Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-12-15; City Council; Minutes; lwnutes of: CITY CCUNCIL (Aegular Meeting) :Date of Meeting: December 15, 1964 i Time of Meeting: 7:Oi) P. &!I. I >!&me \, -:! : Place of Meeting: Council Chamhers : G' '3 :~"""""""""""""""-""""""""""".."""-~"-""""~""""""". i XLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Atkinson, Eunnk : Neiswender and Jardine. Councilman Ehghes was present: i at 7: 05 P. M, Also present were City Manager Mamaux, I I City Attorney VI ikon and City Clerk Adams. I I I -. ' \ '? I \' t '\\ ", '*, ', ', ' I I : MerTiber 0 I t t 1 t INVOCATION was offered by Chaplain MI J, Bouterse, of .i i the Carlsbad Union Church. 1 I ; 4 I I i ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. i 4 I b 1 I I ! i APPAGVAL OF MZKUTES: I : Atkinson : 1964,were approved as submitted. ; Neiswendel I t I * I 1 (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of December 1, IDunne I I Jardine I I : Sughes I I I I I I 1 1 I Mayor Neiswender acknowledged the presence of the ; Eighth Grade Class from Fine Avenue School, who were I I present to observe Council procedures. 8 8 ! I s I i CCd,RESFCNDENCE: I I I I b I ! t % (a) Bequest for waiver of paving on Ccean Street in i I - i connection with lot split - Kamar Construction Go, , Inc. i i Letter d-d December 8, 1564, from Karnar Construction: : Co., Inc. , requesting waiver of paving on Ocean Street in ; D connection with a lot split. i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the lot split be i Dunne i approved and that an improvement agreement be entered {NeiswendeY : into between the City and Kamar Construction Co., Inc. , ! Jardine jfor the paving of Gcsan Street. : dughes "- I I I I I A tkinson I I I I I I I I (b) Letter dated December 14, 1964, from the Army : : and Navy Academy, stating the Army and Navy Academy i i executed an agreement with Kamar Construction Co. to : : trade a portion of Lot A for Lot 47 in Granville Park. It i i has come to their attention that before final approval of thd : lot split and Kamar Construction Co. can begin develop- i i ment of its portion of Lot A, agreements as to full street : i improvement must be signed. The Army and Navy Acade-i I my requests that, upon posting of suitable bond, it be al- : : lowed not to undertake its portion of the improvements un-; 1 til it can be determined whether or not a 191 1 Act Improv9- i ment District can be formed. I 1 i By motion of the Council it was agreed that the request foriAtkinson :waiver of imrpovements on Ocean Street be granted, and jDunne : that an improvement agreement be entered into between :Neiswender i the City and the Army and Navy Academy. : Jardins I I 1 I t I I i Hugnes I I S I 4 I I I : ; GiL4.L CC.~~~MTJNICA.TIONS: .I_" I I i Di3. ItON PACKA;i';D stated he was representing the profesi : sional group. They have met since the business license i !ordinance was amended and they are concerned a-bout the t ; action faken against the professional group. The question4 i they would like to ask are: (I) Lth;y the increase is neces- ; ; sary? (2) I4 hy the professional groq was specifically is$ i lated out? (3) Vd hy the Council did not see fit to accept the : : recommendation of the Chamber of Commerce group, :whereby they recommend that no basic chnge ke made in i I the ordinance? ? : The increase they have received is out of ii?e in compar- i i ison to other cities and they would like 40 !<now why the i :change was made? 4 I 1 4 I I I I I I 4 0 I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I s I I 4 I * S * L I I I I I 1 I ''.\ \ ', 8 '\ '\ ' I I \ ', '\ '\ * -2- I ', 8 '\ I : cf yt? I I I I i %a me '.,,'$ ! ; I Member ti ~""""""""""~""""""""""""""""""""""""""","""""""-. I : I 4 I 0 i I I * I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I ! t I I I 1 b f I * I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. I I I Mayor Ne.iswender informed Dr. Packard a team has i heen working on this ordinance. 13. meeting T\;as held at : the school to discuss the busir-ess license ordinance and i a,i>proxi.mate!.y 12 people showed xp, We have ~lso given : the group from the Council and tlie Channber of Commercb six months to bring in a good working ordinance for next i year. It is the Council's intention to go ahead with the I ordinance as amended. I t I I I Cmn, AtKinson stated the amendment was based on ap' i proximate gross receipts in relation to other business ; license fees. The City Manager stated it is very difficult to come up i with an ordinance that will make everyone happy. The : staff recommended that everyone be placed under gross i ordinance. Dr Packard stated his own business license would be les$ if it were placed under gross receipts; however, he per- : sonally would oppose a license based on gross receipts. i They are concerned at this time rather than waiting the : result of a study. I I . I I I I receipts and the Chamber group did not recommend this ; b 8 * I I I : Cmn, Dunne stated the Council has an open mind and the i i members of the Chamber have an open mind, and he did i : not feel the matter should be prejudged. I I i Mayor Neiswender informed Dr. Packard it is the Coun- i i cil's feeling that within six months the group should be i i able to come up with a workable ordinance. I I i Mii, GEOdGE €€EN&Y asked €or clarification of the or- i ; dinance concerning the professional group. Does the i i ordinance mean a person engaged in the business or does: : this mean each person in the office. i The City Attorney informed Mr. Henry the ordinance >' i I states each person engaged in a profession or semi-pro- ; : fession. I I I I I I I I I I 1 $ I * I I I I I a b * 0 I I I I I I 1 t I 8 : I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I f b I I I I I I I I I t 4 I I I I I I I 1 b I * I I I I 1 I I t ! I I I I I Chamber of Commerce Budget. Mr. Tony aoward-Jones i presented the Council rre mbers with a schedule showing i funds expended from July 1, 1964, to December 1, 1964,; in the amount of $2,747.47. Also a schedule was pre- i sented showing commitments for the Spring and Summer ; of 1965 in the amount of $2,900.9il. Mr. Howard-Jones informed the Council the Chamber ori: ginally requested $8,650. GO. They are requesting ap- ; proval of the balance of the money in the amount of adver:isir?g, which would be a $u&@gp@i in the . --; New Years edition of theA imes ewspaper. This ! adci will c;>st $2, 700. 00. They are in hopes of getting : some cocperation from other businesses in the city. Als6 they are considering a half page add wich would run I I $1, 350. I I I I I I I $5,900. 00. They are working on one commitment for I $ I I I I I Mayor Neiswender stated when the money was placed in i the budget the Council was in hopes the Chamber would ; come up with a definite plan for the Y~?E:L-. After discussion by the Council by m:.. cim ci' .i-hr;? C..:l.~;~cil i Atkinsor Mayor Neiswender was authorized in celease .... IC balacce; Dunne of the monies to the Chamber in accordauct-, wit?. the bud: Neiswen get as he sees fit. : Jardine : Hughes I I I I I ,- I 4 ! I & I I I I I I I I I * I I s 8 I I I 8 I I I I - 3- I I I"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""*""""""""~" I I I I I I * I I s 8 I I I 8 I I I I - 3- I I I"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""*""""""""~" '\ '\\ '\ -\, '\ '. ' , -. '\ Name '\ '.?r Of '\,& ,% ,< .I F?en-ber ' """"""_ :Request for lot sp1i.t and waiver of improvemezt ?33c?na.ld A. : :Erje;gs, Jr. Mr. Eriggs stated he had a lot s.p'-j.t pmciing. ; ;at. would like to know what the City's irz.i;errlf.cn S.s 2s far as I :impraving Park D?*iT.re, He has 1Wiu foot frontage on Park ; !Drive, and between he and his father t-iey have %/ 3rds of I :one side of the street. i3e would like to see a 1911 Act Prq- !t@edi~-~$i~ ifistigated from the 9umme1 properiy to the lago-! \ ion. Mr Briggs inquired if the City would improve the 8 8 1 "_""""___ ."""_".-." "" t I" --. " - .. 0 :street if he put in curb and gutter? :The City Engineer informed the Council they do not have i ithe official grade established for Park Drive. I I iMr, Briggs requested wakver of street improvements for i ;at least one lot as the purchaser would like to commence i !building immediately. I I !After further discussion by motion of the Council it was : :agreed that the request for waiver of street improvements !Atkinson jbe granted on Lot I, that a written agreement be entered Dunne :into between the City and Mr. Briggs, and that a bond or iNeiswender !cash be posted in the amount of the street improvements :Jardine :for the three remaining lots. !Hughes I 4 I 4 I I I I B I 8 I I , :ENGINEEn%INC: - I i I 8 I 8 I 8 (a) aemlock Street Improvements - 1411 Act Proceed-! 1, :xs. The Engineering Department requested this matter i jdefFrred as the Contractor had not completed the work. : - I I I : i t (b) &eport on petition for 1911 Act.1rnprovement Dis- ! : trict for Buena Vista V, ay. The Engineering Department i jinformed the Council that at the last Council meeting they i " : i t (b) &eport on petition for 1911 Act.1rnprovement Dis- ! : trict for Buena Vista V, ay. The Engineering Department i jinformed the Council that at the last Council meeting they i " fwere instructed to contact the property owners on Buena i :Vista V: ay to see how many property owners were against : :the 1911 Act proceedings. The property owners were con-: i tacted and 41.6670 have stated they will protest a 191 1 Act : :proceedings for the improvement of Buena Vista b ay. 8 !SO. 12% have stated they were in favor of the improvements: :Cmn. Dunne Asked what the proposed street width was. i !Mr. Thornton stated they are proposing a 50' right of way,! :which would require 5' from the property owners. The : ;city would contribute 39% of the cost. I ! jCm. Dunne inquired if the City could contribute a greater i !percentage participation, as he felt there was justification : :in an increase. :Cmn. Jardim inquired if the school could contribute more.: :The City Attorney stated he would have to check as to the i i school contrlbuting more. s * ICmn. Duni;e stated he felt 50% participation should be the i :minimum fOi* the City to contribute. 9 I :The City Mmager informed the Cogncil Cas Tax funds !could not be used for this street. The rnoney would have i :to come fr0.m the Street Fund. + 8 * I t 4 I I I I I 1 I 8 I 8 I I * I I i I s I I I I I 4 I I 8 1 B 8 I I I * !Mi& FELEN FELKNELZ, 1.W 3wna ?is's Way, stxted i :she could not understand why all the .z;t,&ion i.s Lziw :focused on Eueaa Vista t', ay. Las Fiores 13rls.o will scon i !be paved and this will take care af ;?. gyeat deal of the traf- I ific. In order to ta.ke more right of vm.7 on B.t~cnz T.:.::cta, ; !trees an.d shrubs will have 'co be r2moved, ZEA. chc. ealzld i jnot see :IOF th':lis woulrf benefit aziy of the prq~~iy mners : :on Buena Vista. The Cit~ has jwt recatntfy m-tootheci i Buena Vista. I 0 I a I I I I # I 8 * I I I ! I I I i t L a I I \\ .\ - ' . " '\ I * I I I I -4- I 8",t t \\\ '*.\ '\\ i Na me "8, '.'$ I I i of '\.V I \g I I Member ' ~"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-~"""""""- J MR. ASHLEY stated the main thinking in improving : Buena Vista is that the street is too narrow and not wide I I ; enough to park cars parallel. I i Cmn. Atkinson stated as long as we do not have sufficient i i percentage in favor of this improvement, he felt the mat- 4 : ter should be neld in abeyance until the property owners i i are ready.. i After further consideration, by motion of the Council it ! Dunne I was agreed that this matter be held in abeyance mtil i Neiswende~ i there is the necessary 60% in favor of the &Feet improve ! Jardine : ments, i Hughes 8 f I t 0 4 I I I I I : Atkinson I I 1 I I I I (c) Approval of Freeway Agreement. The Council was! i informenmgreement includes the portion of the Free-: 1 way from Cannon doad north to the City limits, * ! A map of the proposed right of way was presented for the ! i Council's consideration. Mr. Thornton pointed out that I;: : the State will construct a four-lane bridge at Tamarack i i Avenue only if the City improves Tamarack Avenue to a : : four-lane street. Mr. Thornton also pointed out this plan:h I i will create a drainage problem on Pi0 Pico. The City is i I in hopes of joining in with the State to install drainage ; ; either down Pi0 Pic0 or the Freeway. i After fwther consideration, the following resolution was i i presented: I I i ;'desolution No. 1085. A RESCLUTFON OF TSE CITY : BETWEEN TaE STA.TE CF CAL1FC;EIL'IA AND THE CITY! Atkinson i CCVEdING ROAD 11-SD-5 BETKEEN 0. 3 MILE NG3TH : Dunne.. i GF CANNON i2C;kD AND 0.2 SOUTH OF JWNCTIGN I Neiswende ! waived. i aughes I I I t I I t I 4 I I I I I 1 I a I I t I : CCUNCIL OF THE CITY CF CAdLSBAD AUTHGdIZING i i THE MA.YOi3 TO EXECUTE, FREEVIAY -4.GiWEMEB.T : i A~CUTE 78, was adopted by title only and further reading : Jardine 8 I I i PLANNING: I * I I * 4 4 I I t (a) Tentative map of Carlsbad Country Homes Subdi- i i vision (CTntinued). An area map was presented and a map: ! showing the proposed extension of Elm Avenue. I I i Mayor Neiswender asked if any changes had been made i ; to the original map that was presented. ! A written report from the Engineering Department was i i presented. Mr. Thornton pointed out to the Council the : ; subdivider proposes an estate type of development and the: i extension of Elm Avenue would route through the proposea : development. Falcon Rills subdivision was approved ap- i i I proximately 1 1/2 years ago and it was designed around ; : the extension of Elm Avenue. Due to the topcgraphy of I I the area the city is forced to curve Elm Avenue at the : : crest, and they are in hopes of having not more than 6 to i i ?YO grade. i MA. E3NEST ADLE22, subdivider, presented several ' i maps, stating one of the objections of the Engineering De-i I partment was the divider in Donna Drive, which has been I i eliminated. They have also eliminated two lots to allow ; ; for the extension of Elm Avenue. A map of San Eiego : i County shows Elm Avenue running in a ,.;-traight line. The: ; Master Street Plan adopted by the city in 1957 s!:ows Elm i : Avenue to the south and it is now propsed to the north. ; i One reason the Planning Commission rejected their map i i was that they interfered with the proposed route of Elm ; : Avenue; also that they did not take into consideration the i "- I I I I * s 1 * * I t I s * I I I I 0 I 8 I I I I I 8 ! I * I I ! 4 8 * 4 I '\\\' 8. '. ', '*. ,I i 8 -5- '*, '\ ', I i Name 'x,'%$ I : Member .I 1 I * 1 -- '\ ?, t 8 : of *$ I :""""~""""""""""""""~"""""."""""""""""""~""""""~" lerrtengion af E~YI Ave~us in accordance with the tentative i !map of Falcon ilills. ' ' They have complied with Ordinance ; 0 Iti9050; they do not interfere with the route to El Camino i I "2eal; and the gubdivision does not interfere with the Mas- : 1;er Street plan. I I :Mr. Adler further stated they did not feel. the proposed i :route of Elm Avenue was the most feasible route, as they ; !could see no reason why the road should not be straight : lthrough to the .crest. &So it is their feeling that exception& :were given to Falcon Hills subdivision that have not been i !given to them, i. e. access from 12 lots to Elm A.venue. : :In closing Mr. Adler asked the Council if they felt they did: :not have sufficient information, and if so would they prefe~ :to continue the matter. I b !After considerable discussion by the Council the following : :resolution was presented: I I idesolution No. 1082. A dESOLUTICN OF T23Z CITY :Atkinson :"cFTCITY OF CAkZLSBAD, DENYING TKE :Dunne :TE.NTATIVE MAP OF CA.HLSBAD COUNTAY HOMES i iNeiswender jSUEDIVISION, was adopted by title only and further read- :Jardine I ing waived . :Hughes :The tentative map of Ocean Vlew Estates was presented i I a I I I I I t I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I (b) Tentative map of Ccean View Estates Subdivision. i ifor the Council's review, I I I I I I :The Engineering Department informed the Council that the I !map complied with all the requirements of Crdinance No. i 19050; however, there is a water situation created by this : !subdivision. 750' of off-site water line will have to be con: jstructed from Chestnut Ave. to the southeasterly corner : ;of the proposed subdivision through an easement, to pro- i !vide adequate water system for the subdivision. Does the I :Council wish to require the subdivider to pay the extra . , :amount? Ittwill cost approximately $4, 300. V. hen this : :Line is completed the City will construct a connection from: jthe northerly boundary of the proposed subdivision to the i :existing water system in Seacrest Estates, which will give; :a limited benefit to Seacrest Estates. Some areas of the : :Seacrest Estates have low pressure. I I :Don k€olly, engineer for the subdivider, stated the reason i ;crest Estates is in trouble. I I !Mr. Thornton stated at the present time the City is engag- i Iing in a Master Plan and this line is only to be constructedi :as an interim system until this Master Plan is completed. : iCmn. Jardine stated he felt this was a matter for the staff.! :By motion made by Cmn. Jardine and seconded by Crnn. ; iDunne the matter was referred to the City staff as to the i :percentage of City participation recommended, and a re- : !port made back to the Council. i s :Discussion was given as&o the percentage of City partici- i Ipation. Mr. Thornton stated he felt probably 50%; how- : :ever, he did not feel that this Participation should set a i ;precedent for future subdivisions, as this is an unvisual i I * I I ithe developer had to provide an easement was because Seat: $ I I I 1 I I I I I I a I I I I ;situation, + 4 I 8 I I I I a I :Cmn. Jardine and Cmn. Dunne withdrew their motion. I I :The following resolution was presented: I I I I 1 I I I I t I * I 4 I I I I ! I & I 1 IS ; 1 e I a -6 - I I ', 8, *\ ' \ *' I '. '" '. I I -*, '\ ', i Name '.,'%$ 8 I I : of '3 I : Member ', ~"""~"""""""~"-"~"""~""""~""""~."""~---"--"-""-~-""--"-"--- :desolution No. 1084. A &ESC.LU?rCN CF ?'HE CITY I T3.E CITY OF CPd,LSBAD, AFPIECVING : :THE TENTATIVE MAP C-F GCEAN VIEVv ESTATES SUB- i IDIVISICZ.N, subject to the final approval by the Council as ;Atkinson ;to the amount of city participation to the off-site water 1ine:Dunne :for the subdivision, at the time the final map is presented, :Neiswender :said resolution being adopted by title only and further read+Jardine :ing waived. :Hughes ire: Buena Vista Lagoon. A memorandum from the Carls- ; ;they recommended that the Council consider the adoption ; !of a joint resolution between the City of Carlsbad and the i :City of Oceanside regarding the Buena Vista Lagoon. A ; !proposed resolution was attached to the memoradum. jCmn. Atkinson inquired as to whether this proposed reso- i :lution had been approved by the Gceanside Planning Com- : jmission. s I \The Council was informed that a committee from the Carls: :bad Planning Commission had been working with the City : !of Gceanside. 1 !Mayor Neiswender stated he had an understanding with the i :Mayor of Gceanside that any matters concerning both citieq $would be discussed by them prior to any action being takeq; 9nd he requested this matter deferred until he heard from i $he Mayor of Oceanside. I bNE: h BUSINESS: :The City Manager inform.ed the Council the following reso-! ilutions had been prepared for the Council's consideration i Sn connection with the application for the Library: I j3esolution No. 1087. A RESCLUTION CF TEE CITY :Dunne :CCUNCIL OF TiIE CITY CF CARLSBAD STATING INTEM-jNeiswender jby title ...only and furtner reading waived. ;Hughes ji+?solution No. 1088. A iaSOEUTION OF Ti35 CITY I I ;COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF CA.3LSBAD AUT;IORIZING :Atkinson :THE CAKLSBAD LIBi<AdY BOA~D CF T~USTEES TG i~unne i JGIN IN AND PA&TICIPATE IN AN ESTABLISXME3T , :Neiswender !GRANT FOet THE COCPEBATIVE LIE3ARY SYSTEM, .; Jardine :was adopted by title only and further reading waived. {Hughes !Mayor Neiswender stated he would like to express appreci: !ation and thanks on behalf of the City of Carlsbad for the i :excellent Christmas Display by the San Diego Gas & Eke- ; i tric Company. !OLD BUSINESS: I LcGu-Nc-Im-F I I 0 I I I 8 4 I (c) Memorandum - Carlsbad City Planning Comrnissio4 6 imkflning Commission was presented, wherein ! ! I I I I I 1 I I I I I I s I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I e I t I :Atkinson i TIBN TO CALL SPE CIAL BGND ELECTIGN, was adopted !Jardine I I * I I a I I I I t I 4 I I 1 I 1 I I e I I 1 (a) itesolution No. 1086, granting permission to the i kity of OceansideEtifize well sites for recreational i ;purposes. At the previous meeting a Iettkr from the City 1 jbf Oceanside was presented, requesting permission to I I :utilize well sites for recreational purposes in the San Luis: i Rey Valley. The Mayor appointed himself and Cmn. Dan,+ :to investigate the request. I I I " "" * I 8 I IC-. Dunne stated he and the Mayor went out on site, and i !it is their opinion the site would be considerably improved : :by-a park area, as long as it would not prevent access to i i the well sites. i The following resolution was presented: I I & 8 I 1 I I I I I * s $ I t l e l I I I I I I I I I ! .. '4 I * * I I I I 1 t : -1- I 1 1 I '\,, y-, '\* i' I '\ '. ', i Name '\ '\% ; of '. 4'' \.a I .- I : Member 1 .A ~""""~"""";""""""-""~""""~""""""""""----""-"~"---------"-- i itesolution No. 1086. A RESCLUTION CF THE C1.m : Atkinson : CCUNCIL C-F THE CITY CF CAhLSBAD APPitOVING PLA$ Dunne i F0i2 IMPitOVEMENT OF CERTAIN WELL SITES, was iNeiswender : adopted by title only and further reading waived. : Jardine 8 I I : Hughes I I I I 4 I 1 ' Ib) Second reading of Ordinance fi9174, regarding I : ! : street trees in subdivisions, The following ordinance was ; - ! 1 presented for a second reading: . I .I I I ' Ib) Second reading of Ordinance fi9174, regarding I : ! : street trees in subdivisions, The following ordinance was ; - ! 1 presented for a second reading: . I .I I I 8 I Winance No. 9174. AN CidDINANCE OF Ti33 CITY OF {Atkinson : CARLSBAD AMENDING SUBSECTION 10 'OF SECTION IDunne i 3TdE;E;T TBBES IN SUBDIVISIONS, was given a second i Jardine I reading by title only and adopted. : Hughes 1417 OF OLDINANCE NO, 9050 EEGAi3DING RECUIliED :Heiswendel I I $ I I 1 I (c) Proposed policy regarding necessary street widths: : and street improvements. Cmn. Dunne requested this i i matter deferred until the second meeting in January. I I I I I f I I I * I I CITY ATTWNEY% KEPCGW: I - I 1 I I (a) Vau hn property. The City Attorney reported the i last parcel -+- o the Vaughn property is now in escrow. : Council action is needed whereby the Council accepts the I deed to the parcel from Aleatha W. Vaughn. i By motion of the Council the deed was accepted on behalf : of the City of Carlsbad. I I I 4 I . I I I I i I I I I I I 1 t I 4 t I : Atkinson i Dunne : Neiswende i Jardine : Hughes ! I I I I (b) dequest to install rip rap around sewer interceptei : line. The City of Carmrequested permission from the F i =Diego Gas & Electric Co. to put rip rap around the t i sewer intercepter line. The San Diego Gas & Electric Cot ; has agreed to grant permission to install the rip rap on : : the condition that the City hold said company harmless i i and consent to the installation as Lessee. ! By common consent it was agreed that the City of Carls- : i bad hold the San Diego Gas & Electric Co. harmless from; : any claim resulting from installation of the rip rap, and I i further that the City agrees as Lessee of the lagoon to ; : the installation. I t I I I I I t I I I I I I I 1 I (c) Purchase of fire equipment.The Fire Department i i wishes to purchase a rescue salvage unit mounted on a I " : 1965 Ford chasis from Seagrave Corporation under a leas$ I purchase agreement. It will be necessary for the Council: : to authorize the Mayor' s signature on the agreement. : By motion of the Council authorization was given for i Atkinson i Mayor Neiswender to execute the lease-purchase agree- : Dunne i ment between the City of Carlsbad and Seagraves Corp. I Neiswendc : on behalf of the City. : Jardine ; INSERT (d) See page 9 i Hughes i Assignment of funds - Sydro Construction Company. At i : the last Council meeting it was reported that Hydro-am- : i struction Company has requested the City to consent to th4 : assignment of monies due them under contract for the : i intercepter line to National Union Fire Insurance Cornpani : and the matter was referred to the staff for recommenda- i i tion. ! ! I The staff hasragreed that'itie 'asiignment wiii stken th& i i our position and it is recommended that the Counci 8 con- .; ; sent to the assignment. I 4 I I $ 4 I t * * I e I I I * I I I b I I I I I I I ! I. I I I I 'I ' I .' I -8- & 8, '\ ", -' \ '. '8 I I I -, . . I i Name '\,'+ I 1 ; of '$ I : Member ': : By motion of the Council it was agreed that the City of : Atkinson ;""""~"""""~""~""""""""""~""""""""""~"-""~"----"--"-" : Carlsbad consent to the assignment of monies due Hydro i Dunne ! Construction Company to National Uniori Fire Insurance ; Neiswender * i Company. i Jardine , I ! i Hughes I i CITY "SAGEii'S BEPCRT: 8 I 1 * ! I I I (a) A.cceptance of Work and Materials and Notice of ; i Completion - Joint Sewer Project. ' Final inspection of the i f work for the construction of a Meter Station and Pump : i Station for the Vista Sanitation District, Schedule LT, has i :been completed in accoedance with the contract. it will : 1 be necessary for the Council to accept the work andwrtho-i : rizerthe Mayor to execute the Notiee of Completion. I IBy rt.lation,of the Cduncil the Mayorwas authorized to ex- :Atkinson i ecuie the "Acceptance of 1% ork and lKat.e*ials and Notice iDunne I of Completion, and the document ordered filed. i Neisw ender I : Jardine 1 4 I 4 I I I I t i Hughes I I I I I (b) iZequest to hold outboard marathon - Carlshad i i Landing. The Carlsbad Landing has requested permission:. jto hold an outboard marathon Sunday March 18, 1965, to i :be sponsored by the California Outboard Racing Associa- : I tion. !By motion of the Council the rauest = was granted to the !Atkinson :Carlsbad Landing to hold an outboard marathon on March :Dunne i 18, 1.965. INeiswender I I I 1 I I I I 1 I Sardine * I :Hughes I I I iDisoussion.was given as to the feasibility of purchasing a i :portable traffic light for Elm Avenue. It was pointed out i !it could also be used for other areas in the City. !The City Manager informed the Council this light would I :cost approximately $1,9OG. a I I I I l e 1 I I I ;After further discussion the City Manager was instructedtoi :purchase a portable traffic light. ICmn. Hughes inquired as to resurfacing Monroe Street. : !The City Manager informed the Council it is on the schedulk !of work to be done, however, due to the limited manpower i :he could not statedvhen the work would be done. PAYMENT OF BILLS AND iUTIFICATION OF PAYSQLL: : :Authorization was given for the payment of bills for the : :general expenses of the city in the amount of $1 34,445.47 &Atkinson :and for the Nater Department in the amount of $9,067.79, Dunne ifor the period December 1,3964 to December 15, 1964, asbeiswendel :certified by the Acting Director of Finance and approved pardine :by the Auditing Committee. g3ughe s $kcember, 1964, in the amount of $18, 345.49, as CertifiediNeiswende :by the Acting Girector of Finance and approved b: the : Jardine :$uditing Committee. :Hughes I I I I I 8 I 4 I * 4 I I I I I I I 8 I I I I I I !A tkinsc n %atification of the payroll was given for the first half of fDunne I I I I I I I I ~ADJOU&NMENT: 8 e l i :By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at S:45 P. M. i I I I I I :Liespectfully submitted, I $ I * 1 I j? .Rh r E. ADAMS I 1 I I I I I I t ! P -* II) I' ,\-\\'. 1 I I ,\, 8'' I I, '., 8.. '.,",'~\\ *; ! \\ t, ,\, '.,'\". i ',. ..,& ', '\? I I ; sf '.@?+, , : Member '-$@.3 I"""""" ~~."""""""~"""""""~""""~~""""-----"-----;----"-"------'~ "-i"i ; (dl Eincroachrnents - Underground and above ground.' The i i:: i Ci$%~6~~v?5~~& the committee appointed by mayor: Ill I:: ! Neiswendcr met t:, d-iscuss the fee for encroach.ments : i undergro.ind and &ove ground. They are recommending i ;I:; : that a fee of .$%. Oh: be charged for underground encroach1 ::: i rnents, when permission has been granted by the Engineer- ::: ::I : ing Department, and when the encroachment has been in- l I stalled without permission that a fee of $70.00 be charged. ::; ::I I t ::I i As to above ground eccroachrnents, they are recommend4 :; ; ing that 3. fee of $50. tj;i be charged, and in the event the I i encroachment has bzen installed without permission from: :: : the Counrrl, that a fee of $lW. UO be charged. I I; ! ! !; I After further discussion the City Attormy was instructed: :t ! to draft an ordimnce in accordance with, i-1,~ recornmendat !i i tions for the Council's consideratian st thc next regular i 11 i meeting. I :; I I :; I I :: I I :' I I 1: I I :: 8 I :' $ I 1; I I :I I I 1: I I :: I I :; I I :: I Y :; I 4 ;; I I ! I! I I I I :: * I 1: I I t I i: I 8 l1 ' I :: I I ;: 1 I ;: I l 1: I I :: 1 I :: I I :I I 1 ;: I I I@ I I 1; I I :a I I ;: I I 1: I I :; I I I I i: I I ;: I I ;I I I I I ;1 ;1 ! I '1 ! !I I * :I I * a! I * ;~ ! I . . 1.: ,.. , 't 1 I \ ',' \\' i Nam ',, (2, ',,' I 11 (11 1 I 11, 11 $1 81 I 11 11 11 *I I I I I I I I I I I I a1 I I 11 I 1 I I I I I * I I ii I a 11 I I 'I I I SI I I *I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 4 I 4 I I I I I 1 I I I I 4 t I 1 I s 1 I + I * I I e I I 1 4 I I I I I I I 8 1 I I e' *I I I I I I I I * I 1 I * I I I * * I I I 4 4 e * I l I I i I I I * I I I 1 I I 1 I \ I I a I I I I I t I 1 I l l I 1 * I e 8 I I I * I I * I I I I I I I I I I * I I ' I I I I I t ! I I ! I I I 2 I I I I 8 I I 1 l I 1