HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-02-20; City Council; Minutes: CITY OF CARLSBAD i Minutes of: City Counci 1 (Regular meeting): : Date of Meeting: February 20, 1968 I i Time of Meeting: 7:OO P.M. : Place of Meeting: Council Chambers
i 1 ROLL CALL was answered by Councilmen Worthing, : @ ; Neiswender, Dunne and Jardine. Also present 1 were City Manager Martin, City Attorney Wilson i
i and City Clerk Adams. f
t I I t INVOCATION was offered by Vice Mayor Dunne. ; I 1 I .'ALL'EGIANCE to the Flag was given. I I
I I I
I I I I I
(-""-""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""I I -0 I
t
1
4
I I i APPROVAL OF MINUTES: I
! I I (a) Minutes of the' regular meeting held on 1 February 6, 1968, were approved as' corrected.
t I
! CORRESPONDENCE:
'!.i There was no written correspondence presented.
b
8
I t I ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:.
! I There was no one present desiring to speak on : any matte.r not appearing on the agenda.
: PUBLIC HEARINGS:
I
I
113 ! (a) (Continued) A.ppeal of the decision of the 3 Planning, Commission in denying application for ; Amendment to Pre'cise Plan PP 6704, re: Signs at i Southwesterly corner of Palomar Airport Rd. and ; .Interstate 5 Freeway; and the addition of one (1 i small gasoline price sign. Appellant: Paul and ; Magdalena Ecke. I
113
-0
I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I
I I I I I
I
I I I 4 I I 4
I I I I I I I I I
8 I I I I I e
l I L I I I I -1 I !
I I I I 4 I 8 I I t I I I I I
I I I
I I
I f I !
,
~ and
~ (b) (Continued) Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission in denying an application' 1 for an Amendment to Precise Plan PP 6602, re:
~ Signs at the Southeasterly corner of Palomar i Airport Rd. and Interstate 5 Freeway; and the
~ addition of one (1 ) smal f. gas.01 ine price sign.
1 Appellant: Paul and Magdalena Ecke.
I I The Mayor announced the Council would hear from
~ the appellant or his representative.
Russell Grosse, Attorney at Law, stated he was representing the Appellant, and had p.reviously delivered a memorandum concerning some of the. issues on this matter. David Smith, Manager of the Mobile Station, was introduced and spoke in support of the Appeal emphasizing the need for a proper sign , as their business was being hurt. The Vice Mayor asked Mr. Smith if the station did not have a sign, and Mr. Smith stated they had a sign that was approximately 120 sq. ft. in size; however, the Shell Station sign was approx imately 219 sq. ft.
Mr. Jack Lloyd, Vice President of V. P. Heath Co was introduced, stating their company handled all the signs for Denny's Restaurants , and ex- pressed comments concerning electrical signs as to size and the amount of investment to the
owner. Mr. Lloyd also explained he wa.s the
4
4
I
I
I I I
I
I
I I I
I I 4 I
I I I
1 I I I
8 e
I I # I I 8 *
I I
4 I!
1
I I I I
I I
I
i
I 8 I !
I I I
I 8 e
I I
I I 8
I 1 I
I I I I
I I I I I
I 1 I 4
I I
I
t
J
1 i
?
I
I
8 I
t
t J
I I
1 b
'*8 '.8->, '9-
Name 's, .:! -. \, '
of 8-?i
'8, '888'8
Member . """"""".
I
I
I
i Worthing , Nei swende ; Dunne I Jardine
I ,
, j
1
I
I
I
I
I !
I I I
I
1 ,
,
I
I
Y
I I I '8, 8s,-'8 '*,
I I I '8, '.,'\, :: Name *.:'\$
I : of '+
:"""""""""-""""""""""""."""""""""""""""~"""~"""" I Member '
I I
-2- I 8, ?
4
I. I I 0 ,i Chairman of the.Sign Ordinance Committee for the i i Sign Association, and urged the Council not to be: ; hasty in adopting a sign ordinance. In closing ! i Mr. Lloyd pointed out all they were requesting * ! : 4 i .A design of a proposed. sign for the Southeasterly! i quadrant was presented, including 590 sq. ft. t
! John Grant, representing National Business Invest; . i ment, Inc. , owned by Denny's Restaurants, spoke ; i in support of the Appeal , further emphasizi.ng the! 1 need to be identified due to the c.ompetition with; 1 existing Denny Restaurant signs in other cities i i within the County and other counties that sur- t I
. . : round Carlsbad. He felt the Council should con- : i sider the limitations of signs in other cities - i : and .counties. The location for Denny's in Carls-: '; bad, was purchased be'cause of its proximity to t
t the Freeway, and the success of the proposed bus-; 1 iness at this location is dependent upon a sign ; : being visible to freeway traffic. Vice Mayor * t i Dunne asked Mr. Grant how the business was doing.,! ; and Mr. Grant stated the business was doing ap- : : t- proximately $4,000.00 per week, which was about i i half. of what they anticipated. The Building In- ; :, spector permitted a wall sign on the building, i and the business did double. This business re- i f presents. well over, a quarter of a million dollars!
i Mr. Grosse spoke. again on behalf of the Appellant; ; stating since the proceedings had commenced, there : had been no protests registered. In examining : i ordinances from Oceanside, Escondido and some of I : the other neighboring cities; no provisions have : I been made for freeway signs. The County controls! ; a ve-ry small portion of the Freeway area, and it :
! the testimony given these businessmen are conkerns I ed with the livelihood of their business.' 8 I
I Harry Truax, 4.125 Harbor Dr. , stated he was speak! ; ing for himself, and pain-ted out these sites I 8 : were approved by the Council for' these service i I facilities. An 80 sq. ft. sign is unrealistic, : : and not sufficient square footage to see from ; I the freeway. He expressed hopes that a sign or- { : dinance' would be adopted that could be used i through the years. Also the law states a property! : owner has the right to use his property.
: Mrs. Mary Scherr, member of the Parks and Recre- i i ation Commission, stated there had been a member i : of the Commission present at all of,the hearings.; i The Commission realizes freeway signs are differ-! ; ent than the local business signs. The Commis- ; : sion is concerned with the type of signs that I
i They would favor having signs stating "Service : ; Facilities Next\ Four Exits". 1
i Bill Moore, 376 Juniper, expressed concern as to I
{ Highway Department be contacted as to how they i : determine the size of a sign in order for motor-; i ists to get off the freeway.
I 1
a t was proper identification.
e
I 9
.' I
I
I 6
I I
*
t : seemed to him the cities should be uniform. From;
I 1 I I
I 6
t I
4 I
I : will be used on the freeway through Carlsbad. !
I I i
: the sign ordinance, and suggested the State I 0 6
1
I I
1
1 I
t
1
I * 1
I & 6 I t I
I I
I
I I
1 I -88..
'8, '* ', \
I I ! '8' y-,,
I I i Na me '88, '\$ ; of 'e -3- ! t ! Member ', ~""""~~~""",""""""""""""""~"""""~~~""""""".~~""""""" .-
I. I 0 I 4 i There being no further oral communications, the i ; Vice Mayor declared the -hearing closed. J b
! ! i Don Schoell, City Planner, explained when' this i i matter was discussed by the Planning Commission, : : the applicant was requesting a sign of 400 sq. I :ft. in area and this w-as turned down by the Com- I : mission. The applicant returned with an, applica-i i tion requesting a sign of approximately 500 s.q. : : ft. in area. It was the Commission's feeling the! . i applicant had made no effort to comply with the f : Commission's thinking. The Commission- is of the ! 1 opinion the signs should be handled by way of the! I zoning ordinance. Mr. Schoell stated he fe1.t the!
,. i applicant had a valid point in requesting that ; :the open space not be included as a part of the : I same square footage allowed. I I
': Vice Mayor Dunne inquired of the Planner if he :
i Planner stated he had not. t I
,i General discussi.on ensued and Cmn. Jardine was o-fi ; the opinion this matter should be solved and a : : decision made by the City Council,. even. if it i ! mean-t professional help by committee or else- 1 I i where. Cmn. Worthing agreed, but felt a decision! ; should be made by the Council this evening. I
i After further discussion, by motion of the Coun- i : ,ci 1 it was agree.d that the following formula for i i Freeway Service Facility signs be presented to ; : the Planning Commission for consideration and re-: i port: 1 I
I That each use be allowed a total of 150
I .sq. ft. of sign space; that 2 feet be
4 allowed between each sign space; that ,
b the bottom sign be placed 20 feet above 1 Northing
I of the sign standard be limited to 50 : Dunne
4
B
t I .. I I
i had seen any signs that were 80 sq. ft., and the i
I * I t
8 1. b I
I I I I I I 4
I
I
I I 9 *
t t the ground; and that the maximum height i Neiswende:
* feet. i Jardine
: As to item (b) (single use facility), .by motion : Worthing i of the Council it was agreed that 200 sq. ft. be f Neiswender I allowed for a single use, with a maximum of 35 : Dunne : feet. I i Jardine
I
4.
b 1 I
I * I
11s i (c) Appeal of the decision of the Planning Com- I ; mission in denying the application submitted by I 1 Richard V. Jordon et a1 , for a zone change from ; : R-1-7,500 and R-3 to C-1, and for a precise plan i i on property located on the Northeasterly corner ; : of Tamarack Avenue and Pi0 Pic0 Drive. i Appellant: Richard V. Jordon, et al.
I As this matter had been rescheduled for hearing, i : the Clerk certified to proper notification and : i publication.
i Vice Mayor Dunne called for written communica- ; ; tions and the Clerk read a letter from the State; i Division of Highways with reference to the Notic4 : of Appeal, stating the proposed rezoning of the : i subject property was not in conflict with pro- t i posed state highway widening plan, therefore,
I !
8
I I
I I 1
t I I I b i
0
t
I
I I
I I
a
I j
1 a
I 1. I 1
# 8- 1 , N '.
I ' '\ * ',, '*, ',
8 -4- i Name '8, ' ;, .. ! of '.: :"-""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""*""""""" : Member
I
:.
f was also read from Dale ti, Budl.ong, .requesting . ! ; that the hearing be held up until approximately :
.' i 8:OO P.M. I due to his arrival from San Francis-co:: ! b
.I 'I 8. . . ; they had no objection to the rezoning. A letter i. s
t .
9
i
I
.I
b
I 8
B 8
I * i
.' 1
.#
t
B
C
e*.#
? I 1
I *
I I t *
t I I
I I
r * I :
I
I 1
I 1 8 t I I
I I .I
t * * I
t : 1 .* I I
8 * I # :-
D
# I I I I I I I * 4 I 3 I I 4 I t I I I # I I I I t !
I I * t I I I * J I I t 8 ,8 I I #
8 I * 1.
I I
The Vice Mayor called for oral comm.unications and i .Dale Budlong, Attorney at Law;representing the i 'Appellant, spoke in. support of the appeal, empha- ; sizin.g the fact the City Planner and Chairman of i the Planning Commission both stated the precise : plan was one of the best plans presented to the : Commiss.ion. Also it was agreed by the Commission 3' there should be at least two uses at an inter- section. The other three corners already have a i commercial use. His clients own the Southwester- ; ly corner, representing five acres, of which they i have plans for a shopping center. They now have ; a lease with Alpha Beta Markets in the shopping : center, but due to financial .difficulties they i are being held- up on the development of the cen- ;
Northeasterly corner, they can get the financing ; for both corners. The decision of the Commissionj was the Northeasterly corner shou1d:be used f-or . : institutional and residential purposes. Residen-: ti a1 use is not feasible due to the proximity to i the freeway. As to institutional. use, there is a ; letter on file from Father O'Dwyer,, Pastor of St:! Patrick's Church, and authorized. representative- : of the Diocese of the San. Diego Education and lnlelfare Corp. supporting the plan. In closing i ,Mr. Budlqng stated his client felt there was no : other use for this property other than commercial i and asked that the Council reverse the decision ; of the Planning Commission.
Harry Truax, 4125 Harbor Drive, spo'ke in support ! of the appeal, pointing out there are no side- I
walks in this intersection and this development ,t would provide sidewalks -for the children. The I school has a large holding and any expansion woula probably go toward the interior and eventually : the entrance to the school would. be from Adams St,;
There being no further oral communicatio-ns, the i hearing was declared cl osed. 8
The City Planner gave a -report OM the findings of: the Planning Commission and stated their reasons i for denial of the application. Mr. Schoell was : asked by Cmn. Northing if he did not feel that ; resi denti a1 use fcr thi's corner was unreal isti-c, i and Mr. Schoell stated it was difficult to plan i .uses for areas near a freeway, and residential i uses would not be too realistic. The Commission ; had no objection to the plan, however, this ap- [
plication came in when the Commission was con- ! sidering a71 the freeway intersections. I 8
Following general discussion by the Council, by I '.motion of the Council, the appeal was granted fori the following r'?asons, and the matter referred I back to the Planning Commission for a report: I
I 8
ter. If the owners can obtain rezoning' for the i
t
I I t
t
e 8
I 4
e
I
I. I I I I
I I t
1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 7
1
I 1 I I
I I
1 \ -\ 8,
'8 ' 3 I I ' '. +,
1 I Name '8,'4 * -5- : of 8+
0 i
I *8 ', ',
4
~~r~rrr~"r""orr~~~0~*~*~~"~o~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~W~~~~~D~~~~~~b~~b~~~b~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~. I Member
I I I I * I 1. There does* not seem to.be any other : logical use for .the property.; 1 ! ! .
't 2.. The development would be taxable. income i i for the city; and fldorthing I :Neiswendel
; this intersection. : Jardi ne I)
I 8: I
8 *
3. There is alre-ady a commercial density atiDunne
113; (d) Appeal of the decision of the Planning Com- I
, . t mission in denying the application submitted by i i Jay R. and Maryon D. Hoffman; for a zone change f 1 from R-A-10,000 to C-2, and for a ,Precise Plan on: I property located on the South side of El Camino i ! Real approximately 800 feet east of Kelly Drive. i
' i Appellant: Jay R. and Maryon D. Hoffman. #
(' : 8 The .Clerk announced t.his was the time and place i
'; set for public hearing, to consider the appeal, ; i and that proper notice had been given. I i The Vice Mayor called for written communications i ; and the Clerk presented letters in support of the! I Hoffman appeal from the following persons: I I
: Mr. .and Mrs. Morris L. Sims, 1640 Basswood Ave. i i Perry T.. and Marguerite M. Loesch, 4228. Highland : : Drive i Mrs. Pat-ricia Palmer : Mrs. Patricia Hardin, 3851 El Camino Real : Mrs. C. A. (Haze-1) Roberts, 369 Hemlock ; Mr. and Mrs. James M. Gaiser, 3784 Skyline Road ! i Mrs. Vera S. Miller, 3001 Ocean Street I : Mr. and Mrs. J. Paul Brown, 3450 Monroe St.,Apt.D-;
B -1
4 8
l e
I I
I
I *. I I I 8
I. 1
I I I I
I I I
I I
1 I .I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
1 3
I
I I I I I *
I I I 8 I I I 9 I
I i !
4 I I I I I I t
I I 8
4 i The Mayor called for oral communications and I i Byro'n White, White, Price, Froehlich & Peterson, 6
j Attorneys at Law, representing the Hoffmans, , t j stated the applicants were requesting that the i
I Council allow their matter to be reheard by the ! j Planning Commission, as it was the Commission's i
; feeling they did not have. a definite precise I I I plan. Since that time they have ha-d considerable: engineering work done and a more complete precise: plan drawn. This planned development entails I leasing businesses within the main building. The!
property is zoned R-A and cannot be leased for i commercial use, causing an economic loss to the ; owners. In closing Mr. White again requested the! matter returned to the Planning Commission in I
I
.order that it could be reheard. I I
I
There being no further oral communications the : hearing was declared closed, and a drawing of the! planned development was presented for review. I
Following Council discussion, by motion of the Northing Council, the matter was referred back to the illeiswender Planning Commission for further study in light :Dunne of new developments.
I
f :Jardine
: a I I I I 8 t I 3 * I I * t
8 I I
I * I
I
8
I
I 1 :
1 I t 1
t I I I t I I
I 8 1 I I I I I I I I I
I I
1 -6-
I I l"""--"-"""""""----"""""""""""""""""""""""""l" I. I
-*8 '\ '\ *%?
8, '\ ",
8' \\ ', '\
Name *\ '4 \\ /':
\7 \( Of
Member .""""""_
e. I
I I'
:ENGINEERING: 4
4 I 1 i I
971 (a) Petition f0.r' Temporary A1 ley improvement be- i :tween Elm Ave. and .Oak Ave., Jefferson St. and : :N.arding St. The Clerk read a petition signed by i i e,ight property owners requesting the Council to : I initiate proceedings to have'temporary'improve- i ; ment work done for the alley between Elm Ave,. . and ; :Oak Ave., Jefferson St. and Harding St., with. 2" : !of road oil miX, 20'. wide, laid upon approved bas4 ; by City of Carlsbad. t
!The Engineering Department repo.rted the owners i !have agreed to pay for the cost.of the material i i if the City fcrces would perform the work. I
-
..
1 I
-1 b t By motion of the Council the petition was appro- 1 I '.i ved and it was agreed that the City forces per- IWorthi.ng : form the work at such time as sufficient m'onies iNeiswender I have been deposited by the property owners for thdDunne i cost of material. :Jardine
: (b) Reques't from State Division of Highways for i ''? 3" Water Meter .for new maintenance statton - I ! Lowder Lane. The City Engineer informed the Coun- : i cil a request has be-en received from the. State i : Division of Highways. for permission to install a : :3" water..meter for-the new maintenance station i > i at Palomar Airport Road and Lowder Lane.
!Mr. Haven frrom the State Division of.Highways was I : present and addressed the Council stating- this wa$. i a normal request. The meter will be used to fill ; ; the tanks for watering,the landscaping along the : 1 Freeway and is strictly for economics. I ! : ! The City Engineer was questioned as to whether he i i felt this was an adequate size, .and he reported ; : this would be a 3" meter on a 10" line, which I i would be satisfactory. I 8
! By motion of the Council the request was granted JWorthing ; for the installation of a 3" meter. :Neiswender
I :Jardi ne
t I
*
I I
I * I
I
*o
I
1
*.
I I I I iDunne
I 8
99 i (c) Kamar Construction Co. - re: Request for one i i year extension of time on tentative map for I i Laguna Riviera Estates. Letter dated..February 16i ; 1968, from Kamar. Construction Co. , Inc., request- i i ing a one year extension of time on the tentative; : map of Laguna Riviera Estates Subdivision, pur- i
; suant to the State Map Act, ! i By motion of the Council a one year extension of IWorthing ; time was granted Kamar Construction Co., Inc. on fNeiswender : the tentative map of Laguna Riviera Estates. :Dunne
9
I
1
I * I !Jardine
I i I' I I
I
I
I I
0 8 I
t I 8 1 I I ? I f I I t I
lr I I I
I I
I
1 I i !
t I
I 3
e
63
‘ , -/-
i (-.“-‘-‘----P-----.----~---“-----------~----.--.--------~---~~---.--------.
I
I I
~LIBRARY:
i(a) James M. ' Galser - re: Resignation from Li-
;~brary Board of Trustees. Letter dated February
t12, 1968,)from James M. Gaiser was read, submit-
iting his:resignation with deep regret from the
tLibr.ary Board of Trustees, due to the pressing
idemands of his practice.
IWith deep regret the resignation of Mr.
!Gaiser was accepted,
James.'
and the Council reuuested
jthat a letter of appreciation. be sent td.Mr. D unne
jGaiser from the Vice Mayor. '. pardine
1 : 63 ,(b) Memorandum from Presi.dent of Library Board :
:of Trustees -.re: Resignation of Mr. James Gaiser.:
iMemorandum from President of the Library Board of ;
iTrustees, stating the Board had receive2 with I
'5deep regret the resignation of James Gaiser, and , I
ithey wished to submit the name of Mr. Angelo :
ICarli to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Gaiser. I
: :
iWith the consent of the Council, Vice Mayor Dunne i
iappointed 'Mr. Angelo Carli to fill the unexpired i
Iterm of Mr. Gaiser. The Vice Mayor requested
:that.a letter of appointment to the Board be pre- i
lpared for his signature. : . : i
IPLANNING:
: : gg:(a) Tentative map of Parcel Map on property loca- I
:ted on the Southwesterly side of El Camino Real I
!at Kelly Drive, being Lots 17, 18, and 19 of La- !
'guna Riviera Unit #l; Map No. 5871. The Assist-:
iant Engineer'presented-the Parcel Map, and infor- i
i
: 4
0
i;l;iezhe Council this map was a revision of Lot . Parcel 1, 2 and 4 are lot line adjust-
i
t
!ments'on.lots~~approved.‘in'Laguna Riviera Unit No. i
il subdivision, and they all conformed to Precise
: Plan No. 6601, approved August 16, 1966.
:
This i :was occasioned by the realignment of El Camino
i Real. The City is requiring .a small dedication i
;.of land for Kelly Drive. :These lots will be sub-i
'ject to the same requirements as the original I I :
:
: ,
:
:
:
:
: I
:
:
;
:
tentative map of Laguna Riviera Unit No.-1. : : I
After consideration,
presented:
the-following resolution was i
:
:
Resolution No. 1494. A RESOLUTION OF .THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD APPROVING THE .'
TENTATIVE MAP OF THE PROPOSED PARCEL MAP, was
adopted by title only and further reading.waived.
,
:
NEW BUSINESS:
(a) County of San Diego - re: Establishment of
County-wide Air Pollution Control Program.
Letter dated February 9, 1968, from T. M. Hegg-
land, Chief Administrative Officer, County of San
Diego, stating the Board of Supervisors has under
consideration a recommendation of the Citizens
Ad.visory Committee on Air Pollution Control that
rules, regulations and an enforcement program be
* I
I
I
I '\, ', '\, '\
1 8" 8 3'' I I '\ '*, '\
I : Name 8, \<
I i of '-5
I X!
;.".."L"-.......~.w*.~..."o....~~."..".."."""""""~".""""~~"~~""""" : Member
I
x. -8- 8'
- i- t i 0 ' ideveloped and adopted by. the Air Pollution Controlj :District of San Diego County, relating to the pro-; :hibition of open burning, dust emissions, .and odor: control, similar. to regulations and programs in 1
:effect in Los Angeles, and other Air Pollution 4 !Control Districts in Southern California. It was ; :requested that this matter be brought to the at- : itention of the Council, with 'a request-'that the : :Council express an opinion. on the need for, and : :desirability of establishing a County-wide air i !pollution control pr-ogram as recommended by the i' 'Citizens Advisory Committee.
/The t City Council requested the City Manager to 1
.. ;have a staff report 'prepared on this matter to ; :any decision being made by them. -I
s~.'(b) 'step-ups - re: Request for permission to hold jteen dances. Letter dated February 13, 19.68, froi : the Club Manager of the. Step-ups, -requesting per- ; jmission to hold another dance at the Carlsbad
&
t.
8
I
1 t
I I I * .. ;High School Gym on April 20th and on May 11th. 'I
t
.86
..
..
i .l !By motion 'of the Council permission was granted t4 ;the Step-ups to- host a dance at the CarTsbad High : I School Gym on April 20th and May 11 thy with the jWorthing ':.provision that proper police surveilance- be ob- :Neiswender
; Carlsbad-High School for use.of the gymnasium, :Jardine f. : tained, and.that permission be obtai.ned from the iDunne
1 I * 8 I
I
I I I 8
I t !
I J * I t
I I I
I I 6 I 8
I 1 I I I I
I (c) North Coast YMCA - re: Request to hold teen : :dance,. Letter dated February 19, 1968, from the. i '/North Coast Family YMCA, requesting p-ermission ; to hold a teen dance at the Carlsbad High School, 1 Saturday, February 24,.'1968, and that permission ! had already been obtained for use of the high I school gym. Also that plans had been made to use i L. C. Settle Security Service to patrol the dance.:
The Clerk informed the Council Mr. Maurer, Dance ! Director, had been informed the organization I would be required to employ four off-duty Police i .Officers to patrol the dance in addition to the i private security patrol. I
e
e
a
I I i By motion of the Council, permission was granted IWorthing ; to the North Coast Family YMCA to host a. teen :Neiswender i dance on February 24, 1968, 'wi,th the provision jDunne : that proper police patrol be obtained. :Jardine
1 e I
31 i (d) Mira Mar Catering Co. - re: Protest of I I t i Business License fee. Letter dated February 8, I i 1968, from the Mira Mar Caterinq Go., 220 Via I
i Del Monte,, Oceanside, protesting their 1968 busi-i i ness license fee in the amount of $80.00, as they! .i do not have a regular route in Carlsbad where one: I truck spends the entire day in this city, there- : : fore, they feel that the fee established for theii ; business by the City is unjust and not in accord ! i with comparable fee schedules prevailing in other: : areas of the County. t
i Discussion and questioning ensued relative to the: i fee schedule for out-of-town businesses, and.it ; ; was agreed that 'Mr. Wood, owner of the Mira Mar 1 1 I
> $ * 8 0
i Catering Co. be advised the Council could find !
I I t I
I ; I
f
I 1 j
I
.I 9 I I I I '\, '\,-\\, '8,
I I ', , ' 8 '\ I I * ', x 8 \-
I -9-. I Name '.,'\< I ; of '<>
t Member ': :"--"""-"-"-."-*~~~"""---".. ."".."..~~.""..".~"""""~"~""""""~~~~ I
I l
8 8 * e !no justification for placing his business in i another category. 1 8
$ I * :OLD BUSINESS: I'
b a
!
98!(a) Resolution No. 1476, concurring. in designa- 1 i tion of certain streets within City as "Route S. i ; 1.8". The City Manager reported to the.City Coun- ; ;cil he had requested a recommendation -from the i : Chamber of Commerce on this matter, as reques.ted ; i by the Council at the last meeting, but as yet : ;no answer had been received. ' It was agreed that I the matter be'deferred until an answer had "been l !
received from the Chamber of Co.mmerce. 4 I 'I I .63 i (b) Acceptance of Library Building. The City :Attorney presented the fo.llowing resolution for. i
s-
4.
i
*
i the Council's consideration:
'4 ;
a I
: Resolution No. 1495. A RESOLUTION.OF THE .CITY ; i COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ACCEPTING LIBRARYiWorthing
, :AND DIRECTING FILING OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION IN :Neiswender
'; I REGARD THERETO, was adopted by title only and iDunne : further reading waived. ~ :Jardine I
.:Attorney informed the Council is obligat,ed to pre4 :'sent an Audit to the. State, prior to the City re- i iceiving the final 10% of the Federal Grant. Dis- : , ; Cussion was given' as to calling for bids to have : i the audit made. D 8
i It was agreed that the City Attorney proceed with i ; the employment of an auditor to audit the Library': i Construction Fund.
0
63 i Audi t of Library Construction Fund. The 'City I
I
1. t
I I
I I I 1
. : COMMITTEE REPORTS; dl
I I I . i 34 i Reimbursement of Chamber of Commerce expenditures; ; By motion of the Council it was agreed that the :Northing
i for the third quarter in the amount of $-7,404..14, IDunne : as recommended by Crnn. Netswender. :Jardine :. I
.. : Chamber of Commerce be reimbursed expenditures :Neiswender
37 I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I
1
I 8
I Joint meeting with Parks and Recreation Commissioi
j Vice Mayor Dunne stated that he would like to set;
~ up a joint meeting with the City Council and the : Parks and Recreation Commission for sometime in i March. Cmn. Worthing suggested that the Parks ; and Recreation Commission present some, of their I ; projects at this meeting. I
Cmn. Jardine informed the Council .he would relate I the request of the Council to the members of the ; Parks and ,Recreation Commission. !
t f
I I -i CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: I I
8 1
4 I 106 : Proposed Underground Uti1 ities ordinance. The i i City Attorney presented a proposed Underground i : Utilities ordinan'ce,. to be discussed and studied i i at a later date. i
I ! 0 I I I I f I t I 1
i 1
i I ! t
I 9 I i 1
I 1 i i
I 1 :
I
,I '1 I
1 '\\ "* -\, '\
* I \ '\ \' I I ' \' '\ ' '
I -10- I N a me '8, '8:
I ; of '3
s Member .I :"""""""""""--"-"""""--"""""""""""~"""""""'""""""",
! 0 .28 :Appointment to Underground Utilities. Committee.. : a :The Mayor appointed the City.Manager, City Attor- i jney, City.Engineer and.himself, to work'with re- i ;presentatives of. the San Diego Gas & Electric Co. i :and the Pacific Telephone Co. relative to under- i
Igro'und utilities in the City. I :
30 1A.pproval of Signs. A ,request .for a permit to in- ! Istall a sign has been received from Maic Young and I ; the May Co. The City Planner informed the Coin- : : cil the Council placed a moritorium on all signs; : there has been no .procedure set up.. for i issuing signs. Cmn. Jardine inquired as to I whe.ther the signs could be. approved by the Plan- i ining Commission without being brought before the i
' ' i City Council for approval .. .Discussion was had as ; ; to a.dopting 'an emergency ordinance, placing all- :
!signs under a Conditional Use Permit. !
i By motion of the Council approval was given to Porthing ; th.e signs applied for by Max Young and the May Co.:Neiswender
I I \'
6
I 'I
I 1 I
I: 4
i however'
'p I I t t
t iDunne
I
b :Jardine l 8
1 20: App'roval of Joint Sewer Condemnation Cos.ts. The i ;City.Attorney presented a statement of costs in : : connec-tion with the _Joint Sewer Condemna.tion Suit i !in the amount of $48-,286.75, showing the City's : f share as ..$23,728.,17. *> a
i By proper motion authorization was given for the : :payment of bills in connection with the Joint I i Sewer Condemnation Suit. 8
! !
I I
3 I t t I . : CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
I I
55j Report on McDougall Sanitation Co. .rate increase. I ; The City Manager reported he had.reviewed the i file and discussed the rate increase with Mr. I ; McDougall. This rate increase amounts to approx- i i imately 18% over a period of 10 years. Under ; this rate Mr. McDougall handles any amount of do- i : mestic trash, and includes. a nominal fee for {'extra trash and rubbish that the customer may ! want hauled away. Mr. Martin stated he felt the i I increase was a fair request. * I
1 I
I f
I I e
I
I 1
112: Clean-up Program. The City Manager stated he I 1 t : felt that something could be done about the eye- ! i sores in the City. The City Beautiful. Committee ; ; have submitted certain suggestions. Mr. Martin ; : requested permission to explore the possibility i
: problems. :
I
i of embarking upon a campaign to clean up these f
& * I t I : The City Attorney informed the Council a list 8 i could be made of the properties and the matter { : handled similar to the Weed Abatement Program. 1 *
I The Building Inspector stated prior to Mr. Martini i becoming City Manager, his department acted on a j : complaint being received. I f
I
I I
,
a $ I I I t I 1 1 1 1 6 I I I I I I
c i 8 I
a
i ;
I I
# I I I
'I
I
j 1 I
\ I I ,! ;
I
0
0
4 I I ; * I
-, \ -
\ '\ '\
i Name 8,
I
I t I k
\' ', 'I '
\ " \, 'r \'
I -11- 8
I ! ,of '-
* )"~"""""."""""""~"""""""""""""""""""""""~""~"""" : Member
I t
:By moti'on of the- Council ,t.he City Manager was . IWorthing iauth0rize.d to p.roceed along the lines outlined. :Neiswende
:
! I
I I
8 iDunne :Jardine I
103 iTraffic Safety Committee Report.' A.report- from i
ithe Traffic Safety Committ.ee was presented and it i I !was agreed that the report be' deferred until the i ; next meeting. . I
r * I
38iFinancial Reports. Cmn. Worthing requested. that j I the City Manager give a brief report on the ..Finan-; cia1 Report when they are. presented. I 1 8
.9? I I *
I
I &I
I
I !
Street Paving and re'surfac;"g schedule. Mayor .. asked that a street pavinq and re schedule be set up for the'next-quarter Manager informed the Council the Engine Department is in the prpcess of prepari deficiency report for. streets.
I 1 The Vice. ;
surfacing- : '. The City! ering I I
ng a I I 5
k. i
77 iP1anning Department. Vice Mayor Dunne requested i :the City Manager .to. investigate the possibility . i
s :of having mo.re time given for Planning. I I I
!AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT OF BILLS AND RATIFICA- i ;TION OF PAYROLL: . ._ !
# * 1
i I :Authoriz&tion was.g.iven for the payment. of bills i :for the general expenses in the amount of :$74,863.60 and for the Water Department in the- .:
!amount of $5,950.71, for the period February 6, iWorthing
ithe Acting Director of' Finance and approved by theiDunne
I
I .. '7968, thra-ugh February 20, 1968, as certified by :Neiswende
. . i Auditing Committee. : Jardi ne
I I iRatifi.cation was given the payroll for the first !Northing I
;half of February, 1968, in the amount of. iNeiswende1 :$27,450.29, as certified by the Acting Directoi 0f;Dunn.e
.. i Finance and approved by the Auditing Committee. :Jardine
I
. . i ADJOURNMENT:
k I I BY Proper motion the meeting was adjour-ne.d at : 10:30 P.M.
I i Respectfully submitted, *
:$QL&;,,s li/ F gA55M4,
i MA~G~ ET E. ADAMS : City, jerk
t I I I
L * I I I I l a : * I I I 1.
I I * I I I 1 I I I f
I I I 1 # !
1
I
I 1 * t I I
8
I # f
I I k
1 I I
k I !
I b I I t I I I t
I I 8 @ 8 I I
I i I 1: I I I 3 4 :
i i I
I I