Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-12-04; City Council; MinutesI; i t '8'- ". i CITY OF CARLSBAD \ ' , \,',had* { Minutes of: CITY COUNCIL (itegular Meeting) '; , ', '\ ', '8 ' : Date of Meeting: December 4s 1962 * Na me '\= '*&, b, <*A, '\ ''4 : i Time of Meeting: 7:OO P. M. , Of '*'@?e, ', "p/., I Place of Meeting- Council Chambers i Member $'@.@$%. ',hO x 9' *'$ I""""-"""""" f""""""""""~""""""~"*"~~""""--~""-~-"---"--"-"~--~~--" I ;:I:; It i L%X.& CALL was answered by muncilrnen GueVaka, $' ':ii ii 1, i was present at 7:08 la. Mi Also present were City Clerk i :$: ;*I ' : Price, City Manager Slater and.Deputy City Attorney ; ,:d: i ~Llson. .:;!;: t ? :,; I ' ;s I ,* ; i i ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. * : ; !.;, I :i.i:i i IMVOCATXON was offered by Cm. Neiswender. + I ::::: I I a ::;:: i APPSOVAL OF MINUTES: 1 :;I:; I 4 v iiiii i (a) Wnutes of the regular meeting of November 20, i Guevara l ; !x: : !:':: i 1962, were approved as submitted. :: Bierce k i ;xi i I : McFherson : : :x! ; I I i 9 Neiswenderi jx:x; I ::pt "b ! (b) Minutes of &e Specid meeting of November 27, i Guevara ; !xixi ; ! 1962, were approved as submitted. ! Bierce : ; ;xi I * i McPherson i : !x; i I I ; Neiswender jx [ :xi ; I :::;: I F iii:: 8: I COBi3ESPONDrnCEk 1. ;;!;: t :t* * 1 ,a*:: 1::;: 1:;:: i;;$ I;;:: \* '','*,, '8 '' " t '. 8. '. '8 69 7 6 E \\ 'x '8, , I ,* I f I $ Bierce, McPherson and Neiswender. Councilman HugfieSi I 1 1 I 1 9 1 4 l ((I*, b t I , I * I 1 4 t I ! Cauncilman I3ughes was present at 7: 08 P. M. * I f i (a) De artrnent of Public Health, Sarr Diego County re: i. ;'I * I itevisedalth permit fees. Letter dated November 16, { ; 1962, from the Department of Public Health, County of ; i San Diego, in which they informed the City of Carlsbad , i *I;# : the County Board of Supervisors had adopted Ordinance * ;l:'l ! No. 2443 (N.S, } revising the fee schedule for Public Health ;;;:i ; permits for food handing establishments in $an Diego : iI:i; i County. This ordinance will recover some of the cost. I :i;h : The new fee schedule will be effective Jamary I, 1965. ! i In accordance with paragraph 7 of the. Basic Health Agree-! : ment between the City and the County of $an Diego, the : '11 i County must collect the new fee for PUWC Sedlth permits.! : A copy af the County Ordinance No. 2443 (N, S. ) was I I attached. i Deputy City Attorney -Wilson informed the Council an 1 i:::: : urgency ordinance had been prepared, which, by referend, t:;:; i adopted County Ordinance No. 2443 (N. S. 1. The followingt ;t4; I ordinance was presented and read in full by the Attorney: i :I;:; I ::: :; I Ordinance No. 5034. AN OBDINANCE OF THE CITY i Guevara #: :x; : ::'f: PtLSBAD AaEXDING OiiEBINANCE NO, 5005 OF ; Bierce : ;x:x; i i THE CZTY OF CAWBAD, RELATING rn THE: P~E- I McPherson I i ixi ; : PARATIOM AND DSSTitIBUTiGN OF FOOD, was read in : Neiswenderi : :x; : i full and adopted. i Hughes ; i :x; i I ::::': i (b) Glen Metcalf - re: 3,equest for extension of time i !; I;: :. in filing final subdivision snap of Glenview Estates Sub- ; ::::; I division. Letter dated November 29, rom Glen i :;!I: : ']Meteal€, 3157 Highland Drive, reques$:t2l$f a one year i ;*? I extension be. granted for filing the final map on Glenview ; ;id: ,4::; : Estates Subdivision, as provided for in Section 400 of i I 4::; i Ordinance No. 9050. 4 ;:::I t I ::::: :ip; i By motion of the Council a one year extension was granted! Guevara i ; ; 3 i : to Mr. Metcalf from February 20, 1963, for filing the I Bierce ; !Xi% i 3 find map on Glenview Estates Subdivision. : McPhersm j : ; x: : t I t i Neiswender: i , i xi i 4 I : Hughes 8; ; q : t , from A. C. JohaRsson, requesting the install- ; iii;: 4 ;::I: I 4*:;: I I * :!;:; :1:i: :I::: :;:i: :p:; ;$i: 8 4 :+: ;: *. 1 ::I:; ;::', 4 I I 1 :e: t s a I t * i I :: $ 1 9 *, 4 4 ;a::: i (C) A. C. Joknsson --re: Bequest for street li ht at i iiiri : Forest Avenue and cripriano Lane. Letter dated dimbe# (:ti: i :$O;?a Street light at or near the corner of Forest Av+ :I1 ,I i and Cipriana Lane, This area is very dark and there : have, been prowlers in the neighborhood. de also stated i $1 1'1 . -I 1 ' %, ' *,e, 8 '\ *, '8 I I I I I " '\ "\ 's88 '.,:. bp 1 8 I 9 3- 8 '8, 's, ', '. % '\ d I i Name 't '.$$,, 'i s8 '+ $&, I I : of 'i+.e?', \, 'p', I : Member ?%'6.+,+B 8$3@\$8$?98 ;""""~CLirr""""""""c-"""""""".~"""""""""""".~""-""""--"""".,--" 'SI); ::I:: i are hbre concpete facts tb present. 3 I ii:!; i pM~~fiGf. I I : ; :' ;:'I1 I 1 ::;I: i (a) Mahiorandurn from the Plann qmmisgiori:., . I :a#:; : Proposed future lot splits on Highl ., for Dr. Pafmabr. ;:::: i A memorandum from the Planning Commission was pre- : 1:::: i sented, stating that a report was given by the City Engine&r :;:;* *::I: ; regarding proposed future' lot splits on Highland Drive fori !:I:; : Dr. falmateer. It. was their conclusicrn that in view of ; ,a::: 1;' { the fact the problem had been created by the proposed i 1:: :!:;I I extension of Tamarack Ave., and also the legal ramifi- : ' I!! ::;I' ; cations involved,. that the matter should be referred tu th4 ii: I t CiQ Gouncil for guidmce, Attached was the City EngineeP's 1:d: ;;::; i report. I I :*:;; It1 e I ::;*, i The report of the Engineer was presented in which it was i :;I:' i pointed out that Dr. Palmateer has property fronting on ; ;;:': , I;* : Highland Drive, which' can be split into seven lots. Dr. ; p:;: I;:# i Palmateer has offered to dedicate the necessary right-of-: : way 150' in depth and varying in width from 34' to 38, far I ;:':: i the opening of the Tamarack Street extension on the east- ; 41) :ir ; erly side of Highland Drive. If Ws dedication were made; : 3 of the 7 lots wouid,be substandard. . Proposed Lot #I : ::;:; i would be substandard'in that it wouid have a frontage of t ;;::: ':iiii i 70' instead of 75'; Lot #2 would .be substandard in frontag$ : in that %would have 66' frontage instead of 77' and a re- ; I:;:: i duction from IO, 000 to 9,900 sq. feet. Proposed lot #3 ; :I::; *:* ' : wauld be substandard in that it would have a reduction in i ::::* i side yard from 7.5' to 6. 5t upon the removal of a porch i ii:;: : on the 'existiag residence on the lot. :I:': I 4 I:':; I I ' :'a i It was also pointed out that Lots 1 and 2 could be divided { li::: { with frontage on Tamarack Avenue, rather than Xigkiland i :::!I : Drive, however, in the interest of uniformity and adi- : :::(I ,;*:: i bility of utility lines this was nc8 considered preferrable. ; t ii;:; ;I, $1 I Dr. Pdmateer is aware of the variance requirements, M@- $8:; 1 ever, he would.like an indication by motion as €Q the anti-i ::iii : cipated approvat or disapproval of the proposed future lot: :iiii i split variance. .. I t p4' :I; I I ;: I I ::/ i Considerable discussion was given this matter by the 8 ::::; ;::I1 : Council. The City Attorney stated he had done research i I;:; i on this matter and he did not feel it was wise for the I I ::I; : Council to make any decision at this time as it may be i i:;:: ;I:; i detrimental to the Council and the Planning Commission i ::x: : at a future bate, I 4 :r:i f 4 ii:: ! By motion of the Council it was agreed that this matter be! Guevara : :xi X: i returned to the Planning Commission for their decision, i Bierce : I ;x; : that a public hearing be held in accordance with the pro- ; McPherson: : i xi 1: : visions of Ordinance No. 9060, and that this Council makq NeiswenderIxi :X: i no decision on this matter implied OF inferred. ; I Hughes : : !x; : Also by motion of the Council it was agreed that this i Guevara i i :xi i Council go on record as being in favor of extending Tam- : Bierce ;x; :x: : arack Ave. from Bighland Drive to Park Drive. i McPherson: ; !xi I I I t 8 8, \'., 8 '' .*' I I t I I $ t $*I* I i ::: :; * l 'It!! !;: l 1': !iib, I * I I I I*' I I t I 8 1::: I + i Neiswenderi : : ; I I : iZughes i ;x;.; I I ii'' :::: ;!:a * ;: :::: iii: t 1 I ii:: I I I I :;:: I ;' I i (b) Memorandum €rom Planning. Commission: Precise! , :: i lans for Harrison Street and Locust Avenue. Memoran- : )"I I sum dated November'30, 1962, from the Planning Corn- ; i mission, stating at their last meeting the Secretary was i ! directed to send a memorandum to the Council requesting ; p;: i that Harrison St. and Locust Ave. be precise planned in I ti: : view of the fact that it is felt the area bounded by Chin- ; ; quapin, U, S. 101 Freeway, Etarriaon St. and Adams St. i i should be rezoned from R-1 to R'3. Due to the substand-: :::: : . ard nature of Narrison and Locust Streets, it is. the 1: 1 f. :;I: ::i: I 1 I 4 I' 8*. I I * : t '',,:;;S8 ",:""8 2 f, 9 * t * I 8\888, ', '+, '\8 8 * I t : Na me I '* '8!& 't8 '?$A8 I I i Of \?&&4,;8, '3 '*8+sqj$, ' i!;:; v;;; :; :;I:; ;'I * r t I I:::! :'i{i ::,;I !!I*: li; I ::, i:; i:::: s -4- I s. I I , * 8 ', ', '8 I Member '&@\+4?'$%8 ~"""~"",,""",",,,""""""~"~""""""""~""""~"""~*"~;""~~.""."~"""..~~""~ i i "I,: i opinion of the Planning Commission. that they should be. - i ; precised planned to meet the City standards. prior to the ; i Planning Commission taking any action on the rezoning. i 1:s4 !I,#, 1:;:: t * :)a:: i A map of the area was presented by the Planning Techni- i : cian showing the area in question. t 1 :' ! A motion was made by Cmn. Bierce that the Engineering i I Department be directed to prepare a precise plan for I ::;;: ; EIarrisoa and Loeust Streets, and that it be given a low ; i priority on the Engineering list, . The motion died for lac3 ::,,I : of a second. I I ::as: ! After further discussion, by motion of the Council it was i Guevara i ; ;xi : : agreed that due to the work load in the Engineering De- i Bierce '. ; !x !x: i i partment that this matter. be brought to the attention of ; McPherson s ; ;x: : ; the Council at the first meeting in Febmary, 1963. i Nefswender: i :x: I 4 I )'Ill i (c) Report an development of Agua Bedionda Lagoon i i area. 'Mr. Melton, Plan&ng Technician presented the i ''4,; :-council with a written report. A map was presented of : :::;; I the entire area. An oral report was given by Mre Melton i i on the progress of the planning for the Agua Hedionda : it::# : Lagoon area, in which it was pointed out khat Je€ferson : 'a 1: I Street should be precised plan and extended southerly and I ; then in a westerly direction tu the Santa Fe Railroad right! :::I: 5 of-way, am? that private easements on the Santa Fe right- i : of-way should be brought up to standard and.intersect withi i Chinquapin. Also the property owners concerned have i : expressed a willingness to dedicate the necessary proper-: i t I t *I I I 4 t : I Hughes y : :xi : ;I::: :ip; !;::: ::I:' I:,:: ;:':: ;;:;: ;::;I :q:: :Xi! * $ t I:: ill:* 1: i The Council wits informed that no action was needed at i :x:: : this time due to the fact this proposed plan is still in the ; 1 ;:#;a 11: i early development. stage, 1 1 * 1;::: i PA- AND L"1ECi;lMTION COMMISSION: % 1 ;+I: I I ;v;: i (a) Parks and Recreation Commission re: Correction$ I;;*; !;I" ; to Master Street Tree List, Letter dated Movember 29, : ::\ i 1962, from the Secretary of the Parks and 3ecreation i :::I, !i;;; : Commission, stating that at their regular meeting held ; ::I4 i September 26, 1962, some changes in the street tree + 8 ;:::I : planting list were suggested and approved. The reason i 1::: i for the suggested changes is due to the trees not being i 1: $:: i available. They submitted corrections to be made to the : 1;:: i Master Street Tree fist. t 1 vi: i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the Master 1 Guevara . : i +X! i Street Tree list be amended as recommended by the : Biesce ;x; :xi * Parks and Recreation Commission. j Mcfherson : ; :xi st 48 i ty. I I i t i::t: ;1tat I I t I ::I* a ;::I i : Neiswender i : :x: I ? i 8 Sughes I i !x: * 6 ;::i I (b) Parks and Recreation Commission re: Librar & ::i: i location in Holiday Park. Letter dated November 29,'1962, I:;: : was presented from the Secretary of the Parks and Recrey lit: :',I i ation Commission, stating the Library Committee is pro- i 1:: ; posing to place the new library in the middle of Eoliday ; i;;: i Park. It was their undershnditzg that the library would i :I:: t: :; : be placed at the south end of the area bounded by Eureka ' ; i Place, Pi0 Pic0 Dr. and Chestnut Ave. 'The Commission i 4::; i::: : was not granted the opportunity to make known its views : $:it i on this proposal, which is of vital importance to them. : '1;: 1 They pointed out the Olin property is .included as a capital I 111: :I1 8. * i outfay in the 1962-63 budget for the Parks and 3ecreatioa i 1';: : Commission and this property is proposed to be occupied ; :I:: i by the new building. ;.I 8 : I * 1::: '*I) i *' The City Manager presented the proposed plot plan of the ! iq; i * i t $1: 4i't ! ;;i: t 1 ;'#I 1 * '1 a I t . t 8% ,, b, .b ', '\ *8 I I \ t' I I I ', +b '\ '+,,u 3 & "'1 0 1 I I 1 '\,\,,", ',, b, I -5- I : of +LQ.+&* ~""""""""~~""-"""~"""""~""""""""-"--"""""~~"~"""""----"----,"-- ; Member *%@.+\e $98) b I :::I: i library that was prepared by the architect, for the Council i:: :; ; to review again. He pointed out this proposed plan was 1 1:;:; :;;I i approved by the council at a previous meeting. ~ccordit& ;:':I I '1 : to the proposed plan the library would face on Eureka P1. ; ;:':I : as it was felt there woad be less noise if the building werfe ::pi i placed further back from Pi0 Pic0 Drive and the Freeway; I1I:i I L ::::I '* I $ "I : ; i ! After further discussion it was recommended that a lette6 :::!I i be sent to .the Secretary of the Parks & Recreation Corn- : ;::ii ; mission, .inviting him to come to the City Manager's offick 1:::: i and review the proposed plan, and that the City Manager i ; explain the Councif*s reason for approving this' proposed ; i:' I I: i plan. I I 4;::; 14 I * I I :;::i I NEVI BUSINESS: I I i:ii: I I * ::'I: I 1 ii: i (a) Besolution No. 864, vigorously opposing any legis; :it 1 ; lation permitting or sanctioning the use of partisan I\ :::;; I I'll i political labels by Municipal Office candidates. At the. i ;::;I '::'I I previous meting the City Attorney was instructed to pre-: ;&I:; i pare an qrdinance opposing any Legislation psrmittiug or I :!l'l i;: ; sanctioning the use of partisan political labels by Munici-: :I* t i pal Office :candidates. The following ordinance was pre- I ::::; : sented fqr the Council*s review: e ::::; t. l i:ii; I 8 :i:;: i Resolution No. 864. A ZtESGLUTJON OF THE CITY i I:::; CITY OF CAfhLS3AD VLGO&OUSLY i Guevara : 1 i L ; 1 ~~~~$Go~?!EGISLATION PERMITTING OR : Bierce ixt : xj ; i SANCTIONING THE USE OF PAaTfSAN POLITICAL i McPherson: 8 : X i i LABELS BY MUNICIPAL OFFICE CANDIDATES, was : Neiswendeli !xi 4 i : adopted by title only and further reading waived. : Zughes i i i 1 ; I t I :::;I '6 i Ii'uture site for Fire Department substation in ,the Terr- ;;:;: i I- area. Cmn. Neiswender asked the C~uncif~s approval in : ::I:: : providing the Planning Commission with a project which { ::::' i would- in the future establish a substation for the Fire i p1:: *:I; ; Department in the Terramar area. This is not an im- : $;!: I mediate necessity, but should be made a part of the t ;*I 1:; ; future planning and growth of the city. 1 $ ;:i;i t I ::;i: i BY motion of the council it was agreed that the Planning i Guevara ; : i 4 i : Commission make a study toward the possibility of estab- i Bierce : i !x: ; i lishing a substation for the Fire Department in. the neigh- I NcPhersoni i ! g i ; borhood of the Terramar area. : Neiswendeqx: J + ; t * (1) 8 I , t !c *, \,'* I i Na m.e '8 'x%, '.,,'*I> I I =$ .$?+, &I1 *I :*'b; I:;( I I ." I f 18 I I * * i Hughes : !x: q i I Contribution towards Fire Department Christmas Prograe. :i;i; :* : Cmn. Hughes stated the Fire Department is in the proces$ ::::i 1::; i of preparing for their Christmas program, however, they! ::;I# : do not have sufficient funds in their budget to complete : ;SI:* I:#*; i the project. This project is something the City of ZarlsbQd ::p: i has become known fur, and he would like to request that : :Be:! 1:::; 'I $300.00 be allocated to them €or this project. I ::;:I I t t $1;; i Cmn, Neiswender suggested that the Chamber of Comerbe 1::;; i contribute towards this project. I 'I::;; I I :I::: 1 I ::;:, : The Director of Finance was present and informed the i :x: i Council the only sour.ce of monies available is in the Con-: ::;; : tingency Fund. I I ;;it 1 * ;::: i By motion of the Council it was agreed that $300.00 be i Guevara 1 t : xi :;:I ; allocated to the E'ire Department budget from the Contin- i Bierce i iXiXi I gency Fund for the Christmas project, ; McPhersoni : :x: I * 1 I I I I' 1 * i Neiswender: ; ;XI t I : Bughes /xi :x: :::I ::;: I I 11 I I I * 'I:: I Cmn. Bierce stated he would take it upon himself to I : contact members of the Chamber of Commerce to see i :**I i what the Chamb,er could contribute towards this project. ; :::: I 1 I * ("b 1 1 I :s; .b I I : I * t ::i: !t ti I I '8 8. t 1 .' I 't ' f I 8' I \' I I . I I I I I -6- I 8. I ; of I i Member ;"",,"",,"",,,"~""i"""""""""""~"-~"---""-""*.~""""-- I i Name I i i TLZAFFIC- SAF'FTY: WMM~TTER I 1 I I 1 I f I I f 4 (a) Report on petition re: Ridgecrest,, S,eacre$t and i ; Basswood intersection, At the previous meeting of the l i Council a petition was presented signed by property ownets t in the Seacrest area requesting that an investigation be ! I made of the intersection at the point where Basswood Avd, : rulis into Ridgecrest Drive, and Seacrest Drive meets . I i Ridgecrest Drive. This matter was' referred to the a * : Traffic Safety Committee. I 1 I I I I * t I I i I I f I I I 1 I I I I t I t s I I s I t I I I 1 I I I I 8 I I # The City Manager informed the Council the Trdic Safety! Committee took this matter under investigation and found: that the visibility at the intersection is sufficient in all : directions of movement. However, they recommended i that a T type sign be installed on the south side of Seacrest Drive. Also it was the opinion of the Committe4 that striping was not necessary. The Police records werk checked as far back as 1960 and no accidents have been ; reported at this intersection. The committee was fortun4te enough to have Mr. Peter Kaltnow, Traffic Engineer for : the Automobile Club of Southern California inspect this i intersection, and it was his opinion that the intersection : in question provided sufficient visibility for drivers. The Council requested that the property owners who sign4d the petition be notified of the Traffic Safety Committee's i findings and recommendations. * I 11 11 I I I I t I I I I I : CITY ATTOiINEY'S &EPOitT I I # i i The Deputy City Attorney informed the Council drafts had: : been prepared for the agreements between the City and I i the property owners on the improvement of Tamarack i : Avenue, which involves six property owners. .I ! Contribution by subdivider towards a park site. An i opinion has been requested by one of the Coun6U member$ : as to whether or not the City could require the subdivider; i to contribute $25.00 per lot towards future park sites, i : After researching this matter and further checking with : i the League of California Cities, it would not be legal i : unless the park is integrated with the subdivision., * I ! Division of land. An inquiry has been received from i Lever, Acker and Israel, attorneys at law, regarding the! : dividing of a parcel of land so as to not come within the ; i provisions of .the Map Act. Mr. Nilson requested per- i : mission to answer the letter informing them that the City : i would not take any position with regard to whatever they i : intended to do until they actually came in on the request, : i and that the City reserves the right to exercise any pre- i : rogative they might have at that time. I 1 i By common consent of the Council permission was granted : Mr. Wilson to answer the inquiry. I. I 'I I I I t f I f I 1 I I I I I I * I 4 I i CITY MANAGER'S i3EEPOitT: I I I I i ; A letter of thanks has been received from Mr. Reid Knighi, i concerning the improvement in the water and the improve; i ment of State Street. : I i The Council requested that a letter of thanks be sent to ! : Mr. Knight. I I I I I I I I i i Santa Fe Depot and adjacent properties. A letter has bee4 I received from Mr. A. K. Johnson of the Santa Fe ; Railroad Company, stating he hoped to be able to give i i some comforting information within the next two weeks : ; regarding the depot and adjacent properties. I I ! I 4 I s I t * ,, ', ', -* 8, ', 'x '3 ,, \ ', '\8'882 2 'a \,,'x,, '*8 '8 '8 "8 "@ "\ "$& '\+\St '. "?&, $ \q8\ 4?+¶.ty? ,o * J\.tqp, ;;I I 'f::: .;;:$ 1'::: I:, *;ll; 1I:;l ;::I: .a:;:: ':::* iii:: pl:: slJ ;: :!!:; :::I: ::::: :;4; 'bit; ii:!: !:':: :11 4;: 4:;;: !id;l ;;'I; IJ:; 861 :;I:: ;::I' ,a::: /I:: ii::; '1; :;Ill !:::I 4; ;:'I: /::; I::;, :1*1; 4::: ::::: '::::; ;::%I 1:;:; i:::: * ::: 1;11, ::;:, ;Ill; ::I;; ,"I; 1::*1 ::I" :*I:; 1::11 :#t;* :;!:! ::::: i:;:i 41;: i:::; ;::*I :;i;: :I!:: $,*I ::::: 1:;:: ::;:; :::Il :; I::;, ii;;; 1,:;: ::;4; :;;:; ;It:< 1;::~ ; @ ;; ;: 1' ,If:: :::; :*I ;::; ;!;a ll;: :::; i::; 1::: ;!:I I;:: i::; i::: """"""""" 1;;:; ;;:;; 141)* 1,:;: @I I1 $I# pi; 1.1 k* 1;;: ** * ;' !I,! . I I' I I 8\ 88 *\ '8 ' ' t I I t 8, 8<,'-8, 8, \8 '* 9 2 3 I i '\\ ', 8, '8 '\ 'b," , '\ '* I I t I U I . "7 - ~"""""~"""""""""""""""""""""-""---"""----""*;"--------"-""------~--- : .Member *%'@\&?!-@~, I t I I I:::: i Community effort - "Lights for Lancers", It has been J ;;:;: ; suggested by one of the members of the Council that the : lt;ul :It:: I City help in some way towards the community effort for I +:: 11% ; the "Lights for Lancers". The 3ooster Club has done a : :it I: i tremendous job on this project. They still owe approxi- : y:: : mately $3,500. $2,900.00 in pledges have been received! ::,:: t:; '&I:: i Also they will receive between 4 and 5 hundred dollars : :;*:: t from the school as a part of the proceeds from the footbail ::pi ; games. This project was started in April of this year. i :;I ' ; They have received $17,000 so far. The lights are paid : :;;:: :1,*1 i for, but they still owe for the press box and memorial 1 :::i: : plaques. I I 1I:'l @:It: I I "8:; :'I i Cmn. Neiswender stated he was certainly very proud of : ;:::i i the Booster Club. He went through a similar experience i :!pa *(I : in a town where he was stationed at one time, and they { hl;: !::id 1 added $1. 00 to the Electric bill to raise funds for a pro- : 1:::; : ject. He suggested that the City could perhaps place a : ::::: i rubber stamped notice on the water bill, asking for a i :~~11 ;i!:; : donation towards the "Lights for Lancers". This would j 1:::: I be purely voluntary. Also he would like to have the I I 1:::: : newspapers publicize this project. l*I1l I 1 ::;;: t I I t :::;i : By common consent of the Council it was agreed that a i ::;;4 i rubber stamped notice be placed on the water bill asking ; i:::: ! for a donation to "Lights €or Lancers" project. I I ;iii; I t. I:: ': 4 I I-: ' : ; t Bids for the purchase of two fire trucks. Three bids I I I;::; i were received for the two fire trucks. The following bid4 at:*l ;:I:' i were received, which included the trade-in of the old fire: :::;: : truck t 1 ;:::i I Van Pelt Cos I 1 $34,588.00 1:::: 'I I American-La France 33,695.00 1 11: ;:::I 1 I Seagraves Co. 32,118.00 I :; 1:;;; I :::;: ;:1 :: I I ::;I: I * I p18 ;:: \88 8\8 88 '88 '8 ' I I ! Name - -% '8:4)s8 I I I of '*$+?8 '?&.089'+$+ ', \", I€ I I 1 I 11' t I i t I I 1 6 ? 8 i The low bidder was Seagraves Co. The company will work :s+ : out a lease purchase agreement, with interest at the rate ! i of 670. The City Manager informed the Council he was i : going to contact the various banks to see what interest ; ::,,; i rate they could offer. I I I:::: i We will not need to budget any monies until the next fiscal: :: 1:;: ; year due to the trade-in factor, as it will be some time ; ::I,; B+l) ; in May before we accept the trucks. J :;*I; ! By motion of the Council the low bid of Seagraves Co. wad Guevara ;x! : xfi i i accepted in the amount of $32,118.00 for two new fire ; Bierce I 8 :x: i i trucks. i McPherson; ; !g i ::i:; :!+ 4 18 :;* I I I I Neiswende+ ; ; xi ; + t i 1 Hughes : !xi x: 11 i I 8 ;:' I:!; I i Employment of Civil mgineer assistant for Water Dept. i : The City Manager informed the Council he would l%e 1 I :a:: I authorization to employ a person in the Engineering De- i ;;ii : partrnent for the Vrater Department. The City is badly ; ::5: i in need of having some new water maps made. After the I $Jl #I: : work is caught up in the Water Department, then perhaps : :::I I part of this wants salary could come from the General i !;I: i Fund. i By motion of the Council the City Manager was authorized: Guevara ;x ! :xi i to hire a Civil Engineer assistant for the Vilater Depart- I Bierce '1 1 1 :x: : ment. : McPherson I : :x! ::It: I ii;: I I I :::I !;;I I I I Neiswenderi i !xi I 8 I I ; Hughes ; ix :x: I I :I!; i Cmn. Bierce suggested that after the work is caught up in! t::: i the Water Department that this man's salary continue to ; .:*I: ; be pa4d from the Water Department budget, in order to : ;::; %@:I i repay some of the engineering work that has been done €o$ ;:,: : the Water Department in the past few years. 1::l I I :::: r1 'I I * t :I:: I I 1 i:::i v I ; '.'. *" \\ '"",, '\ -\ '\ '8, '\\ '. '\, '\ \ 1. i Name '8, .". I ; of '+J$-$, '\\ '*. : Member '%@ ' '0'4 \,& y)' 9'44p i """"""-""" ~ """ * """"""""""_______)_ """""-""""~""""-"""-""--:~~-~--- "1,: I i::;1 i The Mayor informed the members of the Council that I ::::: l:i8: : General, Masters from Camp Pendleton sent him 30 8 !I8 i tickets to distribute to those who would like to visit * :ii{l : Camp Pendleton, and if anyone wishes to have tickets I I :;:I: 4i i to please contact him. ;:;#I I I I i:::: i EU%TIFICA'MON OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: I b::@l b I I 1 :I::: 8I:@l i Wtification of the payment of bills was given for the i ::::: I I I I I I I ' '\ '-,W& !3 '3 I I I -8- ", *, '\ ' ', ' ', ' '\ I I. I .'& ', \yh I I I I 1 I t pt;; I I I 'I ::4; i general expenses of the City in the amount of $8,857.02 : Guevara i ; I 8 ; ; and for the Water Department in the amount of $6,047.043 Bierce ;XI ;A : ! for the period November 20, 1962 to December 4, 1962, i McPherson; ; i 4 i : as certified by the Director of Finance and approved by ; Neiswended ; ; + ; ! 1- the Auditing Committee. i Hughes i :xi x : i Ratification of the payroll was given for the second half i Guevara ; {xi x: I : of November, 1962, in the amount ef $1'7, 638.62, as : Bierce :::*: i certified by the Director of Finance and approved by the i ,McPhersonj i i x: i : Auditing Committee. : Neiswended : ; x! : I t ;.i Hughes ix: : rr: i I:',, I ADJOURNMENT: t p::: :::;I 4 f ;ii:i 88 11 i By motion of the Council the meeting was adjourned to ; Guevara ; ; :x: ; ! December 11, 1962, at 7:30 o'clock P. M. , for ,the openin4 Bierce : : i xi I i of the sewer bond bids. ' . ; McPhersoni i ; x: ; I I I 1 ;:::I +: I I I I I i t 1 I I : Neiswenderjx: ;x! : I 1 i Hughes ; :xi x: i !:I:: I By proper motion the regular meeting was declared I I p:' /:;: I 1 t ;:::I 1 I I I i;::: ;::ii I Respectfully submitted, 1 t :x:; ::I:$ 11:;: I I 4 * ;::I: 1:::: :si:: I I # :ii:: I 1'1 I I I ;+:; i Deputy City Clerk 1 ;;-I 11:;: 1 ::: ;:::: I & I ::;:I 4::: I I I I ::I:: 1 I :i::,: I I I :I!:: I I I I :;;:: I 4 I ::::, i 1 I I ::I:; 1 I I I '11,; ::*;I I I * & i:;+ I' I I I I i adjourned at 9:45 P. M. I I I 11' I" I I 1 I I I I t I I 4 8 I I t I I I I I l I * I I 4 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I b I I I I * I;':; #'I 1 I I I ;::'$ f * :'I1; I I I t I 1 I r 1 :::;; t 4 r :::I I I t * 1,;: t I I I !I:;: I I I :;:;: I * I :I::! I I ;::a, l t a I 11;; I I I I :;+: t I I :;::; ::::: I I I I !:;:I I i I I ::;:: *#I;: I I :::;: ::: ;: I t * 1 ;:;:: 4 I r ::; ,,I: I t i;;;: I( I I I4 I I I 'I *I I I I 4 I I i I 1 I I 181 I I t I I 1 I I 6 I t I' (LI'/ I:;:1 ?*I!\ I I I !