The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1963-11-05; City Council; Minutes* * I' , 8, '8 ', ', '\ I I 8 x' i CITY OF CARLSBAD i Minutes of: C?.TH COUNCIL (Regular Meeting) i i Date of Meeting: Nc,-t.ember 5, 1963 : Name '\ '$& 8, .&+ '\ 'QS8 *.8 '.Q ; Time of Meeting: 7: 00 F. M. : of .?&\O,.$ +$$ \-9 $?p, i,~~~~e_~-~-~e"~~~~~~l"~~~m~~~~" "" "" - -""" """"',""" "- "" "- ""." 'i "" I I I::;, i ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen McPherson, i 8;: I Guevara, Neiawcnder and Hughes. Crnn. Bierce was i ,::,I : present at 7: 12 P, M. Also present were City Manager ; ;:::; 4:l i Slater, City Attorney Wilson and City Clerk Adams. * : I :,; : * I !{I:: i ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. * * :,: ; :::I I * ;. :. ;. : i i INVQCATION was offered by City Attorney Wilson. I i :I;:: * I I '8'8 ",x", '8, '\,",I 8 3 i ;.I 1: 8, '% ', 8 8 8 8 \ ',', \ I Member . ~$$@,~*p~@. 1 * * It 4 I I I * 1 *:,!I * * i APPROVAL OF MINUTES: * **I,: 1 :;!!t I -. I * iiiii 1 I 8 1I;'I I (a) Approval of the Minutes of the regular meeting I Mcphersoni : :x! I * I I Neiswender! xi : x: i I I i a Hughes : :x! XI : i of October 15, 1963, were approved as corrected. ; Guevara : i !xi ; b !ll!: $11 i CORRESPONDENCE: I I I I I i (a) State of California, Department of Public Works - re:! : Construction of 1.01 Highway. Letter dated October 25, i i stating this letter was in reference to the City of Carlsbaqs i Resolution No. 936, calling the attention to the urgency of: : completing freeway construction on U. S. 101 in northerl$ i San Diego County. A review of their work schedule indi- : i cates they will complete plans for a 9.7 mile project fro4 ; Oceanside to north of Las Pulgas Road by late 1964, and : : for the remaining 8.7 miles to the Orange County Line by I i late 1965. The time at which these two projects can i actually be placed under construction will depend upon i ; negotiations for right of way through the Marine Corps : i Base and the availability of Federal Interstate funds. i By common consent of the Council the letter was ordered I : filed. I 1963, from J, C. Wornack, State Highway Engineer, I I I 1 I b I * I b t L * t * i ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: I There were no oral communications. ! I * I t * I I I * * I ! PUBLIC HEAMNGS: i (a) Proposed annexation of "South Carlsbad Annexation i :- I The Clerk certified as to proper notice having been given i : by publication and by mail. : A map of the proposed area was presented for the Council:s i review. i The Clerk announced that no written protests had been re; : ceived. : The Mayor announced the public hearing was open and : i the Council would hear from any persons desiring to speak : in favor of this proposed annexation. : There were no persons present desiring to speak in favor: I of the annexation. { The Mayor announced the Council would now hear from ; i all persons desiring to speak in opposition to the propose4 : annexation. i There were no persons present desiring to speak in op- I : position to the proposed annexation. i The Mayor declsred the pv-blic hearing closed at 7: 34 P. M. : After discussion by the Council the following resolution : t I b * I 8 I : 1. La". I a i I I I * L I 1 I I * I f I I I * I I I * I * s I t I * I * I * * B I 4 4 I I I I * t I I I I i a * I t I t a I I I ? ;;;;I ::.I: 'I:;: IiiI. #I,*: ;lall 8:::: :I::: I:::: ltl;t *:;I: ;:I:: :::I: 1;: I-; :::i: ::::: :::;I ' I* )lof :';I; :;I:; ::iii ili;; ;x:: ;:'I: ,*::; a;:;* !I:;; 'II1t iilii :SI 14;:' ::I:! :/::; ;;::I ;,::I '::a: ::;i; )*I*; ::I;' 'I :::,I :1 iii;; ::;I' I:[: It:: I*:# ;: 1:: I::: *I:; ::;; iii: :I;: :::I i::I ::;i I::: ;::; ;I:; ;::: ;::; ;i:: :I:: :::; iii: ;::i ;::; 1 :.: * ;::i :'; I : :;I1 11;: :;;: i::: :i:i I* ' t' ,I,; I I)' I I ', \\ .\ '\ " .., I 1 I I * I 4 i '\\ '\ \,,'\,, ', 8, '\\ '\,".'\,I '. ' 8 9 I I i *f '52% ' &'\&', '\ .p" *f+> #+';t'\ i- -2- I I '\\ '\\ ;, ', '\ '\ I : N a me '., "."r;, ', 'st I I Member '$&'<~,~$@~ I :""""-""""~"""""""""""""""""~""""""""""~~~"""~"""""""-~---. ! I ::!!: : I I was presented for the Council's consideration: # I @"I ;:;:: ,! I! b I $ I I ;::;i ::::: : Resolution Nov 949. A RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY ! i T~JCECF-CITY OF CARLSBAD FINDING I::'$ ; McPherson: :x: 4 i i AND DECLARING THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST €€AS i Bierce !xi i X : : NOT BEEN PRESENTED WITH REGARD TO "SOUTH : Guevara : : ; 4 : i CARLSBAD ANNEXATION 1.4", was adopted by title i NeiswendeG i i x: i : only and further reading waived. : Hughes i i ; 4 I I 111 I The following ordinance was presented for a first reading: i by the Council: I 1:;:: I I::;: ;:'a: I I:,!* I @I;;: i Ordinance No, 1084. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY ! McPhersoni ; : 9 i { CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY, DESIGNATED i Guevara $1 : ; i X I : "SOUTH CARLSBAD ANNEXATION 1.4", was given a : Neiswender! x: : $ i i first reading by title only and further reading waived. i Hughes i i' i 3 : i (b) Proposed annexation of "East Carlsbad Annexation 2.4 I1 . i The Clerk certified as to proper notice having been given i ;:a:; : by publication and by mail. I I :I1 ::a I I CARLSEND APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF : Bierce I :x:+ ; $8 I I I I @It( ii::: 1 b I $ ::::i ::I:: ! I ::;:: . I I! I I I A map of the proposed area was presented for the Council: : to review. : The Clerk announced that no written protests had been i i received. 8 i The Mayor announced the public hearing was open and : i the Council would hear from any persons desiring to spes$ i in favor of this proposed annexation. I i There were no persons desiring to speak. i The Mayor announced the Council would now hear from : i all persons desiring to speak in opposition to this propgseh ; annexation. t i There were no persons desiring to speak in opposition to ! : the proposed annexation. I i The Mayor declared the public hearing closed at 7: 45 P. mi I I I * I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B $ I * I I I I a 1 I t I I ! * ;a:;# I:#:; :::at ::::: !::;I 81 l:'l: :I::, ;I::: :::;: ;::;: ;::I: 1:;:: 1'0' ;81:8 l!!B! I - 11.; 4i;: :' ;:I:: ;:I:; ,I::; ;::I1 :I::: ;;/a 4l1 If: ::I:; ::::; ::::; :::q ::::I ::!I: I After discussion by the Council the folbwing resolution i I was presented for the Council's consideration: i Resolution No. 950. A RESOLUTIGN OF THE CITY i DECLARING THAT A WORITY PROTEST HAS NOT i i BEEN PRESENTED WITH REGARD TO "EAST CARLS-: : BAD ANNEXATION 2,4", was adopted by title only and i i further reading waived. I i The following ordinance was presented for a fir& reading: : by the Council: $ I I I I I I I I I :- CITY OF CARLSBAD FTNDING AND~ I I I I ! I I I :;i:i ;b:@: ;:':I 1:;: ::!I: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ii'i 11)) ;;:; ;;t: :$; :'I:; ;::@I t:4: i;::; :1::1 ;;;i; i::;; ;:::; e:!!: : Ordinance No. 1085. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY I UE' CARLSBAD APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF : CERTAIN UNINHABITED TER3ITOTORY DESIGNATED : "EAST CARLSBAD ANNEXATION 2. 411, was given a : first reading by the Council by title only and further i reading waived. I B I b I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I , I I McPhersor-, i Bierce i Guevara ; Neiswenderi j Hughes p $ I i (c) Proposed reclassification of certain proper located i i between Buena Vista Circle and Jefferson Street, .-; nort er4y ; of Laguna Drive, from Zoae 8-1 to Zone €7,-3. Appllcant:_L : Robert L. Means. ! I I I : The Clerk certified as to proper notice having been given, i i Also that no written protests i~xl kcen received regarding i I I I I I I I 8 I I t I 9 i I I I I L I I I I 1 I I I ! i'i :I; {xi i x:xi 1 ;x: ~ ;xi ~ i x; .I i" ;:: 4:: :'I 1:: ::; I:: 1:: ::a ;;: ;;: ; ;: (41 f I( * 1' 2,' I I I I I I' ,,- .\. I & 1 c, ','.,, \ t .. 4 I \, ..,'*, y, '8 I b i pia me '8, \$\ %.>qb, : of *,'$'%\ \,& ./J , +' 8 \*', I I I %i: ii1:; \X' ', 8 \ ",'8~''%l 9 9 I -3- I \\ '\ ' . \ I I I y;., J\+, I 4 4 I:::: :::I; ;::;I :""-"""""""""""~"""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""""" : Member ,d '4 x.c-\? '4, i this change 01 zone. i The City Planner presented a map of the area in question: ;I:*: : and informed the Council this area was recently approved! i:::: *;I i for a subdivision. i Resolution No. 318 of the Planning Commission was pre- i 1;Il: I ::I:: Ill 1 sented, wherein they recommended reclassification of ; @:#:I ! the property on the grounds the property is adjacent to i :::;: ii' I existing R-3 property, and there were no oral or written ; ::; : protests. I ::::i I I ;;;:; i The Mayor announced the public hearing open and that the: 0I)l :;p: i Council would hear from the applicant or any persons : * ::;:I : desiring to speak in favor of this application. I !I :I; I :;::I i There were no persons present wishing to speak in favor i :::;: i of the reclassification. ;::;: I :;::; i The Mayor stated the Council would now hear from all i ! persons desiring to speak in opposition to the proposed i 4:;; I:::; 8; i reclassification. I :iii: i There were no persons desiring to speak in opposition to ! ::;:: : the proposed reclassification. 8 I pi:: f i I :v:; i The Mayor declared the public hearing closed at 7: 53 P. h$. ::;;; 4 I ,i,:1 : After discussion by the Council the following resolution i :::I: ::i:i i was presented for the Council's consideration: 41:; ;* a ;::;: i Resolution NO. 951. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i I : :.; I I CG F CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING! ::;I, i .Fmy$& ?NI?:&XSION REGARDING CHANGE OF : McPhersod i 1 $ I 11,;: : ZGNE CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED : Bierce I I :q i i PRePERTY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD FROM ZONE Guevara i :: !$ : i R- 1 TO ZONE R-3, was adopted by title only and furthee Neiswendeq ; i q I : reading waived. : Hughes !x; : $ ; i The following ordinance was presented for a first reading: i;::: i by the Council: i Ordinance No. 9152. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i : OF CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, : McPhersoni : i 4 ; i CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY FROM i Bierce :X: i X: i i BAD, was given a first reading by title only and further I Neiswende; !X: 3 ; : I reading waived. .I : Hughes ! ! ; 4 : I (4) Proposed classification of a portion of certain property i known as "East Carlsbad Annexation 2.3", located two i I miles east of Palomar Airport and North of Palomar Air-: 1 port Road. Applicant: Belsan, Rubel and Sandru Invest- i : ment Companies. I The Clerk certified as to proper notice having been given; : Fksolution No. 320 of the Planning Commission was pre-: i sented wherein they recommended approval of the class- i : ification due to the fact it is in the flight pattern of PalomFr !;I1: i Airport, there were no voiced objections, and it would : : be the best usage of the land and would be compatible wit? i the zoning of property nearby which is zoned "M". i The following letters of protest were presented: i Letter from Mrs. Beverly kalicka, Administratrix of the! 1:: : Estate of Kay Kalicka, stating they own property adjacent: ::::; i to the land applying for C-2 zoning, and wished to protes4 : the zoning of the Belond property 8s C-2 for the following * a I I t I 41 I I I I I I I I It I t I t 11 I I I I I I:# ;I:] I I I I I 118 I I :I, I I I I I I I l 'I I I I I I :i;:i I j;!;: I I/:: 1:141 I I' ::It; I I I I : ZONE R-1 TO ZONE R-3, IN THE CITY CF CARLS- : Guevara 8 1 : 4 *A l l : I I 11 I I ;I:&: 1:::: ;:::I ;: iii;: iyl: * 4 1;::: a )1411 I 1 ::;:: :;a:: :I::: 4:;: i:::: 1:::: I:!; ::::I It::! I i;::; I a :;::; I I :I::; ;::*, I ;pi: i:::; ; ;.::; :I;:; I :L:: I I ::;:; I :::;: I I :!;:: !: 1- 1- 1- s- e )I#) 1 I I b I tat 1 I I 8 8 I I I I I I / I I I I I ! r!r I I I I I I , \ 8-8. *. I '8 ' ' '\ '\ I I '\ "x, '\, ", '8 888 \\ 194 I -4- I ?\, '8 ' 8 8 '8 I 8\ '\ 'x, '\ '* 88 I I i Name ',8*8$b *8,'8~* I I ,+$. ', %% I I 8f$~>,j;,.g@ :""""""""~"~"""""~""~""~"-.""~"""""""""""""~"""""""""-~"" ; Member ,o.@..py?\,o'. @I. I : of I I 1;"i I I 81 : reasons: (1 ) C-2 zoning would condemn the area involv-: ::;;: i ed to a use incompatible with demand for future develop- i !;;I: I I:' : ment; (2) If C -2 zoning is imposed to allow a drag strip : ::'I: i:4 I then development of the area will be retarded; and (3) i :{I:: I Effective and logical development demands that the entird :;*I1 *I:': : area east of El Camino Real withih the City of Carlsbad I ::I:' 1: i be master planned. I I ;:::I I::': I L ::!:: I I I I I I I I 1 t 4 6 I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I 1 I I t I I I I I Letter dated .November 5, 1963, from Russell i,. Thibod9, Margaret Thibodo, Roger and :Marilyn Meisinger, and : Russell L. Thibodo as Executor of the Will of Prknk E. : Thibodo, deceased, stating they ape the bwner's df appro& imately 1700 Bcres of lattd which is either adjdcent to, 04 in the immediate proximity of the property proposed to ; be classified ,Cb2. The dndersigned protested on the i grounds that they are presently engaged in serious nego- ; tiatioris for the sale of all said 1700 acres and the pro- : posed purchaser intends to develop the same for residential use; if tkie conditional use permit is granted the logical i deuklopment of the area for residntial use will be delayed for years, They protested the granting of the C-2 zoning! and requested that the City Council take no affirmative ; action to zone the property in question until a master plat) can be developed of the entire area. ! I 8 I I Also attached was a letter from the First National Bank ! : of Vista, addressed to Mr. Russell L. Thibodo, stating i i that if a change of zone to C-2 is granted and a special ; : use permit is granted for the construction of a dragstrip,! i they felt the valuation of the Thibodo property would de- I : crease, and would definitely influence their appraised ; i value for loan purposes, I The Mayor declared the public hearing open and announc4d i the Council would hear from the applicant or any other ; i persons desiring to speak in favor of this proposed clas,si : ification. i I ! MR. BELOND, 929 Goldenrod, Coronoa del Mar, stated: i he noted there was only one letter of protest registered ! : by a property owner living in Carlsbad, and asked that : i the Council look favorable upon his request. I I I I I I I I 1 I t I a I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DON FRASER, P. 0. Box 305, San Marcos, stated he i is one of the developers of Lake San Marcos. They have: spent 12 1 /2 million dollars on this project and are con- i tinuing to spend approximately one million per month, : They feel the area in the north county is a most desirabl4 area for residential. If you put this zoning in the middle: of this desirable residential area it will certainly deter i any future development as far as residential. He asked : if any master planning had been done for this area? t I 1 I :y;; /::, ;:a:; i:: 1;4* ~1:~: ::a:: :;I:' 1:*1 !:;*I It; #*I:: 1:; 81 ::'I; ::!;; I:: 8: 1;:;: 4::: i:::: :!$: ;,,:I :::I: 1;':; ;I:@l 1;::; i:::: ::::: ;:::: !::'I 1,:; ;:::: ::!:I ; i; I.' !::I I! 1::: ;::I I::: 1::: :::: :;:: :;#I 11:; i::: :::: ;::I :;I1 1: iIi: i:;: ; i.: i ::!: !:I: /:; lll 1 ;:I Id: t:: 1:::: :)I :*I:# I::I *I l!!l I I I 4 4 , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 B i I I I I I 4 The Mayor stated a study had been made for sewer pur- I poses only. Mr. F. C. Luchinger, Assistant Vice President of Unite! California Bank, who is the executor of the Leo Carrillo ; Estate, stated he was present at the Planning Commis- I sion meeting when this matter was considered. He was : not aware this reclassification was to be on the agenda : for tonight. He protested the conditional use permit, and it was his understanding it was not granted. However, i since that time he has been informed the City Attorney ; has ruled it was granted. He would like to register the i bank's protest at this time, due to the fact that if the ; C-2 zoning is not approved then the conditional use per- i mit cannot be approved. He suggested that the Council : consider this matter carefully before doing any; spot ! 1 I I I I I"1 ;::: ;::: :::: ;::: 1;;1 ;:I: $14 :* ;::; :it: :;:: :;:: i:ii It 1::: ;;:: :I:: ;::: ;::: ;::; ;::: I!!l : zoning. 4 I i::: ;I .*I I I I I t I I I I ;;I# 6 ;;/ I I i::; I I I 1:;: ! l!!l I I * I 1 s, '. ', b ' '. I -5 - I \' I' . ,.. t 1 I 8,. '*\ *8',>'\y,\J 9 2 I t i Name- \% "$ '\?&, \O' '\,'%*, ' '$$, I I of \,L\\b\,+ O ?p,J.l.'p ~"""~""""""~"""""""""""""""~""""""""--"-"-;--------"-"-------"-~-"- I I I i::;: lip: ::I:: "1:: :a::; 4*;1 I 1 8,'\' \ 8 ' * , \ '\ '\ ', '\ I Member %\~..p\p' 48, i MR. MIKE FORTUNATI, 325 Elm Avenue, stated he was! : representing Mrs. Beverly Kalicka, and as stated in theid t:14: i letter this will certainly prevent any future development I I of that area. Mr. Thibodo has checked with the County ad ::;*I i to the flight pattern for the Palomar Airport, and this i : is not in their flight pattern. Within two years the sewer? i;:;: I will be available and they want to protect the development; ;I,;: 1:;': : of their property. #a!': 1 I I t 1;1:1 I I 1 I : MR. JERRY ROMBOTIS, 325 Elm Avenue, stated the : i area adjacent to this property also belongs in the City of I : Carlsbad, and by granting this C-2 zoning and the condi- I i tional use permit, it will certainly discourage future t I : development and future annexations. t ! The public hearing was declared closed at 8:08 P. M. ! Cmn. Bierce stated there are two lines of thought in this i : matter. This area is down in a deep valley. It is not : i suitable for residential area. i Cmn. Hughes stated he has flown over this particular are4 ; and it is definitely in the flight pattern of the airport. * * : Cmn. McPherson stated he has been out to the property ! I on three different occasions. It is strange to him that : ; all this residential development has been mentioned at thii i time when it has never been brought up before. I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I 1 I I ! I 1 1;' 1:' ;:::: ;::I: 1:::: ::;:: p;:: I:;*: ::1:a !:::; :::I: 1;to; ;l:;l *1;14 l:ll; :81:8 ::i:: ::I:: l!!l: :i;:i ;::a: ;:::: 1::;: ::;I: * )It ;:I:: :;::; l:'lt 1I::l :::1: (1111 I b i Cmn, Neiswender stated he takes an opposite position. I ;I;;; : It has been stated that this will draw a lot of visitors. He;hpProfic.h ::I:: l ; : I ; i would not like to see visitors staying in the "6" ; ZdAlC i : : ; #I I i airport. He has checked the areas surrounding the drag- : 1::;: ; strips in Riverside and Pomona, and these areas have i :;'I: '1;ll I not developed since the dragstrips were placed there. I !I: ;:i;: I ;!46 I f After further consideration by the Council, the following i i resolution was presented for consideration: I 1 I * I I I :;;:i :;;:: 118 :::I; ::!:: i Resolution No. 952. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY : COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING ! I,,:, i FINDINGS AND DECISION REGARDING CHANGE OF i McPherson i ix 1x1 i : ZONE CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED : Bierce sr : :xi : i PRQPERTY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD FRUM ZONE! Guevara i I !x: t : R-l TO 20NE C-2, was adopted by title only and further; Neiswenderj : ; i xi i reading waived. i Hughes ; : :x: : ! The following ordinance was presented for a first reading:! ;;;:; i Ordinance No. 9153. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY : i OF CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO,' 9060, ; McPherson i ix;xi I : CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPEBTY FROM i Bierce F I !xi 1 : ZONE; R-1 TO ZBNE C-2, IN THE CITY OF CABLSBAD, Guevara : : ;x; 1 i was given a first reading by title only and further i Neiswender: ; ; i x~ i reading waived. : Hughes i : :x; I I t8 z!!: I 1 :;i:i ::;I: I I I I ;:,;a I I I I:::; ;:;:I I:;:/ I i (e) Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision for a ; : Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of all fa&-: i ties for a drag strip located approximately two miles east I : of Palomar Airport Road. Appelxant: Belsan, Rube1 and : I Sandru Investment Companies. I I I I ! ';;; :::; :::I :::: !:;I ;::: :::; I!#* i The City Attorney stated that he would like to suggest this i I matter be referred back to the Planning Commission, as i i in his opinion the Planning Commission did not take propet ; action at the time of the hearing in ac.cordance with the : i vote cast. D I * 8 I t I * I I 8 8 I t I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 4 1 ! -0 :::: 11 :::I Ii:i :I:: :::I 1**; ;::; :::; 1;;1 :;I: :::: :*:: :;:: *.!I I s I;*r ! l!!l 1 I I :I:: I I ; '\\ '\ ., '\\ '\, .\\ I -6 - I : of ;""""""""""--""~""""""""""""""""""""""~"-~"""~""""""""~---- 1 By motion of the Council the matter was referred back to i McPhersoni :x: x; : ; the Planning Commission for proper action. I Bierce :x! ;x: i I I I \, 8',", \ 8 ' 1qe 1 I vi I I I I 8 '\ '-.,'*, I '\\ '8 '\ I \, '\ \, "8 ' '' I I i Na me 8t,,'t$$,,, '\,"'$, I I : Member y$@j>2%+ ,o.,o..p$?\,d, I :::;: I ; Guevara : ; :xi ; 8 i Hughes i : :x; ; 4 :::I; 11 It ,e::; @::$I I ::;:: I ;!!:; 1 I I I I I i Neiswenderi : i XI i I I i A short recess was called at 8:20 P. M. The meeting re- i : convened at 8: 36 P. M. I I I I : PLANNING: ! (a) Tentative map of Carnino del Sol subdivision. 1 t t I I I I ; 8 I I:; 4; :::;: l:'l; *I:;& ::!I: * I I : The tentative map of Camino del Sol subdivision was pre- i i sented for the Councilts review. t # 8 4 I ::--I l:1I ;;,:I pi:: ;:!!I ': I i i Resolution No. 319 of the Planning Commission was pre- I : sented wherein they recommended approval of the tenta- : { tive map subject to certain conditions and restrictions. i ::I$ '::Is :#I:; :::;I !I!!: t 8 s i!!:! -. i The City Planner pointed out that all of the lots will be 1 1;::' : greater than 7500 sq. feet. I /I:: I I::,: I :;'I; i The following resolution was presented for the Council's i a'::; : consideration: :::I, I 4 I :I::: ::p: i Resolution No. 953. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i McPherson i i !x: i i COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, APPROVING ! Bierce I :x;xi : : TENTATIVE MAP OF CAMIN0 DEL SOL SUBDIVISION,! Guevara : ; :x: i i was adopted by title only and further reading waived. : Neiswender! ; ;xi : I ! I!!:! t t I t I 11 I I a i Hughes 7 i !x: i i ENGINEERING. 1 t I Iiili I ::*?I :I1 I ; f :;':I i (a) - Report on Las Flores Drive extension. At the previo<s i meeting of the Council the Engineering Department was ; : instructed to make a report on the cost of a pedestrian i I underpass at the present pedestrian way as proposed by : : the Carlsbad Union School District. t ! I 1 I I : The City Engineer gave a report on the cost of street i improvements necessary to extend the southerly half of i : Las Flores Drive from Olive Drive to the easterly bound-; I ary of the Buena Vista Elementary School site, plus the : : cost of a pedestrian underpass, which he estimated would i i be $7,500.00. He pointed out the pedestrian underpass i : would increase construction costs for the city by over ; i 60%. This crossing is no more hazardous than many othets i within the city, and accordingly, he recommended that if ; : the School District desires such a crossing, they should : i agree to reimburse the city €or the actual cost of this iter& I I t I ;:vi :;':I !::I: ::::: $;;: ;;:ll ;I 1!!1! I;'*; ;I::; ::i: ;: ;: !I ;'::I :;:: :I:: ;:@I :;;i :I ::;* :;;: i::: :':i: @*I; !I:! 4 : Cmn. Neiswender suggested this report be forwarded to ! i the school district for their consideration. i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the contents i McPherson ; ; :X: i of the report be forwarded to the School District for their t Bierce : %;xi : study and decision. I Gueviira i i !x: '18; ::it I ::;I 8 I :::I :;:: 1 I I I I I I : Neiswender: x: ;x: I I I i Hughes : i :x! I I t ::!* b I submitted and adopted as the .budget of the proposed ex- : ; penditures of the gas tax allocation -for the City of Carlsbab, : prior to any funds being received from the funds allocated: i from the State Highway Fund to cities. A resolution has i I been submitted by the State Highway Division for this I I I :~i: 1::: ::;I ;It: ;::; ;::: ;::: 4:: I::: t((I !a :::: !I:* : purpose. I $ I I I I I. I I 4 :I is I 1'1 I I ;:I: 18:; I 1 ;;I: 1 t ;it1 :I I ? I:!; ': I L ', -. '\ '\ .\ * I I I ', '.\ '\ '\ 8' '\ 4 I 1 I 1 '\ +, ',,'\,*',~ 9 jr;l I -7 - I '8' ', " '\\'\,'\\ I I i N a me "\ '8!$& ',, '?&, I I i of ""g&',>,,&?@. I 1 Member $'@,*e 4 I I I ~""""~"""~""""-""""~"""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""" ----"" I 1 ;:!!: I i -. : The following resolution was submitted for the Council's I ::i;, :; :' 4;:: I Resolution No. 954. ,A RESOLUTION .OF. THE CITY ; 8 :;ll: :;:I; ! ADOPTING AND SUBMITTING A BUDGET FOR EX- ; Bierce !xi ; 4 1 i PENDITUi3.E OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE I Guevara : ; i f i : STATE HIGHWAY FUND "3 CITIES, was adopted by : Neiswende4 : : 4 : i title only and further reading waived. I Hughes : i x! f4 i i Birch street dedication. Several months ago Mr. Donald i 1:411 : Briggs, Jr. offered to dedicate property to the city to : i realign Birch Street. The city has now received a deed i : from Briggs Land Corporation for this purpose, and it : i will be necessary for the Council to accept this deed. I I :I :: By motion of the Council the deed was accepted and the :: McPherson i : :x: ; : City Clerk instructed to prepare a certificate of accept- ; Bierce t :x:xi i I ance and record both documents simultaneously. I Guevara i ; :x: ; 1 I I I I i I consideration: I :::;: f CUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNU$, McPherso$ I i 4 i I * I I I i:::: ::li: I:::: ;:;'I 1:'::: t: I t 1:::: ::::: I I i I Hughes : I !xi i t1 11 I I : Neiswender: x: ; xi : s I :::;: i LIBRARY: I I ::;a: 8 ::::; I I I I !i;!i ! (a) Adult Library building. Letter dated October 31, 1968, i from the President of the Library Board of Trustees, : stating they wished to remind the Council of the predica- i I ment facing the Adult Library should the land on Elm Ave.; ; be sold or leased. They suggested that in the event of a ; i sale or lease it be made contingent upon allowing the I Adult Library to occupy its present site until such time as: i a new building is available. I The City Manager informed the Council this was a remind! I er in the event the city chooses to go ahead with the sale : i or exchange of the property. 1 NEW BUSINESS: i (a) Planning loan agreement with Division of Small Craft i ! Harbors. The City Manager reported that he and Cmn. : I mattended the meeting of the Small Craft Harbor i I Commission in Cresent City. Consideration was given to : i Carlsbad's application for a loan in the amount of $15, OOOi : The loan was granted to the City and it will be necessary ; i for the city to enter into an agreement with the Small 8 1 Craft Harbors. The City Attorney has approved the agree; i ment and a resolution has been prepared authorizing the i i Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I t I :;i;' :a1 ::Il; 11 i:::( ;::'I I::! i::: ;!:I :::: :;I1 ::,e ;; !II! I* 117. ;.;:: I;!; 1::; :::; I::: ;::: It1 i::i !::: ::I :: I:$: ;;I: I::: 1::: ::;; :I:; ::I $1: ;:Ib :I l1I1 #I1 1818 .at! I I I I : The following resolution was presented for the Council's : I consideration: I I I 1 I;;: 11;; I:;; ::;I !II! I : Resolution No. 955. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY \ McPherson : 8 :xi i COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AUTHORIZINGi Bierce 1;' ; I :x: I THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE PLANNING LOAN AGREE-: Guevara : I :X: I MENT ON BEHALF OF CITY, was adopted by title only i Neiswender !x i !x: : and further reading waived. : I Hughes ' I :x :xi **-m ?ll. I. I I I I I I i (b) First reading of Ordinance No. 3065, amendin ; Ordinance No. 3048, relating to the licensing of do\s. : The Council was informed the County has amended their i D i ordinance relating to the licensing of dogs, and as they : : handle our dog control here in the city, it will be necessa$y i for the city to amend their. ordinance. This will increase : ; the fee from $2.00 per year to $3.00 per year, and also i i licenses may be issued for two years if the owner so I desires. i The following ordinance was presented for a first reading:: I I I I & 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 # l a ! I I I I 1 1 I ! ;*I; 1;;s 1;:: ;;a1 :::i :::I :::: 1:;: :;:: ::;: I::! 1::; ::'I :;i: ::a1 $ la :*I1 :! b !I!! ::;: J::i l!!l I b ', 8 . '8 '8 '\ I I t I I ! I \'\ y,8 '\,;';.8 I a P I i N a me '\ '?&, \<, \$$, 8 I ; of ''S+!+, ' .*', I : Member .?b 8@$3.$.0.0' .o \ 48 0p$$ I I -8 - I '\ ', ', \\ ', 8, d3 I "\ '8 '\ 88 '8,> :""""""-""""","""""""""""""""""""""""""-;"""""-""""""~-:-. I ! i:::: I I b ', 8 . '8 '8 '\ I I t I I ! I \'\ y,8 '\,;';.8 I a P I i N a me '\ '?&, \<, \$$, 8 I ; of ''S+!+, ' .*', I : Member .?b 8@$3.$.0.0' .o \ 48 0p$$ I I -8 - I '\ ', ', \\ ', 8, d3 I "\ '8 '\ 88 '8,> :""""""-""""","""""""""""""""""""""""""-;"""""-""""""~-:-. I ! i:::: I i Ordinance No. 3065. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i McPherson i i ;xi i I -NDING ORDINANCE NO. 3048 OF i Bierce : :x:xj : i THE CITY OF CARLSBAD REGARDING DOG CONTROG# Guevara : : :x: I ! was given a first reading by title only and further reading ; NeiswenderIxi i x! : ; waived. i Hughes 'I : ; !x: i I I !*l!l I 4 i (c) First reading of Ordinance No, 7029, regardin : "Capital Contribution Charges". At a previous rnetting i i the Council.zgreed to amend Ordinance No. 7020 in re- 1 I i gards to "Capital Contribution Charges'' for person living i ; outside a sewer district. The following ordinance was I : presented for a first reading: ! 1 t I I t I ;;I;: *&,:I ::pi ::::; ::::I :I;): 1:::: 1:' 4; :::!I I ! Ordinance No. 7029. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i McPherson: t :xi ; ;:;:; i OF CARLSBAD AMENDING SECTION 8 OF ORDINANCE! Bierce 1: : NO. 7020, REGARDING CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION ; Guevara I ; :x: ! : CHARGE, was given a first reading by title only and i Neiswenderjxj I xi I i fuz-ther reading waived. : Hughes : :x:xl : ! I ::!I: ; ; !x: : I I (d) Acceptance of deed - re: Greenwood property. The I ; City Manager reported the escrow on the Greenwood I I I property is ready for closing, however, prior to the deed I ; being recorded it is necessary that the Council accept ; i the deed and instruct the City Clerk to execute a certifi- : ; cate of acceptance. I ! I I I I;;@; ;:I:, :;::I :;::; :a::; ::::: ::::: ::::; ;:::t l:!l: ! By motion of the Council the deed on the Greenwood propefMcPherson !xi :X: ; i ty was accepted and the City Clerk instructed to execute i Bierce ; :xixi : i a certificate of acceptance. ~ ; Guevara : i !xi i -8; I I I : Neiswender! ; :x: l I I i Hughes : : :xi i I I ::::: 1:'l 1 I :;I:, I I ;: I I : OLD BUSINESS: ! I ll!!: : (a) Disposition of city owned property. At the previous I i meeting the Council requested this matter deferred until i i this meeting in order that other bids or proposals could ; : be submitted. i The City Manager reported no written proposals on this i ; property had been received other than the proposal that : i was received at the last meeting from the Oceanside i Federal Savings and Loan Association. I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 8 'ti'i I;::: I:::; I ;:* a:,:: "II: ;:::I *!!I! *ii;; :;::; ::::: ::::: :; :;:ii ?l:!l i It was moved by Cmn. Hughes and seconded by Cmn. Bierke ;;:;I ; that the city accept the offer made by the Oceanside 1 :;*:; i Federal Savings and Loan Association, with the provision : I :*I : that some other firm besides the Oceanside Federal Savin& ;:#:a ll;l: j and Loan Association handle the escrow. 1 I ::::I ::I:; I !:!!: b ;;;:I ! I I ,Considerable discussion was given this matter by the ; members of the Council. I I i Cmn. McPherson stated he would not be in favor of accepq- i ing the offer at the present time. I i Cmn. Neiswender stated he did not feel the Elm Avenue ! : property should be sold. It is his opinion this property i i should be held for a City Hall and Library. If necessary : : other property adjacent to the city owned property could I I be purchased for parking area if necessary. The shop : : structures that are located there now could be located i i in some other area. The land worth is growing and we : : may want to use this for further planning. : Cmn. Hughes stated we need a new place for the water : j department facilities. The Library will stay in its prese$ ; location for two years or more if necessary. I : Mr. Richard Geyer, 755 Elm Avenue, stated he was i speaking as a taxpayer and as a real estate agent. He had : three clients who will make a cash offer. He was happy i I I I b I I I 1 I B f P I * t * I 8 I I I I e I I I I I I I ! ;:::I ::;I: ::;:; ::;;: !:;;; ::;:I -.i :!I!: i;;;' v:lI I' ::::! 18 I' ;::I; ;I::' :';:I ::I:; ;::;< ;::; I::!; s;;1 i::: l;:l ::;: :::: :!a: 181 *;;I :;I' !:I: ;: 1:;l ::;: :;;: !! I! I I I' ! b I I I i -9 - I 1 \,*;o', .8 *-/" I 1 i of \?&%\ $ \%8 i Member ,o~,o..p$?"ot ,<h8@8 J'+'@ ~"""""""""""~"""""""~""""""~"""""~""""-""~""-""-"""----"-~---- ! I ::!!: 4 ', 8 -8 88 ', .\ I *, '8 '8 \8' I I %, '\ ' '8 '\,''83 9 6 I t8 '\88b\ 'S8 ', % ! N a me "8, *8&8 *bb~$d~. 8 ,\ x\' I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I 1 , , I to Rea two Counci! member= opposed to selling the proper: t' ty. Utle picce of property could be sold if it was felt that : it was necessary to purchase the Lebedeff property. The; Realtors and other people in the area have never seen a : piece of property disposed of in this manner. In closing i he addressed the Mayor and asked that he give this matte? considerable consideration before making his decision. : I :;:i; i:::: 4::1 ::::: ::::: ::;I: "1;: iii:: 11 ;;:i: #I!#! I Iii'i ;be:t i Mr. Hynes, Attorney for the Oceanside Federal Savings i ;:::: i and Loan Association, stated he did not want any misundet- ;::'I i the Library would have the facilities not to exceed two i ; standing, but it,was his interpretation of the proposal that; 1;: I: ;e4$ 4:;: ; years. Also they would have no objections to having the ; ::'I: ;I;# 1 escrow placed with some other reputable firm. I 1;;;: *t1$ f:::: I t I i After further discussion the motion was voted on that the i McPhersoni i : :x! ; City accept the proposal submitted by the Oceanside Fed- : Bierce : :xixi I I erd Savings and Loan Association. : Guevara : ; f ;xi i'Neiswender! i i :x: I I I I 8 : Hughes !x i !x: 81 : ; The motion died -for lack of a majority. I le ;:::I I 8 I I * D!!*! I (b) Second reading of 0r.dinance No. 8040, amendin i Ordinance No. 8025, adopting the 1961 Plumbing Case. i : The fo1lowin.g ordinance was presented for a second read-: I 4 t i ing: t I I 8 I ;;;q I:::: ::;:; :#I ;:,:I :I::: &a!*! I Ordinance No. 8040. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY I McPhersoni : :xi : *;;I; t OF CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8025 BY I Bierce :I I ; x:xi : i ADOPTING THE 1961 EDITION OF TilE UNIFORM i Guevara i : :x; : : PLUMBING CODE, WITH CHANGES, was given a second: Neiswenderjx! !XI i i reading by title only and adopted. i Hughes ; i !x: I ! CITY CLERK I 1 I:::: I!!! I I I 1 : : 1.: 4 I ! (a) Report on initiative petition to make the office of ; Mayor" elective. The city Clerk informed the Council ; ; a petition had been received bearing 649 signatures, re- i i questing that an ordinance be passed without alteration : ; that the office of Mayor shall be elective by the electors; i i or in the event- said ordinance is not passed, that the folloy- : ing question be submitted immediately to a vote of the ; I people at a special election - "shall the electors elect a : : Mayor and four city councilmen? I' I 1 i The City Clerk certified that she had examined the pe.titio< i and determined that said petition was insufficient to re- : : quire action by the City Council pursuant to California i i Election Code Section 4011 (Special Election), but that i f said petition is sufficient to require action by the City ; I Council pursuant to California Election Code Section 4012,: f (General Election). I I The City Clerk requested that the City Attorney explain i I the sections of the Government Code pertaining to this ; f petition, I I : The City Attorney informed the Council this was not an i i initiative petition, therefore they could not adopt an ordi- f : nance making the office of Mayor elective even if there i i were sufficient signatures. The petition lacks sufficient : : signatures to call a special election, however, the petitio4 i bearers have 10 days in which to obtain more signatures. i : The Code also states that if a general election is schedule$ i within six months, the Council is not required to call a i i special election and the matter can be presented to the ; i electors at the next regular general election. At the 1 1 i present time there are sufficient signatures to have the I ; matter presented at the next general election, without i : additional signatures. t I l a I 11 I 1 t 1 1 I I 1 I I D D I I I I 1 I * I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I # :*if: ; : :. ;. e i'i :I I: ; * eJ;l; ::e:: ;:I I:!: ::;:: :I: :i i:::; ::::; ;::I 111:: lelb; ;:;'I ti;:: !;I:: 4:; :I ;::i: :!pi iy': /::.: :i::; :I::: 'I;#& ::;:: :;;:: :;;:: !::if ::i:i ;:/I ;:;:I 1;:;; :::;i :I::; ii::; :$: :;;:I 4: l;a'l :;::I :::;I 11; ::;I: :i::; ;#;;I $1:: 8';l; :I::: !!a:! I!::: I1 I I' . ,&' I 8, 'x ' 8 8, '8 I I I I I 8, 888888, '\, ', '\ I -10- I Name ~""""""""~""""""""~"""""~""""""""----------"--;--"---"-"-----------~---~ !ll.l I I I I '8' 8 8 8 8 8' 8a97 '8' ','& '8, "&8 I 88 'S8 '8, 88 ', '8 I i I t I : of =.&j+, 8\ 'f+., I : Member .Q*. '$f@'+$?'\d' 80 \ ;',+','t,. I $ I I i Considerable discussion was given as to whether the ; petition should be returned to the petition bearers for . i i additional signatures. I I I I I l a I ! ili;a ;a:; :;#:a ;l181 118 1:;:: :I;:: ! !'I I ! i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the matter be i McPherson : ;x: XI ! : deferred until the next meeting in order that the petition i Bierce p] ;x: : i bearers can obtain additional signatures. ; Guevara I l :x! : "I I I : Neiswender! : :x: 1 I I I 4 $ 'I i Hughes i i !X: -1 i !1l!l i CITY ATTORNEY'S 'REPORT : I I I I I ;:;i: :::!I 1:: i Epoh roperty, The City Attorney reported that it looks : t ;;::I I as I t 1s matter will go to trial. chr appraisal is $IOO,Oq ;*I:: : and their appraisal is $10,000, If this matter does go to : :;::; : trial it will be necessary to have a more detailed appraisai I;::; 1;::: i made of the property. The City Attorney suggested that : ::i:: i he be authorized to have a more detailed appraisal.made i ::la I:: ; and take whatever action is necessary to bring this matter: :::I' :: I to a conclusion. This will involve an additional fee for i pi1; :;:ll : the appraiser. I t 1 1:: I ::::I I I 1:11: I By motion of the Council the City Attorney was instructed i McPherson i Ixix i : ! to obtain an additional and detailed appraisal of the Epoh ; Bierce F I !xi i : property and to take whatever action is necessary to bring: Guevara : i ;x: : i this matter to a conclusion. i Neiswender: ; ;xi i --"- 1:18: 4 I 1 : Hughes : ; :x; : !I,.I I I I I : Easements along Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Negotiations i i are being made to obtain easements from property owners! : along the Agua Hedionda Lagoon for the sewer line. Mr. : i Owen has executed an easement and he is going to obtain i i easements from the adjoining property owners. : CITY MANAGER'S REPORT : F. J. Fox - re: Request for permission to hold boat i races on Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Letter dated November I : 1, 1963, from F. J. Fox of Fox's Snug Harbor, requestin4 ; permission to allow boat races on the Agua Hedionda I I ! Lagoon for a two day period commencing April 11th to 5 J April 12th, 1964. The association sponsoring the event : i will be the California Outboard Boat Racing Association. i I I 1 I I I t I I I I I I I P I I I I t II1); .. ::::; :;:I, ii:ii :*I: :;i: ::to :::; : :.; ; !;;a 488: :::: :::: ;:ii :I:: :;:I It :::i :;*a ;;:I 1: ::;a It !@I! 1 By motion of the Council the request by Mr. F. J. Fox : McPherson i : !xi : was granted to allow the racing event on April 11th and 12& Bierce P i !xi i 1964. I Guevara : I I I x: I I 9 : Neiswender: : :xi I # i 1 Hughes ; !*I! ix:x: t 1 ; Parks and Recreation Commission - Letter of resignation: : Letter dated November 4, 1963, from Robert M. Darling, i i submitting his resignation as a member of the Parks and ; : Recreation Commission, as it is his feeling this commis- I i sion requires more attention and consideration than he is ; I able to put forth at this time. He thanked the Council for I i having selected him as a member of the comission. * I i By common consent of the Council Mr. Darling's resigna-: : tion was accepted with regret, and the City Manager in- i i structed to send a letter of thanks to Mr. Darling. I * i The Mayor requested the Council members to consider a i i replacement on the commission at the next regular meetin@. : A letter was received by Mayor Guevara from General i i Fairbourn at Camp Pendleton, inviting the Mayor and I I I members of the Chamber .of Commerce to attend a progra+ ; on Friday, at 300 P. M., celebrating the Marine Corps : : 188th birthday. I I I + * I I I B I * t I I I I I I :;;; :;I: i;;: 4:: :::I I::: it:: It;: ::I* ::;: !*I! ;*;; ;:,I It': :q: :I;: !It! ;;a- *I i::i ::;: ::;; $1: :::; ::;; 1::; ::;I !::I :::; I I : The Mayor extended the invitation to all members of the i is:; $18 I ! !:1; I I I t 1::; '> c I 8 8, s. \ -. I 4 I I I I I 8 I '\ '.:.., '.,'\\'\\ 1 ;I r? I i N a me ', '\!& '\, "& t I : of .c$& +, %+ 8. ' '\ 3.d I 8 '\'.\'., ',X" I -11- '\\ '\ \8 '8 \\ ' t I 4 '\$'$38, '\ 'PA\ :"""""""-"-""""""""""-""~"""""""""""""""-~""""""""~"""~"" : Mt?mber ,(n-p\ ,o.,o,.+(?\& &+tp ! 1 ;:!I: I I i Council. 1 Lease of Ecke beach property. Mr. Ecke is willing to ! : lease the beach property owned by him along the west sidi i of Carlsbad Blvd., providing the city pays the annual taxes, : which run approximately $200.00 per year. I I ! i I I I I I b I ; Discussion was given as to Mr. Ecke 'allowing rocks to : i be picked up off his property. Mr. Ecke wishes to reserGe : the right to have rocks picked up. The City Manager I i stated he felt that with further discussions Mr. Ecke : would agree to leaving the rocks. I Washington Street improvement. The Engineering Depart: : ment presented a preliminary precise plan for the exten- 3 : I sion of Washington Street from Beech Ave. to Tamarack ; : Ave. The area from Oak Ave. to Tamarack Ave. is not ; i a dedicated street. Mr. Briggs made -it known to the city: : he is going to take out a building permit on a lot within i i this area. If the city wishes to make this a dedicated ; : street he is willing to sell the property to the city. The i i Santa Fe Railroad Co, was contacted four years ago con- ; : cerni.ng their policy on street dedications in their rights i i of way, and they informed the city that they will never : : dedicate over 50% of a right of way and will.not participate i in any improvements. I I J I I B 4 I I I t * I :ll:~ @;;@i 41@*: I:*'* ::::: pi;: ;:::: ::::: :::;: #::I: !ll!l I I i The Engineering Department inquired of the Council as to: : whether or not they wished to proceed with the precise i i plan for Washington Street. * I ! I B ;a;;: ;::;I 1:: I1 :;: ;: i:;:; I: (l@ll ;:,:I ;:It: a!!* li;ll ;8l:t ::::: 'Ill: :::@I ltl:t ;::I: ;:*:' ,l:1l :::I' :at:: 1:111 :::I, 11; "1:; I:::; #::I1 i;':: ,,It1 :::I: 1:;:; !Il:: i After considerable discussion it was agreed that the pro- i : perty owners and the Santa Fe Railroad Co. be contacted i I to see what their feeling was in regards to the street. : : dedication. I I ! J 1 ;:;i: ::::I ::::I ::::; ;:':I !l:!l "!: I:: ;:::I ;:::I ;:i: ; : 1.; ~ f:!l I i Water meter rates. The Mayor stated according to the f : monthly statement of the Water Department, the city is : : losing money. He contacted one of the Mayors in San i i Diego County as to how they handle services for trailer ; I parks, motels, Homes for the aged, etc., where they 1 ; have only one service for the entire development. It was : i the Mayor's feeling each individual should pay their own i : way. ! The City Manager informed the Council a meeting will be: i held between the Engineering Department and the Water : : Department to discuss the water rates, and a report will i ! be made to the Council. I I I I J * I a I l I ':ii: :;:I I 1;:: I* I;;: I:;: $4 ;::; :;:: :;:: ::': ; : :.: :::I t;;: :a;: $1: ;::: 1;*1 11 #'!! I i RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL: :i:: i Ratification of the bills was given for the general expensek ;::: l::I : of the city in the amount of $100,402.12 -and for the Watee McPhersoni i i 4 i Department in the amount of $19,808.15, for the period : Bierce i , : I :$ i October 15, 1963 to November 5, 1963, as certified by i Guevara ; : i 8 : the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing : Neiswendel? xi ; f : Committee. I Hughes : :x; 4 i Ratification of the payroll was given for the second half : McPherso$ : ; $ l:;l i' of October, 1963, in the amount of $17,986.88, as certi-i Bierce i i i 3 : fied by the Director of Finance and approved by the Audit; Guevara I : : f I ing Committee. i Neiswendeg :xi 2 : Hughes {xi ; 4 i ADJOURNMENT: I I ;I I By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 10'08 P. &$. 1 I I I I I ;::; I I ;I I 1 I I B I I :I;: :::; 1 t I ::;I I I 1 :::: I :r Respectfully submitted, I s I * I I I I I I i : .i ; ' I I 1:;: I I :;:: I I :::: I : :a;: ;:/ I 8 8:;: I ':;: I ! I!#: