Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1963-09-17; City Council; MinutesI t CITY OF CARLSBAD : '*' , \;9. "' ', '8 '. i MINU!I!ES OF: CITY CO~NCIL (regular meeting): I DAE3 OF MEETING: September 17, 1963 i TIPlE OF MEETING: 7:OO POW, i PLACE OF MEETING: Council Chambers ' Of '?!\Q\+\#$\ 0"""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""""~"""""~""""""""""~~~"~~:~ ; Member 8@.("0\,*,0+ ', 88 8 8, "\,, '%8"*:8, 15 z] ' ' ', I '\*8 8'.8& '., \'$ i Name ' *$8 ', $>, 't5 kg+, ' \92, kOLL CALL. was answered by Councilmen McPherf ::I:! :;;:: : son, Bierce, Guevara and Meiswender. Councilman i i:;:: : Hughes was present at 7:14 P. M., Also present I ))fII (;I:: ! were City Manager Slater, City Attorney Wilson i ::!:: i and City Clerk Adams. I ::;;: 4 i::;: * :::;: I ::'I: I I :;!!; I I ::;;: I INVOCATION was offered by City Manager Slate. ::#I; :I::; I b ;;::: I ;:::; I (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of Sept-i McPherson : :x! 2 ; I { Guevara : ; 8 , ;* , : : I A letter from the San Diego Gas & Electric i !:"I ,I::! I 8 t # I '81 b I I I I I I I I ALLEGIWCE to the Flag was given. I I * I I I I 8 b I i:,:; :'I I I I ::'Il ! APPROVAL OF MIMUTES: i ember 3, 1963, were approved as presented, : Bierce !xi ;d i i Neiswendei i i 3 ; I I I i CORRESPONDENCE: I I I ii::: I *IS I:;:: i Company was presented wherein they enclosed a : 4:;: i lease on the beach property between the two (2) i :;:;: i inlets fronting on Carlsbad Boulevard. :p:; I ;&:'I I I c I ;::ii I :I,'* at I The City Attorney informed the Council this was 1 ::;:; t the same lease that was presented some time ago, i ::::: ; : ; :-I i with one change, providing that if any building : ; : 1 ;.I ; is constructed, that the San Diego Gas & Electrid iiiii i Company be permitted to approve the plans. I * :I::* I I I ::I:! ;::'I i Councilman Meiswender inquired as to "chis prbvi- i :iiIi i sion being included in the lease. I ;I::; I ::!;: J Mr. Frank DeVore, representative of the San Dieg4 ::::: ::p; : Gas & Electric Company stated this is the same I :;' i provision that appears in all of their leases, : ;;::i e ;:; i and is included in the lease o€ the upper lagoon.! ;: ,I::; $1 8 * ::I:; ':;'I i By m0tio.p of the Council, authorization was give4 McPhersoni i i i i i for the Mayor to .execute the lease on behalf of i Bierce !x! i 4 i : the City of Carlsbad. I Guevara i : : 4. I I : Neiswende# !g 4 ! i Mayor Guevara extended thanks and appreciation ti ,a* I ;; 1.:' 1:;; i the San Diego Gas & Electric Company ,and the Citi i :'; ; ; 1 Manager was instructed to send a letter of appreJ ;:::I i ciation to the Company. B ;i!;! '*I;: I * ::;;; I (a) Petition - Re: Requesting 1911 Act i :;'I; v :;::; I::;: :;' ;;:!: :;;;; :* I: I i'; : ::;I !I:; ;i:: b I ii;! I I i;::' ;::a I ;:I: ! t I,'* :;;: I :I:: I I :!;: I ;.I I : t ;::; I 4 * I I * 'I ID @ I I I I I I I + I ; Street Improvement for a portion of Chestnut Avei , ::I i nue. A petition signed by five (5) property own4 i ers was presented, stating in view of the proposid i Chestnut Heights Stibdivision, it is their feelin4 i the time is aprqpos to consider full improvement! ,t ::;: ! 02 Chestnut Avenue, including streets, gutters, i ; curbs and sidewalks from Monroe to and including i **'I : the above-mentioned subdivision. Therefore, the$ i wished to express their desire for the City to I '1;; i initiate 1911 Act proceedings under the City's : :::; i Street Improvement and Participation Program. I 'I *I1 t I 'I 1 1 I I I t 18 I @I I J I I I I I I I 4 *!!I I I * - I I I I I I B' , 8, \, -8 ' ' -* I * '8 ' B s, '.,"., ''8 "8 ', 4 \\\ 8, ' 8, \\ NJ 5 s I ', ',,'\, 8 ' 8 t -2- I Name 'b, ,%, , '+$jlj I I : cf Y$@, ,?*.+ 92,+',+48 '\ +, I :-"""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""""""";"-.."""""""""-~-~- : Member \,;*.gt..p9\;0 i By motion of the Council, the City Engineer was : McPherson I : !xi i I instru.cted to prepare A petition under the 191.1 I Bierce (I1 I : Act proceedings €or t5e Pmpxcvenent of Cheatnut [ Guevara i i :xi i i Avenue from Monroe Street up to and including th4 NeiswendeGx; :xi i i Chestnut &fanor Subdivision, i Councilman Hughes was present at 7:14 P.M. 'B 1 :x:xy : 1 I I ;I1 I 4 4 ;:'I: 18': i:;;: 1 a I I 11 * ;!!:: D l t I I I I I I t 1 I I I I I I I I (b) Petition from residents oUoure3.1 A& nue, - re: Speedincp A petition signed by twsn.$y four (24) property owners was present.cd, request: ing that appropriate action be taken by the City i Council to reduce the incidence of speeding on i ! ~ Yourell Avenue. I I I I $ i A written report made by the Police Department w& : submitted, stating the area had been patrolled or3 I September 10, 1963 and September 11, 1963, showik i no traffic violations observed and no citations I i were issued. i The City Planager informed the Council the TraffiG i Safety Committee made a survey of the area and i : the problem seems to be at the crest, It is the* : recommendation that a sign be erected on the i southeast corner of Yourell Avenue and Spruce i i Street, designating, "SLOTJ, CHLI1DMN AT PLAY". : i By common consent of the Council, it was agreed 1 i that the recornmendation of the Traffic Safety : i Committee be accepted and that a sign be erected.! I I I I I 1 I I I * * * * I t 1 t I I I I (e) Rabuco - re: City participation in Le{ i Earr Estates Unit NO. 2 for Storn Drains. Letter! ! dated September 9, 1963, from Rabuco Development i i Corporation,'stating that on June 28, 1962, they : i wrote to the City regarding their installation 04 i a drainage structure in the area of Lebarr Estateb : Unit No, 2, In this letter, they informed the I i City of costs to them and the amount they felt i i should rightfully be paid by the Cityo On July I i 5, 1962, they received a reply to the effect that: i their request would be referred to the staff for i i further study as to engineering, city participa- : i tion, etc. As they had had no further corres- i i pondence with the City, they requested an immedi: : ate review of the matter. I i The City Engineer informed the Council this matt* i had Been discussed previously, There were no I i storm drain improvements made in the subdivision: i that were incorporated in the City's permanent i : storm drain system, There will have to be cons- i : iderable more wQrk done in correcting the system I i that was installed and it will have to be contin: i ued on down, It is estimated this will run i approximately $1,500 D 00 e * t I I I I I I * I 8 I I a * I i Councilman Neiswender requested a clarification ; i i of this matter. * I I ! f I f a I I I I I I I I I 8 I 4 b I I I I I I r ::vi I( i:::: :;I:' ;:I:; ;:;:: ::::: ::I:! ::,:; :;:Ia i::i: ;::I: ;:;:; ,:::1 ;I:@' /*:: I::;! ::;I, ;ll;l ;:::j '::*I ;:a:l @I:;\ :i;j; i:: 1,:; ::;$I ;;1*1 ::,; :: ;I1 # 8 I .: ;;I* 1;: ::;; ::i: :!I; :ai; ;:I4 ;:'I 1::: ::;a ;: :iii i::: ;::: 1::: 1:ii ':I1 ::I: ;I!; :::I ::;I ;8I: :::: :::; $;;I ii:: :;;: ;*&I ;::i ::i: ;:I8 I' ;::i i;:: i;:: ll:; 4;; ::;; :::: I::; ;::; :::: :::: :::: ::I* ;: :::: :::: 1:;t: :a: ii$i l*)I I10 :I '11 ))'I :'ii :::I 'I :I:: !,I! I I 8, \; .\ ', ., -\, I -3- I I I t *, 8, s,~', 'b '8 ' I I * i , ' lGc I : Member ?e(<& b',c\ 2 ;~""~""-""""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""~""-"""~""""" x-* .v'.P-\.,:,, . ::+ I :!I:; l*I !::i: I:!:: i:::: 1 I I ;:4' s:;: I ;:::; I I ::!I: 4 pl': 1::: ::::; i::!: ;:/I t;':1 I*;:! ::::; ::;:: !:I:: I I I I ::;I: :;':; ;;I ' :4 ; ', \\ 8.. ', ', '8 I t 8 \' J '8, ', ', \ 8 ', I I * I I Nama "8,>:c>, 8, \t,\ ',+& '\8 8q!,! ' Qf 8 L. *'fi 4. .$$?+;, 8y '*,', \%', I The City Engineer stated that if a system in a i ::'I; 'l:;l. i subdivisioiis a part of the -perinanent starm drak 1 :;; I i system, the policy has beei? Zor the City to party ::::: : icipate in the improvements . I :I1 1 I tI:'I : The City did approve the subdivision, It would ! : be very difficult for the City to go back on the i i subdivider at this time. I Councilman Neiswender stated he did not feel thaq Ifi1l( ;;:ab i the City should have to participate in these sub' i;::: i divisions- This should be a part of their engi- ; ,I;': I;':; i neering costs. i The City Engineer further stated the drainage i i that is involved in a s&division usually involve$ i a larger area than is in the subdivision. This i ih:; 11; i is the reason for asking the City to participate.: l';ls i The draina.ge in this subdivision cost the subdi- : , i vider approximately $9,000 -00 and the subdivider i i has asked that the City participate in the amoun4 ; of $2,500.00, The Engineer recommended that the I i line be extended approximately another 100 feet. i 1::;: i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the i McPherson i :Xi 4 I ; request be ,denied, : Bierce I I I # 8. I I IIII * I I b I (1' I I '1 1 'I& 'I I I I i Guevara 1 i i 3 j I I I I Hughes i i i { I i Neiswendegx: i 4 ~ ; ORAL CO!YMUNICATLONS: I D :ii: I :;a: i One of the property owners living at 1415 Yourel4 ::I: i Avenue stated it is his understanding that the : :'I: ;:ii I sign will only be placed on -one side of the stredt $1 : at the crest- It was his feeling that a sign i $1: t should be placed on both sides of the street as i :;:; i there are children living on both sides of the i i::: :;I: i street- I :::i I I ; ('1 * I '::: i By comn consent of the Council, it was agreed i ::ti : that a sign be placed on both sides of the street& :ill i;:: I I 1;:: : PUBLIC HEARING: I :: : * ;;:I / (a) Proposed annexation of "East Carlsbad Annex4 :;:; ;::: i ation e2.3". I * I :i;: I ;I I I ,I:: ; The Clerk certified as to proper notice having ; 4:; : been given to all ppoperty owners and as to pub- i i i'i i : lication, I ii:' I t ;: I I & I ;I:: i The City Attorney informed the Council written i :::; ;t:; ; objections had been received from the City of i ;::: i Vista, City of San Marcos, Bueno Colorado Muni- : :iii i cipal Water District, San Marcos County Water Did- ::;I i trict and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District. I :::: i;;: ; However, none of these entities are owners of i ;:I: :::: ; property lying within the proposed annexation i ,I:: i boundaries- 1 I :i:: I ;I:: I * I ;:Is I I: I ' :; t ::;a I I ;:I: I 8 I ;::i 1';o 4 ;:*a ,*I' ::;: 1,: * I!** I 4 'I4 I I b I* #It I I 1 I t I b I :itt 1 8 I I I I' 1 :* D I I I I I I I I I I f I I I a I I I >,,e \s. I I * I I ., q, ', '. '* I '. ',. '., ',, '.,"' I -4- \" I ; af .,+".O' I '8L':9, ,L ~'Yf+,;,,&<~, t I *, , ', '.,'.,'x, 16.; I I I I i Name' \., '\$&, =,;?&, . '?$;, I ;""""""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-. : bqernber \:e ,a..pf8;0 ',..I I I I I The City Attorney further stated two letters of i i protests have been received from agents of pro- I : perty owners within the proposed boundaries. ! Letter from Russell W, Grosser Attorney at Law, { 1 protesting in behalf of his clients, Albert Zais4r i and Edward Y, M, Leong, dated September 17,, 1963; i to the inclusion of any of their property in the: i proposed annexation, : Letter dated August 13, 19C3, from Daniel H, ! Wiegand, Manager of the Eressi Ranch, stating i i their belie€ is that,annexation to any city for i i property in this area is premature at this time, i I and requesting that the boundaries be redrawn to i i exclude that portion of Lot A belonging to the i i Bressi Ranch.. : The City Attorney noted for the Council that in i i accordance with the Government Code any agent i i acting on behalf of an owner must show authoriza: i tion from the property owner, and none had been i i received from the two owners. Also that the onl$ i question to be considered is that written proteses ; have been received from two (2) property owners. i i The Mayor announced that the Council would hear i i from the property owners who had submitted writt4n i protests if they desired to speak. 1 1 I I I t I t I I I I I I I I 1 t I I I e I I l l I I I I 1 8 * I 1 :::I: :;a:; ;I::; 1"I) &:;:I ::I;! :::!I -1 I:: l,ii !:!pi ;!::I @I!!: :: ti::: ::; 11 :x:; 1: :;e:; :I!!: ;;It1 la ;: Id': :;: 1:;:: :'::; ;:,;I iiiii :I::! ll:,I i:::: ~;:~l :::I: ;I, 1 1'::: :::;: :;'I; I,:, 1 :'I ::I:: I;:': 1:; :;;I, ::;:I i::;; "1 :I I, l#Itl la1 jjiii '11'1 I:!!! 1 I I I : There were no owners present who wished to speak.: I The Council was informed that the total number 04 i written protests registered represented 18,835% i : of the assessed valuation of the properties pro- i : posed to be annexed. i MR. LINDEN R. BURZELL, was present and stated he i i was representing the City of Vista, Vista Irrigai : tion District and Buena-Colorado Water District. i : The Mayor informed Mr. Burzell as the entities I I which he was representing did not own property i I within the boundaries of the proposed annexation i i he could see no reason for his speaking at this i I time. : The public hearing was declared closed at 7:40 i : P". i After discussion by the Council the following i !.resolution was presented for the Council's cons- : i ideration: ! I t I .. I I I I 1 I I I I 4 I 6 s I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l a I I-.#, ;:I; ;::: ;::: ;I:: 1::: lii: iy: 1:; :;:: :::I I::: I:;* :;I: ;;:: i;!; iiii 4 $11 :; $11 l*:: ;::; :it: :::; ::a* #I:; i::: $88 ::8: :' ;:a1 14; $11 *:: I::: il:' 1:: II't 11 '!a,! i Resolution No. 940- A RESOLUTION OF THF. CITY i McPherson i i i i i COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DECLARING THAT A i Bierce !xi : 4 i MAJORITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN MADE WITH REGARD TdlGuevara i i i 3 i "EAST CARLSBAD ANNEXATION 2.3 'la was adopted by i Neiswende4 i xi 4 i title only and further reading waived, ! Hughes i i ; 4 I 1 .I 4 1 D 'I * 1 I b I ;::: I I i::: I * ::I: :I * I pi! I I I I I I 1 I I I 101 I ;::a I I ::I: I I 1 b' L t * I' I S '8 *', '\ '8 '8, 1 I .4 1 '\, ', 8 ' 8, ' 8. ', n I -5- I 888 '\ '\ '8, I i of '8+' 9,. I 1 I I I '\ ''8'888 '8 '8J.J 6 L I I .Q; <;;* qi ;%+ :""""""""-""~"""""""""""""*"""""""""""""~"""""""""""-~"" : Member *$3+db.$~g..d9 @...I I 4 I N a me 'b, '%$ '\8, "*&. ,,J%, t 1 : The following ordinance was presented for the : :ti:: p:: i Council's consideration: 4 ll:dI I I I :I I:; I( i Ordinance No. 1083, AN OJU3INANCE OF THE CITY l ;::I: : McPherson :. ; i 4 : : OF CARLSBAD APPROVING THE MNEXATION OF CERTAIN ! Eierce !x! ! 3 I i UJUNHABITED TERRITORY, DESIGNATED "EAST CARLSBAD i Guevara i i p ; i ANNEXATION 2.3"', was read in full and adopted. I Neiswanded IX: 4 : I A short recess was called at 7:50 P.M, The meet4 1:i:i i ing reconvened at 8:03 P.M. I !:;;: i Drainaqe System for LeBarr Estates Unit No, 2. i In regard to Item (c) under Correspondence, Counl ::i:i ! cihan Bierce suggested that authorization be I I ;,,:a i given for funds to correct and extend the drainade I,:,: ; system in Lebarr Estates Unit No. 2. I i By motion of the Council, authorization was give4 McPherson , . J )f ; i for the expendi.ture of funds between $1,500.00 ; Bierce ;x: i 3 i i and $2,000 -00 to correct the drainage system in i Guevara I : ; 4 : i LeBarr Estates., : Neiswende? !x! 4 ;I : PLANNING : I k ,'pi i (a) Tentative subdivision map of Waqnolia Villa&, ::;:: i The City Engineer presented the tentative map of i '. !-Magnolia Village, to be located on the Northwest : ;:I% i corner of Magnolia Avenue and Harding Street. i Resolution No. 316 of the Planning Commission wa4 ;;!I: : presented wherein they recommended approval of i ::I:: 81 11 i the tentative map, subject to certain conditions i j:::: i and restrictions, i After a review of the map, the following resolu- i i tion was presented for the Council's consideratioh, : concurring with the recommendations of the Plannf :I;:: i ing Commission: i Resolution No, 937 e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i McPherson i :x! 4 I l:*l: i COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF CARLSBAD# APPROVIEJO THE I Bierce !x! \ 4 j : TENTATIVE MAP OF MAGNOLIA VILLAGE SUBDIVISION, i Guevara : ! i ';4 / i was adopted by title only and further reading i Neiswende; i : :x/ i waived, I Hughes ; ; i 3 ~ 11'11 I i::;~ : Councilman Neiswender inquired as to the square ! ;:::I : footage in Lot 5* I l;:l I !I:! * I 11 I I 1::: i Donald Creegar, representing Don Holly, Engineer i ::;I I for the Subdivider, stated the buildings will no$ *I#' ::;i i be deep but wide and that is why the lots are 80ti :::; ::;I i in width. They have not anticipated requesting i :xi I any variance. I :;I' a I::: : ENGINEERING : I I :::; I I :::; t I**, I 1;;1 i (a) 1911 Act Street Openins and Improvement _- I i!;: i Authorization to employ Roy Klema for enqineerind 111: iii; i consultinq services, 11:; I I I :::; : The City Engineer informed the Council this t t ::;I I :;:; i street opening is .between Laguna' Drive and Knowleb i::; I 1"l : Avenue. I ;;@I 1;:: I I ;a I@ I I I*;: I ::;: I I I I I I # I : Hughes i i i 4 ! I !!::I 1: I 1 I I t I I I@ /I:: I I:!:: ;i:;: i i. :;a:: I I I I ;l:ll 4:;; I I Hughes ; ! I I e! I I 1 : $ i I :;;:: i:::: I::;; 8s I I ;;It1 ,I::: I I :;::; 1 ::I I!! I I I I I I '1 I ::: 1 I I I 1 I /4; ;:PI 1:::: :';:: ;:PI I I 18;:; * ;;I:; *I I ,4:1 I I 1 I I I I b I 1 l I I t t b B I I I I I I * I I ! I !*I! * I I I I I I I * '\ ', -\ \ - 1 f I ', 8, '\ '88 ',,"' I -6- I '\ ' ', '.,'.,qs3 I '\ ',8 ', ' 8 I i Name 8\ 4% ' ', 8.6, I '.$$Q, '\ '@* I I i of ',?&8+, %$., ;:::I 1:::: I ::j:; * I :;4; :*!I: I' ;::I: 1:;:: ;;I" I:@ i : :.; : I I ::!;: 1 la^ I 1 0::;: ', 8, '* % 8 ' I :"""""""""""""-""""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""~~"-. 8 Member \e:Q,@?$s I The City has received $1,5OO,GO for engineering i ;:;I: ;@I:# i fees from the property owners, and it is estfrna- I ::II: : for the project. ! At the time Tanner and Marquardt were employed fdr i engineering services, it was the intent of the : I City Council to employ other engineers for out- i i side work. It was recommended that Roy Klema be : till: i employed €or this outside work. ! By motion of the Council, authorization was given! McPherson ; !xi y ; ~ i for the employment of Roy Klema for the engineer: Bierce !xi ; 4 : ! ing work on this project. i Guevara i i i 4 I 1 i ted this will cover all the engineering required i I I I 11 ! I I I :'#I; #I I I I I : Ueiswendelf : : 4 ; I I Hughes I i I ! i i (b) Report on fencinq and traffic warninq liqht: I-:! i:: i - Tamarack and Carlsbad 3oulevard. The City i by:; i Engineer informed the Council a letter was sent i i to the State Division of Beaches and Parks, in- 1 ::i:; I quiring as to their fugure plans for this area. i ! A letter was received back stating that funds ar$ i not available for any additional work at the in- : i tersection of Tamarack and Carlsbad Boulevard. i Bowever, they would be happy to work with the i i City in future planning. : Sn reviewing this matter again, beacon lights i *:I i were considered. These could be located several! ::;:I { hundred feet south and north of the Tamarack t :I I I .: ; : i crossing. It is estimated that it would cost I ;VI; i approximately $l,200000 to instal1,these lights. i '::; I iii: I I;:! ; Councilman McPherson asked if this was the only i I ::ii : hazardous street crossing in the.City3 8 ;:$I I I I i;:; i Mayor Guevara stated the reason for his bringing: 1:' :: i this matter up originally was there are a great : :!I: :;:: i many children concentrated at this intersection I ;I:@ i during the three months of the summero Many I ;:;: I '111 i thousands of. persons use this beach during the I ::;: ; summer and he would dislike seeing an accident i l;;l ::;; : occur and then make an investigation, t i::' 8 * 11,: I :::: I Councilman Bierce suggested that the office of i l;al I#:; i the State Beaches and Parks be contacted within i :::I ,I,: i the next nine months to see if something can be i ;::I i worked out prior to next summer seasono 1;;; * :;:; 11:; : Councilman Neimender stated there is perhaps i ::;; i::: ! more foot traffic at this intersection during th! 1;;s i three months of the year than any other intersec-t :I;: $1: i tion in the City during the remaining nine monthi. :::a I I * ;::: a :::! i The Mayor requested the City Engineer to contact: ;;I' : the State Beaches and Parks and see what can be i ;::: ;:I: : worked out. I l 1;:: ;I:: I ;::I i (c) Final Map of Stella Maris Estates Subdivisidn. I@#: '::; i The final map and the grading plan were submitted ::;; i for the Council's review. I :;!; 8 I :I;: I $1: ! The Council was informed that the subdivider had i :ii: ! met a11 the requirements prior to the approval i ::i: i of the final map. I:;: :L:; :x:; :if I h:!: i ; 1.1 ; 1:ii: ::pi 1 I ;:::; 1 ;: ;ii I I :::&I I 1': It1 : i j I ;:ii; ::i: 81 6 :I I I A I * I I * * 1 I ai I I I $1 #* I I I I I 1 I I I I I * D I I I I I 1 I I 1;4 ! :!:: 18 1 I I t.8.8. I I I * t I t I -7- I * \\ '8 '8 -8 \, '8 I '8, '8.,'888"88 't8 88\ 1 6 4 I ', \ 8 88 '8 '% I I i Name 888'8@, '8,'F I I : of '$ \?d-$%;,8*8p ,O'\ ' f+&,, I !, Member '@@8+$? 84' ~""~""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""""""~""~""""""-:""~---~ i By motion of the CounciL the final map of Stella 1 MePhersoni : :xi : i Maris Estates Subdivision'was approved, and the : Bierce !x: :xi : : Mayor authorized to execute the improvement agre4- Gueiara i i !x: ! i ment on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. i NeiswendeS ; ;xi ; tI1! : NEW BtfSfNESS: i (a) Annexation Droceedinqs for proposed "EAST I i CAFGSBAD ANNEXATION #2 , 4". 'I, I 11 I I I I * I Hughes i !x !x; i I :I 1;:;: I I I ;'I:: It( ;::I: I I ::;i; .( I I I *::I: I #I.!) I I I I i The Council was informed that a petition had bee; I received from property owners representing 65.354 i of the assessed valuation of the property propos$d ! to be annexed, I f pi:* ::I:: ::p: :::I: :; ;.I; :::II 81 ::;:: I I* t i 'i'li I I I :4:: I The Council was informed the Boundary Commission : : has approved the boundaries -as definite and ! !::I; 1":; l::1I i certain> :I I:!:: t::ll I I t t I I !f.!t I I i The map of.khe proposed area was presented. Aft+ i review -of the map by the Council, the following i : resolution was presented: b I I I 1 ::ii: ::I$ ::;:I :I 1:;:; ::!I: I i pi:; i Resolution No. 938. A RESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE i McPherson : : : 4 : i OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CITY OF CARLSBAD OF UN~ ~ierce !xi 14 i i INHABITED 'TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIG- i Guevara : I i* i i NATED Itms~ CARLSBAD ANNEXATION 2 , 4", AbJD GIVING i Nei'mendei i 5 4 i i NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARXNG OF PRCYCESTS i Hughes i i !T j i THERETO, was adopted by title only and further I :::I, : reading waived. I 1: 1 +:!! i+: I t t :'@I ! (b) A%nexation proceedinqs for Proposed "SOUTH i i CARLSBAD ANNEXATION 1.4" I t 8 I I I t i A map of the proposed annexed territory was pre- i i sented for the Council's review. The Council wa? : informed the Boundary Commission has approved ! : the boundaries as definite and certain, * t I 4 I vi: ;::: ;:ii e:!! -. iii: i:;: ;: I# :: Ii 1:;: :;I: !I!! I i The €allowing resolution was presented for the ! !;:I i Council's consideration: * I ;::: I I ;;:: I t ;::; i Resolution No. 939. A RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT i McPherson i !x! 4 : PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN INITIATED BY T= COUNCIL o$ ~ierce !X: i d ! THE CITY OF CARLSBAD TO ANNEX TO SAID CITY CER- ! Guevara : i i i i DESIGNATED "SOUTH CARLSEAD ANNEXATION 1.4" AND i Hughes i i i 5 i GIVING NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED ZWNEXATION was I :::; i adopted by title only and further reading waived,! :::; ::;I I 1 !@I! ,(*I ! TAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEMIN AND i Neiswende2 i i { I I I I ; Proclamation - National Business and ProfessionaG : Women's week, The Mayor proclaimed the week of i i October 6, 1963 through October 12, 1963, as !"National Business and Professional Women's Week".; I I I I . I ? ! Liqhts for downtown area. Councilman McPherson i : stated he was downtown the other night, and he i i was wondering why we cannot have street lights i4 : the downtown area, It looks like everyone is ! asleep, We have improved our streets; why canna$ B I * i we now have lights, * t I I f 4 1 * 1 1.; !x: *&I: ;;@I :;p ::I: iii: I! ;;'; :*:: 1::: ;;at :::: :;:: :::i ::I* 1;;: :I ii:! : ;' i The City Manager informed the Council that the m&- i chants in the downtown area had a survey made to ! : have mercury-vapor lights installed. For some i : reason the project fell through. i::i ;::I I;&: :::; * t i::; $1 b ; 1.:; I t ! :?': # , S8\*,\. I I I I I I I I *8 '8,8',8 'S8 8'88*\8 I 'X ' ' ' *8p65 I '\ '8\\, '\,'\, \ I 8 \ 8,8' I -8- I I I ! Na me8 \* 'x%, '8\ 8.4 <+), 9 : of '8$ is 'x 8*&, I ; Member ' Q @@.& d-9 ,+\e ,dl :-""""""","""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""~~"-."~"" I::,: :'I:; I:::I : : I. ; ,: ;::;: 4::; I !*Ill I I 1;:ol ::;:I :I;:: l1 1:::: !Councilman Bierce stated the property owners in i Ithe downtown area did not want to pay for the :lights. The property owners in Oceanside paid I jfor the lights and that is why it is well-lightedi :Councilman PicPherson asked if there could not be g :one or tw6 lights installed? ICouncilmah Bierce stated there have been at least! i sik attempts made to form a district. It is his i !feeling that you could not spend tax-payers rnonef !ii;: i for a particular area. I @I;': ' It1 :Mutual Fire Aid Acfreement, Councilman Hughes in-! :':;:; It8 jquired as to the article in the newspaper regardi6g !Mutual Fire Aid, :The City Nanager informed the Council he received! !a call from the City Manager of Vista concerning : :I1:; !mutual fire aid. They are also contacting Camp i IPendleton. Oceaside has an agreement with Camp i :x:; : Pendleton e iCouncilman Hughes inquired as to liability in the! :event someone were hurt, Also he felt the City it ;:::: :responsible to the people in Carlsbad, I *I 1 !The City Manager stated there is a great deal of i I pro and con on the subject. The City of San Diegb !was against this mutual aid because they spend a t I great deal of money on their fire protection. Thh I I:* ::I !City Managers' have been attempting to form a !mutual aid among. the cities in the County. i Article XI., Sec: 27.28- Capital Contribution i :a;* :Charge for persons outside sewer districts. !Councilman Neiswelider stated it was his feeling i )*I1 1;;; ithat this section of the code should be amended tQ ii:: jprovide that the Terramar property owners who ; hook up to the new sewer plant not be charged the; 4 :: (I,* i $50.00 Caatal Contribution Chzrge. e :I :Councilman Bierce suggested that the Council mem-i ;I la jbers study the proposed amendment prior to the i I 1:;; ::i: :next meeting before taking any action, : OLD BUSINESS: i (a) Second readinq of Ordinance. No, 9151, amend-: iinq Ordinance No. 9060, bv addins ZO~ R-3L- :: The following ordinance was presented for a seCon$ i reading by the Council: i Ordinance NO, 9251. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i McPherson ; : !X: i CARLSBAD AMENDING CITY OF CARLSBAD ORDINANCE NO. ! Bierce F i i 3 i 9060 BY ADDING THERETO ARTICLE 6.5, ESTABLISHING i Guevara : : ;x! i zgg R-~L ZONE, was given a second reading by title! Neiswender! i i i: i only and adopted. i Hughes i Ixix; I I I iiril 11;:: :' I ii::: ::I:# :;:;I I I ::i:: I : ; ; I.; I:::: ;:::: Is::;, i::;; I I. :::;: t :q:i i:,:; ::i:; I I :;':I t I*: I I I ::;;: li8 I ;,:i: iii:; 11; : i; :'I ;:':I I I I I I I ;I:': ;I$I I 11 I I 4 I f I I I I b I I I I 18 I I I I 1:;: :::; I t ::;: ;:;: I !/ij 11 I I I I:;: I*:: I I I I a :::; I I' * I ,i ; I : ;::; 1 I I $ I ::;: 1 la I I 1 I I :;i: t I I ;::: iii; I ;::a I 1;;: I ;;:* ::I: I;; I. ::;I I ::;i I iy: t- s I I I I I I B It I I I t I t :::; 4 I l:*l /:; I I :;:: I I i;:: I ;::: I *:I I ;I I I I I I I I : !*I! s 1 I I 8 \,3'\8' t 4 4 * \, ',,'*,, '\,'\\'\\ I I , " t '\ '\, '\ x, ,,'\.I 6 G s i Name '\ '\$, 8 \, "\&, I s ; of ''+?@, '\ Y% I : Member \,L.O.g\ $'@,&?$& ;%* ~"""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""""""""""""""""""~"" i (b) Report on beach frontasc property. At the i i:ls; /::; i last regular meeting, the staff was instructed t4 ;I:;, I make a study of the beach area between the two : ;:;;: ;::;: i inlets to see what could be done to clean up thid :::I: *:::: 1 area. t I ; ;'I I I 4 *:: I I :::I: : The Council was informed the staff made a study i ::;;I i of the area and it is their recommendation that i :!;:I ;*:I: i a study be made for parking area and that a berm i *I,*: I;;:1 i be constructed. Also that signs be posted pro- ; :;;:; ::*:; i hibiting parking between the hours of 2:OO A.M. : ::::I i and 5:OO A.M, There will be some problem until I I;!:; i such time as Mr- Ecke can be contacted. s I ;:I:: I I 4ii: I:( I I i:::; ! Councilman Bierce moved and Councilman Neiswended *II:I ! seconded the motion that the City Attorney be in4- ;I:;: :::;: ! tructed to prepare an emergency ordinance prohi-: ;I::: i biting parking between the hours of 2:OO A.M. and iiiii i 5:OO A.M. '1: s :;:;I I I I ;I::! i Bob Quigley, Manager of the Boys' Club, stated i ;::b ;:;:: ! he would like to point out that there are many i I#;;; ;: 8s i people who come to this area just for the purpos$' 11:'1 I I.;: I 1 of fishing and fish all night. He likes to fish: ;11:! :::a* i and frequents this area quite often. I /;:; t I ;:*I; s :::i: I* i Councilman Bierce rescinded his'motion. t l';8: I I I * ::I:; I I ;;/I I The Mayor suggested that the City Manager, City i SI::: :*I:* ! Attorney and the Chief of Police study this I t ;:::I ;;'I: ! matter further and report back with their recommi ll:*: i endations . 4 ;i!ii I s :::i: I ::: ;.: i Widenins 02 Harrison Street. Councilman Neis- i ::; :; * i wender stated he would still Like to see Harris04 ;;;Il ::;I: f Street widened to 40* and that 22' of surfacing i :I;:; ; be installed. 4 I:::: I I I ;;::: Is1* s ::;:; i Councilman McPherson stated the street &t 22"iSi i:;:: i wider than Highland Drive is now. Why should thd 1;;:: i City widen this little street to a 40' width? i 1:;:: ;::I, #8111 i Councilman Hughes and Councilman Bierce stated i $1:; ;:I:; ; they were in accord with Councilman McPherson. i /::; I ;::I; ;i::; I CITY ATTORNEY *s REPORT: :I::[ I t I ;::;: I :!I:; 'I s $1 :I::( :;::I 'I I I I ;::*I I ::;:: I '\\ ', ', '\ \\ \ I t I -9- I t 8 I k s 4 11 I I s I t I I I I I 8 I I I 1 ;*I:; I 3 s s 1 I I i Kelly - Hicks water suit. The City Attorney in-! ' ::; i formed the Council a Preliminary Hearing was s I 1:;:: : held in the Superior Court in San Diego on this i : matter, I I I:::; i Since 1961, the parties concerned have been re- : ;:;:: i ceiving Colorado River Water. The Court suggest4d 4;;; i::;' ! that 1961 be fixed as the date for billing. It ; ;;I:: i was proposed that the parties pay .for all water i ;;$! : received from September, 1961; that they would i : not be charged for any water received prior to i +:: :* i that date, and that the penalties be dropped. I I * a:, 1;: I I ii::: i This would mean approximgtely 500 on the dollar. : ;I:;: B , I 1 *,: I ;;I:: t I ::::; :I:;' :I:;! ;::;s : with the above, or did they wish to have the b. k .: I I ;I::: I 1 1 i The City Attorney inquired of the Council if it ! i was their desire to make settlement in accordan& : matter go to trial. s I ;i::: s l'* ! !@I!* *'*I I ! I I I I : '8 ', -8, '8 '8 '8 I -10- I I '8, '8 , '8 '8,'*, - I I I '\ 88,8'\8 88, ',,',, PK I I I '\8 '\ \, ' 8 I i Na me '8, 8s.. C, I .?$*)8;J,+?+ :-"""""-"""""-""~"""~""""""""""""""""""""l"""""~""""""," : Member 80'08.p89'\< '8@, '8% '.&, v I I : of 8$+\0', \ '*' I i!!b! i It was agre&that the Council go on record as i I favoring settlement . t : Amendment to bicycle ordinance. The firm .who . : : handles the codification o€ our ordinances have { : informed the City' there is a conflict 'in the prej i sent code. Also the Chief of Police has request4d i some changes in the ordinance. The City Attorne$ i informed the Council he has prepared an amendmen4 i to the ordinance €or consideration as follows: : I 1 I I I I I t- I I I I 1 I;;l; Il(0 ;,,,I lit:: ::ii: 1"1: ::::I :p': 114; :#!;I $1;; ;#I:! *:;I; 17;; :::I, :;@I; ::::; ::i:! I,.*; i Ordinance No. 3064. AM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i McPhersoni : !x: I CARLSBAD, MENDING ORDINaEjCE NO, 3062 REGARDING i Bierce i i ;xi ! THE LICENSING OF WCYCLES, was given a first read- Guevara I i ;x: ! ing by title only, and further reading waived. I Neiswendei !xix: I i Hughes !xi ;xi I CITY MANAGER t s &BURT: I I :::i I 1 ;:;I i Lebedeff Property. The City Manager informed thd I::: si;! : Council that he contacted Mr. Lebedef f and he in; ii:: i dicated to Mr. Lebedeff that this purchase could i I::: i not be made in cash, Mr. Lebedeff stated that h4 i;ii i did not want to be paid in cash as he wanted to i ;I:: ,:I1 i depreciate his property out. The City Attorney i tl:; ::I1 i and the City Manager will meet with the real es- i I:!: r:I: : tate agent to discuss possible financing. I I i;:: I 1:;: ti", I I I # I I 1 I t i Letter from Terramar Associakion - re : Sewers.. A i I letter from George C. Henry, Chaijcman, Committee i i on Sewers ...f or Terramar, was presented, wherein I i they .requested clarification of Section 17 -18 of { i Article 1, concerning "Capital. contributions i charge". ,I.t is their feeling this section appli& : to %he old sewer district and is not clear as to i ; its effect and intent. In their opinion it would! i be inequitable to impose the $50.00 nook-on char$F i as they are in the new sewer district. i Councilman' Bierce requested that a copy of this i : letter be sent to all-the meaers of the Council : ! in order that it can be studied along with I I i Councilman Neiswender's suggested amendment, i Letter from Citv of Escondido - re: So B. 861 i I and S,B, 1662, concerninq "Local Aqencv Annexa- i i tion Comm.ission", Letter dated September 6, 1963j, : from the City of Escondido, enclosing a copy of : ! their Rem lution No. 1926, disapproving the pro- i i visions.of Chapter 6.5 of Part 1, Division 2, I I i Title 5 of the Government Code, en.titled "Local i i Agency Annexation Commissionn, and urging the i immediate repeal thereof by the California Legis-! i Pature. : I 'I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I * b I I I I I B "if ::;; i::: 1 .; ; I ::;:, :::; ::I; :;I; I::: $81 ,a;; ;; /:: :::: ;::: ;;ne 1:ii 1::: :::; :I ;;:: ;::; ;:: I 1'1: l:'l ;I:; :a:: :'; : ; 11 ;::: ll;; ;I:' ;:I: 1;:: i::: 1;:: :a:: i;:: 1; ;: I(* iq :"I )"I !*a! I :: Mayor Guevara stated he would like .to suggest thak : this City Council go along with the resolution i : adopted by the City of Escondido, One of the maib !objections he has to the Bills is that there are i i two men being appointed from the County' of San i i Diego- 'I I I I I I t I I 1 I 1 t I I I $ 1 a I ! : :ti; 1*1I 1::: :;:I ::I: ::;: ::;: !I:; :I:: ;I:; ;;:e ;;I; ;: ;::: ;::; ,I:, F'lI l:!l I i. .; 1 !&I! I 1 I I I I ; '\, \, -, ', ', '\ I I ., \.\'\, '\ ' ' I I 1 , ',,",, 1 s 2 I -11- I I \, , ',,'\, ' 'X,', , '.\> I I : of '+$+>&,;?+ ;""""""""""-""""".-""~""""""""""."""-"""""~~""""""""~ ; Member ,o ; pp& #--;-;--[ .g I f ::;:; . I 1 b i Na rn e \\ '9$, 'x, \$$, 1 I \\ \' .. I * # 'x+ '0, \ :The following resolution was presented for the i :::*I !Council I s consideration: I :;:;: :Resolution No. 941. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY :;l*I ! McPherson i : ixi : iCOlJXCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING CITY OF i Bierce :x; ;x: i :ESCONDIDO RESOLUTION NO. 1926, AND DISAPPROVING i Guevara : ; ;xi : I,'# !THE PROVISIONS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 1662, was adopted i Neiswende; ix!xi i by title only and further reading waived. i Hughes ; ; ;x: ; 'I, I 1 I I ::I:: I ::::; ;RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: I @:;it I !!I:; * 11;:: :Ratification of the bills was given for the generGl {:::I !expenses of the City in the amount o€ $19,299,20 i ;:.:;i !and for the Water Department in the amount of 4:;; i McPherson i : !x: : !$12,744,02, €or the period of -September 3, 1963, i Bierce , , I4 1, 8 :x:q ; $0 Septeniber 17, 1963, as certified by the Direc- i Guevara i i :x!: I !tor of Finance and approved by the Auditing Commi-: Neiswende$x! ;xi ; it tee o { Hughes ' : !xi { :Ratification of the payroll was given for the fir4t Meherson :: I !x: 1 !ha15 of Septeniber, 1963, in the amount of i Bierce ; : !xi ' !.$17,488.88 as certified by the Director of Financ< Guevara i i I ; Xi !and approved by the Auditing Committee, : Neiswenderf :x:xi 1 I I t I I I1 $1 1 I I I I I I I ;I::, I I 14 I I I ;!:,I I I I I ;:i r I 1 1 i Hrghes :xi !xi I i-: ; ; I I ;!:: 1 * I 1';: ;; /:: I $8 8ii I I :it: 1 I :a:: I I ;;a1 I ;::: * p:: I I I ;::I I;*: I I :::: : : 1.; 8 ii:: I .i::; 'f I I I I::; ii:; 1 I 6 ;!{i I I ;*:: :p: * I :I:: I I :::; 10 I I ::;; I I :;I1 I I ;$: e :;ii 1 ::;I I I I:: I I I 1::: * :;:: I I::: 1. i::: B :::; I I::: I * * ;::I I I ::;: * I ill: 1 ;:I: 1 I I;'* I f 8 11:; :::: * I :::* a';: I I I I I I 11 '&DJ'OURNMEBT :: by proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at i i93551 P.M, I I I I I :Respectfully submitted, I 1:; I I 1 I 1 s I I ;I I I b 8::: e f ::;; I 1 t I I 1 I I t I I I I I s I I I I I I 1 I I I 6 I I a I * I I 18 4;' I v I I I * I I I I I f I * ::;i af ' * I l a;;! ;::: f I * I I I I I I I I I I t .I 9 I I I 6 .I I I 'f I:; I I I I I k i::: I ,I, I I t f I . I * ;.: , ; ? :i:: I I I I I lb!l