HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-04-04; City Council; Minutes: c1-w OF CARLSBAD * * \, -. ',
i Minutes of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting)! \\ '\ ',
I Date of Meeting: April 4, 1967
; Time'of Meeting: 7:OO P.M. : of ' :Place of Meeting: Council Chambers
i ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Northing, i i Neiswender, Atkinson, Dunne and Jardine. Also ;. : present were City Manager Mamaux, City Attorney i i Nilson and City Clerk Adams. D t
i INVOCATION was offered by Councilman Neiswender. {
i ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. 4 k
.' \' \'
I i Name '*,
("-.""""".""""--"""""""""""""".".."~"-""""""~""~"""""~ : Member I 9
e
I 1 I
I I I
I b I 8 i APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
!
1 : 1 4 I i (a) Minutes of the regular meeting held ,March 21:Worthing : 1967, were approved as corrected. ,! I'iiei swend
I i Atkinson
I i Jardine
t
t I
t 1 1 * 1 I I
I t & I I i I
: Dunne
:. CORRESPONDENCE:
i The Council recognized a letter from John A. : Steiger and Associates and V. C. McFarland, New i i Business Representative from The American Oil . ;
' i 'Company, conc;.rning the purchase of the Greenwood! ; property. I I i By common consent the letters were ordered filed.: !
i Letter dated March 25, 1967, from G. L. Southwell!,
I L/Col USAF Ret, was presented, stating this lettejr i was in response to a letter dated Jufy 22, 1966, ; : from Stuart C. Wilson, City Attorney, thanking i i him for submitting documentation concerning an f I 8' Lagoon Sidewalk Easement across Lots 1. thru 9,: : in Buena Vista Gardens. After receiving the $ I i letter from the City Attorney, he discussed the i ; matter with him and was advised that the City : i would accept a decision of the Title Insurance i ; and Trust Company of San Diego. An exhaustive : i search of County Records .was made by the title i ; company and photostatic copies, toge.ther with : I their letter, showing two c,onveyances were made i
1 to the City - Parcel 1 covers "Easement for
f private road, and Parcel 2 covers Easement for ; : drainage purposes.. Further enclosed proof shows: i no other conveyance of real interest was made to I I the City, the'refore,* the property owners request : I that the City of Carlsbad rescind their letter i
f dated March 18, 1966, wherein it stated that it ; i was the decision of the Counci 1 that in view of I : the potential recreational and park deve1o.pment : 1 of Buena Vista Lagoon, it would be inadvisable tq : relinquish any public rights to the easement at : : this time.
i The City Attorney informed the Council he had : : discussed this matter with the title company and I I the original map filed with the County shows an i : 8' sidewalk easement. However, there i.s no I I i record of a grant deed for the 8' easement.
: Col. Southwell was present and informed the !
! Council this was a matter with which owners of 1 i 9 lots wished to clear their property of a cloud! ; on the title. He has spent considerable time I I i and money in gathering this proof. It was his i : opinion the City of Carlsbad had no interest in ; i this 8' easement. Col. Southwell further stated: ; this matter has been under discussion since 1956,:
*
*
1 I I
I I I
I I I I I I
..
I I I t t I
e
I I I I
I I
I
I I
', \ -\ *
I I '\ , '* 8 ' *\
1 -2- I I * '\ '1 '. \
I I t t I
i Name '<, * I of ':
*\
I
:""""""g"""-"________"""~"""".""""""""""~"~""~~"""" I Wrnber
I ; f After further discussion by members of the 1
! Council and Col. Southwell, by motion of the I Northing i Council the City Manager and the City Attorney :.!Ieisb:er\ci i were instructed to review the easements in the i Atkinson ; Buena Vista Gardens, specifically any sidewalk ; Dunne
! easements.
1 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
; Cmn. Neiswender stated he would like to present i i Mr. Bruce Nelson of 1I.J. Anderson Co. 'Mr. NelsoTr:
i has worked up a plan for Christmas decorations i i in th.e downtown area. He did not expect the I Council to take any action tonight.
i Mr. Nelson stated that Mr. Kirk of the Chamber of: : Comme-rce and Councilman Neiswender asked him to : i work up some ideas for Christmas decorations.
; A sketch showing several designs for light poles i i was presented.
I b
e
4 : Jardine
I I I I 1 I
I $ 1 I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I 1 I
1 t
t i I I I Mr. Nelson informed the Council there were 4.3 ' '. I available light poles available for use, and the ; !
; decorations would cost approximately 8205.12 per;
i pole, or a total of $8,819.00 per year if all I i the poles were used, on a three year basis. ThiG I would inc!ude installation, removing and storing i : decorations, and refurbishing prior to the next i i season. The decorations can be purchased out- : right; however, the City would have to install, i i remove and store, and refurbish. After a three : : year period the decorations usually need to be i i replaced. Mr. Nelson pointed out their firm I I
i services 90% of the Christmas decorations in the i
I I
i County. 1 I
I t 1 1 : 1- PUSLIC t-IEARING:
!
I I I F I
I I I t I 1 1 8 I I I
(a) Aueal of the decision of the P1.anning Corn-, i mission in denying .the Tentativ,e Subdi<is'i-on ,Map 7 of Park r4anor Unit "B': Subdiv'isiin. Appellant: I,
Donald A. Griggs, Jr.' for D. E. Jr., Inc. + "-
I I
I I : The Clerk presented a letter received March 24, : I 1967 from Donald A. Briggs, Jr. on behalf of 0. 6;. : Jr., Inc., stating he wished to appeal the de- i i cision of the Planning Commission, who recently : I denied his application for a subdivision map of i ; Park Manor Unit "B", lying between Park Dr. and I : Sunnyhill Dr.
: The Council was informed that no written corres- I i pondence had been received in regards to this I I : hearing before the Council. At the Planning Com-i i mission hearing there were six letters received : : in favor of the application, two letters from i : persons requesting further study on the matter, ! I 24 letters from persons objecting to the zone i : changes and variances, and a petition bearing :
i 208 signatures protesting the zone changes as i i they would devaluate their property and be con- ; I trary to the Idaster Plan. I
I The Assistant Engineer presented the tentative I i map of Park Kanor Unit "E", ar;d reported that i
i the subciivision map as presented did not include:
!
I 1 I
I I I I
I
I
I I I I I 0
1 I
I
I I
I
1
I '\, '. '\ " t I '\ '\ ',
I -3- I I '\ ', ' 1 . " $ -.
t i Name '\, ''
I ; of 'C 1 I :"""-""""-""""""""""""""".""".."""""."""""~""""""" : Member
1 I ! all the property owned by the property owner. Ai i portion of the land was submitted on another $
I tentative map but this map has not been finalized,
: map. ' Further, the map does not comply with the ;
; Master Street Plan nor the Master Plan of the
I City. Tamarack and Hillside Drive are separate i \ residential collectors and should be kept sepa- i I rate. 1 1
! The Mayor announced the Council would hear from i i the appellant.
I MR. DON BRIGGS, JR., stated he was not appealing:
i the variances requested; however, 'it will be i necessary to work with the Planning Commission : : on vari'ances for two panhandle lots. He was not i I aware that the additional property had to be in- ! .: cluded in this map. The streets and drainage I ; are always a problem. He wauld like to keep thi; : subdivision alive and work with the Planner. I
; Hillside Dr. is impossible to build on as it is !
' i 'presently designed. There have been a total of i I 23 hearings and discussions concerning Tamarack ; : Ave. and Hillside Dr. There is a possibility of: i connecting Hillside Dr. to Laguna Riviera. He : : would like to work out a residential subdivision I t on a portion of this land, and was not cansider-: i ing the C zoning nor multiple zoning at this tim4.
I e I therefore, it should have been included in this I
I 4 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I'
I' I I
I'
t f
I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I t
I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1
.. 1 I
I t I t I I I I I I I l e l I I I 1
I I I I 1 I I I I
I I The City Manager inquired as 'to whether this map I was filed prior to the time the ordinance re- I I quiring park dedication became effective?
Mr. Briggs stated the map was filed prior to the! effective date of the ordinance, and did not see:
why this had any bearing on the matter. He woulQ be willing to dedicate a portion of the land for; park purposes, I !
The Mayor announced the Council would hear from ! all persons desiring to speak in opposition to ;
the subdivision map.
MR. DON JOHNSON, 4065 Sunnyhill Dr., stated h? i
was representing a newly formed property owners ; association, and wished to point out the follow-: ing factors concerning their opposition to this : subdi vi si on :
I I I I I
1 I I I I
I
I I I I I 1. The proposed subdivision is contrary to i the Master Plan of the City. t I
2. The plan as submitted would constitute i spot zoning. I I I
I I
I I 3, This property was zoned R-1-7500 without ; the surrounding property owners' knowledge, due i to a whim of one of the former councilman. I I I I t 4. The property owners are very much in favor: of the downtown maul for the business area and i feel that commercial zoning should be kept in ! that area. I I
5. Any type of zoning ether thhan R-1 will add:
I I
to the traffic in this area, and commercial
zoning would add an additional problem.
1 I I I 1 I
* I I
I .,\- . I , , '\
I '\ '. '
I I 1 -4- I \ '. , \ '\
I I
I
I
I
.-
I 8 ',
I : of 'T
; In closing Mr. Johnson stated the property owners: / are in hopes that in some way the Planning Com- : i mission and City Council can work something out i
! with the developer to have this property zoned ! 1 back to R-1-10,000. I 1
* i Name '8,
:""""""""""""""".-"""""""""""*.""""""""""-~""~"""" ; Member I
0
I I i The Mayor informed Mr. Johnson that the applicant! i was not appealing the zone changes considered at :
i the Planning Commission hearing.
: MRS. ARTHUR WOOLRICH, stated she was a member of : ! the Parks and Recreation Commission. This map I i was filed one day prior to the effective date of I ; the park dedication ordinance. Mr. Briggs men- -: f tioned at one of the Parks and Recreation meet- t I ings he would be willing to dedicate a portion i i of the 'property for park area. If this plan is ; ; kept alive it would be difficult for any park ; i dedication. Also the plan does not follow the i ! Engineer's design for streets. 1 1
! In rebuttal Mr. Briggs informed the Council he i ; discussed the park dedication with the Planner, 1- ; and there is a mesa on the other end of the de- : i velopment that could be used for park purposes. I : He would like to be able to work with the Plannevl . I and the Council in regards to Hillside Dr. I' I
i As there were no other persons desiring to speak; : the Mayor declared the public hearing closed at t i 8:OO P.M. I I
i After discussion by the Council, the following i : resolution was presented for consideration: I 1
i Resolution No. 1393. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY \ : COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DENYING THE i Korthing i APPEAL ON THE DENIAL BY THE PLANNING CONHISSION : Neiswend
; SUBDIVISION, was adopted by tit.le only and iur- : Dunne
I * 1 I t : 8
I.
! t 1
. ,- .. t I
t I I I
I + I t
* I I I
I OF THE TENTATIVE MAP OF PARK MANOR UNIT "B" r Atkinson
i ther reading waived.
i ENGINEERING:
I I
I
i Jardine
I f * 1 I t I I i (a) Jefferson St. Improvement District - A.D. i 2-1965. In reference to the above improvement i ; district, easements for drainage a.nd slope .pur- ; I poses have been offered by the Nature Conserv- i : any to the City of Carlsbad. The staff has rec- ; : commended that these easements be accepted.
I I I
I I I I * I 1 : By motion of the Council the easements were ac- I Northing ! cepted, and the Clerk instructed to record the i Neiswend
! same. i Atkinson *' I
I
I
I I Dunne
t i Jardine
I I I i [b] El Camino Real Improvement - re: Offer of ! I
; drainage easement by Carroll Kelly. i t
I I i An easement for drainage purposes in regards to i Northing ! the imDrovement of El Camino Real was accepted I Neiswend e' i from Carroll Kelly, and the Clerk instructed to !Atkinson i record the same. I Dunne
I I I Jardine I I I I I I I I I.
i
I I I I
?
I ;
I I I
.'
I I ', *', ',, ',
I '\\ '\, '\,
.,
I '\ ' \
! 8
I . '. I * I
1
I
\ -.
I -5- ' i Name '\,
I : of '< :""""""~"""""""""""""""""""".~"""""~"""""'""""""~, : Membe:
i (c) Final Map of Laguna Riviera Unit No. 1 Sub- [
: final Map of Laguna Riviera .Unit No. 1, and in- i i formed the Council the subdivision meets all the:
f requirements of the ordinance. The City has I I 1 requested that Kelly Drive be an 84' right of ; t way with 68' pavement. The Engineering Depart- i
i rnent is recomrnen-ding that the City approve the \ / expenditure of gas tax funds for Ctty participa- i ; ti-on in the extra width of Kelly Drive, and for ;
1 extra base and pavement in the improvement of. I
-I : El Camino Real: Also the subdivi.der is extend- i : ing the joint sewer line approximately 1200', and i they are only req'uired to install ar,' 8" line but ;
1 the City has requested that a 12" line be install:- i ed. Therefore, the Engineering Department is : i recommending that the City participate in the i i difference in cost for this line. I I
; After further discussion the final map of Laguna! Northi9g : Riviera Unit No. 1 was approved, as recommended i Neisrrrend i by the Engineering Department.. : Atkinson
1 i Jardine i Offer of El Camino Real rig,ht-of-way an'd drainage! : easements. With reference to the above subclivi- i I sion, L. R. Partnership have executed a grant ; : deed for right-of-way purposes in.El Camino Real ,i i and two Easements for drainage purposes. The 1 I : Engineering Department recommends acceptance of i I the Grant Deed and Easements. t 8
i By motion of the Council the Grant Deed and : Uorthi ng i Easements from L. R. Partnership were accepted i Neiswend I and the City Clerk instructed to record the same.: Atkinson
t ; Jardine
l e ! division, The Assistant Engineer presented the -f
1 * I I I I
I ?
8 I i Dunne
I
I t I I I
I I t i Dunne
9
I * I I I 1
I I I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 1 I I I
(d) Request for street vacaticn - re: Proposed I Tamarack Plaza Subdivision. The Council was in- i formed a request has been received from the de- ; veloper of Tamarack Plaza to start street vaca- i tion proceedings on the service street lying 1 I parallel to Tamarack Avenue between Jefferson St.!
and Interstat,e 5. The following resolution of :
intention was presented: I I I 1 I i Resolution No. 1394.. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i i COUNCIL OF THE c1-rY.0~ CARLSBAD DECLARING THE ! i INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO VACATE A SERVICG i ROAD IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD BETWEEN JEFFERSON ; \+'orthing : STREET AND INTERSTATE 5 IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD; i Neiswend i AND ESTABLISHING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING, : Atkinson
; wai ved. i Jardine ! ' was adopted by title only and further reading f Dunne
I I I 1 * I I I I I I I I 1 1
0 I I I I V I I I I I I I + t I I
(e) Report on Final Map of Park Manor Unit I
Subdivision. The Assistant Engineer reported
I I J I ! the Engineering Department was-not recommending i approval of the Final Map of Park Manor Unit 1 i as the improvement costs had not been posted. Mr. Briggs has requested a one year extension of 1 time for filing of the final map. The Engineer- 1 ing Department recommended that a one year ex- !
I I
I I
1
I
I I
I I I I I
I
I
9 I ~""-""""""""~""~"--"..~"""""""""""~""""~~, I I
I I .'\, 'b, '*,
I -6- I '\ '\\
I i Name '8,
I i Member
i of the Park Dedication Ordinance, and that ad- !
8, '\ 'I
I : of '(
%
a : tension be granted, subject to the compliance i
! ditional right-of-ways be dedicated -on Park Dr. ;
f The Assistant Engineer further stated the ap- i i plicant has requested perriission to bear a stree$
1 improvement petition for the improvement of, Park ; i Dr. and Monroe Street based on the development I i of a 40' roadway in a 60' right-of-way. * I
! The City Manager pointed out that in effect the i
; Engineering Department is requesting a 68' dedi- i.
i cation. If the petition is successful theh they,! i will reduce the width of the street to 60'
i Mr. Briggs stated he has talked to six property :
i owners 'regarding this petition. He would like i i to have this go through to the High School. t. Rather than have a street width designated he i i would prefer having the street width made sub- i
! ject to the recommendation of the Engineering : : Department, It was his feeling that without i the participation 'of his property and his father$ : it would be several years before this street : would be improved..
i By motion of the Council a one year extension i i was granted for the final map on Park Manor Unit: : 1 Subdivision, subject to compliance with the i i Park Dedication Ordinance, and in the event the : : 1911 Act Proceedings are successful for the im- :Northing i provement of Park Dr. a 5' street dedication i Nei swend : would be allowed for Park Manor U.nit 1 Subdivi- :Atkinson i sion, otherwise a 9' street dedication would be t Dunne
I required. ! Jardine
I I I !
1'
I I
I I
I I
I I
t
I I 1- I I
I t
I I
I *. . 1.
I I I I t I 1 I I
i PL.ANNING:
I 8
I
!
I I i (a) Appointment, to Planning Commission. Mayor i : Atkinson requested the appointment to the Plannin$ i Commission deferred until the next regular,meetina.
I I I ! i PARKS AND RECREATION:
I
I I I I I i (a) Memorandum - re: Street trees on Nestwood i : Drive. A memorandurn from the Parks and Recrea- : i tion Covmission was presented, recommending that I : the existing street trees on G!estwood Drive be i I replaced with Brisbane Box and that said remov- ; : a1 and replacement be done at the expense of the i i homeowners with 100% participation required. $ I
i Cmn. Neiswender stated he agreed with the Parks i : and Recreation Commission that the trees are not t
; right, but he did not feel the property owner's ; : should have to pay for the re.placement of the 1 I trees. The people on the Commission are not in- i : fallible and are very dedicated. In his opinion : i the City should pay for the replacement. I
i Cmn. Iclorthirtg stated that if the City does pay i : for the replacement, he would like to have it i understood that it was being done on the basis i : this particular tree was not successful.
I 1 I I
I 1
I I I 1
I I
0 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I t I I
I t I
! 1
I I I I I t s 1 t 3 I
-7-
1 ', ' - ', I '\ '\ '\\
I '\, \\, 't,
I Name '%, : of ':
I
I I \' ' '\
I 1 :"""""""""""""""""-""""""""".."""""""""""""""""~ 1 Membgr
1
I 1 I By motion of the Council authorization was given [Northing i for the replacement of the street trees on West- : Neiswend
!wood Drive, and that the City pay the cost of re-! Atkinson ; placement. : Dunne
! 4
e
I I Jardi ne
I 4
I (b) Memorandum - re: Street trees for Elsie I I I Place, Sunrise Circle and Kelly Drive. Memorand-: i urn from the Parks and Recreation Commission was ! i presented recommending certain trees for Elsie i : Place, Sunrise Ci.rcle and Kelly Drive, was pre- i r sented.
I By motion of the Council -the street trees for : No-rthing : Elsie Place, Sunrise Circle and Kelly Drive were i Neiswend i approved as recommended by the Parks and Recrea- i Atkinson : tion Commission. i Dunne
! ! Jardine
I t
I I
I I
$ I NEW BUSINESS: !
I I I I I I
-. 1 (a) Proclamation - re: "City, of Carlsbad Clean-;
I up Week". Mayor Atkinson proclaimed the week of ; i Aprilih through April 22, 1967 as "City of I I
..
I Carlsbad Clean-up Week", and urged all citizens I : to participate in making this a successful event.:
I I I (b) Procl amat.ion - re: "Pub1 ic School Week". i The week of April 24 through April 28, 1967, was- i : proclaimed by the Mayor as "Public Schools Week ; i in the City of Carlsbad, and all citizens were : : asked to attend and participate in Public Schools: i Week observances. .. I
I I (c) Proclamation - re: "National Boys' Club .I
; Week". The Mayor proclaimed the week of April 2 ; I through April 8, 1967, as "National Boys' Club i : Week", and urged the people in this community to ; I observe our own Boys' Club in action. I I
!
1 I I
I I I t
I I I OLD BUSINESS:, I 1 I & i i r (a) Request for waiver of street improvements .- i ; W. D. Cannon. Crnn.' Northing stated he and Crnn. I i Dunne went over the property with the City Mana- ; ; ger and the Assistant Engineer last week. Mr. I Thornton was to contact Plr. Cannon.
i Mr. Thornton stated he was unable to contact Mr. i : Cannon. In reviewing the original agreement, the: I agreement expired April 29, 1966. If this pro- i : perty reverts back to the proper.ty owner in
; not have a dedicated street frontage. I
I I
.I
I I I I I * I I I
I I i accordance with the agreement. Parcel #2 does ! I
* I : The City Attorney was asked if the property re- : verts back to the property owner, and he stated i that it ded.
i Mr. Thornton further stated the original agree- : ment called for a 60' right of way with a 40' : pavement. However, the Engineering Department i is recommending dedication for an EO' right of : way.
I I
0 I I i MR. ROY KLEMA, stated he was the engineer for
I I
:*
1 1 I 1 t I I
I I I I i I I I I I I I I I t I I 1 I I
1 1 I I
I I' : ',\\\.,',,', .t '
I 't,, '\, '\, -8- 5 \' ' '\,
I ; Name '<,
I i Member ~""~"""""""""""""""""-""~~"""~-..--"""---"--------:------"---"-~
!
! I
I
I
I 1
i Qf '' 0 I
I I I
I Mr. Cannon. According to the previous agreement i I Mr. Cannon dedicated 60' of right of way for 1 Cannon Rd. Parcel #2 is the lagoon property. Mr.! : Cannon is willing to improve El Arbol , which ! would be part of the tentative subdivision. They: :are asking that the improvements for Cannon Rd. i i be waived, as this piece of land- is of no value. ;
i Mr. Cannon informed the Council when the sewers I ;were installed he was assessed $13,000.00 for i
:and he would like to get some of his money back. i.
!After further discussion it was the general con- I I census of the Council that Mr. Cannon should : dedicate sufficient land for an 80' right of way ! i in Cannon Rd.; that Mr. Cahnon enter into a I I
I future street improvement -agreement for Cannon Rd:: i and that the City agree to improve 40' of roadway; ; in Cannon Rd. in accordance with the original i agreement.
i The City Attorney was instructed to prepare an i : agreement for the Council's consideration at the i i next regular meeting. I I
i (b) . Request for waiver of .street improvements I
; on perimeter properties in connection with im-
; Russell W. Grosse. 'Cmn. Dunne reported that he i i and Cmn. Northing had made a study of this matter!, : and they recommend that when -James Dr. is improve: i ed that any future lot splits on the adjoining ; ; streets be approved subject to the property i owner entering into a future street improyement I : agreement.
i After consideration by the Council, by motion of ! i the Council it was agreed that when James Dr. is i Northing ; improved any future lot splits on the adjoining I Neiswe.nd I streets will be approved, subject to the proper-.! Atkinson : ty owner entering into a future street improve- i Dunne I ment agreement. i Jardine
t The following ordinances were presented for a
!
I I
I I
1 I
I I
i sewer connections along El Arbol and Cannon Rd., ;
t I I I
I I
I I I 1 I I I t I
t I
I I
I I I , I ! provement and.stree-6 opening of James Dr. - "' .
I I
I I
I t
I I I
I I I 1 I I I
4 I
I
I second reading: I
i (c) Second reading of Ordinance R920.4 - re: I I : Names of Zones. 1 I I' I I 1 I I I
0
i Ordinance 59204. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY ; COUNCIL OFTE-CITY OF CARLSBAD APlENDING SECTION I i 300 OF ORDINANCE KO. 9060 REGARDING NAMES OF 1 I
; ZONES, was given a second reading by title only f i and further reading waived, and adopted. 1 I
i (d) Second reading of Ordinance $9205 - re: i Adding subsection (21) to Section ,1400, Artz-lT i : I -___ 14 ofTrdinance .""_ #3060, to'include additionalit
; uses under "C%idi tional Uses .
I I
I I I I 8 I
I 1- "" I
I
I I
.I . ..
"
I ..
Worthin: Nei swent Atkinsor Dunne Jardine
i 1' , '.\ '
I \\ '\ \ '3 I , \ '. I 1 , ', \
I -9- b I \' '\ \ \,
I \ \.
I I
I
I
; i Name 'x,s*
1 \
k I ; of ..
:"""""""""""-..""""""""""""-~"-..-~"-""""""""~""""""-. ; Member
:Ordinance No. 9205. AN ORDIl\iAi\iCE OF THE CITY OF i i CARLSBAD AKENDING SECTION 1400, ARTICLE 14, OF :Northing
i ORDINANCE NO. 9060, BY ADDING SUBSECTION (21) TO INeiswendl i INCLUDE ADDITIONAL USES PERNITTED UNDER CONDI- : Atkinson
I TIONAL USES, was given a second reading by titleiDunne
f only and adopted. : Jardine
8 I I
0
I
I I I 1 (e) Second reading of Ordinance #4004 - re: : Water Meter Charges.
1
1 I s * 4 I I i Ordinance No. 4004. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i Northing I CARLSBAD ESTABLISHING CHARGE FOR INSTALLATION OF i Neiswend : WATER METERS, SERVICE CONNECTIONS, LOAN METERS, : Atkinson ! AND EXCHAIiGES OF PETERS, was given a second read-! Dunne jing by title only and adopted. : Jardine * I i COMMITTEE REPORTS,:
1 1
I I I * I t i Civic Center Building Committee. Cmn. Dunne re- : : ported the committee met and discussion was given: i as to the procedure for financing and forming a ;. I I non-profit organization. Also the City ,Attorney : i was instructed to prepare a contract between the i : ar-chitects, Weber and Edwards, and the City. The: I next meeting of the comrnitte-e will be held on I I :April 12> 1967. I 1
I 5 I I 1 Water Committee. Cmn. Dunne informed the Council: i a meeting will be held on Friday,.April 7, 1967. i
I L I :.Library Building Committee. Crnn. Neiswender re- i ! ported thhat a 'letter has been received from the 1 I Building Inspector stating that when the change ; ; order for the carpeting was approved by the City I : Council at the last meeting, 952 sq. ft. of area i i was omitted. This is the area that was changed i : from Terrazzo flooring to carpeting. This change! i will mean an additional $&OO.OO, or a total of : i $5,&00.00. I I
I By motion of the Coun-ci1 approval was given to i Worthing ; the additional $&OO.OO change order for carpeting: Neiswend I in the Library. i Atkinson
I : Dunne
I I 1 I
I
I
I I i Jardine
I I I I I I I I I 8 I
: CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
: (a) Ordinance $9206 - re: Increasivg minimum I
r Gallons to 12 gallons. The following ordinance: : was presented for consideration: I I
i Ordinance No. 9206. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i Northing : CARLSBAD INCR'EASING MINIMUM SIZE STREET TREE ; Nei swendc i REQUIRED IN SUBDIVISIONS FROM FIVE GALLON TO i Atkinson
i TWELVE GALLON , was given a first re.ading by title: Dunne i only and further reading waived. ; Jardine
i Cmn. Worthing inquired as to ;./hether the City : Attorney had made any decision as to how the ! Park Dedication Ordinance would be implemented. i
i The City Attorney informed the Council the City i i Planner was preparing a map showii1g the proposed i i parks in the City.
I I ! !
I " ; size street tree required in subdivisions from - ,
s I I I
I I + I I 4 I I I
I I I I 0
I I I
t
1 ,
I $ '\ -. . t t \' I ' '\ 6
I -10- I Name '8,
! of ': *
t :""""""""-"""""""""""""""""".~""""""""""-!""""""- i Member
I I : CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: !
I I I 4 I I I
'0
i i The City Manager presented a written report dated
I March 31, 1967, setting forth .a status report on : i the 1966-67 Street Maintenance Program l
I
e 4'
I ! t 1 ; Also included in the City Manager's report was I I a compilation of City owned property. The City ; ; Manager recommended that all such .property be : i retained by th-e City, excepting properties on Lasi ; Flores. I I I I I ! I I I
I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I
I I I
I I I f
f a I I I I 'I +
I I I I
I I ,I
I I
Cmn. Dunne recommended that the City owned pro- ;
perty be reviewed by the City Manager periodi- I I
cally and that a recommendation be,made by him ! . ' as to any disposals. 1. I I * Transfer of North Carlsbad Water System. The I
City Manager informed the Council members of the ; ..staff met with the City of Oceanside today regard: ing the. transfer of the North Carlsbad Water I I System. It was requested that the Council appro+ the date of April 10, 1967 as the t.ransfer date. ; The City of Carlsbad will bill the North Carlsbadi users on April 20, 1967. The City of 0.ceanside : will collect for the last month's billing and
will cut off water service if the City of Carls- i bad is not paid. A lease agreement is being pre-i pared by the Oceanside City Attorney. I
By motion of the Council the City Manager was )/orthing. I authorized to proceed with the orderly transfer Pleiswende
1 the approval by the City Attorney of the lease : Dunne
I 1
t .I
~ of the North Carlsbad Water System, subject to ; Atkinson I
agreement. i Jardine
I t : Cmn. Dunne stated there has been considerable i i monies invested this past year, and requested I I : the City Manager to make a report on the percent-! i age of monies invested as of April 1, 1967. I I
I I
1 I i Cmn. Worthing inquired if the City Nanager or : Building Inspector could give a report on the i 1 effectiveness of the Nuisance Ordinance. I I
i The Building *Inspector informed the Council they i : would probably be holding their first hearing : f : soon on the enforcement of the ordinance.
; Cmn. Worthing asked if there had been any pro- i
i on the list of priorities for park projects. I I
i Cmn. Jardine informed the Council no progress hadi ; been made by the Commission in regards to this : I report. I I
I TIOM OF 'PAYROLL: &' I
i Authorization was given for the payment of bills i!nJOrthing : for the general expenses of the City in the ;Neiswende i amount of $331 ,472.35 and for the Water Depart- !Atkinson : ment in the amount of $36,397.90 for the period $)urine i March 21, 1967 to April 4, 1967, as certified :Jardine : by the Director of Finance and approved by the i i Auditing Committee. 1
I I 8
I 8
I I
8 f
I e I I
I ; gress made by the Parks and Recreation Commission;
I 8 I I
I I I I : AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMEF\IT OF BILLS AND RATIFICA- i
I I I I
0
1 I I ! f r !
I I I I I
b I
I
I
-.1 '\ '\ .,
'\ ' ' ' I '. ', *'
'\ '\ ' ! '.
I -11- i Name 'x%, *
I f of '( :""""""~""""--"""""""""""""~~"..""""""""""~'"""""~". i Member
I I
I
I
! I ,
/Ratification of the payroll was given for the :second half of March, 1967, in the amount of i $24,075.60 as certified by the Director of :Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee.
1 4
I i ADJOURNMENT:
:By proper motion the meeting was adjou;ned a.t
i k50 P.M.
I
:Northing i Nei swendc : Atkinson i Dunne : Jardine
I I * I t I f !
I I 1 I I 1 I I I I
t 1 I t I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I r I I I ? I I I * I I I 1 I J I I I f I I f
I
I
0
t I t I i Respectfully submitted,
s : *.. /- i : .d ,' 6 '/L& &/&~ y q>[;:.,L4,L,2,!
: MAR. AR~ E. ADAMS i City C,l*erk
I I t I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I i I % I I I I I I
I .. I I 1 !
a
. I I 1 & s 8 I I I I I I I I
'I
1 1 I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1
I I 1 I 4 I 1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I t I * !
I I I ? 1 I I I I I
I I I I I i
I I
I 4 I I e l I 1 I t I I I I 1
, I
I I I I I I I I i 4
I
I t I t I t 1 I I I
1 I I I ! I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I 1 t I
0 I I I
f , I I 1
I 1
'I !
1 I ,