HomeMy WebLinkAbout1963-10-15; City Council; MinutesI I '\ \.\ \ '. I " '\ \, '* " '8
I 4 \, \, ', y+Ifj 1
I ', '\ ' ', 3 8 I " " '\i \, 8, '\
I 1 ~a m2 \, '\$&, \,, \a\
I I , of ''.+$?&, \\ b*\
I 1 14 em bet $d>.Qx+.p \,<
I 1
I -3-
I
I $3. '& x0 ' 9 ! .t"+?\
;~,,","~"~",~""""""""""~""-~"""""""""""""""";~"."""""""~ "",". i By ,moti.cn of the Council the Engineering Lkpart- I McPkerson i : i 4 i : Dent was ihstructed to work with the Chamber of ; Bierce !x; i 4 ; ! Conmerce as to the engineering factors, and it i Guevara ; : ; A ; i was agreed that the Chamber be permitted to use i Neiswende4 i i 4 i i City property to place the sign on. i Hughes : !xi )4 ;
4 0l18 I ::;I: I Cbunciltnan Reiswender inquired of Mr. Dunhan as' i :;4; i to the Eicjn bsing placed in South Carlsbad adver-: :I, I
1 tising Oceanside, as he objected to a sign of i **8::
1::'l : this type beiag placed in the City of Carlsbad I ;';;! i advertising some other City. I I 1::::
I I 8 :::I, :::;I i Mr. Dunham stated the Chamber has gone on record f (11 ;:*:!
i as to sending a letter to the Chamber of Commerc$ i:+ 1811
i in Oceanside objecting to this sign. ::ii~
; The City Manager presented a letter that was re-.i ii;: ! ceived from the Chamber of Commerce in Oceanside ; 14:; I::: i several months ago, requesting permission to re- i I;;@ .i locate their- sign. I I !;I:
1 I ::::
i The Council was informed a plan was presented and: 9::: I a building'permit was taken out in accordance i : with the plan presented. However, in checking ; pi
; the sign upon completion, it was found the sign i ;:ii i is nine feet (9') over the maximum size allowed. I 110
i The City Attorney stated there is no question but! :;:: i what they will have to conform to the sign ordi- i :a:: I nance, He felt a letter could be sent to the ;;I1
I *I:* 8 I**; t Oceanside Chamber requesting the sign to be I ;!:I : changed. I I 114 :;::
I I :I:: 4 ;::; ; (d) Yellow Cab Company - re: Request to chanqe i ;::;
I :;i: i from zone rate to mter rates. Letter dated i October 11, 1963, from the Yellow Cab Co. of I I i:::
& 1: ; Oceanside, Inc,, requesting permission to change ! *';I ::;: : from the zone rates now charged to meter rates, i ; I@1 i The rates would be fifty cents for the first half: ;:::
*#;I i mile, and ten cents each additional quarter mile,: $1:
I 4 1::: I I 1 ::;f i The Council was informed the Yellow Cab Co. is i ;*I: ::i; i now operating under a Certificate of Necessity i :::; i and Convenience which calls for zone rates, They i ; 1.1,
1 :\: : : are changing over in Oceanside and would like to ; : :,;;
:make it uniform in all the surrounding cities. :;:I
I :a;: i The rates would be approximately the same as they: :L1
It': i are now. D f $!;
I I ;:;I
I By motion of the Council it was agreed that the iMcPherson ; pix; ;::;
i Yellow Cab Company be allowed to change from zone: Bierce i i :xi : rate to meter rates. iGuevara I : :xi
b
'I
11
I 1
:I!!:
I :: I
I
I
I I * s
I t1
I t 4::;~
I I * li:; :; I
::::
;:'8
I I s f I ;::: ;i:i
I
I *
I I
I
I
I
&
b
I
I
I I iNeiswenderi i ;x!
I i Hughes :xi !x: * I ::;I
iPolicy statement - re: legal descriptions and i *a:: ::/ i applications before the Planning Commission, The! 1:;: ::;I ;Mayor presented a statement regarding the estab- i ::;: : lishment of a policy concerning legal descriptions i::; I on applications for reclassifications, variances, i :::; ;::: i conditional use permits, etc., wherein the legal i :::; i descriptions would be checked by the Engineering i 1:;1
'111 11,)
I e 4 I ::I: ::::
? i::i
I
I I
I
B
I I
I * ! *
I ; ' % *, ', ', *, I I 8 ; I '.,'"',, ',""
b 6 '\ ,, ' '., , 8, ', ' " ' " 1 I]:z
t : N a me 't, '.e, *,, ,*, 1 ; of y3'<$!!, \?& '6 , ;\ +?+
ii:::
!:;:I
I -4- I ,, , \' ', X.'\* s I '. '.&
~"""""""""~"~"""""""""~~""""""""""""""""~""--------"-~--~--"-~--. : Member \*@,+d$
I I ;:;;: i Department prior to any publication or notices i ' I:(
i being sent to the adjoining property owners: that! 4:l; i these apslications should be processed ahead of i I any subdivision projects; and that the applica- i 1*111 I;'@; i tion be read in full at the time of the hearing i lI:el
; before the Planning Commission, t i:ii
I i I :ii; I By common consent of the Council it was agreed i 11,' pi : that this policy be established by the Council. i ('*I
? I :iii
i PLANNING: '. 1 I , I '(I(
I I ::I:
1 I :':; : (a) Tentative map of Kremeyer Cisclk Subdivision; ii::
:A map of the proposed subdivision was presented, i :::!
i which had been submitted by Robert L, Means, own-! !:I: 4:: Ier and subdivider,. located on property northerly : ::'I t::: !of Laguna Drive between Jefferson Street and I I 18 I 1::: i Buena Vista Circle. I I:::
I ::a*
I 1;:: :Resolution No. 317 of the Planning Commission was! ii::
:read wherein they reconmended approval of the I i::: ! tentative map, subject to certain conditions and : 111: ::!! i restrictions being complied with. I !I::: I I:**
t 1 ;;I: !It was pointed out this proposed subdivision pro-; I:::
jvides for a recreational area for all the properti , ;::: 1:
:owners within the subdivision. I ;I:: * ;::I I I 11; !After further consideration by the Council, the ! it la :::I
!following resofution was presented for the Coun- i ;::: a**
jcil's approval: t ::;I
4 I I :I::
:Resolution No, 947. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY .t * i:::
I- iMcPherson l ; ix : :COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING TENTA- :Bierce . i xi :xi :TIVE MAP OF KREMEYER CIRCLE STJBDIVXSIOM, was a- iGuevara ! : F ;
idopted by title only and further reading waived. iNeiswender i i $! i :x?!
!MEN BUSINESS: *
1 I::: I1 I
I ;::: ; (a) Proclamation - Farm- City Week, With the con- i 1:::
!sent of the Council, the Mayor proclaimed the wee4 :;;;
:::I
:of October 21, 1963 through October 27, 1963, as i ; 1 *I
iFarm-City Week. I
I ;;:i
lo::
I ;!It
I 1 *: i(b) Request for State Department of Finance to i :;:\
ulation estimate, The City Manager in: :::: :prepare POP :;I
:formed the Council a population estimate was made i ';I;: ;!;: bast year. According to the building permits I :i;; !issued this past year it is estimated there are i ;;;;
i382 new units. Using the formula that the State : i:;l
!uses, this would increase the population to ll,OOO!. ;::I
pnder the per capita monies received from the I
I ii:
$%ate this would give the City an additional
:$500,00. If the Council wishes another estimate i
kade, it will be necessary to adopt a resolution i {i:
B bequesting the State to make such a survey. 1 1 i:i $1
I I I :::
8 I ::; * t * I:: I*
I I ::;
I I!:
I I i::
I ;::
I ;:;
1
::I;!
:; 1: *,
I I
I I
I I
11
*
9
I
I I
I
I
1
9 I
I
I I
I I
I I :Hughes
I
I
I I I
I
* 9
1';
l 1:: t ::;
::; 1)1
I
I I * I
I
I I
I
I t
4
(61 1
$
b
I
I *I# *
I
D
I I
1
.! , !I,
* *
I I * * I
i
I' 1 \ '8 '$ ', '% '8
I I I
I '8, '8,8888 8\,8""\
'88 '8 ', ' 8 '8'183 I -5- >, '\ ,8 '8, 88 ',
I ! Na me *s8 '.%8 8. '8 88%b8 '?h
I I : of '%\%.,$,,$$.+ i "" "" - -"" - - - "" - - - - - - - "- - - - -" - - - - - - - - .. - - - - - - - -e- - - - -" - - - - - - - - - - - - -;- - -. - - .. - - - - - * - -:f:L?", "- I The following resolution was presented for the i 1::::
* p:; i Council's consideration: I
I I 1 ::;i: I::I:
: Resolution No, 948, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY I ::I::
: COUNCIL OF THE CIW OF CARLSBAD REQUESTIPJG THE i ::i:t ;;/: ! STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE TO Pd- M&hezso& I :x: I :::
i PARE A POPULATIONS SURVEY AND AUTEORIZING THE i Bi.erce ! ix !x; i i EXECUTION OF m AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT i Guevsrn i i F; : 41 i OF FINANCE AND THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, was adopted i B?sis~~ende~x~ $ci i i by title only and further reading waived. : H~~ghes ;:$:
I (c) First readinq o€. Ordinance No. 80A0, amend- I ! ins Ordinance No. 8025, by adopthqthe 1961 Edi- i ::'I;
11:;1 { tion of the Uniform Plusribins Code with chanqes, i I The City Attorney presented the following ordi- i ::oil t fl i nance, and informed the Council this ordinance id i at the request of the Building Inspector in orded : to bring the plumbing requirements up to date: i
i Ordinance No. 8040. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i McPherson i I & ! i I CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8025 BY ADOPTING I Bierce :xi k i ~ I THE 1961 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLuEdiBING CODE, i Guevara I i Zi i WITH CHANGES, was given a first reading by title i Neiswende4 I xk i i only and further reading waived. : Hughes i i b i
4 I ? :::: : OLD BUSINESS:
i (a) Report from Traffic Safety Committee - re: i .:: 1:
i Stop siqn at Garfield.Street and Acacia Avenue- I :;I:
;I:# i At the last meeting of the Council a petition wa! :::i i presented by the property owners in the area of : ::i: :;;i : Acacia Avenue and Garfield Street requesting a i I*'$ : stop sign placed at the intersection of Acacia i ::;i
: Avenue and Garfield Street, I I ii;;
I I i:::
I ::I: :+ i The City Manager reported the Traffic Safety I 4 ii" i Committee inspected the site and it is their recj ;: I@ 1;:: i omendation that no stop sign be erected due to : ;:*, i the fact that vision iL normal in every directioi, *:a@ i::: : enabling motorists and pedestrians to see on- I 1::: : coming traffic. It was felt that is a sign was i :;e !!** :i ! placed at this intersection that citizens would i :*'* *ai; i demand stop signs at other cross streets along i :I I Garfield Street, I I ;:::
I I ;;!: 1;': ! By common consent the recommendation of the corn$- :,::
1';;
; ttee was accepted by the Council. t I iii; * Ii f f: i (b) Report on Tamarack Avenue and Carlsbad Boule< :i i::; i vavd intersection, The City Manager informed th4 1::; I Council he took it upon himself to have Mr. Kolt-4 i:::
: now, Traffic Engineer for the Automobile Club of I :i:: I::: i California, make an inspection of this intersec-! 1:::
I tion, A letter from Mr. Koltnow was presented, i I I' ;; 1; ! and after an inspection of the intersection and i ::;: i an analysis of the accident record, installation: ::I: a*:; i OP a flasher at this time seems premature. He i i::;
i suggested that the signs and pavement markings i ::ii :::I : should be brought up to standard, before assum- : ::;I : ing the expense of a flasher equipment, I a $' * IiIr I:'
I $ ::*I :;:;
I i;;; :'
;:*I
: Member '*@%\,A ,p\,d
1 t
I
*
I I I :;I It1:; 8 ::ii:
;;:':
1 :ii
;:I;;
4:;1
:*:I: {I:!:
I *::;I :;*I;
fi
* I
I I
I L I ':::
I I I I :::! 811 I
4 I
8
t
I t I
I * 1
4 I
88
B
1
I I * 4 I I I *
*
t I
I * I *
;$I;
6 !I! I' !
I I *,\' 8 b' I J 8, ',,'x, '\ '\ "
I I ".?+2;;0,
I
I I -5- I ', 8 ' '8, ","84 8 4
I I I \\ 88 '\,"., , , \ '\, ' '' '
I I ~a me '8 '+&, ',, ,?+,,
s
4 I . 'x&,
I I ; of '\LlO\a\/t\+.\ ;""~"""""~"""""""""""""""~"""~""""""""""~""""""""-"""
{ The City Manzger further stated he was informed i ;:I:: I by the San Diego Gas & Electric Company, the Cit$ ;::::
1;::: i would not be allowed to use. their poles to run a I i cable acrosso This would mean the City would I :i::i : 1 ;.t
i have to install their own poles and they would ; ;:I:; ,I: ! have to be located on State Beaches and Parks pri- . :i::i i perty. I I ,*:I, /::;
I I I ;:.4; I By motion of the Council, it was agreed that the i McPherson; ; +* ; ;::::
i recommendation of Mr. Koltnow be accepted, and i Bierco !x: :A i : that this supercede the action taken by the Cowl Guevara ; : l 1:' :+ i 1 cil at the meeting of October 1, 1963. : EJeiswende$ : ;x! :
4 i Hughes : i I%! ! i (c) Report on appraisal of City-owned property. I i The Council was informed that an appraisal had I ;J:; i been made by the Realty Board and by Mr. Arthur i ;J;i i N. Clemens.of the Elm Street property and the i i Lebedeff property, which was as follows: I I I:: /Ii~
I :!Ii~
I Elm Street Property Lebedeff' Properti
I I !::I:
I 1::;
I I I $8 I Clemens - $ 94,500.00 I :: I
ii
I .. I I i:;: ! An Offer of Purchase and Exchange of Real Proper-! i!1a
; ty has been received from the Oceanside Federal : I. I;:!
I Savings and Loan Association, wherein they propode ;:;: i to purchase the Lebedeff property for $52,500.00 i :iil i and after obtaining title to the property, they i ::!I: .i of fer to convey said Lebedeff property to the i Ill(
i City of Carlsbad in exchange for the Elm Street i i::: :::; i property, and pay the City an additional I :'*I : $40,000.00 net, and rent free of the library r 1:::
I ;::e
1 facilities for a period of two (2) years. 4 ;::;
I 1 1 .; ; ; i Councilman Bierce stated if consideration is I I ::I: i given to cost of removing the water facilities, i iiii I free rent of the library facilities, etc., in hi4 :::;
i opinion he felt this was a fair off&. I ;!::
I I@;:
I ::I: ! Councilman McPherson'stated he would be in favor I ;:i: i of asking for bidst I
41; :;;;
I :;:;
i Councilman Hughes stated he felt this offer made i ::;:
i by the Oceanside Federal Savings and Loan Coo I ii:;
I :;ii i was a .substantial offer and he would be in favor : iiii : of- accepting the offer, I I ::;;
I I ::I: i Councilman Neiswender stated he would like to ! :;{i i have the balance of the 'next three weeks to Cons: :::: :;;; i ider this offer, I i::;
I I 1::;
:;I1 i By motion of the Council, it was agreed that i McPherson i : i 4 : this matter be table until the next regular i Bierce ; ;x:d i meeting of the Council for further study, i Guevara i i :+
: Member ~%'@.~~~~
:I
1
IO)(
)(I8
I I
I ::p;
::;I:
I:::( :::;I I I
I I I
€ I I *
I
i Realty Board - $108,500.00 $ 40,035.00 I i::; I**(
I I
$ 38,000000 I
t I
111
;'
;I:'
I
I
I I
I
11:
I I '1 I
I
I 11
4 I
I
l1 1
I I I
I
I
'la I I
*
I k I I
D I 1 i DfeiswendeSx: !x
I I i Hughes i i ;+
D I i;::
I t I 1:::
It!:
I ::I;
I I :::I
8 I I ;:;:
I I * ;:': 1;; :: 1.;:
I
4
8
l
I
1 $
I I
I
a I 1
1 *
I
! I !
I IR
r . .. 0 t I I 1 1
I ?
\ *'
I I I 'y+, '\ '\ y,, ' '. ",3. Q pr;.
8 \ ', '\ 4.9 ! -7- 8 1- '8, '8 ', \ \ ',
I l . I a me \\, '4$. \8, ,PA,
t I .?d&\s'.\;?j
'\ '.*. ; of .,+'\08,
~"""""""""""""""""""~"~""~""""""""""""-"~;~"---"------------"-7---- : Member '%@+s .&
1 ;;I .!I 1
1
i : Mr, Hyne, Attorney-at-Law, stated he represented i i the Oceanside Federal Savings and Loan, They ar3 i not trying to push this matter: however, Mr. Le- : I bedeff's property has been placed in escrow and ! : Mr. Lebedeff is leaving for Europe on November 6,; : 1963. The Oceanside Federal Savings and Loan i ! Association has an application for a permit to i i do business .in Carlsbad in the offering, They i i cannot guarantee they will build a building unti? i they receive this permit. If the City is going ! i to consider putting the property up for bid, they! i would like to be informed and also as to what i
I terms they wish the bids based on. They obtaine4 i an appraisal of the City property from Mr. Lee i ! Johnson, an appraiser from San Diego, in the i amount of $92,500,00 , They submitted their pro- ! I posal on the basis of free rent for the library : I for the next two years, which would be approxi- : i mately $6,000.00 .
1
I I
t I I 1 I i Mr. C. R. Narciso, Executive Vice President, was i i present and stated the Oceanside Federal Savings i i and Loan Association wishes to pay the City what ! i they feel the property is worth,
i Mr. Richard Geyer, Realtor, stated he .has several! : clients in Carlsbad who are interested in this i : property, He has been informed on several occa- i i sions that .the City could not sell this property.! i It is his feeling the only fair way to handle i I this matter is to put the property up for bid, :
!
I I I I I I
I k
ti;:;
1::::
:;'I; i::::
1:;:: i::*:
11*:: :ii:;
I::,: ;I i::;;
.4::g1
:I::: :!;I:
:::I:
::I:;
11;;: ::::;
::::e
!::I:
1::;: iiii:
*I :,:I:
1:::: ::;::
:::I:
Ill,
Ib :liii
IS
*t1:*
1 I *: I
;Qllt
l*!l ::;i;
:::I ;It;:
1:::: ::;::
:::I' ::: :: ::: :;
;t1:1 ti::\
:;;:I
:;I:'
::;I ::;i i::: ;I;: :;;!
11
I : Mrs, Cole, City Librarian, stated the Library
I Board on two different occasions asked for an i ! opinion as to whether the property could be sold,! i and they were informed by the former City Attorn-! i ey it could not be sold as it was part of the i i assets of the Water Company.
1 I I
I I I I *
:;:;
::I:
:I:: ;:::
;:'I
1::; ::I;
i;:;
::I: :I
!'I, 1 I i Mr. Wilson, City Attorney, stated he checked with: : the bonding attorneys, and he was informed that i t :::I 17; : title to the property can be transferred.
!Mayor Guevara stated it was his feeling the pro- i #:I:
:;a1 i perty should be put up for bid, and announced i that the property is up for bid for anyone wantink :;;;
i to submit a bid. however, the city reserves the right t$ reject i:::
: any and all bids. 1:;; '4
: (dl) Las Flores Drive extension. Councilman Neis-i ;::: i wendes stated he attended the meeting of the Carib- ;:::
!bad School District, and the extension of Las I ::::
I ;::;
j Flores Drive was discussed, They propose that i '::; ::;; ithe Council consider some type of crosskalk, over: :a1 ;;:; i or under the proposed extension and adjoining the!
jwalkway easement, in the plans for the extension i :::t :::: I of Las Flores Drive. I :Ill
I *:I:
t ::i: I It is recommended that in order to arrive at a ! :::: i:;; { 1ogical.conclusion the Council request a study be! l:al :::: 1 made as to cost and programming, with considera- :
:tion of a possible secondary street, before the ! :::; I::: : finalizing of the plans for the extension of Las i ;::; ! Flores Driveo This study should evaluate the I **I
t I :;;I i financial, engineering a.nd traffic items involved; i:::
I I I;;*
I::; 4::
a I $1 ;:i:
I I I I
I I /I::
I I i::i
$1
I I
01
t
I 5 t D
11
1 I I
* I ;::: $'a:
I *+14 ! !4,!
*
I
1 I
t
I : ", '\\"*\ ', ',",, \-.
I I I I
'\ ' 8 ', \, 8 ', '\ '\ \\ 185
I TI1 -8- I \\ 8 " '\ 8 '' , 'X '.:'*'
I i Na me \\, ?&,, 'i,, ,pA,
I ; of \,+ \O'\
I ~?&&,+.$3$.$, :"""""~""""""."""""""""""""""""~""""~"""~"~""""""""""~"~~ ; Member ,~~~~p,.
1 ;:;a: ; By common consent of the Council it was agreed i i::;i ! that a study be made as recommended, I 1:1+ I 11:*:
I I ::*Il 1::
i CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: I I ii::;
:.I; 1; ii;!: i Drainaqe - re: Glenview Estates subdivision. Thd :::::
i City Attorney informed the Council a letter was i 1:;a*
88;;: : received from Feist and Vetter, Attorneys-at-Law,; ii::: I concerning the drainage from Glenview Estates. . i 4::*1 i Subdivision onto his client's property adjoining i :;'I:
;'I : ; : i the subdivision, Since receiving the.letter,the I ":::: ;@I i City Engineer has been contacted and it was founq 1;::: ::; :; i that the grading was not in accordance with the i i;t:I i grading map that was approved. However, since ; :e: 1:,;1 : that time, it has been taken care of, I ::;Ii
I I;'::
I I ::':: ;':
I CMWD water rate increase. The City Attorney I iiIi: i attended the adjourned meeting of the Carlsbad I il;:: i Municipal Water District. The district approved i .; ::::; 1 t 1 : the increa-se in water rates as proposed. On be- : t:*l: I half of the 'City it was requested that the City i tt.:;1 ::::\ ! be allowed' to check the basis on which they based !;:{; ! their increases. The District was agreeable to i ,:!I : Eurnish this in€omation. There will be a meet- I :;::I
It ':I 8' i ing with the District's manager, and the rates { vi;: i will be discussed at this time,
: Library. The City would like to have Mr. Melvin i ld: : go ahead with the final plans for the library; i 1:;'
; however, the City does not have the money availaj ::I: ! ble at'this time for his fees. He is agreeable i PI * l::l i to borrowing money to meet his cost if it is nee-! ;*I:
1::: i essary, providing the City would pay the interes? i::: I on the money that he might have to borrow. I :!:I
I I :;;:
: The City Manager stated he and the lviayor and Coun-i !:I: :I :::: : cilman Bierce attended a meeting with the Board i ::;: i of Library Trustees and the Building Committee. I I: 1:
!.This matter was discussed at the meeting and the$ ::;; ;I1
i were informed it would be brought up at the next i **a:
8::: i Council meeting. It is the opinion of the City I :I:# i Attorney, an amendment to the contract could be : ;I;: I::: I executed to provide for this proposal, I I :I:;
:I:; i By comon consent of the Council it was agreed i Iiii i that the City Attorney prepare an amendment to i ii;i i the contract to provide for the borrowing of ::i; i monies by the architect, if necessary. I :: I
I :I:: i:!! ! Schwabacher & Company have submitted a proposal * @:I #I ! allow them to obtain financing for the library i ::;I i facilities, According to the proposal, the City i :,::*
$1: 1 would retain the right to abandon the project and! 1:;:
:::I I pay no fee up to the -time funds are deposited I ::4 i with the City's ,trustee. I ::ii
1 ::;e
#*I: i By motion of the Council the Nayor was authorized! McPherson !x: I & i to execute the agreement between Schwabacher and iBierce : : $ i Company and the City of Carlsbad, on behalf 09 i Guevara ; ; t4 :'
i the city. i Neiswende6 I i $
I ;::;
::;I
I (It)
I
b
I
"&.
1 I
I 1
8
I I I I I
tI
* I * 8
)I1
1::;:
4 4 ;::I
I 1 :::: 1 II
4 !;I8
i:::
I I
I
b * 1: 8
I
I
I
a8
* **
I I
* I I I * * I I
I
I B 4
11
I * I i Hughes i !x:$
I I 1:::
I I 4
I 1 a
I I 11 I
I
1
!!I:
* t
I I I '8 88,'*\, 88' 8 8 8
I I
I' I ..-
I
I I 8., \\ 88 \* '.,"' 18 7
I 't '\, '\, "88'\ '8 I -9- ' '. I i Na ,,'=.'~&. 8&?&
I I ; of '.,+%!;x8 \\ +&', ,?&%&+,&?& I """ .. - - - - - -". - -"--"-" .. - - - - -"" - ., - - - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - .. - - - - " - - - .. +" - -" - - .. --.. - -:92:.C&-. ! CITY MANAGER'S XEPORT: I I :* It:;;
I 1 ii:i: ! Small Craft Harbor Commission Meetinq. On Octobqr :::I: ! 21, 1963, the State Small Craft Harbo Commission i !:;I1
11;:; i will meet in Crescent City and the City of Carls-! +::
: bad's application will be considered at that tirn4, :::ii
: The City Manager and Councilman Bierce will I I :iii: * pi': i. attend this meeting. t 1':::
1' 1iiii. I# I i- Appointment of members to the Local Aqency Forma-! :I:;:
*6!:! i tion Commission, Mayor Guevara reported that : :Il8; i Nayor Sklar and Mayor Fellows were elected to thi iiii; : Local Agency Formation Commission, Supervisors i 1 ::;I; 14 i Cozens and Bird will represent the Board of I I 1 $1 ::;
i Supervisors. These four members will meet and I 1st::
1:;11 i elect the fifth member to the Commission.
I I ::, ::: I: i Councilman Neiswender inquired as to the status I ;I/: I;':; i of the installation of the street signs. I :$;
I I :;:::
i The City Engineer stated the Junior Chamber of I lI#;:
:;#I; ; Commerce members have offered to kelp install I i:p: ! these signs, They will be ready to start next i ::;'I
,11;I i week.
I RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL:
I Ratification of the bills was given for the gen- i ! era1 expenses of the City in the amount of lla: i McPherson ; i I? i $75,460.78 and for the Water Department in the I Bierce' i i I 7 i amount of $1,248,18, for the period October 1, I Guevava i i ; 3 i 1963, to October 15, 1963, as certified by the : PJeiswende4x: i 4 i Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing i Hughes i !xi 24
; Committee. t 8:lB
i Ratification of the payroll was given for the i McPherson I 1 1 q i first half of October, 1963, in the amount of i Bierce :;
i $b7,495,85, as certified by the Director of Fin- I Guevara t : i 4' i ance and approved by the Auditing Committee, : Meiswend=* :x: 4
1
: Member
I 1 I
11 8
I
I I I I I
I I I w;; 8'1:;
8
8
I I I I
I8 I
#
I
I I iiy I I, I l;t:1
I I ;;::I
I :::; It1
I I !::a l1 ii::
I
I
I I I
I 1 ;;:' I I 1;
I :::: #
11
:: :+
I ! Hughes !xi ! y ; ADJouRMpaEMT::
I I I :i:; 11
I I I ;i:; I l :I
I I 1:;: I I i;:'
I I ::;:
I i:r;
I I I fl4& kAf& &* F: y/+d. I D I ;::; 4::;
i MdGAR E. ADAPIS', I I ::::
I :*I1 i City C2rk I I I ;::; $'I
I I 4:: :::e
81
1
I
4
I
* ::::
I ::;I
;;I: ;:::
a *@I: I (@*I * ti:;
I I I By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at i i 9;25 P,M.. l
I I I I
I I
I
4
; Respectfully submitted, I I
I $'
'81:
I I I I 1 I , ..-.e I
L
I I I I t I I I I t I
I I
B I
1 I ::;:
I QSl: 1 :::I ;II: t 1::;
I I::;
I ::::
I ;a::
L I :::I a":
I I :::;
I 1;;1
I I ::I:
I I * I
I
I
I I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I
I ! I
!!:!