HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-11-07; City Council; Minutesw c "* I I "I "I,I.L-YY,,Y I i Minutes of: CITY COUNCIL (Regular Meeting)! : Date of Meeting: November 7, 1967 ',, '., '%
i Time of Meeting: 7:OO P.M. i Name '\, ' ! Place of Meeting: Council Chambers f of ' ;""""~~""....".""""""".~~~".~"~~"..""."-*-"-"---..""~~"""""~.~~ t s 1 ROLL CALL was answered by Councilman Worthing, I ; Neiswender, Atkinso'n, Dunne and Jardine. Also i : present were City Manager Mamaux, City Attorney : :Wilson and City Clerk Adams. a 8
i INVOCATION was offered by Mayor Atkinsan.
:ALLEGIANCE to the Flag was given.
-\ *, ', ., '
* '. s
8.
: Member
I *
I & 4
I
:
I
l a
I ! i APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
I I (a) Minutes of the regular meeting held October i 39 1967, and { (b) Minutes of the regular meeting held October 117, 1967, were approved as submitted.
: I
[ CORRESPONDENCE:
c. I I
I
: ! ildorthi ng :Neiswendc !Atkinson ;Dunne
jJardi ne
t * I I I ! . i A letter addressed to the City Council was re- : ceived from Mrs. Mary Beddoes thanking them for i i the street light which was placed at the corner : ;of Olive and Garfield Streets. * I
i ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
i There were no oral communications.
l e
* 8 B I I I I 1 : :
I a
:
s !CITY HALL AND POLICE FACILITIES:
I I
I I* : ! i The City Manager informed the Council the Carlsbaj : Civic Center Building Committee met this after- ; i noon, Members present were C, R, Helton, Elmer I
! H. Jose, Jr. and A. H. Peterson. Councilmen Dunng i and Neiswender were absent. Later in the after- i : noon the Carlsbad Building Authority met. The ; i following recommendations were made by both the I ; Committee and the Authority: I
I I
8 That the total cost of the construction,
I including all costs, in the amount of
I issue bonds for only $460,000.00. It was
s further recommended that the Architects
I fee be paid from the General Fund.
I
I * I $485,000.00 be accepted acknowledging
I I that the Carlsbad Building Authority will I
I
I
I I Cmn. Nei'swender stated on Monday when the Carls- : bad Civic Center Building Committee met the ! Architects were instructed to check into the poss
:ibility I of deleting the air conditioning equip-
; ment and report back.
I
4
I I I
I I 4 'I I
I I I I I !
I I
I I
8 a
e
l
I
# s
a
I s
I 1 a * : I I
I ! The City Manager stated the deduction of the equipment only amounted to $10,454.00, and the i Committee concluded that with such a small deduc- i tion the equipment should be installed now. Fur-: ther, the cost of construction is below the $400,000.00 figure established by the City Council.
I 1
8
I i i Cmn. Worthing as'ked what the major deductions t i were? 1
I I I ! i The Architects in reviewing the deductions stat- i i ed the major deduction was the electrical equip- i ; ment. The low bid of C.A. Larson has been re- I i duced $45,158.00, making the total Price # ; $369,895.00. 1 t
I 1
I I I I I
I
I
I t -2-
a . \- 7
I I '" '+
b '\ \ 'q I " " i Name 't,',
s I
I I
; Cmn. Dunne asked th.e City. Manager if he felt the ; f 0
; $25,000.00 expenditure from the General Fund was i i justified? 8 a
i The City Manager stated he felt the Architects j ; had worked very hard to reduce.the cost and ' : i should be commended. .The bids were very close, i : in fact within 10% of each other, and it was not : : felt the City could do better by a rebid. I
i Cmn. Dunne then asked the City Manager if he i would recommend that the $25,000.00 be taken from: i the General Fund? b ?
: of 'i 'I :""""""""""""""""-""""~"""""""""""""""".""""""", t Member * 1
I I #
I t * 6
a
,. t The City Manager ans.wered' the question by stat- : : ; ing as a taxpayer he would certainly approve the ; ! expenditure from the General Fund.
': Cmn. Dunne informed the Council there is a. I possibility that the City can apply for a loan i : through the Public Facilities Loan Program, and i i recommended that Mr. Weinstein be contacted s b : concerning an application. $
i After further consideration, by motion .of the : Worthing i Coun.ci1 it was agreed that the Council accept i Neiswendl
:. the issuance of bonds in the amount of $460,000, : Atkinson 3 as recommended by the Carlsbad Civic.Center Buil(+Dunne ; ing Committee and the~'Carlsbad'8uilding Authori- : Ja'rdine i ty, and that the Architects fee be paid from the i : ,General Fund.
f (b) Award of Contract: The City Manager intra- 1 I duced Mr. Fritz Stradling representing the firm ; : of Rutan & Tucker and Special Councel for the : : Building Authority. I
: Mr. Stradling presented the following Resolut-ion i i and stated the contract will not be executed by ; : the Mayor and City Clerk until such time as the i I Bonds are sold. I
-t I I I I 'b I I I
I b
I I I I * 8 9
I I I
1. I 8 I Resolution No. 1449. RES'OLUTION OF THE CITY i Worthing : COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, A- : Neiswend i WARDING CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE i Atkinson
f CARLSBAD CIVIC CENTER BUILDINGS AND POLICE : Dunne I FACILIT.Y, subject to the modifications indicated! Jardine : in the report was read by title only and further i i reading waived. I' b
I I t I 1 (c) Earl'sSad Building Authority - re: Financ3ngf ; Proceedings : I I * a I : Mr. Stradling pointed out the Joint Powers Agree; i ment has been amended to exclude that portion of! : the Civic Center property being sold to the State I for the widening of the Freeway.
i The following resolutions were introduced by r ; Mr. Stradling: ~
I * * 6 I
8 i I i Resolution No. 1450. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY : Worthing : COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ; Neiswend i ADOPTING JOINT .POWERS AMENDMENT NO. 1, was ; Atkinson : read by title only and further reading waived. I Dunne
i
8 I
I
I * i Jardine
t i I I I 1
i
I I
I I
I I i -3-
I I -'8 -s ', .
6 s ', 3
i Name 8, ' S8 \, I '8, '\ ', I
I * : ! of " ',
:"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-""""""!"""""-~" : Member * t I : 1 Resolution No. 1452. RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL iWorthing : OF THE CITY OF CARL'SBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING. INeiswende i RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF CARLSBAD :Atkinson
; 4 BUILDING AUTHORITY, was read by title only and iDunne
t further reading waived. : Jardi ne t 8 i ,The Mayor stated that .he would publicly like to : ; thank three members of the Building Committee * i for their time and effort, A. H. Peterson, C. R. i : Helton and E. H. Jose.
I PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1
8
4
4
t
f 1 (a) Resolution No. 1437 stating the Council's . i ! intention to vacate a portion of Kelly Drive. I I
,b a I The Affadivit of Publication was presented and - i ; ordered filed.
" ; t i Mayor Atkinson requested the Clerk to read all ; : written correspondence that had been received I i on the matter. I I
i Office of the County Engineer, stating that the I i portion of Kelly Drive to be vacated will not I I : interfere with the right of way requirements for i : the construction of'E1 Camino Real to its ul ti- ; t mate wid.th, therefore, they had no objection. I* b
* *
I * I I I
I 1) Letter dated October 4, 1967, from the I I
q I I
1 I I
I
1
I I
I
I 1 I !
I I
I 2) Letter da.ted October 17, 1967 from San ,Diego Gas & Electric Company requesting that the i
Resol uti on Vacating for the confl i cting under- * I ground facilities of San Diego Gas & Electric t Company. If this easement is reserved, San Diego:
1 Gas .& Electric Company has no objection to the :
~ vacation of Kelly Drive. I
City of Carlsbad reserve an easement within the i
I
I
t 3) Letter from the Pacific Telephone & Tele- i graph Company, dated October 25, 1967, stating : that they have made arrangements with the proper-, i ty owner for their teleph-one facilities within : the proposed vacation area and therefore, have i no objection.
i The Mayor asked if there was anyone present who ; would li'ke to speak on this matter. As there well i no person desiring to speak, the hearing was ; closed at 7:35 p.m.
I +
r ! ; The following Resolution was introduced:
I
I
8
I I I 'I I 1 @
I
4 * 4 I
I
nt3
8 I' I
I I
t I
I I Resolution No. 1442. .A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY I Worthing : COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD VACATING PORTIONSI Neiswend i OF KELLY DRIVE, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RESERVATIONS ! Atkinson : AND EXCEPTIONS, was read by title only and fur- I Dunne i there reading waived. ; Jardine
I I I I * 1 I I I
I
9 . I
6 i * *
I I
.@ ! I I
I
I I I
I
I I !
I
8
1 4 I
.- I I I 8
I
'\ -*, -\,
I I '*, '8, '9
t -4- ! ; I Name *\ 'q I : of 'Y
I '\ '
I
I
I
I
I 4 * :"-,""""-"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~""""""~. 1 Member
: (b) Appeal .of the .decisipn of the Plannin b i Commission in denying a portion of.the appyica- ! i tion submitted by EARCO, requesting a side yard : ;set-bac.k from six (6') feet to zero (0') feet on i ! the Northerly side, for construction of a garage ; ; located on the Westerly side of Ocean Street, i :Southerly of Cedar Avenue. !
! The Clerk presented the Affidavit of Publicat.ion I I and the same was ordered filed.
I 1) A Letter of Appeal was received.from An- 1 t dreason, Thompson, Gore & Grosse of Oceanside b 1
.. i appealing the decision of, the Planning Commissionj
: The Mayor announced the Council would now hear ; ,,,! from all persons present withing to speak on this;: : matter. 8 I
I MR. RUSSELL GROSSE, Attorney at Law, spoke on i behald of EARCO. He stated that his clients : felt that, it would. be best to have the garage * 5 built zero (0') feet from the property line, : than to have it split three (3') feet on one sidej : and .five (5') feet on the other. He also stated ; k that the. garage being zero (0') feet from the i 3 property 1 ine would be more eye appeal ing. t i Some points brought out were that:
! 1) The grading of the variance would not be i i setting a precedence. I
2) The garage being zero (0') feet from the i i property line would not be a fire hazard.
I the property owner (Tony Howard-Jones) to the, i i North of this property. e
i form to this request. I 8 i The Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed at i I 7:50 p.m. a I
I By proper motion, this matter was referred back : Worthing i to the Planning Commissi.on for further study and i Neiswend : reconsideration, and that a report be made back i Atkinson i to the Council. ; Dunne
8
I * 4
* b
b t
I dated September 7, 1967, representing EARCO, I
8 l
I
-1 e
: e I
4 I e I
I I I
b *.
I
e
I l 1,
I
I
1
e b 3) There would be less maintenance problems. I
t 4') The EARCO plans fit in with the plans of ;
I 5) Most of the residence in this area con- i 'I
*
I t
! I Jardine
i I I I I I I I I
I I
e
I 'I
(c) Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission in denying a zone change requested by i Richard V. Jordan, et al, from Zone R-1-7,5000 : and R-3, to Zone C-1, and Precise Plan on proper-: ty located on the Northeasterly corner of Tama- 3 : rack Avenue and Pi0 Pic0 Drive. I
I * t
4 I
8
I a : The Mayor announced the Council would now hear i I from all persons desiring to speak in opposition ! : to the proposed zone change and precise plan. 1
t I I I t I I I 1 I I I I
I I I I * # I I I
:
! : I I b
t . - \-, - . '\ % \
8, '. ' I I I
I I 4 .( ', '1
I : of 'Y [ - 5.- i Name '- q
'. '\
! l-"""""""-"""""""""""""""."~""~~"~"""""""~~~"""""".
: Member
I l a i DON JOHNSON, stated he was representing the ABC ! ; Association, and found Mr. Budlong's comments vel*$ 1 interesting. The ABC Association felt in this : i instance the Council should follow the recommend-: I ation of the City Planning Commission. By a 8
8 poll of the Association they were 100% in agre.e- i i ment that the zoning should be left as is. In ; i ''discussing the economic factors, Mr. Johnson I ; stated a:service station operator makes little ; i or no profit on the sale of gasoline. The : profit goes to the lessor. The City is faced i with three service stations at the entrance to i * Carlsbad, and it was his understanding another ; 1 service station is proposed for Las Flores. This: I would make nine ser.vice s-tations through Carlsbad;.
, . : The Association recommend.ed that the owner devel-: i op a restaurant or motel complex for this corner.! : If a motel were built, the City would receive 4% : ,,.! Transit Tax, which funds are earmarked for Parks I ; and Recreation. A check with City Treasury De- : i partment revealed the City does not collect a taxi : on-gasoline sales. . f
1
4
@ D b
6
b I b I As there were no- others persons desiring to speak: i the Mayor declared the public hearing closed. t
I The 'City Manager informed the Council the gas taxi : monies collected by.the State are pooled and I I distribu>ed to cities according-to population. i I*
I I I
t I I t 8
8
I Cmn. Jardine stated he was interested in the : ,Planning Commision's thinking on gas stations ; i all along the :Freeway. Perhaps a study session i ; is needed by the Planning Commission and members ; i of the City Council concerning service stations. i
: Mayor Atkinson asked the applicant if he had con--: i sidered just a restaurant for this intersection? i
I Mr. Jordan informed the Councl Byservice station I
I and restaurant compliment each other. They had : i considered other uses of the property. Even I i though there are other st-ations on the other threk ; corners of the intersection, service stations I
I compliment each other. I
: Cmn. Worthing stated he was in sympathy with I
8 : Cmn. Jardine's statement, however, he also feels i
i and perhaps a study is needed.
i Cmn. Dunne stated he did not feel the Council ha:;:. : all the information needed. I
. 1 I . I 9 I
I s I I
! as the City Planner does, this is a good plan a 1' t
I f I * e
3 I i After further consideration, by motion of the i Council , it was agreed the pub1 ic hearing be .: continued, and that a study be made by the Plan- : ning Commission and members of the Council as to ; the number of service stations needed along i Interstate #5 within the city limits of Carlsbad,, *
I I I
I I ,* 1 > 1 #
# 8 1
Worthi ng Neiswendc Atkinson Dunne Jardine
i Councilmen Jardine and Worthing were appointed by! ; the Mayor to meet with the Planning Commission. i 8 I I 1
I 1 I I
I :
i
! $
6
8 t I
1
1 I
r
I b
.A ' ! * * . \".*
I
**, '*., '\
8 '* ** ',
: of '(
I I
B '8 't
: - '6 - I Name *\, 1
:"""""-"""""""""""""""""*""""""~""""""~"-!""""""-. : Member ;
I I I 1
8
t * i ENGINEERING:
! B i (a) Requ.est for Encroachment upon public right- i I of-way - re: Oak Avenue. Applicant: EARCO.
I The EARC.0 Company requests permission to construct : mon-standard items in. the Southerly parkway 4 i area of Oak Avenue, westerly of Carlsbad Boule- !
B #
I I 4
I vard, as follows; I
I 1) Construction of driveway-opening in curb i I
t I
b
I
i to match the garage opening (110 feet in width.) :
f 2) Construction of concrete driveways as ! necessary to meet garage floors, with the bpeak i
' . i from standard driveway grade to begin not less - : : than 10 feet from face of curb. * I
I I
I I $ " ; I ized pipe handrail at the northerly prolongation ; ; of the westerly property line; the northerly i temination of said wall to be not less than 10 i ; feet.from face of curb.
I 3) Construction of masonry wall with ,gal van-!
B I
* *
I ! I I i The City E-ngineer recommended that this. request i I be granted under the provisions of Ordinance No. I i 8041, with the requirement that all construction ; : and plans for construction in the public right i f of way be subject .to the approval of the City : * ; Engineer. The City Engineer also stated that i : b. this would be of no expense to the City. I ? t [ By motion of the Council, the Encroachment Permi(Worthing : was granted to EARCO with the approval of the :Neiswende : City Engineer. :Atkinson
I :Dunne
? jJardi ne
I
4 I (b) Request for driveway access on Elm Avenue - i : K. T. Fuller. I ? 8
I i The City Engineer stated that Mr. K. T. Fuller I i is seeking permission for a d.riveway access on : : Elm Avenue from his property which is located i i at 30T5 Valley Street. It was pointed out by ; : the City Engineer that this would set a preced- I : I ence on Elm Avenue and that it is the intention ;
! of the .City to keep a minimum of driveways on t ; Elm Avenue. I ! I MR. FULLER stated that this request was only : for a matter of convenience as when it rains, : I there are many large puddles to drive through:on i : the driveway he is now using.
I I I t
I rn 4
1 I I * b I ! It was moved that permission be granted to Mr. :Worthing i Fuller for an access driveway onto Elm Avenue INeiswende I from his property until such time as James DriveiAtkinson i is open; at which time Mr. Fuller will terminateiDunne : this access onto Elm Avenue and use an access onto Jardine : James Drive. ! i I I i The City Attorney was instructed to draw the I I i the proper agreement.
I 1 !
4
1 I
I
I 81 I
I # I
I I 1
I ;
t 1
1 1
c 8
I i
I I -7-
I D I D I
', 8 -+, '
',8 '., '. ,' 8, ' ' i Name '8.'
'.
D : : of '(
:----"--------"-""~~""~"""""""""""""""~~~""""""",""""""~, i : 1 I Member e n i (c) Dedication of .Osuna Drive:
4
I 8
I 1
8 ; By motion of the Council, the offer of dedication! Worthing i of Osuna Drive was accepted, and the Clerk in- : Neiswendl ; structed to record the same. i Atkinson
t I .PLANNING: I Jardine
8 : Dunne
! : i (a) Tentative map of Carlsbad Manor Subdivision i : located East of Park Drive, between Monroe S.treelii : and Hillside Drive - Owner: Donald A. Briggs, St:! : Developer: R. E. Geyer. !
I
I * ! It was pointed out by the City Planner that Carl:;! i bad Manor Subdivision conforms to the requirement!
. ' : of the City and that the 'drainage pipes have not ; i yet been completed. <I '*,! The 'City Planner stated that this drainage system; ; wil.1 have a tendency to reduce the silt at the ; i north end of Bristol'Cove.
I I 8
I . k I i MR. DONALD JOHNSON, representing the Association ! ; for the. Betterment of Carlsbad (ABC) expressed i : the concern of .the height restriction on all of t i the most easterly lots to assure.that the present: ; view from the existing adjacent properties would : : I not be impaired by the structures place in Carls-1
I i- f bad Man0.r.
I He also stated that he hoped the drainage problem: i 'would be solved. I
i MR. ROY KLEMA, Engineer of Carlsbad Manor, stated! : that the average size lot of Carlsbad Manor is i i 9,000 sq. ft. He stated the drainage system has i : been. designed to carry the water freely and that ; i the highest structure being built in this sub: I : division is on the right-hand.side of Tamarack i i Avenue and will definitely not obstruct the view : : of property owners on Sunnyhill. I
i
I I I
! I I *. i The following Resolution was presented:
!
I 1 a
I i Resolution No. 1447. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY I Worthing
! TENTATIYE MAP OF CARLSBA-D MANOR SUBDIVISION. i Atkinson 1 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING THE : Neiswendf
I : Dunne
; NEW BUSINESS:
I I
I t * i Jardine
I
t I D
* ! i (a) Request for the use of Holiday Park - North i i Coast Y.M.C.A. I I
I I . i By Motion of the Council permission was granted i Worthing : to the North Coast Y.M.C.A. for the use of Holi- i Neiswendr i day Park for the Y-Indian Guide Induction Cere- :Atkinson : mony to be held on the evening of November 30, 3 Dunne i 1967, from 5:30 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. ; Jardine
1 D i : , I_- (b) Request for permission to park campers - I
* Carlsbad Boat and Ski Club. ! 8 6
t I 8: i Cmn, Neiswender4nformed the Council that Carls- I 1
I bad Boat & Ski Club would park their campers at ; : Carlsbad Landing.
b I I 1 1 1
I
1
I 1
&
i
I
I I * -8-
@ '8 -' - '
I '8
I i
, t '8
I '88 '88 ",
t8 '\ ! Name '. I I : of 'i
I ! Member :"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~"""""""~"~""""""
I By Motion of the Council, .permission.was granted horthing
I I * I
i to the Carlsbad.Boa"t & Sk'i Club to.park six (6) iNeiswendr ; to eight. (8) campers at Carlsbad Boat Landing , :Atkinson i on the weekend of November 17th and 18th.- ; Dunne
: (c) Carlsbad Girls' C1 ub request to hold a Teen i i '.Dance at Carlsbad High' School.
i By proper motion, permission was granted the . i.Worthing : Carlsbad Girls' Club to. hold a Teen Dance at" i Nei'swendl I Carlsbad High School on November 11, 1967. !Atkinson * t
t !
I 4 : Jardi ne
I I
I e
z ; Dunne : Jardine
/ OLD BUSINESS: I I .. 4 ! *
I I
" I
I
I
I 8
I
(a) Water Systems Improvement Committee Report. i Cmn.- Dunne stated this report was presented at ; the last meeting and was deferred until this meeting. General Rogers is present to answer any: questions the Council might want to ask.
I I
I
I * . i General Rogers informed the Council. the Committee: : is requesting that the recommendations of the I i Committee be approved, as well as the Engineering: : Repo.rt. I I
r v i Cmn. Worthing stated he did not recall that the ; I
: Engineer-ing Report. went into maintenance cost I* 8 : on the San Luis Rey Water System. I I
: Cmn. Worthing was informed the report recommendedj r that the San Luis Rey Water System be maintained : : in its present status. I I
: Discussion was- given to the recommendations sub- i i mi tted by the Water Systems Improvement Committee: : in their report dated September 28, 1967.
! Cmn. Dunne recommended that Item 10 be omitted i i from the recommendations, in which it was recom- ; : mended that studies be in-itiated to effect a I consolidation of CMWD and' the City of Carlsbad i
t Water Department. !
I 6
I
I 8 t
I I t 8 1 k
I I
I I I
I I t I ! Genreal Rogers pointed out at their conference 1 I in San Francisco they were instructed to send a ; i copy of the Committee's report, and it was not t : felt this item had anything to do with the in- I' I i formation needed for the application submitted. :
4 1 ! I I I 1 I
I
t
1
8 I I * I * I I I I 1
I n I I I I .8 ; I
I 1 I
1
I I
Item 13, regapding an increase in water rates I was discussed.
! Cmn. Dunne felt perhaps the Committee should I make a further study of the water rates as it is i possible a water rate increase would not be need-! ed if the City receives a grant. I
The City Manager stated the ratesrcould be de- i creased if the grant were sufficient. I
4
I
t ?
I I I
I I
t I I
t I
I I 7
8
I
I
I I I - 9 .-
8 I I y+,:
I i Name 8 8s. 'a ' t '8 '
I I : of '<
:""""""""-"-""""""""~"""""""""~"""""""""~*""""""~, : Member
i General Rogers stated he was convinced the rates 1 ; would have to be raised 2-5%, and recommended the :
1 rate increase be commensurate with the approval ; i of the Federal Grant. !
I
I. 8 a I
6
I 8 fi
i
: Worthing asked if Lake. Calaveras was to be sold, i 'and' Genreal Rogers stated. it coul d. be converted : into park use at a later date, however, .at this i time it is listed as part of the assests of the ; Water Department.
! Under Item 11 of the recommendations, Cmn.
I
t + ! @
1
#
I !
8
! I i i .. I
I
I
" .!
After further discussion it was agreed that the : Worthing recommendations of the Water Systems Improvement i Neiswend Committee was accepted as. amended. t Atkinson
Cmn. Worthing stated he felt the Committee should! Jardine be complimented on the report. I t !
i Dunne
* : (b) Business License Ordinance. The proposed i ! Business License Ordinance was presented for i discussion.
: Crnn. Jardine stated the Committee had worked for i i several months on this proposed Ordinance. He : : and Crnn. Worthing met with the City Clerk to iron! I out 'some of the mechanical phases. : ! 5 Crnn. Dun.,ne pointed out that according to the : proposed Ordinance' the May Company would be pay- I i ing approximately $3,000.00 a year, and inquired : : ,how this fee would compare with Walker Scott and i I other larger department stores in San Diego? S
f
I I * b I
I I
t
I.
1 I a
: I Cmn. Worthing informed the Council, a check was i ; made and San Diego-levies a tax according to the i i numb.er of employees. k
! I
1 I I I k * I I I I I I t I
8 !
6
8 t
I I I I
Cmn. Dunne stated he did not want this city tn i have a hfgher rate than other cities.
Cmn. Jardine stated the Committee felt that the : rate applied to a local d-ownt'own business depart-! ment store should apply to a larger department i
8
I I I
store. !
4 I Cmn. Worthing stated his understanding of the ; busines's 1 icense was to levey a tax according to i the amount of service required by the City. I I~
I I i Cmn. Jardine further stated the Committee studiecf : this matter and it was their feeling that the : : City should try this License Ordinance on for i I size. & I
i The City Manager inquired of Crnn. Worthing as i .: to how much more revenue this ordinance would I i bring in to the City? e
i Cmn. Worthing i,nformed the Council the proposed 8 : Ordinance shouTd bring in $100.00 a year, more 1 i or less. t
! :
t I I I
* 6 1 I I
4 8 i I I I I t I f #
@
4 I I 1
1 I t I I
I
I t
t
1
b
,. - * -\ * s I '' *','*, '
I - 10 - *, * ' ' "
I I Name '8, -
I : of ':
I i Member :"""""""""""""""~"""""""~"""-""""~-""""""~""~"""".
I 1 a
I 8 '\
I
i a a I I I o t
b !
I The City Manag-er pointed .out $30,000.00 in re- i venue was proposed from business licenses for i fiscal year 1967-68. This would mean approximate-: I ly $4,800.00 less than anticipated, and the bud- t ; get would have to be changed to reflect this 4 1 change,
L !
B
*: !
: 8 Mr. Mamaux further inquired as to why. a milkman i : would pay more than a professional man? Und.er i i the present Ordinance a milkman fell under gross : ; gross receipts, and in the proposed Ordinance ! they are not shown under gross receipts. ! 1 It was agreed a milkman should be .placed under 1
.. ; gross receipts in category "C". I a
4
I 1 a
CI I The City Manager stated there had been no dis- I ..,i cussion as to the administrative cost involved : ; in the proposed.0rdinance. I The City Clerk explained some of the additional i : administrative problems involved in processing ; i the proposed Ord.inance, and informed the Council : ; she did not have the personnel needed for pro- I 1 cessing. !
i The City- Attorney was asked .by the City Manager i ; if the-law did not preclude the City from taxing i . i Insurance Agents? . He checked with three other t : cities and they do not tax Insurance Companies i i ,nor Insurance Agents. * I
I I I * I
t 1 I
8 I i The City Attorney informed the Council Insurance i ; Companies cannot be taxed, but Insurance Agents i i can be.
i After further discussion, the following Ordinance! ; was presented for a first reading. 8
I I
b I
b I
b I I ; Ordinance No. 6040. AN ORDINANCE LICENSING THE : : TRANSACTION AND CARRYING ON OF CERTAIN BUSINESSES! i TRADES, PROFESSIONS, CALL-.INGS AND OCCUPATIONS I : IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, FOR THE PURPOSE OF 1 : RAISING MUNICIPAL REVENUE, PROVIDING A. PENALTY f
i ING ORDINANCES, was given a first reading by I : title only and further reading waived.
i FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF, AND REPEALING CONFLICT!
I
I I ! I
Worthing Neiswendc Atkinson
Dunne Jardine -
I I I i COMMITTEE REPORTS: 1- * ! I I i (a) Chamber of Commerce. Authorization was gi'venlNorthing ! for the reimbursement of bills paid by the Carls-: Neiswendc ; bad Chamber of Commerce for the second quarter !Atkinson i in the amount of $1,471.10, as recommended and ; Dunne ; certified by Councilman Neiswender. i Jardi ne
i The City Manager asked if the Board-of Directors i I of the Chamber had approved the expenses, and ; ; Cmn. Neiswender informed the Council it was
b I
I I
I ! handled as it always had been. i ! * I : The City Manager pointed out according to the ! i By-Laws of the Chamber of Commerce, the Board : I : of Directors should approve all expenditures. I I
!
8 t
I 8 I
#
4 I
1 I *
I t t !
.. I
8 I
I ! - 11 -
8 8 \, -' ', I ''* I ', '. ' '. ", i Name *-.
8 . 8 : of 'q
I : Member ;""""~"~"""""""""""""""""""""""""-~""""~""""""".~
1 l a i I CITY ATTORNEY'S REP.ORT: - .
1
I
I 0 #
8 b I : (a) May'.Company Reimbursement Agreement. An i Agreeme.nt providing for the collection and pay- i i ment of $3Oa000,O0 to the May Company over a 1
I I fifteen year period in repayment of their costs t ; :in ins tal 1 ing a water .main in El Cami no Real. Thb : terms of the Agreement have 'been previously i approved in principle by the Council..
I
I
4 8 I i By proper motion the Agreement between the City-- i Worthing
I and the May Company was approved and the Mayor iNeiswend and City Clerk authorized to execute the docu- !Atkinson 1 ment on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. I t i Jardine r (b) Police Pistol Range Contract. An agreement ;
.I has .been prepared concerning the use of the ';
t pistol firing range by the State of California, i i Department of California Highway Patrol. The * : conditions have been approved by the Carlsbad i t Police Chief and the Department of California t 1
: Dunne
t
-8 I
1 8
I
! ; 8 Highway Patrol. i
a ; By motion of the Council approval was given to i Worthing i the .terms of the Agreement, and authorization i Neiswend t given fo.r the Mayor. and Clerk to execute the : Atkinson
I : Agreement on tjehalf.of the. City of Carlsbad. i Dunne
8 : JaFdine I :
I * 8 * I
I
I I I
I 8 t 8 8 8 8 8 I b I I I ! I 8 I I I 8 :
8 I
I I
I * *
8 I 8 (c) Resolution #1448, approving report under "Special Assessment Investigation and Protest i Act of 1931 - AbD. 3-1 964 - James Drive. A hearing will be held concerning Assessment Dis- i trict No. 3-1964, James Drive due to the fact 60% of the property owners within the district ; was .not given. The date of the hearing is set : for December 19, 1967. b
The following resolution was presented for con- i
sideration: I :
Resolution No. 1448. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ! Worthing COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, APPROVING REPOR? I Neiswend UNDER "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION AND PRO- ;Atkinson TEST ACT OF 1931 - A.D. 3-1964, re: James Drive I Dunne was ado.pted by title only and further reading ; Jardine waived.
I I
I 1 I
I b
I
8 a1 I i C.ITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
I
I
a
I i The City Manager informed the Council he had i nothing further to report.
* I 8 I I I 8 e * 1
I * 8
8 * 8 * I * : I I t I I * I * -8 * I
I t
I 8 I I 8
I I 1
Executive Session. Mayor Atkinson requested an i Executive Session by members of the Council to : discuss personnel. The Council adjourned to the i adjoining room at 10:35 P.M. I
The Council reconvened at 11:18 P.M.
The Mayor announced the purpose of, the Executive; Session was to consider the status of the City I Manager, and unless the resignation of the City ; Manager is in the hands of the Mayor prior to !
1 1
I
November 15, 1967, the. Council has resolved that I I the services of the City Manager are terminated i as of the close of business, November 15, 1967. ;
I
. L *. I 8 -* '8 ' I I
1 I I
1
88 b '\,
I I '8, 888, ; Name "8.' i - iz - : of '
I : Member ;"""";"""""""-""-"""""""~~"""""""""--"-"-""..~;""""""-
I I
I I a i i
8
-3 B
I AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT. OF BILLS AND RATIFICA- : i TION OF PAYROLL: . ! I : t
t
I 1
1 I
I I
I
I Authorization was given for the payment of bills i Worthin
for the general expenses of the City in the : Neiswen amount of $60,553.58 and for the Water Department: Atkinso at in the amount of $30,203.39, for the period of : Dunne
~ October 3, 1967 to October 17, 1967, as certified: Jardine i by the Director of Finance and approved by the ;
j Auditing Committee. I 6 I I I i Authorization was given for the payment of bills iWorthing i for the general expenses of the Ci'ty in the iNeiswend1 1 amount of $46,675.90 and for the Water DepartmentiAtkinson ! in the amount of $14,837.34 for the period Octo- :Dunne i ber 17, 1967 to November 7, 1967, as certified. !Jardine : by the Director of Finance and approved by the ; : Auditing Committee.
I Ratification of the payroll was given for the :Worthi ng ; first half of October, 1967, in the amount of ' INeiswend, ! $28,465.87, and for the second half of October, ;Atkinson i 1967, in the amount of $28,154.56, as certified !Dunne i by the Director of Finance and approved by the !Jardine ; Audi ti ng Committee. I
i ADJOURNMENT:
5 ; By prope-r motion the meeting was adjourned at : 11:21 P.M.
b !
I 6
l
" I I 8
I I
# I I I *
I I I* I I I I
I
i : Respectful ly submi tted,
I Iy-&A5.---Fg2i+"
i I city .derb : MAR A ET E. ADAMS
* I I # I I I I D t I 8 I 4 I ! * #
I I * I ! I I I I 4 I I I I I 8 & * t b
I * I 'I I * I !
I l e I I D * I I * I I I I 8 e t I I I I I I t 1 t
8
I I s I
I I I t I t
6
t
t 1 v
I t :
I I I I
I I I 4 I a I I t
I, * I I I I 8 I I I b I b
I I t I I & I I I 1 i i
* 1 k ?
i I I
I I
#
t I 1 I I