Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-05-17; City Council; MinutesI I I ',\.\' ! I \'\ " L I '., ',;, '\\' $kqi nutes of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Neeting) i \\ '\ \\ ', '\\ '\ '\\ :Gate of Meeting: May 17$ 1956 ; Name '\,'<$$ :Time of Fleeting: 7:GO P.M. ; of '$2 : MP-nber \$ '4 $@Lt CALL was ansvtered by Councilmen Atkinson, lBunne and Jardine. Councilman Neiswender vias :p;.escnt at 7:06 P.M. Also present were City Xz.!:iigzr Mamaux 9 City Attorney Wilson and City iC-1 erk Adams. !IWOCATlOi\l was offered by blayor Atkinson. IALLEGIAHCE to the Flag was given. hPPROVAI.. OF MZ?dUTES: :(a) PiinUtes of the regular meeting of April 19, IDunne 1 I il966, were approved as submitted. pardine i !(b) i/linutes of the regular meeting of !,lay 3, 1966$tkinson ~ !were appro.ved as submitted. :DEnne I I I 8 ip_l_i?_c_e_o,f_"~e_~-i-ngt____C_o_l;l_n_c_j_l___C_~-~~~erS """" "- ""_ - """; "" :'""""" I I I I I I I ! I 1 I I 4 I .t I I I I I I I I I I I I - I $ t I I 1 I !4Atkinsan I I $ I I I I ?ardine 1 I I , I I I I I , I I I I ~CORRESPOIWEMCE: I !tetter dated May 17, 1966, 3596 Harding St., was i :presented, requesting the Council to consider the : :possibility of the City owning and operating their: :own ambulance service. 1 I , jiilayor Atkinson requested this matter referred to i :the staff for study and report. Letter dated Hay 4, 7966, from Francis J. and \Virginia E. FOX of FOX'S Snug Harbor, requesting i lovernight privileges tc a limited number of guests: :over the Hernorial Day weekend. i5y motion of the Council permission was granted btkinson i :to Fox's Snug Harbor for overnight privileges to lrjunne I I :a limited number of guests over the Memorial Day ?ardine !, :weekend. I I I I ilct-ter dated May 8, 1966, from the California Out-i :board Boat Racing Association, asking the Council'$ :sanction to hold a 30 mile Outboard tdarathon Race : :at the A311a Hedionda Lagoon on September 25, 1966.; iAlso they requested that their club be given per- I !mission to camp overnight at Fox's Snug Harbor on ; :Saturday, September 25, 1966. I I I :By motion of the Council permission was granted to; l ithe California Outboard Boat Racing Association ; :to hold a 30 mile Marathon Race on September 25, i I1966, at the Agua Hedionda Lagoon, and the club fltkinson i :allowed to camp overnight at Fox's Snug Harbor Qunne I ion Saturday, September 25, 1966. 9ardi ne :) :Can. Neiswender was present at 7 :06 P.&. :OR91 COMMUNICATIOllS: !There were no oral communications. I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 I I I b I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I \ I 1 I I I I 8 I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * I L-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 t I * iPUBLIC HEARINGS: I I 8 I * I I I t !(a) Appeal of the Decision. of the Planning Commis-i ision .in denying a reduction in lot widtIiioii"T5r~ !eel s ''Ait .) :iaorthcr'iy Side of Stratford Lane. ppgl ants: I lNorene E. Batchelder and Arthur N. Ennis. I i' I IIpi and IIC" 9 on;proper:.y~iocated on the ; I". 1". " - """" " __L_ 1 I a I I "- I * I 1 I I " "5__ I t : ! I I I I I I # I I I I I I t ! I l a I I I I t I I k 8 I I I' , a', <' I I , ' 8 ', '\ I I I I I I I I '\\'\> '\\ ', ' t I \\ '\, '\ '\, I -2- ', ', '\ I I i Name 't, *$$$ I I I of $$$J I ~"~"""""""""""""""""""~""""""""""~"~~-~~~"~-~~~~~~~~~-~~~~---~ I Member \$ !-?he ~iayop~ annotlnceci this was ti-ic time and place I ! r-lixed by the City Council to hc2i' all persons ;dc:s?;..ing to speak in regard to tht? rtbove appeal. i I 8 'X&.% I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I ;Tke Clerk pressnted the Affidavit of Publication ; I I iEtjd the Council ordered the same filed. j~he following written letters of protest were :presented: I I I I I {tetter dzted May 11 1 19636, from Rabco Land Corpor: latinl!.i, 2937 Madison St., stating they did not op-: :pose the reduction of lot sizes on this property I [at the Planning Conmission hearing as they were : jnot f:o"tfied. They presently own two lots of :standard size on the south side of Stratford Lane! /and are in the process of constructing two homes : :that will sell for $21,900 and $24,900. A1 so the3 :are in the process of purchasing a lot from Mr. i :and C.-?rs. St. Clair cn the North side of Stratford ; :lane in order to build a home for a client, which i jwil'l cost $25,500. Therefore, they strongly op- i J I I f I I I I I I s I I I : I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :pose any reduction in lot width or lot area on I :Stratford Lane. 1 I I ! I I I I I I :Letter dated Clay 16, 1966, from Dr. Sven G. Lund- i :qvist, 1226 Laguna Dr., stating he strongly ob- i ijected to any reduction in lot size on Stratford : :Lane, as he purchased a lot at 1225 Stratford Lane!, jznd proceeded to build a home valued at $28,000, : :which is now practically completed. It is feeling! jthat the present minimum lot size barely permits i !a reasonable size home to be built and any reduc- ; $ion can only result in small low cost home build-: jing. Also cutting the back yard area tends to :drive children into the streets to play. hayor Atkinson announced the Council would hear i jfrom the Appellants or their representative. I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I 1 jMR. HARZY PRIGG, 3235 Plaezel, stated he was repre-! ;sent?ng the property owners. Two of the proposed ; :lots are over 7,100 sq. ft. and one is over 6,400 i :sq. ft. When the street was improved the City : ;st.jabb~d in three laterals for sewers, as it was t :evidently the City's idea there should be three : :lots. Until tonight there were no objections from; :the surrounding property owners. These protests : :are from owners of property located as you go up 'i. :?.!le hill. This also involves one lot that is sub-: Ista.t:da;-d and has been for several years. If the i Jot line is moved back as recommended by the Plan-: Isling Commission, and If)' is taken off the property! \Fu.onting on Knowles Ave. for street improvements, : :this WGL;?~ require that someone would have to I I !build an a lot that is 14,003 sq. ft. in area, in i :a 7,5G0 sq. ft. area. These proposed lots are at i jtk~ end of Stratford Lane and the street will carry Iv~P~ little traffic except for Chose living on : Ithe street. $R. RON BROL~AR;), stated he was 2 pa.,.rtner on the! i :letter subnitted by RZbCG, ai16 if the rest QT the ; i~ots on this street liave sufficient area then :this property shculd, as there is sufficient isquare footage fcr LLVU lots. * I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 3 I I I I 1 t I I I I I I I I I t 8 I I I * I 4 1 I 1 t; t * I I : t 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 t I I I ! $s there were no other persons desiring to speakp i jthz public hearing was closed at 7:46 P.M. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I' ,.' \\ I I I I I 8 ', '\\'\.\ ", '? i Name '\,xi$ ! ; of \,+a I t Member "3 I I ', \ ' ', '8, ' ', I ''' '\ ' I I I -3- t 8: 1""""""""""--""""""""~""~"~"~~"""""-"-------------,---------------- I !%r. Don Schoell, City Planner, informed the COUM- t Icil the entire parcel owned by Batchelder and Enniis :wzs split into three parcels on March 9, 7966, I I !making one lot with 13,999 sq. ft., one lot with i 1T0,?52 sq. ft. and one lot with 20,731 sq. ft. I I i51.;? owners now wish to split the Southerly 20,791 1 ;sq. ft. parcel into three parcelsg A,B, and C. I I !The Planning Commission felt that if the lot line I twere moved back it would give sufficient square I !footage for the three lots, and at the same time ; :leave the necessary square footage for the north- i iorly parcels. However, word was received from ; jthe owners that they did not wish to move the loti :line back. I iCrnn. Dunne stated he was opposed to reducing the i ! $mn. Neiswender stated he had gone over the pro- i Iperty on three different occasions, and he is not 1 !in Favor of reducing the square footage. I I $mn. Jardine stated he agreed with Cmn. Dunne and i Iiieiswender, and offered the following resolution : ifor the Council's consideration: I I iResolution No. 1267: :A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF $qeiswender ICARLSBAD, DENYING THE APPEAL FOR A VARIANCE ON ptkinson iPkOPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF STRAT- tDunne b :FORD LAHE AT THE EASTERLY TERNINUS IN THE CITY OF gardine i SARLSBAD, was adopted by title only and further : jreadi rig waived . I I $mil. Dunne offered the following reasons for deny-i 1 jing the appeal : I 1 8 I 1. It would be undesirable to reduce the lot : I :size in this area. 1 2. 6y reducing the ?ut size it woutd create I I !substandard lots. 8 I I I 3. I\!o adequate showing was made as required I 4 !by SectiDn 1802 of Ordinance #9060 to allow the ; branting of the variance. t I , I I I I I I * I 3 I isquare footage of the lots. I I I I 1 , I I 1 I t I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 4 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 8 * I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 : I I i(b) Application for Certificate of Public Conven- 1 tience ac?d"Tecessity to operate taxicabs within F&"-C-ity%fmbad. Applicant: Avocado Cab Co. ! 4 I 1 I I I 1 I I I -~- I L-. - " -" ""- * I the Clerk Dresented the Affidavit of Publication 1 ;and the same was ordered filed. I I XThe application to operate taxicabs within the city of Carlsbad was reviewed by the Council. $he Nayor announced the Council would hear fram i ?he applicant or his representative. I t I I NR. DON MARTIRSON, Attorney at taw, stated he was : bepresenting the owners of the Avocado Cab CID.? F4r. and Mrs. Bookout have been doing Business 1i1 i Vista since 1959 under the name of Avocado Cab Co.; I I :They have 11 cabs at present and have 3 new cars i :on order. They propose to have 24 hour local I I I I :service here in Carlsbaci. It is their intention i :to mainta.in an office here in Carlsbaci and have ; 1 1 jentered into a lease with Mr. Baurngartner at 3065 i I 1 8 : I 9 I I I 1 I t I I I I I I 1 I b I I I I 1 I I t I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I * I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I $ ' \\' ! ! I \\ I\, I\, I, I\\ I I '., ', '\ '\ I \\ 'x '\ '\ I ' 8. \. ' 8 I I -A- i Bame \%,'+$, I ! sf \$\C 1 $JJ\. ;"~""~""~"""""-"""""~"-""~""""""""""-""""---~""""""""i : Member $ :State Street. his location has off-street parkin!g i7aci7 ities. The cab fares would be metered rates.! :All of the cabs have radios installed. In closing: I I :?:ire Marti nson stated he was sure that with Nr. I I 1 I hKd Mrs. Bookout's background they nil1 be able to: I I j2ive good service to the City of Carlsbad. i I I I jCnn. Jardine inquired about the amount of insur- i lance coverage? I t I :The City Attorney stated the applicant would have i ita increase +he amount of insurance coverage in I ! :order to ccmply with the City ordinance. I I I $liscussion was given as to the rates proposed in i :the application for cab fares. I I I I :sir. Bookout informed the Council the rates for ICarlsbad would be the same as are now in effect in): :Vista and Oceanside. I I 1 I 1 ! \" I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 t I I I I 1 t I I 1 t I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I :Mr. !+jartinson pointed out Mr. Bookout has a re- istricted license in Oceanside to serve Nira Costa ! $mn. Jardine asked Row often the meters were cal- E :i brated? kr. Bookout stated there were periodically checked/ ! I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I $01 1 ege. I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I l 8 :by the County of San Diego. I t I \It was pointed out the ~e11ot.l cab CO. of Oceansidej :is now licensed and operating here in Carlsbad. : :However, they do not have an office here in Carls-i jbad. I I !Mayor Atkinson announced the Council would hear i :from all persons wishing to object to the applica-i jti on. $R. JOSEPH GEIER, stated he was President of the i :Yellow Cab Co., Sluebird Cab Co. and Red Cab CG. : ;in Oceanside. He was not notified of this hesringi, :but saw it in the newspaper. In contacting his ; :attorney, he was informed he would be out of town,I :therefore, he would like to request this matter : !held over for one month in order for his attorney i $0 present his case. Gtherwise he would have to ! :speak on behalf of the company. t I I I I I 1 t t I I ! I I I I 8 1 I I $ 1 I i I I I I I I I 8 I I I I I 8 I * I 1 I * I I I :The Mayor informed Mr. Geier Re should make any i jstatements he had to offer at the meeting this ; , :eveni ng. I I , ! I I I I I :fdr. Geicr inforined the Council the Yellow Cab Co. i $as served the City of Caplsbad for a long time ; :an3 has been operating at a loss. They attempt i $0 do their best in servirq the city. There is ; :nothing in the Certificate of Convenfence and I :Necessity that states the City needs additional ! jservice. The meter rates for the Avocado Cab. Co.; :in Vista are $.SO per nile after the flag drops. : :It was Frir. Geier's feeling the matter shGgld be i :further advertised to see if the general public : jneeds additiorial cabs in the City. The Applicant i :does no-t state how many cabs he will put in the i jC7't.y of Carlsbad. The rates for the Yeillo:~ Cab I :go. are $30 for the first 1/% mile after the flag: :drops and $.lo for each 7/4 mile addstional. I I t I I I I I 6 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 4 I 4 I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I , I I I I I I I 1 I I I s 1 I I' I I \'- "' 1 I \' ',\., '\, '\\'*, I '\, '\ 'x, '\ , * i I ', 'I ', 'b ! Name 8, '+$A " : of '$%, : Member .%< .?&? :""""""""""~""""""""""--"""-""~~"~"~""-.."""~~""""""""," i i4r. Geier was asked how long it takes a cab to i :get to Carlsbad from Oceanside, and i4r. Geier in-i i 59rrned the Council it takes approximately 7 I I 1 :minutes unless there happens to be a cab in this i i area. I : i ! i As there were no other persons desiring to speak : :in opposition to the application, the public :hearing was declared closed at S:lO P.M. *I I \ t <* I I 1 -. 5 - I I I I 8; I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I i Cmn. i;eisr:;Ii?nder stated the Yellow Cab Co. ha!; :been here for a nunlber of years and the name is i jkncwn to this area. illr. Geier states he has lost: Iaoney serving this area and perhaps the Avocado ! !Cab Co. will find they will lose money. However,! i it is his feeling that competition is healthy. I I i Cmn. Dunne inquired of the City Attorney if the i :ordinance relating to a Certificate of Public I i Convenience and Necessity states any reasons for i I denying an application. 8 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 The City Attorney informed the Council the sec- i i tion in the City Code they rmy wish to consider \ :for denying an application is: (1) there are a : !sufficient number of cabs in the City for hire; I i (2) that the granting of more certificates would ; :unduly congest the traffic and interfere with the: :free use of the public streets by the public;, and: : (3) that the public interests, convenience and i !necessity do not require the issuance of such I I : certificate. I I I I I $ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 i Cmn. Jardine stated he bid not feel that any of i jthe three rzasons applied in this instance. He ! :asked i4r. Geier if there is a charge made to maker * a !a Yellow Cab available here in Carlsbad in acidi- : t tion to the meter rate? I t I I :Idr. Geier stated there has never been an addii- I I ; tional charge made. I I i After further consideration, the fo11owing resoltdf i tion was presented fora review by the Council :: I I I I I :' i Resolution No. 1268. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY I : COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF: CARLSBAD, GRAHTING A CER- iNeiswenderj ITIFICATE 3F PUBLIC COhVENIEEICE ASJD NECESSITY TO :Atkinson i 1 :OPERATE TAXICABS k!ITHXb! THE CITY OF CARLSSAD,, wasjllunne I :adopted by title and further reading waived. :;arcline i x; b !j I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ! # 1 I I 0 I I I I 1 It II 1, 1% I i (c) (Continued) Resolution of Intention #56,, of i jthe Planning Commission - General Plan. * I I I I :i :' ;I It I! :The Hayor ammounced this hea-ring had been contin-: :I 'I i ueb from the previous meeting, and t!le Council i :; :would now hear from a1 1 persons desiring to speak: :; :I i on bellalf of the General Plan, ; !I 1; 1 ~AR. DONALD ERIGGS, JR., stated he WOUM like it : jto be made a matter of record that he still ab- ; : jects to three main factors. (1) R-1 zoning I jalong Interstate 5; (2) There is no.. means for : vehicular traffic between the two &bas of Carls- i :bad; and (3) He objected Lo the continuation of : lTarnarack through Birch Street to El Camino Real. i :The Engineering Department has ap-jroved a 63' I I :right of b~ay through the :proul Hmesy the Junior! :High Schcol area and Kama:. tievelcpr?ct:vlt. Any I I :right OF vay dcviation wr~ulci S~WI like iocking i ! ! 8 b I 'i ;I 1; ;I It PI ;I *I 1; :I $1 :; :I :' 11 :' lj :; !I It l1 * I 1 I t I I I' , \'\, 8 I \8 '\ ', '\ '\ I 8, '-, '\ '\ I .1 1 I ', \ ', 8 I 8, '\ ' I -6- i Name \$ ''$ t I t I e f "$?$ et I"""""-."""-"""-"""-""""""""""""""""""""""-~"""""""", 1 Member \$ I I I I I I I I I I :the barn door after the horses an-e out. I ! I I :8R. JACK KUBOTA stated the Planning Conmission i i and Counci 1 have had many -.things before them. He: t felt it would be appropriate to go back to tils ; i original comments made that this is a broad :general plan, and not a specific plan. He views ! :this plan as a specific plan. You have rezoned I jan area for a parking lot, you have had subdivi- : lsions before you that were approved, etc. This i jis in fact a specific plan. The treatment af- I I :forded the properties along Pi0 Pic0 Dr. and !State Interchange 5 indicates this area as a R-7 I !Zone. This is not realistic. Pi0 Pic0 Dr. is I !way is going through the city a% grade. He is i :sure there are other property owners along Qio i i Pic0 Dr. that fee? the way he does. If he were : ; to corae to the Council with a problem that was i i counter to the General Plan it would be tough I I I going. Once you start "nibbling" at the General i !Plan then the plan has to be specific. I I i I I I 1 at grade and one of the few areas where the free4 ! 4 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i4Rf iiIORT1r:IEfi EONDY asked what the General P?an ! ;indicates for Pi0 Pic0 from Elm Ave. to Tamarack i i Ave.? It was his understanding that this area : : woul d rerrlai n R-3. ; f4r. Bondy ljlas informed the area is zoned R-3. :?Ir. Bondy further stated there are 30,000 cars i i that go by on the Freeway per day. He did not ! I I t I feel the City ws in a position to turn dow bus-! t : iness. A committee was appointed to study the I properties adjacent to the Freeway. Their report: ! indicated that the areas adjacent to the Freeway : # i are prime commercial areas and should be considerkd ; for cormercial use. i MR. DALE PdORHOLD informed the Counci 1 he fe'l t Pioi 1 Pi co Drive should definitely be considered for ; i other than R-1 zoning. As you drive along the i : Freeway through Santa Ana and Anaheim you find : i bl;sinesses adjacent to the Freeway. i As there were no other persons desiring to speak,! : the bfayor declared the pub1 ic hearing closed at i I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I 1 * I I I I 1 I t I I I I I I I I l 4 I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I i 8:30 P.A. i Cm. Dunne stated the Planning Commission, the i : citizen committees and DMJ?l have done a fine job i i on this Plan and this is a sound plan for the 1 I I I : growth of the City. He took exception to the i economic report, i.e., a bedroom community. It i :is his feeling we need desirable industry and he ; i does not see that Vista and Oceanside have any- i : thing additional to offer than Carlsbad. Indus- i i try will bring jobs and a better tax base for I I * I the City. i Cmn. Jardine stated there are different kinds of i :industry. This City would be delighted to have i i certain types of industry and industry should be ; : encouraged. E4r. Kubota made a strong point abouti i this being a General plan. The intention is; that: : the Plan not be so rigid that it cannot be changk i ed. The citizens involved and the economic con- : t i There will be revjsions and chan.;z.c to the Plan. ; I :The Plan is ilot as rigid 8s idr. Kubota indicated.! ! ! I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I i. I I I I t I I I I I I I I 1 I t I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I t I I I I i ditions go to form the imptmentaticn of the PIanJ I I I I I I I I s I I I I I I '\ *. b' I \\ \\,'\\ '., '* I I '\ ' '\\ 8, I I '\\ ', 'X\ -7- i Name \\ '8% ; of '.,%! I I I 8 '\ 8 i Member t! 'J :"""""""""""""""""~"""~"~""""""""~""""""-~"""""""" !In general he felt the Plan was very good. There i !are several points he would like stricken - one Coy :icstance that the overcrossing at Tamarack Avenue i !be removed. I I ICmn. Neiswender stated he would like to compliment! la71 of the people who had a part in this Plan as i It0 delete - (1) the extension of Tamarack Avenue; ; land (2) that the zoning remain flexible along the I :Freeway. To him a plan is a guide and takes us 3:. jfrorn here to there. There will be changes and he : :hopes they will be good ones. 1 1 I I t I I I bel 1 as DMJM. There are two things he would 1 i ke ; I I I t I iMayor Atk-inson inquired of the City Attorney that i :in the event the Council wished to delete any por-: ttion of the General Plan, should the Council adopt! !the Plan with certain changes and then refer it ' !-. :back to the Planning Commission. !The City Attorney stated the Council can adopt i Ithe Plan with exceptions and notify the Planning i IComrni ssion of these changes. t I :Discussion was given as to the extension of Tam- ! igression the property owners do not object to Tarn-; jarack being extended as long as it stays within I :the 60' right of way. I I :MR. GERALD M~CLELLAN stated the property owners i :in the Highlands object to Tamarack being ma,de a i :major thoroughfare. He felt a study should be ; :made of a major collector street. I I iCmn. Jardine stated he felt there would be a. need i :for a major street through to El Camino Real, but : :he did not feel it should go through the Highlancisi. :If Tamarack is allowed to be a 60' street it. could: !very well be that Tamarack could become a major i :street. :After further discussion it was suggested thlat i ;Dr. and that a study be made for a major street i !East of Highland Dr. through to El Camino Real. I I !i4r. Taylor 9 Superintendent of the Carlsbad E.le- i :mentary Schcol District, informed the Council I ithey have made arrangements to purchase a school i :site in the Laguna Riviera Subdivision. Hillside i :and Park Dr. are designated residential collectors: ;and Kelly as a major collector. They are concern-: :ed about too many major collectors in the vicinitx :of the schools. t 1 :The Council requested that the collector streets i :around the school areas be studied. l~on Schoell, City Plannerg informed the council i :the subdividers have submitted a new map for the I jof the area and they found there is no need for ; la majcr collector street in that arsa. There are i !two natural collectors proposed at Hillside ar;d ; :Park Dr. Kelly 9r. and Tamarack Ave. will go jthrough to ES Camino Real. !Considerable discussion was given as to the zonind !along Pi0 Fico Dr. adjacent to the Freeway. 1 * . ', I 4 I I I I I I 9 I ;arack Plve. Hayor Atkinson stated it was his im- \ I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I !Tamarack remain a major street Nest of Highland ! I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I t I I Laguna Riviera Subdivision. A study has been mad4 I I I I I I t I t 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ! I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I % I I I I I I I I 1 I I t I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 8 I I I ! I I + I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I I , ', \ *\ '\ ', I I I I I I I I 8, '\ ', \, ', I I \, '\ ', * I I \, '\ ', \. I \\ '\ \\ I -8- I ; of \.9.( I Member \$ $1: ~"""""""""""""~"""""""""~"""""""""-..""""""""""""~~ : Crnn. Jardine stated he agreed wi?h Cmc. I;eis!;len- ; I der that the zoning along Pi0 Pico Drive should : 1 be flexible, I ! I Ilayor Atkinson stated he did not see how the zon-; ! ing could remain R-1 along Pi0 Pic0 Dr.; however; I he felt it would be preciscd planned. Also the ; : Easterly boundary of the zoning should be estab- i i lished. The present zoning on Pi0 Pic0 Dr. be- : ; tween Elm Ave. and Tamarack Ave. is R-3. Any I i change should be precised planned. I Don Schoell informed the Council the General1 Plai t shows cornmiercial zoning at the off-ramps. : The City ijanager pointed out the requirement for i I precise planning is restricted so that the Counciil i would have control of the developlent. I I I I I i 8r. Fox, operator of Fox's Snug Harbor, inqjuired i ! as to how far back the Easterly boundary of! the I I zoning would go? I I I i The i4ayor stated he felt this matter should! go ! : back to the Planning Commission as to the East- i i erly boundary and that the area should be pre- i cised planned. I i ~3 me '%,'*% I I 1 8: I I .I 1 I , I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I * I I I I I I I 8 I I I I I : i4r. Neal, Project Planner for DaJiS, pointed out i i the Plan is flexible. If you ask the Planning i i Commission to establish the Easterly boundaery ; : then you are in fact asking for a specific plan. r i As time goes by you can modify the plan. If an : : Easterly boundary is established this would be a i i precise plan. Also each time you establish a : : commercial area away from the downtown area you i i are hurting the downtown area and the City : economically. He suggested that the staff pre- i i parc a precise plan after the Freeway is coin- ! : s tructed. I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I t I I I I I : The City blanager stated he would be relucta.nt to i i have the staff prepare a precise plan. he. moti; i vation and precise plan should come from the pro+ : perty wners. He felt it would be sufficient to i i notify tha Planning Commission that any zon'e I I I : change in this area should be precised planned. i : Pir. Kubota stated these are general thoughts. i ~t is difficult to go along Pi0 Pic0 Drive as : i there are no boundaries relating to zoning. The i : Civic Center is a precise plan. This is incon- i i grwous with the General P1 an. i Don Schoell informed the Council the Civic Centei : plan is a precise plan. Carlsbad is in a very : : zoning. The area that is recommended as R-1 is i i that it will act as a buffer for those-livipg : : along this area. This could be made a very fine i i residential area if it is landscaped properly. : : \.!e have an ordinance for a landscaped freeway. i I We have a chance to save the commercial area in : : the downtown area. We have R-3 zoning on Pi0 i i Pic0 Drive between Elm Ave. and Tamarack Ave. to: : take care of motels, etc. There are sufficient i i intersections to take care of motels and res- I taurants for a 20 year period. Tile City would i I be making more money and collecting more taxes i t than if the enti re area were a7 lowed to become ; i comrnerci a1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I t t I I 8 I I I I I I I 8 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ; farkunate position in that there is not strip I I I I I I I * I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I 5 # I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' , \., 8' I I \\ '\, ', 'x, '\, I I 8, '\ ', '\, I I \' I -9- ', '\ '\\ i Name ', '+@ ~""""""~""""""~"""""""""~~"""-"""-----""-"-"-~------""-""-, !After further consideration it was agreed that i ; the General Plan be adopted and that the follow- 1 jing proposed cilanges be referred to the Planning i lConmission for study and wport: # 1 1. That Tamarack Avenue remain a major 3 I jstreet ldesterly of its intersection with Highlandj :Dr. 9 and that it be a local street Easterly of I \its intersection with /Highland Drive. I I I ied to study a1 ternate routes to replace Tamarack i :Avenue as a major collector from Highland Drive ; I I :Easterly to E1 Camino Real, I I I I *\ I I I I 1 I I I ; of $4 f Member \?& \$ I 8; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I t i I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I 2. hat the Planning Commission be instruct; I I I I I 1 I I I I ! I ! I 3. In making their study of Alternate i I I 1 I I I froutes to replace Tamarack Avenue from Highland : I I :Drive Easterly to EI Camino Real, the Council re- i lquested that the Planning Commission take into i iconsideration any affect a major street might 1 I 1 I jhave upon a school site. I 4. That the General Plan be amended to1 I I !reflect that in the future any colnrnercial uses i \that may be deemed to be proper along Pi0 Pic0 i :Drive, be subject to an approved precise plan of : I I ithe proposed improvements and uses. I I 1 1 !The fol1 owi ng resol uti on was presented: :Resol uti on !io. 127'1. !, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i 'POUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD TE!lJPATIVELY AP- !Neiswenderi [PLROVIi!G AND f\DOPTIMG GEFfERAL PLAPd XITH CERTAIN !Atkinson i :Ct-iAi.JGES Ai4D REFERRING CHANGES TO PLRi:iNIf4G COM- Dunne I iflISSIOid FOR REPORT, was adopted by title only and !Jardine :further reading waived. I I I I I I I I I I I b 4 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I :Ei.'jGINEERIj(G: I I I I I :(a> Review of City policy on Engineering deposit [ :for 1911 Act street openings and street inprDve- ; imen ts. - I 1 , I I I I !ijr. Thorntoon?, Assistant Engineer, informed the i :Council in 1952 the street opening for Stratford I !Lane was ini tiated by the property owners. ,~t i jthat time the Council adopted a policy wherein i :the property mners would be required to deposit : i$l50.00 per lot for preliminary engineering, the ! I,'f@@ling being that if the district failed the en- : I igineers'ng costs would have some return. I I I I I t :There is a petition being circulated for a street i :opening the block surrounded by Bwena Vista I I iAve., Highland ilr.9 Forest Ave. , Arland Rd. and i lWilson St., with street improvements, including : :underground utilities and street lights. The :City has requested a $150.00 deposit per lot from i ithe property owners. The property wners do not i Ifeel they should have to deposit this amount,, :This job will probably be jobbed out to a private i kngiineer, and he could bear the cost of the 1 iengineering up to the time of the hearing on the i :resolution of intention. However, if a $150.00 : ideposi t is made by tke property owners and the :project is cornp~eted they will get their derlosit i I ! t I I 1 s; I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I b I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I % I 8 l a 1 I 1 I I ! t 0 I I I' , .., *' I .\ , ', \ '\ I ! \. . '\ < I I ',\ '\, '\, ', ', I I I I - 10 - '\, '\ -\ I I / ~ame \\, '.% I I I 8: : of 'S d $?L' :"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-""""""~"""""""", i Member -$ i back. The property owners do not feel they ; should be required to put up this deposit as they! i would not be required to put up a deposit on a : : dedicated street if it were ur,der the 1911 Act. i i As the policy stands now this project would be : ; handled the same as Stratford Lane. I CKW Dunne suggested that Tamer and iiiarquardt f I be contacted to see if they wished to do the pre-: 1 j : liminary engineering on a no deposit basis. 8 I I I i ~mn. Neiswender. stated he felt if the people had: ! I to deposit the $lSO.OO they would think twice I I i before signs'ng a petition, and he was in favor : : of leaving the policy as is. I Cmn. Dunne pointed out that Tanner,and Narquardt i i took the risk on the proposed sew$'b district for I I Valley Street, et al. i Cmn. Jardine stated the people are going to have i : to pay for this project one way or another. : f,'ir. Thornton pointed out that sometimes it does i i cause a hardship on property owners to have to ; ! advance the money: hobJever, after tile protest ; i hearing the property owners are refunded th'ei r ; I money. * I I I i By motion; of tne Councii it was agreed that the tleiswender i. I policy requiring the $150.00 deposit for prielirn- Rtkinson i : inary engineering remain as is. bunne * I I I * I b I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,. ,, I I I b I I I I I $ I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I .I I I $ I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I gzrdine i I ! i (h) Resolution #1269, adopting and submitting a i : budget for expenditure of funds allocated from I i State HiqhvJay Fund to cities. The Council was i illformed each fiscal year a budget must be sub- i ; lnitteci to the Division of Highways for expendi- i i ture of funds allocated to the city. This Iludget: : has been prepared, allocated $26,676 for street i i maintenance and $46,287.34 for acquisition of I ; A resolution has been prepared, approving and ! i adopting said budget for th2 Cauncil's considera-: : tion as follows: I t i right of way for the extension of Elrn Avenue. 4 t I I I I ! I I t I I I I $ I 1 I 1 I t I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I 1 I 1 4 I I : Resolution ?io. 1269. RESOLUTIO!l OF THE CITY ! COUidCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ADOPTIPiG AND SUB-heiswender ! i YITTIHG A BUDGET FOR EXPE?JDITURE OF FUNDS ALLO- btkinson i i CATED FROM THE STATE HfGH1dAY FUND TO CITIES, was Dunne ;x i adopted by title only and further reading waived.gardine J I i (c> Request for waiver of street improvements - i : i9r. John St. Clair. Letter dated ?,lay 4,1366,r : from John 2. and Mabel St. Clair was presented I i reqwestjng a waiver of street improvement bond ; i for the improvement of KnowIes ~ve. at th~s time : : as they wi 11 have to pay cash for the sel;rer main f I on Knowlcs Ave. and this wi 11 cause a fi nanci a1 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I t 8 I I 1 I I I I * 4 I r I I ! i burden. I I I I i The Engineering Departmefit reported the St. Clair$ I have requested a lot split, which will requlre : i street improvements or bond for their property : i located at 1279 Know!es Ave.; however, this letteir 8 I t * I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I J I ! I i' . 8\ I I '\, '\, '8, '\ '\, I I ,\x' I I \\ '\, '\ \\\ I I \ .8 I - 11 - ', \ '\ I : Name '. '+& I 4 I I ! I of '8.& t is premature in that they have, applied for a I I 8; i Member .(r '\& ~"""~""""""""""""""""""""""""""~~""..""""-l~"""""""-, ; variance, and. the matter has not been before the : I i Planning Commission as yet. The Council can I i either act on ttlis matter nol,:, or defer tile matte; : until the Planning Cortlmission has :nade their de- I i cision. i ~y common consent of the Council it was agreed I ; that the matter be deferred until the matter bas i i been heard by the Planning Commission. 4 I I I I I i I I I F I I I I i PARKS AiiD RECREATIOi4 COi4MISSIOiJ: I I 1 (a) Appointment to Parks and Recreation Commis- ! i sion. !'it11 the consent of the Council the [dayor I I appointed fdrs. t;Iary Scilerr, 3335 Seacrest Drivep I i to the Parks and Recreation Cornmission, to fill ; : the unexpired term of Qlr. Robert little, which i I ! i term will expire in August, 1968. I I I I I i NE!J BIJSIXESS: I I I I I I I I I I I i (a) First reading of Ordinance iY7C34, consentin ' ; to estabiishment of a portion of El Camino Real ? i as a part of the County Highway. The City I I i Attorncy informed the Counci 1 the County 01' San i i Diego :lis requested that the City Council consen? i to the establishment of a portion of El Camino ; ; Real from State Highway Route 78 to 400 feet i south of Chestnut Avenue as a part of the c:olanty i : highray for purposes of acquisition of rights-of: i way, constructions, maintenance and improvement. ; ; The following ordinance was presented for the I i Counci 1's consideration: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i Ordinance No. 7034. AP; 3RDINAMCE OF THE CITY ! COUNCIL OF TClE CITY OF CARLSBAD CONSEhITING TO !Neiswender! I 1 i I I i ESTABLISHIviENT OF A PORTION OF EL CAMINO REd\L AS !Atkinson i i A BART OF THE COUNTY HIGHMAY FO2 CERTAIN PURPOSE$Qunne : was given a first reading by title only and fur- !Jardine i I tker reading waived. I ! I I I I I I I I I i (b) Proclamation - re: Poppy Days 9 Hay 27th and i ;.lay 28th. The ;*layor declared !day 27th and Hay i i 27th as "Poppy Days" in the City of Carlsbaid and i ; asked that all citizens to observe these dalys by ; I wearing the memorial poppy. i Trash Collection. Cmn. fileiswender stated he had I i received aumkrous complaints as to the ti.a:;h I I ; collection, i.e. Donna Drive and Sasswood. He i i requested that the company be notified as t:o the ; : debris that is being dropped from their trucks. I I i : The City ESanager stated he had notified Fir. PIC- i i Douga'l regarding this matter. I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I * 1 I I 1 I I I I I 4 t I I I I I I I I I I I D ! i Live Christmas Tree. Cmn. Neiswender further : stated at one time discussion was given as to th4 i City having a live Christmas Tree. tkje have one i i on this property and he felt it should be given ; I b ; consideration. I Improvement of Jefferson Street. Cmn. Dunne in! i quired about the progress on the improvement of : : Jefferson Street. I I I I I I I I I I I i; I I L 8 t I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 3 I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I' ,,'.\' I \' I I \ '\ '\ ', \\ I I \, ', I, ', ' - f2 - I ', 't, '8, ", I I t ! i Name '\ '-$& ;"""""""~""""-~"""---"""~-"""~""""""~""-"-"-"~~~"""""""--~ : Member -$ :Ar. Thornton informed the Council ft will be :about a month and a half before the Engineering i !Department t~oulcf have the plans to present to the : I I : Counci 1. :Drainage of water in Basswood. Cmn. Jardine! in- 1 !fornled the Council he had received numerous in- i :quiries from citizens as to the water that drains ; i down Basswood Avenue. t I I !The City danager informed the Council the High I lSchool is over-watering, I I I ! I I \, \ , I I I ; of '& I 8 8?&! I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 1 I I I I I /:dr. Thornton stated the High School bas a drainagi :system on their playing field. The Engineering i !Department is budgeting monies for necessary I I I I idrai nage faci 1 i ties on f?aSS\VOOd. I I I I I I 1 I I I t 9 4 I I I I :Street tree list. At the previous meeting a pro- i :posed street list for new streets in the City 4 I {was presented by the Parks and Recreation Commis- i Ision fpr the Council's approval. The City Council irequested the matter deferred until the list I I ;could be studied. I I I ! I I 1 I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ICrnn. iieiswender informed the~Counci1 an amended I jlist has been prepared for the Council's approval ! I I :and he recommended that the list be approved. I I I I 8 I # I I I I I I I1 is t was approved. iAtki nson i hy motion of the Council the amended Street Tree %eiswnderi 1 I :Dunne I I I :Jardi ne i I I I I ! I I !CITY ATTORi-IEY 'S REPORT: ! I I I I I I I I 1 I !The City Attorney submitted the County Ordinance i !concerning trash, old cars and other debris, and ; irequested the Council study this ordinance. If i i they agree with the contents he will prepare an : :ordinance. I I :The Council requested the City Attorney to pre- i !pare an ordinance for the City of Carlsbad with i jthe provisions contained in the County ordinance ; :for their consideration at the next regular I jmeeti ng. I I I I I I I f I I ! iEasement for Public Highway from Carroll R, and ; :Alice 1. Kelly. An Easement for Public Highway i !has been received from Carroll R. and Alice L. I I :Kelly for street purposes for the widening of El i jCarnino Real. The City Attorney asked that the I I :Council accept the deed and order the same filed. i :By motion of the Council the Easement for Puiblic i :Highway from Carroll R. and Alice L. Kelly was i jaccepted and the City Clerk instructed to file : :the same. I I I I I I I I s /I911 Act Proceedings - A.D. 1-1964 - Stratford i :Lane. The City Attorney requested that the hear- ! :ing the Assessment for Stratford Lane, A. D. 1- i i 1964 be con ti nued. * I I f I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ! I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 9 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I 4 I I 1 t I 4 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I 1 I I I I I * ! I I' I , \\ '\ .\ '\ '. 4 4 , \, '\\ \, '* 1 I \<' ", '\\ '%, 1 I \\ ' I - 13 - , \ ', I i Name \\ '%$* ; of '*& \?& ~""""""""""~"""""""""""""""""-"""-.--..""""-~"---"""""-, : Member \$ ! Wcquisition of property for Civic Center. The i Council was informed the City has been negotiatinb ! with Mrs. Poole for the purchase of her property ! i located within the Civic Center site. An agree- i i rnent has been reached, and the City Attorney I I I recommended that the City Ehqager he authorized i i *LO open an escrow for the purchase of the propertt. i ~y motion of the Council authorization was given i fjeiswender : for the City Xanager to open an escrow for the : Atkinson i purchase of the Poole property. ; Dunne I i Jardine I 1 I I + I I 1 I 8: I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I & I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I i Resolution ;io. 1270 - re: Permanent Street Im- i i provemcnt Program applicable to A. 3. 5-1964 - I : :dadison Street. The City Attorney presented a i i resolution making findings that the permanent I I I ; street improvement program of the City of Carls- I : bad is applicabje to Assessment District 5-1964. : i The Council was informed the attorney for the i bonding conpariy has requested this resolution be ; I made part of the 1911 Act proceedings for i 1;iadison Street, I. I 1 I I I I I I I 8 I I I L I I # I I 1 1 8 I I I I I I I i The following resolution was presented: i Resolution ?.IC. 1270. A RESCLUT1OI.J OF THE CITY i I THAT THE PERMAt4Ei;lT STREET IMPROYEf4EilT PROGFIAF~l Of i Neiswenderi i THE CITY OF CARLSBAD (1961) IS APPLICABLE TO 1 Atki nson ; I ASSESSI:IENT DISTRICT 5-1964 (MADISOH STREET) y was I Dunne ; adopted by title only and futher reading waived. :Jardine i I I I I I I I I I 1 i COUWCIL OF TI1E CITY OF CARLSEAD MAKING FINGINGS : I I I I I I I i CITY i.lAljAsER1s REPORT: ! There has been considerable discussion concerning! i the annexation of the Luecadia area to the City : :of Carlsbad. The firm of J. E. Etanauer & Cio. i have indicated a wiflingn~ss to perform an leco- i i nomical study of this annexation. There would ; I i being that in the event the annexation is clorn- I 1 8 : leted any bonding issue that might occur in the i i future that they be considered as bond cons'ultantb. I Mayor Atkinson inquired of the City Attorney if \ : such an agrement could be worked out between the! i City and J. B.. Hanauer C Co., and the City httor-1 : ney informed the Council he was sQre a satisfac- i i tory agreement could be worked out. i By motion of the Council the City Manager was i Neiswznderj i authorized to continue negotiations with J. BI. :Atkinson : : i-lanauer & Co. as to an economic study relating i Dunne 9 i to the annexation of tile Luecadia area. : Jardine : i AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT OF BILLS AAD RATICICA- i : TION OF PAYROLL: I I 1 ! ! i Authorization was given for the payment of INls i * i for the general expenses in thc amount of I f 8168,528.65 and for the Water Department in the ifieiswenderi i amount of $43,100,49, for the period islay 3, 1966 :Atkinson : i to May 17, 1966, as certified by the Director of i Dunne i( i Finance and approved by the Acditing Committee. :Jardine i I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i be no charge for this study, the only contingencyj I I 8 I $ I I I I I I I 1 t I I I I I I I I I I I t I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I t I I I I I ; I t I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I e I I I 1 I I I I I ' I 4, ' 8 6 I I I I I I I I I 1 - 14 - I I 1 ("""L"""""""""--"""""""""""""""""""""."""- I 1 Rati*Fi cation 0.1: the payroll \#Jas Gj ven fop the i first half of t4ay, 1965, in the amount of I $21,544.54, as ccrti fie6 by the Di rector of: i Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee. : A3JOURiWiEMT: i By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at I 9:29 P. i4. I I I I I i I I I t : ! Respectfully suimitted, [,hg-py hAr$ L. ;."' !".7 //z I%' ._I ,/ K-f//L/.;.', 1 MA GAP, 7'7 E. ADAYS ' i City C/jerk I I t ! I I I I I I I 1 I I . I I I I I I I r I I , I t I I I i I I I I I 1 ! I 1 , I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t 4 I I I I I 1 I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I I I I' I \, '\ .'8 '\ '. I '\ '. '\ '\\ I I ,*88' , % '8' I \'\ ', '8 ' / N a me '*,:$& : of \$ i Member .!: """"""""" I I I :Meiswender ! ;Atkinson i iDunne I I :Jardine i I > I 4 8 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I t I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 $ I I I I I 1 I i I ! I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I t I * I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I f I ! I I I I $ t I I I t 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I t 8 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I 1 I I I 8 I I I I * 1 1 I I I I I 1 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 8 ! ! I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 4 I I I I I I I I I