HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-07-21; City Council; Minutesi CITY CF CfiELSBAD I . t ', '\
i Date of Meeting: July 21, 1964 i Name ''t,'8% : Time of Meeting: 7:OO P.M. : of '3 i I Place of Meeting: Council Chambers 1 Member ': ,"""~"""""""""""""""""""~""""""""""""""-~""""-"""
:ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Atkinson, i i Dunne and Neiswender. Comn. Jardine was present : : at 7:05 P.M.. and Cmn. Hughes at ?:18 P.M. Also : i present were City Manager Mamaux, City Attorney I i Wilson and City Clerk Adams, I
: INVOCATION was offered by Rev. Warren of the I I i Carlsbad Union Church. I
i ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. I I i APPROVAL, OF MINUTES:
! i (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of July 21, htkinson I 1964, were approved as presented, Dunne
I be i swe nd er i Cmn, Jardine was present at 7:05 P.M. I
I ! i CORRESPONDENCE:
: (a) Library Board of Trustees, The City Manager :: ! informed the Council the only cprrespondence re- : i ceived was the letter fron the Library Board of ! ; Trustees, and that each member of the Council had! :received a copy of the letter. I
! ORAL COMIvKJNICATIONS: I
i There were no oral. communications. I
i PLANNING:
i (a) John Palmer - re: Letter of resiqnation. I I : Letter dated July 8, 1964 from John T. Palmer, I i submitting his resignation as Chairman and member:
! By motion of the Council Mr. Palmer's resignation: Atkinson i was accepted with regret, and the City Manager : Iknne : was instructed to send a letter of appreciation I Neiswende i to ~lr. Palmer . i Jardine
\, -, ' - I 1 Minutes of: CITY COUFCIL (Reg:.; ;. <.,z !,-,e et ing )i 8' '\ '.\.,
I 4
0
I 1 i
1 I
I
I I
I I I I
I I 8 I 0 - . .. I
I
I
1 I I I I I I 1
I 1
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
8 I
I I
I
I
I
: of the Planning Commission, effective immediately; * I
I . * i (b) kppointment to Planninq Commission. I I I I * ! I i By motion of the Council an executive session was:Atkinson i called, for the purpose of discussing personnel, i Dunne
# : Neiswende I
I
I I I
I i Jardine
I t I The Council adjourned to the adjoining room of .. i : the Council Chambers at 7:08 P.M.
i Crnn. Hughes was present at 7:L8 P.M.
!The meeting reconvened at 7:40 F,M. !
!The Mayor announced that he had been authorized i i by the Council to appoint David Freistadt to the :
I Planning Commission and James Gaiser to the i Library Board of Trustees, Also the purpose of i I calling the City Attorney to the executive ses- i i sion was to discuss possible litigation, but no : ; decision was reached. 8
I I I I I I I I I e
I I
I I I
I I I 8
8 I
I
0 I I I 4 8 I I
i PUBLIC HE~INGS:
0 I t I (a) Resolution Intention #48 of the Planninq Corn-! i mission to consider. an amendment to subsections ;
: qardinq keepinq of horses in R-l Lories.
1 I 6) (b)(l) and (5)(b)(2) of Ordinance #19060, re- :
I 1 I I I I I I
$
1 I I I I I I 1 I :
I t
1
G I I 1
-2-
I . %<'\
: i\~ 3 me ',\ '\$
I $7 f .$
, -_ ..
I '\ '\, '\\ J
8, '\ ',
I .C
I :"~"""-"""""""""""""""~"""""""""""""""""~""~""""" i t+mt;er ':
i The Clerk certified as to proper notice having i / beel? g.i.WM and th3.t no written correspondence ha$ ' been received, !
: The !\tiayor announced the Council would hear from i f all persons wishing to speak in favor of the pr0-i
! ment, I
i DR. Le H. FAIRCHILD, stated he wished to speak id : regards to allowing horses in an R-1 Zone and ; i would like to propose an amendment to the ordi- i
I ante that not more than two horses be allowed in ; i an R-1 zone and that they be placed 70' from any : ; habitation. I
:As there were no other persons desiring to speak,: I the Mayor declared the public hearing closed at i I7:45 P.M. *
:The proposed amendments as recommended by the i i Planning Commission were reviewed. I
i cni-1,. Hi;ghes stated he agreed with Gr. Fairchild. i
; Cmn, Atkinson stated he would not go along with i t the second section as he could not see how YOU : i could have a stall 70' away fron habitation on i : an R-1-10,000 lot . $
i After further discussion the Mayor appointed Cmn.: i Dunnc and Cmn. Atkinson as a committee to study : : this matter and make a report back to the Council: i at the next meeting. The Mayor also requested .*-. ) i the staff to assist in this study. #
I (b) Resolution of Intention #lo41 of the Cit i Council to consider an amendment to Section ;OO i : of Ordinance No. 9060, to allow as a permitted :; :use on-sale and off-sale beer uses as_ an adjunct i :to another business beinq operated on property. i
0
I I t I 3
; posed ammendment or in opposition to the amend- ;
6
I
t
I
$
I I
$ I 1
I I
I 8 I
I 8
i I I
6 b I
9 1
I 1
I I I
I
I I I I I
I I
I I
:The Clerk certified as to proper notice having i
; been received, t
:The Mayor announced the Council would now hear i i from all persons desiring to speak in favor of i I the proposed amendment or opposed to the amend- ; I ment.
:There were no persons present desiring to speak i i in favor of the amendment or in opposition to the! : proposed amendment.
!The Mayor declared the public hearing closed at I i 8:OO P.M. I
. ;Resolution No. 366 of the Planning Commission wasi Ipreaented, recommending approval of the proposed i 1 amendment a I
I :
:The following resolution was presented for the i : Council r s review:
i Resolution No. 1052. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY :=-OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING FIND- ' ! INGS AND DECISION REGAWING AMENDING SECTION 90b :Atkinson : OF ORDINANCE NO. 9000 TO PERMIT ON-SALE AND OFF- i Dunne
; been gl;ven and that RO written correspondence had: I
t I
I s a
e I I 8 I
I I
I I
a I I I
l
a I I
I
I I
I I I I I I
0
: SALE BEER 'IJSES ;:s P,N ADJTJXCT 7.9 ANG;:!: IE;~ BUSINESS i Neiswendc i ON THE SNvIE 1.DT Ib! K-T ZONES j *bias ::.dc;>ted by : Jardine i title only and further rearli-n? waived. i Mughe s
I I l I I I
a I I I # I
a I I I
-8, '\ ', .\,
8'' 1 '. '\ '\
I 1 9 I
I
- 3.- '\ .., '\ i Name x,,'\:: : of y$! 4
I I : Member - ;"""""""""""""""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""" I The following ordinance was presented for a firrstj 3 reading: I I
: Ordinance No. 9171. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF I Atkinson ! CMLSBAD MENDING SUBSECTION (4) OF SECTION 900, i Dwne i OF GRDINANCE NO. 9060 OF THE CITY OF CARLSBaD, : Neiswende~ : was given a first reading by title only and fur-: '1 Jardine ; ther reading waived. : Hughes !
.\'
I 1
! I l e
I 1 (c) Proposed annexation of "South Carlsbad Annex-*! : ation No. l,*5Zn b
! * I I :The Clerk certified as to proper notice having I i been given, s 1
:The Clerk presented letters of protest from the i : following property owners, on the grounds that i i they could not be assured of proper zoning for ;
! their property: !
: Howard F. Barton, Jr., 852 Candlelight Place, La i ! Jol1.a
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I Lawson Martineau, 7250 Ponto Drive i Paul Ivicevic, Cardiff
I t I I I I
I t I I The Mayor announced the Council would hear from ; i all persons desiring to speak in .favor of the t I ;proposed annexation, and those who wish to speak : : in opposition. I I
:MR. HOWARD BARTON, SR., stated he also owns pro- ! i pcrty in the area under ques$ion, He has owned i : this property for approximately 10 years and is ; i in hopes of having the property zoned commercial-: : ly prior to annexation. If they donPt gebirproperi i zoning they will be out of business, t 1
I I
t I
1 ) ! ; &B. 1.RI;V'SON MARTI:NEAt;, stated he wished to with- : d..=av~ his protest if he can be assured of proper i zoning,
1
!
8 f 6 I 1 I I I i As there were no other persond present desiring i : to speak the ?Jayor declared the hearing closed at: i 8:08 P.M.
i A map of the area in question was presented.
i The question was asked if Mr. Howard Barton, Sr:s;: I protest would count as to the percentage protest-: ; ing, and the City Attorney inforned the Council : : only written protests count as to the percentage i i ~f protests received.
i The City Enginee..: informed the Council that 28.85; ! percent of the property owners have protested. !
I Cmn. Hughes requested the City Attorney to inform: : the property owners as to the procedure for zon- i : ing, - I I
i The City Attorney stated the zoning ordinance : provides that all properties come into the city :: i as R-1 zoning. The normal procedure would be fori : the Planning Commission to hold hearings as to : : the proper zoning for this area,, As to the I I existing businesses they will continue on for a i : certain period of time unless the zoning is com- i i patible with their type of business,
i Mayor Neiswendel stated he felt i.c would be in i i order to recGrnmend to the Planning Cornmissi-on '. : : that they take a :.on9 fcoi; ::t thz z.oning in exis-:
I I I 1 I 9 I I I I
I I
I I
# I I I 9
1
I I 1 I
1 I
I I 8 I I
0 * I a 1 1 4
..
I tence. ! !
I
I 1
1 *
. I 8 8.. '\ '\. '\
.. , ., '\ '.,
I 8
I '.. ' . '. 'x
8 * 8 I I I
"- I
I I I I
I I
I """ *""""".."""""""""~""~"""""""""""""""~"
j-csnli, hghes asked the property owners present if ; :they would be in favor of the annexation as long i ias the zoning is compatible, and Mr. Barton and : ih?e Martineau indicated they would be, l
:'ik fOllOWing resolution was persented for the i i Coun,zi.l' s review:
0 I
t I I
I
i I I
-\, '* ,d. dame 8, ':$
'0
Member - '\ 4
of 8 +''
.""""""_
1 :Resolution No. 1053. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY I I !COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CMLSNiiD DECLARING THAT i
:VALUE OF PRIVATELY OWNED TERRITORY AND PUBLICLY :Dunne IO'AINED TERRITORY PLIRBJANT TO &~V€RMMENT COB€ QEL fNeisweAde3 ;TION 35313.2, was adopted by title only and fur- :Jardine i ther reading waived. jHtighe s,
jPROTEST NOT MADE BY OWNERS OF ONE-HALF OF TEE ;Atkinson
I I 1 !The following ordinance was presented for a first i :reading: t I . I I I I :Ordinance No 1089. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF : iCARLSBAD APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UN- !Atkinson :INHABITED TERRITORY y DESIGNATED llSOUIH CARLSBAD" iDunne :ANNEXATION NO. 1.511 TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, was :Neiswende~ !given a first reading by title only and further :Jardine :reading waived. !Hughes
:PLANNING: (Continued) I
I I I I
I I I I I I i(c) Decisj.on on front yard variance re: Eddie R. i :Vasquez - Report from Planning Commission, !
I I t I I I :The Council was informed the variance granted to : :Mr. Vasquez by the Planning Commission. Their i :decision was appealed by adjoining property own- : Iers, and the matter on the appeal was heard by th4 :Council on June 3, 1964. At that time the matter: :was referred back to the Planning Commission for i if urther report. I
!A written report was submitted by three members oft :the Planning Commission, and the members of the i :Council have received a copy of their report. I
I
1 8 8 *
I
I I
I I !After consideration h-y the Council the following : iresolution was presented:
I
I I I I I
!Resolution No. 1054. A RESOLLTION OF THE CITY
:COUNCIL OF THE CITY CIF CAFiLSBAD ANNOUNCING AND DE :Atkinson
iVA3IANCE GqANTED BY THE PLANFUN(; COtW4lSSION TO :Neiswende: :EDDIE R. VASQLJEZ, was adopted by title and furthe4Jardine jreading waived. :Hughes
jMayor Neiswender expressed his a2preciation of t& :report that had been given by the Planning Corn- i jmissioners. I !
I 8
iCL1WING FINDIf\TGS, AND DENYING i.Lp\J APPEAL FROM THE YDunne
I l a
I
I
e
I !(dl Request for extension o€ time on tentative ma{ :for Falcon Hill subdivision - KE-Constructlon ;
~CO., Inc. Letter dated July 17, 1964, from Kamar i :Construction Co. y Inc., was presented, requesting ; ia one year extension for filing the final map due: :to the fact the subdivision has a large number o€ i :lots and it is not economically feasible to build: :this number of houses in one year,
I I
I I # I !By motion of the Council a one year extension of :Atkinson :time was granted on the .tentative .map' of Falcon ;T)unne :Hill subdivision, :Ne i swe nde
I * ; !Jardine
I I :Hughes
I I t $ 8 I & I
I I I I I 8
!
I I
I I I J I
-5 '1
7 .x I , \ -.. .
'\ \ ', I Name '., '3
I I '\\ \\\\\ '
8C
: of .+ '.C
I
"
;" """""""""""--""--"""""""""""""~""""""""-~""----------- I Member ; [GI Tentative-nap of Holly-Brae Estates Subdivi- : : sion, The tentative map of Holly-Brae Estates : a.':.- i ;=vision was presented for the Council* s re- i : view.
i liesolution No. 368 of the Planning Commission was: I presented, recommemding approval of the tentative:
! map subject to certain conditions and restric- ! i tions,
! i The City Planner pointed out that Lot 1 is requir; : ed to have 15,000 sq. ft. due to the fact this : i lot cannot be sewered at this time and will re- i : quire a septic tank. I
I Discussion was given as to no sidewalks in the i I subdivision. The City Engineer informed the I : Council it has been the policy when the lots are ! i15,OOO sq. ft. the city has not required side- ! I walks. I
:The City Engineer advised the Council this map . s: !meets all the requirements, however, he recommend: i ed dry sewers be installed. The engineer and B ;planner for the subdivider requested that they i
! not be installed at this time, t
0 I I
I I I I
I
I I
I
* t I
$ I
8 I I I
I
I
1
i I I
t 4 1 I
: The following resolution was presented: I
I
iResolution NO. 1055, A RESOLUTIGN OF THE CITY !Atkinson i COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, APPROVING THE : Dunne I TENTATIVE MAP OF HOLLY BRAE ESTATES SUBDIVISION, iNeiswende i was adopted by title only and further reading i Jardine : waived. ;Hughes
I I I : ENGINEERING:
I t I $
0
l a I i (a) Authorization €or Chanqe Order No. 1, Aqua ! IHedionda Interceptor Sewer, Project 1-33. A lettet :from Wayne Lill, consulting engineer for the pro-: i ject, was presented by the City Engineer, stating! :the San Diego Gas & Electric Company proposes : i that the city serve this pump station with under-! : ground electrical conduit from a pole near Fox's ;
! landing. They, in turn are rebuilding their ! ; overhead system from that pbin-t. The City did i i not receive the San Diego Gas & Electric Com- I : pany's firm proposal until June, and as this was ! i during the bidding time it was decided that the i :matte.? best be handled by a change order after : i award of contract. The estimated cost €or the I ; underground conduit is $2,959.72. I
i By hotion of the CDuncif authorization was given !Atkinson i for Change Order #1, in the amount of $2,959.72. i Dunne
I : Neiswende
I i Jardine
1 I : Hughes
t
I
I I I
I
I I
r
s 1 ! (b) Extension of Enqineerinq Contraci; - Aqua Hed-: Iionda Interceptor Sewer and Downtown Force Main, ; ;Project 1-33, AssociLated Enqineers. The City !Engineer axvised the Council the City has contern-! :plated having Mr. LilZ do the inspection on this ; !project, however, his contract does not call for i :this service. The City Engineer requested that ; i the contract with Associated Engineers be extend-! led to cover this service. I
.-r
I I "
I 8 I 1 I I 8 I 1 i I I B I I I 1
1 I I I a * i I I I t I 4 I 4 I
t
I
6 e
I
I 8.
I * b, ', '8 .',
t -6-
1 ; of ',c I '85 I ! Member - ;""""""""""""""~""""""-"""""""""~"""""""~"""---""" :By motion of the Council it was agreed that the :Atkinson Icontract with Associated Engineers be extended to jDunne :cover inspection service.
I 4 l
, \ \\
I . '\ ' ', x '8 : Name ', 'x$
I
I 0
Neiswender
V I !Jardine
I I :Hughes ! I i (c) Adoptinq and submittinq a budqet €or expendi- !
:The City Engineer presented a proposed budget for: %ure I of Gas Tax Funds for fiscal, year 1964-65, I :
!expenditure of funds allocated from the State a I
:Highway Fund to Cities in the amount of $76,150.04 !which included $24,150,00 for maintenance and 1
:$52,000.00 for an anticipated improvement distric4 ifor Jefferson Street from Elm Avenue to Las Flore4 :Dr. It will be necessary €or the Council to ap- : ;prove this budget by way of adopting a resolution?
!The following resolution was presented:
:Resolution No. 1057. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY :COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ADOPT4Atkinson
iFUNI3.S A,LLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGE-IlrJAY FUND TO ~Neiswende~ :CITIES, was adopted by title only and further :Jardine jreading waived. :Hughes
I I 1 I 1 1 8 I I I I
I I
imG AND SUBMITTING A BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF . fDunne
I L
t I :LIBRARY: I I I I I I(,) Appointment to Library Board of Trustees. Thi; :appointment was made previously in the meeting. i
i(b) Resolution Nn. 1047, determininq that public i jinterest and necessity demand the acquisition and : :construction of a certain municipal improvement i i and rnakinq findinqs relative thereto. The City : :Manager stated the Council took this matter under: i advisement pending Cmn. Atkinsonl s return, I I
:A short recess was called at 8:54 P.M. The meetin4 ;reconvened at 9; LO P. j v I
I !
iCmn. Jardine stated this matter of the library : :comes up at a time when there are many capital imi ;provements before the city. It is his own person+ \a1 feelings that it is going to be necessary €or : :the various city officers to do the job that the i !people of the City of Carlsbad have asked. They : :have asked that improvements be provided. The be: !ginning of this capital improvement program will ; ; start in a study being made by DMJM. It will be i :essential that we appeal for the funds in a way ; :the electorate will understand. It is also his i {feeling that the library should be integrated b t
:with other capital improvements. Therefore he i jwould like to submit to the Council a motion deny+ :ing a bond issue for the library at this time. I
i Cmn. Sardine's motion was seconded by Cmn. Atkin-i
'I I I *
1 I I
I
I I I I I
I son. I
$ e I l 1 : Cmn. Hughes stated there are 400 people who have ! !worked on this project and he felt they were en- i jtitled to a vote by the people of Carlsbad, Also: :he €elt it was in order to vote on the resolution: i that has been presented to the Council. * 6 1 I I
0 I i Cmn. Jardine and Cmn. Atkinson withdrew their :motion.
1
I I I I t I I I 8 * t I I 8
~ ,.
4- . .. ..
I 1 1 I I I s I I t I I t I 8 I 1 I I 4 * I
1 I
I \, -, '\ -. . I 8. '\ ', ' 1 .
f I I v 0 I I
- ; ^,. c
I I -\, '\, '\ I Name '\, $ : of '%
\ \'
0
I ! ~"""""~~""~"""~"""""""" """"""-------------------- ;Resolution No, i047. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY : COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DE- iTERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY : DEVAND THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF CER- iTAIN hWMICIPAL IM3PCVE"I AND PL4KING FINDINGS iRELATING THERETO, failed to pass for lack of a
I I
1
1
""
! I I I 1
I 1 I I I I I
Member "_ """ "_ ' <I
1 -
! mend,
I
4 !
I ! Cmn. Dunne stated he felt the Council was all in i jaccord with the need for a library that is ade- i :quat% He agreed that the Library Board and the ; :Freinds of the Library have done a tremendous job; itjowever, he has not been convinced that the city : jneeds a facility costing $400,000. I 8
' :By motion of the Council it was agreed that DMJM i :be authorized to undertake a subsidiary study for :Atkinson !the precisa plan of a library to be integraJcecl lDunne :with the overall capital imprcvement plan as :-.--.:. :Neiswende~ :necessary for the orderly development of city fa- IJardine :cilities.
! %t. ROBERT STAUBER stated he was speaking on be- i jhalf of the Library Board of Trustees. If this i :motion had been presented six months ago he would: !be more enthusiastic. This has been a frustrat- I :ing project. It seems to be in the minds of the ; !Council the inadequacy of the planning. These i :plans have been reviewed by the Library Board of i !Trustees and the Council. The basic factor seems : :to hinge on the growth of the community. The orif iginal scope of the work was done in accordance : !with the American Library standards, They have i :tried to satisfy the Council that they have a I 1 !group (Friends of the Library) who are willing to i !work on this project. In closing Mr. Stauber re-: :quested the Council to call for an election. $ &iR. JACK I<UBOTA, stated in the Council's delibera: itions they want the Master Planners to undertake : ithe validity of a library. In previous action th$ :Council authorized negotiating €or a public works; :yard. If the Council proposes to have the plan- i iners look at this library, then why don't we have: Ithe planners consider other projects such as 8
:public works, etc.
:The City Manager informed Mr, Kubota that the tit; :has not proposed to purchase the land for the I :public works yard, and that matter has been dis- i !cussed with the planning consultants. I
\Cmn. Hughes asked what the. ti-miwould be on such i I a study by DAliJM? !
iCmn. Jardine stated hs had talked with Mr. Norwood :of Dh4JM, and he assured him that this study would! :be made in suff icient tine. t 1
I 0 I t 4
I
I I 1 !Hughes
I
I 8 !
I I I
I I I
I 1 t l a
I I
I 1 I I !NEW BUSINESS:
I
I I t i
a
I I i (a) First readinq of Ordinance ftt6035, amendinq and jrepealinq certain sections of Ordinance No. 6015. : :reqardinq cardrooms. A copy of the proposed or- i :dinance was presented by the City Attorney. a 1 I
I I
iCmn. Jardine stated this ordinance in effect puts! :a man out of business. This man has done businesi :under a license issued by the city, and we know : :of no objections to the operation of his business.!
!
I 8
1 I I I
I t I 6
1 I
I *
I
8 1
e I 4
I 1 \\ ', ', -,
I ,\\' I '. ', '\ ' I I
I
1
I 1 -*, , 'x \ ' '\
I -8-. i Name '\.'$ I t i of '\S I 85
;By motion of the Council the City Attorney was :Atkinson i instructed to amend the existing ordinance to prokDunne i hibit any future licenses being issued, and that ;Neiswende: lthe existing license be allowed to exist. i Jardine
~"""""""""""""""""""~"""""""-~"-""--""-~-----;-------"--"-- I ! Member 1
e I 1 i Hughes I t
I 8 i (b) First readinq of Ordinance #j 1088, amendinq '! I Ordinance 81040 concerninq appeal of dismissal of! i City Manaqer. The City Manager informed the I :Council this amendment was prepared upon his re- i !commendation. The reason for making +his recorn- ! ;mendation is the manager would have the cighk 26 I i appealc:his: case bef ore--:the-?'s.ane bod9 ,that:.di,ssmis- : : sed him. I
:Cmn. Atkinson inquired if this section were re- I !moved would there be any other body that the man-: lager could appear before, and he was informed I I i there is no other body. I
9
I I
I I s I
i
I I
4 I
!The following ordinance was presented for a first i i reading: I
!
I I 1 I :Ordinance No. 1088. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF /Atkinson I CMLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1040 REGARDING :Dunne :OFFICER OF CITY MANAGER, was given a first read- :Neiswendel Iing by title only and further reading waived. !Jardine
! !Cmn. Hughes stated he would like to have the City I !Code revised and modernized.
$layor Neiswender asked that all the members revie4 :the code and make their recommendations to the I !City Manager.
!OLD BUSINESS : I
I I I :Hughes
#
I I
I I I I
I I
I t e s
I I I I I s :(a) Second readinq of Ordinance #9169, chanqinq i :certain desiqnated property from Zone R-3 to C-2. i :Applicant: Younq and Bower. The following ordin- : iance was presented for a second reading: I I
I I
!Ordinance No, 9349. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF itkinson ;CARLSBAD ATdENDiNG ORDINANCE NO. 9060 CHANGING CER-flunne ITA334 DESIGNATED PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-3 TO ZONE C-meiswende~ :was given a second reading and adopted. !Jardine
I Hughes b
! I
:(b) Second readinq of Ordinance #1087, imposinq a ! itax upon the privilege -o~.::tr.~sieO:t,occupa~~-.,.an4~
jprovidinq for the collection thereof . I
I
I I
:(b) Second readinq of Ordinance #1087, imposinq a ! itax upon the privilege -o~.::tr.~sieO:t,occupa~~-.,.an4~
jprovidinq for the collection thereof . I
I
I I
I s jCHARLES IE.FALTERII1AN, stated he was representing : :the Surf iGotel in Carlsbad. He is oposed to this I :tax as Oceanside does not have it and transients i ivill drive 4 or 5 blocks to Oceanside, San Diego ; !has a petition signed by 14,000 to appeal this i :legislation. In a large town such as Los Angeles : !it would not hurt. In his opinionthe city will i :lose quite it bit of business if this tax is im- ; ipo sed. I
?he following ordinance was presented for a second:
I I
I I 8 I
;reading: I
1
I I
0 1 Qrdinance No. 1087, AN ORDINANCE CF THE CITY OF i Atkinson ~CAFX%AD IMPOSING X TX UPON THE PRIVILEGE OF : Dunne
~RANSIEN OCCUPANCY.M\TD PROVIDING FO~ THE COLLEC- i ~eiswendl XION THE~EOF~ Was grven a second reaoing and adoptbdardine :ed . : Hughes I I I 1
I 1 I s I I I I
i t I I b !
I I I
7 I I I I I I I I I I I *""""""""""""--"""""". : CITY ATTORNEY f S REPORT : !
1
-9-
1 I
I I * I I
i .""",""""""""""*"""""~-.
I I I
-8, ', ' '\
3, '\,'88 '
, 8 '\ '8 \ 8
Name 8x,'h$
of 8*
Member 'I .""""""_
P I I I ;Claim for damaqes. Letter dated June 23, 1964, I !from Mrs. Helen S. Welch, claimins damaoe from ! ;injury sustained during construction and improve-! i rnent of Harding and Oak streets. I ! 4 ! I :By motion of the Council the claim was denied andjAtkinson jreferred to the insurance carrier. : Dunne
I I I INeiswende:
I I :Hughes
I
I I : Jardine
I $ I I I I !Execution of enqineerins contract for Valley :. :Street sewers. The engineering contract between I :Tanner, Marquardt and Associates and the city has; i been executed. I I
:Sewer plant site, Possession of the sewer plant : !site has been acquired. I
:Executive session, The City Attorney requested a$ !executive session to discuss possible litigation.:
:The Council agjourned to an adjoining room of the: !Council Chambers at 1O:lO P.M. I v
:The meeting reconvened at 10:18 P.M.
!The Mayor announced discussion was had as to pos- i jsible litigation, but no decision was reached. I t
I-
I I
I I I
I I
I I
I i
I I 1 I
I I t I I I I I
I I
1 I
I I I I I I I I
: crry MANAGER 1 s REPORT : I- I I :Acceptance I- of temporary permit - Joint Sewer Pro- i :Ject , A temporary construction permit exeCUtf$d .bj jthe Nature Conservancy, granting to the City of : :Ca:rlsbad and the Vista Sanitation District, the i
;received. Acceptance of this permit is needed. ;
:The following resolution was presented:
!Resolution No. 1056. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY : ~COTJNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING AND AC- !Atkinson :CEPTING TEMPORARY PERMIT FOR USE IN CONSTRUCTION iDunne !WITH VISTA SANITATION DISTRICT - CITY OF CARLSEAD Neiswende :JOINT SEWER PROJECT, was adopted by title only ancjJardine !further reading waived. :Hughes
:Reservations for Leaque of California Cities Con- : ivention. Mayor Neiswender requested the members 03 :the Council to notify the City Manager as to theil: !intentions of attending the League Convention, I
!Traffic on Ocean Street. Cmn. Atkinscn requested i
:traffic situation on Ocean Street between Beech ; !and Cypress. I I I
jright to install and remove a pipe line has been ! :
I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I I I I
I I
I I 8
jthe Traffic Safety Committee to investigate the 1
e
t i 1 PAYMENT OF BILLS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL:
I !
t I 1 I I
!Authorization was given for the payment of bills i :for the general expenses of the city in the amoun6 !of $46,338.35 and €or the Water Department in the IAtkinson :amount of $12,851.31 for the period July 7, 1964 :Dunne jto July 21, 1964, as certified by the Acting :Neiswende :Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing !Jardine :Committee. 3iughe s
I : + I
I 1 I I I I I I I * I I I I I I
1 !
I I
I
a
e
v
I t I t
I -\, '\\ '\ '\,
I * \\ '. '. I I 1
%' '\ '\ '\
-LO- : Name '\, '%
I : of '$
:Ratification I of the payroll was given for the \ Atkinson
I I I
I ~""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-"""""""""~-"---"--"--- : Member ':
:first half of July, 1964, in the amount of : Dunne !$18,844.61, as certified by the Acting Director iNeiswende i of Finance and approved by the Auditing CommitteeLJardine
I I I i Hughes
I 1 .I
I 1 8 *
i ADJOURNMELT : I
I I !By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at I
! 10~23 P.M. I
I I I I
I I I I I I i Respectfully submitted, I I
!
:Y !a%ET E. ,4DiUvlS i CityiClerk t I
t 1
I
I
I I
4 ,#? d,f.&;, 7 1, /L- I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I f I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I !
I I f t I I I I I I 8 I I I I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I
I
I 1 I b f I e I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I
! I
1 I I 1 I I 1 I l 1 I * L I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I f I I I
1
I t
! !
I I I I I I I I * 1 + I I I I I I I I I 1 8 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I b I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I * * I I I I 1 I I I I * I I 1
! I
I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I * I I + I 1