HomeMy WebLinkAbout1963-09-17; City Council; MinutesI t CITY OF CARLSBAD : '*' , \;9. "' ', '8 '. i MINU!I!ES OF: CITY CO~NCIL (regular meeting): I DAE3 OF MEETING: September 17, 1963 i TIPlE OF MEETING: 7:OO POW, i PLACE OF MEETING: Council Chambers ' Of '?!\Q\+\#$\ 0"""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""""~"""""~""""""""""~~~"~~:~ ; Member 8@.("0\,*,0+
', 88 8
8, "\,, '%8"*:8, 15 z] ' ' ', I '\*8 8'.8& '., \'$ i Name ' *$8 ', $>, 't5 kg+, ' \92,
kOLL CALL. was answered by Councilmen McPherf ::I:! :;;:: : son, Bierce, Guevara and Meiswender. Councilman i i:;:: : Hughes was present at 7:14 P. M., Also present I ))fII
(;I:: ! were City Manager Slater, City Attorney Wilson i ::!::
i and City Clerk Adams. I ::;;:
4 i::;: * :::;:
I ::'I:
I I :;!!;
I I ::;;:
I INVOCATION was offered by City Manager Slate. ::#I; :I::;
I b ;;:::
I ;:::;
I (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of Sept-i McPherson : :x! 2 ;
I { Guevara : ; 8 , ;* , : :
I A letter from the San Diego Gas & Electric i !:"I ,I::!
I 8 t #
I
'81
b
I I I
I
I
I I
I ALLEGIWCE to the Flag was given.
I I *
I I I I
8 b I i:,:; :'I
I
I I ::'Il
! APPROVAL OF MIMUTES:
i ember 3, 1963, were approved as presented, : Bierce !xi ;d i
i Neiswendei i i 3 ;
I I
I i CORRESPONDENCE: I
I I ii:::
I *IS I:;::
i Company was presented wherein they enclosed a : 4:;: i lease on the beach property between the two (2) i :;:;:
i inlets fronting on Carlsbad Boulevard. :p:; I ;&:'I
I I c I ;::ii
I :I,'* at I The City Attorney informed the Council this was 1 ::;:;
t the same lease that was presented some time ago, i ::::: ; : ; :-I i with one change, providing that if any building : ; : 1 ;.I
; is constructed, that the San Diego Gas & Electrid iiiii i Company be permitted to approve the plans. I * :I::*
I I I ::I:! ;::'I i Councilman Meiswender inquired as to "chis prbvi- i :iiIi i sion being included in the lease. I ;I::;
I ::!;:
J Mr. Frank DeVore, representative of the San Dieg4 ::::: ::p; : Gas & Electric Company stated this is the same I :;' i provision that appears in all of their leases, : ;;::i e ;:; i and is included in the lease o€ the upper lagoon.! ;: ,I::; $1
8 * ::I:;
':;'I i By m0tio.p of the Council, authorization was give4 McPhersoni i i i i i for the Mayor to .execute the lease on behalf of i Bierce !x! i 4 i : the City of Carlsbad. I Guevara i : : 4. I
I : Neiswende# !g 4 ! i Mayor Guevara extended thanks and appreciation ti ,a* I ;; 1.:'
1:;; i the San Diego Gas & Electric Company ,and the Citi i :'; ; ; 1 Manager was instructed to send a letter of appreJ ;:::I i ciation to the Company. B ;i!;!
'*I;:
I * ::;;;
I (a) Petition - Re: Requesting 1911 Act i :;'I;
v :;::;
I::;: :;' ;;:!: :;;;; :* I:
I i'; : ::;I !I:; ;i::
b I ii;!
I I i;::'
;::a I ;:I:
! t I,'* :;;:
I :I::
I I :!;:
I ;.I I : t ;::;
I 4 * I I *
'I
ID @
I I
I
I
I
I I +
I
; Street Improvement for a portion of Chestnut Avei , ::I i nue. A petition signed by five (5) property own4 i ers was presented, stating in view of the proposid i Chestnut Heights Stibdivision, it is their feelin4 i the time is aprqpos to consider full improvement! ,t ::;: ! 02 Chestnut Avenue, including streets, gutters, i
; curbs and sidewalks from Monroe to and including i **'I : the above-mentioned subdivision. Therefore, the$ i wished to express their desire for the City to I '1;; i initiate 1911 Act proceedings under the City's : :::; i Street Improvement and Participation Program.
I 'I
*I1 t
I
'I
1
1 I
I I
t
18
I @I
I
J I
I
I I
I
I
I
4 *!!I
I I * - I I
I I I
I
B' , 8, \, -8 ' ' -*
I *
'8 '
B s, '.,"., ''8 "8 ',
4 \\\ 8, ' 8, \\ NJ 5 s
I ', ',,'\, 8 ' 8
t -2- I Name 'b, ,%, , '+$jlj
I I : cf Y$@, ,?*.+ 92,+',+48 '\ +,
I :-"""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""""""";"-.."""""""""-~-~- : Member \,;*.gt..p9\;0 i By motion of the Council, the City Engineer was : McPherson I : !xi i I instru.cted to prepare A petition under the 191.1 I Bierce (I1 I
: Act proceedings €or t5e Pmpxcvenent of Cheatnut [ Guevara i i :xi i i Avenue from Monroe Street up to and including th4 NeiswendeGx; :xi i i Chestnut &fanor Subdivision,
i Councilman Hughes was present at 7:14 P.M.
'B
1 :x:xy :
1
I I ;I1 I 4 4 ;:'I: 18': i:;;: 1 a
I I 11 * ;!!::
D
l t
I I I
I
I I
t 1 I I
I I I I
I I
(b) Petition from residents oUoure3.1 A&
nue, - re: Speedincp A petition signed by twsn.$y four (24) property owners was present.cd, request:
ing that appropriate action be taken by the City i
Council to reduce the incidence of speeding on i
! ~ Yourell Avenue. I I
I I $ i A written report made by the Police Department w& : submitted, stating the area had been patrolled or3 I September 10, 1963 and September 11, 1963, showik i no traffic violations observed and no citations I i were issued.
i The City Planager informed the Council the TraffiG
i Safety Committee made a survey of the area and i : the problem seems to be at the crest, It is the* : recommendation that a sign be erected on the i southeast corner of Yourell Avenue and Spruce i i Street, designating, "SLOTJ, CHLI1DMN AT PLAY". :
i By common consent of the Council, it was agreed 1 i that the recornmendation of the Traffic Safety : i Committee be accepted and that a sign be erected.!
I I I I I 1
I
I I *
* * * I
t 1 t I
I I
I (e) Rabuco - re: City participation in Le{ i Earr Estates Unit NO. 2 for Storn Drains. Letter! ! dated September 9, 1963, from Rabuco Development i i Corporation,'stating that on June 28, 1962, they : i wrote to the City regarding their installation 04 i a drainage structure in the area of Lebarr Estateb : Unit No, 2, In this letter, they informed the I i City of costs to them and the amount they felt i i should rightfully be paid by the Cityo On July I i 5, 1962, they received a reply to the effect that: i their request would be referred to the staff for i i further study as to engineering, city participa- : i tion, etc. As they had had no further corres- i i pondence with the City, they requested an immedi: : ate review of the matter. I
i The City Engineer informed the Council this matt* i had Been discussed previously, There were no I i storm drain improvements made in the subdivision: i that were incorporated in the City's permanent i : storm drain system, There will have to be cons- i : iderable more wQrk done in correcting the system I i that was installed and it will have to be contin: i ued on down, It is estimated this will run i approximately $1,500 D 00 e
* t
I I I I
I I * I
8 I I
a
* I i Councilman Neiswender requested a clarification ; i
i of this matter. *
I I ! f I f a I I I
I I
I I
I
I 8 I 4 b
I I I I I I r
::vi I( i::::
:;I:'
;:I:; ;:;:: ::::: ::I:! ::,:;
:;:Ia i::i:
;::I: ;:;:;
,:::1
;I:@' /*::
I::;!
::;I,
;ll;l ;:::j
'::*I
;:a:l
@I:;\ :i;j; i:: 1,:;
::;$I
;;1*1 ::,; ::
;I1 # 8 I .:
;;I*
1;: ::;; ::i:
:!I;
:ai;
;:I4
;:'I
1:::
::;a ;: :iii i::: ;:::
1::: 1:ii
':I1
::I:
;I!; :::I
::;I
;8I: :::: :::;
$;;I ii:: :;;:
;*&I ;::i ::i:
;:I8
I' ;::i
i;:: i;::
ll:; 4;; ::;; :::: I::; ;::; :::: :::: ::::
::I* ;:
:::: ::::
1:;t:
:a:
ii$i
l*)I
I10
:I
'11
))'I
:'ii
:::I
'I
:I::
!,I!
I I 8, \; .\ ', ., -\,
I -3-
I I
I t *, 8, s,~', 'b '8 ' I I * i , ' lGc
I : Member ?e(<& b',c\ 2 ;~""~""-""""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""~""-"""~""""" x-* .v'.P-\.,:,, .
::+
I :!I:; l*I
!::i:
I:!:: i::::
1 I I ;:4' s:;:
I ;:::;
I I ::!I:
4 pl':
1::: ::::; i::!:
;:/I
t;':1
I*;:! ::::; ::;::
!:I::
I I I I ::;I: :;':;
;;I ' :4 ;
', \\ 8.. ', ', '8
I t 8 \' J '8, ', ', \ 8 ',
I I * I I Nama "8,>:c>, 8, \t,\
',+& '\8 8q!,! ' Qf 8 L. *'fi 4. .$$?+;, 8y '*,', \%',
I The City Engineer stated that if a system in a i ::'I; 'l:;l. i subdivisioiis a part of the -perinanent starm drak 1 :;;
I i system, the policy has beei? Zor the City to party ::::: : icipate in the improvements . I :I1 1
I tI:'I
: The City did approve the subdivision, It would ! : be very difficult for the City to go back on the i i subdivider at this time.
I Councilman Neiswender stated he did not feel thaq Ifi1l( ;;:ab i the City should have to participate in these sub' i;::: i divisions- This should be a part of their engi- ; ,I;': I;':; i neering costs.
i The City Engineer further stated the drainage i i that is involved in a s&division usually involve$ i a larger area than is in the subdivision. This i ih:; 11; i is the reason for asking the City to participate.: l';ls i The draina.ge in this subdivision cost the subdi- :
, i vider approximately $9,000 -00 and the subdivider i i has asked that the City participate in the amoun4
; of $2,500.00, The Engineer recommended that the I i line be extended approximately another 100 feet. i 1::;:
i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the i McPherson i :Xi 4 I ; request be ,denied, : Bierce
I
I
I
#
8. I
I IIII *
I I b
I
(1' I I
'1 1
'I&
'I
I
I I i Guevara 1 i i 3 j
I I I I Hughes i i i {
I i Neiswendegx: i 4 ~
; ORAL CO!YMUNICATLONS: I D :ii:
I :;a: i One of the property owners living at 1415 Yourel4 ::I: i Avenue stated it is his understanding that the : :'I: ;:ii I sign will only be placed on -one side of the stredt $1
: at the crest- It was his feeling that a sign i $1:
t should be placed on both sides of the street as i :;:;
i there are children living on both sides of the i i::: :;I: i street- I :::i
I I ; ('1 * I '::: i By comn consent of the Council, it was agreed i ::ti : that a sign be placed on both sides of the street& :ill i;::
I I 1;:: : PUBLIC HEARING: I ::
: * ;;:I
/ (a) Proposed annexation of "East Carlsbad Annex4 :;:; ;::: i ation e2.3". I * I :i;:
I ;I I I ,I:: ; The Clerk certified as to proper notice having ; 4:;
: been given to all ppoperty owners and as to pub- i i i'i i
: lication, I ii:'
I t ;:
I I & I ;I:: i The City Attorney informed the Council written i :::; ;t:; ; objections had been received from the City of i ;::: i Vista, City of San Marcos, Bueno Colorado Muni- : :iii i cipal Water District, San Marcos County Water Did- ::;I
i trict and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District. I :::: i;;: ; However, none of these entities are owners of i ;:I: :::: ; property lying within the proposed annexation i ,I:: i boundaries- 1 I :i::
I ;I::
I * I ;:Is
I I: I ' :;
t ::;a
I I ;:I:
I 8 I ;::i
1';o
4 ;:*a ,*I' ::;:
1,: * I!**
I 4
'I4
I I
b
I*
#It
I
I 1
I t I
b I :itt
1
8 I
I
I I' 1
:*
D
I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I I
f I I I a I
I I >,,e \s.
I I * I
I ., q, ', '. '*
I '. ',. '., ',, '.,"'
I -4- \"
I ; af .,+".O'
I '8L':9, ,L ~'Yf+,;,,&<~,
t I *, , ', '.,'.,'x, 16.; I
I
I I i Name' \., '\$&, =,;?&, . '?$;,
I ;""""""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-. : bqernber \:e ,a..pf8;0
',..I I I
I I The City Attorney further stated two letters of i i protests have been received from agents of pro- I : perty owners within the proposed boundaries.
! Letter from Russell W, Grosser Attorney at Law, { 1 protesting in behalf of his clients, Albert Zais4r i and Edward Y, M, Leong, dated September 17,, 1963; i to the inclusion of any of their property in the: i proposed annexation,
: Letter dated August 13, 19C3, from Daniel H, ! Wiegand, Manager of the Eressi Ranch, stating i i their belie€ is that,annexation to any city for i i property in this area is premature at this time, i I and requesting that the boundaries be redrawn to i i exclude that portion of Lot A belonging to the i i Bressi Ranch..
: The City Attorney noted for the Council that in i i accordance with the Government Code any agent i i acting on behalf of an owner must show authoriza: i tion from the property owner, and none had been i i received from the two owners. Also that the onl$ i question to be considered is that written proteses
; have been received from two (2) property owners. i
i The Mayor announced that the Council would hear i i from the property owners who had submitted writt4n i protests if they desired to speak.
1 1 I I I t
I t
I I I I I I I I
1 t I
I I e I I
l l I
I I I
1 8 * I 1
:::I:
:;a:;
;I::;
1"I) &:;:I ::I;!
:::!I
-1
I:: l,ii !:!pi
;!::I
@I!!: ::
ti::: ::; 11 :x:; 1:
:;e:;
:I!!:
;;It1 la ;: Id': :;:
1:;:: :'::;
;:,;I iiiii :I::!
ll:,I i::::
~;:~l :::I:
;I, 1 1'::: :::;:
:;'I;
I,:,
1 :'I
::I::
I;:': 1:;
:;;I,
::;:I i::;;
"1
:I I,
l#Itl la1
jjiii
'11'1
I:!!! 1 I I I : There were no owners present who wished to speak.:
I The Council was informed that the total number 04 i written protests registered represented 18,835% i : of the assessed valuation of the properties pro- i : posed to be annexed.
i MR. LINDEN R. BURZELL, was present and stated he i i was representing the City of Vista, Vista Irrigai : tion District and Buena-Colorado Water District. i
: The Mayor informed Mr. Burzell as the entities I I which he was representing did not own property i I within the boundaries of the proposed annexation i i he could see no reason for his speaking at this i I time.
: The public hearing was declared closed at 7:40 i : P".
i After discussion by the Council the following i
!.resolution was presented for the Council's cons- : i ideration:
!
I t I
.. I I I I 1
I I I
I 4 I
6 s I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I I
I I I
I I l a I
I-.#, ;:I; ;::: ;:::
;I::
1::: lii: iy:
1:; :;:: :::I I:::
I:;*
:;I: ;;:: i;!; iiii
4 $11 :;
$11 l*:: ;::; :it: :::;
::a* #I:; i:::
$88
::8: :'
;:a1
14;
$11 *:: I::: il:'
1::
II't
11
'!a,! i Resolution No. 940- A RESOLUTION OF THF. CITY i McPherson i i i i i COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DECLARING THAT A i Bierce !xi : 4 i MAJORITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN MADE WITH REGARD TdlGuevara i i i 3 i "EAST CARLSBAD ANNEXATION 2.3 'la was adopted by i Neiswende4 i xi 4 i title only and further reading waived, ! Hughes i i ; 4
I 1 .I 4 1
D 'I
* 1
I
b I ;:::
I I i:::
I * ::I: :I
* I pi!
I
I
I
I I I
1 I
I I 101
I ;::a
I I ::I:
I I 1 b'
L
t * I' I S '8 *', '\ '8 '8,
1
I
.4 1 '\, ', 8 ' 8, ' 8. ', n
I -5- I 888 '\ '\ '8,
I i of '8+' 9,.
I 1 I I
I '\ ''8'888 '8 '8J.J 6 L
I I .Q; <;;* qi ;%+ :""""""""-""~"""""""""""""*"""""""""""""~"""""""""""-~"" : Member *$3+db.$~g..d9 @...I
I 4 I N a me 'b, '%$ '\8, "*&. ,,J%,
t 1 : The following ordinance was presented for the : :ti:: p:: i Council's consideration: 4 ll:dI I I I :I I:; I(
i Ordinance No. 1083, AN OJU3INANCE OF THE CITY l
;::I: : McPherson :. ; i 4 : : OF CARLSBAD APPROVING THE MNEXATION OF CERTAIN ! Eierce !x! ! 3 I i UJUNHABITED TERRITORY, DESIGNATED "EAST CARLSBAD i Guevara i i p ; i ANNEXATION 2.3"', was read in full and adopted. I Neiswanded IX: 4 :
I A short recess was called at 7:50 P.M, The meet4 1:i:i i ing reconvened at 8:03 P.M. I !:;;:
i Drainaqe System for LeBarr Estates Unit No, 2. i In regard to Item (c) under Correspondence, Counl ::i:i ! cihan Bierce suggested that authorization be I I ;,,:a i given for funds to correct and extend the drainade I,:,:
; system in Lebarr Estates Unit No. 2. I
i By motion of the Council, authorization was give4 McPherson , . J )f ; i for the expendi.ture of funds between $1,500.00 ; Bierce ;x: i 3 i i and $2,000 -00 to correct the drainage system in i Guevara I : ; 4 : i LeBarr Estates., : Neiswende? !x! 4 ;I
: PLANNING : I k ,'pi
i (a) Tentative subdivision map of Waqnolia Villa&, ::;:: i The City Engineer presented the tentative map of i
'. !-Magnolia Village, to be located on the Northwest : ;:I% i corner of Magnolia Avenue and Harding Street.
i Resolution No. 316 of the Planning Commission wa4 ;;!I: : presented wherein they recommended approval of i ::I:: 81 11 i the tentative map, subject to certain conditions i j:::: i and restrictions,
i After a review of the map, the following resolu- i i tion was presented for the Council's consideratioh, : concurring with the recommendations of the Plannf :I;:: i ing Commission:
i Resolution No, 937 e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i McPherson i :x! 4 I l:*l:
i COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF CARLSBAD# APPROVIEJO THE I Bierce !x! \ 4 j : TENTATIVE MAP OF MAGNOLIA VILLAGE SUBDIVISION, i Guevara : ! i ';4 / i was adopted by title only and further reading i Neiswende; i : :x/ i waived, I Hughes ; ; i 3 ~
11'11
I i::;~ : Councilman Neiswender inquired as to the square ! ;:::I : footage in Lot 5* I l;:l
I !I:! * I 11 I I 1::: i Donald Creegar, representing Don Holly, Engineer i ::;I I for the Subdivider, stated the buildings will no$ *I#' ::;i i be deep but wide and that is why the lots are 80ti :::;
::;I i in width. They have not anticipated requesting i :xi I any variance. I :;I' a I:::
: ENGINEERING : I I :::;
I I :::;
t I**, I 1;;1 i (a) 1911 Act Street Openins and Improvement _- I i!;: i Authorization to employ Roy Klema for enqineerind 111: iii; i consultinq services, 11:;
I I I :::;
: The City Engineer informed the Council this t t ::;I
I :;:; i street opening is .between Laguna' Drive and Knowleb i::;
I 1"l : Avenue. I ;;@I
1;::
I I ;a I@ I I I*;: I ::;:
I
I I I I
I # I : Hughes i i i 4 !
I !!::I 1:
I 1
I
I
t I
I I@ /I::
I I:!::
;i:;:
i i.
:;a::
I I I I ;l:ll 4:;;
I I Hughes ; !
I I
e!
I I 1 : $ i
I :;;::
i:::: I::;; 8s
I I ;;It1 ,I:::
I I :;::;
1 ::I I!!
I I I
I
I I
'1
I :::
1 I
I
I 1 I /4;
;:PI
1:::: :';::
;:PI
I I 18;:; * ;;I:; *I
I ,4:1 I I 1
I I I
I
b
I 1
l
I
I t
t b
B I I I
I I
I *
I
I ! I !*I!
* I I
I I
I I
I
* '\ ', -\ \ - 1 f I ', 8, '\ '88 ',,"'
I -6- I '\ ' ', '.,'.,qs3
I '\ ',8 ', ' 8
I i Name 8\ 4% ' ', 8.6,
I '.$$Q, '\ '@* I I i of ',?&8+, %$.,
;:::I
1::::
I ::j:; * I :;4; :*!I: I'
;::I:
1:;::
;;I" I:@ i : :.; :
I I ::!;:
1 la^
I 1 0::;:
', 8, '* % 8 '
I
:"""""""""""""-""""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""~~"-. 8 Member \e:Q,@?$s I The City has received $1,5OO,GO for engineering i ;:;I: ;@I:# i fees from the property owners, and it is estfrna- I ::II:
: for the project.
! At the time Tanner and Marquardt were employed fdr i engineering services, it was the intent of the : I City Council to employ other engineers for out- i i side work. It was recommended that Roy Klema be : till: i employed €or this outside work.
! By motion of the Council, authorization was given! McPherson ; !xi y ;
~ i for the employment of Roy Klema for the engineer: Bierce !xi ; 4 : ! ing work on this project. i Guevara i i i 4 I
1 i ted this will cover all the engineering required i I I
I
11
!
I
I
I
:'#I;
#I
I I I I : Ueiswendelf : : 4 ;
I I Hughes I i I ! i i (b) Report on fencinq and traffic warninq liqht: I-:! i::
i - Tamarack and Carlsbad 3oulevard. The City i by:; i Engineer informed the Council a letter was sent i
i to the State Division of Beaches and Parks, in- 1 ::i:;
I quiring as to their fugure plans for this area. i ! A letter was received back stating that funds ar$ i not available for any additional work at the in- : i tersection of Tamarack and Carlsbad Boulevard. i Bowever, they would be happy to work with the i i City in future planning.
: Sn reviewing this matter again, beacon lights i *:I i were considered. These could be located several! ::;:I
{ hundred feet south and north of the Tamarack t :I I I .: ; : i crossing. It is estimated that it would cost I ;VI; i approximately $l,200000 to instal1,these lights. i '::;
I iii:
I I;:!
; Councilman McPherson asked if this was the only i I ::ii : hazardous street crossing in the.City3 8 ;:$I
I I I i;:; i Mayor Guevara stated the reason for his bringing: 1:' ::
i this matter up originally was there are a great : :!I: :;:: i many children concentrated at this intersection I ;I:@
i during the three months of the summero Many I ;:;:
I '111 i thousands of. persons use this beach during the I ::;:
; summer and he would dislike seeing an accident i l;;l ::;; : occur and then make an investigation, t i::'
8 * 11,:
I :::: I Councilman Bierce suggested that the office of i l;al
I#:; i the State Beaches and Parks be contacted within i :::I
,I,: i the next nine months to see if something can be i ;::I
i worked out prior to next summer seasono 1;;;
* :;:;
11:;
: Councilman Neimender stated there is perhaps i ::;; i::: ! more foot traffic at this intersection during th! 1;;s i three months of the year than any other intersec-t :I;:
$1: i tion in the City during the remaining nine monthi. :::a
I I * ;::: a :::! i The Mayor requested the City Engineer to contact: ;;I' : the State Beaches and Parks and see what can be i ;:::
;:I: : worked out. I l 1;::
;I::
I ;::I i (c) Final Map of Stella Maris Estates Subdivisidn. I@#: '::; i The final map and the grading plan were submitted ::;;
i for the Council's review. I :;!;
8 I :I;:
I $1: ! The Council was informed that the subdivider had i :ii:
! met a11 the requirements prior to the approval i ::i:
i of the final map. I:;:
:L:; :x:;
:if I h:!: i ; 1.1 ;
1:ii: ::pi
1 I ;:::;
1 ;: ;ii
I I :::&I I 1': It1 : i j
I ;:ii;
::i: 81
6 :I
I I A
I
*
I
I *
* 1
I ai
I
I I $1
#* I
I
I I
I 1 I
I I I
I
*
D I I
I
I I
1 I I 1;4 ! :!:: 18
1
I I t.8.8. I I
I * t
I
t I -7-
I * \\ '8 '8 -8 \, '8
I '8, '8.,'888"88 't8 88\ 1 6 4
I ', \ 8 88 '8 '%
I I i Name 888'8@, '8,'F
I I : of '$ \?d-$%;,8*8p ,O'\ ' f+&,,
I !, Member '@@8+$? 84' ~""~""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""""""~""~""""""-:""~---~ i By motion of the CounciL the final map of Stella 1 MePhersoni : :xi : i Maris Estates Subdivision'was approved, and the : Bierce !x: :xi : : Mayor authorized to execute the improvement agre4- Gueiara i i !x: ! i ment on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. i NeiswendeS ; ;xi ; tI1!
: NEW BtfSfNESS:
i (a) Annexation Droceedinqs for proposed "EAST I
i CAFGSBAD ANNEXATION #2 , 4".
'I, I
11 I
I I I * I Hughes i !x !x; i
I :I 1;:;:
I I I ;'I:: It( ;::I:
I I ::;i;
.(
I I I
*::I: I
#I.!) I I I I i The Council was informed that a petition had bee; I received from property owners representing 65.354 i of the assessed valuation of the property propos$d ! to be annexed, I f
pi:*
::I:: ::p:
:::I: :; ;.I;
:::II 81 ::;::
I I*
t i 'i'li
I I I :4:: I The Council was informed the Boundary Commission : : has approved the boundaries -as definite and ! !::I;
1":; l::1I i certain> :I I:!::
t::ll
I I t t I I !f.!t I I i The map of.khe proposed area was presented. Aft+ i review -of the map by the Council, the following i : resolution was presented: b I I I 1
::ii:
::I$
::;:I
:I 1:;:;
::!I: I i pi:; i Resolution No. 938. A RESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE i McPherson : : : 4 : i OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CITY OF CARLSBAD OF UN~ ~ierce !xi 14 i i INHABITED 'TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIG- i Guevara : I i* i i NATED Itms~ CARLSBAD ANNEXATION 2 , 4", AbJD GIVING i Nei'mendei i 5 4 i i NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARXNG OF PRCYCESTS i Hughes i i !T j i THERETO, was adopted by title only and further I :::I, : reading waived. I 1:
1 +:!!
i+:
I t t :'@I ! (b) A%nexation proceedinqs for Proposed "SOUTH i i CARLSBAD ANNEXATION 1.4" I
t 8 I I I t i A map of the proposed annexed territory was pre- i i sented for the Council's review. The Council wa? : informed the Boundary Commission has approved ! : the boundaries as definite and certain, * t I 4 I
vi: ;::: ;:ii
e:!! -. iii: i:;: ;: I# :: Ii
1:;:
:;I:
!I!! I i The €allowing resolution was presented for the ! !;:I
i Council's consideration: * I ;:::
I I ;;::
I t ;::; i Resolution No. 939. A RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT i McPherson i !x! 4 : PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN INITIATED BY T= COUNCIL o$ ~ierce !X: i d ! THE CITY OF CARLSBAD TO ANNEX TO SAID CITY CER- ! Guevara : i i i
i DESIGNATED "SOUTH CARLSEAD ANNEXATION 1.4" AND i Hughes i i i 5 i GIVING NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED ZWNEXATION was I :::; i adopted by title only and further reading waived,! :::;
::;I
I 1 !@I!
,(*I
! TAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEMIN AND i Neiswende2 i i {
I
I I I
; Proclamation - National Business and ProfessionaG : Women's week, The Mayor proclaimed the week of i i October 6, 1963 through October 12, 1963, as
!"National Business and Professional Women's Week".;
I I
I I . I ? ! Liqhts for downtown area. Councilman McPherson i : stated he was downtown the other night, and he i i was wondering why we cannot have street lights i4 : the downtown area, It looks like everyone is ! asleep, We have improved our streets; why canna$ B I *
i we now have lights, * t
I I f 4 1
* 1 1.; !x:
*&I: ;;@I :;p
::I: iii:
I! ;;'; :*::
1:::
;;at ::::
:;:: :::i
::I*
1;;: :I
ii:! : ;' i The City Manager informed the Council that the m&- i chants in the downtown area had a survey made to ! : have mercury-vapor lights installed. For some i : reason the project fell through.
i::i
;::I
I;&: :::; * t i::; $1
b ; 1.:; I t ! :?':
# , S8\*,\. I I I I I
I
I I *8 '8,8',8 'S8 8'88*\8
I 'X ' ' ' *8p65 I '\ '8\\, '\,'\, \
I 8 \ 8,8' I -8-
I I
I ! Na me8 \* 'x%, '8\ 8.4 <+),
9 : of '8$ is 'x 8*&, I ; Member ' Q @@.& d-9 ,+\e ,dl :-""""""","""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""~~"-."~""
I::,:
:'I:;
I:::I : : I. ; ,: ;::;: 4::;
I !*Ill I I 1;:ol
::;:I
:I;:: l1
1::::
!Councilman Bierce stated the property owners in i
Ithe downtown area did not want to pay for the
:lights. The property owners in Oceanside paid I jfor the lights and that is why it is well-lightedi
:Councilman PicPherson asked if there could not be g
:one or tw6 lights installed?
ICouncilmah Bierce stated there have been at least! i sik attempts made to form a district. It is his i
!feeling that you could not spend tax-payers rnonef !ii;: i for a particular area. I @I;': ' It1
:Mutual Fire Aid Acfreement, Councilman Hughes in-! :':;:; It8
jquired as to the article in the newspaper regardi6g
!Mutual Fire Aid,
:The City Nanager informed the Council he received!
!a call from the City Manager of Vista concerning : :I1:;
!mutual fire aid. They are also contacting Camp i
IPendleton. Oceaside has an agreement with Camp i :x:; : Pendleton e
iCouncilman Hughes inquired as to liability in the!
:event someone were hurt, Also he felt the City it ;::::
:responsible to the people in Carlsbad, I *I 1
!The City Manager stated there is a great deal of i I pro and con on the subject. The City of San Diegb
!was against this mutual aid because they spend a t
I great deal of money on their fire protection. Thh I I:* ::I
!City Managers' have been attempting to form a
!mutual aid among. the cities in the County.
i Article XI., Sec: 27.28- Capital Contribution i :a;*
:Charge for persons outside sewer districts.
!Councilman Neiswelider stated it was his feeling i )*I1
1;;; ithat this section of the code should be amended tQ ii::
jprovide that the Terramar property owners who
; hook up to the new sewer plant not be charged the; 4 :: (I,* i $50.00 Caatal Contribution Chzrge. e :I
:Councilman Bierce suggested that the Council mem-i ;I la
jbers study the proposed amendment prior to the i I 1:;; ::i:
:next meeting before taking any action,
: OLD BUSINESS:
i (a) Second readinq of Ordinance. No, 9151, amend-:
iinq Ordinance No. 9060, bv addins ZO~ R-3L- :: The following ordinance was presented for a seCon$ i reading by the Council:
i Ordinance NO, 9251. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i McPherson ; : !X: i CARLSBAD AMENDING CITY OF CARLSBAD ORDINANCE NO. ! Bierce F i i 3 i 9060 BY ADDING THERETO ARTICLE 6.5, ESTABLISHING i Guevara : : ;x! i zgg R-~L ZONE, was given a second reading by title! Neiswender! i i i: i only and adopted. i Hughes i Ixix;
I I
I
iiril
11;:: :'
I ii:::
::I:# :;:;I
I I ::i::
I : ; ; I.; I:::: ;::::
Is::;, i::;;
I I. :::;:
t :q:i i:,:; ::i:;
I I :;':I t I*:
I I I ::;;: li8 I ;,:i: iii:; 11;
: i; :'I
;:':I
I I I
I
I I ;I:': ;I$I
I
11
I I
4
I f I
I
I I
b
I I I I
18
I I I I 1:;: :::;
I t ::;: ;:;:
I !/ij 11
I I I I:;: I*::
I I I I a :::;
I I'
*
I ,i ; I :
;::;
1 I I $ I ::;:
1 la I
I
1
I I :;i:
t I I ;::: iii;
I ;::a
I 1;;:
I ;;:*
::I: I;;
I. ::;I
I ::;i
I iy:
t- s
I I
I
I I I
B It
I
I
I
t
I t :::;
4 I l:*l /:;
I I :;::
I I i;::
I ;::: I *:I
I ;I
I I
I
I I
I
I : !*I!
s 1 I I
8 \,3'\8'
t 4 4 * \, ',,'*,, '\,'\\'\\
I I , " t '\ '\, '\ x, ,,'\.I 6 G
s i Name '\ '\$, 8 \, "\&,
I s ; of ''+?@, '\ Y%
I : Member \,L.O.g\ $'@,&?$& ;%*
~"""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""""""""""""""""""~"" i (b) Report on beach frontasc property. At the i i:ls; /::; i last regular meeting, the staff was instructed t4 ;I:;, I make a study of the beach area between the two : ;:;;: ;::;: i inlets to see what could be done to clean up thid :::I: *:::: 1 area. t I ; ;'I I I 4 *::
I I :::I: : The Council was informed the staff made a study i ::;;I i of the area and it is their recommendation that i :!;:I
;*:I: i a study be made for parking area and that a berm i *I,*: I;;:1 i be constructed. Also that signs be posted pro- ; :;;:; ::*:; i hibiting parking between the hours of 2:OO A.M. : ::::I i and 5:OO A.M, There will be some problem until I I;!:; i such time as Mr- Ecke can be contacted. s I ;:I::
I I 4ii:
I:( I
I i:::; ! Councilman Bierce moved and Councilman Neiswended *II:I ! seconded the motion that the City Attorney be in4- ;I:;: :::;: ! tructed to prepare an emergency ordinance prohi-: ;I::: i biting parking between the hours of 2:OO A.M. and iiiii i 5:OO A.M. '1: s :;:;I
I I I ;I::! i Bob Quigley, Manager of the Boys' Club, stated i ;::b ;:;::
! he would like to point out that there are many i I#;;; ;: 8s i people who come to this area just for the purpos$' 11:'1
I I.;: I 1 of fishing and fish all night. He likes to fish: ;11:!
:::a* i and frequents this area quite often. I /;:;
t I ;:*I; s :::i: I* i Councilman Bierce rescinded his'motion. t l';8:
I I I * ::I:;
I I ;;/I I The Mayor suggested that the City Manager, City i SI:::
:*I:* ! Attorney and the Chief of Police study this I t ;:::I ;;'I: ! matter further and report back with their recommi ll:*: i endations . 4 ;i!ii
I s :::i:
I ::: ;.: i Widenins 02 Harrison Street. Councilman Neis- i ::; :; * i wender stated he would still Like to see Harris04 ;;;Il ::;I: f Street widened to 40* and that 22' of surfacing i :I;:;
; be installed. 4 I::::
I I I ;;::: Is1*
s ::;:; i Councilman McPherson stated the street &t 22"iSi i:;:: i wider than Highland Drive is now. Why should thd 1;;:: i City widen this little street to a 40' width? i 1:;::
;::I,
#8111 i Councilman Hughes and Councilman Bierce stated i $1:; ;:I:; ; they were in accord with Councilman McPherson. i /::;
I ;::I; ;i::; I CITY ATTORNEY *s REPORT: :I::[
I t I ;::;:
I :!I:; 'I
s $1
:I::(
:;::I 'I
I I I ;::*I
I ::;::
I '\\ ', ', '\ \\ \
I
t I -9-
I
t 8 I
k s 4 11
I I
s I
t
I
I
I
I
I
8 I I I 1
;*I:;
I 3 s s 1
I I i Kelly - Hicks water suit. The City Attorney in-! ' ::; i formed the Council a Preliminary Hearing was s I 1:;:: : held in the Superior Court in San Diego on this i : matter, I I I:::;
i Since 1961, the parties concerned have been re- : ;:;:: i ceiving Colorado River Water. The Court suggest4d 4;;; i::;' ! that 1961 be fixed as the date for billing. It ; ;;I:: i was proposed that the parties pay .for all water i ;;$! : received from September, 1961; that they would i : not be charged for any water received prior to i +:: :* i that date, and that the penalties be dropped. I I * a:, 1;:
I I
ii:::
i This would mean approximgtely 500 on the dollar. : ;I:;:
B , I 1 *,:
I ;;I::
t I ::::; :I:;'
:I:;!
;::;s : with the above, or did they wish to have the b. k .: I I ;I:::
I 1 1 i The City Attorney inquired of the Council if it ! i was their desire to make settlement in accordan&
: matter go to trial. s I ;i::: s l'* ! !@I!*
*'*I
I
!
I
I I
I : '8 ', -8, '8 '8 '8
I -10- I
I '8, '8 , '8 '8,'*, - I
I I
'\ 88,8'\8 88, ',,',, PK
I I I
'\8 '\ \, ' 8
I i Na me '8, 8s.. C,
I .?$*)8;J,+?+
:-"""""-"""""-""~"""~""""""""""""""""""""l"""""~""""""," : Member 80'08.p89'\<
'8@, '8% '.&,
v I I : of 8$+\0', \ '*'
I i!!b! i It was agre&that the Council go on record as i I favoring settlement . t
: Amendment to bicycle ordinance. The firm .who . : : handles the codification o€ our ordinances have { : informed the City' there is a conflict 'in the prej i sent code. Also the Chief of Police has request4d i some changes in the ordinance. The City Attorne$ i informed the Council he has prepared an amendmen4 i to the ordinance €or consideration as follows: :
I
1 I I I I I
t-
I
I I I 1
I;;l;
Il(0 ;,,,I
lit:: ::ii:
1"1:
::::I :p':
114;
:#!;I
$1;;
;#I:!
*:;I;
17;; :::I,
:;@I; ::::; ::i:! I,.*; i Ordinance No. 3064. AM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i McPhersoni : !x: I CARLSBAD, MENDING ORDINaEjCE NO, 3062 REGARDING i Bierce i i ;xi ! THE LICENSING OF WCYCLES, was given a first read- Guevara I i ;x: ! ing by title only, and further reading waived. I Neiswendei !xix:
I i Hughes !xi ;xi I CITY MANAGER t s &BURT: I I :::i
I 1 ;:;I
i Lebedeff Property. The City Manager informed thd I::: si;! : Council that he contacted Mr. Lebedef f and he in; ii:: i dicated to Mr. Lebedeff that this purchase could i I:::
i not be made in cash, Mr. Lebedeff stated that h4 i;ii
i did not want to be paid in cash as he wanted to i ;I::
,:I1 i depreciate his property out. The City Attorney i tl:;
::I1 i and the City Manager will meet with the real es- i I:!:
r:I: : tate agent to discuss possible financing. I I i;:: I 1:;:
ti",
I I
I
#
I
I
1 I t i Letter from Terramar Associakion - re : Sewers.. A i I letter from George C. Henry, Chaijcman, Committee i i on Sewers ...f or Terramar, was presented, wherein I i they .requested clarification of Section 17 -18 of { i Article 1, concerning "Capital. contributions i charge". ,I.t is their feeling this section appli& : to %he old sewer district and is not clear as to i
; its effect and intent. In their opinion it would! i be inequitable to impose the $50.00 nook-on char$F i as they are in the new sewer district.
i Councilman' Bierce requested that a copy of this i : letter be sent to all-the meaers of the Council : ! in order that it can be studied along with I I i Councilman Neiswender's suggested amendment,
i Letter from Citv of Escondido - re: So B. 861 i I and S,B, 1662, concerninq "Local Aqencv Annexa- i i tion Comm.ission", Letter dated September 6, 1963j, : from the City of Escondido, enclosing a copy of : ! their Rem lution No. 1926, disapproving the pro- i i visions.of Chapter 6.5 of Part 1, Division 2, I I i Title 5 of the Government Code, en.titled "Local i i Agency Annexation Commissionn, and urging the i immediate repeal thereof by the California Legis-! i Pature.
: I
'I
I I 1 I I
I
I I I I I I I
I * b
I I I I I
B
"if ::;; i:::
1 .; ; I ::;:, :::; ::I; :;I; I:::
$81
,a;;
;; /:: :::: ;::: ;;ne
1:ii
1::: :::;
:I ;;::
;::; ;:: I
1'1: l:'l ;I:;
:a:: :'; : ;
11 ;:::
ll;; ;I:'
;:I:
1;:: i:::
1;::
:a:: i;::
1; ;:
I(*
iq
:"I )"I
!*a! I :: Mayor Guevara stated he would like .to suggest thak : this City Council go along with the resolution i : adopted by the City of Escondido, One of the maib
!objections he has to the Bills is that there are i i two men being appointed from the County' of San i i Diego-
'I
I I
I I
I t
I I
1 I
1 t
I I
I $
1 a I ! :
:ti;
1*1I
1:::
:;:I
::I: ::;: ::;: !I:;
:I:: ;I:;
;;:e
;;I;
;:
;::: ;::;
,I:,
F'lI
l:!l I i. .; 1
!&I! I 1 I I
I I ; '\, \, -, ', ', '\
I I ., \.\'\, '\ ' ' I I 1 , ',,",, 1 s 2
I -11- I I \, , ',,'\, ' 'X,', , '.\>
I I : of '+$+>&,;?+ ;""""""""""-""""".-""~""""""""""."""-"""""~~""""""""~ ; Member ,o ; pp& #--;-;--[ .g
I f ::;:;
.
I
1
b i Na rn e \\ '9$, 'x, \$$,
1
I \\ \'
.. I * # 'x+ '0, \
:The following resolution was presented for the i :::*I
!Council I s consideration: I :;:;:
:Resolution No. 941. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY :;l*I ! McPherson i : ixi :
iCOlJXCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING CITY OF i Bierce :x; ;x: i
:ESCONDIDO RESOLUTION NO. 1926, AND DISAPPROVING i Guevara : ; ;xi : I,'#
!THE PROVISIONS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 1662, was adopted i Neiswende; ix!xi i
by title only and further reading waived. i Hughes ; ; ;x: ; 'I, I
1 I I ::I::
I ::::;
;RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: I @:;it
I !!I:; * 11;:: :Ratification of the bills was given for the generGl {:::I
!expenses of the City in the amount o€ $19,299,20 i ;:.:;i
!and for the Water Department in the amount of 4:;; i McPherson i : !x: :
!$12,744,02, €or the period of -September 3, 1963, i Bierce , , I4 1,
8 :x:q ;
$0 Septeniber 17, 1963, as certified by the Direc- i Guevara i i :x!: I
!tor of Finance and approved by the Auditing Commi-: Neiswende$x! ;xi ;
it tee o { Hughes ' : !xi {
:Ratification of the payroll was given for the fir4t Meherson :: I !x: 1
!ha15 of Septeniber, 1963, in the amount of i Bierce ; : !xi '
!.$17,488.88 as certified by the Director of Financ< Guevara i i I ; Xi
!and approved by the Auditing Committee, : Neiswenderf :x:xi
1 I
I
t I
I
I1
$1
1
I I
I
I
I
I
I
;I::,
I I
14
I I I ;!:,I
I I I I ;:i
r I 1 1 i Hrghes :xi !xi
I i-: ; ;
I I ;!::
1 * I 1';: ;; /::
I $8 8ii
I I :it:
1 I :a:: I I ;;a1
I ;:::
* p::
I I I ;::I I;*:
I I :::: : : 1.;
8 ii::
I .i::; 'f
I I I I::; ii:;
1 I 6 ;!{i
I I ;*:: :p:
* I :I::
I I :::; 10
I I ::;;
I I :;I1
I I ;$:
e :;ii
1 ::;I
I I I::
I I I 1::: * :;::
I I:::
1. i:::
B
:::;
I I:::
I * * ;::I
I I ::;: * I ill:
1 ;:I:
1 I I;'*
I f 8 11:; ::::
* I :::* a';:
I I I I I
I
11
'&DJ'OURNMEBT ::
by proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at i
i93551 P.M,
I
I
I
I
I
:Respectfully submitted, I 1:;
I I 1
I
1 s
I I ;I I
I b 8:::
e f ::;;
I 1 t I
I 1 I I
t I I I I I s
I
I
I
I
I I 1 I I I
6 I
I a I
*
I I 18
4;'
I
v
I
I
I *
I
I
I
I I f I * ::;i af '
* I l a;;! ;:::
f I * I I I
I
I I I I
I I t
.I 9
I I
I 6
.I
I
I 'f
I:;
I I I I
I k i::: I ,I,
I
I t
f I .
I * ;.: , ;
? :i:: I I I I I lb!l