Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-12-06; City Council; Minutes._. r: - D B CITY OF CARLSBAD COUNCILME Meeting of: CITY COUNCIL (Adjourned Regular Mee Time of Meeting: 7:OO P.M. Date of Meeting: December 6, 1978 Place of Meeting: Council Chambers ROLL CALL: MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION PLAN Mayor Packard stated the documents pertaining to the Miscellaneous Employees Compensation Plan had been prepared per Council instructions at the meeting of December 5, 1978, and were offered for Council consideration. The following Resolution was adopted by title only: RESOLUTION NO. 5635, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING TION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES AFFECTING THE MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. LAKE CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT. Mayor Packard stated the purpose of the meeting was to continue the public hearing on the Lake Calavera Hills Master Plan Amendment. He then referenced the Memorandum from the Planning Director to the City Council dated November 16, 1978, and indicated Council had progressed to the section titled' Applicant Conditions on page 2 of said Memorandum. Condition B-39. The Planning Director gave a brief report as to the contents of the condition proposed by the applicant. Mr. Roy Ward, 3088 Pi0 Pico, Carlsbad, applicant, addressed Council. Mr. Ward spoke in favor of the condition stating it was a condition they wished to impose on themselves. Following brief discussion, Council .concurred wit the inclusion of Condition B-39. Condition B-40. The Planning Director gave a report on the condi- tion indicating the street currently goes through the County. Therefore, this condition would attempt to bring the street under the City's control. (74) (113) CERTAIU SALARY COMPENSATION, NONSALARY COMPENSA- In addition, the City Manager stated if it was possible to comply with the proposed condition, the maintenance and repair of the road which goes 1 I through Cou.nty property, would be under the i jurisdiction of the City. 1 sta'ted the roa'd is a condition on a map in the ~ City. Therefore, it was his feeling that the I Mr. Roy Ward, applicant, addressed Council. He I road should be under the control of the City. In addition, he indicated that should the road re- qui re major repairs, the landowner and developer could assume the responsibility until such time as the City is ready to take over the responsi- bility. t - t .... 3 D L. i CITY OF. CAWLS -2- December 6. 1978 ". Council expressed concern about acquiring the responsibility of a road belonging to the County. Also discussed was the possibility of conditionin the project to prohibit construction until such time as the land between the Master Plan area and El Camino Real is annexed to the City. Mr. Bob Ladwig, representing the applicant, addressed Council. He stated the Streets and Highways Code allows dedications by property owners to Cities, easements of property in the County. In addition, he expressed concern re LAFCO's policy of annexation of agricultural areas in that it may be a long time before the area is annexed to the City. Following further discussion, Council agreed that Condition B-40 be retained, to include such language that would indicate the condition would be applied "if possible". Also to include such language that would require the applicant to reimburse the City for costs of major repair or maintenance to the road until such time. as it becomes annexed to the City or until such time as the City Council otherwise determines it is desirable to assume that responsibility. Council then began discussion of those conditions contained on page 3 of the Memorandum under the section Additional Conditions. Condition 1, '2 and 3. The Planning Director gave a brief explanation of the contents and purpose of the proposed addi- tional conditions. I Mr. Roy Ward, applicant, expressed concurrence with the proposed conditions. Council expressed concurrence with the addition of Condition 1, 2 and 3 as outlined in the Memorandum dated November 16, 1978, on-page 3. I Condition 4. D The City Manager gave a report on the matter outlining the contents of his Memorandum to Council dated December 6, 1978. He concluded by explaining the proposed methods of imposing this condition: the developers, City staff's, and that contained in his Memorandum. The City Attorney indicated the Quimby Act is a tool for land acquisition, and the fee provision woul d be appl ied if it is determined land is not required. In addition, new legislation, effectiv January 1, 1979, would provide that Park-in-Lieu fees be committed within five.years or reimbursed Mr. Roy Ward, applicant, addressed Council re- questing t'hat the park sites be dedicated, im- proved, and that the developer be reimbursed through the Park-in-Lieu fees. I Council discussed the three alternatives at length, as. well as the possibility of including a fee for'park development with the previously discu'ssed pub1 ic facilities fee. .. . 1 e CC4UNClLE 4AE X -. * CITY QF CARLS5AD -3- December 6, 19.78 Council accepted the City Manager's recommendatio for the proposed condition as contained in his memorandum to Council dated December 6, 1978. RECESS: Mayor Packard called a recess at 8:51 P.M. and Council reconvened at 9:06 P.M. with a1 1 Council members- present. The Planning Director then explained the purpose of the requested inclusion of the condition as contained in the first paragraph on page 4 of the Memorandum to Council dated November 16, 1978. Mr. Roy Ward expressed his concurrence with the proposed condition. Council concurred with the inclusion of the proposed condition. The Planning Director then referenced the section of the Memorandum dated November 16, 1978, titled Policy Issues, indicating they were more clearly defined in the Memorandum to Council dated November 29, 1978 under proposed conditions 2 and 3. He then explained the contents and purpose of the proposed conditions. Condition 2 - Memorandum dated November 29, 1978 Roy Ward, applicant, addressed Council. He spoke in favor of the proposed condition, but expressed concern with the wording "Prior to the issuance of building permits ..." in that it would require the development of the fee schedule prior to any construction. In this regard, he suggested that wording be added which would allow an acceptable agreement being reached between the City and the developer re the fees in the event the fee schedule had not been developed. Following brief discussion, Council concurred with the proposed condition, to be modified as per the request of Mr. Ward. Condition 3 - Memorandum dated November 29, 1978. Mr. Ward expressed approval of the proposed condition. Council concurred with the inclusion of the proposed condition as outlined in the Memorandum. The Planning Director then gave an explanation of 'the section titled Design Standards as con- tained in the Memorandum dated November 16, 1978. Mr. Ward stated he had no objections to the matte Council concurred with staff5 recommendation on design standards as contained in the Memorandum dated November 16, 1978. ~ I r r COUNCILME .".. " . I I .. L.. CITY OF -4- CARLSBAD December 6, 1978 The City Attorney then gave a brief explanation re the section titled Legal Concerns contained in the Memorandum dated November 16, 1978. Mr. Ward stated he had no objections. Council concurred with the recommendations of staff as outlined in the section under Legal Concerns contained in the Memorandum dated November 16, 1978. The Planning Director then referenced his Memoran dum to Council dated November 29, 1978, indicatin proposed conditions 1 and 4 needed Council consideration. Condition 1 - Memorandum dated-November 29, 1978. The Planning Director gave a report indicating there may be some slight changes with regards to the village areas which would result from the correct alignment of Elm Avenue. The City Attorney stated the proposed condition would be reworded in order to clearly.reflect the intent Mr. Ward expressed concurrence with the proposed condition as outlined by staff and the City Attorney. Council concurred with the inclusion of the condition. Condition 4 - Memorandum dated November 29, 1978. The Planning Director gave a brief report stating the words "and each subdivision" should be deleted from the proposed condition. In response to questions, Mr. Mike Zander of the Planning Department indicated the Master Homeowne Association establishment would be concurrent wit the first subdivision being developed. Mr. Ward stated he had no objection to the condition. Council concurred with the inclusion o'f the pro- posed condition with the change as suggested by the Planning Director. Other Concerns Councilman Skotnicki expressed concern relative to the need for developing public facilities concurrent with their need. He also expressed concern with the timing of the individual village and the timing of the entire master plan in that if the development is not properly timed, it coul be severely growth inducing. In this regard, he expressed the desirability of examining the .Capital Improvement Program. ~ T - g r: h !S d COUMCtbME 363 - ... > I .. . A< CITY OF c89Rl-sBAD COUNCILME -5- Since no one desired further discussion on the November 19, 1978. ADJOURNMENT: By proper motion, the meeting was adjourned at 1O:OO P.M. Respectfully submitted, ..