HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-10-10; City Council; Minutes, _. ;.. GOUNClbA4Ei I, ._1 . 4. CITY. QF
e
x+%-:
8
\gp
Minutes of: CITY COUNCIL (Adjourned Regular Meeting) Date of Meeting: October 10, 1972 Time of Meeting: . 6:OO P.M. Place of Meeting: Council Chambers
ROLL CALL: I
Mayor Dunne announced this adjourned meeting was called primarily to discuss and establish guidelines and re-- sponsibilities in order to comply with the Environment- al Quality Act of 1970, and the Superior Court decision entitled Friends of Mammoth vs. Mono County. Until the City receives further information and interpreta- tion on this matter, it was felt that a policy state- ment should be adopted by the Council to assist the staff. It is the responsibility of the City to pre- pare the Environmental Impact Statement, but the City is requiring the developer or applicant to furnish the necessary information in order for the staff to prepare the statement.
A proposed policy statement was read in full by th Mayor, followed by.discussion of the Council members. Some of the members of the Council expressed concern over the fact it would be impossible to include all information that might be required, .and the. City Attor ney stated in his opinion the staff should be instruct ed to consider items not listed in the sDirit of the
e
" -
Act. I
With reference to Paragraph 4 of the policy statement, Crnn. Chase asked if every permit would have to have an indemnity agreement, and the City Attorney stated he did not feel that those with an insignificant;would n.eed an agreement.
Crnn. Frazee asked if there would be a method of appeal in the event a member of the staff requested addition- al information from the applicant or developer? It .was agreed that the City Manager would make the deci- si on:
The City Manager informed the Council a tentative check list is being prepared by the staff, which shoul be ready tomorrow, and by October 20th the City should have sufficient information to proceed with the pre- paration of an ordinance. Also this matter will be given considerable discussion at the League Conference next week.
Present Absent
~
The following additions and .deletions were made to the ' proposed policy: I
Paragraph 2. Subsection (e) was added to read ''e'' Uti 1 i ty connections.
Paragraph 3. Line one to read "The City shall re- quire the submission of Environmental Im- I pact information" . . . . . . . I Subsection (j) - deletion of words ''or building line". I Paragraph 6. The words "by the developer or ap- plicant" to be added after the word sub- mi tted.
I
I
Paragraph 7. Sentence to end after the word relate with the remainder of the sentence deleted
q:
0 J p b ;rtl
$%e
e*<- !j
Lsr
X
"\p\ .fls r .-
d.!!" t z.
L #J.4 dL Y
\($% 4 P
*J .>’ Y ~ ,;c’ CI -ry 0 F c/+q[”spj/q-,J aU;<Cp.p,/jE
v
I_
t. .
8
-2-
z~zawz%mp*- Adjourned.met’ng of City Council held October 10, 1972
Paragraph 9 to be added to read as follows:
“-.u”” .
“Developers or applicants shall furnish such information as shall be required by the sta.ff.
By proper motion the City Council adopted Policy ‘Statement #13, establishing guidelines to insure com- I pliance with the Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the Supre,me Court Decision entitled Fri vs. Mono County (September 21, 1972), as amended..
..
Report on “East Carlsbad Annexation if The City Manager announced that the. anfiex ments were filed with the Secretary of Certificate has been returned to the City. The staff plans to record the necessary documents on October 16, 1972, following the hearing with LAFCO.
Mayor Dunne requested information as to how the City will implement the services to La,Costa.
ADJOURNMENT:
By proper motion the meeting was adjourned. at 6:55 P.M
‘
%/ .&/&F@& 6q f MA GA ET E. ADAMS CityiClerk