HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-04-18; City Council; MinutesL. -
.. . . r- -.-~- . ..
i 1% , ', y", '1 : CITY OF CARLSBAD I " 8 i Minutes of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Me'etingf . i ; Date of Meeting: April 18, 1967 : Name '8, i Time of Meeting: 7: 00 P. M. : of '
'\ '. '', '' .' . ', -a : Place of Meeting: Council Chambers ! Member )""""""""""- ................................... I I I : ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Worthing, i Neiswender, Atkinson, Dunne and Jardine. Also present i : were City Manager Mamaux, City Attorney Wilson and ; i City Clerk Adarns. I
; : INVOCATION: The Invocation was offered by Reverend i i Gordon Baker of the Pilgrim Congregational Church. 1
I I I
I I I I &
I
I I I
0
1 I
I I I I I I
I
I I
I I I I * I
* I i 8 I 1 I & I I I I i + I t
I
I I
I
i
ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES 8
(a) Minutes of the regular meeting of April 4, 1967, wer.e i Worthing
approved as submitted. i Neiswendt
; Atkinson i Dunne
b @ I a 8 I "_ " I I
; Jardine
I I I CORRESPONDENCE: I I
(a) Letter dated April 14, 1967, from the Carlsbad City i Schools, was presented, stating that as much as the School
Board looks with favor on the proposed swimming pool as ;
extremely important to the community, it appears that i
the school district will be unable to participate in the I next several years. t 1
"- I I
I
I 1 I I : Letter dated April 12, 1961, from the Department of : 4 i Public Health, was presented, stating that before their i
, ; office can recommend to the State Board that favorable i I action be taken on the City's application for a permit for : ; domestic water, certain defects must be eliminated. t I
! I I I
0 ; The Mayor requested this letter referred to the City I
6
I I
t i Manager. 4 t
* 1 I Letter dated April 11, 1967, from the Magnolia Elemen-. i :iary P. T. A. , was acknowledged, thanking the P-olice i
, . i Department and the Public Works Department for their ; : assistance in their "Bicycle Safety"'prograrn. I I
: The Mayor acknowledged .a letter from the Carlsbad 4 I i Chamber of Commerce, dated April 4, 1967, thanking i
I the City Manager and staff for expediting the landscaping i i around the Chamber office at the Santa Fe Depot. f
I 1
I 1 $
i I 1 I
' I An option to purchase dated April 14, 1967, was recog- i. ; nized, concerning the Greenwood property, in the amount I i of $160,000. 00. t r Mayor Atkinson commented on the fact that several offers! ! had been received for this property, however, it has been: i the policy of the Council to place these options on file, as ; : the City does not contemplate any action concerning this i i property at the present time. I
i ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
I I
1 I I
8 * I
I. I
I I I . _- "
-0 i There were no oral communications. * t
I
I I I
I ! : of " ', i
i PUBLIC KEARING
: Member : """""""""""~"""""""~"""""""""""""""""" + """"""" I * 4 : b I "" !
0.
I I
I I I I
I
I !
!
(a) Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission I
in deEnfiheappl1catlon submitted bv Marvin S. and ___"_ I * "- " " Idella R.rm.reys T;jr a, zonicha.n&? from R.-1-7500
to R-3,8riafor-apr=se plan on-erty locata on the i
Street. .ApFeKnT Marvin S. 2nd Idella R. Humphreys. ---" I
" 1 -
BoutheasteTyTorner of CheXnzGWMonroe -7
P""". ""
I I i The Clerk certified as to the publication and mailing of i
f notices of said appeal.
: An appeal dated April 4, ,1967, from Marvin S. and Idella i 1 R. Humphreys, was read, stating their reasons for I I ; appealing the decision of the Planning Commission.
! Mayor Atkinson declared the public hearing open, and re- i : quested the Clerk to read all correspondence that had b I : been received concerning this matter.
: The Clerk announced that correspondence had been re- i i ceived from the following persons in opposition to the ' ; : requested zone change and precise plan:
! Charles A. and Dorothea M. Kitching, 2091 Chestnut Ave.; i James R. and Kathryn Go Einum, 1218 Haloa Drive, 1 I
I I I I 1
I t I
I I I
I I
* I I I I
I 8 I
I
b I I I
0. I I Honolulu, Hawaii, owning property at 3820 Monroe:
I I Street, Carlsbad * I
I
I
I I
I i The following correspondence was received from.persons i : in favor of the requested zone change and precise plan: i
I
0
8 I I *
I I I I I 1 I
I
I I
: Duane A. Walker, 2015 Karren Lane i Gerald C. McClellan, 2937 Carlsbad Blvd.
! R. R. Robinson, for earco, P. 0. Box 95, Carlsbad I H. M. Baumgartner, Inc., P. 0. Box 277, Carlsbad i John Allan McKaig, 4225 Skyline Dr,
I : A petition was presented, containing 99 signatures, stat- : ing they wished it to be known they were in favor of the : reclassification and development proposed by Marvin S. I and Idella R. Humphreys.
! i The Mayor announced the Council would hear from the : Appellant or his representative.
: MR.. JAMES WEBER, stated their firm, Weber & Edwarc i was retained by Mr. Humphreys as architects. It appear i ed it would be unadvisable to develop this property as ; residential; therefore, the basis for development of a I plan w.as to design a project that would be an asset to the ; community. The development is surrounded by fencing. : Due to the zoning on the adjacent properties it was felt I there was a need for a buffer zone such as the one pro- ! posed. Further, an R-1 development would not be eco- ; nomical.
i DON HOLLY, stated he was retained by the owner as : Engineer for this project, and the owner is requesting ; R-3 low density zoning through a precise plan,
I I
I
1
I I I f : I
1 I I I I a
I I :
I I I j-i
%+
I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I 8 I I
I I I I I I 1 I I !
5,
I t : REV. GORDON BAKER, informed the Council he attend- i I
i ed the Planning Commission meeting and was impressed I : by the number of protests made by persons not living in i i the immediate area? Their main objection to this devel- ; : opment seemed to be the traffic. In his opinion the ad- ; i dition of 20 units would not add appreciably to the traffic i : situation. Rev. Baker pointed out he was speaking as a i i home owner and not in behalf of the church. However, ; : this matter was discussed by the Board of Trustees of ; i the church. I I
I 4 I
* I I -8, '\, ', -1
I i I '\, 8, '8,
I I I ' ,' * k - 3- 4 % '\
0
I I t
t
4 k 8 I
I I
$ i I I I 1 t f
i Name '\,', : of 'i : Member """~""""""~""""""""""~"""""~--""""-""-"-----;-"----"--"~
.-
I
I" GEORGE MANN presented a letter from the Board oi . ; Trustees ~f the Pilgrim CGiigi-eg&tiGilizl Church dated * April 17, 1967, stating they would like to go on record as f
supporting the proposal made by Mr., Humphreys. I'
k I I i GEORGE MANN, 2031 Charleen Circle, stated he would : 1 like to speak as a home owner, and felt the proposed de- i i velopment would eliminate the eye sore of the weed in- i ; fested field. I I
i R. L, WATSON, 4018 Sunnyhill, explained he would like I : to approach this matter as a competitor. It' appeared to i i him that the highest and best use of this property would ; ; be the type of development proposed by Mr.' Humphreys. : i The property : across the street was approved for R-3L I I zoning without a precise plan. In his opinion Mr. Hum- : ; phreys has provided the City with an up-to-date complex, i i and he wovld welcome this type of development in the City i ; of Carlsbad. I I
1 MR, MANSFIELD, 2030 Chestnut Avenue, stated from his ; I point of view this type of development would be far better I ; than some other buildings that could be constructed on the ; I property, This development would enhance the area and : ; the City of Carlsbad. I
I I t I
..
I I I I 1
0
!
I t 1 MARVIN HUMPHREYS, the developer, iniorrned the i Council he and his wife had owned this property for the :
; past 10 years, They felt they had approached this develop; i ment in the proper manner..
: As there were no other persons desiring to speak in favor i i of the development, the Mayor announced the Council b I i would hear from all persons desiring to speak in opposi- ' i : tion to the proposed development. I I
: CHARLES KiTCHEN, 2097 Chestnut Avenue, opposed the i i development due to the added traffic it would create, 20 :
! units would bring 20 to 40 more children entering onto I i Chestnut Avenue and going to and from the schools. 8 I
i ,MONTY WEAVER, 2100 Chestnut Avenue, opposed the i : development due to the added traffic, He pointed out when: i the May Coo complex is completed and El Camino Real is i
i widened it will draw more traffic onto Chestnut Avenue. [
: sidewalks are needed on Chestnut Avenue; the construc- : i tion of this complex will cause a blind corner. If the ; requested zoning is approved it will be allowing R-3 zon- I i ing to creep into the R-1, Also most of the letters stating : : their approval were from persons not living in the imme-- : I aiate area.
i CHARLES EY MANN, 4140 Skyline Road, stated that at the !
i Planning Commission meeting it was pointed out there was! i sufficient R-3 areas in the City undeveloped, When all of I
! the R-3 has been developed then they should provide more ; i R-3 areas. The economic factor has been mentioned. It I : is not the prime purpose of the City Council to help people! i make a profit. The owner knew what he was purchasing i i when he bought the property. He did not feel the Council ; ; nor the Planning Commission should have to make these I : decisions. The need for sufficient parking in this develop: i ment should also be looked into before any decision is i : made, I I
a I I
I I 1 I I I I
I
I I I
I 8 I
t : The developer has not provided for guest parking; more i B .=
I
I I I I I
I 3
I'
I I i The public hearing was declared closed at 8:15 P. M. I 1
I I I
1 1
I 1 I
8
I I
I I
I
I ;
1 -4- * ',\ '" '.
I i Name '\, '
I : of " 8,
'\, '\ -\* ' I I
I
''8
8 '\
:"""""""""""""""""""-"""""""..""""""""-"""""""""~ : Member
I Considerable discussion was had by members of the : COGECC 2nd it w=rc the deci~i-on of the ceunci1 Lhe anneal I
I I 1 l e ' should be denied due to the fvllswing reasonti; rr
I ; s I' I t
I . 1. The development does not follow the Master Plan. I i 2. The need for R-3 development in this area has not ;
I been substantiated. I
i The following resolution was presented
i Resolution No. 1395, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
i APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COM- i i MISSION IN REGARDS TO RECLASSIFICATION OF CER- i Worthing ; TAIN PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-1-7500 TO ZONE R-3 i Neiswendt I AND A PRECISE PLAN FOR CHESTNUT GARDENS SUB- ; Atkinson : .DIVISION was adopted by title only and further reading i Dunne i waived. ; Jardine
I ENGINEERING:
I
I I
t 0 I 4 I I I I I
t
: COUNCILOFTHECITY OF CARLSBAD DENYING THE :
I I
I 1 8
$
" J 1 L i (a) Jefferson Street, et al, street improvement - A. D. i ; 2-1965.mlm Proceedings, . The Council was in-zrxi I that sevemds were raved by the Clerk on March : : 20, 1967. The City Engineer has examined the bids, i computed the amount of the bids, and determined the ; lowest responsible bidder to be M. L. Chilcote,Construc- i I tion Company of San Diego, in the amount of $138,838.11. ;
I I I I I
. I 'I t .i The City Engineer pointed out this bid was approximately i : 14% below the Engineer's estimate. !
I I I I
8 I I I I ! ' The following resolution was presented: s I
I I I I : Resolution No. 1396. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
: AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WORK OR IMPROVEMENT i Neiswendc
I COUNCE-OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, i Worthing
I : ORDERED BY RESOLUTION NO, 1382 OF SAID CITY ; Atkinson
f COUNCIL, A. D. No. 2-1965, Jefferson Street, et al, ; Dunne * I I was adopted by title only and further reading waived. : Jardine
i (b) Sanitary Sewer System in Garfield Street, Date Ave-. ! : nue, -C)liveFnue andSwTrZeGnt. A. D. .1-19667:
! 'thePlans and Specifications for the Council's review, and: i informed the Council the district represents the lower : : end of the Palisades. The properties owned by Mr, Ecke i i and the San Diego Gas & Electric Coo on the West are : : not included in the district. It is estimated the cost will i i run approximately $7.98 per front foot due to the pump : : station and the burrowing under the railroad tracks.
: After consideration by the Council the following resolu- I i tions were presented: 1
I I 1 I
"" I mroceed-Lngs, TheXZZa3 Enginee-eFeTe?$
* I I
I I I *
1 I I I
I i Resolution No. 1397. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY t mjm F TmCITY OF CARLSBADAPPROVING 8
!
i PLANSYN; SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER i Worthing' i WOW, AND APPROVING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT MAP, i Neiswend : Assessment District No. 1-1966, Garfield Street, Date : Atkinson : Avenue, Olive Avenue and Sewer Easement, was adopted i Dunne i by title only and further reading waived. ; Jardine
8
I I I l a 8 I I 1 I I
.. .
8
I I I 8 I I
I
I I
t
I
9
9 !
I I I I I !
-5 -
-
* .- t 88 ' '\ i Name '\, : of ';
t :""""""""""""""""""""""""""-..""""""""""-~""""""- : Member
! Resolution No. 1398. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i
~~~7lT~ITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, i 1 DECLARING ITS 1NTENTI:ON Kl ORDER. T-F-IE: COMSTR.TJG- 1 TION OF CERTAIN SANITARY SEWERS AND APPURT- i ! ENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK IN SAID CITY; i 1 DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL' i OR ORDINARY PUBLIC BENEFIT; DESCRIBING TIB3 ; i DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED BY SAID WORK AND TO ; i BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COST AND EXPENSE THERE$ : OF; DETERMINING THAT BONDS SHALL BE ISSUED TO I
I ING THE TIE AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS i I AND OBTECTIONS TO SAID WORK OR TKE EXTENT OF : : THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED, OR BOTH, AND I Worthing i GIVING NOTICE THEREOF, Assessment District No. 1- ; Neiswend( : 1966, Garfield Street, Date Avenue, Olive Avenue and l : Atkinson [ Sewer Easement, was adopted by title only and further : Dunne : reading waived. : Jardine
: Resolution No. 1399. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 1 COUNC?OnrCITY OF CARLSBAD, DETERMINING ; Worthing : THE GENERAL PREVAILING RATE OF PER DIEM i Neiswendf i WAGES, Assessment District No. 1-1966, Garfield Street,! Atkinson : Date Avenue, Olive Avenue and Sewer Easement, was i Dunne I adopted by title only and further reading waived. ; Jardine
i PLANNING:
I (a) Memorandum - re: Laguna Riviera School/Park site. i : A memorandum dated ApnT12,TW,Pthening i i Commission was presented, stating that at the regular. : ; meeting of the Planning Commission held on April 11, 1967') I the Commission unanimously approved the proposed I I : Laguna Riviera School/Park site as presented.
i The City Planner presented a map of the proposed sehool i i and park site for the Laguna Riviera subdivision. The ;
i subdivider for this purpose. The Planning Department I : has worked with the School District, Parks and Recrea- i i tion Commission and the Planning Commission, and they ; : have all given their tentative approval. The exact usage i I of the park site will be determined at a later date. It is :
t proposed that the play area of the school be adjacent to i i the park ,site. 8 I
I By motion of the Council the proposed Laguna Riviera : Worthing : School and Park site were approved. : Neiswend
I t I
0
: REPRESENT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED; AND FIX- :
4 I
I I I 1 I
0
4 t
I I I I I I t
- 1 I
I I I I I I
I Council was informed a 12 acre site was set aside by the 1
1.
e
I I I I t
*
I
I I
I I I I
t ! Atkinson
t i Dunne
I ; Jardine
i (b) Appointment to Planning Commission. Mayor Atkin- i : son requested this matter def~eTuTtEEhe next regular i i meeting of the City Council. 1
8 I
! NEW BUSINESS: t
i (a) Annexation proceedings - re: East Carlsbad An- I : nexation NO,'^, 7". The Clerk informed thecouncil. a 1 i petition da5aFril 7, 1967, had been received, bearing ; i the names of Charlotte C. Carey, M. H. Ireys and Jay F.i : Hoffman, requesting annexation of certain properties to ; : the City of Carlsbad. This matter was approved by the i : Local Formation Commission on March 20, 1967.
i A map of the proposed area was presented, and after re- 1 i view by the Council, the following resolution was pl'esent; : ed: I I
4 t
I 4
8 I
I"
11
1
0 I t I I I
I I I
i b
I -6 - I 8 ' '\
I ; of 'i ;"""""""""""~"""""""""""""""""""~""""-""-~""""""-~ : Member
I Resolution No. 1400. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
'\ '.
I i Name '8, I 1
I
I # 8 * I I mUTCmTFTEE-CITY OF CARLSBAD GIVING NOTICE i Worthing i OF PROPOSED ANhrEXATiON AND SETTING PROTEST ! Nelswendt i HEARING REGARD1N.G "EAST CARLSBAD ANNEXATION i Atkinson f NO. 2. 7rr, was adopted by title only and further reading : Dunne I waived. : Jardine
i (b) Request for overnight camping - re: FOX'S Snug i Harbn written request from Jeaneand John Fox, t ; operators of Fox's Snug Harbor, dated April 13, 1967, was! i presented, requesting permission for overnight camping ; ; privileges to a limited number of guests over the Mem- i i orial Day weekend. I I
i Cmn. Jardine pointed out previously it has been the poli- i : cy of the City Council that a request be made by a certain I i group for a specific occasion, I #
I Mr. Fox was present and informed the Council he had re- I i ceived requests from certain families for this particular I i weekend. I *
I Permission was granted to FOX'S Snug Harbor for over- I Worthing .I night camping over Memorial Day Weekend, subject to i Neiswendc ! privileges being limited to a maximum of 20 campers. ; Atkinson
0
I 1 I I
I
* I I
I t I I I 1
I I t
I
0
I
I 1
I i Dunne
I : Jardine t I I 8 I I I
I I
i OLD BUSINESS:
"
I I I. i (a) Second reading of Ordinance No. 9206, increasing ; : minimum size street tree required in subdivisions."TliG- I I mwwordinance waspresented for a seconlrzading: :
"-
1 I I I i Ordinance No. 9206. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i Worthing
I REQUIRED IN sUBDIVTSIONS FROM FIVE GALLON TO i Atkinson ; TWELVE GALLON, was given a second reading by title i Dunne i only and adopted. : Jardine
; CAmmTITCXEASIrtiG MINIMUM SIZE STREET TREE I Neiswendl
0 I i COMMITTEE REPORTS: ""-
t
I 1 I
I I I Agua Hedionda Lagoon Committee. Cmn. Neiswender ! : %Gi-dark-FrTjTrepared by the my Attorney from findings! i made by the Committee. It was the Committee's recom- :
i mendation that due to the need for extensive parking I facilities, police problems, litter and sanitation problems: : and substantial noise generated from boat racing, a I i policy be adopted not to close the Lagoon for large boat : I races, or other similar events, and future requests be I ; uniformly denied, I I
I I
I
I I I
I i The Mayor requested the matter held over for further :
I : : G. L. Southwell, L/Col USAF Ret, - re: Sidewalk ease- i / ments ZETosslotE-l thru 9, Huena VistaGa?dGE'sXAt-; : the previous meeting 0Tfh.e Council a reqG-eZEs made i i by Col. Southwell on behalf of 9 property owners, that ; : the City relinquish all:inter'est, if any, to the sidewalk i i easements. The Mayor appointed Councilmen Llorthing I : and Dunne to review the easements in the Buena Vista i I Gardens, specifically any sidewalk easements. 1 I
! Cmn, Dunne informed the Council he and Cmn. Worthing I
, i looked into this matter and they could see no need for i ; these easements by the City. I I
i The City Manager stated the staff recommends that the i
1 study by the Council. I 1
8
I I I
I b 8 1
I I I I
I \ .I -\8 '. '\
I -7 - 8, \\ ' I I t
a
b
8 t
I i ~a me \x\ "*
f : of 'Y
,*<. I i Member .." (""""~~".~""""--"""""""""""~~.~~""..-"""-"-"--------"-"-----"".
I I i sidewalk easements be vacated by way of quit claim deeds;
i By motion of the Council the City Attorney was instructed i Worthing 1 to prepare quit claim deeds in order to release the City ; Neiswendl
i of any claim or interest in the sidewalk easements, i Atkinson
I : Dunne
i CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
: (a) Agreement - re: Rabco Land Corporation. The City i I Attorney reported Rabco LZi"CEWation was granted :i
I variances by the Planning Commission to allow lot splits I i for the development of four parcels of land located on 1 I i Valley Street between Chestnut Ave. and Basswood Ave. : : Rabco intends to: assign its interest to Ronald D. Browardd
i are required. Mr, Browardlias -requested that he be I I ! allowed to construct dwellings on the four lots prior to I ; constructing street improvements. He would not be given ; \ final occupancy of the dwellings until the street improve- i
1 ments are installed. Also the lot split map would be held ;
i up until such time as the street improvements have been i i completed. I I
i Cmn. Worthing asked if Mr. Browa.rd would be required f i to pay a fee in accordance with the Park Dedication Ordi- i : nance? I $
: Discussion was had as to whether the Park Dedication 1
' I Ordinance applied to lot splits as well as subdivisions,. , i : and the staff was requested to review the ordinance to see ; I if the ordinance did apply to all division of lands.
i By motion of the Council the Agreement was approved t Worthing : between the City of Carlsbad, Rabco Land Corporation i Neiswende I and Ronald D. Broward, and the Mayor authorized to i Atkinson : execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. . : Dunne
I t I 0
I.
I I 1 I Jardine, I I
a
I I f t
t
8 """_ 0
I
; As a condition of the lot splits full street improvements ! I
0 I I 8 t
I * I 1 I
I I I * I S 8
b I 0 i Jar dine
I I I I i (b) Ordinance #5041 - re: Weed and Trash Abatement. i : A memorandum dated March 31, 1967;rom the City .: Attorney was presented concerning Weed and Trash : Abatement. A form of Ordinance was also presented, t I i repealing various. City Code sections regarding the Abate-:
f ment of Weeds and Trash. The City Attorney informed : \ the Council if the ordinance is adopted the City could then i : proceed under the State Code. Certain procedures for : i administering the abatement program were suggested.
i Crnn. Dunne asked if the City had started any abatement i i proceedings as of this date, and the City Manager inform-:
; was over.
! Ordinance No. 5041. AM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i Worthing ' i lTKTTIiD-R%mLING VARIOUS OPLDINANCES AND i Neiswende : SECTIONS OF ORDINANCES REGARDIiYG WEEK AhrD : Atkinson i TRASH ABATEMEXT, was given a first reading by title i Dunne : only and further reading waived. ; Jardine
: (c) Resolution ##1401 - re: Establishing Park Areas. The i i City-.ini>Trescnted a resolution designating park I i areas within the City and Carlsbad General Plan area for ; : purposes of implementing Ordinance #9190,
- e
l I 1 I
t I I I 8 4 I
; ed the Council they were waiting until the rainy season t !
I I I I I I
I * 1
0 I I I I i I i The City Planner presented a boundary map showing park !
; areas. Any properties that are split will contribute 1
I 1 I #
1 I I
I I I I
I
i 1 -&
&
1 -8- I '\ \ '\
'\ *'''\. *
I I I Name '.,'4
I I Member ! : of 4
!"-"""""-"""""""""""""""""""-..""""""""""~"""""""-
i towards a park within the boundary of that area.
f The City Manager pointed out there could be areas where i I there would be a neighborhood park as well as a commun- I ! ity park. & I
i The Planner informed the Council this boundary map has i : been discussed with the schools as to future school sites. i
i Resolution #1401 was presented for discussion and it was i : suggested that on Line 13 the word "anticipated" be in- & I serted and on Line 21 the word "may".
1 : Resolution No. 1401. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY : Worthing : "OWHECITY OF CARLSBAD ESTABLISHING i Neiswende: i PARK AREAS Ah! PARK SITES FOR IMPLEMENTATION: Atkinson
: further reading waived. : Jardine
i (d) Agreement - re: Kelly Wells. An Agreement was I ! presented by theTity Attmy-wxeereby Arthur Shapiro, ; i operator of the Sintarosa Golf Course, would make use of z : certain City water rights located on the Carroll Kelly I I i property. The terms of the Agreement were developed : i and recommended by the Engineering Department and the i ' ; Water Department. The Agreement provides for a 30 day : i termination clause, and prior approval by the City of any ; : improvements done by Mr. Shapiro to the wells for which I i the City would be liable for reimbursement. I I
i By motion of the Council the Agreement between the City i Worthing ; and Shapiro was approved and the Mayor authorized to i Neiswende i execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. ; Atkinson
.E' .7
t I $ '\ # * 1 I J e I I
I I
4 t
t 8 1 I
8 * '1 I I I
I
/ OP ORDINANCE NO, 9190, was adopted by title only and i Dunne
I t I I
0
I 1 I I
I I ; Dunne I ; i ! Jardine * i CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
"""P
1 I 8 1 I I I e i (a) Report on monies invested by City during fiscal year I : 1966-67. A-rittenreFrt was -suxlxed by the City
; Manager regarding monies invested by the City during I i fiscal year 1965-66 and fiscal year 1966-67. The sum of ! I interest earned during fiscal year 1965-66 was $53, 326. 00: : as of April 14, 1967, $41, 945. 00, and the estimated in- i i terest.to'be earned as of June 30, 1967, $54, 949.00. I I
I Cmn. Dunne requested that a similar report be made : each time a fiscal report is submitted.
1 I 1 "-
I I e I 8 1 I 1. I I
I I I I ; p ,written report on revenues and expenditures of the i City was presented by the City Manager.
I I * -t
I I I
; (b) Compilation of contractual serdces for Planning ' ! 1 I
"I I
t
"" : purposes. A compilation of contractual services for i Planning purposes was presented including fiscal years i : 1962-63 thru April 1, 1967.
: North Carlsbad Water Facilities. The Council inquired i i as to thestatusoff"Kgreement between the City of 4 t : Carlsbad and the City of Oceanside concerning North { Carlsbad Water Facilities.
i The City Attorney informed the Council there was no : major problem and the matter should be resolved shortly.:
I 1 I I' t I I
I t t i t * t I t I I I 0 I I I I i Completion of Library Building. " Inquiry was made as to i
I I I I I 8 I I t
a 1
I
v .,,, FL I ; b, -. ' \
I I I
I 8 8, '8 ''\ I '\, '8, '\
I -9 - t .'
I ' '\
1 I Name '8, I 1 of ' 'I ! ;"~""""""""""~.--"-"""--~~"".""""..""..""."""""~~~"""""~ ; Member
I I the completion date for the Library, and the Building
; Inspector indicated it would probably be the middle of I : October, 1967. According to the contract the contractor ; i has 29 days after August 31, 1967 to complete the job. I !
8
I
0
I 1 I
I I I 4 I : Nuisance Ordinance. Inquiry was made as to the progres$ i beiiigmadeinenforcing the Nuisance Ordinance. a
i The Building Inspector stated he would present a case i
f for consideration by the Council as soon as he could get : i away from the Library. inspection. I
I I
I
1.
I l e
i Traffic light at the intersection of Chestnut Avenue and ; : Monroe Street. 'Cmn. Worthing requ~tiTfFiiTraffic i i I mComm'ittee to study the possibility of a traffic , i
i Avenue and Monroe Street. I
: Parks and Recreation Commission Progress Report. i =mrtTiing asked if the Progress Report had been i I completed by the Parks and Recreation Commission.
I Cmn. Jardine stated he had not contacted'the Comrnis- i : sion since the last meeting.
; Resolution - re: Establishing the Central. Business i District Action CommissZ5n. MayTrFinson pFEsGiiET~ t afo-fresolution establishing the Central Business i i District Action Commission, and requested the members ; : of the Council to study the resolution prior to the next i I Council meeting. I
i
t "-
: signal being installed at the intersection of Chestnut !
I * t I I I
0
I I I t I
I & I I I I I
I
,.
I
I
t I I i Authorization for payment of Chamber of Commerce I Worthing ; bills. AuthorizatETaTzlven for the payEGnt of bills ; Neiswend i submitted by the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce in the i Atkinson : amount of $1, 210,70, for the period February 9, 1967 to : Dunne i April 4, 1967, upon recommendation of Cmn. Neiswender.:' Jardine
I 8 I I I I I I I I- I I I I I
. i AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMBNT OF BILLS AND
I RATIFICATTON OF PAY-ROLL:
: Authorization was given for the payment of bills for the i i general expenses of the City in the amount' of $53,121.59 : Worthing ! and for the Water Department in the amount of $3, 083.84,; Neiswendt
,, ' : I for the period April 4, 1967 to April 18, 1967, as certi- :Atkinson : fied by the Director of Finance and approved by the i Dunne I Auditing Committee. : Jardine
i Ratification of the payroll was given for the first half of I Worthing ; April, 1967, in the amount of $23,161, 00, as certified by i Neiswendc i the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing ! Atkinson : Committee. : Dunne
-
-
I I I I
s
I I
I I Jardine I
I
I I I
. i ADJOURNMXNT:
I I'
-___-
i Mayor Atkinson requested that a discussion session be I : held after the meeting of May 2, 1967,
: By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 9: 35 P. M. i
I I I I I I
1 8 I I
I I I l
a i Respectfully submitted, w 1 I f ~4ypGfi t: P fi;A,,,yce /. I ! MARG74RET E. ADAINS I City Clerk
I I I I I I
I
1 I I I I 1