The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1966-03-15; City Council; MinutesI I' 3 \ ' .\ '\ '\ ' ' I I t CITY OF CARLSCAD GI I'i CGUYCIL { R~CJU~ ar i'jleetgfig) '\,,'',," i Minutes of: ! Date of Neeti 1::: March 15, 'I 966 ; Name '\ '! I Time of ;dectt:.~!;: 7:oo P. ;;I. ; of '.3 j._Pl_a.w Rf-jIezt-i-35: """ r """" * _."""_" "" .. """"""""-: """""_ e" Councj 3 2':a;:ib~f.:: : Men!xx ; '.,'+, '. I a I I I I i : !?QLL CALL was 2sir;werzd by Cohnci 1nien DGYI~!~;~ ; .>: . i '.31st~criderS ~l~~~~~nsoc3 tfughes and Sardine. Also i i r>i*C:<cRt were City Manager N.lamau~ 3 City Attorney : ; Gi lsbn and Ci.ty Clerk Adams. t 1 t 1.:'4'iOCATTLaH was offered by Wayor Atkinson. I I : 'P.L.LEGIANC& to the Flag was given. I I , 1 > & & 8 I >. I I I 8 * ' F, j? 3 3 fj \/A [ 17 F p; T st ! ('4 2 !?!I , . " ; L IdmS : i it-) ~?-i n;!tes :).F the regular meeting held ;):arch I j~unne : 1366, MFPE! approved AS corrected. jl'ieiswende I :Atk i ns OR I 2 1 """"." 6 r I 1 I 1 1 !Hughes I a 1 iJarcli ne I # I I 1 I I I I I ; C~~~~ESpO;,jDE;;C~: I ---.-..- "" I \ l-eltcr fr@m ti?? Car'fsbad City Schools dated I Kzrch 4$ 7965 9 addressed to ;."fayor Atkinson, was ! i presented, expressing ttleir appreciation for the! i services sf Police Officer- Llalton assisted by : ; Guest and Garcia of the Fire Department, in li- i i ce;;st~g some 150 bicycles on February 17th, was : ! i presented. I 1 i Letter from i'trs-. Charles E. Harvey, 7276 Laguna i I Dr., dated ?!..?larch 9, 1966, was presented, stating: I her protest of having her property condemned OR I i the CJorth side for the opening of Stratford Lane: : a~~d on the South side for Civic Center site pur- i ; prises. i i;!zycr Atkinson reqrtested this matter referred to i i thc? staff for a report. I I i Let.ter dated !'larch 14, 1966 from C.O.B.R.A. Inc,! i knw~n as California Outboard Boat Racing Associaf i t-io;?: rviaeqting sanction of the Council to hold: : a 30 ni:e Outboard filarathon Race at the Agua 1 I i t.Jcd-ionda Lagoon on April 17, 1956, v?ras presented: i Also 03 behalf of the members that travel a great : dislanc~ to attend, they requested permission I I to ~tlaw ca%;phg overnjght (Saturday night) at i : FOX'S Snu; Harbor, as the members have campers ; i for this p:nrpsse. 1 I ! Zy motion of the Council it was agreed that the :%nne I request made by C.O.B.R.A. Irtc. be granted for i2eiswende i the weak-end of April 17, 1966. :Atkinson I :Jardine : ./ I f A memorandum from the Carl sbad Planning Commis- : *_ : si~n was preseilted, concerning the rerilnval of ; '.., i LagcoG Sidewalk Easement on tots 1 thru 3, Buena i i Vista Gardens, stating that in view of the p~tent : t.ia1 wcreationa,l and park develapqent r;f Ruena I i Vista Lagoon, tcle Planning Comsission consr'cicrs ; : it inadvisable to relinquish any public rights t.9 1 the easement at this tirne, ! i T~Q city Attcr,ney t t-ifomrd the Council a requast! i as made by -the prop2rty cw:;e?+s W~IO ow5 propcrtyi i on t~le lagoon fcr the remuva? OF thr. 1agooi-r side.: i walk caszxcnt cn ~ots I th~u 9, euena 'lists Car--! ! dens, and $::?e council referred the natter to tile: i Planning Commission for st~riy and regort. 8 2 c ! I I I t 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I jHughes 1 I/ I I\ t I I 1 I I I * * t I I' , * .\ '\ I . " ' b *" ? 8 \, '\ * ' I I I I $ -2- \* ', '\ I I tbarne *\, b: I c, f \$ J i Mex:x?r *\ \ ' I . ', ' 1 I I I * ,"_^""""""""~""~~""""~"~"""""""~.""~*""""""~."""""""" 0 1 I 1 After I"iscuxfon b,y the Counci 1 9 Si! rnoii on r3f tR$Dunne t i r' '. :<S:-!E~ 7 it MCY agreed that the C~un?ci 1 accept the$kiswendel I ' ;-.:cvxc.:er?d~tion of the Planning Corn#-ission. t4tki nson L ! IHllghes , ! 4- L~L~~. -,I r %~~~Zsr.:~ncHe.r presented a statement from the i f .k 1l c -j .;. ; 1, j ,< ./ i s -. LG~ on the statement for payment. ! i i $823.59. !Atkinson :Jardi ne I I i ; C;r'!:<k2;.' Ci-lamber of Commerce on advertising and : i , ;l:-w::k-i;~~ . ." ;'or the City of Carlsbad for February i ; +hW!? . .. ;.,.;:;.,.h .I ..li 14: y966, and stated he had checked : I 1 yi I ." 1 ...+ :;tt?":o~? P,? f:hc Counci 2 authorization was given iDunne I ?.'ob- t;i:e payz2zt of tile statenient in the amount oCNeiswender ! $ardi ne itiughes i I 4 1 I ! 3 2 ijt L L 6 iji ;!I i: $1 i: C /i 'p X 0 kf S t ,I 1 """"" " I I I * i TK:? CP.:~F=F~~C G< r is and two members of the BI uebi& ; o~y3ciza.;;.i~n, :r!?,r;ncly, Cynthis I~!lcNail, $lichelle i i 3rcc?n, PzTty k??en and Theresa !Aall presented the! : Cc3ztici: :z-i ti? 2 cake in celebration of the Gampfi~e i $:y's 55th a;:njversary, I 5 I I I I I : " ; GIFJ~~.;;~ ALkinson congratulated the Campfire Girls : : ?x:':i~?'t~tion ., on their 56th anniversary and stated! i eh~i Us;;tf~~'pci I and citizens of Carlsbad appreciate i : ti:@ fine Ncrk theit group has done for the commun:- / i ty . 1 I I t 1 i E1R.C;. RUSSELL GROSS€, JR., stated she was deeply i ; in"... 'iG<esteci . in a park in the area of the Hosp I i Grc.?:e. Uii7ess sone very prompt action is taken i i it ?% i 27 fte destroyed, Mrs, Grosse requested I t ! ti1it.b a skudy be made to see if a major part of I i the 2ssp Gwve could be acquired for park purpose$. i i',Tfs. C:,:.'QS?,L: :.'as informed she should present this i : matze? tc the Parks and Recreation Commission, ; i S""d th~y i II tcrn would make their recommendation i : LC .;..!.$$ City eouncj 1. I I J . :J d.' . . . , .A ic 1 A G 5 : 4 I I I 1 I L L 1 I I I I t F p<A[, j, .I ;* I.(F, -" ** 1 .I. " ..._ ..- .""_ I 1 I : rnent of kl;ladis_on St. 9 et a7 - 1911 Act Proceeding$. * Rssessmnt District 5-1964. ,& : ('23 .~~sc~ution of Intention #1221 for improve- I I "-"" I I I I I ."."." I I ; ihe ijl3yor announced the hour of 7330 P.H. having : : arrived, thfs was the time and place fixed by i i thf! C-iQy Cottnci 1 for hearing objections or pro- : I ~-,Qs~s .~n the proposed work, or the extent of? the ; 1 i:;s:::s~fnent district, or on the proyosed grades. i i !.!ncEe\* the ReSo3ii tjon of Intentisn #'I 221 providind ; for ,i,!72 cnnstt.uctian or' certain street inprr>t/lc- : i ~~egts OR idadison Strent, et al. ; T~?c C3er.i:. !,reser!ted affidavits of Pubticzt.ion, i i4ai 1 it13 an82 "z;st.ing, and the Council orc!e!-ed the i r sa;r;f fj 'I a;; t- I .. I I I I 4 I t I I I. * . r> e t I I I t ! a i ?I~J!~P k\tk..i?~*;~;~ asked ti:a.t: 2.l 'I ;!rjttep 7r>o"istr, i i filed. I I I I I I I t I I , 9 * I I L I I I 1 I I I I I I t : I I i I I -3- 4' , ', .- '\ I ', ', '\\ '. I '\ ' ., I ', '., '., I I " \ i 9. * I I I i N a me "8, 's' 1 Mcmber ' 1 1 ?; 4 "< I # e ;""""""""""--"""""~~"""""""~"~"-~""-""."-"-"--"-.-""-~---"--- 6 I 12 ]ett?r dated Warch 8, 19SG9 frem Daniel S. at.;dl i ;.*~:?;q J-. Sanchez was presented, StRtilng they did, I r.ot :van?. sidewalk, curb a~d gutters ?ut in front : ; :;-? t.hc:: y' property at 763 ;(agnol ia ~ve. as it wil i i cat r:fF their -?rant yard almost to their fmnt { i ~$2:;:- + it, will cause ~uch damage to the retainer i b ,'j :; L ? ~~32 Ssnce that borders their property, and : 1 ?,h~ci: tilt., cost of inprovement was more than they / i ::oi...:! c ~;P'Yosd. A1 so i -I was their feelings that : i site\;l!~,lk~ 9:: the OP~OS~ te side of the Street was I ; 3 :*. I L I ,? p. t . . r lif"c' ",.I I I .. ." ,. I I I . ? -1. ' 1.- I ;;p :!;:f]s:- :s~.:~ -j j f the person who fi led a I I ; b L'r.1' ?'I $j .%.. r,n pro'ip$ + .. wished to speak in support of his! 1 16,; 1' -; j; .; p j'] protex't? I I ; ;,; ;; ~ DB"' ,j~Et., ., " t SANCHEZ stated the Engineer came out : i today and -b:~~nc? oze property line marker. Mhcn I t 1 ti>;#' -.. i>$j;.;.:#>cle[j i-.he property they assumed they I I i otfncri 119 P:O iu'i~crc the street pavement is now. I The,;; I;$ ',' . . . a rc?tainer wall , and a few years ago i t t h .? .; ,<: -Fr:: ;" -- I , CKC::;~? had to move the wall. idr. San- ; i C~EZ irsf;:e$ ~ho aas going to pay to have the wall I : 0: r) St! (+ d <,, $! 5 j :> :i I i *!!I? &:\si-;ta?t Engineer informed the Council the I i C+*.,y 9s not acquiring any additional right-of-way!, 1 1'he ?.+,ky owns 60 feet of right-of-way. If ~r. i S~rchez makes a request a direct cut-back can be i : p]?d!? i : Cmn. H!~~hes inq:ri red about the slope .. to .the drive! i The. i',:;sisLT-;nt Engineer informed the Council they i i caa <!zy=-l ight the dri vetJay. I Titc ~'ity 2is:;ager pointed out what Mr. Sanchez i ; cir.a,s f;ryiag tu find out is whether a building per-: i r1it KRC ~SSI~C! for the construction of the retain) ; i n,a WRI 7 :..:t.::w it is presently located. The i ~':f~~lnci'! t;ouid tiot be able to give this informatjob; I l^!o:::i*~c:~g if LIi-, Sanchez wjl 1 come into the office: 1 f. !] i? s <a ff :.e i I I f i t I t I I I I 1 I I I i I I I I 9 I I I i !'I c., y : t I I 1 I 8 I I I I I I I I 1 * +*: il. check the permits issued. 1 I ! .. ',1 .-' ; d ;I,>< ;> '< ~ b ;<'; ' :J ' if there were any persons present: ; ;\I; ,;F' 4, _. t "3 :';.:re 110 pe~sons present desiring to I I i I "1 >. i; i* .... i: it?? ctral protest, the idayor declared the I I t 1' :r I t ~h!:) y-is'?cd to make an oral protest? I i I i I I 1 .i . I I t I I I : ;~!jbl-i r: f,ra.ri ng closed at 7:43 P.i;l. i ';.!!;-.% fnllineer of &ork reported written protests i i ;arrlcl nbj:,ct,iotts had been filed !;tj.ti?. thz City CIGrk; i by owners of 6/lOths of 1% 0;' the tots1 area ,i;aD I ; 1:e ssst-)ssed ,SOP the improveloent. I I I Ti.l p I i'oi low; vg resolut-icns ~erc pres~~ted for the ; i ~riunc-ii 'c considc!*a.tjan: I I I I I I I I t I ! i Rzsoluticjn ticj, f239. A F!ESOLliYi'ii\l OF THE CITY i ?/AKil\lG FINilSkiGS A?!D OVERRUITfJS, PROTESTS .'\~~~~ 08- ij,tki n~On I /q "_ "."-I.-.""" .. . "__ ;3unne IJEc:T'EO!a::, A.5. 4s-*rss4, w2.s 3dop'ced by title on1,yjHughes : COl.iNi:IL. OF Tf-iE CTTY OF CARLSSAD, CA!"IFcR;m, :Pici swender i ar:ci ~u~ti1c.1; readi ncy wa i ved. ::I 3 i* d i E e 0 I I I 1 I I I I I t I I I I I t I I I t 1 I 1 I I I' 8 I ', '8, \\, ', 6 %\' '\ ' ! -4- : \ '. '. 1 I & .' I I ', \ '. l a 8 I I Na me 'x\,'"* I : OF '4 I *; ~""""""""""""""""-""~"""""""""""""~"~""-~"-~~-"""-""" / Epso7ution Ho. 1240. A R,ESt3LUTI@N OF THE CITY :D~~GS : I r..fj!j!:T?:i-T"l-HE CITY OF CARLS3AD, BRDERIllrG THE :Mefsmnde i ',iji2Y',*$(j:;"( lijij OF CERT/\Ir\l STREET II!iP~;c\jcE:i]EPJTS AND jntki nSon i ;?II!;Ekm ill{: ?gS-rIMG AND PUBLICATIQII OF iijilTICES IN- :HUghcS t .I'f;%G SERtED PROPQSALS OR BIDS, A.D. 5-5964, waillardine r 0 : Mc.mSer i ! :- tr, !. I ; ,'? ,> fi j; <; d I I !?y title only and further reading waived; I ~~~*:-.ti~ilt~!i1 NG* 1241. 4 RESOLUTI3M QF THE CITY :Dunne f 4 ,'.'% .l: , ,!(>. I ',t p I!,. x.rt '.; r * ita? " 3 -. CITY OF CfiRLSBAD, DETERMINING THE iMeiswende : yC.;:!.di i>s i;rai 'JCd. iJardi ne I I l I, 3 . .. .."" ""_l_" i GE.'d:'i<r"71. P2EVR%LlE\3G RATE OF FER DIAN MATES, A.D. :Atkinson ; 5-1?".., vas adopted by title only and further !Hughes ! 1 i,. .j i a ;G: ~,,.~.~~~.~~~.~"~~?~~ cf Intention #1237, declaring I ; ~ t -... + -i-hc+ ? rl?t?riticn of the City Counci 1 to vacate a 8 ' nn~r*i-i ~r-~ Gl-f"zt> unnamed street. : .c". - ' "..^ ..". I -* ~. I I I I I I - "_._ _.. . -. .._. 1. , - I - - "" I I I I : ilIayer ~r,g;i yIsen announced this was the time and i : "7,>CQ f*!xyj /-JU J the City Col;ncil for hearing ob- : : ,rAL,t,.~w ST pr'otests on the proposed vacation of! E 0': i!:i:G;;tjof) ::1237. 8 I t I " : 1):: C I~Y:.:. vi-esented the affidavits of posting i I i Q n .a. .: I t a porctnn o? ail unnamed street under Resolution i .. s I I I ! ;znd pt~lbi i cation, and the Counci 1 ordered the I I I I I I I i :.; i; ,:I c .t .i j 3 d . i I I I .^. I !Lip s i f b I I I I I: c<rk informed the Counci 1 there were no + ; \.i.~.i t%ert protes Is or ob jecti ons . : 'ihe ;"jt?*yor- asked if there weye any persons preSew4 i who wished to make an oral protest? I I ! Ac there were no persons present desiring to : speak, the i4ayor declared the public hearing : CJ<J.;C~ st 7:4-5 P.3. i I I I I I I t t I I 1 I I I I I 1. i The City Attorney informed the Council the title! f s~~rnp?:-,y tj?s record of a deed dated 1886, showing ; ; ,j. !ji?3tlL ~f certain property for street purposzs. 1 ; .i~:~zve;; i.his street does not show up on any of : I l .' t,;:~ ' Y-~~s: and there is no indication as to its i I p '.; -: ,~ i. -' I . - . .,A I I' c i? t i $3 n . 8 1 1 [I? i':.: i iszwi ng resolution was presented for con- i ; .s '; i.c p;> 8- I' '. i ii+duticn iJo. 1247. A RESOLUTION QF TIE CITY iDunne I ~&wc:x"$~TKE CITY OF CARLSBAD ORDERING VACA- jMeiswendzr i YTijld CtF' A CERTAIN STREET, was adopted by title :Atkinson ; 0 t', .i y .s?d further reading waived. jSiL4ghes I : Jardi ne i ;cj Resolution of Intentiort #1223, declaring in-: I ! tentivn of the Council to vacate a portion S? ! r those streets located within the Hasp EucalypCus I : F~rrst Co.'s Tract. t I i piace fixed by the City Council for I~earing cb- : I jcctions 3i- protssts on the proposed vacation of: : a !~~~t4~~:ii or tki0s.I street 1 ocated withein the b 1 : ?$si; C~icalyplus i-o;*r.st C3. * s Tract, nznely, F ~"QVC?S~ Strl!et, Eucalyptus Street, and Cai7yon I : St~.2&: t.'orr~ct-~?y Can;lnn St;..ec~,. 1 ,. 1 t f * 2 I. . I. I. .. ', ' :2 i? : I I I 1 I I ! , I i I I * $ a I I i Y~;z*>!. Atkfl:son Z~~~?OEEC ed tilis tta~ .<he ti^? apd i ,a t I I t I I I I I I I 1 D I 3 I I I Y I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 t t I I a d ! I I I I ! ; 4 I I t I 1 -5- 4 I ! I I t I I I 1 ~""""""~""""~"""""""""""""~~""-------"""-"---"~-- t "I ;in: Clerk pvcsented the affidavits of publication i , .i ..a : : J . . L , . I' ; {< '" :: _. -i ;:.Fo:-x'tC! the Counci 1 at the last ~eet- ! ii~~) *$c attorney representing the property owners p i :Y'c:L,:~~E.!:~~~J that the original request be modified : ;;;A i:c\:cr silt !.;ialy that portion of Eucalyptus I :?rc ."t 'iyi kig Easterly of the intersection of ~Eccc:ypL:.s Street and Canon Street be vacated. 4 I I t t * I I I. .- ' r ;3~521':n~3 ~~:-id tilt2 Counci 7 ordered the sarne . ,. .. 4; .. . 8 * ? I I +&- i - I iJ i ' : i 1'. c: c f' ch. Council a fetter had been presented i 1 . ._ .. I I I I I I I I '\ ', .\ ', \' '\ \, '\ ', ', '\, '. '\ \ '% Ffarne \, '' '\ '. Of \,? Me rn ber ."""""" I I I I (f!,erz w~I-:: * IP x," tten protests filed. I~hz qsj;;y(-Ip asked if tiiere were any persons pre- !sei;;. 4zsirS vag to make sn oral protest? I I !As there VGY" no persons present desiring to I I :sr?ak, the public hearing was declared closed at i !/\ft?~ discussi,:.;: by the Council, the f;ollowing i :resolution was presented: I I I I p ,*..:.. -. .. , ;-, 1 . u 3. . icn No. 7248. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i ..I ix:~ /c c- :c.i?.Etsr?.4b FIIDING. A- PORTION- UF EUCALYPTUST ' T 1 I I 1 I I . .. $ I t I .. * 1 I t I I 1 I ;:7: 50 ".;.j. I I I I I I I I 4 I I 4" " ~ - " ." .., ._"."_"" ~ r.<.TREE'I' I!;-ihJECESSARY FOR PRESEbIT OR PROSPECTIVE I I I iP!JzLIC ::TREET PURPOSES; VACATING SlJCH PORTION OF ji3unne :E!tiZP..LYPTUS STREET; RF4D ORDERING CLERK TO RECORD :i,ieishrendeo :n I' ' WUIFIED COPY HEREOF MITH THE COUFJYY RECORDER $Winson :OF SAP! DIEGO COURTY, was adopted by title only :Hughes :and further reading waived. idarcti ne ;C?fir- 5ei s~cnder i nqui red about the spell ing of i :lq-L:. .i7t'" :the old maps showed the street spelled in this ; :mznncr. I I I 1 l 48. J Street, and Cmn. Meiswender was informed i t t P I I I i(Z> " L.z;~ltlation "_.. .^." of Intention #1223, stating the i :?ntc cit-ic:! .,f the Council to vacate a portion of : ; ii 3. 7 i ey 2: I r.;.. -? t o 1.- - ._" ." ~ " I I I I"- _I_ "_."." _- I ! !T!:G ;,a:~3\: arlnounced this was the tiole and place i :x.* l1 I Y.;.A # c r h.y the e^i ty Counci 1 for hearing objections : ; ';! '::- p i" 0 t e Tj t s on ttle proposed vacation of a portion i 1 :!a1 lzy Street. I yi!i;z C9'ly Attorney requested this tatter continued I ;3s an agreement between the school district and ; it-:te kity had not been completed. iEy tiioti on of the Counci 1 the pub1 ic hearing on i ; :.ft e ;jroposed vacation of a portion of Vafley 4 jS6:ri:et <!as continued until April 5, 1966, at 7:30 i io' cl okk b) .PI. 6 I i(e3 ihcqrrest fur reclassification of certain :pro~ei-t>/_located at the S!.J corner of State i-!;*f~t. ; ; , . , ,. . I-. . - - . -. ""_ - " _- - I..:.:?" I:' _"" a;t3 El Camjno ,- ?tal from Zom:e R-A-IC to Zone i iC-2. Appa -i cant: F'AiJ21CO 9 et a1 . The Pic?.yor ani:GuRced this was the tip-? and place i :or pyatests on the proposed reclassification of ; jcertai~ property located at tile sw corner of !State Hwy. 78 and El Cr!mir!o Res1 frorn Zone R-A-10 ! ;to Zone C-2, requested by FF\$iCIj, ct a?, I 1 s ,. :. i,)? i I I f t I 1-2 e I t I i I I 4 I I I > " i a t I I -* e -" t --.- I . . "_ _. r :?.; I. w.,'.L,.! .. ri ,- by tile City Counci? for hearing objzctions i I 3 I I ! I t t 1 I I 1 I I 1 ! I I t' ,\' *, I 1 L I 8, '\,'\., '\, I '8, '\ '\ t -6- ." I '\ '\ ' I i Name '8, '? I : of '-5 $ .! I".... """""~""""""""""""".""""".""""""""~""~~"""""""~ i Menher I I ? I 0 I j Th,? Clerk :;I;'esented the aFfidz.v'it sf publication ! i aiii cev r.i fled that proper notice had been mai led ; ; ':: ",:-"; ;:!j.~ining property otqners. 3 ; ; *' <..A 6 I I l I 3,. c . . I_ :'!?re 110 written objections or protests pre-i I. ,,. . : :\ . . . _If. .? '$ . 4 I I i '. ... . I, . I,1 I-,.. Atkinson announced the Council would hear : : 1 4: 1 ., j (..' :,! 1 ;.>erso:?s desiring to speak in favor of i ' , .: ;q2 rQ,i? cssifications. 1 I i ;::si shcre $;ere 50 persons desiring to speak in I I i,f;p cQ{Fct?;j; ;:logrd hear from all persons desiring i I l P~R. p 'I JACK KUSOTA, 2965 Eoosevelt Street, asked if ! ; c.2: 2p 1 ex ? I I ; id: ;, . KuSota was inforrned that the proposed reclass: 1 if*krtii.sn did "!nclude the property designated I I I : .-,.) A <> 9::ie~ c! \?ere n~ other persons desiring to speak,! I ** a I I ; r'+,~:ou~ of the rec':assification, the Mayor stated : !< I ;o 21 :.\..{e: a.2 ora, protest or objection. t I i the proposed reclassification included the proper! i ty designated for the parking area in the shoppinp I I t I I 9 I 1 : fei. t.ti.2 P2r.k: i?g 1 Ot. I I t I I 1 1 ci;e $!isit:: hearing was declared closed at 7:53 P.ti. l r r!l A .+ -; <*:I" discussion by the Council the following i r.::jolution t!as presented for consideration: I I 1 I I I I I I ! I : i;esalui:ion No. 1250. A RESOLUTIOH OF THE CITY ! E-O~fi;r~-I-~73T=i=-$lE CITY OF CARLSBAD AHNOUNCIrdG FIHD- I I I i IEG3 GND DECISION REGARDING CHAI\SGE OF ZONE CLASS-: Dunne : SFI<ATI[OFd OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY IN THE i Neiswender i Cfl''; tlF 'CARLSBRB FROF.1 ZONE W-A-16) to ZONE C-2, : Atki nson i was dopted by title only and further reading I Hughes t y 2.j ved. : Jardine i 'i?~: fo:i@wing ordinance was presented for a firsti 1 P,' ad! 019 ::,>! !:he Counci I : I I I I I 1 : I .""-:-" CY.*:.~$~GTCV NO. 9185. A[;d ORDII\1AI'.JCE OF THE CITY OF I : Cr",R!.SdFti) ?:YEb!GIHG ORDINAF4CE RO. 9060 , Ct{$,[lGIiJG i D\lnne i CE~:;AIV DEsrm,v-ED PROPERTY FROM ZBP~E R-A-~O TO ; ~~~~.is\,~ei7d~:* i y (' l ,HE C-2, I13 THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, was given a i Atltjnsan ; 1; : ." .:. l . 1 .> L. ~~ead-ing by title only and further reading : Hughes : bj 2 :: y 2 c,i , I Jardi r;e ! I / ; f~ (Continued) Res. of Intention i~(56 of the ; I? :I~.rsklinrl Gonrnission - re: General Plan, 1 "- .." :- 9 I 1 I I I -. I a I !- ; ]he islayor announced the hearing on the General I ; ; I i C:I wzs csnti nued, and at this time he wou? d s ,.** T - 0 : dc-rlars the public hearing open. I XR. JKK KUSQTA, stated with the permission of ti+ : t-:a:-? ::YO questions. ('I ) At a previous hear$ ng i I 7 :1 i,>t spoke ~f "Le influence of business and COG- ; i i;rerce ou-tside the sphere of the downtown busi ncssi : d-istra'ct, aiid it was his understanding that bus- i : iriess and conmeree should not be taken away frm ; I tbe ctriwntown business area. IT this be thc case i i he would 1 i ke to knox the irffluence it v~i2.4 ;;;vc : : OR the downtown business area w iti: the var.l.?;n?: : i sh3pp-i ng centers S~OK~? on ;:he ~-2n~r31 plan; rind I O 0 $ I 1 8 t n I i C:.,w?c-i'f lx would like to ask the Pfanf]fng Con(;ulm: . 1 I I .. s t I I I I I t 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I b I I I Q 0 I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I t I ! I I i # I >; \ 'x 8, I \" I \, '\ ' '\ ' \ ', '*\ '. I i !dame \, '! I ; of \4 I I Member ~"""""""""""""~""""""""""~.-""""""--"-"-""-~-~-------"-"- i (21 tI?e crigiria~ plan showed administrativs and i : professional offices located in the vicinity of i 1 .i!.iP CivSc Center, howevero this section of the i ; l :;:art Rzs been deleted, and he would like to knqw ; !"I ; ?. ; ! .' hsypene?d to this section of the plan? 4 I ; .! ,: ;;k 7: c 3 ] I L4ht%a s representative from DiilSH, stated the ! ; p .: $9 :..,pp-i ,,\ ng centers shown in the plan are neighbor- : i !~O~CE :on.:..:;i~ienres. If tile Council chooses to I i bave commercial along the Freeway, then they I I ; s~~nuld remove an equal amount of commercial zon- i i l"n::; from the downtown area 9 as the economic re- : : prt re.f!x:s the percentage of commercial need24 i :x~ comparison to the population. I I In tinsth!er to 14r. Kubota's second question, the i I General Plan previously stated there could be I I i professional aiad administrative offices around i i the area of the Civic Center. The Planning Corn- I : mission requested this section removed, the I i reason being there will not be a jail in the : Civic Center site, thereby removing any need for i i bail ~QG~SW~, attorneys, etc. I I I $I!?. HA20Li3 EtIGLEMANG, 2435 01 ive Drive, ; lock his property. At the present time they I f h;.,ve access at the north end of Pi0 Pic0 Drive. i ; !hare is no plan for Pi0 Pic0 Drive beyond Las I i b'lores. Recently he was approached by a buyer wkq ! ; yerty 7's an ideal site for a motel site as it car( : he szen S:s motorists traveling north or south. i i 'Tiiz? propc:~ty will have access from Las Flores a?.:, ; !~iie~-t the freeplay is- constructed. His reason fori i apg.;taring NSIS to point out the potential for a I ! zote'! site at this location. I I t iha. Hughes inquired cf the Engineer as to the i i -1l1 i!,;tmen-t ~-f the freeway and Pi0 Pic0 Drive set i i .'or-eh i:i r.i~p approved by the Council. I I i lt~e Assistant Engineer informed the Council they! ; ~vgce.6 wjth the Division of Highways that Mr. i 1:ngs'i;nann needed access from Pi0 Pic0 Drive; how-: I 'VCY, the Division of Hiijhvdays maintained he had i i ticcc1ss from Olive Drive. I I i l!r. Englmann stated they have three separate i i rjarcefs of land on Olive Drive. He obtained a I ; cot split, and before they could get the lot spliit f they had to have access at the north end of Pi0 ; 1 si<;G rive. i ~au~ rieal quoted from tlse General plan regarding I I freeway commercial serv-ice .uses, arid .Stated this : ; c?,n cn'ly be arlswered by the need. This p'an doe.$ i riot stop or obliterate any service areas. I I i !srli. NELSO3 UESTREC 1288 Las Flores. Drive, stated ; I ,;;hey own tile only remaining corner at the north I i ptjd of tE;g city limits. . The toning is now I?-I, i ; afid they wotxld like to have more light LrauGf.? ! i OII the subject. 1 I I ! I , I 1 I I I I I - 7.. - I '\ \\,'*' t I 0 I 1 I. 1 I I I, I 1 t I I I 8 I I I I I I I I ; :;tt!,ted 't;he new freeway when constructed wi 11 land- 7 L_ f desires to build a motel on this site. His pro-! I I I ; I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I e 0 I I I I a I I I I I 4 I * 1 I I 1 I r I 1 I I I I I I I t I' I\ I I I * 1 I I I 1 I ; '\, y,, '\ 1 1 '\, ', '\ I -8- I '\\ '\\ ' I 1 Name x\,8> * 1 of '( 1 I Member ~"""""""~"""""""""""""""""-""-""-"--"-""""~"-----------. ! MR. ED'WWRD i4Ci CBNN, stated he wished to reempha- i : site the fact this corner is peculiar. The City: i sncclld take advantage of the economy that goes I f ty at 60 miles per hour on the freeway. This ; 1 I mation is unSque, in fact in comparison it is .i t ': :::.? %-,he location of the Colony ]Inn at San Juan I i -7prstrano. ;!hen the new freeway is constructed! ! S.,.<s corner will stand out. The City should : t2ke advat;tage sf the sales tax, transit motel i I tax and ad valorem tax through businesses fre- ; t quested by transits. I I i i4R. JAiiiES QERTELSEN, 1270 tas Ffores Drive, stated i he '%.ives on Las Flores Drive, and he would like I I to go along with the statements made by Yr. Englq- i maen, ~r. k!estree and Mr. ..ccann. i i4R. !JESTREE informed the Council there are ts4~0 : i parcels of land owned by 0ut-sf-ttw-t. persons, and ; the tpemainf ng property owners are in favor of 8 i conwercial zoning for this area. ;4r. Libby is ii ; favor of partial commercial zoning OR his proper6J. ! ! : NR. 3. 1:. CP,R,JICIiAEL inquired as to if there was 1 i anytliing new concerning the proposed extension i : 0": Tamarack Avenue. I I 1 i4ayor Atkinson stated a report was made to the i i tounci 1 % however, they have not had time to stud4 i the report. I I : MW. RALPH WORTHING, 1771 Andrea Place, asked how ! i far from a freeway interchange does commerciaI : i nr;rmally extend? In this regard he can certainlji : se:! the validity of providing commercial service i i areas to the freeway. i4r. kdorthing inquired if ; I it wauld not be beneficial to have architectual i i design for such services rather than a "hodge : : nrrdge" commercial area. I I I AS there !we no other persons desiring to speak i i the Claycr inquired of the Council about closing ! i t5e pub'iic hearing. 1 1 I i C~G. Neiswender stated ne fe7 t it would be ex- i : ?ransly valuable to give the area around Las I I ticl-es DY. more discussion. i Cmn. Dunne stated the questi,on of service areas I : other than this particular area was discussed 7 i previously. 1 CN~. Neisnender stated he did not feel the Councijl i should close the door on these people. I I i ~ith the consent of the Council the public hear- : : f!?g en the General Plan was continued u~ti1 : April 5, 1966, st 7:30 P.3. ! i A short recess was called at 8:25 P.H. The meet-: e t I 4 1 1% t I I I I I 4 I I I * I I 1 I I I 1. 1 I I I I t I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I 0 ; ing reconven.c6 at 8:40 P.@l. . I : ENGINEERING: I I I I I I 1 I I I 0 I i (a) Offer of street dedication by Arthur Ennis t i and Norene Batchelder - re: I&GW?~S Avel-i.lj&. i T~P city ~ttorney informed the !:q,tancj1 deeds had i : been received ft'om Arthur ?:. E~I?:$s a:ld ilorcnz I I -_ __"I. l." 8 I I I P I I 1 I 1 0 I I I I I I I I I t I 4 4 I 1 I I -9- :' .' ' ; '.,",,',,'\ v J '\ ' ' I \, '\ ', 1 Name \\, ' I .' ' '\ : Qf '< ! ~""""""""""~""""---"""""""*"""""""""""~"""~~""""""" I Member e e l I Batcheldcr, for street purposes on Knowles Avenud ; in connection with a lot split previously granteq. i sy notion of tho counci 1 the deeds were accepted !Duane i I.!*X; .Arthur i.4. Ennis and Norene Batchelder and :Pteiswende : Fb.7>ksr !fewell Ennis, and the Clerk ordered to :Atkinson : 1- t .~c:ord the same. :WugS.,es i jb) Proposed Tamarack Ave. alignment and width i i 1- iadjacent to Interstate 5 overcrossing. In order i I to qualify FCB~ a 4-lane structure for the over- ; i pass at Tamarack Ave. the City is required to i ! establish a 4-lane street on both sides of the ; 'I Freeway. The city has designed a 4-lane roadway I ; State. This \voulci implement the General Plan as i i recornmended by the Planning Conmission with 102' : : of right-of-way from Carlsbad Blvd. to the Free- I i way and 84' of right-cf-way from the Freeway to : I Highland Rve. I 1 i ~mn. Neiswender suggested this matter be referred i to the Planning Commission and the Parks and I liecreation Commission, either as a joint session! I or ind<v<dual meeting. I By motion of the Council it ~2s agreed that the iDunne i matter be referred to the Parks and Recreation :$leis\qendel : Commission and the Planning Commission for studyiAtkinson i and report back to the Council. :Hughes i (t) DOU~~OWII Street Lightinq District - 1911 Ac : I" Proceedings. A.D. 4-1964. The City Engineer ?- : rcijorted sealed bids were received for the Down- i i t~wn Street Lighting Improvement project on Feb- i i wary 11, 1966. All proposals were check and : ; Perry Electric Company of Imperial Beach, Calif- i i dt'ilia, wre the low bidders in the amount of I 1 : $72,400.00. This bid was 14% under the estimates i and the Engineering Department recommended the : : bid be accepted. I I : The following resolution was presented for the i i Council's consideration: I I I I I I I) iJardi iie I I I ; I frm Jefferson St, to Adam St. to present to the I I I I I I I I I & t I I I I :Jardine r 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I J I I I P l e l 1 I I i 1 : 4 I I I 1 I I I I I 0 I i I I I I 1 I I I I I a I I I I I I I 1 I I I ! 1 " iiesolation No. 1222. A RESOLL'TIOiI OF THE CITY iDunne COLiNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSZAD, CALIFORNIA, iNeiswender ANARDIT\IG CONTRACT FOR NORK FOR IMPROVEMENT ORDER4Atkinson ED i3Y RESOLUTlOH NO. 1205, OF SAID CITY COUMCIF,;Hughes A.9. #4-1964, was adopted by title only and iJardi ne further reading waived. 1 I I I (d) -" Petittion for proposed sewer district under the 191 1 Act proceedlngs - A.D. 2-75356, in Adarns - Ste9 ^""_." Chjnquapin Ave., Harrison St., Highland Dr. "I Hillside Dr., t-ioover St., Park Dr.9 and Locust . . " A \I t: . The Clerk informed the Council a formal psti tion has been received requesting sewers in the above mentioned area. 62.02% of the property owners in the area have signed the petition. A plat of the area was presented showing thr? boundaries of the p;-cposed d7"strict. I I I I I I # ? I L. I f J 1 I I i I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I a I * I I 6 I I I I , '\.' % I I \ \'\ ' I \\ \\ \\ ', 1 ', '* ', I I I I I I . \. \ I I t I -\ - ' \\ i - 13 - i Name '\, ! : of '< I i Member 0 :"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""" i Cnn. Jardine stated that due to the fact there i : are a number of streets involved, he wondered if i i any consideration had been given to the alloca- : : tion of cost as to penalizing property owners in i i t!:e nlore accessible areas then those in the dif- i i f.rcult areas? 4 I : 1 ~k.e Assistant Engineer informed the Council this i 1 occurs in many sewer districts. Park Dr., Hi 11- I i side Dr. and the majority of Highland Dr. tdJill : : be nominal depths. A one side sewer wi 11 be in- i i stalled in a portion of Adans St. The larger : : the district the lower the contract kjill be. i It is the feeling of the Engineering Department I I that is would be in the best interest of all t I those in the proposed district 'io be in one large: i district rather than three separate districts. ! I Cmn Jardine stated in essence then Park Dr. for I I instance COUIC~ znjoy sewers at a pro-rata cost i i equal or less by joining in this proposed dis- : ; ttnict. I After further consideration the following resolu-i I tions were presented: i I I I I Resolution No. 1242. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY iDunne : COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING PETI- jNeiswends1 i TI014 A.D. 2-1966, was adopted by title only and :Atkinson i further reading waived. :Hughes I IJardi ne I Resolution Eo. 1243. A RESOLUTIQI4 OF THE CITY $+Junne i CCUT.1CIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUESTING OPIl?a- :Neiswendel : 133 OF HEALTH OFFICER, AND DECLARING THE FIECES- !Atkinson i Si'T'r' OF INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SE;J€RS, A.D. 2- :Hughes : 1966, was adopted by title only and further read-$ardine i ing wai vzd. I I I I t I t I 1 i b I * I I I I I I I I I I I I t t * i t ' I .."___I. !3eso?utic~1 - ifo. 1244. A RESOLUTIOFj OF THE CITY :Dunne i COUi'u'CIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING PERSON heiswende: ! TO PREPARE ALL PROCEEDINGS, A.D. Ho. 2-1966, was iAtkinson i adopted by title only and further reading waived.;Hughes i Resolution No. 1245. A--RESOLUTION OF THE CITY jilunne i iO%-NCmFmE CITY OF CARLSBAD APFOINTItdG PERSOIWeiswendel i TO ACT AS ENGINEER OF !.!ORX, DESIGNATING ENGINEER :Atkinson I TIOM OF THE ENGIMEERING DOCUMEl?fTS s, ASSESSMENT !Jartine i IPdG THE ENGINE€!? OF WORK TO SUPERVISE ALL ??JORK; I : APPOINTING ENGINEER OF HORK AS THE SUPERiNTENDENf i OF STREETS AHD FIX1l";lG COi(PENSATI9N FOR SERVICES, ; : A.D. 2-1966, was adopted by title only and . i i further read1 119 waived. I i kesolution !do. 1246. A RESOLUTIOR OF THE CITY !Dunne : SGilNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DI2ECTING PREPAR-$eiswender i ATIOfJ OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DESIGMaTI~~GAtkins~n i adopted by title only and further reading waivcd.iJardine ! jJardi ne I I I i OF MOR!<, AS THE PERSON RESPG34SIBLE FOR PREPARA- :t-lu~~hes : DIASRALl, ASSESSi3ENT XOLL Ai4D !,!ARRANT; DESIGNAT- i a I I I * e ; ENGINEER TO PREPARE PLANS, AID, l'io. 24956, was !Hughes I MEl.,' BUSINESS: 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I i (a) Resolution fr'1251, addressed to the pcsteridy I : of the citizens of CarIsbad_, The Council was _." I 1- I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I $ I t I ! 1 I I I 1 t * 1 I I I .. 11 - I' l t' '\ .' '\ I I \\ >.,'\,\ '9 1 '\ '\ ', I 'X\ '\\ - i Name '\, '! : of 'Q t I t Member .................................................. 1 ! i informed the San Diego Highway Development Assoc: 1 iation .is in tile process of formu~ating .apprgpri" : ate operiing ceremonies for a major portion of : i Interstate Highway 5, and it is anticipated that: ; a "time capsule" wi71 be buried in an adjacent : i roadside park. The Security-First National Bank! : has wquested each community to provide a resolu! i tion on the opening of the freeway to be sealed : ; in the t'inle capsule. I I I The following resolution was presented: e f I I 1 I 1 4 I I I i Resolution No. 1251. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY jllunne i COU1.3CIL Of- THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, ADDRESSED TO :Neiswende> ! POSTERITY OF THE CITIZEIIS OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAdAtkinson i was adopted by title only and further reading !Hughes i 1 wa i ved. ;Jardine i (b) Proclamation - re: Law Day U.S.A. Mayor i : Atkinson proclaimed Sunday, !jay 1, 1966, as Law ! i Day USA in the City of Carlsbad and called upon : ; all citizens, organizations, churchess and schools i to recognize this special day through apprspriatd : program. a I : (c) Prsclaxation - re: BoyS'. Club ?-leek. .The i i Hayor also proclaimed the week of: Warch 27, 1366i : as "Boyri.! Club Week" , and asked that all citizenq I in Carlsbad support their BoyS' Club. I Cmn. Nei swender made a suggestion that where i heavy development is taking place that the Schood : Board be notified well in advance. Also that th< I Parks and Recreation Commission be notified. I ; The City Pdanager informed the Council this has i : been done in the past on an informal basis; how- i i ever in the future they will be notified in writ< : ing. i I ; Cmn. Dunne asked if the ordinance still holds as i i to requiring the Subdivider to dedicate park areifs? I Can this requirement be. m8de :of .the^ Shbdivider' '": : as to school areas? I I I The City Planner informed the Council there is nd i provision in the law requiring dedication sf pro: I perty for school sites. 4 I i The City Manager pointed out that if a subdivide< : brings in a map for 100 homesp this is no indica: i tion that an elementary school will be needed in: 1 I , I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 4 I I I I I I I I 1 t ! I the area. I I I I i I ~mn. Hughes stated in one instance the subdivide$ 1 has agreed to' dedicate 7 acres for park purposes.: i Cmn. Meis2Jender commented the City could go brokd I : maintaining these small park areas. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t 1 : OLD BUSINESS: 1 e l I e i (a) Addendum to Agrement between City and Tan- i : ner, Marquardt, Melvin .an-~.A.s-~o.c_jnt,e_s, In-k - :-e! i Valley Street sewers. he Cit:. Attorney informed ; the Council at a 'previous meetiijg he was instruct- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i ed to prepare an addendum to the original agree- i ; ment with the engineering Pim 0% Tanner, Nar- : i quardt, Fylelvin and Assoc1at:>sS Inc., deleting tk4 : storm drains from the district, and this addendgirj I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I' , % .' ', f 8, '\ '\ I 1 I I ',, ", '\\ ' I . '. ' i I .- I I 1 I I - 72 - i Name 'x, - ' '. I ; of '= ("""""""-""""""""""""""-"""~""~""-.~"~"~""""""""~""". 1 Member i has been submitted for the Council's considera- 1 i tion. It was agreed that the firm be paid t I : $1,000.08 for their cost of the design and the : I cost of deleting the storm drains from the design! i of the district. I I t l?;qu<ry was made as to who would pay this $l,OOO,i i and the City Manager stated this would paid by : ' "the city - not by the district. Perhaps at some : : future date the plans can be used. It was felt i t i that if the storm drains were deleted from the : : project, the project would proceed for sewers. : By motion of the Council the first addendum to Bunne i the contract between the City of Carlsbad and $lei swcndel : Tanner, filarquardt, blelvin and Associates, Inc. !Atkinson i vias approved and the iiiayor authorized to execute fiughes : the same. gardi ne * I I I I f I I I I I I I b I i I t (b) Report from staff - re: Request for sewer i easement from Jack PlcElhose. At a previous : meetinq of the Council this matter was referred t I I I I I ., i to the staff for Further study and reports as i the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended i ! that the easement be granted. t il written repert was submitted to the Counci? by : i the City Manager dated r4arch 11 9 1966, stating i ; the staff's reasons and recommendation that the 1 i request for sewer service through Lake Calaveras ; : be denied. : The City lanager informed the Counci 1 the staff i i recognizes the Parks and Recreation Commission's : I posi tion in making their recommendation as they i i have been working diligently towards the develop-: i ment of Lake Calaveras as a park. * s i It was moved by Cmn. Hughes and seconded by Cmn. i ; Neiswender that Mr. NcElhosc's request for a / sewer easement be denied. { MR. P1C ELHOSE stated he was present at the meet- i i Lo the Parks and Recreation Commission. He ap- : ! peared before the Commission and they unanimouslg i recommended that the request be granted subject : i ts! certain conditions. He has not heard the I ; reasons the staff based their recommendation on, i i however, he could not understand the Council fail:- : ing to recognize that to deny this easement 1. I i wouId definitely make sewers available to the i ; city for park purposes. It will hurt no one, but i i it can help other acreage. The City would have ; ; to build 2ts own sewerage to service Lake Ca'la- i i veras, and for what it would cost they could I build a city hall. 1 Mayor Atkinson informed Nr. McElhose he was not ! ; speaking on behalf of the other merribers of the : i Council 9 but this City was subjected to consider{ ! able litigation due to the Oceanside sewer plant i i being located south of Vista May near .Jefferson : : Street. The door as left open to th.e City that : I in the event the plant is not satisfactcry the : ; City as the right to go back ta CSGrt. S I I 8 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I i ing of the Council when the matter )/as referred f ../ I I I I I I I 0 0 I. I 1 I I I I I l e l 1 I : I I I t I 1 I I I I I I I I' I I \ 8% 'x '\ I 8, \ 'x \ I I 8. '\ '. ' I I I : I '*. '%, 'x, I - 13 - i Name '8, '' I '\ '\ I t + I ; of 'J I : Member f~""""""""""~"~""""""""""""""""""""""""-~"""""---- 1 1 I t i PIP. ElcEIhos~ stated he was only askjng for a I I I ; sewer easement with the condition that the city i i can "Lie into this line. If the Counscil'is deny- ; ; ing this request because of something that hap- : i pzncd 10 or 15 years ago, he will go to Oceanside: : ar?d nake a proposal. This park could be used I would not consider it. A paved road would be ; accessible to the Areag however, if the easement ! I I ss a regiona? park. Without sewers the County i I 1 i is not granted the road wiI1 noi be accessible. i : Also he nould like to go on record as stating ; I the Council was denying the city progress. i Cmn. Jardine inqu-ired as to the added cost of ! t construction, and Nr. McElhose stated it wu?d : i not cost anything additional; howevero if at some: i firturer,time a line is needed it would cost an : ! additional $20,030 for another lift station. I ! ! i Cmnn. Jardine further inquired about the $29,000. i : dr. ?:?cElhose informed the Council there are ap- i I proximateTy 1750 acres to the east and south. i Cmn. Hughes askad Mr. NcElhose if he would be in-i : volvcd in the cost if the addi tionat property i were deve~oped? i Mr. dcElhose stated he was not sure if he would I : deve7op the land or r?ot. If he did he would be : I I I I 1 I I I I I I I e l I I l e I I 1 I I I I I * I ; i nvol ved. I I I I I I I @mn. Hughes stated in his opinion the granting i ; of this easement would only benefit the City of : i Occ.anside and i4r. PIcElhose. fie could see no I I ; benefit to the City of Carisbad, I ! I ;;ir. ~~~cEl~~ose commented that evidently the Council! : wants the City of Oceanside to make the offer. e l i He asked that the Council say "yes" and then he I ; would carry the ball to Oceanside. I I ; Cnn. Hughes stated he felt it should have been i i granted tile ott~er way around. The city is not I i sure they want Calaveras Lake as a County Park. i i P!r. 'Carrnichael of the Park and Recreation Corn- i :mission stated the Commission felt this would I I i definitely be an advantage to the city. Some of I : the members of the Commission sirorked on the Cal- : i avertas Lake project 4 years ago and nothing has i ; been done in 4 years. b I I I I I 8 I I t I 1 I I 1 1 I t hyor Atkinson asked Nr. McElhose if he would b~ ! jwi1'~ing to pay for this easement? I :Nr. E4cE'lhose stated he would be willing to pay a i i reasnrrable land fee. $ t I Gnn. Jardine stated be felt this matter had merit: 1 I I I I I I s I e !and suggested that perhaps a lease agreernsnt cou?$ : be \;.sorked out. I I 1 r 1 a 0 !The City blanager pointed out if sewers fer this : ;area were not needed then the granting df this ! jeasernent is of no ber?ef'it to the City. I I ! I I 1 I I I I I I I b I s I $ 0 * I I e * 1 * I I I I t 4 I I I - 14 I *- , \ ', -* ', I \ ' '\ '3 1 N' . '. .' 1 4 I '\\ "\, ', ' '\ i Name '\. d I I I I : of .'$ ~"""""~"""""""""-"-"""""""""~""""""""--""""~"""-"-"" I Member i IJIr. t:icElhose informed the Cotlnci I 12e is cons truce- f ing a private sewer under private contract. At : i sach time as it is completed then it will be of- : ; fered to the City of Oceanside and they in turn i i ccin ei they accept or reject the system. i T;I~ ~.i ty i;Ianager i nqui red of blr. IIlcEIhose as to i i how he intended to take care of the effluent, I I i and tdr. i'icElhose stated they would put it through! ; the Oceanside plant. He is trying to eliminate : t a lift station, ! 1 i Cmn. Dtenne stated he could see no disadvantage in: i granting an easement providing the city does not : ; use the Oceanside sewer systerri. I I ! Cmn. Hughes stated he could see no advantage to i i the City of CarIsbad in granting this easement. i ; It would open up the adjoining 'lands in the City ; i of Qceanside. i Mr. HcElhose a,sked what the disadvantages were to: : the city? I I i The Assistant Engineer informed the Gouncil that i : if this easement lies within a drainage area it i : could work 'Go a disadvantage. + 1 i Cmn. Jardine stated he felt blr. IMlhose should 1 ; be given the opportunity to work with the staff ; i a5 to a private easoment on a fee basis. i Crnf;. Hughes stated after hearing the discussion i i he would vjithdraw his motion and have the matter : ; referred back to the staff. I i By motion of the Council it was agreed that Mr. :Dunne I JcElhose be allowed to negotiate with the staff heiswender : to see if a satisfactory agreement can be worked $tkinson i out on a fee basis. Hugh cs I Cmn. Neiswender stated he would like to have it i i made clear that by referring this matter back to i ! the staff this does not mean that the Council 9 I : approves of the plan as it now stands, I ! i Prscedure far notifying Parks and Recreation Corn-: i mission": re: Trees. Cmn. Jardine inforrned the : : Couna?- a meeting was held in the Ci ty Managers ! i office wi th two members of the Parks and Recrea- ; : tion Commission and himself to discuss the proce-i i dure in which the Parks and Recreation Commission: i is to bc notified concerning improvements that in:- : volve the removal of trees. I I ; Et was agreed that upon the adoption of the budgeit I tile Cornsissi on would be notified and asked to re-: I vis! ihe 1913 Act and Engineering projects for i i the next Y'scal year and work with the Eugineering : Department to determine the best moves Lo be macle!, i Any new 1317 Act projects that appear during the : I year, the Commission is to be notified ZF soon i : as the Council accepts the proposed pro.,;:xt. A& ; tentative subdivision map is f-ikd. i Cmn. Ounne stated the Council has not given any i i policy to the staff or Commfssion as to what 1 I : should be done about ths Sr~zr,. , e l I 1 * J I I I 1 I I I I t I I I t 8 I I 8 I I I 4 f I * I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I gardine t + I I I I I I -" 3 "I- I I I I 0 e I the Comhlissiom is to be notified at the time a ; I I 8 I I I 1 I I I I $ I I I I I I I I I I s I I I I c :"""""""""~""""""""""""""~"""""""""""""""""""""~ ! Mernoer I I 1 I 1 * I I I I I - 15 - '., '\ .\ '\ , '\ '\\ ', 'N, '\ \ X\ '\ ',, Name 'x, \' of '3 ' '\ .I a t I I 1 i Cnn. Jardine informed the Council it was recow- t f mended that trees should be planted where trees i i have been removed. I I T!I~ ci: ty ~janager informed the COU;IC~ 1 there is a j : r'4.nster Street Tree plan adopted by the Council. : ; ;:le procedure for the actual removal of the tree$ t is set forth by ordinance. One of the reasons : i for the report subm.itted by Cmn. Jardine was t< I determine the procedure by >!hjch the Parks and I : Recreation Comaission will be notified. I I : Cmn. Meiswender stated he attended a Parks and ! i Recreation Comml'ss'l'on meeting some time ago and I f the Commission asked what the City Council wants : i tilem to do. I I i 141.. Carsnichael stated the ordinance very clearly i : defines bfhat the Commission is to do. I I i Cmn. kist~ender infomed the Council Commissione< f Little suggested that everyone who has a bicycle: i meet down at the Jefferson Street School and rid? : around through town and end up at Holiday Pabk : i For a picnic lunch. The Commission did not know i ; ho~ to get the matter off the ground. 4 I i CITY ATTORilEY 'S REPORT: : (a) Agreement between City and Southwest Bank - i i re: 1Jate1- bill collection. The Council was in- i : formed an agreement has been prepared between the: i City and the Southnes t Bank in Carlsbad for the i I cGllection of the city's water bills. The city i : has a similar agreement with the Security Bank: : i in Carlsbad. ! Plcyor be authorized to execute the agreement an :Meiswend@; : behalf of the City of Carfsbad. :Atki nson t 8 I I I I -. I I I I I I f I I I I I 1 I 9 8 I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 " I I I I * I I I Ey motion of the Council it pias agreed that the !Dum I I :Hughes I I I I jJardi ne I I I i Collection of delinquent water bills. The City i i Attorney stated the city has been unable t~ col- : ; lcct the closing water bi 11 from The Vi 11 ageo I I i formerly owned by ;;?I.. Archie Koyle, and asked if i : the Council wished to bring suit as this seems to; i be the only alternative due to the fact the FWA i : foreclosed on Ur. Xoyle. I I f By motion of the Council the City Attorney was bunne ; authorized to proceed with legal action for col- $!eiswender : ?ecticn of the water bill. Rtki 11521: I pug h es ! !Jspdine I I I I I I I t : , -_- C?aim for damages - Piartha F4udge. A claim has t * I been wceived from Martha Nudge, 715 Arbuckle, i I for damages received as a result of a fall into : : a ditch dug by the City of Carlsbad Mater Depart-: i ment on Madison Street near Arbuckle Place Gn i ; February l3 1966, in the amount of $10,000.00 t r I 5y inot-io;:~ of the Counci 1 the c?aim was denied Dunnc ! a.nd the matter referred to the city's insurance ~Jeiswendeu i carrier. %tki nson I 3ardi ne 0 0 9 I I I I I I I )lug hcs I I I ! ! I I I .* c I I I ! I I I I I I I - 16 * ', 8 '\ '\ I \ \,' t I '\ .. 8, ! ', . t '\ '\ b I '. '8, I Name \\, ; of '( 0 I :"~""""""""""""""""~"""""""""""-""""-""""~-~"""~""-, : Member I ' ; ". CJTY iUd\iAGER'S REPORT: I I I I I f i ; ... ?wuest IL-" for monthly Teen Dances - Uexican Americin I 8 ... Asssejation. I. - "" ~ The Nexican American Association ha$ i D,nces at the Carlsbad High School. The dances : i 1:rj7 'I Le t:c17 chaperoned by interested parents and : a-isisted by sufficient nembers of Settles Security 1 Patrol and other well qualified personnel. I i The &?t> ifanager informed the Council the Chief i t 0% police has no objection to the dances bring ; i held providing three ofT'-duty police Officers ar$ i present ever and above the private police securii i ty. 1 l I aLq:tfesteci .., permfssion to conduct monthly Teen I t 4 I 1 I I I I I I i 3y motion of the Council it was agreed that per- i Dunne I mission be granted to the Mexican American Assocf-lieiswend i alion, with the provision recommended by the i Atki nson i Chief of Police. : Hughes : The City blanager informed the Council the forma- i i tion Comnissioi? approved the annexation of two i : parcels of city owned property, and held the I ; bad had held their election for annexation to I I I I I I i Jardine I I i third parcel in abeyailce until after North Carls; I i the Ci ty of Carlsbad. This ltri 11 reduce the I : amount paid for property taxes approximately I I i $3,000, I I t I I I 1 I i Cmn. Dunne inquired about the status of Jefferso( i Street improvement project, and he was informed : : the design is approximately 60% completed. I I I I t I I : "" AU'7RORIPATIO$l FOR PAYE.?E?.!T OF BILLS AND IIATIFI@A-. i : TIO& OF PAYROLL: I I "- I I I I I i Authorization was given for the payment of bi?i'ls I i i for the general expenses of the city in the : Dunne I amount ~f $90,865.55 and the ??ater Department in i Neiswendl i the amount of $530.92, from b'larch 1, 1966 to I Atkinson : ?!arch 15, 1966 as certified by the Birectar of ! Hughes i Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee. i Jardine 1 I I i Ratification of the payroll was given for the i I Dunne I ; $21,773.37, as certified by the Director of Fi- i Atkinson I first half of P.'rarch, 1966, in the amount of ; IJeiswmlr I I Jardine : nance and approved by the Auditing Committee. ; Hughes I I I I I I I I I I t A2JOURNMEN-r: 8 I I - I I I i By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at : I : 1O:OQ P.I.1. I a I I I I I l e e I i 2espectfully submitted, I I I I I :<2, 2LY. &&&e, ,4 /" : irl FGk, ET E. ADAHS- ! &J" 1' " ; ci ty 7 ; c1 erk I I I I I I t $ I I I .:t I I I e I I l a I I I I I I 8 I I I I I I t I I t t 4 8 I I ! ! I