevara b I : 4 i
i CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERW FROM ZONE R-1 TO ZONE: McPherson I : I + i i R-3, 3N THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, was adopted by titlb Neiswendy :xi d ;
I 1 1::1:
: CARLSBAD AE/IENDING ORDINANCE NO, 9060, CHANGING i Bierce Ill ; f :+ ;
i only and further reading waived. + y& 1 i Hughes I I I :e,,:
i (c) Policy €or future secondary streets and park; i ways. I
; The City Manager read a report from the Planning !
!Commission dated July 27, 1962, requesting 62* of: I right-of-way with 48* curb Fo curb streets on new!
; secondary streets. I
i Councilman Bierce stated he was essentially in I i agreement with the report, However, he suggested!
I that a policy be set up that commerckal :streets !
:have contiguous curb and gutters and that new i i residential streets be constructed with parkways, i i He also stated he had taken pictures of streets i i with parkways with a place for trees in the City.:
iCouncilman Neiswender stated this should be a I I I satisfactory plan to the majority of people. He !
:also stated .tt;at the City Code Book required a i i minimum 66 * right of way.
:The City Attorney read from Chapter 218, 18.9, / ! Section "C" of the Code Book regarding the mini- ; i mum required right-of-way. I
I I I
I I I I
I I I
I 4 I I
I I I
I I I
I I i I 3 4 I
I I
I I t
;I;'- ;::;* I: I:::! :I::;
:::I, ::;:; ::;:: ;:;:: *:;:;
:,::I
I:,::
::!I: I-.( :::; :::: ;::: ;::: ::i:
;:I; :::: ::::
f:::
;:If
l:ll
:IIl
I!I
SI
I 1 I i I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I :;;;i
:::I; ::;I; :;::;
:;I::
;1:;~ ::::; I. ::;: :;::
:I:;
::Il ;::;
!::! I 'I i The City Engineer stated a 62' right-of-way leave6 :t:i ;:'1 ! a 5' sidewalk with 1 1/2 * inside and that a 66 t i 1::: i right-of-way leaves a 5 ' sidewalk with 3 l/2 c in-i :;:;
a*:; I side, He explained a 68' right-of-way was sugg- i I::; :::; jested instead of 66' to allow for a 5' clear park? ;I:: i way, I I i::I
I ! !'I! I 1 ::;:
I
I I I ! -11-
I I I I t 1 I
I I I I I L I I I I I
I
i""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" I i The Mayor asked if a 4' sidewalk was sufficient, i
I I 4 I i The City Engineer stated a 4.' sidewalk is suffi- I i I cient, hut a 5 * sidewalk at curb is Better be- i i cause of 6riveways. However, on a secondary or i i commercial street, a minimum of 5' should be re- I i quired to allow two people to conveniently pass i i each other on the sidewalk.
I
I I
I I
\\ *, ', .. -\ - \, ', \, '\ '\ '8
"\\ ",,'.\ '88\\8.;\, 16
Of ',"io.G&, '\ '?-A
Member \B.("o.,+?@\$ \\L \d .. $. \*+\
;;I**
1;;
:::;I
::;I;
:;;:I
lll::
::I;: " :::::
;:::I
11:
:!a#;
1::;:
'1::l :;I:;
Name '\\ '?&, \, %& ', t', 8 8' \ \'
.-------- """" :"* _"".
I I I ii;;i ;:;:;
**;:I
4::ll
::,:I ;i:;;
!because of the extreme c topography. ;I:;:
I I I ;::::
icouncilrnan ~ierce suggested *ere be a minimum of; :;:;I 81 i 62 * and a maximum of 68" right-of-way, and ghat : ::i:i :::*;
i in the Ordinance to allow this, :I:;; ;::I,
I ;I::; 'Ill
I n@y Was instructed to draft a change in the ordi-I ::i:: ::
i Frank DeV'oke, Right-of+?ay Agent for the San Die& !;41 :*I:; :':
!would be permitted to be put ia normal positions. I 1:::
I iii:;
I normal positions. I ;: iiil:
:The City Engineer inquired if residential homes i j!il ;; i in a commer.eittl zone would be required to cons- i /::: I truct a 10' sidewalk, I ;!;;; 11
;It1:
1 ;!:$ i Councilman Bierce suggested that 5 t sidewalks, i :I:;,
jcontiguous to the street be put in by home owners! ::it: 1:;:: i in a commercial zone, and when the home or properg !it::
1 :I# i ty becomes commercial, then require tl1e owner to i ;:;::
:complete the sidewalk to 10'. ;;41 ::::i
t I::,
!The City l4anager suggested that the Council ins- I i ;SI 11:: ::;e: I truct the City Attorney to irxorporate this into i ;:;:; i an amendment to ae Ordinance, rather *an a 4; i policy, to avoid confusion. 1,;:: :;;:'
;l,11 II ;: !By motior: of the Council, the City Attorney was + iGuevara 1;:1: i : ;x! ;
:The Assistant Engineer,stated there are examples i
:such as Eighland Drive, where a 62' right-of-way i ! is desired rather than a 68' OK 66 g right-of-way i
I I I 1 I
lf*l;
:the City Attorney be instructed to draft a change: ::I:;
i By com~~n consent of the CounciL, the City Attor-; ::;
inace to allow a 62' minimum and 68' maximum I
!right-of-way on future secondary streets. 1
I I I
I I I
:::;:
I ::::i ;:::;
;:;:I
1:;s:
;Gas & Electric Company, asked if utility poles i $~11
iahe City Engineer stated the poles would go in i la;:;
I
I I I I
I. I
I
1
I 4 i:;::
1:::
I :;;I:
I I I I I I
I 1 I 8 I I
~1'~
I *
1 1 I I
I 4 ;;
4 i 4 I I I
i instructed to draft an amendment to 6Te OrdinanceiBierce y ; :xi i ! stating a 42' minimum and a 68' maximum right-of-jNcPherson ; ; :x: i
:way would be allowed. in future secondary streets. iNeiswenderi kix: I
I : Hughes
i and the City Attorney were instructed to clean up! a::::
: ordinances,
!Councilman Neisweader inquired if Palmistry husi-i ~ll~i
jnesses were still in practice in Carlsbad,
/The City Attorney explained that the City Businesg :1:;1
1" l I
I I : ' :xi :
:By common consent of the Council, the City Manage; $1 ::I:;
It;:;
I the policies and inmrporate then into the proper! ::;I, :;::?
I i ::I:: :;::I
I ::;::
::::; :::::
::If; ::::;
:license is issued for one year, and some licenses; :::ii 41
!had been issued bePore the ordinance against :::I; !practicing palmist-y was passed, She stated! to I i i:;::
!avoid Law suits, these businesses would be ;::::
I
1 I I I
I s I I I I I
1 I
I;':(
ll;*: I allowed to continue until their license expires. i :::::
I ::::; ;:;;:
I I I
I
I I 1
I 1 I
I
I ; ',
* I , ', *\\ ', '. %,
\8*
I
\\ 81\*\'\ '\ '\ ',
I I I I .' , . '\ ' *, \\\'\, 161
I I -12- i N a me '%., 't~, '88,'8?&'
I I ; of 'i+\c& ' '%\
I i Member 'Qr-4, ~@~,~*$~,o., a. &$& :""""~""""-""""-"""--""-"~-"""""""""""""""~;"""""""""~""""~
I ::::: :::::
:;:!I
1 issued to people wishing to practice palmistry, i pi::
;::I:
I I I ;::I: i CITY ATTORNEY ' S =PORT:
fa7 14; ;;:::
I I I## I I p::; ; (a) City of Carlsbad versus Schuyler. I I 1::::
8 I I i:: I The City Attorney stated after the Vista bond [ ::I:: i issue was passea, she served on Mrs. Schug.;r to i ::pi I acquire the Schuyler property. Mrs. Schuyler has: :!::;
::I:: i ten (10) days to answer. She stated she hoped to: I have this matter in court within ninety (90) days: i::;:
I:;#;
I I I I :::;I : (b) Oceanside Union school District versus Anna i iii::
:I::*
!weik, et al. ;x;;
I +:I :I: i The City Attorney stated this concerns a deed i :#::I
:given by the City to the School District. Mrs. i 4:::
IWeik has contested this action by stating the' : 1Ji: :: Ill:! ::I
$::: ;:;:I
:held next Thursday, Septexher 6, 1962, to allow i ;::I: :I::, 11
i:::: ;:::I
:answer asseptiqthe city's right on ~riday, 18 l::;;
! (c) ~equest from YMCA for certain portion of the; it,:; II
I I
I
I I 8, '\ '. 8 , ',
I 411'1 I She informed the Council that these business ! people had been notified by the City Clerk that ! i when their licenses terminated, they would not i :I,,*
:be renewed, and that no new licmses would be i ;:i:l
I;*#;
! etc. , in the City of Carlsbad. ,*I;*
I 8 I
I I I I I
,I
I
I
I
I ,:;I: ::;::
I
I
I I
I I 'I 1 I 1
:City has no authority because it does not have i
:prior rights. The City was notified of this I
iaction on August 20, 1962. A hearing will Be 8 t ;::i:
i the City to re-enter the case. The City has a i ::::: :deed granted in 1915 for a main conduit water i 1: !line. The City Attorney stated she had filed an :
:,I : August 31, 1962, and that trial would be held on i 1:::; : Septeuiber 11, 1962, I I !:I::
I * I*
I I
I I
I I I I ;:::; :::::
j Agua Hedionda Lagoon and San Diego Gas & Electric! ::ii:
!Company lease for aquatic facilities, The Attor-: :;:I: I,,:: Iney stated it would be a one year lease from July: ::ii:
it1 :30 to July 30, with a charge of $1.00, subject toi /*;:
ithe approval oE the City and the Sm Diego Gas & i :::I: ;:I::
!Electric Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Corn- I 1::::
:pay approval is subjeck to City approval regard-: :::;: iii'i iing a combined boat and fishing pier. The Attor-: I:#::
jney suggested the Council authorize the Mayor or i ::::: I the City Manager to sign the lease of City 1::;:
:approval with the yp/LcA. I :::i; I 1 ;:PI ;*I:!
I'
4 I I
I
Ill
I
;By motion of the Council, the Mayor was authorize4Guevara : 3 :x1 1
;;*I:
i to sign the lease with the YMCA giving City i Bierce ; b :x: ; i approval to the lease, IMcPherson 11 : : ;xi i
I 1:;
I I I 1 :Neiswender: I :XI : : : :xi i
:*11; ::::; :?::
I I I I i:::: I ::::t $1
:::I; i Jane Soqneman, Counciktan Bierce, and The City ; :*;I1
:Manager 'did not make too much progress8 and asked: !:;:I I:::
!if this committee should be reactivated. I :I:#:
1:;::
I I :,*;I
I I I ::I:: 11 :dit: ;:'::
I I f Hughes It
i CITY WAGERtS F33PORT: 1 1::::
i (a) Sign Ordinance,
t I I I 1
I
I
I I
:The City Manager stated the committee to sftudy i ;:r:i
!the sign ordinance comprised of the City Attorney; '::*I
81 01
I I
I I
I I
8 1 s I I I I ,a:!;
I I I I I I
+ \\ ,- \ *. , \, '\, '\ '\ '*
I I I I '\\ ', ' \','.\'*, 16:
I I -13- i N a me ',, '8$$, ",,"%x,
I I : of '$&,,@, '\'?%x
I i Member .,$o ,0'$3.*\p$d 8 q',.Z?$e
tCounciqan Bierce suggested a new committee be i ;:p: I appointdd or the old committee reactivated. I I !I;:;
I I I :::I;
jCouncilr(tan Hughes volunteered to sehe on this i ::::: i:::; i committqe. I I ;:::;
I I I :::::
I iii:; :The Mayqr appointed Councilman Hughes, Bierce,
:.the Cit$ Attorney and City Manager to serve on i I:::; ::;I:
ithis con/mittee regarding sign ordinances. 1 I i;:;;
I ::;I1 I The City: Manager stated he had a sdgn ordinance f ::;:: ::$i i from the City of Redlands, and that perhaps the : ::ab'
Icommitteie could draft it to fit the needs of I !:*:I :I:
I Carlsbad:. I I :t:;:
I I I ;:::;
I {::I1 41
iC0UnCihpn Bierce suggested the City Manager set i ;:;::
:up a didcussion meeting. I I
;::::
I tlll: *;:;I
1 ::::i i The MaWr appointed the City Manager Chairman : :::;;
:of this committee.
I I I I /iiI
I :I::; 'I i (b) Re&l:ts;; of the bids for the LCPR. I I 1I:;l
8 1 $ I i:; '!
9 r :.; I i :The City Manager reported that three bids were i ;;:':
jreceived on the LCPR as follows: I I b ::I ;:,;I :::::
kity of San Diego $1151.00 I 1 1::;: *'I; i A. H. Gllissman $. 975',.@ * I ::::I I I:;;:
!F. 3. Fox $ 801,OO I I '4 I
I :ii:i
!After a short discussion, by motion of the :Gu%vara ; l :X; : !Council, the City of San Diego was awarded the :Bierce :2 :xi :
:bid on iihe LCPR. i McPherson i '(1 : ;xi i
I \ ', '\ , \ \,
I
? I I '\, '\ '\\ ', '\ '\
:"""""".."""""""""""-""""""""""""""""*"""~-""""""""""""".
,.
I
I
I
I 4
I
I
I
81
I I
I I 11
I
I
1
I
I I I I
I I ;:
1
I 1 I I s
I
I I I I p1:: :::I,
I I INeiswender: 1 pi ; I; I
I I I Hughes i ; ; ;x;
! (68 The City Manager stated he had attended the i ::::;
i the subject of forming an improvement district : :i::i
:about $1~,250.000.00. I I !!;:I ;: 'I
:be defined as one with c@hs, public institutionsi :;i:i 1:I
I *
I
I
4 I
t I I I
:I, ,I,:*
;t:a: iCarlsbad Municipal Water District meeting where i I:*:* :I:::
:for the construction of sewers was discussed. 1
:The projects would cover about 4,858 acres at 1 I :::::
tapproximhtely $258.00 per acre for a total of I I 1:::;
I i:!::
4 I 1 1 ;!:
;+::
:;:I1 i1l
!schools, public buildings, or local businesses. I :I::: 81
I I 4 I 1s::: 111
1 ;:'::
I
I
I I
I
I ;: ICouncilmw Bierce suggested the City Attorney i I:!;: :when draifting the amendment concerning parkways :
:and streets, deffne residential and commercial i I/:;
:streets. He suggested a commercial street would :
:::I:
::1
!Councilman Guevara requested a letter be written i ::::i I!
:to Mr. Butters, P. 0. Box 262, Brawley, California, I:;:: 1s
:asking him to clean up the debris and yeeds:on hi'd i:::: 81
:property in Carlsbad. r I I ::::i
I I :::I,
I ::::: !By common consent of the Council, the City Manage4 :;/I ,I::/
;was instructed to write such a fetter to Mr. 1 I It'l
:Butters requesting him to clear and clean up his i ;!I+: lip:
:property in Carlsbad. I I ::,;: :*::I
I I:;,;
I I ::a::
I * :1:;1
I I 1;It;
I' I
I
I I
+
I I
I I I I I I :;!:a 11 1:
I I I I ::;:; !l*!l
I I
I 1
.@
I I I I I J I I
J
I I
1
1
I I
I' \ 8, .\ ' ' -8
I 8 it '8'. *
I '%, ', '% '8,8,,888 16 3
1 \' '\ '8. *, ', '8,
1 +$$..8.+,;%.+ :""-"-"""""""-"""""""""""""~~""""""""""""'"""""""""""~~"~ : Member ,o ',o ..e"$ \Q
I+:
I I 1::::
I :a:::
:::::
I ::i;;
I :I: ;:I:;
+ I I :!!:I Ill
I ::,I: 1 RATIFXChTION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: I 1 !: 8;:;
I I I I :;:::
I 4; ! Ratific3tion of the payment of bills was given i Guevara I :xixi ; I:lIl i for the ,general expenses of the city in the amounk Bierce k I ixi i
;Of $11,&'2-16 and for the Water Department in theiMcPherson ; i :X: i
iazraol.Int 9f $2,625.02, for the period of August 16,iNeiswender: l #:'I :x; ;
:I962 t6August 31, 1962, as certified by the i Hughes I f* : ;x: ;
iDireCtOlir of Finance and approved by the Auditing i i!i:i
:Committqe. I t ::;::
I ::J It
! Ratificqtion of the payroll was given €or the i Guevara : i :x: : /4;
I last ha$€ of August, 1962, in the amount of i Bierce 11 ; ; :xi i i$16,606.!81, as certified by the Director of IMcPherson ; ; ;x; I i Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee, INeiswenderi ?;X: i
I -14- ',, ',, '8 ' ' 8 i N a me x .!& '*,'%$x : of ',&\, 8, %*.
I I 'I, I
I ;; :Councilvan Neiswender asked in something could be; iii:: i done &+ut the fire hazard in the alleys of I i State S+reet.
:The City Manager stated he had discussed this i ::I:; ! problem with the Fire Department, and would I
! dxck wj,th them again to see what action had I I ;:
:been taken to remedy this situation. I
I I I ;;I:;
$
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
I
I I I :*:::
I I I I :Hughes # I !xi :
: ADJOUWFT: I I ;;:;I
I i;:i:
::::;
I I I:::; 11 l1 1:;:;
I I :;:::
I ::;:I
I I I I :;::i
I I i;:::
I I ;I::'
I I :I::! $I1l
I * I /::; $:;;
::::: 9:;
ii::: I:::: i:p:
I I I I 1s:::
I II'I;
i By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at i ~1:~: I 10 :57 P.lM.
I I
I
I
1 I I I
I
I I J I
:Respectfully submitted, I"::
1
I I k\-3$i7Q I I I
alii:
41
IJ. H, PRICE, City Clerk
I ''1 wish to have the minutes corrected. With re-: i gard to Subject A under New Business--it was not; ::,,I :i: : my inte:ntion or understanding that I was approv- i (11 !;I1:
i ing an annual $1500,00 gift to the Chamber of i I Commerce and I want to go on record as agreeing I I to only so much as pertains to the written agree$ 11; i ment between the City of Carlsbad and the Chamber: i of Commerce. If this is to be interpreted as : llll( I approval of an additional annual gift of $1500,0@ l;;l'
: to the Chamber of Commerce, I wish to go on re- i :;;.I
:;I::
: cord as disapproving any such appropiation." I :a::; : COUNCILMAN CARL NEISWENDER I I ;:::I
1:::;
I ;::;I ::::i
I t Ills I I t i::::
t 11;
¶ I I !!;:; I ::;:;
I I ;:I:; I ,I:+,
I I I 1:::;
I ::@:I
* I 1 ::::i :I::,
1;st:
;l:ll
I 1:l
r I I I ::;I; f1I:l
I I I I ;:,::
1 1::: I :::$:
I
I l a :!:;I 1;:':
I::;+
'J,::
I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I I
I
I
I I
I I I I
I
I I I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I I 1 r I I I ;:I1: I;;:*
I I
I
f I ;!I I I
I
I