Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-05-16; City Council; Minutes\ 0 . * -0 . .. i CITY OF CARLSBAD :Minutes of: t CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting) :Date of Meeting: May 16, 1967 i Time of Meeting: 7: 00 P. M. :Place of Meeting: Council Chambers IROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Worthing, tNeiswender, Dunne and Jardine. Mayor Atkinson was tabsent. Also present were City Manager Mamaux, City :Attorney Wilson and City Clerk Adams. !INVOCATION was offered by Vice Mayor Dunne. !ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given. I APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ("""-"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~ I 4 I I I 1 I " 1 I I * I I I e I I I 1 I I I I I I U I I I 8 I 4 I I I I I I I I I -1 ?, -t -\ ', '., '. '8' '. Name 's8 of ' .' .. Member """""". ; I (a),. Minutes of the regular me eting held May 2, 1967, werd Worthing : ; approved as submitted. INeiswend i I t D l I Dunne i Jardine B I I I e I : CORRESPONDENCE: I 1- I "" I I : There was no written correspondence presented. I I- : ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: I I : There were no oral communications. I : PUBLIC HEANNGS: I I ! (a) (Continued) Resolution of Intention #1394, stating : I City Council'snionov7ZEZESe~ice Road, running : : mwithTEarack Ave. betweenTefferson t. an "t * I I I I I " I * I t I - I I I t I "- I I I I -1 " S"2-A iEtXK-" ! I I t I The Engineering Department requested the hearing con- ; : tinued until the final map of Tamarack Plaza is approved. I I By motion of the Council the hearing on Resolution of i Worthing i Intention #1394, was continued until June 6, 1967, at 7: 30 : Neiswend : P. M. I Dunne I ; Jardine i (b) Resolution of 'Intention #1398, declaring Council's a I : inten-nTo order sanirZ"-lT7Gc!mngs, ___) ; i AID.1-;;1966-TaFAve.,OliveAve. , port1TnTTGaFfEIC : KmEasements. i Vice Mayor Dunne announced the hour of 7:30 P. M. having { arrived, this was the time and place fixed by this City : t Council for hearing objections or protests on the proposed! ; work, or the extent of the assessment district, or on the ; : proposed grades under the Resolution.of .Intention, Resolu; i tion No. 1398, providing for the construction of sanitary I i sewers and appurtenances in Date Ave., Olive Ave., I ; portion of Garfield St, and sewer easements. I The Clerk presented the Affidavits of Publication, Mailing! : and Posting. The Affidavits were approved and ordered i i filed. i A map of the assessment district was presented. The : : Assistant Engineer informed the Council the district in- 1 i volves and benefits 32 parcels of land. This is one of the : I last areas along the beach needed to .be sewered. The i ; cost will run approximately $7.98 per front foot. The t i cost is a little high due to having to tunnel under the rail- I ; road track. I i I i The Vice Mayor requested the Clerk to read all protests i ; that had been filed. , . .. . t I I I I I I I I - "A" I I t I"" 8 I I I t I I I I I I I I I I 1 I t I I t I I . ,. L I : -s, ', ~'\ " I ', ' ' & ', I : of 'x :"""""""""""";"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" : Member . I 1 I -2- i 1 I ,' '' \' '' I i Name 's, '' I I * " 8 6 I I * i The Clerk reported that up to the time set for hearing no i - i written protests had been filed. 3 0 I t 0 I : I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I .I 1 I i t I * I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I t I * I I I I I I 1 The City Attorney stated he had received a letter fro,m an i attorney representing Mrs. Anna H. Higman, 3910 Walnut! Grove Ave., Rosemead, California. Mrs. Higman is : not objecting to the district but to the offer made to her i fpr.':an easuement. I * As there were no oral protests, tmhe Engineer of Work : , reported that 0% protests and objections had been filed ; with the City Clerk by owners of the total area to be I assessed for the improvement. I I ~ The public hearing was declared closed at 7:40 P. M. I The following resolution was introduced: 6 t a * I I I * I I * I I l e. I I * I I Resolution No. 1406. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCSTKIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, NIAKING FIND-: ~ INGS AND OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS i Worthing I ON RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 1398, Assessment i Neiswend I District No. A. D. .l-1966, was adopted by title only and : Dunne 1 further reading waived i Jardine I ENGINEERING: I I 1 I I I "- * , i (a) Res. #1407, adopting and submitting Budget for Ex- ! penditurex3ate allocam (Enginee'Fing) Funds. The ! Couiw-iirmed thiwoEXiX%%?o= each I year for Gas Tax monies. This Budget is for Engineering funds in the amount of $3,000. The following resolution was presented: I Resolution No. 1407. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ADOPTING AND SUBMITTING A BUDGET FOR EXPEND-: Neiswend ITURE OF STATE ALLOCATED (ENGINEERING) FUNDS,; Dunne was adopted by title only and further reading waived. i Jardine I t 1 I 'I I I I COUXLTFTTECITY OF CARLS BAD, CALIFORNIA, i Worthing L ! (b) Res. #1408, adopkng and .submitting Budget for Ex- i I penditure of Funds allocated from Statemway Fund to ; : m1rTh.e City Manager informed the Council the pro- i ; wslons outlined are for the improvement of Kelly Drive ; i and the extension of Elm Avenue. ! 1- I I I I t The following resolution was introduced: : : Resolution No. 1408. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY I : SUBMITTING A BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS, Worthing i ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO : Neiswend : CITIES, was adopted by title only and further reading i Dunne i waived. : Jardine i (c) Relinquishment of Lowder Lane, Avenida Encinas, I i Solamar Drive and Palomar Airport Road by Carfornia I ; Righway-Commission to the City of Carlsbad, l'hese I I i mTiave been comple5TaXd the Califorza Highway i ; Commission is relinquishing them to the City of Carlsbad: I I I I i CDURCT~LTF-TTCITY OF CARLSBAD ADOPTING AND: I I I I " * I * 1 (d) Relinquishment of Old 101 Highway by California I I 0 I I HighxyTommission to the Cityofmsbad. Due to the-; I ! I - t I 1 (d) Relinquishment of Old 101 Highway by California I I 0 I I HighxyTommission to the Cityofmsbad. Due to the-; I ! I - t I i t I t b # I ? b -* 1 , '. \ '. **, I 8 I I I i 1 8'. y*, -, * \ I I 1 -3- I '1, '8. 1 i Name '8, 1 : of 'I t I Member ;~"""""""""""""""""""""~"""~~--"--."---"--"-"-".."....~.*~ I 1 : completion of Interstate #5 south of Palomar Airport Rd, ,i - i the California Highway Commission is relinquishing Old. ; I 101 Highway to the City of Carlsbad from Palomar Airport: i R.d.. to the South City limits. ; Upon motion of the Council, the following roads were ac- : i cepted by the Council on behalf of the City of Carlsbad: : Worthing i Lowder Lane, Avenida Encinas, Solamar Drive and i Neiswend ! Palomar Airpo.rt Road, and Old 101 Highway from Palornart Dunne i Airport Road to the South Citj. limits. i Jardine i (e) Offer of street dedication by Mrs. C. I?. Leftwich. i : The Assistant EngineerTeFoXeTEis offer of streetedi- : ; cation is in connection with the Jefferson Street project. i ; There were 33 street dedications to be obtained, and the i I City has received 32.. There is one that will have to go I : to Court. : By motion of the Council the street dedication from Mrs. : Worthing i C. F. Leftwich was accepted, and the Clerk instructed to ! Neiswend I record the same. : Dunne i -, ' I 0 b 8 4 1 t I 1 1 I t I t 1 I 1 I I I i Jardine $ I * t 8 8 t i PLANNING: # I I I " 1 (a) Tentative Map of Terramar Unit #7 Subdivision. The [ ; TentativeTa>oi:T=amar Unit #7 was presentedby the : i Assistant Engineer. Mr. Thornton stated the Engineering! I Department recommended that the tentative map be ap- I' i proved, subject to a lot split being processed and proper : i dedication being given for Cannon Road. There is a small! ; section of land to be vacated at the North end of the sub- i : division, and the Engineering Department recommends i i that this item be processed in the same manner as the i i street vacation for Tamarack Plaza, : MR, CANNON, subdivider for Terramar Unit #7, stated ; i it would be almost impossible for him to improve approx- i i imately 500 feet of roadway in order to proceed with the : : subdivision. This includes approximately 300 feet of r i lake. This would mean fill in order to construct sidewalki. ; He could not recover the money spent for this improvemerit. I However, he is willing to dedicate the proper right of way: i The Assistant Engineer stated according to the Lot Split i : I Ordinance he would have to enter into a future street im- i : provement agreement. The City does not expect Mr. I i Cannon to do this improvement at this time. The City is i I responsible for 40 feet of right of way improvement. In I ; the future no doubt Gas Tax monies would be used for the I i improvement, but the City feels Mr. Cannon should be ! : responsible for curb, gutter and sidewalk. The 250 feet i i between the lake and the Railroad is zoned R-1 at the : present time. i Mr. Cannon further stated there is industry to the West i i and East of his property. He deeded 60 feet of right of : ; way and is willing to dedicate 20 feet more if necessary. I i However, he did not feel he should have to sign an agree- : ; ment to obtain a lot split for 16 lots. I - ! The Assistant Engineer pointed out that when this road : i needs four lanes Gas Tax monies will do the majority of ; t the wo rk. I i After further consideration Cmn. Neiswender requested i : the matter deferred until the next meeting. I 4 ? t I t I 1 I I t I 4 L I I 4 1 I b I I I 1 I I 0 I t I I I I I I I I t 4 I I i I ', , ' * -4 - I * '. ', ', '1 8' -' - \' \ I I 0 . I I I I I I I I I I 4 i t f i 4 I I I ! 8 I I t I I t I b I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I t I I I I l a I ! : ! .I I ' -1 I i Name 't, I D. . I of " ~""""""""""""""""""""""""-""..""""""""""""""""-" : Member I I * 1 I. (b) Tentative map of Helton Hinterland Subdivision. I ! The EiEXve m.ap of mnf-Iinterland Subjaniwas \ presented. The Assistant Engineer informed tQe Council : this subdivision is located between Arland Road and the i proposed James Drive. This subdivision will be subject : to the street opening of James Drive and lot splits: pro- : cessed prior'to the final map being approved. Also a study is needed by the subdivider's engineer that there ; I will be no further sewers for Arland Road, There will : have to be future street improvement agreements entered i into by the property owners similar to those processed .: for Stratford Lane street opening. A variance was grant- i ed by the Planning Commission for Lot 3. I I After discussion by.the City Council, the following res- I olution was presented: l * I * I I I 8 Resolution No. 1410. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY D I COUNCILmTmITY OF CARLSBAD, APPROVING I Worthing THE TENTATIVE MAP OF JXECLTON HINTERLAND I Neiswend, SUBDIVISION, was adopted by title only and further read-: Dunne ing waived. i Jardine (c) Appointment to Planning Commission. Vice Mayor i Dunne requested this matter held over until the next meet: ing, I I NEW BUSINESS: I * I I I I "" b I t I $ : (a) Proclamation - re: National Public Works Week. i TheweekoTyT4th to May 20th, 1967 was prossed . i : "National Public Works Week by Vice Mayor Dunne. I I * I I I I : (b) Presentation of proposed plans for the City Hall. I I i Weberana-Ems, Architects, presented aman i i of the City Hall and Police facilities, showing the place- : i ment of the buildings on the property and the parking area{ i Mr. Edwards stated the building as proposed would be I ! a one story building. The Council Chambers would be a i i separate building. Plans for the interior offices were : : also presented, and Mr. Edwards stated they were 80% i : sofidified. *. 1 %I ! : Plans for expansion were also discussed. Cmn. Jardine : i asked if the Police Department would be designed for a 1 i second story in the future? I L i Mr. Edwards stated they felt it would be a simple matter : i to construct outside columns. i Cmn. Working asked why a single story building was con-! ; sidered rather than a two story building. I I i Mr. Edwards informed the Council if it had been possible : : for the City to have a Civil Defense Shelter they would i i have considered a two story building, A single story I I i building is much more economical. Also it works out i i better as far as walkways and parking. b I * I I I I I I I I l e I I 1 I I I 1 I I I * I i Vice Mayor Dunne informed the Council this presentation ! I was made to acquaint the other members of the Council i i what has taken place in the course of study by the Build- : I ing Committee. I I I I 0 I I 1 I I b I I 1 1 I I I I I I I t t I I * I -5- i I I b '\ ' '. * 6 ." '\ ' *' *' '' " I Name **, .: of ' i :"""""""~"""""""""""""""""""-""""""-""""~""""""~ : Member I : OLD BUSINESS: . " e - I I 1 4 I f I ! i I I I I I 1 a 1 t t 8 1 I I I I I I I I 4 * # I I ! I I I I ! * 1 $ I 8 I .I I I I I I * I I I I * ! I I I i I (a) Agua Hedionda Lagoon Report. Vice Mayor Dunne ! I inform-theuncllhehad received a letter from Mayori Atkinson concerning this matter. 8 t Cmn. Neiswender suggested that the matter be held over i until the next meeting when the Mayor'wo.uld be present, i and he was in hopes a decision could be made at that time: (b)' Resolution establishing Central Business District . i ActionKmiss'lon.-Cmn. Worthing stated he had gone i over the revisGEGsolution and found it to be satisfactory.: However, he wanted it*to be understood that this was not i a City problem. W-4 , 4 r a a I c I 8 B . I At the request of the Council members the resolution was : read in full. Some discussion was given to Section 4, I regarding the resignation of any person on the Commis- ; sion at the Mayor's request. 8 I * # 1 After further consideration, the following resolution was adopted; Resolution No. 1412. A RESOLUTION OF'THE CITY -1zmmCITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ACTION COMMISSION. COMMITTEE REPORTS: "- I I I 3 I I i I ; Worthing i Neiswend : Dunne i Jar dine + L I I I I : Buena Vista Lagoon Committee. Cmn. Dunne reported i i the Committee met last we33Fdiscuss State Funds that ; : are available. I I i I 1 -. I I : Civic Center Building Committee. A meeting was held I i on May 10, 1967, to review the Hreliminary Plans. The : : plans presented this evening by the Architects were ac- I i cepted in principle by the Committee. I # I I I I i Water Facility Improvement Committee. Cmn. Dunne i : ZiEEGme Councllthat no meeting had been held by ; I the Committee since the last Council meeting. I I I I I I i Library Building Committee. Cmn. Neiswender reported I : the Library Building Committee have requested that all i i bids received for the metal shelving in the new library : : be rejected, and authorization given to readvertise for i i bids. I I By motion of the Council all bids received for the metal I Worfiing : shelving in the new library were rejected, arid authoriza- i Neiswend, i tion given to readvertise for bids. : Dunne I I I I I 1 I 4 4 I i Jardine I I i The Building Committee also requested that the low bid i : of B. F. Shearer Company in the amount of $8, 415.65 for : 'I i furniture be accepted by the Council. i The low bid of B. E'. Shearer Company in the amount of i Worthing ; $8, 415. 65 was accepted by the City Council in behalf of I Neiswend! i the City of Carlsbad. i Dunne I ; Jardine I I 1 I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I i I # 1 1 1 I I 1 I -8 ' 1 s ', '8 L " ' ' ' ', ' $ I -6 - ! '. ' I I t I Name '8, I : of ' :""""""""~"""~""""""~""~""""""""""""""""""""""-*- : Member i The low bid of Remington Records for Card Catalogue in i Worthing - i the amount of $ 3,109. 39 was also accepted, as recom- i Neiswend -, I I 1 0 t mended by the Building Committee, I 1! : Dunne I_ . I i Jardine .e ! 8 I 1 I I k I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I ! 4 4 I 1 1 ! : Chamber of Commerce, Cmn, Neiawender presented a i bill submitted by the Chamber of Commerce from the I I Williams Printing Coo in the amount of $105. 20, for 250 I industrial maps and 1000 fact folders. S 8 1 s : By motion of the Council authorization was given for the i Worthing payment of the bill submitted by the Chamber of Commer+ Neiswenc in the amount of $105.20, as recommended by Cmn. ; Dunne Neiswender. i Jardine I 0 I Cmn. Neiswender also presented bills submitted by the : 1 Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $599.70, for the : period April 5, 1967 to May 5, 1967, and recommended I that authorization be given for payment of the bills. I I I I , Upon motion made by the Council authorization was given i Worthing : for the payment of bills submitted by the Chamber of i Neisw end 1 i Commerce in the amount of $599.70, as recommended : Dunne I by Cmn. Neiswender. i Jardine 1 I 1 i Chamber of Commerce Budget for fiscal year 1967-68. I i -CrnnTNeiswender presented theChambermEFe i : Budget for fiscal year 1967-68, and recommended that a i i contract be entered into between the City and the Chamber: : of Commerce for the fiscal year 1967-68. i By motion of the Council the City Attorney was instructed i Worthing i to prepare a contract between the City and the Chamber : Neiswend t of Commerce, for review by the City Council at their i Dunne i next meeting. : Jardine i Cnm. Worthing requested that a statement of expenditure; I be presented by the Chamber of Commerce for fiscal yea4 i 1966-67, in order to compare the proposed expenditures ; : for fiscal year 1967-68. I : Business License Committee. Cmn. Jardine reported i i the Business Lxense Committee had not met since his ; : last report to the Council; however, the committee is i i scheduled to meet next week. I f i CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: I I * I I I I 1 k 1 I I I I I .. I I' I 8 I I I I i I i San Diego Gas & Electric Co. - re: Request for E.ase- I i ment. The City'ManaZ? informedtheiiZci1 the San i i Diego Gas 8t Electric Co. has requested an easement I I : from the City for the purpose of installing a pull box on i i City owned property at 1492 Chupmosa Way for under- ! : ground utilities. The following rzsolution has been pre- i i pared for the Council's consideration: I I - 4 I ; i Resolution No. 1411. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY I I i EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPAN* Neiswendc : FOR UTILITY PURPOSES, was adopted by title only and i Dunne i further reading waived., : Jardine i Cmn. Worthing inquired as to the April financial report. I i The City ?Manager informed the Council the report was i : completed today, however, he did not have a chance to i i prepare any comments and recommended that it be held ; i over until the next meeting. 3 I I I UNCIL OFTHECITY OF CARLSBAD GRANTING : Worthing 0 I t I I I I 1 * -8 ' 8 I I 1 I * I f 8 1 I ! I I I I 8.. '*.,'*, I i Name *%, I : of ' i Member !- _""" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - - - - - - - -,' - f - - - - - - ---I 1 -7 - " '. '8 ' ,-, i Parks and Recreation Requirements. At the last meeting: - !of the City Council a report dated April 26, 1967, was 3 I :presented from the Parks and Recreation Commission, i :listing present requirements and future needs for parks : :and recreation in the City of Carlsbad. In discussing the i 'L ireport, the City Council requested that a member of the : :Commission be present for the Council meeting of May 16, i 11967, and that a map be prepared showing the recommende~ :land acquisitions. e ; The City Planner presented a map showing park. sites as i !recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission, ! :and pointed out the park sites follow the General'Plan of i ;the City more or less. !Vice Mayor Dunne asked if one of the Commissioners werd e I' I 0 # I t t 1 !present to brief the Council? :Commissioner Blacic informed the Council he and Mrs. ! iScherr had been asked by the Chairman of the Parks and : :Recreation Commission last evening to appear here and i !brief the Council on the Commission's recommendations. : c Commissioner Blacic stated the Commission held a num- : :ber of meetings regarding a priority list to present to the i i Council. The items listed in the report were voted on by I :the Commission., The Commission feels a Recreation i :Director should be employed for the coming year. There : iare many organizations in the City that are doing a tre- i ; mendous job. ;Vice Mayor Dunne asked if this person would be employed I i just for recreation or would he have other functions. I i Commissioner Blacic stated the Commission felt the i :Director could set up a recreation program. i Cmn. Worthing asked if the recreation program would be i : for all age groups? * i Commissioner Blacic stated it would. The age group up I ;to 16 years of age is fairly well taken care of by the Girls' i : Club and Boys' Club. However, from age 16 and over I ithere is a need for recreation. This person should work i i closely with the schools as they have facilities. t e i Cmn. Neiswender asked if the schools had been contacted, i :and Commissioner Blacic informed the Council it was his i :understanding the Council requested that a plan be sub- ; : mitted by the Commission. ! Cmn. Worthing asked. if the Commission felt a part-time i i Director would be sufficient at the present time, and I I : suggested that members of the Commission contact the i i City Manager as to qualifications and salary. 1 t i Vice Mayor Dunne asked if the Commission had a cost i : estimate on the land acquisitions" : Cornmissioner Flcic stated the Commission did not feel I i they were qualified to give any figures. i i Commissioner Mary Scherr informed the Council she was ! : sure the Council was aware that all the members of the i t i Commission were not in favor of all the items listed. The! : Commissioners are not professionals,, They did not know I I what the cost of the items would be, The Commission t 1 would like to see a great deal of green areas along the ' 8 8 1 I t I l a I b t I I $ t I I I I b 6 e I I t f l I I I I e 1 e I a 8 I I I 1 * 8 i -* 1 a # I i I I . 8- ', \ - I I '\ " I -8- I ', \ ' I ; ' '\ : ', ' i Name 'k, I :. of :Freeway. It was their feeling Carlsbad would always be : 9 la tourist community. The natural bemty of the City should ;be preserved. Other cities have developed streets around : !clumps of trees. Proper planning should be given now to i ;parks. They have no means of knowing the amount of I b jmoney to be spent. The Commission only meets once a { :month, but the developers are working full time. They : !are encouraged by some of the ordinances that have been ! : adopted I \ I :"""-""""""""""""""""~"."~"""""""""""""""""""""~~ 1 Member I 8 0' I I I I I I I 8 * 1 I I 1 I I 8 I I I I I I I I I I e I I I I I i I I t I I I 1 I I I I i 1 I Vice Mayor Dunne remarked that this report was an ex- ! cellent report. I 'Cmn. Neiswender stated he has received more informa- ; tion from the reporfs than he has 'received in the past I L ~ five years. I I 1 I B .I * Cmp. Jardine asked Mrs. Scherr if it would benefit the i Commission to know how these various items could be financed'? Commissioner Scherr stated the Commission would like I to see a large park in the City for recreation. Holiday : Park is not a relaxing place due to the Freeway. Perhaps: Hosp Grove or Calavera .Lake would be suitable. Chair- : man Carmichael is in hopes of having a work shop to dis- I cuss these items further. Vice Mayor Dunne suggested that perhaps the Financial : Consultant on the Water Report could look over these i items. I I I t I I b I I # I I I t I : The City Manager informed the Council the first year of ! i employment for a Recreation Director would not accom- ; i plish much visably, as it would take approximately one : ; year to analyze these items. At the present time the City i i does not have the staff to do this work. If the Council i wants to proceed, the tax base for the Parks and Recrea- ; ! tion can be raised and then a Financial Consultant or a i I Recreation Director could be employed. I I In closing Commissioner Scherr informed the Council i : this was not a definite priority list, Perhaps some of i i the items could be accomplished without too much finan- : 1 1 I .I I I I I I - i cia1 help. 1 i I * I t i Method of financing City Hall and Police facilities. Cmn. : ; Worthing requested the City Manager to brief the Council i : as to his recommendation for financing the City Hall and : ; Police facilities. ! i The City Manager informed the Council his recommenda- i : tion to the Building Committee was to finance the entire i ! project through a joint powers agreement with the County t i of San Diego. Any monies received from the State for i : the present site of the City Hall would not be received ; ! until the property is vacated. When this money is re- I ; ceived it could then be put in the General Fund for other ; i Capital Improvements. It was also his recommendation i : that any furnishings needed would also be paid for out of ; i the joint powers agreement monies. i Annexation fees. - Cmn. Worthing stated he and the City I : Manager had briefly discussed annexation fees, and he ; i would like him to explain how other cities handle annex- i 1 ations. r' - I I r t I I I * I I I I 0 ! 8 I I 8 I 8. I ! 1 ! .I." 0 - 0 I I I I I I I -9- * '" " -\ ', ' ' { Name '\, 0 L 6 I " '' .' " ? : of ' I : Member :"""""""""""""""-""""""""""""~"-"""."""""'"""""". I I I ;The City Manager stated when a city has something to i I offer they can impose a fee. Some cities have a fee as i :high as $2, 000 per acre. Many cities do not want to im- ; !pose a fee as they want to grow. Perhaps a $200.00 per : :acre fee could be imposed. The only fee this City has is i iwhen property is annexed and the owner applies for a 4 I building permit they have to pay the back taxes on the I ;sewer system. There is a recent report out on annexa- ! l :tion fees. It might well be that if these outside areas : :ation fee there might be a number of properties annex to i !the City. It was his feeling that any properties that annex I ito'the City should be required to dedicate the necessary ; :rights of way so that in the future the City would not have i :to go back and purchase property. C 8 :Cmn. Worthing suggested that Cmn. Dunne and the City I i !Manager meet with Mayor Atkinson and discuss annexa- i :tion fees prior to the next Council meeting. {Review of General Plan. Cmn. Worthing requested that 'I ,4 .yLy-~e&/ ithe General Plan of the City be reviewed by the Planning i,Jy2 : Commission. I 0 I I' I I 'were aware that the City contemplates charging an annex- I I 0 t 0 1 I I .i..i-jj 4 J (l r h,*w I I 1 I A AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT OF BILLS AND RATI-. i IPEKTIONF-PAYROLL: """_ 1 I-" I - L I I :Authorization was given for the payment of bills for the ! 1 :general expenses of the City in the amount of $171,814.02, : i and for the Water Department in the amount of $2, 883,65, lWorthing ifor the period May 2, 1967 to May 16, 1967, as certified :Neiswendc :by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing :Dunne i Committee. i Jardine , 3 Ratification of the payroll was given for the first half of i Worthing f May, 1967, in the mount of $23, 157.06, as certified by i Neiswend i the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing ; Dunne : Committee. i Jardine I ! I l a I I * i ADJOURNMENT: t ! I I t I i By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 P. M. i i Respectfully submitted, I I I t I I t I I I j(,"&&JFAqiw I ! I I : iWAqGA,RET E, D' MS I I i City C&rk 6 * I 1 I I I I I I 1 I c I I I I I * I I I 1 I I I I I I I -1 I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I * I 1 I I 1 I I 6 : I I I I I t I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I t 1 1