HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-07-18; City Council; Minutes* .- .= I .r ;CITY OF CARLSBAD ! I \"
-\, '\ ',
i Minutes of: ', '., ' CITY COUNCIL {Regular meeting); " ' i Date of Meeting: July 18, 1967 ; Name '-,
:Time of Meeting: 7:OO P.M. : of '
i ,-P,1"-"""""--"" ace of MeetinJ: -""""- Council ""_ -* Chambers' """""_. -"" """" ""- ""; i "_"""_". Member
\'
i * , ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Northing, i Neiswender, Atkilison and Duiine. Councilman : Jardine was absent. Also present were Acting r City Manager Thornton, City Attorney Wilson and
! City Clerk Adams.
1 INVOCATION was offered by Mayor Atkinson.
I ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given.
1 8
,
I t I I I
I t I 8 8 b t 1 t + I ; I I * 8 i APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
t. i (a) Minutes of the adjourned regular meeting i held July 5, 1967 , were approved as presented.
I t I 8 t I I CORRESPONDENCE:
I Letter from the Carlsbad City Beautiful dated ; July 10, 1967, was recognized, commending the i City Departments who worked toward the landscap : ing around the depot.
! ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
I I
I I
I
-
* t I 8 I 4 l Worth i ng i Nei swend : Atkinson i Dunne * I *
I I I I I I t I 1 ,I
I I
I
I I t I I i ! There were no oral communications.
i PUBLIC HEARINGS:
i (a) Resolution of Intention No. 61 of the : Carlsbad City Planning Cornmission, to consider a i ,i proposed zone change of property located on the :
'8 : Easterly side of Park Dr., Lot 73, Shelter Cove I ; Subdivision; and on the Northerly side of Adams i I St., Lot 16 and portion of Lot 15, Block E, B.ellai- ; Vista, Map 2152, from Zone R-T to Zone R-1-15,000:. i Also property located between Carlsbad Blvd. and i : Jefferson St., Northerly of Laguna Dr., from I * i Zone R-T to Zone R-A.
I The Affidavit of Publication was presented and i ; ordered filed.
; The City Clerk announced that no written corres- : i pondence had been received on the matter up to i : the hour of 7:30 P.M.
:l i Mayor Atkinson requested the City Planner to i brief the Council on the proposed zoning. I I
i Flr. *Don Schoell, City Planner, informed the
1 Council that as a part of the General Plan the ;
a Zones. They made a study of each of the areas as:
! to whether they conformed to the surrounding I 1
; area. After further study it was their feeling I i that the area lying Ncrth sf Adams St. around i : the Agua Hedionda Lagoon should be rezoned to ; I R-1-15,000; and that Adams St. is a natural ; dividing line between tourist and residential i
t area. Tkt2 Bird Island property, located between; ; Carl-: ... L BluJ. and Jefferson St. on the Souther- t
i patibie with the residential area around the t I i lagoon and should be rezoned to R-A. Further I
i there has been no development on the Buena Vista: i Lagoon since it v!as zoned R-T in 1963. 1 I
!
I I 1 4 8 I t I
I I I t I
t
$ I I
I I I I
I 1
I I I I
@
1 k I I I
I I I I I t
Planning Commission took under study the R-T I.
I
I I
I
e : ly s jrir of the Buena Vista Ldgoon, was not corn- I
I 1 I
1
.I
a -, -
I I I '8 ' '.
I t '. '. ' I t.
$ !
-2- I -8 ' I .' 8' i Name '*.
7 I : of a
;""--""""-"""""~""""""""~""""""""""*"""""~""""""~ : Member
I I t
% i The Mayor announced the Council would hear from i
:all persons desiring to speak in opposition to thb
i proposed zoning. $ I
8 MR. EDWARD LINDLEY, representing Palomar Savings f i &-Loan Association, Escondido, stated his firm 1 i owned property along the Buena Vista Lagoon, and :
! they could not understand why the properties f I
; lying along the Buena Vista Lagoon should be re- i
. i zoned R-A when it was never zoned R-A. The City i- i of Oceanside and Carlsbad have been working to- ; ; wards having the Lagoon accepted as a State Park.: i The R-T Zone would be compatible with a State I t :Park. R-A zoning does not fit the present or I I i future use of these properties. In their opinion! : R-A zoning could have an adverse affect on the i ! State making this area a State Park. Further, I t : R-T Zoning is associated with lagoon properties. i i In closing Mr. Lindley asked the City Planner if i : this rezoning would affect the valuation of this ; i property? I I
i Mr. Schoell stated he did not believe it would i
L I
I I I I
I ; affect the valuation of the properties.
{ MR. ROBERT KNAUF, Attorney at Law, stated he was I ; with the firm of Hyne, Swirsky & Knauf, and was i : representing Mr. David Baird, who owns one of the: i parcels under consideration around the Agua I : Hedionda Lagoon. Mr. Baird's proDerty is located; I on the North side of Adams St. across from the ; : Pit Stop,(formerly Whitey's Landing). The parcel : i is situated on a bluff, and there is no visible i : site of residences from this property. It is I t i their feeling the logical break in the R-T zoning! ; should be at Lot 16 and not Adams St, as the only; i visible structure is the Pit Stop. Due to the I : bluff behind the Baird property the noise from ; i the lagoon and the Pit Stop carries up to these i ; two lots. 1 i I
: Mr. Knauf presented a written statement from ! i Mrs. Lana R. Mitsch, one of Mr. Baird's tenants, i
i verifying the noise and traffic from the lagoon. : i Also an appraisal of Mr. Baird's property was i ; submitted, which- was prepared by Edward McCann ;
I, 1 & Associates, stating in their opinion if the i : zoning were reduced from the existing R-T to I i R-1-15,000, a great financial loss and inconven- I ; ience would be suffered by the owner. The pre- ; i sent reasonable market value is $65,000.00, and i : the 'property is being offered for sale at that :
' price. To reduce the zoning to R-1-15,00 would, I reduce the market value from 1/3 to 1/2. It 1 I
! would also be difficult to develop saleable '; legal lots because of the extreme elevation.
I I 1. I I I 1
I 1
1 I I 1 I
I I I I I : blr. Knauf ,po-in'ied out when this parcel of land ; : I was zoned R-T the Planning Commission found that i : it was compatible with the lagoon property and ; ! that it w-as not spot zoning. As the circumstancf ; es have not changed since the property was zoned: I R-T, Mr. Knauf requested that his clier,t's pro- i : perty remain zone R-T. I t
i Cnln. Worthing asked what change Mr. Baird had ; : made since his property was zoned R-T? 1 I
t !
0 I I I
* I
I 1 I ,
I ,.
I I I I I I # i 4
. "
-3-
--- .. . ..
; 8. \\ -.
1 8, \ ', I '\ '\ ' * X\ 8. b
4 .' 8 i Name \\ : of * 7 """-~""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~~~"""""~ ! Member
I I
4 ;Mr. Knauf stated his client had not made any ad- \ ; ditional improvement on the property since it was! i rezoned R-T, but he has changed his plans as far i ; as residential development. 8
i As there were no other persons desiring to speak 1 ! the Mayor declared the public hearing closed at i ! 8:OO P.M. t t
1 Crnn. Neiswender stated if the City has control i i of the R-T uses, it was his feeling the Baird ; property should remain R-T. Further Mr. Baird i :has been paying taxes based upon R-T Zoning, and I ! the sewers have only recently been made available:
$ 1 I
I s t I
I 6
1
I 1 i Cmn. Dunne asked the City Planner if the Planning! I Commission felt there was too much R-T Zoning? i :Also what did he feel was the best use of the I I ; Baird property?
i Mr. Schoell stated the planning Commission did i ; not indicate there was too much R-T zoning as I I i one of their reasons. It was his opinion that i ; R-3 zoning was the best use of the land, however,: i there are no sewers available in the immediate i : area at this time. The Planning Commission felt ; i if the property were left as R-T that another un-;.: ; desirable business could go in this area, i.e., i i beer joint, etc.
I I : f
I I 1 I t I t
' I Cmn. Worthing asked Mr. Baird if he would accept :
. ; R-3 Zoning? * I
i Mr. Baird stated he did not feel he could trmt i : anyone now. The Planning Commission rezoned this: i to R-T as he requested. Now they want to rezone ;
i it to something else. He has been awaiting
1 sewers in order to develop this property.
i The City Planner reveiwed the R-T zone uses, and i i pointed out hotels, motels and residential can ; ; be developed in the R-T zone without the PlanninG
i Commission's or City Council's approval. All : other uses under the R-T zone would have to come i : before the Planning Commission and the City : Council for approval.
! Crnn. Worthing stated, basically, the Planning i i Cornmission feels it was a bad decision of the i : former Planning Commission to have zoned this ; i property R-T.
I I 8 I
a
t I I I I I 4 I
I I
I I 1 I t
1 &
1,
0
I
I I I I 1 !
i
I I
I
I I I I I 8 a I I I I I I 1 I I !
Cmn. Neiswender pointed out the former Council i also had to approve the zoning. I I
Mayor Atkinson stated the lagoon area is in a i transitional stage and no doubt some of the uses i
will be unpleasant to the property owners in the: area. Also he could appreciate the Planning CommisF;Gnls dilemma as to the Baird property; i howe;cy. he did not think it would be fair to : the r;'cder;t prcperty owner to change the zone i n o w
I t
t I
I I I I
; ', -. '
I 8' ', . '<
# -4- I \' i Name '*
4 : of
i After furth'er discussion it was agreed that the i
.: Baird property remain R-T for the following i reasons, and that a memorandum be sent to the 1 ,: Planning Cwnrnission to that effect:
.- C I * 8
t. 8
I a
.' .'
\
;-"."""""""""""--"-"-"""""""""""..""""""""""""""""~~ i Member w 4 I
I b
I a 1. Proper justification was not apparent {
I to rezone the property; and *
I or Zone R-3. 8
I 1 I
I I * 1 ! 2. The property is logically Zone R-T I I I I I *
I * I 8 : The following resoluti'on was presented: I !* : Resolution No. 1419. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i I COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING FIND- ; : INGS AND DECISION REGARDING CHANGE OF ZONE CLASS-! i IFICATION OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY IN THE : Worthin< - i CITY OF CARLSBAD FROM ZONE R-T TO ZONE X-1-15,000$Neiswen~ : was adopted by title only and further reading : Atki nsor i waived. i Dunne
! The following ordinance was presented for a first; ; reading: I
i Ordinance No. 9207. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF I i CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, CHANGING I Worthin5
s CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-T TO ZONE: Neiswend 1 R-1-15,000, was given a first reading by title :Atkinson ; only and further reading waived. : Dunne
i Further discussion was given to the proposed I zoning of the properties situated on the' South I : side of the Buena Vista Lagoon from Carlsbad Blvd:. i ,to Jefferson St., from Zone R-T to Zone R-A. I I :: Mr. Linclley, representing the Palomar Savings and:
. : Loan Association, stated he felt the statement : : t made by the City Planner was in error when he i
! stated the surrounding property was zoned R-A 1 I and residential, He pointed out the R-A uses i i and asked the City Council if they felt this I I I area was suitable for agricultural use.
1 The City Planner informed the City Council the i i R-A zone is a holding zone. Also at the present : i time there is no access to the R-T zoned area, i ; which is required by ordinance. I I
: COL. SOUTHNELL, stated he was representing 10 : i property owners along the Buena Vista Lagoon, I I : and they support the Planning Commission's de- : i cision to have this property revert back to R-A. i Thej could see no advantage to having the I I property zoneti R-T when it has never been devel- I
oped as such. I e
I I t
I 0
5 8 I t I
* I 1 b
$ 1
I & I
I t t
I I i I
I I $ * 1' I
1 I I
I
I
I I
I I I I @ I I * I I 1 1 I I I I 0
I I I !
1 I I
I
Cmn. Worthing stated he felt th'at R-A was the
proper zone for this area, however, he was con- I cerned with the legal aspect as far as the I I Palomar Savings & Loan Association. They have i been paying taxes in accordance with R-T zoning. ;
Cmn. Dunne asked what the firm'.. reccurse would i be if their oroperty were rezo12icl R-A?
The City Attorney stated the only rgcourse they i . '. . would have would be a court actionS and this is ; a very difficult type of case as they would be ; attack,ing the legislative bodv.
I I I
I
I 1 I 1 1
I-
I
I .*, '7 I I -5-
I' f of I i Name '\,
;"","-""""""""""-""""~"""""""""""""""""""""""""-~ : Member
I :The City Planner pointed out the zoning would noti
;make any difference as far as the State is con- i
' cerned if they wished to purchase the property :
1 for a State Park.
i After further consideration, the following reso- i : lution was presented: !
!
* ! t I I * I
I I
i Resolution No. 1420. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i !COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ANNOUNCING FIND- I i INGS AND DECISION REGARDING CHANGE OF ZONE CLASS-iWorthi.ng : IFICATION OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY IN THE INeiswend ! CITY OF CARLSBAD FROM ZONE R-T TO ZONE R-A, was :Atkinson i adopted by title only and further re.ading waived.iDunne
i The following ordinance was presented for a + t
; first reading: *
- i Ordinance NO. 9208 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF!
I I I I
I 8 I'
i CARLSBAD AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9060, CHANGING i Worthing ; CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-T TO ZONE1Neiswend : R-A, was given a .first reading by title only and :Atkinson i further reading waived. i Dunne
I ENGINEERING:
: (a) State Division of Highways - re: Mainten- I i ance Agreement, covering El Camino Real over- I : crossing on State Route 78. The Council was in- ! : formed by the Assistant City Engineer the Divi- i i sion of Highways have prepared a Freevlay Main- 8 I i tenance Agreement covering the El Camino Real
; Overcrossing on State Route 78, and have request-: : I ed the City to execute the Agreement. The 4 r ; Engineering Department recommended that the I I
# t I I I I # I I
I t I
I
I I i Agreement be approved, I !
. i The following resolution was introduced: 1 1 1 4 1 1 t Resolution No. 421. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY l i Worthing
i WAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, was adopted by title i Atkinson
; only and further reading waived. : Dunne
i (b) Offer of street easement by Otis E. Vander- ! ! burg. Otis E. Vanderburg and, wife, have offered i
1 an easement to the City for a short .extension of : ! Marron Road. This entails a 30' return at El i : Caminc Real and Marron Rd. This is the return ; !'to the East for the precise alignment of Marron i ; Rd. at €1 Camino Real. Marron. Rd. will be a I
1, part of the City's Select Street System. The Citi ;will .pay for the improvements, i.e., curb, gutter:,
I COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING FREE- ; fieiswend(
I
i fill' and pavement, as payment for the easement. ! i
I I 4 i By,motion of the Council the easement offered by :Northing ; Otis E. Vanderburg and wife was accepted, and thelNeiswende i City Cferk instructed to record the same. i Atkinson
I : Dunne I I I (c> 9uest for plaiver of street improvements. [
, .P .=.i Mr. Vanaerburg has sold the North corner of his ;
i property to Newel I 3 et al. Under the Lot Split : i Ordinance Mr. Vanderburg would h? required to put: , in approximat,?ly 1,785 feet GI- -.,dewalk. There ; : is 16 acres i2vslved in this ~,*t:c?ship. It is i : the feeling of the Engineering Department this 1 i request is justified as there is only one struc- i : ture on the property, and the prop?rty is present: i ly zoned R-A. The pavifig will be done under the :
1
0
I -\, '\ '
I I * 8' \'
I ', '.
1 ! Name '*,
i"""-""""""""""""""""""."""""""-~""""""""l"""""" i Member
I 1
!
* : of
-6- 1
8
I
I
Q i joint agreement between the City and County. The: i Engineering Department also feels the City is 1 I
* fully protected as the owner would be unable to i I split or improve any of the remaining property ; until sidewalks are installed. 8
I 4 t i I By motion of the Council the waiver of sidewalks :Worthinl i was approved, subject to the owner entering into i Neiswen . a ,future street improvement agreement for side- :Atkinso i walks. I Dunne-
i (c) Proposed Osuna Dr. street opening and street!
; opment between Vanderburg and Newell, et al, and ; ! will be a part of the City's local street system.: i They are proposing a short stub street, which I I : will only benefit the abutting property owners. I
- I They have requested the possibility of putting : : in the improvements, having the acceptance by the: i City prior to the street dedication being accept-: I ed by the City, without bond. I I
: The Assistant Engineer was asked if he felt a i i bond was necessary, and he informed the Council ; : the City is best protected by a bond. I I
' It was agreed that the property owners be allow- : i ed to put in the improvements as requested, sub- i
; ject to a bond being required. I I
I t
I improvement. T.his street will be a joint devel- ! I
I
I I I
i I I I 1
1 I I 1 I
! Presentation of Key to the City. Mayor Atkinson! ; stated be would like to present a Key to the City: i to Mi kko Pimia from Sweden, who has been attend- ; i ing school at the Army and Navy Academy this pasti :.year under the foreign student program.
i Mikko Pimia was present and the Mayor presented i i him with a Key to the City of Carlsbad. I *
i PLANNIHG:
I-
I 1 I I I I
I I I' I I I t I I I i (a) Memorandum - re: General Plan review. A i
i memorandum from the Carlsbad City Planning Com- : ! mission dated July 12, 1967, was presented, stat-!
I ing an adjourned meeting would be held on Friday,; i July 21, 1967, at 2:30 P.M. in the Council I I : Chambers, for the purpose of reviewing the t I i General Plan of the City. 4 f
I t i A short recess was called at 8:55 P.M. The : meeting reconvened at 9:Ol P.H. I I
Executive session. Mayor Atkinson requested an i executive session to discuss personnel and appoit@- ments. The Council adjourned to the adjoining ;
1 I I
I l 1 1
1 room.
: The regular meeting reconvened at 3:lZ P.I.I. and i : the Mayor annour;ced the Council discussed ap- I I i pointments to the Parks and Recreation CommissioQ : but no decision was made.
1 1 I
I
I I
I I I
0 : PARKS AT4D RFCREATION: - "_ !
I
I I I t I : (a) Three hppointmen-ts to Park and Recreation i
! Commission. /he Mayor ~equested this matter deyI
! ferred until the next regular meeting. I 1
I I.-
t I
I
4 I 1
I
i'
. l a, .. ',
I I r t. ' I 1
f
1 S"
I >'
& -7- I '., **,
I i Name '8
I"-""-""-""-"""--""""""""""""""""""~~"""""""""""~ i Member
i * (a) Fox's Snug Harbor - re: Request for over- i
i ed, requesting permission to extend overnight 4 t
4 : of * b l e b I #
* NEW BUSINESS:
:night privileges. Letter dated July 19, 1967, I I : from F. J. Fox of Fox's Snug Harbor, was present-!
i privileges to a limited number of guests from the! :Garden Grove Boat Club. I I
I !
. ; By motion of the Council overnight privileges l I Worthin! i were extended to a limited number of guests from ; Neiswenc : the Garden Grove Boat Club for the weekend of {Atkinsor
i (b) Royal Palms - re: Request for Dance Permit.: : Letter dated July 14, 1967, from Bob Brown, oper-j i ator of the Royal Palms Cocktail Lounge, was I f
f presented, requesting a dance permit in conjunc- i I tion with the Cocktail Lounge. I
i By motion of the Council a dance permit was is- i Worthin: i sued to Mr. Brown, to be used in conjunction with; Neiswenc ; the Royal Palms Cocktail Lounge, located at 3001 ; Atkinsor : Carlsbad Blvd.
i (c) Ordinance No. 4005 - re; \;ater rates, The i
; City Attorney informed the Council an ordinance ; I had been prepared setting forth the 10% increase I
I in water rates.
! The following ordinance was presented and read in: i full, due to the fact it was an emergency ordi- I ; nance effective August 1, 1967:
i Ordinance No. 4005: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY i i OF CARLSBAD AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. i Worthing
; 5001, et seq. REGARDING THE SUPPLYING OF WATER i Neiswend i AND THE RATES TO BE CHARGED THEREFORE, was read i Atkinson ; in full and adopted. i Dunne
i COMMITTEE REPORTS :
#
I
i August 5, 1967.- : Dunne
I
$
1 I
#
I I I
.I i Dunne I I t
I -
I I
I I 1 1
f I
I I I 8
I I I $ I I f I I I i Mayor Atkinson reported that he and Councilman i .: Dunne met with members of the Carlsbad Municipal I : Water District concerning the rneLhod of billing i : the City for water purchased. A letter has been I ; received from the District as to their method ; :'of billing the City, and he and Cnn. Dunne recom-i ; mend that the method of billing be app.roved by ; i the City Counci 1. I
i By motion of the Council the method of billing lCIJorthing the City of Carlsbad for water purchased from INeiswendc the CMkfD was approved as presented by the Atki nson
I I
1 f I I
, Di str-i ct. ; Dunne
1 Cnn. Durtne stated there \\'as a request made to the! : CMWD that they go into metering as Soon as POS- i i s'ble. I
i Cmn. Worthing suggested that an indoctrination i
I commissions as we71 as the City COUnC:;, and f I i that a committee be appointed froin eaCk C2:ilmiS- i
I sion as well as the Counc-il to work up a kit. I
!
I
I I
I I
I I I +
i kit be prepared for new members on the VariOlJS i
0
I I
I I
i Crrrn" Neisv!end?r pofnted out that Cnn. L!o:-thing ;
I I I
1 1
* ; ', -8 '\
I I
I
i %, '\ '.
1.
1 t
7
1
! L
I -8- I \ ',
'\\ '8, 1
1 I Name '8,
I : of
;""""""""""""""-I"-"-""""""""""""""""""""~"""""" i Member
' was elected to the Council at an inopportAne time: i as the League of California Cities holds a semi- ;
' nar for new members.of the Council after the k
I General Election.
I Q
i I I I I I
; Cmn. Neiswender suggested that Cmn. Northing be j i appointed to work out some rules for the kit. * I
I I I I !
; It was agreed that the suggestion be sent to each: : of the commissions and the Library Board of i Trustees.
I * I '8 8 I' t I 8 i Library Building Committee. Cmn. Northing re- ; ported there will be a meeting of the Library f Building Committee after the Council meeting this;
* I I t t
1 evening.
! Business License Committee. Cmn. Worthing stated; i the Business License Committee has not met since ; i the last report to the Council due to Cmn. Jardink I being out of town. a I
I Civic Center Committee. Cmn. Dunne informed the i ; Council at the last meeting of the Civic Center i
; Building Committee a general discussion was given; : concerning materials that wi 17 be used in the
1 new administration offices.
i Chamber of Commerce. Cmn. Neiswender reported ! ; the Chamber of Commerce has sent out the notices i i for membership dues, and the. dues have been re- I : turned promptly. There is harmony between the i I Mexican-American Association and the Chamber of i
. : Commerce now. The committee is working on the i :-Christmas decorations. In other matters the I 1 : Chamber is moving along as planned.
: Mayor Atkinson stated he would like to congratu- :
i late those persons who participated in the Art i I Sympos i urn.
t OLD BUSINESS:
4 t I I t
a I I t
I I
I I I I i I I 1
t 1 I I t I I
I I I I I t I I I 1 1 * ! (a) Request for removal of trees on Jefferson i i Street - Mrs. Irene Possinger. The Mayor in-iormf
l ed the Council that he and Cmn. Northing met wit! i members of the Tree Committee, and it was their ; ; decision that the Palm Tree be removed and that ; i the Jacaranda Tree remain. Also that the side- i : walk be contiguous, allowing planting area for ! i the Jacaranda Tree. t I
' (b) City Policy - re: Widening or establishing I official grade of public right-of-way. In re- I I , viewing the writter; pol icy submitted by the ' Engineering Department at the regular meeting of ; i the City Counci 1 held on July 5, 1967, Pilayor * I
; Atkinson stated he felt tile policy was a ~ooci ; i .policy and the Council should accept the recom- :
I 4 I 3
I I I
t mendation of the City Engineer. t !
I
0
I I I Cmn. W- :thir!3 stated he was concerned with the : i lega-I Lspect in regards to the policy. I I I I I I I The City Attorney stated the legal aspect would i i be not to leave tlic property in a worse condi- I
I I I I I 1 1 I 1
* 1
b
.. I
'P * t b *, '\ > '\ -\ '\
i Name '-
I I I- \' I \ ',
I -9- * \
t : of ! : Member
!
,""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""""""""""""""".
I
; tion than it was before the, grading was done.
;
i The Assistant Engineer requested the policy be :
I made rectroactive in order that the policy could i i apply to Mrs. Daiger's property in regards to the: i fence.
I t : By motion of the Council the Policy for Widening ;Worthin
; or Establishing Official Grade of public-right- : Neiswen i of-way was adop,ted as recommended by the City i Atki nso : Engi neer. ; Dunne
I I I
4 1 I 1 I
8. I ! I i (c) Carlsbad Parking Authority - re: Revised : ! estimates and landscaping. I I
! b I
I
I I -1 8 I
1. Revised cost estimates. Cmn. Worthing i stated he had requested this matter deferred at : the last meeting in order to review the matter, i and the City Manager had furnished him w-ith suf- i fi ci ent materi a1 . I I
k 4 ! By motion of the Council the revised cost esti- i ; mates chargeable to the Authority in the amount ! Worthir i of $1,397,650.00, including previous commitment i Neiswer ; for rough grading, were approved, as recommended I Atkinsc i by the Carlsbad Parking Authority. i Dunne
I 2. Landscaping. Mayor Atkinson stated he I
; and Cmn. Worthing met with members of the Park i i and Recreation Commission, and three changes were: : agreed upon as to the landscaping for the parking: : l area. The May Co. has agreed upon these changes.!
i Cmn. Neiswender stated he was concerned with the i t fact the City Council appointed a Parking Author-: i ity to work with the May Co. on such matters as i : this.
I b I I
1, I k
I I $ ! I v I i By motion of the City Council the landscaping !Worthin i plan for the parking area as revised was approved;.pjeiswen
I : Dunne !
I I I t Atkinso
i : CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
I I I I I
1 I 1 (a) Authorization to file suit. The City !. Attorney informed the Council on May 25, 1966, : and June 17, 1966, Jennings Grading and Paving i I Co. danaged the City's water lines in the San I I : Luis Rey Valley. The Water Department attempted 1 i to gbtain payment from the company for the re- I
! pair bills in the amount of $446.95 over an ex- i tended period of time and then it was turned I over to him for collection, and he has been un- !
1 able to obtain payment, therefore, he would like i
I to request authorization to'file suit on behalf : t of the City against the company. 4
! ; By motion of the Councjl the City Attorney was i Northil : authorized to file suit against Jennings Grading I FIeiswel i and Paving Company on behalf of the City of I Atkinsc : Carlsbad i? the amount of $446.:5. : Dunne
I 1 I I I I
I 4 I
0 1 I t I i (b) Ordinance No. 3033 - re: Ei'qhting. The i Counci 1 was informed by the City -ri.torney an
I I I 1 I I i ordina.nce has been prepared at the request of I
I I
I I 1 I
> 1 1 ?
i I I -* ' I + I ',, '.,""~,".,'*, f j
I -10- I \\ ', '2, ', ,\ \ '
; of *.+;,$+, \\\ 'f4
,".."""" """""-""-"-'""~~""""""""""--""~"~~~~""""""""""-,. .LJ '3 \.P?
'% \\'
8 i Na me ., 's:;, \. '3.
':c, (34 q,,q>:
8 ::!I
!
! 4 f Member \<'P'? '
I
# the Police Department in order to aid them in : contro'll ing activities in the City during the : summer months, and that it be adopted as an
; emergency ordinance in order for it to become : effective immediately. The Police Department
i have found when persons have created a disturb- : ance by fighting it was difficult to find some- : one that was offended by the time the Police
; arrived at the scene.
I The City Attorney pointed out the only problem : th'at might arise is whether the State law pre- i empts ithis ordinance.
!
I I
I
I I I I 1 I 1 I I 4 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
, :"I I::
::I1 ::::
:::I
::I*
'1:
:::; ::it
:;I: I;:: ::::
::;; :::; I::#
l:4
It
11
:!:I
illl
@,!I I I li;l i The following ordinance was presented and read i : in full:
! Ordinance No. 307.3. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF i Worthin;; I ix:x; i EARLSBAD MAKING UN-LAWFUL FIGHTING, OR CHALLENG- ; Neiswenderk; i x! : ING TO FIGHT IN A PUBLIC PLACE OR A PLACE WHICH j Atkinson i : :x; i IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, was adopted. : Dunne : : :x:
t I l:ll
: CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: I I ;:::
8- - I I i::;
I 8 1111 ! (a) Change Order No. 2 - re: Carlsbad Cit I I*Il I 1:;' : LibraF;/. The Acting City Manager informed'the i I ::;I
I Councl I Change Order No. 2 for the construction : :;'I ::;; : of the Library has been received from the archi- i :@*I i tect in the amount of $910.15. The Change Order ; ;;#I
It;: : has been approved by the architect and the con- i ;:I: i tractor. 1:;1
I I I :::i
I I i::: i By motion of the Council Change Order No. 2 was IWorthing ; 4 !x: : approved and authorization was given for the i Neiswender: : :xi i Mayor to execute the Change Order on behalf of :Atkinson i i :xi : the City of Carlsbad. I Dunne ; ix : XI
l a 1: i AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT OF BILLS AND RATIFICA- i ;:;:
: fION OFPAYROLL: 1:4
I- 1 :;I:
I I ;;I; @I : Authorization was given for the payment of bills : :::: i for the general expenses of the City in the I :;;: : amount of $165,131.47, and for the Water Depart- iWorthing I i :x: I ment in the amount of $16,388.25, as certified INeiswender: :xix: : by the Director of Finance and approved by the :Atkinson I : ;x: i Auditing Commi ttee. i Dunne : )G :x:
I I $1:;
I6 I :#I : Ratification of the payroll was given for the i Worthi ng. : :xixi i first half of July, 1967, in the amount of : Nei swender; y :xi .: $25,679.10, as certified by the Directof of :Atkinson : I :X: i Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee. i Dunne ;: : ' :xi
I!::
::::
::I:
1::; I I I l :;:I 1:
t a
1 I
1 -"----&-"- 11
I
I I
I I)Il I
I I
I
! I
,
I ,
I
I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 4 I I
I
ADJOURNMENT: - "
I I t I 1 I e I I 1 1 I 1 I I
B,y proper motion the meeting was adjourned at 9 : 45 P ., f4.
Eespectfully submitted, !
' I ?~7,f'( q ,; <;. ..%- Y 62, ~ ,, L . ,,i ,,
MARGARET E. ADAMS c i ty .C'I erk
I 1 I I I I I t I I I
I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I
I' 1::: :;:: :;:: i::: @I ;::I :I:: I::; ;:I; i:::
1::: I;:: :;::
!::I *I
;::;
1::; 1::: ; .I l8;; (:::
I::; ;!!#
1'11