HomeMy WebLinkAbout1963-12-03; City Council; MinutesI I ', 8, *s 8, ', *< i CITY OF' CARLSBAD I I , ' '+. 20 6 i Minutes 02 CITY COUNCIL (Regular meeting) i '*, '8 '. \8 %, \, ' : Date of Meeting: December 3, 1963 ; Name '%,X*% *,,*+A i Time of Meeting: 7:OO P. M. ; of '$o*@ ', .-!p ' Place of Meeting Council Chambers : Member '\*&?+$q&! ; """"""""_ "" """""""""""""""""--"""."-""""I "" - """." -:$@ -." X""
I I 1;14:
; ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen McPherson, i ;I::; i Bierce, Guevara and Neiswender. Councilman Hughes i ;;::I
1:::: : was present at 7:06 P. M. Also present were City Manage Ltl; i Slater, City Attorney Wilson and City Clerk Adams. ;;;;I I*)#&
I : :**Il $1; I ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. 4 ::i:;
I ;:
4 :: iii 8 i INVOCATION was offered by City Manager Slater * I ;::;:
I ;::;; i CQRJU~SPONDENCE: * I *$: I#
# I p:;: i (a) City of Barstow, California - re: Request for City i 4:;:
:;ai; i Opposition to H-R 6457. Letter dated November 25, l9Bi ::i * ; &om the City of Barstow, California, in which was en- ; ;I,*, i closed a copy of legislation now before the 88th Congress I (:;I: ::;:: : of the United States. H. R. 6457 can result in substantial ; :'::; i economic damage to cities along the Interstate Highway ; ;. i ;:a
: System if those cities depend to any substantial amount on! ;'I ::I:: i tourist trade. The "service facilities" referred to in the i ::: ;:
: bill consists of motel, automotive service, and dining ; 1:;::
:;e:; i facilities, which would be operating in competition with i ;;p; : established facilities in your city. The City of Barstow ; ii;:: $1 { has strongly stated their opposition to He R. 6457 by letter! a::;: : to their representatives in Washington, D, C., 2nd they ; :::t: i are in hopes this city will see fit to take similar action, i i:::;
i The City Manager was instructed io send for a copy of i ::'I; ;:::, : H. R. 6457, and have copies made of the bill to send to : :!i:i i each of the Council members. I * :':i; ;:I I
t I::!: i Executive Session. The Mayor requested that an executiv4 +:; i session be called to discuss personnel. The Council ad- : :;a:*
a*::: : journed to the Manager's office at 7: 10 P. M. I ::::i
8 ii::; ; The regular meeting reconvened at 7: 23 P. M.
1 I ;e::; * *::#I ! The IWayor announced that no action was taken by the I : . . . uncil. .... .- - - ,. a#*:!
b b ;i: *
i PUBLIC HEARINGS:
I (a) Reclassification of certain property located on the i ;;;:; i north side of Oak Ave. between Pi0 Pic0 Drive and High- $ : 'land Drive, from Zone R-1 to Zone R- 3. Applicants: i Jack L. Moye, Otis M. Walton, and John H. Spencer. I I :;**I ((t
I I # ;*; : The Clerk certified as to proper notice having been given : ;.: * 1; i to the adjoining property owners. 1 1;;::
I Resolution No. 325 of the Planning Commission was pre- i i;!:: i sented wherein they recommended that approval be given ; :!pi : to the proposed reclassification, F b {:,*' 11;
i The Clerk informed the Council no written corresponden& i had been received up to the hour of 7:30 P. M.
i The Mayor announced the Council would hear from all i
* ;e* 1 i reclassification. * ;::i:
i There.were no persons present desiring to speak in favor i : of the reclassification.
I llal: ! The Mayor announced the Council would now hear from alli i persons desiring to speak in opposition to the proposed i
f reclassification. 8 I '4;:
: There were no persons desiring to speak in opposition. i i:;;;
(81, i The public hearing was declared closed at 7: 38 P. M,
I
I ', ', ', **,',., ',, '8 '.,
I
I 9
I I #
I '*
b I ::I;;
I
* I
I
b :;::;
(.CO" ' ** I:;:'
* ::;;; ::;
I I * ii * ::; I*
I
t .- " : I
b I
i;;::
;;I:'
I '4:;
* i!;!;
* I ii:$
I I ::i:;
;:/I * ;:;:: *-:;
:ii:;
;::;;
t I :::;: :!::; :;::; :;::;
I iiia;
I I !::;I
I a t :::e: * * 1:::: * i;:::
I
*
I
#
I b ;::;;
: persons who wished to speak in favor of the proposed I I i!iI: 'I
I - ii;;:
* I **a~;
* I
$ I
! I:!:!
* I ; " " *', ', ' i
* -2- I I " ', '8 ' h 8
* I
I t '. *' ' '& "'"'~' ', '\ 't, 20 4
I i Name 'b X$ '. \, '.+ fh
c I of 'y9.0.. f?&$&$'&?+& ' I ""I".. * ""e """ """"""""" - """""""-"""""""""" -I""&" ""-." :O-& "-,"-
:;i:i ::;::
{ and C-2 zoning to the north. I I I::;; ;::;,
I ;::I:
I ;:::a
I I *;I1: ;:' ::;;I
* I ;I::;
I :;::;
;4'I
I;':; * ;; 1'1 :;:
'8 ' S ', '\ 8
b
* Member *e'c\~g~$? 4
I :I I * 1 ! The City Planner presented a plat of the area, showing th& ;::;: i zoning of the surrounding area. He pointed out the reque4tJ : was being made €or two lots, with R-3 zoning to the west ;
i As there were no objections registered it was the general: ;:iii i feeling of the Council the request should be granted,
: The following resolution was presented for consideration i i by the Council:
I ntesolution No. 961. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING: i ~k%So&D%CE310N 8EGArZDING CHANGE OF i McPhersoni i i,q ; i ZONE CLASSIFICATICN OF CEtETAIN DESIGNATED : Bierce :x: ; s i : PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD FROM ZON$ Guevara : : ;x 1 i H-1 TO ZONE 8-3, was adopted by title only and furthel: Neiswende4 :x; x! I 1 reading waived. i Hughes : i iq i
'! *
$ The following ordinance was presented for a first reading: ::::;
: Ordinance No. 9155. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i 1:::: BAD AMjE;NDING ORDINANCE NG. 9060, : McPhersoni : i 4 : ING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PLEOPERTY FROM i Bierce :x: i4 i i ZONE R-1 TO ZONE R-3, IN THf3 CITY OF CAaLS- : Guevara : : :x: i i BAD, was given a first reading by title only and further i Meiswendes :XI & ; ; reading waived, i Hughes i : :+ i
' :ii:; i (b) Reclassification of certain property located on the : ll 11 ; southwest corner of the intersection of Chestnut Ave. and; ::i:; :'vi{ i Monroe Street, from Zone R-L to Zone R- 3L. Applicant: I :i:;l I Dakley G. Parker. I I I;;!: I#+
i The Clerk certified as to proper notice having been given.! *:;:):
1 I I iii:i i Resolution No. 326 of the Planning Commission was pre- ! ::;:; ; sented, wherein they recommended approval of the pro- i i:ii; i posed reclassification. I 4: *I :*:**
I I I :::I; I The Clerk informed the Council there were no written i p:;
: protests received up to the hour of 7: 30 P. M. I i:;:: 1:s
::;
* I ;:::' i The Mayor announced the Council would hear from all i :; I;;: i persons wishing to speak in favor of this reclassification.; ::pi
l I *'I i NIB. JOHN PATTERSON, 316 Nevada Street, Oceanside, i ii:;:
l('I(
; stated he was an attorney at law representing Mr. Oakleyi 4;;: i Parker. This matter came before the Council some two : L,,: :*I:; i to three months ago. At that time K-3 zoning was request- ::::; ; ed; since that time R-3L has been introduced into the I :::i:
i rack would not run through to Park Drive. At the previoJs ;:::: : hearing before the Council there was a petition presented ; i with some 170 signatures. In studying this area it is not i ::,:I : felt that the highestt type R-1 development should be i placed on this property due to the fact the high school is I : across the street. On two different occasions the Plan- ; i ning Commission voted to recommend that approval be i I::! : given to the proposed reclassification. The people who ; i:;:; i have voiced their objections do not live in the immediate i ;: 1;::; 11 i area, however, they do pass by it.
I those desiring to speak in opposition to the proposed re- ; :;;:: : classification.
: MR. DONALD JOHNSON, 4065 Sunnyhill Drive, stated i :ii:i i he noticed Mr. Slater mentioned that there was no written: I!!:; 'I : correspondence received. He would like to present a i $8 i letter of protest from Mr. and Mrs. James It. Einum, : i:::; : who are presently residing in Honolulu, but who own I I I:::: 1:;:;
I !*!!:
'I
B
I*
I
1
* ' ;:::I
4 * *(I ;:;:: I
11 11
t I I
' I I ;::I:
I
I
: zoning ordinance. At that time it was thought that Tama-i ::,:: la
!::I:
I*;:;
I ;::;:
I :!pi i:;:: I;:::
I 1::;: : The Mayor announced the Council would now hear from i :x;;
l ::;:: it;:: * ;::::
I
I I
I I
I I * I ii:;;
I
I : '\, ', -8, 't ', '8
I I \\ '\ ' ', '. '9 20 8
a I 8 ', ""*,, ", ""~.
I - 3- ',, ', 8, 't '\ '* ' I i N a me '., 't$&,), "&
k ; of '$Q'G+. ', 'PA
I ..$+,+,;%+ :""""""""~""""""""~~"""""""""""""""""""-;"~"-"""-----""--~--- : Member ,o .gh.e$?'\d
I I :;:/
I 1 :.:;;:
I k ::;:;
* l
I
I
I I ')It)
I $14,;
i Mr. Johnson also presented a petition with 114 signatured, ::I:; I objecting to the proposed reclassification, on the grounds; ::;Il I::;1 1 that it is not in keeping with the immediate surrounding : ;I#;: i almost 100% R-1 zoning, that it would increase an alreadj ':iii ; dangerous traffic problem for school children, and it is i ::
Id:; : an undesirable spot zoning rather than a transition zone. ; :* 1::::
I :;;:: i Mr. Johnson stated he was not in favor of this R-3L zonidg. ::;I: ; The people who signed the petition are in hopes that the ; ::'a:
*t;11 i Council will deny this R-3L zoning as they previously : pi:: ; denied the 8-3 zoning. One of the Planning Commissionets 1::::
i pointed out this was a transition zoning, At the hearing : I!::: p':: : before the Planning Commission Mr. Parker stated he i ,:p: i would build one unit and then when that was sold he would i ;nl;l *:::I ; continue building units as they are sold. It was his feel- ; :&@ti ;::'I i ing this might result in the same situation that exists witK ;:;it ; the apartments on Monroe Street. They have never been I !:I:: i fully occupied. In his opinion the R-1 property to the i ;slll I:1# : west is well kept and all but one is occupied. 1 8';:; ;:
! Mfi. JIM NELSON, Anne Drive, stated he lives directly i l;~l,
i behind the apartments on Monroe Street, and they have i ::;;! : never been fully occupied and the property is certainly ; :'I1
I ;el 1
I ;:;:: I The Mayor asked for a count of those present who were i$ ::::: : favor of the reclassification, and those who were there to: $ 11;:; 'I I voice their objection. I /::: ;:::;
i There were tw, in favor of the reclassification and nine i ;;;ri i who were opposed to the reclassification. I I ;:::;
t I ,11:1 ; Mr. Patterson, attorney €or the applicant, stated that if 1 i;:;:
{ Mr. Johnson counted husband and wife as one property i ,I:*,
: owner there would be 50% less. There are some who no ; :::;: { doubt feel this would hurt their property. He is sure that! {:::; : when the R-3L ordinance was adopted it was the Councii*s: :!!:; i feeling the R-l areas would be protected. In their opinio4 i:;:; : the 8-3L zoning is the heghest and best use of the properw. I' I* i MR. EDWARD McCANN, 3485 Charter Oak Drive, stated :hii : he felt the highest and best use of the land should be con- i '::I;: i sidered, There have been unsold houses to the west of : ;:I:; : this property, and they have been built for over two year4. ;:;:: i The city is certainly not going to gain anything by vacant ; $1 /I;:
; property. Multiple dwelling is going to have to be recog-: ;::;i
i nized if we are going to grow. :::,;
I ::::;
#::*I i MR. RSCHAfiD GEYER, 755 Elm Avenue, stated this i ~k,:, ii::: : density of housing will certainly create a greater traffic i '::::; '1: i hazard to the children going to school. I I ;::I, :ii& i The Mayor declared the public hearing closed at 8: 05 P. M. "'I: t I I :::I'
I ;:;:: i The City Planner pointed out to the Council this R-3L : ;:;:: : zoning was adopted last September. This zoning makes if ;:;:: I compatible with R-1 zoning. It requires off-street parkin& ;::;I : The R-3L zoning only allows single family duplex, triplex ;::** ;:i:i i and quadplex. I t ::;::
I llk;; I Cmn. Bierce stated in his opinion the modern concept of i .I:;;; ; Garden Apartments is the corning thing for Carlsbad. He: 4::: i would like to point out that Tamarack is going through to i ::;I:
: Park Drive, which will take the traffic load off from i Chestnut Avenue. We have a low tax rate in Carlsbad, i ;I:
':I:;
; and we cannot turn down development such as this if we * 1:;:: ::;i: i intend to keep the tax rate down. Single family residence& i;::: ; do not take the same loan value across from a school. TGe I:::: i Council adopted the R-3L zoning for just such property as: a:;::
I I I i:;::
I I.! ! : !
I
t i property at 3820 Monroe Ave. in Carlsbad. I
I I'
k I
I ll:i; ;*i:;
! not w,ell kept. I * ;!!!; 1:
I I I
I
I
I
$
I::!;
I I I i;::; ::;
I b 1 I
*
I
*
I I
I' I
I I ::iii
11
k I
I t I 88 \ . 8 ', '8 I
I * * 8, 'N,", '88 '\ '8, 289
* 8 : of '8*o$& 88$@@,&,24$ :"""-""-""-*"""~"""""""""""""""""""""""~"~~"~""""""""""~"~ : Member ,o.,o\.ppd
* :::;i
t I 'N 8,88NN, '8, '*, '\
I '* 8 8 8 88, I Name 8 .$ , \&
t t
I -4- '8, '.,si. '., '%\+
I 8, \P+
* I :@*I' i this. He is certainly in favor of the R-3L zoning request.! 1::::
I :I::; I Cmn. McPherson asked Mr. Johnson what zoning he wouli ;:::; i suggest to be placed on this vacant land, and Mr. Johnson! ;::#I i stated he was not qualified to say what should be placed ori 1:;:: :;"' : the property. I
*,;:a
;:I::
D I l I (I:::
; Cmn. Neiswender stated that Chestnut is the main artery I ,:;I;
8'::; i in this area, and even if there is off-street parking pro- ! :;;:; : vided there would still be more traffic on Chestnut Ave. i 8 (11 ;:I;*
I :iiiI : After further discussion by the Council, the following i !::;! i resolution was presented for the Council's consideration: i 1:: #
I I 8 ::;:: :;,:I
2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i I::;:
CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING! :p:i I FINDINGS AND DECISION BEGARDING CHANGE OF : McPhersoni : :xi I : ZONE CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED i Bierce pi !x! ; i PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD FROM ZOml Guevara 8 ; : :xi : R-1 TO ZONE R-3L, was adopted by title only and : Neiswenderj ($1 ; ; :xi i further reading waived. i Hughes ; : *x; *
1 The following ordinance was presented for a first reading;: :::::
: Ordinance No. 9155. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i I;::; I OF CmSBAD A1MENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, : McPherson: : i x: ; : CHANGING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PftOPERTY FROM i Bierce x: !xi i i ZONE id-1 TO ZONE R-3L, IN THE CITY OF CARLS- f Guevara I : ; :x: : BAD, was given a first reading by title only and further i Neiswender: : i :xi i reading waived. : Hughes : :xi 4 i
! PLANNING: s ;I:*I
\ (a) Memorandum from Planning Commission - re: Polic :I:*: : % for precise plan development. Memorandum from the' 7 ;:;If 1l;I ! 't?lanning Commission, datedNovember 27, 1963, regard< I:;:; : ing policy for Precise Plan Development was presented, ; ::::; i stating a special committee was appointed to formulate a : ::;:: i policy of objectives, principles and standards recommend1 :::I:
: ed for the City Council, Planning Commission and the : iiipi I various City Departments relating to Precise Plan Devel-j :I 1; ;:::; : opments. At the regular meeting of the Planning Commis! I!:;: i sion held November 26, 1963, the policy was discussed, ; ::::i ; and the results were: (1) The policy could expedite pre- : :i::; i cise planned developments until such time as Daniel, Ma&, : Johnson and Mendenhall has prepared the city's new ordi-i !::;I 'I i nance; (2) due to the complex issues in such a policy, it : ;::;: : should be presented and reviewed by the Planning Consul-! liiii i tants hired to revise the present ordinance; and (3) upon : :::I: : the Planning Consultants review and submission of any I (@I:* i recommendations, the policy would be forwarded to the : ::i:i : City Council for review and adoption, In conclusion the i ;: llf:i i Planning Commission has confidence in the draft of a 1 I ;:::; i policy, however, the review requested by the Planning i *:'a8
: Consultants and the staff would indicate strength, which f I ;:; : fully meets the needs of the city. I ;:**I ;;I1&
: The City Manager informed the Council a copy of the pro-! i posed policy was forwarded to each member of the Council I for their review. I I ::;:: i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the policy as i McPhersoni !xi 4 i i proposed by the Planning Commission be turned over to : Bierce ;x: :& ; : Daniel, Mann, Johnson and Mendenhall for their review i Guevara * : I+ i i and study. ; Neiswenderi i :$ ;
i ENGINEERING I :*I;: ;:::1
I ;::;:
i (a) Acceptance of easements for sewer purposes from i ;::;:
;::I: : C. A. Harvey, J. F. Reese and H. G. Johnson. The I e:':; I 'I:;#
I !I*!:
I
I I
I I I ;::::
1 1 ;::I: 1::::
I I i::;:
I I I 1::::
I ii:i:
I
::;:: :(I
;::::
;:::;
I I * I ,e::: a:;:: i:;:: *:;::
::'::
I I i Hughes ; i ilc: i
I I
I a
I
1 I I I * ;;if;
I f f f I
8 ',..,,'. % , '\, t, ', '\ '\ I ' " 910
'x, , ' '\ ',,'*' u I I '\ \,,'*\ '\
\\ , ', ' '\ '*
I i of ,$&&,',\ '!9'
I : Member ',L\O, &'e\&@ a, 'Pi i """"""" __* """ *"" """"""""""""""- """-""-""-r,"-------"""~~-~:~-~-:-.
f ::::I
I I
I
I * -5- i N a me ',, ',!& *' ''&
I 'I f f i Council was informed that additional easements for sewer: 1;:;; : purposes on the Joint Sewer Project had been received an+ :I:*: i it will be necessary for the City to accept these easementg :: :ii : before recording. f I:::: 1I;1f
1 "1:; ! By motion of the Council the easements from C. A. Har&&IcPherson : I xlx: ; i J. F. Reese and H. Q. johnson, for sewer purposes, wereBierce !x ; ;xi ;
I ed. I of acceptance to each document and have the same record: Neiswenderj : ;x: : i Hughes : 1 : : !xi i
i WATER: :11:a
i (a) Water rate study. A memorandum dated December 3, 1 ;i::: : 1963, from the City Manager was presented, concerning : i:::: i water rates, stating that wholesale rates for water deliver4d : to the city have recently been increased. In the past, the :
; rates; however, due to the present increase both from the : :: 1.:; i CMWD and the San Diego County Water Authority, it is i l:4Iq
: made in order to update the present water orilinance No. i i 4001.
i The City Manager reviewed certain sections of the ordi- 1 ;:i:f : nance and indicated their recommended change. I f ;:::;
I ;::;I
1 f.; ; f :
i it was agreed that the recommendation of the staff be ac- : McPhersoni !X! # : : cepted and that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare i Bierce :x: : X; i i an amendment to Ordinance No. 4001 reflecting the chang-; Guevara : i i X : i es, for the Council's review at the next regular meeting. I Neiswenderi : : X! 1
I ':if: i A short recess was called at 8:40 P. M. The meeting re- i :If:; I convened at 8:52 P. M. t I ;::;I
i NEW BUSINESS:
I (a) Authorization for Mayor to sign insurance release : ::::: : claim. The City of Carlsbad filed a claim for damage dode ii:ii
: struction, Inc. A release has been received for the city ; I to execute in the amount of $714.84. Upon the release i :4:; : being properly executed they will forward a draft to the : iiii: i city. I 1::;:
I f ::;II Of'l i By motio,n of the Council the Mayor was authorized to i NcPherson I i ; xi i i execute the release on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. : Bierce : ; !xi :
;:
I I :::;;
: accepted and the Clerk instructed to attach a certificate : Guevara @I ; ; :xi i
I I ::;:I
I :::::
4:;;
::I , 1.4: z ;::b i Water Department has absorbed any increase in wholesale! ;:i::
::{':: I not possible for the Water Department to absorb these ; 'L ;:::i i increases. Therefore, certain reco.mrriendations azCe bginif ;;at: f I ,I
;I!::
I {i::!
: After consideration by the Council, by motion of the CouncFl :::@I 'I
f I f
I I f f
I :::;:
I f f b
I f I
I I I ; Hughes i i I3 ;
I I :I::;
1 I '::I:
i ='in transmission line by the Stuckey-Wiegand Con: ;f::I
;i:ii
1
f
I ::p:
i ::::: I f
;::4
I I
I
f I i Guevara i I !x: i
I I : Neiswenderjx: :xi :
I I I Hughes ; ix !x: i
'I#;*
::;I: i (b) Notification of intent to file cardroom application.. f f ::::; : Letter 'dated November 20, 1963, from 2. Taylor Vinson, i ;It;* i Attorney at Law, notifying the City of Carlsbad that Bella ; ::I:: i Vista Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation, intend$ ;::;:
; to make timely applicati,on, pursuant to Section 7. 3 of : i:;:: ;:;:; i the City Code, to the Chief of Police for a cardroom licenie. 4:;:
I I :-I; i The City Attorney informed the Council the principals of i :i;:; i:::: : this corporation came to the City Hall approximately six : 81 i months ago, and made certain suggested amendments to i I;:;;
: our cardroom orainance. Now they are giving notice that ; ;:::: ;:::: i they intend to file an application with the city. The letter i ;:::: : can just be filed. I I ii:'f I I I::
I ;:::: ! Cmn. Neiswender stated he would like to be notified when i ;:::I i an application is received. I I ;::::
f 8:::;
I :;::; ! I
I
I I I
t1fI1
I I f I
I
I I
!*l!f
I
1 I I '\ 8, .\ ', ', '\
I I ,, 8 ' '\ '8888, 3, 11
c I 8 I
'\ 8\8'8\ ', , 8
I L I
8, ,' 9 ', \, '\ ''8 '8 '\ \
I i Na me ', '.$\ '\, ''a
I 1 Member %$@,*$\% :""""""""""""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~"-
t ;';I; i (c) Request for Council to grant right-of-way to San Diegb :iii: 1 Gas & Electric %o. for pole purposes on city owned I I) i:::; Letter dated November 18, 1963, from the ! ;;:::
: an leg0 Gas, & Electric Company, requesting that the i :I::: 4::: i City of Carlsbad execute a Grant of Right of Way for the : I:::: ; purpuse of installing an electrical power pole line on the t ;:'I: i west side af U. S. Highway 101 and immediately southerly! ;:i;:
: of Pine Ave. The installation is intended to provide ;::,I * q:: i service to the development proposed by Richard E. GeyeL ;;
,I,:,
* :::;: i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the request be! McPherson: : I 4 : $14:
: granted, and the Mayor authorized to execute the Grant 04 Bierce : i XI x ! i Right of Way on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. : Guevara i : : 4 :
L -6- I I i of ',+'$8 '8?&e8 8 $8 8 '$?& ;?+,
t
Q?i!F
I
* I I I i Neiswendeq x! : X i
i San Diego Gas & Electric Co. Christmas Display. Mayor! :::i: : euevara stated he would lik ((l)* e to compliment the $an Diego: ii::: i Gas & Electric Company on their Christmas Display at thb '1: i Encina Plant, and requested that the City Manager send ai !I:!:
: letter to the company expressing. the city's gratitude of I i::;;
: the display. 1 I I :iiii i:::: i Mayor's Advisory Committee. The Mayor announc.ed that 1:;:: ; for the remainder of his term as Mayor, he would like to I ::'I, : appoint the following persons as an advisory committee: ; i:!!:
I I 1 I :I::: I' : Pierce Davis I I :*I:;
I ::ii: i William Cannon I ';I I i Don Duriham I b ::a::
I I I i::::
I I!!: i Notifi&kori.,qf zone changes. All zone changes ,that need ! ii * ili : to be enfprcled by the Police Department, Mayor.Guevara I ;:, I i requestkd thbt a copy of the ordinance concerning such : $1::
:'I : change be gi%m to the Police Department. Also all other! :I;::
i departments khould be notified of such change. I i Tree at Corn& of Grand Ave. and State Street. Cmn. I i;::: : mcPherson stated he has received calls regarding the i "4:: 1;::: i large Eucalyptub Tree at the corner of Grand,AVq,. aiid i 'I;* ; State Strtiet, claiming it obstructs theif Vie& kit &id htek 'j.4 ; ; I ! i i section. i;; I i 8
I ,. #t 1 :$
i The City Manager stated he would have this intersection ! ; checked. $ :!,*I
1::
* I I I :;la I;: : Patch work at Jefferson St. and Tamarack Avenue. Cmn.: ti;:: i Rughes requested that better patch work be done at this ! ;:a::
: intersection as it is causing a driving hazard. 1:;:;
I 1 I I ;:::: i OLD BUSINESS I I I:;*:
1 I I i;:!:
: (a) Second reading of Ordinance No. 6033, amending :#*:I ;:::: i Business License Ordinance No. 6005. e'*#;
I 1;:*1
I :;I:; i MR. DON DUNHAM, stated he was appearing as an indepknd- ::i::
1 ent business man, and was also representing some of his ; :;::I !!;;: ; colleagues. He is very bitterly opposed to the proposed i '1; i ordinance as it exists for the following reasons: ::::I
I I I ::;I:
I I :;I:: z (1) The increase as proposed would double, triple and ! ;pi:;
: quadruple some of the fees. It is his feeling that if there i ;:l;I
;::e: i was any justification or purpose for the increase that t I I:':: ; possibly the business district could live with it. I
::I:;
I :'Is;
1 I ::::I i He has been told that this study has been in process for : ;::;: i three years. Not once was the business man or the Chamber ;:::: i of Commerce approached about the change. :::I:
I *;I:;
I :a::; I (2) It will hinder the growth of the community. If this i 1:;:: i increase goes through, the Chamber of Commerce might : "I:; : ;,: ; I
I :I:':
1 ! !.::I:
t : Hughes : I { 4 :
I ::;I:
::::I
I
I
I pi; fa:;
I i :i '! ; 4
I I I I
I1 I
.I
B :I: .I j
I
;I1 I
I I :11,1
I 1 I I I
I I
I
I
I
t I
I"
I 'b
I I
* I ' *-,.>*- s # b*,..*< w % .*' 8 t. . " yI ..,. *- '. *.
b -7- * * t, 'i\ *"** 3, .1 2
8 *
* .. I' '. ', ', b --
'8 '*,',\ 8 '*"'* '
# i Name *'8 **+'**,:\
9 b i 8 Member of =*@i+;*y ~".*""."."*"""""""""""""*"""-*"""""""""-"" 4 ""." - """- '$* @gq!
8 b at ; just as well throw their industrial brochures out. NumerGus I:::: i of his colleagues; will be hurt by this increase. This corn! 4:;:; :,;:: : naunity should not be based on other communities. t ::4; * t :;::; ! (3) After it was discovered that there was an increase i o* Iliii i being considered: by the Council, they were informed that i !:/I
' the city did not have to give a copy of the ordinance to ; ;::::
I:':: I anyone until after it was adopted, However, through a I ;:::; : friend he was able to get a copy to study. t
::::;
* I I ::':i:
: In closing Mr, Dunham requested that the Council see fit i :::I: i:;ii i to oppose this proposed change in the ordinance, e I I ii;ii
i MR. TONY HOWARD JONES, owner of cove Nursery, i ;:;::
;::a, 81 I stated we are dealing with all the business people. He : 1:;:: : feels it is a moral obligation to work with the merchants i ;I##*
i on such a matter. He would like to know on what basis : ;:;::
:;I:: : this ordinance was determined. I I 1::::
I Cmn. Neiswender stated he was not aware that an ordinanbe :a I;!:: i was not available to the public. ;'I:;
i The City Manager stated at the time an ordinance is being: iii:; 'I
; considered by the Council there are only certain copies ; (*IIl
] available for the Council; however, anyone who wishes to i : come to the City Wall is welcome tu look at the proposed ; I ordinance at any time.
i Cmn. McPherson stated he was not in favor of the ordi- 1 ; nance from the beginning. I i:ii:
I :' ; Cmn. Bierce stated he has reviewed this ordinance very i ;$:' I carefully, and he would like to suggest that this ordinance! : be set aside until further study can be made, as there are; @:;I1 i certain inequities.
i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the ordinance i MCPhersoni :Xi X: ; i in its present form be dropped, and that the Mayor and : Bierce {Xi iG : : his advisory committee meet and work out a new ordinancb Guemra ; ] 1 Xi ! i for the next regular meeting. ; Nelswender, ; ;5 ;
I ; Hughes : : :X; : i Mayor Guevara requested that the Advisory Committee, ! i:::: ; Cmn, Neiswender, the City Attorney, City Manager and i ;::;: i the City Clerk meet within the next few days in order to : ;:'I:
I+; : make a further study of the ordinance. I $1,;
I :ii:; :: (b) Report on Government Organizational Study. The City! ::;::
; Manager informed the Council he contacted three firms ; ::;:: ::;:; i and requested that they submit a proposal as to the cost : .; I t .: I ;:::I i of an organization and management survey of the operatio& ; of the City Government of Carlsbad. He has received the i 1 : :.; I
: following proposals: I
: George S. May Company $15,000 i :I:*: ;:;:: i H. Zinder 8~ Associates, Inc. 2,650 i :iiii i Griffenhagen-Kroeger, Inc. 2,950 : I::;:
I ::::: i Cmn. Bierce stated he fully realizes this would be very I ;;;;i : helpful to the city, however, he did not realize that the :. ::;I: i city would be operating on such a limited budget when he : ;::': : made the suggestion some months ago. Therefore, he i 1:;::
i would recommend that this matter be deferred at the 1 ii':;
I 1::: : present time. I * ::;:: * I i;::; i CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT I :I:;:
I '::;!
I I :t ! Amendment to Health ordinance, The County of San Diego! 1:;:; ::;i: i handles our health inspections, and they have recently : ;;:;; ; adopted a new ordinance concerning food handling, and i $ '1; i have requested that the city adopt a similar ordinance. : :i::;
; The City Attorney stated he would have an amendment i i;!;:
e;'*; i prepared for the next meeting.
I ! :I::!
b
I
0)
I 11
I * !!{:;
:ii:;
iiiii
:I;:; :::::
* I;:':
l * *:ii
I 4;;i
1:; i::;;
::I:; I ;;::; * :;::;
I I I I I
b 1: I
e I
811 :p:;
I
-1 *
I
: i; i.!
b I I iiiii 11
I 8
I
I b p::;
I I I I
I ', 8 '8 t8 ', *\
8\ '8 ' s 8, ',
t I * ', '.\\, '8, 88 '\, 213
I I 1 Name *s8*$+ 8, +A
I I I i of '@$.8>,,J??
: -3 lW3 * ::{;I
I t 1 -8- t '8 '8 '8 '88 's8
1 Member ''&@k+08& :"""""""""""""""""""""""*""""""""""""""~""""-"""~," ""-:""
I :;;:; i EPOH property trial. The trial has been set for Decedr :;; ::::I It at 10: 00 A, lif. on the EPOH property matter. i
i City vs. Hicks and Kelly. The proposed judgment has I ;I;:;
: been dictated and will be presented to the attorney for : ::;i;
::::I i the defendants shortly. 8 I:;::
I < :;::a i Library - Architects contract. The City Attorney inform-; :;I:; : ed the Council on July 16, 19G3 at their regular meeting : i:!::
1';:: i Mr. Melvin presented the artist's concept of the library : ;: : building. At that time the Council indicated that the archf ;: ili
i itect proceed with the plans. Mr. Wilson asked for I;*:'
I 8 '14 : clarification of the following items: I St'1i
I I*;;: ; Was it the intent of the Council to authorize the architect i :::I* ': i to proceed with both the Design Development phase and i ::::I i the Construction Document phase. I i':::;
I 'I::; : The Council indicated it was their intention at that time i ::::: J for the architect to proceed with the plans and specificatidns. ;:It;
1 I 1 ;:::I $1 i Also was it the Councills understanding that if the plans i ::::;
::I:/ I were changed that the basic fee for the architect would be! iiI{I : 8% of the construction cost? I I ;i::i 1 $1'
I ;1:: i The Council indicated this was their understanding. I e ::::
I I 0::; i Further, does the Council wish an amendment to the con- i iiIi I tract whereby the city agrees to reimburse to the archi- I :#*I ;;I* : tect his interest costs, to run to the Design Development ; I::! i Phase only, or the Design Development and Construction 1 ji::
: Document Phase? b I ;!;; *ti:
: Mr. Melvin stated his fees to the engineer are based on i 4:: ; ;-;; i the construction cost. It would not be in the best interest$ I;** i to just cover the Design Development Phase. 11;; I #*IS
; ii;: i Cmn. Neiswender inquired if the Council revised the plan4 1. ;
; to accommodate 20 to 40 thousand people at a cost of b ; ;i i ;
i $100,000 to $125,000, how would this affect the contract?! ; ;.I:
I I. I :::: i Mrs. Cole, City Librarian, stated Cmn. Neiswender was i i ; ; ;'
; a member of the Building Committee. The city has spent i 1::;
:;#I : considerable money so far and she felt this should have : ;I!; i been considered prior to this time.
I I I ':ii :Il* i Cmn. Neiswender stated he agreed with Mrs. Cole; how- i ;I:\ i ever, when he became a member of the committee he was: ::;; ; not sure of the functions of the library. He feels the city i ii:: i should have a library that is functional, but we should be I ii:: : realistic. I 1 i:::
t 1';: i Mr. Melvin stated the scope of the work was designed basbd ;:
1';; i on the Rawn report. It is not designed primarizy for volur5les ;:I,
: of books but for the best usage. A mezzanine has been i ;::;
i designed which would give an additional 3000 sq. feet : 4:; :::;
; when needed. The building itself can be expanded in thre; ;::I i directions. ;:;:
I I t b::: Ill:
i Mrs. McCann, stated she is a member of the Library Bo+d, ::.I: : and was a member of the building committee. She went 01) :;; i this committee with an open mind. She did not feel the cigt i:: : should build on any less than 15 years growth if we are ; a:: i asking for a 30 year loan. We owe it to ourselves and the! :::
i community to build the best. A well designed library can: I::
1 operate with a minimum of employees. I ;::
I ;:a
i After further discussion it was agreed that the contract bet :et
a!: i amended to provide that the agreement to reimburse the ; ::;
; architect his interest charges relate to both the Design i ::; ::;
I i::
'8 ' 8 '\ '\ *,
I I
: 1
I
I 1 I ::iii ;:
I I e:*
1
b I 1
I 1
I rn
I I ;
I
b
. i, ..: I 8
t 'I
1 ;:I
I
(0
*I
I I
t I
I
I*'
D *'I
B I D: *
* s 8
8 1 I I I;:
I I ; ** 8, -*,* **- %* '* ',
I -9- '., '* b, ' '
:"""""""""""""-"""""""""""""""~"""""*""""""""""""- , I","'";
I
I
I ', ' I I , * ', "*", 2 3 I
I I Name ',,'*$\ '* '*$ e 1 of &$+,"* *+*
I ; Member *+g ,os&~~p*~ \a.,lt?\.t,
I ', '*,'\., " , " '*
I
I I I I
I *
; Development and Construction Document Phases.
: Mayor Guevara requested the architect to present the i i plans and drawings in their present status for the Counci; : to review. & 1
i It was suggested that the Council hold a joint meeting wit$ i the Library Board of Trustees on Monday evening. I I
I
I 4 I
I I I !
:;::; i:;:: ::;i:
I'*I;
':;I1 !I:;!
I' ;:If: ,:i:;
:;I:: I::::
1;::;
!Il!l I i By common consent it was agreed that the Council mernbfrs : meet with the Library Board of Trustees in the Carncil ; (*I:# i Chambers on Monday, December 9, 1963, at 7: 30 P. M. : 4:::
i CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
i Population increase. A request was made to the Depart-! I:::: i ment of b'inance in Sacramento, requesting a population ; ;;'I:
,I::@ : estimate. A phone call was received today stating there I ;::;: i has been an increase of 13 1/2%, or 11,350 population. ; :!::I
; This will be an increase of approximately $9,000 in lieu i :::if
f funds. '1I)I
I I::::
I I I I f::': i Sale of City property. At the last meeting of the City ; ; Council, the City.Manager was instructed to advertise I i;h; i the city property for sale. The City Manager inquired : ;I::; : as to the length of time that should be stipulated in the i i notice for occupancy of the adult library. I I ;::':
i It was agreed that a maximum of two years should be i :::;; : stipulated in the notice. : $',I; : Lease of Ecke property along the beach front. The City i i 'Manager stated he has received a legal description of : ;I:*' #*l:I : Mr. Ecke's property along the beach, and he would en- i ;:'I: i deavor to have a lease prepared for the Council's consid-: 1:::; ; eration at the next regular meeting of the Council.
i Violation of sign ordinance. Cmn. Bierce stated accord-: ;Il*l 1:::: i ling to the sign ordinance blinking signs are not allowed. ; :I;:: : The sign on the "Daisy Donut" establishment is a blinkin4 ;:I ;i:i: I1 i sign. I (('4:
i The City Manager stated he would have the sign checked. i ::;;; i Lights for the Buena Vista Lagoon Area. It was suggest* ;::I: : that consideration be given €or the installation of lights : i in the area of Carlsbad Blvd. and the Buena Vista Lagoo$ D"*' $I : The City Manager stated there is a study being made at i :::i: i the present time for additional lighting throughout the cit;y, i:::: : however, considerable monies are being spent for the I ('I ;:;i: i maintenance of the lights in the city at the present time. : *;*I'
i Lighting district. Cmn. Bierce requested the City Manaier :!* 4; : to inquire as to the procedure Oceanside followed in i setting up their lighting district throughout the city.
# I :I,*,
: committee of the subdivision committee will meet Monda$ : I; ;:, r '8 I evening to further discuss policies for subdivisions, and : ;I:;:
f a report will be made to the Council as to their findings. i * I*:
: RATIFICATION OF BILLS AND PAYROLL:
i Ratification of the bills was given for the general expense$ i of the city in the amount of $10,043.02, and for the Watel: McPhersorf i i 2, I : Department in the amount of $1,823.31, for the period i Bierce :::x; i November 19, 1963 to December 3, 1963, as certified by: Guevara : : ; x: : : the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing i NeiswendeG xi i 4 i i Committee. : Hughes : :x: x: ;
& 'd;:
I p:;:
i:;;: ;::::
I I ::I
$ I ::Il; "iil
I I I iiii: I I *
'I $4: 1;:;;
I I I ;;*!I /:::
I (1' ;::::
I I* ::ii;
::;::
;::::
I :*p: b'
I ;;::;
I
I
'I *I
I
I I
I
I I I I :*::;
I I iiiii ;hi! *:I
;*:a: I I ;p::
* 4:;
I ii;::
1 '~.. 1;;::- ; ; I ;.+I i Subdivision policies. The Council was informed the sub-! * ;*-; *.
:ii:; a I ii:::
I * t ;:;
I I I ::;:; :i;::
I
I
;;#!I
I I b I$*(* ii:;:
I 4 * 4
I
! ! I!!b!
I I I
I
i
; ', ' -\ '8 '\ *'b
I '\, ', ' '3 '8 ' * ' \', "
I I ', " ' 8, ', 7) 1 5 I ', =,'\,, ', ', '.,m
I i of 'y&' '* ,FA, I "_"""""""""" ""*I""""""""""""""" -""""-"";""-"-"""-:?:~:.~:~ "-.
I
I - 10- I : Name ', '?& b ', 8' '?&
I : Member .?.p@, ,c'8<n'b'%$p 4. %&.
I I 'I' I ::;:: i Ratification of the payroll was given for the second hbf i McPher$oni ; I4 i i Qf November, 1963, in the amount of $la,, 369.29, as : Bierce i i : q . ; ; certified by the Director of Finance and approved by the i Guevara I i i x; i : Auditing Committee. : Neiswender; :xiq i
t;:l' i ADJOURNMENT: :;I::
I t ;I;f:
1:::: i By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at lO:21 P. M. :;I:#
;I:::
I I 4:;:
t I :,; 1 * i Respectfully submitted, I * ;I::: ' 1.::
I * ::::;
I * I I ::I;:
I I :';I: ;:,:e
I I I ;:::I
I ;::I,
1 I I I ::':: l;;.I
I I l I ;p;:
I I 'I:':
I I * i:;:'
I I I;*::
I I I I I;::' : I. :
$/I
I I I I ;:::: t 'I
I I I 8 I::::
I I 1 ::;
I I I ;I!:;
I i:t:: 'I
I I :ii:;
I :'::I 81
I I I I ;i:;;
I I I i:;::
I I 1 :I:::
I t I I ;: ii:
.I I t pii: ;:::I :p:;
I 8 i;:ii
i I t I :::::
I I I i:::; '"1;
I I I I .;;:+ ;;I 1
1 ;;::I
I e ::;:;
I I :;;:;
I I I I i;iil
I I ;;'I:
I t ,I:::
I I I 8 :ii:;
I I I;':: * I ::i:; t :::;;
4 I * I I iilii
I ;: 1":
I I I :.;::; 4 *I
I I t ;I:::
I I i:iii
I I I,;,, ;:,*I
I I ;;:::
I I l;l:' t I I :I::;
* I ;::;I
t I ;::::
I s I:ll;
I s :I:::
1 ;:::I
l ;::'I
I l;;;l 11,;:
I !!:;I
* I p:::
I I ::!I;
4 I I j Hughes ;xi ;xi :
I I I I
I I
I
I
I t I
* I I
I I I *
* 8
I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I '::*I
I ;I
I I
I
I
I I I"! I
* I 1 I I I I
I
t I I I
I I
I I s I I
I I
I I
I
I I I
:;;I: I(
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
1 1II11
I a
i I I
4 I :le I $ 1:s *
I I I
I
I 4
J I
I I *
9 I
s e I t I I
;:::;
#
I b
l 1 I
e
J
I I I
f I
8 1;;;;
I I 1
I $
I
I I I
r I :;;:;
;I*:;
! ! ;!!b'