HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-09-19; City Council; Minutes0
I 8 I I i I t t t i I I I F I I t I I I I I 1 t I I t t I t I
I 1
f f I
r
f I 1 I I I
1 I t 1 I f * t I 1 I I t I I I I I I I I I I I b I I I I i 1 1
I I
& t !
I
I
f 9 I I I 1 I I I I I b I I I
I
r
tion of Mr. Mamaux as .City Manager.
The Mayor reported receiving a letter from the i Association for the Betterment of Carlsbad stat- ; ing that they approve of the Counci.1'~ action in ! regards. to the City Manager. I I
*
I I t
r
8 1 f t t 1 I
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
Mr. James Weber from Weber and Edwards, AIA spoke: regarding the plans and specifications for the ! new City Hall Complex. The City Manager explain-: ed that the City has moved to enter into a Joint I Powers Agreement with the County almost assuring : County participation in construction of the Civi.c:
Center. The cost of the new structure at t
bon.ds be limited to a maximum of $400,000.00 and the balance of the construction .could be paid for by cash from the sale of the existing : City Hall and land when the freeway is widened. i . The bonds could not be s-old until after the bids : for the new City Hall are opened.
Construction of the b.ui1ding is estimated at $375,444.00. Added to that figure are fees for I architects, furnishings, landscaping and other : incidentals, bringing the cost to its estimated I total. I *
The annual bond payments night range between $25,000.00 and $28,000.00 a year.
Mr. Weber stated that thg total landscaping will ! be approximately $12,500.00. I I
Cmn. :!ciswende;- stated that one change would be r made in the Civic Center and that it is agreeabl$ -with the Architects. The change would be in the ; Council Chambers wherein the Baffle Bar would be : lowered to 50" rather than floor to ceiling as i called for in the plans for the Civic Center. l a
t $421,444.00. The City Manager recommended that : : I I a 1
I
I t I 1 I
t I I t I 1 * I t
a 1
6 I
.. I (b) Offer of street dedication by Catheryn : Fennel Chrjstiansen, et al.
1 b 8 I t t 1 ! I i By motipn of the Council the offer .of four (4) i : drainage easements and one (I) grant deed to the i i City of- Carlsbad was accepted and the Clerk asked: : to record the same. I t *
t ? i (c) 1911 Act Proceedings - re: A.D. 1-1966, Date: : Olive and portion of Garfield, et al. The i following Resolution was presented:
1 i
, .t t 1 t I 1 & : Resolution NO. 1430. A RESOLllfION OF THE CITY $~~rthin!
! CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND l~tki~~~,
' t COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARiSEAD, ORDERING THE . :Nejswen,
i ORDERING POSTING AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICES IN- :Jardine ; VITING SEALED PROPOSALS OR BIDS was adopted by :
1 title only and further reading waived.
!
I 1 * I * I : Sealed bids were received on September 5, 1967 . : . I for Date, Olive and portion of Garfield, et al, i : 19li Act Proceedings, ar!d a copy of the bid I i tabulation, was presented to the Council. R. M, : ; Vuchanovich Construction Company, 732 South I : Garfield Avenue, Alhambra, Calif. submitted the : i lowest bid in the amount of $19,039.21 which i ; was 3% less than the Engineer's estimate. The i i Engineering Department recommended that this bid: : be accepted.
! The following Resolution was presented: t
i Resolution No. 1434. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ;b!orthjr;i : COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, iNeiswenc i AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WORK. CIR fMPROVEMENi ORDER- :Atkinsol i ED BY RESO'-UTXON NO. 1430 OF SAID CITY COUNCIL :Jardine : was adopted by title only and further reading ; : 'waived. s
1
*
& s
* I a 8
I 1 + t I
t
0 a I
1 r
1 I i . * .. ~ ." . . t.. I .- .* .. .'
-..
... .-~
. .. . ..
t I \ .. -1;. - ~. - I- . -. . I .. .. I . ,. ~- .. . . .. .. . ~
. . - . . . . - .; F-:?in$ 1
. .. ; Member
.. -..I - ,3 -
.. . .. . - . . .. , I . . .. I Of
.. .- 1 I f
.. I""""""~"""""~".-"--"""""."~""""""""""-"-""""""~"". .. .. .. .. .. .. -1
.%.
.. I *- t t t 1 I 8 C i
I 6
I 1 I I b 4 I t I t t * t I I I 8 I 1 a I
I b I * I I I I $ I t I t I I b 8 1 I I
t t 1 4 f t
I I 8 I 1 t s I f l e 8 I I I * I I I I
8 ? t e I 8 t I I t t * t b t t 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I * I 9 I t I 1 f I
t I
1 I 1 t PLANNING: .~
...
I I (a) .Sari Diego County Preliminary Regional Genera7 Plan. Resolution No. 517 of the Planning Commissj iori recommending approval of the- above plan was ;
considered together with the Parks and Recreation! Commission memorandum commending the County 1 I Planning Department for their excellent .regional i park plan. I I
The following Resolution supporting the Prelimin-! ary Regional General Plan was presented: I I
Resolution No. 1435. BY CITY COUNCIL RE: PRE- !Worthin LIMINARY REGIONAL GENERAL PLAN, was read in full :Neiswen and adopted. i Atkinsc : Jardine
1 i
t I
t I
N.EW BUSINESS: B I I *. I (a) Fox's Snug Harbor - re: Request for over- night privileges: 1 8
I I I
I b
Permission was granted to Fox's Snug Harbor for i Worthir overnight privileges to a limit of not more than i Neiswer 20 families of the La Mirada Angling Club for i Atki.nsc the wee-kend of Sep:tember 30, 1967, as requested : Jardine in letter dated September 5, 1967. 1 1
(b) Notice to Department of Housing and Communi-: ty.Development, State of California that City 8 t has and is enforcing a local ordinance prescrib- : i nq minimum standards. I i
A letter was received. from the Departnent of Housing and Community Development regarding health and safety codes.
The City Attorney asked that he be permitted to i send a reply to the Department of Housing and :
Community Development and also asked for authori-: zation to handle this matter.
By common consent, the Council gave authorizatiod to the City Attorney to handle this entire t matter.
I I
1 t I I 1 I .I
-1 I *
1
t I t I.
1 e
I I
r
OLD BUSINESS: 1
I a * 1 There was no old business brought before the Council.
# f I t t t I COMMITTEE REPORTS: I 8 1 I I t I 1 r : (a) Trieste Drive Extension to County Road. i Cmn. Jardine reported that he had contacted the i : property owners of the property located ?4ortherl$ : I of Trieste and stated that' the property owners i : (The Bartletts) were agreeable to the City using; : I. that portion of their property for public use : : with the right to revoke such public use upon i : request by the owners. t 1
I I I e I t I
I I
* I t I I I I I 1 I I I I I
I
I I I I I I *
a
.* I I .\ * f a
t \ t 1 , ..
1. -& .
t
I' -4- I 2' -.. * t.; 5 3 2
.. I '!.';ember
.~ t .. . ".~. . . .~ .
I I -t
4 €
I - .~ 0: .. *:,
.. ..
f""""~"~""~."""""""~~~""""""~"""""~..~""""~""""~";"" L .. . ..
I
. - I. t I - The City Manager pointed out- that his viould mean i : constructing public improvements on private prop-:: '8. . . . i erty and he did not feel public funds should be I ~.-
; used this way when the property owners still have:. ... : the right to revoke the public's use of this
;. ger felt that this was not i,n the best interest" ;.
. . ."
..
8 - . . -. . .
I - -.
t I
t
.I 1 portion of property at any time.. The City blana- i
t I t
I .. I i
:. I of the community. . .. .. . . ~ . ..
..
i The City Attorney stated that the. City- would have:
: but this would still give the property owners i .the right of revoking that use.
r' the right to use such private property by licensei
I * I 1. i i
I f a I- & I f 1 *
!
'i
t 4 I
I 1 8 !
I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 t 8 I I' 1 I t I t I I
e t 5 I I t I 1 s * $ I I I t I 8 I 1 t I I I I * I I I * 4 t t I 1 f I
8 t I s .
I t Cmn, Neiswender pointed out that the City Manager! had a point and that he agreed that City funds ; should not be used for public improvements on private property under these terms.
The City Manager felt, on a staff level, that in : the best interest of the City, that portion of : property should be condemned and the public could! bear the expe~ses as a result of this condemna- i
tion. 8 b
* t I i * 1
f
Mayor Atkinson stated that as he recalled, the i future :plans of the City will eventually make Trieste s, through street.
8 4 I I & I
The Mayor requested the City Attorney and Cmn. Jardine to study the matter further and report I at the next regular meeting.
* *
I * I
t I t t I
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
(a) Business License Ordinance. The City
Attorney reported that the Business License Ordinance had been completed for the Council's i approval. 8 t
I f I I .I
I l a t
8 Cmn. Jardine recommended that the draft for the Business License Ordinance be approved by i
the Council as it had been nine (9) months since i the committee started working on it.
The Mayor asked that this matter be deferred un- I til the next meeting .as he did not-have the opportunity to study it.
6y common consent, the matter was deferred until i the next regular meeting. I t !
I I I I
I 1 1 I I I I
i (b) Holiday Park Conde-nation. The City Attor- i : ney presented the following Resolution: 8 I
I I
I
I I I 1 t I f I !
I. * I I I I I 0 I I I I I
b I I I I I 6
1 t
Resolution No. 7436. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY i!dorthin
COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF CARLSSAD AUTHORIZING :Meiswen AND DIRECTING CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY FOR iAtki nso
further reading waived. I I
PUBLIC PARK was adopted by title only and :Jardi ne
* I
I
I I I i * 1 1 k 4 t I
I I I
r
r
y .> ., -.; . t- 1 I I
i t
.. -. .. . " I . t. 1 .. i
1 I I t
.. . . .. ~. .
"~ ~. . . ." .. . .c -5- 8 I . .. . I
I I : "" """ -""" "" """""_"".-" """"""_ - """" :."-""- ""_ '"
I
,- , .'
#\'&me
Of
t4em bt.r
""""
1 1 I
t .8.::-: '
.. : (c) Street Vacation for portions of Kelly Drive. 1 i The City Attorney presented the following ; Reso7ution.of Intention:
1 I I I 8 1
t I
L.
: Resolutior: of- Ir,tention Yg. 1437. A RESOLUTION :Worthin
I ! CARLSBAD DECLARING INTENTION T@VACATE PORTIClNS lAtkinsc ; OF KELLY DRIVE, was adopted by title dnfy and . l : Jardi ne : further reading waived.
i OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY .OF ileiswer
~.. . a I I
I s -a I I I c I
L I
I I I b 8
I I I t I 1 I ; I I I t I I a t 4 t
1 1 I f # t f 3 6 L ; I t t t I t t t € ; t
f
# t f I t I I I * I I * 1 I I i t
!
I I I I I I t I I I t 1 I t t b I t I 1 I * I I * I 8 I I I I
I I I I I
I
I * t I t I I I ;
I (d) Sewer Plant Condemnation Proceedings. The i
City Attorney reported on the Sewer Plant Con- ! demnation Proceedings and asked that the Council ! authorize the engaging of David Walker, an I attorney, to handle the suit.
The City Manager felt.that the length of years : this litigation has been going on should be known: to the public and inquired why nothing has been i done regarding this matter. The City Attorney : could not recall the number of years this suit : has been in process but it was estimated at least:
I I I I I
four (4) years. 1 .
1 *
The City Manager asked that a figure be reached i before .any decisi0.n was made on the hiring of an ! outside. attorney. ' & I
It was pointed out by the City Attorney that it I was difficult to set a definite amount, however, ; the preparation time would cost $35.00 per hour i plus $225.00 per day trial t!'me, with ten (10) ; days estimated in trial proceedings. The cost : would be shared by the Vista Sanitation District.!
The City Attorney stated that this suit involved : approximately $150,000.00 and that the hiring I of David Walker was a recommendation 0% the Joint; Supervisory Board. a I
t f
I I
a a The motion was made that the Council authorize I Worthir the etnpioyment of David Walker to try the ; Neiswel Condemnation ProceEdjngs. on the Sewer Plant Trial: A'tkinsl on behalf of the City. i Jardin(
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT.:
1 t I I 8 I
(a) Coast Cable Tele-vision Services, Inc. The City Manager introduced Mr. Norman Vetter i of Feist and Vetter, Attorneys at Lawp represent-; ing Coast Cable Television Services, Inc,, who : are requesting a franchise. I L
It was recommended that this matter De held over i
Neiswender and Cmn. '::!Drtnit?g to stud$( Y thfs matted further and report at the next regular meeting. i
[b) Municical Financial Consultants - ?e: Cit.v : I -Hal 1 The City r"l2anager reccmmgnded the eaploy- : Dent of Nilliam Fieldman & Associates as Munici-: pal Consultants for the Civic Centerq I I
* I *
I t
$0 r r.. ~urther .- study and the Mayor appctjnteci Cmn. I
4
1 I
0 t .. I I I * * I 1 t I b t
& 8 I 1 t 1
i
I I I 1 t I 1 *
9 :' k I I I I
I I
I I
'. ' \
B. -6- I : Name '
I : of t
1 .* a-------------------.--------.--------.--..--------_-----_--__--.-______,_._,~~~__-~~~---~ : Member
I &
I t I t s.,. -. i I'
t t 4 & I t .8 t !
I
I f I I I I I I : s t I
..
t I I 6
:' 6 I
.. I
I I L I I I I t a L I I I I t t I
I I I I I
I
* * I I 1 * I 8 t t I I # L I I I I $ I * I * I I I I # 3 I 1
a
I t t f The City Manager gave a brief review of the experience of William Fieldman and Associates I 1 and stated that he had received offers from other. Financial Consultants for this position.
Authorization was giv-en for the employment of . :Worthin Nilliam Fieldman & Associates as Municipal Finan-:Neiswen cia1 Consultants for the Civic Center. '- i Atki nso i Jardi ne
I I 1 I & : 4
.. . .. . ..
I I t I I I I Mayor Atkinson recommended for the Council's approval, the employment of Griffenhagen-Kroeger,: Inc., Personnel Management Consultants, to handle; the employment of the new City Manager. I I
The Council approved the hiring of Griffenhagen- : Worthin Kroeger, Inc., Personnel Management Consultants, :&iswend and appointed Cmn. Jardine and Mayor Atkinson i Atkinso to interview the applications selected by GriffenkJardine hagen-Kroeger, Inc. I I
I t I
* 1 AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT OF BILLS AND RATIFICA- I TION OF PAYROLL: 8 ! I Authorization was given for the payment of bills bdorthing for the general expenses of the City in the : Neiswen amount of $92,599.29 and the Water Department i Atkinso in the .'amount of $708,807.66, for the period : Jardine September 7, 1967 through September 15, 1967, 1 I as certified by the Director of Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee. I I
Ratification of the payroll was given for the ; Worthin first" half of September, 1967, in the amount i Neiswen
of $26,322.25, as certified by the Director i Atkinso of Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee:. Jardine
I I I
I I I
I
ADJ.OURNMENT: I l
I a
I i By proper motion the meeting was adjourned at I
! ; 7:55 P,M. I
I
I : Respectfully submitted,
: MARGARET E. ADAMS i City Clerk
I I'
* I I, i BY : ,,-Le:,:?- ,-3 ~." %-,. .-cc/- -. - ., '.. ,. !, -, , - - ..
L 1 ; NORA K. DANIELS I Recording Secretary
I I I s t s I I * I I I
I I
1 r t !-
I
I I
I I * I
I t t I
I
t I I t I I I
f I f 1 1 I ? I i I I 8 t ? t I 1 I I I 1 I *
1 I I I *
I I
1 I I I I
I
r
I 1 4 !
1 t 1 I
b I I I I t I I
I
I I I I 4 I